Date: 23/12/2022 20:33:52
From: monkey skipper
ID: 1970982
Subject: Stormwater harvesting

This is something I have also been talking about for some time amongst friends and at least one engineer . So it is interesting to note that re-using stormwater as a water resource was implemented in Vic (back in 2021 – i think) and more recently a concept being rolled out in Bathurst to give that area water security by using flood waters to their advantage.

https://watersensitivecities.org.au/solutions/case-studies/kallakallo-stormwater-harvesting-and-reuse/#:~:text=The%20Kalkallo%20Stormwater%20Harvesting%20and%20Reuse%20Scheme%20is,for%20direct%20injection%20into%20the%20drinking%20water%20system.

Kalkallo stormwater harvesting and reuse

https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/other/construction-under-way-on-stormwater-harvesting-project-december-22-2022-western-advocate/vi-AA15ykWv?ocid=msedgntp&fbclid=IwAR2xdjgMe5lRbxLOVlV8QpAlpGNHoFh2NYh0Umz1OjSZagxZ7595FKme6LI

Construction under way on stormwater harvesting project | December 22, 2022 | Western Advocate

Work is under way at the water filtration plant.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/12/2022 20:38:41
From: monkey skipper
ID: 1970985
Subject: re: Stormwater harvesting

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The Kalkallo Stormwater Harvesting and Reuse Scheme is the first facility in Australia attempting to harvest and treat stormwater to a standard acceptable for direct injection into the drinking water system. The facility is located in the major greenfield development of Merrifield, next to the existing township of Kalkallo in Melbourne’s northern development corridor. The facility includes:
A 65ML stormwater storage basin located downstream of the stormwater collection system and wetlands of a 160ha area of the Merrifield development.

A treatment plant designed to process up to 1ML/day to drinking water standards.
The facility was completed in 2014, but is yet to commence operating due to development delays which have impacted the amount of stormwater available.

THE DRIVERS

Deliver sustainable water services for Melbourne’s booming suburbs
Improving water security:
Create alternative supply options that better utilise available water resources to service Melbourne’s growing population.

Reducing costs:
Collect and treat water locally to reduce the need to transport water over distances, resulting in lower water transfer costs and deferring the need to augment centralised assets such as dams and desalination.
Improved waterway health:

Reduce the impact of flows and urban stormwater contaminants into local streams and waterways.
Complement existing water recycling:
Treated effluent is already used to create Class A recycled water in many greenfield areas. By treating stormwater for drinking water uses, stormwater harvesting can complement rather than compete with recycled water.

THE INNOVATIONS

The first direct-injection stormwater to drinking water plant in Australia
Cooperation with developer:
Yarra Valley Water worked with developer, Merrifield Corporation, to ensure the full catchment could be treated, with Merrifield Corporation providing pre-treatment of the stormwater through a large public wetland.

Direct injection:

The facility aims to produce water that does not require shandying with another source (i.e. indirect supply) to inject into the drinking water supply, reducing the need for the facility to be located near a major traditional water source like a reservoir.
Delivery of the highest quality water:
The technology and processes used were selected with a focus on using best practice quality control systems that identify changes in the water characteristics, and react accordingly. The facility will initially supply the Class A recycled water system until sufficient monitoring and data collection confirms the quality of the treated water. At that stage, it will be further treated and tested to demonstrate to key stakeholders the reliability of the water quality. Regulatory approval would then be sought for the water to be used to supplement the drinking water supply.

THE LESSONS

Reliability vs value was a key concern:
Sizing of the stormwater harvesting infrastructure to match the stormwater supply of the catchment was a key design consideration. Analysis showed that the unit cost of water produced could increase significantly for only a small gain in reliability, and that significant early effort is required to optimise likely stormwater availability against the harvesting infrastructure investment.
Regulation and risk should be considered first:
This is a new concept in the urban water solution space, and stormwater reuse jurisdiction and regulation to this standard in Victoria is unclear. Given the potential impact on public health, any interim considerations made by authorities are made very cautiously. As a result, designs can be more conservative and potentially increase costs. For pilot projects such as Kalkallo, early identification of any regulatory gaps and collaborative work with regulatory authorities can help optimise the risk profile and provide a basis for developing future regulations.

Chemistry and direct injection affect technology selection:
Considering Kalkallo is directly injecting treated water into supply, the impact of chemical contaminants in stormwater is a key risk. A focus on identifying likely contaminants, their associated risk profile and how to identify them in stormwater drove fundamental decisions regarding monitoring and treatment technology selection.

TRANSFERABILITY

This project is scalable for urban development sites with adequate land available for incorporating wetlands, storage and water treatment systems. The project will be most transferable to regions where there are clear existing regulatory frameworks in place to enable the use of treated stormwater for potable uses. However, pilot projects such as these can encourage and accelerate the review of such frameworks. Where regulation is lagging, early and continual stakeholder engagement is needed to overcome impediments to the project.

Project stats
Location

Kalkallo, VIC, Australia

Participants

Merrifield Corporation

Yarra Valley Water

Melbourne Water

Hume City Council

Australian Government Department of Human Services

Merri Creek Management Committee

Victorian Government Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP)

Awards

Victorian Stormwater Excellence Awards (2009) – Master Planning and Design
National Stormwater Excellence Awards (2009) – Highly Commended in Master Planning and Design

Topics

Alternative water supplies

Rainwater and stormwater harvesting

Water sensitive precincts

Kalkallo 2
Additional information

CRCWSC Kalkallo: A case study in technological innovation amidst complex regulation

Yarra Valley Water awarded for stormwater harvesting

Dalton Consulting Engineers News

Sustainable Melbourne

Coburg and Merrifield stormwater harvesting projects (McGrath, J., Wilson, G., et al.)

