Date: 27/07/2022 13:28:18
From: PermeateFree
ID: 1913629
Subject: 560 million-year-old tentacled creature may be the animal kingdom's first known predator

The fossil was discovered in the U.K.


This bizarre creature existed prior to the Cambrian Explosion.

A bizarre, tentacled creature that lived in the deep ocean 560 million years ago resembled a goblet crammed full of wriggling fingers. It may be an ancient relative of modern jellyfish and the earliest known predator in the animal kingdom, analysis of a newly described fossil suggests.

More than a decade ago, scientists uncovered a fossil of the purported jellyfish relative in an outcrop of volcanic and sedimentary rocks called the Bradgate Formation in Leicestershire, England. Located in Charnwood Forest, the outcrop formed about 557 million to 562 million years ago, during the Ediacaran period (635 million to 541 million years ago).

This means that the newly identified fossil predates the Cambrian explosion, a 55-million-year episode in which life on Earth rapidly diversified. During the Cambrian period (541 million to 485.4 million years ago), many animal forms evolved, including arthropod ancestors of insects, spiders and crustaceans; clamlike and hard-shelled brachiopods; and chordates — creatures with a spinal nerve cord.

It’s almost unheard of for Precambrian fossils to resemble forms seen in animals alive today, so the discovery of an Ediacaran animal resembling a jellyfish is exceptional, said Philip Donoghue, a professor of palaeobiology at the University of Bristol in England, who was not involved in the study. “They found an animal, a member of a modern group of animals, in the Precambrian, where they’re classically not meant to be found,” Donoghue told Live Science. (Although not involved in the new work, Donoghue was formerly the doctoral advisor to several authors on the paper.)

To date, the vast majority of Ediacaran fossils don’t share structural features with any living animals, so they’re generally thought to belong to extinct animal groups, Donoghue said. “This fossil’s probably the oldest one recognized, with quite convincing evidence, to be a member of one of the living phyla,” or large groups of related animals, Donoghue said.

The researchers named the newly identified creature Auroralumina attenboroughii and described the animal in a new study, published Monday (July 25) in the journal Nature Ecology & Evolution(opens in new tab). The genus name, Auroralumina, translates to “dawn lantern” in Latin and references the fossil’s old age and its torch-like shape. The species name honors broadcaster and biologist Sir David Attenborough for “his work raising awareness of the Ediacaran fossils of Charnwood Forest,” the authors wrote in their report.

The research team uncovered A. attenboroughii during a 2007 expedition in Charnwood Forest, but the first major fossil discoveries there date to the 1950s, when two children, first Tina Negus and then Roger Mason, stumbled upon a fern-shaped fossil in a quarry, according to the University of Reading(opens in new tab) in England. That organism, named Charnia masoni, was the first fossil that could be confidently dated to the Ediacaran period, and since its discovery, many paleontologists have traveled to Charnwood to hunt for similar snapshots of Precambrian life.

On their 2007 expedition, the scientists focused their search on a rockface that rose from the forest floor at a 45-degree angle and wore a thick coat of lichen and dirt. The team dug into the rockface while dangling from ropes, using toothbrushes, toothpicks and high-pressure water jets to expose any fossils hidden under the muck.

“As soon as we cleaned off all the dirt, all of sudden, rather than just a couple scrappy fossils there were a thousand fossils on this surface,” said paleobiologist Philip Wilby, a team leader for Palaeontology at the British Geological Survey and senior author of the study. The fossils, which likely represent 20 to 30 different species, were preserved as impressions in the rock; excluding A. attenboroughii, many of the fossils resembled the frond-like creatures previously found in Precambrian rocks.

“Beautifully preserved — some of them absolutely stunning,” Wilby told Live Science.

The team made rubber casts of the fossil-filled rockface and transported the casts back to the lab. Such impressions can be difficult to work with “because they’re all squidged, flattened,” which makes the animals’ internal anatomy and body shapes challenging to interpret, Donoghue said. To create 3D models of their flat fossil casts, the researchers used a technique that involved illuminating the casts from different angles and snapping lots of photos; these photos were then compiled into a virtual 3D model that could be manipulated digitally.

