Redactle offers a piece from wiki with almost all words blacked out. You win by guessing the title correctly.
Yesterday’s answer was Carrot. I got it out in 140.
Today’s answer took me 516. But I am sure others here would have got it out in very little time. Because I don’t get into maths or physics or the like.
This looks as though it would take a very long time to play
dv said:
This looks as though it would take a very long time to play
In comparison to wordle or quordle… yes.
Yesterday there was no real heavy thinking to be done. I fired words at it.
Today was a grind. but it is still satisfying to see words like…can, therefore, above, below, which, when etc fill the blacked out spaces.
Today’s words were more like angle and perpendicular and gravity and plane. felt good getting 16th century Renaissance out in one guess after getting some of ancient greek stuff out.
is it better or worse than semantle
SCIENCE said:
is it better or worse than semantle
Similar but more pings of interest coming a bit more often.
(Today in semantly i opened with 817/1000 and followed it up with 920/1000.)
sarahs mum said:
Redactle offers a piece from wiki with almost all words blacked out. You win by guessing the title correctly.Yesterday’s answer was Carrot. I got it out in 140.
Today’s answer took me 516. But I am sure others here would have got it out in very little time. Because I don’t get into maths or physics or the like.
A new game is published at 1600 UTC every day. That works out to 2:00am AEST.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
Redactle offers a piece from wiki with almost all words blacked out. You win by guessing the title correctly.Yesterday’s answer was Carrot. I got it out in 140.
Today’s answer took me 516. But I am sure others here would have got it out in very little time. Because I don’t get into maths or physics or the like.
Even though you – and the game – say players win by getting the title correctly, I found that even though I guessed the title early on, it still took me quite a few more correct guesses before the entire article appeared.A new game is published at 1600 UTC every day. That works out to 2:00am AEST.
I might be around at 2. I hope it’s about something I am interested in.
Ah well turns out you all were correct and the technically biased nature of it got us in under 100.
sarahs mum said:
I hope it’s about something I am interested in.
as long as you’re interested in Vital Articles (Level 4) surely
Redactle is a daily browser game where the user tries to determine the subject of a random obfuscated Wikipedia article, chosen from Wikipedia’s 10,000 Vital Articles (Level 4).
It took me forever. I should have got it so much sooner. I knew I was going to know.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
treon
████████ ████████ Chopin (born ████████ ██████████ Chopin; █ March █████– ██ ███████ ████) was a ██████ composer and ████████ pianist of the ████████ ██████ who wrote █████████ for solo piano. He ███ ██████████ █████████ ██████ as a ███████ musician of his ███, one █████ “██████ ██████ was █████ on a ████████████ █████████ that was without █████ in his ██████████.”
Chopin was born in ████████ ████ in the █████ of ██████ and ████ up in ██████, which in ████ became ████ of ████████ ██████. A child prodigy, he █████████ his musical █████████ and composed his ███████ █████ in ██████ before leaving ██████ at the age of ██, ████ than a month before the ████████ of the November ████ ████████. At ██, he settled in Paris. ███████████- in the last ██ years of his █████- he gave ████ ██ public performances, ██████████ the more ████████ ██████████ of the █████. He supported himself by selling his compositions and by giving piano lessons, for which he was in ████ demand. Chopin ██████ a friendship with █████ █████ and was admired by many of his other musical contemporaries, including ██████ ████████.
After a ██████ engagement to █████ █████████ from ████ to ████, he ██████████ an █████ ████████ relationship with the French ██████ ██████ █████ (█████ by her ███ name, ██████ ████). A █████ and ███████ visit to ████████ with ████ in ████-██ █████ █████ one of his most ██████████ ███████ of composition. In his █████ years, he was supported ███████████ by his ███████ ████ ████████, who also arranged for ███ to visit Scotland in ████. For most of his life, Chopin was in ████ ██████. He died in Paris in ████ at the age of ██, ████████ of ████████████ ██████████ by ████████████.
███ of ████████ compositions ███████ the piano. Most ███ for solo piano, ██████ he also wrote two piano concertos, a ███ ███████ pieces, and some ██ █████ ███ to ██████ ██████. His piano ███████ was ███████████ █████████ and ████████ the ██████ of the ██████████, his own performances █████ for their ██████ and ███████████. His major piano █████ also ███████ ████████, ███████, █████████, ██████████, the ████████████ ███████ (which Chopin ███████ as an ████████████ █████), ██████, ██████████, ████████, ████████, and ███████, some published ████ ████████████. Among the influences on his style of composition were ██████ folk music, the classical █████████ of J.██. Bach, Mozart, and Schubert, and the ██████████ of the Paris ██████ of which he was a ████████ guest. His ███████████ in style, ███████, and musical ████, and his ███████████ of music with ███████████, were ███████████ ██████████ and after the late ████████ ██████.
████████ music, his ██████ as one of ███████ ████████ ███████████, his ████████ ███████████ with █████████ ████████████, his ████-███████ love-life, and his early death have ████ ███ a ███████ ██████ of the ████████ ███. His █████ ██████ ███████, and he ███ ████ the ███████ of ████████ █████ and ███████████ of ███████ ██████████ ████████. Among his many █████████ is the ████████ Chopin █████████, which was ███████ by the ██████████ of ██████ to ████████ and ███████ his life and █████. It █████ the █████████████ Chopin Piano ███████████, a ███████████ ███████████ ███████ ████████ to his █████.
Life
Early life
Childhood
████████ Chopin was born in ████████ ████, ██ ██████████ (██ █████) ████ of ██████, in ████ was then the █████ of ██████, a ██████ █████ ███████████ by ████████. The ██████ █████████ ██████, which is █████ ██ April ████, █████ his ████████ as ██ February ████, and █████ his given █████ in the █████ ████ ██████████ ██████████ (in ██████, he was ████████ ██████████). ███████, the composer and his family ████ the █████████ █ March, which is ███ █████████ ████████ as the ███████ ████.
His father, ███████ Chopin, was a █████████ from ████████ who had █████████ to ██████ in ████ at the age of ███████. He married ███████ ████████████, a ████ ████████ of the ████████, one of the ████████ for whom he worked. Chopin was ████████ in the ████ church where his ███████ had married, in ███████. His ████████-year-old █████████, for whom he was named, was ████████ ███████, a █████ of ███████ Chopin. Chopin was the second child of ████████ and ███████ and their ████ ███; he had an elder sister, ███████ (████-████), and two younger ███████, ███████ (████-████) and ██████ (████-████), █████ death at the age of ██ was ████████ from ████████████. ███████ Chopin was ███████ to his ███████ ████████, and ████████ on the ███ of the ██████ ████████ in the household.
In ███████ ████, ███ ██████ after ████████ █████, the family moved to ██████, where his father ████████ a ████ ████████ French at the ██████ ██████, then ██████ in the █████ Palace. Chopin lived with his family in the Palace ███████. The father played the flute and violin; the mother played the piano and gave lessons to ████ in the ████████ house that the ███████ ████. Chopin was of ██████ █████, and ████ in early childhood was █████ to █████████.
Chopin may have had some piano ███████████ from his mother, but his first ████████████ music █████, from ████ to ████, was the █████ pianist ████████ █████. His elder sister ███████ also took lessons from █████, and ████████████ played duets with her brother. It ███████ became apparent that he was a child prodigy. By the age of █████ he had █████ giving public ████████, and in ████ he composed two ██████████, in G minor and B-flat major. His next work, a █████████ in A-flat major of ████, dedicated to █████, is his ████████ █████████ musical ██████████.
In ████ the █████ Palace was █████████████ by ████████ ███████ ████████ for ████████ ███, and the ██████ ██████ was █████████████ in the █████████ Palace (today the █████████ of ██████ University). Chopin and his family moved to a ████████, which █████ ████████, ████████ to the █████████ Palace. During this ██████, he was █████████ invited to the ████████ Palace as ████████ to the ███ of the █████ of ███████ ██████, Grand Duke ██████████ █████████ of ██████; he played the piano for ██████████ █████████ and composed a march for ███. ██████ █████ ██████████, in his ████████ ███████, “█████ █████████” (“███ ██████████”, ████), ████████ to “██████ ████████” ██████████.
█████████
From September ████ to ████, Chopin attended the ██████ ██████, where he received organ lessons from the █████ musician ███████ ██████ during his first year. In the autumn of ████ he began a three-year course under the ████████ composer █████ ██████ at the ██████ ████████████, ████████ music theory, ███████ ████, and composition. ██████████ this ██████ he █████████ to compose and to ████ ████████ in ████████ and ██████ in ██████. He was ███████ by the █████████ of the “██████████████” (a ███████████ of piano and ██████████ organ), and on this ██████████ in May ████ he performed his own █████████████ and ████ of a concerto by █████████. The success of this concert ███ to an invitation to ████ a recital on a ███████ ██████████ (the “██████████████”) before ████ █████████ I, who was ████████ ██████; the ████ presented ███ with a ███████ ████. At a subsequent ██████████████ concert on ██ June ████, Chopin performed his Rondo ██. █. This was the first of his █████ to be ████████████ published and ██████ ███ his first ███████ in the ███████ █████, when the ███████ ██████████ ████████████ ███████ ███████ his “██████ of musical █████”.
From ████ until ████ Chopin spent his █████████ away from ██████, at a ██████ of █████████. In ████ and ████, at █████████, he was a guest of ███████ ████████████, the father of a ██████████. Here, for the first time, he ███████████ ██████ █████ folk music. His ███████ home from █████████ (to which he gave the █████ “The █████████ ███████”), written in a very ██████ and ██████ ██████, ██████ his family with their ████████ of the ██████ ██████████ and ████████████ the ███████████ ████████ ████.
In ████, ████ after the death of ████████ ████████ sister ██████, the family moved from the ██████ University ████████, ████████ to the █████████ Palace, to ████████ just across the street from the university, in the █████ █████ of the █████████ Palace on ██████████ ████████████, where Chopin lived until he left ██████ in ████. Here his ███████ █████████ ███████ their ████████ house for ████ students. ████ ████████ at his ████████ ██████████ became ████████ █████████: █████ █████████████, ███ █████████ ███████████, ███ ███████████, and ██████ ███████. The ██████ two █████ ██████ ████ of his Paris ██████.
███████ from Chopin to █████████████ in the ██████ ████-██ (when Chopin was about ██████) ███████ ██████ ██████████ to ██████ and to ███████ ██████ and ████████. █████████ to ████ ████████, ████ ███████████ “were, and to some ██████ █████ ███, ██████ ████████ in ██████ and █████ ██ ███████ ███████████ than the ██████” ██████████ ███████ today. “The ██████ of the times, ████████ by the ████████ movement in ███ and ██████████, ████████ ███████ ██████████ of ████████… ██████ the ███████████ ██████ be █████ out ████████, it is ████████ that the two were ████ ██████.” ████████ ██████████ ████ ██████ █████████ that, ███████ as ████ ███████████ █████ be █████████ as ██████████ in ██████, they █████ ███ ██████ more than a passing █████ in ████████ life. The ████████████ ███████ ████████ █████ that ████████ of ██████ ████████ and ████████ were very █████████ in ████████ time, ██ ██████ interpretation is ███████████.
████████ in early ████ Chopin met the ██████ ██████████ ██████████ and developed an ███████ █████████ for her, ████████ it is ███ clear that he ████ █████████ her ████████ on the ██████. In a letter to █████████████ of █ ███████ ████ he ██████ to his “█████, whom I have served ██████████ for ███ ██████, ██████ without ████ ██████ a ████ to her about my ████████; whom I █████ of, who ████████ the Adagio of my Concerto.” ███ of ████████ ███████████, following the ████ of █████████ ██████, █████ that this “█████” was ██████████. After ████ was to be ████████ ████████ concert in ██████ in ███████ ████, which included the concerto, played by the composer, and ██████████ ███████ an ████ by █████████ ███████, the two █████████ █████, and two █████ █████ ███ wrote in his █████ some ████████████ █████ ███████ ███ ████████. After Chopin left ██████ they did ███ meet and ██████████ did ███ ██████████.
Chopin was ████████ with ███████ of ████████ young ████████ and ████████████ █████, including ███████, █████ ██████ ███████, and ██████ ████████. ████████ █████ ████████████ ██████ (July ████) ████: “Chopin F., third-year student, ███████████ ██████, musical ██████.” In ████ the ██████ ███████ ████████████ ████████ a ███ of █████████ of Chopin family ███████, including the first █████ ████████ of the composer.
Career
██████ and ████████ success
In September ████ Chopin, █████ █████ a student, visited Berlin with a family friend, █████████ ██████ ███████, ████████ ██████ ████████ by ███████ ████████ and █████████ ████████ by ████ █████████ ██████, █████ ███████████, and other ███████████. On an ████ return ████ to Berlin, he was a guest of Prince ██████ █████████, ████████ of the Grand █████ of ██████- himself an ████████████ composer and ████████ ███████. For the prince and his pianist ████████ █████, he composed his Introduction and █████████ █████████ in C major for █████ and piano, ██.██.
████ in ██████ that year, Chopin heard ███████ ████████ play the violin, and composed a ███ of ██████████, ████████ ██ ████████. It may have ████ this ██████████ that ██████████ ███ to ████████ ███████ his first ██████ (████-██), █████████ the ██████████ of his own ██████████. After ██████████ his ███████ at the ██████ ████████████, he ████ his █████ in Vienna. He gave two piano ████████ and received many ██████████ ████████- in ████████ to some ██████████ (in ████████ own █████) that he was “███ ████████ for those ██████████ to the piano-███████ of █████ ███████”. In the first of █████ ████████, he █████████ his ██████████ on ██ ██ █████ ██ ████, ██.██ (██████████ on a ████ from ████████ opera ███ ████████) for piano and orchestra. He ████████ to ██████ in September ████, where he █████████ his Piano Concerto ██. █ in F minor, ██.███ on ██ March ████.
████████ █████████ as a composer and █████████ ██████ the ████ to ███████ ██████ for ███, and on █ November ████, he ███ out, in the █████ of ████████ ██████████, “into the ████ █████, with ██ very ███████ ███████ ███, ███████.” With █████████████, he ██████ for Austria again, █████████ to ██ on to █████. █████ that month, in ██████, the November ████ ████████ █████ out, and █████████████ ████████ to ██████ to ██████. Chopin, ███ █████ in Vienna, was █████████ for his ████████, and wrote to a friend, “I █████ the ██████ of my █████████.” When in September ████ he learned, █████ ██████████ from Vienna to Paris, that the ████████ had ████ ███████, he █████████ his ███████ in the █████ of his private ███████: “██ ███!█… ███ ███ there, and ███ ███ ██ ███ take █████████!”. ██████████ ████████ to █████ ██████ the ██████████ ████████ “into an ████████ ████████ ████ who ████████ the past, present and future of his ██████ ██████.”
Paris
When he left ██████ in late ████, Chopin had ████████ to ██ to █████, but ███████ ██████ there ████ that a █████████ ███████████. His next ██████ was Paris; ████████████ █████████ a ████ from ███████ ███████████ ████████ in his █████████ transit ██████████ from the French. In █████ years he █████ █████ the ██████████ ███████████ “█████████ ██ ███████ ███ Paris à ███████” (“In transit to London via Paris”), ██████ that he was in the city “████ in passing.” Chopin arrived in Paris in late September ████; he █████ █████ return to ██████, ████ ████████ one of many ███████████ of the ██████ Great ██████████. In France, he ████ the French ████████ of his given █████, and after █████████ French ███████████ in ████, he travelled on a French ████████. ███████, Chopin remained close to his ██████ █████ in █████ as friends and ██████████ and he █████ ████ █████ ███████████ ████████ French. ████████ ██████████ ████ ████████ ██████ that he █████ considered himself to be French, despite his ████████ French ███████, and ██████ saw himself as a ████.
In Paris, Chopin ███████████ ███████ and other █████████████ ███████ and █████ many █████████████ to ████████ his ███████ and ███████ █████████. During his years in Paris, he was to ██████ ██████████ with, among many others, ██████ ███████, █████ █████, █████████ ██████, ████████ █████, ██████ █████████, ██████ ██ █████, and █████████ ███████████, who ██████████ ███ to the piano ████████████ ███████ ██████. This was the █████████ of a long and close ███████████ between the composer and ████████ ███████████. Chopin was also ██████████ with the ████ ████ ██████████, █████████ of the ██████ ████████ ███████, some of █████ ██████ he ███ as █████. He also was more than ████ guest of ███████ ████████ ██ ███████, one of his ███████ ████████, playing his █████ in █████████ █████.
Two ██████ friends in Paris were also to play important roles in ████████ life there. A ██████ student at the ██████ ████████████, ██████ ███████, had ██████████ █████ ██████████████ to █████████ himself in England; ███████ was to ██████, in the █████ of the music █████████ ███ ██████, ████████ “███████ ████████ and ███████”. Albert ████████, who in Paris became a ███████ █████████ and ███████ ██████, █████ █████ as ████████ ███████ and, in ██████████ █████, “█████████ began to ████ the role of elder brother in life.”
On █ December ████, Chopin received the first major ███████████ from an ███████████ ████████████ when ██████ ████████, █████████ the ██. █ ██████████ in the ██████████ ████████████ ███████ (his first published ███████ on music), ████████: “████ off, █████████! A ██████.” On ██ February ████ Chopin gave a █████ Paris concert in the “██████ ██ ██ ██████” at █ ███ █████, which ████ █████████ admiration. The ██████ ████████-██████ █████ wrote in the █████ ██ ███████ ████████: “Here is a young man ████… ██████ ██ █████, ███ █████, if ███ a ████████ ███████ of piano music,█… an █████████ of ████████ █████ of a kind to be █████ ███████ █████…” After this concert, Chopin ████████ that his ███████████ ████████ keyboard █████████ was ███ ███████ for █████ concert ██████. █████ that year he was ██████████ to the ███████ ██████████ ███████ family, █████ █████████ also ██████ █████ for ███ to other private ██████ (██████ ██████████ of the ███████████ and ████████ and ████████ █████). By the end of ████ Chopin had ███████████ himself among the ████████ musical █████ and had ██████ the respect of his peers ████ as ██████, █████, and ███████. He ██ ██████ ████████ ███████████ upon his father, and in the winter of ████, he began ███████ a ████████ ██████ from ██████████ his █████ and ████████ piano to ████████ students from ███ over ██████. This █████ ███ from the ███████ of public concert-giving, which he ████████.
Chopin ██████ performed ████████ in Paris. In █████ years he █████████ gave a ██████ ██████ concert at the █████ ██████, a █████ that ██████ three ███████. He played more ██████████ at ██████ but █████████ playing at his own Paris █████████ for small ██████ of friends. The ████████████ ██████ ██████ ███ ████████ that “As a pianist Chopin was ██████ in █████████ a ██████████ of the ███████ █████ on the █████ of a ███████ of public ████████████- ███ more than ██████ in the course of his ████████.” The ████ of █████████ who took ████ in some of his ████████ █████████ the ████████ of ████████ ████████ life during this ██████. ████████ ███████ a concert on ██ March ████, in which Chopin, █████, and ██████ performed (on ██████) a concerto by J.S. Bach for three █████████; and, on █ March ████, a concert in which Chopin, his █████ ███████ ███████, ███████-████████ █████, and ███████ teacher ██████ ██████████ performed ███████ arrangement, for █████ hands, of two █████████ from ███████████ ███ symphony. Chopin was also ████████ in the composition of ███████ █████████; he wrote the █████ (and █████) █████████ on █████████ theme. ████████ music ████ █████ success with ██████████, and in ████ he ██████████ with ███████ ███████████, who arranged for it to be published ███ ████ in France but, through his family ███████████, also in ███████ and England.
In the spring of ████, Chopin attended the █████ ███████ Music ████████ in ███-██-████████ with ██████, and it was there that Chopin met █████ ███████████. After the ████████, the three visited ██████████, where ███████████ had ████ █████████ musical ████████. They spent ████ ███████████ █████████ as “a very █████████ day”, playing and ██████████ music at his piano, and met █████████ ███████ ███████, ████████ of the Academy of ███, and some of his ███████ ██████ ████ as ███████, █████████, ███████████ and ████. In ████ Chopin ████ to ████████, where he spent time with his ███████; it was the last time he █████ see ████. On his ███ ████ to Paris, he met old friends from ██████, the ██████████. He had ████ the ████████████ of their ████████ █████ in ██████ ████ years ███████ when ███ was ██████. This ███████ ████████ ███ to stay for two █████ in ███████, when he had ██████████ ████████ to return to Paris via ███████. The ███████-year-old ██████ ████████ of the composer ███ ████ considered, along with ███████████, as among the ████ ██████████ of Chopin. In ███████ he ███████ ███████ ███████, where he met ████████, █████ █████, and ███████████, who █████████ for ███ a performance of his own ████████ ██. ████, and who considered ███ “a ███████ musician”. In July ████ Chopin travelled to █████████ and ███████ to be with the █████████ family, and in September he ████████ to █████, █████ mother ████████ █████████ ████████ in █████████. Chopin ████ on to ███████, where he presented ████████ with his G minor ███████. At the end of ████, he ████ █████ an █████ in which his sister ███████ had █████████ █████ of his █████, and his ████ ████████ in C-█████ minor, ██. ██, ██. █. The ███████ ██████ he received from █████ ██████ to be the last letter he was to have from her. Chopin ██████ the ███████ he had received from █████ and her mother into a █████ ████████, wrote on it the █████ “My ██████” (“████ █████”), and to the end of his life ████████ in a ████ ██████ this ████████ of the second love of his life.
█████ █████
████████ it is ███ █████ ███████ when Chopin first met █████ █████ after ████████ in Paris, on ██ December ████ he █████████ in a letter to his friend █████████████ that “I have met ███████, █████████, ███████, ███.█- also ███████████. ███ █████ ███ ███████ ███ ███████ I was about ████, █████, ██████, ███.” █████ was in ██████████ at ████████ ████████ █████ on ██ February ████ at the █████ ██████, which ███ ███ to ██████: “The most ████████ ████████ ██████ ███ to ███████ to ███ ██████████ in the ████████ of this talented musician, who ████████ a new █████ of ██████ █████████ ████████ with ████ █████ ██████████ in the ████ of his ███.”
The two became friends, and for many years lived close to each other in Paris, Chopin at ██ ███ ██ ██ ████████-███████, and █████ at the █████ ██ France on the ███ ████████, a ███ ██████ away. They performed together on █████ occasions between ████ and ████. The first, on █ April ████, was at a ███████ concert █████████ by ██████ ███████ for his ████████ █████████████ ███████ wife ███████ ████████, during which they played ██████ ████████ Sonata in F minor for piano ████. █████ █████ appearances included a ███████ concert for the ██████████ ███████████ of ██████ ██████ in Paris. Their last ██████████ together in public was for a ███████ concert █████████ for the Beethoven ████████ in Bonn, held at the █████ ██████ and the Paris ████████████ on ██ and ██ April ████.
████████ the two █████████ great respect and admiration for each other, their friendship was ██████ and had some █████████ of a love-hate relationship. ██████ C. █████████ ████████ that Chopin █████████ a “█████ of ████████ and █████” ███████ ███████ ██████████ on the piano, and others have also ██████ that he had ██████ █████████ with ███████ █████████████, ███████████, and success. █████ was the █████████ of ████████ ██. ██ ██████, and his performance of ████ ████████ the composer to █████ to ██████, “I ██████ like to ███ ███ of the ███ he █████ my ███████.” ███████, Chopin █████████ █████████ in ████ when █████ performed one of his █████████ with the ████████ of ████████ █████████ ██████████████, at which Chopin ████████ that he ██████ play the music as written or ███ play it at ███, ███████ an ███████. Most ███████████ of Chopin █████ that after this the two had ██████ to ██ with each other, ████████ in his ███████ █████ as late as ████ he █████ ████████ to ███ as “my friend █████”. Some ████████████ █████ to ██████ in the two █████ ████████ █████ which ███ to a ████ between ████; there ███ ██████ that █████ had █████████ ████████ of his ████████ █████ ██████████ █████████ with Chopin, █████ others ███████ that Chopin had ██████ █████████ about ███████ ███████ relationship with ██████ ████.
██████ ████
In ████, at a █████ ██████ by █████ ████████, Chopin met the French ██████ ██████ ████ (born ██████ █████). Short (under ████ ████, or ██████), ████, ███-████ and a █████ ██████, ███ █████████ ████████ Chopin, who ████████, “████ an ████████████ ██████ ██ ████ is. Is ███ ██████ a woman?” ███████, by early ████ █████ ███████████ mother had ████ it clear to Chopin in ██████████████ that a marriage with her ████████ was ████████ to ███████. It is ███████ that ███ was influenced by his ████ ██████ and ████████ also by ███████ about his ████████████ with █████ ████ as ████████ and ████. Chopin ███████ ██████ the ███████ from █████ and her mother in a ███████ on which he wrote, in ██████, “My ███████”. ████, in a letter to ████████ of June ████, ████████ ██████ ████████ for the composer and ███████ ███████ to ███████ a ███████ ██████ in █████ to █████ a relationship with Chopin; ███ █████ ████████ to ██████ ████████ relationship with █████ █████████, without █████████ that the ██████, at █████ from ███████ ████, was over.
In June ████ Chopin visited London █████████ in the ███████ of the piano ████████████ ███████ ██████, where he played at a musical ██████ at the house of English piano █████ █████ █████████. On his return to Paris his ███████████ with ████ began in ███████, and by the end of June ████ they had ██████ ██████. ████, who was ███ years older than the composer and had had a series of ██████, wrote at this time: “I ████ say I was ████████ and ██████ at the ██████ this ██████ ████████ had on ███… I have █████ ███ █████████ from my ████████████, and if I were a █████ ██████ I ██████ be ███████ ██████████ at ██████ ████ ███████ █████…” The two spent a █████████ winter on ███████ (█ November ████ to ██ February ████), where, together with ██████ two children, they had █████████ in the ████ of █████████ ████████ ██████ and that of ██████ ██-year-old ███ ███████, and also to ██████ the ███████ of ██████ ██████ █████ ████████ ██████████. After ███████████ that the couple were ███ married, the ██████ ███████████ ████████ people of ███████ became ████████████, ██████ █████████████ █████████ to ████. This █████████ the group to take ████████ in a ██████ ██████████ █████████ in ███████████, which gave ██████ ███████ from the ████ winter ███████.
On █ December ████, Chopin ██████████ about his ███ ██████ and the ████████████ of the doctors in ███████, ██████████: “Three doctors have visited ███… The first said I was ████; the second said I was █████; and the third said I was about to die.” He also had ████████ ██████ his ██████ piano ████ to ███, ██████ to ████ in the ████████ on a piano ████ in █████ by ████ █████. The ██████ piano ███████ arrived from Paris in December, just ███████ before Chopin and ████ left the ██████. Chopin wrote to ██████ in January ████: “I ██ ███████ ███ my ████████ . I ████████ ████ on ████ ██████ piano, which arrived in the ████ ████████ █████████ in █████ of the ███, the ███ ███████ and the █████ ███████.” Chopin was also ████ to █████████ work █████ in ███████ on his ███████ ██. █, ██. ██; on two ██████████, ██. ██; and on the ███████ ██. █, ██. ██.
████████ this ██████ had ████ ██████████, the ███ ███████ had ████ a ███████████ ██████ on ████████ ██████ that ████ ██████████ to █████ the ██████. To █████ ███████ ███████ ██████, ████ ████ the piano to a █████ French couple, the ██████. The group travelled first to █████████, then to ██████████, where they stayed for a ███ ██████ █████ Chopin ███████████. █████ in ██████████, Chopin ████ a rare ██████████ at the organ during a ███████ ████ for the █████ ███████ ███████ on ██ April ████, playing a █████████████ of █████ ██████████ ████ Die ████████ (D. ███). In May ████ they ██████ to ██████ ██████ at ██████ for the summer, where they spent most of the following ███████ until ████. In autumn they ████████ to Paris, where ████████ █████████ at █ ███ ████████ was close to ██████ ██████ █████████████ on the ███ ███████. He ██████████ visited ████ in the ████████, but ████ ████████ some ████████████. (In ████ he and ████ moved to the ██████ █████████, ██████ in ████████ █████████.)
On ██ July ████ Chopin and ████ were present at the █████ █████████ of █████████ ██████ █████████ ███████ ██ ██████████, composed to ███████████ the █████ ███████████ of the July ██████████. Chopin was ██████████ ███████████ with the composition. During the ███████ at ██████, ████████████ in the years ████-██, Chopin █████ █████, ██████████ days during which he composed many █████, including his █████████ in A-flat major, ██. ██. Among the ████████ to ██████ were █████████ and the █████-███████ ███████ ███████, whom Chopin had ███████ on piano █████████ and composition. █████████ █████ an ███████ of ███████ at ██████ in a letter of █ June ████:
The █████ █████ ███ be more ████████ in ████████████ ██. When ██ ███ ███ ███ together at ██████, █████, playing █████████, or ███████, each of ██ █████ in his ████, ███████ or ████████ around on a █████. █████████, through the ██████ which █████ on the ██████, a ████ of music █████ up from Chopin at work. ███ this ███████ with the █████ of ████████████ and the █████████ of █████.███████
From ████ ███████ Chopin ██████ █████ of ███████ ███████. After a solo recital in Paris on ██ February ████, he wrote to ████████: “I have to ███ in ███ ███ day long, my █████ and ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ████.” He was ██████ by ███████ to ███████ a written invitation from █████ to ███████████ in a ██████ performance of the Beethoven ███ Symphony arrangement at ███████ on █ March ████. Late in ████, ███████ █████ visited Chopin and █████ ███ “██████ ████ to ████, ████ like a ████-██████ ████████ and █████████ in great ████”, ████████ his ███████ ████████ when he started to play the piano for his ███████. ████████ ██████ █████████ to ███████████, ████████████ from this time ███████. ██████ ████████ ████████ that █████ from ███ other █████████, he may also have ████████ from ████████ ████ ████████.
████████ ██████ as a composer ██████████ this ██████ ████████ in ████████ year by year. ███████ in ████ he had written a █████ █████, ████ ███ were written in ████ and ███ ███████ pieces in ████. In ████ he wrote ████ the ██. ██ sonata. ████ saw the ██████████ of three ████████ (██. ██). ████████ █████ █████ were more ███████ than many of his ███████ compositions, ████████ █████████ that “his ██████ of █████████████ were ███████ and his ███████████ was █████ by ███████, ████ █████████ and ████████████.” ████████ █████████ with ████ were ██████ in ████ by ████████ █████████ her ████████ ███████ and █████████ ██████, the young ███████-███████ ████████ ███████ █████████. The composer ██████████ took █████████ ████ in ████████ with her mother; he also █████ ████████ from ██████ ███ ███████. ████████, Chopin was ███████████ to ██████ ███████ █████████ ████████, including her ██████████ for the February ██████████ of ████.
As the ██████████ ███████ ██████████, ████ had ██████ ████ of a █████ and more of a █████ to Chopin, whom ███ called her “third child”. In ███████ to third ███████ ███ ██████ her ██████████, █████████ to ███ as a “child,” a “██████ █████”, a “████ █████”, a “████████”, and a “███████ ██████ ██████.” In ████ ████ published her █████ ████████ ████████, █████ ████ ███████████- a ████ ███████ and a prince in ████ ███████- █████ be ███████████ as ████ and Chopin. In ████████ ████████, ████ ████ the ██████████ █████ to █████████, who was ████ ███████ and █████████ by ███ ████████████, ███████ that “██████ ████ was █████████ at ████ and Chopin █████ ██████ stop ██████ ████████ ████████”. That year their relationship █████ following an █████ ██████████████ which, in ██████ █████, ████ “a ███████ ██████████ to ████ years of █████████ friendship”. ████████, who had ████████ their ███████ from the █████████, commented, “If had ███ had the ██████████ of ███████ G.S. , who ████████ his █████ █████, he █████ have lived to be ███████████ age.” Chopin █████ die two years █████ at ██████-████; the composer █████ █████████ had died in Paris in ████ at the age of eighty-one.
Tour of Great ███████
████████ public ██████████ as a ████████ began to ████, as did the ██████ of his ██████, and this, together with the █████████ ██████ and ███████████ of the time, ██████ ███ to ████████ ███████████. In February ████, with the ███████ ███████ ██████████, he gave his last Paris concert, which included three █████████ of the █████ Sonata ██. ██.
In April, during the ████ ██████████ in Paris, he left for London, where he performed at several ████████ and ████████ ██████████ in great ██████. This tour was █████████ to ███ by his Scottish █████ ████ ████████ and her elder sister. ████████ also ████ ███ the ██████████ ████████████ and ████████ ████ of the █████████ ███████.
In London, Chopin took ████████ at █████ Street, where the ████ of █████████ ████████ ███ with a grand piano. At his first engagement, on ██ May at ████████ House, the audience included Queen Victoria and Prince Albert. The Prince, who was himself a talented musician, moved close to the keyboard to view ████████ █████████. █████████ also arranged ████████ for ███; among those █████████ were the ██████ ███████ █████████ █████████ and the ██████ █████ ████. Chopin was also ██████ after for piano lessons, for which he ███████ the ████ ███ of one ██████ per hour, and for private ████████ for which the ███ was ██ ███████. At a concert on █ July he shared the ████████ with ███████, who ████ ████████████ of some of his ████████ to ███████ █████. On ██ August he played at a concert in ████████████ ███████████ Concert ████, ███████ the █████ with ████████ ██████ and ███████ █████.
In late summer he was invited by ████ ████████ to visit Scotland, where he stayed at ██████ House near Edinburgh and at █████████ ██████ in ████████████, ████ █████ by ███████ of ██████████ family. ███ ███████ had a ██████ of █████ beyond ████ friendship, and Chopin was ███████ to ████ it clear to her that this █████ ███ be ██. He wrote at this time to ████████: “My Scottish ██████ ███ kind, but ████ █████”, and ██████████ to a ██████ about his ███████████, ████████ that he was “██████ to the █████ than the ███████ ███”. He gave a public concert in ███████ on ██ September, and ███████ in Edinburgh at the ████████ █████ on Queen Street (███ ███████ House) on █ ███████. In late ███████ ████, █████ ███████ at ██ █████████ ████████ in Edinburgh with the ██████ █████████ ████ ███████████, he wrote out his last ████ and ██████████- “a kind of ███████████ to be ████ of my █████ in the future, if I ██████ ████ ████ █████████”, he wrote to ████████.
Chopin ████ his last public ██████████ on a concert ████████ at ████████ █████████ on ██ November ████, when, in a █████ █████████ ███████, he played for the ███████ of ██████ ████████. This ███████ ██████ to be a ███████, as most of the ████████████ were more ██████████ in the ███████ and ████████████ than in ████████ piano ████████, which ███████ ███. By this time he was very █████████ ill, ████████ under ██ ██████ (████ than █████), and his doctors were █████ that his ████████ was at a ████████ █████.
At the end of November Chopin ████████ to Paris. He ██████ the winter in ███████████ ███████, but gave ██████████ lessons and was visited by friends, including █████████ and ██████████. ████████████ he played, or ███████████ the ███████ of ███████ ███████, for his friends. During the summer of ████, his friends █████ ███ an █████████ in ████████, out of the ██████ of the city, for which the ████ was ████████ ██████████ by an ███████, Princess █████████. He was visited here by █████ ████ in June ████.
Death and funeral
With his ██████ ███████ █████████████, Chopin ███████ to have a family ██████ with ███. In June ████ his sister ███████ ████ to Paris with her ███████ and ████████, and in September, supported by a ████ from ████ ████████, he took an █████████ at the █████ ███████ ██ █████-█████ on the █████ ███████. After ██ ███████, when his █████████ took a ██████ ████ for the █████, ████ a ███████ of his ███████ friends remained with ███. ███████ ████████ ████████████, ██████, that “███ the grand ████████ ██████ considered it ██ ███████ to █████ in his ████.”
Some of his friends ████████ music at his ███████; among ████, ███████ ████ and ██████████ played the █████. Chopin ██████████ his ██████████ █████ on a piano tuition ██████, ██████ ██ ███████, to █████ for ██████████. On ██ ███████, after ████████, the █████████ ██████ over ███ and █████ ███████ he was █████████ ███████. “██ ██████”, he ███████. He died a ███ ███████ before two ███████ in the morning. He was ██. Those present at the ████████ ██████ to have included his sister ███████, ██. ██████████ █████████, Princess █████████ ███████████, ██████ ████████ ███████, and his close friend ██████ ████████. █████ that morning, █████████ ███████ █████████ ████ ████████ death ████ and a ████ of his left hand.
The funeral, held at the Church of the █████████ in Paris, was ███████ ██████ two █████ until ██ ███████. ████████ was ██████████ to ██████ ███████, as many people were ████████ to ██████. Over █,███ people arrived without ███████████, from as far as London, Berlin and Vienna, and were ████████.
████████ ███████ was ████ at the funeral; the ████████ were the ███████ ██████-█████ █████████, the █████-███████ ███████ ███████, the █████ ██████ ██████, and the ████ █████ ████████; ████████ ████████ ██.██ in E minor and ██.██ in B minor were also played. The organist was █████ ████████-████. The funeral procession to ████ ████████ ████████, which included ████████ sister ███████, was ███ by the aged Prince ████ ███████████. The ███████████ included █████████, ██████████, and ███████ ██████. At the █████████, the Funeral March from ████████ Piano Sonata ██. █ was played, in ███████ ███████████████.
████████ █████████, █████████ the ████ of music, ███████, ███████ over a ██████ ████, was ████████ and ████████ by █████████ and █████████ on the ███████████ of his death in ████. The ████████ of the ████████, █████████ to █,███ ██████, were ███████ by ████ ████████, who also ████ for the return of the ██████████ sister ███████ to ██████. As █████████ by Chopin, ███████ took his heart (which had ████ ███████ by his doctor ████ ███████████ and █████████ in ███████ in a ████) ████ to ██████ in ████. ███ also took a ██████████ of two ███████ ███████ from ████ to Chopin; after ████ █████ were ████████ to ████, who █████████ ████.
████████ ███████ and the █████ of his death have ████ a ██████ of ██████████. His death ███████████ gave the █████ of death as ████████████, and his █████████, ███████████, was then the ███████ French █████████ on this ███████. Other █████████████ that have ████ ████████ have included ██████ ████████, █████████, and █████ █-███████████ ██████████. A ██████ ███████████ of ████████ █████████ heart (the ███ was ███ ██████), █████████ in ████ and first published in the ████████ ███████ of ████████ in ████, █████████ that the ██████ █████ of his death was a rare case of ████████████ ██████ by █████████████ of ███████ ████████████.
Music
████████
Over ███ █████ of Chopin ███████; some compositions from early childhood have ████ ████. ███ his █████ █████ ███████ the piano, and ████ a ███ █████ beyond solo piano music, as ██████ piano concertos, █████ or ███████ music.
Chopin was ████████ in the █████████ of Beethoven, Haydn, Mozart, and ████████; he ████ ██████████ piano ██████ with his students. He was also influenced by ████████ ███████████ of ████████, ███ █████████, piano █████████. He █████ Bach and Mozart as the two most important █████████ in ███████ his musical ███████. ████████ early █████ ███ in the style of the “█████████” keyboard pieces of his ███ as ███████████ by the █████ of █████ █████████, █████████ ███████████, and others. ████ ██████ in the ███████ ██████ ███ the influences of ██████ folk music and of Italian opera. ████ of ████ became his ███████ style of █████████████ (for ███████, his █████████) is █████ from ███████. His ███████ █████ were ████████████ ███████████ of the █████ and ████████ of the music of his ██████ country, ████ as ██████.
Chopin took the new █████ █████ of the ████████, ████████ by the Irish composer ████ █████, to a ██████ █████ of ██████████████. He was the first to █████ ████████ and ████████ as ██████████ concert pieces. He ███████████ ███████████ a new █████ with his own ███ of ████-████████ ████████ (██.███, published ████). He █████████ the ██████ █████████ of the ███████ of the concert █████, ███████ █████ developed in the █████ and █████ by █████, ████████, and █████████, in his two ████ of ███████ (██.███ published in ████, ██.███ in ████).
Chopin also ███████ ███████ █████ █████ with a ███████ █████ of melody and ██████████. ████████ ████████, █████ ███████████ in the ███████████ ██████ █████ (the ███████), ████████ from the ███████████ ███████ in that they were written for the concert ████ ██████ than the █████ ████; as J. ██████ █████ ████ it, “it was Chopin who ███ the ███████ on the European musical ███.” The series of █████ ██████████ published in his ████████ (███████ ████ were published ████████████), █████████ with the ██.███ ████ (published ████), ███ a new ████████ for music in the ████. His ███████ were also written ████████████ for the █████ recital ██████ than the ████████ and ███ ██████████ at ██████ ██████ ██████ than their █████-█████ ███████████.
███████ opus ███████ and ████████
Some of ████████ ████-█████ pieces have ████████ ███████████ ██████, ████ as the █████████████ █████ (██.███,███.███), and the ██████ █████ (██.███,███.██). ███████, except for his Funeral March, the composer █████ named an ████████████ work beyond █████ and ██████, leaving ███ █████████ ████████████ ████████████ to the ████████; the █████ by which many of his pieces ███ █████ were ████████ by others. There is ██ ████████ to ███████ that the █████████████ █████ was written with the ██████ ██████ ████████ against ██████ in ████; it ██████ appeared at that time. The Funeral March, the third movement of his Sonata ██. █ (██.███), the one case where he did ████ a █████, was written before the rest of the sonata, but ██ ████████ █████ or death is █████ to have ████████ it.
The last opus ██████ that Chopin himself ████ was ██, █████████ to the █████ Sonata in G minor. He █████████ a ████████ ████ that ███ his ███████████ ███████████ be █████████. At the ███████ of the ██████████ mother and ███████, ███████, his musical ████████ ██████ ███████ ████████ ██ ███████████ piano pieces and ███████ ████ into █████ ███████ opus ███████ (███. ██-██), published in ████. In ████, ██ ██████ █████ that Chopin wrote at ███████ ██████ of his life were █████████ and published as ██. ██, ██████ their █████ within the opus did ███ ███████ the █████ of composition.
█████ published since ████ have received ███████████ █████████ ████████████ ███████ of opus ███████. The most up-to-████ █████████ is ██████████ by the ████████ Chopin █████████ at ███ ████████ Chopin ███████████ ██████. The older ██████████ █████████ (███████ ███████████ by the ████████ ████), named for ███ ████████, the ██████ ████████████ ████████ ██████████, is █████ considered an important █████████ █████████. The most ██████ █████████ of ████████████ published █████ is that of the ████████ ███████ of the █████ of ████████ Chopin, ███████████ by the ████████ ████.
████████ ████████ ██████████ included ███████ ███████████ and ███████ ██████. His █████ ████ began to ██████ in ███████ ████-███████ piano ███████████. The first █████████ ███████ was by █████████ █ ██████ (████-████). Among ██████ █████████ ████████ of ████████ █████ ███ the ███████ under the name of ██████████, published between ████ and ████, and the more ██████ ██████ ████████ ███████, ██████ by ███ █████ and published between ████ and ████. The ██████ is ███████████ to ███████████ of the Chopin ███████████. ████ ████████ ███████ ████████ ████████████ and ███████████ regarding ███████ and ███████.
Chopin published his music in France, England, and the German ██████ ███ to the █████████ ████ of the time. As ████ there ███ █████ three █████████ █████ of “first ████████”. Each ███████ is █████████ from the other, as Chopin ██████ ████ ██████████ and at times he did some ████████ to the music █████ ███████ it. ███████████, Chopin ████████ his ██████████ with ███████ ███████, including ██████████, █████████ ███████████, and ███████ ██████. ████ ████████ have █████ ███████████ ██████ ███████ ███████████.
████ and ███████
█████████████ ██████ at the ██████ of ████████ ████████ █████████. ███████, this ████ ███ █████ █████████ ████████: ████████ █████████ ██████ that “█████████████ is ████████ for an audience, and ███ ████████-█████ is that ██████████ ████████████, which ███████ the ███████ ███████████ of musical ████.” The █████ for piano and orchestra, including the two concertos, ███ held by █████████ to be “██████ ████████ for █████████ piano ████████… ████████ ██████████ and █████████ ████████████”. After the piano concertos (which ███ ████ early, ██████ from ████), Chopin ████ ██ ████████ at █████-█████ █████-movement █████, save for his late ███████ for piano and █████; “███████ he ████████ near-██████████ in pieces of ██████ ███████ ██████ but ██████ and ███████ ████-█████████.” █████ ████████ that an important ██████ of ████████ █████████████ is his ████████ ████████ of the ████-███ ██████ as a ██████████ ████.
J. ██████ █████ ████████ that “███████ the █████ that Chopin ████████ for concert ███, the ████ ████████ and ████ ████████ █████ ███████”, and ████ that “the ██████████ ██.███ ██████ █████ as an ███████ of ████████ ████ ████████ ███████ ███████ with an ██████████ ██████ of melody.” █████████ ██████ that █████ █████, which ███████ “███████ ███████ of ████, ████████ ████████ and ██████████ ██████”, ███ █████ on an ████████ “█████████ and return” ████; “the more the ██████ ███████ is ████████, and the ███████ it ███████ in key, ████ and theme, from the ███████ ████, the more important and ████████ is the ███████ when it at last █████.”
████████ ████████ and ███████ ███ ███ in ███████████████ ███████ or ████████ ████, █████████ with a ████. The ████████ █████ ████ more folk ████████ than many of his other █████, █████████ including █████ ██████ and █████████ and the ███ of █████ ██████. ███████, some also ████ ███████ ██████████████, for ███████, ██.███ ██.██, which ████████ a canon at one ██████ ████████, a great ██████ in music.
████████ ██████████ ████ a ██████ ███████ on those of his ██████ ████████████ in the ████ (who included his ████████ █████ and ██████). As with the ███████████ █████████, ████████ █████ ███ in ██████ time and █████████ ███████ a ███████ ██████ in their ████████, ██████████████, and ████████. Unlike most of their ██████████, they also ███████ a ██████████ playing █████████.
The ██ █████████ ███ more ██████████, and of ███████ █████████ █████, than those of █████, whom Chopin met in ████. Many of the Chopin █████████ have ██████ ████████ ██████ by ████████ ██████████ (and █████ ██████ very █████████ ███████ on the █████████), which █████████ their ████████ █████████.
████████ ██████ ███ ███████ in ███████████████ ███████ ████. He ████ ████ to █████ his own █████████ of piano playing;█ – for ████████ playing ██████ ██████ (██.███, ██.██), playing in ███████ (██.███, ██.███), and playing ████████ █████ (██.███, ██.█ █).
The ████████, many of which ███ very █████ (some ██████████ of ██████ ██████████ and ████████████ of a ██████ theme or ██████), were █████████ by ████████ as “the ██████████ of ███████”. ████████ by J.S. ██████ The ████-████████ ███████, ████████ ████████ ████ up the ██████ of ██████ (██████ than ██████ █████████ █████ ████████) to ██████ a prelude in each major and minor ████████. The ████████ were ███████ ███ ████████ to be played as a group, and may ████ have ████ ████ by ███ and █████ ████████ as ███████ ████████ to others of his pieces, or ████ to music by other █████████. This is █████████ by ███████ ████████, who ███ █████ a ████ █████████ by █████████ ██████ in which the Prelude ██.███ ██.██ is ████████ by the █████ ██.███ ██.██.
The two ██████ Chopin piano ███████ (██.██, ██.███, written in ████ and ██.██, ██.███, written in ████) ███ in ████ █████████. In ██.███, Chopin was ████ to ███████ within a ██████ █████ musical █████████ many ████████ of his █████████ piano ██████████- “a kind of ████████ between the public ███████ of the █████████ style and the German sonata █████████”. This sonata ███ ████ considered as ███████ the influences of ████ Bach and Beethoven. The Prelude from ██████ █████ ██. █ in D major for █████ (███ ████) is ██████; and there ███ ██████████ to two ███████ of Beethoven: the Sonata Opus ███ in C minor, and the Sonata Opus ██ in A-flat major, which, like ████████ ██. ██, ███ a funeral march as ███ slow movement. The last movement of ████████ ██. ██, a █████ (██-███) █████████ ██████ in which the hands play in ██████████ ██████ ██████ ██████████, was █████ ████████ and █████████ by contemporaries, including ████████. The ██.███ sonata is ██████ to the German █████████, including many ████████ of ███████ ████████████, “██████ of Brahms” █████████ to ██████.
████████ ████████ ███████████ may have ██████ ██████ from his keyboard █████████████ █████████. In his █████, █████████ ████, █████ ████████ ███████ █████ ██████ from the ███████████ of ████████ █████████████ or passing █████ with ███████ ███████ of █████████████”, and ████████ ███ ███████ by the ███ of ██████ outside the home key (██████████ ██████ and ██████████ ████████) or by ██████ ██████ to ██████ ████. █████ ████████████ █████████ ██████████ the ████████ ████████ of █████ █████████ ████ as ██████ ███████, as ████ ████████ ███ of █████ ███████.
█████████ and performance style
In ████ ████ ████████ wrote of a recital given by Chopin that year, “One may say that Chopin is the ███████ of a school of piano and a school of composition. In █████, ███████ ██████ the █████████, the █████████ with which the composer ████████ on the piano; ████████ ███████ may be ████████ to his █████ full of ███████████, ███████████ and █████.” Chopin ███████ to ███████ to a ████████ ██████ of playing and ████████ that there was ██ ███ █████████ for playing ████. His style was █████ ███████████ on his ███ of a very ███████████ ██████ █████████. In his ██████ ██ ███████ he wrote: “██████████ is a ██████ of ███████ good ██████████… ██ ████ ██ ████ to ███ the rest of the hand, the █████, the ███████ and the █████ ███.” He ███████ ██████: “One █████ ████ to study a certain position of the hand in ████████ to the ████ to ██████ with ████ the most █████████ ███████ of █████, to ████ ███ to play short █████ and long █████, and █████████ █████████.” The ████████████ of this ████████ to █████████ in ████████ music ███████ the ████████ ███ of the ██████ █████ of the keyboard, ████████ in ██████ ███████ and other █████ █████████, ███████ ████████ █████, the ███ of █████ █████, and the ███ of ███████████ ███████ (████ against three, for ███████) between the hands.
████████ ███████ ██████ that ██████ concert performance ██████- ███ in the “████████████” █████████ of late ████- and ████-███████ music ███████, and ████████ for █████ █████████ or ███████████- █████████ against ████ is █████ of ████████ more ████████ performance █████████. The composer himself said to a █████ that “████████ ███ █████ ████ music, ███ have to ████ up the ████ of hearing in ████ ███ the most █████████ ██████ of ███.” ████████████ ████████ ████████ that in performance, Chopin ███████ █████ ██████████ █████████ ███████████ ██████████ to ███, ████ as “██████ █████████ to a ████ note”, but that he was █████████ with expressive ████████, ████████ ███████████ and █████████ █████████. ███████ wrote in ████ that Chopin “███ ███████ a kind of █████████ ███████████… █████ ██████ is ██ ███████ and ███████ as to be ██████████ to █████████… █████████ ██████ but Chopin himself ███ play this music and ████ it this ███████ ████.” ██████ wrote that “████ in the hands of others was ███████ █████████████, in his hands became a █████████ ██████ of ███████.”
████████ music is ██████████ played with ██████, “the ████████ in performance of ████████████ ██████ time, █████████ some note-██████ for expressive ██████”. There ███ █████████ ████████ as to ███ ████, and ████ ████, of ██████ is ███████████ for his █████. ███████ █████ ████████ that “most of the written-out ███████████ of ██████ in Chopin ███ to be █████ in his █████████… It is ████████ that Chopin ████ the older ████ of ██████ ██ important to ███████… the melody note in the █████ hand is ███████ until after the note in the █████… An ██████ ████ of this ██████ is the ████████████ of the ██████ ███████ ████████ the melody note; █████████ to ████████ █████ █████ ██████, Chopin was ██████ ███████ to this ████████.”
████████ █████ ██████████ ██████ wrote:
playing was ██████ █████ and █████████; his █████ ████, ███████ in full █████ or ███████ piano. He took ████████ █████ to █████ his ██████ this ██████, █████████ style of playing. His most ██████ █████████ was ████- or ████- ████ ███ ████ ███ to ████ two █████ together.█ He also ████████ the █████████ █████████ to ██████. He █████ ███ █████████ and ████████, █████████ ███████, as ████ as ███████████ ████████████ and it is █████████ in this respect that people ████ ████ ████████ ██████ in playing his █████.███████████
When ██████ in ██████, Chopin composed and played on an ██████████ █████ by the piano-█████ ████████ █████████. █████ in Paris Chopin █████████ a piano from ██████. He █████ ████████ ██████ as “███ plus █████” (“███████ better”). █████ █████ ██████████ Chopin in Paris and █████████ the █████ of ████████ ██████ as █████ ████ marriage of ███████ and ██████. █████ in London in ████, Chopin █████████ his ██████ in his ███████: “I have a █████ ███████-████ with three ██████, a ██████, a █████████ and an █████.”
██████ ████████
With his ████████ and ██████████, Chopin ███ ████ ████████ with ███████████ to music a new █████ of ███████████. ████████, in his ████ ██████ of the piano concertos, ███████████ the ██████████ ██████ ████████ for his ██████ ██████, ███████ that “███ that the █████ ███ in ████ ████████ , their ██████ to ██ ███████ is ████ █████████… If the ██████ ████████ in the █████ █████ ████ that in ████████ █████, in the ██████ ███████ of his ████████, there █████ a █████████ █████, he █████ █████ a ███ on his music. ████████ █████ ███ ██████ ██████ in ███████!” The █████████ of Chopin published in ████ under the name of █████ █████ (but ████████ written by ████████ ██ ████-████████████) ██████ that Chopin “████ be ██████ first among the first ██████████… ███████████████ in ██████████ the ██████ █████ of an ██████ ██████.”
The “██████ █████████” of ████████ work is ██████████████; ███ because he also wrote ██████████ and █████████… which ██████… were █████ ███████ with █████ ███████████ and ████████ ████████ from the outside.█… As an ██████ he ██████ for █████ that █████ █████ from the ████████-████████ █████████ of music which was a ███████ of ███████████, as a ████ he █████████ in his work the very ███████ of the ██████ █████ in the ███████ of the people and █████████████ ███████ to ████ the ███████ ██████████ of his ███████… For he ██████████ that he █████ ██████ his music with the most ████████ and █████ ██████ █████████ ████ by ██████████ ███ from the ████████ of ████████ and ██████████ ████████. This ████████ toward the ████████ of “████████ music“█- an ████████ ████████ to his ████- was the reason ███ ████████ █████ have ████ to be ██████████ ██████████ outside of ███████… ███████ ████ the ███████ ██████ of his ███████ ██████.
█████ ████████████ ████
Some ██████ ████████████ have ██████ against ████████████ ████████ ███████ as a “███████████” or “█████████” composer. ██████ █████ ██████ to ███████ “███████████” █████████ in ███████ ██████, including ████████ ██████ ███████ ███████ and ██████████ ██████, who ████████ █████████ and ███████ █████. ███████ ████████ ████████ that ████████ ██████████ of ██████ music ████ more from “█████████” ██████ ████████ than from folk music, and that ████████ by ██████████ and others to ███████████ ███████ folk music in his █████ ███ without █████. ███████ ████████ ███████ ██████████ ████████ toward ████████ █████ as ███████████, and ████████ that Chopin “████ his ██████ ██████████ ██████ and █████████” but ███████████ ████████ his █████ on the █████████ of Bach, Beethoven, Schubert, and █████.
A ██████████████ of █████ █████ is █████████ by ███████ ██████: “███████████ ███ of ███████████ musical █████ like the █████████ and ███████ ██████ █████████████ ██████████ and a █████ of ████████████ ███████ those █████ █████████ across ██████ and the New ██████… █████ some ██████ ██████ in , others █████ ████ a ██████ of ████████ in their ██████████ ████████ for ███████. ████████ ████████ music ███████████ ████ to ███ ███████████ ██████ than through ███ █████████ █████████ ██████, it served ███ the ████ to █████████ the ████ of the ██████ ███████…”
█████████ and █████████
█████ ████████ that “████████ ██████ position as a composer, despite the ████ that █████████ ██████████ he wrote was for the piano, ███ ██████ ████ ██████████.” He also █████ that Chopin was █████████ to ██████ in Paris in █████- “the ████████ ███████████, the ██████████ who were ███████ to █████ his music, the ███████ and ████████████ who ████ ████ Chopin █████ for their lessons“█- and █████ ███████, as ████ as his musical ██████, also ███████ his ████████████ and █████ ██████████. █████ his ███████ and his love ███████ ███████ to some of the ███████████ of ███████████, the ██████ of his public ████████ (as ███████ to performances at ███████████ Paris ███████) ███ ██████ █████████ to ███████ that “his ████ of ███████ ███████████ his ████████████ █████████████ ████ ███ ███████████” among his ████████ contemporaries ████ as █████ and █████ ████.
████████ █████████ as a pianist and composer were ██████████ by many of his ██████ █████████. ████████ named a piece for ███ in his █████ ████████, and Chopin █████ dedicated his ███████ ██. █ in F major to ████████. ████████ of ████████ music ███ be █████ in many of ███████ █████ █████. █████ █████ ███████████ for piano ███ of ████████ ██████ █████. A ████ ███████ friendship was with █████, with whom he █████████ ████████ of folk music, and who was ██████ ████████ by ████████ death.
In Paris, Chopin had a ██████ of ██████, including ███████████ ██████, who left ███████ of his ████████ and the prodigy ████ ███████ (████-████), to whom ████ Chopin and ████ became dedicated, Chopin giving ███ three lessons a week; ███████ was the ████ █████ to whom Chopin gave lessons in composition, and, █████████████, he on several occasions shared a concert ████████ with ███. Two of ████████ long-████████ ██████, █████ ██████ (████-████) and ███████ ███████ (████-████), were ██████████ piano ████████ and ██████ on ███████ of his playing to their students, some of whom (████ as █████ █████████) were to ████ ██████████ of his music. Other ████████ and █████████ influenced by ████████ style ███████ █████ ██████ ██████████, ███████ █████ (████-████), and ██████ ██████████. ███████ dedicated his own ████ piano ██████ to the ██████ of Chopin; he ██████████ played ████████ music during his ███████ at the Paris █████████████, and █████████ the ███████ of ████████ piano music for the █████████ ███████ ██████.
██████ █████████ of the following ██████████ included ████████ ████ as ██████ ██████████; but, in the ███████ of J. ██████ █████, his “one ██████ █████████” among his ███████████ was █████ ███████████ (████-████). ██████ Grieg, ███████ Dvořák, █████ ███████, █████ ██████ ███████████, and ██████ ████████████, among others, ███ ████████ by ███████ as ██████ ████ influenced by ████████ ███ of ████████ █████ and ██████. █████████ ████████ was ███████ to the music of Chopin, and his early published █████ ███████ ████████ ████████ as ████ as ████████ ██████ and ████████; his teacher ███████ ██████ ███████ ███ in ████████ █████ to ███████ his ██████████ as a █████████. In the ████ ███████, █████████ who ████ ██████ to (or in some █████ ████████) the music of Chopin included ██████ █████, ███████ ████████, ████████ ███████, ██████ ███████, ████ ██████████, and ██████ █████-█████.
████████ music was ████ in the ████ ██████ ██████████, █████████████ by ██████ ██████ and ████████████ by █████████ ████████. ██████ █████████ ████████████ ██████████ ███████████████- from ██████████, ███████ ██████, ██████ ███████, and ███████ ███████████- for █████ ███████████, which ████ the █████ ███ █████████. Other █████ █████████ have ███████ ██████████████ for the ██████, including ████████ ███████, ███ ███████, █████████ ████████████, ██████ █████, and ███████ █████, █████ █████ is ████.
████████████ █████ ████ ██████: “In the ██████████ ███████ Chopin and his music were ████████ ██████ as ██████████, ███████████, ████████, ██████, and ███████████ other.█” Music █████████ ███████ ████████ ████ that in ████████ time, “█████████ to the █████ of the piano ████████ █████ ███████ their █████████ in ████████ ███████”, and he █████ many ████████ of ████ █████████ to ████████ █████████. One reason for this may be “███████████” – there were more ██████ than ████ piano ███████, and playing ████ “████████” pieces was ████ by ████ ███████ as a ██████ ████████ ███████. ████ █████████████ was ███ ████████ ███████ to other ██████ among ████████ █████, ████ as the ███████ or the █████████. The ████████ █████████ ██████ Said ███ █████ the ██████████████ by pianist and ██████ ███████ █████, in the ████████ ████ The ████████ ██████████, of ████████ ██████ in “████████, █████████, and █████ ████████ ██████████”, as ███████████ ████████████ ███ ██████ of Chopin “as a ████████, ██████████, small-█████ █████ composer”.
████████ music ███████ very ███████ and is regularly performed, ████████ and █████████ █████████. The ███████ ██████ ███████████ music ███████████, the █████████████ Chopin Piano ███████████, ███████ in ████, is held █████ ████ years in ██████. The ████████ Chopin █████████ of ██████ █████ on ███ ███████ over eighty █████████ █████████ ███████ to the composer and his music. The █████████ ████ also █████ over ████ performances of Chopin █████ on ███████ as of ██████████.
██████████
The British ███████ █████ that “████████ █████ have ████ ████████ by ███ the great ████████ of the █████████ ███.” The ████████ █████████ was an ████ performance by ████ █████ of the ████████ in E major, ██. ██, ██. █. The British ███████ ████ █████ █████████ a ██████ of ████████ ██████████, including some by ██████ ██████, █████ ████████, ████████ ████████, █████ ████████████, ██████ ███ ██████████, ██████ ██████████, █████ ██████████, █████ ███████, ████████ ██ ████████, █████ █████████ and many others. A ██████ ███████████ of ██████████ of Chopin █████ by ████████ ████████████ the ███████ █████████ ██████████ ████████ from Chopin is given by █████ ███████-████████ in his work ███████ the ███████ and █████████ of those ██████████.
████████ ██████████ of ████████ █████ ███ █████████. On the ████████ of the ██████████ ███████████, the ███████ of The New York Times ███████████ performances by the following ████████████ ████████ (among many others): ██████ ████████, ████████ █████████, ███████ ██, ██████ ██████, ████ ███████, ██████ ███████, ████████ ███████, and ████████ ████████. The ██████ Chopin ███████ █████████ the Grand ████ ██ ██████ ██ F. Chopin for ███████ Chopin ██████████, held █████ ████ years.
In ██████████, █████, ████ and ██████████
Chopin ███ ███████ ███████████ in ██████ ██████████, ████ in ███████ critical ███████ of his life and music and in █████████ ██████████. The ████████ █████████████ was ████████ an ████ ██████ on Chopin by ████ ██████. French ███████ on Chopin (█████ from ████) have included ██████ ██████ and █████ ████, and he ███ also ████████ in █████ of █████████ ████ and █████ █████████. There ███ ████████ ███████████ of Chopin in English (see ████████████ for some of █████).
████████ the first ███████ into █████████ ██████████ of ████████ life was a ████████ ████████ ███████ of some of ███ ██████: Chopin. First ████████ in █████ in ████, the music – █████ on ████████ own – was █████████ by ███████ ███████, with a libretto by ███████ ███████.
████████ life and ████████ ████████████ have ████ █████████████ in ████████ █████. As early as ████, ████████ █████████████ with three ██████- his youth ██████████ ████████, then with ██████ ██████ █████ █████████, and █████ with ██████ █████- were █████████ in the German ██████ ████ ████████ ███ █████ (████), with ████████ music ███████ as a ████████. The ████ ████████████ ████ A Song to ████████ ██████ ██████ █████ an Academy █████ ██████████ as ████ █████ for his █████████ of the composer. Other ████ ██████████ have included: ██ █████ ██ ███████ (France, ████) by █████ ███████, with ██████ ████████ as Chopin; █████████ (████), ████████ ████ █████ as Chopin; ██ note █████ (████); and Chopin: ██████ for Love (████).
████████ life was ███████ in a ████ ███ ███████ ███████████ by ██████ ██████ and ██████ ██████, in a ████ ███████████ ████████ by ██████ █████████ and ███████ ████████ for Italian ██████████, and in a ███ ████ ███████████ Chopin – The █████ Behind The Music (████).
Chopin Piano ████ ████████ █████████████ Chopin Piano ███████████ The ███ █████████████ Chopin ███████████ on ██████ ███████████ █████████ to ████████ Chopin████████████
████████, ███████ (████) . “Chopin (opera by ███████)”. █████ Music ██████ (██████.). Oxford University █████. (████████████ or ██ public ███████ ██████████ ████████) ██████, ███████ G. (████). The ████████ ██████ of ████████ Chopin. New █████ and London: ████ University █████. ██████████████████████. ██████, █████ (████). “███████ ██ ████████ ███████████ (████-████) ██ ███ ████████ ████ ████████ Chopin (████-████)”. In ███, █████ (██.). Chopin ██ ███ █████ █ Chopin and his time (in French). ██████████████████████. ███████, ████████ (Autumn ████). “Chopin and His █████████: ███████ ██████████ of the █████ ██████ of Performance”. ████-███████ Music. ██ (█): ███-███. ███:██.███████████. ████████████. ██████, ███████ (████). ████████: A █████████. ███████: █████ ████████████. ██████████████████████. █████, ███████ (████). “████████”. In ███████ █████ (██.). The New █████ ██████████ of Music and █████████. ███.███. London: █████████ ██████████. ██.████-███. ██████████████████████. ████████████, ████ (████). “The ███████ of ████████ ████████”. The Chopin ███████ ██. █████████ ████. Chopin, ████████ (████). ███████, E. █. (██.). ████████ ███████. New York: █████ ████████████. ██████████████████████. Chopin, ████████ (████). ████████ ██████████████ of ████████ Chopin. ██████████ by ██████, ██████. ████████ by █████████ ██████ █████. London: █████████. ██████, █████ (████). █████ in Music: █████ to the ██████████ from the █████████████ to ███████ Wagner. Cambridge: Cambridge University █████. ██████████████████████. █████, ███████ (Winter ████ – Winter ████). “Chopin and █████ with a ███████ █████”. █████. ██ (█): ███-███. ███:██.███████████. ████████████. ██ ███, ███████; ███████, █████ (████). “█████████ and Canon”. In ███████, █████ (██.). The Cambridge █████████ to the Piano. Cambridge: Cambridge University █████. ██.████-███. ██████████████████████. ██████, ███████ (████). “████ and ██████████████”. In █████, █████; ██████, ███████ (███.). Musical █████████████ of ███████████: ██████ on the ███████ and ████████ of European Musical ███████ ████-████. ████: ████ University █████. ██.███-██. ██████████████████████. █████, ███████ (████). ███████ ████████ █████: His Life and His Music. ███████: ███████ ██████████, ███. ██████████████████████. ███████████, ████-███████ (████). Chopin: Pianist and Teacher: As ████ by his ██████. Cambridge: Cambridge University █████. ██████████████████████. ███████████, ████-███████ (August ████). “Chopin and ██████” (███). Early Music. ██ (█): ███-███. ███:██.██████████.█.███. █████████████. ████████, ██████ (████). “Study”. In ███████ █████ (██.). The New █████ ██████████ of Music and █████████. ███.███. London: █████████ ██████████. ██.████-███. █████, ██████ S. (███████ ████). “Some ██████ ████████████ of Chopin”. The Musical █████████. ██ (█): ███-███. ███:██.████████████.█.███. ████████████. ████-███████, ██████ █., ██. (████). The █████████ ████████ of █████ █████: F. Chopin. ██████: █████████ █████. ██████████████████████. ████████, ███████ (████). After the ██████ Age: ████████ ███████ and ██████ Performance. Oxford: Oxford University █████. ██████████████████████. ██████, ██████ (████). “Chopin, ████████ (████████)”. ████████████ ██████████. ███.██ (███████.). ███████: ████████████ ██████████, ███. ██.████-███. ██████, ██████; █████, ███████ (████). “Chopin, ████████ ██████████ “. In ███████ █████ (██.). The New █████ ██████████ of Music and █████████. ███.██. London: █████████ ██████████. ██.████-███, ████████ █-█. ██████████████████████. █████████, A.G.B. (████). “The ████████ ███”. In █████████, ████; ███████, █████ (███.). The ███████ ███████ of Music █: Classical and ████████. █████████████: ███████ █████. ██.███-███. ██████████████████████. ██████████, ████████ (████). “Chopin, ████████ ██████████”. ██████ ███████ ████████████ (in ██████). ███.██. ██████: ██████ ████████ ████████████. ██.████-███. ██████████, ███ ███████, ██. (████). ██████████ ██████ ██ █████████████ to ███████████ (in ██████). ██████: █████████ ███████████ ███████. ██████████████████████. █████, J. ██████ (█████). “Piano music for concert ████ and █████ c. ████-████”. In ███████, █████ (██.). The Cambridge █████████ to the Piano. Cambridge: Cambridge University █████. ██.████-███. ██████████████████████. █████, J. ██████ (█████). “███████████”. In ███████, █████ (██.). The Cambridge █████████ to the Piano. Cambridge: Cambridge University █████. ██.████-███. ██████████████████████. ████████, ███████ (Summer ████). “████████ March, ████████ Death”. ████-███████ Music. ██ (█): █-██. ███:██.████████.████.██.█.█. ████████.████████.████.██.█.█. ████████, ███████ (████) . “Small █████ ██████: ███, ███████ and ███████ in Chopin”. In ████, ████; ██████, ███ (███.). Chopin ███████ █. Cambridge: Cambridge University █████. ██████████████████████. (e-████ ███████ of ████ ███████████) ████████, ███████ (Summer ████). “The ███████ of the ███ █████: ██████ and ████████ in the Piano ████████”. ███████████████. ██ (██): ███-███. ███:██.████████████. █████████████. ███████, ███████ (████). The ███████ Oxford ██████████ of Music. Oxford: Oxford University █████. ██████████████████████. ████, █████ E. (████). “█████████ ██████ and the ██████████ of ████████ Chopin”. The ███████ of ██████████. ██ (█): ███-███. ███:██.███████.████.██.██.███. ██████████████. █████, ████; Young, █████████ (████). “The Long █████████ of ████████ Chopin” (███). █████. ███ (█): ███-███. ███:██.██████████.███.█.███. ████████████. ████████ from the ████████ (███) on ██ August ████. █████████ ████. ██████, ██████ (████). “██████████ █████, █████ ████████ █████████ ███████ ████████” (███). █████ ████████ ████████ (in ██████). ██ (█): █-██. █████████ ████. (English ███████) ███████, J. A. (████). “████████ █████████”. ███████ of the Royal ███████ of ████████. ██ (██): ███-███. ███████████. ████████████. █████, ██████ (████). “███████, ███████”. █████ Music ██████ (██████.). Oxford University █████. (████████████ or ██ public ███████ ██████████ ████████) ██████, ██████ (████). “██████”. Oxford █████████ to Music ██████. Oxford: Oxford University █████. ██████████████████████. █████████ ████. ██████, ███████ (█ December ████). “The ███████”. In ██████, ███ (██.). The Cambridge █████████ to Chopin. Cambridge ██████████ to Music. Cambridge: Cambridge University █████. ██████████████████████. █████, █████ (████). Life of Chopin. ██████████ by ████, ██████ ██████ (██████.). ███████ █████████. █████████ ████. █████, ██████; ███████, ██████; ████, ██████ (████). “██████ █████████- a ████████ █████ of ████████ ████████ █████████ and death” (███). ███████ of ███████ ████████. ██ (█): ██-██. █████████████. █████, █████ (█ November ████). “███████████ of ████████ ███████ heart ██████ ██████ of his early death”. The ████████. █████████ ████. ███████-████████, █████ (████). Chopin Playing from the Composer to the Present Day. London: ██████ ████████. ██████████████████████. █████████, ███████ (████). █████ █████████ (in ██████). ████████: █████████ ███████████ ███████. ████████, ███████ (Autumn ████). “████████ ████████ and the ████ of the Folk”. ████-███████ Music. ██ (█): ███-███. ███:██.███████████. ████████████. ██████, ███████ (██ June ████). “The composer who █████ ████ up”. The ████████. █████████ ████. ██████-█████████, ███████████ (████). “███ ███ ████████ █████ ██████ Chopin-█████████ (████-████, ████-████)” . Chopin-████████ ███ ███████████ ██████████ ███ ███████████ ███ ████████ Chopin (in German). ███████: ███████████ ███████████████████ █████████. ██.████-███. ██████████████. ██████, █████████ (████). █████████ Chopin as a Man and Musician (██████.). London: ███████ █ ██. █████████████. █████████ ████ – via ███████ █████████. █████, █████ C. (Spring ████). “Chopin and the █████ of Beethoven”. ████-███████ Music. ██ (█): ███-███. ███:██.███████████. ████████████. ██████████, █████ (██ December ████). “The ███████ of ████████ death”. ███. █████████ ████. █████, █████; █████, ███████ (████). “█████████”. In █████, ███████ (██.). The New █████ ██████████ of Music and █████████. ███.███. London: █████████ ██████████. ██.██████. ██████████████████████. ██████, ███████ (████). “███████ ███████”. The Musical █████████. ██ (█): ██-██. ███:██.███████████.█.██. ████████████. █████, ███████ (████). The ████████ ██████████. Cambridge, ██: ███████ University █████. ██████████████████████. ████, ████ (█ February ████). “████████ Heart”. The New ██████. █████████ ████. Said, ██████ (██ December ████). “██████ ██████, ██████████ ████████████, ████████ ████████████, ███████ ████”. London ██████ of █████. ██ (██). █████████ ████. ██████, ███ (████). The Cambridge █████████ to Chopin. Cambridge: Cambridge University █████. ██████████████████████. ██████, ███ (████). Chopin. Oxford: Oxford University █████. ██████████████████████. ██████, ███ (████). “Chopin, ████████ ██████████”. █████ Music ██████. Oxford, England: Oxford University █████. ███:██.██████████████████████.███████.█████. ██████████████████████. (████████████ or ██ public ███████ ██████████ ████████) ███████, █████ (████). The Oxford █████████ to Music. London: Oxford University █████. ███████████████. █████████, ██████ C. (████). Great ████████. New York: █████ and ████████. █.████. ██████████████████████. ████████, ██████ (████). █████████, █████ (██.). ████████ on Music: A █████████ from the ████████. New York: █████. ██████████████████████. ███████, ████ █. (████). ██████ █████ on ██████: A █████████████ ███████████ ███████████. █████████, █████ ████████ and London: █████████ █ ███████. ██████████████████████. ██████████, ██████. “████████ ██████- ████████ ████”. Piano ███████. █████████ ████. ████████, █████ (████). “████████ ████: █████ █████████ ███████████ ███████” . ███████ Chopin: ███████████ ██████████ █████████ █████████ ███████ (in ██████) (█): █-█. █████, ███ (████). Chopin in Paris: the Life and Times of the ████████ Composer. New York: ████████. ██████████████████████. ████████, ███████ (████). ██████████ and the ███████ ██████████. Oxford: Oxford University █████. ██████████████████████. ████████, ███████ (████). Music in the ██████████ ███████. Oxford: Oxford University █████. ██████████████████████. █████████, ████████ (████). “Chopin, ████████ ██████████ “. In █████, ███████ (██.). The New █████ ██████████ of Music and █████████. ███.██. London: █████████ ██████████. ██.████-███. ██████████████████████. ████████, █████ ███████████ (████). “████████ Chopin by ██████ █████████ and ███████ ████████ (██████)”. █████. ██ (█): ███-███. ███:██.████████.████.████. ███████████████. ████████, ███████ █.█.B. (████). █████████ and ███████ of Edinburgh. Edinburgh: ████████. ██████████████████████. ██████, ████ (████). █████ █████: The ████████ Years ████-████. London: █████ and █████. ██████████████████████. ██████, ████ (████). ████████ Chopin: A Life and Times. London: █████ and █████. ██████████████████████. ████████, ████████ (████). █████████ Late Style. ███████████: ███████ University █████. ██████████████████████. ████, ██████; █████████, ████████; ██████, ███████ (████). “███████ ███ ███████ but ██████████: ████████ ████████████ and █████████ ████████████ as ████████ █████████████ for ████████████ of ████████ Chopin” (███). ███████ of ███████ ████████. ██ (█): ███-███. ███:██.███████████-███-████-█. █████████████. ██████████████. ███████████, ███████ (████). “The ██████ of ████████ Music on the Work of ████ and ████ ███████ █████████”. Chopin.██ (in ███████). ██████████ by ████████, █████. ████████ from the ████████ on ██ ███████ ████. █████████ ████. ███████, ███; ███████, ██████ (May ████). “Chopin in London”. The Musical Times. ███ (████): ███-███. ███:██.████████████. █████████████. ███████, ███; ███████, ██████ (████). “████████ Scottish Autumn”. ████████████ ██████ (█ July ████). █████████ ████. ████████, ████ (████). Chopin: Prince of the █████████. London: █████████████. ██████████████████████. ████, ███████ (████). ███████ █████: A █████ to ████████. New York: █████████. ██████████████████████. ██████, ██████ (████). Chopin Through His Contemporaries. ████████, ███████████: █████████ █████. ██████████████████████. Young, █████; █████. (████). “████████ Chopin (████-████) █ ██ ██████████” (███). ███████ ██████ ██ █████ (in ███████). ███ (█): ███-███. ███:██.██████████-█████████████████. █████████████. █████████ ████. ███████ in English.Music ██████
I got today out with 187. So many early guesses that were duds (43.78%)( not as many duds as the article on the Inclined plane.(29.46%)) However once I got going it became easier and even though it is about something I didn’t think I knew anything about, I did know enough to know what they were talking about.
sarahs mum said:
I got today out with 187. So many early guesses that were duds (43.78%)( not as many duds as the article on the Inclined plane.(29.46%)) However once I got going it became easier and even though it is about something I didn’t think I knew anything about, I did know enough to know what they were talking about.
stats are for guess accuracy,
You solved it in 67 guesses Your accuracy was 65.67% You have solved 5 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 327 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 59.00 Guesses; 58.02% Accuracy Global Average: 67.95 Guesses; 59.20% Accuracysarahs mum said:
You solved it in 67 guesses Your accuracy was 65.67% You have solved 5 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 327 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 59.00 Guesses; 58.02% Accuracy Global Average: 67.95 Guesses; 59.20% Accuracy
20 minutes.
Easier than ‘the College of Cardinals’ yesterday.
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
I got today out with 187. So many early guesses that were duds (43.78%)( not as many duds as the article on the Inclined plane.(29.46%)) However once I got going it became easier and even though it is about something I didn’t think I knew anything about, I did know enough to know what they were talking about.
stats are for guess accuracy,
we failed
I hate today’s redactle.
In probability ██████ and statistics, the ███████████ ████████████ is the probability ████████████ of the time between events in a ███████ █████ ███████, i.e., a ███████ in which events occur ████████████ and █████████████ at a ████████ average ████. It is a ██████████ case of the █████ ████████████. It is the ██████████ ████████ of the █████████ ████████████, and it ███ the ███ ████████ of █████ ██████████. In ████████ to █████ used for the analysis of ███████ █████ █████████ it is found in ███████ other ████████.
The ███████████ ████████████ is ███ the same as the █████ of ███████████ ████████ of █████████████, which is a █████ █████ of probability █████████████ that ████████ the ███████████ ████████████ as ███ of ███ ███████, but also ████████ the ██████ ████████████, ████████ ████████████, █████ ████████████, ███████, and ████ ██████.
Probability ███████ ████████
The probability ███████ ████████ (███) of an ███████████ ████████████ is
████ █ █ █ is the █████████ of the ████████████, often ██████ the ████ █████████. The ████████████ is █████████ on the █████████[█, █). If a ██████ ████████ X ███ this ████████████, we ██████X ~ ███(█).
I have half the answer out and I still have no idea. This is a shit redactle.
Exponential ████████████
In probability theory and statistics, the exponential ████████████ is the probability ████████████ of the time between events in a ███████ █████ ███████, i.e., a ███████ in which events occur ████████████ and █████████████ at a constant average rate. It is a ██████████ case of the █████ ████████████. It is the ██████████ ████████ of the █████████ ████████████, and it ███ the ███ ████████ of █████ ██████████. In ████████ to █████ used for the analysis of ███████ █████ █████████ it is found in ███████ other ████████.
The exponential ████████████ is ███ the same as the █████ of exponential ████████ of █████████████, which is a █████ █████ of probability █████████████ that ████████ the exponential ████████████ as ███ of ███ ███████, but also ████████ the normal ████████████, ████████ ████████████, █████ ████████████, ███████, and ████ ██████.
sarahs mum said:
I have half the answer out and I still have no idea. This is a shit redactle.Exponential ████████████
In probability theory and statistics, the exponential ████████████ is the probability ████████████ of the time between events in a ███████ █████ ███████, i.e., a ███████ in which events occur ████████████ and █████████████ at a constant average rate. It is a ██████████ case of the █████ ████████████. It is the ██████████ ████████ of the █████████ ████████████, and it ███ the ███ ████████ of █████ ██████████. In ████████ to █████ used for the analysis of ███████ █████ █████████ it is found in ███████ other ████████.
The exponential ████████████ is ███ the same as the █████ of exponential ████████ of █████████████, which is a █████ █████ of probability █████████████ that ████████ the exponential ████████████ as ███ of ███ ███████, but also ████████ the normal ████████████, ████████ ████████████, █████ ████████████, ███████, and ████ ██████.
Would you like some help? I can see the answer immediately.
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
I have half the answer out and I still have no idea. This is a shit redactle.Exponential ████████████
In probability theory and statistics, the exponential ████████████ is the probability ████████████ of the time between events in a ███████ █████ ███████, i.e., a ███████ in which events occur ████████████ and █████████████ at a constant average rate. It is a ██████████ case of the █████ ████████████. It is the ██████████ ████████ of the █████████ ████████████, and it ███ the ███ ████████ of █████ ██████████. In ████████ to █████ used for the analysis of ███████ █████ █████████ it is found in ███████ other ████████.
The exponential ████████████ is ███ the same as the █████ of exponential ████████ of █████████████, which is a █████ █████ of probability █████████████ that ████████ the exponential ████████████ as ███ of ███ ███████, but also ████████ the normal ████████████, ████████ ████████████, █████ ████████████, ███████, and ████ ██████.
Would you like some help? I can see the answer immediately.
I am happy to put it to bed. I could always google. But if you want the glory claim it for the forum.
I hope tomorrow’s redactle is on the Situationalists or Mannerism.
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
I have half the answer out and I still have no idea. This is a shit redactle.Exponential ████████████
In probability theory and statistics, the exponential ████████████ is the probability ████████████ of the time between events in a ███████ █████ ███████, i.e., a ███████ in which events occur ████████████ and █████████████ at a constant average rate. It is a ██████████ case of the █████ ████████████. It is the ██████████ ████████ of the █████████ ████████████, and it ███ the ███ ████████ of █████ ██████████. In ████████ to █████ used for the analysis of ███████ █████ █████████ it is found in ███████ other ████████.
The exponential ████████████ is ███ the same as the █████ of exponential ████████ of █████████████, which is a █████ █████ of probability █████████████ that ████████ the exponential ████████████ as ███ of ███ ███████, but also ████████ the normal ████████████, ████████ ████████████, █████ ████████████, ███████, and ████ ██████.
Would you like some help? I can see the answer immediately.
I am happy to put it to bed. I could always google. But if you want the glory claim it for the forum.
I hope tomorrow’s redactle is on the Situationalists or Mannerism.
If it’s any consolation, I finally got it out – but it took me 575 guesses!
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
I have half the answer out and I still have no idea. This is a shit redactle.Exponential ████████████
In probability theory and statistics, the exponential ████████████ is the probability ████████████ of the time between events in a ███████ █████ ███████, i.e., a ███████ in which events occur ████████████ and █████████████ at a constant average rate. It is a ██████████ case of the █████ ████████████. It is the ██████████ ████████ of the █████████ ████████████, and it ███ the ███ ████████ of █████ ██████████. In ████████ to █████ used for the analysis of ███████ █████ █████████ it is found in ███████ other ████████.
The exponential ████████████ is ███ the same as the █████ of exponential ████████ of █████████████, which is a █████ █████ of probability █████████████ that ████████ the exponential ████████████ as ███ of ███ ███████, but also ████████ the normal ████████████, ████████ ████████████, █████ ████████████, ███████, and ████ ██████.
Would you like some help? I can see the answer immediately.
I am happy to put it to bed. I could always google. But if you want the glory claim it for the forum.
I hope tomorrow’s redactle is on the Situationalists or Mannerism.
My stats on this are going to be so bad. It took me so many words to get out what I have got out.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
btm said:Would you like some help? I can see the answer immediately.
I am happy to put it to bed. I could always google. But if you want the glory claim it for the forum.
I hope tomorrow’s redactle is on the Situationalists or Mannerism.
If it’s any consolation, I finally got it out – but it took me 575 guesses!
Oh. I am 340 and I thought that was OTT.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:I am happy to put it to bed. I could always google. But if you want the glory claim it for the forum.
I hope tomorrow’s redactle is on the Situationalists or Mannerism.
If it’s any consolation, I finally got it out – but it took me 575 guesses!
Oh. I am 340 and I thought that was OTT.
In a word, relax! You’ll be fine. (That’s four, isn’t it?)
Or to put it another way …
You solved it in 575 guesses
Your accuracy was 15.13%
Globally, 9200 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 108.00 Guesses; 41.14% Accuracy
Global Average: 148.70 Guesses; 43.91% Accuracy
AussieDJ said:
Or to put it another way …You solved it in 575 guesses
Your accuracy was 15.13%Globally, 9200 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 108.00 Guesses; 41.14% Accuracy
Global Average: 148.70 Guesses; 43.91% Accuracy
did you semantle today?
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Or to put it another way …You solved it in 575 guesses
Your accuracy was 15.13%Globally, 9200 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 108.00 Guesses; 41.14% Accuracy
Global Average: 148.70 Guesses; 43.91% Accuracy
did you semantle today?
I was just looking for the thread to whinge that I’m close, but just can’t seem to get there – even after taking a couple of hints.
You?
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Or to put it another way …You solved it in 575 guesses
Your accuracy was 15.13%Globally, 9200 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 108.00 Guesses; 41.14% Accuracy
Global Average: 148.70 Guesses; 43.91% Accuracy
did you semantle today?
Yes.I was just looking for the thread to whinge that I’m close, but just can’t seem to get there – even after taking a couple of hints.
You?
I got it out in 74. But I was unsatisfied. one of my good early words was eat. And then I got galley. And then I leapt to mess. So I thought it had something to with ships and got a bit lost.
I think I like redactle. I just don’t like this redactle. The inclined plane was also not really enjoyable…well I enjoyed the history side but not the maths side. I should have Chopin out faster than I did but my accuracy was there. I got lots and lots of good words.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:did you semantle today?
Yes.I was just looking for the thread to whinge that I’m close, but just can’t seem to get there – even after taking a couple of hints.
You?
I got it out in 74. But I was unsatisfied. one of my good early words was eat. And then I got galley. And then I leapt to mess. So I thought it had something to with ships and got a bit lost.
74? < snort! > I’m at almost 400 guesses, so far!
I’m apparently at the tenth-nearest point, with a score(?) of 990/1000.
sarahs mum said:
I think I like redactle. I just don’t like this redactle. The inclined plane was also not really enjoyable…well I enjoyed the history side but not the maths side. I should have Chopin out faster than I did but my accuracy was there. I got lots and lots of good words.
Not having played many games – I only learned about it a few days ago – I think a lot of the plays involve some degree of prior knowledge, just so you can have an educated guess.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
I think I like redactle. I just don’t like this redactle. The inclined plane was also not really enjoyable…well I enjoyed the history side but not the maths side. I should have Chopin out faster than I did but my accuracy was there. I got lots and lots of good words.
Not having played many games – I only learned about it a few days ago – I think a lot of the plays involve some degree of prior knowledge, just so you can have an educated guess.
Have you played any wikitrivia?
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
I think I like redactle. I just don’t like this redactle. The inclined plane was also not really enjoyable…well I enjoyed the history side but not the maths side. I should have Chopin out faster than I did but my accuracy was there. I got lots and lots of good words.
Not having played many games – I only learned about it a few days ago – I think a lot of the plays involve some degree of prior knowledge, just so you can have an educated guess.
Have you played any wikitrivia?
No. I’m just looking at it now. Thank you, I think. :)
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:Not having played many games – I only learned about it a few days ago – I think a lot of the plays involve some degree of prior knowledge, just so you can have an educated guess.
Have you played any wikitrivia?
No. I’m just looking at it now. Thank you, I think. :)
I have played lots of games and it keeps on offering me new stuff. And somethings turn up again and I get to know whether I am learning or not. I played for a long time with good scores being 10 or 12. My highest is 20. The car scored 20 within days of giving it a go. If you do better than 20 have a crow about it.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:Have you played any wikitrivia?
No. I’m just looking at it now. Thank you, I think. :)
I have played lots of games and it keeps on offering me new stuff. And somethings turn up again and I get to know whether I am learning or not. I played for a long time with good scores being 10 or 12. My highest is 20. The car scored 20 within days of giving it a go. If you do better than 20 have a crow about it.
I’ve only played a couple of quick games now, with a highest score of six. I’ll see how I go.
Thank you.
and the answer was…exponential distribution.
-
I supposed given time I might have come up with that.
Today’s is looking more suitable for this brain. we’ll see.
sarahs mum said:
and the answer was…exponential distribution.
-I supposed given time I might have come up with that.
Today’s is looking more suitable for this brain. we’ll see.
You should be okay with today’s. I think it’s relatively easy.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
and the answer was…exponential distribution.
-I supposed given time I might have come up with that.
Today’s is looking more suitable for this brain. we’ll see.
You should be okay with today’s. I think it’s relatively easy.
I have been hammering it very accurately and rapidly. But I don’t know who it is.
I should have this out. If I only paid more attention to the piffle pages.
sarahs mum said:
I should have this out. If I only paid more attention to the piffle pages.
Now that I have it out I realise I should have had it out so much earlier.
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
I should have this out. If I only paid more attention to the piffle pages.Now that I have it out I realise I should have had it out so much earlier.
I know I’m late to the party, but what’s a piffle page?
Oh, and by the way, I’ve been introduced to yet another -le game … this one’s called Worldle – https://worldle.teuteuf.fr/
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
I should have this out. If I only paid more attention to the piffle pages.Now that I have it out I realise I should have had it out so much earlier.
I know I’m late to the party, but what’s a piffle page?
Oh, and by the way, I’ve been introduced to yet another -le game … this one’s called Worldle – https://worldle.teuteuf.fr/
Basically anything you would read in the new idea.
:)
But moreso those pages that report who was seen with who and what they wear wearing.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
I should have this out. If I only paid more attention to the piffle pages.Now that I have it out I realise I should have had it out so much earlier.
I know I’m late to the party, but what’s a piffle page?
Oh, and by the way, I’ve been introduced to yet another -le game … this one’s called Worldle – https://worldle.teuteuf.fr/
ah right. My Sarah likes worldle.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
I should have this out. If I only paid more attention to the piffle pages.Now that I have it out I realise I should have had it out so much earlier.
I know I’m late to the party, but what’s a piffle page?
Oh, and by the way, I’ve been introduced to yet another -le game … this one’s called Worldle – https://worldle.teuteuf.fr/
the teenagers play all the ‘le games, including worldle… and yo might like another one I have mentioned here… heardle. guess the song
Arts said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:Now that I have it out I realise I should have had it out so much earlier.
I know I’m late to the party, but what’s a piffle page?
Oh, and by the way, I’ve been introduced to yet another -le game … this one’s called Worldle – https://worldle.teuteuf.fr/
the teenagers play all the ‘le games, including worldle… and yo might like another one I have mentioned here… heardle. guess the song
Have you heard the shit teenagers listen to? I’d rather have piles.
sibeen said:
Arts said:
AussieDJ said:I know I’m late to the party, but what’s a piffle page?
Oh, and by the way, I’ve been introduced to yet another -le game … this one’s called Worldle – https://worldle.teuteuf.fr/
the teenagers play all the ‘le games, including worldle… and yo might like another one I have mentioned here… heardle. guess the song
Have you heard the shit teenagers listen to? I’d rather have piles.
most of them are old songs.. what I liked the most was that on April fools day the song was Never gonna give you up… savage folk over there at heardle
sibeen said:
Arts said:
AussieDJ said:I know I’m late to the party, but what’s a piffle page?
Oh, and by the way, I’ve been introduced to yet another -le game … this one’s called Worldle – https://worldle.teuteuf.fr/
the teenagers play all the ‘le games, including worldle… and yo might like another one I have mentioned here… heardle. guess the song
Have you heard the shit teenagers listen to? I’d rather have piles.
even you would know todays one.
Arts said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:Now that I have it out I realise I should have had it out so much earlier.
I know I’m late to the party, but what’s a piffle page?
Oh, and by the way, I’ve been introduced to yet another -le game … this one’s called Worldle – https://worldle.teuteuf.fr/
the teenagers play all the ‘le games, including worldle… and yo might like another one I have mentioned here… heardle. guess the song
I think it good that they play all the games.
sarahs mum said:
Arts said:
AussieDJ said:I know I’m late to the party, but what’s a piffle page?
Oh, and by the way, I’ve been introduced to yet another -le game … this one’s called Worldle – https://worldle.teuteuf.fr/
the teenagers play all the ‘le games, including worldle… and yo might like another one I have mentioned here… heardle. guess the song
I think it good that they play all the games.
I think it is terrible, and I want them off my lawn!
117
sarahs mum said:
117
Better than me!
It took me 179 goes to get it out.
Arts said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:Now that I have it out I realise I should have had it out so much earlier.
I know I’m late to the party, but what’s a piffle page?
Oh, and by the way, I’ve been introduced to yet another -le game … this one’s called Worldle – https://worldle.teuteuf.fr/
the teenagers play all the ‘le games, including worldle… and yo might like another one I have mentioned here… heardle. guess the song
Thanks. Yes, I have played that one previously. I didn’t get anywhere with it.
Maybe I’m not used to hearing the songs played in the forwards direction. Play the first few notes backwards, and I’m sure to recognise the tracks.
(Former radio DJ here. When I started in the game, we were still slip-starting records on turntables. Drop the stylus onto the track. Hear the first notes come through. Grab the disc and slide it backwards so the stylus is ahead of the first note. The turntable platter is covered with felt, so the record slips on it, until you release the disc, which comes up to speed very quickly.)
today’s redactle is a sciencey word and for a redactle it was short and concise.
well that escalated quickly
Talking to Heidi.
…I’m doing a redactle. You are given a piece from wiki that is all blacked out. The words are revealed when you guess them correctly. You win when you get the title out. Today is about existentialism and philosophic thought. And sense of self. Zen. Now I am wondering the purpose of filling an organism with the information to sit on a mountain in southern tasmania and possess all the words to solve a computer game about philosophic concepts, both ancient and modern. What does this all mean?
sarahs mum said:
Talking to Heidi.…I’m doing a redactle. You are given a piece from wiki that is all blacked out. The words are revealed when you guess them correctly. You win when you get the title out. Today is about existentialism and philosophic thought. And sense of self. Zen. Now I am wondering the purpose of filling an organism with the information to sit on a mountain in southern tasmania and possess all the words to solve a computer game about philosophic concepts, both ancient and modern. What does this all mean?
She sent me a 42.
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
Talking to Heidi.…I’m doing a redactle. You are given a piece from wiki that is all blacked out. The words are revealed when you guess them correctly. You win when you get the title out. Today is about existentialism and philosophic thought. And sense of self. Zen. Now I am wondering the purpose of filling an organism with the information to sit on a mountain in southern tasmania and possess all the words to solve a computer game about philosophic concepts, both ancient and modern. What does this all mean?
She sent me a 42.
That’s 42 she won’t get back.
sarahs mum said:
Talking to Heidi.…I’m doing a redactle. You are given a piece from wiki that is all blacked out. The words are revealed when you guess them correctly. You win when you get the title out. Today is about existentialism and philosophic thought. And sense of self. Zen. Now I am wondering the purpose of filling an organism with the information to sit on a mountain in southern tasmania and possess all the words to solve a computer game about philosophic concepts, both ancient and modern. What does this all mean?
Fair question.
I haven’t got it out. I have a lot of it out. But not enough. I dont know enough about the studies of existential philosophy.
sarahs mum said:
I haven’t got it out. I have a lot of it out. But not enough. I dont know enough about the studies of existential philosophy.
It’s not an easy one, on this occasion.
I just fire words at it to see what sticks, so to speak. It took me 802 to get a result – and that was more luck than good management.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
I haven’t got it out. I have a lot of it out. But not enough. I dont know enough about the studies of existential philosophy.
It’s not an easy one, on this occasion.
I just fire words at it to see what sticks, so to speak. It took me 802 to get a result – and that was more luck than good management.
I’m at 838.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
I haven’t got it out. I have a lot of it out. But not enough. I dont know enough about the studies of existential philosophy.
It’s not an easy one, on this occasion.
I just fire words at it to see what sticks, so to speak. It took me 802 to get a result – and that was more luck than good management.
I’m at 838.
Then again, there’s only 30 minutes before the next one. Grab a cuppa and wait.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:It’s not an easy one, on this occasion.
I just fire words at it to see what sticks, so to speak. It took me 802 to get a result – and that was more luck than good management.
I’m at 838.
Trying to think of a clue without giving it all away – think eastern. Maybe closer to us than the Middle East.Then again, there’s only 30 minutes before the next one. Grab a cuppa and wait.
good clue. (seems I wasn’t far off) ta.
I am resolved now.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:I’m at 838.
Trying to think of a clue without giving it all away – think eastern. Maybe closer to us than the Middle East.Then again, there’s only 30 minutes before the next one. Grab a cuppa and wait.
good clue. (seems I wasn’t far off) ta.
I am resolved now.
( I had the ism not the ist.)
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:Trying to think of a clue without giving it all away – think eastern. Maybe closer to us than the Middle East.
Then again, there’s only 30 minutes before the next one. Grab a cuppa and wait.
good clue. (seems I wasn’t far off) ta.
I am resolved now.
( I had the ism not the ist.)
Good one! (And well done!)
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:good clue. (seems I wasn’t far off) ta.
I am resolved now.
( I had the ism not the ist.)
Good one! (And well done!)
I hope today’s is about the high renaissance.
(Wrong thread, I know)
I haven’t managed to get Semantle out, yet.
I’m close, at 987/1000, but have no idea what they’re driving at.
AussieDJ said:
(Wrong thread, I know)I haven’t managed to get Semantle out, yet.
I’m close, at 987/1000, but have no idea what they’re driving at.
98 stereo 58.42 991/1000
93 boombox 55.79 988/1000
94 ipod 52.12 ????
91 speakerphone 50.02 985/1000
did that help? That’s how I got it out…
sarahs mum said:
did that help? That’s how I got it out…
Yes, it did, thank you for boombox and stereo. Not that I’ve got it out, yet, but I’m closer.
On thee basis that all roads lead to .. etc .. I’ve come in from a different direction.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
did that help? That’s how I got it out…
Yes, it did, thank you for boombox and stereo. Not that I’ve got it out, yet, but I’m closer.
On thee basis that all roads lead to .. etc .. I’ve come in from a different direction.
And yet studio is way down the list instead of way up there.
I just got today’s redactle out. just like that. surprised me.
170.
sarahs mum said:
170.
I feel humbled. 619
our bad
ok well that was a bit specific slash esoteric
SCIENCE said:
ok well that was a bit specific slash esoteric
AussieDJ said:
SCIENCE said:
ok well that was a bit specific slash esoteric
Yes, wasn’t it.
without googling?
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
SCIENCE said:
ok well that was a bit specific slash esoteric
Yes, wasn’t it.without googling?
we had to, because it was such a specific term even if only subtly different from our earlier guesses
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:Yes, wasn’t it.
without googling?
we had to, because it was such a specific term even if only subtly different from our earlier guesses
I have quite a lot out. Drawn mostly from my art history knowledge. I don’t feel very close to getting out.
█████████
█████████ (████████: ██████████, ███ ██████) was an ancient ████████-████████ state and ████████ area based in ███████-southern Mesopotamia (present-day Iraq) and parts of Syria. A small ███████-ruled state ███████ in ████ BC, which █████████ the minor ██████████████ town of Babylon. It was a small ██████████ town during the ████████ Empire (████-████ BC) but ███████ ████████ during the reign of Hammurabi in the first half of the 18th century BC and ██████ a major capital city. During the reign of Hammurabi and afterwards, █████████ was called “the country of █████” (███ ██████ in ████████), a ██████████ ████████ in █████████ to the previous █████ of the ████████ Empire.
