Praise the Lord, and pass the ammunition.

Dark Orange said:

Praise the Lord, and pass the ammunition.

If guns are legally obtained it must be OK to use them to kill people.
Strange logic.

Tamb said:

Dark Orange said:

Praise the Lord, and pass the ammunition.

If guns are legally obtained it must be OK to use them to kill people.
Strange logic.

oh c’m‘on you all know that it’s sad when you spend money on something that’s never used

SCIENCE said:

Tamb said:

Dark Orange said:

Praise the Lord, and pass the ammunition.

If guns are legally obtained it must be OK to use them to kill people.
Strange logic.

oh c’m‘on you all know that it’s sad when you spend money on something that’s never used

Do you mean you all or y’all?

Tamb said:

SCIENCE said:

Tamb said:

If guns are legally obtained it must be OK to use them to kill people.
Strange logic.

oh c’m‘on y’all know that it’s sad when you spend money on something that’s never used

Do you mean you all or y’all?

good point, fixed

disclaimer: we’ve never used a gun to kill anyone

SCIENCE said:

Tamb said:

SCIENCE said:

oh c’m‘on y’all know that it’s sad when you spend money on something that’s never used

Do you mean you all or y’all?

good point, fixed

disclaimer: we’ve never used a gun to kill anyone

Except gooks, slopes, japs, jerries and other assorted furriners,

https://twitter.com/jadedcreative/status/1530208114171166722

SCIENCE said:

https://twitter.com/jadedcreative/status/1530208114171166722

we mean it’s just a steel pipe right, it’s not like he was buying ammunition

SCIENCE said:

SCIENCE said:

https://twitter.com/jadedcreative/status/1530208114171166722

we mean it’s just a steel pipe right, it’s not like he was buying ammunition

You prolly get a couple of hundred rounds free with the rifle.

imagine that, getting into the news business, making their own news

welcome the libertarian dystopia

Santa Rosa County has a plan to stop re-offenders.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDKCDgjOkg8&t=153s&ab_channel=CTVNews

I think individual towns should take a vote to see if the town’s folk want to trial a gun amnesty for 5 years, view the results and vote whether to continue with a gun amnesty.

With small pockets of change, more towns that have been personally affected by such events are more likely to want this type of change.

If the 5-year trial period clearly shows a decline in deaths due to civilians opting to not carry firearms, then more towns may opt to move across to this strategy as well.

monkey skipper said:

I think individual towns should take a vote to see if the town’s folk want to trial a gun amnesty for 5 years, view the results and vote whether to continue with a gun amnesty.

With small pockets of change, more towns that have been personally affected by such events are more likely to want this type of change.

If the 5-year trial period clearly shows a decline in deaths due to civilians opting to not carry firearms, then more towns may opt to move across to this strategy as well.

A town would have to make guns illegal for there to be an “amnesty”, and I am not sure they have the power to override state laws.

And so on it goes…

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-06-02/oklahoma-police-mass-shooting-medical-building-tulsa/101119704

monkey skipper said:

I think individual towns should take a vote to see if the town’s folk want to trial a gun amnesty for 5 years, view the results and vote whether to continue with a gun amnesty.

With small pockets of change, more towns that have been personally affected by such events are more likely to want this type of change.

If the 5-year trial period clearly shows a decline in deaths due to civilians opting to not carry firearms, then more towns may opt to move across to this strategy as well.

unfortunately towns aren’t an isolated entity. People have legitimate uses for guns.. hunting is a huge recreational activity in many parts of the USA and the knock on effects of removing a leisure activity to peoples mental health.. why, they would then have to implement adequate mental health services… .. . .. .. . . . .

Arts said:

monkey skipper said:

I think individual towns should take a vote to see if the town’s folk want to trial a gun amnesty for 5 years, view the results and vote whether to continue with a gun amnesty.

With small pockets of change, more towns that have been personally affected by such events are more likely to want this type of change.

If the 5-year trial period clearly shows a decline in deaths due to civilians opting to not carry firearms, then more towns may opt to move across to this strategy as well.

unfortunately towns aren’t an isolated entity. People have legitimate uses for guns.. hunting is a huge recreational activity in many parts of the USA and the knock on effects of removing a leisure activity to peoples mental health.. why, they would then have to implement adequate mental health services… .. . .. .. . . . .

Funny, is it the case that mental wellbeing in places where guns are more restricted and people can’t as easily enjoy a good murder or two for the weekend, is not as good as mental wellbeing in the USSA ¿

SCIENCE said:

Arts said:

monkey skipper said:

I think individual towns should take a vote to see if the town’s folk want to trial a gun amnesty for 5 years, view the results and vote whether to continue with a gun amnesty.

With small pockets of change, more towns that have been personally affected by such events are more likely to want this type of change.

If the 5-year trial period clearly shows a decline in deaths due to civilians opting to not carry firearms, then more towns may opt to move across to this strategy as well.

unfortunately towns aren’t an isolated entity. People have legitimate uses for guns.. hunting is a huge recreational activity in many parts of the USA and the knock on effects of removing a leisure activity to peoples mental health.. why, they would then have to implement adequate mental health services… .. . .. .. . . . .