These reconstructions revealed that one of the fossil creatures resembled a simple candelabra, with two goblet-like structures branching off from a single node. “They seem to have actually budded off from one another,” Wilby said. The tips of short tentacles could be seen poking over the edge of each goblet, like stubby fingers reaching from the center of a cup. Ridges that ran up the sides of the fossil suggest that these “goblets” were supported by a stiff skeleton.

“This is the first creature, the first animal that we’re aware of that actually grew a skeleton,” Wilby said. Its tentacle structure hints that A. attenboroughii likely fed on plankton and protists, which would make it the earliest known predator in the animal kingdom.

Advertisement
A. attenboroughii shares many core characteristics with Cambrian fossils of Medusozoa, a group that includes modern jellyfish and other animals that transform into free-swimming, bell-shaped creatures for part of their life cycle. “That’s what leads us to believe that it is a Medusozoan,” Wilby said. While the fossil might not look like a jellyfish at first glance, it’s important to note that, for part of their life cycle, neither do Medusozoans. For a chapter of their lives, the animals anchor themselves to the seafloor to reproduce asexually. During this life stage they resemble anemones — and A. attenboroughii.

If A. attenboroughii is indeed a member of Medusozoa, it would belong to a broader group of organisms known as the cnidarians, which also includes corals, sea pens and sea anemones. Prior to the new study, fossil evidence suggested that the basic “blueprint” for cnidarians didn’t emerge until the Cambrian period. However, “what we’re able to show here is that, at least 20 million years before that, the blueprint for cnidarians was actually set,” Wilby said.

This not only pushes back the evolutionary history of cnidarians but also provides hints about what animals must have come before them, Donoghue said. Prior research suggests that cnidarians and bilaterians — a group of animals that includes humans — split off from a common ancestor. If A. attenboroughii existed 560 million years ago, it’s possible that the split already occurred and the earliest bilaterians were already roaming the planet.

“The fossil’s not just important for showing us, clearly, cnidarians are here — by implication, their sibling lineage must have also evolved by this time,” Donoghue said.

https://www.livescience.com/jellyfish-relative-fossil-david-attenborough

Reply Quote

Date: 27/07/2022 13:54:54
From: Bubblecar
ID: 1913639
Subject: re: 560 million-year-old tentacled creature may be the animal kingdom's first known predator

Goodo, ta.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/07/2022 08:13:49
From: SCIENCE
ID: 1913846
Subject: re: 560 million-year-old tentacled creature may be the animal kingdom's first known predator

so it predated other predators, which weren’t even around for it to predate, nice

Reply Quote

Date: 28/07/2022 08:18:27
From: Tamb
ID: 1913848
Subject: re: 560 million-year-old tentacled creature may be the animal kingdom's first known predator

SCIENCE said:


so it predated other predators, which weren’t even around for it to predate, nice

So it was a pre-dator.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/07/2022 08:26:10
From: SCIENCE
ID: 1913852
Subject: re: 560 million-year-old tentacled creature may be the animal kingdom's first known predator

Tamb said:

SCIENCE said:

so it predated other predators, which weren’t even around for it to predate, nice

So it was a pre-dator.

Schroedinger’s predator, which both predates and does not predate other predators at the same time.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/07/2022 09:28:39
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1913862
Subject: re: 560 million-year-old tentacled creature may be the animal kingdom's first known predator

Named after David Attenborough I see.

I’m not sure how I’d feel about having a worm like predator named after me.

Maybe they should have chosen Trump for the honour.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/07/2022 09:30:45
From: roughbarked
ID: 1913863
Subject: re: 560 million-year-old tentacled creature may be the animal kingdom's first known predator

The Rev Dodgson said:


Named after David Attenborough I see.

I’m not sure how I’d feel about having a worm like predator named after me.

Maybe they should have chosen Trump for the honour.