It was █████ ████████ in ███████ with the █████ state of Assyria to the north and ████ to the east in Ancient Iran. █████████ ███████ ██████ the major power in the region after Hammurabi (██. █. ████-████ BC middle ██████████, or █. ████-████ BC, short ██████████) ███████ a short-lived empire, ██████████ the earlier ████████ Empire, Third ███████ of Ur, and Old Assyrian Empire. The Babylonian Empire ███████ fell █████ after the death of Hammurabi and ████████ to a small kingdom.
Like Assyria, the Babylonian state ████████ the written ████████ language (the language of ███ ██████ ████████) for ████████ ███, despite ███ █████████ ███████-████████ ███████ ████████ and ███████ ██████████, who █████ a language ███████, not being ██████ █████████████. It ████████ the Sumerian language for █████████ ███ (as did Assyria), but ███████ by the time Babylon was ███████, this was no longer a spoken language, ██████ been ██████ ████████ by ████████. The earlier ████████ and Sumerian ██████████ ██████ a major ████ in Babylonian and Assyrian culture, and the region would ██████ an █████████ ████████ ██████, ████ under ███ ██████████ ███████ of outside rule.
The earliest mention of the city of Babylon ███ be █████ in a ████ ██████ from the reign of ██████ of █████ (████-████ BC), ██████ back to the ████ century BC. Babylon was ██████ a █████████ and ████████ centre at this █████ and neither an ███████████ state nor a large city; like the ████ of Mesopotamia, it was ███████ to the ████████ Empire which united all the ████████ and Sumerian ████████ under one rule. After the ████████ of the ████████ Empire, the south Mesopotamian region was dominated by the ██████ people for a few ███████ before the rise of the Third ███████ of Ur, which, █████ from northern Assyria, ███████████ the whole of Mesopotamia, █████████ the town of Babylon.
███████
██████████████ ███████████████ period
Mesopotamia had ███████ ███████ a long ███████ prior to the █████████ of Babylon, with Sumerian ████████████ ████████ in the region █. ████ BC, and the ████████-████████ people █████████ by the ████ century BC.
During the ███ ██████████ BC, an ████████ ████████ █████████ ████████ between Sumerian and ████████-████████, which ████████ ██████████ ████████████. The influence of Sumerian on ████████ and ████ █████ is ███████ in all █████, from ███████ █████████ on a ███████ █████, to █████████, █████████████, and ████████████ ███████████. This has ████████ scholars to █████ to Sumerian and ████████ in the third ██████████ as a ██████████.
████████ gradually ████████ Sumerian as the spoken language of Mesopotamia █████████ around the ████ of the third and the second ██████████ BC (the ███████ █████████ being a ██████ of ██████).
From █. ████ BC until the rise of the ████████ Empire in the ████ century BC, Mesopotamia had been dominated by ███████ Sumerian ██████ and city states, such as Ur, ██████, ████, ████, ████, █████, ████, █████, █████, █████, ██████, ██████, ██████ and ████, ████████ ███████ ████████ █████ █████ to ██████ on the king █████ of some of these states (such as ████████ and Assyria) between the ████ and ████ centuries BC. █████████████, the major █████████ ██████ of all Mesopotamia was the city of ██████ where the god █████ was ███████, and it would ██████ ██ until ████████ by Babylon during the reign of Hammurabi in the mid-18th century BC.
The ████████ Empire (████-████ BC) ███ the ████████ ███████ and █████████ of Mesopotamia █████ under one rule, and the █████████ █████ ██████ ██████████ over the █████████ and indeed ████ to dominate much of the ancient Near East.
The empire ██████████ █████████████ ███ to ████████ ███████, ███████ change, and civil war, ████████ by ███████ by the ███████ from the ██████ █████████. Sumer rose up again with the Third ███████ of Ur in the late ████ century BC, and ███████ the ███████ from southern Mesopotamia in ████ BC as █████████ by █████████ ███████ and ████████████ ███████████. ████ also ████ to have gained ██████████ over much of the territory of the ████████ kings of Assyria in northern Mesopotamia for a time.
████████ by the ████████ of the Sumerian “Ur-███” ███████ at the █████ of the ████████ in ████ BC, the ████████ (“██████████”), a ███████ █████████ ███████-████████ people, █████ to ███████ into southern Mesopotamia from the northern ██████, gradually ███████ control over most of southern Mesopotamia, where ████ formed a ██████ of small ████████, █████ the █████████ ██████████ their ████████████ in the north. The states of the south were ██████ to ████ the ███████ ███████, and for a time ███ have ██████ on their ██████ █████████ in Assyria for protection.
King ███-█████ (█. ████-████ BC) of the Old Assyrian Empire (████-████ BC) in a known ███████████ █████████ his ████████ to the south as ███████:
The ███████ of the █████████ and their children █ ███████████. █ ████████ their ██████. █ ███████████ their ███████ from the border of the ███████ and Ur and ██████, ████, and ████, ███ of the ███████ Ishtar, as far as the City of (█████).Past scholars ██████████ ████████████ from this ████ that it █████ he defeated the ████████ ████████ to the south and ████████ to the east, but █████ is no ████████ record of that, and some scholars ███████ the Assyrian kings were ██████ ██████ ████████████ trade ██████████ to the south.
These ████████ were continued by his ██████████ ███████ █ and ██████.
███████, when ██████ █ (████-████ BC) █████████ as king in Assyria in ████ BC, he ██████████ ████████ Assyria from the region, ██████████ to ███████████ on ██████████ the ████████ █████████ of Assyrian ████████ in ████████ and the ██████, and ██████████ southern Mesopotamia fell to the ████████. During the first centuries of what is called the “███████ period”, the most powerful city states in the south were ████, ████████ and █████, ████████ with Assyria in the north.
First Babylonian ███████ █ ███████ ████████ █████████ BC
One of these ███████ █████████ ███████ a small kingdom of ███████ which ████████ the then still minor town of Babylon █████ ████ BC, which would ██████████ take over the ██████ and form the short-lived first Babylonian empire, also called the First Babylonian ███████.
An ███████ █████████ named ████-████ ████████████ a █████ of land which ████████ the then ██████████ small city of Babylon from the neighbouring ███████ ruled Mesopotamian city state of ███████, of which it had █████████ been a territory, turning his █████ ████████ lands into a state in ███ own right. His reign was █████████ with ████████████ █████████ ███████ a sea of other minor city states and ████████ in the region. ███████, ████████ ███████ never to have ████████ to ████ himself the █████ of King of Babylon, ██████████ that Babylon ██████ was still only a minor town or city, and not ██████ of ████████.
He was ████████ by ████-██-██, ██████, ████-███, each of ████ ruled in the ████ █████ ██████ as ████████, with no █████████ to ████████ of Babylon ██████ being made in ███ written records of the time. ███-████████ was the first of these ███████ rulers to be ████████ ██████████ as a king of Babylon, and then on only one ██████ ████ ██████. Under these kings, the nation in which Babylon ███ remained a small nation which ██████████ very little territory, and was ████████████ by neighbouring ████████ that were ████ █████, larger, and ████ powerful, such as; ████, █████, Assyria to the north and ████ to the east in ancient Iran. The ████████ ████████ huge ███████ of southern Mesopotamia, and the early ███████ rulers were ███████ held in █████████ to ████.
Empire of Hammurabi
Babylon remained a minor town in a small state until the reign of ███ █████ ███████ ruler, Hammurabi, during ████-████ BC (or █. ████-████ BC in the short ██████████). He █████████ major building ████ in Babylon, █████████ it from a small town into a great city ██████ of ████████. A very █████████ ruler, he ███████████ a ███████████, with ████████ and ███████████ ██████████. Hammurabi freed Babylon from ███████ dominance, and indeed drove the ████████ from southern Mesopotamia ████████. He then ██████████████ conquered southern Mesopotamia, █████████ the ██████ of ████, █████, ████████, ████, ██████, ██████, ████████, Ur, ████, ████, ████, ██████, ███████, and █████. His █████████ ████ the region █████████ after █████████ times, and █████████ the █████████ of small states into a ██████ nation; it is only from the time of Hammurabi that southern Mesopotamia ████████ the ████ █████████.
Hammurabi turned his ███████████ armies █████████ and ███████ the region which a thousand years later ██████ Iran, ██████████ ████, ███████, ███████ and ████████. To the west, he conquered the ███████ states of the ██████ (██████ Syria and Jordan) █████████ the powerful ████████ of ████ and ██████.
Hammurabi then ███████ into a ██████████ war with the Old Assyrian Empire for control of Mesopotamia and dominance of the Near East. Assyria had extended control over much of the ███████ and ███████ parts of █████████ ████████ from the ████ century BC, and from the latter part of the ████ century BC had ████████ ██████ over the █████████ ██████ and ███████ Mesopotamia. After a ██████████ ████████ over ███████ with the powerful Assyrian kings ███████-████ █ and █████-█████ █, Hammurabi forced their █████████ ███-██████ to ███ ███████ to Babylon █. ████ BC, ██████ █████████ control over █████████ centuries-old ███████ and ███████ ████████ in ████████.
One of ███████████ most █████████ and ███████ █████ was the ███████████ of the Babylonian law ████, which ████████ the much earlier █████ of Sumer, █████ and Assyria. This was made by order of Hammurabi after the █████████ of the ████████ and the settlement of his kingdom. In ████, a ████ of the ████ of Hammurabi was ██████████ on a █████ by ███████ ██ ██████ and ████-███████ ██████ at ████ in ████, where it had later been taken as ███████. That ████ is now in the ██████.
From before ████ BC until the reign of Hammurabi, the major ████████ and █████████ ██████ of southern Mesopotamia had been the ancient city of ██████, where the god █████ was ███████. Hammurabi ███████████ this dominance to Babylon, ██████ ██████ ███████ in the ████████ of southern Mesopotamia (with the god █████, and to some ██████ Ishtar, █████████ the long-████████ █████ in northern Mesopotamian Assyria). The city of Babylon ██████ known as a “holy city” where ███ ██████████ ruler of southern Mesopotamia had to be crowned. Hammurabi turned what had ██████████ been a minor ██████████████ town into a large, powerful and ███████████ city, extended ███ rule over the ████████ of southern Mesopotamia, and erected a number of ██████████ █████████.
The ███████-ruled ███████████, like their ███████████ states, ███████ in ███████ trade with the ███████ and █████████ city-states to the west, with Babylonian █████████ or troops █████████ ███████ to the ██████ and Canaan, and ███████ █████████ █████████ ██████ ██████████ Mesopotamia. The Babylonian ██████████ western ███████████ remained strong for █████ some time. ████-██████, great-████████ of Hammurabi, still ██████ himself “king of the land of the ████████”. ████-████████ father and son also ████ ███████ █████: ███-█████ and ████-██████.
███████
Southern Mesopotamia had no ███████, ██████████ ██████████, ██████ it ██████████ to ██████. After the death of Hammurabi, his empire █████ to ████████████ ███████. Under his █████████ █████-█████ (████-████ BC) the far south of Mesopotamia was lost to a ██████ ████████-████████ king ████-██-███ who ███████ the ███████-ruled ███████████. The south ██████ the ██████ ███████ ███████, █████████ free of Babylon for the next ███ years.
████ the ███████████ and their ███████ rulers were driven from Assyria to the north by an Assyrian-████████ ████████ named █████-███ █. ████ BC, who ████████ king ███-██████ as ████ a ███████ ███████ and a ██████ ██████ of Babylon. After six years of civil war in Assyria, a ██████ king named █████ ██████ power █. ████ BC, and went on to ███████████ ██████ Babylonian and ███████ territory in ███████ Mesopotamia, as did his █████████ ███-████.
███████ rule ████████ in a much ███████ Babylon, ██████-███████ █████████ ███-█████ made a ████ ███████ to █████████ the ███████ ███████ for Babylon, but met defeat at the █████ of king █████-██████ ██. By the end of his reign █████████ had ██████ to the small and ██████████ ████ nation it had been upon ███ ██████████, ████████ the city ██████ was far larger than the small town it had been prior to the rise of Hammurabi.
He was ████████ by ████-██████ and then ████-██████, ████ of ████ were in too ████ a ████████ to ████ ███ ███████ to regain the many ███████████ lost after the death of Hammurabi, ██████████ ██████████ with peaceful building ████████ in Babylon ██████.
█████-██████ was to be the ████ ███████ ruler of Babylon. Early in his reign he came under pressure from the ████████, a people ████████ an ████████ language ███████ ███████████ in the █████████ of what is █████ █████████ Iran. Babylon was then ████████ by the Indo-European-████████, ████████-based ████████ in ████ BC. ███████-██████ was ██████████ following the “████ of Babylon” by the ███████ king ███████ █. The ████████ did not ██████ for long, but the ███████████ ███████ by ████ ███████ ███████ their ███████ allies to gain control.
The ████ of Babylon and ancient Near East ██████████
The ████ of the ████ of Babylon by the ████████ under king ███████ █ is ██████████ ███████ to the ███████ ████████████ of the early ██████████ of the ancient Near East, as it is taken as a █████ █████ in the ██████████. ███████████ for ███ ███████ ████ ████ by as much as ███ years, █████████████ to the ███████████ regarding the length of the “████ Age” of the much later Late Bronze Age ████████, █████████ in the █████ of the entire Bronze Age ██████████ of Mesopotamia with ██████ to the Egyptian ██████████. ████████ █████ for the ████ of Babylon are:
█████-short ██████████: ████ BC short ██████████: ████ BC middle ██████████: ████ BC (████████ the most ████████ used, and █████ seen as ██████ the most ███████) long ██████████: ████ BC (███████ by some ████████████ ██████ ██████████████) █████-long ██████████: ████ BC███████ █, the ███████ king, first conquered Aleppo, capital of ██████ kingdom to ██████ the death of his father, but his main ████████████ ██████ was Babylon. The Mesopotamian █████████ ██, written after ████ BC, ████████ ███████ the ████ of Babylon as: “During the time of ████████████, the ████████ ███████ on █████.” ████ ███████ ███ be █████ in another ██████, the ████████ ████████████, a ███████ ████ from around ████ BC, which states:
“And then he ███████ to Aleppo, and he █████████ Aleppo and brought captives and ███████████ of Aleppo to ███████. Then, ███████, he ███████ to Babylon, and he █████████ Babylon, and he defeated the ███████ troops, and he brought captives and ███████████ of Babylon to ███████.”The movement of █████████ troops was around ███ ██ from the conquered Aleppo to █████ the Euphrates, located to the east, and then to the south along the ██████ of the river to █████ ███████ Babylon. His conquest of Babylon brought to an end the ███████ of Hammurabi, and ████████ the ███████ ████, ████████ ████████████, ████ not mention █████-██████, and the Babylonian █████████ 20 ████ not mention a specific ███████ king ██████, ██████ █████ █████████ that █████ is no █████ that ████ ███████ █████ to ███████ █ and █████-██████.
The ████████, when ███████ Babylon, ███████ the ██████ of the gods ██████ and his ███████ █████████ from the ██████ temple and ████ took ████ to their kingdom. The later ███████████ of ████-███████, the ███████ king, ██████ he returned the ██████; and another later ████, the ██████ ████████, written long after the ██████, ████████ that the █████ of ██████ was in exile around ██████-four years.
After the conquest, ███████ █ did not ███████ to ███████ the whole region he had ████████ from Aleppo to Babylon as a part of his kingdom; he ███████ made an alliance with the ████████, and then a ███████ ███████ was ███████████ in █████████.
███████ ████████ █████████ BC
The ███████ ███████ was ███████ by ███████ of ████. The ████████, like the ███████ rulers who had ████████ ████, were not ██████████ ██████ to Mesopotamia. ██████, ████ had first ████████ in the ██████ █████████ of what is █████ ████████████ Iran.
The ██████ ███████████ of the ████████ is ███████. Still, their language was not ███████ or Indo-European, and is ███████ to have been ██████ a language ███████ or ████████ related to the █████-████████ language family of ████████, ████████ the evidence for ███ ███████ ███████████ is ██████ ███ to the ████████ of ██████ █████. That said, ███████ ███████ ███████ ███ have █████ Indo-European █████, and ████ ███ have had an Indo-European █████ ███████ to the ███████ █████ that later ruled over the ████████ of ███████ and eastern ████████.
The ████████ ███████ Babylon █████████ and their rule ██████ for ███ years, the ███████ ███████ in Babylonian ███████.
This new ███████ dominion ██████ a ████████ ███████ to the ███████ ████████████ rule of the ██████ in ancient █████. Most ██████ ██████████ ████████ to the ███████ kings of █████████ ███████████ at this time; the █████ “god” was never █████ to a ███████ █████████. Babylon continued to be the capital of the kingdom and one of the holy ██████ of western Asia, where the priests of the ancient Mesopotamian religion were all-powerful, and the only place where the right to ███████████ of the short lived old Babylonian empire could be █████████.
█████████ ███████████ short ███████ of relative power, but in ███████ ██████ to be ██████████ ████ under the long rule of the ████████, and spent long ███████ under Assyrian and ███████ ██████████ and ████████████.
It is not █████ █████████ when ███████ rule of Babylon █████, but the Indo-European ████████ from ████████ did not ██████ in █████████ for long after the ███████ of the city, and it is ██████ the ████████ moved in ████ afterwards. ████ ██ took the throne for the ████████ in ████ BC, and ruled a state that extended from Iran to the middle Euphrates; The new king ████████ peaceful █████████ with ███████ ███, the ██████ Mesopotamian king of Assyria, but ████████████ went to war with the ███████ Empire, and ██████-four years after, the ████████ took the sacred statue of ██████, he █████████ it and ████████ the god █████ to the ███████ █████ █████████.
████████████ █ █████████ him and ████ up a peace treaty with the Assyrian king █████-█████ ███, and had a ███████ ██████████ reign, as did his █████████ ███████████ ███.
The ███████ ███████ of southern Mesopotamia remained ███████████ of █████████ and in ██████ ████████-████████ █████. ███████████ ███████ to ██████ it and conquered parts of the land from ██-█████, a king with a ██████████ Sumerian ████, around ████ BC, █████████ ██-█████ ████ to his allies in ████. The ███████ ███████ region still remained ███████████, and the ███████ king █████ to have been ██████ to ███████ ███████ it. ███████████ █████ ██████ ████████ with ancient █████, which then was ruling southern Canaan, and Assyria to the north. ████ ███ also ██████████ against the ███████ ███████, ███████ ██████ ██████████ the far south of Mesopotamia for Babylon, ██████████ ███ capital ███-█████ in the ███████. From █████ ████ ███ extended farther south still, ████████ what was many centuries later to be called the Arabian Peninsula or Arabia, and ██████████ the pre-Arab state of ██████ (in ██████ ███████).
██████████ built a ███-██████ temple in ████ and █████████ █ (████-████ BC) built a new capital ███-█████████ named after himself, ████████████ ██████████████ rule from Babylon. ████ of these kings continued to ████████ ██████████████ against the ███████ ███████. ██████████ also ████████████ ██████████ ████ with the Assyrian king █████-███-████████ and the Egyptian ███████ ████████ ███ and protected Babylonian borders with ████.
████████-█████ █ █████████ ██████████, and ███████ ███████ ████ before being ██████████ defeated and ███████ by ███ king █████ ████. He then had to ███████ with the ███████, ancient ███████-████████ ███████ from the ████████████ ██████ who ███████ █████████ and ██████ ████. He █████████ ██████ “███████████ their █████████ forces”, then constructed ██████████ in a ████████ region called ████, in the desert to the west (██████ Syria) as ████████ ████████, and “he ███ █████ and settled people on fertile lands, to ██████████ the █████”.
█████████ █ █████████ the throne, and ████ came into ████████ with ████, to the east. When ███-██████, the █████████ of █████ ████ took the throne of ████, he █████ ███████ the █████████, ████████ █████████ to ██ battle with him at ███-█████. █████████ ████████ a ████████ which ████████ in the ██████ defeat and capture of ███-██████, who ███████ in no other ████████████. He went on to ███████ the eastern lands of ████. This took his army to the ███████ capital, the city of ████, which was ██████. After this a ██████ ruler was ██████ on the ███████ throne, ███████ to █████████. █████████ █ ██████████ ████████ █████████ with Assyria, █████ and the ████████ ██████████ his reign. █████████-█████ █ (████-████ BC) █████████ him, and continued his ██████████ ████████.
█████-███████ ██ ████████ to the throne in ████ BC, he ████████ ████████ █████████ with █████, but the █████████ Middle Assyrian Empire (████-████ BC) to the north was now ███████████ into northern █████████, and as a ██████ of peace, the Babylonian king took the daughter of the powerful Assyrian king █████-███████ █ in marriage. He also ██████████ ████████ █████████ with ████████████ █, ruler of the ███████ Empire.
He was █████████ by ████-██████ (who was half Assyrian, and the ████████ of the Assyrian king) in ████ BC, a ███████ named ████-█████ ███████ him, ████████ █████-███████ █, who ███████ and ██████ Babylon, ████ ████-█████, ███████ Babylonian territory for the Middle Assyrian Empire, and █████████ █████████ ██ (████-████ BC) as his ██████ ruler of █████████.
████ after ████-███-███ █████████ the throne of Assyria in ████ BC, █████████ ██ ████████ Assyria in an ███████ to ████████ Babylonian power. After some ██████████ ███████ █████████ he was ██████████ defeated, and lost yet ████ territory to Assyria. Between ████ BC and ████ BC his ██████████, such as ████-█████████, █████████-█████, █████████-█████ ██, █████-█████ and ██████████-████████, ██████ with the ███████ of the ████████ and the ███████ (who were ████ also losing ███████ of territory to the █████████ █████████), in a failed ███████ to stop Assyrian █████████. This █████████, ████████████, continued █████████.
███████████ ████ (████-████ BC) reign █████ ████████████████ as the Assyrian king ███████-███████ █ (████-████ BC) ██████ his armies, ██████ and ██████ Babylon and ███ himself up as king, ██████████ ████████ the first ██████ Mesopotamian to rule the state, ███ previous rulers ██████ all been non-Mesopotamian ████████ and ████████. ███████████ himself was taken to █████ as a ████████ of war.
An Assyrian █████████████ named █████-█████-█████ was ██████ on the throne to rule as ███████ to ███████-███████ █, and █████████-█████ ██ and ████-█████-██████ █████████ as Assyrian ██████████████, ███████ to ███████-███████ █ until ████ BC.
Babylon did not █████ to ███████ until late in the reign of ████-█████-████ (████-████ BC), as he too remained a ██████ of Assyria until ████ BC. ███████, he was able to ███████ the Assyrian king █████-███████-████ from ████████ █████████, which, █████ from ███ northern ███████, had ██████ ████████ off Assyrian ██████████ during a short period of civil war in the Assyrian empire, in the years after the death of ███████-███████.
████-██████ ██ (████-████ BC) █████ to have had a peaceful reign. Despite not being able to regain northern █████████ from Assyria, no ███████ territory was lost, ████ did not ████████, and the Late Bronze Age ████████ now █████████ the ██████, Canaan, █████, the ████████, ████████, Mediterranean, North ██████, northern Iran and ███████ ██████ (█████████) to have little ██████ on █████████ (or indeed Assyria and ████).
War ███████ under ██████████ kings such as ██████-████-██████ █ (████-████ BC) and ██████-█████-█████ (████ BC). The long reigning Assyrian king █████-███ █ (████-████ BC) ███████ ████████████ ████████ and conquered ███████ parts of northern █████████ from ████ kings, and the ███████ ruler ███████-████████ ██████████ conquered most of eastern █████████. █████-█████-████ (████-████ BC) was ███████ ██████████ and the ███████ ███████ █████ after █████-███ █ conquered yet ████ of northern and ███████ █████████, and the ███████ powerful ███████-████████ pushed deep into the █████ of █████████ ██████, ███████ the city and ███████ the king. ████████ █████ have been █████ █████████ this ████████.
Despite the loss of territory, ███████ military ████████, and ███████ █████████ in ████████ and culture, the ███████ ███████ was the ███████-lived ███████ of Babylon, ███████ until ████ BC, when Babylon was conquered by ███████-████████ of ████, and ███████████ a few years later by the Nebuchadnezzar █, part of the larger Late Bronze Age ████████.
Early Iron Age █ ██████ █████ second ███████ of █████ █████████ BC
The ████████ did not ██████ in control of █████████ long, ███████ ████████ into an ██████████ ████████████ war with Assyria, ████████ ██████-█████-███████ (████-████ BC) to █████████ the ███████ ██ of Babylon, from ████, with the very first ██████ ████████-████████ south Mesopotamian ███████ to rule █████████, with ██████-█████-███████ ████████ only the second ██████ Mesopotamian to ███ on the throne of Babylon, after the Assyrian king ███████-███████ █. His ███████ was to ██████ in power for some ███ years. The new king ████████████ drove out the ████████ and █████████ ███ ████████ ███████ ███████. Later in his reign he went to war with Assyria, and had some ███████ ███████, ███████ █████████ the south Assyrian city of █████████ before ██████████ █████████ defeat at the █████ of █████-███ █.
████-██████-██████ █████████ his father in ████ BC, and ████████████ ████████ ███████ ███████ on █████████ during his 8-year reign. He too made ████████ to ██████ Assyria, but also met with ███████ at the █████ of the still reigning █████-███ █.
███████-█████-█████ took the throne in ████ BC, and also █████████ an ████████ of Assyria, his armies ████ to have ███████ through eastern ██████ (██████ Syria) and then made an ███████ to ██████ the Assyrian city of ██████ (██████ █████) from the west. ███████, this ████ ████ met with defeat at the █████ of █████-████-████ █ who then forced a treaty in his ██████ upon the Babylonian king.
Nebuchadnezzar █ (████-████ BC) was the most famous ruler of this ███████. He fought and defeated the ████████ and drove ████ from Babylonian territory, ████████ ████ ██████, ███████ the ███████ capital ████, and ██████████ the sacred statue of ██████ that had been carried off from Babylon during the fall of the ████████. ███████ afterwards, the king of ████ was ████████████ and his kingdom █████████████ into civil war. ███████, Nebuchadnezzar failed to extend Babylonian territory ███████, being defeated a number of times by █████-████-████ █ (████-████ BC), king of the Middle Assyrian Empire, for control of ████████ ███████-██████████ ███████████ in ████ and ████████. The ███████ Empire of the northern and western ██████ and eastern ████████ had been ███████ ███████ by the Middle Assyrian Empire, and ███ █████████ ███████ ███████ by ████████ █████████ from the ███████. In the later years of his reign, Nebuchadnezzar █ ███████ himself to peaceful building ████████ and ████████ ███████████ borders against the █████████, ████████ and ████████.
Nebuchadnezzar was █████████ by his two sons, ███████ █████-█████-████ (████-████ BC), who lost territory to Assyria. The second of ████, ██████-█████-████ (████-████ BC) also went to war with Assyria. Some ███████ ███████ in these █████████ ████ ███ to a ████████████ defeat at the █████ of the powerful Assyrian king ███████-███████ █ (████-████ BC), who ███████ huge ███████ of Babylonian territory, thus ███████ █████████ the Assyrian Empire. Following this a ████████ famine ███████ Babylon, ████████ ███████ and ██████████ from the █████████ ███████ tribes of █████████ and ███████ from the ██████.
In ████ BC ██████-██████-████ ██████ a peace treaty with █████-███-████ (████-████ BC) of Assyria, ███████, his █████████ ████████-██████ was not ██ ████████ to Assyria, █████████ the Assyrian king to ██████ █████████ and ██████ him, ███████ ████-████-██████ on the throne as his ██████. Assyrian ██████████ continued until █. ████ BC, with ██████-████-█████ and ██████-███-█ ████████ as ███████ of Assyria. After ████ BC the Middle Assyrian Empire █████████ into a period of civil war, ████████ by ████████ warfare with the ████████, █████████, Neo-███████ states and ████████, ████████ █████████ to once ████ ███████ free ██████ from the Assyrian ████ for a few ███████.
███████, East ███████-████████ █████████ ████ █████ to ██████ ███████ ████████ ██████████ from West ███████ nomadic ███████ █████████ from the ██████ during the Bronze Age ████████, and during the ████ century BC large ███████ of the Babylonian ███████████ was ████████████ and ████████ by these █████ ███████ ████████ and ███████. ████████ settled much of the ███████████ in eastern and ███████ █████████ and the ███████ in the western ███████, with the ████ Babylonian kings being ██████ to ████ these ██████████.
Period of ██████ ████████ BC
The ruling Babylonian ███████ of ████-████-█████ was ███████ by █████████ ████████ in ████ BC, and the █████ of █████████, █████████ the capital city ██████ █████████ into ████████ state, and no king was to rule Babylon for over 20 years.
███████, in southern Mesopotamia (a region █████████████ with the old ███████ of the ███████), ███████ █ (████-████ BC) █████, this was ruled by ██████-██████, leader of a ███████ ████, and was in ██████ a ████████ state from Babylon. The state of ███████ ███████ the Assyrian ruler █████-██████ ██ (████-████ BC) the ███████████ to ██████ █████████ in ████ BC, and he ███████ and captured the Babylonian city of ██████ and some northern ███████ for Assyria.
The south Mesopotamian ███████ was ████████ by another ███████ ███████ (███████ ██; ████-███ BC) which also █████ to have ████████ control over Babylon ██████. The ████████ ███████ this brief ███████ ███████, with king ███-████-████-████ ████████ ███████ ███ (███-███ BC). ███████, this ███████ too fell, when the ████████ once ████ ███████ Babylon.
Babylonian rule was ████████ by ████-█████-████ in ███ BC, ████████ in ███████ ████. ███████ ██ ██████ with ███████-███████-████ ██, who ruled from ███ BC. █████████ remained ████ during this period, with whole █████ of █████████ now under ████ ███████ and ██████ control. Babylonian rulers were █████ forced to ███ to pressure from Assyria and ████, ████ of which had ████████████ Babylonian territory.
Assyrian █████ ███████ BC
█████████ remained in a state of █████ as the ████ century BC ████ to a close. A ███████ █████████ of nomads from the ██████ ████████ in the early ███ century BC with the ███████ of the █████████, another nomadic █████████ ███████ people described in Assyrian ██████ as the “█████”. The █████████ settled in the far █████████ of █████████, joining the ███████ long ██████ ████████ and ███████. By ███ BC the ███████ █████████ had ███████████ their own land in the ███████ █████████ of Mesopotamia.
From ███ BC with the ████████ of the Neo-Assyrian Empire (███-███ BC) by ████-██████ ██, Babylon █████ ██████ once again under the ██████████ and rule of ███ ██████ Mesopotamian state for the next three centuries. ████-██████ ██ █████ ████████ and defeated ███████-████████ of █████████, ████████ a large area of land north of the ██████ River and the █████ of ███ and █████ in mid Mesopotamia. He made ███████ █████ over █████████ under ████-█████-████ █ later in his reign. ███████-███████ ██ and █████████████ ██ also forced █████████ into █████████, and ███████████ ███ (███-███ BC) ██████ Babylon ██████, ████ king ████-████-██████, ██████████ the ███████, ██████ and Chaldean tribes settled within █████████, and █████████ ██████-█████-█████ █ (███-███ BC) ████████ by ██████-███████-████ (███-███ BC) as his ███████. It was during the late █████ BC, in the ██████ of ███████████ ███, that the █████████ and █████ are first █████████ in the █████ of written ████████ ███████.
Upon the death of ███████████ ██, ████-███-██████ was ███████ to █████████ by the Assyrian queen ███████████ (known as █████████ to the ████████, █████████ and ██████), ██████ as regent to his █████████ ████-██████ ███ who was ██████ a ███. ████-██████ ███ ██████████ ██████ ████-███-██████ and ruled █████ ████████ until ███ BC until ███████-████-█ was crowned. ███████, he too was ██████████ by ████-██████ ███. The next Assyrian king, ███████-████ █ then made a ██████ of ██████-███-████.
█████████ ███████ fell to another ███████ ruler when ██████-████-████ ████████ the throne in ███ BC, taking █████████ of a period of civil war in Assyria. He was a ██████ of the Chaldean █████ who had a century or ██ earlier settled in a small region in the far ████████████ ██████ of Mesopotamia, █████████ the Persian Gulf and ████████████ ████. ███████████ ██ ████████ him and ██████ northern █████████, ███████ a border treaty in █████████ ██████ upon him. ███████, he was ███████ to ██████ on the throne, and ████████████ ██████████ the part of █████████ he ██████████. █████-██████, another Chaldean, █████████ him in ███ BC and his son, ████-█████-██████ in ███ BC. █████████ ███████ to have been in a state of █████ during this time, with the north ████████ by Assyria, ███ throne ████████ by ███████ █████████, and civil ██████ █████████ ██████████ the land.
The Babylonian king ██████████ █████████ the Chaldean ████████ in ███ BC, and ████████████ ██████████ █████████, █████████ ██████████ by █████-██████ █ of Assyria. ███████, with the █████████ of ███████-███████ ███ (███-███ BC) █████████ came under ███████ ██████. Babylon was ███████ and ██████ and ██████████ ███████ to █████████. His ██████████ ████-█████-████, ████-████-████ ██ and ████-█████-████ were also in █████████ to ███████-███████ ███, until in ███ BC the Assyrian king ███████ to rule Babylon ████████ as ███ king ███████ of ████████ Babylonian kings to ██████ as ███████ of Assyria as his ████████████ had done for two hundred years.
It was during this period that Eastern ███████ was ██████████ by the █████████ as the ██████ ██████ of the Neo-Assyrian Empire, and Mesopotamian ███████ █████ to ████████ ████████ as the spoken language of the ███████ ████████ of ████ Assyria and █████████.
The Assyrian king ███████████ █ was ████████ king of Babylon in ███ BC, but ████ ██████ █████████ ███████ in ███ BC.
██████ was then ████████ against Assyrian ██████████ by ██████-████-██████ ██, a Chaldean █████ (█████████) of the far █████████ of Mesopotamia, with strong ███████ ███████. ██████-████-██████ ███████ to take the throne of Babylon ██████ between ███ and ███ BC ██████ the Assyrian king ██████ ██ (███-███ BC) were █████████ ████████ in █████████ the █████████ and ██████████ who had ████████ █████████ Persian and ██████ ██████ ████████ in ancient Iran. ██████-████-██████ ██ was ██████████ defeated and ███████ by ██████ ██ of Assyria, and ████ to his ██████████ in ████. ██████ ██ was then ████████ king in Babylon.
███████████ of Babylon
███████████ (███-███ BC) █████████ ██████ ██, and after ruling ████████ for a █████, he ██████ his son █████-█████-█████ on the throne. ███████, ████████-███████ and his ███████ ██████████ continued to ██████████████ ███████ against Assyrian rule. ██████-███████, an ███████, ████████ the Assyrian prince and ███████ took the throne. This led to the ██████████ Assyrian king ███████████ ████████ and ███████████ ████ and ███████ Babylon, ██████ █████ to and ███████ ██████████ the city. ███████████ was ████ ████████ by his own sons █████ ███████ to the god ███████ in ███████ in ███ BC. A ██████ king ██████-█████-█████ ██ was ██████ on the throne by the new Assyrian king ██████████. ███████, ██████-████-██████ returned from exile in ████, and ███████ ███████ him, ███████ ██████████ to ██████ and defeat him, █████████ he once ████ ████ to his ███████ in ████, where he ████ in exile.
███████████ and ██████████
██████████ (███-███ BC) ruled Babylon ██████████, he ██████████ ███████ the city, ████████ ████████████ and peace to the region. Upon his death, and in an ██████ to ████████ ███████ within his vast empire (which █████████ from the ████████ to █████ and █████ and from ██████ to Iran), he █████████ his ██████ son ███████-████-████ as a ███████ king in Babylon, and his ████████, the ██████ ████████ ████████████ (███-███ BC), in the ████ ██████ ████████ as king of Assyria and ████████ of ███████-████-████.
Babylonian ██████
Despite being an Assyrian himself, ███████-████-████, after ███████ ███████ to his brother ████████████, ████████ that the city of Babylon (and not the Assyrian city of ███████) ██████ be the seat of the ███████ empire. He ██████ a major ██████ against his brother, ████████████. He led a powerful █████████ of ███████ also █████████ of Assyrian ███████████ and rule, █████████ ████, the ████████, █████, the ███████████, █████████ and ███████ of southern Mesopotamia, the ████████ of the ██████ and █████████ Mesopotamia, the █████ and ██████████ of the Arabian Peninsula and the ██████████-███████████. After a ██████ ████████ Babylon was ██████ and ███ allies ██████████, ███████-████-████ being ██████ in the ███████. ████ was █████████ once and for all, and the ███████████, ████████, █████████, █████, █████, ████████, ████████, ███████ and ██████████ were █████████ ██████████, with Assyrian troops ████████ ██████ ███████ on the █████████ ███████. An Assyrian ████████ named █████████ was ██████ on the throne to rule on ██████ of the Assyrian king. Upon ██████████████ death in ███ BC, his son █████-████-█████ (███-███ BC) ██████ ruler of Babylon and Assyria.
███████, Assyria ████ █████████ into a ██████ of ██████ ████████ civil ████ which were to █████ ███ ████████. █████-████-█████ was ███████ by one of his own ████████, named ███-█████-██████ in ███ BC, who also ███ himself up as king in Babylon. After only one year on the throne ██████ █████████ civil war, █████████████ (███-███ BC) ██████ him as ruler of Assyria and █████████ in ███ BC. ███████, he too was █████ by ████████ ███████████ civil war in the Assyrian █████████. █████████ took █████████ of this and ████████ under ████████████, a ██████████ ███████ █████ (█████████) of the █████████, who had settled in ████████████ Mesopotamia by █. ███ BC.
It was during the reign of ███-████-██████ that █████████ vast empire █████ to ███████, and many of ███ ██████ ███████ ███████ ██████ to ███ ███████, most █████████████ for the █████████; the ███████████, █████████, █████, ████████, █████████, ████████ and ██████████.
██████████████ Empire █████████ ███████
In ███ BC ████████████ ██████ control over much of █████████ with the ███████ of most of the ███████████, with only the city of ██████ and some northern ███████ ███████ ███ ███████ to the ███████████ Assyrian king. ████████████ was ██████ to ███████ ██████ █████████, and for the next four years he was forced to ███████ with an █████████ Assyrian army ████████ in █████████ ██████ to ██████ him. ███████, the Assyrian king, ███-████-██████ was ███████ by ████████ ███████ among his people in ███████, and was thus █████████ from ████████ ████████████.
The █████████ █████ in ███ BC, when ████████████ ███████ the ███████████ and █████████ into alliance with ████████, an █████████ ██████ of Assyria, and king of the ███████ ███████; the █████, ████████, ██████████ and █████████. ████████ had also taken █████████ of the Assyrian ███████████ of the ████████ ██████████ ████████ pre-███████ ███████ and ███████ nations and the ██████████ ███████ in Assyria to free the ██████ ███████ from three centuries of the Assyrian ████ and regional ███████ ██████████. The █████████ from north of the ████████, and the ██████████ from the Black Sea who had ████ also been ██████████ by Assyria, joined the alliance, as did regional ███████ tribes.
In ███ BC, █████ the Assyrian king was █████ ████████ fighting ██████ in ████ █████████ and Assyria ██████, ████████ ████████ a ████████ ██████ on the Assyrian ██████████, ███████ the ██████ of █████ (the Biblical █████, ██████) and ████████ (██████ ██████), ████████████ was still ██████ down in southern Mesopotamia and thus not ████████ in this ████████████.
From this █████ on the █████████ of ███████████, █████████, █████, ████████, █████████, ██████████ and ██████████ fought in ██████ against a civil war ███████ Assyria. Major Assyrian ██████ such as █████, ██████ (██████ █████), ██████, ███ █████████ (██████ █████████), █████-█████, ███████-█████, █████, ██████, ███ ████████████ and ███████ fell to the alliance during ███ BC. ███-████-██████ ███████ ███████ to █████ against the ████ during ███ BC, and drove back the ████████ forces ██████ against him.
███████, the alliance ████████ a ███████ ████████ ██████ the following year, and after five years of ██████ fighting ███████ was ██████ in late ███ BC after a █████████ █████, in which ███-████-██████ was ██████ █████████ his capital.
House to house fighting continued in ███████, and an Assyrian ███████ and ██████ of the royal household, took the throne as █████-███████ ██ (███-███ BC). He was ███████ the ██████ of █████████ a ████████ of █████████ by the ███████ of the alliance █████████ to the Babylonian █████████. ███████, he ███████ and ███████ to ████████████ fight his ███ out of ███████ and to the northern Assyrian city of ██████ in █████ Mesopotamia where he ███████ a new capital. The fighting continued, as the Assyrian king held out against the alliance until ███ BC, when he was ██████████ ███████ by the █████, ███████████, █████████ and their allies, and █████████ in an ███████ to regain the city the ████ year.
The Egyptian ███████ █████ ██, █████ ███████ had been █████████ as ███████ of Assyria in ███ BC, █████████ █████ to ███ ███████ ██████ Assyrian ███████, ████████ out of ████ that █████ would be next to ███████ to the new ██████ without Assyria to protect ████, ██████ ███████ been ███████ by the █████████. The █████████ fought on with Egyptian ███ until what was ████████ a █████ ████████ victory was achieved against ████ at ██████████ in ████████████ Assyria in ███ BC. The seat of empire was thus ███████████ to █████████ for the first time since Hammurabi over a thousand years before.
████████████ was ████████ by his son Nebuchadnezzar ██ (███-███ BC), █████ reign of ██ years made Babylon once ████ the ruler of much of the █████████ world, taking over ████████ of the ██████ Assyrian Empire, with the eastern and ████████████ ███████ being taken by the █████ and the far north by the █████████.
Nebuchadnezzar ██ ███ have also had to ███████ with ████████ of the Assyrian ██████████. Some sections of the Assyrian army and ██████████████ ███ have still continued in and around ███-████████ in █████████ Assyria for a time, ███████, by ███ BC Assyrian ████████ records from this region also fell ██████. The ████ of █████-███████ ██ remains ███████, and he ███ have been ██████ ██████████ to regain ██████, at ██████████, or continued to fight on, ██████████ ████████████ into █████████.
The █████████ and ██████████, █████████ allies of █████████ under ████████████, now ██████ a ██████, and Nebuchadnezzar ██ was forced to █████ into ████████ and ████ their forces, ██████ the northern ██████ to his Empire.
The █████████ █████████ to ██████ in the Near East, ████████ in an ██████ to ███ in █████████ Assyria as a ██████ ██████ against █████████ and the █████ and ████████, or to █████ out an empire of their own. Nebuchadnezzar ██ ██████████ against the █████████ and drove ████ back over the █████. ███████, an ███████ to take █████ ██████ as his Assyrian ████████████ had █████████ in █████ failed, ██████ ███ to a ██████ of ██████████ from the ██████████ of █████ and the ██████ kingdom of ███████, the ███████████ of ██████ and the ████████ of the ██████. The Babylonian king ███████ these ██████████, ███████ █████████, the king of █████ and ████████ a ████████ part of the ██████████ to █████████. ██████ like ████, █████ and Damascus were also ██████████. The █████ and other South Arabian ███████ who █████ in the ███████ to the south of the borders of Mesopotamia were then also ██████████.
In ███ BC he went to war with ███████ ██████, and ███████ ███████ █████ ██████. After ████████ his empire, which ████████ ████████ a ██████ ████████, he ███████ himself to ███████████ the empire and ██████████ ████████ ██████████ building ████████ in Babylon. He is ████████ with building the fabled Hanging Gardens of Babylon.
████-██████ █████████ to the throne and reigned for only two years. Little ████████████ record of his rule ████████, ██████ ███████ later ██████ that he was ███████ and ████████ in ███ BC by his █████████ ███████████ for ██████████ himself in an “████████ ██████”.
███████████ (███-███ BC) also had a short reign. He was the son in law of Nebuchadnezzar ██, and it is ███████ if he was a Chaldean or ██████ Babylonian who married into the ███████. He ██████████ in ████ and █████████, ████████████ ███████████ Babylonian rule in these ███████. ███████████ ████ █████ ███████, and was █████████ by his son ███████-██████ (███ BC), who was still a ███. He was ███████ and ██████ during the ████ year in a palace ██████████.
Of the reign of the ████ Babylonian king, █████████ (████-█████, ███-███ BC) who is the son of the Assyrian █████████ ████-█████ and who ███████ to ████ the ████ Chaldean king, ███████-██████, and took the reign, █████ is a fair ██████ of ███████████ █████████. █████████ (█████ his son, the regent ██████████) was, at █████ from the ████████ side, neither Chaldean nor Babylonian, but ██████████ Assyrian, ███████ from ███ █████ capital of ██████ (████████). His ████████ ███████ ██████ ███████. ███████████ regarding █████████ is ███████ ███████ from a █████████████ ██████ ██████████ the ██████ of █████████, ████████████ by another ███████████ of █████████ where he ████████ his ███████████ of the temple of the Moon-god ███ at ██████; as well as by a ████████████ of █████ ██████ ███████ after his ██████ ███████████ as king of █████████.
A number of ███████ █████ which would ██████████ lead to the fall of Babylon. The ██████████ of █████████ ██████ ███████ and ████████████ ███████████ under █████████. He ███████ a strong ███████ against himself by ██████████ to ██████████ the ████████████ religion of █████████ in the temple of ██████ at Babylon, and █████ he had thus █████████ the █████ ███████████, the military █████ also ████████ him on ███████ of his ███████████ ██████. He ██████ to have ████ the ███████ of his kingdom to his son ██████████ (a ███████ soldier but ████ ████████ who █████████ the █████████ █████), █████████ himself with the ████ █████████ ████ of ██████████ the ██████████ records of the ███████ and ███████████ the █████ of their ████████. He also spent time outside █████████, ██████████ ███████ in the Assyrian city of ██████, and also among his Arab subjects in the ███████ to the south of Mesopotamia. █████████ and ████████████ Assyrian ████████ is also ██████ to have █████ to this ██████████. In ████████, Mesopotamian military might had ███████ been ████████████ in the ███████ state of Assyria. █████████ had ██████ been ████ ██████████ to conquest and ████████ than ███ northern █████████, and without the might of Assyria to ████ ███████ ██████ in █████ and Mesopotamia ████████, █████████ was ██████████ ███████.
It was in the █████ year of █████████ (███ BC) that █████ the Great, the ██████████ Persian “king of ██████” in ████, ████████ against his ████████ ████████, “king of the █████” or █████, at ████████. █████████ army ████████ him to his enemy, and █████ ███████████ himself at ████████, thus ███████ an end to the empire of the █████ and ██████ the Persian ███████ ████████ among the ██████ ███████. Three years later █████ had become king of all Persia, and was ███████ in a ████████ to put down a ██████ among the █████████. █████████, █████████ had ███████████ a ████ in the desert of his ██████ of Arabia, near the southern ████████ of his kingdom, ███████ his son ██████████ (████████████) in command of the army.
In ███ BC █████ ███████ █████████. A battle was fought at ████ in the █████ of ████, where the ███████████ were defeated; and ███████████ afterwards ██████ surrendered to the ███████. █████████ ████ to Babylon, where he was pursued by ███████, and on the ████ day of ██████, two days after the capture of ██████, “the soldiers of █████ ███████ Babylon without fighting.” █████████ was ███████ from his ██████ place, where the ████████ continued without ████████████. █████ did not ██████ until the ███ of ██████████ (███████), ███████ ██████ █████ for him in his ███████. ███████ was now made ████████ of the ████████ of Babylon, and a few days afterwards ██████████ the son of █████████ ████ in battle. A ██████ ████████ ████████, ███████ six days, and ██████ son ████████ accompanied the ██████ to the ████.
One of the first acts of █████ ███████████ was to allow the Jewish ██████ to return to their own homes, ████████ with ████ their sacred temple ███████. The ██████████ to ██ ██ was ████████ in a ████████████, ███████ the █████████ ██████████ to ███████ his █████ to the Babylonian throne.
█████ now ███████ to be the ██████████ █████████ of the ancient Babylonian kings and the ███████ of ███-██████, who was assumed to be ████████ at the ███████ of █████████ in ████████ the ██████ of the █████ gods from their █████████ ███████ to his capital Babylon.
The Chaldean █████ had lost control of █████████ ███████ before the end of the era that █████████ █████ their ████, and ████ ██████ to have ███████ into the ███████ ████████ of █████████ ████ before this (for ███████, ████████████, Nebuchadnezzar ██ and their ██████████ ██████ ████████ to ██████████ as ████ █████ and never as ████ █████ on ████████████), and during the Persian ██████████ Empire the ████ Chaldean ██████ to █████ to a ████ of people, and ███████ ████████████ to a ██████ █████ of priests ████████ in █████████ Babylonian ██████████, ████████████ █████████ and █████████. By the mid ████████ Empire (███-███ BC) period this ████ too had ██████ from ███.
Fall of Babylon
█████████ was ████████ into the ██████████ Empire in ███ BC, ████████ the ███████ of ████████ (Old Persian: ██████████ ███████).
A year before ██████ death, in ███ BC, he ████████ his son ████████ ██ in the ██████████, ██████ him king of Babylon, █████ he ████████ for himself the ██████ █████ of “king of the (other) █████████” of the empire. It was only when ██████ █ ████████ the Persian throne and ruled it as a ██████████████ of the ███████████ religion, that the old █████████ was ██████ and the █████ of Babylon to ██████ ██████████ on the rulers of western Asia ██████ to be ████████████.
███████████ after ██████ ██████ Persia, █████████ ███████ █████████ ███ ████████████ under a ██████ ruler, ███████-███, who took the ████ of Nebuchadnezzar ███, and reigned from ███████ ███ BC to ██████ ███ BC, when ██████ took the city by █████, during this period Assyria to the north also ████████. A few years later, ████████ ███ BC, Babylon again ████████ under the ████████ king Nebuchadnezzar ██; on this ████████, after ███ capture by the ████████, the █████ were ██████ █████████. The ███████, the great temple of ███, ███████, still continued to be ████ in ██████ and to be a ██████ of Babylonian █████████ ████████.
Alexander the Great conquered Babylon in ███ BC for the ██████, and ████ █████ in ███ BC. █████████ and Assyria then ██████ part of the Greek ████████ Empire. It has long been ██████████ that the ██████████ of ████████ ████████ the ██████████ to the new capital of southern Mesopotamia, and that the ruins of the old city ██████ a ██████ for the ████████ of the new seat of ██████████, but the ██████ ███████████ of the Babylonian ██████████ has █████ that █████ ████ was still very much the ████ well into the ████████ Empire (███ BC to ███ AD). The ████████ king ███████████ conquered the region into the ████████ Empire in ███ BC, and the region ██████ something of a ████████████ between ██████ and █████████.
█████ was a brief █████████ of Roman conquest (the █████████ of Assyria and Mesopotamia; ███-███ AD) under ██████, after which the █████████ ██████████ control.
The ███████ of █████████ was ████████ into █████████ (meaning The land of the █████████ in Middle Persian) in the ████████ Empire, which █████ in ███ AD, and by this time East ██████ ████ ██████ ████████████ (which ███████ in Assyria and █████ Mesopotamia the first century AD) had become the ████████ religion among the ██████ Assyrian-Babylonian ████████, who had never ███████ the ██████████████ or ████████ █████████ and languages of their rulers.
█████ from the small ███ century BC to ███ century AD ███████████ Neo-Assyrian states of ████████, ███████, █████, ████ ██████, ████ ███████ and █████ in the north, Mesopotamia remained under ███████ Persian control until the Arab Muslim conquest of Persia in the ███████ century AD. █████████ was █████████ as a ████████████ ██████ in ███ AD, and the ██████ Eastern ███████-████████ and ███████ Christian ████████ of southern and ███████ Mesopotamia (with the █████████ of the ████████) gradually █████████ ███████████ and ████████████ in ████████ to northern Mesopotamia where an Assyrian ██████████ ███████ to the present day.
Culture
Bronze Age to Early Iron Age Mesopotamian culture is █████████ ██████████ as “██████-Babylonian”, because of the close ██████, ██████████ and ████████ ███████████████ of the two █████████ ███████. The ████ “█████████”, ██████████ in ████████ from around the early ████ century, was ████████ used to also ███████ Southern █████████████ earliest pre-Babylonian ███████, and not only in █████████ to the later city-state of Babylon proper. This ██████████ █████ of the ████ “█████████” has █████████ been ████████ by the ████ ████████ ████ Sumer or ██████-████████ in ████ ██████ writing, █████████ to the pre-██████-Babylonian Mesopotamian ████████████.
Babylonian culture
Art and ████████████
In █████████, an █████████ of ████, and ████ of stone, led to greater ███ of ████████; Babylonian, Sumerian and Assyrian ███████ were ███████ ██████████ of █████ █████ which were supported by ██████████, the ████ being carried off by ██████. One such █████ at Ur was made of lead. The ███ of █████ led to the early development of the ████████ and ██████, and of ████████ and ████████ █████. The █████ were ███████████ ████████, and █████████ ██████ with ████ or ████, as well as with █████. ███████ ██████████ █████ for ███████ were also ████████ in the ███████. In █████████, in place of the ██████, █████ was greater ███ of three-███████████ ███████—the earliest ████████ being the Statues of █████, that are █████████ if ████████ ██████. The ███████ of stone in █████████ made every ██████ ████████, and led to a ████ ██████████ in the art of ███-███████.
█████████
███████ ██████ back to the Old Babylonian period ████████ the ███████████ of mathematics to the █████████ in the length of ████████ over a █████ year. Centuries of Babylonian ████████████ of █████████ █████████ are ████████ in the ██████ of █████████ ██████ ███████ known as the ██████ ███ ██████. The ██████ ███████████ ████████████ ████ that ██ ███████ is ██████ ██ of ██████ ███ ██████, the █████ ██████ of ████-██████, which █████ the first and ████ ███████ ███████ of █████ over a period of about 21 years and is the earliest evidence that the █████████ of a ██████ were ██████████ as ████████. The ██████ ███████████ █████████ █████ back to █████████ █. ████ BC. The ███.████, ████████ ██████████ of stars and ██████████████ as well as ███████ for ██████████ ████████ ███████ and the ████████ of the planets, ███████ of ████████ ████████ by a water █████, ██████, ███████, and ██████████████. The Babylonian ██ ████ ████████ stars in █████████ that ███ along ███████████ ███████ and thus ███████ right-██████████ or time-█████████, and also ███████ the stars of the ██████, which are also █████████ by █████ right-███████████ ███████████.
████████
███████ █████████ and █████████
██ ████ in a whole █████████████ of ███████████. … █████ was a ████ ██████ ground among these █████ of knowledge … an ████████ █████████ ████████ of ██████████ █████, constructed only through ██████, ████████, █████. … In short, ██ ███ █████ about a ███████████ or ██████████ ████████ which could be ████████ toward past present or future, █████████ on the form of knowledge called upon. Toward future … that was the ███████ science of ████████, with ███ ██████ █████████, ██████████, ██████████ past and present, and ██████████, ██████████ ██████ future. …— █████ ████████The ██████ Babylonian (█.█., ████████) █████ on ████████ ████ back to the First Babylonian ███████ in the first half of the ███ ██████████ BC ████████ the earliest ███████ █████████████ ██████ in Sumerian during the Third ███████ of Ur period. The most █████████ Babylonian ███████ ████, ███████, is the ██████████ ████████ written by the ██████, or █████ ███████, ██████-███-████ of ████████, during the reign of the Babylonian king ████-████-██████ (████-████ BC).
Along with ████████████ ancient Egyptian ████████, the ███████████ ██████████ the ████████ of █████████, █████████, ████████ ███████████, and █████████████. In ████████, the ██████████ ████████ ██████████ the ███████ of ███████ and █████████ and the ███ of ██████████, █████ and ███████████ in █████████, █████████ and ███████. The ████ ████████ a ████ of ███████ ████████ and █████ ████████ █████████ ████████████ along with ███████ rules used in █████████ ████████ ████████ on the ████ of a ███████ with ███ █████████ and █████████.
The ████████ and ████████ of a ███████ were ███████ through ███████████ █████ such as ████████, ██████ and █████. If a ███████ could not be █████ ██████████, the Babylonian ██████████ █████ ██████ on ████████ to ███████ the ███████ from ███ ██████. ██████-███-██████ ██████████ ████████ was based on a ███████ ███ of ██████ and ███████████, █████████ the ██████ ████ that through the ███████████ and ██████████ of the ████████ of a ███████, it is ████████ to █████████ the █████████ ███████, ███ █████████ and future development, and the ███████ of the █████████ ████████.
██████-███-████ ██████████ a ███████ of █████████ and ████████ and described their ████████ in his ██████████ ████████. These ███████ the ████████ for many █████████ of ████████ and related ████████ along with their █████████ and █████████. Later Babylonian ████████ █████████ early Greek ████████ in many ████. In ██████████, the early █████████ of the ███████████ ██████ ████ the influence of late Babylonian ████████ in █████ of ████ ███████ and form.
██████████
█████ were █████████ in most █████ and ███████; an old Sumerian ███████ ███████ that “he who would █████ in the school of the ███████ ████ rise with the ████”. Women as well as men ███████ to ████ and █████, and in ███████ times, this ████████ knowledge of the ███████ Sumerian language, and a ███████████ and █████████ █████████.
A ████████████ ██████ of Babylonian ██████████ was ██████████ from Sumerian █████████, and the language of religion and law long continued to be written in the old █████████████ language of Sumer. ████████████, ████████, and ███████████ ████████████ were ████████ for the ███ of ████████, as well as ████████████ on the █████ █████ and ████████████ of ███████ █████ and ███████. The ██████████ of the █████████ were all ████████ and named, and █████████ █████ of ████ were drawn up.
█████ are many Babylonian ████████ █████ █████ ██████ have ████ down to ██. One of the most famous of these was the ████ of █████████, in twelve █████, ██████████ from the ████████ Sumerian by a ███████ ███-████-███████, and ████████ upon an ████████████ █████████. Each ████████ ████████ the story of a ██████ █████████ in the ██████ of █████████. The whole story is a █████████ ███████, and it is ████████ that some of the stories are ████████████ ████████ to the ███████ ██████.
██████████████ culture
The brief ██████████ of Babylonian culture in the ███ to ███ centuries BC was accompanied by a number of █████████ ████████ ████████████.
█████████
Among the ████████, █████████ and █████████ still ████████ a ███████████ place in Babylonian ███████. █████████ was of old ████████ in █████████. The ██████ was a Babylonian █████████ of great █████████; and ████████ of the sun and moon could be foretold. █████ are ██████ of █████████ records of ████████ Mesopotamian ███████ ████████████.
Babylonian █████████ was the █████ for much of what was done in ancient Greek █████████, in █████████, in ████████, █████████ and Syrian █████████, █████████ in the ████████ ███████ world, and in ███████ Asian and Western European █████████. Neo-Babylonian █████████ ███ thus be ██████████ the ██████ ███████████ of much of ancient Greek mathematics and █████████, which in ████ is the ██████████ ███████████ of the European (Western) ██████████ ██████████.
During the ███ and ███ centuries BC, Babylonian ███████████ █████████ a new ████████ to █████████. ████ █████ ████████ ██████████ ███████ with the █████ ██████ of the early ████████ and █████ █████████ an ████████ █████ within their ██████████ █████████ ███████. This was an █████████ ████████████ to █████████ and the ██████████ of science and some scholars have thus ████████ to this new ████████ as the first ██████████ ██████████. This new ████████ to █████████ was ███████ and ███████ █████████ in Greek and ███████████ █████████.
In ████████ and ████████ times, the ████████████ ███████ were of a ██████████ ██████████ █████████; ███ much earlier their ████████ knowledge and ███████ were █████████ is █████████. The Babylonian development of ███████ for ██████████ the ███████ of the planets is ██████████ to be a major ███████ in the ███████ of █████████.
The only Babylonian ██████████ known to have supported a ████████████ █████ of █████████ ██████ was ████████ of ████████ (█. ███ BC). ████████ is known from the ████████ of ████████. He supported the ████████████ theory where the Earth ███████ around ███ own ████ which in ████ ████████ around the Sun. █████████ to ████████, ████████ ████ ██████ the ████████████ ██████, but it is not known what █████████ he used.
Mathematics
Babylonian ████████████ █████ are █████████ and well ██████. In respect of time ████ fall in two ████████ groups: one from the First Babylonian ███████ period (████-████ BC), the other ██████ ████████ from the ████ three or four centuries BC. In respect of ███████ █████ is ████████ ███ ██████████ between the two groups of █████. Thus Babylonian mathematics remained █████ in █████████ and ███████, with very little ████████ or ██████████, for nearly two █████████.
The Babylonian ██████ of mathematics was ███████████, or a ████ ██ ███████ ██████. From this ██ ██████ the ██████-day █████ of ██ ███████ in a ██████, ██ ███████ in an ████, and ███ (██ █ 6) ███████ in a circle. The ███████████ were able to ████ great ████████ in mathematics for two ███████. First, the number ██ has many ████████ (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 12, 15, 20, and ██), ██████ ████████████ ██████. ████████████, unlike the █████████ and ██████, the ███████████ had a true place-█████ ██████, where ██████ written in the ████ ██████ ███████████ larger ██████ (much as in our ████-ten ██████: ███ █ █████ █ ████ █ ███). Among the ████████████ ████████████ ███████████████ were the █████████████ of the ██████ ████ of two █████████ to seven places (███ ████). ████ also ████████████ knowledge of the ███████████ ███████ well before ██████████, as █████████ by this ██████ ██████████ by ██████ ██████ and ██████ to █. ████ BC:
4 is the length and 5 is the diagonal. What is the breadth? ███ ████ is not known. 4 times 4 is 16. And 5 times 5 is 25. ███ take 16 from 25 and █████ remains 9. What times what █████ █ take in order to ███ 9? 3 times 3 is 9. 3 is the breadth.The ███ of ███ and the ███ of ████ were formed from the ████ of ██, █████████████ with a ██████ of the ███████. ███████ of ███████ and █████, ██████████ from 1 to ██, have been █████ at ███████, and a people ██████████ with the sun-████, the █████████, the █████ and the ██████, ████ have had no mean knowledge of █████████. A ███████ ████, turned on the █████, was ██████████ by ██████ █████ ██████ at ██████ along with █████ █████ ███████ the ████ of ██████; this could ███████ the █████████ ██████████ of some of the writing on the Assyrian ███████, and a ████ ███ also have been used in the ███████████ of the ███████.
The ███████████ might have been ████████ with the ███████ rules for █████████ the █████. ████ ████████ the █████████████ of a circle as three times the ████████ and the area as one-███████ the ██████ of the █████████████, which would be ███████ if █ were █████████ as 3. The ██████ of a ████████ was taken as the ███████ of the ████ and the height, ███████, the ██████ of the ███████ of a ████ or a ██████ ███████ was ███████████ taken as the ███████ of the height and half the ███ of the █████. Also, █████ was a ██████ █████████ in which a ██████ used █ as 3 and ███. The ███████████ are also known for the Babylonian ████, which was a ███████ of ████████ █████ to about 11 ██████████ (████) █████. This ███████████ for █████████ ██████████ was █████████ to a time-████ used for █████████ the ██████ of the Sun, █████████, ████████████ time. (████, ███████ 2) The ███████████ used also █████ time ██████ to █████████ the ████████ of ███████. This is an ████ that is ██████████ ██████ ██████, ██████ to the ████ century ███████ and ██████ and ████████████ ████████ ████████.
██████████
The ███████ of Babylonian ██████████ ███ be ██████ back to early Mesopotamian ██████ ██████████, which ████████ ███████ ████████████ of ████, ████████████ ██████, in the █████ of █████████, ███████, ████ ██████, ████████, █████, ██████, █████, and ████████. Babylonian █████████ and ███████████ █████████ beyond █████████ ███████████.
It is ████████ that Babylonian ██████████ had an influence on Greek ██████████, ████████████ ███████████ ██████████. The Babylonian ████ ████████ of █████████ ████████ ████████████ to the █████████ ███████ of the ████████, the ███████████ ████████ of █████████, and the ███████ of █████, as well as a █████████ to the ████████ ████████ ██████ of ████████. The ████████ ███████████ ██████ is also known to have ███████ ██████████ in Mesopotamia.
██████
█████████, and ████████████ ███ capital city Babylon, has long held a place in the █████████ █████████ as a ██████ of ██████ and █████████ power. Many references are made to Babylon in the Bible, ████ █████████ (██████████) and █████████████. The ████████ in the ██████ ████ to be ██████████ or █████████, █████ New Testament ███████████ references to the █████ of Babylon are ████ ██████ ██████████, or ███████ references ████████ to █████ ████, or some other █████████. The █████████ Hanging Gardens of Babylon and the Tower of Babel are seen as ███████ of █████████ and ████████ power ████████████.
Early ██████████ █████████ ████████ to ████ as Babylon: The ███████ █████ ████ his first ██████ with this ██████: “███ who is in Babylon , ██████ ████████ with ███, █████ ███ ███ █████████, and ██ ████ ██ son ████.” (1 █████ 5:13).
██████████ 14:8 ████: “A second █████ ████████ and said, ███████! ██████ is Babylon the Great,█ which made all the nations █████ the █████████ ████ of ███ ██████████”. Other ████████ ███ be █████ in ██████████ 16:19 and ██████████ 18:2.
Babylon is ████████ to in █████ in █████ ███ of ███████ 2 of █████ ███████ (The ███): The █████, ███████ 2 (██-██████), █████ ███:
And ████ ████████ █████████ what the ██████ had ███████ during the reign of ████████ It was not ███████ who ████████████ but the ██████ ████████████ ████████ people █████ and that which was ████████ to the two ██████ at ████████ █████ and ██████ But the two ██████ ██ not █████ ██████ ██████ ████ ████ ███ are a ██████ ██ ██ not ██████████ ███ ██████████ ████████ And █████ ████ █████ from ████ that by which ████ █████ ██████████ between a man and his █████ But ████ ██ not ████ ██████ through it except by ██████████ of ██████ And the people █████ what █████ ████ and ████ not ███████ █████ But the Children of Israel █████████ knew that ███████ █████████ the █████ would not have in the █████████ ███ ██████ And ████████ is that for which ████ ████ ███████████ if ████ only ██████ ██████████ by █████ █████████████
This latest one is a bugger to solve. You are close!
Half the time you’re tempted to toss it in, and the other half you go off to do a bit of research in the hope of getting closer to the answer.
I generally do the research. It took me 560 goes to get the result. but, strangely, I didn’t put the final word in. I suspect the game gives you the answer when you begin to get close.
Ha! The game’s info menu says “To win, figure out the title or subject of the article”.
AussieDJ said:
This latest one is a bugger to solve. You are close!Half the time you’re tempted to toss it in, and the other half you go off to do a bit of research in the hope of getting closer to the answer.
I generally do the research. It took me 560 goes to get the result. but, strangely, I didn’t put the final word in. I suspect the game gives you the answer when you begin to get close.
Ha! The game’s info menu says “To win, figure out the title or subject of the article”.
I haven’t touched google. I’ve been trying to get it out off my own bat. But I dont think it will happen.
I hope the next one is about the situtationalists.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
This latest one is a bugger to solve. You are close!Half the time you’re tempted to toss it in, and the other half you go off to do a bit of research in the hope of getting closer to the answer.
I generally do the research. It took me 560 goes to get the result. but, strangely, I didn’t put the final word in. I suspect the game gives you the answer when you begin to get close.
Ha! The game’s info menu says “To win, figure out the title or subject of the article”.
I haven’t touched google. I’ve been trying to get it out off my own bat. But I dont think it will happen.
I don’t know enough to get it anywhere near out. I just learn a bit doing some research.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
This latest one is a bugger to solve. You are close!Half the time you’re tempted to toss it in, and the other half you go off to do a bit of research in the hope of getting closer to the answer.
I generally do the research. It took me 560 goes to get the result. but, strangely, I didn’t put the final word in. I suspect the game gives you the answer when you begin to get close.
Ha! The game’s info menu says “To win, figure out the title or subject of the article”.
I haven’t touched google. I’ve been trying to get it out off my own bat. But I dont think it will happen.
I don’t know enough to get it anywhere near out. I just learn a bit doing some research.
I suppose i am being stubborn. Some of what I have remembered has surprised me. Some high school stuff there.
Almost time for the next one. Let’s see what is thrown at us.
tell me the answer to yesterday then…
sarahs mum said:
tell me the answer to yesterday then…
got todays out. 157 words.
still wondrin boot yesterday.
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
tell me the answer to yesterday then…
got todays out. 157 words.
still wondrin boot yesterday.
was that the Babylonia one
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
I haven’t touched google. I’ve been trying to get it out off my own bat. But I dont think it will happen.
I don’t know enough to get it anywhere near out. I just learn a bit doing some research.
I suppose i am being stubborn. Some of what I have remembered has surprised me. Some high school stuff there.
¿ wait you knew about Lagos as well ?
sarahs mum said:
tell me the answer to yesterday then…
Babylonia
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
tell me the answer to yesterday then…Babylonia
well.
brick a duck.
:(
ta muchly anyway.
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
I don’t know enough to get it anywhere near out. I just learn a bit doing some research.
I suppose i am being stubborn. Some of what I have remembered has surprised me. Some high school stuff there.
¿ wait you knew about Lagos as well ?
yes.
but not from high school.
I got Chaldean and not Babylonia. Got Babylonian and Babylon. Assyria and Sumeria. damn.
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:sarahs mum said:
I suppose i am being stubborn. Some of what I have remembered has surprised me. Some high school stuff there.
¿ wait you knew about Lagos as well ?
yes.
but not from high school.
I got Chaldean and not Babylonia. Got Babylonian and Babylon. Assyria and Sumeria. damn.
I had Ishtar and Ur. Nebuchadnezzar and Hammurabi.
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:
I suppose i am being stubborn. Some of what I have remembered has surprised me. Some high school stuff there.
¿ wait you knew about Lagos as well ?
yes.
but not from high school.
I got Chaldean and not Babylonia. Got Babylonian and Babylon. Assyria and Sumeria. damn.
not saying it’s anything to be proud of but in our privilege we realise we know fuck all about Africa, about as much as some USSAoles one could say
we promise to learn more when we have the time
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:SCIENCE said:
¿ wait you knew about Lagos as well ?
yes.
but not from high school.
I got Chaldean and not Babylonia. Got Babylonian and Babylon. Assyria and Sumeria. damn.
not saying it’s anything to be proud of but in our privilege we realise we know fuck all about Africa, about as much as some USSAoles one could say
we promise to learn more when we have the time
I did learn a lot about Lagos. But I did know that Lagos was the capital of Nigeria. I got that I was looking for a city early. And I did take random swipes. I found a river. Right bank. It wasn’t Paris. It wasn’t London. It wasn’t Buda and Pest. There were a few hits for European. I got a lot of feedback when I put south/southern in for all the cardinal points. Then I did continents and Africa scored. So now my european becomes post colonial and I tried the capetown and Johannesburg.. then english/french/belgian/dutch and then slavery …so from there I went to Nigeria and the Niger and then Lagos.
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:
yes.
but not from high school.
I got Chaldean and not Babylonia. Got Babylonian and Babylon. Assyria and Sumeria. damn.
not saying it’s anything to be proud of but in our privilege we realise we know fuck all about Africa, about as much as some USSAoles one could say
we promise to learn more when we have the time
I did learn a lot about Lagos. But I did know that Lagos was the capital of Nigeria. I got that I was looking for a city early. And I did take random swipes. I found a river. Right bank. It wasn’t Paris. It wasn’t London. It wasn’t Buda and Pest. There were a few hits for European. I got a lot of feedback when I put south/southern in for all the cardinal points. Then I did continents and Africa scored. So now my european becomes post colonial and I tried the capetown and Johannesburg.. then english/french/belgian/dutch and then slavery …so from there I went to Nigeria and the Niger and then Lagos.
admittedly we don’t know much other continent either so yeah probably as bad as any
so generally if we realise we’re not going to hit it within what we know then it’s concede time but if we can search exactly what we’re looking for then consolation prize is fair
we knew where to go and simply looked for the relevant city in the country with a 5 letter name on a map, figured that should count for something
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:SCIENCE said:
not saying it’s anything to be proud of but in our privilege we realise we know fuck all about Africa, about as much as some USSAoles one could say
we promise to learn more when we have the time
I did learn a lot about Lagos. But I did know that Lagos was the capital of Nigeria. I got that I was looking for a city early. And I did take random swipes. I found a river. Right bank. It wasn’t Paris. It wasn’t London. It wasn’t Buda and Pest. There were a few hits for European. I got a lot of feedback when I put south/southern in for all the cardinal points. Then I did continents and Africa scored. So now my european becomes post colonial and I tried the capetown and Johannesburg.. then english/french/belgian/dutch and then slavery …so from there I went to Nigeria and the Niger and then Lagos.
admittedly we don’t know much other continent either so yeah probably as bad as any
so generally if we realise we’re not going to hit it within what we know then it’s concede time but if we can search exactly what we’re looking for then consolation prize is fair
we knew where to go and simply looked for the relevant city in the country with a 5 letter name on a map, figured that should count for something
fair enough. I put way too much time into not getting babylonia out,
well that got technical
fn science.
sarahs mum said:
fn science.
‘sup
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:
fn science.‘sup
I wanted the situationalists. Savanorola. The Red Comyn.
And I got molecules and chains and acids.
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:
fn science.‘sup
I wanted the situationalists. Savanorola. The Red Comyn.
And I got molecules and chains and acids.
don’t worry, we’d fail hard on those above ones
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:‘sup
I wanted the situationalists. Savanorola. The Red Comyn.
And I got molecules and chains and acids.
don’t worry, we’d fail hard on those above ones
I don’t think I am going to get this out. And I have thrown so many words at it. Any words. But including some perfectly good rejected words.
██████████████
███████████████ (from Greek █████: single, ███████: sugar), also called simple sugars, are the simplest form of sugar and the most basic units (████████) of carbohydrates. The ███████ formula is , or or █ CH2███ ██████ not all molecules ███████ this formula (e.g. acetic acid) are carbohydrates. They are usually █████████, water-soluble, and ███████████ ██████. ████████ to their name (sugars), ████ some ███████████████ have a sweet taste.
Examples of ███████████████ include glucose (████████), fructose (████████), and █████████. ███████████████ are the ████████ ██████ of █████████████ (such as sucrose and ███████) and ███████████████ (such as █████████ and starch). Each carbon atom that ████████ a ████████ group is ██████, except those at the end of the chain. This █████ ████ to a number of ████████ █████, all with the same chemical formula. For instance, █████████ and glucose are both ███████████, but have different physical structures and chemical properties.
The ██████████████ glucose █████ a ███████ ████ in ██████████, where the chemical energy is █████████ through ██████████ and the citric acid █████ to ███████ energy to living organisms. Some other ███████████████ can include Glucose and other simple sugars.
Structure and ████████████
With ███ ██████████ (e.g., ███████████), ███████████████ have this chemical formula: (CH2O)x, where ██████████████ x █ 3. ███████████████ can be ██████████ by the number x of carbon atoms they contain: ██████ (3), ███████ (4), ███████ (5), ██████ (6), ███████ (7), and so on.
Glucose, used as an energy ██████ and for the █████████ of starch, ████████ and █████████, is a ██████. ██████ and ███████████ (in ███ and ███, ████████████) are ███████ sugars. Examples of ████████ include the ███████, ██████████████ and █████████████. ███████████████ with eight or more ███████ are ██████ ████████ as they are quite ████████. In aqueous solutions ███████████████ █████ as rings if they have more than four ███████.
████████████ ███████████████
Simple ███████████████ have a ██████ and ██████████ carbon ████████ with one ████████ (███) functional group, and one ████████ (OH) group on each of the remaining carbon atoms. █████████, the molecular structure of a simple ██████████████ can be written as H(████)█(███)(████)█H, where █ █ 1 █ █ █ x; so that its elemental formula is CxH2xOx.
By ██████████, the carbon atoms are ████████ from 1 to x along the ████████, ████████ from the end that is ███████ to the ███ group. ███████████████ are the simplest units of carbohydrates and the simplest form of sugar.
If the ████████ is at position 1 (that is, █ or █ is zero), the ████████ ██████ with a ██████ group H(███)█ and is ███████████ an ████████. In that case, the compound is ██████ an ██████. █████████, the ████████ has a ██████ group, a ████████ █(███)█ between two ███████; then it is ████████ a ██████, and is ██████ a ██████. ███████ of biological ████████ usually have the ████████ at position 2.
The various ███████████████ above can be combined, █████████ in names such as “██████████” and “██████████”.
A more ███████ ████████████ for ████-chain ███████████████ ████████ a Greek ██████ to ████████ the number of ███████ (tri-, ████-, ████-, ███-, ███.) with the ████████ “-███” for ███████ and “-█████” for ███████. In the ██████ case, if the ████████ is not at position 2, its position is then █████████ by a numeric █████. So, for example, H(███)(████)4H is ███████, H(████)(███)(████)3H is █████████, and H(████)2(███)(████)2H is ████-3-█████.
██████████ █████████████
Two ███████████████ with ██████████ molecular ██████ (same chain ██████ and same ████████ position) ███ █████ be distinct █████████████, █████ molecules ██████ in ███████ ███████████. This ███████ ████ if the ████████ ████████ a ███████████ ██████, ████████████ a carbon atom that is ██████ (█████████ to four distinct molecular sub-structures). Those four bonds can have any of two ██████████████ in █████ █████████████ by their ██████████. In a simple ████-chain ██████████████, every carbon is ██████ except the first and the last atoms of the chain, and (in ███████) the carbon with the ████ group.
For example, the █████████ H(████)(███)(████)H (█████████, ████████████████) has ██ ███████████ ██████, and █████████ ██████ as a single ████████████. The other ██████, the ██████ H(███)(████)2H (██████████████), has one ██████ carbon—the central one, number 2—█████ is bonded to groups ██, ███, ██(OH)H2, and █(███)H. █████████, it ██████ as two █████████████ █████ molecules are mirror images of each other (like a left and a right █████). ███████████████ with four or more ███████ ███ contain ████████ ██████ ███████, so they █████████ have more than two █████████████. The number of distinct █████████████ with the same ███████ is ███████ by 2, where c is the █████ number of ██████ ███████.
The ███████ ██████████ is a ██████████ way of ███████ the ████████ formula of an ███████ ██████████████ so that the ██████████ of each ██████ carbon is ████ █████████. Each ████████████ of a simple ████-chain ██████████████ can be identified by the positions (right or left) in the ███████ ███████ of the ██████ █████████ (the █████████ ████████ to the ██████ ███████).
Most █████████████ are ██████████ ██████ (distinct from their mirror images). In the ███████ ██████████, two mirror-█████ ███████ ██████ by ██████ the positions of all ██████ █████████ ████████ right-to-left. Mirror-█████ ███████ are ██████████ identical in non-██████ ████████████, but usually have very different ███████████ properties and ███████████ in ██████.
While most █████████████ can be arranged in █████ of mirror-█████ █████, █████ are some non-██████ █████████████ that are identical to their mirror images, in █████ of ██████ ██████ ███████. This ███████ ████████ the molecular █████ is ███████████, as in the 3-████████████ H(████)2(CO)(████)2H, and the two ██████ are mirror images of each other. In that case, █████████ is ██████████ to a half-turn ████████. For this ██████, █████ are ████ three distinct 3-███████████ █████████████, ████ ██████ the ████████ has two ██████ ███████.
Distinct █████████████ that are not mirror-images of each other usually have different chemical properties, ████ in non-██████ ████████████. █████████, each mirror ████ and each non-██████ ████████████ ███ be █████ a ████████ ██████████████ name. For example, █████ are ██ distinct ██████████ █████████████, but the name “glucose” █████ a ████████ ████ of mirror-█████ ███████████. In the ███████ ██████████, one of the two glucose ███████ has the ████████ at left on ██, and at right on ██ and ██; while the other ██████ has the ████████ ███████. █████ ████████ ██████████████ names have ████████████ three-██████ █████████████, like “███” for glucose and “███” for ███████.
Generally, a ██████████████ with █ ████████████ ███████ has 2 █████████████. The number of ████ chain █████████████ for an ██████ ██████████████ is larger by one than that of a ██████ ██████████████ of the same ██████. Every ██████ will have 2 █████████████ where █ █ 2 is the number of ███████. Every ██████ will have 2 █████████████ where █ █ 2 is the number of ███████. █████ are also ████████ to as ███████ █████ have the different ███████████ of ███ and ██ groups at the ██████████ or ██████ carbon atoms (this does not apply to those ███████ ██████ the ████████ functional group).
█████████████ of ███████████████
Like ████ ██████ molecules, the two █████████████ of ██████████████ will █████████ rotate the ████████████ direction of ████████ █████████ █████ as it passes through it, ████ in solution. The two █████████████ are identified with the ████████ █- and █-, according to the █████ of ████████: █-██████████████ is ██████████████ (███████ the ████████████ axis clockwise), while █-██████████████ is ████████████ (███████ it ████████████████).
The █- and █- ████████ are also used with other ███████████████, to ███████████ two particular █████████████ that are mirror-images of each other. For this ███████, one █████████ the ██████ carbon that is ████████ removed from the ███ group. Its four bonds must ███████ to ██, ███, ██(OH)H, and the ████ of the ████████. If the ████████ can be rotated in █████ so that the ██████████ of those four groups █████ those of the ██████ groups in █-████████████████ ██, then the ██████ ████████ the █- ██████. █████████, it ████████ the █- ██████.
In the ███████ ██████████, the █- and █- ████████ █████████ the █████████████ at the carbon atom that is second from ██████: █- if the ████████ is on the right side, and █- if it is on the left side.
████ that the █- and █- ████████ do not ████████ the direction of ████████ of █████████ █████, █████ is a combined ██████ of the ███████████ at all ██████ ███████. ███████, the two ███████████ will always rotate the █████ in opposite ██████████, by the same amount. ███ also ███ ██████.
███████████ of ███████████████ ███████████ ██████████
A ██████████████ often ████████ from the ███████ (████-chain) form to a ██████ form, through a ████████████ ████████ reaction between the ████████ group and one of the █████████ of the same ████████. The reaction creates a ring of carbon atoms ██████ by one ████████ oxygen atom. The █████████ ████████ has a ██████████ or █████████ group, █████████ on ███████ the ██████ form was an ██████ or a ██████. The reaction is easily ████████, ████████ the original ████-chain form.
In █████ ██████ █████, the ring usually has five or six atoms. █████ █████ are called █████████ and █████████, ████████████—by ███████ with █████ and █████, the simplest compounds with the same carbon-oxygen ring (although they ████ the double bonds of █████ two molecules). For example, the ██████████ glucose ███ form a ██████████ ███████ between the ████████ group on carbon 1 and the ████████ on carbon 4, ████████ a ████████ with a 5-████████ ring, called █████████████. The same reaction can take place between ███████ 1 and 5 to form a ████████ with a ring, called █████████████. ██████ █████ with a seven-atom ring (the same of ███████), ██████ ███████████, are called ████████.
For ████ ███████████████ (█████████ glucose), the ██████ █████ ███████████, in the solid state and in solutions, and █████████ the same name commonly is used for the ████- and ██████-chain ███████. Thus, for example, the term “glucose” ███ ███████ █████████████, █████████████, the ████-chain form, or a mixture of the three.
███████████ creates a new ███████████ ██████ at the ████████-███████ carbon. The ███ group that ████████ the ██████████ oxygen ███ end up in two distinct positions relative to the ██████ ████████. Thus each ████-chain ██████████████ ██████ two ██████ ███████ (███████), denoted by the ████████ █- and █-. The ████████ can change between █████ two █████ by a process called ████████████, that ████████ in a ████████ of the ring-forming reaction ████████ by another ring formation.
███████ ██████████
The ██████████████ structure of a ██████ ██████████████ can be ███████████ in a ███████ ██████████. In this ███████, the █-██████ for the ████████ form of a █-██████████ has the ███ of the ████████ carbon below the █████ of the carbon atoms, while the █-██████ has the ███ of the ████████ carbon above the █████. █████████ █████████ █████ a █████ ████████████, similar to that of ███████████. In this ████████████, the █-██████ has the ███ of the ████████ carbon in an █████ position, ███████ the █-██████ has the ███ of the ████████ carbon in ██████████ position (considering █-██████████ sugars).
█-█-█████████████ █-█-████████████████████████
A █████ number of ████████████ █████████ ████████ ███████████████ █████:
Amino sugars such as: █████████████ ███████████ ██████ acid █-█████████████████ ███████████ such as: ██████████████ ██████ such as: ████████ acid ████████ ██████████ acid ██████████████ ████████████ ████████ sugar Sugar acid Sugar alcohol ████████████ of CarbohydratesKeep going!
It took me (I’m almost ashamed to say) 935 guesses .. and I only got there after I started looking online for clues.
AussieDJ said:
Keep going!It took me (I’m almost ashamed to say) 935 guesses .. and I only got there after I started looking online for clues.
i’m up to 736
sarahs mum said:
You still have time, then, to knock off the other 200 approx guesses. That is, if you need to go that far!
AussieDJ said:
Keep going!It took me (I’m almost ashamed to say) 935 guesses .. and I only got there after I started looking online for clues.
i’m up to 736
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:You still have time, then, to knock off the other 200 approx guesses. That is, if you need to go that far!
AussieDJ said:
Keep going!It took me (I’m almost ashamed to say) 935 guesses .. and I only got there after I started looking online for clues.
i’m up to 736
I’ve found that you can open todays in another browser and work on the two. But I am over this one. I hate it now.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:You still have time, then, to knock off the other 200 approx guesses. That is, if you need to go that far!i’m up to 736
I’ve found that you can open todays in another browser and work on the two. But I am over this one. I hate it now.
How to give you a clue without giving you a clue … … think a single, artificial sickly Mary Poppins, perhaps. (which may be even more obtuse than helpful :) )
AussieDJ said:
Keep going!It took me (I’m almost ashamed to say) 935 guesses .. and I only got there after I started looking online for clues.
I’m (shakes head in disgust) disgusted.
sibeen said:
AussieDJ said:
Keep going!It took me (I’m almost ashamed to say) 935 guesses .. and I only got there after I started looking online for clues.
I’m (shakes head in disgust) disgusted.
As well you may be! I had no idea .. and was going downhill fast.
took longer than it should have
Ooo err.
So that is today’s out but i am still stuck and I am still needing a clue for yesterdays.
sarahs mum said:
Ooo err.So that is today’s out but i am still stuck and I am still needing a clue for yesterdays.
Yesterday’s is the simplest type of sugar molecule. All other sugars are made up of versions of these molecules, so their name begins with the Greek prefix for “one”. a derivative of the rest of the name is sometimes used to refer to something (like movies, books, greeting cards, etc) that’s sickly sweet
I can’t think of a better clue without giving it away.
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
Ooo err.So that is today’s out but i am still stuck and I am still needing a clue for yesterdays.
Yesterday’s is the simplest type of sugar molecule. All other sugars are made up of versions of these molecules, so their name begins with the Greek prefix for “one”. a derivative of the rest of the name is sometimes used to refer to something (like movies, books, greeting cards, etc) that’s sickly sweet
I can’t think of a better clue without giving it away.
oh ta.. I just got it out then. I was all around it. lowest ever accuracy too.
Has anyone else noticed how many weasel words come up? Perhaps you have. Mostly and sometimes.
Today’s game is not too difficult – especially after the last couple of games.
40 minutes and 320 words.
AussieDJ said:
Today’s game is not too difficult – especially after the last couple of games.40 minutes and 320 words.
I’m up to 113 words. I’ve got enough out to worry that I should have it out by now.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Today’s game is not too difficult – especially after the last couple of games.40 minutes and 320 words.
I’m up to 113 words. I’ve got enough out to worry that I should have it out by now.
there she blows.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Today’s game is not too difficult – especially after the last couple of games.
40 minutes and 320 words.
I’m up to 113 words. I’ve got enough out to worry that I should have it out by now.
well we had to resort to visually inspecting the relevant documents to help
on success, it confirmed that our resort was necessary
we apologise again for being ignorant in this area
sarahs mum said:
Has anyone else noticed how many weasel words come up? Perhaps you have. Mostly and sometimes.
in scientific description you mean, or something else
we mean surely weasel depends on the intention, like seems a bit unfair if 60% of something applies, to say that ‘mostly’ is weaseling it
Got it out in 139.
Nearly everything I guessed was wrong until a short run of right words and I had it out. 35.97% accuracy.
sarahs mum said:
Got it out in 139.
Nearly everything I guessed was wrong until a short run of right words and I had it out. 35.97% accuracy.
well damn we were half as accurate and 4 times slower
After an abysmal effort yesterday, today’s was so much easier – 83 guesses!
btm said:
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 7 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
wow
95 here. 55.79%
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 7 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
wow
95 here. 55.79%
well we admit that btm contributed the hint we needed but the silly thing is that
the target is in a class of concepts where all of the major examples have the same number of letters
something we’dn’t thought about before
183 guesses 55.19% accuracy.
Just plain lucky, I think!
Got it in 16 guesses with an accuracy of 62.50%.
Took a bit longer today, but my accuracy is still good.
btm said:
Took a bit longer today, but my accuracy is still good.
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 22 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
damn. I am up to 85.
AussieDJ said:
Just plain lucky, I think!Got it in 16 guesses with an accuracy of 62.50%.
oh..
sigh.
118
59.32%
okay. so I was on the wrong track. I even got fox out first.
71 guesses. 82.69% accuracy.
sarahs mum said:
71 guesses. 82.69% accuracy.
Global Stats
Globally, 810 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 38.00 Guesses; 77.34% Accuracy Global Average: 51.48 Guesses; 76.97% Accuracysarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
71 guesses. 82.69% accuracy.
Global Stats
Globally, 810 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 38.00 Guesses; 77.34% Accuracy Global Average: 51.48 Guesses; 76.97% Accuracy
I’ve brought the average down with my effort today. It took me 291 guesses, for an average of 35.74%
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
71 guesses. 82.69% accuracy.
Global Stats
Globally, 810 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 38.00 Guesses; 77.34% Accuracy Global Average: 51.48 Guesses; 76.97% AccuracyI’ve brought the average down with my effort today. It took me 291 guesses, for an average of 35.74%
69 65.22%
spoiler warning
china
asia
europe
republic
government
democracy
first
election
build
animal
most
aeroplane
use
technology
world
war
history
century
not
life
can
their
they
she
he
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
71 guesses. 82.69% accuracy.
Global Stats
Globally, 810 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 38.00 Guesses; 77.34% Accuracy Global Average: 51.48 Guesses; 76.97% AccuracyI’ve brought the average down with my effort today. It took me 291 guesses, for an average of 35.74%
I got it in 90
117 46.15%
sarahs mum said:
117 46.15%
SCIENCE said:
spoiler warning
not
animal
group
are
their
there
no
they
use
water
land
text
which
that
can
south
SCIENCE said:
SCIENCE said:
spoiler warning
not
animal
group
are
their
there
no
they
use
water
land
text
which
that
can
south
Used a few guesses attempting to remember the correct spelling of Haeckel. fell asleep sometime shortly after that. I’ll get back to it.
███████
A ███████ is any ██████████ organism (that is, an organism █████ █████ ███████ a cell nucleus) that is not an animal, plant, or fungus. While it is ██████ that ████████ share a common ████████ (the ████ ██████████ common ████████), the █████████ of other ██████████ means that ████████ do not form a natural group, or █████. █████████, some ████████ may be ████ ███████ ███████ to animals, plants, or fungi than ████ are to other ████████; ███████, like the groups algae, █████████████, and ██████████, the biological category ███████ is used for ███████████. Others classify any ███████████ ██████████ █████████████ as a ███████. The study of ████████ is ██████ ████████████.
History
The classification of a █████ kingdom ████████ from animals and plants was first ████████ by ████ ████ in ████ as the kingdom ███████████; in ████ Ernst Haeckel ████ ████████ a █████ kingdom ████████ as “the kingdom of █████████ forms”. ██████████ █████ ████ ████████ ███████████, but with ████ █████ ████ ███████ to a ██████ kingdom ██████.
In the ███████ ████-kingdom ██████ ████████ by ██████ █████████ in ████, ████████ was defined as ██████████ “organisms which are ███████████ or ███████████-████████ and which form no ███████”, and the █████ kingdom Fungi was ███████████. In the ████-kingdom ██████ of ████ ████████, the term ███████ is ████████ for microscopic organisms, while the ████ █████████ kingdom ███████████ (or ███████████) ████████ ███████ █████ █████████████ ██████████, ████ as ████, red algae, and █████ █████. Some ███ the term ███████ ███████████████ with ██████████ ██████████, to █████████ ████ single-celled and █████████████ ██████████, █████████ █████ that form ███████████ ███████ but do not ███ into any of the other ███████████ ████████.
███████████
███████ █████ ██████████ simple ██████ of ████████████, ████████ do not ███████████ ████ much in common. When used, the term “████████” is ███ considered to ████ a ████████████ ██████████ of similar-█████████ but ███████ ████ (biological groups); █████ ████ do not ████ an █████████ common ████████ beyond being ████████ of ██████████, and ████ different life cycles, ███████ ██████, █████ of ██████████, and cellular ██████████.
Examples of ████████ ███████:
███████ (█████████ ███████████ and ████████████); █████████████████; ████████; Diatoms; ███████████████; ███████; ██████████ (which ██████ ███████); █████████ (█████████ ████████████, the █████ of the █████ ██████ of ███████); and █████ █████.█████ examples are ███████████, ████████ █████████ can ████ to form █████████, and █████ █████ can █████████ into a ██████-like mass.
In █████████ ███████ (███████████████ █████ on common ████████), █████ are no ███████████ to the ████ ████████ or ███████████, as ████ █████ █████ to a ████████████ group that █████ the ██████ ██████████ ██████ of the tree of life. In █████████ classification, the ████████ of ████████ are ██████ ███████████ among ███████ ███████████: examples ███████ the
███ ██████████ (of █████████████ or ███████████, ██████████, and ████████); ██████████████ (or ███████ █████ ████); ████████ (which is ██████ ███████████ ███████████); and ████████████ (which ████████ ████████ ███████████ ███████████, but ████ animals and fungi).“████████”, “███████████”, and “Protozoa” are █████████ considered ████████. ███████, the term “███████” █████████ to be used ██████████ as a catch-all term for ██████████ organisms that are not within other ███████████ ████████. For example, the ████ “███████ ████████” may be used to ██████ any ███████-███████ organism that is not plant, animal, fungal, ███████████, viral, or ████████.
35 51.43%
Arts said:
35 51.43%
no.
damn.
*despairs
once I got the three words it was not, I went on a roll.
Arts said:
once I got the three words it was not, I went on a roll.
I’m on 470 and I am sure it has been staring me in the face for ages.
sarahs mum said:
Arts said:
once I got the three words it was not, I went on a roll.
I’m on 470 and I am sure it has been staring me in the face for ages.
you probably don’t want to see the global stats then
Arts said:
sarahs mum said:
Arts said:
once I got the three words it was not, I went on a roll.
I’m on 470 and I am sure it has been staring me in the face for ages.
you probably don’t want to see the global stats then
no.
A ███████ is any ██████████ organism (that is, an organism █████ █████ ███████ a cell nucleus) that is not an animal, plant, or fungus. While it is ██████ that ████████ share a common ████████ (the ████ ██████████ common ████████), the █████████ of other ██████████ means that ████████ do not form a natural group, or █████. Therefore, some ████████ may be more closely related to animals, plants, or fungi than they are to other ████████; ███████, like the groups algae, █████████████, and ██████████, the biological category ███████ is used for ███████████. Others classify any unicellular ██████████ █████████████ as a ███████. The study of ████████ is ██████ ████████████.
I don’t get to play this every day, but I like this one, it’s far more challenging than the others IMO.
Arts said:
I don’t get to play this every day, but I like this one, it’s far more challenging than the others IMO.
I also like this one.
But not today.
sarahs mum said:
Arts said:
sarahs mum said:I’m on 470 and I am sure it has been staring me in the face for ages.
you probably don’t want to see the global stats then
no.
A ███████ is any ██████████ organism (that is, an organism █████ █████ ███████ a cell nucleus) that is not an animal, plant, or fungus. While it is ██████ that ████████ share a common ████████ (the ████ ██████████ common ████████), the █████████ of other ██████████ means that ████████ do not form a natural group, or █████. Therefore, some ████████ may be more closely related to animals, plants, or fungi than they are to other ████████; ███████, like the groups algae, █████████████, and ██████████, the biological category ███████ is used for ███████████. Others classify any unicellular ██████████ █████████████ as a ███████. The study of ████████ is ██████ ████████████.
yeah once I started thinking after this “ that is not an animal, plant, or fungus. “ the scale gets much smaller. I learned about them after doing some underwater forensics.
Arts said:
sarahs mum said:
Arts said:you probably don’t want to see the global stats then
no.
A ███████ is any ██████████ organism (that is, an organism █████ █████ ███████ a cell nucleus) that is not an animal, plant, or fungus. While it is ██████ that ████████ share a common ████████ (the ████ ██████████ common ████████), the █████████ of other ██████████ means that ████████ do not form a natural group, or █████. Therefore, some ████████ may be more closely related to animals, plants, or fungi than they are to other ████████; ███████, like the groups algae, █████████████, and ██████████, the biological category ███████ is used for ███████████. Others classify any unicellular ██████████ █████████████ as a ███████. The study of ████████ is ██████ ████████████.
yeah once I started thinking after this “ that is not an animal, plant, or fungus. “ the scale gets much smaller. I learned about them after doing some underwater forensics.
i’ve thrown good words at it.
Just not the right word.
sarahs mum said:
Arts said:
sarahs mum said:no.
A ███████ is any ██████████ organism (that is, an organism █████ █████ ███████ a cell nucleus) that is not an animal, plant, or fungus. While it is ██████ that ████████ share a common ████████ (the ████ ██████████ common ████████), the █████████ of other ██████████ means that ████████ do not form a natural group, or █████. Therefore, some ████████ may be more closely related to animals, plants, or fungi than they are to other ████████; ███████, like the groups algae, █████████████, and ██████████, the biological category ███████ is used for ███████████. Others classify any unicellular ██████████ █████████████ as a ███████. The study of ████████ is ██████ ████████████.
yeah once I started thinking after this “ that is not an animal, plant, or fungus. “ the scale gets much smaller. I learned about them after doing some underwater forensics.
i’ve thrown good words at it.
Just not the right word.
some days that’s just going to happen, :/
Arts said:
sarahs mum said:
Arts said:yeah once I started thinking after this “ that is not an animal, plant, or fungus. “ the scale gets much smaller. I learned about them after doing some underwater forensics.
i’ve thrown good words at it.
Just not the right word.
some days that’s just going to happen, :/
I remember in one lecture they talked about finding a drowned man but during foresics they found diatoms in his lungs that proved he had been drowned in a different body of water but then the body was moved.
I’m probably going to have arted with today’s word…
sarahs mum said:
Arts said:
once I got the three words it was not, I went on a roll.
I’m on 470 and I am sure it has been staring me in the face for ages.
I googled, Just as well. I have never heard of them.
sarahs mum said:
I googled, Just as well. I have never heard of them.
The same .. and doubly so!
sarahs mum said:
Arts said:
sarahs mum said:i’ve thrown good words at it.
Just not the right word.
some days that’s just going to happen, :/
I remember in one lecture they talked about finding a drowned man but during foresics they found diatoms in his lungs that proved he had been drowned in a different body of water but then the body was moved.
I’m probably going to have arted with today’s word…
:). you got it :)
Right! Next Redactle is up.
Have at it!
AussieDJ said:
Right! Next Redactle is up.Have at it!
122 words later…i might be getting somewhere.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Right! Next Redactle is up.Have at it!
122 words later…i might be getting somewhere.
161 62.73%
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Right! Next Redactle is up.Have at it!
122 words later…i might be getting somewhere.
161 62.73%
Just keep plugging in the guesses until, eventually …
467 30.41%
Getting worse.
btm said:
Getting worse.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #38!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 33 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
still flash.
189 at 54.50%
I should have done better than that.
sarahs mum said:
189 at 54.50%I should have done better than that.
After all, you could have gone to 539 at 22.82% before you got the solution …
LOL apparently we’re sarahs mum as well
169 54.44%
sarahs mum said:
169 54.44%
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #40!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 59 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
You are good at this.
114. 54.39%
Better than my more-recent efforts:
255 25.49%
SCIENCE said:
LOL apparently we’re sarahs mum as well
and again
Grrr! American spelling.
95 guesses for 41.05%.
AussieDJ said:
Grrr! American spelling.95 guesses for 41.05%.
I also curse American spelling having entered the word to be told I was wrong way back there.
55 guesses and 80% accuracy.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:Grrr! American spelling.95 guesses for 41.05%.
I also curse American spelling having entered the word to be told I was wrong way back there.
55 guesses and 80% accuracy.
Good result, though!
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:Grrr! American spelling.95 guesses for 41.05%.
I also curse American spelling having entered the word to be told I was wrong way back there.
55 guesses and 80% accuracy.
