Date: 19/06/2022 18:02:20
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1898602
Subject: Toxicity of elements?

Is there any table of toxicity of the elements?

Such as pure elements when ingested.

I’m interested in how the toxicity of various elements compare. eg. copper vs lead vs mercury; or iron vs nickel; or gallium vs germanium; or molybdenum vs manganese vs other metals, or antimony vs tellurium.

Clearly some elements are exceedingly toxic, eg plutonium (radioactive), francium (explosive)
Other elements quite toxic, eg. phosphorus, arsenic
Other elements pretty safe, eg. krypton, hydrogen, zinc, carbon
But where do other elements slot into the picture, eg. cadmium, chromium, sulfur, magnesium, aluminium, etc.

To be thorough, there would be several tables:

Reply Quote

Date: 19/06/2022 18:25:18
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1898614
Subject: re: Toxicity of elements?

70 SSR December 2019, 101(375) The periodic table The periodic table of danger
Michael Hal Sosabowski, Michael Stephens and John Emsley
https://www.ase.org.uk/system/files/SSR_December_2019_070-076_Sosabowski.pdf

This one lists

Antimony
Arsenic
Bromine
Cadmium
Fluorine
Chlorine
Iodine
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
Tellurium
Thallium
Tin
Zinc

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4427717/

this one lists

Aluminium
Chromium
Iron

https://www.thoughtco.com/worst-elements-on-the-periodic-table-3989077

this on lists

Francium

any element from atomic number 84, polonium, all the way to element 118, oganesson

and + now I would imagine

https://www.howitworksdaily.com/10-deadly-elements/

this one lists

Hydrogen
Caesium

Reply Quote

Date: 19/06/2022 18:32:13
From: dv
ID: 1898616
Subject: re: Toxicity of elements?

mollwollfumble said:


Is there any table of toxicity of the elements?

Such as pure elements when ingested.

I’m interested in how the toxicity of various elements compare. eg. copper vs lead vs mercury; or iron vs nickel; or gallium vs germanium; or molybdenum vs manganese vs other metals, or antimony vs tellurium.

Clearly some elements are exceedingly toxic, eg plutonium (radioactive), francium (explosive)
Other elements quite toxic, eg. phosphorus, arsenic
Other elements pretty safe, eg. krypton, hydrogen, zinc, carbon
But where do other elements slot into the picture, eg. cadmium, chromium, sulfur, magnesium, aluminium, etc.

To be thorough, there would be several tables:

  • Pure element ingested as a tablet (in an undamaged digestive system)
  • Pure element inhaled
  • Pure element injected
  • Organo-metallic

I would think sodium would be right up there

Reply Quote

Date: 19/06/2022 18:33:20
From: roughbarked
ID: 1898619
Subject: re: Toxicity of elements?

dv said:


mollwollfumble said:

Is there any table of toxicity of the elements?

Such as pure elements when ingested.

I’m interested in how the toxicity of various elements compare. eg. copper vs lead vs mercury; or iron vs nickel; or gallium vs germanium; or molybdenum vs manganese vs other metals, or antimony vs tellurium.

Clearly some elements are exceedingly toxic, eg plutonium (radioactive), francium (explosive)
Other elements quite toxic, eg. phosphorus, arsenic
Other elements pretty safe, eg. krypton, hydrogen, zinc, carbon
But where do other elements slot into the picture, eg. cadmium, chromium, sulfur, magnesium, aluminium, etc.

To be thorough, there would be several tables:

  • Pure element ingested as a tablet (in an undamaged digestive system)
  • Pure element inhaled
  • Pure element injected
  • Organo-metallic

I would think sodium would be right up there

Phosphorous too.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/06/2022 18:33:59
From: roughbarked
ID: 1898621
Subject: re: Toxicity of elements?

roughbarked said:


dv said:

mollwollfumble said:

Is there any table of toxicity of the elements?

Such as pure elements when ingested.

I’m interested in how the toxicity of various elements compare. eg. copper vs lead vs mercury; or iron vs nickel; or gallium vs germanium; or molybdenum vs manganese vs other metals, or antimony vs tellurium.

Clearly some elements are exceedingly toxic, eg plutonium (radioactive), francium (explosive)
Other elements quite toxic, eg. phosphorus, arsenic
Other elements pretty safe, eg. krypton, hydrogen, zinc, carbon
But where do other elements slot into the picture, eg. cadmium, chromium, sulfur, magnesium, aluminium, etc.

