Date: 18/12/2022 19:45:47
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1968876
Subject: Philosophers' Test

https://www.idrlabs.com/philosopher-personality/test.php

Apparently I don’t much agree with any of ‘em, but I’m closest to Hume, Epicurus and Diogenes, with a little bit of Aristotle.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/12/2022 19:48:14
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1968877
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

The Rev Dodgson said:


https://www.idrlabs.com/philosopher-personality/test.php

Apparently I don’t much agree with any of ‘em, but I’m closest to Hume, Epicurus and Diogenes, with a little bit of Aristotle.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/12/2022 19:53:39
From: roughbarked
ID: 1968879
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

My brane is hurting too much to do that right now.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/12/2022 19:57:57
From: sibeen
ID: 1968881
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

Reply Quote

Date: 18/12/2022 20:03:53
From: sarahs mum
ID: 1968882
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

Your traits are closest to those of Kant.

—-
I would have guessed that.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/12/2022 20:04:05
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 1968883
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

Hume: Hume was skeptical of most beliefs – be they religious or derived from pure rationality without experimental data to back them up. Consequently, friction with the settled orthodoxies of his time was a constant theme in his life. Like the other empiricists that preceded him, Hume believed that the contents of the mind came only from experience. Hume is known for the is-ought divide, also called Hume’s Fork: The proposition that it is not possible to derive an “is” from an “ought” (e.g., we cannot go from the moral proposition that everyone ought to be equally smart to the factual proposition that everyone is equally smart). Hume also proposed tremendous challenges to concepts like causation and induction – challenges that some consider have never been solved to this day.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/12/2022 20:41:44
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1968887
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

sibeen said:



Similar to mine then.

Just more of a bugger for the bottle.

Sounds about right.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/12/2022 20:52:10
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1968888
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

Aristotle was a bugger for the bottle.
And don’t get me started on Kant.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/12/2022 21:20:41
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1968892
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

Just reading about Diogenes:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diogenes

Interesting character.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/12/2022 21:21:54
From: Bubblecar
ID: 1968894
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

Reply Quote

Date: 18/12/2022 21:24:07
From: buffy
ID: 1968895
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

The Rev Dodgson said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

https://www.idrlabs.com/philosopher-personality/test.php

Apparently I don’t much agree with any of ‘em, but I’m closest to Hume, Epicurus and Diogenes, with a little bit of Aristotle.


I was stuck in the middle for a good number of those questions.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/12/2022 21:39:11
From: PermeateFree
ID: 1968897
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

Reply Quote

Date: 18/12/2022 21:43:24
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1968899
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

sarahs mum said:


Your traits are closest to those of Kant.

—-
I would have guessed that.

Have to remind myself what Kant said that apparently I don’t agree with.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/12/2022 21:47:58
From: btm
ID: 1968902
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

I got up to question 3. Using words like good and evil without defining them makes the questions meaningless. I’m beyond good and evil.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/12/2022 21:48:36
From: roughbarked
ID: 1968903
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

The Rev Dodgson said:


Just reading about Diogenes:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diogenes

Interesting character.

Which was the one who lived in a barrel?

Reply Quote

Date: 18/12/2022 21:49:31
From: roughbarked
ID: 1968904
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

btm said:


I got up to question 3. Using words like good and evil without defining them makes the questions meaningless. I’m beyond good and evil.

I had similar misgivings about the questions.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/12/2022 21:52:58
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 1968905
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

btm said:


I got up to question 3. Using words like good and evil without defining them makes the questions meaningless. I’m beyond good and evil.

I’m glad I done it. Now I know exactly where I stand on the philo spectrum.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/12/2022 21:56:46
From: roughbarked
ID: 1968906
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

ChrispenEvan said:


btm said:

I got up to question 3. Using words like good and evil without defining them makes the questions meaningless. I’m beyond good and evil.

I’m glad I done it. Now I know exactly where I stand on the philo spectrum.

I’ll have another go at it later. I’m not feeling the best. Might retire early.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/12/2022 21:56:59
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 1968907
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

Reply Quote

Date: 18/12/2022 21:57:46
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 1968908
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

Reply Quote

Date: 18/12/2022 22:01:33
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1968909
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

roughbarked said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

Just reading about Diogenes:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diogenes

Interesting character.

Which was the one who lived in a barrel?

That was him.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/12/2022 22:05:23
From: roughbarked
ID: 1968910
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

The Rev Dodgson said:


roughbarked said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

Just reading about Diogenes:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diogenes

Interesting character.

Which was the one who lived in a barrel?

That was him.

Thought so.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/12/2022 22:19:26
From: dv
ID: 1968912
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

Reply Quote

Date: 18/12/2022 22:32:42
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1968917
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

dv said:



Seems most people here are a good bit Kantian than I am.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/12/2022 22:35:13
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1968921
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

btm said:


I got up to question 3. Using words like good and evil without defining them makes the questions meaningless. I’m beyond good and evil.

Quite a few of the questions I left the pointer in the middle because I thought they were too ambiguous to give a vote in favour or against.

OTOH, perhaps you should whatever is your preferred definition of good and evil.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/12/2022 22:41:38
From: SCIENCE
ID: 1968925
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

ah well at least we’re the most philosopher of all of yous

Reply Quote

Date: 18/12/2022 23:01:08
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 1968927
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

btm said:


I got up to question 3. Using words like good and evil without defining them makes the questions meaningless. I’m beyond good and evil.

I bet you’re an uber-driver too.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/12/2022 00:11:15
From: wookiemeister
ID: 1968934
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

Cool !

I’m 25 % unabomber

Reply Quote

Date: 19/12/2022 02:35:44
From: SCIENCE
ID: 1968950
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

Reply Quote

Date: 19/12/2022 11:12:32
From: Cymek
ID: 1969007
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

The Rev Dodgson said:


sibeen said:


Similar to mine then.