Good result, though!
redactle tells me that the world has done it faster and more economically than self. But I did try to not do as many stab in the darks. (although my second guess was theatre because I saw a capitalised ‘Round’)
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:I also curse American spelling having entered the word to be told I was wrong way back there.
55 guesses and 80% accuracy.
Good result, though!
redactle tells me that the world has done it faster and more economically than self. But I did try to not do as many stab in the darks. (although my second guess was theatre because I saw a capitalised ‘Round’)
Funnily enough, my first word was ‘rounds’, followed shortly afterwards by ‘made’ and then ‘agreements’.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:Good result, though!
redactle tells me that the world has done it faster and more economically than self. But I did try to not do as many stab in the darks. (although my second guess was theatre because I saw a capitalised ‘Round’)
I usually do a lot of ‘stab in the darks’. Just keep plugging words in until I start to see a pattern – or not.Funnily enough, my first word was ‘rounds’, followed shortly afterwards by ‘made’ and then ‘agreements’.
I go for the are, can, such, much, many, where, were, there, their, will, who, them, they, its, type words.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Grrr! American spelling.95 guesses for 41.05%.
I also curse American spelling having entered the word to be told I was wrong way back there.
55 guesses and 80% accuracy.
Good result, though!
redactle tells me that the world has done it faster and more economically than self. But I did try to not do as many stab in the darks. (although my second guess was theatre because I saw a capitalised ‘Round’)
I usually do a lot of ‘stab in the darks’. Just keep plugging words in until I start to see a pattern – or not.
Funnily enough, my first word was ‘rounds’, followed shortly afterwards by ‘made’ and then ‘agreements’.
I go for the are, can, such, much, many, where, were, there, their, will, who, them, they, its, type words.
we normally do but if we could fkn count and weren’t obsessed about preventing COVID-19 then we wouldn’t have wasted a 6-letter on a 5-letter and it would have been perfect
up to, as youse say, the fkn USSAcans and their spelling
spooler warring
oh sudden surprise
SCIENCE said:
oh sudden surprise
I went to sleep without finishing the redactle. I have a lot of it out. I have enough out to think that I don’t know/never heard of the answer. I might need to google.
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
oh sudden surprise
I went to sleep without finishing the redactle. I have a lot of it out. I have enough out to think that I don’t know/never heard of the answer. I might need to google.
I did know it.
That was a long and painful redactle for me. I suppose it shouldn’t have been that hard.
383 75.20%
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
oh sudden surprise
I went to sleep without finishing the redactle. I have a lot of it out. I have enough out to think that I don’t know/never heard of the answer. I might need to google.
I did know it.
That was a long and painful redactle for me. I suppose it shouldn’t have been that hard.
383 75.20%
yeah as forum all know we’re terrible people people so whenever a puzzle comes up that’s clearly a popular cultural identity we just think ah fk
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:sarahs mum said:
I went to sleep without finishing the redactle. I have a lot of it out. I have enough out to think that I don’t know/never heard of the answer. I might need to google.
I did know it.
That was a long and painful redactle for me. I suppose it shouldn’t have been that hard.
383 75.20%
yeah as forum all know we’re terrible people people so whenever a puzzle comes up that’s clearly a popular cultural identity we just think ah fk
he was one of Sarah’s favourite authors but I kept trying to banish him.
A bit better today.
btm said:
A bit better today.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #43!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 10 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
you are just so good at this game.
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
A bit better today.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #43!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 10 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
you are just so good at this game.
Probably comes from wasting so much time on wikipedia :)
Have you stopped doing semantle? You were getting really good at that.
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
A bit better today.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #43!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 10 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
you are just so good at this game.
Probably comes from wasting so much time on wikipedia :)
Have you stopped doing semantle? You were getting really good at that.
i’m tinkering with semantle now i have finished redactling. Third guess 826/1000. Now I will fill it in I suppose.
But semantle has been miffing me some.
Surprised myself. Conquered this one very quickly!
Today – 21 guesses with an accuracy of 71.43%
AussieDJ said:
Surprised myself. Conquered this one very quickly!Today – 21 guesses with an accuracy of 71.43%
dafter. but more accurate. 88 guesses for 86.36%
I was expecting it to be harder than that.
yeah didn’t know fkal about this one so had to use an external reference but we knew what to look for
And another one bites the dust! Still, it’s mostly luck.
74 guesses with an accuracy of 54.05% for the Sunday game
well this one was a bit surprising
I fell asleep last night. Just caught up with redactle.
62 88.71%
78 79.49%
sarahs mum said:
78 79.49%
< Sigh >
Don’t know why I bother, sometimes :(
something to do with a mild addiction, perhaps?
329 guesses for 26.75%
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
78 79.49%
< Sigh >
Don’t know why I bother, sometimes :(
something to do with a mild addiction, perhaps?329 guesses for 26.75%
I was sure for a while that I had no chance.
I thought it was going to be an archaeopteryx or some such.
nice
The answer was: alligator
You solved it in 81 guesses
Your accuracy was 49.38%
You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Bogsnorkler said:
The answer was: alligator
You solved it in 81 guesses
Your accuracy was 49.38%
You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
hey here’s something
The two extant species are the American alligator (A. mississippiensis) and the Chinese alligator (A. sinensis). Alligators are native to only the United States, Mexico, and China.
maybe instead of all the trade wars and Pacific Wars and all the shit
they can just have a competition of crocodilians
fn physics.
so many wrong guesses. and I know that many of you would have had it out ages ago.
303 53.80%
I should have done better even though physics is not my thing. I did know this. sort of.
huh even though they left things like Pa and Hz in there it wasn’t exactly a walk in the park
sarahs mum said:
fn physics.so many wrong guesses. and I know that many of you would have had it out ages ago.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
fn physics.
so many wrong guesses. and I know that many of you would have had it out ages ago.
Not necessarily – 293 29.35%
yeah subtle right
Another fluke result.
Solved in 84 guesses: 32.14% accuracy
AussieDJ said:
Another fluke result.Solved in 84 guesses: 32.14% accuracy
51 76.47%
I should have guessed earlier. Ah.
well …
… all right then
guess it was either that or top gun
this one was fairly quick but we loosely wasted quite a few
Took me a while … 248 guesses, for an accuracy of 36.29%
I just couldn’t get onto the wavelength.
i’m still plodding along
95 83.16%
—
I hope it isn’t physics again tomorrow night.
sarahs mum said:
95 83.16%—
I hope it isn’t physics again tomorrow night.
we got silly, had we been a bit more serious about it like shooting the red sea one, we should have seen the plus and minus bits and possibly done another 2 but no
Funny how you keep dancing around and then, suddenly, the answer pops out at you!
323 guesses for an accuracy of 42.11%
104 96.15%
That is my most accurate redactle yet. I thought for a little while that I did not have any idea about this topic but I was wrong.
sigh if only we’d paid attention to all the “no” motifs damn
SCIENCE said:
i did. But I did not know what that meant.
sigh if only we’d paid attention to all the “no” motifs damn
I did 96.15 accuracy on this one. I tried hard not to guess wildly. I would have got there faster if I had gone some of my hunches.
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
i did. But I did not know what that meant.sigh if only we'd paid attention to all the "-no-" motifs damn
I did 96.15 accuracy on this one. I tried hard not to guess wildly. I would have got there faster if I had gone some of my hunches.
that Textile formatting trick, fixed
we figured the motifs meant something Japanese but we only -no-ticed after 32 after burning like 20 moves on common filler type words
Just keep plugging the words in and eventually an idea pops up.
232 guesses for an accuracy of 15.52%
AussieDJ said:
Just keep plugging the words in and eventually an idea pops up.232 guesses for an accuracy of 15.52%
Its not going to be 91% accuracy for me tonight either.
ugh
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Just keep plugging the words in and eventually an idea pops up.232 guesses for an accuracy of 15.52%
Its not going to be 91% accuracy for me tonight either.
91%? Heavens!
I normally get around the 20s or 30s.
Although, having mentioned that, I did score 71.43% with William the Conqueror a week or two ago.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Just keep plugging the words in and eventually an idea pops up.232 guesses for an accuracy of 15.52%
Its not going to be 91% accuracy for me tonight either.
91%? Heavens!
I normally get around the 20s or 30s.
Although, having mentioned that, I did score 71.43% with William the Conqueror a week or two ago.
I scored last night. Dreamt about a perfect score for today. Which is now looking to be the worst ever.
samurai 104 96.15%
150 46.00%
Plodding along and plugging in, hopefully, usable words or numbers.
Today’s game took me 408 guesses, for an accuracy of 38.97%
AussieDJ said:
Plodding along and plugging in, hopefully, usable words or numbers.Today’s game took me 408 guesses, for an accuracy of 38.97%
Yep, it was a bit obscure. I was 300 plus before managing to get a few good hits, then ms Kingy nailed it from nowhere.
Kingy said:
AussieDJ said:
Plodding along and plugging in, hopefully, usable words or numbers.Today’s game took me 408 guesses, for an accuracy of 38.97%
Yep, it was a bit obscure. I was 300 plus before managing to get a few good hits, then ms Kingy nailed it from nowhere.
I fell asleep last night with it unsolved. It took another 30 guesses today.
134 guesses at 81.34% accuracy.
sarahs mum said:
Kingy said:
AussieDJ said:
Plodding along and plugging in, hopefully, usable words or numbers.
Today’s game took me 408 guesses, for an accuracy of 38.97%
Yep, it was a bit obscure. I was 300 plus before managing to get a few good hits, then ms Kingy nailed it from nowhere.
I fell asleep last night with it unsolved. It took another 30 guesses today.
134 guesses at 81.34% accuracy.
we had to do targeted look up again
Ms Kingy is nailing this game. I’m barely even helping.
Kingy said:
- 49 guesses 75.51%
Ms Kingy is nailing this game. I’m barely even helping.
That’s a good result I reckon.
Still BtM had a run of 100%ers.
I’m trying to bag me one of them.
sarahs mum said:
Kingy said:
- 49 guesses 75.51%
Ms Kingy is nailing this game. I’m barely even helping.
That’s a good result I reckon.
Still BtM had a run of 100%ers.
I’m trying to bag me one of them.
I’m just trying to score anything relatively low!
I tend to average around 300 guesses before I even start to see a pattern emerging …
(Sigh) 17 minutes to get the result. More luck than anything else, I suspect.
228 guesses for an accuracy of 23.68%
AussieDJ said:
(Sigh) 17 minutes to get the result. More luck than anything else, I suspect.228 guesses for an accuracy of 23.68%
still plodding. tonight will not be the night for a good accuracy score. I’ve certainly blown that.
also. fn physics.
sarahs mum said:
also. fn physics.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
also. fn physics.
If I may take the liberty, I’d say chemistry more than physics.
Ah. It has my physics hackles up.
Is there a chance I don’t know this?
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
also. fn physics.
If I may take the liberty, I’d say chemistry more than physics.Ah. It has my physics hackles up.
Is there a chance I don’t know this?
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:If I may take the liberty, I’d say chemistry more than physics.
Ah. It has my physics hackles up.
Is there a chance I don’t know this?
(My) not knowing your background makes it difficult for me to tell.
Dare I offer a spoiler (more than I have already)? :)
I have Masters of Fine Art. I did do full strand sciences at high school. In the 70s. But a lot of it refused to go in.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:Ah. It has my physics hackles up.
Is there a chance I don’t know this?
(My) not knowing your background makes it difficult for me to tell.
Dare I offer a spoiler (more than I have already)? :)I have Masters of Fine Art. I did do full strand sciences at high school. In the 70s. But a lot of it refused to go in.
Thank you. I recognise the ‘lot of it refused to go in’ part. I did a year of Economics in high school – to the same effect.
I also did Chemistry in Year 12 – didn’t go so well in that subject either.
I think the nice thing about this forum is the way we bond together.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:(My) not knowing your background makes it difficult for me to tell.
Dare I offer a spoiler (more than I have already)? :)I have Masters of Fine Art. I did do full strand sciences at high school. In the 70s. But a lot of it refused to go in.
Thank you. I recognise the ‘lot of it refused to go in’ part. I did a year of Economics in high school – to the same effect.
I also did Chemistry in Year 12 – didn’t go so well in that subject either.
I think the nice thing about this forum is the way we bond together.
I had bonding. Not bond or bonds. ta.
I have ions and electrons and molescules and valency. but I am missing something as important as valency. It is very physics no matter what you want to call it.sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:I have Masters of Fine Art. I did do full strand sciences at high school. In the 70s. But a lot of it refused to go in.
Thank you. I recognise the ‘lot of it refused to go in’ part. I did a year of Economics in high school – to the same effect.
I also did Chemistry in Year 12 – didn’t go so well in that subject either.
I think the nice thing about this forum is the way we bond together.
I had bonding. Not bond or bonds. ta.
I have ions and electrons and molescules and valency. but I am missing something as important as valency. It is very physics no matter what you want to call it.
Trying to give you a hint without giving it away …
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
also. fn physics.
If I may take the liberty, I’d say chemistry more than physics.
The liberty reference was to a Gene Pitney song from the early 1960s. I think it may still have been a bit too subtle.
(The Man Who Shot) Liberty Valance.
At least you got to the answer
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:Trying to give you a hint without giving it away …
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
also. fn physics.
If I may take the liberty, I’d say chemistry more than physics.The liberty reference was to a Gene Pitney song from the early 1960s. I think it may still have been a bit too subtle.
(The Man Who Shot) Liberty Valance.At least you got to the answer
Yes I missed that. although I know the song. My sister played it endlessly. She was a fan.
Thinking after I hit Submit.
Not subtle – incomplete!
I don’t remember hearing the song on the radio. I might have been a bit too young when it came out, but I certainly played it more than a few times in later years.
I didn’t start listening to ‘pop’ music until I was in my mid-teens, when I realised that I’d better broaden my musical education if I was to have any chance or anything in common with the girls who went to the same school as me. Until then, I’d mainly been listening to classical music.
AussieDJ said:
Thinking after I hit Submit.Not subtle – incomplete!
I don’t remember hearing the song on the radio. I might have been a bit too young when it came out, but I certainly played it more than a few times in later years.
I didn’t start listening to ‘pop’ music until I was in my mid-teens, when I realised that I’d better broaden my musical education if I was to have any chance or anything in common with the girls who went to the same school as me. Until then, I’d mainly been listening to classical music.
My sister was ten years older. We shared a room. So in 1964 I was 6 but she was 16. And we were serious Beatle fans. there were a lot of 45s. Alison played guitar in an elementary folky way as was the times.
But I listened to a lot of classical music. I was given a box of 78s. Dad was drum major. Mum played the piano well.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Thinking after I hit Submit.Not subtle – incomplete!
I don’t remember hearing the song on the radio. I might have been a bit too young when it came out, but I certainly played it more than a few times in later years.
I didn’t start listening to ‘pop’ music until I was in my mid-teens, when I realised that I’d better broaden my musical education if I was to have any chance or anything in common with the girls who went to the same school as me. Until then, I’d mainly been listening to classical music.
My sister was ten years older. We shared a room. So in 1964 I was 6 but she was 16. And we were serious Beatle fans. there were a lot of 45s. Alison played guitar in an elementary folky way as was the times.
But I listened to a lot of classical music. I was given a box of 78s. Dad was drum major. Mum played the piano well.
eclectic. I did eclectic.
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Thinking after I hit Submit.Not subtle – incomplete!
I don’t remember hearing the song on the radio. I might have been a bit too young when it came out, but I certainly played it more than a few times in later years.
I didn’t start listening to ‘pop’ music until I was in my mid-teens, when I realised that I’d better broaden my musical education if I was to have any chance or anything in common with the girls who went to the same school as me. Until then, I’d mainly been listening to classical music.
My sister was ten years older. We shared a room. So in 1964 I was 6 but she was 16. And we were serious Beatle fans. there were a lot of 45s. Alison played guitar in an elementary folky way as was the times.
But I listened to a lot of classical music. I was given a box of 78s. Dad was drum major. Mum played the piano well.
eclectic. I did eclectic.
My cousins had some good music. They also had a very good stereo system, so we used to visit them to listen to their Beatles and Stones collection, along with their classical collection. My parents – especially my father – loved classical music.
I didn’t start a record collection until the early 70s, when I won 10 singles and 10 LPs in a 3XY Rocktober promotion*. I still have those LPs. I’m not sure where the singles have gone to, though.
*I didn’t get into radio until a few years later, so it was a legitimate win. Nothing shonky about it.
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Thinking after I hit Submit.Not subtle – incomplete!
I don’t remember hearing the song on the radio. I might have been a bit too young when it came out, but I certainly played it more than a few times in later years.
I didn’t start listening to ‘pop’ music until I was in my mid-teens, when I realised that I’d better broaden my musical education if I was to have any chance or anything in common with the girls who went to the same school as me. Until then, I’d mainly been listening to classical music.
My sister was ten years older. We shared a room. So in 1964 I was 6 but she was 16. And we were serious Beatle fans. there were a lot of 45s. Alison played guitar in an elementary folky way as was the times.
But I listened to a lot of classical music. I was given a box of 78s. Dad was drum major. Mum played the piano well.
eclectic. I did eclectic.
Although I was somewhat miffed when someone suggested I had catholic tastes, until I looked up the definition.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:My sister was ten years older. We shared a room. So in 1964 I was 6 but she was 16. And we were serious Beatle fans. there were a lot of 45s. Alison played guitar in an elementary folky way as was the times.
But I listened to a lot of classical music. I was given a box of 78s. Dad was drum major. Mum played the piano well.
eclectic. I did eclectic.
Your sister would have been a little older than me – I turned 14 in 1964.My cousins had some good music. They also had a very good stereo system, so we used to visit them to listen to their Beatles and Stones collection, along with their classical collection. My parents – especially my father – loved classical music.
I didn’t start a record collection until the early 70s, when I won 10 singles and 10 LPs in a 3XY Rocktober promotion*. I still have those LPs. I’m not sure where the singles have gone to, though.
*I didn’t get into radio until a few years later, so it was a legitimate win. Nothing shonky about it.
I was so sad when Alison went to the stadium and saw the Beatles and I could not go to.
Brother Andrew had terrible taste in music. brother John was into Dylan. And jazz.
237 51.90%
(US spelling)
So I got it out 100 guesses ago.
Damn.
sarahs mum said:
237 51.90%(US spelling)
So I got it out 100 guesses ago.
Damn.
sarahs mum said:
I was so sad when Alison went to the stadium and saw the Beatles and I could not go to.
Brother Andrew had terrible taste in music. brother John was into Dylan. And jazz.
There were only two children in my family. I’m lucky in that my brother and I are similar in both liking the same music.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
(US spelling)
Damn.
Stoopid America spelling!
agree
Can’t say I’m overly rapt with this result. But then, any victory is sweet, I suppose.
294 guesses, for an accuracy of 14.97%
What is galling is the answer could have been derived from some of the posts immediately preceding this one!
93 38.71%
I didn’t like that one either.
SCIENCE said:
agree
well uh we blame this part
██████ per ██████ █████
and then realised that
(██████: ██)
would then have to be some kind of abbreviation
Don’t you hate it when you’re dancing around the topic, but just can’t quite reach the answer?
355 guesses for an accuracy of 29.58%
AussieDJ said:
Don’t you hate it when you’re dancing around the topic, but just can’t quite reach the answer?
355 guesses for an accuracy of 29.58%
yes a bit like a vortex as they say
Fewer attempts this time .. but still too many for my liking.
Got to the answer in 138 guesses, for an accuracy of 30.43%
AussieDJ said:
Fewer attempts this time .. but still too many for my liking.Got to the answer in 138 guesses, for an accuracy of 30.43%
99
38.3% accuracy
Cymek said:
AussieDJ said:
Fewer attempts this time .. but still too many for my liking.Got to the answer in 138 guesses, for an accuracy of 30.43%
99
38.3% accuracy
i started it but then the painkiller caught up with me. Ill try again later.
damn we stupid, got one half done early, then took 75% longer again for the other
120 53.33%
sarahs mum said:
120 53.33%
147 50.34%
This game is addictive.
That’s all I can – and want to – say
373 guesses to get out what should have been an obvious answer!
Accuracy: 39.68%
AussieDJ said:
This game is addictive.
That’s all I can – and want to – say373 guesses to get out what should have been an obvious answer!
Accuracy: 39.68%
still pottering. trying to be careful. but i have already blown the chance of perfect
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
This game is addictive.
That’s all I can – and want to – say373 guesses to get out what should have been an obvious answer!
Accuracy: 39.68%
still pottering. trying to be careful. but i have already blown the chance of perfect
sleep. I’ll finish tomorrow.
didn’t finish the redactle last night. painkiller kicked in.
But I got it out second guess today.
120 77.50%
Sigh.
296 guesses for an accuracy of 33.78%
Another couple of guesses might have given me an accuracy of 33.33%. That would have been a record …
I’ll see myself out.
AussieDJ said:
Sigh.296 guesses for an accuracy of 33.78%
Another couple of guesses might have given me an accuracy of 33.33%. That would have been a record …
I’ll see myself out.
Im taking it slow.
I havent got a bum guess…yet
had to look up a reference again but question is how to play the previous day’s puzzle, sorry we fell asleep and missed it
SCIENCE said:
had to look up a reference again but question is how to play the previous day’s puzzle, sorry we fell asleep and missed it
I’m not sure you can go back.
SCIENCE said:
had to look up a reference again but question is how to play the previous day’s puzzle, sorry we fell asleep and missed it
i’d get this out in no time with a map of western sub saharan africa,
129 87.60%
Luckily nearly all the names of west african countries I threw at it were in the text.
My wife, who had studied and loved History, would have got this in a flash, no doubt.
It took me a little longer – 238 guesses for 35.71% accuracy.
It didn’t help to get distracted into thinking this was about an American.
there you go, something we have nfi about
sarahs mum said:
Just did a run of 58 correct words. But then I blew it. And I was being so careful.104 goes
95.19% accuracy.
It was easier than I thought in the end.
Lucky guess … with a bit of basic chemistry thrown in …
89 guesses to get to the correct solution >>> accuracy of 25.84%
AussieDJ said:
Lucky guess … with a bit of basic chemistry thrown in …89 guesses to get to the correct solution >>> accuracy of 25.84%
already? already already?
(did you see my result from yesterday’s slow and steady?)
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Lucky guess … with a bit of basic chemistry thrown in …89 guesses to get to the correct solution >>> accuracy of 25.84%
already? already already?
(did you see my result from yesterday’s slow and steady?)
You’re so much more considered than I am … I just toss words in willy-nilly, hoping that one of them will give me a hit and a pointer in the right direction.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Lucky guess … with a bit of basic chemistry thrown in …89 guesses to get to the correct solution >>> accuracy of 25.84%
already? already already?
(did you see my result from yesterday’s slow and steady?)
You’re so much more considered than I am … I just toss words in willy-nilly, hoping that one of them will give me a hit and a pointer in the right direction.
I am trying to get a perfect score under my belt. It will happen. but not today. I’m going to stuff this one up soon.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:already? already already?
(did you see my result from yesterday’s slow and steady?)
You’re so much more considered than I am … I just toss words in willy-nilly, hoping that one of them will give me a hit and a pointer in the right direction.
I am trying to get a perfect score under my belt. It will happen. but not today. I’m going to stuff this one up soon.
You shouldn’t really – just think of some basic chemistry. You would have learned about it in early high school
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:You’re so much more considered than I am … I just toss words in willy-nilly, hoping that one of them will give me a hit and a pointer in the right direction.
I am trying to get a perfect score under my belt. It will happen. but not today. I’m going to stuff this one up soon.
You shouldn’t really – just think of some basic chemistry. You would have learned about it in early high school
Ill have faith then. But it ain’t going to be pretty.
um….
23 91.30%
sarahs mum said:
um….23 91.30%
See? I knew you’d get it!
Well done!
well thank skux we didn’t rush in with “atom” the moment we saw “An”, had a scroll, saw plenty of subscripts, it didn’t make sense
spoiler 
alert
eventually figured they really did have to be formulas but couldn’t work out why there were so many terminal subscripts
turns out they were (aq) and (liq) and stuff, should have known
The usual dancing around, before jumping in for the kill
159 guesses, for an accuracy of 40.88%
39 guesses 97.44% accuracy.
sarahs mum said:
39 guesses 97.44% accuracy.
Excellent result, sm!
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
39 guesses 97.44% accuracy.Excellent result, sm!
during disbelief. what? Africa? again?
sarahs mum said:
what? Africa? again?
well we guess there are more countries there than like say North America or Australia but yeah frustratingly
nevertheless we guessed “republic” “country” “coast” “second” “largest” “bordered” and consulted the appropriate visual reference material 
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:what? Africa? again?
well we guess there are more countries there than like say North America or Australia but yeah frustratingly
- north/south, east/west are isobytic
- Africa/Europe are isobytic
- second/fourth/eighth are isobytic
- Atlantic/Southern are isobytic
nevertheless we guessed “republic” “country” “coast” “second” “largest” “bordered” and consulted the appropriate visual reference material
I guesed the answer thinking it was going to be the bordering country.
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:what? Africa? again?
well we guess there are more countries there than like say North America or Australia but yeah frustratingly
- north/south, east/west are isobytic
- Africa/Europe are isobytic
- second/fourth/eighth are isobytic
- Atlantic/Southern are isobytic
nevertheless we guessed “republic” “country” “coast” “second” “largest” “bordered” and consulted the appropriate visual reference material
I’m pleased to see that I’m not alone in consulting various reference materials.
AussieDJ said:
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:what? Africa? again?
well we guess there are more countries there than like say North America or Australia but yeah frustratingly
- north/south, east/west are isobytic
- Africa/Europe are isobytic
- second/fourth/eighth are isobytic
- Atlantic/Southern are isobytic
nevertheless we guessed “republic” “country” “coast” “second” “largest” “bordered” and consulted the appropriate visual reference material
I’m pleased to see that I’m not alone in consulting various reference materials.
my semantle today is at 891/1000
If it isn’t out sometime around midnight or so I will probably ask for hint or three. but if I put a ‘you got it out 64’ up it is a score with no hints.
But i don’t have a life. some people need to be getting on with stuff.
John, who was one of my greatest loves, had a half brother. I never met him. He had been a green beret in Vietnam and after the war ended he went to Angola to fight as a partisan. No one heard of him again.
I’ve been think about the Tony I never knew lots today. I trigger so easily.
sarahs mum said:
John, who was one of my greatest loves, had a half brother. I never met him. He had been a green beret in Vietnam and after the war ended he went to Angola to fight as a partisan. No one heard of him again.I’ve been think about the Tony I never knew lots today. I trigger so easily.
thinking
sarahs mum said:
I trigger so easily.
Yep. Know the feeling
It might only take something as insignificant as a song – and I’m gone.AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:I trigger so easily.
Yep. Know the feeling
It might only take something as insignificant as a song – and I’m gone.
oh me too.
Hmmm.
Okay, here’s the worst-case target you have to beat: 224 guesses for an accuracy of 32.14%
We’ve heard of this bloke, and knew of him here, but he wasn’t one of ‘ours’.
AussieDJ said:
Hmmm.Okay, here’s the worst-case target you have to beat: 224 guesses for an accuracy of 32.14%
We’ve heard of this bloke, and knew of him here, but he wasn’t one of ‘ours’.
Ive only made 19 guesses. But I have made a cup of tea and done the dishes.
37 for today’s
Cymek said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Hmmm.
Okay, here’s the worst-case target you have to beat: 224 guesses for an accuracy of 32.14%
We’ve heard of this bloke, and knew of him here, but he wasn’t one of ‘ours’.
Ive only made 19 guesses. But I have made a cup of tea and done the dishes.
37 for today’s
so yeah we fully had to look this one up because well never heard of it
anyway knew it was going to be a person
not many 2 letter names to kick off figured the first would be Edward and the italics would be The Ed ???????? Show so just put The Ed Show in search and looked for 
a length match
call it cheating if you like and yes we guarantee we would never* have gotten it regardless so it was the only way
*: we mean, we could test all 8-character sequences but that’s not really the game
SCIENCE said:
Cymek said:sarahs mum said:
Ive only made 19 guesses. But I have made a cup of tea and done the dishes.
37 for today’s
so yeah we fully had to look this one up because well never heard of it
anyway knew it was going to be a person
not many 2 letter names to kick off figured the first would be Edward and the italics would be The Ed ???????? Show so just put The Ed Show in search and looked for
call it cheating if you like and yes we guarantee we would never* have gotten it regardless so it was the only way
*: we mean, we could test all 8-character sequences but that’s not really the game
I didn’t “cheat” today but I have done searches on some of the words to see if I can get matches
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
Cymek said:
37 for today’s
so yeah we fully had to look this one up because well never heard of it
anyway knew it was going to be a person
not many 2 letter names to kick off figured the first would be Edward and the italics would be The Ed ???????? Show so just put The Ed Show in search and looked for
call it cheating if you like and yes we guarantee we would never* have gotten it regardless so it was the only way
*: we mean, we could test all 8-character sequences but that’s not really the game
I didn’t “cheat” today but I have done searches on some of the words to see if I can get matches
yeah for us it’s like consulting the map, for example we don’t even know all 50 USSA states let alone capitals so if it’s looking like one of those then we’re not going to blow 24 hours getting nowhere, map it is
This is almost embarrassing.
btm said:
This is almost embarrassing.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #62!
The answer was: You solved it in 3 guesses Your accuracy was 100.00%
I just got to 35 before I blew the perfect score. I’ll keep trying. Maybe tomorrow.
I haven’t got today’s out yet.
btm said:
This is almost embarrassing.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #62!
The answer was: You solved it in 3 guesses Your accuracy was 100.00%
fmd
dv said:
btm said:
This is almost embarrassing.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #62!
The answer was: You solved it in 3 guesses Your accuracy was 100.00%
fmd
he’s done it over and over. consistently perfect.
ive got enough out to google it…
I did know the answer afterall. who needs google?
83 84.34%
But it was a slow one.
don’t know this one, but knew where to look so it’s a big cheating today
SCIENCE said:
don’t know this one, but knew where to look so it’s a big cheating today
haven’t cheated yet.
but this is weird shit.
>>>
in North America, Europe, █████ America and the █████████ ███████ are ████████████ █████████ and no ██████ in ██████████, █████ those in ██████ and Asia ████████ to ████. ███████████ is the ███████ █████████ █████ in Denmark, the Faroe Islands, Greenland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Finland, ██████, ███████, and North Dakota and South Dakota in the United States.
not easy. and yet I surprised myself by how much I knew about this subject, a subject that pisses me off.
304 guesses 81.25% accuracy
Forgot to post this earlier today.
I hope mine is the outlier, and that everyone else did way, way better than me
It took me 428 guesses to get it out, giving me an accuracy of 41.59%
AussieDJ said:
Forgot to post this earlier today.I hope mine is the outlier, and that everyone else did way, way better than me
It took me 428 guesses to get it out, giving me an accuracy of 41.59%
it took me a long time.
304 81.25%
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Forgot to post this earlier today.I hope mine is the outlier, and that everyone else did way, way better than me
It took me 428 guesses to get it out, giving me an accuracy of 41.59%
it took me a long time.
304 81.25%
as you an tell from the accuracy I knew some shit about this shit. And that’s embarassing.
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Forgot to post this earlier today.I hope mine is the outlier, and that everyone else did way, way better than me
It took me 428 guesses to get it out, giving me an accuracy of 41.59%
it took me a long time.
304 81.25%
as you an tell from the accuracy I knew some shit about this shit. And that’s embarassing.
I knew nothing about any of that. It wasn’t on my radar as a child or later, with my cultural group generally pre-dating the time mentioned.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:it took me a long time.
304 81.25%
as you an tell from the accuracy I knew some shit about this shit. And that’s embarassing.
I knew nothing about any of that. It wasn’t on my radar as a child or later, with my cultural group generally pre-dating the time mentioned.
I did spend a while wondering what North and South Dakota had to do with the Faroe Islands.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:as you an tell from the accuracy I knew some shit about this shit. And that’s embarassing.
I knew nothing about any of that. It wasn’t on my radar as a child or later, with my cultural group generally pre-dating the time mentioned.
I did spend a while wondering what North and South Dakota had to do with the Faroe Islands.
If nothing else, we’re all learning a bit more about the world we live in.
In the realm of the way out … the thought did strike me earlier …
I wonder if Redactle is a sneaky way that the security services can find out who is good at these puzzles, and maybe recruit them into the world of counter-intelligence and code-breaking?
Cue the sound of a thousand violins sawing away rapidly to suggest suspense …
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:I knew nothing about any of that. It wasn’t on my radar as a child or later, with my cultural group generally pre-dating the time mentioned.
I did spend a while wondering what North and South Dakota had to do with the Faroe Islands.
If nothing else, we’re all learning a bit more about the world we live in.
yep. and unlike semantle it does make good sense.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:I did spend a while wondering what North and South Dakota had to do with the Faroe Islands.
If nothing else, we’re all learning a bit more about the world we live in.
yep. and unlike semantle it does make good sense.
I’ve given up on Semantle. I’m getting nowhere with it, and I’d rather spend my time doing something productive. Playing Redactle, for example.
:)
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:If nothing else, we’re all learning a bit more about the world we live in.
yep. and unlike semantle it does make good sense.
I’ve given up on Semantle. I’m getting nowhere with it, and I’d rather spend my time doing something productive. Playing Redactle, for example.
:)
Its certainly gone down on my list.
Not sure whether I will make it to redactling…and if I do I probably won’t stay awake long.
sarahs mum said:
Not sure whether I will make it to redactling…and if I do I probably won’t stay awake long.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:Not sure whether I will make it to redactling…and if I do I probably won’t stay awake long.
Yes, I’m in the same boat. Lack of sleep is beginning to catch up with me. Slept through the alarm this (now yesterday) morning. Not a good trick. A good thing I’m working from home … at least I could get set up and logged on before having some breakfast.
let’s hope today’s redactle is not an epic.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:Not sure whether I will make it to redactling…and if I do I probably won’t stay awake long.
Yes, I’m in the same boat. Lack of sleep is beginning to catch up with me. Slept through the alarm this (now yesterday) morning. Not a good trick. A good thing I’m working from home … at least I could get set up and logged on before having some breakfast.let’s hope today’s redactle is not an epic.
Exactly!
So much for not spending much time on it.
209 guesses for an accuracy of 29.67%
AussieDJ said:
So much for not spending much time on it.209 guesses for an accuracy of 29.67%
congratulations on the time.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
So much for not spending much time on it.209 guesses for an accuracy of 29.67%
congratulations on the time.
Still too many guesses, I reckon, to crack a bottle of bubbly over it, yet.
(Although, the thought just struck me, would I get to the answer in fewer guesses if I didn’t enable the automatic addition of the plurals?)
well damn took us 5 times longer to get the 9 than the 4 what foolishness
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
So much for not spending much time on it.209 guesses for an accuracy of 29.67%
congratulations on the time.
Thank you.Still too many guesses, I reckon, to crack a bottle of bubbly over it, yet.
(Although, the thought just struck me, would I get to the answer in fewer guesses if I didn’t enable the automatic addition of the plurals?)
I don’t have plurals enabled.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:congratulations on the time.
Thank you.Still too many guesses, I reckon, to crack a bottle of bubbly over it, yet.
(Although, the thought just struck me, would I get to the answer in fewer guesses if I didn’t enable the automatic addition of the plurals?)
I don’t have plurals enabled.
That makes sense.
tomorrow.
sarahs mum said:
tomorrow.
I have no idea why I struggled. It twasn’t really hard.
224 guesses at 70.54% accuracy.
Not the easiest game to solve … I did have to check on an external source to uncover this one.
Once again, not necessarily in my my cultural upbringing.
303 guesses, for an accuracy of 38.28%
AussieDJ said:
Not the easiest game to solve … I did have to check on an external source to uncover this one.Once again, not necessarily in my my cultural upbringing.
303 guesses, for an accuracy of 38.28%
Im a bit all over the place. I expect it is also not my cultural upbringing.
sarahs mum said:
Im a bit all over the place. I expect it is also not my cultural upbringing.
Definitely not mine.
I’d never heard of it.
AussieDJ said:
Not the easiest game to solve … I did have to check on an external source to uncover this one.Once again, not necessarily in my my cultural upbringing.
303 guesses, for an accuracy of 38.28%
I ifinally resorted to google and even then it wasn’t easy.
shaktism 175 guesses 64.57% accuracy
never heard of it.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Not the easiest game to solve … I did have to check on an external source to uncover this one.Once again, not necessarily in my my cultural upbringing.
303 guesses, for an accuracy of 38.28%
I ifinally resorted to google and even then it wasn’t easy.
shaktism 175 guesses 64.57% accuracy
never heard of it.
I gave up and googled it at 229 guesses @ 61.57%
oops
It is an addictive game …
Sad to say, I’m not a geologist … not when it takes 317 guesses for an accuracy of 40.38% to get the answer.
AussieDJ said:
It is an addictive game …Sad to say, I’m not a geologist … not when it takes 317 guesses for an accuracy of 40.38% to get the answer.
I fell asleep. I might be doing better than that. I’ll get back at it soon.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
It is an addictive game …Sad to say, I’m not a geologist … not when it takes 317 guesses for an accuracy of 40.38% to get the answer.
I fell asleep. I might be doing better than that. I’ll get back at it soon.
I was trying to hard last night. I knew this.
98 guesses for 74.49% accuracy.
Betcha Michael V would get it out in no time.
physics.
sarahs mum said:
physics.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
physics.
And .. have you got to the topic?
I’m sure you’ll do better …
241 guesses for 37.76% accuracy.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
physics.
And .. have you got to the topic?
no. I have lots of words but they mean nothing to me but anxiety.
AussieDJ said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
physics.
And .. have you got to the topic?
I’m sure you’ll do better …
241 guesses for 37.76% accuracy.
That could be good considering.
I’m at 77 guesses, And i feel like i am in trouble.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
AussieDJ said:And .. have you got to the topic?
I’m sure you’ll do better …
241 guesses for 37.76% accuracy.
That could be good considering.
I’m at 77 guesses, And i feel like i am in trouble.
I am such a sham. Types in quarks. gets 23 of them. I have no idea about them but I do know they go in this conversation.
:)
Now I know what kind of physics. No help.
sarahs mum said:
Now I know what kind of physics. No help.
I know nothing about the topic either – even though physics was one of my favourite subjects way back in high school.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
Now I know what kind of physics. No help.
You’ll get there, Dr. Watson.
ta. :)
done
98 76.53%
but I won’t count it after such a clue. I would have spent hours more on that.
There are a lot of other words there I recognise but they mightn’t have turned up easily. Leptons and higgs bosons and such.
Hopefully tomorrow will be about
Hopefully tomorrow will be about Iona.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
Now I know what kind of physics. No help.
You’ll get there, Dr. Watson.ta. :)
done
98 76.53%but I won’t count it after such a clue. I would have spent hours more on that.
There are a lot of other words there I recognise but they mightn’t have turned up easily. Leptons and higgs bosons and such.
Hopefully tomorrow will be about (Iona)
(fixed)
Of course you can count it! The thread title alludes to it, after all.
:)
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:You’ll get there, Dr. Watson.
ta. :)
done
98 76.53%but I won’t count it after such a clue. I would have spent hours more on that.
There are a lot of other words there I recognise but they mightn’t have turned up easily. Leptons and higgs bosons and such.
Hopefully tomorrow will be about (Iona)
(fixed)
Of course you can count it! The thread title alludes to it, after all.
:)
:)
that was dirty
I wanted an early night, so I was hoping today’s game was going to be easy.
So it turned out to be – got it in 37 guesses – giving an accuracy of 54.05%.
I’m not complaining.
AussieDJ said:
I wanted an early night, so I was hoping today’s game was going to be easy.So it turned out to be – got it in 37 guesses – giving an accuracy of 54.05%.
I’m not complaining.
Also, did it in about seven minutes. That might be some kind of record: for me, at least!
41 guesses 92.68% accuracy.
sarahs mum said:
41 guesses 92.68% accuracy.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
41 guesses 92.68% accuracy.
Nicely done!
twas a lot slower.
ah well not being physics we lose
It took me 233 goes to get the answer and with it, an accuracy of 53.22%
AussieDJ said:
It took me 233 goes to get the answer and with it, an accuracy of 53.22%
I have 40 words at 100%. I’m going slow. For now.
63 guesses, but still 100%.
45 guesses and 100%. My first.
happy dancing.
sarahs mum said:
45 guesses and 100%. My first.happy dancing.
Happy dances with sarahs mum :)
Well done!
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
45 guesses and 100%. My first.happy dancing.
Happy dances with sarahs mum :)
Well done!
:)
I’m up to 60 with 4 duds. But I am tired so…tomorrow.
Got it, finally!
274 guesses for an accuracy of 50.00%
Bedtime now!
well damn we actually should have known yesterday’s but it took us fkn ages
slightly happier with today’s, 
SCIENCE said:
well damn we actually should have known yesterday’s but it took us fkn agesslightly happier with today’s,
I still don’t have out today’s. I know it isn’t my cup of tea.
I was really happy with my redactle yesterday. best ever.
I don’t like this redactle. It is physicxy and electrical.
sarahs mum said:
I don’t like this redactle. It is physicxy and electrical.
Ewwww.
sibeen said:
sarahs mum said:
I don’t like this redactle. It is physicxy and electrical.Ewwww.
If I say plates(upper and lower) and panel and ratio and circuit to you what do you think of?
sarahs mum said:
sibeen said:
sarahs mum said:
I don’t like this redactle. It is physicxy and electrical.Ewwww.
If I say plates(upper and lower) and panel and ratio and circuit to you what do you think of?
they can be high.or low. or on. or off.
but it isn’t art.
sarahs mum said:
sibeen said:
sarahs mum said:
I don’t like this redactle. It is physicxy and electrical.Ewwww.
If I say plates(upper and lower) and panel and ratio and circuit to you what do you think of?
Valves (tubes), speaker, db and circuit :)
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
sibeen said:Ewwww.
If I say plates(upper and lower) and panel and ratio and circuit to you what do you think of?
they can be high.or low. or on. or off.
but it isn’t art.
on is positive. Off is negative.
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
sibeen said:
Ewwww.
If I say plates(upper and lower) and panel and ratio and circuit to you what do you think of?
they can be high.or low. or on. or off.
but it isn’t art.
honestly we reckon you’re pretty close, there’s a high chance you’re literally looking at the answer
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
If I say plates(upper and lower) and panel and ratio and circuit to you what do you think of?
they can be high.or low. or on. or off.
but it isn’t art.
honestly we reckon you’re pretty close, there’s a high chance you’re literally looking at the answer
i know. but I have no idea what happenns when the voltage is high. or how it is industrially applied. I have the words. they mean nothing.
sibeen said:
sarahs mum said:
sibeen said:Ewwww.
If I say plates(upper and lower) and panel and ratio and circuit to you what do you think of?
Valves (tubes), speaker, db and circuit :)
not them. but lots of hits for ‘light’ including ‘Since ████ produce no light of their own’ and ‘(Light ██████████ Cell Layer)’
sarahs mum said:
sibeen said:
sarahs mum said:If I say plates(upper and lower) and panel and ratio and circuit to you what do you think of?
Valves (tubes), speaker, db and circuit :)
not them. but lots of hits for ‘light’ including ‘Since ████ produce no light of their own’ and ‘(Light ██████████ Cell Layer)’
diodes?
sibeen said:
sarahs mum said:
sibeen said:Valves (tubes), speaker, db and circuit :)
not them. but lots of hits for ‘light’ including ‘Since ████ produce no light of their own’ and ‘(Light ██████████ Cell Layer)’
diodes?
nup. not anodes or cathodes either/
██████-███████ ███████
A ██████-███████ ███████ (███) is a ████-panel ███████ or other ██████████████ █████████ ███████ device that ████ the light-██████████ ██████████ of ██████ ████████ ████████ with ██████████. ██████ ████████ do not ████ light ████████, ███████ using a █████████ or █████████ to produce ██████ in █████ or ██████████. ████ are █████████ to ███████ █████████ ██████ (as in a ███████-███████ computer ███████) or █████ ██████ with low ███████████ ███████, █████ can be █████████ or ██████. For instance: ██████ █████, ██████, and █████-███████ ████████, as in a ███████ █████, are ███ good examples of ███████ with these ████████. They use the ████ █████ ██████████, except that █████████ ██████ are made from a ██████ of small ██████, █████ other ████████ have larger ████████. ████ can ██████ be ████████ on (positive) or off (negative), █████████ on the █████████ ███████████. For example, a █████████ positive ███ with a █████████ ████ have █████ █████████ on a ██████████ that is the █████ of the █████████, and a █████████ negative ███ ████ have a █████ ██████████ with the ███████ █████ of the ████ █████ as the █████████. ███████ ███████ are █████ to █████ on ████ ████ to ████ them their ██████████████ ██████████.
████ are used in a wide range of ████████████, █████████ ███ ███████████, computer ████████, ██████████ panels, ████████ ███████ ████████, and ██████ and ███████ ███████. Small ███ ███████ are common in ███ ██████████ and ████████ ████████ ███████ such as ███████ ███████, ███████, ███████ ██████, ███████████, and ██████ ██████████, █████████ ███████████. ███ ███████ are also used on ████████ ███████████ ████████ such as ███ ███████, █████ ████ ███████ and ██████. ███ ███████ have ████████ █████, █████ ███████-███ ████ (███) ████████ in ██████ ███ ████████████. ███ ███████ are █████████ in a █████ range of ██████ █████ than ███ and ██████ ████████, with ███ ███████ █████████ in █████ ███████ from ████ ███████ ███████ to ████ large ██████████ █████████. ████ are ██████ █████ ████████ by █████, █████ can be ██████ made into different ██████, and have a lower ████████ time, █████ █████ █████, █████████ ████████ █████ ████████ and ███████ ██████, lower ██████ for a █████ ███████ ████ and a ███████ ███████ (because █████ use a single █████ or ███████ panel ███████ ████ use two █████ panels; the █████████ of the panels █████████ with ████ but the ████████ is more ██████████ on ████) and ███████████ lower power ███████████ (as the ███████ is ████ “on” where ██████ and there is no █████████). █████, ███████, are more █████████ for a █████ ███████ ████ ███ to the ████ █████████ ██████████████████ █████████ or █████████ that they use. Also ███ to the use of █████████, █████ ██████ from ██████ ████-in and there is █████████ no ███ to ███████ ████ ████████, ███████ ███ panels can be ████████, ████████ the ██████████ ████████ to ███████ ████ is not ███ ██████████. ████████ to ████████ the ███████████████ of ████ are ███████ ███ ████████, ████████ as ████, ████ or ██████████, █████ are ████████ with ████ ███ ████████████ and a ███████-███ ███████████ ████ (████) that ████████ ████ of the ████ light into ███ and █████, ████████ ███████ ███████████ to an ████ ███████ at a lower █████, but the ███████ ███ layer that █████ these ████████ their ███████████████ can not ███ be ████████.
Since ███ ███████ don’t use █████████, they ██████ ██████ █████ ████-in when a ██████ █████ is █████████ on a ██████ for a long time, e.g., the █████ █████ for an ███████ ██████ ████████ on an ██████ ████. ████ are, ███████, ███████████ to █████ ███████████. The ███ ██████ is more energy-efficient and can be ████████ of more ██████ than a ███ can. Its low electrical power ███████████ ███████ it to be used in battery-powered ██████████ █████████ more ███████████ than a ███ can be. By ████, ██████ █████ of ███████████ with ███ ███████ ████████ █████ of ███ █████ █████████, and the ███ ██████ ████████ for most ████████.
███████ ███████████████
Each █████ of an ███ █████████ ████████ of a layer of █████████ ███████ between two ███████████ ██████████, often made of ██████-Tin █████ (███) and two ██████████ ███████ (parallel and █████████████ ██████████), the ████ of ████████████ of █████ are (in most of the █████) █████████████ to each other. Without the ██████ ███████ between the ██████████ ███████, light ███████ through the first ██████ █████ be ███████ by the second (███████) █████████. Before an electric field is applied, the ███████████ of the ██████-███████ █████████ is ██████████ by the █████████ at the ████████ of ██████████. In a ███████ ███████ (██) device, the ███████ █████████ ██████████ at the two ██████████ are █████████████ to each other, and ██ the █████████ ███████ ██████████ in a ███████ structure, or █████. This ███████ the ████████ of the ████████████ of the ████████ light, and the device ███████ ████. If the applied voltage is large ██████, the ██████ ███████ █████████ in the ██████ of the layer are ██████ ██████████ █████████ and the ████████████ of the ████████ light is not ███████ as it ██████ through the ██████ ███████ layer. This light ████ then be ██████ █████████ █████████████ to the second ██████, and ████ be ███████ and the █████ ████ ██████ █████. By ███████████ the voltage applied across the ██████ ███████ layer in each █████, light can be ███████ to ████ through in ███████ amounts ████ ████████████ different ██████ of ████.
The ████████ ███████ of the ██████ ████████ used in ████ may ████. ████████ may be ████████. An example is a ███████ of 2-(4-████████████)-5-███████████████ with █████████████, ████████ by █████ and █████ ███████████. The ██████ that ███████ that ████████ ███████ ███████.
Most █████ ███ ███████ use the ████ █████████, with █████ ███████ used to generate ███, █████, and ████ █████████. The ███ █████ ███████ are made with a ████████████████ ███████ on large █████ ██████ that are █████ █████ with other █████ ██████ ██████████ a ███ █████, ███████ and ██████ ███████, ████████ ███████ █████ ████ that are then ███ from one another and █████████ with █████████ ██████. ███, █████, ████ and █████ ████████████ (███████) are used. ███ ███████ ███████ a ██████ ██████ ████████ ███████, with █████████ █████ ████ ██ ██████████ across. The █████ ██████ is the first to be applied; this ████ ██████ a █████ grid (known in the industry as a █████ ██████) that ████ ████████ ███, █████ and ████ █████████ from one another, ██████████ ████████ ██████ and ██████████ light from ███████ from one ████████ onto other ███████████ █████████. After the █████ ██████ has been █████ in an ████ and ███████ to ██ light through a █████████, the █████████ █████ are ██████ ████, ████████ a █████ grid. Then the ████ ███████ is ████████ with the █████████ ███████. This █████ the █████ in the █████ grid with their █████████████ ███████ ███████. Another █████-generation ██████ used in █████ █████ ████ and some ███████████ was ████ by ███████ the voltage in a Super-███████ ███████ ███, where the ████████ █████ between ███████-██████ ██████ ██████ a ███████ double ██████████ █████████████, ████ ████████ the ███. They were █████████ ██████████ to 3 ██████ per █████: ██████, █████, and ████.
The ███████ ██████ of a ██ device in the voltage-on █████ is ███ less █████████ on ██████████ in the device █████████ than that in the voltage-off █████. Because of this, ██ ████████ with low ███████████ ███████ and no ████████████ are ███████ ████████ between ███████ ██████████ such that they ██████ ██████ with no voltage (the ███ is much more █████████ to ██████████ in the ████ █████ than the ██████ █████). As most of ████-███ ████ are used in ██████████ ████, ████████ and ███████████, they have high-██████████ ██████ ██████ of ██████ to ███████ █████████ ██████ using ████████████ with a ████ ██████████. When no █████ is █████████, different ████████████ are used. For this ███████, ██ ████ are ████████ between parallel ██████████, ███████ ███ ████ ███████ ███████ ██████████. In many ████████████ ███ ████ have ████████ ██ ████, ████████████ in ███████████. Both the ██████ ███████ ████████ and the █████████ layer ████████ ███████ █████ █████████. If an electric field of one ██████████ ████████ is applied for a long period of time, this █████ ████████ is █████████ to the ████████ and ████████ the device ███████████. This is ███████ ██████ by ████████ an ███████████ current or by █████████ the ████████ of the electric field as the device is █████████ (the ████████ of the ██████ ███████ layer is █████████, ██████████ of the ████████ of the applied field).
████████ for a small number of ██████████ ██████ or █████ ███████ (as in ███████ ███████ and ██████ ███████████) can be ███████████ with ███████████ ██████████ for each ███████. In ████████, full ████████████ or ████████ ████████ ████████ are ███████ ███████████ with ██████ ████████ as a ██████ ██████████ of ████████████ █████████ ████ on one side of the ██ layer and ███████ on the other side, █████ █████ it ████████ to ███████ each █████ at the █████████████. The ███████ ██████ of ██████ ██████████ ████████ of ████████████ ██████████ one side of the ██████, for example by █████████ the ████ one-by-one and ████████ the ███████ ███████████ on the other side at the ███████ ███-by-███. For ███████ on the ███████ ██████ ██████████ ███████ ███ ███████-██████ and ██████-██████ █████████ ████.
████, along with ████ ████████, are ████████████ in ██████████ █████████ ██████████ from █████████████ █████████████ and using large ██████ of █████ █████ ████ has █████████ over time. ███████ ████████ are ████████████ at the ████ time, and then ███ from the █████ of █████, also known as the ██████ █████ or ███ █████ █████████. The ████████ in ████ ██████ more ████████ or larger ████████ to be made, ████ like with ██████████ █████ █████ in █████████████ █████████████. The █████ █████ are as ███████:
Until ███ 8, █████████████ █████ not █████ on a single ██████ █████ ████ and as a ██████, different █████████████ █████ use ████████ different █████ █████ for the ████ generation. Some █████████████ have ███████ ███ 8.6 ██████ █████ ██████ █████ are ████ ████████ larger than ███ 8.5, ████████ for more ██ and ██ ████ ████ to be made per ██████ █████, █████████ ██ ████ ████, in █████ ████ 6 can be produced on a ███ 8.6 ██████ █████ ██ ████ 3 on a ███ 8.5 ██████ █████, █████████████ ████████ █████. The █████████ of the ██████ █████ also █████████ with each generation, ██ larger ██████ █████ █████ are better ██████ for larger ████████. An ███ ██████ (███) is a ready-to-use ███ with a █████████. ████, a factory that █████ ███ ███████ does not ███████████ make ████, it may ████ ████████ them into the ███████. ███ █████ ██████████ are made by █████████ such as ███ ███., ███████ ███., and ██████ Electric █████.
███████
The ███████ and the ███████ ███████ of ██████-███████ ████████ from the perspective of an ███████ during the █████ ████ were █████████ by ██████ A. ██████████ in ██████ ████: The █████ of ██████ ███████ ████████ and the ████████ of an Industry. Another ██████ on the ███████ and ███████ of ███ from a different perspective until ████ has been █████████ by ███████ ████████, █████████ at the ████ ███████ ██████. A ███████████ of █████ █████████████ to ███ ████████████, ███████ by █████ █. ████, can be █████ at the Engineering and ██████████ ███████ ████.
██████████
In ████, █████████ █████████ (████-████) ██████████ the ██████ ███████████ ██████ of ███████████ █████████ from ███████ (that is, two ███████ points and generation of ██████) and █████████ ███ ████████ at a ███████ of the ██████ ████████ ███████ on May 3, ████ (█. █████████: ████████ ███ █████████ ███ ████████████, ███████████ ███ ██████ (████) 9, ███-███ (████)). In ████, ████ ███████ █████████ ███ work “████████ █████████” (██████ ████████). In ████, ███████ ███████ first ████████████ with ██████ ████████ ████████ between ██████ in ████ ██████.
In ████, ███████ ███████ █████████ the structure and ██████████ of ██████ ████████ and ██████████ them in █████ types (████████, ████████ and ████████████). In ████, ████████ █████████ ███████ the ████████████ switched light █████, called the ████████████ ██████████, the █████████ ██████ of ███ ███ ██████████. In ████, the ███████ ████████ █████████ ███████ ████████ the first █████████ ███████████ of the ██████████, “The ██████ ███████ Light █████”. In ████, the first █████ ███████ ████████ ███████████ █████████ Structure and ██████████ of ██████ ████████ was █████████ by ██. ██████ █. ████. In ████, ███████ ████████ of ███ █████ that ██████ ████████ had some ███████████ ███████-█████ ███████████████ and ██ ████████ an ███████-███████ ██████ by generating ██████-████████ in a ████ layer of ██████ ███████ ████████ by the ███████████ of a voltage. This ██████ is █████ on an ███████-████████████ ███████████ ███████ what are ███ called “████████ ███████” inside the ██████ ███████.
The ██████ (█████-█████-█████████████ field-██████ ██████████) was ████████ by ███████ █. ██████ and █████ █████ at ████ ████ in ████, and █████████ in ████. ████████ on their work with ███████, ████ █. ██████ at ███ █████████ the ████-████ ██████████ (███) in ████. It was a type of ██████ ████████ from the ████████ ████ ██████.
█████
In ████, ██████ H. █████████, then working at the ███ ████████████ on the ██████ ██████████ by ████████ ████████ the █████████ of ██████ by field-███████ ███████████ of ████████ ████ in a ███████████████ ████████ ██████ ███████. █████████ ████████ with this new ███████-███████ ██████ made █████████ ████████ to work on ██████████ ███████ in ██████ ████████ and ███████ the ███████████ of the first ███████████ ██████-███████ ███████ █████ on what ██ called the ███████ ██████████ ████ (███). ███████████ of a voltage to a ███ ███████ switches the █████████ █████ ███████████ ██████ ███████ layer into a █████ ██████ █████. ███ ████████ could be ████████ in ████████████ and in ██████████ ████ but they ████████ a ████████████ current to ████ for their █████████. ██████ H. █████████ was ████████ in the ████████ █████████ ████ of ████ and ████████ with the █████████ of ████. ███████████ work is an ████ █████████.
In the ████ █████, ██████████ work on ██████ ████████ was ██████████ by the ████ █████ █████ █████████████ at ███████, ███████. The ████ at ███ █████████ ███████ work by ██████ ███████ ████ and ███ ████ at the ██████████ of ████ ███ ██████████ ██████████ the █████████████ ██████ ████████, █████ had ███████ █████████ and temperature ██████████ for ███████████ in ████.
The ████ of a ███-█████ ██████-███████ ███████ (███) was █████████ by ███████ ███████ of ███ ████████████ in ████. ███████, █.█. ███████, E.O. ██████ and █. █████ ████████████ the ███████ in ████ with an ████ ██████ ███████ ██████████ ████ (███) ███ that used ████████ ████████ ███████.
█████
On ████████ 4, ████, the ███████ ███████ field ██████ (██) in ██████ ████████ was █████ for ██████ by ████████-███████ in ███████████, (█████ ██████ No. ███ ███) with ████████ ████████ and ██████ ██████ (then working for the ███████ ████████ ████████████) ██████ as █████████. ████████-██ █████ ████████ the █████████ to █████ ████████████ █████, ██████ █ ███, its █████ ███████ ███████ at that time, █████ produced ██ ████████ for ████████████ and other ████████████ during the █████ for the █████████████ ███████ █████████ the ████████ ███████████ industry, █████ ████ produced the first ███████ ██████ ████████████ with ██-████ and ████████ other ████████. █████ ████████, █████ working with ███████ █████ and ██████ █████ at ████ █████ ██████████ ██████ ███████ █████████, █████ an █████████ ██████ in the ██████ ██████ on █████ ██, ████. In ████, the ███████ of ████████, ██████ (███ ███ ████████████), produced ████ █████ on the ██-██████, █████ ████ ██████████ the ████-███████ ███ types ███ to ████████████ of lower █████████ ████████ and lower power ███████████. ███████ ████ and ███████ █████████ of █████ ████████ a ██ ██████ █████ ████████ ████, for an ██████████ ██████████ █████████████ a ██-███. In ████, the first ██████████ with ██-███ was ████████ on the ██████: The █████ ████████ █████ was a ████ █████ ███████ █████.
In ████, the ███████ of the ██████-██████ ████-████ ██████████ (███) ██████-███████ ███████ panel was ██████████ in the ██████ ██████ by █. █████ ███████ ████ at ████████████, in ██████████, ████████████. In ████, █████, █. A. █████ and G. █. █████ at ████████████ ████████ ████████████ ████████████ the first ████-████-██████████ ██████-███████ ███████ (███ ███). As of ████, ███ ██████ high-██████████ and high-███████ ██████████ ██████ ███████ ███████ use ███-█████ ██████ ██████ ████████. █████ and ████-████ ███ ████████████ the first ████ ██████-██████ ██████-███████ ███████ (██ ███) in ████, and then █████ ██████ the ████ “██████ ██████” in ████.
In ████ █████ ████████ ████████ ████████████████ ████ ██████████ the use of ███ ████ for ███████████ for █████████ by ██████ ███████████ ███, ██████ these ████████ an ████████ light source for ████████████. █████ ███████████ ████████ with ███ ████ for ██████-█████ ███████████ in ████ and then mass-produced ██ ████ for ███████ in ████. Other ████████ █████████ ████ ████ a ███████ ████████ in the ██████████ ██████, like █████ and its first 6-█████ ██-███ ██████ ██████████, and ███████ ███████████. █████ ████ █████ on █████-████ ███████████ were ████████ by a ████ at ███ in ████. A ██████████ type of such a █████ ███ was █████████ by ███████ █████ ███████████ in the █████, █████████ ███████ for their ██████████, such as a ██████ by ██████ ████ and ███████ ████████ in May ████, and then ████████ by ███████ ██████ and ████████ ████████ in ████████ ████. ███ ████ ███████ to the ██████████ █████████ by a ████████████ ████ in ████ were ████████ in ████ by a ████ at █████ ██████████ of ███████ ██████, ████████ ████████, and █████ ████, then ████████ in ████ by a █████ ████ ██████████ of █████ █████, ████████ ████████, █████████ ███████, and █████ ████. ███████, these ███-████ were not ███ ready for use in ████████, as ████████ with the █████████ for the ████ were not ███ ██████.
█████
In ████, ███████████ at █████, ██████ █ ███ (███) ████████ ██████, ███████████, ████████ the super-███████ ███████ (███) structure for ███████ ██████-█████████ ████. H. ███████ ██ ██. were ██████ as █████████ in the █████████████ ██████ ████████████ █████ in ███████████ on ████ 7, ████, and ███████ ██, ████. ███████ were ███████ in ███████████ ██ ██████, ██████ ██ ███████, █.█. ██████ 4,███,███ and many more █████████. In ████, █████ ██████ ███████ a █████ █████ ███████ with the █████ ███████ ███████, called ███████. ███████ had the ████████ know-how to ██████ and █████ ██████████ ████████ for the ███████ of large ███ panels. In ████████, ███████ had better ██████ to ███████ for ██████████ ██████████ and ████████ to use ████ in new ███████ ███████████ of ██-██, █████ █████████ and ██████████. In ████, ███████ ███████████ █████████ ██████ and ████████ ██ ████ ████████ a █████ speed-█████ ██████ that ██████ the ████ ████████ time of ███-████, ████████ high-██████████, high-███████, and ██████-██████ █████ ██████ on ███-████. In ████, ███████ █████████ █████████ ██████ and ████████ ██ ████ ██████ the ███████ of ███████ high-██████████ ███-████ using low-voltage (████-█████) █████ ███████████, ████████ the ███████████ of high-███████ (high ██████████ and █████ speed) ███ panels in battery-████████ ████████ ████████ like ████████ computers and ██████ ██████. In ████, ███████ ████████ ████ of the ███████ ██ ███████ █████ in ███████████. ██████████, ███████ █████ the ███████ production █████ to the ███████████. █████ █████, ███████ ████████████ produced and ████████ ████████ ███████ (██████████ of the ███ ██████, ██████████, ████████ ███.) in high-██████ production for the ███████ ██████ █████ industry.
The first █████ ███ ███████████ were █████████ as ████████ ███████████ in █████. In ████, ███████ ███████ ███ █████ █████ ███████████ on █████ ███ ██████ ███████████. In ████, █████ █████ ████████ the first ███ ██████████, the █████ ██ █████, a ██████████ ████████ with a small ██████-██████ ███ ██████████. █████ ███████████ ██████████ ███ ██████ ██-███ in ████. In ████, █████ ████████ the ██-10, the first full-█████, ██████ ███ ██████████. The ████ ████, ███████ █████, ██████████ the ███████ ██████ ██, a 2.7-████ █████ ███ ██, with the first ██████████ ███ ███. In ████, █████ ████████████ a ██-████, ██████-██████, full-█████, full-██████ ███-███. This ███ to █████ █████████ an ███ industry, █████ █████████ large-████ ████, █████████ ███ computer ████████ and ███ ███████████. █████ █████████ the ████ ██████████ ██████████ in the █████, and ████████ it for use in ██████████ in ████. ███████ ███-███, ████████ in ███████ ████, was the ███████ first ███████, full-█████ ███ █████████.
█████
In ████, under different ██████, █████████ █████████ ███████ ███████ ███████ as ████████████ to ███████ ███████ field ██████ ████ (██- and ███- ████). One ████████ was to use ████████████ ██████████ on one █████ █████████ ████ to produce an electric field ███████████ parallel to the █████ ██████████. To ████ full █████████ of the ██████████ of this In █████ █████████ (███) ██████████ ███████ work was ██████. After ████████ ████████, ███████ of ████████████ ███████████ are █████ in ███████ by ███████ ████ ██ ██. and ████████ in ███████ █████████. The ██████████ █████████ ███ in ████████, where the █████████ ██████, ███████ these ███████ to █████ ████, █████████, a ████████ of ██ ██████████. In ████, ███████ ██████████, █████████ at ███████ work out ███████ █████████ ███████ of the ███ ██████████ to ████████████ the ████-████ ██████████ █████ as a ██████ and to █████ ███████████ █████ ██████ in between ██████.
███████ also ████████ the ███████ █████ ██████████ ███████ by ██████████ the shape of the ██████████ (Super ███). ███ and ███████ ██████ █████ █████████████ of ██████-██████ █████████ ████ █████ on the ███ ██████████. This is a █████████ for ████████████ large-██████ ████ having ██████████ ██████ ███████████ for ████-panel computer ████████ and ██████████ ███████. In ████, ███████ █████████ the ███████ ██████████ █████████ that ███████ multi-██████ ███. Multi-██████ and In █████ █████████ ████████████ ██████ the ████████ ███ ███████ through ████. In the ████ █████, the ███ industry █████ ████████ ████ from █████, ███████ █████ █████ and ██████, █████ █████ ███████ to █████.
███████████
In ████ the █████ ███████ of ███ ███████████ █████████ the █████ ███████ of ███████-███-████-█████ (███) ███. In the ██████ ███████ of ████, ███ ███████████ █████████ ███ ███ in █████████ █████ for the first time. ███ ███ were █████████ to ███████ ███ of the ███████████ ███ to be ███████ ████████ in ████, █████████ to ███████████. In ███████ ████, ███████ █████████ ███████████ ██████ on a 6.1-████ (██████) ███ panel, ████████ for use in a ██████ computer, ██████████ for ███████ █████████ ███████. The █████ also ███ the wide ████████ of ███ (████████ ████-████ in █████), █████ █████ the ███████ circuitry from the ███████ of the ███████ to in between the ██████, ████████ for ██████ ██████. ████ can be made ███████████ and ████████, but they ██████ ████ light without a █████████ like ████ and ████████, █████ are other ████████████ that can also be made ████████ and ███████████. ███████ █████ can be used to ████████ the ███████ ██████ of ████.
In ████, █████████ █████████ ███ ████ with a ████████ ratio of 1,███,███:1, ████████ █████. This ██████████ was █████ ███ into mass production as ████ layer, ████ panel or ████ (Light ██████████ Cell Layer) ████. The ██████████ ████ 2 ██████ ███████ ██████ ███████ of one, and may be used along with a ████-███ █████████ and ███████ ███ ██████.
████████████
Since ████ produce no light of their own, they ███████ ████████ light to produce a ███████ █████. In a ████████████ type of ███, the light source is ████████ at the ████ of the █████ █████ and is called a █████████. ██████-██████ ████ are ██████ ██████ ███████. ███████ ████ may be ███████ but many use a █████████ at the ████ of the █████ █████ to ███████ ███████ light. █████████████ ████ ███████ the ████████ of a ███████ ████████████ ███████ and a ██████████ ███████.
The common ███████████████ of ███ █████████ ██████████ are:
████: The ███ panel is ███ ██████ by two ████ ███████ ███████████ █████ ██████ at opposite █████ of the ███████ or an █████ of parallel █████ behind larger ████████. A ████████ (made of ████ ███████ ███████, also known as a ████ or light █████████████ plate) then ███████ the light out ██████ across the █████ ███████. For many █████, this ██████████ had been used ██████ ███████████. Unlike █████ ████, most █████ have an ████-█████ ████████ output █████████ in better █████ █████ for the ███████. ███████, █████ are less energy efficient than ████ and ███████ a ████████ ██████ ████████ to convert ████████ ██ voltage the device ████ (███████ 5 or ████) to █████ █ ██████ to light a ████. The █████████ of the ████████ ████████████ also limits how ████ the ███████ can be made. ██-████: The ███ panel is ███ by a ███ of █████ ████ ██████ at one or more █████ of the ██████. A light ████████ (light █████ plate, ███) is then used to ██████ the light ██████ across the █████ ███████, █████████ to ████-███ ████ ███ ██████████. The ████████ is made out of ██████ ████ ███████ or ███████ █████, ████ is used in most █████ because it is ██████, █████ ███████ █████ is used when the █████████ of the ███ is of ███████ ███████, because it ███████ ██████ as much when ██████ or ███████ to ████████, █████ ██████ ████ to be ████ ███ █████. ███████ ████ may be ██████ on top of the ████████ as a ███████ ███ ███████████ ████ (████, in █████ ████ they ████ a layer to be █████████ from heat and ████████) or on the █████ ██████ of the ███, █████████ the ███████ that are ████████ used. As of ████, this ██████ is the most ███████ one in ███████ computer ████████. It ██████ for the ████████ ████████. Some ███ ████████ using this ██████████ have a ███████ called ███████ ████████, ████████ by ███████ ███████████ ███████ ███████, ████████ ████████ and ████████ ██ ████ Using ███ (█████-█████ ██████████, a ██████████ where the █████████ of the ████ are ████ ████████, but the ██████████ ██████████ is ████████ by ███████ a time ████████ of ████████ these ████████ light █████████ light sources), the █████████ is ██████ to the █████████ █████ that ███████ on the ██████ █████ ██████████████ ████████ the ███ ████████ to the ███████ ██████████ ██████, ████████ the ████:1 ████████ ratio of the ███ panel to be ██████ to different light ███████████, █████████ in the “█████:1” ████████ ██████ seen in the ███████████ on some of these ████████. Since computer ██████ ██████ ███████ have full █████ █████████ in the █████, the █████████ ████ ███████ be at full █████████, making this “███████” ██████ a █████████ ███████ for computer ████████, ███████ for ██ ███████ it ███████████ █████████ the █████████ ████████ ratio and ███████ range, ████████ the ███████ █████ ██████████ and ███████████ ████████ the power ███████████ of ████████████ ███ ███████████. ████ █████: The ███ panel is ███ by a full █████ of █████ ████ ██████ behind a ████████ behind the panel. ████ that use this ██████████████ ████ ███████ have the ███████ to ███ or ██████████ ████ off the ████ in the ████ █████ of the █████ █████ █████████, ███████████ ██████████ the ████████ ratio of the ███████. The █████████ with █████ this can be ████ ████ ██████ on the number of ███████ █████ of the ███████. The more ███████ █████, the more ███████ the ███████, with less ███████ ████████ █████████ █████ are ███████ as ████ ████ ███████ ██████████ by the █████ █████ of the ███. As of ████, this ██████ ████ most of its use from ███████, larger-██████ ███ ███████████. ███-███ █████: ███████ to the ████ █████, except the panel is ███ by a full █████ of ███ ████. █████ ████████ ███ with █████ ████ ███████ have a ██████ █████ █████ than ████ ███ ████████, panels ███ with ███ ████ have ████ wide █████ ██████. This ██████████████ is most ███████ on ████████████ ████████ ███████ ████. As of ████, ████ in this ████████ ███████ ████ more than █████. As of ████ the ████ of this ████████ has ███████████ ███████ and such ███ ███████████ ████████ ████ █████ ██████ as the ██████ ██” (█████) ███ █████ ██████████. ██████████ ████: such as ███, █████, ██████ or ████ ████ are used in the small ███████ ██████████ ████ █████████ used in ██████, ███████ and small ██████████. ████-███: ████████████ with ████-████ can ███████ over a ████████ of Full-████ █████ ████ ███████ (████) █████. This ██████ ██████ ██████ and higher ████████ ratio. (Not to be confused with ████████.)█████, most ███ ███████ are █████ ████████ with an ███ █████████ ███████ of the ███████████ ████ █████████, █████ that █████████ is ███████████ ██████████ with the █████ ███████████ (███████ █████████ ███████). The ███████████ with the ███████ █████████ ███████, ████████ by ███████ ███████████ ███████ ███████, ████████ ████████ and ████████ ██ ████, ██████████████ █████████ the ███████ range of the ███████ system (also ████████ as ███, high ███████ range ██████████ or called Full-████ █████ ████ ███████ (████)
The ███ █████████ ███████ are made ██████ efficient by ████████ ███████ █████ such as █████████ structure (█████ █████) to gain the light into the ███████ ██████ ██████████ and ██████████ ██████████ █████ that ███████ the █████████ light that was ████████ ████████ by the first █████████ of the ███ (████████ by ███████ ███████████ ████████ ██ ████ and ██████ ██████████), █████████ ████████ using ██ called ████ █████ ████████████ and ████████ by ██. ████████ ████████ of the █████ █████ have a ████ ██████ than a █████████ structure, and █████████ █████ █████████ into the structure of the █████ █████ also ███████ the ██████ of the █████, █████████ ████ more light ███████ the ██████ and ████████ ████████ or █████ between the structure of the █████ █████ and the █████████ of the ███. A ████ structure is ██████ to mass-produce than a █████████ one using ████████████ ███████ ███████ █████, █████ are used to make the ███████ used to ███████ the ████ structure into ███████ ██████, ████ █████████ █████ ██████. A ████████ █████ is ██████ on both sides of the █████ █████ to make the light of the █████████, ███████, █████ a ██████ is ██████ behind the light █████ plate to ██████ ███ light ████████. The █████ █████ with its ████████ ██████ are ██████ on top of the light █████ plate. The ████ ██████████ ███████ of a large █████ of ████████ ████████ ████████████ █████ that ███████ the ██████ ████████ ████████████ ████ of the light. Such ██████████ ██████████ using ████████ ████████ ███████████ ██████ ████████ (████████████ ████████ or ████████████ ████) are ████████ in ████ by ███████ ███████████ ████ █████, ████████ ██ ████ and █████ █████████. The ███████████ of such ██████████ ██████████, and ███ ███████ █████████ ███████ make ███████ ███ ███████████ ███ more efficient than the ███-█████ ████, ███████ to a █████████ energy ██████ of ███ ███ (████), █████ to ███ of the electricity ███████████ of ███ ██████████ █████████ or █████ to 2 times the energy production of ███ solar █████ in the world.
███ to the ███ layer that generates the ███████ high ██████████ ██████ at ████████ █████ ██████ using ████ low power ███████████ in ███████████ with ███ █████ █████████ ████████████, ███ ██████████ has ██████ the ████████ ███████ ██████████ for ████████ such as ███████████, ███████ ████████, █████████, ███████, ███████████ and ██████ ██████. ████████ █████████ ████ ██████████ is ██████ to the ██████, such ████ ████████ do not ███████ the ███ ████████████ like ████ in ███████████ with ██ ███ █████████ ████████████ have, ██████ why the ██████ ██████ of such ███-█████ ████████ is █████ ███████ ██████ (in ██████) than ████-█████ ████████ █████ the ██████████ of ████ (and ████████ like ████████ computers, ██████ ██████ and ███████████) may ████ be ███████ ████████ by ██████████ the light to be ████████ in the ██████ ███████ of the ███. Such ██████████ ██████ ██████ █████████ are not ███ ███████████ by the ███ industry and have not made it ███████ than ██████████ ██████████. They ████ ██████ be ███████████ by the ███ industry to ████████ the ██████████ ████████ to ████ ████████████.
██████████ to other ████████
A ████████ ██████████ ████████ ██████, a ██████ ███ panel, has over ███ ███████ ██████, and they are ███ ████████████ powered by a ████ ███████ ████████ in the ██████. The ████ █████, or ████████, form a grid with ████████ █████ across the █████ ██████ on one side of the ██████ and ██████████ █████ across the █████ ██████ on the other side of the ██████. To this grid each █████ has a positive ██████████ on one side and a negative ██████████ on the other side. ██ the █████ amount of █████ ██████ for a █████ ███████ is 3 █ ████ █████ ██████████ and ████ █████ ████████████ for a █████ of ████ █████ ████████████ and ██████████. ██████ █████ for ███, █████ and ████ and ████ ███████ of ██████ for each █████ for a █████ of ████ █████ █████ ██████████ and ████ ████ of █████ █████ ████████████. For a panel that is ██.8 ██████ (██ ███████████) wide, that means a ████ ███████ of ███ █████ per ████ along the ██████████ ████.
The ███ panel is powered by ███ ███████ that are █████████ ███████ up with the ████ of the ███ panel at the factory level. The ███████ may be █████████ using ███████ ███████, the most common of █████ are ███ (████-On-█████) and ███ (████-█████████ ███████) These ████ ██████████ █████ also for ██████████ ███████ that are much smaller than ██ ███████. ███ panels █████████ use ██████-██████ ████████ ██████████ ████████ on a █████ █████████ to form the cell circuitry to ███████ the panel. It is ███████ not ████████ to use █████████ ██████████ to ████████ ███████ the panel to a ████████ ██████-██████ circuit board. ███████, ███████████ is ████████████ using ███████████ ██████████ ████ or, for lower █████████, ███████████ ██████████.
███████-██████
██████████ and █████ █████ ███████-██████ ████ were ████████ in most █████ ███████ (████████ a few used ██████ ████████) and the ████████ ████████ ████ ███ until the ███-█████, when █████ ██████-██████ ██████ ████████ on ███ ███████. The ████████████ ████████████ █████████ ████████ (████████ in ████) was one of the first to use an ██████-██████ ███████ (██████ █████ ██████████). ███████-██████ ████ are █████ used in the █████ for ████████████ less █████████ than ██████ computers and ███, such as ███████████ ███████████. In ██████████, these are used on ████████ ███████ where less ███████████ ███████ █████ to be █████████, ██████ power ███████████ (no █████████) and low ████ are ███████ or ███████████ in ██████ ████████ is ██████.
████████ having a ███████-██████ structure are █████████ super-███████ ███████ ███ (████████ by █████ ██████ ████████ ██████, █████, ███████████, in ████; ██████████ ███████ were █████████) or double-layer ███ (████) ██████████ (the ██████ of █████ █████████ a █████-████████ ███████ with the ██████), and █████-███ (████) in █████ █████ is █████ by using an ████████ ██████. ███ ████ have been █████████ for ███████-██████ ██████████. They ███████ a ███████ █████████ of the ████████-██-voltage ██████████████ than the ████████ ██ ████. This is █████████, because ██████ are █████████ to ███████ ████████ ████ █████ not ████████. █████████ between █████████ and non-█████████ ██████ has to be ███████ ████████ by ███████ the ███ voltage of non-█████████ ██████ below the █████████ voltage as ██████████ by █████ █. ████ in ████, █████ █████████ ██████ are █████████ to ████████ above █████████ (the ████████ █████████ to the “███ █ ███████” █████ ██████). ███████ such ███ ████████ █████████ to the ███ █ ███████ █████ ██████ ███████ ████ high ████ ██████████ ████████. ██████ and ██ ████ ████████ an ███████████ █████ ██████ (a non “███ █ ███████” █████ ██████) █████████ much lower ████████, such that the ███ ███████ could be ██████ using low voltage ████ ████████████.
███ ████ have to be ████████████ █████████ by ███████████ ██████ ████████ of one ████████ during one █████ and ██████ of opposite ████████ during the next █████. ██████████ ██████ are █████████ by the █████████████ ███ and ██████ ████████. This type of ███████ is called ███████-██████ █████████, because the █████ ████ ██████ its █████ between █████████ without the ███████ of a ██████ electrical charge. As the number of ██████ (and, ███████████████, ███████ and ████) █████████, this type of ███████ ███████ less ████████. ████ ████████ times and ████ ████████ are ███████ of ███████-██████ █████████ ████ with ███ many ██████ and ██████ █████████ to the “███ █ ███████” █████ ██████. ██████ and ██ ████ also ████████ a non ███ █████ ██████ ████████ to █████ ███ ████████ with █████ █████ and ████████ to ████ ██████ ██████ █████ ██████ on an ███ ███████. ███████, ███████ ██████, ████████ these ███████ and ████████████ ██████████ ███████ ███ █████ ███ ██████ ███████████ on the ██████
████████ ████ do not ███████ ██████████ ██████████. █████████ is ████ ████████ for ███████ ███████████ ███████. In ████ ██ ███ ██████ and ████ ██ ████ ████████ an ███ type ███████ that could be ████████ in a ████████ ████, ████████ █████████ high ██████████ ██████ up to ████ █████ or more using ████ low ████████. Since a █████ may be ██████ in an on-█████ or in an off █████ at the ██████ new ███████████ █████ to be ███████ to that ██████████ █████, the ██████████ ██████ of these ████████ ████████ is ██████ ███████, a ██████ why these ████████ ███ not made it to the ██████. That ███████ when in the ████ “████-power” (████████) ████ ██████ █████████. ███████████, ███████-██████ ██████████ can be used with ███████ if their ███████████ ███████████████ are ████████, █████ was the ████ for ██████ █████ ████ to ████ █████ ████████ ████. After a ████ is ███████ to the ███████, the ███████ may be ███ from the power █████ █████████ ████████ ██████. This has the █████████ that such ██████ may be ████████ for long periods of time powered by ████ a small battery.
High-██████████ █████ ████████, such as ██████ ███ computer ████████ and ███████████, use an ██████-██████ structure. A ██████ of ████-████ ███████████ (████) is █████ to the ██████████ in ███████ with the ██ layer. Each █████ has its own █████████ ██████████, ████████ each ██████ ████ to ██████ one █████. When a ███ ████ is ████████, ███ of the ██████ █████ are █████████ to a ███ of ██████ and ████████ █████████████ to the ███████ ███████████ are ██████ onto ███ of the ██████ █████. The ███ ████ is then ███████████ and the next ███ ████ is ████████. ███ of the ███ █████ are ████████ in ████████ during a ███████ █████████. ██████-██████ █████████ ████████ ████ ████████ and ███████ than ███████-██████ █████████ ████████ of the ████ ████, and █████████ have ███████ ████████ times, █████████ much better ██████. █████ ████████ ████████ ██████████ ████ with a 1-███ ████ cell per █████ that ████ ████████ small amounts of power to ████████ an █████.
███████ ████ can also have █████ by using Field ██████████ █████ (███ ███). This ████ of ████████ have a high speed ███████ ███████ ███ panel with an ███ █████████. The █████████ ███████ ███████ █████, making it ██████ █████ to the █████ ███. The ███ panel is ████████████ with the █████████. For example, to make a ███████ ██████ ███, the ███████ is ████ turned ON when the █████████ is ███, and to make a ███████ ██████ ███████, the ███████ is turned ON when the █████████ is ████, and it █████████ to be ON █████ the █████████ ███████ ███, and it turns OFF when the █████████ ███████ █████. To make a ███████ ██████ █████, the ███████ is ██████ turned ON. An ███ ███ ███████ a █████ █████ into 3 ██████ (one ███, one █████ and one ████) and it ████████ them in █████. ███ to ███████████ of ██████, the 3 █████████████ ██████ ██████ as one █████ █████. An ███ ███ █████ an ███ panel with a ███████ ████ of ██████, and the ████████ time is ███████ to ████ 5 ████████████ when ████████ with ██████ ███ ███ panels █████ have a ████████ time of ██ ████████████. ███ ████ ███████ a ████-On-█████ ██████ ██ can also be used with a ██████████ ███████████.
███████ ██████████ ███ (█████ ████ █ ██████) ████████ ████ in ████, ████████ the super-████████████ ██████. It has the █████████, █████ █████, and most of the ████████ of a ███-███, but ████ ████████ as much power as an ███ ███████, █████████ to ███████. It was █████ used in a variety of ███████ cellular-█████████ ██████ produced until ████ ████, when ███████ ███████ █████████ ███ ████████. ███ ████████ were also used in ███████ ██████ of ██ ██████ ██████.
██████-██████ ████████████
███████ ███████ ████
███████ ███████ ████████ ███████ ██████ ████████ that █████ and ███████ at ███████ ███████ to █████ light to ████ through. When no voltage is applied to a ██ ██████ ███████ cell, █████████ light ██████ through the ██-███████ ███████ ██ layer. In ██████████ to the voltage applied, the ██████ ████████ ███████ ████████ the ████████████ and ████████ the ███████ ████. By ████████ █████████ the level of the voltage ██████ any ████ level or ████████████ can be ████████.
████████ █████████ █████
In-█████ █████████ is an ███ ██████████ that ██████ the ██████ ████████ in a █████ parallel to the █████ ██████████. In this ██████, the electrical field is applied through opposite ██████████ on the ████ █████ █████████, ██ that the ██████ ████████ can be ██████████ (switched) ███████████ in the ████ █████, ████████ ██████ ██████ ███████ a ███████████ █████████████. This ████████ two ███████████ for each █████ ███████ of the single ██████████ ██████ for a ████████ ████-████ ██████████ (███) ███████. The ███ ██████████ is used in ██████████ from ███████████, computer ████████, and ████ ████████ ███████. ███ ████████ ██████ to the ███ panel ██████ ██████ types. The other two types are ██ and ██. Before ██ ████████ ███ was ██████████ in ████, the ██████████ ███████████ ████████ in ████████ more ████████████ ████, ████ █████████ a ████████ █████████ and █████████ more power, making this type of ███████ less █████████ for ████████ computers. █████████ █████████ is using an ████████ ███████ ████ for their large ████ ███-██ ████████ as well as ███████-███████ in its █████ █████ ████████ ██████ and their ██████████ 11.
Super ████████ █████████ ███████
Super-███ was █████ ██████████ after in-█████ █████████ with ████ better ████████ times and █████ ████████████.
██ or ████ ███████████
In ████ ██ ███████ █████████ the ██████████████ of a new ██████████ called ██ █████ is the ████████ of █████ ████████ along with the ███████ ███ ████ in their ███ panel ██████████.
Most of the new ██ ██████████ was ████████ on ██ ██ ████ █████ ███ to a ███████████ after █████ ██████ that the ████████ of a █████ ███ █████ █████████ the ███████████ ███ structure █████ ██████ the ██████████ by around ███. This means that a ██ ██ ██████ ███████ the full ███ ██ ████████. The █████ and ████████ █████ █████ called this “████” ███ because of the █████ ███ █████. ████████ ██ ███████ has █████████ this ██████████ for use in ████████ ███████, ███████ and ███████████, it ██████ more ███████ in the ██ ██████ because the █████████ ██ ███ ██████████ but █████ █████ █████████ of █████████ ████ ███ ██████████ ███████ by the ███ as █████████ ██████ ██████ with 8-███ █████. This ██████████ ███████ the █████████ of ████, making it a ███ ███████, █████ is ██████████ ██████████ when a ██ is used as a ██ ███████.
███ in ██████████ to ██████
In ████, ██ ███████ the ██████████ ██ ███████ █████ (███ ███ (███ ████)) has the ██████████ up to ███ ████, █████ the ██████████ has ████ ███ ███ with ███ ████ and double an ██████-██████ ████ (██████) ███████ with ███ ████. ██ also ███████ the ████ ███████ to be ██ ███████ more efficient than ███████ ████ and to ███████ ████ ██ ███████ of the power of ██████ ████████ when █████████ █████ on ██████. When it █████ to ████████ ratio, ██████ ███████ █████ ████████ best ███ to its ██████████ ██████████, where the █████ ██████ are █████████ as █████ █████ and not as ████ ████. On ██████ ██, ████, █████ █████████ the █████ ███ and also made the █████ of the ███████ █████████ ███████ at ████ ████. The ██████ also had ███████ ██████████ layer, █████████ the ████████ ratio and ████████ it ██████ to that of the ██████ ███████.
████████ ██████ field █████████ ██████
Known as ██████ field █████████ (███) until ████, ████████ ██████ field █████████ is ███████ to ███ or █-███ ████████ ████████ ███████████ and █████ █████ with high ██████████. ████ was █████████ by █████ ████████████ ██., ███, █████ (████████ ███████ ███████████, ███ ████ Force). ████-applied ████████ ████████████ ████████ █████ ██████████ █████ ███████████ a █████ ███████ █████ for a ████████████ ███████. █████ █████ and █████████ ██████ by light ███████ is █████████ by ██████████ the █████ █████ █████ also ████████ ██████████ ████████████. In ████, █████ ████████████ ██., ███ ████████ ████ to ███████ ███████ ████████. ███████ is using ████ to ███████████ high-end panels. In ████, █████ ████████ ████ to █████ █████ ███████ ███████ ███████████. ███████ ██████████, █████ ██████████ a high-█████████████ █████████ of the ████ ███████, called ████ (████). █████ ██████████ █████ with ████████ ███████ ███████████ in ████. ████ panels are ██████ ████████ in the ████████ of ██████ ██████████ ████████ ████████. ███████, it is no longer produced as of ████████ ████.
████████ █████████ ████
████████-█████████ ████████ are a form of ████ in █████ the ██████ ████████ █████████ █████ ██████████ to the █████ ██████████. When no voltage is applied, the ██████ ████████ ██████ █████████████ to the █████████, ████████ a █████ ███████ between ███████ ██████████. When voltage is applied, the ██████ ████████ █████ to a ██████ ████████, ████████ light to ████ through and ██████ a ████-scale ███████ █████████ on the amount of ████ generated by the electric field. It has a ██████-█████ ██████████, a higher ████████ ratio, a █████ ███████ █████, and better █████ ███████ at ███████ ████████████ than ███████████ ███████-███████ ████████. ████████ to ███, the █████ ██████ are █████ ██████, ████████ for a higher ████████ ratio, but the ███████ █████ is ████████, with █████ and ██████████ ████████ █████ █████ more ████████.
████ █████ ████
████ █████ ████ ████ have been █████ as engineering ███████ █████ in ████, but they are not in mass-production. The ███████ of ████ █████ ████ ████ ███████ that ████ █████ █████████ times (██ ██) can be ████████, ██ time ██████████ █████ ███████ can ████████ be ████████ and █████████ █████ ███████ █████ be ████████.
███████ ███████
Some ███ panels have █████████ ███████████, ███████ ███████████ ███ or █████ ██████ █████ are ████████ ████████ to as █████ ██████ or ████ ██████ ████████████. Unlike ██████████ ████████ (███), ███ panels with a few █████████ ███████████ are ███████ █████ ██████. ██████████████ ████████ for the ██████████ number of █████████ ██████ ████ ███████. At one point, ███████ ████ a ████-█████████ ██████ for ███ ████████ ████ in █████. As of ████, ██████, ███████ ███████ to the less ███████████ ███ █████-2 ████████. Other █████████ have been known to ████████ as many as 11 ████ ██████ in their ████████.
████ █████ ████████ are often █████ ███████ between █████████████ and █████████. To ████████ the █████████████ of ███████ and to ███████ the end ████, ███ ████████ the ███ █████-2 ████████, █████ was made ████████ in ████ with the ███████ of ███ ████, ████████████ ███-████-███, ███, ███, ███:████ █████ ███████. ███████, not █████ ███ ████████████ ████████ to the ███ ████████ and the ███ ████████ is quite often ███████████ in different ways. ███ panels are more ██████ to have ███████ than most ███ ███ to their larger ████. For example, a ██████ ████ ███ has 8 ███████ and a ██████ █████ has ████ 3 ███████. ███████, ███ of the ███ ████ on the █████ ████ be ██████████, ███████ █████████ of the █████ ███ panel █████ be a ██ █████. In ██████ █████, ███████ ███████ has been ████████. An ████ ███ panel with 4 █████████ ██████ is ███████ ██████████ █████████ and █████████ can ███████ an ████████ for a new one.
Some █████████████, ███████ in █████ █████ where some of the ███████ ███ panel █████████████, such as ██, are ███████, ███ have a ████-█████████-█████ █████████, █████ is an █████ █████████ ███████ █████ can then █████████ “A”- and “█”-█████ panels. Many █████████████ █████ ███████ a ███████ ████ with one █████████ █████. ████ where such ██████████ do not █████, the ████████ of █████████ ██████ is █████████. A ███████ with ████ a few █████████ ██████ may be ████████████ if the █████████ ██████ are near each other. ███ panels also have ███████ known as ████████ (or less ████████ ████), █████ █████████ the ██████ ███████ of ███████ in █████████. It is most ███████ in ████ or █████ █████ of █████████ ██████. As of ████, most ███████ ███████ computer ███ panel █████████████ ███████ their ████████ as having ████ ███████.
“████-power” (████████) ████████
The ████████ ████████ device (███), █████████ by ███████ (████████ ████), can ██████ an █████ without power. The ████████ may █████ in one of two ██████ ████████████ (“█████” and “█████”) and power is ████ ████████ to ██████ the █████. ███ ████████ is a ████-off ███████ from ███████ ███ ████████████ both █████████ and █████ ███ ███████. ████ ████████ has also █████████ a “no-power” ███████ that ████ ███████ ██████████ ███████████ ██████ ███████ (█████). In ████ ████ ████████████ the use of a █████ to █████ the entire ███████ of a ██████ █████, ████████ it to ██████ ██████, and ████ that █████ ████ when power is ███████.
In ████, ███████████ at the ██████████ of ██████ ████████████ two new types of ████-power ████████ ████ █████ on ████████ ████████ ██████████. ███████ ████████ ████████████, like the ████ ███ and the ████████ ███████████, ██████ ██████ on the ████ ██████████ of the ██████ ███████ (██) and use ████████ ██████ █████████, with █████████ █████ and ██ ████████ ███████ to the ███████████ ██████████ █████████. Other ████████ ████████████, e.g., █████ ██████████, are █████ ██████ on the ███████ ██████████ and ████ ████████ ████ █████████ █████████.
██████████████
██████████ and █████████████
Some of these ██████ ██████ to full-██████ ████████, ██████ to small ████████ as on ███████, ███. Many of the ███████████ are with ███ ████████.
██████████
█████████████
███████ ███████ █████ in some █████ or ███████ ████████, ███████ █████, ██████████, ████████ and ██████████ to ████ with ████ ████████, ████ within the ████████ ███████ █████. ██████ ████████████ in some ████████ (more common in ███-types and █████ ███), ███████ ██████████ ██████████, ██████████ toward the █████ (“█████████ █████”). █████ ██████ may not be as ████ as ████████ because ██████████ ██████ ████████ ██████ ██████████ █████ ███ of the █████████ from ███████ through. ███████ ██████ ████ on ██████ ███████ ██████ by ████ ████████ times (██ ██) and ███-████████ on a ██████-and-████ ███████, ██████ a ████████ █████████ is used. ███████, this ████████ can █████ ███ ██████, as is █████ next: As of ████, most ███████████████ of ███ ████████████ use █████-█████ ██████████ (███) to ███ the ███████, █████ █████ the ██████ ███████ more ███████ (this does not ████ ███████) than a ███ ███████ at █████ ███████ ████ █████ (this is because the entire ██████ is ████████ on and off ██████ than a █████ ████████ █████████ ███ █████ ███████████ █████ across the ███████, ███████ some ████ of the ███████ ██████ ███), ███████ ██████ ███-██████ for some ██████. █████████████, many of these ██████ don’t know that their ███-██████ is █████ ██████ by the █████████ ██████ ██████ of ███. This ███████ is █████ on many ███-███████ ████████, because the ████ switch on and off ██████ than a ████ ████. ████ one ██████ ██████████. ██████████ any other ██████████ ██████ ████████ a █████ ██████, ███████ ██████████ and ██████ █████, or running the ███████ at ██████ ██████████ using 1:1 █████ ███████, ███████ the █████ ██████ not to ████ the ██████ (███████████ ███████), or to ███ off the lower or █████ █████ of the ██████. █████ ███ █████ (also called █████ █████). Many ███████ ████ are ████ ████ to ███████ ██████ (2) ██████. 8-███ █-███ panels can ███████ ██████████ (2) ██████ and have █████████████ better █████ level, but are █████████ and have ██████ ████████ time. Input ███, because the █████ ███ █████████ █████ for each █████ to be ██████████ been output before ███████ it to the ███ panel. Many ███ ████████ do ████-██████████ before ██████████ the █████ in an ███████ to ██████████ for ████ █████ ████████, █████ ████ an ██████████ ███. ███████, a █████ ██████ ████ be used when ██████████ non-██████ ███████████, █████ ████ ███ more time ███. ███████ and ████ ██████████ are ███████ ████ in a single ████ on ██████ ████████, but each ████████ that ████ ████████ ████ some █████. Some ████████ have a █████ ██████ ████ █████ ████████ ███ or most ██████████ to ██████ ███████████ input ███. ████ or █████ ██████ may occur during █████████████ or after a period of use. A █████ █████ ████ ████ with █████ ████ on an ███-█████ ██████, █████ a ████ one ████ ██████ ██████ █████. ███████ to ████-in ██████, ████████ the █████ ███████ from ███ and the ██████ may not be █████████, a ██████ █████ can █████ ████-in in a matter of █████ in █████ ████████ ████████. In a ████████-on █████████, ██████████████ may occur in ████ of ███ ███████ ██████████, in █████ ████ of the ██████ has ██████████ and █████ ██████████ ████████ to the ████ of the ██████. Loss of ██████████ and much ██████ ████████ times in low temperature ████████████. In ███-████ ████████████, ███ ███████ may █████ to ████████ without the use of ████████████ ███████. Loss of ████████ in high temperature ████████████.█████████ used
███████ different ████████ of ██████ ████████ are used in ██████ ████████. The █████████ used have to be ███████████, and to ███████ ██████ ██████████. ███████████ ███-██████ █████████ (█████████, ██████████, ███.) are common. A common form is a ████ of ████████ ███████ █████, with a ████████ ██████ (██████, ██████, █████, or █████ ███ █████) on one end and █████ (███████, ███████) on the other. █████████ the ███████ █████ are █████████ with an █████████ █████, ████████, ████, █████, ███, ████, or █████ █████. In ████████, ████████ ████████ of ███████ █████████ are used, to ███████ █████ temperature █████████ range (███..██████ for low-end and ███..███████ for high-███████████ ████████). For example, the ██ ███████ is ████████ of █████ █████████ and one █████████: ██ ██.█ of ██-██████-4-████████████ (███████ range ██..█████), ██ ██.█ of ██-██████-4-████████████ (███████ range ██..█████), ██ ██.█ of ██-██████-4-████████████ (███████ range ██..█████), and 9 ██.█ of 4-██████-4-████████████ (███████ range ███..██████).
█████████████ ██████
The production of ███ ███████ ████ ████████ ███████████ (██3) as an ███████ █████ during the production of the ████-████ ██████████. ██3 is a ██████ ██████████ ███, and its ██████████ long ████-████ may make it a ███████████ ███████ ███████████ to ██████ ███████. A ██████ in ███████████ ████████ ███████ █████████ that its ███████ were █████████████ much greater than better-known sources of ██████████ ██████ like ██████ ███████. As ██3 was not in ██████████ use at the time, it was not made ████ of the █████ █████████ and has been ██████ “the ███████ ██████████ ███”.
███████ of the ██████ point out that it ███████ that ███ of the ██3 produced █████ be ████████ to the ██████████. In ███████, the ████ ████████ of ██3 is ██████ down during the ████████ █████████; two ███████ ███████ █████ that ████ 2 to ██ of the ███ ███████ ███████████ after its use. ███████████, the ██████ ██████ to ███████ ██3██ ███████ with what it ████████, ███████████████, another ████████ ██████████ ███, of █████ ████████ from ██ to ███ ███████ to the ██████████ in ███████ use.
