The Rev Dodgson said:
Cymek said:
transition said:
here it is
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mortality_salience
“…..Most research done on terror management theory revolves around the mortality salience paradigm. It has been found that religious individuals as well as religious fundamentalists are less vulnerable to mortality salience manipulations, and so religious believers engage in cultural worldview defense to a lesser extent than nonreligious individuals……..”
The sad aspect of death to me is the missing out on the potential of humanity when gone, how and where do we end up
More from the wikilink:
“Mortality salience comes into effect, because humans contribute all of their actions to either avoiding death or distracting themselves from the contemplation of it. Thus, terror management theory asserts that almost all human activity is driven by the fear of death.”
That’s complete bollocks, isn’t it?
probably is bullshit, to test the idea i’d ask if it’s likely true of all or most or many other living things, and if it weren’t demonstrably or likely true from what can be observed i’d further ask why expect it to be so different, so entirely different for humans
I have a hunch the proposition tends to define what fear is, what it ought be, and in the proposition you have death and fear defining each other, and likely of the real world nothing exact like fear of death exists, though it may feel very much exactly like that if you were being chased by a lion, or whatever, while the threat is immediate, present
and what is lost with fear, playfulness maybe, curiosity perhaps, whatever absences
I think the truth or otherwise of the proposition might be better considered if you imagine a five year old human child stating the proposition, conjure a five year old saying all human activity is driven by the fear of death, it might cross your mind that that sounds like a really messed up peculiarly grownup idea