Date: 7/11/2023 09:09:04
From: buffy
ID: 2091852
Subject: Australian Politics - November 2023

Australian Future Fund

The Opposition might want to be a bit careful when they comment on this. Someone might actually look up the dates of when the investments were made.

Reply Quote

Date: 7/11/2023 09:13:02
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2091854
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

LOLWTF

A government committee has recommended that Medicare only contribute to someone’s first appointment with a specialist doctor when it is conducted face-to-face.

Why¿

Reply Quote

Date: 7/11/2023 09:14:57
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2091855
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

buffy said:

Australian Future Fund

The Opposition might want to be a bit careful when they comment on this. Someone might actually look up the dates of when the investments were made.

What’s wrong with investing money in regionally dominant militaristic countries established in the late 1940s that imprison millions of Muslims in their western areas and seek completion of their claims over autonomously governed territories while economically or religiously spreading influence over the Pacific region¿

Reply Quote

Date: 7/11/2023 10:18:50
From: Michael V
ID: 2091870
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

buffy said:


Australian Future Fund

The Opposition might want to be a bit careful when they comment on this. Someone might actually look up the dates of when the investments were made.

Well, I’m sure the pollies are not personally making the investment decisions, but policies and rules around the investment decision-making process should be set and regularly reviewed.

Reply Quote

Date: 7/11/2023 10:45:54
From: dv
ID: 2091885
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

SCIENCE said:

LOLWTF

A government committee has recommended that Medicare only contribute to someone’s first appointment with a specialist doctor when it is conducted face-to-face.

Why¿

To increase the risk of transmission

Reply Quote

Date: 7/11/2023 11:04:58
From: Michael V
ID: 2091899
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Michael V said:


buffy said:

Australian Future Fund

The Opposition might want to be a bit careful when they comment on this. Someone might actually look up the dates of when the investments were made.

Well, I’m sure the pollies are not personally making the investment decisions, but policies and rules around the investment decision-making process should be set and regularly reviewed.

The Future Fund Act 2006 – SECT 24 (Investment policies) indicates that it’s the board that sets and publishes it own policies. Pollies don’t get a look in. Even so, I bet some pressure can be applied…

https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ffa2006147/s24.html

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 10:21:15
From: dv
ID: 2092578
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 10:23:59
From: Tamb
ID: 2092580
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:




Similarly with the Voice referendum.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 10:26:06
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2092581
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:



Over at Fox, they accept that Labor beat the L/NP.

They just can’t understand that the L/NP did anything which would warrant them not winning the election, or that the electorate cannot see that the L/NP are the divinely-ordained party of government.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 10:31:52
From: diddly-squat
ID: 2092584
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:



what is that even suppose to mean?

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 10:38:33
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2092586
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

diddly-squat said:


dv said:


what is that even suppose to mean?

I suppose if the ABC is criticised by both the right and the extreme left they must be doing something right.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 10:40:29
From: roughbarked
ID: 2092587
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Witty Rejoinder said:


diddly-squat said:

dv said:


what is that even suppose to mean?

I suppose if the ABC is criticised by both the right and the extreme left they must be doing something right.

true-ish

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 10:45:29
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2092594
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:



Maybe I’m missing something, but those three appear to be ABC people, and I haven’t noticed anyone on the ABC not recognising that Labor won the election.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 10:47:13
From: roughbarked
ID: 2092595
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

The Rev Dodgson said:


dv said:


Maybe I’m missing something, but those three appear to be ABC people, and I haven’t noticed anyone on the ABC not recognising that Labor won the election.

It is more like what diddly said. https://tokyo3.org/forums/holiday/posts/2092584/

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 10:49:39
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2092596
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

dv said:


Maybe I’m missing something, but those three appear to be ABC people, and I haven’t noticed anyone on the ABC not recognising that Labor won the election.

It is more like what diddly said. https://tokyo3.org/forums/holiday/posts/2092584/

How does asking what something is supposed to mean explain what it is supposed to mean?

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 10:57:51
From: roughbarked
ID: 2092597
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

The Rev Dodgson said:


roughbarked said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

Maybe I’m missing something, but those three appear to be ABC people, and I haven’t noticed anyone on the ABC not recognising that Labor won the election.

It is more like what diddly said. https://tokyo3.org/forums/holiday/posts/2092584/

How does asking what something is supposed to mean explain what it is supposed to mean?

I would have thought that the sense of meaningulness what not there to gather or glean.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 13:03:18
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2092676
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

SCIENCE said:

roughbarked said:

SCIENCE said:


I just now had them in hot water and detergent for 15 minutes. Does that qualify?

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/wash-hands-of

Typical Labor Corruption Capitalism ¡

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-09/nsw-icac-canada-bay-mayor-angelo-tsirekas-corruption-finding/103084202

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 14:41:19
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2092728
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Possibly sensible if legit‘¡

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-09/nsw-macquarie-park-homes-redevelopment-proposal/103082828

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 14:53:25
From: dv
ID: 2092729
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

SCIENCE said:

Possibly sensible if legit‘¡

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-09/nsw-macquarie-park-homes-redevelopment-proposal/103082828

good

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 14:56:21
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2092730
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

“Sydney mayor and ex-Labor candidate found corrupt”

Well I never.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 14:58:01
From: dv
ID: 2092731
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Peak Warming Man said:


“Sydney mayor and ex-Labor candidate found corrupt”

Well I never.

I knew corruption was rife but I never thought it would reach Sydney

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 14:59:14
From: Michael V
ID: 2092732
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Peak Warming Man said:


“Sydney mayor and ex-Labor candidate found corrupt”

Well I never.

Me neither.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 15:00:13
From: roughbarked
ID: 2092733
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:


Peak Warming Man said:

“Sydney mayor and ex-Labor candidate found corrupt”

Well I never.

I knew corruption was rife but I never thought it would reach Sydney

hahaha

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 15:01:01
From: Woodie
ID: 2092734
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Peak Warming Man said:


“Sydney mayor and ex-Labor candidate found corrupt”

Well I never.

Not our Clover?

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 15:05:05
From: dv
ID: 2092735
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Kind of misleading. Angelo Tsirekas was Mayor of the City of Canada Bay.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 15:08:28
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2092736
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Woodie said:


Peak Warming Man said:

“Sydney mayor and ex-Labor candidate found corrupt”

Well I never.

Not our Clover?

No Woodie, one of them foreigners, a bloke with a foreign name.
A bounder called Mr Tsirekas Woodie.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 15:11:55
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2092737
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Peak Warming Man said:


Woodie said:

Peak Warming Man said:

“Sydney mayor and ex-Labor candidate found corrupt”

Well I never.

Not our Clover?

No Woodie, one of them foreigners, a bloke with a foreign name.
A bounder called Mr Tsirekas Woodie.

Not a proper Koori name like Bruce.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 15:12:10
From: Boris
ID: 2092738
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Peak Warming Man said:


Woodie said:

Peak Warming Man said:

“Sydney mayor and ex-Labor candidate found corrupt”

Well I never.

Not our Clover?

No Woodie, one of them foreigners, a bloke with a foreign name.
A bounder called Mr Tsirekas Woodie.

any relation to our Woodie?

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 15:14:59
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2092740
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Boris said:


Peak Warming Man said:

Woodie said:

Not our Clover?

No Woodie, one of them foreigners, a bloke with a foreign name.
A bounder called Mr Tsirekas Woodie.

any relation to our Woodie?

Damn sintax.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 15:15:00
From: Woodie
ID: 2092741
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Boris said:


Peak Warming Man said:

Woodie said:

Not our Clover?