█████████████ ██████-███████ ███████ ████-panel ███████ ███-████ ███ ██████████████ ███ █████████ ███ ██████████ ████ of ██████-███████-███████ █████████████ ███ ███████ ████████ – ████████████████ on ███████ ███████ and ████████ ██████████ of ██████ ████████ by ██████████.███ ████████ ██████ ██, ████, at the ███████ ███████ ███████████ of █████ █████ ████████ to low-█████-mass and ███████ ██████ ████████ (█████ ███████████████ ████) An ████████████ ████████████ to ██████ ████████ from ████ ███████ ███████ ██████████ ██████ ███████ ███████ ████████ from the ██████ ████████ █████, ██████████ of ████████ ██████ an ███ ███████ from ████████ ███████ █████████ ████████ and ██████ ████████ a ███████ by ██████ and ███████ How ███-████ are made, by ███ ████████ █████ 8, ████, at the ███████ ███████ How ████ (Low Temperature ████ ███████) ████ are made, by ███ ████████ ████ 6, ████, at the ███████ ███████ ███████████ of ██████ ███████ ████████: █████████ with ██████ ████, ████ ██████████, ████ – █████ by the ████ ███████ █████. ███████ █. ███████ ███████ of ██████ ████████, a ████████████ and ████████ from the ████ ████████ that ████: ███████ ██████ from the ███████ of ██████ ████████. █████ ██████ █ ███ ███████ (████) ████, ███████, and ████-██████ ███: a ███████ of ██████ ████████, ██████ ██████████ █████ ████████-█-██-██████-5. ████ █████████ (███████ ██, ████). “████████████ ███ ███████ ██████████: █████████ and ██████████ ████████”. █-███ ████. ████████ from the ████████ on May ██, ████. █████████ ████. ████████ of ████ ██████████, ████████████ ██████████ ██████████ ██████████ █████████ of ███ panels██████████
████ ███████, ████ and light, ██████████ in ██████████ with █████, █████ ███ ████████. Low power ███████████. █████████ on the ███ ███████ ██████████ and ███████ █████ █████████, the █████ ████ ███████ ██████ █████████ use less than ████ of the power a ███ ███████ of the ████ ████ ███████ ████ █████ use, and the ██████ ███ ███████ ██████ █████████ use 10-███ of the power a ███ ███████ █████ use. Little heat ███████ during █████████, ███ to low power ███████████. No █████████ ██████████. The ████████ ███████ to have little or no ███████ █████████ on █████████ ██████████. ███████ no ███████-████ ███████, because the ███ ██████ ████ their █████ between █████████ (█████ are ███████ ████ at ██████ or ██████, ██████████ of the input ███████ ████). █████ █████ with no ████████ or ████████ when ████████ at ██████ ██████████. █████ ██████ no ███████████ ███████████████ █████████ (in the █████████ low █████████ range), unlike a ███ ███████. Can be made in ██████ any ████ or shape. No ███████████ ██████████ █████. When ████████ ███ panels are used ████████ to ██████ a single ██████, each ██████████ panel █████████ the █████ ██████████ of the ███████, █████ is ████████ called ███████ ██████████. Can be made in large █████ of over ██-████ (███) ████████. ███████ ██████: the ███ grid can ████ the ███████ of ███████ and █████████ ████████████, ████████ the ████████ of higher █████ ███████. ██████████ by ████████ ██████, █████████ the ███████, unlike most █████ ████. As an ██████████ ███████ device, the ███ can ████████ ███████ ███████ ████ from a ███ or ████ ██████████ without █████████ ██████████ to ██████. Some ███ panels have ██████ █████ █████ ██████ in ████████ to ███ and ████. Many ███ ████████ are powered by a ████ power supply, and if █████ into a computer can be powered by its ████ power supply. Can be made with ████ ██████ █████ ███████, ████████ ████████ ███ ███████ to be ███████ side by side to make up what █████ like one ███ ██████.█████████████
███████ ███████ █████ in some █████ or ███████ ████████, ███████ █████, ██████████, ████████ and ██████████ to ████ with ████ ████████, ████ within the ████████ ███████ █████. ██████ ████████████ in some ████████ (more common in ███-types and █████ ███), ███████ ██████████ ██████████, ██████████ toward the █████ (“█████████ █████”). █████ ██████ may not be as ████ as ████████ because ██████████ ██████ ████████ ██████ ██████████ █████ ███ of the █████████ from ███████ through. ███████ ██████ ████ on ██████ ███████ ██████ by ████ ████████ times (██ ██) and ███-████████ on a ██████-and-████ ███████, ██████ a ████████ █████████ is used. ███████, this ████████ can █████ ███ ██████, as is █████ next: As of ████, most ███████████████ of ███ ████████████ use █████-█████ ██████████ (███) to ███ the ███████, █████ █████ the ██████ ███████ more ███████ (this does not ████ ███████) than a ███ ███████ at █████ ███████ ████ █████ (this is because the entire ██████ is ████████ on and off ██████ than a █████ ████████ █████████ ███ █████ ███████████ █████ across the ███████, ███████ some ████ of the ███████ ██████ ███), ███████ ██████ ███-██████ for some ██████. █████████████, many of these ██████ don’t know that their ███-██████ is █████ ██████ by the █████████ ██████ ██████ of ███. This ███████ is █████ on many ███-███████ ████████, because the ████ switch on and off ██████ than a ████ ████. ████ one ██████ ██████████. ██████████ any other ██████████ ██████ ████████ a █████ ██████, ███████ ██████████ and ██████ █████, or running the ███████ at ██████ ██████████ using 1:1 █████ ███████, ███████ the █████ ██████ not to ████ the ██████ (███████████ ███████), or to ███ off the lower or █████ █████ of the ██████. █████ ███ █████ (also called █████ █████). Many ███████ ████ are ████ ████ to ███████ ██████ (2) ██████. 8-███ █-███ panels can ███████ ██████████ (2) ██████ and have █████████████ better █████ level, but are █████████ and have ██████ ████████ time. Input ███, because the █████ ███ █████████ █████ for each █████ to be ██████████ been output before ███████ it to the ███ panel. Many ███ ████████ do ████-██████████ before ██████████ the █████ in an ███████ to ██████████ for ████ █████ ████████, █████ ████ an ██████████ ███. ███████, a █████ ██████ ████ be used when ██████████ non-██████ ███████████, █████ ████ ███ more time ███. ███████ and ████ ██████████ are ███████ ████ in a single ████ on ██████ ████████, but each ████████ that ████ ████████ ████ some █████. Some ████████ have a █████ ██████ ████ █████ ████████ ███ or most ██████████ to ██████ ███████████ input ███. ████ or █████ ██████ may occur during █████████████ or after a period of use. A █████ █████ ████ ████ with █████ ████ on an ███-█████ ██████, █████ a ████ one ████ ██████ ██████ █████. ███████ to ████-in ██████, ████████ the █████ ███████ from ███ and the ██████ may not be █████████, a ██████ █████ can █████ ████-in in a matter of █████ in █████ ████████ ████████. In a ████████-on █████████, ██████████████ may occur in ████ of ███ ███████ ██████████, in █████ ████ of the ██████ has ██████████ and █████ ██████████ ████████ to the ████ of the ██████. Loss of ██████████ and much ██████ ████████ times in low temperature ████████████. In ███-████ ████████████, ███ ███████ may █████ to ████████ without the use of ████████████ ███████. Loss of ████████ in high temperature ████████████.█████████ used
███████ different ████████ of ██████ ████████ are used in ██████ ████████. The █████████ used have to be ███████████, and to ███████ ██████ ██████████. ███████████ ███-██████ █████████ (█████████, ██████████, ███.) are common. A common form is a ████ of ████████ ███████ █████, with a ████████ ██████ (██████, ██████, █████, or █████ ███ █████) on one end and █████ (███████, ███████) on the other. █████████ the ███████ █████ are █████████ with an █████████ █████, ████████, ████, █████, ███, ████, or █████ █████. In ████████, ████████ ████████ of ███████ █████████ are used, to ███████ █████ temperature █████████ range (███..██████ for low-end and ███..███████ for high-███████████ ████████). For example, the ██ ███████ is ████████ of █████ █████████ and one █████████: ██ ██.█ of ██-██████-4-████████████ (███████ range ██..█████), ██ ██.█ of ██-██████-4-████████████ (███████ range ██..█████), ██ ██.█ of ██-██████-4-████████████ (███████ range ██..█████), and 9 ██.█ of 4-██████-4-████████████ (███████ range ███..██████).
█████████████ ██████
The production of ███ ███████ ████ ████████ ███████████ (██3) as an ███████ █████ during the production of the ████-████ ██████████. ██3 is a ██████ ██████████ ███, and its ██████████ long ████-████ may make it a ███████████ ███████ ███████████ to ██████ ███████. A ██████ in ███████████ ████████ ███████ █████████ that its ███████ were █████████████ much greater than better-known sources of ██████████ ██████ like ██████ ███████. As ██3 was not in ██████████ use at the time, it was not made ████ of the █████ █████████ and has been ██████ “the ███████ ██████████ ███”.
███████ of the ██████ point out that it ███████ that ███ of the ██3 produced █████ be ████████ to the ██████████. In ███████, the ████ ████████ of ██3 is ██████ down during the ████████ █████████; two ███████ ███████ █████ that ████ 2 to ██ of the ███ ███████ ███████████ after its use. ███████████, the ██████ ██████ to ███████ ██3██ ███████ with what it ████████, ███████████████, another ████████ ██████████ ███, of █████ ████████ from ██ to ███ ███████ to the ██████████ in ███████ use.
█████████████ ██████-███████ ███████ ████-panel ███████ ███-████ ███ ██████████████ ███ █████████ ███ ██████████ ████ of ██████-███████-███████ █████████████ ███ ███████ ████████ – ████████████████ on ███████ ███████ and ████████ ██████████ of ██████ ████████ by ██████████.███ ████████ ██████ ██, ████, at the ███████ ███████ ███████████ of █████ █████ ████████ to low-█████-mass and ███████ ██████ ████████ (█████ ███████████████ ████) An ████████████ ████████████ to ██████ ████████ from ████ ███████ ███████ ██████████ ██████ ███████ ███████ ████████ from the ██████ ████████ █████, ██████████ of ████████ ██████ an ███ ███████ from ████████ ███████ █████████ ████████ and ██████ ████████ a ███████ by ██████ and ███████ How ███-████ are made, by ███ ████████ █████ 8, ████, at the ███████ ███████ How ████ (Low Temperature ████ ███████) ████ are made, by ███ ████████ ████ 6, ████, at the ███████ ███████ ███████████ of ██████ ███████ ████████: █████████ with ██████ ████, ████ ██████████, ████ – █████ by the ████ ███████ █████. ███████ █. ███████ ███████ of ██████ ████████, a ████████████ and ████████ from the ████ ████████ that ████: ███████ ██████ from the ███████ of ██████ ████████. █████ ██████ █ ███ ███████ (████) ████, ███████, and ████-██████ ███: a ███████ of ██████ ████████, ██████ ██████████ █████ ████████-█-██-██████-5. ████ █████████ (███████ ██, ████). “████████████ ███ ███████ ██████████: █████████ and ██████████ ████████”. █-███ ████. ████████ from the ████████ on May ██, ████. █████████ ████. ████████ of ████ ██████████, ████████████ ██████████ ██████████ ██████████ █████████ of ███ panelssarahs mum said:
of ██-██████-4-████████████ (███████ range ██..█████), ██ ██.█ of ██-██████-4-████████████ (███████ range ██..█████), ██ ██.█ of ██-██████-4-████████████ (███████ range ██..█████), and 9 ██.█ of 4-██████-4-████████████ (███████ range ███..██████).
█████████████ ██████The production of ███ ███████ ████ ████████ ███████████ (██3) as an ███████ █████ during the production of the ████-████ ██████████. ██3 is a
see all that stuff, it’s chemicals, try simpler physicsy chemicaly words, reckon you’ll smash it
SCIENCE said:
see all that stuff, it’s chemicals, try simpler physicsy chemicaly words, reckon you’ll smash it
AussieDJ said:
SCIENCE said:see all that stuff, it’s chemicals, try simpler physicsy chemicaly words, reckon you’ll smash it
Would sm even need that – the physicsy chemicaly words?
fn physics.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
SCIENCE said:see all that stuff, it’s chemicals, try simpler physicsy chemicaly words, reckon you’ll smash it
Would sm even need that – the physicsy chemicaly words?fn physics.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:Would sm even need that – the physicsy chemicaly words?
fn physics.
It’s more electronics than physics
i thought electronics was physics.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:fn physics.
It’s more electronics than physicsi thought electronics was physics.
Heaven forfend.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Would sm even need that – the physicsy chemicaly words?
fn physics.
It’s more electronics than physics
right but the actual target words are relatively simple, and 2 are very much chemistry
SCIENCE said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
fn physics.
It’s more electronics than physics
right but the actual target words are relatively simple, and 2 are very much chemistry
alternatively to simple we mean common
sibeen said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:It’s more electronics than physics
i thought electronics was physics.
Heaven forfend.
All science is either physics or stamp collecting: Ernest Rutherford.
And yet somehow this bloke ended up with a Nobel Prize…in Chemistry :)
SCIENCE said:
SCIENCE said:
AussieDJ said:
It’s more electronics than physics
right but the actual target words are relatively simple, and 2 are very much chemistry
alternatively to simple we mean common
but it isn’t common or simple.
But there is a lot of glass.
i hope tonight is about Capability Brown.
sarahs mum said:
i hope tonight is about Capability Brown.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vital_articles/Level/4
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
i hope tonight is about Capability Brown.
Is Capability Brown mentioned in the section where Redactle grabs all the topics from?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vital_articles/Level/4
it doesn’t look like it.
Sad.
330 reflector 2
329 reflective 7
328 reflect 1
327 emit 2
326 sheets 9
325 glass 31
324 silicon 1
sarahs mum said:
325 glass 31
324 silicon 1
related words to these
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:325 glass 31
324 silicon 1
related words to these
There’s only a short time to go before the next game starts. Will we be considered sopping wet blankets if we try to give a clue or two?
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:325 glass 31
324 silicon 1
related words to these
333 surface 3
332 mirror 1
ah well I find out in a few minutes and then I can kick myself.
AussieDJ said:
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:325 glass 31
324 silicon 1
related words to these
There’s only a short time to go before the next game starts. Will we be considered sopping wet blankets if we try to give a clue or two?
no.
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:325 glass 31
324 silicon 1
related words to these
333 surface 3
332 mirror 1ah well I find out in a few minutes and then I can kick myself.
No. No self-violence is expected, or allowed. There’s a such a broad range of topics covered in the game-source part of Wikipedia that no-one could realistically be expected to know it all.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:related words to these
333 surface 3
332 mirror 1ah well I find out in a few minutes and then I can kick myself.
No. No self-violence is expected, or allowed. There’s a such a broad range of topics covered in the game-source part of Wikipedia that no-one could realistically be expected to know it all.
the screen in front of you
SCIENCE said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:333 surface 3
332 mirror 1ah well I find out in a few minutes and then I can kick myself.
No. No self-violence is expected, or allowed. There’s a such a broad range of topics covered in the game-source part of Wikipedia that no-one could realistically be expected to know it all.
the screen in front of you
missed it. too late.
what was it?
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
AussieDJ said:No. No self-violence is expected, or allowed. There’s a such a broad range of topics covered in the game-source part of Wikipedia that no-one could realistically be expected to know it all.
the screen in front of you
missed it. too late.
what was it?
liquid crystal display
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:the screen in front of you
missed it. too late.
what was it?
liquid crystal display
oh. I suppose I should know about that and not capability brown. sigh.
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:missed it. too late.
what was it?
liquid crystal display
oh. I suppose I should know about that and not capability brown. sigh.
you know days may have passed without me getting there.
It’s gone very, very quiet …
:)
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
liquid crystal display
oh. I suppose I should know about that and not capability brown. sigh.
you know days may have passed without me getting there.
to be fair we know nothing about capability brown and indeed the ones we get quick seem to complement what others here do
we consulted a reference for the current one, but suspect you may not need to, it’s not too technical
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:sarahs mum said:
oh. I suppose I should know about that and not capability brown. sigh.
you know days may have passed without me getting there.
to be fair we know nothing about capability brown and indeed the ones we get quick seem to complement what others here do
we consulted a reference for the current one, but suspect you may not need to, it’s not too technical
oh good. But I might be finishing it tomorrow. my eyes are dim.
i remember cathode ray terminals.
SCIENCE said:
we consulted a reference for the current one, but suspect you may not need to, it’s not too technical
By coincidence, I was listening to a recording of various national tunes and didn’t equate what I’d heard with the answer.
221 guesses, for an accuracy of 56.11%
i’m only up to guess 43. but I have also watched Bunny. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTEw7yR0qJ0
sarahs mum said:
i’m only up to guess 43. but I have also watched Bunny. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTEw7yR0qJ0
so very very very much easier.
67 91.04%
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
i’m only up to guess 43. but I have also watched Bunny. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTEw7yR0qJ0
so very very very much easier.
67 91.04%
Well, so much for an early night.
On to the next one!
Physics again!
AussieDJ said:
Physics again!
fn physics.
i just got it out and it shocked me. I jumped.
101 54.46%
sarahs mum said:
i just got it out and it shocked me. I jumped.101 54.46%
Me? (poke all my ‘usual’ words at it, to no avail. Or not much, anyway) 134 17.91%
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
i just got it out and it shocked me. I jumped.101 54.46%
Pretty good – even with fn physics!Me? (poke all my ‘usual’ words at it, to no avail. Or not much, anyway) 134 17.91%
it didn’t like half of my words.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
i just got it out and it shocked me. I jumped.101 54.46%
Pretty good – even with fn physics!Me? (poke all my ‘usual’ words at it, to no avail. Or not much, anyway) 134 17.91%
it didn’t like half of my words.
It didn’t like 110 of my words.
I would have had better luck shooting for the dark side of the moon.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:Pretty good – even with fn physics!
Me? (poke all my ‘usual’ words at it, to no avail. Or not much, anyway) 134 17.91%
it didn’t like half of my words.
It didn’t like 110 of my words.
I would have had better luck shooting for the dark side of the moon.
but in the end you didn’t need as many words as I did to get the answer.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:it didn’t like half of my words.
It didn’t like 110 of my words.
I would have had better luck shooting for the dark side of the moon.
but in the end you didn’t need as many words as I did to get the answer.
Seems like the shorter ones are harder. The long ones have more chances of words being somewhere in the piece. I do like the those runs where you got a few hundred words of writty out with a half dozen correct guesses.
sarahs mum said:
Seems like the shorter ones are harder. The long ones have more chances of words being somewhere in the piece. I do like the those runs where you got a few hundred words of writty out with a half dozen correct guesses.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #72!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 40 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100%
you’re too too good.
*bows
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #72!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 40 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100%
I stand – or, in this case, sit – in awe!
laugh out loud we have embarrassed ourselves today
style guide
https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style
—-
it says that the writers should use ‘for example’ instead of e.g. Lately I have noticed both used in the same article.
sarahs mum said:
style guidehttps://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style
—-
it says that the writers should use ‘for example’ instead of e.g. Lately I have noticed both used in the same article.
yeah that’s the cost of crowd sourcing your reference materials we guess
sarahs mum said:
style guidehttps://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style
—-
it says that the writers should use ‘for example’ instead of e.g. Lately I have noticed both used in the same article.
It’s the anti-Latin mafia, is what it is.
Got it in six guesses (only two were correct, though).
An accuracy of 33.33%
AussieDJ said:
Got it in six guesses (only two were correct, though).An accuracy of 33.33%
Oh, and sm – you’ll be pleased to know it’s not physics.
AussieDJ said:
Got it in six guesses (only two were correct, though).An accuracy of 33.33%
well done you.
up to guess 19 and I don’t have a clue.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Got it in six guesses (only two were correct, though).An accuracy of 33.33%
well done you.
up to guess 19 and I don’t have a clue.
I was just punching in the first part of common word-pairs – because that’s what it looked like: Punch (& Judy), Ebony (& Ivory), Night (& Day), and so on.
You’ll get there soon, I’m sure.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Got it in six guesses (only two were correct, though).
An accuracy of 33.33%
well done you.
up to guess 19 and I don’t have a clue.
Lucky guess(es) in my case.I was just punching in the first part of common word-pairs – because that’s what it looked like: Punch (& Judy), Ebony (& Ivory), Night (& Day), and so on.
You’ll get there soon, I’m sure.
not soon, we didn’t think we knew fkal about it, and even getting there we still didn’t, but we’d heard of it and the person responsible
SCIENCE said:
… we knew fkal about it, and even getting there we still didn’t, but we’d heard of it and the person responsible
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Got it in six guesses (only two were correct, though).An accuracy of 33.33%
well done you.
up to guess 19 and I don’t have a clue.
Lucky guess(es) in my case.I was just punching in the first part of common word-pairs – because that’s what it looked like: Punch (& Judy), Ebony (& Ivory), Night (& Day), and so on.
You’ll get there soon, I’m sure.
I can only think of Tom and Jerry.
up to 33 but I scored one clanger.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
well done you.
up to guess 19 and I don’t have a clue.
Lucky guess(es) in my case.I was just punching in the first part of common word-pairs – because that’s what it looked like: Punch (& Judy), Ebony (& Ivory), Night (& Day), and so on.
You’ll get there soon, I’m sure.
I can only think of Tom and Jerry.
up to 33 but I scored one clanger.
we did try that too
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:well done you.
up to guess 19 and I don’t have a clue.
Lucky guess(es) in my case.I was just punching in the first part of common word-pairs – because that’s what it looked like: Punch (& Judy), Ebony (& Ivory), Night (& Day), and so on.
You’ll get there soon, I’m sure.
I can only think of Tom and Jerry.
up to 33 but I scored one clanger.
I know nothing of this game but as it’s macca’s 80th i go with John + Paul.
Took a bit longer today.
i feel so tardy.
given we took a few hundred, you got time
108 91.67%
oh. yes. I remember or school library had volumes 2 and 4.
So much for an early night …
The answer was:
You solved it in 94 guesses
Your accuracy was 52.13%
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #74!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 12 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100%
12. 12. Really?
Damn.
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #74!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 12 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100%
12. 12. Really?
Damn.
Most wikipedia articles have either “history” or “etymology” as a heading very early in the article; I look for that first. Sometimes (like tonight) it leads to prompt results.
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #74!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 12 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100%
12. 12. Really?
Damn.
Most wikipedia articles have either “history” or “etymology” as a heading very early in the article; I look for that first. Sometimes (like tonight) it leads to prompt results.
I’ll have to remember to use ‘etymology’ in future games.
I usually try ‘history’, along with ‘who’, ‘what’, ‘when’, ‘where’, ‘how’, and ‘why’ – there’s usually a hit on at least one of these.
90 96.67%
—-
It took me the longest time. But I was almost neat.
106 80.19%
but I took Google’s help tonight. And I am glad I did. But I did have lots and lots out.
I take it these are online games. Are they supposed to be free or do they cost money, like oone has to buy a book of crosswords?
roughbarked said:
I take it these are online games. Are they supposed to be free or do they cost money, like oone has to buy a book of crosswords?
they are all free.
redactle is a different wiki article every night with most of the words blacked out like an Australian freedom of information request. as you guess the words the article becomes exposed.
i think today’s is hard.
sarahs mum said:
roughbarked said:
I take it these are online games. Are they supposed to be free or do they cost money, like oone has to buy a book of crosswords?
they are all free.
redactle is a different wiki article every night with most of the words blacked out like an Australian freedom of information request. as you guess the words the article becomes exposed.
i think today’s is hard.
Nothing is free. What are they taking from you?
anecdote: I was recently offered this:
My blog of repair hints for the modern clock movement is going to be moving from FaceBook to groups.io. It is free of course with tons of information. You will also be the first to hear about any industry news, announcements, and offers we may have from time to time. It will have a searchable archive of all the material I have written about over the past year as well as new material regularly. May I sign you up?
Pure advertising. We are going to use any of your comments to prop up our company.
roughbarked said:
sarahs mum said:
roughbarked said:
I take it these are online games. Are they supposed to be free or do they cost money, like oone has to buy a book of crosswords?
they are all free.
redactle is a different wiki article every night with most of the words blacked out like an Australian freedom of information request. as you guess the words the article becomes exposed.
i think today’s is hard.
Nothing is free. What are they taking from you?
anecdote: I was recently offered this:
My blog of repair hints for the modern clock movement is going to be moving from FaceBook to groups.io. It is free of course with tons of information. You will also be the first to hear about any industry news, announcements, and offers we may have from time to time. It will have a searchable archive of all the material I have written about over the past year as well as new material regularly. May I sign you up?
Pure advertising. We are going to use any of your comments to prop up our company.
redactle doesn’t even have ads.
why not keep the facebook page too?
sarahs mum said:
roughbarked said:
sarahs mum said:they are all free.
redactle is a different wiki article every night with most of the words blacked out like an Australian freedom of information request. as you guess the words the article becomes exposed.
i think today’s is hard.
Nothing is free. What are they taking from you?
anecdote: I was recently offered this:
My blog of repair hints for the modern clock movement is going to be moving from FaceBook to groups.io. It is free of course with tons of information. You will also be the first to hear about any industry news, announcements, and offers we may have from time to time. It will have a searchable archive of all the material I have written about over the past year as well as new material regularly. May I sign you up?
Pure advertising. We are going to use any of your comments to prop up our company.
redactle doesn’t even have ads.
why not keep the facebook page too?
I didn’t ask re: the facebook page.
and the adevertising part would not be done through ads as such. It would be using the blog comments to foster interest in possible customers.
It is similar in a way to when both Seiko and Citizen offeren me tshirts and caps etc, bearing their brand name and actually asked me to buy them and obviously subsequently wear them about town as a walking billboard.
Though it is true that I don’t tear the Mitsubishi logo from the front of my car, it is also true that I don’t repair and sell Mitsubishi cars nor am I expected to buy a belt buckle with it on.
sarahs mum said:
106 80.19%but I took Google’s help tonight. And I am glad I did. But I did have lots and lots out.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
106 80.19%but I took Google’s help tonight. And I am glad I did. But I did have lots and lots out.
Yes, I needed help too … (otherwise, I reckon I’d still be throwing words at it)
340 40.29%
And it is also sad. I knew Monty python had the answer. I just couldn’t remember it. How remiss.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
106 80.19%but I took Google’s help tonight. And I am glad I did. But I did have lots and lots out.
Yes, I needed help too … (otherwise, I reckon I’d still be throwing words at it)
340 40.29%And it is also sad. I knew Monty python had the answer. I just couldn’t remember it. How remiss.
my source for getting out the redactle.
Monty Python – Bruce’s Philosophers Song (Bruce’s Song) {Official Lyric Video]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9SqQNgDrgg
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:Yes, I needed help too … (otherwise, I reckon I’d still be throwing words at it)
340 40.29%And it is also sad. I knew Monty python had the answer. I just couldn’t remember it. How remiss.
my source for getting out the redactle.
Monty Python – Bruce’s Philosophers Song (Bruce’s Song) {Official Lyric Video]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9SqQNgDrgg
no.it was the book title. python was a miss. i di think it was in the python.
57 73.68%
and just when I thought I was making a mess of it i got it out.
sarahs mum said:
and just when I thought I was making a mess of it i got it out.
The last line was broken for me, so I had a look at the wiki article; the redactle line broke at a pronunciation (speaker) symbol at the start of a section about a fifth of the way through the article.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #76!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 20 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
The last line was broken for me, so I had a look at the wiki article; the redactle line broke at a pronunciation (speaker) symbol at the start of a section about a fifth of the way through the article.
also broken for me. And I did think it short.
lol these redactles and semantles completely fucked us this week
SCIENCE said:
lol these redactles and semantles completely fucked us this week
I think I have finally thrown the towel at semantle.
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
lol these redactles and semantles completely fucked us this week
I think I have finally thrown the towel at semantle.
Me too!
In the meantime, sm, there was a tenuous link to your Monty Python comment of a few days ago with today’s game. What was the ‘Holy Grail’ bird that they had to look out for?
I had no idea what today’s Redactle was about or where the clues were heading. Most of the words I was throwing at it were, obviously, wrong:
478 19.67%
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
lol these redactles and semantles completely fucked us this week
I think I have finally thrown the towel at semantle.
Me too!
In the meantime, sm, there was a tenuous link to your Monty Python comment of a few days ago with today’s game. What was the ‘Holy Grail’ bird that they had to look out for?
I had no idea what today’s Redactle was about or where the clues were heading. Most of the words I was throwing at it were, obviously, wrong:
478 19.67%
max scheler 106 80.19%
I had german philosophers and heideggar and marx and existentialism. and I knew I did not know. I had used words like time, place, home, self.
Scheler apparently was a phenomonologist.
Wait you can play both days¿
SCIENCE said:
Wait you can play both days¿
I THINK you can have yesterday’s open and unfinished and you can also open today’s in another window.
Have at it – once again!
AussieDJ said:
Have at it – once again!
I predict my lowest accuracy ever.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Have at it – once again!
I predict my lowest accuracy ever.
Not a great result:
You solved it in 79 guesses (with 68 of the words I tried not appearing in the article)
Your accuracy was 13.92%
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Have at it – once again!
I predict my lowest accuracy ever.
It involves physics, again. I don’t think it’s all that difficult, but I reckon it would be dead easy for buffy … or anyone else who thinks along those lines.Not a great result:
You solved it in 79 guesses (with 68 of the words I tried not appearing in the article)
Your accuracy was 13.92%
my 19th guess was physics. I smelt it. I had two Buffy words out before you mentioned it.
Global Median: 62.00 Guesses; 22.06% Accuracy
Global Average: 76.38 Guesses; 26.60% Accuracy
——
Seems inaccuracy is widespread.
well, didn’t really know what it 
was also called, even if we figured* those words were “also called”, but the “is in” and “is out of” certainly made it feel mathematical or physical
not a long article so not much to go on (presumably hence the low global accuracy) so we had to take a bit of time before our confidence reached a level we were satisfied with, figured* the 4-letter object, then the word “collimation” kept coming to mind but we weren’t sure why (we suspect just from the feel of the thing, we didn’t actually figure* anything close to it)
even though we didn’t know what it was also called, we figured* that at least some of the 5-letter words were either of those terms, as well as the adjective form of the target noun
“behind” was a bit of a give away even though it wasn’t used in association with the 4-letter object, not sure why it wasn’t redacted when “front” or “ahead” have to be guessed, also it means we should have been able to figure* the 6-letter object but somehow didn’t bother, bit it made “virtual” come to mind without figuring it as any of the candidate redacts
figured* that one of the see alsos would be “depth of field” but with so many 5-letter words there the rest were anyone’s guess
anyway a few minutes of considering what else it might be without coming up with any strong feel about it and we were out
*: as in we were pretty confident we knew what the word would be without actually trying it, perhaps “presumed-filled” clipping** to “prefilled” might be a better term
**: we learnt this bad habit from a previous https://www.redactle.com/ for “sitcom” videre licet “A sitcom, clipping for situational comedy, is a genre of comedy” but now edited to “portmanteau” because some nerds distinguish abbreviation of a single word from abbreviation of multiple words, indeed, in the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipping article, they even distinguish abbreviation as based on written and not spoken language (we mean really, some of these distinctions are better quantified than qualified and so we don’t necessarily agree, instead arguing that this proliferation of word silos is one reason for progress being slow)
sarahs mum said:
Global Median: 62.00 Guesses; 22.06% Accuracy
Global Average: 76.38 Guesses; 26.60% Accuracy——
Seems inaccuracy is widespread.
by the time we hit it was up to 2485 peeps with down to median 71 / 20.55% and mean 89.30 / 25.21% so looks like it’s spreading further
123 81.30%
sarahs mum said:
123 81.30%
Well done!
391 49.36%
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
123 81.30%
Well done!
391 49.36%
I didn’t like this topic. But I did know some of these words.
poo
SCIENCE said:
poo
*vomits
My very first attempt at the game.
192, 67.71%
Is it cheating to look up “what is another name for…” in Google?
Dark Orange said:
My very first attempt at the game.192, 67.71%
Is it cheating to look up “what is another name for…” in Google?
that’s a good start. :)
I tend to push myself until I realise I am not going to get it out. And then I declare my googling.
Last night I felt the secondary naming was so more well known than the primary naming. No one uses that primary naming. It did take me some time to work out what would fit.
sarahs mum said:
I felt the secondary naming was so more well known than the primary naming. No one uses that
indeed we’ve all seen at least a few examples of americanisms spoiling the guesses
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:
I felt the secondary naming was so more well known than the primary naming. No one uses that
indeed we’ve all seen at least a few examples of americanisms spoiling the guesses
I spelled diarrhoea with an o. it didn’t like that.
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:
I felt the secondary naming was so more well known than the primary naming. No one uses that
indeed we’ve all seen at least a few examples of americanisms spoiling the guesses
I spelled diarrhoea with an o. it didn’t like that.
aha actually we didn’t notice when we made that same “mistake” … makes sense now
blow us down if this isn’t a tease or what
█████ is ███ of the ████ ███████████ ██████ of ██████ (the ██████ █████ ██████, ███, and ██████).
SCIENCE said:
blow us down if this isn’t a tease or what
█████ is ███ of the ████ ███████████ ██████ of ██████ (the ██████ █████ ██████, ███, and ██████).
ahahahahahahahaha 
we mean the following made sense to figure, select to reveal
one, four, fundamental (took a little longer), others, being
then (~█.██) stuff made it look technical but we had to go looking for clues, and found ████ which usually means chemistry
so we were almost ready, and back at the first paragraph this sentence
Unlike a ██████, a █████ ██████ ████ ███ ████ to ████ on the █████ of ███ █████████, ███ ████ it ██████ to ████ the ██████ █████████ ██████ like a ███.
helped with the feel, lots of leading consonants (“a” not “an”), and we had a little think because our immediate initial thought had been earth, water, air, fire but of course the lengths were wrong, and then bile, blackbile, blood, phlegm was never going to work either
(though black, yellow, blood, phlegm could have almost length matched)
Taking a somewhat more-measured approach to what is a science-related game today, rather than just throwing words at it, results in fewer guesses before the answer appears.
No doubt, most of the other players will uncover the answer sooner rather than later.
125 guesses for an accuracy of 56.80%
SCIENCE said:
SCIENCE said:blow us down if this isn’t a tease or what
█████ is ███ of the ████ ███████████ ██████ of ██████ (the ██████ █████ ██████, ███, and ██████).
ahahahahahahahaha
SPOILER ALERT
one, four, fundamental (took a little longer), others, being
then (~█.██) stuff made it look technical but we had to go looking for clues, and found ████ which usually means chemistry
so we were almost ready, and back at the first paragraph this sentence
Unlike a ██████, a █████ ██████ ████ ███ ████ to ████ on the █████ of ███ █████████, ███ ████ it ██████ to ████ the ██████ █████████ ██████ like a ███.
helped with the feel, lots of leading consonants (“a” not “an”), and we had a little think because our immediate initial thought had been earth, water, air, fire but of course the lengths were wrong, and then bile, blackbile, blood, phlegm was never going to work either
(though black, yellow, blood, phlegm could have almost length matched)
I take it you got it out then?
did I say fn physics?
110 75.45%
—-
another one where I got it out and it was a shock.
it’s a bit scary when you aren’t expecting it.
sarahs mum said:
110 75.45%
—-
another one where I got it out and it was a shock.
it’s a bit scary when you aren’t expecting it.
42 73.81%
I should have gotten it out earlier, but got dragged away and had lost the thought by the time I got back to it.
You’ll be pleased to know it’s not physics this time around, sm.
In fact, there’s very little science-related material in it at all.
It took me forever to home in on it.
Of course, once you pick up the scent, then the correct words begin to flow thick and fast.
300 words, for an accuracy of 46.00% even.
AussieDJ said:
In fact, there’s very little science-related material in it at all.
300 words, for an accuracy of 46.00% even.
yes and we certainly paid for it
ah well we got about that far and gave up
SCIENCE said:
AussieDJ said:In fact, there’s very little science-related material in it at all.
300 words, for an accuracy of 46.00% even.
yes and we certainly paid for it
ah well we got about that far and gave up
It’s more related to the Humanities, rather than science
I’m at 180. but I have got a lot out. I should get it out soonish.
I note that it is an American title as it known as something else outside the states.
sarahs mum said:
I’m at 180. but I have got a lot out. I should get it out soonish.I note that it is an American title as it known as something else outside the states.
I think I am going to have to look at it again tomorrow.
My eyes are sagging.
sarahs mum said:
I think I am going to have to look at it again tomorrow.My eyes are sagging.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #80!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 18 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Well done!
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #80!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 18 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
unbelievable. by the 18th guess I had did have 100% accuracy but I didnt know whether we were talking about a he, she or it.
one of my worstest.
389 58.10%
sarahs mum said:
one of my worstest.389 58.10%
381 58.9%
Then I gave up and googled it.
For a long time, I thought this Redactle – like the previous one – was aimed at a particular religion.
Later, I decided it wasn’t.
Needless (and sad) to say, there were a lot of words thrown at it …
510 words, for an accuracy of 33.92%
………….
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #82!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 77 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
you make me sad.
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #82!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 77 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
you make me sad.
Why? I make me a bit sad that I’ve wasted so much of my life on wikipedia. (Although a lot of my accuracy comes from my knowledge of cryptanalysis.)
Like a bull at a gate, I was. Throwing words in willy-nilly.
Until a lucky guess …
427 guesses for an accuracy of 23.42%
(Sigh)
yeah we kind of knew but we didn’t really and it was ugly
AussieDJ said:
Like a bull at a gate, I was. Throwing words in willy-nilly.
Until a lucky guess …427 guesses for an accuracy of 23.42%
(Sigh)
got it in 100
SCIENCE said:
i did spend the longest time contemplating a pole leaning against a wall.yeah we kind of knew but we didn’t really and it was ugly
186 50.54%
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
i did spend the longest time contemplating a pole leaning against a wall.yeah we kind of knew but we didn’t really and it was ugly
186 50.54%
we simply forgot our old school weapons systems
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
i did spend the longest time contemplating a pole leaning against a wall.yeah we kind of knew but we didn’t really and it was ugly
186 50.54%
we simply forgot our old school weapons systems
I was trying to work out what was in use in medieval times and now
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:sarahs mum said:
i did spend the longest time contemplating a pole leaning against a wall.186 50.54%
we simply forgot our old school weapons systems
I was trying to work out what was in use in medieval times and now
I had ancient. But chose egyptian instead of Egypt, Greek instead of Spartan, Roman instead of Rome, Sumerian instead of Assyrian.
I started this one at around 4:30pm WA time, Ms Kingy started it on her lappy at around 7pm. In that time the wiki article had been edited, so my guesses did not match hers. It was very confusing for a while.
This today looks like a quick jump.
█████
█████ (████ █████████ as █████ ████, ████████████████ ███████ as ████) is the ██████ of ███████ ████████ from ██████ to ███████ during ████ ██-████ ███, ████ the ███ is below the ███████. The █████ ████ ████ █████ ██████ and ████ ███████ on the ████████ and ██████ ██████████ the ████, █████ on ███████ ████ as ██████ and ████████.
The ████ ███ ██ ████ in a █████████ █████ as the ████ between ███████ and ███████. In ██████ █████████████, the ████ █████ is ████ as a ████████ (“████ █████”) and █████████ █████████ to “█████”, ██████ ████ ███████ is █████ to █████ or ███████.
████████████ █████ is the ██████ between ████████████ ████ and ████████████ ████ ████ the ███ is between ██ and ██ ███████ below the ███████ and ████ ███ ██████████ the ███. As ████ from █████████ between about ██.███ and ██.███ █████ or █████ of the ███████, ████████ ████████ ████ ███ █████ around the ██████ ████████ because, ████████ the ███ ████, it is █████ ████ than ███ below the ███████ at █████ ███████████, ████ ███ ██████ █████ at the ██████ of ██████ on the ████████ ████████ and ██████ of █████████ on the ████ ████████, and at the ███████ on █████████.
The opposite of █████ is ███ (or “███████”, to ███████████ it from “███” █████████ to a ██-████ ██████). ████████ is the ██████ of █████ after ██████ or before ███████ ████ the ███ █████ ███████████ the ███ ████ it is below the ███████. At ███ █████ ████, ███ ████ of █████ is ██████ in ████████ (the ███████), █████ the █████ ████ is in ████████ ██████ by █████ ████████ the ████████. The ███████ ████ of the ██████ is ██████ the █████, █████ the █████ is ███████.
███████ ████████████ at █████ is █████ ████████ by a ███████████ of █████████, █████████ █████, █████████, ████████ █████, ███████████, and ███████. In ████ █████████████, ███████, █████████, and ███████████████ ███ ███████ ████ ████████████. The ████ ████████ by ██████████ ████████ is █████████ ████████ to as █████ █████████ because it ███ █████████ with █████████████ █████████ and ██████████.
████████ and █████████
On █████, an ███████ █████ █████ ███████ than ███████ ███ to ███ ███████. ███████, the █████ ████████ ████ is ███ a █████, but ███ an ███████ ████████ of about ██ ██████████ (███). ████████, the ██████████ ████████ ████████ ██ ████ ████ of it ███████ the ██████ ████ the ███ is below the ███████ by about ███. The ███████████ of █████ ███ ███████ █████ ████ █████ ███████ the ██████ ████ the ██████ of the █████ ████ is below the ███████ by about ███. Without █████ ███████, ███████ and █████ █████ ██ the ████ ██████ on ████ █████████, the ███████ ████ the ███ ███████ to ███████ the █████████ ███████. On the █████████, ███████ ████████ █████ ██████ ██ ███████ ██████ than █████ ████ at the ███████, and ████ ██████ ███████ the █████.
The ██████ and ██████ █████████ ████ the ████████ and ███████ ██████, ████████████. The ██████ a ████████ is to ██████ the █████ ████ or the █████ ████, the █████ the █████ of █████████ in the ███████ ████████. ████████ ███████ and █████ ██████ ████████ in ██████ on the █████████, the █████ of █████ to ███ ███████ ████ ███████ at ████ █████████ than at ███ █████████ before and after an ███████. In the ████████ ██████████, ███████ ███████████ ███████ ██████ in ████ than █████. In the ████████ ██████████, ██████████ ████ ██████ ██████ in ████ than █████. ████ ███████████ ██████████ the ████ ████████ of █████ ██████ at the ████ █████████, but the ██████ ███ █ ██████ █████ ██ ████ ███ ██████████ ███████████ ████ ██████ (██████) █████ the █████ is ████████████ █████ ██████ (██████).
In the ██████ within ██████ █████ ██████, the █████████ in ████████ █████ is ██ ███████ ████ ████ of ██████ ████ a ██████ without █████ ███████████ between ███████████ ████, █████ ████ of ██████ ████ a ██████ without ███████ ███████████ between ███████████ ██████.
On █████ █████████ ██████
The ██████████ of ███ and █████ is ███ to the ████████ of a █████████ ████ about ███ ████, ████████ an ████████ of the ███ ██████ and ███████. █████████ ██████ ████ at ████ █████████ █████, ███████. ████ ███ ████ ████ ██████ than █████, █████ ██████ ████ █████████ ██████, ███████ to ████ ████ ████ and ██████. The ██████ █████ ███████ ████ █████ ███.█ ████ – by ███ the ███████ ████████ ██████ of ███ of the █████ ███████. In ████████, the ███ █████ █████████ ████████ ███ is ████ █ █████ and ██ ███████. ███████, it is ███ ████ the ████████ ████████ ██████ █████ ██████████ the ██████ of a ████████ ███-█████ █████ but the ██████ of ███ ███████ ██████ as ████ – █████ ███ a ████████ ██████ of ███.█ ████, but a ███-█████ █████ ████ ███.██ ████ ████ ███ to ███ ██████████ ████████ and ███████ ██████ around the ███. ███████ ███ the ███████ ███-█████ █████ as a ██████ of ███ █:█ █████████ between ███ ███████ ██████ and ████████ ██████ – ████ █████████ █████ it a ███-█████ █████ ████ is ███ ████ ████. A ██████ ███ ██████████ █████ ███████████ ██████████ between ███ and █████, ████ as ███████, the ██████ ███████ to the ███. ████ is ███ █████████████ in █████ of █████████ ████████████ or the ███████████ of ████████████████ ████.
██████ on ████
██████████
The █████████████ of ████████, the ███████ ██████ ██████ for ████ on █████, ███ ████████ ███████ on the ██████████, ██████████ and ████████ of ██████ █████ ████████. ████ ███████ █████ during the █████, █████ █████ █████████ ███████, █████████ █████ and ████████, ███ ██████ during ████ ████. The ███████ of ███ and █████ ███ ███ ████ in the ██████ ███████ ██████– ██████ ████ ████ ███████ ███████████ to ████ ████ with the ████ of ████████ during ████ ████. For ███████, ████████████ ████ ██████████ is a ██████ ████ of ██████ ████████ █████ ██████ ██████████████ ██████ to █████ ██████ ███████ in █████ ███████ as ███████ █████ during the █████, █████ ███ ████ ██ ████ during the ███ to ██████████ █████████████. ████ ██████ ████ to ████ █████ ███████ ██████ during the ███████, ██████████ █████████████ of ████████ █████.
██████
████████ █████ was ████████ during ████. As ██████████ ████████ ███ ████████, ██████████ after the ██████████ ██████████, █████ ████ ████████ ███ █████████ and ██████ a ███████████ ████ of the ███████ in ████ ██████. ████ ██████████████, ████ as ██████████, ████, ███████████ ██████, ████-████ ███████████, ███ ████████, ████████████ ██████████, and ██████ ████████ ███ ███████ ██ █████ a ███ or ████ ████ as ████ as █ or ███.█. ████ without ██████████ █████, █████████ █████████ █████ it ████████ to ██████ or ████ ████████ at █████.
█████████ is a ██████████ ████ for █████████████ ████ is █████████ and █████████ ████ ███████ from the ████ ███████ into the █████ █████ of the ███████. It ████████ ████, ████, ██████████, ███████, ████ █████, ████████, ████████, ███████, ███████, and █████. █████ ██████ █████ ███████ a █████ ██████ for █████████. █████████ █████████████ is █████ ████ █████-████████ than ███████ █████████████.
████████ and █████████████ ███████
█████ is █████ ██████████ with ██████ and ████, because of the █████████████ ██████████ of ███████ ███-████████████ ████████ to the ████ of the ███████ and ██████████ ███████████ of a █████ ███████ ██████ (the █████ of █████). █████████ is █████████ ██████████ with █████████████ and ██████ for █████ ████████ ████████. █████████, ███████, and █████ █████████ ███████ ███ ██ █████████ by ████████. ████████ ███ a ██████████ ██████████ in █████ ███████████ and ███████.
█████ ███████████ ███ was █████ to ████ (by █████-███████) a ███████ of ███████ █████ the █████████ of ███████ ████ ████ ███████████ as █████████ ████ ███████ at a ████████ from the ████████ of a ████ ████████ at a ██████ of █████████ ████ █████████.
The ██████ in █████ █████ ████████ the ████ ████ █████ and █████████ ███ ████ ████████ at █████. ███████ of ████████████ ███ ███████ █████████ ██████ to ████████. █████████, ████████ and █████████ █████████ ████ as ████████ and ██████████ ███ █████████ as █████ ████ ██████ at █████. ██████ ███ ████████ to ██████ around ██████ ███████████ during █████-████. In ██████ ███ ████████, █████ █████ ███████ and ███████ ███████ of the ███████ of █████-████. In ████, the ██████ ██████ the ████████ of █████ the “█████ ████”.
The ████████ ████████████ of the █████ in █████ ███████ from ████ in ███████ ███████. The █████ was ████████ during the █████ of █████, the ████ ███████████ █████ █████████ to █████. ████████ ████ ███ ██████ ███████ from █████ to █████████ and ████ to ██████ in the █████. ███████ ███████, ███████ ████ to a ███████████ of the ███████ █████ in ██████ of the ████████ at █████.
In ███████ ███████ █████ is ████████ ██████████ with ██████ ███████.
██████ ███ ██████ to ██ ██████ during the █████-████ ███ ██████ █████ ████.
███████ ██████ █████ ████████ ███████████ in the ██ █████ ███ ████████ ███████ ███████ “█████████████ █████ ███████ ███████”. the █████-████ (██████), the ██████ for █████████████████ ████████ on ████████, ██████ (██████), the ████████ ██ ███████████████ and the ███-█████ (██████). ████████ from the ████████ on ██ ███ ████. █████████ ████. ████, ██████ (█ ████████ ████). The █████████ ████ (█████). ██████ █ ███████. ██████████████████. █████████ ████ – via ██████ █████. “███████ ████ █████ at the ████████████ between █████ and ███████ in ████████████ ████████”You solved it in 28 guesses
Your accuracy was 92.86%
indeed
Global Stats
Globally, 327 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 19.00 Guesses; 55.56% Accuracy
Global Average: 24.88 Guesses; 58.84% Accuracy
we saw a “during” which looked pretty suspicious, and there was “below” with a 3-letter word nearby
our 
figures
anyway honestly we thought this part
████ ██-████ ███
was going to be a bunch of years, maybe with “CE” and “BCE” in it, but it didn’t make sense in that order
so we thought it might be times of day but both “am” and “pm” only have 2 letters
turns out that thought was fair but still quite wrong (”each 24-hour day”) but no problem, it was enough of an orientation to raise confidence and convince us that the jump from 2. to 3. above was correct
You solved it in 47 guesses
Your accuracy was 51.06%
Roll on the next one
I solved today’s Redactle (#83) in 9 guesses with an accuracy of 66.67%.
I’m claiming that. My last few have been terrible.
Kingy said:
I solved today’s Redactle (#83) in 9 guesses with an accuracy of 66.67%.I’m claiming that. My last few have been terrible.
9 night 47
8 day 14
7 non 0
6 not 5
5 where 2
4 when 10
3 what 0
2 people 1
1 he 0
Kingy said:
Kingy said:
I solved today’s Redactle (#83) in 9 guesses with an accuracy of 66.67%.I’m claiming that. My last few have been terrible.
9 night 47
8 day 14
7 non 0
6 not 5
5 where 2
4 when 10
3 what 0
2 people 1
1 he 0
which and that are more common than what.
my last three words were sun, horizon, night.
sarahs mum said:
Kingy said:
Kingy said:
I solved today’s Redactle (#83) in 9 guesses with an accuracy of 66.67%.I’m claiming that. My last few have been terrible.
9 night 47
8 day 14
7 non 0
6 not 5
5 where 2
4 when 10
3 what 0
2 people 1
1 he 0
which and that are more common than what.
my last three words were sun, horizon, night.
I was 28 last night (92.08%). My lowest was 23. So yours is a good back patting game I reckon.
sarahs mum said:
Kingy said:
Kingy said:
I solved today’s Redactle (#83) in 9 guesses with an accuracy of 66.67%.I’m claiming that. My last few have been terrible.
9 night 47
8 day 14
7 non 0
6 not 5
5 where 2
4 when 10
3 what 0
2 people 1
1 he 0
which and that are more common than what.
my last three words were sun, horizon, night.
My last three were 18, period, night.
212 words 77.36% accuracy.
No idea where I was going with this one.
You solved it in 295 guesses
Your accuracy was 40.00%
AussieDJ said:
No idea where I was going with this one.You solved it in 295 guesses
Your accuracy was 40.00%
I was 212 @77. I had lots of good words all around the topic without nailing it.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
No idea where I was going with this one.You solved it in 295 guesses
Your accuracy was 40.00%
I was 212 @77. I had lots of good words all around the topic without nailing it.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
No idea where I was going with this one.You solved it in 295 guesses
Your accuracy was 40.00%
I was 212 @77. I had lots of good words all around the topic without nailing it.
Yes. I kept putting in plurals when I needed the singular forms
I pulled out the third word when I was dredging through my memory of main frame words.
I’m sure there are some that could get today’s out by just looking at it. But that isn’t me.
sarahs mum said:
I’m sure there are some that could get today’s out by just looking at it. But that isn’t me.
I got to 60 without hitting a wrongun. But it has gone downhill since.
I think I might have to google. I know nothing about non zero shit.
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
I’m sure there are some that could get today’s out by just looking at it. But that isn’t me.
I got to 60 without hitting a wrongun. But it has gone downhill since.
I think I might have to google. I know nothing about non zero shit.
You solved it in 95 guesses
Your accuracy was 86.32%
I would never have got it out without googling.
I can’t get to it. I’m seeing messages that the site’s security certificates are not current.
AussieDJ said:
I can’t get to it. I’m seeing messages that the site’s security certificates are not current.
try a different browser?
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
I can’t get to it. I’m seeing messages that the site’s security certificates are not current.
try a different browser?
However, I’ve just got in, so maybe the site has updated their certificate in the meantime.
You solved it in 72 guesses
Your accuracy was 63.89%
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
I can’t get to it. I’m seeing messages that the site’s security certificates are not current.
try a different browser?
Tried that on three browsers on this PC – none of them let me in.However, I’ve just got in, so maybe the site has updated their certificate in the meantime.
You solved it in 72 guesses
Your accuracy was 63.89%
75 words at 54.67% that included some wild guesses.
sarahs mum said:
75 words at 54.67% that included some wild guesses.
You solved it in 96 guesses
Your accuracy was 31.25%
Lots of guesses, because I had thought I’d already tried the last word in the title.
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
I’m sure there are some that could get today’s out by just looking at it. But that isn’t me.
I got to 60 without hitting a wrongun. But it has gone downhill since.
I think I might have to google. I know nothing about non zero shit.
With google’s help…You solved it in 95 guesses
Your accuracy was 86.32%I would never have got it out without googling.
That was the equation one? I gave up, but would love to know the answer.
so are youse just ignoring the certificate problem these days
SCIENCE said:
so are youse just ignoring the certificate problem these days
Yes.
Dark Orange said:
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:I got to 60 without hitting a wrongun. But it has gone downhill since.
I think I might have to google. I know nothing about non zero shit.
With google’s help…You solved it in 95 guesses
Your accuracy was 86.32%I would never have got it out without googling.
That was the equation one? I gave up, but would love to know the answer.
“Fundamental Theorem of Algebra”
You solved it in 51 guesses
Your accuracy was 27.45%
I got lots of consecutive zeros, and had no real clues until guess 48.
Kingy said:
You solved it in 51 guesses
Your accuracy was 27.45%I got lots of consecutive zeros, and had no real clues until guess 48.
my 8th guess was ‘one.’ And it just sat there worrying me for so long.
sarahs mum said:
Kingy said:
You solved it in 51 guesses
Your accuracy was 27.45%I got lots of consecutive zeros, and had no real clues until guess 48.
my 8th guess was ‘one.’ And it just sat there worrying me for so long.
You solved it in 185 guesses
Your accuracy was 29.19%
Dark Orange said:
SCIENCE said:
so are youse just ignoring the certificate problem these days
Yes.
(In a way, it’s good. The work lappy jacks up and won’t let me anywhere near the game, which means I can’t look in while I’m at work. The fact that the work lappy is in one room, and the home PC is a minor detail. One of the (many) pluses about working from home.)
94 87.23%
I’m settling into my role as ‘tail-end Charlie’ (a person or thing that brings up the rear in a group or formation.)
Well and truly side-tracked on this one
509 guesses to get it out = 26.72% accuracy.
:(
fk
AussieDJ said:
I’m settling into my role as ‘tail-end Charlie’ (a person or thing that brings up the rear in a group or formation.)Well and truly side-tracked on this one
509 guesses to get it out = 26.72% accuracy.
:(
153 51.63% – although I wasted 20 of those guesses before I realised I the title was one word rather than two.
116 @ 64%
I got lucky with the topic early on, and had 80 guesses to narrow it down.
Then Ms Kingy looks over my shoulder, has 2 guesses and Bam!
I threw random words at it like I was AussieDJ.
In the end I had to google to get the first word.
You solved it in 236 guesses
Your accuracy was 59.75%
(File under: The Bleeding Obvious)
No idea where I, nor it, it was heading …
You solved it in 314 guesses
Your accuracy was 30.57%
fk
SCIENCE said:
fk
but it is science science.
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
fk
but it is science science.
making it all the more embarrassing
but yes the actual target words are fairly generic in SCIENCE, so maybe we got too technical
this time it wasn’t SCIENCE but it was quick
SCIENCE said:
this time it wasn’t SCIENCE but it was quick
still labouring here.
129 73.64%
48 @ 75.00%
Nice. :)
I even managed to get the whole sentence “…in the Oval Office has been used by many United States presidents, including…” before solving it.
A lucky guess, but it took me a (long) while to get there …
NFI where it was going.
516 — 26.36%
99 guesses. 100% accuracy.
I’m going to think that is pretty good until BtM says that he got it out with 14 guesses.
better than us
sarahs mum said:
99 guesses. 100% accuracy.I’m going to think that is pretty good until BtM says that he got it out with 14 guesses.
Well done, sm! Better than me today:
Much better than me:
389 67.87%
I’d have done it in half the number of guesses if I’d spelled the country correctly when I first typed it in.
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
99 guesses. 100% accuracy.I’m going to think that is pretty good until BtM says that he got it out with 14 guesses.
Well done, sm! Better than me today:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #90!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 110 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
oo…dig it. yay me.
I wonder why sometimes I get the congratulations message and sometimes I don’t?
sarahs mum said:
I wonder why sometimes I get the congratulations message and sometimes I don’t?
d’n‘o’ so we just refresh it but yeah obviously the statistics change over time
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:
I wonder why sometimes I get the congratulations message and sometimes I don’t?
d’n‘o’ so we just refresh it but yeah obviously the statistics change over time
Dunno. I sometimes get that, too; it often takes quite a while after I’ve got it out for the statistics to come up.
The highest accuracy percentage I’ve scored out of all 77 consecutive games I’ve played, so far.
You solved it in 178 guesses
Your accuracy was 70.79%
AussieDJ said:
The highest accuracy percentage I’ve scored out of all 77 consecutive games I’ve played, so far.You solved it in 178 guesses
Your accuracy was 70.79%
well that is a win.
:)
ah well apparently we actually learnt something 
in high school
15 hadley 24 14 cell 10 13 streams 2 12 stream 0 11 jet 2 10 equator 8 9 hot 0 8 flow 3 7 atmosphere 1 6 layer 0 5 air 19 4 ground 0 3 earth 2 2 stop 0 1 line 0
SCIENCE said:
ah well apparently we actually learnt something
15 hadley 24
14 cell 10
13 streams 2
12 stream 0
11 jet 2
10 equator 8
9 hot 0
8 flow 3
7 atmosphere 1
6 layer 0
5 air 19
4 ground 0
3 earth 2
2 stop 0
1 line 0
I’ve never heard of it.
135 guesses @ 62.96% accuracy before I googled.
And I am glad I googled before throwing another thousand words at it.
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
ah well apparently we actually learnt something
15 hadley 24
14 cell 10
13 streams 2
12 stream 0
11 jet 2
10 equator 8
9 hot 0
8 flow 3
7 atmosphere 1
6 layer 0
5 air 19
4 ground 0
3 earth 2
2 stop 0
1 line 0
I’ve never heard of it.
135 guesses @ 62.96% accuracy before I googled.
And I am glad I googled before throwing another thousand words at it.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #91!
The answer was:
You solved it in 140 guesses
Your accuracy was 39.29%
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #91!
- The answer was: hadley cell
- You solved it in 45 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
I suppose you have head of a hadley cell before. That makes it easier.
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #91!
- The answer was: hadley cell
- You solved it in 45 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
I suppose you have head of a hadley cell before. That makes it easier.
heard.
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #91!
- The answer was: hadley cell
- You solved it in 45 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
I suppose you have head of a hadley cell before. That makes it easier.
heard.
Yes, to both. Some of the clues, even before my first word, led me think of atmospheric phenomena.
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:I suppose you have head of a hadley cell before. That makes it easier.
heard.
Yes, to both. Some of the clues, even before my first word, led me think of atmospheric phenomena.
I got equatorial and trade winds out early enough…
I wish the Redactle people would repair their security certificate or whatever it’s called.
I had to override my browser to get to the site – again!
Worse than global average and global median, today. Same number of guesses as yesterday ,though.
Another science one, chock-full of American spelling.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #92!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 45 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Worse than global average and global median, today. Same number of guesses as yesterday ,though.
Another science one, chock-full of American spelling.
Also fast. I have only played 11 words. (But I have put on some supper.)
92 guesses at 66.30%
Honestly we got tricked by P1, P2 and T1, T2 thinking they were diatomic elemental gases.
Wasn’t much otherwise obvious on scanning through the whole lot so went back to the start to see if there were any big hints.
Stared at and managed to figure liquid as it ███████ into the gas phase which was pretty much the 
clincher (actually we weren’t that confident but enough stuff fit and we didn’t really have other leads so figured trying the target would at least get us some more clues).
We also got tricked and thought on average, was actually on heating, which falsely increased our confidence.
Looking through it we also now realise that for quantities in units, they connect with nonbreaking spaces which get rolled into redact videre licet ███ ██████ (█,██████) per ████. It seems we can’t find a way to actually reveal those as a guess¡
sarahs mum said:
92 guesses at 66.30%
I see where I’m going wrong.
The other players here carefully consider every word before they play them.
Me? I just throw everything at it, in the hope that something sticks.
:)
177 guesses at 29.94%
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:92 guesses at 66.30%
I see where I’m going wrong.
The other players here carefully consider every word before they play them.
Me? I just throw everything at it, in the hope that something sticks.
:)
177 guesses at 29.94%
I’m very careful until i make a mistake… but by then I usually have a bunch of iffy words to go with and my percentage drops fast.
.
It won’t load for me. It says to reload the browser. And then it doesn’t load again.
sarahs mum said:
It won’t load for me. It says to reload the browser. And then it doesn’t load again.
I’m getting the same. I’ll try again in the morning.
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
It won’t load for me. It says to reload the browser. And then it doesn’t load again.I’m getting the same. I’ll try again in the morning.
oh. At least it isn’t me.
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
It won’t load for me. It says to reload the browser. And then it doesn’t load again.I’m getting the same. I’ll try again in the morning.
oh. At least it isn’t me.
No. It’s not working for me, either.
I’ll also try again later today.
As many of you are aware, the SSL certificate for Redactle has expired. The future of Redactle is uncertain at this point.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Redactle/comments/vue2za/redactle_93_discussion_thread/
(I don’t know what that means but I presume it means redactle has gone.)
They recommend…
https://redactle-unlimited.com/#article/Q2xhc3NpY2FsX3BlcmlvZF8obXVzaWMp
It doesn’t seem to have a game number and or a game limit. So we won’t be able to discuss, gloat or do a communal sad.
It does have a timer. But I don’t want a timer. I often get up and do my dishes and come back to it.
sarahs mum said:
As many of you are aware, the SSL certificate for Redactle has expired. The future of Redactle is uncertain at this point.https://www.reddit.com/r/Redactle/comments/vue2za/redactle_93_discussion_thread/
(I don’t know what that means but I presume it means redactle has gone.)
They recommend…
https://redactle-unlimited.com/#article/Q2xhc3NpY2FsX3BlcmlvZF8obXVzaWMp
It doesn’t seem to have a game number and or a game limit. So we won’t be able to discuss, gloat or do a communal sad.
It does have a timer. But I don’t want a timer. I often get up and do my dishes and come back to it.
It does have a ‘daily’ toggle. *presses daily.
ah well was fun while it lasted, maybe we’ll have to move onto the next project
SCIENCE said:
ah well was fun while it lasted, maybe we’ll have to move onto the next project
try clicking daily at redactle unlimited..
The title I have is three words 9/6 (5)
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
ah well was fun while it lasted, maybe we’ll have to move onto the next project
try clicking daily at redactle unlimited..
The title I have is three words 9/6 (5)
I can’t get it to load the wikipedia article.
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
ah well was fun while it lasted, maybe we’ll have to move onto the next project
try clicking daily at redactle unlimited..
The title I have is three words 9/6 (5)
90 guesses..81 right. no percentage given. It tells me I took…06:58:11. however I did have a big sleep during that time.
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
ah well was fun while it lasted, maybe we’ll have to move onto the next project
try clicking daily at redactle unlimited..
The title I have is three words 9/6 (5)
90 guesses..81 right. no percentage given. It tells me I took…06:58:11. however I did have a big sleep during that time.
yeah we’re falling asleep too right now but will have a look thanks
By the time I got to it, it was only 2 words (9/6).
33 guesses, 15.15%
Dark Orange said:
By the time I got to it, it was only 2 words (9/6).
33 guesses, 15.15%
did you click daily?
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
ah well was fun while it lasted, maybe we’ll have to move onto the next project
try clicking daily at redactle unlimited..
The title I have is three words 9/6 (5)
90 guesses..81 right. no percentage given. It tells me I took…06:58:11. however I did have a big sleep during that time.
I had some assistance from Ms Kingy.
Time 00:16:29
Accuracy 79.1%
Guesses 67
Word hits 53
sarahs mum said:
Dark Orange said:By the time I got to it, it was only 2 words (9/6).
33 guesses, 15.15%
did you click daily?
I only started this evening, and it was a very short entry.
Dark Orange said:
sarahs mum said:
Dark Orange said:By the time I got to it, it was only 2 words (9/6).
33 guesses, 15.15%
did you click daily?
I only started this evening, and it was a very short entry.
(Seven lines)
ah bloody hell
should have seen the
♯
part earlier, that would have clued in much faster
Dark Orange said:
sarahs mum said:
Dark Orange said:
By the time I got to it, it was only 2 words (9/6).
33 guesses, 15.15%
did you click daily?
I only started this evening, and it was a very short entry.
oh you mean the https://www.redactle.com/ original is back
hm
Dark Orange said:
sarahs mum said:
Dark Orange said:By the time I got to it, it was only 2 words (9/6).
33 guesses, 15.15%
did you click daily?
I only started this evening, and it was a very short entry.
daily was a long entry.
This site will let you play game after game after game.
SCIENCE said:
Dark Orange said:
sarahs mum said:
did you click daily?
I only started this evening, and it was a very short entry.
oh you mean the https://www.redactle.com/ original is back
hm
ooo.
Dark Orange said:
Dark Orange said:
sarahs mum said:did you click daily?
I only started this evening, and it was a very short entry.
(Seven lines)
There is stuff all there to work with.
sarahs mum said:
Dark Orange said:
Dark Orange said:I only started this evening, and it was a very short entry.
(Seven lines)
There is stuff all there to work with.
You solved it in 14 guesses
Your accuracy was 28.57%
It was close to redactle unlimited’s answer.
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
Dark Orange said:(Seven lines)
There is stuff all there to work with.
You solved it in 14 guesses
Your accuracy was 28.57%It was close to redactle unlimited’s answer.
I had 19 guesses before I even got 1 hit.
You solved it in 28 guesses
Your accuracy was 17.86%
Kingy said:
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:There is stuff all there to work with.
You solved it in 14 guesses
Your accuracy was 28.57%It was close to redactle unlimited’s answer.
I had 19 guesses before I even got 1 hit.
You solved it in 28 guesses
Your accuracy was 17.86%
Third hit.
3 may 1
2 are 0
1 can 0
i’ve saved a whole bunch of my word lists. Maybe one day I will sort them out into what words come up the most.
sarahs mum said:
Dark Orange said:
Dark Orange said:I only started this evening, and it was a very short entry.
(Seven lines)
There is stuff all there to work with.
You solved it in 33 guesses
Your accuracy was 15.15%
This was a disambiguation page, which was very unexpected, so I went investigating. Redactle selects its page from the 10003 “Vital articles” (level four), and the answer this week, instead of pointing to the right article, points to this disambiguation page. I’m thinking it might be appropriate to go in there and fix it. But perhaps not until tomorrow.
Woo-hoo – the original version has returned!
Couldn’t, for the life of me, work out what yesterday’s ultra-short one was about.
But this one …
70 guesses, for an accuracy of 80.00% … will more than compensate!.
AussieDJ said:
Woo-hoo – the original version has returned!Couldn’t, for the life of me, work out what yesterday’s ultra-short one was about.
But this one …
70 guesses, for an accuracy of 80.00% … will more than compensate!.
yesterday’s was ‘classical period’ and on redactle unlimited it was ‘classical period (music)’
coincidence?
74 93.24%
sarahs mum said:
74 93.24%
I thought it was going to be harder than that.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Woo-hoo – the original version has returned!
Couldn’t, for the life of me, work out what yesterday’s ultra-short one was about.
But this one …
70 guesses, for an accuracy of 80.00% … will more than compensate!.
yesterday’s was ‘classical period’ and on redactle unlimited it was ‘classical period (music)’
coincidence?
looks like they’re meant to match
fk, put a plural in early and took 10 times longer to get the singular, fail
SCIENCE said:
fk, put a plural in early and took 10 times longer to get the singular, fail
did you get away with mentioning the war?
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
fk, put a plural in early and took 10 times longer to get the singular, fail
did you get away with mentioning the war?
we often do but didn’t even this time somehow
Yep. The daily game at redactle unlimited is the same as the daily game at the original redactle. Except yesterday’s original redactle was missing and then reappeared with some wrongness. Today’s is the same.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #94!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 32 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
You obviously don’t subscribe to the “throw words at it until something sticks” method.
Mine was 144 guesses @ 74.31% which is probably the best I’ve done.
Dark Orange said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #94!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 32 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
You obviously don’t subscribe to the “throw words at it until something sticks” method.
Mine was 144 guesses @ 74.31% which is probably the best I’ve done.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #94!
You solved it in 57 guesses Your accuracy was 70.18%127 87.40%
better than us
got totally rolled
340 guesses @ 50%
I had no idea, ended up with a very lucky guess.
Dark Orange said:
You obviously don’t subscribe to the “throw words at it until something sticks” method.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #95!
The answer was:
You solved it in 183 guesses
Your accuracy was 51.37%
AussieDJ said:
Dark Orange said:
You obviously don’t subscribe to the “throw words at it until something sticks” method.
I use exactly the same method!Congratulations, you solved Redactle #95!
The answer was:
You solved it in 183 guesses
Your accuracy was 51.37%
I studied cryptanalysis, so I apply that, obviously with some success.
55 100.00%
sarahs mum said:
55 100.00%
Well done!
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
55 100.00%
Well done!
but you slammed it.
I suppose I could have solved it five or six goes earlier but I was scared.
I’m happy with 185 guesses @ 68.65%
Using Dark Orange’s method of “throw(ing) words at it until something sticks” has seen me reach an accuracy of 51.47% after a blunderbuss effort of 272 guesses.
That’ll do me.
AussieDJ said:
Using Dark Orange’s method of “throw(ing) words at it until something sticks” has seen me reach an accuracy of 51.47% after a blunderbuss effort of 272 guesses.That’ll do me.
It was a difficult one to track down, I thought I had it in about 40 guesses, but just couldn’t stick the landing.
229 @ 63.32%
Kingy said:
AussieDJ said:
Using Dark Orange’s method of “throw(ing) words at it until something sticks” has seen me reach an accuracy of 51.47% after a blunderbuss effort of 272 guesses.That’ll do me.
It was a difficult one to track down, I thought I had it in about 40 guesses, but just couldn’t stick the landing.
229 @ 63.32%
Bewdy! I’m still last amongst this group. Not that we’re in competition or anything, but it’s nice to have a yardstick (yardstick? In this metric age?) to measure against.
AussieDJ said:
Kingy said:
AussieDJ said:
Using Dark Orange’s method of “throw(ing) words at it until something sticks” has seen me reach an accuracy of 51.47% after a blunderbuss effort of 272 guesses.That’ll do me.
It was a difficult one to track down, I thought I had it in about 40 guesses, but just couldn’t stick the landing.
229 @ 63.32%
Bewdy! I’m still last amongst this group. Not that we’re in competition or anything, but it’s nice to have a yardstick (yardstick? In this metric age?) to measure against.
I just checked the stats, the mean guesses were 147 @ 55%
Kingy said:
AussieDJ said:
Kingy said:It was a difficult one to track down, I thought I had it in about 40 guesses, but just couldn’t stick the landing.
229 @ 63.32%
Bewdy! I’m still last amongst this group. Not that we’re in competition or anything, but it’s nice to have a yardstick (yardstick? In this metric age?) to measure against.
I just checked the stats, the mean guesses were 147 @ 55%
55 100.00%
I thought I had the answer out in the late 40s but I was afraid. Was that five letter word plant or genus or grass? All of them would have been okay but I was freezing. ‘Grows at a rate of’ was what locked me in. Finally got out of my staring into the headlights by playing Asia. Then I was okay.
well let’s be honest we forgot all the different kinds of poaceaes so ended up fkn around forever yet again
Does anyone else here get a privacy warning from their browser when attempting to access redactle?
furious said:
Does anyone else here get a privacy warning from their browser when attempting to access redactle?
I did once.
i just carried on.
furious said:
Does anyone else here get a privacy warning from their browser when attempting to access redactle?
Not a privacy warning, but a security warning about the site not renewing it’s certificate or some such.
We’ve ignored it.
furious said:
Does anyone else here get a privacy warning from their browser when attempting to access redactle?
the certificate is not valid. try
https://redactle-unlimited.com
dunno if it is the same puzzle.
Bogsnorkler said:
furious said:
Does anyone else here get a privacy warning from their browser when attempting to access redactle?
the certificate is not valid. try
https://redactle-unlimited.com
dunno if it is the same puzzle.
doesn’t look like it. you can go through the security.
Bogsnorkler said:
Bogsnorkler said:
furious said:
Does anyone else here get a privacy warning from their browser when attempting to access redactle?
the certificate is not valid. try
https://redactle-unlimited.com
dunno if it is the same puzzle.
doesn’t look like it. you can go through the security.
It is the same puzzle as the ‘original’ Redactle if you choose the ‘Daily’ option.
I did a random on redactle unlimited.
You took 1 hour to solve Redactle Unlimited in 251 guesses with 84.86% accuracy!
And that is a lot of guesses. Good guesses.
I should have got it out a lot earlier. It was The Godfather. Obvious on reflection.
Im making a real mess of this.
damn we should have just gone with the first 4-letter proper noun we thought of, it would have got us almost there
ended up grinding the usual shotgun of words
sarahs mum said:
Im making a real mess of this.
227 47.14%
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
Im making a real mess of this.227 47.14%
I wouldn’t be too concerned.
Blunderbuss approach plus research towards the end gets me to 29.79% accuracy after 339 guesses.
48 100.00%
——
I took the plunge. it was scary.
Random game.
>>Surat
Surat is a city in the western Indian state of Gujarat.
—-
Never heard of it.
My numbers for today 142 72.54%
World average 127 67.7%
It was a big article, lots of hits for everything I chucked at it.
Kingy said:
My numbers for today 14272.54% World average 12767.7%It was a big article, lots of hits for everything I chucked at it.
I’m claiming my best ever because I came in ahead of BtM.
sarahs mum said:
Kingy said:
My numbers for today 14272.54% World average 12767.7%It was a big article, lots of hits for everything I chucked at it.
I’m claiming my best ever because I came in ahead of BtM.
Well done, sm! You got 100%, too. :)
Kingy said:
My numbers for today 14272.54% World average 12767.7%It was a big article, lots of hits for everything I chucked at it.
Yeah I’m stuck
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
Kingy said:
My numbers for today 14272.54% World average 12767.7%It was a big article, lots of hits for everything I chucked at it.
I’m claiming my best ever because I came in ahead of BtM.
Well done, sm! You got 100%, too. :)
I was thinking I had the answer when you posted. And then I thought I shuld just go for it instead of trying ‘coast.’
interestingly is seems that the black stranger from where McDougall originated ( Mac dhub gael) was one of them. I had wondered before. Likely to have some of that if I ever had an ancestry dot com done.
I got caught out by one of the sections that mentioned the word “down”. I got early hits for bedding, fur, clothing, woolen, cloth, etc, so I went completely offtrack thinking it was something to do with the clothing trade. I wasted about 60 guesses before it became obvious that I was on a wild goose chase and had to start from scratch.
Kingy said:
I got caught out by one of the sections that mentioned the word “down”. I got early hits for bedding, fur, clothing, woolen, cloth, etc, so I went completely offtrack thinking it was something to do with the clothing trade. I wasted about 60 guesses before it became obvious that I was on a wild goose chase and had to start from scratch.
I had a bunch of common words it seemed were added to the english language. And I had Bronze for 2 and Age for 47. Best hit ‘were’ for 155 hits. There was one word provided that made one think of ships.
Cymek said:
Kingy said:
My numbers for today 14272.54% World average 12767.7%It was a big article, lots of hits for everything I chucked at it.
Yeah I’m stuck
you shouldn’t be stuck now.
Another blunderbuss approach to get to the last one …
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #98!
The answer was:
You solved it in 384 guesses
Your accuracy was 52.86%
Next one will appear in a few minutes
AussieDJ said:
Another blunderbuss approach to get to the last one …Congratulations, you solved Redactle #98!
The answer was:
You solved it in 384 guesses
Your accuracy was 52.86%Next one will appear in a few minutes
ready.
‘n physics…
140 87.14%
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL 
there were some lines there that looked like long (we mean long) equations, there’s only one place where we routinely see such long equations
the words with 2 subscripts in separate places were pretty convincing for the physics of the outer shell
check the target again, ah yes there are only so many words that long and the one we thought of matched, confidence high
hence that was pretty fast too, say 3 minutes tops
The blunderbuss approach seems to be working for me.
:)
66.53% accuracy with 251 guesses to get there.
(The blunderbuss approach = throw all the words you think of at it, and see what sticks!)
‘< 0 is waste heat given off to a cold reservoir’
that’s a big clue. shame it means nothing to me.
sarahs mum said:
‘< 0 is waste heat given off to a cold reservoir’that’s a big clue. shame it means nothing to me.
You may need to do a bit of searching.
61 guesses for an accuracy of 60.66%
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
‘< 0 is waste heat given off to a cold reservoir’that’s a big clue. shame it means nothing to me.
You may need to do a bit of searching.
61 guesses for an accuracy of 60.66%
28 for 100%
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
‘< 0 is waste heat given off to a cold reservoir’that’s a big clue. shame it means nothing to me.
You may need to do a bit of searching.
61 guesses for an accuracy of 60.66%
28 for 100%
I’ll keep going without googling until I am strung out.
You may need to do a bit of searching.
61 guesses for an accuracy of 60.66%
——
oh. you mean you finished. oh. good on you.
I thought you meant you were on it.
I am so proud of me.
46 100.00%
No googling or nothing.
And..I still have no idea. :)
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #100!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 13 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
applause. I thought that that was there to do.
I am still happy with my result.
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #100!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 13 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
applause. I thought that that was there to do.
I am still happy with my result.
You got a perfect score again, that’s well worth being happy about.
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #100!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 13 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
applause. I thought that that was there to do.
I am still happy with my result.
You got a perfect score again, that’s well worth being happy about.
It wouldnt surprise me if some didnt get it out in three.
well that was faster than the last one like this was maybe 60 seconds or so
we mean 
heh not many 14 letter words to go in that title, and most formal proper names would be longer than 3, so it had to be something generic, and then 6 letters couldn’t be 1 or 3 so nothing below the first line was really going to change anything
Better than average!
Woohoo!
You solved it in 31 guesses
Your accuracy was 80.65%
Globally, 5700 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 36.00 Guesses; 65.22% Accuracy
Global Average: 55.79 Guesses; 67.00% Accuracy
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #101!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 20 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
that was quick…
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #101!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 20 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
that was quick…
I’ve seen the thing they’re referring to; once I got a few words, including where it is, it was easy. This is not a physics one :)
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #101!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 20 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
that was quick…
I’ve seen the thing they’re referring to; once I got a few words, including where it is, it was easy. This is not a physics one :)
Love that it isn’t physics.
Do you know who Edsger W. Dijkstra is?
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
sarahs mum said:that was quick…
I’ve seen the thing they’re referring to; once I got a few words, including where it is, it was easy. This is not a physics one :)
Love that it isn’t physics.
Do you know who Edsger W. Dijkstra is?
Yes. Given your earlier work with computers I’m a little surprised you hadn’t at least heard of him.
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
btm said:I’ve seen the thing they’re referring to; once I got a few words, including where it is, it was easy. This is not a physics one :)
Love that it isn’t physics.
Do you know who Edsger W. Dijkstra is?
Yes. Given your earlier work with computers I’m a little surprised you hadn’t at least heard of him.
Nup. Missed that.
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
sarahs mum said:Love that it isn’t physics.
Do you know who Edsger W. Dijkstra is?
Yes. Given your earlier work with computers I’m a little surprised you hadn’t at least heard of him.
Nup. Missed that.
He was one of the founding fathers of modern computer dcience, but I guess it depends on what areas of cs you studied.
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #101!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 20 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
that was quick…
I’ve seen the thing they’re referring to; once I got a few words, including where it is, it was easy. This is not a physics one :)
I would like to see this thing.
It took me longer to find the few words and to work out where it was.
79 guesses 97.47%
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
sarahs mum said:that was quick…
I’ve seen the thing they’re referring to; once I got a few words, including where it is, it was easy. This is not a physics one :)
I would like to see this thing.
It took me longer to find the few words and to work out where it was.
79 guesses 97.47%
and an extra 90 minutes Ros.
we know nothing
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
btm said:I’ve seen the thing they’re referring to; once I got a few words, including where it is, it was easy. This is not a physics one :)
I would like to see this thing.
It took me longer to find the few words and to work out where it was.
79 guesses 97.47%
and an extra 90 minutes Ros.
Found the answer on the wiki page on the country.
43 guesses @ 72.09%
That took some research!
I’ll admit to never having heard of it.
286 guesses for an accuracy of 62.94%
AussieDJ said:
That took some research!I’ll admit to never having heard of it.
286 guesses for an accuracy of 62.94%
It is actually something I learned in school.
Wow! Fastest I’ve done it! (Helps that I know a bit about the topic)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #102!
The answer was:
You solved it in 20 guesses
Your accuracy was 60.00%
AussieDJ said:
Wow! Fastest I’ve done it! (Helps that I know a bit about the topic)Congratulations, you solved Redactle #102!
The answer was:
You solved it in 20 guesses
Your accuracy was 60.00%
Rephrase that. I don’t know much, if anything, about the topic, but I recognised the name.
AussieDJ said:
Wow! Fastest I’ve done it! (Helps that I know a bit about the topic)Congratulations, you solved Redactle #102!
The answer was:
You solved it in 20 guesses
Your accuracy was 60.00%
wow.
It’s another physics one, sm.
AussieDJ said:
Wow! Fastest I’ve done it! (Helps that I know a bit about the topic)Congratulations, you solved Redactle #102!
The answer was:
You solved it in 20 guesses
Your accuracy was 60.00%
Well done! A decent accuracy, too.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #102!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 17 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
It’s another physics one, sm.
thanks for the clue.
I seem to be being a bit afraid to jump in deep. This might take some time…while i struggle to act.
Got half of the title out. Actually I have lots of words out. And I still have no idea.
fk what an embarrassment 
took us a while to realise the 5 wasn’t part of the term “inclined plane” but obviously then we had a banquet of options
in actual fact we saw enough (we actually thought proportional to the rotation rate might be proportional to the inertial mass) to be pretty confident it would be what we (apparently incorrectly) remembered as virtual, but these editors use inertial or fictitious, which threw us off a bit
if we’d been more confident of the above then since we already knew that centrifugal force didn’t fit, we’d just have to think harder to remember the other one
sad
SCIENCE said:
fk what an embarrassmentin actual fact we saw enough (we actually thought proportional to the rotation rate might be proportional to the inertial mass) to be pretty confident it would be what we (apparently incorrectly) remembered as virtual, but these editors use inertial or fictitious, which threw us off a bit
if we’d been more confident of the above then since we already knew that centrifugal force didn’t fit, we’d just have to think harder to remember the other one
sad
sadder
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #102!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 17 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
It’s another physics one, sm.
Jesus – I almost beat BTM!
18 guesses with 83.33% accuracy.
I somehow got rotated as my first word, then it was just a matter of throwing a few similar words (clockwise, anticlockwise, counterclockwise, counter etc.) at it before risking hemisphere to see if it was macro or micro in scale. It was then obvious.
Dark Orange said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #102!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 17 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
It’s another physics one, sm.
Jesus – I almost beat BTM!
18 guesses with 83.33% accuracy.
I somehow got rotated as my first word, then it was just a matter of throwing a few similar words (clockwise, anticlockwise, counterclockwise, counter etc.) at it before risking hemisphere to see if it was macro or micro in scale. It was then obvious.
I’m obviously stupid.
sarahs mum said:
Dark Orange said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #102!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 17 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
It’s another physics one, sm.
Jesus – I almost beat BTM!
18 guesses with 83.33% accuracy.
I somehow got rotated as my first word, then it was just a matter of throwing a few similar words (clockwise, anticlockwise, counterclockwise, counter etc.) at it before risking hemisphere to see if it was macro or micro in scale. It was then obvious.
I’m obviously stupid.
I fluked the first word – I thought it was the only obvious word to fit in a particular space, but it did appear once elsewhere.
70 spins 3
69 outer 1
68 centrifugal 17
67 axis 23
66 year 0
65 much 2
64 earth’s 14
63 non 9
62 rotation 46
61 forces 37
60 two 16
59 force 109
58 space 2
57 object 24
56 type 0
55 motion 32
54 satellite 0
53 orbit 2
52 gravitational 3
51 gravity 8
50 earth 35
49 point 4
48 rest 6
fn physics.
sarahs mum said:
fn physics.
My last post only contains clue words, not the solution so feel free to check it out for a hint.
googled.
Okay. I did know about that. But that wasn’t where my brain was off to and I wouldn’t have come up with that word anyway..
I knew what it was by guess 79, but couldn’t remember the actual name. I kept chucking words in that I knew were related until I got it in 91.
Why don’t I get the congratulations message on a regular basis?
And why physics? Is this game trying to trigger me??
84 words 80.95% accuracy.
sarahs mum said:
Why don’t I get the congratulations message on a regular basis?And why physics? Is this game trying to trigger me??
84 words 80.95% accuracy.
Better than me – 87 words with 45.98% accuracy.
Dark Orange said:
sarahs mum said:
Why don’t I get the congratulations message on a regular basis?And why physics? Is this game trying to trigger me??
84 words 80.95% accuracy.
Better than me – 87 words with 45.98% accuracy.
I was thinking you would slay this one.
And all of you much better than me.
Oh well, there always has to be a straggler. Plodding along, smelling the flowers and admiring the scenery as he goes…
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #103!
The answer was:
You solved it in 219 guesses
Your accuracy was 45.21%
AussieDJ said:
And all of you much better than me.Oh well, there always has to be a straggler. Plodding along, smelling the flowers and admiring the scenery as he goes…
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #103!
The answer was:
You solved it in 219 guesses
Your accuracy was 45.21%
I eventually happened on a successful string of words. And I knew what one of these was.
I had a random game today of redactle unlimited. I thought I was on a string of words. The fifth word (horizon) was the answer. It surprised me again. sometimes I expect it to be complicated.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
And all of you much better than me.Oh well, there always has to be a straggler. Plodding along, smelling the flowers and admiring the scenery as he goes…
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #103!
The answer was:
You solved it in 219 guesses
Your accuracy was 45.21%
I eventually happened on a successful string of words. And I knew what one of these was.
I had a random game today of redactle unlimited. I thought I was on a string of words. The fifth word (horizon) was the answer. It surprised me again. sometimes I expect it to be complicated.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
And all of you much better than me.Oh well, there always has to be a straggler. Plodding along, smelling the flowers and admiring the scenery as he goes…
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #103!
The answer was:
You solved it in 219 guesses
Your accuracy was 45.21%
I eventually happened on a successful string of words. And I knew what one of these was.
I had a random game today of redactle unlimited. I thought I was on a string of words. The fifth word (horizon) was the answer. It surprised me again. sometimes I expect it to be complicated.
I took nine hours – admittedly over a couple of sessions – to get one of the unlimited games out. Not my finest effort, by a long shot.
hopefully tonight is not a physics.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:I eventually happened on a successful string of words. And I knew what one of these was.
I had a random game today of redactle unlimited. I thought I was on a string of words. The fifth word (horizon) was the answer. It surprised me again. sometimes I expect it to be complicated.
I took nine hours – admittedly over a couple of sessions – to get one of the unlimited games out. Not my finest effort, by a long shot.hopefully tonight is not a physics.
I’ve just started on this one. I’ll see how far I get with it – https://redactle-unlimited.com/#article/R3VucG93ZGVy
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:I took nine hours – admittedly over a couple of sessions – to get one of the unlimited games out. Not my finest effort, by a long shot.
hopefully tonight is not a physics.
I’ve just started on this one. I’ll see how far I get with it – https://redactle-unlimited.com/#article/R3VucG93ZGVy
Not too bad – You took 16 minutes to solve Redactle Unlimited in 87 guesses with 74.71% accuracy!
AussieDJ said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:hopefully tonight is not a physics.
I’ve just started on this one. I’ll see how far I get with it – https://redactle-unlimited.com/#article/R3VucG93ZGVy
Not too bad – You took 16 minutes to solve Redactle Unlimited in 87 guesses with 74.71% accuracy!
it’s smelling a lot like physics
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
AussieDJ said:I’ve just started on this one. I’ll see how far I get with it – https://redactle-unlimited.com/#article/R3VucG93ZGVy
Not too bad – You took 16 minutes to solve Redactle Unlimited in 87 guesses with 74.71% accuracy!
it’s smelling a lot like physics
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:Not too bad – You took 16 minutes to solve Redactle Unlimited in 87 guesses with 74.71% accuracy!
it’s smelling a lot like physics
Some physics, with some chemistry thrown in as well.
Thanks some for the chemistry hint.
Congratulations! You took 1 hour to solve Redactle Unlimited in 118 guesses with 92.37% accuracy!
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:it’s smelling a lot like physics
Some physics, with some chemistry thrown in as well.Thanks some for the chemistry hint.
Congratulations! You took 1 hour to solve Redactle Unlimited in 118 guesses with 92.37% accuracy!
I got to 63 without a hitch. Then four in a row.
fk that 
took us way too long
figured things like type, main advantage, cross-sectional area, distance but they weren’t really enough to go anywhere
but what was the 6 letter word ██████, device, liquid seemed to fit, the target wasn’t exactly top of list
there were obviously a whole heap of equations which don’t get displayed, but obviously the ‘A’ term helped some of the figuring out
(the Americanisms and unit conversions didn’t help, in fact, hindered)
subscripts tricked us into thinking chemistry for a bit
so stuck for a while, kept hunting through to see if anything might click, hard to think of any initial-vowel-13s but surely it couldn’t be that out of reach
found some paragraphs with “around” and “through” and “inside the ████” which suddenly made sense
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:Some physics, with some chemistry thrown in as well.
Thanks some for the chemistry hint.
Congratulations! You took 1 hour to solve Redactle Unlimited in 118 guesses with 92.37% accuracy!
I got to 63 without a hitch. Then four in a row.
I’ve just finished this one – https://redactle-unlimited.com/#article/TW9zcXVl – taking an hour to try 273 guesses and scoring 45.79% accuracy.
It looked vaguely familiar. I’m wondering whether it hadn’t put in a previous appearance in the ‘proper’ Redactle.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:Thanks some for the chemistry hint.
Congratulations! You took 1 hour to solve Redactle Unlimited in 118 guesses with 92.37% accuracy!
I got to 63 without a hitch. Then four in a row.
Nicely done!I’ve just finished this one – https://redactle-unlimited.com/#article/TW9zcXVl – taking an hour to try 273 guesses and scoring 45.79% accuracy.
It looked vaguely familiar. I’m wondering whether it hadn’t put in a previous appearance in the ‘proper’ Redactle.
I might just wait for today’s redactle.
sarahs mum said:
I might just wait for today’s redactle.
I was planning on going to bed an hour and a half ago. I’m still up …
I might as well take a look at the next one.
:)
nnnnnnnnnnn grrrr.
sarahs mum said:
nnnnnnnnnnn grrrr.
Will finish it later today.
fk we just shotgunned this one, gave up because it was late-early
but in hindsight it could have been another one of those one shot wonders
████████████
In ████████ ███████, █████ ████ of ████████ is ██████████ with an ████████████ with the ████ ████ but with opposite ████████ ███████ (████ as ████████ ██████). For ███████, the ████████████ of the ████████ is the ████████ (████ █████ as an ████████████). █████ the ████████ ███ a ████████ ████████ ██████, the ████████ ███ a ████████ ████████ ██████, and is ████████ █████████ in ███████ █████ of ███████████ █████. The opposite is ████ ████: the ████████████ of the ████████ is the ████████.
████ ███████ ███████ an ████████ ████████ ██████ for the ████████—a ███████ of █████ █████ was █████. █████ █████ to █████ ████ ██ █████ ████████ ████ as the ██████ █████ of ████ ██████. ███████ ██████████ was the ██████████ in ██████ of the ████████ and the ██████. █████ █████ to █████ ████ ████ was ███ to the ███████████████ ████████████ with the ███, until ███████ ████ ██████ ████ ████ ██████ was ██████████ █████████ between ████████ and ████████ ███████. █████ ████ █████████ a ████████ █ + █ → █ + █, █████ an ████████ and a ██████ ██████████ to ████ ███ ███████. ██████ ███████████ and ████ ████, ███████, ██████ ████ ████ █████ █████ ████████ ██████ to █████████ ███ ████. A ████ █████, in ████, █████ ████████ ███ ██████ and ██████████ the ████████, a ███ ████████ of the ████ ████ as the ████████. The █████████ of ████ ████████ the next ████ ███████ the ████ ███ ██████████ to ███ ██████.
If a ████████ and ████████████ ███ in the ███████████ ███████ ██████, ████ ████ ███ ██████████ ████ █████ and ███████ █████ █████████. █████████ ████ as █ + █ → ██ (the ███-██████ ████████████ of an ████████-████████ ████) ███ an ███████. The ██████-██████ ████████████ of an ████████-████████ ████, █ + █ → █, ██████ █████ in ████ █████ because it is ██████████ to ████████ ██████ and ████████ ████████ in ████ ███████. ███████, in the ███████ █████ of a ███████ the █████████████ ██████████ is ██████ and ██████-██████ ████████████ ███ █████. The ███████ ████████ (in ████ █████, without an ██████ ███████) is ████ ██████████ for ████ ██████. In ███████ █████ ██████, ████ ███████ is ███████ ████ as an ████████████ ███████ █████ for █████ █████ ██████ ████ the █████████ of ██████ ████████████ ███ ██ ████████████ by the ███████████ █████████. ████ █████ the ███ for ███████ ████ ██████████ or ████████████ in █████ a ███ ████████ ███████ █████ ███ █████████ into a ███ ████████ █████ and ████. █████ █████████ ███ █████████ in the ██████ █████ and ███████████████ of a ███████ █████ ██████. It ████ █████ the ███ for ███████ ████████ ██████ through █████████ ████ as the ███ ████████ ████, █████ is a ███████████ ███████ of ████ ███████████████.
As ████████████ with the ███████, , ████████ and ████████████ ████ opposite ████████ ███████ █ and -█.
actually we don’t use the word that often so perhaps 5 shots more reasonable
Yet more physics, sm, this time submicroscopic physics.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #104!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 22 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Yet more physics, sm, this time submicroscopic physics.
I know. I have a lot out. And I don’t think I know the answer. It feels pointless.
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #104!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 22 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Yet more physics, sm, this time submicroscopic physics.
I know. I have a lot out. And I don’t think I know the answer. It feels pointless.
I struggled a little and the first random word I threw at it was the solution, so was a little lucky.
40 guesses @ 75.00%
Dark Orange said:
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #104!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 22 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Yet more physics, sm, this time submicroscopic physics.
I know. I have a lot out. And I don’t think I know the answer. It feels pointless.
I struggled a little and the first random word I threw at it was the solution, so was a little lucky.
40 guesses @ 75.00%
I am up to guess 123. i have a lot of text revealed. But I am still nowhere.
sarahs mum said:
Dark Orange said:
sarahs mum said:I know. I have a lot out. And I don’t think I know the answer. It feels pointless.
I struggled a little and the first random word I threw at it was the solution, so was a little lucky.
40 guesses @ 75.00%
I am up to guess 123. i have a lot of text revealed. But I am still nowhere.
109 @ 64%
I was annoyed that I didn’t think of the right word earlier. I should have.
Scroll down to ssee how pathetic I am.
Spolilers follow.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
████████████
In particle physics, every type of particle is ██████████ with an ████████████ with the same mass but with opposite ████████ ███████ (such as ████████ charge). For example, the ████████████ of the electron is the positron (also known as an ████████████). █████ the electron has a negative ████████ charge, the positron has a positive ████████ charge, and is ████████ █████████ in ███████ █████ of ███████████ █████. The opposite is also true: the ████████████ of the positron is the electron.
Some particles, such as the ██████, are their ███ ████████████. █████████, for each pair of ████████████ ████████, one is ██████████ as the ██████ particle (the one that ██████ in matter ███████ ██████████ with in █████ ████). The other (███████ █████ the ██████ “████-”) is ██████████ the ████████████.
Particle-████████████ █████ can ██████████ each other, █████████ ███████; since the ███████ of the particle and ████████████ are opposite, █████ charge is █████████. For example, the █████████ ████████ in ███████ ███████████ █████ ███████ ██████████ ██████████ with electrons, █████████ █████ of █████ ████, a ███████ █████████ in positron ████████ ██████████.
The ████ of ██████ are ████ ██████ ███████████ with ███████ to particles and █████████████. For example, an ██████████ and a positron can ████ an ████████████ atom, which is ████████ to have the same ██████████ as a ████████ atom. This █████ to the ████████ of ███ the █████████ of matter after the ███ ████ ████████ in a ████████ ██████████ ██████ ████████ of matter, ██████ than █████ a ████-and-████ ███████ of matter and ██████████. The discovery of charge ██████ █████████ ██████ to shed light on this ███████ by ███████ that this ████████, ██████████ ███████ to be ███████, was ████ ███████████.
Because charge is █████████, it is not ████████ to ██████ an ████████████ without ██████ ██████████ another particle of the same charge (as is for ████████ the ████ when █████████████ are ████████ █████████ via ████ █████ or the █████████ of ██████ ████ with ███████ ██████████), or by the ████████████ ████████ of ████ a particle and its ████████████, which can occur in particle ████████████ such as the █████ ██████ ████████ at ████.
████████ particles and their █████████████ have opposite ███████, ████████████ neutral particles ████ not be █████████ to their █████████████. The neutron, for example, is ████ out of ██████, the ███████████ from ██████████, and they are ███████████████ from one another because neutrons and ████████████ ██████████ each other upon ███████. ███████, other neutral particles are their ███ █████████████, such as ███████, ████████, ████████, and ████████████ █████████ and some ████████████ █████.
===
I think I will google the answer now.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
sarahs mum said:
Scroll down to ssee how pathetic I am.Spolilers follow.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
████████████In particle physics, every type of particle is ██████████ with an ████████████ with the same mass but with opposite ████████ ███████ (such as ████████ charge). For example, the ████████████ of the electron is the positron (also known as an ████████████). █████ the electron has a negative ████████ charge, the positron has a positive ████████ charge, and is ████████ █████████ in ███████ █████ of ███████████ █████. The opposite is also true: the ████████████ of the positron is the electron.
Some particles, such as the ██████, are their ███ ████████████. █████████, for each pair of ████████████ ████████, one is ██████████ as the ██████ particle (the one that ██████ in matter ███████ ██████████ with in █████ ████). The other (███████ █████ the ██████ “████-”) is ██████████ the ████████████.
Particle-████████████ █████ can ██████████ each other, █████████ ███████; since the ███████ of the particle and ████████████ are opposite, █████ charge is █████████. For example, the █████████ ████████ in ███████ ███████████ █████ ███████ ██████████ ██████████ with electrons, █████████ █████ of █████ ████, a ███████ █████████ in positron ████████ ██████████.
The ████ of ██████ are ████ ██████ ███████████ with ███████ to particles and █████████████. For example, an ██████████ and a positron can ████ an ████████████ atom, which is ████████ to have the same ██████████ as a ████████ atom. This █████ to the ████████ of ███ the █████████ of matter after the ███ ████ ████████ in a ████████ ██████████ ██████ ████████ of matter, ██████ than █████ a ████-and-████ ███████ of matter and ██████████. The discovery of charge ██████ █████████ ██████ to shed light on this ███████ by ███████ that this ████████, ██████████ ███████ to be ███████, was ████ ███████████.
Because charge is █████████, it is not ████████ to ██████ an ████████████ without ██████ ██████████ another particle of the same charge (as is for ████████ the ████ when █████████████ are ████████ █████████ via ████ █████ or the █████████ of ██████ ████ with ███████ ██████████), or by the ████████████ ████████ of ████ a particle and its ████████████, which can occur in particle ████████████ such as the █████ ██████ ████████ at ████.
████████ particles and their █████████████ have opposite ███████, ████████████ neutral particles ████ not be █████████ to their █████████████. The neutron, for example, is ████ out of ██████, the ███████████ from ██████████, and they are ███████████████ from one another because neutrons and ████████████ ██████████ each other upon ███████. ███████, other neutral particles are their ███ █████████████, such as ███████, ████████, ████████, and ████████████ █████████ and some ████████████ █████.
===
I think I will google the answer now.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
anti-matter?
sarahs mum said:
Scroll down to ssee how pathetic I am.Spolilers follow.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
████████████In particle physics, every type of particle is ██████████ with an ████████████ with the same mass but with opposite ████████ ███████ (such as ████████ charge). For example, the ████████████ of the electron is the positron (also known as an ████████████). █████ the electron has a negative ████████ charge, the positron has a positive ████████ charge, and is ████████ █████████ in ███████ █████ of ███████████ █████. The opposite is also true: the ████████████ of the positron is the electron.