The outcomes

Cities providing ecosystem services
Reduced urban water runoff into local streams: Runoff to the Kalkallo Creek from the catchment is reduced by 51%, reducing sediment transport and stream erosion.
Stormwater quality improvement: Any remaining stormwater entering Kalkallo Creek exceeds statutory quality requirements, improving creek ecology (i.e. TSS 94% reduction, TP 83% reduction, TN 71% reduction).
Cities as water supply catchments
Large-scale alternative water supply: This facility will supply up to 365ML of stormwater harvested each year, reducing demand for imported water by up to 90% for the 160ha development.
Capturing stormwater for reuse from industrial catchment: The facility is designed to be able to provide high quality water from all types of urban stormwater runoff, including industrial areas.
Cities comprising water sensitive communities
Integrating infrastructure early in the planning and construction process: Yarra Valley Water worked with community builders and developers to properly integrate infrastructure into the community.
Consider community need: The facility was designed with the expectation that the catchment’s community should not need to actively change their behaviours for the plant to provide high quality water locally.

BUSINESS CASE
Costs
Benefits
$20.2 million total cost of project
Received $9.6 million in funding under the first round of the Federal Government’s ‘Water for the Future -National Urban Water and Desalination Fund’
Removal of stormwater flows to the receiving waterway, resulting in both water quality and flow regime benefits
Improved water security through provision of an alternative water source

Reply Quote

Date: 23/12/2022 20:41:59
From: monkey skipper
ID: 1970990
Subject: re: Stormwater harvesting

https://watersensitivecities.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/24-Kalkallo-Stormwater-Havesting_FINAL.pdf

down load full case study

Reply Quote

Date: 24/12/2022 07:45:14
From: roughbarked
ID: 1971073
Subject: re: Stormwater harvesting

Thanks.

I’ve always retained almost all the stormwater from the small catchment around me. I can’t reetain it all because my floor is basically at ground level. If I had the money, I could create infrastructure that would guarantee my supply through the dry times. Luckily, the catchment area has little in the way of contaminants compared to a city.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/12/2022 09:51:00
From: Dark Orange
ID: 1971091
Subject: re: Stormwater harvesting

Pop quiz: Who actually owns the stormwater run-off?

Spoiler alert: It’s the State Government.

Should stormwater run-off be owned by whoever captures it, or should the usage rights be licenced and managed?

Reply Quote

Date: 24/12/2022 09:52:55
From: Tamb
ID: 1971092
Subject: re: Stormwater harvesting

Dark Orange said:

Pop quiz: Who actually owns the stormwater run-off?

Spoiler alert: It’s the State Government.

Should stormwater run-off be owned by whoever captures it, or should the usage rights be licenced and managed?


If they own it should they not be responsible for any damage it causes.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/12/2022 10:05:54
From: roughbarked
ID: 1971097
Subject: re: Stormwater harvesting

Dark Orange said:

Pop quiz: Who actually owns the stormwater run-off?

Spoiler alert: It’s the State Government.

Should stormwater run-off be owned by whoever captures it, or should the usage rights be licenced and managed?

It’s a long term argument that one. Particuarly of the rain that falls in Queensland yet needs must travel all the way to the southern ocean.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/12/2022 13:02:52
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1971164
Subject: re: Stormwater harvesting

monkey skipper said:


https://watersensitivecities.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/24-Kalkallo-Stormwater-Havesting_FINAL.pdf

down load full case study

Brilliant, will read.

I heard at least 10 years ago that SE Qld was implementing a flood harvesting project.
At the time, SE Qld was the most forward thinking of all water authorities.

I haven’t heard more than that.

I’ve given some thought as to how flood harvesting could be most successfully implemented.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/12/2022 15:45:15
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1971209
Subject: re: Stormwater harvesting

> The facility was completed in 2014, but is yet to commence operating due to development delays which have impacted the amount of stormwater available.

Dang. Plenty of rainfall in the district in the past six months.

https://merrifieldmelbourne.com.au/masterplan/

Same area in Google Earth. Whoops, Image failure. Houses cut in half.

Also same area from Google Earth, historical imagery May 2022.

Reply Quote

Date: 25/12/2022 07:41:00
From: monkey skipper
ID: 1971456
Subject: re: Stormwater harvesting

roughbarked said:


Dark Orange said:

Pop quiz: Who actually owns the stormwater run-off?

Spoiler alert: It’s the State Government.

Should stormwater run-off be owned by whoever captures it, or should the usage rights be licenced and managed?

It’s a long term argument that one. Particuarly of the rain that falls in Queensland yet needs must travel all the way to the southern ocean.

Yeah … water security is a national need and indeed a global need.

Reply Quote

Date: 25/12/2022 15:46:10
From: SCIENCE
ID: 1971548
Subject: re: Stormwater harvesting

Reply Quote

Date: 27/12/2022 01:32:54
From: SCIENCE
ID: 1972003
Subject: re: Stormwater harvesting

then there was this

https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/12/24/1066041/a-startup-says-its-begun-releasing-particles-into-the-atmosphere-in-an-effort-to-tweak-the-climate/

Reply Quote

Date: 27/12/2022 03:11:57
From: PermeateFree
ID: 1972008
Subject: re: Stormwater harvesting

SCIENCE said:

then there was this

https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/12/24/1066041/a-startup-says-its-begun-releasing-particles-into-the-atmosphere-in-an-effort-to-tweak-the-climate/

This sort of thing was predicted some time ago, the $64,000 question is where it might go and where it might end. Any country and almost any company or wealthy individual could do various unscientific and dangerous experiments. It is one of the few things that could make our current tenuous environmental situation even worse. To add an additional problem, there are just too many crazy people in this world to control.

Reply Quote