No Woodie, one of them foreigners, a bloke with a foreign name.
A bounder called Mr Tsirekas Woodie.

any relation to our Woodie?

A crook??? A foreign crook? I know naaarthink. Naaaaaaaaarthink.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 15:22:39
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2092742
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Woodie said:


Boris said:

Peak Warming Man said:

No Woodie, one of them foreigners, a bloke with a foreign name.
A bounder called Mr Tsirekas Woodie.

any relation to our Woodie?

A crook??? A foreign crook? I know naaarthink. Naaaaaaaaarthink.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 15:24:28
From: Michael V
ID: 2092743
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Woodie said:


Peak Warming Man said:

“Sydney mayor and ex-Labor candidate found corrupt”

Well I never.

Not our Clover?

No, no, never, never no Moore.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 15:24:34
From: roughbarked
ID: 2092744
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Bubblecar said:


Woodie said:

Boris said:

any relation to our Woodie?

A crook??? A foreign crook? I know naaarthink. Naaaaaaaaarthink.

A Bollywood crook?

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 15:25:52
From: dv
ID: 2092745
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Michael V said:


Woodie said:

Peak Warming Man said:

“Sydney mayor and ex-Labor candidate found corrupt”

Well I never.

Not our Clover?

No, no, never, never no Moore.

Ha

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 15:26:03
From: Michael V
ID: 2092746
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Bubblecar said:


Woodie said:

Boris said:

any relation to our Woodie?

A crook??? A foreign crook? I know naaarthink. Naaaaaaaaarthink.

LOLOL

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 15:26:51
From: dv
ID: 2092747
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

I’m going to be honest and say I’ve never heard of the City of Canada Bay.

There are too many LGAs in NSW and they probably need to go the Qld route in that regard.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 15:29:50
From: kii
ID: 2092748
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:


I’m going to be honest and say I’ve never heard of the City of Canada Bay.

There are too many LGAs in NSW and they probably need to go the Qld route in that regard.


I think I was born nearby.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 15:31:34
From: Boris
ID: 2092749
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:


I’m going to be honest and say I’ve never heard of the City of Canada Bay.

There are too many LGAs in NSW and they probably need to go the Qld route in that regard.

I remember years ago me and a mate were talking about where we were going for our holidays. He was going to Queensland, we were in Victoria, so I asked him what route he was taking…

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 15:32:24
From: dv
ID: 2092750
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Boris said:


dv said:

I’m going to be honest and say I’ve never heard of the City of Canada Bay.

There are too many LGAs in NSW and they probably need to go the Qld route in that regard.

I remember years ago me and a mate were talking about where we were going for our holidays. He was going to Queensland, we were in Victoria, so I asked him what route he was taking…

Then what happened?

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 15:34:18
From: Boris
ID: 2092752
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:


Boris said:

dv said:

I’m going to be honest and say I’ve never heard of the City of Canada Bay.

There are too many LGAs in NSW and they probably need to go the Qld route in that regard.

I remember years ago me and a mate were talking about where we were going for our holidays. He was going to Queensland, we were in Victoria, so I asked him what route he was taking…

Then what happened?

well, as you know aurally route and root sound the same.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 15:37:00
From: kii
ID: 2092753
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

kii said:


dv said:

I’m going to be honest and say I’ve never heard of the City of Canada Bay.

There are too many LGAs in NSW and they probably need to go the Qld route in that regard.


I think I was born nearby.

Yep, just a few streets back from the actual Canada Bay.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 15:50:02
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2092754
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:


Kind of misleading. Angelo Tsirekas was Mayor of the City of Canada Bay.

I hadn’t heard of Canada Bay, but it’s just down the road.

Seems kind of small for a city, even by Australian standards.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 15:53:16
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2092755
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:


I’m going to be honest and say I’ve never heard of the City of Canada Bay.

There are too many LGAs in NSW and they probably need to go the Qld route in that regard.

There has been plenty of merging going on in recent years.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 15:53:41
From: kii
ID: 2092756
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

The Rev Dodgson said:


dv said:

Kind of misleading. Angelo Tsirekas was Mayor of the City of Canada Bay.

I hadn’t heard of Canada Bay, but it’s just down the road.

Seems kind of small for a city, even by Australian standards.

There is a commemorative plaque marking the place of my birth.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 16:02:28
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2092758
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

kii said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

dv said:

Kind of misleading. Angelo Tsirekas was Mayor of the City of Canada Bay.

I hadn’t heard of Canada Bay, but it’s just down the road.

Seems kind of small for a city, even by Australian standards.

There is a commemorative plaque marking the place of my birth.

I’ll wave to it next time I’m passing on the train.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 16:03:07
From: dv
ID: 2092759
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Boris said:


dv said:

Boris said:

I remember years ago me and a mate were talking about where we were going for our holidays. He was going to Queensland, we were in Victoria, so I asked him what route he was taking…

Then what happened?

well, as you know aurally route and root sound the same.

I see, I see, so did he say “turnip” or something like that?

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 16:04:47
From: Boris
ID: 2092760
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:


Boris said:

dv said:

Then what happened?

well, as you know aurally route and root sound the same.

I see, I see, so did he say “turnip” or something like that?

he was taking a Swede.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 16:45:18
From: dv
ID: 2092774
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

The Rev Dodgson said:


dv said:

I’m going to be honest and say I’ve never heard of the City of Canada Bay.

There are too many LGAs in NSW and they probably need to go the Qld route in that regard.

There has been plenty of merging going on in recent years.

Indeed, WP tells me…

“The city was formed on 1 December 2000, following the merger of Concord and Drummoyne councils.”

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 16:47:51
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2092778
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

dv said:

I’m going to be honest and say I’ve never heard of the City of Canada Bay.

There are too many LGAs in NSW and they probably need to go the Qld route in that regard.

There has been plenty of merging going on in recent years.

Indeed, WP tells me…

“The city was formed on 1 December 2000, following the merger of Concord and Drummoyne councils.”

What’s Koori for Canadian Bay.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/11/2023 17:36:59
From: sarahs mum
ID: 2092804
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:


I’m going to be honest and say I’ve never heard of the City of Canada Bay.

There are too many LGAs in NSW and they probably need to go the Qld route in that regard.

The city was formed on 1 December 2000, following the merger of Concord and Drummoyne councils.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Canada_Bay

Reply Quote

Date: 10/11/2023 09:44:40
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2092981
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

NSW Saving The Cuntry Again ¡

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-10/feral-pig-deliberate-releases-south-australia-limestone-coast/103084364

Reply Quote

Date: 10/11/2023 09:45:42
From: roughbarked
ID: 2092983
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

SCIENCE said:

NSW Saving The Cuntry Again ¡

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-10/feral-pig-deliberate-releases-south-australia-limestone-coast/103084364

Pig hunting. The noble sport of Australia.

Reply Quote

Date: 10/11/2023 09:51:41
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2092986
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:

SCIENCE said:

NSW Saving The Cuntry Again ¡

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-10/feral-pig-deliberate-releases-south-australia-limestone-coast/103084364

Pig hunting. The noble sport of Australia.

Reply Quote

Date: 10/11/2023 14:40:45
From: dv
ID: 2093079
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Reply Quote

Date: 10/11/2023 14:48:15
From: Michael V
ID: 2093083
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:



:)

Reply Quote

Date: 10/11/2023 14:49:59
From: roughbarked
ID: 2093085
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:



Get thee an offshore investment scheme.