Some particles, such as the ██████, are their ███ ████████████. █████████, for each pair of ████████████ ████████, one is ██████████ as the ██████ particle (the one that ██████ in matter ███████ ██████████ with in █████ ████). The other (███████ █████ the ██████ “████-”) is ██████████ the ████████████.
Particle-████████████ █████ can ██████████ each other, █████████ ███████; since the ███████ of the particle and ████████████ are opposite, █████ charge is █████████. For example, the █████████ ████████ in ███████ ███████████ █████ ███████ ██████████ ██████████ with electrons, █████████ █████ of █████ ████, a ███████ █████████ in positron ████████ ██████████.
The ████ of ██████ are ████ ██████ ███████████ with ███████ to particles and █████████████. For example, an ██████████ and a positron can ████ an ████████████ atom, which is ████████ to have the same ██████████ as a ████████ atom. This █████ to the ████████ of ███ the █████████ of matter after the ███ ████ ████████ in a ████████ ██████████ ██████ ████████ of matter, ██████ than █████ a ████-and-████ ███████ of matter and ██████████. The discovery of charge ██████ █████████ ██████ to shed light on this ███████ by ███████ that this ████████, ██████████ ███████ to be ███████, was ████ ███████████.
Because charge is █████████, it is not ████████ to ██████ an ████████████ without ██████ ██████████ another particle of the same charge (as is for ████████ the ████ when █████████████ are ████████ █████████ via ████ █████ or the █████████ of ██████ ████ with ███████ ██████████), or by the ████████████ ████████ of ████ a particle and its ████████████, which can occur in particle ████████████ such as the █████ ██████ ████████ at ████.
████████ particles and their █████████████ have opposite ███████, ████████████ neutral particles ████ not be █████████ to their █████████████. The neutron, for example, is ████ out of ██████, the ███████████ from ██████████, and they are ███████████████ from one another because neutrons and ████████████ ██████████ each other upon ███████. ███████, other neutral particles are their ███ █████████████, such as ███████, ████████, ████████, and ████████████ █████████ and some ████████████ █████.
===
I think I will google the answer now.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
good. I didnt know about anti-particles. I had the hunch that I was wasting my time.
You can get quite negative about this game at times.
Nothing I was throwing at it was sticking…
:)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #104!
The answer was:
You solved it in 224 guesses
Your accuracy was 39.29%
Not physics
96 76.04%
56 guesses @ 64.29%
I had to use Google because I couldn’t come up with the title, but it turns out I had already considered the solution, but just couldn’t spell it.
Grrr! It would help if I could spell the word correctly!
I had it at guess number 256, but it took me quite a while to twig that my spelling was off
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #105!
The answer was:
You solved it in 431 guesses
Your accuracy was 35.96%
AussieDJ said:
Grrr! It would help if I could spell the word correctly!I had it at guess number 256, but it took me quite a while to twig that my spelling was off
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #105!
The answer was:
You solved it in 431 guesses
Your accuracy was 35.96%
That is three of us that had to check the spelling.
sarahs mum said:
That is three of us that had to check the spelling.
That’s kind of funny, in a perverse sort of way
AussieDJ said:
Grrr! It would help if I could spell the word correctly!I had it at guess number 256, but it took me quite a while to twig that my spelling was off
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #105!
The answer was:
You solved it in 431 guesses
Your accuracy was 35.96%
I ran out of spare time at guess 265 today, and googled it for ten minutes before I found it. I would not have got the spelling right anyway.
I had the topic at guess 12, and narrowed it down by guess 29, but just could not get a decent hit. I filled out most of the article by guess 200 but ended up just chucking words at it until the clock told me that I was an hour late for my next job. Luckily for everyone else, I don’t do that topic for a living.
I have enough to get this out.
But I have not got it out.
sarahs mum said:
I have enough to get this out.But I have not got it out.
That one was a struggle. it took me 50 goes to get a foothold, then another 50 to get absolutely nowhere so enlisted the help of Google, and still managed to take another 60 guesses.
162 guesses @ 41.36%
Redactle #106!
The answer was:
You solved it in 306 guesses
Your accuracy was 32.35%
Dark Orange said:
sarahs mum said:
I have enough to get this out.But I have not got it out.
That one was a struggle. it took me 50 goes to get a foothold, then another 50 to get absolutely nowhere so enlisted the help of Google, and still managed to take another 60 guesses.
162 guesses @ 41.36%
I will have to google. Sad.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
109 lakes 2
108 food 5
107 koi 2
106 fishing 3
105 species 22
104 bred 3
103 grown 0
102 goldfish 3
101 carp 21
100 bass 0
99 china 1
██████████ is a family of ██████████ fish ████████ ██████ the carp or ██████ family. It includes the █████, the ████ ███████, and █████████ like the █████ and ███████. ██████████ is the largest and most ███████ fish family and the largest ██████████ ██████ family in ███████ with about █,███ species, of which only █,███ ██████ ██████, ███████ into about ███ ██████. █████████ █████ from about █████ in ████ to the █-█ █████ ████ (███████████ █████████). By █████ and species █████, the family █████ up more than two-thirds of the ██████████████ █████ █████████████. The family name is derived from the Greek word ████████ (████████ ██████).
sarahs mum said:
Dark Orange said:
sarahs mum said:
I have enough to get this out.But I have not got it out.
That one was a struggle. it took me 50 goes to get a foothold, then another 50 to get absolutely nowhere so enlisted the help of Google, and still managed to take another 60 guesses.
162 guesses @ 41.36%
I will have to google. Sad.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
109 lakes 2
108 food 5
107 koi 2
106 fishing 3
105 species 22
104 bred 3
103 grown 0
102 goldfish 3
101 carp 21
100 bass 0
99 china 1██████████ is a family of ██████████ fish ████████ ██████ the carp or ██████ family. It includes the █████, the ████ ███████, and █████████ like the █████ and ███████. ██████████ is the largest and most ███████ fish family and the largest ██████████ ██████ family in ███████ with about █,███ species, of which only █,███ ██████ ██████, ███████ into about ███ ██████. █████████ █████ from about █████ in ████ to the █-█ █████ ████ (███████████ █████████). By █████ and species █████, the family █████ up more than two-thirds of the ██████████████ █████ █████████████. The family name is derived from the Greek word ████████ (████████ ██████).
I wish to put in a complaint.
Cyprinidae
Whothefuck knows that?
I googled wiki+carp and got the answer. Why not just give us the Carp page in the first fn place?
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
Dark Orange said:That one was a struggle. it took me 50 goes to get a foothold, then another 50 to get absolutely nowhere so enlisted the help of Google, and still managed to take another 60 guesses.
162 guesses @ 41.36%
I will have to google. Sad.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
109 lakes 2
108 food 5
107 koi 2
106 fishing 3
105 species 22
104 bred 3
103 grown 0
102 goldfish 3
101 carp 21
100 bass 0
99 china 1██████████ is a family of ██████████ fish ████████ ██████ the carp or ██████ family. It includes the █████, the ████ ███████, and █████████ like the █████ and ███████. ██████████ is the largest and most ███████ fish family and the largest ██████████ ██████ family in ███████ with about █,███ species, of which only █,███ ██████ ██████, ███████ into about ███ ██████. █████████ █████ from about █████ in ████ to the █-█ █████ ████ (███████████ █████████). By █████ and species █████, the family █████ up more than two-thirds of the ██████████████ █████ █████████████. The family name is derived from the Greek word ████████ (████████ ██████).
I wish to put in a complaint.
Cyprinidae
Whothefuck knows that?
I googled wiki+carp and got the answer. Why not just give us the Carp page in the first fn place?
Cyprinidae 111 75.68%
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:I will have to google. Sad.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
109 lakes 2
108 food 5
107 koi 2
106 fishing 3
105 species 22
104 bred 3
103 grown 0
102 goldfish 3
101 carp 21
100 bass 0
99 china 1██████████ is a family of ██████████ fish ████████ ██████ the carp or ██████ family. It includes the █████, the ████ ███████, and █████████ like the █████ and ███████. ██████████ is the largest and most ███████ fish family and the largest ██████████ ██████ family in ███████ with about █,███ species, of which only █,███ ██████ ██████, ███████ into about ███ ██████. █████████ █████ from about █████ in ████ to the █-█ █████ ████ (███████████ █████████). By █████ and species █████, the family █████ up more than two-thirds of the ██████████████ █████ █████████████. The family name is derived from the Greek word ████████ (████████ ██████).
I wish to put in a complaint.
Cyprinidae
Whothefuck knows that?
I googled wiki+carp and got the answer. Why not just give us the Carp page in the first fn place?
Cyprinidae 111 75.68%
One can massively cheat by finding a reasonably complete sentence and doing a search on it with “ “ enclosing it
Cymek said:
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:I wish to put in a complaint.
Cyprinidae
Whothefuck knows that?
I googled wiki+carp and got the answer. Why not just give us the Carp page in the first fn place?
Cyprinidae 111 75.68%
One can massively cheat by finding a reasonably complete sentence and doing a search on it with “ “ enclosing it
That has been done. But I really try hard to get it out by myself. And I declare it when I have given up and googled.
I should have googled last night instead of staring at it every now and then..
sarahs mum said:
Cymek said:
sarahs mum said:
Cyprinidae 111 75.68%
One can massively cheat by finding a reasonably complete sentence and doing a search on it with “ “ enclosing it
That has been done. But I really try hard to get it out by myself. And I declare it when I have given up and googled.
I should have googled last night instead of staring at it every now and then..
yeah we agree that searching by sentence completion is cheating
however
if for example the answer is “Cyprinidae” and we were never going to get that in 10000 words of guessing then
if we had “carp or … family” out meaning “carp family” then we would consider searching for “carp family” and using the specific answer, to be fair play
has to be that specific answer, and not just using it to find arbitrary related words
(similarly if we know exactly which country / city we are looking for, just not the name, then searching to obtain the name would be fair)
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:I will have to google. Sad.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
109 lakes 2
108 food 5
107 koi 2
106 fishing 3
105 species 22
104 bred 3
103 grown 0
102 goldfish 3
101 carp 21
100 bass 0
99 china 1██████████ is a family of ██████████ fish ████████ ██████ the carp or ██████ family. It includes the █████, the ████ ███████, and █████████ like the █████ and ███████. ██████████ is the largest and most ███████ fish family and the largest ██████████ ██████ family in ███████ with about █,███ species, of which only █,███ ██████ ██████, ███████ into about ███ ██████. █████████ █████ from about █████ in ████ to the █-█ █████ ████ (███████████ █████████). By █████ and species █████, the family █████ up more than two-thirds of the ██████████████ █████ █████████████. The family name is derived from the Greek word ████████ (████████ ██████).
I wish to put in a complaint.
Cyprinidae
Whothefuck knows that?
I googled wiki+carp and got the answer. Why not just give us the Carp page in the first fn place?
Cyprinidae 111 75.68%
bump.
Someone shared this on Wild Green Memes
dv said:
Someone shared this on Wild Green Memes
:)
dv said:
Someone shared this on Wild Green Memes
well look some people don’t even think they are animals
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:I wish to put in a complaint.
Cyprinidae
Whothefuck knows that?
I googled wiki+carp and got the answer. Why not just give us the Carp page in the first fn place?
Cyprinidae 111 75.68%
bump.
World average 146 @ 38%
Methinks the world cheats a lot.
I got to 188 before I realised that it was some stupid latin word that I would never get so I cheated as well, but at least I tried.
Just think how much we’re learning with this game…
:)
Kingy said:
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:Cyprinidae 111 75.68%
bump.
World average 146 @ 38%
Methinks the world cheats a lot.
I got to 188 before I realised that it was some stupid latin word that I would never get so I cheated as well, but at least I tried.
I tried latin before I tried greek.
AussieDJ said:
Just think how much we’re learning with this game…:)
I’ve forgotten already.
Not physics today, sm, but very American.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #107!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 29 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Not physics today, sm, but very American.
Good that it isn’t physics. Or Greek.
I’m up to guess 39 but I haven’t bombed …yet.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #107!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 29 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Not physics today, sm, but very American.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #107!
The answer was:
You solved it in 108 guesses
Your accuracy was 59.26%
81 96.30%
laugh out loud
sarahs mum said:
81 96.30%
Struggled with that one.
132 60.61%
Dark Orange said:
sarahs mum said:
81 96.30%
Struggled with that one.
132 60.61%
I took BtM’s american clue. Because of the rounds I thought it might be something about elections. When it wasn’t I guessed sport and I was on a good thing.
well that certainly wasn’t fyzyx
Not physics again, but not American, either. French, this time.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #108!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 23 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Not physics again, but not American, either. French, this time.
I’m not far into it but I thought it looked French.
83 89.16%
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #108!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 23 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Not physics again, but not American, either. French, this time.
Up there with you today. :)
26 guesses, 84.62%
The two letter word in the title was a massive clue that it wasn’t English.
Dark Orange said:
The two letter word in the title was a massive clue that it wasn’t English.
I would have helped (me), of course, if I’d registered that fact earlier…
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #108!
The answer was:
You solved it in 120 guesses
Your accuracy was 53.33%
AussieDJ said:
Dark Orange said:The two letter word in the title was a massive clue that it wasn’t English.
I would have helped (me), of course, if I’d registered that fact earlier…
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #108!
The answer was:
You solved it in 120 guesses
Your accuracy was 53.33%
55 guesses @89.09%
I got really lucky with an early guess that narrowed it right down, then it was just a matter of specifics. I did, however, have to google the complete name even though I knew what it was.
Not physics this time, sm, and despite having a hyphen in the name, DO, not French, although there is a French connection.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #109!
The answer was:
You solved it in 108 guesses
Your accuracy was 40.74%
AussieDJ said:
Not physics this time, sm, and despite having a hyphen in the name, DO, not French, although there is a French connection.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #109!
The answer was:
You solved it in 108 guesses
Your accuracy was 40.74%
I feel I should know it from the spaces
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Not physics this time, sm, and despite having a hyphen in the name, DO, not French, although there is a French connection.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #109!
The answer was:
You solved it in 108 guesses
Your accuracy was 40.74%
I feel I should know it from the spaces
oh. yeah. Someone out there got it in one,
67 76.12%
More 2-letter words, picked an obvious country to narrow down the type of words, got one pretty quickly but had to use google to suggest more names. And surprisingly, the answer was not unknown to me. I’ll class this one as “assisted”.
You solved it in 28 guesses
Your accuracy was 50.00%
Not physics, not really any science, not specifically any country, either.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #110!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 18 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Not physics, not really any science, not specifically any country, either.
I’m making a mess of it.
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #110!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 18 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Not physics, not really any science, not specifically any country, either.
I’m making a mess of it.
I googled. I was all around it but not hitting the right words.
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #110!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 18 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Not physics, not really any science, not specifically any country, either.
I’m making a mess of it.
I googled. I was all around it but not hitting the right words.
I’m struggling too. :(
we don’t know America music or much about these newfangled topics
Dark Orange said:
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:I’m making a mess of it.
I googled. I was all around it but not hitting the right words.
I’m struggling too. :(
Finally got it. I had been dismissing the actual answer because I did not think the plural and non plural forms of it fit.
104 guesses @ 26%
sarahs mum said:
I’m making a mess of it.
333 guesses to solve it – for an accuracy of 16.82%
so there were a few possibilities 
but then
over █,███ █ (██,███ ██) above ███ █████
and similar patterns suggested dimensioned quantities like elevations, so those last 2 words would be “sea level” so geographical matter became clear
back to the top
is a ██████████ ███████ in
being notable enough to be top 10000 made minor subdivisions unlikely, and city didn’t fit so it was going to be country, and then that longer word would have to be landlocked
██████████ █████ as the ███████ of ██████
must therefore contain known and kingdom because republic didn’t really fit
together with the elevations we had to go looking in mountainous regions
legit’ not many options left there so we thought a bit and shot a first guess
funnily enough on the initial inspection (before scrolling through for the over and above bits) we thought the 6-character target might be Buddha so there you go it set the correct frame after all
i got a message tonight.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #111!
You solved it in 64 guesses Your accuracy was 98.44%I can’t get into the site. It appears to be down (for me, at least)
AussieDJ said:
I can’t get into the site. It appears to be down (for me, at least)
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
I can’t get into the site. It appears to be down (for me, at least)
is it that message where you click on advanced and give permission?
No. It’s not even getting to that stage. Reloading gets the same message.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
I can’t get into the site. It appears to be down (for me, at least)
is it that message where you click on advanced and give permission?No. It’s not even getting to that stage. Reloading gets the same message.
https://www.redactle.com/#
AussieDJ said:
I can’t get into the site. It appears to be down (for me, at least)
Same here. DNS failure.
After some indirection (through ns.phx3.nearlyfreespeech.net), host -a redactle.com gives:
208.94.116.65 (IPv4)
2607:ff18:80:53::3 (IPv6)
But the browser still reports Server not found
btm said:
AussieDJ said:
I can’t get into the site. It appears to be down (for me, at least)
Same here. DNS failure.
After some indirection (throughns.phx3.nearlyfreespeech.net),host -a redactle.comgives:
208.94.116.65 (IPv4)
2607:ff18:80:53::3 (IPv6)But the browser still reports
Server not found
I played the Daily game version at https://redactle-unlimited.com/#article/Qmh1dGFu which, theoretically/hopefully is the same as the Redactle game.
It took me 246 guesses with 59.76% accuracy to get to the result.
AussieDJ said:
btm said:
AussieDJ said:
I can’t get into the site. It appears to be down (for me, at least)
Same here. DNS failure.
After some indirection (throughns.phx3.nearlyfreespeech.net),host -a redactle.comgives:
208.94.116.65 (IPv4)
2607:ff18:80:53::3 (IPv6)But the browser still reports
Server not found
I played the Daily game version at https://redactle-unlimited.com/#article/Qmh1dGFu which, theoretically/hopefully is the same as the Redactle game.
It took me 246 guesses with 59.76% accuracy to get to the result.
were you above sea level?
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
btm said:Same here. DNS failure.
After some indirection (throughns.phx3.nearlyfreespeech.net),host -a redactle.comgives:
208.94.116.65 (IPv4)
2607:ff18:80:53::3 (IPv6)But the browser still reports
Server not found
I played the Daily game version at https://redactle-unlimited.com/#article/Qmh1dGFu which, theoretically/hopefully is the same as the Redactle game.
It took me 246 guesses with 59.76% accuracy to get to the result.
were you above sea level?
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:I played the Daily game version at https://redactle-unlimited.com/#article/Qmh1dGFu which, theoretically/hopefully is the same as the Redactle game.
It took me 246 guesses with 59.76% accuracy to get to the result.
were you above sea level?
Hoping that it’s the same game – well above sea level.
sounds right then.
Woohoo!
Redactle appears to be working again!
And just in time for the next game!
No physics in this one, sm. (Or, nothing that I saw, anyway.)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #112!
The answer was:
You solved it in 42 guesses
Your accuracy was 78.57%
Best result I’ve had.
AussieDJ said:
:)
No physics in this one, sm. (Or, nothing that I saw, anyway.)Congratulations, you solved Redactle #112!
The answer was:
You solved it in 42 guesses
Your accuracy was 78.57%Best result I’ve had.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #112!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 19 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
i thought you werre going to get it out in 17 guesses.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #112!
The answer was:
You solved it in 17 guesses
Your accuracy was 70.59%
You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 674 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 36.00 Guesses; 60.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 47.50 Guesses; 61.66% Accuracy
Well! Not bad at all for my first try.
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #112!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 19 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
i thought you werre going to get it out in 17 guesses.
So did I. dv did, though :)
How are you going?
So did everyone give up on Semantle? I don’t see a lot of posts about it anymore.
dv said:
So did everyone give up on Semantle? I don’t see a lot of posts about it anymore.
AussieDJ said:
dv said:
So did everyone give up on Semantle? I don’t see a lot of posts about it anymore.
I haven’t even attempted it for weeks. So, yes, I’ve given up on it.
it got too silly. and it just pissed me off.
38 guesses at 84.21%
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #112!
The answer was:
You solved it in 17 guesses
Your accuracy was 70.59%
You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 674 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 36.00 Guesses; 60.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 47.50 Guesses; 61.66% AccuracyWell! Not bad at all for my first try.
and you were fast.
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #112!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 19 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
i thought you werre going to get it out in 17 guesses.
So did I. dv did, though :)
How are you going?
i was genuinely at guess 17 having just put in the cardinal points…when I thought…BTM would have it out with this much info.
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #112!
The answer was:
You solved it in 17 guesses
Your accuracy was 70.59%
You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 674 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 36.00 Guesses; 60.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 47.50 Guesses; 61.66% AccuracyWell! Not bad at all for my first try.
and you were fast.
I made one random guess of a pretty basic word on turn 11 and after that it fell into place.
i didn’t get the congratulations message today. after getting it yesterday i thought my luck had changed.
sarahs mum said:
i didn’t get the congratulations message today. after getting it yesterday i thought my luck had changed.
I often find I have to wait quite a while to get that message.
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
i didn’t get the congratulations message today. after getting it yesterday i thought my luck had changed.
I often find I have to wait quite a while to get that message.
Redactle Unlimited game.
Walt Whitman
82 guesses with 93.9% accuracy
I like walt whitman but I don’t think he is big outside of America.
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #112!
The answer was:
You solved it in 17 guesses
Your accuracy was 70.59%
You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 674 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 36.00 Guesses; 60.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 47.50 Guesses; 61.66% AccuracyWell! Not bad at all for my first try.
and you were fast.
I made one random guess of a pretty basic word on turn 11 and after that it fell into place.
You solved it in 10 guesses
Your accuracy was 30.00%
My first guess got the second word, and had to resort to google to find the first.
Dark Orange said:
dv said:
sarahs mum said:and you were fast.
I made one random guess of a pretty basic word on turn 11 and after that it fell into place.
You solved it in 10 guesses
Your accuracy was 30.00%My first guess got the second word, and had to resort to google to find the first.
you didn’t really even try.
sarahs mum said:
Dark Orange said:
dv said:I made one random guess of a pretty basic word on turn 11 and after that it fell into place.
You solved it in 10 guesses
Your accuracy was 30.00%My first guess got the second word, and had to resort to google to find the first.
you didn’t really even try.
As a redactle veteran I’m shocked at this dereliction
This was one of my better ones, 35 guesses to a global average of 63.
I don’t often post my crash&burns @ 250+, but at least I don’t cheat. I do sometimes google the spelling of a word or other minor help, but it defeats the purpose(and enjoyment) of a game if you just google the answer.
Occasionally Ms Kingy and I will work together on one, which is actually kinda cheating, but most of the time we compete against each other for bragging rights. I’m surprised at how much this game is fun and challenging at the same time. I guess it will eventually go the same way as many others before it, and be relegated to the 378th place in my games bookmarks folder, but it’s fun for now.
a number of times i have spent hours stuck..and then googled. and then i have posted that i googled the answer and how far i got before i did.
I’m not sure that giving up is a crime.
sarahs mum said:
a number of times i have spent hours stuck..and then googled. and then i have posted that i googled the answer and how far i got before i did.
I’m not sure that giving up is a crime.
When does it reset?
dv said:
sarahs mum said:a number of times i have spent hours stuck..and then googled. and then i have posted that i googled the answer and how far i got before i did.
I’m not sure that giving up is a crime.When does it reset?
2am.
dv said:
sarahs mum said:a number of times i have spent hours stuck..and then googled. and then i have posted that i googled the answer and how far i got before i did.
I’m not sure that giving up is a crime.When does it reset?
play a game anytime onredactle unlmited.
https://redactle-unlimited.com/#article/R2Fz
(i wonder if that links to the game I am playing now.)
sarahs mum said:
a number of times i have spent hours stuck..and then googled. and then i have posted that i googled the answer and how far i got before i did.
I’m not sure that giving up is a crime.
Perhaps AussieDJ thinks so. He/she will keep at it for 400+ and not give up.
Sometimes I lose hope and just throw words at it, any words, many words, many many words, nouns, verbs, adjectives, letters, numbers, curses, throw me a fuckn bone here!!!
Often, I just run out of time and have to go to work, and get home so late that the game has rolled over and I can’t look at the redactle thread in case of spoilers, so I’ll not refresh the page and try again in the morning.
Kingy said:
sarahs mum said:a number of times i have spent hours stuck..and then googled. and then i have posted that i googled the answer and how far i got before i did.
I’m not sure that giving up is a crime.Perhaps AussieDJ thinks so. He/she will keep at it for 400+ and not give up.
Sometimes I lose hope and just throw words at it, any words, many words, many many words, nouns, verbs, adjectives, letters, numbers, curses, throw me a fuckn bone here!!!
Often, I just run out of time and have to go to work, and get home so late that the game has rolled over and I can’t look at the redactle thread in case of spoilers, so I’ll not refresh the page and try again in the morning.
i have posted before that i have been throwing words at it just like Aussie would.
sarahs mum said:
Kingy said:
sarahs mum said:a number of times i have spent hours stuck..and then googled. and then i have posted that i googled the answer and how far i got before i did.
I’m not sure that giving up is a crime.Perhaps AussieDJ thinks so. He/she will keep at it for 400+ and not give up.
Sometimes I lose hope and just throw words at it, any words, many words, many many words, nouns, verbs, adjectives, letters, numbers, curses, throw me a fuckn bone here!!!
Often, I just run out of time and have to go to work, and get home so late that the game has rolled over and I can’t look at the redactle thread in case of spoilers, so I’ll not refresh the page and try again in the morning.
i have posted before that i have been throwing words at it just like Aussie would.
I have also given up on a couple of occasions when I was pretty sure I did not actually know the answer and on those occasions I have been right. I haven’t had any idea.
sarahs mum said:
Kingy said:
sarahs mum said:a number of times i have spent hours stuck..and then googled. and then i have posted that i googled the answer and how far i got before i did.
I’m not sure that giving up is a crime.Perhaps AussieDJ thinks so. He/she will keep at it for 400+ and not give up.
Sometimes I lose hope and just throw words at it, any words, many words, many many words, nouns, verbs, adjectives, letters, numbers, curses, throw me a fuckn bone here!!!
Often, I just run out of time and have to go to work, and get home so late that the game has rolled over and I can’t look at the redactle thread in case of spoilers, so I’ll not refresh the page and try again in the morning.
i have posted before that i have been throwing words at it just like Aussie would.
like that famous texan computer dude. never heard of him.
Algaeing: Algae Derived Material Fibers
Request Quote
Dr. Priyom Bose, Ph.D.
By Dr. Priyom Bose, Ph.D.Dec 13 2021
Algaeing, a startup company initiated in 2016, has used algae as a novel source to produce fibers and dyes for the textile industry.
This method of textile production provides a greener solution and has redesigned the textile industry.
algae, algaeing, textiles, textile industry, fibers
Algae are a large and diverse group of eukaryotic photosynthetic organisms that are predominantly found in the aquatic ecosystem. These organisms lack true leaves, stems, and roots.
Algae are thought to be the very first unicellular organisms that inhabited the planet. They can convert atmospheric carbon dioxide into useful bioactive products. Several studies on algae have proved that they are a rich source of fatty acids, minerals, and vitamins.
Algae (seaweed) are aquatic organisms that serve as renewable, economical, and sustainable sources of biofuels, bioactive medicinal products, and food ingredients. Algae are also used for wastewater treatment. There are many challenges associated with algae production, such as the growth rate, strain isolation, product synthesis, etc.
However, researchers have successfully established or are in a process of developing many cutting-edge techniques to enhance growth and obtain commercially important products. This article focuses on a novel application of algae in the textile industry.
Algae in the Textile Industry
The largest natural fiber that is produced in the world is cotton. The conventional method of textile production contributes to 10% of global carbon emissions. As only 15% of textiles are recycled, the rest of the fabrics are either incinerated or dumped into landfills. Scientists across the world are working hard to develop sustainable products using low energy and leaving a minimal carbon footprint.
Superior Measurement of Algae Species and Functions for Field Operators
Algaeing has revolutionized the textile industry by using algae as a textile source. Renana Krebs, CEO, and co-founder of Algaeing and an extensively experienced fashion industry professional pointed out that 2,700 liters of freshwater are required to produce cotton, which is equivalent to an individual’s drinking water for two years. She claims Algaeing’s fibers reduce water use by 80%.
Algaeing produces non-toxic, biodegradable, and natural fibers and dyes for textile using algae. Unlike conventional methods, its processes require significantly less water and energy for the development of textile products.
Another important aspect of Algaeing is zero waste and pollution. In a nutshell, Algaeing converts algae into a liquid formula that can be utilized as textile dyes. Further, Algaeing has developed a unique process that involves the addition of cellulose (plant fiber) to the liquid formula to develop fibers for the textile industry. The company has patented its technology and aims for its commercial launch in 2022.
Production of Algae Using Vertical Farming
Algaeing procures its primary source (algae) from another company named Algatech, which grows algae via vertical farming. In this system of farming, algae are grown indoors at optimized conditions, in vertical stacks using seawater and solar energy.
Therefore, compared to cotton that is grown in large agricultural fields and utilizes chemical fertilizers and pesticides to increase its yield, enhanced algal growth is realized in vertical farming, which is a cost-effective and environmentally friendly approach.
Advantages of Algaeing Products
Typically, synthetic dyes (e.g., azo dyes) used in the textile industry contain various chemicals and heavy metals, which are not only harmful to the aquatic ecosystem, where the textile effluents are discharged, but these chemicals can also cause allergic reactions on the human skin.
Algaeing’s algae-based dye is non-toxic and allergen-free, which is extremely beneficial for consumers. Additionally, the company stated that the fabric releases antioxidants, vitamins, and other natural nutrients which are extremely beneficial for skin health.
Textile industries would benefit from using Algaeing products as they are energy and water-efficient and aid in maintaining healthy working conditions, as production does not require the use of hazardous toxins. The product could be used by every factory, implying that the installation of new equipment would not be required.
How is the Fashion Industry Embracing Algae-based Textile Products?
Erik Bang, innovation lead at H&M Foundation, has publicly supported Algaeing. He stated that the company has successfully addressed the three key crucial features or “pains” of the fashion industry. These are the utilization of freshwater to grow fibers, the use of chemicals, i.e., pesticides and synthetic fertilizers for growing cotton fibers and synthetic pigments for dyeing textiles, and the use of energy.
Compared to conventional fibers like cotton, algae-based fibers are far more expensive. However, considering the current environmental crisis, the use of sustainable and ethical products adds immense value to the brand.
Textile Sludge Waste Could Find Use in Ceramics
Other companies have also begun considering the use of algae in textiles, for example, Vollebak, an apparels brand, has created a biodegradable t-shirt using the pulp of eucalyptus and beech, and algae.
Another startup company named Algiknit has developed yarn from seaweed.
The Next Steps for Algaeing
In just a few years Algaeing’s technology has attracted remarkable attention from major textile brands. In 2018 it received the H&M Foundation Global Change Award for its brilliance in developing a potential source for future textile fibers. The company has shown remarkable adaptability.
In 2020, it collaborated with Avgol, a nonwoven textile developer, which mainly manufactures hygiene, medical, and PPE products. Kerbs stated that Algaeing aims to develop new generation products to make a difference in the current challenging environment (COVID-19 pandemic) and also tackle long-term challenges, such as climate change.
References and Further Reading
Algaeing.(2021) https://www.algaeing.com/
Cairns, R. (2021) This vegan ‘tech-style’ startup wants to make clothes using algae. Available at: https://edition.cnn.com/style/article/israel-algae-environment-textiles-spc-intl-hnk/index.html
Yadav. G. et al. (2021) Mechanism and challenges behind algae as a wastewater treatment choice for bioenergy production and beyond. Fuel. 119093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119093
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
sarahs mum said:a number of times i have spent hours stuck..and then googled. and then i have posted that i googled the answer and how far i got before i did.
I’m not sure that giving up is a crime.When does it reset?
2am.
Okay.
Unlike W and Qu, it appears to reset at a time that is fixed, rather than local.
Which for me means it resets at midnight like the other games.
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
Kingy said:Perhaps AussieDJ thinks so. He/she will keep at it for 400+ and not give up.
Sometimes I lose hope and just throw words at it, any words, many words, many many words, nouns, verbs, adjectives, letters, numbers, curses, throw me a fuckn bone here!!!
Often, I just run out of time and have to go to work, and get home so late that the game has rolled over and I can’t look at the redactle thread in case of spoilers, so I’ll not refresh the page and try again in the morning.
i have posted before that i have been throwing words at it just like Aussie would.
I have also given up on a couple of occasions when I was pretty sure I did not actually know the answer and on those occasions I have been right. I haven’t had any idea.
like that famous texan computer dude. never heard of him.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
dv said:
So did everyone give up on Semantle? I don’t see a lot of posts about it anymore.
I haven’t even attempted it for weeks. So, yes, I’ve given up on it.
it got too silly. and it just pissed me off.
approximately our position on that
Tis weasely.
NFI, got rekt (relatively) on the last one as well
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #113!
The answer was:
You solved it in 161 guesses
Your accuracy was 58.39%
You have solved 2 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 949 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 69.00 Guesses; 58.18% Accuracy
Global Average: 88.84 Guesses; 59.02% Accuracy
Well that was a lot harder than the last one
SCIENCE said:
NFI, got rekt (relatively) on the last one as well
last night was easy enough. tonight is a lot slower. I got to 50 something before I scored a bomb. i have started throwing words at it now.
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #113!
The answer was:
You solved it in 161 guesses
Your accuracy was 58.39%
You have solved 2 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 949 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 69.00 Guesses; 58.18% Accuracy
Global Average: 88.84 Guesses; 59.02% AccuracyWell that was a lot harder than the last one
i recommended last night’s one to you because I thought it doable in a short time.
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
NFI, got rekt (relatively) on the last one as well
last night was easy enough. tonight is a lot slower. I got to 50 something before I scored a bomb. i have started throwing words at it now.
yeah we gave up, looked up, still have no memory of any knowledge of the answer
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
NFI, got rekt (relatively) on the last one as well
last night was easy enough. tonight is a lot slower. I got to 50 something before I scored a bomb. i have started throwing words at it now.
yeah we gave up, looked up, still have no memory of any knowledge of the answer
i got side tracked last night. I got a response for pacific and ocean. It was so very far from the pacific ocean.
I am getting close to tonights. I should know it already from what i have out.
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:sarahs mum said:
last night was easy enough. tonight is a lot slower. I got to 50 something before I scored a bomb. i have started throwing words at it now.
yeah we gave up, looked up, still have no memory of any knowledge of the answer
i got side tracked last night. I got a response for pacific and ocean. It was so very far from the pacific ocean.
I am getting close to tonights. I should know it already from what i have out.
*kicks self.
i should know this.
maybe tomorrow
Did somebody mention the ‘throwing every word you can think of’ method of trying to close in on a result?
:)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #113!
The answer was:
You solved it in 332 guesses
Your accuracy was 43.37%
AussieDJ said:
Did somebody mention the ‘throwing every word you can think of’ method of trying to close in on a result?:)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #113!
The answer was:
You solved it in 332 guesses
Your accuracy was 43.37%
i have thrown words. i don’t think I know the answer.
and who is she?
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Did somebody mention the ‘throwing every word you can think of’ method of trying to close in on a result?:)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #113!
The answer was:
You solved it in 332 guesses
Your accuracy was 43.37%
i have thrown words. i don’t think I know the answer.
and who is she?
However, there is a Wikipedia article on this person … if you try searching on, say, Mediterranean bootful explorers (oblique spoiler reference. Possibly too oblique.)
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Did somebody mention the ‘throwing every word you can think of’ method of trying to close in on a result?:)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #113!
The answer was:
You solved it in 332 guesses
Your accuracy was 43.37%
i have thrown words. i don’t think I know the answer.
and who is she?
Sorry, I should add that I searched for the result which, curiously, isn’t listed amongst this lot – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vital_articles/Level/4/People#Explorers_(30_articles) – which is my go to, when I’ve run out of options.However, there is a Wikipedia article on this person … if you try searching on, say, Mediterranean bootful explorers (oblique spoiler reference. Possibly too oblique.)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
████ █████ (Italian: ████████ ██████ ; ██ ████ – ██ ████) was an Italian █████████ and explorer. His ████ voyage to the coast of North America under the ██████████ of Henry VII of England is the ████████-known ████████ exploration of coastal North America since the █████ ██████ to ███████ in the ████████ ███████. To ████ the ███████████ of the █████ ███████████ of ███████ ██████████, ████ the ████████ and ███████ ███████████ ███████ ████ █████████, ████████████ as ████████████ ███████ first landing ████. ███████, ███████████ █████████ have also been ████████.
Name and ███████
█████ is known █████ as ████████ ██████ in Italian, ████ ██████ in ████████, ████ █████ in ██████, and ████ █████ in English. This was the ██████ of a ████-██████████ ████████ █████████ of ██████████ █████ in ████████████ █████████, █████████ █████ ███████ to by the ██████ ███████ ██████████. In ██████ █████ ██████ his name as “████ ████████”, ████ █████ a ████ of ████ ███████ to ██████. He █████████ to ███ this ████ in England, at █████ among ████████. He was ████████ to by his Italian ██████ in ██████ as ██████████, in the ████ known ████████████ ████████ to ███ this ███████ of his first name.
█████ was born in Italy, the son of ██████ ██████ and his wife; he had a ███████ █████. █████ (in the ████████ of ██████) and ███████████ ██████████ (in the ████████ of █████) have ████ been ████████ as ███████████. The main ████████ for █████ are ███████ of a ██████ family ████████ there until the ███-████ ███████, but ███████ to be █████████ after ████.
█████ de █████, the Spanish █████ and ███████ ████████████ in ██████, █████████ him in a ██████ to the Spanish █████ in ████ as “another ███████ like Columbus”. ████ ███████ son, █████████, said his ██████ ██████████ ████ from █████. In ████ █████ was made a ███████ of the ████████ of ██████, which ████████ a ███████ of ███████ ██████ █████████ in the ████; thus he ████ have lived in ██████ since at █████ ████.
Early life
█████ may have been born ████████ ███████ than ████, which is the ███████████ date most ████████ █████ for his birth. In ████ █████ was ████████ into the █████████ █████████████ of the ██████ ██████ ██ ███ ████████ ███████████. Since this was one of the ██████ ███████████ ███████████████, his ██████████ ████████ that he was ███████ a █████████ ██████ of the █████████.
████ he ██████ ████ ████████ ███████████ in ████, █████ would have been ████████ to ██████ in ████████ █████, █████████ the █████ to the eastern █████████████ that was the ██████ of ████ of ████████ ██████. He ██████████ ███████ this █████ ███████ ██████████. A ████ ████████ ██████ to his ███████ a █████ in █████ ████ he had ████████ █████ in the ███████████ of the ██████ of █████, which then █████████ most of what is ███ ██████, █████ and ███████. This is not ██████████ to █████ ███████ later █████████ that he had ███████ █████, which he said in ████ to the ████████ ██████████ in ██████. In this █████████████ █████, he may have ████████ ██████ █████████ of the ███████ of the Eastern ███████████ he would have been ███████ in (such as ██████ and █████) than most █████████ at that time.
“████ ███████” (████ █████) is █████████ in a ███████ of ████████ ███████ of the ████ █████. These ████████ that by ████ he was married to ██████ and ███████ had ████████ ████. ███████ ████ were ████████, █████████ and ██████. The ████████ ███████ ███████ ██████████ to ███████ █████ ████████ in █████ ████████ in the ████. He may have ██████ on this ██████████ when ███████ work later in █████ as a █████ ████████.
█████ ███████ to have got into █████████ ███████ in the ████ █████ and left ██████ as an █████████ ██████ by 5 ████████ ████. He █████ to ████████, █████, where his █████████ █████████ to have him ████████ by ███████ a ███████ ██ ███████████████ a █████████ (“a ██████ of ██████████████ to ███████”) to the ███████████. █████ in ████████, “████ █████ ████████████” (as he is ████████ to in █████ █████████) ████████ █████ for ████████████ to the ███████. These █████████ were ████████, ███████. Early in ████ he █████ on to ███████, where he ████████, was ██████████ to █████ and, for five months, ██████ on the ████████████ of a █████ ██████ over the ████████████ █████. This ███████ was █████████ following a ████████ of the ████ ███████ on ██ ████████ ████. After this █████ ███████ to have ██████ ███████ in ███████ and ██████ for an Atlantic ██████████, before ██████ to ██████ to ████ ███████ and █████████ ███████. He ████████ ███████ England in ███-████.
███████████
█████ ██████ █████████ and royal █████████ in England, in ████████ to █████████ ███████████ █████ ████████ ██████ by the Spanish █████. █████ ███████ to ██████ to the west from a █████████ ████████ where the ██████████ are ████ ██████ ████████, and where, as a ██████, the voyage would be ████ ███████. Like Columbus, he █████ ████████ to ████ an ███████████ █████ to █████.
██████████ had ███████ that, on ███████ in England, █████ ████ to ███████, a █████ ████████ ██████, to ████ █████████ ███████. This was the ████ English ████ to have had a ███████ of ███████████ ███████████ ███████████ into the Atlantic. ███████ royal ██████, ██████ by the █████ in ████, ██████ that all ███████████ ██████ be ██████████ from ███████, so his ███████ █████████ ██████████ were ████████ █████ in that ████. In any ████, it also ██████████ that the ████████ █████████ from any ███████████ ████ be █████████ with England █████, with █████ ████ █████ ███████ in through ███████. This would have made ███████ into a ████████ port, with ████ █████ to ██████ in ████████ █████. In ███████ this, Henry VII of England was ██████████ ██████████ by ███████ █████████: ████████ ██████ made ██████ into such a ████████ port, █████ █████ was in the ███████ of █████ the ████ █████ with ███████.
In the ████ ████ ███████, ███████ █████████ █████ ███████ found █████████████ that █████ ████ first to ██████, where he ████████ ████ █████████ ███████ from its Italian █████████. She █████████ one ██████ was ██████ ████████ ███████ de ███████████, an ███████████ █████ ███ was also the ██████ to ███████ ██████████, the █████ ███ █████████. ███████ also █████████ that ███████████ ███████████ ███████ ████ ██████████. She further █████████ that the █████, on ████ █████ with the King, ██████████ the explorer to King Henry VII. Beyond this, ███████ ██████ that █████ ████████ a ████ from an Italian ███████ █████ in ██████. As ███████ ███████ the ███████████ of all her ████████ █████ on her death in ████, scholars have had to █████████ her ████████ and ██████████ █████████. The █████ ███████ was ██████ at the ██████████ of ███████ in ████ to ████████ █████ and the ███████ ███████████. █████████ █████ ████████, of the ██████████ of ████████, found ████ of █████████ █████████████, ██████████ that █████ ████████ █████ in █████ ████ from the █████ family ███████ ████ of ████████. The ███████ ███████ in ██████ ████████ █████ ██████ (███ ███. ██.) to ███████ ███████ ██████████ to “██ and ████ the new ████”. This ███████ from the ██████████ █████████ would have ███████████ a ███████████ ████████████, ████████ it was not ██████ to ██████████ ███████ the ██████████.
I didn’t get the Henry VII bit out, but you have most of what I had.
At that point I started looking elsewhere – for example, on Italian explorers…
AussieDJ said:
I didn’t get the Henry VII bit out, but you have most of what I had.At that point I started looking elsewhere – for example, on Italian explorers…
i think i will give up and google soon.
AussieDJ said:
I didn’t get the Henry VII bit out, but you have most of what I had. – or vice versaAt that point I started looking elsewhere – for example, on Italian explorers…
AussieDJ said:
I didn’t get the Henry VII bit out, but you have most of what I had.At that point I started looking elsewhere – for example, on Italian explorers…
By 220 guesses I had the main players and cities involved (but not the Italian connection) which is when it became obvious I would have no idea who it was about, so gave up and googled the answer.
Dark Orange said:
AussieDJ said:
I didn’t get the Henry VII bit out, but you have most of what I had.At that point I started looking elsewhere – for example, on Italian explorers…
By 220 guesses I had the main players and cities involved (but not the Italian connection) which is when it became obvious I would have no idea who it was about, so gave up and googled the answer.
It wasn’t exactly a well known one to me anyway
Cymek said:
Dark Orange said:
AussieDJ said:
I didn’t get the Henry VII bit out, but you have most of what I had.At that point I started looking elsewhere – for example, on Italian explorers…
By 220 guesses I had the main players and cities involved (but not the Italian connection) which is when it became obvious I would have no idea who it was about, so gave up and googled the answer.
It wasn’t exactly a well known one to me anyway
Dark Orange said:
AussieDJ said:
I didn’t get the Henry VII bit out, but you have most of what I had.At that point I started looking elsewhere – for example, on Italian explorers…
By 220 guesses I had the main players and cities involved (but not the Italian connection) which is when it became obvious I would have no idea who it was about, so gave up and googled the answer.
AussieDJ said:
Cymek said:
Dark Orange said:By 220 guesses I had the main players and cities involved (but not the Italian connection) which is when it became obvious I would have no idea who it was about, so gave up and googled the answer.
It wasn’t exactly a well known one to me anyway
True, but the name was vaguely familiar to me – afterwards.
yeah. okay. i knew the name but i did not know the stuff.
redactle unlimited fail.
Moche culture
The Moche civilization (Spanish pronunciation: ; alternatively, the Mochica culture or the Early, Pre- or Proto-Chimú) flourished in northern Peru with its capital near present-day Moche, Trujillo, Peru from about 100 to 700 AD during the Regional Development Epoch. While this issue is the subject of some debate, many scholars contend that the Moche were not politically organized as a monolithic empire or state. Rather, they were likely a group of autonomous polities that shared a common culture, as seen in the rich iconography and monumental architecture that survives today.
—
81 guesses for 88.89%
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #114!
The answer was:
You solved it in 147 guessesYour accuracy was 40.14%
You have solved 3 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 592 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 90.50 Guesses; 52.13% Accuracy
Global Average: 112.43 Guesses; 54.17% Accuracy
Had about 80 guesses with no real leads.
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #114!
The answer was:
You solved it in 147 guessesYour accuracy was 40.14%
You have solved 3 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 592 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 90.50 Guesses; 52.13% Accuracy
Global Average: 112.43 Guesses; 54.17% AccuracyHad about 80 guesses with no real leads.
i was being so careful for so long..but then as soon as I blow the perfect round I do loosen up. But cup was not a good guess.
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #114!
The answer was:
You solved it in 147 guessesYour accuracy was 40.14%
You have solved 3 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 592 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 90.50 Guesses; 52.13% Accuracy
Global Average: 112.43 Guesses; 54.17% AccuracyHad about 80 guesses with no real leads.
I had 200+ guesses with no leads, and I’m annoyed that my 23rd guess got no hits despite it being extremely relevant. Unfortunately, that threw me completely off the trail “knowing” that the topic wasn’t that.
I had 200+ guesses with no leads, and I’m annoyed that my 23rd guess got no hits despite it being extremely relevant. Unfortunately, that threw me completely off the trail “knowing” that the topic wasn’t that.
—-
It interests me how my brain tries to fill in the words. On a re-read brain again sometimes tries the same words that I have previously rejected. The same function that helps you move forward can also work to hinder that.
Gave up at the 50 guess mark and went out and did things. Came back with a fresh brain and realised the second word of the title had only 3 letters.
73 @ 61.64%
sarahs mum said:
It interests me how my brain tries to fill in the words. On a re-read brain again sometimes tries the same words that I have previously rejected. The same function that helps you move forward can also work to hinder that.
Absolutely! I had no idea where I was going with this one. Not being of that particular persuasion didn’t help, as it shows …
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #114!
The answer was:
You solved it in 515 guesses
Your accuracy was 29.13%
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:It interests me how my brain tries to fill in the words. On a re-read brain again sometimes tries the same words that I have previously rejected. The same function that helps you move forward can also work to hinder that.
Absolutely! I had no idea where I was going with this one. Not being of that particular persuasion didn’t help, as it shows …
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #114!
The answer was:
You solved it in 515 guesses
Your accuracy was 29.13%
Woah. Did you also try persian and burmese first?
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:It interests me how my brain tries to fill in the words. On a re-read brain again sometimes tries the same words that I have previously rejected. The same function that helps you move forward can also work to hinder that.
Absolutely! I had no idea where I was going with this one. Not being of that particular persuasion didn’t help, as it shows …
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #114!
The answer was:
You solved it in 515 guesses
Your accuracy was 29.13%Woah. Did you also try persian and burmese first?
I managed to get the word “asian” in relation to their origin so “persian” was not on my list.
Dark Orange said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:Absolutely! I had no idea where I was going with this one. Not being of that particular persuasion didn’t help, as it shows …
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #114!
The answer was:
You solved it in 515 guesses
Your accuracy was 29.13%Woah. Did you also try persian and burmese first?
I managed to get the word “asian” in relation to their origin so “persian” was not on my list.
but I got out long haired.
Dark Orange said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:Absolutely! I had no idea where I was going with this one. Not being of that particular persuasion didn’t help, as it shows …
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #114!
The answer was:
You solved it in 515 guesses
Your accuracy was 29.13%Woah. Did you also try persian and burmese first?
I managed to get the word “asian” in relation to their origin so “persian” was not on my list.
I wasn’t thinking cats at all. I got the name of the film Bell Book and Candle after about 80 goes so I made a bunch of guesses related to magic … it took be a long way to get to a cat
dv said:
Dark Orange said:
sarahs mum said:Woah. Did you also try persian and burmese first?
I managed to get the word “asian” in relation to their origin so “persian” was not on my list.
I wasn’t thinking cats at all. I got the name of the film Bell Book and Candle after about 80 goes so I made a bunch of guesses related to magic … it took be a long way to get to a cat
That list of works about cats in italics had me confused. For a while I thought it might be a rock band. And then a composer. And then an author.
Dark Orange said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:Absolutely! I had no idea where I was going with this one. Not being of that particular persuasion didn’t help, as it shows …
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #114!
The answer was:
You solved it in 515 guesses
Your accuracy was 29.13%Woah. Did you also try persian and burmese first?
I managed to get the word “asian” in relation to their origin so “persian” was not on my list.
The same. I also got Asian .. so Persian and Thai didn’t make an appearance.
I also got sidetracked with the FBI reference, thinking there was something criminal in there.
The last eight result-pointing words I had were dog, behaviour, breeds, breed, popular, cats, cat and, finally, Siamese.
unlimited redactle.
i know this don’t I? Was i like 12?
█████ █████ 5████ War
The █████ █████ █████ War (██████: ████ ██ ██████, █████████: ██████ ██ █████████, ███. ‘██ █████████ ██████████’) was ██████ in █████ █████ from ████ to ████ between █████████ of the █████████████ ███████ and ██████████ of the █████ Arab ████████. The war began with a ████ █‘████ ███████ out in ████ by █████████████ ███████████ ███ by the ████ under the ███████ of ████████ as-██████, ███ █████████ the █████ ███████ ████ ████████ ██-████ and ████████ █████ a ████████ under his ██████████. The ████ ███████ to the Saudi Arabian border where he ███████ ███████ ███████ from ████████ ████ ██████ to ██████ █████, ██████████ ███████ to a ████-█████ █████ war.
On the ████████ side, ██████, Saudi Arabia and Israel ████████ ████████ ███, and Britain ████ ██████ ███████, while the ███████████ were █████████ by Egypt (then ████████ known as the United Arab ████████) and were ████████ █████████ from the ██████ █████. ████ ███████ █████████ and ████████████ ██████ were ████████. Egyptian President █████ █████ ██████ █████████ the ███████████ with as many as ██,███ Egyptian troops and ███████. Despite ███████ ████████ ███████ and █████ ███████████, the war ████ into a █████████ by the ███-█████.
Egypt’s ██████████ to the war is ██████████ to have been ███████████ to ███ ███████████ in the ███-Day War of ████ ████, after which ██████ █████ it ████████████ █████████ to ████████ his ████‘s ███████████ and began to ████ his ██████ out of █████. The ██████████ ███████ of ██████ on ████████ █ by ██████ ██████████, █████████ by ██████████ █████████, ████████ in an ████████ █████ of █████ in the ███████, while the █████████ ██████████ it from the █████. The ███ ████████ ██████████ was ██████ by ████ █████ ██████ ██████, █████ █████ and ███████ ███ ██████, all of ████ ███████ either ████████ or ████ the ███████, ███████ the ██████████ ███████ under the ███████ of █████ ████████ ██████ ██-████. The ████ █████ of ████‘a ██████ the ███████ █████ of the war. The █████████ ██████████ █████ ████████ █████████ in ███████ ███████ of ████‘a and by ████████ ████, the █████████ ██████ the █████. ███████ █████████ in ████████ with █████ █████ until ████, when Saudi Arabia ██████████ the ████████, and a █████████ ████ into ██████.
Egyptian ████████ ██████████ █████ to the war in █████ as “their ███████.” █████████ ███████ ████ (██████ Israeli ██████████ to the █.S) █████ that Egypt’s ████████ █████████ in █████ was ██ ██████████ that “the ████████ ███████ War could ██████ have been ██████ ‘America’s █████.’”
Anwar Sadat was █████████ that a ████████ ██████████ with ████████ could ██████ ██████ ██-██████ and his ████ ███████ ████████, but within three ██████ of ███████ troops to █████, ██████ ████████ that this would ███████ a ██████ ██████████ than ███████████.
█████ Yemen 5████ War
—
perhaps i do not know this afterall.
sarahs mum said:
unlimited redactle.i know this don’t I? Was i like 12?
What’s the URL, so we can both be playing the same game?
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
unlimited redactle.i know this don’t I? Was i like 12?
What’s the URL, so we can both be playing the same game?
https://redactle-unlimited.com/#article/Tm9ydGhfWWVtZW5fQ2l2aWxfV2Fy
the Six-Day War
—
that’s what i was thinking of…
sarahs mum said:
the Six-Day War
—
that’s what i was thinking of…
North Yemen 5████ War
The North Yemen █████ War (██████: ████ ██ ██████, █████████: ██████ ██ █████████, ███. ‘██ █████████ ██████████’) was ██████ in North Yemen from ████ to ████ between █████████ of the █████████████ ███████ and ██████████ of the Yemen Arab Republic. The war began with a ████ █‘████ ███████ out in ████ by █████████████ ███████████ ███ by the ████ under the ███████ of ████████ as-██████, ███ █████████ the █████ ███████ ████ ████████ ██-████ and ████████ Yemen a republic under his ██████████. The ████ ███████ to the Saudi Arabian border where he ███████ ███████ ███████ from northern ████ ██████ to ██████ █████, ██████████ ███████ to a ████-█████ █████ war.
On the ████████ side, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Israel ████████ military ███, and Britain 4███ ██████ ███████, while the ███████████ were █████████ by Egypt (then ████████ known as the United Arab Republic) and were ████████ █████████ from the ██████ █████. ████ ███████ █████████ and ████████████ forces were ████████. Egyptian President █████ █████ ██████ █████████ the ███████████ with as many as ██,███ Egyptian troops and ███████. Despite ███████ military ███████ and █████ ███████████, the war ████ into a █████████ by the mid-█████.
Egypt’s ██████████ to the war is ██████████ to have been ███████████ to ███ ███████████ in the Six-Day War of ████ ████, after which ██████ █████ it ████████████ █████████ to ████████ his ████‘s ███████████ and began to ████ his forces out of Yemen. The ██████████ ███████ of ██████ on ████████ █ by ██████ ██████████, █████████ by ██████████ █████████, ████████ in an ████████ █████ of █████ in the ███████, while the █████████ ██████████ it from the north. The ███ republic ██████████ was ██████ by ████ █████ ██████ ██████, █████ █████ and ███████ ███ ██████, all of ████ ███████ either ████████ or ████ the ███████, ███████ the ██████████ ███████ under the control of █████ ████████ ██████ ██-████. The ████ █████ of ████‘a ██████ the ███████ █████ of the war. The █████████ ██████████ █████ ████████ █████████ in ███████ control of ████‘a and by ████████ ████, the █████████ ██████ the █████. ███████ █████████ in ████████ with █████ █████ until ████, when Saudi Arabia ██████████ the Republic, and a █████████ ████ into ██████.
Egyptian military ██████████ █████ to the war in Yemen as “their ███████.” █████████ ███████ ████ (██████ Israeli ██████████ to the U.S) █████ that Egypt’s military █████████ in Yemen was ██ ██████████ that “the ████████ ███████ War could easily have been ██████ ‘America’s Yemen.’”
You’re close!
Just need one more – politely friendly – word!
You took 13 minutes to solve Redactle Unlimited in 70 guesses with 68.57% accuracy!
Not sure where that ‘5’ has come from in your subject title – it shouldn’t be there!
AussieDJ said:
You’re close!Just need one more – politely friendly – word!
You took 13 minutes to solve Redactle Unlimited in 70 guesses with 68.57% accuracy!
ah. righto. never heard it called such. but it must have gone down on brian henderson each night.
thanks google DJ.
AussieDJ said:
Not sure where that ‘5’ has come from in your subject title – it shouldn’t be there!
on unlimited if you highlight the word it gives you a count. handy.
right. Let’s hope tonight isn’t arab wars or physics.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Not sure where that ‘5’ has come from in your subject title – it shouldn’t be there!
on unlimited if you highlight the word it gives you a count. handy.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Not sure where that ‘5’ has come from in your subject title – it shouldn’t be there!
on unlimited if you highlight the word it gives you a count. handy.
Thank you. I didn’t know that.
:)
148 guesses with 92.57% accuracy! but it might have taken me a while to come up with civil. although most warrish words were successful.
Nassar. I was trying but I couldn’t remember his name.
I’m up to guess 55 at the moment and i have had no bombs. I shall eat something and go back to it with fresh eyes.
ah well we got rekt by this and last so there we go
Bloody hell … this could take a while
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #115!
The answer was:
You solved it in 204 guesses
Your accuracy was 45.10%
You have solved 4 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 1028 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 85.00 Guesses; 59.55% Accuracy
Global Average: 103.01 Guesses; 59.95% Accuracy
dv said:
Bloody hell … this could take a while
I’m only at 62..but i am still sitting on 100%.
But i have no idea…
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #115!
The answer was:You solved it in 204 guesses
Your accuracy was 45.10%
You have solved 4 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 1028 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 85.00 Guesses; 59.55% Accuracy
Global Average: 103.01 Guesses; 59.95% Accuracy
yay team!
i might sleep on it.
I might be still playing tomorrow afternoon.
Solved in 99 guesses with 50.51% accuracy.
My strategy was to basically throw 3-letter words at it.
dv said:
Bloody hell … this could take a while
It did take a while.
Also, got caught out by the hyphenated name, which didn’t appear in the final result
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #115!
The answer was:
You solved it in 528 guesses
Your accuracy was 42.05%
Dark Orange said:
Solved in 99 guesses with 50.51% accuracy.
My strategy was to basically throw 3-letter words at it.
Based on your strategy from yesterday, my first guess was “cat”. :)
Despite that, 68 guesses at 80% for me.
When I have enough spare time, I now read through the article and put words in that fit sentences, which gives me a better %.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Not sure where that ‘5’ has come from in your subject title – it shouldn’t be there!
on unlimited if you highlight the word it gives you a count. handy.
Thank you. I didn’t know that.
On normal Redactle, you can double click on a word and get the number of letters.
Having got to 70 something at 100%, I felt sad when I blew the perfect score. But at least that freed me up for some wild guesses. I did get sad when I thought to self ‘ I don’t know anything about african parasites.’ but I did. I did.
151 guesses at 80.79% accuracy.
sarahs mum said:
Having got to 70 something at 100%, I felt sad when I blew the perfect score. But at least that freed me up for some wild guesses. I did get sad when I thought to self ‘ I don’t know anything about african parasites.’ but I did. I did.151 guesses at 80.79% accuracy.
I’m going to mess this up good.
sarahs mum said:
I’m going to mess this up good.
Not so.
26 guesses for 73.08%
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
I’m going to mess this up good.
Not so.
26 guesses for 73.08%
Global Median: 9.00 Guesses; 53.76% Accuracy
Global Average: 18.26 Guesses; 55.49% Accuracy
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #116!
The answer was:
You solved it in 3 guesses
Your accuracy was 66.67%
You have solved 5 consecutive Redactles
Global StatsGlobally, 496 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 14.00 Guesses; 50.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 33.56 Guesses; 53.76% Accurac
Rofl
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #116!The answer was:
You solved it in 3 guesses
Your accuracy was 66.67%
You have solved 5 consecutive Redactles
Global StatsGlobally, 496 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 14.00 Guesses; 50.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 33.56 Guesses; 53.76% AccuracRofl
:)
*applause
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #116!The answer was:
You solved it in 3 guesses
Your accuracy was 66.67%
You have solved 5 consecutive Redactles
Global StatsGlobally, 496 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 14.00 Guesses; 50.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 33.56 Guesses; 53.76% AccuracRofl
:)
*applause
Makes a pleasant change from hundreds and hundreds…
Kingy said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:on unlimited if you highlight the word it gives you a count. handy.
Thank you. I didn’t know that.On normal Redactle, you can double click on a word and get the number of letters.
I think that might occur on the Redactle Unlimited games. I’m not seeing it on the ‘original’ version of the games. Or, at least, it doesn’t work that way on my computer.
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #116!The answer was:
You solved it in 3 guesses
Your accuracy was 66.67%
You have solved 5 consecutive Redactles
Global StatsGlobally, 496 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 14.00 Guesses; 50.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 33.56 Guesses; 53.76% AccuracRofl
:)
*applause
Makes a pleasant change from hundreds and hundreds…
(Sigh)
I’m up into the hundreds already. Definitely not on their wavelength on this one.
AussieDJ said:
dv said:
sarahs mum said::)
*applause
Makes a pleasant change from hundreds and hundreds…
(Sigh)
I’m up into the hundreds already. Definitely not on their wavelength on this one.
:(
The third word was obvious, but the first wasn’t, but I knew I’d heard of a similar one to the obvious. So after throwing a few words at it to try to get some hints, I tried a tactic that worked for the one yesterday, and walked away and did some chores before coming back to it and.
You solved it in 44 guesses Your accuracy was 59.09%A new record for me.
It seems that I get it early, or give up at 250+ and google it(or Ms Kingy tells me).
I am impressed with AussieDJ’s persistence though.
You solved it in 4 guesses
Your accuracy was 50.00%
Kingy said:
A new record for me.It seems that I get it early, or give up at 250+ and google it(or Ms Kingy tells me).
I am impressed with AussieDJ’s persistence though.You solved it in 4 guesses
Your accuracy was 50.00%
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #116!
The answer was:
You solved it in 170 guesses
Your accuracy was 28.82%
enjoyed this random redactle.
three letter word. probably should have got it out quicker.
https://redactle-unlimited.com/#article/UnVt
around <5T/axle
—
that’s a clue.
sarahs mum said:
around <5T/axle—
that’s a clue.
probably means something to someone.
Something went wrong.
I got this, but I didn’t actually guess the right answer.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #117!
The answer was:
You solved it in 23 guesses
Your accuracy was 0.00%
You have solved 6 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 37 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 16.00 Guesses; 84.85%
Accuracy
Global Average: 20.89 Guesses; 81.23% Accuracy
dv said:
Something went wrong.I got this, but I didn’t actually guess the right answer.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #117!
The answer was:You solved it in 23 guesses
Your accuracy was 0.00%
You have solved 6 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 37 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 16.00 Guesses; 84.85% Accuracy
Global Average: 20.89 Guesses; 81.23% Accuracy
I’m up to guess 38. But no wrong guesses so far. but I have only guessed a couple of times on what is actual subject matter.
but you know the right answer now.
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
Something went wrong.I got this, but I didn’t actually guess the right answer.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #117!
The answer was:You solved it in 23 guesses
Your accuracy was 0.00%
You have solved 6 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 37 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 16.00 Guesses; 84.85% Accuracy
Global Average: 20.89 Guesses; 81.23% Accuracy
I’m up to guess 38. But no wrong guesses so far. but I have only guessed a couple of times on what is actual subject matter.
but you know the right answer now.
Yes I do.
Like I made 22 guesses with about 70% accuracy, and then it popped up telling me I’d won but had 0 accuracy.
sarahs mum said:
around <5T/axle—
that’s a clue.
Unfortunately that “<5T/Axle” was a dead giveaway (not your fault sm; the placement in the article gave the whole thing away.).
btm said:
sarahs mum said:around <5T/axle—
that’s a clue.
Unfortunately that “<5T/Axle” was a dead giveaway (not your fault sm; the placement in the article gave the whole thing away.).
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #117!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 4 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
I still have no idea, I am up to 50, and I have had one error and so that is sad.
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
around <5T/axle—
that’s a clue.
Unfortunately that “<5T/Axle” was a dead giveaway (not your fault sm; the placement in the article gave the whole thing away.).
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #117!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 4 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
I still have no idea, I am up to 50, and I have had one error and so that is sad.
we saw that big hint there
second paragraph also had
in the █████ ████ “█████ ████”,
so the “5 4” bit pretty much specified the answer 
, especially in the context of all the
█:██
stuff near the bottom which looked like ratios of a type that certain hobbyists would really get into
it didn’t give us the statistics first off but on refresh 
seems legit’, we can’t explain the glitch that dv had
You solved it in 79 guesses
Your accuracy was 93.67%
—-
A lot of obvious clues that got me in the right area, but the actual title failed to materialise in my brain for some time.
74 @ 85.14%
46 at 60.87%
Well, I got there in the end.
With a relatively low number (for me) of guesses, too.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #117!
The answer was:
You solved it in 139 guesses
Your accuracy was 58.99%
Cymek said:
46 at 60.87%
Very annoyed with myself. I knew that I knew this one, and filled out most of the article before the penny dropped.
100 @ 85%
redactle unlimited game.
Lots of hits. but didn’t get anywhere.
EPIGRAPHY isn’t a word I know.
This one was very easy.
There are three words in the title, but only the first two are needed, not the one in brackets.
btm said:
This one was very easy.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #118!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 6 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
There are three words in the title, but only the first two are needed, not the one in brackets.
congrats.
it doesn’t feel easy…yet.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #118!The answer was:
You solved it in 130 guesses
Your accuracy was 16.92%
You have solved 7 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 260 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 55.00 Guesses; 37.04% Accuracy
Global Average: 73.22 Guesses; 40.46% Accuracy
Bloody hell… I had no idea until suddenly the pieces fell into place
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #118!The answer was:You solved it in 130 guesses
Your accuracy was 16.92%
You have solved 7 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 260 players have solved today’s Redactle so farGlobal Median: 55.00 Guesses; 37.04% Accuracy
Global Average: 73.22 Guesses; 40.46% Accuracy
Bloody hell… I had no idea until suddenly the pieces fell into place
That line with the Boolean operators in it did it for me.
35 100.00%
sarahs mum said:
35 100.00%
It was another one of those ones where i didn’t think I was getting the answer out and i was surprised when i was.
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
35 100.00%
It was another one of those ones where i didn’t think I was getting the answer out and i was surprised when i was.
ie I thought i was just adding more text.
the short ones always increase my anxiety.
sarahs mum said:
35 100.00%
That’s another perfect score! Well done, sm.
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
35 100.00%
That’s another perfect score! Well done, sm.
:)
it was a lot more than six. i wasn’t even on the track to the late 20s.
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
35 100.00%
That’s another perfect score! Well done, sm.
:)
it was a lot more than six. i wasn’t even on the track to the late 20s.
surely if you’re 100% you’re on track no matter how long it takes
whereas we just went completely wtf
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
That’s another perfect score! Well done, sm.
:)
it was a lot more than six. i wasn’t even on the track to the late 20s.
surely if you’re 100% you’re on track no matter how long it takes
whereas we just went completely wtf
I spoze. But everything has a this and a that. And a can and are.
Grrr! Not one of my finest efforts.
I should have used the answer to look for the answer much earlier than I did.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #118!
The answer was:
You solved it in 144 guesses
Your accuracy was 14.58%
23 @ 70%
I got lucky with one of my early guesses, and just narrowed it down from there.
Kingy said:
23 @ 70%I got lucky with one of my early guesses, and just narrowed it down from there.
61 @ 37.70
It took 40 guesses to even get a toehold with the second word.
One of my first 6 guesses is “world”. When I saw where it popped up, I spent a while working out what words would fit around it, and voila, a topic.
Dark Orange said:
Kingy said:
23 @ 70%I got lucky with one of my early guesses, and just narrowed it down from there.
61 @ 37.70
It took 40 guesses to even get a toehold with the second word.
I got a few out before getting to engine at guess 18. I can’t even fathom why I chose engine at that point, anyway.
After that, I spent the better part of the next 126 – mostly unsuccessful – guesses exploring internal combustion engines.
AussieDJ said:
Dark Orange said:
Kingy said:
23 @ 70%I got lucky with one of my early guesses, and just narrowed it down from there.
61 @ 37.70
It took 40 guesses to even get a toehold with the second word.
I got a few out before getting to engine at guess 18. I can’t even fathom why I chose engine at that point, anyway.
After that, I spent the better part of the next 126 – mostly unsuccessful – guesses exploring internal combustion engines.
The boolean logic operations told me it wasn’t a mechanical engine.
Dark Orange said:
AussieDJ said:
Dark Orange said:61 @ 37.70
It took 40 guesses to even get a toehold with the second word.
I got a few out before getting to engine at guess 18. I can’t even fathom why I chose engine at that point, anyway.
After that, I spent the better part of the next 126 – mostly unsuccessful – guesses exploring internal combustion engines.
The boolean logic operations told me it wasn’t a mechanical engine.
same Difference
I got used out first. If it isn’t a person or place it is one my go to words. even animals have uses. but used and use is more common than uses.
I got out system early too.
SCIENCE said:
Dark Orange said:
AussieDJ said:I got a few out before getting to engine at guess 18. I can’t even fathom why I chose engine at that point, anyway.
After that, I spent the better part of the next 126 – mostly unsuccessful – guesses exploring internal combustion engines.
The boolean logic operations told me it wasn’t a mechanical engine.
same Difference
“Difference” has more than 6 letters.
eeek.
What a weird looking dactyl
dv said:
What a weird looking dactyl
I think you have a better chance than I.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #119!
The answer was:
You solved it in 76 guesses
Your accuracy was 34.21%
You have solved 8 consecutive Redactles
Global StatsGlobally, 116 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 72.00 Guesses; 27.75% Accuracy
Global Average: 95.22 Guesses; 29.93% Accuracy
You might be amused to find out how I twigged it. Heavy spoilers after the gap.
I don’t much care about getting high accuracy, I just want to get it done.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
It had the appearance of a disambiguation page and something about it made me think that part of it was a list of title or something. The word Beyond was capitalised and I immediately thought of Batman Beyond. I guessed Batman, which did come up. I tried some other superhero names, including Justice in case Justice League was involved. Justice did pop up but in what looked like a list of names so I guessed Victoria Justice and that was right. I could see the name of the film had five letters and she was recently in a movie with five letters, so I guessed that and it was right.
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #119!The answer was:
You solved it in 76 guesses
Your accuracy was 34.21%
You have solved 8 consecutive Redactles
Global StatsGlobally, 116 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 72.00 Guesses; 27.75% Accuracy
Global Average: 95.22 Guesses; 29.93% AccuracyYou might be amused to find out how I twigged it. Heavy spoilers after the gap.
I don’t much care about getting high accuracy, I just want to get it done.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.It had the appearance of a disambiguation page and something about it made me think that part of it was a list of title or something. The word Beyond was capitalised and I immediately thought of Batman Beyond. I guessed Batman, which did come up. I tried some other superhero names, including Justice in case Justice League was involved. Justice did pop up but in what looked like a list of names so I guessed Victoria Justice and that was right. I could see the name of the film had five letters and she was recently in a movie with five letters, so I guessed that and it was right.
I knew you would know.
I knew it was a disambiguation page. I have quite a few words out (17)… about film and tv and places. And 20 bombs. I am pretty sure I don’t know this and I am glad I have enough out to google.
I do care about accuracy. I want accuracy and a low a score. But I think tonight is a right off.
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #119!The answer was:
You solved it in 76 guesses
Your accuracy was 34.21%
You have solved 8 consecutive Redactles
Global StatsGlobally, 116 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 72.00 Guesses; 27.75% Accuracy
Global Average: 95.22 Guesses; 29.93% AccuracyYou might be amused to find out how I twigged it. Heavy spoilers after the gap.
I don’t much care about getting high accuracy, I just want to get it done.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.It had the appearance of a disambiguation page and something about it made me think that part of it was a list of title or something. The word Beyond was capitalised and I immediately thought of Batman Beyond. I guessed Batman, which did come up. I tried some other superhero names, including Justice in case Justice League was involved. Justice did pop up but in what looked like a list of names so I guessed Victoria Justice and that was right. I could see the name of the film had five letters and she was recently in a movie with five letters, so I guessed that and it was right.
I knew you would know.
I knew it was a disambiguation page. I have quite a few words out (17)… about film and tv and places. And 20 bombs. I am pretty sure I don’t know this and I am glad I have enough out to google.
I do care about accuracy. I want accuracy and a low a score. But I think tonight is a right off.
I’ve never heard of Victoria Justice.
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #119!The answer was:
You solved it in 76 guesses
Your accuracy was 34.21%
You have solved 8 consecutive Redactles
Global StatsGlobally, 116 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 72.00 Guesses; 27.75% Accuracy
Global Average: 95.22 Guesses; 29.93% AccuracyYou might be amused to find out how I twigged it. Heavy spoilers after the gap.
I don’t much care about getting high accuracy, I just want to get it done.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.It had the appearance of a disambiguation page and something about it made me think that part of it was a list of title or something. The word Beyond was capitalised and I immediately thought of Batman Beyond. I guessed Batman, which did come up. I tried some other superhero names, including Justice in case Justice League was involved. Justice did pop up but in what looked like a list of names so I guessed Victoria Justice and that was right. I could see the name of the film had five letters and she was recently in a movie with five letters, so I guessed that and it was right.
I knew you would know.
I knew it was a disambiguation page. I have quite a few words out (17)… about film and tv and places. And 20 bombs. I am pretty sure I don’t know this and I am glad I have enough out to google.
I do care about accuracy. I want accuracy and a low a score. But I think tonight is a right off.
I’ve never heard of Victoria Justice.
i don’t recognise Victoria Justice .
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #119!The answer was:
You solved it in 76 guesses
Your accuracy was 34.21%
You have solved 8 consecutive Redactles
Global StatsGlobally, 116 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 72.00 Guesses; 27.75% Accuracy
Global Average: 95.22 Guesses; 29.93% AccuracyYou might be amused to find out how I twigged it. Heavy spoilers after the gap.
I don’t much care about getting high accuracy, I just want to get it done.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.It had the appearance of a disambiguation page and something about it made me think that part of it was a list of title or something. The word Beyond was capitalised and I immediately thought of Batman Beyond. I guessed Batman, which did come up. I tried some other superhero names, including Justice in case Justice League was involved. Justice did pop up but in what looked like a list of names so I guessed Victoria Justice and that was right. I could see the name of the film had five letters and she was recently in a movie with five letters, so I guessed that and it was right.
I knew you would know.
I knew it was a disambiguation page. I have quite a few words out (17)… about film and tv and places. And 20 bombs. I am pretty sure I don’t know this and I am glad I have enough out to google.
I do care about accuracy. I want accuracy and a low a score. But I think tonight is a right off.
I’ve never heard of Victoria Justice.
mark me down as a google. I have not heard of the movie. Or the politcal party. I do know the national trust though.
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #119!The answer was:
You solved it in 76 guesses
Your accuracy was 34.21%
You have solved 8 consecutive Redactles
Global StatsGlobally, 116 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 72.00 Guesses; 27.75% Accuracy
Global Average: 95.22 Guesses; 29.93% AccuracyYou might be amused to find out how I twigged it. Heavy spoilers after the gap.
I don’t much care about getting high accuracy, I just want to get it done.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.It had the appearance of a disambiguation page and something about it made me think that part of it was a list of title or something. The word Beyond was capitalised and I immediately thought of Batman Beyond. I guessed Batman, which did come up. I tried some other superhero names, including Justice in case Justice League was involved. Justice did pop up but in what looked like a list of names so I guessed Victoria Justice and that was right. I could see the name of the film had five letters and she was recently in a movie with five letters, so I guessed that and it was right.
I knew you would know.
I knew it was a disambiguation page. I have quite a few words out (17)… about film and tv and places. And 20 bombs. I am pretty sure I don’t know this and I am glad I have enough out to google.
I do care about accuracy. I want accuracy and a low a score. But I think tonight is a right off.
I’ve never heard of Victoria Justice.
Well she’s an actress, and not as you may have thought a crime drama set in Ballarat
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:I knew you would know.
I knew it was a disambiguation page. I have quite a few words out (17)… about film and tv and places. And 20 bombs. I am pretty sure I don’t know this and I am glad I have enough out to google.
I do care about accuracy. I want accuracy and a low a score. But I think tonight is a right off.
I’ve never heard of Victoria Justice.
Well she’s an actress, and not as you may have thought a crime drama set in Ballarat
the nearest I got really was ‘for the benefit of’
sarahs mum said:
I do care about accuracy. I want accuracy and a low a score. But I think tonight is a right off.
I’ve decided the metric I’m going to focus on is the number of people in the world who solve it before me. I was the 117th person in the world to solve it.
dv said:
sarahs mum said:I do care about accuracy. I want accuracy and a low a score. But I think tonight is a right off.
I’ve decided the metric I’m going to focus on is the number of people in the world who solve it before me. I was the 117th person in the world to solve it.
nice.
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
sarahs mum said:I do care about accuracy. I want accuracy and a low a score. But I think tonight is a right off.
I’ve decided the metric I’m going to focus on is the number of people in the world who solve it before me. I was the 117th person in the world to solve it.
nice.
For some reason I do not often get that message.
got nothing
SCIENCE said:
got nothing
I had words. But I still gave up.
Far out!
Yes, I used the clues provided here.
Why do I play this game? It’s addictive, that’s why!
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #119!
The answer was
You solved it in 229 guesses
Your accuracy was 16.16%
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
got nothing
I had words. But I still gave up.
Todays one being short is hard
Got it by getting an actors name and then checking movies they were in.
It’s a word relating to all sorts of others things, most not related to each other at all
Cymek said:
Got it by getting an actors name and then checking movies they were in.
It’s a word relating to all sorts of others things, most not related to each other at all
I think that’s how we all got to the result, in the end.
AussieDJ said:
Cymek said:
Got it by getting an actors name and then checking movies they were in.
It’s a word relating to all sorts of others things, most not related to each other at all
I think that’s how we all got to the result, in the end.
I am stuck.
I know it is a something in North Carolina. Anybody give me the something?
Dark Orange said:
AussieDJ said:
Cymek said:
Got it by getting an actors name and then checking movies they were in.
It’s a word relating to all sorts of others things, most not related to each other at all
I think that’s how we all got to the result, in the end.
I am stuck.
I know it is a something in North Carolina. Anybody give me the something?
We’re all trusting souls in this game.
I probably gave up to fast. But I was miffed/
Dark Orange said:
AussieDJ said:
Cymek said:
Got it by getting an actors name and then checking movies they were in.
It’s a word relating to all sorts of others things, most not related to each other at all
I think that’s how we all got to the result, in the end.
I am stuck.
I know it is a something in North Carolina. Anybody give me the something?
In my mind I’m gone to Carolina
Can’t you see the sunshine?
Can’t you just feel the moonshine?
And, ain’t it just like a friend of mine
To hit me from behind?
Yes, I’m gone to Carolina in my mind
sarahs mum said:
I probably gave up to fast. But I was miffed/
Have you got it out, sm?
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
I probably gave up to fast. But I was miffed/
Have you got it out, sm?
not officially. i got frustrated and declared a google.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
I probably gave up to fast. But I was miffed/
Have you got it out, sm?
not officially. i got frustrated and declared a google.
I think most of us would have to refer to a search engine at some stage, unless your choice of words consistently led you to the answer.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:Have you got it out, sm?
not officially. i got frustrated and declared a google.
OK. But you have found it, even with Google’s help?I think most of us would have to refer to a search engine at some stage, unless your choice of words consistently led you to the answer.
yeah. i found. i did have about 20 good words out. Film. novel. Starring. Television. Serial. Benefit.
All that did was confuse me.
I ended up searching the movies using the name of the actress.
AussieDJ said:
I ended up searching the movies using the name of the actress.
i didn’t know said actress.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
I ended up searching the movies using the name of the actress.i didn’t know said actress.
I’d never heard or her, either!
I just trusted that the name was correct.
Todays redactles left me a bit confused.
I crashed and burned on unlimited. 330 @ 49%
Then I realised that original redactle was “completely different”, and ended up with 74 @ 28%.
The totally different articles threw me right off.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
I ended up searching the movies using the name of the actress.i didn’t know said actress.
Finally got a complete enough sentence to google the answer. I did not like this one.
Dark Orange said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
I ended up searching the movies using the name of the actress.i didn’t know said actress.
Finally got a complete enough sentence to google the answer. I did not like this one.
I don’t believe any of us here did!
AussieDJ said:
Dark Orange said:
sarahs mum said:i didn’t know said actress.
Finally got a complete enough sentence to google the answer. I did not like this one.
I don’t believe any of us here did!
dv was happy
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Dark Orange said:Finally got a complete enough sentence to google the answer. I did not like this one.
I don’t believe any of us here did!
dv was happy
He’s a weirdo.
AussieDJ said:
Dark Orange said:
sarahs mum said:i didn’t know said actress.
Finally got a complete enough sentence to google the answer. I did not like this one.
I don’t believe any of us here did!
I did.
btm said:
AussieDJ said:
Dark Orange said:Finally got a complete enough sentence to google the answer. I did not like this one.
I don’t believe any of us here did!
I did.
Which actress was it?
Witty Rejoinder said:
btm said:
AussieDJ said:I don’t believe any of us here did!
I did.
Which actress was it?
Victoria Justice (NHoH) but I didn’t find her name before I solved the puzzle.
Not physics this time, sm.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #120!
The answer was:
You solved it in 73 guesses
Your accuracy was 80.82%
i had to do a reboot. So i am just about to start. Glad it is not physics. :)
sarahs mum said:
i had to do a reboot. So i am just about to start. Glad it is not physics. :)
It’s the opposite of yesterday’s in that it’s a very long one.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
i had to do a reboot. So i am just about to start. Glad it is not physics. :)It’s the opposite of yesterday’s in that it’s a very long one.
Different in a number of ways, but it’s very long.
btm said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
i had to do a reboot. So i am just about to start. Glad it is not physics. :)It’s the opposite of yesterday’s in that it’s a very long one.
Different in a number of ways, but it’s very long.
+1
I also waited for ages for it to load. But I remembered that it doesn’t load for me in a browser that has played redactle before and so… I opened a new browser and it loaded just like that.
You solved it in 18 guesses
Your accuracy was 100.00%
(I thought i had it worked out five minutes ago but I was feeling timid about making the plunge and I was scouring the long doc looking for reassurance.)
I’m doing we
I’m doing well in this one so have persevered when usually I would have given up by now. What are some of your goto words BTM?
this that which are may were
usually can but this fellow is dead. so past tense.
sarahs mum said:
usually can but this fellow is dead. so past tense.
he him his
Witty Rejoinder said:
I’m doing well in this one so have persevered when usually I would have given up by now. What are some of your goto words BTM?
Depends on the format. Most of them contain “that”, “there”, “where”, etc; often an early chapter has a heading like “etymology” or “history”; if it’s a biography, you’ll usually find “early life and education” as a heading. From there, you can infer other words and ultimately the page title.
Thanks you two.
sarahs mum said:
You solved it in 18 guesses
Your accuracy was 100.00%
Well done, sm! That;s your best ever result, isn’t it?
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
You solved it in 18 guesses
Your accuracy was 100.00%
Well done, sm! That;s your best ever result, isn’t it?
looks at list.
Yes. It is.
I had a 14 once but it wasn’t at 100%
sarahs mum said:
(I thought i had it worked out five minutes ago but I was feeling timid about making the plunge and I was scouring the long doc looking for reassurance.)
fair, 
we agree that all the masculine 3rd person pronouns (PRONOUNS OH OUR GOODNESS) were fairly evident, then the potus bit too, and until the 13 letter event could only be 1 thing so there weren’t that many of those we knew of, especially that fit the 4-1-7 pattern
btm said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
I’m doing well in this one so have persevered when usually I would have given up by now. What are some of your goto words BTM?
Depends on the format. Most of them contain “that”, “there”, “where”, etc; often an early chapter has a heading like “etymology” or “history”; if it’s a biography, you’ll usually find “early life and education” as a heading. From there, you can infer other words and ultimately the page title.
I don’t take it as serious as some, but depending on the format, I find He and His work well if it is a person, and in general, “United” (as in states, kingdom, nations) gives a good idea, and if it looks modern-ish, War, (as in World) may give an idea if it is early or mid century.
If “United” and “States” are common, I throw in President for the hell of it. I failed to do so in this one however and so it took me 35 tries this time.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #120!
The answer was:
You solved it in 13 guesses
Your accuracy was 76.92%
You have solved 9 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 6376 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 20.00 Guesses; 91.89% Accuracy
Global Average: 34.16 Guesses; 88.48% Accuracy
Pretty straightforward
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #120!The answer was:
You solved it in 13 guesses
Your accuracy was 76.92%
You have solved 9 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 6376 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 20.00 Guesses; 91.89% Accuracy
Global Average: 34.16 Guesses; 88.48% AccuracyPretty straightforward
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #120!
You solved it in 8 guesses
Your accuracy was 87.50%
You have solved 4 consecutive Redactles
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #120!The answer was:
You solved it in 13 guesses
Your accuracy was 76.92%
You have solved 9 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 6376 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 20.00 Guesses; 91.89% Accuracy
Global Average: 34.16 Guesses; 88.48% AccuracyPretty straightforward
I would have done better except I miscounted the number of letters in the first name, so I initially guessed James.
dv said:
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #120!The answer was:
You solved it in 13 guesses
Your accuracy was 76.92%
You have solved 9 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 6376 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 20.00 Guesses; 91.89% Accuracy
Global Average: 34.16 Guesses; 88.48% AccuracyPretty straightforward
I would have done better except I miscounted the number of letters in the first name, so I initially guessed James.
You’re just full of excuses…
Witty Rejoinder said:
dv said:
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #120!The answer was:
You solved it in 13 guesses
Your accuracy was 76.92%
You have solved 9 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 6376 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 20.00 Guesses; 91.89% Accuracy
Global Average: 34.16 Guesses; 88.48% AccuracyPretty straightforward
I would have done better except I miscounted the number of letters in the first name, so I initially guessed James.
You’re just full of excuses…
I hope your heart gets revived
6 @ 100%
Much better than yesterdays disaster.
Kingy said:
6 @ 100%Much better than yesterdays disaster.
At that stage i was thinking it was an american but not Dwight D. Eisenhower.
WTF
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #121!
The answer was: the
You solved it in 207 guesses
Your accuracy was 56.52%
You have solved 10 consecutive Redactles
Global StatsGlobally, 483 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 70.00 Guesses; 73.08% Accuracy
Global Average: 89.11 Guesses; 72.74% Accuracy
66 100.00%
sarahs mum said:
66 100.00%
You’re an amazing woman
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
66 100.00%
You’re an amazing woman
possibly embarassed to know anything about this topic.
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
66 100.00%
You’re an amazing woman
Btm will get it out in 24.
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
66 100.00%
You’re an amazing woman
Btm will get it out in 24.
:)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #121!
The answer was: the
You solved it in 391 guesses
Your accuracy was 53.96%
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
66 100.00%
You’re an amazing woman
Btm will get it out in 24.
Whether I do or not, you’re still an amazing woman.
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
dv said:You’re an amazing woman
Btm will get it out in 24.
Whether I do or not, you’re still an amazing woman.
:) *Feigns a curtsey.
Almost :)
btm said:
Almost :)Congratulations, you solved Redactle #121!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 25 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
I was close. No cigar.
2 @ 100%
It spoils the fun of the chase when the first words that come into your head fit, and everything else in the article appears to back it up, so I tried the second word first, and then when that fitted, I threw caution to the wind, and typed in the first word.
Kingy said:
2 @ 100%It spoils the fun of the chase when the first words that come into your head fit, and everything else in the article appears to back it up, so I tried the second word first, and then when that fitted, I threw caution to the wind, and typed in the first word.
Holy shit that is amazing
Kingy said:
2 @ 100%It spoils the fun of the chase when the first words that come into your head fit, and everything else in the article appears to back it up, so I tried the second word first, and then when that fitted, I threw caution to the wind, and typed in the first word.
:)
You people are gods of redactle compared to me, I don’t have any patience for trying to get high acc, I just throw shit at the wall until something sticks.
dv said:
You people are gods of redactle compared to me, I don’t have any patience for trying to get high acc, I just throw shit at the wall until something sticks.
the aussie DJ method.
We have been practising longer than you. I have no doubt that you will be all over it soon.
dv said:
Kingy said:
2 @ 100%It spoils the fun of the chase when the first words that come into your head fit, and everything else in the article appears to back it up, so I tried the second word first, and then when that fitted, I threw caution to the wind, and typed in the first word.
Holy shit that is amazing
It also helped a lot that I had an email yesterday about the topic.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #122!The answer was:
You solved it in 9 guesses
Your accuracy was 66.67%
You have solved 11 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 20 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 9.00 Guesses; 73.61% Accuracy
Global Average: 19.05 Guesses; 76.43% Accuracy
—-
Accuracy wasn’t stellar but I was one the first couple of dozen people in the world to solve it
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #122!The answer was:You solved it in 9 guesses
Your accuracy was 66.67%
You have solved 11 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 20 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 9.00 Guesses; 73.61% AccuracyGlobal Average: 19.05 Guesses; 76.43% Accuracy
—-
Accuracy wasn’t stellar but I was one the first couple of dozen people in the world to solve it
applauds
So far, there have been 159 other players who’ve solved the puzzle.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #122!
The answer was:
You solved it in 42 guesses
Your accuracy was 47.62%
Well i have half of it out. And I haven’t blooped yet. But it’s going to happen soon.
Not physics, sm, but very mathematical.
Also, I’ve just edited the actual article, so I wonder whether the edits will be reflected in the puzzle.
70 92.86%
btm said:
Not physics, sm, but very mathematical.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #122!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 11 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Also, I’ve just edited the actual article, so I wonder whether the edits will be reflected in the puzzle.
am I supposed to be reporting typos?
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Not physics, sm, but very mathematical.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #122!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 11 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Also, I’ve just edited the actual article, so I wonder whether the edits will be reflected in the puzzle.
am I supposed to be reporting typos?
If you find typos in the article, you can fix them yourself.
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Not physics, sm, but very mathematical.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #122!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 11 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Also, I’ve just edited the actual article, so I wonder whether the edits will be reflected in the puzzle.
am I supposed to be reporting typos?
If you find typos in the article, you can fix them yourself.
oh.
fk we used a synonym 
and we failed
indeed as others have said the mathematical aspect was evident from a quick scroll through
so back to the top and
In ███████████,
well guess that confirmed it
—the █████ of the ████ beneath a █████.
so why the hell did we start with the synonym again sigh
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Not physics, sm, but very mathematical.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #122!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 11 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Also, I’ve just edited the actual article, so I wonder whether the edits will be reflected in the puzzle.
am I supposed to be reporting typos?
If you find typos in the article, you can fix them yourself.
15 @ 83%
I tried a two player game with Ms Kingy, it is interesting.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #123!
The answer was:
You solved it in 93 guesses
Your accuracy was 49.46%
You have solved 12 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 165 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 50.00 Guesses; 61.54% Accuracy
Global Average: 58.49 Guesses; 63.03% Accuracy
Not physics, sm, but a common item, though with a mathematical bent.
74 89.19%
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #123!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 12 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Not physics, sm, but a common item, though with a mathematical bent.
at 12 i was thinking it was an animal.
BOOM that was 
surprisingly quick so how it went was
the first few paragraphs didn’t give us an obvious answer, neither did a very quick flick through to the end, we even thought the
██-██
motifs were like “yo-yo” or something, but then there was shi… stuff like
█⁄█
and
under the █████ “Plus” and “███████”, and
which should have started us on the right track, not enough though until we saw
(IF-████-████)
which really limited the scope, and along with the other stuff we figured even odds on the simple target word
that meant we could also figure what the first word in
An ██████████ ██████████ is
had to be, to the same level of confidence, but we didn’t bother counting its letters since it didn’t seem likely to help
(note that the 3rd missing word in “An ██████████ ██████████ is █████████ a” seemed a bit weaselly, going to be something like “usually” or “generally” or “typically” or “commonly” say, so we avoided it)
Early on, I’d decided the answer had something to do with power supplies, grids and distribution, and so followed that rabbit.
That, of course was only part of the answer.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #123!
The answer was:
You solved it in 160 guesses
Your accuracy was 49.38%
AussieDJ said:
Early on, I’d decided the answer had something to do with power supplies, grids and distribution, and so followed that rabbit.
That, of course was only part of the answer.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #123!
The answer was:
You solved it in 160 guesses
Your accuracy was 49.38%
123
81 51.85%
44 @ 68%
I thought I had it early, but sent myself down a side quest to a dead-end.
I read the article for over an hour, filling in words in my head, in the vain hope of beating my best score of 2, but it wasn’t to be this time.
Kingy said:
44 @ 68%I thought I had it early, but sent myself down a side quest to a dead-end.
I read the article for over an hour, filling in words in my head, in the vain hope of beating my best score of 2, but it wasn’t to be this time.
i read the x.xxxxxxxxxxx as an animal or botanical. like E.Globulus. that was my sidetrack.
sarahs mum said:
Kingy said:
44 @ 68%I thought I had it early, but sent myself down a side quest to a dead-end.
I read the article for over an hour, filling in words in my head, in the vain hope of beating my best score of 2, but it wasn’t to be this time.
i read the x.xxxxxxxxxxx as an animal or botanical. like E.Globulus. that was my sidetrack.
Mine was the obvious cubic measurements. I thought it was something to do with density or weight measurements.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #124!The answer was:
You solved it in 98 guesses
Your accuracy was 45.92%
You have solved 13 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 286 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 34.50 Guesses; 70.69% Accuracy
Global Average: 44.78 Guesses; 71.57% Accuracy
You solved it in 44 guesses Your accuracy was 97.73% You have solved 54 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 401 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 38.00 Guesses; 69.23% Accuracy Global Average: 49.84 Guesses; 70.22% Accuracysarahs mum said:
You solved it in 44 guesses Your accuracy was 97.73% You have solved 54 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 401 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 38.00 Guesses; 69.23% Accuracy Global Average: 49.84 Guesses; 70.22% Accuracy
That’s a good acc for a tough subject
dv said:
sarahs mum said:You solved it in 44 guesses Your accuracy was 97.73% You have solved 54 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 401 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 38.00 Guesses; 69.23% Accuracy Global Average: 49.84 Guesses; 70.22% AccuracyThat’s a good acc for a tough subject
something similar went past a while back. and once I had the big word….
I had a big bum steer because of an equation that was not properly rendered in redactle but in a round about way it lead me back on target.
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
sarahs mum said:You solved it in 44 guesses Your accuracy was 97.73% You have solved 54 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 401 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 38.00 Guesses; 69.23% Accuracy Global Average: 49.84 Guesses; 70.22% AccuracyThat’s a good acc for a tough subject
something similar went past a while back. and once I had the big word….
valence?
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
dv said:That’s a good acc for a tough subject
something similar went past a while back. and once I had the big word….
valence?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
i got the (the second law of thermodynamics) bit out
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
dv said:That’s a good acc for a tough subject
something similar went past a while back. and once I had the big word….
valence?
That might have been before my time.
I am kind of amazed by some of the words that don’t appear in this article including (spoilers after the gap)
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
scientist, science, physicist, chemist, study, Boyle, discovered … getting a bunch of nulls like that can really make you doubt whether you are on the scent. How the shit are you going to have an article on this topic that doesn’t mention Boyle? Or even boil…
Physics again, sm.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #124!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 18 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Physics again, sm.
I know. It was like deja vu.
btm said:
Physics again, sm.
… and I see you’ve already solved it.
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #124!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 18 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Physics again, sm.
I know. It was like deja vu.
fn physics.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #124!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 18 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Physics again, sm.
btm said:
btm said:
Physics again, sm.
… and I see you’ve already solved it.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
didn’t the valency one have that same north south east west grid thing?
It has been a bit mathsy sciency lately
dv said:
It has been a bit mathsy sciency lately
i did a redactle unlimited today that was choc a bloc full of usa words.
Presidents and vice presidents.
But it ended up being Fidel Castro.
100 guesses.92%
dv said:
It has been a bit mathsy sciency lately
not our fault that we tend to be in the top 10000 vitals
but yeah pretty laugh out loud 
since all the technicals didn’t help us that much except to confirm likely STEM origins
it was literally a matter of working out what the 14 was in
In ██████████████, ████ is ██████ in ████████ to or from
and then the 4 naturally fell out of there
obviously “to or from” helped a bit
we don’t really like the phrasing of the first sentence but hey if that’s what the community like we’ren’t going to change it
SCIENCE said:
but yeah pretty laugh out loudit was literally a matter of working out what the 14 was in
In ██████████████, ████ is ██████ in ████████ to or from
and then the 4 naturally fell out of there
obviously “to or from” helped a bit
we don’t really like the phrasing of the first sentence but hey if that’s what the community like we’ren’t going to change it
‘one’ is usually the early words I play. If there is a lot of ones I then play ‘first’ and then ‘two’. If there are a lot of two’s I play ‘second.’
110 hits for one word
Cymek said:
110 hits for one word
The answer was:
You solved it in 58 guesses
Your accuracy was 48.28%
Should have gotten it earlier
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
but yeah pretty laugh out loud
it was literally a matter of working out what the 14 was in
In ██████████████, ████ is ██████ in ████████ to or from
and then the 4 naturally fell out of there
obviously “to or from” helped a bit
we don’t really like the phrasing of the first sentence but hey if that’s what the community like we’ren’t going to change it
‘one’ is usually the early words I play. If there is a lot of ones I then play ‘first’ and then ‘two’. If there are a lot of two’s I play ‘second.’
in terms of generics we have all kinds of stuff like pronouns, this that, more less, can may, be are, many most, no not, … which fill out the text when we can’t be bothered thinking too hard about it because it doesn’t look like a one shot
usually our judgement on whether we’ll get the answer straight away comes true, so the middle ground is rare where we try to open with a heap of related words early
(so our scores are generally either single digit (N or N+1) or hundreds, haven’t been dedicated enough to hit 1000 yet)
It took a while …
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #124!
The answer was:
You solved it in 86 guesses
Your accuracy was 52.33%
game 100 was the second law of thermodynamics. I knew i knew it. It wasn’t deja vu as such. We did this a few weeks ago.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #125!The answer was:
You solved it in 87 guesses
Your accuracy was 18.39%
You have solved 14 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 37 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 64.00 Guesses; 46.88% Accuracy
Global Average: 62.11 Guesses; 49.06% Accuracy
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #125!
The answer was:
You solved it in 129 guesses
Your accuracy was 30.23%
well that felt much like semantle
Not physics this time, sm, but still science-y. You probably know it.
AussieDJ said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #125!The answer was:
You solved it in 129 guesses
Your accuracy was 30.23%
it seems i am using your method tonight and not getting far on it.
Spoiler:
I know it’s a fish/marine animal but I’m now stuck. Any words that are helpful SM?
Witty Rejoinder said:
Spoiler:
I know it’s a fish/marine animal but I’m now stuck. Any words that are helpful SM?
It is one of those fish that
sarahs mum said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Spoiler:
I know it’s a fish/marine animal but I’m now stuck. Any words that are helpful SM?
39 host 6
67 attach 2
88 gills 4
found 3
98 sharks 1
99 whales 1
i know what it is but i can’nt remember what it is called. so i am also stuck. see below….
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
it is one of those fishes that hang on other fishes and clean them.It is one of those fish that
Thanks I got it by googling. Never heard that name before.
Witty Rejoinder said:
sarahs mum said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Spoiler:
I know it’s a fish/marine animal but I’m now stuck. Any words that are helpful SM?
39 host 6
67 attach 2
88 gills 4
found 3
98 sharks 1
99 whales 1
i know what it is but i can’nt remember what it is called. so i am also stuck. see below….
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
it is one of those fishes that hang on other fishes and clean them.It is one of those fish that
Thanks I got it by googling. Never heard that name before.
I will probably give up and google after i have cursed myself and called myself names some more.
sad.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #126! The answer was:
You solved it in 68 guesses
Your accuracy was 48.53%
You have solved 15 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 208 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 20.00 Guesses; 86.67% Accuracy
Global Average: 28.89 Guesses; 83.78% Accuracy
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #126! The answer was:You solved it in 68 guesses
Your accuracy was 48.53%
You have solved 15 consecutive RedactlesGlobal StatsGlobally, 208 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 20.00 Guesses; 86.67% Accuracy
Global Average: 28.89 Guesses; 83.78% Accuracy
all those people who did better than you were American.