:) except for the fact that Trump doesn’t have any credentials to deserve honour.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/07/2022 09:33:59
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1913864
Subject: re: 560 million-year-old tentacled creature may be the animal kingdom's first known predator

roughbarked said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

Named after David Attenborough I see.

I’m not sure how I’d feel about having a worm like predator named after me.

Maybe they should have chosen Trump for the honour.

:) except for the fact that Trump doesn’t have any credentials to deserve honour.

… other than being the greatest worm like predator on the planet!

Reply Quote

Date: 28/07/2022 09:37:55
From: roughbarked
ID: 1913865
Subject: re: 560 million-year-old tentacled creature may be the animal kingdom's first known predator

The Rev Dodgson said:


roughbarked said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

Named after David Attenborough I see.

I’m not sure how I’d feel about having a worm like predator named after me.

Maybe they should have chosen Trump for the honour.

:) except for the fact that Trump doesn’t have any credentials to deserve honour.

… other than being the greatest worm like predator on the planet!

Deserves dishonour.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/07/2022 09:41:53
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 1913867
Subject: re: 560 million-year-old tentacled creature may be the animal kingdom's first known predator

The Rev Dodgson said:


Named after David Attenborough I see.

I’m not sure how I’d feel about having a worm like predator named after me.

Maybe they should have chosen Trump for the honour.

seeing as it was found in Britain then Boris would have been more appropriate.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/07/2022 10:49:38
From: SCIENCE
ID: 1913887
Subject: re: 560 million-year-old tentacled creature may be the animal kingdom's first known predator

we won’t tolerate having these insults thrown at Yeltsin no we won’t

Reply Quote

Date: 28/07/2022 12:25:24
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1913942
Subject: re: 560 million-year-old tentacled creature may be the animal kingdom's first known predator

The Rev Dodgson said:


Named after David Attenborough I see.

I’m not sure how I’d feel about having a worm like predator named after me.

Maybe they should have chosen Trump for the honour.

IIRC, three species of slime mould beetle were named after US politicians. Here it is.

“Slime-mold beetles named for Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld”. https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2005/04/slime-mold-beetles-named-bush-cheney-rumsfeld

Reply Quote

Date: 28/07/2022 12:27:52
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1913945
Subject: re: 560 million-year-old tentacled creature may be the animal kingdom's first known predator

mollwollfumble said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

Named after David Attenborough I see.

I’m not sure how I’d feel about having a worm like predator named after me.

Maybe they should have chosen Trump for the honour.

IIRC, three species of slime mould beetle were named after US politicians. Here it is.

“Slime-mold beetles named for Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld”. https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2005/04/slime-mold-beetles-named-bush-cheney-rumsfeld

That’s more like it :)

Reply Quote

Date: 28/07/2022 12:29:36
From: roughbarked
ID: 1913950
Subject: re: 560 million-year-old tentacled creature may be the animal kingdom's first known predator

The Rev Dodgson said:


mollwollfumble said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

Named after David Attenborough I see.

I’m not sure how I’d feel about having a worm like predator named after me.

Maybe they should have chosen Trump for the honour.

IIRC, three species of slime mould beetle were named after US politicians. Here it is.

“Slime-mold beetles named for Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld”. https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2005/04/slime-mold-beetles-named-bush-cheney-rumsfeld

That’s more like it :)

Slime moulds are too useful to be naming Trump after them even if the name sounds apt.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/07/2022 12:30:42
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1913953
Subject: re: 560 million-year-old tentacled creature may be the animal kingdom's first known predator

roughbarked said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

mollwollfumble said:

IIRC, three species of slime mould beetle were named after US politicians. Here it is.

“Slime-mold beetles named for Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld”. https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2005/04/slime-mold-beetles-named-bush-cheney-rumsfeld

That’s more like it :)

Slime moulds are too useful to be naming Trump after them even if the name sounds apt.

Fair point :)

Reply Quote

Date: 28/07/2022 13:27:00
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1914004
Subject: re: 560 million-year-old tentacled creature may be the animal kingdom's first known predator

PermeateFree said:


The fossil was discovered in the U.K.