Reply Quote

Date: 10/11/2023 15:21:15
From: Ian
ID: 2093090
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:



Ya. Political wing of L/NP pays zip, nada…

Reply Quote

Date: 10/11/2023 20:47:28
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2093166
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

https://www.dfat.gov.au/geo/tuvalu/australia-tuvalu-falepili-union-treaty

Reply Quote

Date: 10/11/2023 20:53:58
From: party_pants
ID: 2093169
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

SCIENCE said:

https://www.dfat.gov.au/geo/tuvalu/australia-tuvalu-falepili-union-treaty

There’s only a few thousand of them. Just have an EU style freedom of movement between both countries.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/11/2023 00:42:12
From: dv
ID: 2093520
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/nov/10/australia-faces-rush-of-demands-to-release-people-held-in-indefinite-immigration-detention

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/nov/10/australia-faces-rush-of-demands-to-release-people-held-in-indefinite-immigration-detention

Australia to immediately begin releasing people held in indefinite immigration detention
Legal advocate for detainees says government could be liable for compensation if it fails to free people

The Albanese government will immediately begin releasing people from indefinite detention after receiving a flurry of demands from long-term detainees to be set free due to Wednesday’s landmark high court ruling.

On Thursday the director of Human Rights for All, Alison Battisson, said the government was wrong to claim it needed to wait for the full reasons for the court’s decision, and could be liable to pay compensation for failing to immediately release people who it is not possible to deport.

The government now concedes that for some detainees it is clear they must be released because it is not possible to deport them.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/11/2023 00:46:42
From: roughbarked
ID: 2093521
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:


https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/nov/10/australia-faces-rush-of-demands-to-release-people-held-in-indefinite-immigration-detention

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/nov/10/australia-faces-rush-of-demands-to-release-people-held-in-indefinite-immigration-detention

Australia to immediately begin releasing people held in indefinite immigration detention
Legal advocate for detainees says government could be liable for compensation if it fails to free people

The Albanese government will immediately begin releasing people from indefinite detention after receiving a flurry of demands from long-term detainees to be set free due to Wednesday’s landmark high court ruling.

On Thursday the director of Human Rights for All, Alison Battisson, said the government was wrong to claim it needed to wait for the full reasons for the court’s decision, and could be liable to pay compensation for failing to immediately release people who it is not possible to deport.

The government now concedes that for some detainees it is clear they must be released because it is not possible to deport them.

Released with a ball and chain, some of them.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/11/2023 00:49:55
From: party_pants
ID: 2093523
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:


dv said:

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/nov/10/australia-faces-rush-of-demands-to-release-people-held-in-indefinite-immigration-detention

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/nov/10/australia-faces-rush-of-demands-to-release-people-held-in-indefinite-immigration-detention

Australia to immediately begin releasing people held in indefinite immigration detention
Legal advocate for detainees says government could be liable for compensation if it fails to free people

The Albanese government will immediately begin releasing people from indefinite detention after receiving a flurry of demands from long-term detainees to be set free due to Wednesday’s landmark high court ruling.

On Thursday the director of Human Rights for All, Alison Battisson, said the government was wrong to claim it needed to wait for the full reasons for the court’s decision, and could be liable to pay compensation for failing to immediately release people who it is not possible to deport.

The government now concedes that for some detainees it is clear they must be released because it is not possible to deport them.

Released with a ball and chain, some of them.

Some of them need restrictions and supervision orders. I am not very happy about the High Court ruling on this. .

Reply Quote

Date: 12/11/2023 00:52:35
From: roughbarked
ID: 2093524
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

party_pants said:


roughbarked said:

dv said:

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/nov/10/australia-faces-rush-of-demands-to-release-people-held-in-indefinite-immigration-detention

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/nov/10/australia-faces-rush-of-demands-to-release-people-held-in-indefinite-immigration-detention

Australia to immediately begin releasing people held in indefinite immigration detention
Legal advocate for detainees says government could be liable for compensation if it fails to free people

The Albanese government will immediately begin releasing people from indefinite detention after receiving a flurry of demands from long-term detainees to be set free due to Wednesday’s landmark high court ruling.

On Thursday the director of Human Rights for All, Alison Battisson, said the government was wrong to claim it needed to wait for the full reasons for the court’s decision, and could be liable to pay compensation for failing to immediately release people who it is not possible to deport.

The government now concedes that for some detainees it is clear they must be released because it is not possible to deport them.

Released with a ball and chain, some of them.

Some of them need restrictions and supervision orders. I am not very happy about the High Court ruling on this. .

There are many instances in these numbers that I’m not happy about as well.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/11/2023 00:55:13
From: roughbarked
ID: 2093525
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:


party_pants said:

roughbarked said:

Released with a ball and chain, some of them.

Some of them need restrictions and supervision orders. I am not very happy about the High Court ruling on this. .

There are many instances in these numbers that I’m not happy about as well.

Though it is a bit like the trolley thing.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/11/2023 12:49:33
From: sarahs mum
ID: 2093613
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

idiot.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/11/2023 13:06:31
From: Michael V
ID: 2093618
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

sarahs mum said:


idiot.

Canavan is not a kind man, and neither thoughtful nor empathetic.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/11/2023 13:09:53
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2093619
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

sarahs mum said:


idiot.

If their dogs will vouch for them, the people are welcome to come.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/11/2023 13:12:58
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2093620
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Michael V said:


sarahs mum said:

idiot.

Canavan is not a kind man, and neither thoughtful nor empathetic.

but, but, tuvalu is getting bigger!!!

Reply Quote

Date: 12/11/2023 13:16:07
From: sarahs mum
ID: 2093622
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:


sarahs mum said:

idiot.

If their dogs will vouch for them, the people are welcome to come.

‘special visa category’

Australia will offer residency to people affected by climate change in the low-lying Pacific nation of Tuvalu, as part of a sweeping new treaty that also locks the two countries into close security ties.

At a time when many Pacific leaders are pressing Australia to take stronger action against its fossil fuel sector, the treaty explicitly recognises the vulnerability of Tuvalu to rising sea levels.

Tuvalu is a country of nine low-lying islands in the central Pacific, about halfway between Australia and Hawaii, with a population of about 11,200.

Australia will offer up to 280 people access to permanent residency each year, but it has also promised to help the citizens of Tuvalu “stay in their homes with safety and dignity”.

The Australian prime minister, Anthony Albanese, said the deal would also cement his country’s status as Tuvalu’s “security partner of choice” by offering it a form of security guarantee.

The new treaty, announced on Friday, states that Australia will act on requests from its partner to respond to major natural disasters, pandemics or “military aggression against Tuvalu”.

In return for this security guarantee, Tuvalu will be required to “mutually agree with Australia” if it wants to strike a deal with any other country on security and defence-related matters.

These topics are defined broadly to include “defence, policing, border protection, cybersecurity and critical infrastructure, including ports, telecommunications and energy infrastructure” – all of which are of interest to China.

Australia’s military could be granted access and have a presence within the country if such activities are deemed necessary to provide assistance that had been requested by the Pacific country.

The deal will be seen as a strategic win for the Australian government at a time when China has been vigorously pursuing closer ties with Pacific island countries.

more..
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/nov/10/australia-to-offer-residency-to-tuvalu-residents-displaced-by-climate-change

Reply Quote

Date: 12/11/2023 13:25:36
From: party_pants
ID: 2093625
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

sarahs mum said:


captain_spalding said:

sarahs mum said:

idiot.

If their dogs will vouch for them, the people are welcome to come.

‘special visa category’

Australia will offer residency to people affected by climate change in the low-lying Pacific nation of Tuvalu, as part of a sweeping new treaty that also locks the two countries into close security ties.

At a time when many Pacific leaders are pressing Australia to take stronger action against its fossil fuel sector, the treaty explicitly recognises the vulnerability of Tuvalu to rising sea levels.

