Date: 27/06/2023 18:15:29
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 2048331
Subject: MIRI woes

https://phys.org/news/2023-05-jwst-miri-instrument-problems.html

More instrument problems with MIRI on the James Webb.

Previously, friction in the wheels was a problem. Now it’s been found that MIRI is collecting less light than it should at long wavelengths, and less than it did during commissioning.

Another problem pointed out in a completely different paper, is that the viewing of even Spritzer was limited by background radiation. And since Webb is operating at a hotter temperature than Spritzer, the image quality is further degraded. The solution there is that this is true for small viewing times, bit with longer viewing times the background removal is better and the higher resolution of MIRI Webb begins to make itself felt.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/06/2023 18:37:37
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 2048333
Subject: re: MIRI woes

mollwollfumble said:


https://phys.org/news/2023-05-jwst-miri-instrument-problems.html

More instrument problems with MIRI on the James Webb.

Previously, friction in the wheels was a problem. Now it’s been found that MIRI is collecting less light than it should at long wavelengths, and less than it did during commissioning.

Another problem pointed out in a completely different paper, is that the viewing of even Spritzer was limited by background radiation. And since Webb is operating at a hotter temperature than Spritzer, the image quality is further degraded. The solution there is that this is true for small viewing times, bit with longer viewing times the background removal is better and the higher resolution of MIRI Webb begins to make itself felt.

probably got some CO2 in the works.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/06/2023 05:04:31
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 2048394
Subject: re: MIRI woes

ChrispenEvan said:


mollwollfumble said:

https://phys.org/news/2023-05-jwst-miri-instrument-problems.html

More instrument problems with MIRI on the James Webb.

Previously, friction in the wheels was a problem. Now it’s been found that MIRI is collecting less light than it should at long wavelengths, and less than it did during commissioning.

Another problem pointed out in a completely different paper, is that the viewing of even Spritzer was limited by background radiation. And since Webb is operating at a hotter temperature than Spritzer, the image quality is further degraded. The solution there is that this is true for small viewing times, bit with longer viewing times the background removal is better and the higher resolution of MIRI Webb begins to make itself felt.

probably got some CO2 in the works.

Webb only uses passive cooling. But does a startlingly good job of keeping cool that way. As opposed to Spitzer which carried refrigerant until the refrigerant ran out.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/06/2023 10:00:08
From: dv
ID: 2048438
Subject: re: MIRI woes

Shit

Reply Quote

Date: 28/06/2023 10:20:47
From: Cymek
ID: 2048451
Subject: re: MIRI woes

If it does a better job that anything else currently in use its still a win.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/06/2023 10:28:20
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2048462
Subject: re: MIRI woes

Could they put some vanes on it and use the solar wind to cool it?

Reply Quote

Date: 28/06/2023 13:34:11
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 2048569
Subject: re: MIRI woes

dv said:


Shit

Yeah.

Well, it is still working.
They just have difficulty pointing it in the correct direction and it is picking up less light than it ought to.

Reply Quote