To be thorough, there would be several tables:

  • Pure element ingested as a tablet (in an undamaged digestive system)
  • Pure element inhaled
  • Pure element injected
  • Organo-metallic

I would think sodium would be right up there

Phosphorous too.

Can’t iimagine anyone enjoying drinking nitrogen.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/06/2022 18:35:11
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 1898622
Subject: re: Toxicity of elements?

Plutonium in minute amounts will kill you. Not immediately though, you have to suffer for a while.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/06/2022 18:36:01
From: roughbarked
ID: 1898623
Subject: re: Toxicity of elements?

Spiny Norman said:


Plutonium in minute amounts will kill you. Not immediately though, you have to suffer for a while.

Polonium as well.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/06/2022 18:38:09
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1898626
Subject: re: Toxicity of elements?

Radioactivity: The obviously dangerous elements are those which are highly radioactive. While radioisotopes can be made from any element, you’d do well to steer clear of any element from atomic number 84, polonium, all the way to element 118, oganesson (which is so new it was only named in 2016).

Toxicity: Some elements are dangerous because of their inherent toxicity. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) defines a toxic chemical as any substance which can be considered harmful to the environment or hazardous to health if inhaled, ingested, or absorbed through the skin.

Reactivity: Some elements present a risk due to extreme reactivity. The most reactive elements and compounds can ignite spontaneously—or even explosively, and generally burn in water as well as in the air.Reactivity: Some elements present a risk due to extreme reactivity. The most reactive elements and compounds can ignite spontaneously—or even explosively, and generally burn in water as well as in the air.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/06/2022 18:40:01
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1898629
Subject: re: Toxicity of elements?

I’m sure you can get detailed into on each element information on the safety, hazards, handling and storage somewhere.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/06/2022 18:40:07
From: dv
ID: 1898630
Subject: re: Toxicity of elements?

Swallow pure potassium and you’ll hear the original K-pop

Reply Quote

Date: 19/06/2022 18:46:49
From: Thomo
ID: 1898640
Subject: re: Toxicity of elements?

>>>Other elements pretty safe, eg. krypton, hydrogen, zinc

Zinc ?

Is there nothing it can’t do ?

Reply Quote

Date: 19/06/2022 19:19:46
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1898659
Subject: re: Toxicity of elements?

Thomo said:


>>>Other elements pretty safe, eg. krypton, hydrogen, zinc

Zinc ?

Is there nothing it can’t do ?

Actually zinc has me puzzled. I’ve seen it listed as less dangerous than iron.
But I’ve also seen it listed among “heavy metal toxins”

> sodium, potassium

Yes, though not quite as deadly as francium.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/06/2022 19:21:39
From: roughbarked
ID: 1898662
Subject: re: Toxicity of elements?

mollwollfumble said:


Thomo said:

>>>Other elements pretty safe, eg. krypton, hydrogen, zinc

Zinc ?

Is there nothing it can’t do ?

Actually zinc has me puzzled. I’ve seen it listed as less dangerous than iron.
But I’ve also seen it listed among “heavy metal toxins”

> sodium, potassium

Yes, though not quite as deadly as francium.

Heavy metals are toxic but some may be essential to our lives iin small doses.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/06/2022 19:33:56
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 1898666
Subject: re: Toxicity of elements?

mollwollfumble said:

Actually zinc has me puzzled. I’ve seen it listed as less dangerous than iron.

FWIW have a look at a breakfast cereal packet that mentions added iron. Give it a shake with a magnet at the bottom and you’ll see tiny flecks of iron where the magnet is. Yep, they literally add tiny bits of iron to it.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/06/2022 20:43:56
From: btm
ID: 1898691
Subject: re: Toxicity of elements?

Spiny Norman said:


Plutonium in minute amounts will kill you. Not immediately though, you have to suffer for a while.

There seem to be a number of counterexamples of this; between 1945 and 1947 eighteen people aged 4 to 69 were injected with plutonium. Subjects who were chosen for the experiment had been diagnosed with a terminal disease. They lived from six days up to 44 years past the time of their injection. Eight of the 18 died within two years of the injection. All died from their preexisting terminal illness or cardiac illnesses. None died from the plutonium itself. Albert Stevens was injected with 131kBq of Pu (without his knowledge or consent,) but survived for more than 20 years without apparent ill-effects. Ebb Cade was injected with 239Pu in 1945; he lived for another 8 years, also with no apparent ill-effects.