Funny, is it the case that mental wellbeing in places where guns are more restricted and people can’t as easily enjoy a good murder or two for the weekend, is not as good as mental wellbeing in the USSA ¿

I wonder if death resulting in you becoming infamous is desirable to just being an angry disturbed living person

Cymek said:

SCIENCE said:

Arts said:

unfortunately towns aren’t an isolated entity. People have legitimate uses for guns.. hunting is a huge recreational activity in many parts of the USA and the knock on effects of removing a leisure activity to peoples mental health.. why, they would then have to implement adequate mental health services… .. . .. .. . . . .

Funny, is it the case that mental wellbeing in places where guns are more restricted and people can’t as easily enjoy a good murder or two for the weekend, is not as good as mental wellbeing in the USSA ¿

I wonder if death resulting in you becoming infamous is desirable to just being an angry disturbed living person

that is certainly a factor, however the infamous bent is usually only accompanied by a large body count or shock value (such as killing primary school children). One thing that is trending is the news outlets not using the offenders name just referring to them as ‘the shooter’ or ‘the offender’ and this is having a knock on effect to the general public, however this is a minor bandaid measure that is possibly not a consideration to most offenders.

It needs to be made clear though that statistics in mass shootings are skewed because there is no universal definition and there does not need to be fatalities…

Arts said:

Cymek said:

SCIENCE said:

Funny, is it the case that mental wellbeing in places where guns are more restricted and people can’t as easily enjoy a good murder or two for the weekend, is not as good as mental wellbeing in the USSA ¿

I wonder if death resulting in you becoming infamous is desirable to just being an angry disturbed living person

that is certainly a factor, however the infamous bent is usually only accompanied by a large body count or shock value (such as killing primary school children). One thing that is trending is the news outlets not using the offenders name just referring to them as ‘the shooter’ or ‘the offender’ and this is having a knock on effect to the general public, however this is a minor bandaid measure that is possibly not a consideration to most offenders.

It needs to be made clear though that statistics in mass shootings are skewed because there is no universal definition and there does not need to be fatalities…

So much for “un named Shooters”

John Hinckley Jr., who shot Ronald Reagan, set to be unconditionally released on June 15

Ogmog said:

Arts said:

Cymek said:

I wonder if death resulting in you becoming infamous is desirable to just being an angry disturbed living person

that is certainly a factor, however the infamous bent is usually only accompanied by a large body count or shock value (such as killing primary school children). One thing that is trending is the news outlets not using the offenders name just referring to them as ‘the shooter’ or ‘the offender’ and this is having a knock on effect to the general public, however this is a minor bandaid measure that is possibly not a consideration to most offenders.

It needs to be made clear though that statistics in mass shootings are skewed because there is no universal definition and there does not need to be fatalities…

So much for “un named Shooters”

John Hinckley Jr., who shot Ronald Reagan, set to be unconditionally released on June 15

right but you have to remember, that particular victim had a name as well, wasn’t just one of the 30000 cannon fodder needed to ensure militia are well trained

Michael V said:

And so on it goes…

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-06-02/oklahoma-police-mass-shooting-medical-building-tulsa/101119704

There’s a mass shooting every few days, and the President has to give a speech about it but it must feel eventually like it’s not even news

SCIENCE said:

Ogmog said:

Arts said:

that is certainly a factor, however the infamous bent is usually only accompanied by a large body count or shock value (such as killing primary school children). One thing that is trending is the news outlets not using the offenders name just referring to them as ‘the shooter’ or ‘the offender’ and this is having a knock on effect to the general public, however this is a minor bandaid measure that is possibly not a consideration to most offenders.

It needs to be made clear though that statistics in mass shootings are skewed because there is no universal definition and there does not need to be fatalities…

So much for “un named Shooters”

John Hinckley Jr., who shot Ronald Reagan, set to be unconditionally released on June 15

right but you have to remember, that particular victim had a name as well, wasn’t just one of the 30000 cannon fodder needed to ensure militia are well trained

I wasn’t going to make a point about the historical ref.. but anyway…

Arts said:

SCIENCE said:

Ogmog said:

So much for “un named Shooters”

John Hinckley Jr., who shot Ronald Reagan, set to be unconditionally released on June 15

right but you have to remember, that particular victim had a name as well, wasn’t just one of the 30000 cannon fodder needed to ensure militia are well trained

I wasn’t going to make a point about the historical ref.. but anyway…

Matters as far as The TIMING Goes
…one might think “they” had Another President in mind for “The Offing”

dv said:

I reckon Biden has quite a bit of disdain for the attitude of the USA in regards to not doing the decent thing.
He sometimes seems really angry he can’t do more

dv said:

Shit eh.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jun/02/berkeley-california-teen-arrest-planning-school-shooting

Link

Ohio grants teachers permission to be armed in schools as US marks Gun Violence Awareness Day
Ohio is set to enact a law that allows teachers and other staff to be armed with guns in schools once they have completed up to 24 hours of initial training as US marks National Gun Violence Awareness Day.