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #126! The answer was:You solved it in 68 guesses
Your accuracy was 48.53%
You have solved 15 consecutive RedactlesGlobal StatsGlobally, 208 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 20.00 Guesses; 86.67% Accuracy
Global Average: 28.89 Guesses; 83.78% Accuracy
all those people who did better than you were American.
Kind of you to say so
I looked at a list of probables.
46 100.00%
sarahs mum said:
I looked at a list of probables.46 100.00%
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #126!
The answer was:
You solved it in 148 guesses
Your accuracy was 67.57%
i suppose we could have known with a better knowledge of musical theatre.
That one was pretty easy. I see you got another perfect score, sm. Well done!
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #126!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 13 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
That one was pretty easy. I see you got another perfect score, sm. Well done!
I did consult the list when I realised what the answer was.
if anyone can get this out please do tell me what the answer was.
https://redactle-unlimited.com/#article/VHJvcGljYWxfZm9yZXN0
Spoiler below:
Isn’t that the second US president in a week? I cheated after I was sure it was a pre US civil war president.
Witty Rejoinder said:
Spoiler below:
Isn’t that the second US president in a week? I cheated after I was sure it was a pre US civil war president.
Is there some published list of previous redactle answers?
dv said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Spoiler below:
Isn’t that the second US president in a week? I cheated after I was sure it was a pre US civil war president.
Is there some published list of previous redactle answers?
Yes but we find the namericentric nature of these top 10k rather distasteful.
Of course no issue with STEM being top.
dv said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Spoiler below:
Isn’t that the second US president in a week? I cheated after I was sure it was a pre US civil war president.
Is there some published list of previous redactle answers?
Yes Kennedy was the answer not long ago, 6 days actually when I checked
Cymek said:
“Many Northerners, meanwhile, hoped that Vice President Clinton could unseat Madison as Jefferson’s successor.”
dv said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Spoiler below:
Isn’t that the second US president in a week? I cheated after I was sure it was a pre US civil war president.
Is there some published list of previous redactle answers?
Yes Kennedy was the answer not long ago, 6 days actually when I checked
I suppose that is a relative.
sarahs mum said:
Cymek said:“Many Northerners, meanwhile, hoped that Vice President Clinton could unseat Madison as Jefferson’s successor.”
dv said:Is there some published list of previous redactle answers?
Yes Kennedy was the answer not long ago, 6 days actually when I checked
I suppose that is a relative.
Or he’s a time traveller
sarahs mum said:
Cymek said:“Many Northerners, meanwhile, hoped that Vice President Clinton could unseat Madison as Jefferson’s successor.”
dv said:Is there some published list of previous redactle answers?
Yes Kennedy was the answer not long ago, 6 days actually when I checked
I suppose that is a relative.
According to WP, he’s not related to William
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
Cymek said:“Many Northerners, meanwhile, hoped that Vice President Clinton could unseat Madison as Jefferson’s successor.”Yes Kennedy was the answer not long ago, 6 days actually when I checked
I suppose that is a relative.
According to WP, he’s not related to William
ta.
:)
fkn last common ancestrists
SCIENCE said:
fkn last common ancestrists
You’re forgetting that the modern Clintons are lizard people from space
sarahs mum said:
if anyone can get this out please do tell me what the answer was.https://redactle-unlimited.com/#article/VHJvcGljYWxfZm9yZXN0
bump.
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
if anyone can get this out please do tell me what the answer was.
https://redactle-unlimited.com/#article/VHJvcGljYWxfZm9yZXN0
bump.
we cheated and hacked the base64encode but yeah the answer wasn’t obvious
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
if anyone can get this out please do tell me what the answer was.
https://redactle-unlimited.com/#article/VHJvcGljYWxfZm9yZXN0
bump.
we cheated and hacked the base64encode but yeah the answer wasn’t obvious
do tell.
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:
bump.
we cheated and hacked the base64encode but yeah the answer wasn’t obvious
do tell.
https://redactle-unlimited.com/#article/VHJvcGljYWxfZm9yZXN0
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
we cheated and hacked the base64encode but yeah the answer wasn’t obvious
do tell.
https://redactle-unlimited.com/#article/VHJvcGljYWxfZm9yZXN0
nope. that did not work.
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:
do tell.
https://redactle-unlimited.com/#article/VHJvcGljYWxfZm9yZXN0
nope. that did not work.
Tropical_forest
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:sarahs mum said:
do tell.
https://redactle-unlimited.com/#article/VHJvcGljYWxfZm9yZXN0
nope. that did not work.
Congratulations! You solved Redactle Unlimited in 56 guesses with 23.21% accuracy and a time of 00:06:53!
Tropical Forest
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:https://redactle-unlimited.com/#article/VHJvcGljYWxfZm9yZXN0
nope. that did not work.
Congratulations! You solved Redactle Unlimited in 56 guesses with 23.21% accuracy and a time of 00:06:53!
Tropical Forest
Kinda weird that it doesn’t feature the word trees.
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
https://redactle-unlimited.com/#article/VHJvcGljYWxfZm9yZXN0
nope. that did not work.
Tropical_forest
Oh. I thought it might have been harder than that. Well..I couldn’t guess it out so I suppose it was in it’s way.
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:https://redactle-unlimited.com/#article/VHJvcGljYWxfZm9yZXN0
nope. that did not work.
Congratulations! You solved Redactle Unlimited in 56 guesses with 23.21% accuracy and a time of 00:06:53!
Tropical Forest
well played. ta.
i feel better now knowing what it was.
sarahs mum said:
i feel better now knowing what it was.
Sounds like SCIENCE has the cheat codes
dv said:
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
nope. that did not work.
Congratulations! You solved Redactle Unlimited in 56 guesses with 23.21% accuracy and a time of 00:06:53!
Tropical Forest
Kinda weird that it doesn’t feature the word trees.
yeah we got wasted by stuff like that, but then we’re impatient too
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
i feel better now knowing what it was.
Sounds like SCIENCE has the cheat codes
legit’ our redactle-original one-shots are legit’
but shit like PsOTUS we have to look up we mean who really cares about that stuff
it isn’t loading for me. anyone else?
sarahs mum said:
it isn’t loading for me. anyone else?
Seems bronk
Not loading for me, either, but the Redactle Unlimited site has today’s puzzle (# 127) available.
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
it isn’t loading for me. anyone else?Seems bronk
Ah. At least it isn’t just me.
AussieDJ said:
Not loading for me, either, but the Redactle Unlimited site has today’s puzzle (# 127) available.
so we play that and then when redactle comes on line we all get it out first go?
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Not loading for me, either, but the Redactle Unlimited site has today’s puzzle (# 127) available.so we play that and then when redactle comes on line we all get it out first go?
Of course! :)
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Not loading for me, either, but the Redactle Unlimited site has today’s puzzle (# 127) available.so we play that and then when redactle comes on line we all get it out first go?
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Not loading for me, either, but the Redactle Unlimited site has today’s puzzle (# 127) available.so we play that and then when redactle comes on line we all get it out first go?
how do they know what it is going to be?
A good question.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:so we play that and then when redactle comes on line we all get it out first go?
how do they know what it is going to be?A good question.
that won’t load for me either.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:how do they know what it is going to be?
A good question.
that won’t load for me either.
and the last few games i have played are not in my history.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #127!The answer was:
You solved it in 1 guesses
Your accuracy was 0.00%
You have solved 16 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 2923 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 1.00 Guesses; 0.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 1.04 Guesses; 0.03% Accuracy
Ha I tried something and it works
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #127!The answer was:You solved it in 1 guesses
Your accuracy was 0.00%
You have solved 16 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 2923 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 1.00 Guesses; 0.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 1.04 Guesses; 0.03% AccuracyHa I tried something and it works
As a non-redactler, it seems a little strange to me that it can be solved with 1 guess which has 0% accuracy (and at least half the other people did that as well).
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #127!The answer was:You solved it in 1 guesses
Your accuracy was 0.00%
You have solved 16 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 2923 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 1.00 Guesses; 0.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 1.04 Guesses; 0.03% AccuracyHa I tried something and it works
As a non-redactler, it seems a little strange to me that it can be solved with 1 guess which has 0% accuracy (and at least half the other people did that as well).
It’s broken today
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #127!The answer was:You solved it in 1 guesses
Your accuracy was 0.00%
You have solved 16 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 2923 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 1.00 Guesses; 0.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 1.04 Guesses; 0.03% AccuracyHa I tried something and it works
Do tell.
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #127!The answer was:You solved it in 1 guesses
Your accuracy was 0.00%
You have solved 16 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 2923 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 1.00 Guesses; 0.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 1.04 Guesses; 0.03% AccuracyHa I tried something and it works
Do tell.
I just put in a single blank
ie a space
dv said:
ie a space
oh. so still gebrokken.
Googled redactle down and the date and there seems to be no posts about it. Strange.
sarahs mum said:
Googled redactle down and the date and there seems to be no posts about it. Strange.
maybe it’sn’t sufficiently notable, like about 20000 people worldwide do it or something
sarahs mum said:
Googled redactle down and the date and there seems to be no posts about it. Strange.
There’s a bit of comment on it on reddit
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
Googled redactle down and the date and there seems to be no posts about it. Strange.There’s a bit of comment on it on reddit
what’s the vibe?
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
Googled redactle down and the date and there seems to be no posts about it. Strange.There’s a bit of comment on it on reddit
what’s the vibe?
Just “yep, it’s blank”
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
dv said:There’s a bit of comment on it on reddit
what’s the vibe?
Just “yep, it’s blank”
i see. that IS the answer. ‘undefined’
Too tricky.
now i wonder why it won’t load in redactle unlimited and why some of recent games disappeared from the stats. Perhaps that is a different thing.
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:A good question.
that won’t load for me either.
and the last few games i have played are not in my history.
My history is showing (on the original Redactle)
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
sarahs mum said:what’s the vibe?
Just “yep, it’s blank”
i see. that IS the answer. ‘undefined’
Too tricky.
now i wonder why it won’t load in redactle unlimited and why some of recent games disappeared from the stats. Perhaps that is a different thing.
Redactle Unlimited loads okay for me.
I started playing the latest game early this morning and then shut down until later this afternoon, only to discover that the Unlimited version had lost all the words I’d already put in.
However, after putting in as many words as I could remember, then shutting down for another couple of hours, I found that it remembered everything I’d played a few hours ago.
Most strange.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:that won’t load for me either.
and the last few games i have played are not in my history.
My history is showing (on the original Redactle)
no. I meant on the unlimited. I know i am missing the loch Ness monster.I got that out yesterday and it isn’t there.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
dv said:Just “yep, it’s blank”
i see. that IS the answer. ‘undefined’
Too tricky.
now i wonder why it won’t load in redactle unlimited and why some of recent games disappeared from the stats. Perhaps that is a different thing.
Redactle Unlimited loads okay for me.
I started playing the latest game early this morning and then shut down until later this afternoon, only to discover that the Unlimited version had lost all the words I’d already put in.
However, after putting in as many words as I could remember, then shutting down for another couple of hours, I found that it remembered everything I’d played a few hours ago.
Most strange.
the daily game?
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:i see. that IS the answer. ‘undefined’
Too tricky.
now i wonder why it won’t load in redactle unlimited and why some of recent games disappeared from the stats. Perhaps that is a different thing.
Redactle Unlimited loads okay for me.
I started playing the latest game early this morning and then shut down until later this afternoon, only to discover that the Unlimited version had lost all the words I’d already put in.
However, after putting in as many words as I could remember, then shutting down for another couple of hours, I found that it remembered everything I’d played a few hours ago.
Most strange.
the daily game?
You’ve just reminded me … I can see my history in the Unlimited game too. I’d forgotten where to look, but just found it now.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:Redactle Unlimited loads okay for me.
I started playing the latest game early this morning and then shut down until later this afternoon, only to discover that the Unlimited version had lost all the words I’d already put in.
However, after putting in as many words as I could remember, then shutting down for another couple of hours, I found that it remembered everything I’d played a few hours ago.
Most strange.
the daily game?
Yes, the daily game (today’s is #127 – which I still haven’t solved! )
Correction – just solved daily game #127!
It says 98 guesses with 64.29% accuracy, but that’s only since this afternoon’s restart.
AussieDJ said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:the daily game?
Yes, the daily game (today’s is #127 – which I still haven’t solved! )Correction – just solved daily game #127!
It says 98 guesses with 64.29% accuracy, but that’s only since this afternoon’s restart.
i don’t understand.
The original version is working again!!
AussieDJ said:
The original version is working again!!
Praise the lord.
sibeen said:
AussieDJ said:
The original version is working again!!
Praise the lord.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #128!The answer was:
You solved it in 26 guesses
Your accuracy was 46.15%
You have solved 17 consecutive Redactles
Global StatsGlobally, 57 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 21.00 Guesses; 77.27% Accuracy
Global Average: 29.25 Guesses; 77.99% Accuracy
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #128!
The answer was:
You solved it in 70 guesses
Your accuracy was 75.71%
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #128!The answer was:You solved it in 26 guesses
Your accuracy was 46.15%
You have solved 17 consecutive Redactles
Global StatsGlobally, 57 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 21.00 Guesses; 77.27% Accuracy
Global Average: 29.25 Guesses; 77.99% Accuracy
well done.
*sighs
lovin’
it
anyway we stared at this
██,███,███ ██ in ████, it is ████████ as the ██████-████████ of the ████ █████████ ███████ █████████: ███████ than the ███████, ████████, and ██████ ██████ but ██████ than the ██████ █████.
for a long time and there was not much more doubt really
the rest of the article didn’t help that much but we figured enough that the first target was the 4th in the sequence 7 8 6 (8) 6 of decreasing measure
SPOILER ALERT if you want to know our ridiculous
67 100.00%
sarahs mum said:
67 100.00%
You’re getting really good at this, sm :)
btm said:
sarahs mum said:67 100.00%
You’re getting really good at this, sm :)
It ain’t no 17.
And I took longer than everyone.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #129!
The answer was: You solved it in 56 guesses
Your accuracy was 55.36%
You have solved 18 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 15 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 35.00 Guesses; 66.67% Accuracy
Global Average: 53.27 Guesses; 72.76% Accuracy
First 15, not bad
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #129!
The answer was: You solved it in 56 guesses
Your accuracy was 55.36%
You have solved 18 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 15 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 35.00 Guesses; 66.67% Accuracy
Global Average: 53.27 Guesses; 72.76% AccuracyFirst 15, not bad
*Cheers :)
i fell asleep.
lolnfi
88 94.32%
SCIENCE said:
lolnfi
seems i did a shitty job even though i know about this shit.
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
lolnfi
seems i did a shitty job even though i know about this shit.
Did better than us¡ We just load hundreds of pointless common words.
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
lolnfi
seems i did a shitty job even though i know about this shit.
Did better than us¡ We just load hundreds of pointless common words.
did you have druids?
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:sarahs mum said:
seems i did a shitty job even though i know about this shit.
Did better than us¡ We just load hundreds of pointless common words.
did you have druids?
no we never got that specific, just slid down the word frequency list getting 1 or 2 hits each and finally using the 1st target word, which got us on the right track
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:Did better than us¡ We just load hundreds of pointless common words.
did you have druids?
no we never got that specific, just slid down the word frequency list getting 1 or 2 hits each and finally using the 1st target word, which got us on the right track
i’ve been getting quite a few ones.
I played a game of unlimited redactle. got stuck and googled my way out of it.
>>
Ghalib
Mirza Asadullah Baig Khan also Known Mirza Ghalib He popularly known by pen name Ghalib and Asad was an Indian poet. His honorific was Dabir-ul-Mulk, Najm-ud-Daula. During his lifetime, the already declining Mughal Empire was eclipsed and displaced by the British East India Company Rule and finally deposed following the defeat of the First Indian War of Independence (Sepoy Mutiny) of 1857; these are described through his work.
He wrote in both Urdu and Persian. Although his Persian Divan (body of work) is at least five times longer than his Urdu Divan, his fame rests on his poetry in Urdu. Today, Ghalib remains popular not only in the Indian subcontinent but also among the Hindustani diaspora around the world.
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
lolnfi
seems i did a shitty job even though i know about this shit.
Did better than us¡ We just load hundreds of pointless common words.
Blunderbuss technique, followed by research to eventually find the result.
*Congratulations, you solved Redactle #129!
The answer was:
You solved it in 355 guesses
Your accuracy was 41.13%
i threw words. they did not stick. I knew nothing of this subject at all at all.
Khanate of Kazan
The Khanate of Kazan (Tatar: Казан ханлыгы; Russian: Казанское ханство, romanized: Kazanskoye khanstvo) was a medieval Tatar Turkic state that occupied the territory of former Volga Bulgaria between 1438 and 1552. The khanate covered contemporary Tatarstan, Mari El, Chuvashia, Mordovia, and parts of Udmurtia and Bashkortostan; its capital was the city of Kazan. It was one of the successor states of the Golden Horde (Kipchak Khanate), and it came to an end when it was conquered by the Tsardom of Russia.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #130!
The answer was:
You solved it in 111 guessesYour accuracy was 49.55%
You have solved 19 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 128 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 50.00 Guesses; 71.43% Accuracy
Global Average: 58.69 Guesses; 70.64% Accuracy
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #130!
The answer was:
You solved it in 111 guessesYour accuracy was 49.55%
You have solved 19 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 128 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 50.00 Guesses; 71.43% Accuracy
Global Average: 58.69 Guesses; 70.64% Accuracy
i’m not close yet.I just dived into the kitchen for some light refreshments.
100 94.00%
You definitely know this one, sm. There are some non-English words, written non-Latin characters, to beware of, though.
btm said:
You definitely know this one, sm.
The blunderbuss effect:
270 guesses for a 59.26% accuracy.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #130!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 20 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
You definitely know this one, sm. There are some non-English words, written non-Latin characters, to beware of, though.
lots more than 20 guesses.
spoiler warning
https://www.smh.com.au/national/its-one-giant-leap-backwards-for-knowledge-20021217-gdfz9b.html
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #131!
The answer was:
You solved it in 73 guesses
Your accuracy was 34.25%
You have solved 20 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 43 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 35.00 Guesses; 66.67% Accuracy
Global Average: 44.63 Guesses; 66.95% Accuracy
48 95.83%
I did not get a message again
sarahs mum said:
48 95.83%I did not get a message again
wait…
You solved it in 48 guesses Your accuracy was 95.83% You have solved 61 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 148 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 54.00 Guesses; 62.03% Accuracy Global Average: 65.80 Guesses; 62.59% Accuracysarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
48 95.83%I did not get a message again
wait…
You solved it in 48 guesses Your accuracy was 95.83% You have solved 61 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 148 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 54.00 Guesses; 62.03% Accuracy Global Average: 65.80 Guesses; 62.59% Accuracy
Nice
this is clearly not SCIENCE in any real sense
SCIENCE said:
this is clearly not SCIENCE in any real sense
in a sort of sense?
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
this is clearly not SCIENCE in any real sense
in a sort of sense?
spoiler warning though yous all seem to have hit target
The existence of the Oedipus complex is not well supported by empirical evidence.
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:SCIENCE said:
this is clearly not SCIENCE in any real sense
in a sort of sense?
spoiler warning though yous all seem to have hit target
The existence of the Oedipus complex is not well supported by empirical evidence.
It doesn’t seem right to me.
I got the second word first, but the first word had the right number of letters for both types; I tried the wrong one first, but fortunately that was in the text.
Mamma Mia, it took me forever to get this!
The answer was:
You solved it in 120 guesses
Your accuracy was 45.83%
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #132!The answer was:
You solved it in 17 guesses
Your accuracy was 76.47%
You have solved 21 consecutive Redactles
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #132!The answer was:You solved it in 17 guesses
Your accuracy was 76.47%
You have solved 21 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 49 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 16.00 Guesses; 81.81% Accuracy
Global Average: 23.76 Guesses; 81.46% Accuracy
I count it as a win if I’m in the first 100.
You solved it in 48 guesses Your accuracy was 97.92% You have solved 62 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 163 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 20.00 Guesses; 84.62% Accuracy Global Average: 27.08 Guesses; 82.45% Accuracy—-i made a mistake.
One thing that makes redactle different from wordle or quordle is that the others won’t let you enter a misspelled word…
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #132!
The answer was:
You solved it in 90 guesses
Your accuracy was 84.44%
You have solved 119 consecutive Redactles.
Best I’ve done for some time!
AussieDJ said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #132!The answer was:
You solved it in 90 guesses
Your accuracy was 84.44%
You have solved 119 consecutive Redactles.Best I’ve done for some time!
that’s pretty accurate in comparison to some of your word hurling.
dv said:
One thing that makes redactle different from wordle or quordle is that the others won’t let you enter a misspelled word…
if we made a typographical error then are we allowed to deduct it from our claim
well damn we had to use 
the reference images again but
flicked through a bit, weren’t really confident what frame to operate in
then we wrongly figured
over ███,███ █████ ███. The
as a number of things every day, but whatever, it made us think productivity which led us to the geography frame
so being top 10000 meant it was likely to be some country level concept, and they are often called republic, so we just needed an approximate location
amusingly, the old problem cropped up again
but anyway
It is ████████ by █████ ██████ to the █████ and █████████, ███████ to the ████ and █████, and ████████ to the █████████.
gave us all we needed because not many █████ ██████ names in one of those options, indeed, not many double barrelled ones anywhere
SCIENCE said:
well damn we had to use
flicked through a bit, weren’t really confident what frame to operate in
then we wrongly figured
over ███,███ █████ ███. The
as a number of things every day, but whatever, it made us think productivity which led us to the geography frame
so being top 10000 meant it was likely to be some country level concept, and they are often called republic, so we just needed an approximate location
amusingly, the old problem cropped up again
- North/South and East/West are isobytic
- Africa and Europe are isobytic
but anyway
It is ████████ by █████ ██████ to the █████ and █████████, ███████ to the ████ and █████, and ████████ to the █████████.
gave us all we needed because not many █████ ██████ names in one of those options, indeed, not many double barrelled ones anywhere
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.I did all the cardinal points. and then added the ‘ern’ suffix. they were all there and it was a lot of reveals.
4 @ 100%
Kingy said:
4 @ 100%
Bloody
Kingy said:
4 @ 100%
oooo.
sarahs mum said:
Kingy said:
4 @ 100%oooo.
103 at 52.43%
unlimited redactle
https://redactle-unlimited.com/#g/en-Q40787
87 guesses with 100% accuracy.I should have done better I suppose.
Coz BtM would get it out in 8.
sarahs mum said:
unlimited redactle
https://redactle-unlimited.com/#g/en-Q4078787 guesses with 100% accuracy.I should have done better I suppose.
Coz BtM would get it out in 8.
More than likely.
Same Unlimited redactle as you (https://redactle-unlimited.com/#g/en-Q40787)
120 guesses with 80% accuracy.
I was skirting around the answer for a while.
It would have helped if I’d put the country name in rather than the adjective.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
unlimited redactle
https://redactle-unlimited.com/#g/en-Q4078787 guesses with 100% accuracy.I should have done better I suppose.
Coz BtM would get it out in 8.
More than likely.
Same Unlimited redactle as you (https://redactle-unlimited.com/#g/en-Q40787)
120 guesses with 80% accuracy.
I was skirting around the answer for a while.
It would have helped if I’d put the country name in rather than the adjective.
I put in both. But i started with germany. and then france. and then britain. but it is was all good because they were all there.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #133!
The answer was:
You solved it in 20 guesses
Your accuracy was 50.00%
You have solved 22 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 104 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 1.00 Guesses; 100.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 5.97 Guesses; 87.32% Accuracy
sarahs mum said:
You’re amazing
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
You’re amazing
Na. It wasn’t hard.
Tis you who wasn’t on your game.
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
You’re amazing
Na. It wasn’t hard.
Tis you who wasn’t on your game.
i might have done even better if I hadn’t of dithered.
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
You’re amazing
Na. It wasn’t hard.
Tis you who wasn’t on your game.
I mean I’ve never been good at this one.
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
You’re amazing
we’re in agreement with 
all here, literally reading up to the first “on” left quite little doubt
Congratulations and good job, sm.
Meanwhile …
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #133!
The answer was:
You solved it in 60 guesses
Your accuracy was 58.33%
AussieDJ said:
Congratulations and good job, sm.Meanwhile …
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #133!
The answer was:
You solved it in 60 guesses
Your accuracy was 58.33%
The answer was:
You solved it in 9 guesses
Your accuracy was 66.67%
Cymek said:
AussieDJ said:
Congratulations and good job, sm.Meanwhile …
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #133!
The answer was:
You solved it in 60 guesses
Your accuracy was 58.33%
The answer was:
You solved it in 9 guesses
Your accuracy was 66.67%
1 @ 100%
Fkn yay!
I was watching a youtube about the topic 2 days ago, the two letter title gave it away.
Kingy said:
Cymek said:
AussieDJ said:
Congratulations and good job, sm.Meanwhile …
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #133!
The answer was:
You solved it in 60 guesses
Your accuracy was 58.33%
The answer was:
You solved it in 9 guesses
Your accuracy was 66.67%1 @ 100%
Fkn yay!
I was watching a youtube about the topic 2 days ago, the two letter title gave it away.
Champion
Yes the title made it a lot easier
I tried PI and Oz first
Cymek said:
Kingy said:
Cymek said:The answer was:
You solved it in 9 guesses
Your accuracy was 66.67%1 @ 100%
Fkn yay!
I was watching a youtube about the topic 2 days ago, the two letter title gave it away.
Champion
Yes the title made it a lot easier
I tried PI and Oz first
I scanned the first bit. Decided it was a landscape topic. Thought…the answer, Io, or Po. looked again. Decided it wasn’t a river. Decided on elevation. And then dithered deciding whether It was cool to be blowing 100% on my first guess and then decided to go ahead and guess the answer. Meanwhile 18 people around the planet were less dithery.
Kingy said:
two letter title gave it away.
pretty sure they had one which was “go” some time ago damn that was dirty
SCIENCE said:
Kingy said:
two letter title gave it away.
pretty sure they had one which was “go” some time ago damn that was dirty
45 goes but 100%
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #134!The answer was:
You solved it in 33 guesses
Your accuracy was 63.64%
You have solved 23 consecutive Redactles
Global StatsGlobally, 109 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 33.00 Guesses; 69.23% Accuracy
Global Average: 42.38 Guesses; 70.46% Accuracy
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #134!
The answer was:
You solved it in 104 guesses
Your accuracy was 73.08%
55 100.00%
AussieDJ said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #134!The answer was:
You solved it in 104 guesses
Your accuracy was 73.08%
I gave up at 220+ and googled it. :/
Not my area of knowledge.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
unlimited redactle
https://redactle-unlimited.com/#g/en-Q4078787 guesses with 100% accuracy.I should have done better I suppose.
Coz BtM would get it out in 8.
More than likely.
Same Unlimited redactle as you (https://redactle-unlimited.com/#g/en-Q40787)
120 guesses with 80% accuracy.
I was skirting around the answer for a while.
It would have helped if I’d put the country name in rather than the adjective.
Damn we got rekt again.
Kingy said:
AussieDJ said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #134!The answer was:
You solved it in 104 guesses
Your accuracy was 73.08%
I gave up at 220+ and googled it. :/
Not my area of knowledge.
Whereas I should have got it out sooner. Have written essays on subject.
sarahs mum said:
Kingy said:
AussieDJ said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #134!
The answer was:
You solved it in 104 guesses
Your accuracy was 73.08%
I gave up at 220+ and googled it. :/
Not my area of knowledge.
Whereas I should have got it out sooner. Have written essays on subject.
we too had nfi ah well
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #135!The answer was:
You solved it in 68 guessesYour accuracy was 55.88%
You have solved 24 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 35 players have solved today’s Redactle so farGlobal Median: 37.00 Guesses; 71.43% Accuracy
Global Average: 40.06 Guesses; 71.86% Accuracy
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #135!The answer was:You solved it in 68 guessesYour accuracy was 55.88%
You have solved 24 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 35 players have solved today’s Redactle so farGlobal Median: 37.00 Guesses; 71.43% AccuracyGlobal Average: 40.06 Guesses; 71.86% Accuracy
I rebooted again. I’m about to start redactling.
I think there is something wrong with firefox.
sigh.
sarahs mum said:
sigh.
Want a hint?
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
sigh.
Want a hint?
I’ve got lots of it out. But not in 17 at 100%. :)
Give me another ten.
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
sigh.
Want a hint?
I’ve got lots of it out. But not in 17 at 100%. :)
Give me another ten.
I’m so disappointed that it isn’t neo-liberal. :(
ism.
109 92.66%
ism ism ism.
Ye gods!
A double-barrelled blunderbuss effort, along with research to finish off.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #135!
The answer was:
You solved it in 536 guesses
Your accuracy was 51.68%
AussieDJ said:
Ye gods!
A double-barrelled blunderbuss effort, along with research to finish off.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #135!
The answer was:
You solved it in 536 guesses
Your accuracy was 51.68%
blunderbussism.
such topical f… f… pardon our french
SCIENCE said:
such topical f… f… pardon our french
fism.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #136!
The answer was:
You solved it in 41 guesses
Your accuracy was 31.71%
You have solved 25 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 61 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 22.00 Guesses; 58.82% Accuracy
Global Average: 25.38 Guesses; 61.72% Accuracy
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #136!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 24 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
FFS, 24. You’re loosing it.
LOL
so anyway straightforward start with looking at
An ██████ is the █████ █████ of ███████████ of a █████████████ ████████.
just getting a sense of where it was at, no definites yet but then
“███████ in”, from ██ (██), “in” and ████ (████),
was a bit of a clue as well so then
████████████ is the next █████ of █████████ ███████████, and
strongly suggested something with steps / stages / phases / parts
looked ahead a bit to find
Past ████████████, an
which seemed like an abuse of grammar (and we still hold that it is, despite being technically valid) but not really affecting the targeting
so we went back to the top and counted off what we figured for
An ██████ is the █████ █████ of ███████████
and it all fit so there we went
(but we did loosely fit first instead of early not that it really mattered)
Once again I am surprised at some of the words that don’t appear including
.
.
.
.
.
Spoilers below
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Reproduction
sibeen said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #136!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 24 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
FFS, 24. You’re loosing it.
I know. I should have got that much sooner :)
33 100.00%
I took the longest!!!!!
sarahs mum said:
33 100.00%I took the longest!!!!!
I don’t understand how their scoring works.
I doubled your guess numbers – but the accuracy dropped to less than a third of yours.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #136!
The answer was
You solved it in 66 guesses
Your accuracy was 28.79%
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
33 100.00%I took the longest!!!!!
I don’t understand how their scoring works.
I doubled your guess numbers – but the accuracy dropped to less than a third of yours.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #136!
The answer was
You solved it in 66 guesses
Your accuracy was 28.79%
Accuracy is just the number of found words as a percentage of total guesses.
If you guess 99 words, none of which are found in the text, and tgen guess the answer on your 100th guess, your accuracy is 1%.
dv said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
33 100.00%
I took the longest!!!!!
I don’t understand how their scoring works.
I doubled your guess numbers – but the accuracy dropped to less than a third of yours.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #136!
The answer was
You solved it in 66 guesses
Your accuracy was 28.79%Accuracy is just the number of found words as a percentage of total guesses.
If you guess 99 words, none of which are found in the text, and tgen guess the answer on your 100th guess, your accuracy is 1%.
that could be an interesting variant, try to guess the target without a single other correct guess, by if necessary excluding as broad a set of unrelated concepts as possible leaving only that which it must be
probably worse than semantle actually
redactle unlimited game https://redactle-unlimited.com/#g/en-Q178193
68 guesses with 92.65% accuracy and a time of 00:14:13
nice little game.
dv said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
33 100.00%I took the longest!!!!!
I don’t understand how their scoring works.
I doubled your guess numbers – but the accuracy dropped to less than a third of yours.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #136!
The answer was
You solved it in 66 guesses
Your accuracy was 28.79%Accuracy is just the number of found words as a percentage of total guesses.
If you guess 99 words, none of which are found in the text, and then guess the answer on your 100th guess, your accuracy is 1%.
Thank you. That explains the blunderbuss effect
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #137!
The answer was:
You solved it in 84 guesses
Your accuracy was 26.19%
You have solved 26 consecutive Redactles
Global StatsGlobally, 47 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 49.00 Guesses; 50.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 58.23 Guesses; 49.17% Accuracy
126 54.76%
—like pulling teeth.
That was much harder than it should have been.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #137!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 38 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
That was much harder than it should have been.
but that’s not bad considering.
didn’t know much about these, but should have done much better
sarahs mum said:
126 54.76%—like pulling teeth.
I won’t disagree.
I did have to resort to some research, otherwise I might still be prodding and poking at it to achieve a result.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #137!
The answer was:
You solved it in 142 guesses
Your accuracy was 40.85%
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #138!
The answer was:
You solved it in 57 guesses
Your accuracy was 59.65%
You have solved 27 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 102 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 20.00 Guesses; 76.43% Accuracy
Global Average: 27.70 Guesses; 75.52% Accuracy
41 97.56%
sarahs mum said:
41 97.56%You solved it in 41 guesses Your accuracy was 97.56% You have solved 68 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 190 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 28.00 Guesses; 73.03% Accuracy Global Average: 35.58 Guesses; 73.76% Accuracyi was only seconds behind you DV but somehow lots of people finished in those few seconds.
sarahs mum said:
i was only seconds behind you DV but somehow lots of people finished in those few seconds.
I was not speedy in posting the results here
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
i was only seconds behind you DV but somehow lots of people finished in those few seconds.I was not speedy in posting the results here
ah.
Not physics :)
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #138!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 16 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Not physics :)
I’ve even been there.
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #138!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 16 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Not physics :)
I’ve even been there.
I haven’t. I’ve been to the country, but went to different tourist attractions. I had to look up the spelling of the second word, though.
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #138!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 16 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Not physics :)
I’ve even been there.
I haven’t. I’ve been to the country, but went to different tourist attractions. I had to look up the spelling of the second word, though.
I missed doing the Dorsay. Regret.
I could spell the word.
wtf is this stuff
SCIENCE said:
wtf is this stuff
It’s the internet
dv said:
SCIENCE said:
wtf is this stuff
It’s the internet
ah the thing that was going to fade into obscurity when all those cat viewers got bored we remember now
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #138!
The answer was:
You solved it in 198 guesses
Your accuracy was 59.60%
The scattergun approach eventually pays out.
AussieDJ said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #138!The answer was:
You solved it in 198 guesses
Your accuracy was 59.60%The scattergun approach eventually pays out.
I played war for lots of hits. And then I was upset that it wasn’t treaty (of versailles) but got hits for treaty anyway. But I grokked it from there.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #139!The answer was:
You solved it in 27 guesses
Your accuracy was 66.67%
You have solved 28 consecutive Redactles
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #139!The answer was:You solved it in 27 guesses
Your accuracy was 66.67%
You have solved 28 consecutive Redactles
You solved it in 23 guesses Your accuracy was 100.00% You have solved 69 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 104 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 23.00 Guesses; 68.92% Accuracy Global Average: 31.15 Guesses; 69.97% Accuracywell, well, well 
there were quite a few of those 3 letter words but that didn’t help us all that much except to be more certain at the end
the mathematical stuff near the end wasn’t all that helpful either, more of a distraction
we figured some of
The ████ “█████” is █████████ ████ to
but it turns out that what we thought was typically was actually sometimes not that it really gave anything away
it was actually
under █,███ ████ per ██████
that settled it for us, somehow
looking around there was already plenty of
round
revealed so we looked for those 3 letter words and we were done
SCIENCE said:
well, well, well
there were quite a few of those 3 letter words but that didn’t help us all that much except to be more certain at the end
the mathematical stuff near the end wasn’t all that helpful either, more of a distraction
we figured some of
The ████ “█████” is █████████ ████ to
but it turns out that what we thought was typically was actually sometimes not that it really gave anything away
it was actually
under █,███ ████ per ██████
that settled it for us, somehow
looking around there was already plenty of
round
revealed so we looked for those 3 letter words and we were done
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I went from round to fired to target to rifle.
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:well, well, well
there were quite a few of those 3 letter words but that didn’t help us all that much except to be more certain at the end
the mathematical stuff near the end wasn’t all that helpful either, more of a distraction
we figured some of
The ████ “█████” is █████████ ████ to
but it turns out that what we thought was typically was actually sometimes not that it really gave anything away
it was actually
under █,███ ████ per ██████
that settled it for us, somehow
looking around there was already plenty of
round
revealed so we looked for those 3 letter words and we were done
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I went from round to fired to target to rifle.
with some others in between.
23 rifle 99
22 many 11
21 much 7
20 more 20
19 target 4
18 fired 13
never heard of him.
—-
David Hilbert
David Hilbert (; German: ; 23 January 1862 – 14 February 1943) was a German mathematician and one of the most influential mathematicians of the 19th and early 20th centuries. Hilbert discovered and developed a broad range of fundamental ideas in many areas, including invariant theory, the calculus of variations, commutative algebra, algebraic number theory, the foundations of geometry, spectral theory of operators and its application to integral equations, mathematical physics, and the foundations of mathematics (particularly proof theory).
sarahs mum said:
never heard of him.—-
David Hilbert
David Hilbert (; German: ; 23 January 1862 – 14 February 1943) was a German mathematician and one of the most influential mathematicians of the 19th and early 20th centuries. Hilbert discovered and developed a broad range of fundamental ideas in many areas, including invariant theory, the calculus of variations, commutative algebra, algebraic number theory, the foundations of geometry, spectral theory of operators and its application to integral equations, mathematical physics, and the foundations of mathematics (particularly proof theory).
I’ve heard too much of him
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
never heard of him.—-
David Hilbert
David Hilbert (; German: ; 23 January 1862 – 14 February 1943) was a German mathematician and one of the most influential mathematicians of the 19th and early 20th centuries. Hilbert discovered and developed a broad range of fundamental ideas in many areas, including invariant theory, the calculus of variations, commutative algebra, algebraic number theory, the foundations of geometry, spectral theory of operators and its application to integral equations, mathematical physics, and the foundations of mathematics (particularly proof theory).
I’ve heard too much of him
good. suppose. i would hate to think that no one else had have heard of him either.
I thought my favourite way of getting to a result might have been a contender, but it proved not to be …
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #139!
The answer was:
You solved it in 95 guesses
Your accuracy was 44.21%
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #140!The answer was:
You solved it in 18 guesses
Your accuracy was 66.67%
You have solved 29 consecutive Redactles
Global StatsGlobally, 41 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 5.00 Guesses; 100.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 7.68 Guesses; 89.46% Accuracy
Nice
Not physics, sm :)
damn. I’m up to 36.
You solved it in 44 guesses Your accuracy was 97.73% You have solved 70 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 504 players have solved today’s Redactle so farOhh-la-la!
The best score I’ve had, so far.
Of course, the hyphens largely gave it away.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #140!
The answer was:
You solved it in 52 guesses
Your accuracy was 78.85%
AussieDJ said:
Ohh-la-la!The best score I’ve had, so far.
Of course, the hyphens largely gave it away.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #140!
The answer was:
You solved it in 52 guesses
Your accuracy was 78.85%
140
18 guesses
77.78% accuracy
we know nothing about war
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #141!The answer was:
You solved it in 42 guesses
Your accuracy was 45.24%
You have solved 30 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 67 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 21.00 Guesses; 50.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 34.49 Guesses; 51.80% Accuracy
79 guesses, with most of them returning zero hits.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #141!
The answer was:
You solved it in 79 guesses
Your accuracy was 32.91%
You have solved 128 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 157 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 29.00 Guesses; 47.22% Accuracy
Global Average: 40.48 Guesses; 50.10% Accuracy
dv said:
SCIENCE said:
we know nothing about war
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #141!The answer was:
You solved it in 42 guesses
Your accuracy was 45.24%
You have solved 30 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 67 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 21.00 Guesses; 50.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 34.49 Guesses; 51.80% Accuracy
but 
we did know 
this
apart from figuring the other words in
The ████ ██████ was ██████ in
which were fairly standard, we went scrolling through the rest and didn’t really pick up anything else useful
so back to the top to find something that fit in
below ███████ and above █████.
we mean it could have been rock strata or something but we reckoned why not start with the lower hanging fruit
so considering
In ███████, a
wasn’t going to be chemistry or mathematics and “above” and “below” would be layer or level then why not think of some lists of above and below things to see what fits
and boom
SCIENCE said:
dv said:SCIENCE said:
we know nothing about war
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #141!The answer was:
You solved it in 42 guesses
Your accuracy was 45.24%
You have solved 30 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 67 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 21.00 Guesses; 50.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 34.49 Guesses; 51.80% Accuracy
but
apart from figuring the other words in
The ████ ██████ was ██████ in
which were fairly standard, we went scrolling through the rest and didn’t really pick up anything else useful
so back to the top to find something that fit in
below ███████ and above █████.
we mean it could have been rock strata or something but we reckoned why not start with the lower hanging fruit
so considering
In ███████, a
wasn’t going to be chemistry or mathematics and “above” and “below” would be layer or level then why not think of some lists of above and below things to see what fits
and boom
which is Dutch for tree, tying back to your fruit comment
looks like I am the slowest again.
62 77.42%
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #142!The answer was:
You solved it in 32 guesses
Your accuracy was 31.25%
You have solved 31 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 8 players have solved today’s Redactle so farGlobal Median: 21.00 Guesses; 57.15% Accuracy
Global Average: 45.13 Guesses; 59.65% Accuracy
—-
EIGHT
Eight’s pretty fast.
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #142!The answer was:You solved it in 32 guesses
Your accuracy was 31.25%
You have solved 31 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 8 players have solved today’s Redactle so farGlobal Median: 21.00 Guesses; 57.15% Accuracy
Global Average: 45.13 Guesses; 59.65% Accuracy—-
EIGHT
that’s fast.
le sigh
75 76.00%
btm said:
Eight’s pretty fast.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #142!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 14 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
ooo.
don’t know
SCIENCE said:
don’t know
Yes. So far, I’m in the same boat.
AussieDJ said:
SCIENCE said:
don’t know
Yes. So far, I’m in the same boat.
have word 63. Magic.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
SCIENCE said:
don’t know
Yes. So far, I’m in the same boat.
have word 63. Magic.
Gee, Thanks. I’m on 133 with no ideas.
Kingy said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:Yes. So far, I’m in the same boat.
have word 63. Magic.
Gee, Thanks. I’m on 133 with no ideas.
Keep going .. you have a few more to get before you catch up to me.
I was already at the swearing at it stage, so this was a lucky guess:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #142!
The answer was:
You solved it in 166 guesses
Your accuracy was 28.92%
AussieDJ said:
Kingy said:
sarahs mum said:have word 63. Magic.
Gee, Thanks. I’m on 133 with no ideas.
Keep going .. you have a few more to get before you catch up to me.
I was already at the swearing at it stage, so this was a lucky guess:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #142!
The answer was:
You solved it in 166 guesses
Your accuracy was 28.92%
250+ and then Ms Kingy got it before me and told me what it was.
I’m blaming brain fog from the covid stab.
Kingy said:
AussieDJ said:
Kingy said:Gee, Thanks. I’m on 133 with no ideas.
Keep going .. you have a few more to get before you catch up to me.
I was already at the swearing at it stage, so this was a lucky guess:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #142!
The answer was:
You solved it in 166 guesses
Your accuracy was 28.92%
250+ and then Ms Kingy got it before me and told me what it was.
I’m blaming brain fog from the covid stab.
That will definitely do it.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #143!
The answer was:
You solved it in 98 guesses
Your accuracy was 12.24%
You have solved 32 consecutive Redactles
Global StatsGlobally, 12 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 61.50 Guesses; 40.74% Accuracy
Global Average: 62.08 Guesses; 42.94% Accuracy
—-
12% accuracy but also only the 12th person to solve it
81 64.20%
Talk about going around in circles… :(
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #143!
The answer was:
You solved it in 177 guesses
Your accuracy was 25.99%
nfi
SCIENCE said:
nfi
mane 15
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
nfi
mane 15
yeah eventually we got enough to look it up, we’ve heard of the word before but literally never actually used it
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
nfi
mane 15
yeah eventually we got enough to look it up, we’ve heard of the word before but literally never actually used it
it was in the little golden book of horses. I always wanted one.
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:sarahs mum said:
mane 15
yeah eventually we got enough to look it up, we’ve heard of the word before but literally never actually used it
it was in the little golden book of horses. I always wanted one.
There’s even a song about it … https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bk7IKm1Qm70
:)
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:yeah eventually we got enough to look it up, we’ve heard of the word before but literally never actually used it
it was in the little golden book of horses. I always wanted one.
There’s even a song about it … https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bk7IKm1Qm70
:)
:)
Not physics, sm. I see dv hasn’t posted.
You solved it in 57 guesses Your accuracy was 85.96% You have solved 74 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 111 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 29.00 Guesses; 62.07% Accuracybtm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #144!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 13 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Not physics, sm. I see dv hasn’t posted.
13 for 0 is another nice finish.
got trolled ah well next time
SCIENCE said:
got trolled ah well next time
trolled?
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
got trolled ah well next time
trolled?
well, baited into throwing some poorly aimed shots
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #144!The answer was:
You solved it in 55 guesses
Your accuracy was 30.91%
You have solved 33 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 579 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 50.00 Guesses; 56.67% Accuracy
Global Average: 67.51 Guesses; 57.74% Accuracy
I missed the start today
Some research was needed to finish this one off.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #144!
The answer was:
You solved it in 155 guesses
Your accuracy was 42.58%
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #145!
The answer was:
You solved it in 36 guesses
Your accuracy was 44.44%
You have solved 34 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 7 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 2.00 Guesses; 57.14% Accuracy
Global Average: 13.57 Guesses; 62.01% Accuracy
116 75.86%
(admits to spelling it wrong a little while back there. I did get a lot of words spelled right.)
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #145!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 8 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
8!
throws arms up in air
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #145!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 8 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Impressive. What were your eight words?
never heard of it
SCIENCE said:
never heard of it
I have. but they were low on my list.
SCIENCE said:
never heard of it
Me neither.
That took hours – and much research!
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #145!
The answer was:
You solved it in 395 guesses
Your accuracy was 39.24%
14 @ 71.43%.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #146!The answer was:
You solved it in 25 guesses
Your accuracy was 36.00%
You have solved 35 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 20 players have solved today’s Redactle so farGlobal Median: 31.00 Guesses; 62.03% Accuracy
Global Average: 27.90 Guesses; 61.77% Accuracy
You solved it in 41 guesses Your accuracy was 92.68% You have solved 76 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 139 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 43.00 Guesses; 61.29% Accuracy Global Average: 51.16 Guesses; 60.73% Accuracycouldn’t
SCIENCE said:
couldn’t
To throw a variation on a historical slogan at you … yes, you can!
Talk about beating round the bush, though.
Some research and a lucky guess in the end, but it still took a long time to get there.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #146!
The answer was:
You solved it in 232 guesses
Your accuracy was 34.48%
AussieDJ said:
SCIENCE said:
couldn’t
To throw a variation on a historical slogan at you … yes, you can!
Talk about beating round the bush, though.
Some research and a lucky guess in the end, but it still took a long time to get there.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #146!
The answer was:
You solved it in 232 guesses
Your accuracy was 34.48%
148 and 41.22%
we mean yeah we got there but were pretty delayed retarded late slow whatever synonym you like
just should have been faster, wondering whether there was enough to get a one hit like the others, if we hadn’t given up because of the time
I solved Redactle Unlimited in 76 guesses with an accuracy of 72.37% and a time of 00:23:58.
I didn’t have time to go for a low score, so I just threw my standard first 25 words at it to see what stuck, then narrowed it down from there.
SCIENCE said:
we mean yeah we got there but were pretty delayed retarded late slow whatever synonym you likejust should have been faster, wondering whether there was enough to get a one hit like the others, if we hadn’t given up because of the time
Most words didn’t give any clues at all
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #147!The answer was:
You solved it in 24 guessesYour accuracy was 66.67%
You have solved 36 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 11 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 36.00 Guesses; 63.64% Accuracy
Global Average: 38.00 Guesses; 56.68% Accuracy
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #147!The answer was:
You solved it in 24 guessesYour accuracy was 66.67%
You have solved 36 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 11 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 36.00 Guesses; 63.64% Accuracy
Global Average: 38.00 Guesses; 56.68% Accuracy
nice.
you’ll have to excuse me. It’s going to take me more time.
Fn physics.
63 90.48%
—-
I’m happy enough with that. At least i knew these words…mostly.
Back to the blunderbuss approach again, but at least there was no research involved this time.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #147!
The answer was:
You solved it in 171 guesses
Your accuracy was 47.37%
You have solved 134 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 624 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #147!The answer was:
You solved it in 24 guessesYour accuracy was 66.67%
You have solved 36 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 11 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 36.00 Guesses; 63.64% Accuracy
Global Average: 38.00 Guesses; 56.68% Accuracy
26 and 53.85% for me
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #148!The answer was:
You solved it in 42 guesses
Your accuracy was 52.38%
You have solved 37 consecutive Redactles
Global StatsGlobally, 17 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 9.00 Guesses; 77.78% Accuracy
Global Average: 22.18 Guesses; 76.77% Accuracy
Recognised the name when it came up, but it did take a little bit of research to get here.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #148!
The answer was:
You solved it in 73 guesses
Your accuracy was 45.21%
You have solved 135 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 88 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 33.00 Guesses; 67.50% Accuracy
Global Average: 42.14 Guesses; 69.93% Accuracy
… all right given the following
we’re not really going to bother …
45 97.78%
(thread bounce for sm)
:)
AussieDJ said:
(thread bounce for sm):)
why..thank you kind sir.
>>>You solved it in 40 guesses Your accuracy was 95.00% You have solved 79 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 125 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 15.00 Guesses; 70.00% Accuracy —-
*predicts BtM will get it out in 7.
Well would you look at the time, I missed the drop!
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #149!The answer was:
You solved it in 94 guesses
Your accuracy was 37.23%You have solved 38 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 935 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 42.00 Guesses; 58.16% Accuracy
Global Average: 64.09 Guesses; 61.60% Accuracy
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #149!The answer was:
You solved it in 94 guesses
Your accuracy was 37.23%You have solved 38 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 935 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 42.00 Guesses; 58.16% Accuracy
Global Average: 64.09 Guesses; 61.60% Accuracy
I thought you were going to do so much better than me while I was working on it. But arsenic didn’t really help.
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #149!The answer was:
You solved it in 94 guesses
Your accuracy was 37.23%You have solved 38 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 935 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 42.00 Guesses; 58.16% Accuracy
Global Average: 64.09 Guesses; 61.60% Accuracy
I thought you were going to do so much better than me while I was working on it. But arsenic didn’t really help.
I was… kind of taken aback by some of the words that weren’t in it, including element, coin, mineral, compound, scientist, invented, which made me think I was well on the wrong track.
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #149!The answer was:
You solved it in 94 guesses
Your accuracy was 37.23%You have solved 38 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 935 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 42.00 Guesses; 58.16% Accuracy
Global Average: 64.09 Guesses; 61.60% Accuracy
I thought you were going to do so much better than me while I was working on it. But arsenic didn’t really help.
I was… kind of taken aback by some of the words that weren’t in it, including element, coin, mineral, compound, scientist, invented, which made me think I was well on the wrong track.
but it was ‘used’ for a lot of things.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
(thread bounce for sm):)
why..thank you kind sir.
>>>You solved it in 40 guesses Your accuracy was 95.00% You have solved 79 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 125 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 15.00 Guesses; 70.00% Accuracy —-*predicts BtM will get it out in 7.
Sorry sm :) My seventh guess was alloy, then copper, then I worked it out.
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
(thread bounce for sm):)
why..thank you kind sir.
>>>You solved it in 40 guesses Your accuracy was 95.00% You have solved 79 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 125 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 15.00 Guesses; 70.00% Accuracy —-*predicts BtM will get it out in 7.
Sorry sm :) My seventh guess was alloy, then copper, then I worked it out.
I was close. no cigar. :)
I went from alloy to the answer. And possibly i should just have gone straight to the answer.
You solved it in 1 guesses
Your accuracy was 100.00%
All from the first sentence. :)
Dark Orange said:
You solved it in 1 guesses
Your accuracy was 100.00%All from the first sentence. :)
Scrolling back, I can see that there are many spoilers, so I can probably reveal my thought practice…
The third word “an” along with the structure of the words either side of the following “and” suggested the fourth word was “Alloy”. The first alloy that popped into my head fit the template, and turned out to be correct.
Dark Orange said:
Dark Orange said:
You solved it in 1 guesses
Your accuracy was 100.00%All from the first sentence. :)
Scrolling back, I can see that there are many spoilers, so I can probably reveal my thought practice…
The third word “an” along with the structure of the words either side of the following “and” suggested the fourth word was “Alloy”. The first alloy that popped into my head fit the template, and turned out to be correct.
the club, the join, nice
could have been oxide we guess
sarahs mum said:
Global Stats
Globally, 125 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 15.00 Guesses; 70.00% Accuracy —-
Fast Forward a few hours:
Global Stats
Globally, 4563 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 53.00 Guesses; 55.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 78.74 Guesses; 58.71% Accuracy
Dark Orange said:
sarahs mum said:Global Stats
Globally, 125 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 15.00 Guesses; 70.00% Accuracy —-
Fast Forward a few hours:
Global Stats
Globally, 4563 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 53.00 Guesses; 55.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 78.74 Guesses; 58.71% Accuracy
So we may conclude that this forum really does have above average redactlers.
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #149!The answer was:
You solved it in 94 guesses
Your accuracy was 37.23%You have solved 38 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 935 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 42.00 Guesses; 58.16% Accuracy
Global Average: 64.09 Guesses; 61.60% Accuracy
I thought you were going to do so much better than me while I was working on it. But arsenic didn’t really help.
I was… kind of taken aback by some of the words that weren’t in it, including element, coin, mineral, compound, scientist, invented, which made me think I was well on the wrong track.
I was definitely on the wrong track for a very long time
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #149!
The answer was:
You solved it in 225 guesses
Your accuracy was 43.56%
I’ve been playing a bit of redactle unlimited. i played for a while in ‘dark mode’. Not only does dark mode play plurals for you, it also plays alll words from the root. eg if you play ‘has’ then ‘had’ and ‘have’ and ‘having’ also get revealed. It annoyed me eventually and i turned it off.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #150!
The answer was:
You solved it in 55 guesses
Your accuracy was 58.18%You have solved 39 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 113 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 20.00 Guesses; 81.08% Accuracy
Global Average: 29.67 Guesses; 79.82% Accuracy
Should’ve been better
fk
went down the wrong track, should’ve figured it was anthropogenic from the context
You solved it in 40 guesses Your accuracy was 100.00% You have solved 80 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 383 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 30.00 Guesses; 75.86% Accuracy Global Average: 40.87 Guesses; 75.73% Accuracysarahs mum said:
You solved it in 40 guesses Your accuracy was 100.00% You have solved 80 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 383 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 30.00 Guesses; 75.86% Accuracy Global Average: 40.87 Guesses; 75.73% Accuracy
Nice
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #150!
The answer was:
You solved it in 55 guesses
Your accuracy was 58.18%You have solved 39 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 113 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 20.00 Guesses; 81.08% Accuracy
Global Average: 29.67 Guesses; 79.82% AccuracyShould’ve been better
perhaps i should have also been better. considering. but i did do sort of okayish.
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #150!
The answer was:
You solved it in 55 guesses
Your accuracy was 58.18%You have solved 39 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 113 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 20.00 Guesses; 81.08% Accuracy
Global Average: 29.67 Guesses; 79.82% AccuracyShould’ve been better
perhaps i should have also been better. considering. but i did do sort of okayish.
BtM will get in 9.
AussieDJ said:
dv said:
sarahs mum said:I thought you were going to do so much better than me while I was working on it. But arsenic didn’t really help.
I was… kind of taken aback by some of the words that weren’t in it, including element, coin, mineral, compound, scientist, invented, which made me think I was well on the wrong track.
I was definitely on the wrong track for a very long time
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #149!
The answer was:
You solved it in 225 guesses
Your accuracy was 43.56%
The expression “late 19th and early 20th” not being followed by “century” threw me off.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #150!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 8 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
“BtM will get in 9.”
close.
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #150!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 8 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
“BtM will get in 9.”
close.
soon as with all other sports there’ll be a metagame on this redactle thing and people will be putting money on who guesses what
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #150!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 8 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
“BtM will get in 9.”
close.
soon as with all other sports there’ll be a metagame on this redactle thing and people will be putting money on who guesses what
Bags I scoring the wooden spoon on this forum …
Blunderbuss approach every time!!! :)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #150!
The answer was:
You solved it in 236 guesses
Your accuracy was 56.36%
AussieDJ said:
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:“BtM will get in 9.”
close.
soon as with all other sports there’ll be a metagame on this redactle thing and people will be putting money on who guesses what
Bags I scoring the wooden spoon on this forum …
Blunderbuss approach every time!!! :)Congratulations, you solved Redactle #150!
The answer was:
You solved it in 236 guesses
Your accuracy was 56.36%
i felt so much better after I got the word ‘art’ out.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
SCIENCE said:soon as with all other sports there’ll be a metagame on this redactle thing and people will be putting money on who guesses what
Bags I scoring the wooden spoon on this forum …
Blunderbuss approach every time!!! :)Congratulations, you solved Redactle #150!
The answer was:
You solved it in 236 guesses
Your accuracy was 56.36%
i felt so much better after I got the word ‘art’ out.
Accuracy of 56.36%…so that’s like 120 odd correct words. Perhaps they were not the most useful correct words.
i’ve noticed that often DV gets it out with less correct words than myself even though he also has a bunch of incorrect words to make so he has a higher word count..
Did much better than expected – 49 @ 75.51%
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #151!
The answer was: You solved it in 81 guesses
Your accuracy was 56.79%
You have solved 40 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 34 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 23.00 Guesses; 74.29% Accuracy
Global Average: 31.06 Guesses; 75.39% Accuracy
No clues, yet, apart from – look out for American spelling!
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #151!
The answer was: You solved it in 81 guesses
Your accuracy was 56.79%
You have solved 40 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 34 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 23.00 Guesses; 74.29% AccuracyGlobal Average: 31.06 Guesses; 75.39% Accuracy
*says congrats and then sighs.
LOL we must be dv
anyway we forgot about these fellas but damn that 22-character trick was dirty
also there was plenty of “█-████” stuff which should have been meaningful but yeah we forgot
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #151
The answer was:
You solved it in 200 guesses
Your accuracy was 51.00%
Global Stats
Globally, 483 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 64.00 Guesses; 66.67% Accuracy
Global Average: 81.27 Guesses; 68.16% Accuracy
I was convinced it was something else, of course!
I’m hating this.
I still haven’t made mistake, have no clue, and I am getting anxious.
well..i got to 86 without making a mistake. that’s a record run.
114 99.12%
Not very good today. Should have got it much sooner.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #152!.
The answer was
You solved it in 64 guesses
Your accuracy was 37.50%
You have solved 41 consecutive Redactles
.Global Stats
Globally, 5 players have solved today’s Redactle so farGlobal Median: 36.00 Guesses; 38.89% AccuracyGlobal Average: 39.00 Guesses; 45.72% AccuracyCongratulations, you solved Redactle #152!The answer was: vladimir vernadskyYou solved it in 64 guessesYour accuracy was 37.50%You have solved 41 consecutive RedactlesGlobal StatsGlobally, 5 players have solved today’s Redactle so farGlobal Median: 36.00 Guesses; 38.89% AccuracyGlobal Average: 39.00 Guesses; 45.72% Accuracy
Tough one
nfi
SCIENCE said:
nfi
+1
SCIENCE said:
nfi
Probably one where I have an advantage…
dv said:
SCIENCE said:
nfi
Probably one where I have an advantage…
and i don’t.
dv said:
SCIENCE said:
nfi
Probably one where I have an advantage…
physics(1). not geology or geophysics.
fn physics.
Tough one. If I hadn’t studied this stuff for a semester in second year uni I doubt I’d have known the answer.
I ended up googling. And i am glad I did. I have never heard of this fellow.
sarahs mum said:
I ended up googling. And i am glad I did. I have never heard of this fellow.
I did a search as well .. and I’ve never heard of him either.
But then, there are quite a number of people I’ve never heard of.
Blunderbuss effect eventually gets there – eventually:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #152!
The answer was:
You solved it in 454 guesses
Your accuracy was 27.97%
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
I ended up googling. And i am glad I did. I have never heard of this fellow.
I did a search as well .. and I’ve never heard of him either.
But then, there are quite a number of people I’ve never heard of.Blunderbuss effect eventually gets there – eventually:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #152!
The answer was:
You solved it in 454 guesses
Your accuracy was 27.97%
I gave up long before that. And I’m glad I did.
You solved it in 78 guesses Your accuracy was 85.90% You have solved 83 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 422 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 55.00 Guesses; 60.94% Accuracy Global Average: 72.63 Guesses; 61.15% Accuracysarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
I ended up googling. And i am glad I did. I have never heard of this fellow.
I did a search as well .. and I’ve never heard of him either.
But then, there are quite a number of people I’ve never heard of.Blunderbuss effect eventually gets there – eventually:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #152!
The answer was:
You solved it in 454 guesses
Your accuracy was 27.97%I gave up long before that. And I’m glad I did.
^ ^^
SCIENCE said:
^ ^^
on the other hand today 
we saw █-████ again and weren’t misled this time, it gave us most of that sentence but then had trouble narrowing our aim
The █████ █████ of ███████████████ █████ ███████ █████ █████, ████████, ███████ █████, ███████████, █-████ and █████ ████, ███ ████ █████ ███████████ and ██ ████ for █████████████. The ████ ███ of █████ █████ for █████████████████ is ██████ ███ to █████ █████████ ███████████ ██████████ ████████ from █████ █████ ██████████.
if we’d known the exact wording used in that sentence (in particular, where multiple instances of the word “waves” appeared) we would have gotten to target faster
in first paragraph we actually thought ████████ (██) was word term as opposed to a measurement, making it impossible to figure █████████████ (███) so we ended up taking a lucky shot in the end
to that end, the sentence
The █████████ of █████ █████ was █████ ██████ by ██████ █████████ ████████ █████ on ████████ ██, ████.
did actually help but we thought the first word was invention and apart from first couldn’t really figure much more
other things we kind of figured, which didn’t help all that much
funnily enough the first 2 of those had us thinking target was something aerodynamic for ages (making us think that some of the contributors here would be better placed to figure it, similar to yesterday, but as it turned out it was area of expertise of others of the contributors here)
also we thought there were going to be heaps of equations and stuff thanks to the first list (with colon at end of line) and the whole ███, █, █, █, ██ and █a thing
SCIENCE said:
SCIENCE said:
^ ^^
on the other hand today
The █████ █████ of ███████████████ █████ ███████ █████ █████, ████████, ███████ █████, ███████████, █-████ and █████ ████, ███ ████ █████ ███████████ and ██ ████ for █████████████. The ████ ███ of █████ █████ for █████████████████ is ██████ ███ to █████ █████████ ███████████ ██████████ ████████ from █████ █████ ██████████.
if we’d known the exact wording used in that sentence (in particular, where multiple instances of the word “waves” appeared) we would have gotten to target faster
in first paragraph we actually thought ████████ (██) was word term as opposed to a measurement, making it impossible to figure █████████████ (███) so we ended up taking a lucky shot in the end
to that end, the sentence
The █████████ of █████ █████ was █████ ██████ by ██████ █████████ ████████ █████ on ████████ ██, ████.
did actually help but we thought the first word was invention and apart from first couldn’t really figure much more
other things we kind of figured, which didn’t help all that much
- through the ███
- by ████-of-█████
- (█████████ in █████ per ██████ █████)
funnily enough the first 2 of those had us thinking target was something aerodynamic for ages (making us think that some of the contributors here would be better placed to figure it, similar to yesterday, but as it turned out it was area of expertise of others of the contributors here)
also we thought there were going to be heaps of equations and stuff thanks to the first list (with colon at end of line) and the whole ███, █, █, █, ██ and █a thing
‘at the speed of light in a vacuum’
—-
At that point I swore something about physics.
sarahs mum said:
‘at the speed of light in a vacuum’
—-
At that point I swore something about physics.
ah but why not the other parts of STEM like T or E, agree it did have us bogged for a bit
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #153!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 22 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
You seem to be uniquely good at this. Have you got goto words or are you excellent at parsing what some of the redacted words might be and vary your word choice accordingly?
Witty Rejoinder said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #153!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 22 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
You seem to be uniquely good at this. Have you got goto words or are you excellent at parsing what some of the redacted words might be and vary your word choice accordingly?
It depends on the apparent subject, but I tend to start with common words like that, there, where, were, are, etc; that usually gives clues for where to go next. If the subject’s a person, there’s usually an early topic heading like Early life and education”; otherwise there’s often a heading like “etymology”. If the subject’s a person, there’ll be personal pronouns like _he or she, which gives more clues. A lot of my success at this comes from studying cryptanalysis, and some from spending too much time on wikipedia. Having a good general knowledge helps, as does a good understanding of proper sentence structure.
btm said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #153!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 22 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
You seem to be uniquely good at this. Have you got goto words or are you excellent at parsing what some of the redacted words might be and vary your word choice accordingly?
It depends on the apparent subject, but I tend to start with common words like that, there, where, were, are, etc; that usually gives clues for where to go next. If the subject’s a person, there’s usually an early topic heading like Early life and education”; otherwise there’s often a heading like “etymology”. If the subject’s a person, there’ll be personal pronouns like _he or she, which gives more clues. A lot of my success at this comes from studying cryptanalysis, and some from spending too much time on wikipedia. Having a good general knowledge helps, as does a good understanding of proper sentence structure.
Ta.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #153!
The answer was:
You solved it in 31 guesses
Your accuracy was 41.94%
You have solved 42 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 4300 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 65.00 Guesses; 58.45% Accuracy
Global Average: 84.13 Guesses; 59.73% Accuracy
I am going to hang my head in shame.
A topic which should have been intimately familiar to me and, instead, I blew it!
I don’t think ASIO will want me for my skills now … Even that new 50c recruiting tool looks to be beyond me. :(
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #153!
The answer was:
You solved it in 114 guesses
Your accuracy was 46.49%
AussieDJ said:
I am going to hang my head in shame.
A topic which should have been intimately familiar to me and, instead, I blew it!I don’t think ASIO will want me for my skills now … Even that new 50c recruiting tool looks to be beyond me. :(
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #153!
The answer was:
You solved it in 114 guesses
Your accuracy was 46.49%
Slightly better for me
103 at 66.02%
Witty Rejoinder said:
btm said:
Witty Rejoinder said:You seem to be uniquely good at this. Have you got goto words or are you excellent at parsing what some of the redacted words might be and vary your word choice accordingly?
It depends on the apparent subject, but I tend to start with common words like that, there, where, were, are, etc; that usually gives clues for where to go next. If the subject’s a person, there’s usually an early topic heading like Early life and education”; otherwise there’s often a heading like “etymology”. If the subject’s a person, there’ll be personal pronouns like _he or she, which gives more clues. A lot of my success at this comes from studying cryptanalysis, and some from spending too much time on wikipedia. Having a good general knowledge helps, as does a good understanding of proper sentence structure.
Ta.
I’m unconvinced that that is the magic behind BtM’s success.
‘There’ and ‘where’ can be quite sad in feedback sometimes. ‘Early life’ ‘etymology’ and ‘history’ only help so much.(At least there is a chance of multiple early’s and multiple history’s…It is unlikely that etymology will return more than once.)
‘ as does a good understanding of proper sentence structure.’..*admits to thinking more about clauses and tenses than I have for half a century.
AussieDJ said:
I am going to hang my head in shame.
A topic which should have been intimately familiar to me and, instead, I blew it!I don’t think ASIO will want me for my skills now … Even that new 50c recruiting tool looks to be beyond me. :(
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #153!
The answer was:
You solved it in 114 guesses
Your accuracy was 46.49%
:(
they did disguise it though.
sarahs mum said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
btm said:It depends on the apparent subject, but I tend to start with common words like that, there, where, were, are, etc; that usually gives clues for where to go next. If the subject’s a person, there’s usually an early topic heading like Early life and education”; otherwise there’s often a heading like “etymology”. If the subject’s a person, there’ll be personal pronouns like _he or she, which gives more clues. A lot of my success at this comes from studying cryptanalysis, and some from spending too much time on wikipedia. Having a good general knowledge helps, as does a good understanding of proper sentence structure.
Ta.
I’m unconvinced that that is the magic behind BtM’s success.
‘There’ and ‘where’ can be quite sad in feedback sometimes. ‘Early life’ ‘etymology’ and ‘history’ only help so much.(At least there is a chance of multiple early’s and multiple history’s…It is unlikely that etymology will return more than once.)
‘ as does a good understanding of proper sentence structure.’..*admits to thinking more about clauses and tenses than I have for half a century.
common words guessed maybe, but we suspect the implication was that those particular headings didn’t need to be guessed, instead just taken as given
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #154!The answer was:
You solved it in 43 guesses
Your accuracy was 60.47%
You have solved 43 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 9 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 27.00 Guesses; 66.67% Accuracy
Global Average: 25.22 Guesses; 69.45% Accuracy
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #154!The answer was:You solved it in 43 guesses
Your accuracy was 60.47%
You have solved 43 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 9 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 27.00 Guesses; 66.67% Accuracy
Global Average: 25.22 Guesses; 69.45% Accuracy
well done.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #154!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 17 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
also well done.
127 81.89%
all right so as with all the geographics we did look things 
up right at the end because the exact wording was lost on us
we got into linguistics early especially with hints like
For ███████, the ████████████ “in” for “██████” ████ ██ ██████████████ from the ████ “in”, and the ███████ “██ ██ ████ ██.”
and considered without confidence multiple possibilities for
████-to-██████ (███)
including the correct figuring for that, and it was enough combined with the subject area to review the first paragraph
██████ █████████ is the ██████████ ██████████ of █████ ██████. A ████████ ██████ ████ for ████ ███████ is ██████ a ██████ ████████ or ██████ ███████████, and ███ ██ ███████████ in ████████ or ████████ ████████. A ████-to-██████ (███) ██████ ████████ ██████ ████████ ████ into ██████; █████ ███████ ██████ ████████ ██████████ ███████████████ like ████████ ██████████████ into ██████. The ███████ ███████ is ██████ ███████████.
especially the first sentence (thought we misfigured production as generation) which didn’t matter
we mean at that point we should have just thought about the words but we were already half asleep after battling out pumped zealots with mass hydralisks so having figured we were practically there except for the specific words we just did the fool thing and took the easy way out
Blunderbuss approach (i.e. throw everything at it) wins out, again!
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #154!
The answer was:
You solved it in 231 guesses
Your accuracy was 50.22%
this was a quick redactle unlimited game…
https://redactle-unlimited.com/#Q39379
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #155!
The answer was:
You solved it in 52 guesses
Your accuracy was 55.77%
You have solved 44 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 37 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 32.00 Guesses; 68.97% Accuracy
Global Average: 40.38 Guesses; 73.80% Accuracy
71 100.00%
fkn americanz
SCIENCE said:
fkn americanz
I saw that trap and did not fall.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #155!
The answer was:
You solved it in 246 guesses
Your accuracy was 60.57%
How long, do you reckon, will it be before they put up a post about QEII?
AussieDJ said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #155!The answer was:
You solved it in 246 guesses
Your accuracy was 60.57%How long, do you reckon, will it be before they put up a post about QEII?
126 months
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #156!The answer was:
You solved it in 49 guesses
Your accuracy was 42.86%
You have solved 45 consecutive Redactles
Global StatsGlobally, 174 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 9.00 Guesses; 75.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 13.54 Guesses; 76.11% Accuracy
You solved it in 6 guesses Your accuracy was 100.00% You have solved 86 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 69 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 5.00 Guesses; 80.00% Accuracy Global Average: 9.88 Guesses; 79.26% Accuracysarahs mum said:
You solved it in 6 guesses Your accuracy was 100.00% You have solved 86 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 69 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 5.00 Guesses; 80.00% Accuracy Global Average: 9.88 Guesses; 79.26% Accuracy
fmd that’s amazing even in the right thread
it might have been faster if I had believed in self and not sat there wondering if I should type in ‘head’ for my first guess.
I just completely blanked on that particular thing and was guessing several similar things.
dv said:
it might have been faster if I had believed in self and not sat there wondering if I should type in ‘head’ for my first guess.I just completely blanked on that particular thing and was guessing several similar things.
I was worried about it being several similar things. the D & D monster manual and all. but guess 5 sorted me.
fknel the world is into this kind of thing, average 21|42, 
guess that explains the state of the world that fairy tales are more familiar than forces and fotons
wasted a heap of time second guessing ourselves and vacillating on whether to take the shot when
with the ████ of a █████, the ████ of a ████ with the █████ of a ██████
pretty much already delivered it, note of course again effectively synonymous paraphrasia when we figured
In █████ █████████, the
as mythology instead of tradition which didn’t really matter
the rest of the article didn’t help that much but no other commonly known similars quite fit so we just went with a 0.6 confidence shot to end it and it paid off
worth mentioning that we didn’t think that
with the █████ of a ██████
was a big part of it and certainly the variations mentioned in the rest of article didn’t always include it either so that was a tiny bit frustrating and confidence lowering
with the ████ of a █████, the ████ of a ████ with the █████ of a ██████
—-
was where i started.
dv said:
sarahs mum said:You solved it in 6 guesses Your accuracy was 100.00% You have solved 86 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 69 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 5.00 Guesses; 80.00% Accuracy Global Average: 9.88 Guesses; 79.26% Accuracyfmd that’s amazing even in the right thread
Absolutely!
……………………………
This is an improvement for me, just in the number of guesses taken to achieve a result:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #156!
The answer was:
You solved it in 82 guesses
Your accuracy was 48.78%
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
You solved it in 6 guesses
Your accuracy was 100.00%
You have solved 86 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 69 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 5.00 Guesses; 80.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 9.88 Guesses; 79.26% Accuracy
fmd that’s amazing even in the right thread
That’s awesome, sm! Well done!
btm said:
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
You solved it in 6 guesses
Your accuracy was 100.00%
You have solved 86 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 69 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 5.00 Guesses; 80.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 9.88 Guesses; 79.26% Accuracy
fmd that’s amazing even in the right thread
That’s awesome, sm! Well done!
:) it wasn’t physics.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #157!The answer was:
You solved it in 25 guesses
Your accuracy was 56.00%You have solved 46 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 4 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 2.50 Guesses; 78.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 7.75 Guesses; 76.50% Accuracy
4th !
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #157!The answer was:You solved it in 25 guesses
Your accuracy was 56.00%You have solved 46 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 4 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 2.50 Guesses; 78.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 7.75 Guesses; 76.50% Accuracy4th !
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I don’t know any four letter cities on the Caspian sea.
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #157!The answer was:
You solved it in 25 guesses
Your accuracy was 56.00%You have solved 46 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 4 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 2.50 Guesses; 78.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 7.75 Guesses; 76.50% Accuracy4th !
applauds *wildly.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. I don’t know any four letter cities on the Caspian sea.
agree, hence we looked it up, but actually based on this part
and ████ the ███████ ████ in the █████ ███████ below ███ █████.
which literally jumped to the target
as before we hold that as long as we know exactly what we’re looking for, then we’re satisfied, and we claim it’s fair because the name was not familiar to us at all
also we don’t know who these super earlies are because consider
Global Median: 11.00 Guesses; 77.42% Accuracy
Global Average: 19.19 Guesses; 76.42% Accuracy
while as dv said at 02:04:38
Globally, 4 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 2.50 Guesses; 78.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 7.75 Guesses; 76.50% Accuracy
like damn
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #157!The answer was:
You solved it in 25 guesses
Your accuracy was 56.00%You have solved 46 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 4 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 2.50 Guesses; 78.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 7.75 Guesses; 76.50% Accuracy4th !
applauds *wildly.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. I don’t know any four letter cities on the Caspian sea.agree, hence we looked it up, but actually based on this part
and ████ the ███████ ████ in the █████ ███████ below ███ █████.
which literally jumped to the target
as before we hold that as long as we know exactly what we’re looking for, then we’re satisfied, and we claim it’s fair because the name was not familiar to us at all
fair enough. I don’t feel like throwing 200 words at for no avague.
i was right. i did not know.
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #157!The answer was:
You solved it in 25 guesses
Your accuracy was 56.00%You have solved 46 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 4 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 2.50 Guesses; 78.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 7.75 Guesses; 76.50% Accuracy4th !
interesting so based on that apparently the initial 3 players made either {1, 2, 3} guesses or {1, 1, 4} guesses 
sarahs mum said:
i was right. i did not know.
Probably a professional advantage to me again
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
i was right. i did not know.Probably a professional advantage to me again
At least i knew enough to know that i did not know. That saves time.
it’s a bit of let down though.
sarahs mum said:
fair enough. I don’t feel like throwing 200 words at for no avague.
(Cue, in throaty voice): You rang?
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #157!
The answer was:
You solved it in 254 guesses
Your accuracy was 57.48%
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:fair enough. I don’t feel like throwing 200 words at for no avague.
(Cue, in throaty voice): You rang?
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #157!
The answer was:
You solved it in 254 guesses
Your accuracy was 57.48%
well done for tenacity.
Had a game of unlimited redactle. Up my street. got it out in 11
https://redactle-unlimited.com/#Q64450
I saw sm’s post about the body of water this one is located on, which gave me information before I started, so I’m not claiming success with this one.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #157!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 8 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
I saw sm’s post about the body of water this one is located on, which gave me information before I started, so I’m not claiming success with this one.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #157!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 8 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
I saw sm’s post about the body of water this one is located on, which gave me information before I started, so I’m not claiming success with this one.
I’m so bad at these things. Even with a clue that it relates to a littoral feature, after 17 guesses and only 75% accuracy i’m flummoxed.
Witty Rejoinder said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #157!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 8 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
I saw sm’s post about the body of water this one is located on, which gave me information before I started, so I’m not claiming success with this one.
I’m so bad at these things. Even with a clue that it relates to a littoral feature, after 17 guesses and only 75% accuracy i’m flummoxed.
If you’ve read the clues I mentioned earlier, you know the type of thing the subject is, and the region. There are some fairly short words that can be inferred to be the words that apply, which will start to give complete sentences. The geographic region in which this is located is a major subject of some of Eddie Izzard’s standup (though it’s not where he was born,) and the specific place in question is mentioned in several Goon Shows, as part of a running gag.
(I’m trying to offer clues without spoiling it for you.)
btm said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #157!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 8 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
I saw sm’s post about the body of water this one is located on, which gave me information before I started, so I’m not claiming success with this one.
I’m so bad at these things. Even with a clue that it relates to a littoral feature, after 17 guesses and only 75% accuracy i’m flummoxed.
If you’ve read the clues I mentioned earlier, you know the type of thing the subject is, and the region. There are some fairly short words that can be inferred to be the words that apply, which will start to give complete sentences. The geographic region in which this is located is a major subject of some of Eddie Izzard’s standup (though it’s not where he was born,) and the specific place in question is mentioned in several Goon Shows, as part of a running gag.
(I’m trying to offer clues without spoiling it for you.)
Ha. Thanks but i’m resigned to my mediocrity… :-)
Witty Rejoinder said:
btm said:
Witty Rejoinder said:I’m so bad at these things. Even with a clue that it relates to a littoral feature, after 17 guesses and only 75% accuracy i’m flummoxed.
If you’ve read the clues I mentioned earlier, you know the type of thing the subject is, and the region. There are some fairly short words that can be inferred to be the words that apply, which will start to give complete sentences. The geographic region in which this is located is a major subject of some of Eddie Izzard’s standup (though it’s not where he was born,) and the specific place in question is mentioned in several Goon Shows, as part of a running gag.
(I’m trying to offer clues without spoiling it for you.)
Ha. Thanks but i’m resigned to my mediocrity… :-)
Spoiler
This should be enough to guess it but still no cigar:
████ (; ███████████: ████ ) is the capital and largest city of ██████████, as ████ as the largest city on the ███████ Sea and of the ████████ ██████. ████ is ███████ ██ ██████ (█████) below sea level, █████ █████ it the ██████ █████ ████████ capital in the world and ████ the largest city in the world ███████ below sea level. ████ ████ on the ████████ █████ of the ████████ █████████, █████████ the ███ of ████. ██████ █████ population was █████████ at ███ ███████ ██████ as of ████. About ███ of ███ ███████████ of the country ████ in ██████ ████████████ ████. ████ is the ████ ██████████ in ██████████.
… Strangely enough I am excellent at geography and great at trvia.
btm said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #157!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 8 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
I saw sm’s post about the body of water this one is located on, which gave me information before I started, so I’m not claiming success with this one.
I’m so bad at these things. Even with a clue that it relates to a littoral feature, after 17 guesses and only 75% accuracy i’m flummoxed.
If you’ve read the clues I mentioned earlier, you know the type of thing the subject is, and the region. There are some fairly short words that can be inferred to be the words that apply, which will start to give complete sentences. The geographic region in which this is located is a major subject of some of Eddie Izzard’s standup (though it’s not where he was born,) and the specific place in question is mentioned in several Goon Shows, as part of a running gag.
(I’m trying to offer clues without spoiling it for you.)
I was at 18 guesses at 100% when I realised I did not know the answer.
yous all tougher than us then, we try to give up as early in time as possible once we’re sure we don’t know, usually the next 2 hours of 500 scatters confirms it for us
my sister knew the answer. she had booked a tour of 5 ‘stans’ that would have included Baku..but it got cancelled when Covid happened.
sarahs mum said:
my sister knew the answer. she had booked a tour of 5 ‘stans’ that would have included Baku..but it got cancelled when Covid happened.
I knew the answer because it is kind of a major geophysics hub …
On the outer Baku where the churches are few, and men of religion are scanty
dv said:
On the outer Baku where the churches are few, and men of religion are scanty
i was also reciting that last night.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #158!The answer was:
You solved it in 61 guesses
Your accuracy was 36.07%
You have solved 47 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 18 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 17.50 Guesses; 64.38% Accuracy
Global Average: 26.22 Guesses; 62.22% Accuracy
You solved it in 78 guesses Your accuracy was 74.36% You have solved 88 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 281 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 37.00 Guesses; 52.50% Accuracy Global Average: 53.73 Guesses; 56.82% Accuracy—
I should have done better than that.
I should have done much better than that; I’ve been engaging in that activity all my life.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #158!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 18 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
I should have done much better than that; I’ve been engaging in that activity all my life.
Perhaps. But first you have to get a few words into the clear to see where you’re going.
The ‘throw everything – including the kitchen sink which, not surprisingly, returned no hits – at it’ approach, eventually won out, but not before I searched on a sentence I’d managed to get into the clear.
It’s not a field I had ever had anything to do with.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #158!
The answer was:
You solved it in 292 guesses
Your accuracy was 28.77%
98 guesses at 30.61%
Was not what I first thought it was about, one word with lots of hits gave it to me
LOL fuck that what an embarrassment
our excuse* is that we’ll be busy for a few days
should have seen hints like
off-by-███ ██████
but maybe not, given other things like
█████-and-████████████-and-███████
were a bit silly
*: also seems quite different to our sense of what the terms mean but hey maybe we’re just really bad at it
SCIENCE said:
LOL fuck that what an embarrassment
our excuse* is that we’ll be busy for a few days
should have seen hints like
off-by-███ ██████
but maybe not, given other things like
█████-and-████████████-and-███████
were a bit silly
*: also seems quite different to our sense of what the terms mean but hey maybe we’re just really bad at it
i had 3 letter word hyphen time. and seeing i had already blown the chance of a perfect score I tried ‘run’ and that was sweet.
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:LOL fuck that what an embarrassment
our excuse* is that we’ll be busy for a few days
should have seen hints like
off-by-███ ██████
but maybe not, given other things like
█████-and-████████████-and-███████
were a bit silly
*: also seems quite different to our sense of what the terms mean but hey maybe we’re just really bad at it
i had 3 letter word hyphen time. and seeing i had already blown the chance of a perfect score I tried ‘run’ and that was sweet.
But i feel I should have got it out earlier.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #159!The answer was: You solved it in 59 guesses
Your accuracy was 45.76%
You have solved 48 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 8 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 31.00 Guesses; 58.91% Accuracy
Global Average: 29.25 Guesses; 63.91% Accuracy
Today’s was a bit harder, but I’ve done some work in this field, and happened to know the answer.
55 85.45%
btm said:
Today’s was a bit harder, but I’ve done some work in this field, and happened to know the answer.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #159!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 36 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
i have been to numerous lectures. seen docos. still had to rack brain.
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Today’s was a bit harder, but I’ve done some work in this field, and happened to know the answer.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #159!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 36 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
i have been to numerous lectures. seen docos. still had to rack brain.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
built little cities out of scraps of wood. With these scraps from her husband’s hardware store, she entertained him for hours, building imaginary houses and futuristic cities on the living room floor.
—-
I remember doing this. I was only allowed to use the mitre box but I turned lots of tomato stakes into buildings and painted them and designed little cities.
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Today’s was a bit harder, but I’ve done some work in this field, and happened to know the answer.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #159!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 36 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
i have been to numerous lectures. seen docos. still had to rack brain.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.built little cities out of scraps of wood. With these scraps from her husband’s hardware store, she entertained him for hours, building imaginary houses and futuristic cities on the living room floor.
—-I remember doing this. I was only allowed to use the mitre box but I turned lots of tomato stakes into buildings and painted them and designed little cities.
there was a time when i thought I was going to be an architect.
playing unlimited redactle
got the marx brothers out in 11 goes at 100%
the Council of the European Union was 85/137
sarahs mum said:
there was a time when i thought I was going to be an architect.
I have architects and builders in my family, but that still didn’t get me to the answer any quicker!
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #159!
The answer was:
You solved it in 161 guesses
Your accuracy was 49.69%
You have solved 146 consecutive Redactles
So, I’ve worked on and solved 146 consecutive Redactles, along with a few of the unlimited variety.
I’m not going to dwell on how much bloody time I’ve wasted … and, how long before I miss getting one out and break my sequence.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #160!The answer was:
You solved it in 7 guesses
Your accuracy was 71.43%
You have solved 49 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 1 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 7.00 Guesses; 71.43% Accuracy
Global Average: 7.00 Guesses; 71.43% Accuracy
Looks like I was the first person in the world to solve it
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #160!The answer was: You solved it in 7 guesses
Your accuracy was 71.43%
You have solved 49 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 1 players have solved today’s Redactle so farGlobal Median: 7.00 Guesses; 71.43% Accuracy
Global Average: 7.00 Guesses; 71.43% AccuracyLooks like I was the first person in the world to solve it
Good stuff! Well done!
I, by comparison, am the 326th person to have solved it.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #160!
The answer was:
You solved it in 120 guesses
Your accuracy was 55.83%
You have solved 147 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 325 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 48.00 Guesses; 60.61% Accuracy
Global Average: 67.12 Guesses; 63.57% Accuracy
52 98.08%
—
It was a typo. :(
sarahs mum said:
52 98.08%—
It was a typo. :(
37 but my accuracy 32.43
sarahs mum said:
52 98.08%—
It was a typo. :(
Hate that
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
52 98.08%—
It was a typo. :(Hate that
Yeah. And it was close to the end. I had got so far. If I blow it early then I am easier about throwing words at it. So I had taken a lot of care to no avague.
ah fknlol of course they 
had to be isobytic words
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
52 98.08%
—
It was a typo. :(Hate that
Yeah. And it was close to the end. I had got so far. If I blow it early then I am easier about throwing words at it. So I had taken a lot of care to no avague.
we think if it’s legit’ typographical error and an unintended “guess” that revealed 0 then it’s fair to subtract it from one’s totals
(So much for needing to other work and forgetting about Redactle for tonight)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #161!
The answer was:
You solved it in 63 guesses
Your accuracy was 39.68%
You have solved 148 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 47 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 36.00 Guesses; 44.21% Accuracy
Global Average: 48.81 Guesses; 48.24% Accuracy
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #161!The answer was:
You solved it in 85 guesses
Your accuracy was 21.18%
You have solved 50 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 107 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 50.00 Guesses; 42.86% Accuracy
Global Average: 65.18 Guesses; 44.43% Accuracy
—-
Bit of a come down from yesterday
You solved it in 67 guesses Your accuracy was 71.64% You have solved 91 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 192 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 67.00 Guesses; 39.84% Accuracy Global Average: 78.85 Guesses; 42.91% AccuracyNot physics, sm :)
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #161!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 20 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Not physics, sm :)
no. that’s something to be happy about I suppose.
ahlolwtf
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #162!The answer was:
You solved it in 49 guesses
Your accuracy was 63.27%
You have solved 51 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 25 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 25.00 Guesses; 70.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 32.36 Guesses; 68.53% Accuracy
86 100.00%
sarahs mum said:
86 100.00%
noice
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
86 100.00%
noice
did not break any speed records though.
never heard of it
SCIENCE said:
never heard of it
really?
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
never heard of it
really?
yeah terrible right, we got the 2nd word and figured it wasn’t something we knew about
we mean we have in the distant past complained about the history we were taught in school being extremely Australian slash Anglocentric so maybe it was just that
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
never heard of it
really?
yeah terrible right, we got the 2nd word and figured it wasn’t something we knew about
we mean we have in the distant past complained about the history we were taught in school being extremely Australian slash Anglocentric so maybe it was just that
i remember my ex CIA boyfriend demanding to know how I knew about Angkor Wat and me citing my selective girl’s school art education. He knew it more his hands on experience running guns and drugs during Vietnam point of view.
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:
really?
yeah terrible right, we got the 2nd word and figured it wasn’t something we knew about
we mean we have in the distant past complained about the history we were taught in school being extremely Australian slash Anglocentric so maybe it was just that
i remember my ex CIA boyfriend demanding to know how I knew about Angkor Wat and me citing my selective girl’s school art education. He knew it more his hands on experience running guns and drugs during Vietnam point of view.
dang we only really know about the temples from like clichéd imagery in film and from tourism advertising and that stuff, didn’t really know much background
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
yeah terrible right, we got the 2nd word and figured it wasn’t something we knew about
we mean we have in the distant past complained about the history we were taught in school being extremely Australian slash Anglocentric so maybe it was just that
i remember my ex CIA boyfriend demanding to know how I knew about Angkor Wat and me citing my selective girl’s school art education. He knew it more his hands on experience running guns and drugs during Vietnam point of view.
dang we only really know about the temples from like clichéd imagery in film and from tourism advertising and that stuff, didn’t really know much background
it did take me a long time to get to that word. had to work my way through the art. cutlure and geography. I also lucked out a few times.
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
yeah terrible right, we got the 2nd word and figured it wasn’t something we knew about
we mean we have in the distant past complained about the history we were taught in school being extremely Australian slash Anglocentric so maybe it was just that
i remember my ex CIA boyfriend demanding to know how I knew about Angkor Wat and me citing my selective girl’s school art education. He knew it more his hands on experience running guns and drugs during Vietnam point of view.
dang we only really know about the temples from like clichéd imagery in film and from tourism advertising and that stuff, didn’t really know much background
Well worth a visit.
Total stab in the dark to get this one.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #162!
The answer was:
You solved it in 416 guesses
Your accuracy was 44.23%
i googled for the third word.
You solved it in 39 guesses
Your accuracy was 79.49%
You have solved 93 consecutive Redactles
That was really tough
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #163!The answer was:
You solved it in 146 guesses
Your accuracy was 40.41%
You have solved 52 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 166 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 48.50 Guesses; 49.80% Accuracy
Global Average: 62.78 Guesses; 53.59% Accuracy
dv said:
That was really toughCongratulations, you solved Redactle #163!The answer was:
You solved it in 146 guesses
Your accuracy was 40.41%
You have solved 52 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 166 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 48.50 Guesses; 49.80% Accuracy
Global Average: 62.78 Guesses; 53.59% Accuracy
i got three words easily enough.
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
That was really toughCongratulations, you solved Redactle #163!The answer was:
You solved it in 146 guesses
Your accuracy was 40.41%
You have solved 52 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 166 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 48.50 Guesses; 49.80% Accuracy
Global Average: 62.78 Guesses; 53.59% Accuracy
i got three words easily enough.
if i hadn’t googled for the third word i would still be sitting here checking out the screen sadly.
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
That was really tough
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #163!The answer was:
You solved it in 146 guesses
Your accuracy was 40.41%
You have solved 52 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 166 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 48.50 Guesses; 49.80% Accuracy
Global Average: 62.78 Guesses; 53.59% Accuracy
i got three words easily enough.
if i hadn’t googled for the third word i would still be sitting here checking out the screen sadly.
we’ll give yous all that, 
it took us a while to settle on the 3rd also
as evident the long word became clear early, we figured there were a lot of related things like calculus and projection and plane but weren’t sure which 3-letter target it was going to be
that soon meant the 4th word followed, and given they were on about projection we tried the more likely 3-letter target
all the calculus actually misled us a little, we were thinking of things like metric or vector or analytic but it wasn’t going to fit and then we thought topological which was a bit too warped / twisted (leading us to consider noneuclidean, the hint we needed) and then it became clear
—
and then you see how they actually have
or ██████ ███-███████████ █████ (████ █████ as ██ █████, █-█████, or ██-███████████ █████) is a
so that 3rd word isn’t even needed in the title anyway so what the hell eh
redactle unlimited.
https://redactle-unlimited.com/#Q12184
Congratulations! You solved Redactle Unlimited in 137 guesses with 92.7% accuracy…which ends up being an embarassment. BtM would have got it out in 11.
sarahs mum said:
redactle unlimited.https://redactle-unlimited.com/#Q12184
Congratulations! You solved Redactle Unlimited in 137 guesses with 92.7% accuracy…which ends up being an embarassment. BtM would have got it out in 11.
I can’t do redactle Unlimited, sm; I can’t get any puzzles to appear here. I can get the page open, and Loading article from Wikipedia... appears, but nothing else happens. I did have a look at today’s redactle, though:
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
redactle unlimited.https://redactle-unlimited.com/#Q12184
Congratulations! You solved Redactle Unlimited in 137 guesses with 92.7% accuracy…which ends up being an embarassment. BtM would have got it out in 11.
I can’t do redactle Unlimited, sm; I can’t get any puzzles to appear here. I can get the page open, and
Loading article from Wikipedia...appears, but nothing else happens. I did have a look at today’s redactle, though:Congratulations, you solved Redactle #163!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 4 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
oh. much wow.
nice
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
redactle unlimited.https://redactle-unlimited.com/#Q12184
Congratulations! You solved Redactle Unlimited in 137 guesses with 92.7% accuracy…which ends up being an embarassment. BtM would have got it out in 11.
I can’t do redactle Unlimited, sm; I can’t get any puzzles to appear here. I can get the page open, and
Loading article from Wikipedia...appears, but nothing else happens. I did have a look at today’s redactle, though:Congratulations, you solved Redactle #163!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 4 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
You’re so good at this we need to make it tougher. Aim for:
:-)
Witty Rejoinder said:
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
redactle unlimited.https://redactle-unlimited.com/#Q12184
Congratulations! You solved Redactle Unlimited in 137 guesses with 92.7% accuracy…which ends up being an embarassment. BtM would have got it out in 11.
I can’t do redactle Unlimited, sm; I can’t get any puzzles to appear here. I can get the page open, and
Loading article from Wikipedia...appears, but nothing else happens. I did have a look at today’s redactle, though:Congratulations, you solved Redactle #163!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 4 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
You’re so good at this we need to make it tougher. Aim for:
- You solved it in 100 guesses
- Your accuracy was 1%
:-)
I can try :)
DO’s best score is better than any of mine, though: 1 guess @ 100%.
btm said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
btm said:I can’t do redactle Unlimited, sm; I can’t get any puzzles to appear here. I can get the page open, and
Loading article from Wikipedia...appears, but nothing else happens. I did have a look at today’s redactle, though:Congratulations, you solved Redactle #163!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 4 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
You’re so good at this we need to make it tougher. Aim for:
- You solved it in 100 guesses
- Your accuracy was 1%
:-)
I can try :)
DO’s best score is better than any of mine, though: 1 guess @ 100%.
I did that with K2.
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Witty Rejoinder said:You’re so good at this we need to make it tougher. Aim for:
- You solved it in 100 guesses
- Your accuracy was 1%
:-)
I can try :)
DO’s best score is better than any of mine, though: 1 guess @ 100%.
I did that with K2.
:) DO and sm are both better than me!
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
btm said:I can try :)
DO’s best score is better than any of mine, though: 1 guess @ 100%.
I did that with K2.
:) DO and sm are both better than me!
It is not true. most days.
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
redactle unlimited.https://redactle-unlimited.com/#Q12184
Congratulations! You solved Redactle Unlimited in 137 guesses with 92.7% accuracy…which ends up being an embarassment. BtM would have got it out in 11.
I can’t do redactle Unlimited, sm; I can’t get any puzzles to appear here. I can get the page open, and
Loading article from Wikipedia...appears, but nothing else happens. I did have a look at today’s redactle, though:Congratulations, you solved Redactle #163!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 4 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
So… all answers were the subject
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Witty Rejoinder said:You’re so good at this we need to make it tougher. Aim for:
- You solved it in 100 guesses
- Your accuracy was 1%
:-)
I can try :)
DO’s best score is better than any of mine, though: 1 guess @ 100%.
I did that with K2.
we did ok 2
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #163!
The answer was: a pain in the proverbial to get out, when you don’t know what it’s referring to. It took some searching to discover it.
You solved it in 176 guesses
Your accuracy was 35.80%
You have solved 150 consecutive Redactles.
Let 150 consecutive puzzles be my personal record.
If I score more in this sequence, then well and good.
I need to concentrate on some other activities for a while, so if I miss out on a Redactle or three, it won’t be the end of the world.
AussieDJ said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #163!The answer was: a pain in the proverbial to get out, when you don’t know what it’s referring to. It took some searching to discover it.
You solved it in 176 guesses
Your accuracy was 35.80%
You have solved 150 consecutive Redactles.Let 150 consecutive puzzles be my personal record.
If I score more in this sequence, then well and good.
I need to concentrate on some other activities for a while, so if I miss out on a Redactle or three, it won’t be the end of the world.
Hold on. What if we have a really capricious god who thinks to herself “I’ll keep this planet going as long as AussieDJ does Redactle”, Have you taken this scenario into consideration?
sibeen said:
She’ll be right.
AussieDJ said:Congratulations, you solved Redactle #163!The answer was: a pain in the proverbial to get out, when you don’t know what it’s referring to. It took some searching to discover it.
You solved it in 176 guesses
Your accuracy was 35.80%
You have solved 150 consecutive Redactles.Let 150 consecutive puzzles be my personal record.
If I score more in this sequence, then well and good.
I need to concentrate on some other activities for a while, so if I miss out on a Redactle or three, it won’t be the end of the world.
Hold on. What if we have a really capricious god who thinks to herself “I’ll keep this planet going as long as AussieDJ does Redactle”, Have you taken this scenario into consideration?
:)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #164!The answer was:
You solved it in 62 guesses
Your accuracy was 56.45%
You have solved 53 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 33 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 44.00 Guesses; 69.56% Accuracy
Global Average: 55.82 Guesses; 69.43% Accuracy
Tough
Not physics today, sm. You shouldn’t have much trouble with this one.
72 95.83%
i suppose i should have done better.
never heard of them
Getting this result in before the next one lands …
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #164!
The answer was:
You solved it in 219 guesses
Your accuracy was 47.03%
You solved it in 40 guesses Your accuracy was 95.00% You have solved 95 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 72 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 28.50 Guesses; 66.90% Accuracy Global Average: 34.17 Guesses; 67.81% AccuracyThat was quick! I hadn’t intended playing this one yet, thinking I’d leave it for later, but took a sneak peek first.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #165!
The answer was:
You solved it in 53 guesses
Your accuracy was 49.06%
You have solved 152 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 40 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 21.50 Guesses; 69.16% Accuracy
Global Average: 30.57 Guesses; 69.39% Accuracy
Not physics, sm :)
it was quick.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #165!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 18 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Not physics, sm :)
ah fk a wasted opportunity
consider this part
A ██████ ███████ is a ███████ ████ to ███
for long enough and the answer eventuates in and of itself
unfortunately we gave up early and started throwing
use/uses/used is a very useful play.
sarahs mum said:
+1
use/uses/used is a very useful play.
Not physics again, sm :)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #166!The answer was:
You solved it in 63 guesses
Your accuracy was 57.14%
You have solved 55 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 245 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 36.00 Guesses; 64.17% Accuracy
Global Average: 48.87 Guesses; 64.94% Accuracy
71 90.14%
The blunderbuss approach, plus a little bit of sleuthing, finally wins out!
Reminds me of an old song .. or maybe it’s one I’ve just made up:
“You do. We do. the answer was …. “
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #166!