Donald Mastick, a chemist who worked on the Manhattan Project, accidentally swallowed a small amount of PuCl3, which was detectable for the next thirty years of his life, but appeared to suffer no ill effects.
Reply Quote

Date: 19/06/2022 20:49:24
From: btm
ID: 1898693
Subject: re: Toxicity of elements?

Do the condutions under which an element is toxic need to be specified? Exempli gratia, at high partial pressure, oxygen is toxic.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/06/2022 21:44:50
From: wookiemeister
ID: 1898715
Subject: re: Toxicity of elements?

My favourite is thallium – no one ever suspects. Antimony sulphide is another. Polonium is just devious.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/06/2022 21:47:27
From: wookiemeister
ID: 1898717
Subject: re: Toxicity of elements?

As poisons go 1080 is a good one

Invented by the nazis as a chemical warfare agent then proposed to kill concentration camp prisoners. Rejected by the nazis , now proudly used by Australian farmers and gov agencies to annihilate all species. They bait bananas with it up north and wonder why the cassowary is going extinct – stupid bastards

Reply Quote

Date: 19/06/2022 21:53:27
From: Kingy
ID: 1898720
Subject: re: Toxicity of elements?

wookiemeister said:


As poisons go 1080 is a good one

Invented by the nazis as a chemical warfare agent then proposed to kill concentration camp prisoners. Rejected by the nazis , now proudly used by Australian farmers and gov agencies to annihilate all species. They bait bananas with it up north and wonder why the cassowary is going extinct – stupid bastards

Oooh, Wookie is going off on some sort of deranged ramble again. Let’s hope that at least this time he will provide some refs.

Here’s mine:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium_fluoroacetate

I’m not so sure that the Nazi’s were in SW Australia 50,000 years ago to invent this stuff, but ok.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/06/2022 20:40:23
From: wookiemeister
ID: 1899076
Subject: re: Toxicity of elements?

Kingy said:


wookiemeister said:

As poisons go 1080 is a good one

Invented by the nazis as a chemical warfare agent then proposed to kill concentration camp prisoners. Rejected by the nazis , now proudly used by Australian farmers and gov agencies to annihilate all species. They bait bananas with it up north and wonder why the cassowary is going extinct – stupid bastards

Oooh, Wookie is going off on some sort of deranged ramble again. Let’s hope that at least this time he will provide some refs.

Here’s mine:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium_fluoroacetate

I’m not so sure that the Nazi’s were in SW Australia 50,000 years ago to invent this stuff, but ok.


Eat some and let me know how you go

Reply Quote

Date: 20/06/2022 21:09:58
From: Kingy
ID: 1899085
Subject: re: Toxicity of elements?

wookiemeister said:


Kingy said:

wookiemeister said:

As poisons go 1080 is a good one

Invented by the nazis as a chemical warfare agent then proposed to kill concentration camp prisoners. Rejected by the nazis , now proudly used by Australian farmers and gov agencies to annihilate all species. They bait bananas with it up north and wonder why the cassowary is going extinct – stupid bastards

Oooh, Wookie is going off on some sort of deranged ramble again. Let’s hope that at least this time he will provide some refs.

Here’s mine:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium_fluoroacetate

I’m not so sure that the Nazi’s were in SW Australia 50,000 years ago to invent this stuff, but ok.


Eat some and let me know how you go

No refs?

Reply Quote

Date: 20/06/2022 23:09:49
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1899119
Subject: re: Toxicity of elements?

Kingy said:


wookiemeister said:

As poisons go 1080 is a good one

Invented by the nazis as a chemical warfare agent then proposed to kill concentration camp prisoners. Rejected by the nazis , now proudly used by Australian farmers and gov agencies to annihilate all species. They bait bananas with it up north and wonder why the cassowary is going extinct – stupid bastards

Oooh, Wookie is going off on some sort of deranged ramble again. Let’s hope that at least this time he will provide some refs.

Here’s mine:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium_fluoroacetate

I’m not so sure that the Nazi’s were in SW Australia 50,000 years ago to invent this stuff, but ok.

Looking it up. 1080. Sure that’s not a TV resolution?