Tuvalu is a country of nine low-lying islands in the central Pacific, about halfway between Australia and Hawaii, with a population of about 11,200.

Australia will offer up to 280 people access to permanent residency each year, but it has also promised to help the citizens of Tuvalu “stay in their homes with safety and dignity”.

The Australian prime minister, Anthony Albanese, said the deal would also cement his country’s status as Tuvalu’s “security partner of choice” by offering it a form of security guarantee.

The new treaty, announced on Friday, states that Australia will act on requests from its partner to respond to major natural disasters, pandemics or “military aggression against Tuvalu”.

In return for this security guarantee, Tuvalu will be required to “mutually agree with Australia” if it wants to strike a deal with any other country on security and defence-related matters.

These topics are defined broadly to include “defence, policing, border protection, cybersecurity and critical infrastructure, including ports, telecommunications and energy infrastructure” – all of which are of interest to China.

Australia’s military could be granted access and have a presence within the country if such activities are deemed necessary to provide assistance that had been requested by the Pacific country.

The deal will be seen as a strategic win for the Australian government at a time when China has been vigorously pursuing closer ties with Pacific island countries.

more..
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/nov/10/australia-to-offer-residency-to-tuvalu-residents-displaced-by-climate-change

That last bit is the real kicker. They have more or less become a c=vassal state of Australia.

If we are going to do that, we might as well have EU style freedom of movement between the two countries.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/11/2023 13:27:57
From: sarahs mum
ID: 2093626
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

party_pants said:


sarahs mum said:

captain_spalding said:

If their dogs will vouch for them, the people are welcome to come.

‘special visa category’

Australia will offer residency to people affected by climate change in the low-lying Pacific nation of Tuvalu, as part of a sweeping new treaty that also locks the two countries into close security ties.

At a time when many Pacific leaders are pressing Australia to take stronger action against its fossil fuel sector, the treaty explicitly recognises the vulnerability of Tuvalu to rising sea levels.

Tuvalu is a country of nine low-lying islands in the central Pacific, about halfway between Australia and Hawaii, with a population of about 11,200.

Australia will offer up to 280 people access to permanent residency each year, but it has also promised to help the citizens of Tuvalu “stay in their homes with safety and dignity”.

The Australian prime minister, Anthony Albanese, said the deal would also cement his country’s status as Tuvalu’s “security partner of choice” by offering it a form of security guarantee.

The new treaty, announced on Friday, states that Australia will act on requests from its partner to respond to major natural disasters, pandemics or “military aggression against Tuvalu”.

In return for this security guarantee, Tuvalu will be required to “mutually agree with Australia” if it wants to strike a deal with any other country on security and defence-related matters.

These topics are defined broadly to include “defence, policing, border protection, cybersecurity and critical infrastructure, including ports, telecommunications and energy infrastructure” – all of which are of interest to China.

Australia’s military could be granted access and have a presence within the country if such activities are deemed necessary to provide assistance that had been requested by the Pacific country.

The deal will be seen as a strategic win for the Australian government at a time when China has been vigorously pursuing closer ties with Pacific island countries.

more..
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/nov/10/australia-to-offer-residency-to-tuvalu-residents-displaced-by-climate-change

That last bit is the real kicker. They have more or less become a c=vassal state of Australia.

If we are going to do that, we might as well have EU style freedom of movement between the two countries.

i believe quite a few tuvuluans have already gone to NZ. I’m sure some will want to end up there.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/11/2023 13:29:11
From: sarahs mum
ID: 2093628
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

sarahs mum said:


party_pants said:

sarahs mum said:

‘special visa category’

Australia will offer residency to people affected by climate change in the low-lying Pacific nation of Tuvalu, as part of a sweeping new treaty that also locks the two countries into close security ties.

At a time when many Pacific leaders are pressing Australia to take stronger action against its fossil fuel sector, the treaty explicitly recognises the vulnerability of Tuvalu to rising sea levels.

Tuvalu is a country of nine low-lying islands in the central Pacific, about halfway between Australia and Hawaii, with a population of about 11,200.

Australia will offer up to 280 people access to permanent residency each year, but it has also promised to help the citizens of Tuvalu “stay in their homes with safety and dignity”.

The Australian prime minister, Anthony Albanese, said the deal would also cement his country’s status as Tuvalu’s “security partner of choice” by offering it a form of security guarantee.

The new treaty, announced on Friday, states that Australia will act on requests from its partner to respond to major natural disasters, pandemics or “military aggression against Tuvalu”.

In return for this security guarantee, Tuvalu will be required to “mutually agree with Australia” if it wants to strike a deal with any other country on security and defence-related matters.

These topics are defined broadly to include “defence, policing, border protection, cybersecurity and critical infrastructure, including ports, telecommunications and energy infrastructure” – all of which are of interest to China.

Australia’s military could be granted access and have a presence within the country if such activities are deemed necessary to provide assistance that had been requested by the Pacific country.

The deal will be seen as a strategic win for the Australian government at a time when China has been vigorously pursuing closer ties with Pacific island countries.

more..
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/nov/10/australia-to-offer-residency-to-tuvalu-residents-displaced-by-climate-change

That last bit is the real kicker. They have more or less become a c=vassal state of Australia.

If we are going to do that, we might as well have EU style freedom of movement between the two countries.

i believe quite a few tuvuluans have already gone to NZ. I’m sure some will want to end up there.

Apart from the ones that want to hang on no matter what.

“Australia’s pledge also includes further cooperation on the Tuvalu Coastal Adaptation Project, which would reclaim land in the capital, Funafuti, in the hopes of expanding the land mass by 6% to create more space for housing and other essential services and “enabling people to remain living in Tuvalu in the face of sea level rise”.”

Reply Quote

Date: 12/11/2023 19:13:23
From: dv
ID: 2093791
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Labor in NSW continues to have high approval. The voting intention per Resolve polling is 56.6% ALP 43.4% Libs on a 2PP basis.
Lot of “Don’t know/no opinion” on preferred Premier. 35% Minns, 13% Speakman.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/11/2023 19:15:19
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2093793
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:


Labor in NSW continues to have high approval. The voting intention per Resolve polling is 56.6% ALP 43.4% Libs on a 2PP basis.
Lot of “Don’t know/no opinion” on preferred Premier. 35% Minns, 13% Speakman.

13% for Speakman.

Seems that a lot of people don’t really know who they’d like to have as Premier, but they’re pretty sure that it’s not Speakman.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/11/2023 19:15:19
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2093794
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:


Labor in NSW continues to have high approval. The voting intention per Resolve polling is 56.6% ALP 43.4% Libs on a 2PP basis.
Lot of “Don’t know/no opinion” on preferred Premier. 35% Minns, 13% Speakman.

13% for Speakman.

Seems that a lot of people don’t really know who they’d like to have as Premier, but they’re pretty sure that it’s not Speakman.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/11/2023 19:25:39
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2093797
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:


dv said:

Labor in NSW continues to have high approval. The voting intention per Resolve polling is 56.6% ALP 43.4% Libs on a 2PP basis.
Lot of “Don’t know/no opinion” on preferred Premier. 35% Minns, 13% Speakman.

13% for Speakman.

Seems that a lot of people don’t really know who they’d like to have as Premier, but they’re pretty sure that it’s not Speakman.

As a well informed NSW voter I’m happy to tell you that I couldn’t have named the leader of the NSW libs, and I don’t recall ever hearing Speakman speak.