This bizarre creature existed prior to the Cambrian Explosion.

A bizarre, tentacled creature that lived in the deep ocean 560 million years ago resembled a goblet crammed full of wriggling fingers. It may be an ancient relative of modern jellyfish and the earliest known predator in the animal kingdom, analysis of a newly described fossil suggests.

More than a decade ago, scientists uncovered a fossil of the purported jellyfish relative in an outcrop of volcanic and sedimentary rocks called the Bradgate Formation in Leicestershire, England. Located in Charnwood Forest, the outcrop formed about 557 million to 562 million years ago, during the Ediacaran period (635 million to 541 million years ago).

This means that the newly identified fossil predates the Cambrian explosion, a 55-million-year episode in which life on Earth rapidly diversified. During the Cambrian period (541 million to 485.4 million years ago), many animal forms evolved, including arthropod ancestors of insects, spiders and crustaceans; clamlike and hard-shelled brachiopods; and chordates — creatures with a spinal nerve cord.

This not only pushes back the evolutionary history of cnidarians but also provides hints about what animals must have come before them, Donoghue said. Prior research suggests that cnidarians and bilaterians — a group of animals that includes humans — split off from a common ancestor. If A. attenboroughii existed 560 million years ago, it’s possible that the split already occurred and the earliest bilaterians were already roaming the planet.

“The fossil’s not just important for showing us, clearly, cnidarians are here — by implication, their sibling lineage must have also evolved by this time,” Donoghue said.

https://www.livescience.com/jellyfish-relative-fossil-david-attenborough

It clearly looks like a cnidarian, and a big one at that.

We’ve been fooled before by Ediacaran (and Cambrian) fauna that looks like, but is not related to, modern species. In this case, though, fingers crossed, it looks like they have hit actually the jackpot. Cambrian fauna from the Ediacaran age.

The timing is rock solid. Charnwood Forest is indisputably within the Ediacaran Age. The Ediacaran “Charnia” is named after Charnwood Forest.

Would that make this fossil our direct human ancestor? Or not? Not, I’d say, because it is clearly not the ancestor of the Cambrian fish.

The next question is: how many different extant lineages survived the extinction at the end of the Ediacaran? DNA doesn’t tell us, because the branching lines to the arthropods, cnidarians, vertebrates, etc. are not accurate enough to determine the sequence or timing. So, lineages that survived the Ediacaran extinction include at least:

Another comment, it is believed (in some articles) that the comb jellies branched off the metazoa before the cnidarians. So we eagerly await a distinct comb jelly ancestor among the Ediacaran fauna.

Could we see the first bilateria within the Ediacaran fauna? Or did they wait until the Cambrian? Trace fossils in the Ediacaran strongly suggest the presence of Bilateria. However, the strongest evidence for an actual bilaterian fossil from the Ediacaran is pretty crappy, Ikaria looks mostly like an elongated blob.

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2001045117

Ikaria does not look like the ancestor of the Cambrian fish, wrong shape IMHO, but I could be wrong. But it could conceivably be the ancestor of the Cambrian arthropods. If not a human ancestor, that would put the separation of vertebrates from arthropods back into the Ediacaran. Which would also put the separation of the Acoelomorpha (an insignificant type of worm) back into the Ediacaran.

Which leaves the Cambrian and later for the origin of other branches of extant animals including the echinoderms, molluscs, nematodes, tardigrades, bryozoans, annelids, rotifers, flatworms, etc.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/07/2022 14:07:43
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1914030
Subject: re: 560 million-year-old tentacled creature may be the animal kingdom's first known predator

mollwollfumble said:


PermeateFree said:

The fossil was discovered in the U.K.


This bizarre creature existed prior to the Cambrian Explosion.

A bizarre, tentacled creature that lived in the deep ocean 560 million years ago resembled a goblet crammed full of wriggling fingers. It may be an ancient relative of modern jellyfish and the earliest known predator in the animal kingdom, analysis of a newly described fossil suggests.