Sodium fluoroacetate is an organofluorine chemical compound with the formula FCH₂CO₂Na. This colourless salt has a taste similar to that of sodium chloride and is used as a rodenticide. Both sodium and potassium salts are derivatives of fluoroacetic acid.

Sodium fluoride and acetic acid are both pretty harmless.
Naturally-occurring and found in more than 30 species of native Australian plants.
It is is safe in the environment, as it dilutes into harmless compounds in water and gets eaten by the bacteria in soil.

Inhibiting the Krebs cycle by reacting with Coenzyme A.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/06/2022 21:42:55
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1899445
Subject: re: Toxicity of elements?

Tau.Neutrino said:


70 SSR December 2019, 101(375) The periodic table The periodic table of danger
Michael Hal Sosabowski, Michael Stephens and John Emsley
https://www.ase.org.uk/system/files/SSR_December_2019_070-076_Sosabowski.pdf

This one lists

Antimony
Arsenic
Bromine
Cadmium
Fluorine
Chlorine
Iodine
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
Tellurium
Thallium
Tin
Zinc

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4427717/

this one lists

Aluminium
Chromium
Iron

https://www.thoughtco.com/worst-elements-on-the-periodic-table-3989077

this on lists

Francium

any element from atomic number 84, polonium, all the way to element 118, oganesson

and + now I would imagine

https://www.howitworksdaily.com/10-deadly-elements/

this one lists

Hydrogen
Caesium

Hi Neutrino, starting to read this now.

Antimony

That’s brilliant ! A reusable medicine.

Arsenic

Bromine

Cadmium

Chlorine

Fluorine

Iodine

Lead

I, personally, found lead to be harmless when ingested in quantities like 5 mg.

Mercury

Mercury miners in olden times, and their children, used to eat metallic mercury as a dare.
I have also heard a report of miners walking across a vat of the stuff for fun.
It’s harmless to chickens when ingested.
I have heard that metallic mercury is more dangerous if its vapour is inhaled.

Plutonium

I have heard that 1 mg of plutonium is deadly when injected. Possibly a much smaller dose than that.
I haven’t heard about ingested.

Selenium

Tellurium

PMSL. Sounds like a good practical joke.

Thallium

Tin

Zinc

Reply Quote

Date: 23/06/2022 18:41:34
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1900022
Subject: re: Toxicity of elements?

https://chemicalsafety.com/sds-search/

Lithium
Chemicals which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases (Category 1), H260
Skin corrosion (Category 1B), H314
Serious eye damage (Category 1), H318

Beryllium
Acute toxicity, Oral (Category 3), H301
= LD50
300 mg/kg

Boron
Acute toxicity, Oral (Category 4), H302
=LD20
2 g/kg

Carbon
Non hazardous

Magnesium
Substances/mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases (Category 2)
Non toxic, non-bioaccumulative

Aluminium

Reply Quote

Date: 23/06/2022 19:40:20
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1900059
Subject: re: Toxicity of elements?

mollwollfumble said:


https://chemicalsafety.com/sds-search/

Lithium
Chemicals which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases (Category 1), H260
Skin corrosion (Category 1B), H314
Serious eye damage (Category 1), H318

Beryllium
Acute toxicity, Oral (Category 3), H301
= LD50
300 mg/kg

Boron
Acute toxicity, Oral (Category 4), H302
=LD20
2 g/kg

Carbon
Non hazardous

Magnesium
Substances/mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases (Category 2)
Non toxic, non-bioaccumulative

Aluminium
Non hazardous

Silicon
Non-hazardous, non-bioaccumulative

Phosphorus
Severe skin burns, Category 1A

Sulfur
Skin irritation, Category 2
Not dangerous if ingested.

Calcium
In contact with water releases flammable gases, Category 2
Severe skin irritation

Scandium
Severe skin burns, Category 1A

Titanium
Not a hazardous substance
Not bio-accumulative

Vanadium
Acute oral toxicity, Category 4 (LD50 is 2g/kg)
Carcinogen, Category 2 (50 mg/kg)
Bio-accumulative

Chromium
Not a hazardous substance
Not bio-accumulative

Manganese (flammable)
Not a hazardous substance

Some of these disagree with my previous knowledge. eg. I thought chromium was hazardous, for example. But SDS says otherwise.

Reply Quote