I suspect many of the 53% “don’t knows” would be the same.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/11/2023 19:26:38
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2093798
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

The Rev Dodgson said:


captain_spalding said:

dv said:

Labor in NSW continues to have high approval. The voting intention per Resolve polling is 56.6% ALP 43.4% Libs on a 2PP basis.
Lot of “Don’t know/no opinion” on preferred Premier. 35% Minns, 13% Speakman.

13% for Speakman.

Seems that a lot of people don’t really know who they’d like to have as Premier, but they’re pretty sure that it’s not Speakman.

As a well informed NSW voter I’m happy to tell you that I couldn’t have named the leader of the NSW libs, and I don’t recall ever hearing Speakman speak.

I suspect many of the 53% “don’t knows” would be the same.

52%

Reply Quote

Date: 12/11/2023 20:55:10
From: dv
ID: 2093827
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

The Rev Dodgson said:


captain_spalding said:

dv said:

Labor in NSW continues to have high approval. The voting intention per Resolve polling is 56.6% ALP 43.4% Libs on a 2PP basis.
Lot of “Don’t know/no opinion” on preferred Premier. 35% Minns, 13% Speakman.

13% for Speakman.

Seems that a lot of people don’t really know who they’d like to have as Premier, but they’re pretty sure that it’s not Speakman.

As a well informed NSW voter I’m happy to tell you that I couldn’t have named the leader of the NSW libs, and I don’t recall ever hearing Speakman speak.

I suspect many of the 53% “don’t knows” would be the same.

Doesn’t even sound real, more like a name an alien might come up with on the spot to pretend to be an earthling politician. “Uh… speak … man … “

Reply Quote

Date: 13/11/2023 22:00:12
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2094030
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

There’s a different kind of

Police told Mr Nugagahakumbura there was no CCTV footage of the attack, despite the centrality of the location. “We are not living in 18th or 19th century,” Mr Nugagahakumbura said. “If someone needs to find someone, there are so many ways of doing that.”

state for this desired kind of surveillance¡

Reply Quote

Date: 13/11/2023 22:04:27
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2094031
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

SCIENCE said:

There’s a different kind of

Police told Mr Nugagahakumbura there was no CCTV footage of the attack, despite the centrality of the location. “We are not living in 18th or 19th century,” Mr Nugagahakumbura said. “If someone needs to find someone, there are so many ways of doing that.”

state for this desired kind of surveillance¡

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-13/family-traumatised-by-racist-assault-in-ballarat/103090590

All right, all

“Our staff were getting phone calls daily, saying, ‘You don’t belong here. We’re going to boycott you. We’re going to close you down, your shop’s going to go’,’‘ he told 7.30. Police have so far said there is no evidence indicating the firebombing of the store was racially or politically motivated.

good then¡

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-13/burgertory-owner-moves-family-to-safehouse-730/103100348

Reply Quote

Date: 14/11/2023 09:37:00
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2094098
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Yeah no shit

uh sorry we mean

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-14/privatisation-public-assets-water-sewage-transport-fair-society/103097448

yeah.

Reply Quote

Date: 14/11/2023 18:03:17
From: dv
ID: 2094264
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

The NSW Labor government will take back control of the maintenance of its 95,000 social housing properties as part of its broader push to reverse the outsourcing of services to the private sector.

In a bid to improve long wait times that social housing tenants face for basic repairs to their homes, the government will not renew the contracts of four private operators due to expire next year.

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/nsw/one-of-our-worst-landlords-returns-housing-repairs-to-public-hands-20231112-p5ejb6.html

Reply Quote

Date: 14/11/2023 20:55:28
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2094296
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:

dv said:

dv said:

The NSW Labor government will take back control of the maintenance of its 95,000 social housing properties as part of its broader push to reverse the outsourcing of services to the private sector.

In a bid to improve long wait times that social housing tenants face for basic repairs to their homes, the government will not renew the contracts of four private operators due to expire next year.

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/nsw/one-of-our-worst-landlords-returns-housing-repairs-to-public-hands-20231112-p5ejb6.html

Britain’s ‘unbearable’ sewerage problem is a warning against privatisation in Australia

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-14/privatisation-public-assets-water-sewage-transport-fair-society/103097448

Ridiculous.

Private industry always does a better job than bloated, lethargic organisations run by the so-called ‘state’.

And don’t forget the benefits of competition. There’ll be all those sewerage companies vying for the right to deal with your sewage, with market pressures compelling them to offer you ever-cheaper options.

You know, just like with the energy market.

Wait.

Reply Quote

Date: 14/11/2023 23:22:20
From: sarahs mum
ID: 2094357
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

This was on our watch. Wake up & hold them accountable.
23 m ·
Didn’t realise Barnaby got married two days ago 👰🏼‍♀️🤵🏻💍😊

Reply Quote

Date: 14/11/2023 23:23:53
From: wookiemeister
ID: 2094358
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

sarahs mum said:


This was on our watch. Wake up & hold them accountable.
23 m ·
Didn’t realise Barnaby got married two days ago 👰🏼‍♀️🤵🏻💍😊


That looks like the member for manilla on the left

Reply Quote

Date: 14/11/2023 23:25:21
From: wookiemeister
ID: 2094359
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

People keep voting for scumbags

Reply Quote

Date: 14/11/2023 23:30:56
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2094361
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

sarahs mum said:


This was on our watch. Wake up & hold them accountable.
23 m ·
Didn’t realise Barnaby got married two days ago 👰🏼‍♀️🤵🏻💍😊

those hats haven’t seen a days work.

Reply Quote

Date: 14/11/2023 23:35:27
From: dv
ID: 2094363
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

sarahs mum said:


This was on our watch. Wake up & hold them accountable.
23 m ·
Didn’t realise Barnaby got married two days ago 👰🏼‍♀️🤵🏻💍😊

Your invite probably got lost

Reply Quote

Date: 14/11/2023 23:49:47
From: party_pants
ID: 2094368
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

sarahs mum said:


This was on our watch. Wake up & hold them accountable.
23 m ·
Didn’t realise Barnaby got married two days ago 👰🏼‍♀️🤵🏻💍😊

What exactly is our fault about this? And what does “hold them accountable” mean in this context?

Reply Quote

Date: 14/11/2023 23:53:27
From: sarahs mum
ID: 2094369
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

party_pants said:


sarahs mum said:

This was on our watch. Wake up & hold them accountable.
23 m ·
Didn’t realise Barnaby got married two days ago 👰🏼‍♀️🤵🏻💍😊

What exactly is our fault about this? And what does “hold them accountable” mean in this context?

left wing memers.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2023 00:07:56
From: diddly-squat
ID: 2094376
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

sarahs mum said:


This was on our watch. Wake up & hold them accountable.
23 m ·
Didn’t realise Barnaby got married two days ago 👰🏼‍♀️🤵🏻💍😊

Gees, George certainty hasn’t lost any weight since leaving politics

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2023 00:20:14
From: wookiemeister
ID: 2094377
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

JudgeMental said:


sarahs mum said:

This was on our watch. Wake up & hold them accountable.
23 m ·
Didn’t realise Barnaby got married two days ago 👰🏼‍♀️🤵🏻💍😊

those hats haven’t seen a days work.


Parasites

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2023 01:52:29
From: sarahs mum
ID: 2094383
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2023 08:06:03
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2094408
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Not Designed To Mislead ¡

China blamed as major backer

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-15/asd-reports-increase-in-cyber-attacks/103103320

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2023 08:23:43
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2094418
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Try This For Your Person Woman Man Camera TV Moment ¡

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-15/nt-public-trustee-brain-injury-survivor-questions-cognitive-exam/102912962

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2023 08:43:52
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094422
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

SCIENCE said:

Try This For Your Person Woman Man Camera TV Moment ¡

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-15/nt-public-trustee-brain-injury-survivor-questions-cognitive-exam/102912962

You mean Trump isn’t the president?