More than a decade ago, scientists uncovered a fossil of the purported jellyfish relative in an outcrop of volcanic and sedimentary rocks called the Bradgate Formation in Leicestershire, England. Located in Charnwood Forest, the outcrop formed about 557 million to 562 million years ago, during the Ediacaran period (635 million to 541 million years ago).

This means that the newly identified fossil predates the Cambrian explosion, a 55-million-year episode in which life on Earth rapidly diversified. During the Cambrian period (541 million to 485.4 million years ago), many animal forms evolved, including arthropod ancestors of insects, spiders and crustaceans; clamlike and hard-shelled brachiopods; and chordates — creatures with a spinal nerve cord.

This not only pushes back the evolutionary history of cnidarians but also provides hints about what animals must have come before them, Donoghue said. Prior research suggests that cnidarians and bilaterians — a group of animals that includes humans — split off from a common ancestor. If A. attenboroughii existed 560 million years ago, it’s possible that the split already occurred and the earliest bilaterians were already roaming the planet.

“The fossil’s not just important for showing us, clearly, cnidarians are here — by implication, their sibling lineage must have also evolved by this time,” Donoghue said.

https://www.livescience.com/jellyfish-relative-fossil-david-attenborough

It clearly looks like a cnidarian, and a big one at that.

We’ve been fooled before by Ediacaran (and Cambrian) fauna that looks like, but is not related to, modern species. In this case, though, fingers crossed, it looks like they have hit actually the jackpot. Cambrian fauna from the Ediacaran age.

The timing is rock solid. Charnwood Forest is indisputably within the Ediacaran Age. The Ediacaran “Charnia” is named after Charnwood Forest.

Would that make this fossil our direct human ancestor? Or not? Not, I’d say, because it is clearly not the ancestor of the Cambrian fish.

The next question is: how many different extant lineages survived the extinction at the end of the Ediacaran? DNA doesn’t tell us, because the branching lines to the arthropods, cnidarians, vertebrates, etc. are not accurate enough to determine the sequence or timing. So, lineages that survived the Ediacaran extinction include at least:

  • sponges – the first metazoa
  • worms – details of which worms is still uncertain
  • cnidarians – this new one
  • ancestor(s) of vertebrates, arthropods, comb jellies, and others.

Another comment, it is believed (in some articles) that the comb jellies branched off the metazoa before the cnidarians. So we eagerly await a distinct comb jelly ancestor among the Ediacaran fauna.

Could we see the first bilateria within the Ediacaran fauna? Or did they wait until the Cambrian? Trace fossils in the Ediacaran strongly suggest the presence of Bilateria. However, the strongest evidence for an actual bilaterian fossil from the Ediacaran is pretty crappy, Ikaria looks mostly like an elongated blob.

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2001045117

Ikaria does not look like the ancestor of the Cambrian fish, wrong shape IMHO, but I could be wrong. But it could conceivably be the ancestor of the Cambrian arthropods. If not a human ancestor, that would put the separation of vertebrates from arthropods back into the Ediacaran. Which would also put the separation of the Acoelomorpha (an insignificant type of worm) back into the Ediacaran.

Which leaves the Cambrian and later for the origin of other branches of extant animals including the echinoderms, molluscs, nematodes, tardigrades, bryozoans, annelids, rotifers, flatworms, etc.

> Cambrian fossils of Medusazoa

The image below is what the Cambrian cnidarian fossils look like. This is a type of cnidarian called a olivooid. The sequence a) to k) is the developmental sequence from egg to full grown adult. At g) we see the tentacles growing inside the spherical egg shell, looking like a jellyfish. At h) it has hatched with tentacles at the top and the remainder of the spherical egg shell collapsing into a cone. Stage h looks most similar to the new fossil in the OP.

But the new Ediacaran fossil isn’t necessarily an olivooid. Olivooids from the Cambrian are members of the group of cnidarians that includes jellyfish, and are not as closely related to the more populous group that includes corals and anemones. This new fossil may be more closely related to the sea anemones or corals.

Reply Quote