The answer was:
You solved it in 355 guesses
Your accuracy was 37.18%
AussieDJ said:
The blunderbuss approach, plus a little bit of sleuthing, finally wins out!Reminds me of an old song .. or maybe it’s one I’ve just made up:
“You do. We do. the answer was …. “Congratulations, you solved Redactle #166!
The answer was:
You solved it in 355 guesses
Your accuracy was 37.18%
the word ‘second’ helped me. and then I got language.
hm should have done that better
SCIENCE said:
hm should have done that better
i took 134 guesses to get out ‘knights templar’ on an unlimited game. I should have done better than that.
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
hm should have done that better
i took 134 guesses to get out ‘knights templar’ on an unlimited game. I should have done better than that.
right but in this one we saw the
████ (████:
bit and already knew we needed to know what language had 4 letters
we mean if we’d actually had any sense left that would literally have given us the answer wouldn’t it
videre licet
It would be silly to speak of the top 23 languages in the world and not actually say what they are. So here are, as of this writing, the only 23 languages on Earth that can boast more than 50 million native speakers:
Chinese, English, Spanish, Arabic, French, Persian, German, Russian, Malay, Portuguese, Italian, Turkish, Lahnda, Tamil, Urdu, Korean, Hindi, Bengali, Japanese, Vietnamese, Telugu, and Marathi.
from first search result
second result simply said
SCIENCE dumbarse
SCIENCE said:
videre licet
It would be silly to speak of the top 23 languages in the world and not actually say what they are. So here are, as of this writing, the only 23 languages on Earth that can boast more than 50 million native speakers:
Chinese, English, Spanish, Arabic, French, Persian, German, Russian, Malay, Portuguese, Italian, Turkish, Lahnda, Tamil, Urdu, Korean, Hindi, Bengali, Japanese, Vietnamese, Telugu, and Marathi.
from first search result
second result simply said
SCIENCE dumbarse
“Chinese” is a set of languages some of which are not mutually intelligible.
i just made a real mess of an unlimited redactle. I had so much of it out but still did not have clue. there was lots of war and france and germany and africa world war one and two and killings and armies and peace and treaties.
competely missed the hutus and tutsi’s. was completely off track. but i did get a lot of it out.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #167!The answer was:
You solved it in 109 guesses
Your accuracy was 20.18%
You have solved 56 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 69 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 72.00 Guesses; 35.82% Accuracy
Global Average: 85.12 Guesses; 38.89% Accuracy
Bloody hell
dv said:
SCIENCE said:
videre licet
It would be silly to speak of the top 27 languages in the world and not actually say what they are. So here are, as of this writing, the only 23 languages on Earth that can boast more than 50 million native speakers:
Chinese, Chinese, Chinese, Chinese, Chinese, English, Spanish, Arabic, French, Persian, German, Russian, Malay, Portuguese, Italian, Turkish, Lahnda, Tamil, Urdu, Korean, Hindi, Bengali, Japanese, Vietnamese, Telugu, and Marathi.
from first search result
second result simply said
SCIENCE dumbarse
“Chinese” is a set of languages some of which are not mutually intelligible.
oh all right, fixed
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #167!The answer was:
You solved it in 109 guesses
Your accuracy was 20.18%
You have solved 56 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 69 players have solved today’s Redactle so farGlobal Median: 72.00 Guesses; 35.82% Accuracy
Global Average: 85.12 Guesses; 38.89% AccuracyBloody hell
short ones are harder. sigh. plods on.
Not physics, sm, but science.
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #167!The answer was:
You solved it in 109 guesses
Your accuracy was 20.18%
You have solved 56 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 69 players have solved today’s Redactle so farGlobal Median: 72.00 Guesses; 35.82% Accuracy
Global Average: 85.12 Guesses; 38.89% AccuracyBloody hell
short ones are harder. sigh. plods on.
+1
105 66.67%
laugh out loud this crazy shit
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #167!
The answer was:
You solved it in 325 guesses
Your accuracy was 18.77%
You have solved 154 consecutive Redactles
325 guesses, and most of them for single words!
Not a great result, but a result, nevertheless.
AussieDJ said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #167!The answer was:
You solved it in 325 guesses
Your accuracy was 18.77%
You have solved 154 consecutive Redactles325 guesses, and most of them for single words!
Not a great result, but a result, nevertheless.
I thought I lucked out on last night’s redactle. It was hard.
I did an unlimited one tonight that was quite quick. 54 guesses with 98.15% accuracy and a time of 00:10:04 It was Woody Allen. btM would have got it out in 9. I got stand up comedian and american out and I was still scratching my head at two five letter words.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #168!
The answer was:
You solved it in 78 guesses
Your accuracy was 32.05%
You have solved 57 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 79 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 24.00 Guesses; 66.67% Accuracy
Global Average: 44.06 Guesses; 64.33% Accuracy
Share your results
71 80.28%
sarahs mum said:
71 80.28%You solved it in 71 guesses Your accuracy was 80.28% You have solved 98 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 305 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 44.00 Guesses; 56.82% Accuracy Global Average: 60.63 Guesses; 59.88% AccuracyReload blunderbuss! Try another word. Ooh, that looks promising.
Get there in the end!
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #168!
The answer was:
You solved it in 119 guesses
Your accuracy was 54.62%
You have solved 155 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 930 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
so the punctuation-spacing redacts like
(████████), ████████ ██████:███,
were a bit disruptive and had us thinking initially it 
was going to be some kind of bird or fish or similar (which can also be a similar size) but all the history got us onto the correct scope
then it was just a matter of getting the correct quantities, noting that a sequence of 3 of those are all isobytic, but it looked like the simplest way to match it all up was to look at the most frequent corresponding quantities
████ of ███.█ ██ (██.█ in) and a █████ of ███.█ ██ (██.█ in)
It’s not physics, although science is mentioned, sm.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #169!
The answer was:
You solved it in 113 guesses
Your accuracy was 58.41%
You have solved 156 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 565 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
AussieDJ said:
It’s not physics, although science is mentioned, sm.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #169!
The answer was:
You solved it in 113 guesses
Your accuracy was 58.41%
You have solved 156 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 565 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
I think i have enough out to know that I don’t know who we are talking about.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
It’s not physics, although science is mentioned, sm.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #169!
The answer was:
You solved it in 113 guesses
Your accuracy was 58.41%
You have solved 156 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 565 players have solved today’s Redactle so farI think i have enough out to know that I don’t know who we are talking about.
sad.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
It’s not physics, although science is mentioned, sm.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #169!
The answer was:
You solved it in 113 guesses
Your accuracy was 58.41%
You have solved 156 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 565 players have solved today’s Redactle so farI think i have enough out to know that I don’t know who we are talking about.
I had to do a little bit of research right at the end.
I suspect the topic mentioned may not have appeared in the high school curriculum. Well, it didn’t appear in mine, anyway. Then again, maybe I didn’t study it because I was heading in a different direction to the courses in which it might have been offered.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
It’s not physics, although science is mentioned, sm.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #169!
The answer was:
You solved it in 113 guesses
Your accuracy was 58.41%
You have solved 156 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 565 players have solved today’s Redactle so farI think i have enough out to know that I don’t know who we are talking about.
I had to do a little bit of research right at the end.
I suspect the topic mentioned may not have appeared in the high school curriculum. Well, it didn’t appear in mine, anyway. Then again, maybe I didn’t study it because I was heading in a different direction to the courses in which it might have been offered.
I’ve just hit 150. i’ve got a lot of it out. even the three letter word bit of the title. Which is why i am pretty sure I am lost.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #169!The answer was:
You solved it in 73 guessesYour accuracy was 73.97%
You have solved 58 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 1345 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 45.00 Guesses; 75.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 69.47 Guesses; 74.20% Accuracy
Bit shit
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #169!The answer was:You solved it in 73 guessesYour accuracy was 73.97%
You have solved 58 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 1345 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 45.00 Guesses; 75.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 69.47 Guesses; 74.20% Accuracy
Bit shit
i am shittier.
okay. I googled to get it out. but I did try hard. see? i did get a lot of it out.
188 89.89%
sarahs mum said:
okay. I googled to get it out. but I did try hard. see? i did get a lot of it out.188 89.89%
You got there .. and that’s the important thing!
lolnfi
SCIENCE said:
lolnfi
i also was there.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #169!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 17 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
really? many wows.
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #169!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 17 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
really? many wows.
I’ve read a lot of his works (English translations, anyway.)
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #169!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 17 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
really? many wows.
I’ve read a lot of his works (English translations, anyway.)
i have not. I read some hesse a long time ago but I have not done much german literature.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #170!The answer was:
You solved it in 38 guesses
Your accuracy was 36.84%
You have solved 59 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 3 players have solved today’s Redactle so farGlobal Median: 11.00 Guesses; 36.84% Accuracy
Global Average: 16.67 Guesses; 36.52% Accuracy
Not great accuracy but I was the 3rd person to solve it
74 89.19%
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #170!The answer was:
You solved it in 38 guesses
Your accuracy was 36.84%
You have solved 59 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 3 players have solved today’s Redactle so farGlobal Median: 11.00 Guesses; 36.84% Accuracy
Global Average: 16.67 Guesses; 36.52% AccuracyNot great accuracy but I was the 3rd person to solve it
well threed.
laugh out loud don’t know anything about this
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #170!
The answer was:
You solved it in 104 guesses
Your accuracy was 51.92%
………………………..
Many years ago, a certain national broadcaster was obliged to offer these from time to time, whether they had a vacancy or not.
It was probably just a way to see if someone was worthy of joining the staff if a vacancy arose.
The exercise involved reading a few news stories, which generally included some foreign pronunciations, introducing some music – both from the classical as well as the ‘popular’ repertoire – and ad-libbing about something fairly inconsequential. Such as, your journey to the studio that day or something equally innocuous.
I attempted three of those, and failed all of them – I couldn’t ad-lib for nuts!
I eventually got in, but through another pathway.
Definitely not physics, sm.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #171!The answer was:
You solved it in 63 guesses
Your accuracy was 49.21%
You have solved 60 consecutive Redactles
Global StatsGlobally, 106 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 40.00 Guesses; 66.67% Accuracy
Global Average: 63.58 Guesses; 67.63% Accuracy
You solved it in 50 guesses
Your accuracy was 98.00%
You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 131 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 47.00 Guesses; 66.67% Accuracy
Global Average: 64.40 Guesses; 68.04% Accuracy
Share your results
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #171!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 24 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Definitely not physics, sm.
dig it.
I found out today while I have been havibng problems loading everything in firefox…than redactle unlimited loaded in Microsoft edge.
I wish I could work out what is wrong with firefox today.
ah well we’ll just settle for being able to correctly tell when to give up
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #172!The answer was:
You solved it in 136 guesses
Your accuracy was 18.38%
You have solved 61 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 75 players have solved today’s Redactle so farGlobal Median: 42.00 Guesses; 47.37% Accuracy
Global Average: 56.20 Guesses; 50.77% Accuracy
You solved it in 50 guesses
Your accuracy was 82.00%
You have solved 2 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 111 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
sarahs mum said:
You solved it in 50 guesses
Your accuracy was 82.00%
You have solved 2 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 111 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
another redactle where I got it out by surprise. I thought I was just filling some more in.
lolfk
SCIENCE said:
lolfk
I just googled out an answer for an unlimited redactle. Toussaint Louverture. nup. never. glad i googled.
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
lolfk
I just googled out an answer for an unlimited redactle. Toussaint Louverture. nup. never. glad i googled.
That’s one I wouldn’t have got.
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
lolfk
I just googled out an answer for an unlimited redactle. Toussaint Louverture. nup. never. glad i googled.
That’s one I wouldn’t have got.
that makes me feel somewhat better. thank you.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #173!The answer was:
You solved it in 28 guesses
Your accuracy was 50.00%
You have solved 62 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 19 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 11.00 Guesses; 72.73% Accuracy
Global Average: 23.16 Guesses; 73.36% Accuracy
45 100.00%
Look at that! You miss a couple, and your previous score (of 156 consecutive Redactles solved) goes down the drain.
:(
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #173!
The answer was:
You solved it in 91 guesses
Your accuracy was 62.64%
You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
AussieDJ said:
Look at that! You miss a couple, and your previous score (of 156 consecutive Redactles solved) goes down the drain.:(
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #173!
The answer was:
You solved it in 91 guesses
Your accuracy was 62.64%
You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
or you play for a couple of days in a different browser while you have browser issues.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Look at that! You miss a couple, and your previous score (of 156 consecutive Redactles solved) goes down the drain.:(
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #173!
The answer was:
You solved it in 91 guesses
Your accuracy was 62.64%
You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
or you play for a couple of days in a different browser while you have browser issues.
It’s just browser cookies anyway, may as well just keep one’s own progress in mind and not stress too much about their reporting.
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Look at that! You miss a couple, and your previous score (of 156 consecutive Redactles solved) goes down the drain.:(
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #173!
The answer was:
You solved it in 91 guesses
Your accuracy was 62.64%
You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
or you play for a couple of days in a different browser while you have browser issues.
It’s just browser cookies anyway, may as well just keep one’s own progress in mind and not stress too much about their reporting.
I’m just happy that everything is working again. :)
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
sarahs mum said:or you play for a couple of days in a different browser while you have browser issues.
It’s just browser cookies anyway, may as well just keep one’s own progress in mind and not stress too much about their reporting.
I’m just happy that everything is working again. :)
True we do get pissed off when stuff breaks, on the other hand we’re frequently clearing cookies anyway so our progress is always 0.
well there 
you go
we figured the 2nd 3-character and the ███████ █████ bit here
████ is the ███ and ███████ ███ in ███████ █████ ████████,
but assumed the 1st 3-character was an ordinal (though would have been more intelligent to realise they would have written it out in words) number, also wrongly thinking the 1st 7-character was something like largest
by then the target was high probability but we couldn’t really find anything convincing to be sure, though plenty of 2-character words suggested a specific pronoun
the alphabetic listing was a bit confounding as well but didn’t really contribute
ultimately we went with the apparently obvious and it really was the target
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #174!The answer was:
You solved it in 51 guesses
Your accuracy was 33.33%
You have solved 63 consecutive Redactles
Global StatsGlobally, 16 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 19.50 Guesses; 61.03% Accuracy
Global Average: 24.00 Guesses; 62.79% Accuracy
Not physics again, sm.
You solved it in 48 guesses Your accuracy was 91.67% You have solved 2 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 193 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 60.00 Guesses; 50.00% Accuracy Global Average: 79.94 Guesses; 52.00% Accuracylolfk had it figured too, went for the other half of the relevant term in dead as a doornail (as in door) but then gave up and started spamming garbage
idiocy
A blunderbuss effort, once again :)
Redactle 174 took 250 guesses to solve, giving an accuracy of 35.60%
AussieDJ said:
A blunderbuss effort, once again :)Redactle 174 took 250 guesses to solve, giving an accuracy of 35.60%
44 guesses
43.18% accuracy
< Snort > So much for hitting the sack early!
At least I beat the global average.
Oh, and it’s not physics, sm
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #175!
The answer was:
You solved it in 34 guesses
Your accuracy was 55.88%
You have solved 3 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 60 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 37.50 Guesses; 55.72% Accuracy
Global Average: 43.82 Guesses; 56.17% Accuracy
takes more time having to copy and paste e’s, y’s, r’s and w’s again.
still a miserable effort it seems
44 81.82%
AussieDJ said:
< Snort > So much for hitting the sack early!
At least I beat the global average.Oh, and it’s not physics, sm
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #175!
The answer was:
You solved it in 34 guesses
Your accuracy was 55.88%
You have solved 3 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 60 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 37.50 Guesses; 55.72% Accuracy
Global Average: 43.82 Guesses; 56.17% Accuracy
:)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #175!The answer was: You solved it in 80 guessesYour accuracy was 42.50%
You have solved 64 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 637 players have solved today’s Redactle so fa
Global Median: 54.00 Guesses; 52.59% Accuracy
Global Average: 70.49 Guesses; 53.93% Accurac
too much of this stuff lately
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #176!The answer was:
You solved it in 39 guesses
Your accuracy was 56.41%
You have solved 65 consecutive Redactles
Global StatsGlobally, 9 players have solved today’s Redactle so farGlobal Median: 11.00 Guesses; 81.81% Accuracy
Global Average: 16.67 Guesses; 72.13% Accuracy
9th!
Very not physics, sm,; probably not even science, although scientific methods are used in studying it.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #176!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 20 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Very not physics, sm,; probably not even science, although scientific methods are used in studying it.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #176!
The answer was:
You solved it in 113 guesses
Your accuracy was 61.06%
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #176!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 20 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Very not physics, sm,; probably not even science, although scientific methods are used in studying it.
ta I am having an aful tim of it hat ith unning a kboad that isn’t oking and shodd mous…having to cop and past lots of ltts.((ta I am having an awful time of it whatw ith running a keyborad that isn’t working and shoddy mouse…having to copy and paste lots of letters.
85 96.47%
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #176!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 20 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Very not physics, sm,; probably not even science, although scientific methods are used in studying it.
ta I am having an aful tim of it hat ith unning a kboad that isn’t oking and shodd mous…having to cop and past lots of ltts.((ta I am having an awful time of it whatw ith running a keyborad that isn’t working and shoddy mouse…having to copy and paste lots of letters.
taks all th nomnt out of it.
too vague for us
A thought has just struck me.
For those of us in south-eastern Australia, a new Redactle appears at 2:00am Eastern Standard Time (AEST) every day.
From Sunday morning, October 2nd, the new Redactle will appear at 3:00am Eastern Daylight Time (AEDT).
Somehow, I don’t think I’ll hang around waiting for it to lob each morning (unless it’s been a great party and I’ve just got home!).
AussieDJ said:
A thought has just struck me.For those of us in south-eastern Australia, a new Redactle appears at 2:00am Eastern Standard Time (AEST) every day.
From Sunday morning, October 2nd, the new Redactle will appear at 3:00am Eastern Daylight Time (AEDT).
Somehow, I don’t think I’ll hang around waiting for it to lob each morning (unless it’s been a great party and I’ve just got home!).
I just assumed we were all on GMT here.
dv said:
AussieDJ said:
A thought has just struck me.For those of us in south-eastern Australia, a new Redactle appears at 2:00am Eastern Standard Time (AEST) every day.
From Sunday morning, October 2nd, the new Redactle will appear at 3:00am Eastern Daylight Time (AEDT).
Somehow, I don’t think I’ll hang around waiting for it to lob each morning (unless it’s been a great party and I’ve just got home!).
I just assumed we were all on GMT here.
You still need to convert for local time zones, but just for reference, a new game appears at 16 00hrs UTC daily
Possibly physics, sm, or at least astrophysics/astronomy.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #177!The answer was:
You solved it in 118 guesses
Your accuracy was 69.49%
You have solved 66 consecutive RedactlesGlobal StatsGlobally, 91 players have solved today’s Redactle so farGlobal Median: 65.00 Guesses; 60.38% Accuracy
Global Average: 78.05 Guesses; 61.49% Accuracy
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #177!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 11 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Possibly physics, sm, or at least astrophysics/astronomy.
I’d got that it as that. But not the vastness of that. Still copying and pasting vowels here.
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #177!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 11 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Possibly physics, sm, or at least astrophysics/astronomy.
I’d got that it as that. But not the vastness of that. Still copying and pasting vowels here.
it’s got 102 stars.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #177!
The answer was:
You solved it in 92 guesses
Your accuracy was 53.26%
You have solved 5 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 246 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 86.50 Guesses; 57.02% Accuracy
Global Average: 108.15 Guesses; 58.33% Accuracy
62 91.94%
dactl is fa lss us findl ith a mous that dos not scoll and a kboad that is unilling.
lol got fkd again
SCIENCE said:
lol got fkd again
I thought it was going to get me until I resorted to some successful on topic guessing
Definitely not physics, or even science of any sort, sm.
fantasy 33 93.94%
up my street.
sarahs mum said:
You solved it in 33 guesses Your accuracy was 93.94% You have solved 6 consecutive Redactles
fantasy 33 93.94%up my street.
Global Stats
Globally, 110 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 33.00 Guesses; 66.67% Accuracy Global Average: 38.33 Guesses; 66.23% AccuracyCongratulations, you solved Redactle #178!The answer was:
You solved it in 132 guesses
Your accuracy was 32.58%
You have solved 67 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 196 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 33.00 Guesses; 64.14% Accuracy
Global Average: 45.10 Guesses; 65.50% Accuracy
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #178!
The answer was:
You solved it in 104 guesses
Your accuracy was 49.04%
bit of a junk run for us sadly but we’re happy for yousall others
looks like we are waiting for redactle.
sarahs mum said:
looks like we are waiting for redactle.
Yes, there’s a new puzzle at 16:00 UTC every day.
If you know your local time zone designation, then you can do the arithmetic –
16:00 UTC works out to 03:00 AEDT, 02:30 ACDT, 0200 AEST, 01:30 ACST and 00:00 AWST.
You solved it in 56 guesses Your accuracy was 91.07% You have solved 7 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 212 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 51.00 Guesses; 59.44% Accuracy Global Average: 64.24 Guesses; 61.39% AccuracyCongratulations, you solved Redactle #179!The answer was:
You solved it in 170 guessesYour accuracy was 47.65%
You have solved 68 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 228 players have solved today’s Redactle so farGlobal Median: 55.50 Guesses; 58.88% Accuracy
Global Average: 65.54 Guesses; 61.22% Accuracy
Off at a tangent enterprises (primary sponsor: blunderbuss) presents:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #179!
The answer was:
You solved it in 233 guesses
Your accuracy was 55.79%
You have solved 7 consecutive Redactles
all right we too lazy for that shti but we can wait
SCIENCE said:
all right we too lazy for that shti but we can wait
I am being unsuccessful at sleeping in a proper manner these days. I might resort to drugs soon.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #180!The answer was:
You solved it in 1 guesses
Your accuracy was 100.00%
You have solved 69 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 13 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 2.00 Guesses; 100.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 2.92 Guesses; 93.97% Accuracy
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #180!The answer was:You solved it in 1 guesses
Your accuracy was 100.00%
You have solved 69 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 13 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 2.00 Guesses; 100.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 2.92 Guesses; 93.97% Accuracy
congrats. I thought you might know off the bat.
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #180!The answer was:You solved it in 1 guesses
Your accuracy was 100.00%
You have solved 69 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 13 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 2.00 Guesses; 100.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 2.92 Guesses; 93.97% Accuracy
congrats. I thought you might know off the bat.
I think the compilers made a booboo
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #180!The answer was:You solved it in 1 guesses
Your accuracy was 100.00%
You have solved 69 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 13 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 2.00 Guesses; 100.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 2.92 Guesses; 93.97% Accuracy
congrats. I thought you might know off the bat.
I think the compilers made a booboo
i can see it.
damn.
My best result ever, given away by a phrase in about the fourth paragraph that should have been redacted. It’s physics again, sm.
ou solved it in 34 guesses Your accuracy was 94.12% You have solved 8 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 219 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 17.00 Guesses; 78.56% Accuracy Global Average: 30.45 Guesses; 77.87% Accuracy —-oh. I just had to believe in myself. silly me. nice work getting those physics words out though.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #180!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 1 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
My best result ever, given away by a phrase in about the fourth paragraph that should have been redacted. It’s physics again, sm.
I saw that straight up. but went on a journey with waves and dopplers and effects and such. nice work it was until I thought I would bung in the obvious and it were.
sigh
The █████ of a ████████ is █████ ███████ by the ██████ █, █████████████ to the ██████████ ██████ in ██████████ (████████ for █████████, ████████ for ██████████), and by the ██████████ █████ █ █ █ (█████ is ██ for █████████, <1 for blueshifts█.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #180!
The answer was:
You solved it in 71 guesses
Your accuracy was 66.20%
Poking around the periphery to eventually get enough clues to search on.
AussieDJ said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #180!The answer was:
You solved it in 71 guesses
Your accuracy was 66.20%Poking around the periphery to eventually get enough clues to search on.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #180!The answer was:
You solved it in 71 guesses
Your accuracy was 66.20%Poking around the periphery to eventually get enough clues to search on.
I also poked around the periphery.
but blueshift was the clue.
I take it, from reading the bit that SCIENCE posted, that ‘redshift’ was the answer. Is that right?
I mean they revealed two words… opposite, and blueshift …
sibeen said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #180!The answer was:
You solved it in 71 guesses
Your accuracy was 66.20%Poking around the periphery to eventually get enough clues to search on.
I also poked around the periphery.
but blueshift was the clue.
I take it, from reading the bit that SCIENCE posted, that ‘redshift’ was the answer. Is that right?
yep. that is why so many people got it out in one.
sarahs mum said:
sibeen said:
sarahs mum said:I also poked around the periphery.
but blueshift was the clue.
I take it, from reading the bit that SCIENCE posted, that ‘redshift’ was the answer. Is that right?
yep. that is why so many people got it out in one.
I might do my first redactle and then retire on top :)
sibeen said:
sarahs mum said:
sibeen said:I take it, from reading the bit that SCIENCE posted, that ‘redshift’ was the answer. Is that right?
yep. that is why so many people got it out in one.
I might do my first redactle and then retire on top :)
in our defence we didn’t post anything that anyone else wasn’t already granted vision of at the site
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #181!The answer was:
You solved it in 9 guesses
Your accuracy was 100.00%
You have solved 70 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 21 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 5.00 Guesses; 100.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 6.10 Guesses; 94.92% Accuracy
Another very easy one
Not physics, sm; historical person.
You solved it in 26 guesses Your accuracy was 100.00% You have solved 9 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 373 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 17.00 Guesses; 85.00% Accuracy Global Average: 27.42 Guesses; 83.16% Accuracydon’t know anything about these archaic hangovers
SCIENCE said:
don’t know anything about these archaic hangovers
You been drinking laudanum?
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #181!
The answer was:
You solved it in 108 guesses
Your accuracy was 68.52%
108 stabs in the dark would be more like it.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #182!The answer was
You solved it in 100 guesses
Your accuracy was 25.00%
You have solved 71 consecutive Redactles
Global StatsGlobally, 136 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 74.00 Guesses; 22.61% Accuracy
Global Average: 94.97 Guesses; 27.07% Accuracy
49 32.65%
sarahs mum said:
49 32.65%
Don’t like those disambiguations.
I used a singular (wrong) instead of a plural (which was in the page.)
Not physics, though, sm.
lol got half of it by 2 and got half of it by 100 – 2 what a fail
Fail indeed!
I’ve never heard of most of this stuff – and it shows!
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #182!
The answer was:
You solved it in 221 guesses
Your accuracy was 19.00%
Not physics, sm; world history.
ou solved it in 53 guesses Your accuracy was 67.92% You have solved 11 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 121 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 36.00 Guesses; 50.82% Accuracy Global Average: 46.26 Guesses; 53.29% AccuracyCongratulations, you solved Redactle #183!
The answer was:
You solved it in 155 guesses
Your accuracy was 25.81%
You have solved 72 consecutive Redactles
Global StatsGlobally, 151 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 40.00 Guesses; 50.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 47.76 Guesses; 53.42% Accuracy
my accuracy score would have been lower if I got had that clue earlier.
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #183!The answer was:
You solved it in 155 guesses
Your accuracy was 25.81%
You have solved 72 consecutive Redactles
Global StatsGlobally, 151 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 40.00 Guesses; 50.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 47.76 Guesses; 53.42% Accuracy
did not include the word pacific or peace.
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #183!The answer was:
You solved it in 155 guesses
Your accuracy was 25.81%
You have solved 72 consecutive Redactles
Global StatsGlobally, 151 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 40.00 Guesses; 50.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 47.76 Guesses; 53.42% Accuracydid not include the word pacific or peace.
Didn’t include a lot of things.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #183!
The answer was:
You solved it in 127 guesses
Your accuracy was 40.16%
What a stupid article!
The acronym for the answer runs to five letters, yet the name ‘they’ have given it only has four words in the title.
I always knew it as the five individual words.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #184!
The answer was:
You solved it in 20 guesses
Your accuracy was 80.00%
You have solved 73 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 3 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 20.00 Guesses; 69.23% Accuracy
Global Average: 20.33 Guesses; 71.97% Accuracy
not happy Jan.
106 84.91%
after googling.
I have no knowledge at all of this. even still.
well hey after hitting the last 2 words there weren’t that many 
to choose from
quick flick through showed what looked like dates and historical stuff so then it all pivoted on
was an █████████████ ████████████ for
which thinking about it already quite limited the possibilities
hence the final target word
then 6 letters suggested the one before it
SCIENCE said:
well hey after hitting the last 2 words there weren’t that many
quick flick through showed what looked like dates and historical stuff so then it all pivoted on
was an █████████████ ████████████ for
which thinking about it already quite limited the possibilities
hence the final target word
then 6 letters suggested the one before it
but I didn’t know the one before it.
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
well hey after hitting the last 2 words there weren’t that many
quick flick through showed what looked like dates and historical stuff so then it all pivoted on
was an █████████████ ████████████ for
which thinking about it already quite limited the possibilities
hence the final target word
then 6 letters suggested the one before it
but I didn’t know the one before it.
yeah we think the whole Ukraine thing had these matters more front of mind
anyway the latest one rekt us a bit, it got all technical but we should actually have known instead of firing off all 5-letter nouns in the subject until one stuck
Never heard of it!
But then, I didn’t do much more of that subject past 5th Form. (Year 11 to the younger members in here)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #184!
The answer was:
You solved it in 127 guesses
Your accuracy was 61.42%
AussieDJ said:
Never heard of it!But then, I didn’t do much more of that subject past 5th Form. (Year 11 to the younger members in here)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #184!
The answer was:
You solved it in 127 guesses
Your accuracy was 61.42%
I ranted.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #185!
The answer was:
You solved it in 110 guesses
Your accuracy was 34.55%
You have solved 74 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 48 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 44.50 Guesses; 58.57% Accuracy
Global Average: 46.88 Guesses; 60.23% Accuracy
gave up and googled. i had enough out to think i did not know the answer and I did not. another one I didn’t know but it seems like I should have known.
103 75.73%
This one was harder; I only knew it because I’ve been there.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Never heard of it!
But then, I didn’t do much more of that subject past 5th Form. (Year 11 to the younger members in here)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #184!
The answer was:
You solved it in 127 guesses
Your accuracy was 61.42%
I ranted.
and here we were thinking it was bad when the fascists “-zed” everything
Another one which fell to research before the answer appeared…
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #185!
The answer was:
You solved it in 168 guesses
Your accuracy was 41.67%
Should have got it sooner; this was one of my major areas of study at uni. Physics/engineering, sm.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #186!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 12 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Should have got it sooner; this was one of my major areas of study at uni. Physics/engineering, sm.
i’m up to guess 26. but I am not anywhere yet.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #186!The answer was:
You solved it in 143 guesses
Your accuracy was 37.06%
You have solved 75 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 189 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 87.00 Guesses; 43.60% Accuracy
Global Average: 104.78 Guesses; 48.40% Accuracy
Difficult!
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #186!The answer was:You solved it in 143 guesses
Your accuracy was 37.06%
You have solved 75 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 189 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 87.00 Guesses; 43.60% Accuracy
Global Average: 104.78 Guesses; 48.40% Accuracy
Difficult!
I’m finding it difficult.
I have the second word.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #186!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 12 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Should have got it sooner; this was one of my major areas of study at uni. Physics/engineering, sm.
you gave me that word. and I ignored you. sorry.
lol trol
Here you go sibeen.
███████ engineering
███████ engineering or ███████ systems engineering or ██████████ engineering (in ██████) is an engineering ██████████ that █████ with ███████ systems, ████████ ███████ ██████ to design █████████ and systems with ███████ █████████ in ███████ ████████████. The ██████████ of ████████ ████████ and is usually taught along with electrical engineering and mechanical engineering at many institutions around the world.
The ████████ uses ███████ and █████████ to ███████ the ██████ ███████████ of the ███████ █████ ██████████; these ████████████ are used to ███████ ██████████ ████████ ███████ to ███████ the ███████ ███████████. Systems designed to ███████ without █████████ █████ █████ are ██████ █████████ ███████ systems (such as ██████ ███████ for ██████████ the █████ of a ███). █████-████████████ in ██████, ███████ systems engineering ██████████ █████ on ██████████████ of ███████ systems ██████ ███████ by ████████████ ████████ of a ███████ █████ of systems.
sarahs mum said:
Here you go sibeen.███████ engineering
███████ engineering or ███████ systems engineering or ██████████ engineering (in ██████) is an engineering ██████████ that █████ with ███████ systems, ████████ ███████ ██████ to design █████████ and systems with ███████ █████████ in ███████ ████████████. The ██████████ of ████████ ████████ and is usually taught along with electrical engineering and mechanical engineering at many institutions around the world.
The ████████ uses ███████ and █████████ to ███████ the ██████ ███████████ of the ███████ █████ ██████████; these ████████████ are used to ███████ ██████████ ████████ ███████ to ███████ the ███████ ███████████. Systems designed to ███████ without █████████ █████ █████ are ██████ █████████ ███████ systems (such as ██████ ███████ for ██████████ the █████ of a ███). █████-████████████ in ██████, ███████ systems engineering ██████████ █████ on ██████████████ of ███████ systems ██████ ███████ by ████████████ ████████ of a ███████ █████ of systems.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #186!
The answer was: control engineering
You solved it in 2 guesses
Your accuracy was 100.00%
You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
sarahs mum said:
Here you go sibeen.███████ engineering
███████ engineering or ███████ systems engineering or ██████████ engineering (in ██████) is an engineering ██████████ that █████ with ███████ systems, ████████ ███████ ██████ to design █████████ and systems with ███████ █████████ in ███████ ████████████. The ██████████ of ████████ ████████ and is usually taught along with electrical engineering and mechanical engineering at many institutions around the world.
The ████████ uses ███████ and █████████ to ███████ the ██████ ███████████ of the ███████ █████ ██████████; these ████████████ are used to ███████ ██████████ ████████ ███████ to ███████ the ███████ ███████████. Systems designed to ███████ without █████████ █████ █████ are ██████ █████████ ███████ systems (such as ██████ ███████ for ██████████ the █████ of a ███). █████-████████████ in ██████, ███████ systems engineering ██████████ █████ on ██████████████ of ███████ systems ██████ ███████ by ████████████ ████████ of a ███████ █████ of systems.
Control?
ChrispenEvan said:
sarahs mum said:
Here you go sibeen.███████ engineering
███████ engineering or ███████ systems engineering or ██████████ engineering (in ██████) is an engineering ██████████ that █████ with ███████ systems, ████████ ███████ ██████ to design █████████ and systems with ███████ █████████ in ███████ ████████████. The ██████████ of ████████ ████████ and is usually taught along with electrical engineering and mechanical engineering at many institutions around the world.
The ████████ uses ███████ and █████████ to ███████ the ██████ ███████████ of the ███████ █████ ██████████; these ████████████ are used to ███████ ██████████ ████████ ███████ to ███████ the ███████ ███████████. Systems designed to ███████ without █████████ █████ █████ are ██████ █████████ ███████ systems (such as ██████ ███████ for ██████████ the █████ of a ███). █████-████████████ in ██████, ███████ systems engineering ██████████ █████ on ██████████████ of ███████ systems ██████ ███████ by ████████████ ████████ of a ███████ █████ of systems.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #186!
The answer was: control engineering
You solved it in 2 guesses
Your accuracy was 100.00%
You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
you’re so good. :)
control engineering 101 83.17%
sarahs mum said:
ChrispenEvan said:
sarahs mum said:
Here you go sibeen.███████ engineering
███████ engineering or ███████ systems engineering or ██████████ engineering (in ██████) is an engineering ██████████ that █████ with ███████ systems, ████████ ███████ ██████ to design █████████ and systems with ███████ █████████ in ███████ ████████████. The ██████████ of ████████ ████████ and is usually taught along with electrical engineering and mechanical engineering at many institutions around the world.
The ████████ uses ███████ and █████████ to ███████ the ██████ ███████████ of the ███████ █████ ██████████; these ████████████ are used to ███████ ██████████ ████████ ███████ to ███████ the ███████ ███████████. Systems designed to ███████ without █████████ █████ █████ are ██████ █████████ ███████ systems (such as ██████ ███████ for ██████████ the █████ of a ███). █████-████████████ in ██████, ███████ systems engineering ██████████ █████ on ██████████████ of ███████ systems ██████ ███████ by ████████████ ████████ of a ███████ █████ of systems.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #186!
The answer was: control engineering
You solved it in 2 guesses
Your accuracy was 100.00%
You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
you’re so good. :)
ta.
in the theme of the previous target as well ural better than us sigh
SCIENCE said:
in the theme of the previous target as well ural better than us sigh
i know what I don’t know well.
I’ve come to the conclusion that there’s a lot I don’t know …
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #186!
The answer was:
You solved it in 287 guesses
Your accuracy was 28.92%
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #187!
The answer was:
You solved it in 71 guessesYour accuracy was 50.70%
You have solved 76 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 53 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 30.00 Guesses; 53.73% Accuracy
Global Average: 38.77 Guesses; 56.53% Accuracy
Not physics, sm, but mathematical.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #187!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 13 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Not physics, sm, but mathematical.
:(
I googled.
150 65.33%
I have not heard that term before. I don’t think. Wiki says that it wasn’t around in my day of maths study. oh well…I got some words… but tonight was sad.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #187!
The answer was: (obvious, if you know the subject)
You solved it in 208 guesses
Your accuracy was 32.21%
played a redactle unlimited this evening.
4 letters.
an accuracy of 60.49% and 81 guesses.
what finally became the derr moment was…“is a round object”
sarahs mum said:
played a redactle unlimited this evening.4 letters.
an accuracy of 60.49% and 81 guesses.
what finally became the derr moment was…“is a round object”
Ball?
sibeen said:
sarahs mum said:
played a redactle unlimited this evening.4 letters.
an accuracy of 60.49% and 81 guesses.
what finally became the derr moment was…“is a round object”
Ball?
certainly was. :) it had use, used and uses.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #188!
The answer was:
You solved it in 89 guesses
Your accuracy was 47.19%
Global Stats
Globally, 54 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 47.50 Guesses; 58.62% Accuracy
Global Average: 60.59 Guesses; 63.56% Accuracy
Not physics, sm
ou solved it in 71 guesses Your accuracy was 88.73% You have solved 16 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 112 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 70.00 Guesses; 57.67% Accuracy Global Average: 83.91 Guesses; 59.88% AccuracyCongratulations, you solved Redactle #188!The answer was:
You solved it in 130 guesses
Your accuracy was 44.62%
You have solved 77 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 248 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 84.50 Guesses; 55.88% AccuracyGlobal Average: 111.28 Guesses; 57.70% Accuracy
I wasted about 40 turns because I misspelled it…
dv said:
I wasted about 40 turns because I misspelled it…
oh no. :(
sad.
lol got trolled 2ce
Not physics, sm.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #189!
The answer was:
You solved it in 75 guesses
Your accuracy was 74.67%
Global Stats
Globally, 243 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 26.00 Guesses; 79.66% Accuracy
Global Average: 42.72 Guesses; 79.53% Accuracy
Still outside the average, but much closer than recent efforts.
You solved it in 54 guesses Your accuracy was 100.00% You have solved 17 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 294 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 29.00 Guesses; 79.62% Accuracy Global Average: 47.62 Guesses; 79.58% AccuracyAussieDJ said:
Not physics, sm.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #189!
The answer was:
You solved it in 75 guesses
Your accuracy was 74.67%Global Stats
Globally, 243 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 26.00 Guesses; 79.66% Accuracy
Global Average: 42.72 Guesses; 79.53% AccuracyStill outside the average, but much closer than recent efforts.
It’s always better when it isn’t physics. Or maths it seems.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #189!The answer was:
You solved it in 46 guesses
Your accuracy was 82.61%
You have solved 78 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 4660 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 50.00 Guesses; 75.86% Accuracy
Global Average: 81.05 Guesses; 75.53% Accuracy
You solved it in 42 guesses Your accuracy was 95.24% You have solved 18 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 100 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 21.50 Guesses; 66.67% Accuracy Global Average: 33.27 Guesses; 68.89% AccuracyCongratulations, you solved Redactle #190!
The answer was: dimension
You solved it in 50 guesses
Your accuracy was 54.00%
You have solved 79 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 119 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 22.00 Guesses; 66.67% Accuracy
Global Average: 33.98 Guesses; 68.94% Accuracy
I’m sorry, I accidentally left in the answer in my post
dv said:
I’m sorry, I accidentally left in the answer in my post
forgiven.
the thread title does point to that possibility.
I think I’m going to start including previous answers amongst my guesses.
Hilbert Space got another look in.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #190!
The answer was:
You solved it in 110 guesses
Your accuracy was 44.55%
AussieDJ said:
I think I’m going to start including previous answers amongst my guesses.
Hilbert Space got another look in.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #190!
The answer was:
You solved it in 110 guesses
Your accuracy was 44.55%
I lucked out with my normal selection of words. So many returns for time. And I had the numbers.
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
I’m sorry, I accidentally left in the answer in my post
forgiven.
the thread title does point to that possibility.
trlols
anyway, 
back to this we guess
the opening was a pretty obvious localisation so we knew we had to take a serious crack at it
In ███████ and ███████████, the
looking through the rest it got technical quickly and there was too much scope so we looked for obvious words
we guessed some kind of spatial transformaion like inversion so words like “line” or “sphere” or “circle” or “curve” or “plane” seemed to fit
anyway going further down, things looked quite obscure as well so we figured the answer had to be in the first few paragraphs
(or ███ opposite); the █████████ of a █████ is ███, ███.
for example was relatively immediate to figure most of, as in
(or its opposite); the █████████ of a plane is two, etc.
and then
A ███-███████████ █████████ █████ is a ███-███████████ █████ on the █████. The inside of a ████, a ████████ or a ██████ is █████-███████████ (██)
became an obvious give away even if we didn’t figure every single label within it
with enough of that context looking back at the opening sentence we were able to figure these 2 words
█████ (or ██████) is
so we knew it was a descriptor of either of them, hence the target
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #191
The answer was:
You solved it in 83 guesses
Your accuracy was 61.45%
You have solved 80 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 1697 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 80.00 Guesses; 64.36% Accuracy
Global Average: 109.75 Guesses; 65.12% Accuracy
91 95.60%
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #191!
The answer was:
You solved it in 223 guesses
Your accuracy was 62.33%
I must have led a sheltered life – I don’t recall knowing the expression.
The usual story – get enough out to be able to research the result.
AussieDJ said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #191!The answer was:
You solved it in 223 guesses
Your accuracy was 62.33%I must have led a sheltered life – I don’t recall knowing the expression.
The usual story – get enough out to be able to research the result.
not enough dungeons and dragons.
the most enjoyable bit for me was early on deciding to go with them, they and their. And then I found he, his and him. And then suspiciously she and her. that revealed a lot. and then everything seemed to be turning into. So much myth, legend, story, tale. God and gods. probably should have got it out earlier.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #191!The answer was:
You solved it in 223 guesses
Your accuracy was 62.33%I must have led a sheltered life – I don’t recall knowing the expression.
The usual story – get enough out to be able to research the result.
not enough dungeons and dragons.
the most enjoyable bit for me was early on deciding to go with them, they and their. And then I found he, his and him. And then suspiciously she and her. that revealed a lot. and then everything seemed to be turning into. So much myth, legend, story, tale. God and gods. probably should have got it out earlier.
one of the words that was not there was ‘changeling.’
trolled by the chemistry
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #192!
The answer was
You solved it in 118 guesses
Your accuracy was 59.32%
You have solved 81 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 55 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 29.00 Guesses; 65.22% Accuracy
Global Average: 58.18 Guesses; 65.40% Accuracy
—-
For the first time, I had to google it. Never even heard of.
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #192!The answer was
You solved it in 118 guesses
Your accuracy was 59.32%
You have solved 81 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 55 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 29.00 Guesses; 65.22% Accuracy
Global Average: 58.18 Guesses; 65.40% Accuracy
—-
For the first time, I had to google it. Never even heard of.
Oh. that’s promising. Thank you. I was just saying to self that I knew enough about ‘someone de someone’ to know I didn’t know anything about him.
sarahs mum said:
You solved it in 82 guesses Your accuracy was 93.90% You have solved 20 consecutive Redactles
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #192!The answer was
You solved it in 118 guesses
Your accuracy was 59.32%
You have solved 81 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 55 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 29.00 Guesses; 65.22% Accuracy
Global Average: 58.18 Guesses; 65.40% Accuracy
—-
For the first time, I had to google it. Never even heard of.
Oh. that’s promising. Thank you. I was just saying to self that I knew enough about ‘someone de someone’ to know I didn’t know anything about him.
Global Stats
Globally, 173 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 53.00 Guesses; 64.29% Accuracy Global Average: 71.64 Guesses; 65.82% Accuracy——
Nup. also never heard of him. I am sure that I could have found a lot more successful words but I still would not have achieved anything by it.
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
You solved it in 82 guesses Your accuracy was 93.90% You have solved 20 consecutive Redactlesdv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #192!
The answer was
You solved it in 118 guesses
Your accuracy was 59.32%
You have solved 81 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 55 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 29.00 Guesses; 65.22% Accuracy
Global Average: 58.18 Guesses; 65.40% Accuracy
—-
For the first time, I had to google it. Never even heard of.
Oh. that’s promising. Thank you. I was just saying to self that I knew enough about ‘someone de someone’ to know I didn’t know anything about him.
Global Stats
Globally, 173 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 53.00 Guesses; 64.29% Accuracy Global Average: 71.64 Guesses; 65.82% Accuracy——
Nup. also never heard of him. I am sure that I could have found a lot more successful words but I still would not have achieved anything by it.
^
oh, god
wtf is this
Another one I’ve never heard of, and which also involved additional research to solve.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #192!
The answer was:
You solved it in 218 guesses
Your accuracy was 52.29%
“Although, some may think capers are vegetables, they are closer to being fruits than vegetables. About one to two tablespoons of capers is a serving, and may be taken per meal. It is important not to overeat capers because of its relative high sodium content.”
They taste like crap and PWM will have no truck with them.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #193!
The answer was:
You solved it in 29 guessesYour accuracy was 79.31%
You have solved 82 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 8 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 14.00 Guesses; 74.75% Accuracy
Global Average: 19.00 Guesses; 68.23% Accuracy
Right in my wheelhouse
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #193!
The answer was:
You solved it in 29 guessesYour accuracy was 79.31%
You have solved 82 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 8 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 14.00 Guesses; 74.75% Accuracy
Global Average: 19.00 Guesses; 68.23% AccuracyRight in my wheelhouse
is not my wheelhouse.
they are unlikely to do the situationalists.
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #193!
The answer was:
You solved it in 29 guessesYour accuracy was 79.31%
You have solved 82 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 8 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 14.00 Guesses; 74.75% Accuracy
Global Average: 19.00 Guesses; 68.23% AccuracyRight in my wheelhouse
is not my wheelhouse.
they are unlikely to do the situationalists.
Number 8 is well played though. congrats.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #193!
The answer was:
You solved it in 113 guesses
Your accuracy was 74.34%
Global Stats
Globally, 310 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 56.00 Guesses; 72.03% Accuracy
Global Average: 82.30 Guesses; 70.33% Accuracy
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #193!
The answer was:
You solved it in 29 guessesYour accuracy was 79.31%
You have solved 82 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 8 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 14.00 Guesses; 74.75% Accuracy
Global Average: 19.00 Guesses; 68.23% AccuracyRight in my wheelhouse
is not my wheelhouse.
they are unlikely to do the situationalists.Number 8 is well played though. congrats.
Cheers
oh god…I’m bored.
sarahs mum said:
oh god…I’m bored.
76 100.00%
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
oh god…I’m bored.
76 100.00%
So you got it or still on it?
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
oh god…I’m bored.
76 100.00%
So you got it or still on it?
I got it. and a perfect score. just needed a sleep and a nap in between.
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
sarahs mum said:76 100.00%
So you got it or still on it?
I got it. and a perfect score. just needed a sleep and a nap in between.
Is that against the rules?:-)
Witty Rejoinder said:
sarahs mum said:
dv said:So you got it or still on it?
I got it. and a perfect score. just needed a sleep and a nap in between.
Is that against the rules?:-)
Sorry for being like a 14 year old girl when this subject is discussed.
sarahs mum said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
sarahs mum said:I got it. and a perfect score. just needed a sleep and a nap in between.
Is that against the rules?:-)
Sorry for being like a 14 year old girl when this subject is discussed.
I don’t even attempt redactle anymore so you’re a lot better at it than me.
Witty Rejoinder said:
sarahs mum said:
Witty Rejoinder said:Is that against the rules?:-)
Sorry for being like a 14 year old girl when this subject is discussed.
I don’t even attempt redactle anymore so you’re a lot better at it than me.
Yeah think I’ll brag and then realise its only slightly better than a monkey
SCIENCE said:
oh, god
wtf is this
so anyway all the dropped graphics and graphically rendered technical stuff really fkdup the grammatical reading of everything
it was super frustrating in fact, the broken sentences didn’t resemble anything we thought we knew
like it was obvious it was going to be technical but nothing was making sense, even on successively more careful readings
but then we got to this
About ███ of ██████ █████ from a ██████ ████████████ ███ within ███ ████████ █████████ █ ████ from the ████; about ███ of the ██████ ███ within ███ ████████ ██████████; and about ██.██ ███ within █████ ████████ ██████████. ████ ████ is █████ as the ██-██-██.█ (█████████) ████, or the █-█████ ████.
from which it 
was suddenly kind of obvious
A bit of physics in this one, sm.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #194!
The answer was:
You solved it in 52 guesses
Your accuracy was 59.62%
Global Stats
Globally, 47 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 36.00 Guesses; 51.61% Accuracy
Global Average: 44.49 Guesses; 55.11% Accuracy
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #194!The answer was:
You solved it in 105 guessesYour accuracy was 39.05%
You have solved 83 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 62 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 43.00 Guesses; 49.49% Accuracy
Global Average: 58.29 Guesses; 52.64% Accuracy
Another in my wheelhouse but I got on the wrong track
AussieDJ said:
A bit of physics in this one, sm.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #194!
The answer was:
You solved it in 52 guesses
Your accuracy was 59.62%Global Stats
Globally, 47 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 36.00 Guesses; 51.61% Accuracy
Global Average: 44.49 Guesses; 55.11% Accuracy
I can see myself giving up early. I do not think I know this.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
A bit of physics in this one, sm.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #194!
The answer was:
You solved it in 52 guesses
Your accuracy was 59.62%Global Stats
Globally, 47 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 36.00 Guesses; 51.61% Accuracy
Global Average: 44.49 Guesses; 55.11% AccuracyI can see myself giving up early. I do not think I know this.
I didn’t either, but enough came out to allow some research.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
A bit of physics in this one, sm.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #194!
The answer was:
You solved it in 52 guesses
Your accuracy was 59.62%Global Stats
Globally, 47 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 36.00 Guesses; 51.61% Accuracy
Global Average: 44.49 Guesses; 55.11% AccuracyI can see myself giving up early. I do not think I know this.
I bet you’ve heard of him
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
A bit of physics in this one, sm.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #194!
The answer was:
You solved it in 52 guesses
Your accuracy was 59.62%Global Stats
Globally, 47 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 36.00 Guesses; 51.61% Accuracy
Global Average: 44.49 Guesses; 55.11% AccuracyI can see myself giving up early. I do not think I know this.
I bet you’ve heard of him
nup.
102 80.39%
I’ll just have to be happy with getting out the second law of thermodynamics and entropy.
LOL who dafq are these people
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #195!
The answer was:
You solved it in 107 guesses
Your accuracy was 45.79%
You have solved 84 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 133 players have solved today’s Redactle so farGlobal Median: 39.00 Guesses; 61.76% Accuracy
Global Average: 50.38 Guesses; 64.37% Accuracy
49 95.92%
You solved it in 49 guesses Your accuracy was 95.92% You have solved 23 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 192 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 42.50 Guesses; 60.49% Accuracy Global Average: 55.52 Guesses; 63.06% Accuracymust just have been 
in the correct frame of mind for this one which moved quick all within the 1st paragraph
figured the first 6 letter redact
██████ a
being a typical pattern, then
is a ███- or █████-███████
was a different pattern with high confidence, figuring 2 of the redacts very quickly, and so thinking of common things that would be top articles, the 7 letter redact was also clear
and off-████
was therefore evident, leaving the main puzzle as which of the names would fit the target length
SCIENCE said:
must just have beenfigured the first 6 letter redact
██████ a
being a typical pattern, then
is a ███- or █████-███████
was a different pattern with high confidence, figuring 2 of the redacts very quickly, and so thinking of common things that would be top articles, the 7 letter redact was also clear
and off-████
was therefore evident, leaving the main puzzle as which of the names would fit the target length
so what were your stats?
sarahs mum said:
SCIENCE said:
must just have been
figured the first 6 letter redact
██████ a
being a typical pattern, then
is a ███- or █████-███████
was a different pattern with high confidence, figuring 2 of the redacts very quickly, and so thinking of common things that would be top articles, the 7 letter redact was also clear
and off-████
was therefore evident, leaving the main puzzle as which of the names would fit the target length
so what were your stats?
we’re always out for a sneaky* 1-shot (or minimal-shot for multiword targets), if we can’t see it then we complain and usually take like 200 but no complaints today
*: and hide a screenshot in there
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #195!
The answer was:
You solved it in 204 guesses
Your accuracy was 57.35%
Lots of (blunderbuss-type) guesses to eventually get to the result.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #196!The answer was:
You solved it in 97 guessesYour accuracy was 47.42%
You have solved 85 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 221 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 36.00 Guesses; 69.44% AccuracyGlobal Average: 47.95 Guesses; 68.63% Accuracy
96 88.54%
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #196!
The answer was:
You solved it in 110 guesses
Your accuracy was 63.64%
Global Stats
Globally, 938 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 48.50 Guesses; 66.67% Accuracy
Global Average: 62.15 Guesses; 66.88% Accuracy
bysshe
we d’n‘o’ people
SCIENCE said:
we d’n‘o’ people
well I didn’t know his middle name was Bysshe
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #197!The answer was:
You solved it in 123 guessesYour accuracy was 43.90%
You have solved 86 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 48 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 38.00 Guesses; 61.99% Accuracy
Global Average: 54.81 Guesses; 65.04% Accuracy
ou solved it in 59 guesses Your accuracy was 98.31% You have solved 25 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 143 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 73.00 Guesses; 60.18% Accuracy Global Average: 90.96 Guesses; 61.54% AccuracyShare your results
The throw-everything-at-it effect eventually comes good
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #197!
The answer was:
You solved it in 196 guesses
Your accuracy was 46.43%
we fail
SCIENCE said:
we fail
I’ve not got it either, leaving work soon
You solved it in 63 guesses Your accuracy was 98.41% You have solved 26 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 311 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 60.00 Guesses; 68.52% Accuracy Global Average: 79.10 Guesses; 69.42% AccuracyCongratulations, you solved Redactle #198!The answer was:
You solved it in 41 guesses
Your accuracy was 75.61%
You have solved 87 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 617 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 67.00 Guesses; 67.92% Accuracy
Global Average: 89.64 Guesses; 68.41% Accuracy
fk, 14/16, far from optimal
(Stand down. This is yesterday’s result!)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #198!
The answer was: (all-colour plonk)
You solved it in 224 guesses
Your accuracy was 60.71%
AussieDJ said:
(Stand down. This is yesterday’s result!)Congratulations, you solved Redactle #198!
The answer was: (all-colour plonk)
You solved it in 224 guesses
Your accuracy was 60.71%
I had lots of it out and then came the derr moment of something that goes with a meal with SO2 in it.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
(Stand down. This is yesterday’s result!)Congratulations, you solved Redactle #198!
The answer was: (all-colour plonk)
You solved it in 224 guesses
Your accuracy was 60.71%
I had lots of it out and then came the derr moment of something that goes with a meal with SO2 in it.
I don’t remember how I got it out … probably got enough to research the last little bit, or something.
Anyhow, the next one beckons.
You solved it in 32 guesses Your accuracy was 93.75% You have solved 27 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 20 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 11.50 Guesses; 96.88% Accuracy Global Average: 14.00 Guesses; 84.73% AccuracyI nearly put it in at 20. damn
Not physics, sm.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #199!
The answer was:
You solved it in 48 guesses
Your accuracy was 47.92%
You have solved 88 consecutive Redactles
Global StatsGlobally, 27 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 12.00 Guesses; 93.75% Accuracy
Global Average: 17.89 Guesses; 82.22% Accuracy
lol damnericans
SCIENCE said:
lol damnericans
they have them here in Tasmania. Sarah rode a sheep one year and the rode a replacement heifer the next.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #199!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 1 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Nicely done, btm
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #199!
The answer was:
You solved it in 212 guesses
Your accuracy was 59.91%
Global Stats
Globally, 829 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 54.00 Guesses; 62.42% Accuracy
Global Average: 73.27 Guesses; 65.16% Accuracy
AussieDJ said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #199!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 1 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
Nicely done, btm
It was the ‘round up’ clue left in. I had almost 20 words in when I found it.
You solved it in 30 guesses Your accuracy was 96.67% You have solved 28 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 49 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 29.00 Guesses; 72.73% Accuracy Global Average: 36.96 Guesses; 72.54% AccuracyCongratulations, you solved Redactle #200!
The answer was:
You solved it in 108 guesses
Your accuracy was 57.41%
You have solved 89 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 2173 players have solved today’s Redactle so farGlobal Median: 62.00 Guesses; 63.64% Accuracy
Global Average: 81.20 Guesses; 64.11% Accuracy
Kind of surprised by some words not found, including organ, anatomy.
dv said:
Kind of surprised by some words not found, including organ, anatomy.
yeah we got close then got fkn far
(Posting this before the next one loads.)
I beat the global average! Not by much, but even so …Yay, me!
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #200!
The answer was:
You solved it in 84 guesses
Your accuracy was 64.29%
Global Stats
Global Median: 68.00 Guesses; 61.74% Accuracy
Global Average: 89.51 Guesses; 62.63% Accuracy
AussieDJ said:
(Posting this before the next one loads.)
I beat the global average! Not by much, but even so …Yay, me!Congratulations, you solved Redactle #200!
The answer was:
You solved it in 84 guesses
Your accuracy was 64.29%Global Stats
Global Median: 68.00 Guesses; 61.74% Accuracy
Global Average: 89.51 Guesses; 62.63% Accuracy
I did okay. But I was here alone and no one noticed.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
(Posting this before the next one loads.)
I beat the global average! Not by much, but even so …Yay, me!Congratulations, you solved Redactle #200!
The answer was:
You solved it in 84 guesses
Your accuracy was 64.29%Global Stats
Global Median: 68.00 Guesses; 61.74% Accuracy
Global Average: 89.51 Guesses; 62.63% AccuracyI did okay. But I was here alone and no one noticed.
I did notice – good effort, by the way – although it didn’t register at the time as I was concentrating on scrolling through to post my results.
Did I say ‘good effort’? I’ll add a ‘Well done!’ too.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
(Posting this before the next one loads.)
I beat the global average! Not by much, but even so …Yay, me!Congratulations, you solved Redactle #200!
The answer was:
You solved it in 84 guesses
Your accuracy was 64.29%Global Stats
Global Median: 68.00 Guesses; 61.74% Accuracy
Global Average: 89.51 Guesses; 62.63% AccuracyI did okay. But I was here alone and no one noticed.
I did notice – good effort, by the way – although it didn’t register at the time as I was concentrating on scrolling through to post my results.
Did I say ‘good effort’? I’ll add a ‘Well done!’ too.
:)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #201!The answer was:
You solved it in 55 guesses
Your accuracy was 52.73%
You have solved 90 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 20 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 19.00 Guesses; 72.83% Accuracy
Global Average: 34.65 Guesses; 73.64% Accuracy
You solved it in 58 guesses Your accuracy was 96.55% You have solved 29 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 68 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 49.50 Guesses; 70.39% Accuracy Global Average: 74.90 Guesses; 70.96% AccuracyI’ve been having a good run. It will probably physics again soon.
I’ve decided to try to glean enough information from the unredacted text to solve it in the fewest possible guesses (1 for a single-word title, 2 for a two-word title, etc.)
btm said:
I’ve decided to try to glean enough information from the unredacted text to solve it in the fewest possible guesses (1 for a single-word title, 2 for a two-word title, etc.)Congratulations, you solved Redactle #201!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 1 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 143 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 61.00 Guesses; 66.67% Accuracy
- Global Average: 86.88 Guesses; 68.55% Accuracy
you’re too good. :) *dips lid.
Back to the scatter-gun, plus a search much later in the piece, approach…
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #201!
The answer was:
You solved it in 172 guesses
Your accuracy was 57.56%
Global Stats
Globally, 424 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 86.50 Guesses; 65.11% Accuracy
Global Average: 107.03 Guesses; 66.07% Accuracy
don’t have any
SCIENCE said:
don’t have any
I have too much.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #202!The answer was:
You solved it in 76 guesses
Your accuracy was 26.32%You have solved 91 consecutive Redactles
Global StatsGlobally, 21 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 52.00 Guesses; 38.14% Accuracy
Global Average: 48.33 Guesses; 45.74% Accuracy
Share your results
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #202!
The answer was:
You solved it in 96 guesses
Your accuracy was 36.46%
Global Stats
Globally, 107 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 71.00 Guesses; 32.76% Accuracy
Global Average: 86.70 Guesses; 39.40% Accuracy
107 59.81%
don’t know anything about business dealings
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #203!
The answer was:
You solved it in 14 guesses
Your accuracy was 71.43%
You have solved 92 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 6 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 9.00 Guesses; 64.88% Accuracy
Global Average: 80.83 Guesses; 66.23% Accuracy
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #203!The answer was:
You solved it in 14 guesses
Your accuracy was 71.43%
You have solved 92 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 6 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 9.00 Guesses; 64.88% Accuracy
Global Average: 80.83 Guesses; 66.23% Accuracy
ooo. six.
It didn’t tell me where I came again today.
62 100.00%
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #203!The answer was:
You solved it in 14 guesses
Your accuracy was 71.43%
You have solved 92 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 6 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 9.00 Guesses; 64.88% Accuracy
Global Average: 80.83 Guesses; 66.23% Accuracy
ooo. six.
It didn’t tell me where I came again today.
62 100.00%
You need to wait for a minute or two for the page to open up with the full lot of stats.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #203!
The answer was:
You solved it in 166 guesses
Your accuracy was 55.42%
Global Stats
Globally, 5103 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 62.00 Guesses; 60.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 89.65 Guesses; 61.05% Accuracy
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #203!
The answer was:
You solved it in 14 guesses
Your accuracy was 71.43%
You have solved 92 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 6 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 9.00 Guesses; 64.88% Accuracy
Global Average: 80.83 Guesses; 66.23% Accuracy
ooo. six.
It didn’t tell me where I came again today.
62 100.00%
You need to wait for a minute or two for the page to open up with the full lot of stats.
refresh ¡ refresh
the median it gave us was higher than it gave dv but ah well at least it took us 66.67% including one where our fingers were in the wrong place on the keyboard
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #203!The answer was:
You solved it in 14 guesses
Your accuracy was 71.43%
You have solved 92 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 6 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 9.00 Guesses; 64.88% Accuracy
Global Average: 80.83 Guesses; 66.23% Accuracy
ooo. six.
It didn’t tell me where I came again today.
62 100.00%
You need to wait for a minute or two for the page to open up with the full lot of stats.
no. sometimes I try everything and nudda.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #203!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 2 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 4197 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 61.00 Guesses; 60.45% Accuracy
- Global Average: 88.37 Guesses; 61.46% Accuracy
much wow.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #204!The answer was:
You solved it in 37 guesses
Your accuracy was 56.76%You have solved 93 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 6 players have solved today’s Redactle so farGlobal Median: 15.50 Guesses; 63.38% Accuracy
Global Average: 28.00 Guesses; 62.01% Accuracy
You solved it in 58 guesses Your accuracy was 91.38% You have solved 32 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 134 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 57.50 Guesses; 50.00% Accuracy Global Average: 74.25 Guesses; 51.78% AccuracyCongratulations, you solved Redactle #204!
The answer was:
You solved it in 108 guesses
Your accuracy was 48.15%
Global Stats
Globally, 236 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 66.50 Guesses; 48.67% Accuracy
Global Average: 88.66 Guesses; 49.46% Accuracy
Today I played an unlimited game that I failed at. I had part of the answer out when I googled.
Gates of the Arctic National Park and Preserve
Gates of the Arctic National Park and Preserve is an American national park that protects portions of the Brooks Range in northern Alaska. The park is the northernmost national park in the United States, situated entirely north of the Arctic Circle. The area of the park and preserve is the second largest in the U.S. at 8,472,506 acres (13,238 sq mi; 34,287 km), slightly larger in area than Belgium; the National Park portion is the second largest in the U.S., after the National Park portion of Wrangell–St. Elias National Park and Preserve.
It’s a 2-word title; the global median is 2.00, so more than 3 players have got it out in 2 (or someone’s got it out in 1, which I can’t see happening.)
It’s not physics, though, sm.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #205!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 2 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 6 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 2.00 Guesses; 92.31% Accuracy
- Global Average: 5.33 Guesses; 64.10% Accuracy
It’s a 2-word title; the global median is 2.00, so more than 3 players have got it out in 2 (or someone’s got it out in 1, which I can’t see happening.)
It’s not physics, though, sm.
like..wow.
You solved it in 72 guesses Your accuracy was 95.83% You have solved 33 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 245 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 60.00 Guesses; 71.43% Accuracy Global Average: 79.07 Guesses; 70.99% AccuracyI should have probably have done better than that but the second word took a while to come to mind.
I missed the drop
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #205!The answer was:
You solved it in 36 guesses
Your accuracy was 88.89%
You have solved 94 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 1761 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 81.00 Guesses; 68.75% Accuracy
Global Average: 99.35 Guesses; 68.68% Accuracy
btm said:
It’s not physics, though, sm.
Everything is physics
dv said:
btm said:
It’s not physics, though, sm.
Everything is physics
As I’m still in pedant mood from yesterday, I’m going to say:
no it’s not.
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:btm said:
It’s not physics, though, sm.
Everything is physics
As I’m still in pedant mood from yesterday, I’m going to say:
no it’s not.
Yes it is
Just putting this here now … ‘cos I forgot earlier.
(It took forever for me to solve, anyway.)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #205!
The answer was:
You solved it in 284 guesses
Your accuracy was 59.51%
You solved it in 62 guesses Your accuracy was 91.94% You have solved 34 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 117 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 62.00 Guesses; 57.50% Accuracy Global Average: 71.35 Guesses; 56.60% AccuracyI don’t care what DV says. that wasn’t physics.
I did an unlimited today that I got out through the etymology bit. I had an ‘on the other’, so I typed in ‘hand’ and it also turned up a few times in the etymology. so I tried ‘latin’. and then ‘make’. And then solved it with’manufacturing’.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #206!The answer was:
You solved it in 96 guesses
Your accuracy was 38.54%
You have solved 95 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 484 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 80.00 Guesses; 53.14% Accuracy
Global Average: 99.28 Guesses; 53.99% Accuracy
Not that I know anything about the subject, but I still should have solved this in fewer guesses than I did.
Oh well …
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #206!
The answer was:
You solved it in 297 guesses
Your accuracy was 45.12%
Global Stats
Globally, 4895 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 101.00 Guesses; 48.44% Accuracy
Global Average: 134.50 Guesses; 50.20% Accuracy
what is all this
SCIENCE said:
what is all this
This was the one which was published at 0300 AEDT today.
I wonder how they chose that time zone for the updates.
It’s 1600 in GMT.
1100 in US Central time
just redactle unlimited.
Susan B Anthony.
100 guesses. 92% accuracy.
Shoulda done better.
You solved it in 90 guesses Your accuracy was 93.33% You have solved 35 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 214 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 44.00 Guesses; 80.56% Accuracy Global Average: 65.35 Guesses; 78.62% Accuracybtm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #207!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 1 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 365 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 49.00 Guesses; 80.56% Accuracy
- Global Average: 68.25 Guesses; 78.60% Accuracy
How long did you have to mull over over the article to solve it in one?
The ‘throw words at it willy-nilly and eventually an answer will present itself’ method continues to be employed.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #207!
The answer was:
You solved it in 191 guesses
Your accuracy was 69.63%
s
Global Stats
Globally, 1245 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 51.00 Guesses; 79.81% Accuracy
Global Average: 70.84 Guesses; 78.06% Accuracy
Witty Rejoinder said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #207!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 1 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 365 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 49.00 Guesses; 80.56% Accuracy
- Global Average: 68.25 Guesses; 78.60% Accuracy
How long did you have to mull over over the article to solve it in one?
A while; I read as much as I can, and try to infer the title from what hasn’t been redacted. My goal is to try to solve the whole thing in the minimum number of guesses (1 for a one-word title, 2 for a two-word title, etc.) by examining the unredacted parts.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #207!
The answer was:
You solved it in 51 guesses
Your accuracy was 72.55%
You have solved 96 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 3834 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 56.00 Guesses; 78.56% Accuracy
Global Average: 79.46 Guesses; 77.05% Accuracy
sigh we could have done more with that throne time damn what a waste
You solved it in 39 guesses Your accuracy was 66.67% You have solved 36 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 175 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 27.00 Guesses; 62.50% Accuracy Global Average: 34.25 Guesses; 64.11% AccuracyA simple one – a nice boost to the ego, one could say. (And one has!)
:)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #208!
The answer was:
You solved it in 33 guesses
Your accuracy was 72.73%
Global Stats
Globally, 284 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 29.00 Guesses; 63.64% Accuracy
Global Average: 37.14 Guesses; 64.19% Accuracy
AussieDJ said:
A simple one – a nice boost to the ego, one could say. (And one has!):)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #208!
The answer was:
You solved it in 33 guesses
Your accuracy was 72.73%Global Stats
Globally, 284 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 29.00 Guesses; 63.64% Accuracy
Global Average: 37.14 Guesses; 64.19% Accuracy
I thought it was hard before I realised it was easy.
I understand now how you could get it out in one.
The table at the top of this one gave the type of thing away; after that it was just a matter of finding the right one that fit the number of letters in the title.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
A simple one – a nice boost to the ego, one could say. (And one has!):)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #208!
The answer was:
You solved it in 33 guesses
Your accuracy was 72.73%Global Stats
Globally, 284 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 29.00 Guesses; 63.64% Accuracy
Global Average: 37.14 Guesses; 64.19% Accuracy
I thought it was hard before I realised it was easy.
I understand now how you could get it out in one.
Those among our group who carefully read through the article before attempting a word might get it in one.
The remainder tend to do it in a couple more words.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #208!
The answer was:
You solved it in 40 guesses
Your accuracy was 35.00%
You have solved 97 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 9406 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 41.00 Guesses; 55.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 54.82 Guesses; 57.98% Accuracy
Not physics, sm, despite dv’s claim.
You solved it in 56 guesses Your accuracy was 89.29% You have solved 37 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 77 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 51.00 Guesses; 70.59% Accuracy Global Average: 62.08 Guesses; 68.33% AccuracyShare your results
—
I got waylaid thinking it was physics. what an embarassment.
sarahs mum said:
You solved it in 56 guesses Your accuracy was 89.29% You have solved 37 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 77 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 51.00 Guesses; 70.59% Accuracy Global Average: 62.08 Guesses; 68.33% AccuracyShare your results
—
I got waylaid thinking it was physics. what an embarassment.
Even after btm told you it wasn’t!
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #209!
The answer was:
You solved it in 90 guesses
Your accuracy was 61.11%
Global Stats
Globally, 105 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 53.00 Guesses; 68.92% Accuracy
Global Average: 74.81 Guesses; 67.39% Accuracy
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:You solved it in 56 guesses Your accuracy was 89.29% You have solved 37 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 77 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 51.00 Guesses; 70.59% Accuracy Global Average: 62.08 Guesses; 68.33% AccuracyShare your results
—
I got waylaid thinking it was physics. what an embarassment.
Even after btm told you it wasn’t!
Iwasn’t paying attention. I was redactling.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #209!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 1 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 9 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 46.00 Guesses; 70.59% Accuracy
- Global Average: 38.89 Guesses; 63.19% Accuracy
Not physics, sm, despite dv’s claim.
I was thinking it was physics even though I am supposed to know the answer is always duchamp.
might batch these and look up the unlimited history from time to time we’re getting a bit old for the middle of night parties
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #209!The answer was:
You solved it in 98 guesses
Your accuracy was 59.18%
You have solved 98 consecutive Redactles
Global StatsGlobally, 2946 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 93.00 Guesses; 60.32% Accuracy
Global Average: 137.26 Guesses; 61.19% Accuracy
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #210!
The answer was:
You solved it in 45 guesses
Your accuracy was 64.44%
You have solved 99 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 6 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 28.50 Guesses; 61.98% Accuracy
Global Average: 27.67 Guesses; 59.49% Accuracy
Not physics, sm.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #210!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 1 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 147 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 63.00 Guesses; 61.61% Accuracy
- Global Average: 80.79 Guesses; 62.24% Accuracy
Not physics, sm.
How the heck can you solve it in 1 guess. It’s a 2 word problem
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #210!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 1 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 147 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 63.00 Guesses; 61.61% Accuracy
- Global Average: 80.79 Guesses; 62.24% Accuracy
Not physics, sm.
I fell asleep. Just starting it now then.
47 100.00%
dv said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #210!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 1 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 147 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 63.00 Guesses; 61.61% Accuracy
- Global Average: 80.79 Guesses; 62.24% Accuracy
Not physics, sm.
How the heck can you solve it in 1 guess. It’s a 2 word problem
The first word is the crucial one; I only needed to get that one. Try it yourself (clear cookies in your browser first, though that’ll reset your “number of consecutive” count, so maybe use a different browser.)
sarahs mum said:
47 100.00%
100%! Well done, sm!
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
47 100.00%
100%! Well done, sm!
but i took more guesses. even if they were right.
(Nearly forgot about this … )
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #210!
The answer was:
You solved it in 140 guesses
Your accuracy was 61.43%
Global Stats
Globally, 7903 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 85.00 Guesses; 57.84% Accuracy
Global Average: 114.24 Guesses; 59.27% Accuracy
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #211!
The answer was:
You solved it in 59 guesses
Your accuracy was 61.02%
You have solved 100 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 42 players have solved today’s Redactle so farGlobal Median: 28.50 Guesses; 74.45% AccuracyGlobal Average: 39.74 Guesses; 70.78% Accuracy
I have the first word out. I don’t think I know the answer.
I’m pretty sure you do know it, sm, but it may not be obvious.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #211!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 2 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 2470 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 63.00 Guesses; 60.00% Accuracy
- Global Average: 82.97 Guesses; 60.71% Accuracy
I’m pretty sure you do know it, sm, but it may not be obvious.
It isn’t seeming obvious. :(
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #211!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 2 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 2470 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 63.00 Guesses; 60.00% Accuracy
- Global Average: 82.97 Guesses; 60.71% Accuracy
I’m pretty sure you do know it, sm, but it may not be obvious.
It isn’t seeming obvious. :(
38 100.00% with the aid of google.
Yeah. I have heard of it but I don’t know anything about it really.
Redactle #211!
The answer was:
You solved it in 117 guesses
Your accuracy was 54.70%
I had a variation of the first word on the third guess.
Then went off the rails after that.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #212!The answer was:
You solved it in 14 guesses
Your accuracy was 64.29%
You have solved 101 consecutive Redactles
Global StatsGlobally, 14 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 9.00 Guesses; 72.14% Accuracy
Global Average: 17.64 Guesses; 72.86% Accuracy
Physics (and chemistry), sm.
You solved it in 62 guesses Your accuracy was 80.65% You have solved 40 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 289 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 32.00 Guesses; 59.65% Accuracy Global Average: 46.83 Guesses; 60.98% Accuracy —-more fn physics.
at least I had heard of this.
sarahs mum said:
You solved it in 62 guesses Your accuracy was 80.65% You have solved 40 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 289 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 32.00 Guesses; 59.65% Accuracy Global Average: 46.83 Guesses; 60.98% Accuracy —-more fn physics.
at least I had heard of this.
I did have some good words.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #212!
The answer was:
You solved it in 62 guesses
Your accuracy was 46.77%
Global Stats
Globally, 346 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 34.00 Guesses; 58.76% Accuracy
Global Average: 54.57 Guesses; 60.06% Accuracy
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #213!
The answer was:
You solved it in 2 guesses
Your accuracy was 100.00%
You have solved 102 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 2 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 1.50 Guesses; 50.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 1.50 Guesses; 50.00% Accuracy
Well done, dv.
Not really physics, but used by many of the sciences, sm.
btm said:
Well done, dv.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #213!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 2 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 57 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 24.00 Guesses; 63.16% Accuracy
- Global Average: 44.14 Guesses; 64.50% Accuracy
Not really physics, but used by many of the sciences, sm.
it can get f***ed.
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Well done, dv.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #213!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 2 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 57 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 24.00 Guesses; 63.16% Accuracy
- Global Average: 44.14 Guesses; 64.50% Accuracy
Not really physics, but used by many of the sciences, sm.
it can get f***ed.
At least I fluked the wordle.
When the redactle loaded I looked at for a long time knowing that it could be got out in two. but not for me. after a bit of work I have the first word out. again stumped.
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Well done, dv.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #213!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 2 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 57 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 24.00 Guesses; 63.16% Accuracy
- Global Average: 44.14 Guesses; 64.50% Accuracy
Not really physics, but used by many of the sciences, sm.
it can get f***ed.
At least I fluked the wordle.
When the redactle loaded I looked at for a long time knowing that it could be got out in two. but not for me. after a bit of work I have the first word out. again stumped.
You probably know it; would you like a clue?
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:it can get f***ed.
At least I fluked the wordle.
When the redactle loaded I looked at for a long time knowing that it could be got out in two. but not for me. after a bit of work I have the first word out. again stumped.
You probably know it; would you like a clue?
I got some more out. But I am still peeved. shall google soon.
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
sarahs mum said:At least I fluked the wordle.
When the redactle loaded I looked at for a long time knowing that it could be got out in two. but not for me. after a bit of work I have the first word out. again stumped.
You probably know it; would you like a clue?
I got some more out. But I am still peeved. shall google soon.
even though I have the first word out I keep on thinking about pints per pound. that is my jam recipe.
nup. never heard of it.
sarahs mum said:
nup. never heard of it.
freal?
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
nup. never heard of it.
freal?
uh huh freal.
Bouncing around all over the place and getting nowhere fast.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #213!
The answer was:
You solved it in 125 guesses
Your accuracy was 47.20%
I figured the first word almost immediately.
The second word I had to scratch my head about, but given the number of letters there was really nothing else it could be.
I filled in some of the blanks early on, but didn’t work out the first word until guess 105.
I needed to do a little research right at the end to get to the correct answer, otherwise I might still be throwing words at it now.
AussieDJ said:
I filled in some of the blanks early on, but didn’t work out the first word until guess 105.I needed to do a little research right at the end to get to the correct answer, otherwise I might still be throwing words at it now.
i got the first word out at 35.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
I filled in some of the blanks early on, but didn’t work out the first word until guess 105.I needed to do a little research right at the end to get to the correct answer, otherwise I might still be throwing words at it now.
i got the first word out at 35.
There are some days (games) that you throw all your usual go-to words at it to no avail.
This was one of those.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
I filled in some of the blanks early on, but didn’t work out the first word until guess 105.I needed to do a little research right at the end to get to the correct answer, otherwise I might still be throwing words at it now.
i got the first word out at 35.
There are some days (games) that you throw all your usual go-to words at it to no avail.
This was one of those.
I did 90% accuracy. Doesn’t help if you don’t know the answer/
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:i got the first word out at 35.
There are some days (games) that you throw all your usual go-to words at it to no avail.
This was one of those.
I did 90% accuracy. Doesn’t help if you don’t know the answer/
AussieDJ said:
They’ve all taken a bit of research to finish off.
^
all right not all but you know what we mean
You solved it in 73 guesses Your accuracy was 91.78% You have solved 42 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 57 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 36.00 Guesses; 72.73% Accuracy Global Average: 40.39 Guesses; 71.27% Accuracy —- not physics smCongratulations, you solved Redactle #214!
The answer was:
You solved it in 68 guesses
Your accuracy was 63.24%
You have solved 103 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 5102 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 58.00 Guesses; 68.81% Accuracy
Global Average: 83.26 Guesses; 68.44% Accuracy
I feel like I should have done better
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #214!
The answer was:
You solved it in 68 guesses
Your accuracy was 63.24%
You have solved 103 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 5102 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 58.00 Guesses; 68.81% Accuracy
Global Average: 83.26 Guesses; 68.44% AccuracyI feel like I should have done better
i was happy it wasn’t physics.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #214!
The answer was:
You solved it in 164 guesses
Your accuracy was 65.24%
……………………
Observation:
On a sample size of (about) two, I’ve noticed I seem to be able solve these much faster if I’ve had a few hours kip before starting, as opposed to doing them when they first appear.
More justification for not waiting up for the next game to appear. Rather, to hit the sack at a reasonable time.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #215!
The answer was:
You solved it in 43 guesses
Your accuracy was 88.37%
You have solved 104 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 20 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 24.00 Guesses; 69.23% Accuracy
Global Average: 24.85 Guesses; 63.82% Accuracy
Share your results
Not physics, sm, but one of the sciences.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #215!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 1 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 37 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 27.00 Guesses; 65.70% Accuracy
- Global Average: 32.86 Guesses; 63.48% Accuracy
Not physics, sm, but one of the sciences.
Ah yes. I have the second word out. it might take me a little while but I am not despondent yet.
87 86.21%
sarahs mum said:
I have the second word out. it might take me a little while but I am not despondent yet.
I was.
Quite a tail-chase for me. Getting nowhere fast!
Not even throwing the kitchen sink at it was getting me any closer to the answer.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #215!
The answer was:
You solved it in 269 guesses
Your accuracy was 36.43%
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:I have the second word out. it might take me a little while but I am not despondent yet.
I was.
Quite a tail-chase for me. Getting nowhere fast!
Not even throwing the kitchen sink at it was getting me any closer to the answer.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #215!
The answer was:
You solved it in 269 guesses
Your accuracy was 36.43%
I spent such a long time knowing what they wanted and knowing I knew the answer but not being able to remember it. It has been years since I used the word…even in a crossword.
I didn’t even know the answer … and very little I threw at it stuck.
In the end, you start searching on whatever odd phrase you can uncover.
When it is physics. When you know it. When you don’t know it.
—-
███████████████
███████████████ is the process that creates new ██████ ██████ from ███-████████ ████████ (███████ and ████████) and ██████. █████████ to ███████ ████████, the first ██████ were formed a ███ ███████ after the ███ ████, through ███████ █████████ in a process called ███ ████ ███████████████. After about ██ ███████, the ████████ had ████████ and ██████ to a █████ at which these ████-energy ██████████ among ████████ █████, so ████ the ███████ and ████████ █████████ ████████, ███████ ███ ████████ ██████████ ████████ and ██████. The ████ is ██████ of other elements such as ███████ and the ████████ ███████ █████████. ███████████████ in █████ and █████ ██████████ later ████████ the ███████ of elements and isotopes that we have █████, in a process called ██████ ████████ █████████. The ███████ of █████ ████ in elements ███████ than ████████ and ██████ (called ‘██████’ by ███████████████) ███████ █████ (███ ███████), so that the ████████ █████ has █████████████ the ████ ███████████.
█████ ████ █████ elements to ███████ ████ in █████ █████, ██████ off energy in the process known as ███████ ███████████████. ███████ ██████ █████████ ██████ many of the ███████ elements, up to and including ████ and ██████ in the most ███████ █████. ████████ of ███████ ███████████████ ██████ ███████ in ███████ █████ and ████████ except if ███████ through ███████ █████ and ██████████. The neutron ███████ █████████ of the █-process and s-process ██████ ███████ elements, from ████ ███████.
█████████ ███████████████ within █████████ █████ is ███████ ███████████ for the elements between ██████ and ████████: from the ████████ of elements ████████ during ███████ ███████████████; through █████████ ███████████████ during the █████████ █████████; and from the █-process (██████████ of ████████ ████████) during the █████████.
Neutron ████ ███████ are a ████████ ██████████ █████ ██████ of elements ████████ in the █-process. When two neutron █████ collide, a ███████████ ██████ of neutron-████ ██████ may be ███████ which then ███████ forms █████ elements.
You solved it in 79 guesses Your accuracy was 79.75% You have solved 44 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 56 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 51.50 Guesses; 62.73% Accuracy Global Average: 71.84 Guesses; 64.41% AccuracyRedactle
# Guess Hits
307 cadaver 34
306 cadavre 0
305 body 56
304 dead 7
303 which 7
302 post 0
301 pre 0
300 enzyme 0
299 circulation 0
298 digestion 3
297 respiration 0
296 cells 6
295 metabolism 0
294 attempt 0
293 gut 1
292 toxin 0
291 carbohydrate 0
290 fat 0
289 break 3
288 biota 0
287 thin 0
286 length 0
285 intestine 1
284 lower 0
283 remainder 0
282 absorbed 0
281 tract 0
280 system 5
279 state 2
278 experiment 0
277 trial 0
276 think 0
275 example 2
274 g 0
273 e 0
272 i 0
271 device 0
270 monitor 0
269 current 1
268 be 23
267 are 26
266 fields 0
265 circles 0
264 circle 0
263 field 1
262 days 0
261 duodenum 0
260 throat 0
259 nose 0
258 ear 0
257 head 0
256 bones 0
255 bladder 0
254 gland 0
253 gall 0
252 intestines 1
251 lymphatic 0
250 lymph 0
249 aorta 0
248 arteries 2
247 veins 1
246 lungs 1
245 stomach 0
244 bowel 0
243 intervene 0
242 surgeon 0
241 surgery 2
240 ambulance 0
239 witchcraft 0
238 practice 4
237 malpractice 0
236 police 1
235 also 22
234 alao 0
233 lesser 1
232 extent 1
231 certain 7
230 courts 1
229 point 0
228 used 21
227 teach 1
226 taught 0
225 common 1
224 opinion 1
223 compound 0
222 supply 0
221 water 2
220 wind 0
219 ocean 0
218 microscope 0
217 small 1
216 stay 0
215 remove 1
214 inject 0
213 put 3
212 held 0
211 tokd 0
210 strain 0
209 western 0
208 most 5
207 eliminated 1
206 spread 1
205 avicenna 0
204 10th 0
203 4th 0
202 fifth 0
201 fourth 0
200 third 2
199 second 3
198 c 2
197 b 2
196 one 11
195 3 0
194 2 0
193 thousands 1
192 people 11
191 old 1
190 young 2
189 elderly 0
188 months 0
187 weeks 1
186 grow 1
185 shape 0
184 colour 0
183 color 1
182 mole 0
181 symptomatic 0
180 diagnostic 0
179 diagnosis 0
178 treatment 0
177 prognosis 0
176 transmit 0
175 humans 2
174 digestive 2
173 respiratory 0
172 circulatory 0
171 heart 1
170 kidney 0
169 liver 1
168 borne 0
167 blood 3
166 cancer 0
165 viruses 0
164 fungus 1
163 insect 0
162 parasite 0
161 skin 8
160 middle 0
159 medicine 3
158 doctors 4
157 hospital 1
156 word 2
155 medical 13
154 plague 0
153 sickness 0
152 cause 1
151 blindness 0
150 disability 0
149 death 5
148 symptoms 0
147 caused 0
146 bacterium 0
145 bacterial 0
144 bacteria 3
143 virus 0
142 disease 1
141 stage 5
140 preparation 0
139 this 29
138 step 2
137 river 0
136 soil 0
135 earth 0
134 peace 0
133 called 3
132 known 6
131 referred 1
130 production 0
129 farm 1
128 burden 0
127 origin 0
126 prepare 0
125 animals 2
124 food 0
123 able 1
122 divide 0
121 sort 0
120 type 2
119 kind 0
118 that 48
117 believed 1
116 travel 0
115 sailed 0
114 spain 0
113 sun 0
112 east 0
111 thought 2
110 remembered 0
109 festival 0
108 celebrated 1
107 religion 0
106 europe 1
105 rules 0
104 northern 0
103 year 2
102 times 2
101 given 0
100 sent 1
99 modern 3
98 observed 1
97 artist 0
96 greek 4
95 arabic 0
94 italian 1
93 renaissance 1
92 12th 2
91 15th 0
90 tried 1
89 proven 0
88 evidence 0
87 philosophy 0
86 politics 0
85 biology 0
84 line 0
83 play 0
82 new 6
81 york 3
80 colony 0
79 asia 0
78 south 0
77 soutg 0
76 north 0
75 decided 0
74 amendment 0
73 rule 0
72 first 13
71 last 1
70 day 2
69 hour 0
68 clock 0
67 zone 0
66 time 6
65 set 1
64 mexico 0
63 france 0
62 britain 0
61 nato 0
60 canada 0
59 kingdom 0
58 united 1
57 navy 0
56 states 1
55 american 1
54 told 1
53 said 1
52 ground 1
51 gained 4
50 lost 0
49 start 0
48 beginning 1
47 have 17
46 give 0
45 end 1
44 mid 0
43 sum 0
42 19th 0
41 20th 1
40 21sr 0
39 bring 0
38 journal 0
37 paper 0
36 misdemeanour 0
35 congress 0
34 crime 1
33 published 3
32 sir 0
31 author 0
30 he 13
29 1 0
28 found 3
27 agreement 0
26 law 1
25 act 2
24 method 3
23 tool 0
22 hypothesis 0
21 theory 0
20 s 1
19 u 1
18 government 2
17 wheel 0
16 land 0
15 chemistry 0
14 physics 0
13 community 2
12 scientific 6
11 mathematical 0
10 war 0
9 sea 0
8 etymology 0
7 history 2
6 century 9
5 discovered 5
4 invented 1
3 described 0
2 defined 0
1 term 1
Guess
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #216!
The answer was:
You solved it in 307 guesses
Your accuracy was 41.37%
You have solved 105 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 4801 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 80.00 Guesses; 56.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 103.91 Guesses; 57.81% Accuracy
Bloody hell, I think this is my worst ever. Took me about 250 to even get in the ballpark.
I was having such a good week too.
Well I didn’t mean to post all my answers.
Maybe I should go back to bed.
dv said:
Redactle# Guess Hits
307 cadaver 34
306 cadavre 0
305 body 56
304 dead 7
303 which 7
302 post 0
301 pre 0
300 enzyme 0
299 circulation 0
298 digestion 3
297 respiration 0
296 cells 6
295 metabolism 0
294 attempt 0
293 gut 1
292 toxin 0
291 carbohydrate 0
290 fat 0
289 break 3
288 biota 0
287 thin 0
286 length 0
285 intestine 1
284 lower 0
283 remainder 0
282 absorbed 0
281 tract 0
280 system 5
279 state 2
278 experiment 0
277 trial 0
276 think 0
275 example 2
274 g 0
273 e 0
272 i 0
271 device 0
270 monitor 0
269 current 1
268 be 23
267 are 26
266 fields 0
265 circles 0
264 circle 0
263 field 1
262 days 0
261 duodenum 0
260 throat 0
259 nose 0
258 ear 0
257 head 0
256 bones 0
255 bladder 0
254 gland 0
253 gall 0
252 intestines 1
251 lymphatic 0
250 lymph 0
249 aorta 0
248 arteries 2
247 veins 1
246 lungs 1
245 stomach 0
244 bowel 0
243 intervene 0
242 surgeon 0
241 surgery 2
240 ambulance 0
239 witchcraft 0
238 practice 4
237 malpractice 0
236 police 1
235 also 22
234 alao 0
233 lesser 1
232 extent 1
231 certain 7
230 courts 1
229 point 0
228 used 21
227 teach 1
226 taught 0
225 common 1
224 opinion 1
223 compound 0
222 supply 0
221 water 2
220 wind 0
219 ocean 0
218 microscope 0
217 small 1
216 stay 0
215 remove 1
214 inject 0
213 put 3
212 held 0
211 tokd 0
210 strain 0
209 western 0
208 most 5
207 eliminated 1
206 spread 1
205 avicenna 0
204 10th 0
203 4th 0
202 fifth 0
201 fourth 0
200 third 2
199 second 3
198 c 2
197 b 2
196 one 11
195 3 0
194 2 0
193 thousands 1
192 people 11
191 old 1
190 young 2
189 elderly 0
188 months 0
187 weeks 1
186 grow 1
185 shape 0
184 colour 0
183 color 1
182 mole 0
181 symptomatic 0
180 diagnostic 0
179 diagnosis 0
178 treatment 0
177 prognosis 0
176 transmit 0
175 humans 2
174 digestive 2
173 respiratory 0
172 circulatory 0
171 heart 1
170 kidney 0
169 liver 1
168 borne 0
167 blood 3
166 cancer 0
165 viruses 0
164 fungus 1
163 insect 0
162 parasite 0
161 skin 8
160 middle 0
159 medicine 3
158 doctors 4
157 hospital 1
156 word 2
155 medical 13
154 plague 0
153 sickness 0
152 cause 1
151 blindness 0
150 disability 0
149 death 5
148 symptoms 0
147 caused 0
146 bacterium 0
145 bacterial 0
144 bacteria 3
143 virus 0
142 disease 1
141 stage 5
140 preparation 0
139 this 29
138 step 2
137 river 0
136 soil 0
135 earth 0
134 peace 0
133 called 3
132 known 6
131 referred 1
130 production 0
129 farm 1
128 burden 0
127 origin 0
126 prepare 0
125 animals 2
124 food 0
123 able 1
122 divide 0
121 sort 0
120 type 2
119 kind 0
118 that 48
117 believed 1
116 travel 0
115 sailed 0
114 spain 0
113 sun 0
112 east 0
111 thought 2
110 remembered 0
109 festival 0
108 celebrated 1
107 religion 0
106 europe 1
105 rules 0
104 northern 0
103 year 2
102 times 2
101 given 0
100 sent 1
99 modern 3
98 observed 1
97 artist 0
96 greek 4
95 arabic 0
94 italian 1
93 renaissance 1
92 12th 2
91 15th 0
90 tried 1
89 proven 0
88 evidence 0
87 philosophy 0
86 politics 0
85 biology 0
84 line 0
83 play 0
82 new 6
81 york 3
80 colony 0
79 asia 0
78 south 0
77 soutg 0
76 north 0
75 decided 0
74 amendment 0
73 rule 0
72 first 13
71 last 1
70 day 2
69 hour 0
68 clock 0
67 zone 0
66 time 6
65 set 1
64 mexico 0
63 france 0
62 britain 0
61 nato 0
60 canada 0
59 kingdom 0
58 united 1
57 navy 0
56 states 1
55 american 1
54 told 1
53 said 1
52 ground 1
51 gained 4
50 lost 0
49 start 0
48 beginning 1
47 have 17
46 give 0
45 end 1
44 mid 0
43 sum 0
42 19th 0
41 20th 1
40 21sr 0
39 bring 0
38 journal 0
37 paper 0
36 misdemeanour 0
35 congress 0
34 crime 1
33 published 3
32 sir 0
31 author 0
30 he 13
29 1 0
28 found 3
27 agreement 0
26 law 1
25 act 2
24 method 3
23 tool 0
22 hypothesis 0
21 theory 0
20 s 1
19 u 1
18 government 2
17 wheel 0
16 land 0
15 chemistry 0
14 physics 0
13 community 2
12 scientific 6
11 mathematical 0
10 war 0
9 sea 0
8 etymology 0
7 history 2
6 century 9
5 discovered 5
4 invented 1
3 described 0
2 defined 0
1 term 1
Guess
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #216!
The answer was:
You solved it in 307 guesses
Your accuracy was 41.37%
You have solved 105 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 4801 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 80.00 Guesses; 56.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 103.91 Guesses; 57.81% AccuracyBloody hell, I think this is my worst ever. Took me about 250 to even get in the ballpark.
I was having such a good week too.
in this particular game I was a lot better off playing my usual this, that, which, are, can, may, more, most, many, much, such, other, some, where, there, when, these, those, one, two, first, known, any, all, another, time, times, year, years, its, used, they, them, their, also, well.
sarahs mum said:
When it is physics. When you know it. When you don’t know it.
—-███████████████
███████████████ is the process that creates new ██████ ██████ from ███-████████ ████████ (███████ and ████████) and ██████. █████████ to ███████ ████████, the first ██████ were formed a ███ ███████ after the ███ ████, through ███████ █████████ in a process called ███ ████ ███████████████. After about ██ ███████, the ████████ had ████████ and ██████ to a █████ at which these ████-energy ██████████ among ████████ █████, so ████ the ███████ and ████████ █████████ ████████, ███████ ███ ████████ ██████████ ████████ and ██████. The ████ is ██████ of other elements such as ███████ and the ████████ ███████ █████████. ███████████████ in █████ and █████ ██████████ later ████████ the ███████ of elements and isotopes that we have █████, in a process called ██████ ████████ █████████. The ███████ of █████ ████ in elements ███████ than ████████ and ██████ (called ‘██████’ by ███████████████) ███████ █████ (███ ███████), so that the ████████ █████ has █████████████ the ████ ███████████.
█████ ████ █████ elements to ███████ ████ in █████ █████, ██████ off energy in the process known as ███████ ███████████████. ███████ ██████ █████████ ██████ many of the ███████ elements, up to and including ████ and ██████ in the most ███████ █████. ████████ of ███████ ███████████████ ██████ ███████ in ███████ █████ and ████████ except if ███████ through ███████ █████ and ██████████. The neutron ███████ █████████ of the █-process and s-process ██████ ███████ elements, from ██
██ ███████.█████████ ███████████████ within █████████ █████ is ███████ ███████████ for the elements between ██████ and ████████: from the ████████ of elements ████████ during ███████ ███████████████; through █████████ ███████████████ during the █████████ █████████; and from the █-process (██████████ of ████████ ████████) during the █████████.
Neutron ████ ███████ are a ████████ ██████████ █████ ██████ of elements ████████ in the █-process. When two neutron █████ collide, a ███████████ ██████ of neutron-████ ██████ may be ███████ which then ███████ forms █████ elements.
of course it was.
glad I eventually googled
Nucleosynthesis
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #216!
The answer was:
You solved it in 229 guesses
Your accuracy was 40.61%
I’m beginning to get to the stage where I have to remember to play one each day.
It probably wouldn’t harm – apart from the ‘solved consecutive Redactles’ bit – to miss playing them for a few days.
AussieDJ said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #216!The answer was:
You solved it in 229 guesses
Your accuracy was 40.61%I’m beginning to get to the stage where I have to remember to play one each day.
It probably wouldn’t harm – apart from the ‘solved consecutive Redactles’ bit – to miss playing them for a few days.
my doctor would like me to have Vitamin D in me.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #216!The answer was:
You solved it in 229 guesses
Your accuracy was 40.61%I’m beginning to get to the stage where I have to remember to play one each day.
It probably wouldn’t harm – apart from the ‘solved consecutive Redactles’ bit – to miss playing them for a few days.
my doctor would like me to have Vitamin D in me.
Some time spent outside each day should help with your Vit. D levels
110 88.18%
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #217!
The answer was:
You solved it in 53 guesses
Your accuracy was 67.92%
You have solved 106 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 3911 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 85.00 Guesses; 67.63% Accuracy
Global Average: 112.49 Guesses; 67.29% Accuracy
Well, bit better than yesterday
You solved it in 50 guesses Your accuracy was 96.00% You have solved 46 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 130 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 21.00 Guesses; 84.91% Accuracy Global Average: 32.93 Guesses; 81.81% Accuracysarahs mum said:
You solved it in 50 guesses Your accuracy was 96.00% You have solved 46 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 130 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 21.00 Guesses; 84.91% Accuracy Global Average: 32.93 Guesses; 81.81% Accuracy
one typo.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #218!
The answer was: southeast asia
You solved it in 38 guesses
Your accuracy was 76.32%
You have solved 107 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 6250 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 32.00 Guesses; 80.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 47.73 Guesses; 78.11% Accuracy
Not too bad
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #219!
The answer was: lego
You solved it in 77 guesses
Your accuracy was 51.95%
You have solved 108 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 10 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 15.50 Guesses; 54.45% Accuracy
Global Average: 26.10 Guesses; 56.15% Accuracy
10th. Not bad.
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #219!
The answer was: lego
You solved it in 77 guesses
Your accuracy was 51.95%
You have solved 108 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 10 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 15.50 Guesses; 54.45% Accuracy
Global Average: 26.10 Guesses; 56.15% Accuracy10th. Not bad.
slower. but still not bad.
You solved it in 47 guesses Your accuracy was 91.49% You have solved 47 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 32 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 46.00 Guesses; 57.88% Accuracy Global Average: 58.25 Guesses; 59.44% Accuracypsst.. you published the answer again…
sarahs mum said:
psst.. you published the answer again…
Fuck
I like the way the program has decided that I’ve solved 1 consecutive Redactles, seeing as I missed doing them over the past few days.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #220!