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2023 08:57:50
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2094428
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:


SCIENCE said:

Try This For Your Person Woman Man Camera TV Moment ¡

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-15/nt-public-trustee-brain-injury-survivor-questions-cognitive-exam/102912962

You mean Trump isn’t the president?

Well, that’s not what i’m hearing from some quarters.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2023 09:54:11
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094437
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:


roughbarked said:

SCIENCE said:

Try This For Your Person Woman Man Camera TV Moment ¡

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-15/nt-public-trustee-brain-injury-survivor-questions-cognitive-exam/102912962

You mean Trump isn’t the president?

Well, that’s not what i’m hearing from some quarters.

He thinks the election was rigged by the vermin in the swamp that he never emptied when he had the chance.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2023 10:00:29
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2094440
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

So… has NACC done anything useful yet¿

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2023 10:02:34
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094443
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

SCIENCE said:

So… has NACC done anything useful yet¿

We still have corrupt politicians.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2023 10:15:52
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094451
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

SCIENCE said:

So… has NACC done anything useful yet¿

Maybe you should ask? https://www.naccinspector.gov.au/

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2023 18:39:19
From: Michael V
ID: 2094536
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Dutton suggests parliament continue sitting until legislation passed on High Court immigration ruling, despite the legislation having not yet been written.

LOL

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-15/dutton-responds-to-immigration-high-court-decision/103107080

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2023 18:44:36
From: Michael V
ID: 2094537
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

The Health Services Union NSW (HSU) said a growing number of paramedics had vowed not to re-register with the professional regulator by November 30, rendering them legally unable to attend triple-0 calls.

More than 1,500 paramedics have signed an online pledge to boycott their renewals, which are due on December 1.

Paramedics who do not pay their registration would be given a month’s grace period in which they can legally work before they are removed from the register on January 1.

In an online newsletter, the Ambulance Division of the HSU said the Minns government was breaking an election promise by failing to recognise members’ increasing skills with a pay rise.

“This government is happy to accept all the benefits of each and every paramedic’s professionalism while attempting to delay paying for it – if they can get away with it,” the newsletter said.

“It’s time to pull the nuclear option and boycott 2023 paramedic registration.”

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-14/nsw-paramedics-threaten-boycott-over-pay-dispute/103105480

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 10:17:10
From: buffy
ID: 2094622
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

I think I’ll put this in here as well as in the meme thread.

Mr Dutton seems to have felt the need to fight his irrelevence yesterday. Apparently his cunning plan was not such a good one after all.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-16/albanese-dutton-question-time-clash-gaza-israel-high-court/103110052

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 10:38:18
From: dv
ID: 2094640
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

https://twitter.com/strangerous10/status/1724657919206252688?t=zu_EEdmQpHHK9RiIqtxjhg&s=19

LNP should probably swap Dutton out now, give the real candidate a good year and a half to establish.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 10:39:33
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2094641
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:


https://twitter.com/strangerous10/status/1724657919206252688?t=zu_EEdmQpHHK9RiIqtxjhg&s=19

LNP should probably swap Dutton out now, give the real candidate a good year and a half to establish.

Who’s your preferred choice for Dutton’s replacement?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 10:40:46
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094642
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

buffy said:


I think I’ll put this in here as well as in the meme thread.

Mr Dutton seems to have felt the need to fight his irrelevence yesterday. Apparently his cunning plan was not such a good one after all.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-16/albanese-dutton-question-time-clash-gaza-israel-high-court/103110052

He’s a dolt.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 10:42:50
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094646
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:


dv said:

https://twitter.com/strangerous10/status/1724657919206252688?t=zu_EEdmQpHHK9RiIqtxjhg&s=19

LNP should probably swap Dutton out now, give the real candidate a good year and a half to establish.

Who’s your preferred choice for Dutton’s replacement?

Probaby someone from a different party?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 10:43:00
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2094647
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:


buffy said:

I think I’ll put this in here as well as in the meme thread.

Mr Dutton seems to have felt the need to fight his irrelevence yesterday. Apparently his cunning plan was not such a good one after all.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-16/albanese-dutton-question-time-clash-gaza-israel-high-court/103110052

He’s a dolt.

He’s good enough to fill the chair while the rest of the L/NP are busy fiddling their travel/office/postage allowances, and making promises to big business for when they next win office.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 10:44:05
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2094648
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:

captain_spalding said:

dv said:

https://twitter.com/strangerous10/status/1724657919206252688?t=zu_EEdmQpHHK9RiIqtxjhg&s=19

LNP should probably swap Dutton out now, give the real candidate a good year and a half to establish.

Who’s your preferred choice for Dutton’s replacement?

Probaby someone from a different party?

Be nice if green opposition for a change.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 10:44:36
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094650
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:


roughbarked said:

buffy said:

I think I’ll put this in here as well as in the meme thread.

Mr Dutton seems to have felt the need to fight his irrelevence yesterday. Apparently his cunning plan was not such a good one after all.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-16/albanese-dutton-question-time-clash-gaza-israel-high-court/103110052

He’s a dolt.

He’s good enough to fill the chair while the rest of the L/NP are busy fiddling their travel/office/postage allowances, and making promises to big business for when they next win office.


Ah, so that’s it.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 10:44:43
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2094651
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:

buffy said:

I think I’ll put this in here as well as in the meme thread.

Mr Dutton seems to have felt the need to fight his irrelevence yesterday. Apparently his cunning plan was not such a good one after all.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-16/albanese-dutton-question-time-clash-gaza-israel-high-court/103110052

He’s a dolt.

Good to see democracy hard at work ¡ Who needs justification for justice ¿

The High Court hasn’t helped the government by deciding to issue its ruling without the reasons for its judgement. Nor is there any clear indication of when those reasons will be delivered.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 10:45:55
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094652
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

SCIENCE said:

roughbarked said:

captain_spalding said:

Who’s your preferred choice for Dutton’s replacement?

Probaby someone from a different party?

Be nice if green opposition for a change.

Now that would be a change.
If the COALition was separated back to two parties or more.. Then the greens would no longer be a minority party.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 10:46:31
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094653
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

SCIENCE said:

roughbarked said:

buffy said:

I think I’ll put this in here as well as in the meme thread.

Mr Dutton seems to have felt the need to fight his irrelevence yesterday. Apparently his cunning plan was not such a good one after all.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-16/albanese-dutton-question-time-clash-gaza-israel-high-court/103110052

He’s a dolt.

Good to see democracy hard at work ¡ Who needs justification for justice ¿

The High Court hasn’t helped the government by deciding to issue its ruling without the reasons for its judgement. Nor is there any clear indication of when those reasons will be delivered.

You could say that the High Court has stymied politicians.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 10:47:40
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2094654
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:


captain_spalding said:

roughbarked said:

He’s a dolt.

He’s good enough to fill the chair while the rest of the L/NP are busy fiddling their travel/office/postage allowances, and making promises to big business for when they next win office.


Ah, so that’s it.

Being in government is nice, but no-one really minds being in opposition for a while now and then, either.

You’re not really responsible for anything, you can blame the government for anything that goes wrong, or for deficiencies in your electorate, and you can talk big about how much better it’ll be when your mob is back in control.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 10:51:10
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094655
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:


roughbarked said:

captain_spalding said:

He’s good enough to fill the chair while the rest of the L/NP are busy fiddling their travel/office/postage allowances, and making promises to big business for when they next win office.


Ah, so that’s it.

