Date: 4/05/2023 11:16:05
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 2027171
Subject: Peak Science

When was Peak Science? Separated by different disciplines.

(eg. Peak Microsoft was in 2001 with Windows XP)

Theoretical astronomy
1982 Slow roll cosmic Inflation
(since then, observation has preceded theory)

Observational astronomy – Nominations
1995 Pillars of creation
1998 Dark Energy
2000 Hipparcos/Gaia/Tycho-2 (distance to the stars)
2004 Hubble deep field/Ultra-deep/GOODS
2005 Discovery of Eris & Sedna
2006 COBE/WMAP/Planck
2010 Kepler’s new planets
2013 Luhman 16 and planet (new nearby star system)
2013 Mars Rovers
2022 Milky Way’s black hole

Geography
2001 Google Earth

Molecular biology – theory
2010 DNA D-loop replication (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bee6PWUgPo8)

Molecular biology – experiment
2012 CRISPR
2014 Nanopore sequencing machine

Chemistry
1985 Buckyball

Geology
2014 Silicate perovskite mineral in the lower mantle

Biology
1977 Discovery of Archaea

Taxonomy
(Not reached peak yet)

Climate science
2004 IPCC Kobe science report
(quality has gone downhill since then, eg. the rejection of the physics connecting CO2 to global warming)

Newtonian physics
1823 Fresnel equations
1850 Navier-Stokes equations
1863 Maxwell’s equations

Subatomic physics
1977 Bottom quark
2001 Neutrino oscillation confirmed
(Top quark and Higgs were pretty much a given)

Reply Quote

Date: 4/05/2023 12:53:16
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2027203
Subject: re: Peak Science

Actually we’re just getting started…

Reply Quote

Date: 4/05/2023 12:55:21
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2027204
Subject: re: Peak Science

SCIENCE said:

Actually we’re just getting started…

+1

Reply Quote

Date: 4/05/2023 12:56:04
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2027205
Subject: re: Peak Science

mollwollfumble said:


When was Peak Science? Separated by different disciplines.

(eg. Peak Microsoft was in 2001 with Windows XP)

Theoretical astronomy
1982 Slow roll cosmic Inflation
(since then, observation has preceded theory)

Observational astronomy – Nominations
1995 Pillars of creation
1998 Dark Energy
2000 Hipparcos/Gaia/Tycho-2 (distance to the stars)
2004 Hubble deep field/Ultra-deep/GOODS
2005 Discovery of Eris & Sedna
2006 COBE/WMAP/Planck
2010 Kepler’s new planets
2013 Luhman 16 and planet (new nearby star system)
2013 Mars Rovers
2022 Milky Way’s black hole

Geography
2001 Google Earth

Molecular biology – theory
2010 DNA D-loop replication (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bee6PWUgPo8)

Molecular biology – experiment
2012 CRISPR
2014 Nanopore sequencing machine

Chemistry
1985 Buckyball

Geology
2014 Silicate perovskite mineral in the lower mantle

Biology
1977 Discovery of Archaea

Taxonomy
(Not reached peak yet)

Climate science
2004 IPCC Kobe science report
(quality has gone downhill since then, eg. the rejection of the physics connecting CO2 to global warming)

Newtonian physics
1823 Fresnel equations
1850 Navier-Stokes equations
1863 Maxwell’s equations

Subatomic physics
1977 Bottom quark
2001 Neutrino oscillation confirmed
(Top quark and Higgs were pretty much a given)

How do scientists reject the physics connecting CO2 to global warming?

Reply Quote

Date: 4/05/2023 13:23:57
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2027215
Subject: re: Peak Science

But more in the spirit of the thread:

Structural mechanics physics:
1750 Euler–Bernoulli beam theory

Reply Quote

Date: 4/05/2023 13:33:36
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2027216
Subject: re: Peak Science

The Rev Dodgson said:


But more in the spirit of the thread:

Structural mechanics physics:
1750 Euler–Bernoulli beam theory

The same Bernoulli who’s theory describes how a wing gets lift?

Reply Quote

Date: 4/05/2023 13:38:12
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2027219
Subject: re: Peak Science

Peak Warming Man said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

But more in the spirit of the thread:

Structural mechanics physics:
1750 Euler–Bernoulli beam theory

The same Bernoulli who’s theory describes how a wing gets lift?

I don’t know, but pretty sure they’d at least be in the same family.

Reply Quote

Date: 4/05/2023 13:40:12
From: diddly-squat
ID: 2027222
Subject: re: Peak Science

The Rev Dodgson said:


Peak Warming Man said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

But more in the spirit of the thread:

Structural mechanics physics:
1750 Euler–Bernoulli beam theory

The same Bernoulli who’s theory describes how a wing gets lift?

I don’t know, but pretty sure they’d at least be in the same family.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernoulli_family

Reply Quote

Date: 4/05/2023 14:11:08
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2027232
Subject: re: Peak Science

diddly-squat said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

Peak Warming Man said:

The same Bernoulli who’s theory describes how a wing gets lift?

I don’t know, but pretty sure they’d at least be in the same family.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernoulli_family

Good to see there’s at least more than 1 female STEMistineeratician in all that, the non male representation is greater than 2% ¡

Reply Quote

Date: 4/05/2023 14:13:52
From: dv
ID: 2027234
Subject: re: Peak Science

Nah

Reply Quote

Date: 4/05/2023 14:20:44
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2027235
Subject: re: Peak Science

dv said:


Nah

We’ve only just begun to live
White lace and promises
A kiss for luck and we’re on our way
(We’ve only begun)

Reply Quote

Date: 4/05/2023 14:28:32
From: roughbarked
ID: 2027236
Subject: re: Peak Science

Bubblecar said:


dv said:

Nah

We’ve only just begun to live
White lace and promises
A kiss for luck and we’re on our way
(We’ve only begun)

Nods.

Reply Quote