Just more of a bugger for the bottle.

Sounds about right.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/12/2022 11:23:55
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1969009
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

Cymek said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

sibeen said:


Similar to mine then.

Just more of a bugger for the bottle.

Sounds about right.


Well I hope you enjoy your life in a barrel :)

Reply Quote

Date: 19/12/2022 11:31:27
From: Cymek
ID: 1969010
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

The Rev Dodgson said:


Cymek said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

Similar to mine then.

Just more of a bugger for the bottle.

Sounds about right.


Well I hope you enjoy your life in a barrel :)

Heaps of laughs it will be

Reply Quote

Date: 19/12/2022 17:11:01
From: Ogmog
ID: 1969154
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

WAIT FOR IT….

The Philosophers Song

Reply Quote

Date: 19/12/2022 17:50:29
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1969157
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

Ogmog said:


WAIT FOR IT….

The Philosophers Song

Surely we have all had that going through our heads as we read this thread anyway.

But I did enjoy the intro :)

Reply Quote

Date: 19/12/2022 17:57:21
From: roughbarked
ID: 1969158
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

The Rev Dodgson said:


Ogmog said:

WAIT FOR IT….

The Philosophers Song

Surely we have all had that going through our heads as we read this thread anyway.

But I did enjoy the intro :)

I wonder why he didn’t call the ladies Sheilas. I mean everyone else was Bruce.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/12/2022 18:02:02
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1969159
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

> Apparently I don’t much agree with any of ‘em, but I’m closest to Hume, Epicurus and Diogenes, with a little bit of Aristotle.

Excellent ! I would agree with that.

I don’t need the test because I already know:

I have a love of Hume.

I have a hatred of Nietzsche.

I would walk a long way to avoid Kant.

Plato is just plain wrong most of the time, but not always.

I like Aristotle.

Epicurus and Diogenes I don’t know well.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/12/2022 18:04:20
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1969160
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

mollwollfumble said:


> Apparently I don’t much agree with any of ‘em, but I’m closest to Hume, Epicurus and Diogenes, with a little bit of Aristotle.

Excellent ! I would agree with that.

I don’t need the test because I already know:

I have a love of Hume.

I have a hatred of Nietzsche.

I would walk a long way to avoid Kant.

Plato is just plain wrong most of the time, but not always.

I like Aristotle.

Epicurus and Diogenes I don’t know well.

So you agree with my philosophical tendencies?

That’s a bit of a worry ;)

Reply Quote

Date: 19/12/2022 18:06:59
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1969162
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

Ogmog said:


WAIT FOR IT….
The Philosophers Song

Thanks!

Would you believe I’ve never seen that? Or heard the music.

I’ve heard about multiple bits of it. Bruce, Bruce and Bruce, etc.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/12/2022 18:08:31
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1969164
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

The Rev Dodgson said:


mollwollfumble said:

> Apparently I don’t much agree with any of ‘em, but I’m closest to Hume, Epicurus and Diogenes, with a little bit of Aristotle.

Excellent ! I would agree with that.

I don’t need the test because I already know:

I have a love of Hume.

I have a hatred of Nietzsche.

I would walk a long way to avoid Kant.

Plato is just plain wrong most of the time, but not always.

I like Aristotle.

Epicurus and Diogenes I don’t know well.

So you agree with my philosophical tendencies?

That’s a bit of a worry ;)

I’ve always known that the two of us think alike ;-)

Reply Quote

Date: 19/12/2022 18:10:08
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 1969165
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

mollwollfumble said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

mollwollfumble said:

> Apparently I don’t much agree with any of ‘em, but I’m closest to Hume, Epicurus and Diogenes, with a little bit of Aristotle.

Excellent ! I would agree with that.

I don’t need the test because I already know:

I have a love of Hume.

I have a hatred of Nietzsche.

I would walk a long way to avoid Kant.

Plato is just plain wrong most of the time, but not always.

I like Aristotle.

Epicurus and Diogenes I don’t know well.

So you agree with my philosophical tendencies?

That’s a bit of a worry ;)

I’ve always known that the two of us think alike ;-)

Gee kick a man while he’s down why don’t you…

Reply Quote

Date: 19/12/2022 18:12:22
From: sarahs mum
ID: 1969166
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

mollwollfumble said:


> Apparently I don’t much agree with any of ‘em, but I’m closest to Hume, Epicurus and Diogenes, with a little bit of Aristotle.

Excellent ! I would agree with that.

I don’t need the test because I already know:

I have a love of Hume.

I have a hatred of Nietzsche.

I would walk a long way to avoid Kant.

Plato is just plain wrong most of the time, but not always.

I like Aristotle.

Epicurus and Diogenes I don’t know well.

what about Heideggar?

Reply Quote

Date: 19/12/2022 21:58:22
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1969280
Subject: re: Philosophers' Test

sarahs mum said:


mollwollfumble said:

> Apparently I don’t much agree with any of ‘em, but I’m closest to Hume, Epicurus and Diogenes, with a little bit of Aristotle.

Excellent ! I would agree with that.

I don’t need the test because I already know:

I have a love of Hume.

I have a hatred of Nietzsche.

I would walk a long way to avoid Kant.

Plato is just plain wrong most of the time, but not always.

I like Aristotle.

Epicurus and Diogenes I don’t know well.

what about Heideggar?

Now that’s a brilliant question !
I have a friend who literally worships Heidegger. Mentions his name at least once every single time I visit.

However, I have to admit to never having read his work, or read about it.
wikipedia suggests that he was a follower of Nietzsche and Satre?

What does our resident philosopher, transition, say about Heidegger?
What does sarah’s mum think of Heidegger?

Reply Quote