Being in government is nice, but no-one really minds being in opposition for a while now and then, either.

You’re not really responsible for anything, you can blame the government for anything that goes wrong, or for deficiencies in your electorate, and you can talk big about how much better it’ll be when your mob is back in control.

As long as your snout is in the trough, you are OK.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 10:52:30
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2094657
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:


captain_spalding said:

roughbarked said:

Ah, so that’s it.

Being in government is nice, but no-one really minds being in opposition for a while now and then, either.

You’re not really responsible for anything, you can blame the government for anything that goes wrong, or for deficiencies in your electorate, and you can talk big about how much better it’ll be when your mob is back in control.

As long as your snout is in the trough, you are OK.

There was a chap, a few elections back, who ran as an independent, with the slogan ‘it’s a big trough, and i want to get my snout into it’.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 10:52:39
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2094658
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:


buffy said:

I think I’ll put this in here as well as in the meme thread.

Mr Dutton seems to have felt the need to fight his irrelevence yesterday. Apparently his cunning plan was not such a good one after all.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-16/albanese-dutton-question-time-clash-gaza-israel-high-court/103110052

He’s a dolt.

Ah, but he’s a Bolt dolt.

He may yet get the top job.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 10:54:36
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2094659
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

The Rev Dodgson said:


roughbarked said:

buffy said:

I think I’ll put this in here as well as in the meme thread.

Mr Dutton seems to have felt the need to fight his irrelevence yesterday. Apparently his cunning plan was not such a good one after all.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-16/albanese-dutton-question-time-clash-gaza-israel-high-court/103110052

He’s a dolt.

Ah, but he’s a Bolt dolt.

He may yet get the top job.

If Rupert approves.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 10:57:21
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2094661
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

roughbarked said:

He’s a dolt.

Ah, but he’s a Bolt dolt.

He may yet get the top job.

If Rupert approves.

… or Rupert junior (whatever his name is).

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 10:57:54
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2094662
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

The Rev Dodgson said:


captain_spalding said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

Ah, but he’s a Bolt dolt.

He may yet get the top job.

If Rupert approves.

… or Rupert junior (whatever his name is).

lachlan

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 10:58:20
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2094664
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

The Rev Dodgson said:


captain_spalding said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

Ah, but he’s a Bolt dolt.

He may yet get the top job.

If Rupert approves.

… or Rupert junior (whatever his name is).

I’m sure that Rupert offers pertinent advice, on occasion.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 11:38:04
From: dv
ID: 2094681
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:


dv said:

https://twitter.com/strangerous10/status/1724657919206252688?t=zu_EEdmQpHHK9RiIqtxjhg&s=19

LNP should probably swap Dutton out now, give the real candidate a good year and a half to establish.

Who’s your preferred choice for Dutton’s replacement?

Well the LNP needs to get a bit closer to the centre so they should probably look at which candidates did well in the most recent election. The only Lib MP to get a swing towards was Bridget Archer.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 11:43:44
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094683
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:


captain_spalding said:

dv said:

https://twitter.com/strangerous10/status/1724657919206252688?t=zu_EEdmQpHHK9RiIqtxjhg&s=19

LNP should probably swap Dutton out now, give the real candidate a good year and a half to establish.

Who’s your preferred choice for Dutton’s replacement?

Well the LNP needs to get a bit closer to the centre so they should probably look at which candidates did well in the most recent election. The only Lib MP to get a swing towards was Bridget Archer.

She is the only one that gets close. The whole party otherwise are not working for the average Aussie.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 11:45:14
From: dv
ID: 2094686
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Dutton has actually improved in the preferred PM polls, up to 27%.

That’s it, Monty, climb the ranks

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 11:50:51
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2094692
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

I’m no fan of Peter but he chose wisely in opposing the voice.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 11:52:59
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2094694
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Peak Warming Man said:


I’m no fan of Peter but he chose wisely in opposing the voice.

I’m definitely no Dutton fan, either. But, the Voice was an excellent example of the right thing being done very much in the wrong way, with a result that you didn’t need a crystal ball to predict.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 11:54:16
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094697
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Peak Warming Man said:


I’m no fan of Peter but he chose wisely in opposing the voice.

The bastard has the temerity to use my name.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 11:54:26
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2094698
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Peak Warming Man said:


I’m no fan of Peter but he chose wisely in opposing the voice.

Well if wisdom is measured in terms of gaining maximum political advantage, regardless of the effects, then yes.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 11:56:14
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094701
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

The Rev Dodgson said:


Peak Warming Man said:

I’m no fan of Peter but he chose wisely in opposing the voice.

Well if wisdom is measured in terms of gaining maximum political advantage, regardless of the effects, then yes.

So another Trumpism.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 11:56:15
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2094702
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:


Peak Warming Man said:

I’m no fan of Peter but he chose wisely in opposing the voice.

I’m definitely no Dutton fan, either. But, the Voice was an excellent example of the right thing being done very much in the wrong way, with a result that you didn’t need a crystal ball to predict.

I think it showed how racist and ignorant a lot of australians are. so much for their easy going nature. lol.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 11:56:40
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2094703
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Peak Warming Man said:


I’m no fan of Peter but he chose wisely in opposing the voice.

Not right-wing enough for you?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 11:56:52
From: dv
ID: 2094704
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Peak Warming Man said:


I’m no fan of Peter but he chose wisely in opposing the voice.

I mean we’ll see what we’ll see, I ain’t vosstrodamus, but I think he fucked the next election for them. They’ll never get those teal seats back.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 11:57:20
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094705
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

JudgeMental said:


captain_spalding said:

Peak Warming Man said:

I’m no fan of Peter but he chose wisely in opposing the voice.

I’m definitely no Dutton fan, either. But, the Voice was an excellent example of the right thing being done very much in the wrong way, with a result that you didn’t need a crystal ball to predict.

I think it showed how racist and ignorant a lot of australians are. so much for their easy going nature. lol.

Spoken like a true smelly pomegranite.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 11:58:35
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094706
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:


Peak Warming Man said:

I’m no fan of Peter but he chose wisely in opposing the voice.

I mean we’ll see what we’ll see, I ain’t vosstrodamus, but I think he fucked the next election for them. They’ll never get those teal seats back.

He isn’t the spokesperson the Libs need at this point in time. If he was back in Hitler’s day he would have been shouted out of office iin this land.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 12:03:34
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2094711
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

JudgeMental said:


captain_spalding said:

Peak Warming Man said:

I’m no fan of Peter but he chose wisely in opposing the voice.

I’m definitely no Dutton fan, either. But, the Voice was an excellent example of the right thing being done very much in the wrong way, with a result that you didn’t need a crystal ball to predict.

I think it showed how racist and ignorant a lot of australians are. so much for their easy going nature. lol.

I think a lot of them just wanted to know what they were voting for, how it would actually work, etc. There was a strong whiff of ‘now, just don’t you worry about that’ around it, as if the government didn’t really know, either.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 12:04:21
From: party_pants
ID: 2094712
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

JudgeMental said:


captain_spalding said:

Peak Warming Man said:

I’m no fan of Peter but he chose wisely in opposing the voice.

I’m definitely no Dutton fan, either. But, the Voice was an excellent example of the right thing being done very much in the wrong way, with a result that you didn’t need a crystal ball to predict.

I think it showed how racist and ignorant a lot of australians are. so much for their easy going nature. lol.

With such an overwhelming majority voting NO it seems a bit too simplistic just to blame racism and ignorance for the outcome.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 12:05:31
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094714
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:


JudgeMental said:

captain_spalding said:

I’m definitely no Dutton fan, either. But, the Voice was an excellent example of the right thing being done very much in the wrong way, with a result that you didn’t need a crystal ball to predict.