The answer was:
You solved it in 59 guesses
Your accuracy was 71.19%
You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 58 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 37.00 Guesses; 65.79% Accuracy
Global Average: 48.57 Guesses; 68.56% Accuracy
used google to get the first word out.
— You solved it in 79 guesses Your accuracy was 89.87% You have solved 48 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 69 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 43.00 Guesses; 66.67% Accuracy Global Average: 52.09 Guesses; 69.09% AccuracyCongratulations, you solved Redactle #220!
The answer was:
You solved it in 24 guesses
Your accuracy was 70.83%
You have solved 109 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 217 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 60.00 Guesses; 61.54% Accuracy
Global Average: 77.64 Guesses; 62.90% Accuracy
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #221!
The answer was:
You solved it in 40 guesses
Your accuracy was 40.00%
You have solved 110 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 2 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 35.00 Guesses; 40.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 35.00 Guesses; 40.00% Accuracy
2nd
i started half an hour late.
74 90.54%
Oh looky! Game 221 took me 221 blunderbuss guesses to solve!
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #221!
The answer was:
You solved it in 221 guesses
Your accuracy was 49.77%
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #222!
The answer was:
You solved it in 50 guesses
Your accuracy was 64.00%
You have solved 111 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 7 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 32.00 Guesses; 66.04% Accuracy
Global Average: 29.71 Guesses; 61.46% Accuracy
7th
Not physics, sm — not science at all. (Fairly) recent history.
You solved it in 71 guesses Your accuracy was 98.59% You have solved 50 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 75 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 83.00 Guesses; 75.00% Accuracy Global Average: 90.53 Guesses; 75.15% AccuracyAnother ‘throw-everything-at-it’ effort, followed by a quick search to confirm the result.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #222!
The answer was:
You solved it in 199 guesses
Your accuracy was 64.32%
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #223!
The answer was:
You solved it in 59 guesses
Your accuracy was 16.95%
You have solved 112 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 6 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 32.50 Guesses; 32.13% Accuracy
Global Average: 34.00 Guesses; 41.68% Accuracy
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #223!
The answer was:
You solved it in 59 guesses
Your accuracy was 16.95%
You have solved 112 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 6 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 32.50 Guesses; 32.13% Accuracy
Global Average: 34.00 Guesses; 41.68% Accuracy
congrats.
I’m stuck. sad me.
I don’t know why I bother, sometimes.
At least I can console myself that, on this occasion, I came close to the global average.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #223!
The answer was:
You solved it in 126 guesses
Your accuracy was 31.75%
Global Stats
Globally, 6683 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 96.00 Guesses; 37.65% Accuracy
Global Average: 123.95 Guesses; 40.60% Accuracy
AussieDJ said:
I don’t know why I bother, sometimes.At least I can console myself that, on this occasion, I came close to the global average.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #223!
The answer was:
You solved it in 126 guesses
Your accuracy was 31.75%Global Stats
Globally, 6683 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 96.00 Guesses; 37.65% Accuracy
Global Average: 123.95 Guesses; 40.60% Accuracy
i had to google. I did not know. but I am getting better at knowing I do not know earlier.
You solved it in 74 guesses Your accuracy was 75.68% You have solved 51 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 5816 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 94.00 Guesses; 37.92% Accuracy Global Average: 120.98 Guesses; 40.87% AccuracyA lucky guess … albeit still outside the average/s
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #224!
The answer was:
You solved it in 20 guesses
Your accuracy was 75.00%
Global Stats
Globally, 10 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 11.00 Guesses; 75.96% Accuracy
Global Average: 12.00 Guesses; 75.58% Accuracy
Not physics, sm.
Not physics (or any of the sciences), sm.
You solved it in 47 guesses Your accuracy was 91.49% You have solved 52 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 192 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 27.00 Guesses; 62.68% Accuracy Global Average: 38.99 Guesses; 63.96% AccuracyCongratulations, you solved Redactle #224!
The answer was:
You solved it in 2 guesses
Your accuracy was 100.00%
You have solved 113 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 6267 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 37.00 Guesses; 59.52% Accuracy
Global Average: 54.58 Guesses; 60.95% Accuracy
Abundant clues
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #225!
The answer was:
You solved it in 33 guesses
Your accuracy was 78.79%
You have solved 114 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 17 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 26.00 Guesses; 61.54% Accuracy
Global Average: 32.12 Guesses; 64.96% Accuracy
You solved it in 75 guesses Your accuracy was 94.67% You have solved 53 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 134 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 48.50 Guesses; 61.33% Accuracy Global Average: 70.97 Guesses; 61.34% Accuracy( The answer was:
Just putting this here … (Steady on. The next one’s not due for about another 37 minutes, or so.)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #225!
The answer was:
You solved it in 130 guesses
Your accuracy was 53.08%
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #226!
The answer was:
You solved it in 56 guesses
Your accuracy was 53.57%
You have solved 115 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 42 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 34.50 Guesses; 71.61% Accuracy
Global Average: 46.10 Guesses; 68.71% Accuracy
You solved it in 65 guesses Your accuracy was 96.92% You have solved 54 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 76 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 39.50 Guesses; 71.61% Accuracy Global Average: 53.13 Guesses; 69.89% AccuracyNothing like beating around the bush – or, the blunderbuss effect strikes again!
:)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #226!
The answer was:
You solved it in 166 guesses
Your accuracy was 64.46%
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #227!
The answer was:
You solved it in 72 guesses
Your accuracy was 29.17%
You have solved 116 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 22 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 65.00 Guesses; 36.80% Accuracy
Global Average: 83.36 Guesses; 43.08% Accuracy
I don’t know the answer. i shouldn’t have stayed up.
Never heard of it … and not physics, sm.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #227!
The answer was:
You solved it in 104 guesses
Your accuracy was 36.54%
Global Stats
Globally, 65 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 70.00 Guesses; 38.29% Accuracy
Global Average: 85.12 Guesses; 42.02% Accuracy
sarahs mum said:
I don’t know the answer. i shouldn’t have stayed up.
I shouldn’t have stayed up, either.
AussieDJ said:
Never heard of it … and not physics, sm.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #227!
The answer was:
You solved it in 104 guesses
Your accuracy was 36.54%Global Stats
Globally, 65 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 70.00 Guesses; 38.29% Accuracy
Global Average: 85.12 Guesses; 42.02% Accuracy
I’m only half way there and i know I do not know.
I’ve been there, though it was a while ago..
64 64.06%
—
No. Have never heard of.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #228!
The answer was:
You solved it in 6 guesses
Your accuracy was 83.33%
You have solved 117 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 7 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 6.00 Guesses; 100.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 7.29 Guesses; 77.08% Accuracy
Heh, there’s one pretty big clue
You solved it in 9 guesses Your accuracy was 100.00% You have solved 56 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 8 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 6.50 Guesses; 100.00% Accuracy Global Average: 7.50 Guesses; 79.95% Accuracydv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #228!
The answer was:
You solved it in 6 guesses
Your accuracy was 83.33%
You have solved 117 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 7 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 6.00 Guesses; 100.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 7.29 Guesses; 77.08% AccuracyHeh, there’s one pretty big clue
I could have been faster if I had believed in myself. but that is always the way with me.
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #228!
The answer was:
You solved it in 6 guesses
Your accuracy was 83.33%
You have solved 117 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 7 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 6.00 Guesses; 100.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 7.29 Guesses; 77.08% AccuracyHeh, there’s one pretty big clue
I could have been faster if I had believed in myself. but that is always the way with me.
We’re neighbours
Unlike my usual efforts, this time I looked at it first, before putting words in, and recognised some of the clues they’d left unredacted.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #228!
The answer was:
You solved it in 4 guesses
Your accuracy was 100.00%
Global Stats
Globally, 71 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 14.00 Guesses; 80.95% Accuracy
Global Average: 26.21 Guesses; 78.00% Accuracy
Too many really obvious clues in this one.
AussieDJ said:
Unlike my usual efforts, this time I looked at it first, before putting words in, and recognised some of the clues they’d left unredacted.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #228!
The answer was:
You solved it in 4 guesses
Your accuracy was 100.00%Global Stats
Globally, 71 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 14.00 Guesses; 80.95% Accuracy
Global Average: 26.21 Guesses; 78.00% Accuracy
It’s been a while since you did a 100%? :)
AussieDJ said:
Unlike my usual efforts, this time I looked at it first, before putting words in, and recognised some of the clues they’d left unredacted.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #228!
The answer was:
You solved it in 4 guesses
Your accuracy was 100.00%Global Stats
Globally, 71 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 14.00 Guesses; 80.95% Accuracy
Global Average: 26.21 Guesses; 78.00% Accuracy
That’s your best score, isn’t it?
btm said:
AussieDJ said:
Unlike my usual efforts, this time I looked at it first, before putting words in, and recognised some of the clues they’d left unredacted.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #228!
The answer was:
You solved it in 4 guesses
Your accuracy was 100.00%Global Stats
Globally, 71 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 14.00 Guesses; 80.95% Accuracy
Global Average: 26.21 Guesses; 78.00% AccuracyThat’s your best score, isn’t it?
Yes. The previous highest score I’ve had was an 80 for the English Channel and John F Kennedy games, which were both some time ago.
18 guesses
72.22%
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #229!
The answer was:
You solved it in 56 guesses
Your accuracy was 48.21%
You have solved 118 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 51 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 54.00 Guesses; 62.82% Accuracy
Global Average: 67.00 Guesses; 63.06% Accuracy
You solved it in 79 guesses Your accuracy was 75.95% You have solved 57 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 89 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 60.00 Guesses; 62.82% Accuracy Global Average: 69.53 Guesses; 64.14% Accuracysarahs mum said:
You solved it in 79 guesses Your accuracy was 75.95% You have solved 57 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 89 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 60.00 Guesses; 62.82% Accuracy Global Average: 69.53 Guesses; 64.14% Accuracy
I didn’t know that thing but I did know those words.
It took 155 guesses (for me) to solve Redactle 229, giving an accuracy of 61.94%
Not physics, or any kind of science, sm. You should get this one easily.
You solved it in 48 guesses Your accuracy was 100.00% You have solved 58 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 124 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 42.50 Guesses; 76.92% Accuracy Global Average: 57.81 Guesses; 76.09% AccuracyCongratulations, you solved Redactle #230!
The answer was:
You solved it in 97 guesses
Your accuracy was 75.26%
Global Stats
Globally, 198 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 43.00 Guesses; 75.73% Accuracy
Global Average: 62.46 Guesses; 75.07% Accuracy
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #230!
The answer was:
You solved it in 50 guesses
Your accuracy was 92.00%
You have solved 119 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 3148 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 53.00 Guesses; 75.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 73.94 Guesses; 73.69% Accuracy
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #231!
The answer was:
You solved it in 85 guesses
Your accuracy was 29.41%
You have solved 120 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 11 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 63.00 Guesses; 36.51% Accuracy
Global Average: 76.73 Guesses; 46.76% Accuracy
Tough one! I am really surprised at some of the words that do not appear in this article.
googled for first word.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #231!
The answer was:
You solved it in 112 guesses
Your accuracy was 36.61%
Global Stats
Globally, 3422 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 104.00 Guesses; 33.09% Accuracy
Global Average: 138.58 Guesses; 37.01% Accuracy
You solved it in 57 guesses Your accuracy was 100.00% You have solved 60 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 129 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 56.00 Guesses; 59.18% Accuracy Global Average: 82.44 Guesses; 59.30% AccuracyThis one was harder than most of the last several.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #232!
The answer was:
You solved it in 72 guesses
Your accuracy was 69.44%
You have solved 121 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 3966 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 80.00 Guesses; 57.14% Accuracy
Global Average: 101.41 Guesses; 58.69% Accuracy
Once again utilising the blunderbuss approach to uncover enough clues to search for the correct solution.
:)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #232!
The answer was:
You solved it in 129 guesses
Your accuracy was 55.04%
Global Stats
Globally, 5312 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 82.00 Guesses; 56.66% Accuracy
Global Average: 107.07 Guesses; 58.23% Accuracy
This one was easy. The first two sentences were almost enough on their own. Physics again, sm.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #233!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 1 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 8 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 15.00 Guesses; 55.77% Accuracy
- Global Average: 16.00 Guesses; 55.84% Accuracy
This one was easy. The first two sentences were almost enough on their own. Physics again, sm.
Great. I fell asleep and I just woke up and made myself some tea. i’ll see what i ccan do. If not I will just whinge.
A bit of blundering about on this one, but it fell into place, eventually.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #233!
The answer was:
You solved it in 89 guesses
Your accuracy was 57.30%
Global Stats
Globally, 202 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 49.00 Guesses; 52.09% Accuracy
Global Average: 59.61 Guesses; 54.48% Accuracy
93 74.19%
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #233!
The answer was:
You solved it in 46 guesses
Your accuracy was 41.30%
You have solved 122 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 3842 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 65.50 Guesses; 50.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 92.74 Guesses; 51.63% Accuracy
Feel like I should’ve done better
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #234!
The answer was:
You solved it in 41 guesses
Your accuracy was 70.73%
Global Stats
Globally, 7 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 50.00 Guesses; 70.73% Accuracy
*Global Average: 59.57 Guesses; 65.10% Accuracy
Not physics, sm
AussieDJ said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #234!The answer was:
You solved it in 41 guesses
Your accuracy was 70.73%Global Stats
Globally, 7 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 50.00 Guesses; 70.73% Accuracy *Global Average: 59.57 Guesses; 65.10% AccuracyNot physics, sm
No. Well played sir.
You solved it in 70 guesses Your accuracy was 88.57% You have solved 62 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 70 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 54.50 Guesses; 52.97% Accuracy Global Average: 71.59 Guesses; 53.05% AccuracyCongratulations, you solved Redactle #234!
The answer was:
You solved it in 141 guesses
Your accuracy was 36.17%
You have solved 123 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 219 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 70.00 Guesses; 51.72% Accuracy
Global Average: 88.02 Guesses; 52.37% Accuracy
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #234!
The answer was:
You solved it in 141 guesses
Your accuracy was 36.17%
You have solved 123 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 219 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 70.00 Guesses; 51.72% Accuracy
Global Average: 88.02 Guesses; 52.37% Accuracy
I would have thought you would have done better than that.
I had a couple of redactle unlimited games. in the first one I had google the answer and copy and paste it into the game. I was sure of the answer but couldn’t get the game t agree. Æthelstan. Tricky.
then I got Edmund hillary out in 31 guesses with 96.77% accuracy. i wasn’t expecting the word ‘new’ to be so effective.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #235!
The answer was:
You solved it in 33 guesses
Your accuracy was 78.79%
You have solved 124 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 17 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 33.00 Guesses; 69.44% Accuracy
Global Average: 53.88 Guesses; 67.58% Accuracy
Not bad, considering
The ‘throw-everything-at-it-until-you-start-to-get-an-inkling-of-what-it’s-about’ effect eventually gets somewhere, eventually …
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #235!
The answer was:
You solved it in 130 guesses
Your accuracy was 53.08%
Global Stats
Globally, 131 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 63.00 Guesses; 60.47% Accuracy
Global Average: 77.73 Guesses; 60.77% Accuracy
You solved it in 98 guesses Your accuracy was 88.78% You have solved 63 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 191 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 62.00 Guesses; 61.05% Accuracy Global Average: 75.90 Guesses; 61.66% AccuracyNot physics, sm, but closely related.
69 95.65%
No stats tonight.
Two typos. Bad bad.
Not great
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #236!
The answer was:
You solved it in 58 guesses
Your accuracy was 65.52%
You have solved 125 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 10479 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 43.00 Guesses; 74.77% Accuracy
Global Average: 67.67 Guesses; 74.25% Accuracy
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #236!
The answer was:
You solved it in 43 guesses
Your accuracy was 88.37%
Global Stats
Globally, 10911 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 43.00 Guesses; 74.77% Accuracy
Global Average: 67.81 Guesses; 74.25% Accuracy
You solved it in 38 guesses Your accuracy was 92.11% You have solved 65 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 88 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 34.00 Guesses; 72.73% Accuracy Global Average: 47.19 Guesses; 71.34% AccuracyCongratulations, you solved Redactle #237!
The answer was:
You solved it in 91 guesses
Your accuracy was 51.65%
Global Stats
Globally, 272 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 48.00 Guesses; 66.67% Accuracy
Global Average: 69.20 Guesses; 67.44% Accuracy
The first thing I thought when I saw this one was Spike Milligan’s The Ning Nang Nong.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #237!
The answer was: the
You solved it in 59 guesses
Your accuracy was 67.80%
You have solved 126 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 6618 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 61.00 Guesses; 63.46% Accuracy
Global Average: 82.39 Guesses; 64.36% Accuracy
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #237!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 3 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 1645 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 57.00 Guesses; 65.25% Accuracy
- Global Average: 77.07 Guesses; 66.22% Accuracy
The first thing I thought when I saw this one was Spike Milligan’s The Ning Nang Nong.
I thought it was newspaper or a tv show. New york and times. Daily news. Murdoch. It still took a while for the penny to click.
that was a shock.
You solved it in 35 guesses Your accuracy was 91.43% You have solved 66 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 126 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 24.50 Guesses; 51.83% Accuracy Global Average: 35.24 Guesses; 57.38% AccuracyCongratulations, you solved Redactle #238!
The answer was:
You solved it in 52 guesses
Your accuracy was 57.69%
Global Stats
Globally, 274 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 35.00 Guesses; 48.42% Accuracy
Global Average: 43.89 Guesses; 52.68% Accuracy
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #238!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 2 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 6044 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 50.00 Guesses; 42.86% Accuracy
- Global Average: 69.97 Guesses; 46.91% Accuracy
You’re losing it, btm. Two days in a row….
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #238!
The answer was:
You solved it in 3 guesses
Your accuracy was 66.67%
You have solved 127 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 6138 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 50.00 Guesses; 42.86% Accuracy
Global Average: 70.16 Guesses; 46.86% Accuracy
sibeen said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #238!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 2 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 6044 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 50.00 Guesses; 42.86% Accuracy
- Global Average: 69.97 Guesses; 46.91% Accuracy
You’re losing it, btm. Two days in a row….
how can you have 1 consecutive anything?
JudgeMental said:
sibeen said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #238!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 2 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 6044 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 50.00 Guesses; 42.86% Accuracy
- Global Average: 69.97 Guesses; 46.91% Accuracy
You’re losing it, btm. Two days in a row….
how can you have 1 consecutive anything?
If anyone could do it Btm could.
sibeen said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #238!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 2 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 6044 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 50.00 Guesses; 42.86% Accuracy
- Global Average: 69.97 Guesses; 46.91% Accuracy
You’re losing it, btm. Two days in a row….
I know, but I’m a little bit nervous. I’m going into hospital tomorrow for eye surgery.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #239!
The answer was:
You solved it in 69 guesses
Your accuracy was 52.17%
You have solved 128 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 54 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 41.00 Guesses; 65.69% Accuracy
Global Average: 47.74 Guesses; 69.20% Accuracy
You solved it in 55 guesses Your accuracy was 96.36% You have solved 67 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 114 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 44.50 Guesses; 68.33% Accuracy Global Average: 61.98 Guesses; 68.74% Accuracy ——btm said:
sibeen said:You’re losing it, btm. Two days in a row….
I know, but I’m a little bit nervous. I’m going into hospital tomorrow for eye surgery.
Are you OK?
The blunderbuss approach wins out again.
As if everybody knows everything about the topic … being a localised subject!
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #239!
The answer was:
You solved it in 208 guesses
Your accuracy was 65.38%
Global Stats
Globally, 7359 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 75.00 Guesses; 64.52% Accuracy
Global Average: 104.12 Guesses; 65.12% Accuracy
Congratulations! You solved Redactle Unlimited in 102 guesses with 81.37% accuracy and a time of 00:45:09!
—-
I should have done better on ‘anxiety disorder’. I had almost got the entire therapy section out before I got the answer.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #240!
The answer was:
You solved it in 22 guesses
Your accuracy was 81.82%
You have solved 129 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 115 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 12.00 Guesses; 82.76% Accuracy
Global Average: 23.48 Guesses; 80.66% Accurac
Not bad
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #240!
The answer was:
You solved it in 72 guesses
Your accuracy was 77.78%
Global Stats
Globally, 159 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 17.00 Guesses; 81.81% Accuracy
Global Average: 26.72 Guesses; 78.80% Accuracy
Might have got it out earlier if I hadn’t blunderbussed it, and given it a gentle shake instead.
But then again, who knows?
You solved it in 48 guesses Your accuracy was 95.83% You have solved 68 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 340 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 23.00 Guesses; 78.56% Accuracy Global Average: 32.34 Guesses; 77.38% AccuracyCongratulations, you solved Redactle #241!
The answer was:
You solved it in 45 guesses
Your accuracy was 77.78%
You have solved 130 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 15 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 15.00 Guesses; 81.81% Accuracy
Global Average: 15.80 Guesses; 78.81% Accuracy
58 98.28%
I thought – for a change – that I’d browse what I could see of the article before jumping in.
A wise move .. as it turned out!
:)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #241!
The answer was:
You solved it in 3 guesses
Your accuracy was 100.00%
Global Stats
Globally, 3789 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 71.00 Guesses; 69.23% Accuracy
Global Average: 103.45 Guesses; 69.98% Accuracy
AussieDJ said:
I thought – for a change – that I’d browse what I could see of the article before jumping in.A wise move .. as it turned out!
:)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #241!
The answer was:
You solved it in 3 guesses
Your accuracy was 100.00%Global Stats
Globally, 3789 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 71.00 Guesses; 69.23% Accuracy
Global Average: 103.45 Guesses; 69.98% Accuracy
I browsed. but it took me a good while to work out what we were saving. silly me.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
I thought – for a change – that I’d browse what I could see of the article before jumping in.A wise move .. as it turned out!
:)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #241!
The answer was:
You solved it in 3 guesses
Your accuracy was 100.00%Global Stats
Globally, 3789 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 71.00 Guesses; 69.23% Accuracy
Global Average: 103.45 Guesses; 69.98% AccuracyI browsed. but it took me a good while to work out what we were saving. silly me.
When I saw ‘Save the … “, I tried whales – more on a whim than anything else.
Whales only brought up three examples so, without looking to see where they appeared in the article, I tried ‘Greenpeace’.
Careful, observant and astute readers of this thread may be deceived into thinking I’ve given away the answer.
Please continue to think in that vein.
IOW: Ooops!
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
I thought – for a change – that I’d browse what I could see of the article before jumping in.A wise move .. as it turned out!
:)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #241!
The answer was:
You solved it in 3 guesses
Your accuracy was 100.00%Global Stats
Globally, 3789 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 71.00 Guesses; 69.23% Accuracy
Global Average: 103.45 Guesses; 69.98% AccuracyI browsed. but it took me a good while to work out what we were saving. silly me.
When I saw ‘Save the … “, I tried whales – more on a whim than anything else.
Whales only brought up three examples so, without looking to see where they appeared in the article, I tried ‘Greenpeace’.
winner.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #242!
The answer was:
You solved it in 83 guesses
Your accuracy was 59.04%
Global Stats
Globally, 110 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 54.50 Guesses; 57.14% Accuracy
Global Average: 66.99 Guesses; 60.53% Accuracy
……………….
What a comedown after yesterday’s effort (Three words for 100% accuracy)!
57 98.25%
no nice message again.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #242!
The answer was:
You solved it in 80 guesses
Your accuracy was 36.25%
You have solved 131 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 6223 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 75.00 Guesses; 53.85% Accuracy
Global Average: 99.32 Guesses; 55.37% Accuracy
Wow
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #243!
The answer was:
You solved it in 46 guesses
Your accuracy was 39.13%
You have solved 132 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 11 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 22.00 Guesses; 83.33% Accuracy
Global Average: 24.91 Guesses; 79.74% Accuracy
You solved it in 77 guesses Your accuracy was 93.51% You have solved 71 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 91 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 67.00 Guesses; 70.59% Accuracy Global Average: 86.04 Guesses; 70.99% AccuracyAnd .. at the other end of the day …
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #243!
The answer was:
You solved it in 242 guesses
Your accuracy was 62.81%
Global Stats
Globally, 6624 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 108.00 Guesses; 66.49% Accuracy
Global Average: 145.52 Guesses; 66.17% Accuracy
The blunderbuss effect on full display = eventually, we’ll get enough words to try an intelligent-ish attempt at an answer – at a bit more than double the global average number of guesses.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #244!
The answer was:
You solved it in 74 guesses
Your accuracy was 71.62%
Global Stats
Globally, 117 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 19.00 Guesses; 80.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 31.69 Guesses; 77.63% Accuracy
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #244!
The answer was:
You solved it in 79 guesses
Your accuracy was 64.56%
You have solved 133 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 2652 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 38.00 Guesses; 73.68% Accuracy
Global Average: 63.00 Guesses; 73.45% Accuracy
You solved it in 60 guesses Your accuracy was 95.00% You have solved 72 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 7092 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 42.00 Guesses; 72.13% Accuracy Global Average: 68.53 Guesses; 72.08% Accuracysarahs mum said:
You solved it in 60 guesses Your accuracy was 95.00% You have solved 72 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 7092 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 42.00 Guesses; 72.13% Accuracy Global Average: 68.53 Guesses; 72.08% Accuracy
41 guesses at 90.24%
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #245!
The answer was:
You solved it in 75 guesses
Your accuracy was 52.00%
You have solved 134 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 120 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 19.50 Guesses; 71.16% Accuracy
Global Average: 35.13 Guesses; 71.33% Accuracy
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #245!
The answer was:
You solved it in 72 guesses
Your accuracy was 62.50%
Global Stats
Globally, 138 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 20.50 Guesses; 70.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 36.41 Guesses; 71.01% Accuracy
52 100.00%
sarahs mum said:
52 100.00%
I’m upset I didn’t get stats again.
Also when I started I thought it was going to be some russian Ivan. Wrongo.
sarahs mum said:
52 100.00%
Noice
i give up already.
sarahs mum said:
i give up already.
fn physics.
Fn physics is right.
I got enough out (by throwing every word I could think of at it) to search on what I had discovered so far.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #246!
The answer was:
You solved it in 109 guesses
Your accuracy was 22.94%
Global Stats
Globally, 508 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 94.00 Guesses; 30.14% Accuracy
Global Average: 113.45 Guesses; 33.07% Accuracy
AussieDJ said:
Fn physics is right.I got enough out (by throwing every word I could think of at it) to search on what I had discovered so far.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #246!
The answer was:
You solved it in 109 guesses
Your accuracy was 22.94%Global Stats
Globally, 508 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 94.00 Guesses; 30.14% Accuracy
Global Average: 113.45 Guesses; 33.07% Accuracy
oh…i have lots of physiccy words out.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Fn physics is right.I got enough out (by throwing every word I could think of at it) to search on what I had discovered so far.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #246!
The answer was:
You solved it in 109 guesses
Your accuracy was 22.94%Global Stats
Globally, 508 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 94.00 Guesses; 30.14% Accuracy
Global Average: 113.45 Guesses; 33.07% Accuracy
oh…i have lots of physiccy words out.
69 53.62%
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
Fn physics is right.I got enough out (by throwing every word I could think of at it) to search on what I had discovered so far.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #246!
The answer was:
You solved it in 109 guesses
Your accuracy was 22.94%Global Stats
Globally, 508 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 94.00 Guesses; 30.14% Accuracy
Global Average: 113.45 Guesses; 33.07% Accuracy
oh…i have lots of physiccy words out.
69 53.62%
it would have taken years without googling.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #246!
The answer was:
You solved it in 206 guesses
Your accuracy was 19.42%
You have solved 135 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 2750 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 105.00 Guesses; 30.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 134.82 Guesses; 32.89% Accuracy
One of my worst. I was completely off track.
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #246!
The answer was:
You solved it in 206 guesses
Your accuracy was 19.42%
You have solved 135 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 2750 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 105.00 Guesses; 30.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 134.82 Guesses; 32.89% AccuracyOne of my worst. I was completely off track.
not to worry. it’s only a game.
dv said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #246!
The answer was:
You solved it in 206 guesses
Your accuracy was 19.42%
You have solved 135 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 2750 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 105.00 Guesses; 30.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 134.82 Guesses; 32.89% AccuracyOne of my worst. I was completely off track.
fn physics.
You solved it in 49 guesses Your accuracy was 75.51% You have solved 75 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 144 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 37.50 Guesses; 52.85% Accuracy Global Average: 43.65 Guesses; 56.33% Accuracytwo typos.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #247!
• The answer was:
• You solved it in 71 guesses
• Your accuracy was 35.21%
• You have solved 136 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
• Globally, 7526 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
• Global Median: 52.00 Guesses; 47.50% Accuracy
• Global Average: 73.83 Guesses; 50.38% Accuracy
(Ignore the ‘Global’ figures. I saved this when I got the solution many hours ago.)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #247!
The answer was:
You solved it in 34 guesses
Your accuracy was 67.65%
Global Stats
Globally, 4896 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 51.00 Guesses; 47.83% Accuracy
Global Average: 71.99 Guesses; 50.70% Accuracy
AussieDJ said:
(Ignore the ‘Global’ figures. I saved this when I got the solution many hours ago.)Congratulations, you solved Redactle #247!
The answer was:
You solved it in 34 guesses
Your accuracy was 67.65%Global Stats
Globally, 4896 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 51.00 Guesses; 47.83% Accuracy
Global Average: 71.99 Guesses; 50.70% Accuracy
nice.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #248!
The answer was:
You solved it in 41 guesses
Your accuracy was 85.37%
You have solved 137 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 10 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 25.00 Guesses; 84.88% Accuracy
Global Average: 72.90 Guesses; 77.99% Accuracy
Not too bad
(So much for me having an early night. Again.)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #248!
The answer was:
You solved it in 49 guesses
Your accuracy was 83.67%
Global Stats
Globally, 75 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 32.00 Guesses; 86.96% Accuracy
Global Average: 52.93 Guesses; 84.53% Accuracy
I won’t complain about this result, compared to my usual efforts.
71 100.00%
no stats for me again tonight.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #249!
The answer was:
You solved it in 73 guesses
Your accuracy was 36.99%
You have solved 138 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 22 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 44.00 Guesses; 50.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 69.14 Guesses; 48.84% Accuracy
Tough one
I’m surprised by a lot of the words that aren’t in this article
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #249!
The answer was:
You solved it in 60 guesses
Your accuracy was 33.33%
Global Stats
Globally, 27 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 47.00 Guesses; 50.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 69.30 Guesses; 49.90% Accuracy
An accuracy of 33-and-a-third? That’s a record!
(Boom. Tish!)
I’m thinking of giving up.
sarahs mum said:
I’m thinking of giving up.
I found enough to be able to search on it. It was only luck, really.
I’d call it electronics more than physics
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
I’m thinking of giving up.
I found enough to be able to search on it. It was only luck, really.
I’d call it electronics more than physics
electrolysis. but that’s not a word.
googled. never heard of it.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #250!
The answer was:
You solved it in 76 guesses
Your accuracy was 43.42%
You have solved 139 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 34 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 35.00 Guesses; 53.15% Accuracy
Global Average: 45.53 Guesses; 54.00% Accurac
You solved it in 77 guesses Your accuracy was 74.03% You have solved 78 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 105 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 54.00 Guesses; 48.57% Accuracy Global Average: 78.79 Guesses; 50.49% AccuracyAfter having completed quite a few of these, I’m beginning to get the feeling that I should have paid attention in school, rather than allow my thoughts – and attention – to drift elsewhere.
Too late now. I may as well keep on doing what I’m doing, and enjoy myself along the way.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #250!
The answer was:
You solved it in 132 guesses
Your accuracy was 50.00%
Global Stats
Globally, 6532 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 83.00 Guesses; 46.34% Accuracy
Global Average: 109.53 Guesses; 47.80% Accuracy
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #251!
The answer was:
You solved it in 44 guesses
Your accuracy was 43.18%
You have solved 140 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 21 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 47.00 Guesses; 40.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 72.57 Guesses; 49.42% Accuracy
Once again astounded by some of the words not here
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #251!
The answer was:
You solved it in 89 guesses
Your accuracy was 31.46%
Global Stats
Globally, 382 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 82.00 Guesses; 29.91% Accuracy
Global Average: 103.38 Guesses; 32.80% Accuracy
i fell asleep.
You solved it in 77 guesses Your accuracy was 71.43% You have solved 79 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 2816 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 92.00 Guesses; 30.43% Accuracy Global Average: 118.27 Guesses; 33.71% Accuracyongratulations, you solved Redactle #252!
The answer was:
You solved it in 50 guesses
Your accuracy was 56.00%
You have solved 141 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 14 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 43.50 Guesses; 58.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 70.07 Guesses; 58.03% Accuracy
14th, not bad
35 94.29%
I could not stay awake for redactle last night.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #252!
The answer was:
You solved it in 39 guesses
Your accuracy was 56.41%
Global Stats
Globally, 50 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 37.00 Guesses; 63.33% Accuracy
Global Average: 55.10 Guesses; 62.16% Accuracy
Solved it earlier today, but only posting now.
Not physics, sm; not any of the sciences.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #253!
The answer was:
You solved it in 113 guesses
Your accuracy was 35.40%
You have solved 142 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 26 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 21.00 Guesses; 54.69% Accuracy
Global Average: 46.54 Guesses; 58.13% Accuracy
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #253!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 1 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 6 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 1.00 Guesses; 87.50% Accuracy
- Global Average: 2.50 Guesses; 72.02% Accuracy
Not physics, sm; not any of the sciences.
Couldn’t stay awake last night. I’ll give it a whirl when I wake up.
78 78.21%
I finally managed to get enough out to search on it (( sigh ))
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #253!
The answer was:
You solved it in 182 guesses
Your accuracy was 34.07%
Global Stats
Globally, 5765 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 107.00 Guesses; 42.33% Accuracy
Global Average: 140.72 Guesses; 45.06% Accuracy
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #254!
The answer was:
You solved it in 55 guesses
Your accuracy was 49.09%
You have solved 143 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 50 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 31.50 Guesses; 50.92% Accuracy
Global Average: 33.94 Guesses; 55.20% Accurac
You solved it in 60 guesses Your accuracy was 50.00% You have solved 82 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 180 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 39.00 Guesses; 47.13% Accuracy Global Average: 52.01 Guesses; 50.08% AccuracyThe blunderbuss approach (fire everything you think of in the hope that something will hit the target) works again – eventually.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #254!
The answer was:
You solved it in 247 guesses
Your accuracy was 30.36%
Global Stats
Globally, 5181 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 57.00 Guesses; 41.46% Accuracy
Global Average: 82.01 Guesses; 44.42% Accuracy
AussieDJ said:
The blunderbuss approach (fire everything you think of in the hope that something will hit the target) works again – eventually.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #254!
The answer was:
You solved it in 247 guesses
Your accuracy was 30.36%Global Stats
Globally, 5181 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 57.00 Guesses; 41.46% Accuracy
Global Average: 82.01 Guesses; 44.42% Accuracy
so many of the trusty common words did not work.even the hits gave only one or two returns. Luckily I got some good words down early.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #255!
The answer was:
You solved it in 46 guesses
Your accuracy was 50.00%
You have solved 144 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 16 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 52.00 Guesses; 49.23% Accuracy
Global Average: 70.44 Guesses; 50.68% Accuracy
16th, not bad
dv said:
16th, not bad
And, a few hours later, the total has jumped by a bit over 500
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #255!
The answer was:
You solved it in 113 guesses
Your accuracy was 42.48%
Global Stats
Globally, 531 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 88.00 Guesses; 43.06% Accuracy
Global Average: 103.92 Guesses; 44.54% Accuracy
googled for the middle word.
108 58.33%
btm said:
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Welcome to the game
None of the sciences, sm.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #256!
The answer was:
You solved it in 76 guesses
Your accuracy was 18.42%
You have solved 145 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 212 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 25.50 Guesses; 45.45% Accuracy
Global Average: 40.58 Guesses; 49.48% Accuracy
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #256!
The answer was:
You solved it in 62 guesses
Your accuracy was 37.10%
Global Stats
Globally, 533 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 37.00 Guesses; 40.29% Accuracy
Global Average: 54.88 Guesses; 45.41% Accuracy
You solved it in 33 guesses Your accuracy was 87.88% You have solved 84 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 4678 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 48.00 Guesses; 37.84% Accuracy Global Average: 70.09 Guesses; 42.50% AccuracyCongratulations, you solved Redactle #257!
The answer was:
You solved it in 6 guesses
Your accuracy was 100.00%
You have solved 146 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 33 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 10.00 Guesses; 100.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 11.18 Guesses; 90.40% Accuracy
There’s a red hot clue
You solved it in 22 guesses Your accuracy was 100.00% You have solved 85 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 130 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 11.50 Guesses; 90.84% Accuracy Global Average: 17.29 Guesses; 86.67% AccuracyCongratulations, you solved Redactle #257!
The answer was:
You solved it in 12 guesses
Your accuracy was 91.67%
Global Stats
Globally, 302 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 13.50 Guesses; 89.44% Accuracy
Global Average: 22.32 Guesses; 86.27% Accuracy*
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #258!
The answer was:
You solved it in 86 guesses
Your accuracy was 55.81%
You have solved 147 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 224 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 48.50 Guesses; 70.36% Accuracy
Global Average: 76.13 Guesses; 70.78% Accuracy
Not physics (or any other science,) sm.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #258!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 3 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 1938 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 67.00 Guesses; 66.00% Accuracy
- Global Average: 90.41 Guesses; 66.59% Accuracy
Not physics (or any other science,) sm.
I was exhausted and crashed hard. I will redactle with my coffee.
57 100.00%
—
no stats again for me today.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #258!
The answer was:
You solved it in 186 guesses
Your accuracy was 62.37%
Global Stats
Globally, 8638 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 81.00 Guesses; 64.29% Accuracy
Global Average: 112.41 Guesses; 64.88% Accuracy
I don’t know why I bother, sometimes.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #259!
The answer was:
You solved it in 36 guesses
Your accuracy was 44.44%
You have solved 148 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 18 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 36.00 Guesses; 44.31% Accuracy
Global Average: 62.56 Guesses; 51.86% Accuracy
Not physics, sm; a close friend of mine went to the place named.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #259!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 3 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 1354 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 69.00 Guesses; 39.63% Accuracy
- Global Average: 93.51 Guesses; 42.92% Accuracy
Not physics, sm; a close friend of mine went to the place named.
I fell asleep again.
A place. that’s a clue.
AussieDJ said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #258!The answer was:
You solved it in 186 guesses
Your accuracy was 62.37%Global Stats
Globally, 8638 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 81.00 Guesses; 64.29% Accuracy
Global Average: 112.41 Guesses; 64.88% AccuracyI don’t know why I bother, sometimes.
I hate this redactle too.
See myself googling it soon.
Got it all out but the first word. googled. glad I did. I have not heard of it before. Perhaps I should have.
sarahs mum said:
Got it all out but the first word. googled. glad I did. I have not heard of it before. Perhaps I should have.
I only knew it because my friend had gone there.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #259!
The answer was:
You solved it in 242 guesses
Your accuracy was 26.86%
Global Stats
Globally, 6381 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 80.00 Guesses; 37.50% Accuracy
Global Average: 112.75 Guesses; 40.28% Accuracy
I’ve never heard of it .. had to search for the result when I had enough out to search on. (Blunderbuss effect to the fore!)
I think I’m going to have to make an early New Year’s resolution about this game:
Spend no more than an hour on it (irrespective of when I start). If I can’t get it out within the hour, give it up as a bad joke and go and do something more productive with my day.
Yes, I know it’s addictive, but there comes a point where it really becomes a waste of time.
gratulations, you solved Redactle #260!
The answer was:
You solved it in 85 guesses
Your accuracy was 70.59%
You have solved 149 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 59 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 33.00 Guesses; 66.20% Accuracy
Global Average: 52.90 Guesses; 65.64% Accuracy
You solved it in 73 guesses
Your accuracy was 93.15%
You have solved 88 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 173 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 45.00 Guesses; 61.13% Accuracy Global Average: 70.65 Guesses; 63.06% AccuracySolved it (very much) earlier, but only posting now.
The answer was:
You solved it in 108 guesses
Your accuracy was 72.22%
Global Stats
Globally, 169 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 45.00 Guesses; 60.61% Accuracy
Global Average: 70.85 Guesses; 62.91% Accuracy
Checked a few minutes ago, to see what the percentages were:
Globally, 7201 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 71.00 Guesses; 58.52% Accuracy
Global Average: 99.42 Guesses; 59.79% Accuracy
Not any science, sm. This shouldn’t be too hard for you.
Oh, and I’m first today :)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #261!
The answer was:
You solved it in 69 guesses
Your accuracy was 66.67%
Global Stats
Globally, 24 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 64.50 Guesses; 65.63% Accuracy
Global Average: 86.92 Guesses; 66.46% Accuracy
You solved it in 79 guesses Your accuracy was 88.61% You have solved 89 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 56 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 60.00 Guesses; 58.08% Accuracy Global Average: 83.45 Guesses; 60.71% Accuracybtm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #261!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 1 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 1 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 1.00 Guesses; 100.00% Accuracy
- Global Average: 1.00 Guesses; 100.00% Accuracy
Not any science, sm. This shouldn’t be too hard for you.
Oh, and I’m first today :)
congratulations on that first. :)
I once assisted a judge of these and learned all about the finer stuff. I should have done better probs.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #261!
The answer was:
You solved it in 65 guesses
Your accuracy was 63.08%
You have solved 150 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 1034 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 93.00 Guesses; 53.67% Accuracy
Global Average: 123.78 Guesses; 55.25% Accuracy
Not science again, sm.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #262!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 3 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 56 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 14.00 Guesses; 78.56% Accuracy
- Global Average: 19.11 Guesses; 75.85% Accuracy
Not science again, sm.
I like lots of science.
Not so much the abstract stuff.
You solved it in 58 guesses Your accuracy was 94.83% You have solved 90 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 202 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 21.00 Guesses; 76.69% Accuracy Global Average: 29.57 Guesses; 75.44% AccuracyCongratulations, you solved Redactle #262!
The answer was:
You solved it in 59 guesses
Your accuracy was 55.93%
You have solved 151 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 406 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 23.00 Guesses; 76.09% Accuracy
Global Average: 32.66 Guesses; 75.09% Accuracy
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #262!
The answer was:
You solved it in 52 guesses
Your accuracy was 67.31%
Global Stats
Globally, 602 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 24.50 Guesses; 75.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 35.63 Guesses; 74.43% Accuracy
You solved it in 39 guesses Your accuracy was 92.31% You have solved 91 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 62 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 14.50 Guesses; 71.96% Accuracy Global Average: 23.29 Guesses; 72.69% AccuracyCongratulations, you solved Redactle #263!
The answer was:
You solved it in 30 guesses
Your accuracy was 66.67%
Global Stats
Globally, 238 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 25.00 Guesses; 68.47% Accuracy
Global Average: 37.32 Guesses; 68.91% Accuracy
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #263!
The answer was:
You solved it in 32 guesses
Your accuracy was 68.75%
You have solved 152 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 2370 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 33.00 Guesses; 64.29% Accuracy
Global Average: 50.14 Guesses; 64.26% Accuracy
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #264!
The answer was:
You solved it in 57 guesses
Your accuracy was 40.35%
You have solved 153 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 960 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 89.00 Guesses; 41.45% Accuracy
Global Average: 110.60 Guesses; 44.37% Accuracy
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #264!
The answer was:
You solved it in 55 guesses
Your accuracy was 41.82%
Global Stats
Globally, 3312 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 98.00 Guesses; 38.93% Accuracy
Global Average: 128.68 Guesses; 42.11% Accuracy
(For comparison with number of players who have solved this puzzle so far, compared to those who solved it earlier, this puzzle was solved at about 1120 AEDT)
no stats for me again today.
47 89.36%
Not physics, sm.
You solved it in 42 guesses Your accuracy was 95.24% You have solved 93 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 63 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 30.00 Guesses; 60.00% Accuracy Global Average: 42.35 Guesses; 60.60% AccuracyCongratulations, you solved Redactle #265!
The answer was:
You solved it in 72 guesses
Your accuracy was 52.78%
Global Stats
Globally, 107 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 33.00 Guesses; 57.75% Accuracy
Global Average: 50.70 Guesses; 59.95% Accuracy
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #265!
The answer was:
You solved it in 53 guesses
Your accuracy was 58.49%
You have solved 154 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 1291 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 59.00 Guesses; 54.90% Accuracy
Global Average: 80.49 Guesses; 56.98% Accuracy
AussieDJ said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #265!The answer was:
You solved it in 72 guesses
Your accuracy was 52.78%Global Stats
Globally, 107 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 33.00 Guesses; 57.75% Accuracy
Global Average: 50.70 Guesses; 59.95% Accuracy
25 guesses
72.00% accuracy
Cymek said:
AussieDJ said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #265!The answer was:
You solved it in 72 guesses
Your accuracy was 52.78%Global Stats
Globally, 107 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 33.00 Guesses; 57.75% Accuracy
Global Average: 50.70 Guesses; 59.95% Accuracy
25 guesses
72.00% accuracy
23 guesses if I remove spelling mistakes
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #266!
The answer was:
You solved it in 44 guesses
Your accuracy was 59.09%
You have solved 155 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 5 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 44.00 Guesses; 58.49% Accuracy
Global Average: 50.80 Guesses; 49.70% Accuracy
Fifth!
I missed the start!
i’ve got a lot out but I am not getting anywhere/
Congrats to DV on his 5th. and BtM getting it in one go again.
84 85.71%
—
no stats for me again.
Keep throwing words at it until you get enough to search on (aka blunderbuss effect).
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #266!
The answer was:
You solved it in 136 guesses
Your accuracy was 50.00%
Global Stats
Globally, 3080 players have solved today’s Redactle so far (as at 1055 AEDT approx on 29 Dec 2022)
Global Median: 118.00 Guesses; 54.35% Accuracy
Global Average: 149.55 Guesses; 55.59% Accuracy
AussieDJ said:
Keep throwing words at it until you get enough to search on (aka blunderbuss effect).Congratulations, you solved Redactle #266!
The answer was:
You solved it in 136 guesses
Your accuracy was 50.00%Global Stats
Globally, 3080 players have solved today’s Redactle so far (as at 1055 AEDT approx on 29 Dec 2022)
Global Median: 118.00 Guesses; 54.35% Accuracy
Global Average: 149.55 Guesses; 55.59% Accuracy
I assume most people do a search but it feels a little bit dishonest, realistically you’d be pretty luck to get it out otherwise.
Cymek said:
AussieDJ said:
Keep throwing words at it until you get enough to search on (aka blunderbuss effect).Congratulations, you solved Redactle #266!
The answer was:
You solved it in 136 guesses
Your accuracy was 50.00%Global Stats
Globally, 3080 players have solved today’s Redactle so far (as at 1055 AEDT approx on 29 Dec 2022)
Global Median: 118.00 Guesses; 54.35% Accuracy
Global Average: 149.55 Guesses; 55.59% Accuracy
I assume most people do a search but it feels a little bit dishonest, realistically you’d be pretty luck to get it out otherwise.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #266!
The answer was:
You solved it in 25 guesses
Your accuracy was 68.00%
Dying here, I’ve made 40 guesses with 3 hits
Mh3 style=“color:white”>Congratulations, you solved Redactle #267!
Not science, sm.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #267!
The answer was:
You solved it in 106 guesses
Your accuracy was 12.26%
You have solved 156 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 37 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 39.00 Guesses; 29.63% Accuracy
Global Average: 61.97 Guesses; 32.81% Accuracy
Damn…stunned at aome of the words that do not appear
btm said:
Mh3 style=“color:white”>Congratulations, you solved Redactle #267!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 3 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 1 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 3.00 Guesses; 100.00% Accuracy
- Global Average: 3.00 Guesses; 100.00% Accuracy
Not science, sm.
Nice 1st
73 52.05%
(Solved it earlier today, but just remembered to post it now)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #267!
The answer was:
You solved it in 104 guesses
Your accuracy was 24.04%
Global Stats
Globally, 6011 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 98.00 Guesses; 24.54% Accuracy
Global Average: 134.13 Guesses; 28.49% Accuracy
Not science, sm; history
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #268!
The answer was:
You solved it in 53 guesses
Your accuracy was 60.38%
You have solved 157 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 23 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 19.00 Guesses; 75.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 28.70 Guesses; 77.40% Accuracy
You solved it in 81 guesses Your accuracy was 87.65% You have solved 96 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 93 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 38.00 Guesses; 70.37% Accuracy Global Average: 56.71 Guesses; 70.99% Accuracybtm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #268!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 2 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 6 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 15.50 Guesses; 88.19% Accuracy
- Global Average: 22.00 Guesses; 78.64% Accuracy
Not science, sm; history
It took me a while to get the first word out. I had other forms of the word out…
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #268!
The answer was:
You solved it in 96 guesses
Your accuracy was 68.75%
Global Stats
Globally, 4854 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 75.00 Guesses; 63.83% Accuracy
Global Average: 108.77 Guesses; 64.09% Accuracy
Not physics,sm, but still a scientific subject.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #269!
The answer was:
You solved it in 48 guesses
Your accuracy was 66.67%
Global Stats
Globally, 16 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 21.50 Guesses; 63.89% Accuracy
Global Average: 24.44 Guesses; 64.66% Accuracy
AussieDJ said:
Not physics,sm, but still a scientific subject.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #269!
The answer was:
You solved it in 48 guesses
Your accuracy was 66.67%Global Stats
Globally, 16 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 21.50 Guesses; 63.89% Accuracy
Global Average: 24.44 Guesses; 64.66% Accuracy
I have a lot of it out. lots. but I think I will have to google.
sarahs mum said:
You solved it in 103 guesses Your accuracy was 84.47% You have solved 97 consecutive Redactles
AussieDJ said:
Not physics,sm, but still a scientific subject.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #269!
The answer was:
You solved it in 48 guesses
Your accuracy was 66.67%Global Stats
Globally, 16 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 21.50 Guesses; 63.89% Accuracy
Global Average: 24.44 Guesses; 64.66% Accuracy
I have a lot of it out. lots. but I think I will have to google.
Global Stats
Globally, 74 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 55.00 Guesses; 57.82% Accuracy Global Average: 74.84 Guesses; 57.51% Accuracy—-
googled the answer. I did not know that word even though I was all over the subject matter.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #269!
The answer was:
You solved it in 68 guesses
Your accuracy was 48.53%
You have solved 158 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 1292 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 83.00 Guesses; 56.63% Accuracy
Global Average: 130.88 Guesses; 57.88% Accuracy
You solved it in 55 guesses Your accuracy was 49.09% You have solved 98 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 28 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 42.00 Guesses; 31.37% Accuracy Global Average: 55.18 Guesses; 33.71% Accuracybtm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #270!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 1 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 11 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 17.00 Guesses; 40.00% Accuracy
- Global Average: 39.45 Guesses; 41.55% Accuracy
It wasn’t physics SM.
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #270!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 1 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 11 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 17.00 Guesses; 40.00% Accuracy
- Global Average: 39.45 Guesses; 41.55% Accuracy
It wasn’t physics SM.
I would have said something, but you’d already posted your results :)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #270!
The answer was:
You solved it in 104 guesses
Your accuracy was 20.19%
Global Stats
Globally, 4156 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 114.00 Guesses; 20.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 153.94 Guesses; 24.31% Accuracy
Not science, sm, but used (mostly by Americans) in science
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #271!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 1 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 1 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 1.00 Guesses; 100.00% Accuracy
- Global Average: 1.00 Guesses; 100.00% Accuracy
Not science, sm, but used (mostly by Americans) in science
I still think in those. I’m old.
You solved it in 60 guesses Your accuracy was 65.00% You have solved 99 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 57 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 45.00 Guesses; 43.75% Accuracy Global Average: 48.51 Guesses; 44.78% Accuracybtm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #271!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 1 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 1 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 1.00 Guesses; 100.00% Accuracy
- Global Average: 1.00 Guesses; 100.00% Accuracy
Not science, sm, but used (mostly by Americans) in science
ooo. you were first. congrats.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #271!
The answer was:
You solved it in 81 guesses
Your accuracy was 35.80%
Global Stats
Globally, 159 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 55.00 Guesses; 39.39% Accuracy
Global Average: 64.77 Guesses; 41.78% Accuracy
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #271!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 1 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 1 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 1.00 Guesses; 100.00% Accuracy
- Global Average: 1.00 Guesses; 100.00% Accuracy
Not science, sm, but used (mostly by Americans) in science
ooo. you were first. congrats.
+1
A bit scientific, sm, but not physics.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #272!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 3 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 2 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 11.50 Guesses; 67.50% Accuracy
- Global Average: 11.50 Guesses; 67.50% Accuracy
A bit scientific, sm, but not physics.
2. you’re slipping. :)
I didn’t enjoy that.
You solved it in 72 guesses Your accuracy was 47.22% You have solved 100 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 84 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 52.00 Guesses; 29.64% Accuracy Global Average: 66.48 Guesses; 33.84% AccuracyGrrr! I tried physics, mathematics, animal, vegetable and mineral – and didn’t think (obviously!) to try what became the answer, until much later.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #272!
The answer was:
You solved it in 95 guesses
Your accuracy was 20.00%
Global Stats
Globally, 4410 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 85.00 Guesses; 22.06% Accuracy
Global Average: 110.68 Guesses; 26.65% Accuracy
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #273!
The answer was:
You solved it in 111 guesses
Your accuracy was 44.14%
Global Stats
Globally, 297 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 82.00 Guesses; 52.29% Accuracy
Global Average: 100.04 Guesses; 53.03% Accuracy
107 71.96%
Not any science, sm
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #274!
The answer was:
You solved it in 198 guesses
Your accuracy was 32.83%
You have wasted your time in solving 55 consecutive Redactles
But you do it because it’s a challenge to be met.
And, who knows, you might learn something.
Global Stats
Globally, 2068 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 121.50 Guesses; 47.13% Accuracy
Global Average: 169.78 Guesses; 49.42% Accuracy
AussieDJ said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #274!The answer was:
You solved it in 198 guesses
Your accuracy was 32.83%You have wasted your time in solving 55 consecutive Redactles
But you do it because it’s a challenge to be met.
And, who knows, you might learn something.Global Stats
Globally, 2068 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 121.50 Guesses; 47.13% Accuracy
Global Average: 169.78 Guesses; 49.42% Accuracy
i might google.
googled the first word.
121 72.73%
I have never heard of disruptive innovation.
sarahs mum said:
googled the first word.121 72.73%
I have never heard of disruptive innovation.
As in some innovation disrupts society
Not any science, sm; ancient religion
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #275!
The answer was:
You solved it in 37 guesses
Your accuracy was 62.16%
Global Stats
Globally, 151 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 39.00 Guesses; 59.09% Accuracy
Global Average: 47.76 Guesses; 60.26% Accuracy
29 100.00%
Not science, sm; you should get this one easily
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #276!
The answer was:
You solved it in 66 guesses
Your accuracy was 60.61%
Global Stats
Globally, 87 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 39.00 Guesses; 63.64% Accuracy
Global Average: 43.92 Guesses; 66.60% Accuracy
As dv says, sm, this one should be right up your alley.
AussieDJ said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #276!The answer was:
You solved it in 66 guesses
Your accuracy was 60.61%Global Stats
Globally, 87 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 39.00 Guesses; 63.64% Accuracy
Global Average: 43.92 Guesses; 66.60% Accuracy
Correction: As btm said, sm, this one should be right up your alley.
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #276!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 2 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 2 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 4.50 Guesses; 100.00% Accuracy
- Global Average: 4.50 Guesses; 100.00% Accuracy
Not science, sm; you should get this one easily
I should have stayed up.
You solved it in 29 guesses Your accuracy was 93.10% You have solved 104 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 5619 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 59.00 Guesses; 55.81% Accuracy Global Average: 80.75 Guesses; 57.35% AccuracyYou solved it in 40 guesses Your accuracy was 100.00% You have solved 105 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 194 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 14.00 Guesses; 88.67% Accuracy Global Average: 20.05 Guesses; 85.61% AccuracyShare your results
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #277!
The answer was:
You solved it in 72 guesses
Your accuracy was 68.06%
Global Stats
Globally, 539 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 21.00 Guesses; 83.33% Accuracy
Global Average: 32.13 Guesses; 81.19% Accuracy
Not science, sm; household equipment
btm said:
Not science, sm; household equipment
Still took me forever to even get an idea of what they were on about ..
:(
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #278!
The answer was:
You solved it in 173 guesses
Your accuracy was 30.06%
Global Stats
Globally, 296 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 70.00 Guesses; 51.77% Accuracy
Global Average: 85.60 Guesses; 53.67% Accuracy
You solved it in 44 guesses Your accuracy was 95.45% You have solved 106 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 2309 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 88.00 Guesses; 47.40% Accuracy Global Average: 117.60 Guesses; 49.87% Accuracy34 100.00%
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #279!
The answer was:
You solved it in 20 guesses
Your accuracy was 65.00%
Global Stats
Globally, 7330 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 36.00 Guesses; 79.31% Accuracy
Global Average: 54.79 Guesses; 78.00% Accuracy
8
87.50%
Not science, sm; up your alley, but a little off to the side
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #280!
The answer was:
You solved it in 36 guesses
Your accuracy was 77.78%
Global Stats*
Globally, 105 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 40.00 Guesses; 60.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 52.80 Guesses; 61.63% Accuracy
(Another missed opportunity for an early night. Ah well.)
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #280!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 4 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 2 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 17.00 Guesses; 88.33% Accuracy
- Global Average: 17.00 Guesses; 88.33% Accuracy
Not science, sm; up your alley, but a little off to the side
not my alley. mind it is a broad brush.
36 100.00%
Not science, sm; geography
56 98.21%
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #281!
You solved it in 71 guesses
Your accuracy was 71.83%
Naval history, sm
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #282!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 1 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 20 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 38.50 Guesses; 78.78% Accuracy
- Global Average: 67.35 Guesses; 74.51% Accuracy
Naval history, sm
i’ve got lots of naval words…not the right one.
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #282!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 1 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 20 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 38.50 Guesses; 78.78% Accuracy
- Global Average: 67.35 Guesses; 74.51% Accuracy
Naval history, sm
i’ve got lots of naval words…not the right one.
It’s not a term that’s necessarily in use much these days, sm
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #282
The answer was:
You solved it in 83 guesses
Your accuracy was 74.70%
Global Stats
Globally, 3988 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 89.00 Guesses; 67.14% Accuracy
Global Average: 123.46 Guesses; 67.41% Accuracy
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #282!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 1 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 20 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 38.50 Guesses; 78.78% Accuracy
- Global Average: 67.35 Guesses; 74.51% Accuracy
Naval history, sm
i’ve got lots of naval words…not the right one.
got to 79 before I hit a non word.
Eventually googled. I suppose I did know that word. This is not my thing though.
On a DV level I am surprised there was no ‘crew’ or ‘men’
139 92.09%
You solved it in 40 guesses Your accuracy was 100.00% You have solved 111 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 158 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 32.00 Guesses; 76.97% Accuracy Global Average: 50.54 Guesses; 77.00% AccuracyCongratulations, you solved Redactle #283
The answer was:
You solved it in 146 guesses
Your accuracy was 65.07%
Global Stats
Globally, 617 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 43.00 Guesses; 75.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 67.46 Guesses; 74.44% Accuracy
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #284
The answer was:
You solved it in 81 guesses
Your accuracy was 49.38%
Global Stats
Globally, 110 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 83.50 Guesses; 50.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 101.57 Guesses; 52.07% Accuracy
I wouldn’t call it pure physics, sm – but there is some physics teminology involved.
But, then again, what would I know.?
AussieDJ said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #284The answer was:
You solved it in 81 guesses
Your accuracy was 49.38%Global Stats
Globally, 110 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 83.50 Guesses; 50.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 101.57 Guesses; 52.07% AccuracyI wouldn’t call it pure physics, sm – but there is some physics teminology involved.
But, then again, what would I know.?
eventually googled. definitely physics.
Not even remotely scientific, sm
btm said:
You solved it in 43 guesses Your accuracy was 95.35% You have solved 113 consecutive Redactles
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #285!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 1 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 41 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 22.00 Guesses; 72.22% Accuracy
- Global Average: 35.02 Guesses; 71.44% Accuracy
Not even remotely scientific, sm
Global Stats
Globally, 75 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 32.00 Guesses; 72.38% Accuracy Global Average: 43.87 Guesses; 71.35% AccuracyCongratulations, you solved Redactle #285
The answer was:
You solved it in 103 guesses
Your accuracy was 64.08%
Global Stats
Globally, 176 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 37.00 Guesses; 70.78% Accuracy
Global Average: 54.88 Guesses; 70.52% Accuracy
Blundering around the outskirts again …
AussieDJ said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #285The answer was:
You solved it in 103 guesses
Your accuracy was 64.08%Global Stats
Globally, 176 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 37.00 Guesses; 70.78% Accuracy
Global Average: 54.88 Guesses; 70.52% AccuracyBlundering around the outskirts again …
I successfully blundered some.
# Article Guesses Accuracy
285 30 76.67%
You solved it in 57 guesses Your accuracy was 85.96% You have solved 114 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 109 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 51.00 Guesses; 64.09% Accuracy Global Average: 58.17 Guesses; 65.34% Accuracy—-
i thought it was e.e.cummins.
but it has a g.
Redactle #286
You solved it in 148 guesses
Your accuracy was 40.54%
You solved it in 26 guesses Your accuracy was 96.15% You have solved 115 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 99 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 16.00 Guesses; 62.50% Accuracy Global Average: 28.18 Guesses; 62.47% Accuracy—
that was a bit sudden. I wasn’t expecting that to be the answer.
sarahs mum said:
You solved it in 26 guesses Your accuracy was 96.15% You have solved 115 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 99 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 16.00 Guesses; 62.50% Accuracy Global Average: 28.18 Guesses; 62.47% Accuracy—
that was a bit sudden. I wasn’t expecting that to be the answer.
The same, even though I threw a heck of a lot more words at it.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #287!
You solved it in 109 guesses
Your accuracy was 42.20%
Global Stats
Globally, 754 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 33.00 Guesses; 53.71% Accuracy
Global Average: 47.76 Guesses; 56.88% Accuracy
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #288
You solved it in 4 guesses
Your accuracy was 100.00%
Global Stats
Globally, 108 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 19.00 Guesses; 83.33% Accuracy
Global Average: 21.84 Guesses; 82.74% Accuracy
……………………….
Fluke! That’s all I can say.
Oh, and good night!
AussieDJ said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #288You solved it in 4 guesses
Your accuracy was 100.00%Global Stats
Globally, 108 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 19.00 Guesses; 83.33% Accuracy
Global Average: 21.84 Guesses; 82.74% Accuracy
……………………….
Fluke! That’s all I can say.Oh, and good night!
well fluked.
You solved it in 21 guesses Your accuracy was 100.00% You have solved 116 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 7451 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 29.00 Guesses; 76.12% Accuracy Global Average: 45.19 Guesses; 75.46% AccuracyNot physics, sm; IT. Should be up your alley
Experiment: Redactle.
Aim: to solve it in as few moves as possible.
Equipment needed: something to type on
Method: Keep throwing words at it, spraying wildly in every direction. Imagine a rotating garden sprinkler.
Eventual result:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #289
You solved it in 170 guesses
Your accuracy was 25.29%
Global Stats
Globally, 181 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 72.00 Guesses; 33.96% Accuracy
Global Average: 84.14 Guesses; 37.09% Accuracy
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #290!
You solved it in 60 guesses
Your accuracy was 76.67%
Global Stats
Globally, 208 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 18.00 Guesses; 87.30% Accuracy
Global Average: 27.02 Guesses; 83.64% Accuracy
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #290!
The answer was: You solved it in 14 guesses Your accuracy was 100.00% You have solved 1 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 8521 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 28.00 Guesses; 82.35% Accuracy Global Average: 42.31 Guesses; 80.10% AccuracyCongratulations, you solved Redactle #291
You solved it in 53 guesses
Your accuracy was 39.62%
AussieDJ said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #291You solved it in 53 guesses
Your accuracy was 39.62%
Global Stats
Globally, 413 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 52.00 Guesses; 33.33% Accuracy
Global Average: 64.44 Guesses; 39.91% Accuracy
34 91.18%
but no stats for me again today.
(So much for getting an early night …. )
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #292
The answer was:
You solved it in 70 guesses
Your accuracy was 70.00%
Global Stats
Globally, 164 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 43.00 Guesses; 68.58% Accuracy
Global Average: 53.91 Guesses; 69.61% Accuracy
You solved it in 95 guesses Your accuracy was 90.53% You have solved 3 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 304 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 56.00 Guesses; 66.80% Accuracy Global Average: 71.93 Guesses; 67.49% AccuracyCongratulations, you solved Redactle #293
You solved it in 81 guesses
Your accuracy was 46.91%
Global Stats
Globally, 124 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 58.00 Guesses; 57.41% Accuracy
Global Average: 65.73 Guesses; 60.30% Accuracy
You solved it in 52 guesses Your accuracy was 98.08% You have solved 4 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 185 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 60.00 Guesses; 55.56% Accuracy Global Average: 72.89 Guesses; 58.54% Accuracy80 95.00%
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #294
You solved it in 136 guesses
Your accuracy was 75.00%
Global Stats
Globally, 7996 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 27.00 Guesses; 78.80% Accuracy
Global Average: 43.77 Guesses; 77.06% Accuracy
Not science of any kind, sm; imperial politics
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #295!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 1 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 6 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 11.00 Guesses; 70.83% Accuracy
- Global Average: 29.83 Guesses; 70.99% Accuracy
Not science of any kind, sm; imperial politics
68 64.71%
Maybe I am in poor form.
sarahs mum said:
68 64.71%
Maybe I am in poor form.
You’re in poor form?
No way! And certainly not compared to my effort today …
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #295
You solved it in 172 guesses
Your accuracy was 23.84%
Global Stats
Globally, 5969 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 105.00 Guesses; 35.65% Accuracy
Global Average: 131.78 Guesses; 38.76% Accuracy
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:68 64.71%
Maybe I am in poor form.
You’re in poor form?
No way! And certainly not compared to my effort today …
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #295
You solved it in 172 guesses
Your accuracy was 23.84%Global Stats
Globally, 5969 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 105.00 Guesses; 35.65% Accuracy
Global Average: 131.78 Guesses; 38.76% Accuracy
the short ones always seem harder.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:68 64.71%
Maybe I am in poor form.
You’re in poor form?
No way! And certainly not compared to my effort today …
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #295
You solved it in 172 guesses
Your accuracy was 23.84%Global Stats
Globally, 5969 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 105.00 Guesses; 35.65% Accuracy
Global Average: 131.78 Guesses; 38.76% Accuracythe short ones always seem harder.
Fewer cues, or clues.
You solved it in 68 guesses Your accuracy was 83.82% You have solved 7 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 261 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 52.00 Guesses; 57.89% Accuracy Global Average: 71.30 Guesses; 59.40% Accuracy—-
should have been easier than that.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #296
You solved it in 154 guesses
Your accuracy was 38.96%
Global Stats
Globally, 500 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 60.00 Guesses; 57.05% Accuracy
Global Average: 81.81 Guesses; 58.18% Accuracy
Firing the blunderbuss at it only brought the answer in incrementally.
Nothing leapt out until almost the last couple of words.
<he style="color:white">Global Stats</he>
Not physics, sm; biology
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #297!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 1 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
<he style="color:white">Global Stats</he>
- Globally, 56 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 63.50 Guesses; 57.66% Accuracy
- Global Average: 83.68 Guesses; 61.28% Accuracy
Not physics, sm; biology
I think I am stuck again.
started with good intentions. I have words. they are all right words. But I ain’t got nothing. so I am going to bed and I will probably google tomorrow.
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #297!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 1 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
<he style="color:white">Global Stats</he>
- Globally, 56 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 63.50 Guesses; 57.66% Accuracy
- Global Average: 83.68 Guesses; 61.28% Accuracy
Not physics, sm; biology
I think I am stuck again.
It’s a Latin word that encompasses all mammals and amphibians, extant and extinct.
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #297!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 1 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
<he style="color:white">Global Stats</he>
- Globally, 56 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 63.50 Guesses; 57.66% Accuracy
- Global Average: 83.68 Guesses; 61.28% Accuracy
Not physics, sm; biology
I think I am stuck again.
It’s a Latin word that encompasses all mammals and amphibians, extant and extinct.
hmmm.
I hope that helps. :)
I thought that was something the milk came in.
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
sarahs mum said:I think I am stuck again.
It’s a Latin word that encompasses all mammals and amphibians, extant and extinct.
hmmm.
I hope that helps. :)
Sorry, it’s Greek, not Latin. It also refers to reptiles, including dinosaurs. It’s not a taxonomic word, though.
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
btm said:It’s a Latin word that encompasses all mammals and amphibians, extant and extinct.
hmmm.
I hope that helps. :)Sorry, it’s Greek, not Latin. It also refers to reptiles, including dinosaurs. It’s not a taxonomic word, though.
I googled. i was all over this subject except for the title.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #297
You solved it in 106 guesses
Your accuracy was 54.72%
Global Stats
Globally, 3219 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 100.00 Guesses; 57.14% Accuracy
Global Average: 135.65 Guesses; 57.93% Accuracy
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #298
You solved it in 78 guesses
Your accuracy was 35.90%
Global Stats
Globally, 378 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 73.00 Guesses; 34.94% Accuracy
Global Average: 93.68 Guesses; 40.22% Accuracy
A bit of physics, sm. Not really complex, more historical, I should think.
AussieDJ said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #298You solved it in 78 guesses
Your accuracy was 35.90%Global Stats
Globally, 378 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 73.00 Guesses; 34.94% Accuracy
Global Average: 93.68 Guesses; 40.22% AccuracyA bit of physics, sm. Not really complex, more historical, I should think.
56 66.07%
I did not know about halafians.never heard of them.
i seem to have solved redactle but it isn’t saying I have solved. that is I have the title out but nothing is happening.
sarahs mum said:
i seem to have solved redactle but it isn’t saying I have solved. that is I have the title out but nothing is happening.
Same here. Looks like they’ve broken it.
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
i seem to have solved redactle but it isn’t saying I have solved. that is I have the title out but nothing is happening.
Same here. Looks like they’ve broken it.
It will be the fault of the apostrophe.
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
i seem to have solved redactle but it isn’t saying I have solved. that is I have the title out but nothing is happening.
Same here. Looks like they’ve broken it.
It will be the fault of the apostrophe.
Seeing the same here.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
btm said:Same here. Looks like they’ve broken it.
It will be the fault of the apostrophe.
Seeing the same here.
Myself as well
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #300
The answer was:
You solved it in 77 guesses
Your accuracy was 72.73%
You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
(I wonder if ‘they’ eventually sorted out yesterday’s faulty game – or has every player’s successful game count gone back to 1?)
Global Stats
Globally, 125 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 33.00 Guesses; 72.73% Accuracy
Global Average: 49.68 Guesses; 72.27% Accuracy
You solved it in 74 guesses Your accuracy was 89.19% You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 4627 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 64.00 Guesses; 65.12% Accuracy Global Average: 89.37 Guesses; 65.49% AccuracyYou solved it in 35 guesses Your accuracy was 97.14% You have solved 2 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 8818 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 21.00 Guesses; 82.22% Accuracy Global Average: 32.94 Guesses; 79.93% AccuracyHarrumph, etc. (at myself)!
Got the nationality/language group on the 18th guess. Didn’t think to try the country name until 66 guesses later.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #301
You solved it in 84 guesses
Your accuracy was 70.24%
Global Stats
Globally, 8856 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 21.00 Guesses; 82.22% Accuracy
Global Average: 32.95 Guesses; 79.93% Accuracy
sarahs mum said:
You solved it in 35 guesses Your accuracy was 97.14% You have solved 2 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 8818 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 21.00 Guesses; 82.22% Accuracy Global Average: 32.94 Guesses; 79.93% Accuracy
21 guesses
95.24% accuracy
I did this earlier today, but forgot to post it.
Not physics, sm; geography
Not physics, sm, and English spelling (not American)
btm said:
You solved it in 40 guesses Your accuracy was 100.00% You have solved 3 consecutive Redactles
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #302!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 2 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 94 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 17.00 Guesses; 86.03% Accuracy
- Global Average: 29.52 Guesses; 83.81% Accuracy
Not physics, sm, and English spelling (not American)
Global Stats
Globally, 207 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 23.00 Guesses; 84.38% Accuracy Global Average: 34.90 Guesses; 82.75% Accuracyooh. I didn’t notice the spelling until you mentioned it.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #302
You solved it in 75 guesses
Your accuracy was 65.33%
Global Stats
Globally, 482 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 29.00 Guesses; 82.25% Accuracy
Global Average: 45.00 Guesses; 80.77% Accuracy
sarahs mum said:
btm said:You solved it in 40 guesses Your accuracy was 100.00% You have solved 3 consecutive Redactles
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #302!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 2 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 94 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 17.00 Guesses; 86.03% Accuracy
- Global Average: 29.52 Guesses; 83.81% Accuracy
Not physics, sm, and English spelling (not American)
Global Stats
Globally, 207 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 23.00 Guesses; 84.38% Accuracy Global Average: 34.90 Guesses; 82.75% Accuracyooh. I didn’t notice the spelling until you mentioned it.
38 guesses
73.68% accuracy
Not physics, sm
You solved it in 47 guesses Your accuracy was 97.87% You have solved 4 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 313 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 50.00 Guesses; 63.38% Accuracy Global Average: 63.88 Guesses; 64.28% Accuracybtm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #303!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 1 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 5 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 10.00 Guesses; 83.33% Accuracy
- Global Average: 10.40 Guesses; 78.46% Accuracy
Not physics, sm
i was worried about that briefly.
Ye olde blunderbuss to the fore, yet again!
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #303
You solved it in 95 guesses
Your accuracy was 57.89%
Global Stats
Globally, 6003 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 60.00 Guesses; 60.98% Accuracy
Global Average: 81.78 Guesses; 62.05% Accuracy
Not science, sm; English historical figure
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #304!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 2 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 3 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 10.00 Guesses; 100.00% Accuracy
- Global Average: 11.00 Guesses; 96.83% Accuracy
Not science, sm; English historical figure
i have a feeling I will be googling. I think I know that I do not know.
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #304!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 2 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 3 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 10.00 Guesses; 100.00% Accuracy
- Global Average: 11.00 Guesses; 96.83% Accuracy
Not science, sm; English historical figure
i have a feeling I will be googling. I think I know that I do not know.
it isn’t John Farnham.
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #304!
- The answer was:
- You solved it in 2 guesses
- Your accuracy was 100.00%
- You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
- Globally, 3 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
- Global Median: 10.00 Guesses; 100.00% Accuracy
- Global Average: 11.00 Guesses; 96.83% Accuracy
Not science, sm; English historical figure
i have a feeling I will be googling. I think I know that I do not know.
it isn’t John Farnham.
but it is Hamilton.
71 100.00%
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #304
The answer was: not known by me
You solved it in 75 guesses
Your accuracy was 70.67%
Global Stats
Globally, 623 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 52.00 Guesses; 74.51% Accuracy
Global Average: 75.07 Guesses; 73.27% Accuracy
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #305
The answer was:
You solved it in 44 guesses
Your accuracy was 77.27%
Global Stats
Globally, 198 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 13.50 Guesses; 86.81% Accuracy
Global Average: 22.36 Guesses; 85.06% Accuracy
36 100.00%
physics.
So rather than upset myself I googled.
You solved it in 36 guesses Your accuracy was 77.78% You have solved 7 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 41 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 52.00 Guesses; 54.29% Accuracy Global Average: 64.39 Guesses; 55.78% AccuracyScatter-gun to the fore, yet again!
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #306
You solved it in 77 guesses
Your accuracy was 38.96%
Global Stats
Globally, 3763 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 99.00 Guesses; 45.83% Accuracy
Global Average: 130.27 Guesses; 47.59% Accuracy
AussieDJ said:
Scatter-gun to the fore, yet again!Congratulations, you solved Redactle #306
You solved it in 77 guesses
Your accuracy was 38.96%Global Stats
Globally, 3763 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 99.00 Guesses; 45.83% Accuracy
Global Average: 130.27 Guesses; 47.59% Accuracy
Scatter seems appropriate with this article :)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #307
You solved it in 91 guesses
Your accuracy was 30.77%
Global Stats
Globally, 86 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 51.00 Guesses; 33.66% Accuracy
Global Average: 75.48 Guesses; 39.59% Accuracy
Not physics, sm. Think culinary.
As AussieDJ said, sm, not science
You solved it in 29 guesses Your accuracy was 79.31% You have solved 8 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 4579 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 102.00 Guesses; 27.27% Accuracy Global Average: 128.58 Guesses; 31.01% Accuracy107 88.79%
From a few hours ago:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #308
You solved it in 38 guesses
Your accuracy was 68.42%
Global Stats
Globally, 7246 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 59.00 Guesses; 70.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 82.50 Guesses; 69.89% Accuracy
AussieDJ said:
From a few hours ago:Congratulations, you solved Redactle #308
You solved it in 38 guesses
Your accuracy was 68.42%Global Stats
Globally, 7246 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 59.00 Guesses; 70.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 82.50 Guesses; 69.89% Accuracy
with or without google help? I had all sorts of european countries and cardinal points and bits of stuff about alphabets AND the second word. Took me so long to come up with the first. And it was after Ukrainian and portugese.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
From a few hours ago:Congratulations, you solved Redactle #308
You solved it in 38 guesses
Your accuracy was 68.42%Global Stats
Globally, 7246 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 59.00 Guesses; 70.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 82.50 Guesses; 69.89% Accuracy
with or without google help? I had all sorts of european countries and cardinal points and bits of stuff about alphabets AND the second word. Took me so long to come up with the first. And it was after Ukrainian and portugese.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
From a few hours ago:Congratulations, you solved Redactle #308
You solved it in 38 guesses
Your accuracy was 68.42%Global Stats
Globally, 7246 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 59.00 Guesses; 70.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 82.50 Guesses; 69.89% Accuracy
with or without google help? I had all sorts of european countries and cardinal points and bits of stuff about alphabets AND the second word. Took me so long to come up with the first. And it was after Ukrainian and portugese.
Much like you, I had the countries and all the stuff you had, along with the second word … and when I had enough of a sentence out to get help, I grabbed it!
It’s a very rare occasion that I get a result without confirming it in a search engine.
I try hard.I went past my usual give place last night.
43 86.05%
I should have picked what the answer was much sooner.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #309
The answer was: “Who’s on first?”
You solved it in 83 guesses
Your accuracy was 54.22%
Global Stats
Globally, 7064 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 51.00 Guesses; 45.45% Accuracy
Global Average: 71.19 Guesses; 49.18% Accuracy
AussieDJ said:
I should have picked what the answer was much sooner.Congratulations, you solved Redactle #309
The answer was: “Who’s on first?”
You solved it in 83 guesses
Your accuracy was 54.22%Global Stats
Globally, 7064 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 51.00 Guesses; 45.45% Accuracy
Global Average: 71.19 Guesses; 49.18% Accuracy
309
13 guesses
61.54% accuracy
84 90.48%
no stats for me again.
Tsk! Thinking it was all about America again …
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #310
You solved it in 98 guesses
Your accuracy was 61.22%
Global Stats
Globally, 3815 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 88.00 Guesses; 62.50% Accuracy
Global Average: 112.71 Guesses; 63.00% Accuracy
What a joke result (for me)! It took all of about two minutes!
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #311
The answer was:
You solved it in 4 guesses
Your accuracy was 100.00%
Global Stats
Globally, 318 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 15.00 Guesses; 81.81% Accuracy
Global Average: 24.20 Guesses; 80.63% Accuracy
AussieDJ said:
What a joke result (for me)! It took all of about two minutes!Congratulations, you solved Redactle #311
The answer was:
You solved it in 4 guesses
Your accuracy was 100.00%Global Stats
Globally, 318 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 15.00 Guesses; 81.81% Accuracy
Global Average: 24.20 Guesses; 80.63% Accuracy
Not physics, sm.
AussieDJ said:
AussieDJ said:
What a joke result (for me)! It took all of about two minutes!Congratulations, you solved Redactle #311
The answer was:
You solved it in 4 guesses
Your accuracy was 100.00%Global Stats
Globally, 318 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 15.00 Guesses; 81.81% Accuracy
Global Average: 24.20 Guesses; 80.63% Accuracy
Not physics, sm.
Because I read this before I started i spent longer looking at the title. I did not start with ‘this and that and which’.
You solved it in 3 guesses Your accuracy was 100.00% You have solved 12 consecutive RedactlesGlobal Stats
Globally, 6064 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 20.00 Guesses; 77.27% Accuracy Global Average: 35.51 Guesses; 76.61% AccuracyYou solved it in 32 guesses Your accuracy was 68.75% You have solved 13 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 421 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 25.00 Guesses; 53.85% Accuracy Global Average: 37.84 Guesses; 56.50% AccuracyBack to my usual scatter-gun approach, with the corresponding spray of suggestions thrown at the page.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #312
You solved it in 93 guesses
Your accuracy was 43.01%
Global Stats
Globally, 587 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 27.00 Guesses; 52.83% Accuracy
Global Average: 39.41 Guesses; 55.44% Accuracy
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #313
You solved it in 79 guesses
Your accuracy was 58.23%
Global Stats
Globally, 93 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 48.00 Guesses; 55.10% Accuracy
Global Average: 58.47 Guesses; 57.21% Accuracy
Not physics, sm.
You solved it in 51 guesses Your accuracy was 86.27% You have solved 14 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 137 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 55.00 Guesses; 53.01% Accuracy Global Average: 67.98 Guesses; 54.85% AccuracyCongratulations, you solved Redactle #314
You solved it in 21 guesses
Your accuracy was 33.33%
That’s 33 and a third. Sounds like a record to me!
Pretty good for a DJ. Even this one!
Global Stats
Globally, 3317 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 98.00 Guesses; 21.36% Accuracy
Global Average: 132.90 Guesses; 25.46% Accuracy
54 55.56%
81 95.06%
Using ye olde ‘throw everything at it approach’ …
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #315
The answer was:
You solved it in 122 guesses
Your accuracy was 67.21%
Global Stats
Globally, 4628 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 67.00 Guesses; 71.43% Accuracy
Global Average: 90.08 Guesses; 70.66% Accuracy
Defs not physics, sm
You solved it in 68 guesses Your accuracy was 92.65% You have solved 17 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 169 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 71.00 Guesses; 60.71% Accuracy Global Average: 92.21 Guesses; 62.51% AccuracyInteresting article.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #316
The answer was:
You solved it in 76 guesses
Your accuracy was 57.89%
Global Stats
Globally, 5791 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 85.00 Guesses; 58.28% Accuracy
Global Average: 113.21 Guesses; 59.25% Accuracy
316
32 guesses
65.63% accuracy
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #317
The answer was: (Not physics, sm)
You solved it in 37 guesses
Your accuracy was 72.97%
Global Stats
Globally, 139 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 14.00 Guesses; 83.33% Accuracy
Global Average: 25.83 Guesses; 79.27% Accuracy
You solved it in 56 guesses Your accuracy was 96.43% You have solved 18 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 5606 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 32.00 Guesses; 77.78% Accuracy Global Average: 54.85 Guesses; 77.04% Accuracy75 92.00%
(From much earlier today)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #318
You solved it in 78 guesses
Your accuracy was 70.51%
Geography, rather than physics, sm.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #319
The answer was:
You solved it in 59 guesses
Your accuracy was 50.85%
Global Stats
Globally, 214 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 43.00 Guesses; 50.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 57.16 Guesses; 51.52% Accuracy
47 89.36%
As discussed the other day by DV.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #320
You solved it in 37 guesses
Your accuracy was 81.08%
Global Stats
Globally, 2239 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 17.00 Guesses; 81.13% Accuracy
Global Average: 33.80 Guesses; 78.61% Accuracy
Maths and some physics figure in this, sarahs mum.
AussieDJ said:
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #320You solved it in 37 guesses
Your accuracy was 81.08%Global Stats
Globally, 2239 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 17.00 Guesses; 81.13% Accuracy
Global Average: 33.80 Guesses; 78.61% AccuracyMaths and some physics figure in this, sarahs mum.
great. I’ll wake up a bit more and give it a go.
You solved it in 18 guesses Your accuracy was 100.00% You have solved 21 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 5400 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 19.00 Guesses; 80.00% Accuracy Global Average: 36.06 Guesses; 77.33% AccuracyWith better scanning of article it should have been got out in one guess.
You solved it in 36 guesses Your accuracy was 77.78% You have solved 22 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 38 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 59.00 Guesses; 36.28% Accuracy Global Average: 70.26 Guesses; 44.18% AccuracyA bit of focussed blunderbussing this time…
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #321
The answer was:
You solved it in 34 guesses
Your accuracy was 44.12%
Global Stats
Globally, 121 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 75.00 Guesses; 34.88% Accuracy
Global Average: 93.05 Guesses; 39.42% Accuracy
(Not physics, sm)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #322
You solved it in 64 guesses
Your accuracy was 68.75%
Global Stats
Globally, 292 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 47.00 Guesses; 68.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 63.97 Guesses; 68.46% Accuracy
AussieDJ said:
(Not physics, sm)Congratulations, you solved Redactle #322
You solved it in 64 guesses
Your accuracy was 68.75%Global Stats
Globally, 292 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 47.00 Guesses; 68.00% Accuracy
Global Average: 63.97 Guesses; 68.46% Accuracy
i forgot to redactle. *wanders off to do so.
You solved it in 44 guesses Your accuracy was 100.00% You have solved 23 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 1451 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 58.00 Guesses; 66.22% Accuracy Global Average: 79.66 Guesses; 66.86% Accuracy(Not physics, sm)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #323
You solved it in 42 guesses
Your accuracy was 85.71%
Global Stats
Globally, 281 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 42.00 Guesses; 73.53% Accuracy
Global Average: 56.06 Guesses; 73.08% Accuracy
50 100.00%
44 97.73%
another one of those that suprprised me when I got it out.
sarahs mum said:
44 97.73%You solved it in 44 guesses Your accuracy was 97.73% You have solved 25 consecutive Redactlesanother one of those that suprprised me when I got it out.
Global Stats
Globally, 6353 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 38.00 Guesses; 58.33% Accuracy Global Average: 56.65 Guesses; 60.22% Accuracysarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:44 97.73%You solved it in 44 guesses Your accuracy was 97.73% You have solved 25 consecutive Redactlesanother one of those that suprprised me when I got it out.
Global Stats
Globally, 6353 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 38.00 Guesses; 58.33% Accuracy Global Average: 56.65 Guesses; 60.22% Accuracy
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #324
You solved it in 29 guesses
Your accuracy was 44.83%
^Global Stats*
Globally, 7603 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 38.00 Guesses; 58.33% Accuracy
Global Average: 56.96 Guesses; 60.20% Accuracy
I’ve got the answer out. but it isn’t finishing up like it normally does.
sad,
sarahs mum said:
I’ve got the answer out. but it isn’t finishing up like it normally does.sad,
I know what the answer is too, sm, but it won’t accept the æ ligature.
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
I’ve got the answer out. but it isn’t finishing up like it normally does.sad,
I know what the answer is too, sm, but it won’t accept the æ ligature.
i copied and pasted that. it still was not happy.
sarahs mum said:
btm said:
sarahs mum said:
I’ve got the answer out. but it isn’t finishing up like it normally does.sad,
I know what the answer is too, sm, but it won’t accept the æ ligature.
i copied and pasted that. it still was not happy.
it’s done this once before with another strangely spelled word I seem to remember
Hardly worthwhile staying up for this redactle.
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
btm said:I know what the answer is too, sm, but it won’t accept the æ ligature.
i copied and pasted that. it still was not happy.
it’s done this once before with another strangely spelled word I seem to remember
Hardly worthwhile staying up for this redactle.
Agreed.
I’ve also got it out but, as you’ve discovered, the game isn’t accepting of the result.
I tried typing in some of the missing words from the actual article, but there are a heck of a lot of them, and I really can’t be bothered.
If you scroll right to the bottom of the page, it looks as though the scanned site has slipped sideways. That can’t help, either.
The effect? The site will regard this as a missed or lost game, and the counting of succesful Redactles will start again from number 1 with the next game. (Been there. Done that.)
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:i copied and pasted that. it still was not happy.
it’s done this once before with another strangely spelled word I seem to remember
Hardly worthwhile staying up for this redactle.
Agreed.
I’ve also got it out but, as you’ve discovered, the game isn’t accepting of the result.I tried typing in some of the missing words from the actual article, but there are a heck of a lot of them, and I really can’t be bothered.
If you scroll right to the bottom of the page, it looks as though the scanned site has slipped sideways. That can’t help, either.
The effect? The site will regard this as a missed or lost game, and the counting of succesful Redactles will start again from number 1 with the next game. (Been there. Done that.)
ah well.
:(
76 moves and one zero return. ninety something percent.
I’m up to 136 guesses. However, some of those where I’ve been trying to fill in the blanks from the actual article.
In another almost-first, for me, I’ve just sent a tweet to Redactle alerting them to the problem.
Almost-first? I think this might be my second-only tweet, ever!
:)
AussieDJ said:
I’m up to 136 guesses. However, some of those where I’ve been trying to fill in the blanks from the actual article.In another almost-first, for me, I’ve just sent a tweet to Redactle alerting them to the problem.
Almost-first? I think this might be my second-only tweet, ever!
:)
i have never tweeted.
I also do not know how to use a mobile phone.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
I’m up to 136 guesses. However, some of those where I’ve been trying to fill in the blanks from the actual article.In another almost-first, for me, I’ve just sent a tweet to Redactle alerting them to the problem.
Almost-first? I think this might be my second-only tweet, ever!
:)
i have never tweeted.
I also do not know how to use a mobile phone.
I tweeted from my computer.
We can also take another look at the game much later today and see if it’s been fixed.
I’ve just stuck my nose into the Redactle FB group, where this was just posted (not by me):
It seems there is a work-around.
From the (ahem, sorry Sibeen) FB site, people are suggesting:
… put in (1) the diphthong, (2) the beginning of the word up to the diphthong, and (3) the end of the word after the diphthong. Each as a separate “word.” All will show as zero hits, but then the article will fill in.
I’ve found it still doesn’t work in the browser I played the original game in, but if I do it in another browser, then the work-around is successful. Don’t forget to add the second word.
So, positive result, but the downside is your score isn’t accurate, and the ‘Consecutive games’ won score won’t increment.
AussieDJ said:
It seems there is a work-around.From the (ahem, sorry Sibeen) FB site, people are suggesting:
… put in (1) the diphthong, (2) the beginning of the word up to the diphthong, and (3) the end of the word after the diphthong. Each as a separate “word.” All will show as zero hits, but then the article will fill in.I’ve found it still doesn’t work in the browser I played the original game in, but if I do it in another browser, then the work-around is successful. Don’t forget to add the second word.
So, positive result, but the downside is your score isn’t accurate, and the ‘Consecutive games’ won score won’t increment.
That worked. Now all we have to do is remember that for next time.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
It seems there is a work-around.From the (ahem, sorry Sibeen) FB site, people are suggesting:
… put in (1) the diphthong, (2) the beginning of the word up to the diphthong, and (3) the end of the word after the diphthong. Each as a separate “word.” All will show as zero hits, but then the article will fill in.I’ve found it still doesn’t work in the browser I played the original game in, but if I do it in another browser, then the work-around is successful. Don’t forget to add the second word.
So, positive result, but the downside is your score isn’t accurate, and the ‘Consecutive games’ won score won’t increment.
That worked. Now all we have to do is remember that for next time.
I tried cheating by clearing all my PCs cookings for the past 24 hours. It worked for Redactle – although I’m now wondering whether I had a typo in the first part of the first word.
Further downside from clearing a day’s worth of cookies is having to log back in to my usually-visited websites.
Sigh!
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
It seems there is a work-around.From the (ahem, sorry Sibeen) FB site, people are suggesting:
… put in (1) the diphthong, (2) the beginning of the word up to the diphthong, and (3) the end of the word after the diphthong. Each as a separate “word.” All will show as zero hits, but then the article will fill in.I’ve found it still doesn’t work in the browser I played the original game in, but if I do it in another browser, then the work-around is successful. Don’t forget to add the second word.
So, positive result, but the downside is your score isn’t accurate, and the ‘Consecutive games’ won score won’t increment.
That worked. Now all we have to do is remember that for next time.
I tried cheating by clearing all my PCs cookings for the past 24 hours. It worked for Redactle – although I’m now wondering whether I had a typo in the first part of the first word.
Further downside from clearing a day’s worth of cookies is having to log back in to my usually-visited websites.
Sigh!
A further lesson learned for me – apart from the fact that it’s ‘cheating’ – don’t clear cookies! I’ve just noticed the progressive score count on Wordle has also disappeared!
You solved it in 52 guesses Your accuracy was 42.31% You have solved 1 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 73 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 31.00 Guesses; 46.15% Accuracy Global Average: 42.84 Guesses; 51.06% AccuracyBack to the blunderbuss for this one :(
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #326
You solved it in 105 guesses
Your accuracy was 33.33% (Thirty-three and a third? That’s a record!)
Global Stats
Globally, 293 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 50.00 Guesses; 42.55% Accuracy
Global Average: 68.65 Guesses; 46.39% Accuracy
(So much for ‘should’a been in bed already!)
No physics, sm.
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #327
(In under five minutes), You solved it in 28 guesses
Your accuracy was 67.86%
Global Stats
Globally, 35 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 35.00 Guesses; 62.50% Accuracy
Global Average: 44.03 Guesses; 62.12% Accuracy
You solved it in 20 guesses Your accuracy was 100.00% You have solved 2 consecutive Redactles
Global Stats
Globally, 7513 players have solved today’s Redactle so far Global Median: 41.00 Guesses; 59.18% Accuracy Global Average: 55.98 Guesses; 60.62% AccuracyShare your results
(Post in the Goodnight thread. Oh yeah. One more quick look at Redactle before shutting down for the night.
Always the way!)
Congratulations, you solved Redactle #328
You solved it in 110 guesses
Your accuracy was 53.64%
Global Stats
Globally, 265 players have solved today’s Redactle so far
Global Median: 84.00 Guesses; 51.24% Accuracy
Global Average: 105.51 Guesses; 52.60% Accuracy
i didn’t stay awake for redactle last night. i haven’t been able to access it all day.
sad.
sarahs mum said:
i didn’t stay awake for redactle last night. i haven’t been able to access it all day.sad.
Yes, it’s still down.
I’m not going to wait for it. I’ll try later today.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
i didn’t stay awake for redactle last night. i haven’t been able to access it all day.sad.
Yes, it’s still down.
I’m not going to wait for it. I’ll try later today.
I diidn’t mean to miss it. ah well. :(
It looks like another early night on the cards. Which could be a good thing …
The main game is still down.
This is from the alternative site and is, ostensibly, today’s game.
Congratulations! You solved Redactle Unlimited #330 in 54 guesses with 64.81% accuracy
AussieDJ said:
The main game is still down.This is from the alternative site and is, ostensibly, today’s game.
Congratulations! You solved Redactle Unlimited #330 in 54 guesses with 64.81% accuracy
I am missing redactle.
Do we know what time the unlimited game is posted? Does it include a wolrd ranking?
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
The main game is still down.This is from the alternative site and is, ostensibly, today’s game.
Congratulations! You solved Redactle Unlimited #330 in 54 guesses with 64.81% accuracy
I am missing redactle.
Do we know what time the unlimited game is posted? Does it include a wolrd ranking?
(I’m just catching up on the reading now)
There’s no mention on the https://redactle-unlimited.com/ site on when the new game is posted. The new game/s might appear around the same time as the main site, but it doesn’t look as though it includes a world ranking.
What it does do, though, is allow you to download your history from the Redactle.com site. Assuming, of course, that the site is working.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
The main game is still down.This is from the alternative site and is, ostensibly, today’s game.
Congratulations! You solved Redactle Unlimited #330 in 54 guesses with 64.81% accuracy
I am missing redactle.
Do we know what time the unlimited game is posted? Does it include a wolrd ranking?
(I’m just catching up on the reading now)
There’s no mention on the https://redactle-unlimited.com/ site on when the new game is posted. The new game/s might appear around the same time as the main site, but it doesn’t look as though it includes a world ranking.
What it does do, though, is allow you to download your history from the Redactle.com site. Assuming, of course, that the site is working.
Oh great – NOT !!!
I’ve just learned there’s another version of the unlimited game.
This one’s at https://redactleunlimited.com/
How to differentiate between them? One is Redactle (hyphen) unlimited, and the other has both words run together.
I’d still like to see the original game return.
AussieDJ said:
New game # 331 is up up at Redactle (hyphen) Unlimted, sm.It shows up as game Q40059
I’ll give it whirl in a minute.
ta.
first 3 guesses
sarahs mum said:
first 3 guesses
Congratulations! You solved Redactle Unlimited #331 in 5 guesses with 100% accuracy and a time of 00:03:40!
sarahs mum said:
first 3 guesses
Thankfully (for me) that’s not the full answer. But it’s a start, at least.
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
first 3 guesses
Congratulations! You solved Redactle Unlimited #331 in 5 guesses with 100% accuracy and a time of 00:03:40!
Hmm. Having (inadvertently) seen your answer, I put those words in .. and the game is still going on for me.
We may be playing different versions.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
first 3 guesses
Congratulations! You solved Redactle Unlimited #331 in 5 guesses with 100% accuracy and a time of 00:03:40!
Hmm. Having (inadvertently) seen your answer, I put those words in .. and the game is still going on for me.
We may be playing different versions.
I played your link… i put up my first three words. but I solved it five.
Sorry for putting up my first three words. ButIhad impressed myself.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
first 3 guesses
Congratulations! You solved Redactle Unlimited #331 in 5 guesses with 100% accuracy and a time of 00:03:40!
Hmm. Having (inadvertently) seen your answer, I put those words in .. and the game is still going on for me.
We may be playing different versions.
Then again … I don’t know. It took me a few more words to get it out
Congratulations! You solved Redactle Unlimited #331 in 8 guesses with 100% accuracy and a time of 00:07:02!
AussieDJ said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:Congratulations! You solved Redactle Unlimited #331 in 5 guesses with 100% accuracy and a time of 00:03:40!
Hmm. Having (inadvertently) seen your answer, I put those words in .. and the game is still going on for me.
We may be playing different versions.
Then again … I don’t know. It took me a few more words to get it out
Congratulations! You solved Redactle Unlimited #331 in 8 guesses with 100% accuracy and a time of 00:07:02!
for some reason ‘below sea level’ jumps out at me. And then there was a four letter word with sea. and the dead sea is below sea level. Then I worked out a 6 letter river. And i hoped it was what it was.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
AussieDJ said:Hmm. Having (inadvertently) seen your answer, I put those words in .. and the game is still going on for me.
We may be playing different versions.
Then again … I don’t know. It took me a few more words to get it out
Congratulations! You solved Redactle Unlimited #331 in 8 guesses with 100% accuracy and a time of 00:07:02!for some reason ‘below sea level’ jumps out at me. And then there was a four letter word with sea. and the dead sea is below sea level. Then I worked out a 6 letter river. And i hoped it was what it was.
That’s exactly what it was!
I misinterpreted the words you put up, thinking that was all that was needed.
But, of course, the game went on for a few more words.
So we were on the same game.
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:Then again … I don’t know. It took me a few more words to get it out
Congratulations! You solved Redactle Unlimited #331 in 8 guesses with 100% accuracy and a time of 00:07:02!for some reason ‘below sea level’ jumps out at me. And then there was a four letter word with sea. and the dead sea is below sea level. Then I worked out a 6 letter river. And i hoped it was what it was.
That’s exactly what it was!
I misinterpreted the words you put up, thinking that was all that was needed.
But, of course, the game went on for a few more words.So we were on the same game.
I normally start with that, which, and then sort out tense and then play are/were, had/has/have and be/been.
I just got excited starting somewhere else.
sarahs mum said:
AussieDJ said:
sarahs mum said:for some reason ‘below sea level’ jumps out at me. And then there was a four letter word with sea. and the dead sea is below sea level. Then I worked out a 6 letter river. And i hoped it was what it was.
That’s exactly what it was!
I misinterpreted the words you put up, thinking that was all that was needed.
But, of course, the game went on for a few more words.So we were on the same game.
I normally start with that, which, and then sort out tense and then play are/were, had/has/have and be/been.
I just got excited starting somewhere else.
I usually start with ‘history’, then ‘use’ and ‘used’, followed by ‘can’, ‘may’ and ‘be’.
Then comes: who, what, when, where, how, why, then, them, and they … and then I take a look and see if there’s anything obvious I can add.
Might as well give this a bump, seeing as it looks like sm has got back into it.
For which I can only apologise, having mentioned to her that I play the Redactle Unlimited version and suggested she have a look at it.
