Date: 30/07/2022 08:29:24
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1914698
Subject: Is this question worth your time?

… the question being, does time exist?

Reply Quote

Date: 30/07/2022 08:31:35
From: roughbarked
ID: 1914700
Subject: re: Is this question worth your time?

The Rev Dodgson said:


… the question being, does time exist?

Without time, what would we comprehend?

Reply Quote

Date: 30/07/2022 08:34:12
From: SCIENCE
ID: 1914702
Subject: re: Is this question worth your time?

no yes anything

Reply Quote

Date: 30/07/2022 08:47:29
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1914704
Subject: re: Is this question worth your time?

roughbarked said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

… the question being, does time exist?

Without time, what would we comprehend?

I don’t think we could have evolved brains without time, let alone be able to comprehend anything.

I think those who say time doesn’t exist, or it is just an illusion, must have a different meaning for “exist”.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/07/2022 08:54:25
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1914706
Subject: re: Is this question worth your time?

And without time, how could we have

Perpetual Change

Reply Quote

Date: 30/07/2022 10:49:39
From: dv
ID: 1914733
Subject: re: Is this question worth your time?

Yes

Reply Quote

Date: 30/07/2022 19:12:45
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1914860
Subject: re: Is this question worth your time?

Does time exist?

My personal preference is that time is far more fundamental than is normally assumed.

General relativity allows us to warp time, and even in certain circumstances generate time loops.

But my idea is that time is truly one dimensional and that the impossibility of time loops governs the combined universe of general relativity and quantum mechanics, making it more fundamental than both.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/07/2022 22:08:22
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1914899
Subject: re: Is this question worth your time?

mollwollfumble said:


Does time exist?

My personal preference is that time is far more fundamental than is normally assumed.

General relativity allows us to warp time, and even in certain circumstances generate time loops.

But my idea is that time is truly one dimensional and that the impossibility of time loops governs the combined universe of general relativity and quantum mechanics, making it more fundamental than both.


I think I agree.

Or at least it seems possible.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/07/2022 23:06:13
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1914913
Subject: re: Is this question worth your time?

The Rev Dodgson said:


mollwollfumble said:

Does time exist?

My personal preference is that time is far more fundamental than is normally assumed.

General relativity allows us to warp time, and even in certain circumstances generate time loops.

But my idea is that time is truly one dimensional and that the impossibility of time loops governs the combined universe of general relativity and quantum mechanics, making it more fundamental than both.


I think I agree.

Or at least it seems possible.

Thanks. If I Understand correctly, that idea is not inconsistent with two TOEs.

One being CDT, causal dynamical triangulation, in which the unidirectionality of time is explicitly built into the model.

The other being ER = EPR where wormholes equate to spooky action at a distance. For reasons that are a bit subtle.

Reply Quote

Date: 31/07/2022 16:04:03
From: Bubblecar
ID: 1915073
Subject: re: Is this question worth your time?

Time is the direction in which we grow sadder and more decrepit.

Reply Quote

Date: 31/07/2022 19:19:23
From: SCIENCE
ID: 1915182
Subject: re: Is this question worth your time?

Bubblecar said:

Time is the direction in which we grow sadder and more decrepit.

yes, William

Reply Quote

Date: 31/07/2022 21:01:01
From: transition
ID: 1915204
Subject: re: Is this question worth your time?

I think so, sure as my coffees goes cold, temperature tends to equalize with surrounds

Reply Quote

Date: 2/08/2022 09:29:12
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1915658
Subject: re: Is this question worth your time?

Another one that I put to the physics forum, just a hypothesis,
is that time is a way of measuring temperature.

In the earliest universe before everything happened, time and temperature both existed, and moved in lockstep. Temperature decreased as time increased.

At some early but as yet undefined epoch, time and temperature decoupled and each went their separate way.

I’m not sure which epoch this would have been, perhaps the formation of the first subatomic particles, so that the temperature of particles decoupled from the temperature of the space around it.

Reply Quote