I think it showed how racist and ignorant a lot of australians are. so much for their easy going nature. lol.

I think a lot of them just wanted to know what they were voting for, how it would actually work, etc. There was a strong whiff of ‘now, just don’t you worry about that’ around it, as if the government didn’t really know, either.

This.. was quite obvious. In an absence of understanding what the oldest living race of humans actually want.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 12:06:26
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094715
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

party_pants said:


JudgeMental said:

captain_spalding said:

I’m definitely no Dutton fan, either. But, the Voice was an excellent example of the right thing being done very much in the wrong way, with a result that you didn’t need a crystal ball to predict.

I think it showed how racist and ignorant a lot of australians are. so much for their easy going nature. lol.

With such an overwhelming majority voting NO it seems a bit too simplistic just to blame racism and ignorance for the outcome.

Are you suggesting that simplistic doesn’t describe an ocker?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 12:11:41
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2094721
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:


JudgeMental said:

captain_spalding said:

I’m definitely no Dutton fan, either. But, the Voice was an excellent example of the right thing being done very much in the wrong way, with a result that you didn’t need a crystal ball to predict.

I think it showed how racist and ignorant a lot of australians are. so much for their easy going nature. lol.

I think a lot of them just wanted to know what they were voting for, how it would actually work, etc. There was a strong whiff of ‘now, just don’t you worry about that’ around it, as if the government didn’t really know, either.

Nah it was pretty simple.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 12:12:15
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2094722
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:


JudgeMental said:

captain_spalding said:

I’m definitely no Dutton fan, either. But, the Voice was an excellent example of the right thing being done very much in the wrong way, with a result that you didn’t need a crystal ball to predict.

I think it showed how racist and ignorant a lot of australians are. so much for their easy going nature. lol.

I think a lot of them just wanted to know what they were voting for, how it would actually work, etc. There was a strong whiff of ‘now, just don’t you worry about that’ around it, as if the government didn’t really know, either.

When you ask people to vote on constitutional change on something called the Voice it needs something of some import not gimmic name.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 12:14:10
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2094725
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Witty Rejoinder said:


captain_spalding said:

JudgeMental said:

I think it showed how racist and ignorant a lot of australians are. so much for their easy going nature. lol.

I think a lot of them just wanted to know what they were voting for, how it would actually work, etc. There was a strong whiff of ‘now, just don’t you worry about that’ around it, as if the government didn’t really know, either.

Nah it was pretty simple.

The concept was simple, the mechanics were unknown.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 12:14:23
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094726
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Peak Warming Man said:


captain_spalding said:

JudgeMental said:

I think it showed how racist and ignorant a lot of australians are. so much for their easy going nature. lol.

I think a lot of them just wanted to know what they were voting for, how it would actually work, etc. There was a strong whiff of ‘now, just don’t you worry about that’ around it, as if the government didn’t really know, either.

When you ask people to vote on constitutional change on something called the Voice it needs something of some import not gimmic name.

Yes, it was about acting swiftly on promises without the application of the thought process.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 12:16:41
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2094727
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:


Witty Rejoinder said:

captain_spalding said:

I think a lot of them just wanted to know what they were voting for, how it would actually work, etc. There was a strong whiff of ‘now, just don’t you worry about that’ around it, as if the government didn’t really know, either.

Nah it was pretty simple.

The concept was simple, the mechanics were unknown.

What didn’t you understand?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 12:16:59
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094728
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:


Witty Rejoinder said:

captain_spalding said:

I think a lot of them just wanted to know what they were voting for, how it would actually work, etc. There was a strong whiff of ‘now, just don’t you worry about that’ around it, as if the government didn’t really know, either.

Nah it was pretty simple.

The concept was simple, the mechanics were unknown.

The real problem is not ever allowing an equitable place on the governing body for the original inhabitants of the land being goverened.
Sort of like kicking the landowners out and only allowing the real estate agents(car salesmen), the voice.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 12:17:37
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094729
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Witty Rejoinder said:


captain_spalding said:

Witty Rejoinder said:

Nah it was pretty simple.

The concept was simple, the mechanics were unknown.

What didn’t you understand?

Well there were only two choices .

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 12:21:09
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2094730
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Witty Rejoinder said:


captain_spalding said:

Witty Rejoinder said:

Nah it was pretty simple.

The concept was simple, the mechanics were unknown.

What didn’t you understand?

If it’s a straightforward matter, how about you set out your understanding of the way in which the Voice would be constituted, its roles, and the mechanisms by which it would achieve it’s desired purposes, and we can see whether or not that should have been enough to satisfy the voters?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 12:25:07
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2094731
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:


Witty Rejoinder said:

captain_spalding said:

The concept was simple, the mechanics were unknown.

What didn’t you understand?

If it’s a straightforward matter, how about you set out your understanding of the way in which the Voice would be constituted, its roles, and the mechanisms by which it would achieve it’s desired purposes, and we can see whether or not that should have been enough to satisfy the voters?


It’s not up to me to explain to you how it would have worked. You explain to me what misunderstanding meant you voted no.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 12:26:02
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2094732
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Witty Rejoinder said:


captain_spalding said:

Witty Rejoinder said:

What didn’t you understand?

If it’s a straightforward matter, how about you set out your understanding of the way in which the Voice would be constituted, its roles, and the mechanisms by which it would achieve it’s desired purposes, and we can see whether or not that should have been enough to satisfy the voters?


It’s not up to me to explain to you how it would have worked. You explain to me what misunderstanding meant you voted no.

Who said i voted ‘no’?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 12:28:49
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094733
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:


Witty Rejoinder said:

captain_spalding said:

If it’s a straightforward matter, how about you set out your understanding of the way in which the Voice would be constituted, its roles, and the mechanisms by which it would achieve it’s desired purposes, and we can see whether or not that should have been enough to satisfy the voters?


It’s not up to me to explain to you how it would have worked. You explain to me what misunderstanding meant you voted no.

Who said i voted ‘no’?

Well I didn’t.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 12:29:02
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2094734
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:


Witty Rejoinder said:

captain_spalding said:

If it’s a straightforward matter, how about you set out your understanding of the way in which the Voice would be constituted, its roles, and the mechanisms by which it would achieve it’s desired purposes, and we can see whether or not that should have been enough to satisfy the voters?


It’s not up to me to explain to you how it would have worked. You explain to me what misunderstanding meant you voted no.

Who said i voted ‘no’?

So you voted yes to something you didn’t understand?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 12:31:03
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094735
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Witty Rejoinder said:


captain_spalding said:

Witty Rejoinder said:

It’s not up to me to explain to you how it would have worked. You explain to me what misunderstanding meant you voted no.

Who said i voted ‘no’?

So you voted yes to something you didn’t understand?

No.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 12:34:00
From: party_pants
ID: 2094736
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Witty Rejoinder said:


captain_spalding said:

Witty Rejoinder said:

What didn’t you understand?

If it’s a straightforward matter, how about you set out your understanding of the way in which the Voice would be constituted, its roles, and the mechanisms by which it would achieve it’s desired purposes, and we can see whether or not that should have been enough to satisfy the voters?


It’s not up to me to explain to you how it would have worked. You explain to me what misunderstanding meant you voted no.

I live in an electorate that voted nearly 70% No. The feeling I got from talking to people was that they thought The Voice was some sort of trojan, that it was going to end up being something far more than just an advisory body. Also, people seemed to think it would do nothing to end Aboriginal disadvantage, particularly in remote areas.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 12:36:02
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2094737
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Witty Rejoinder said:


captain_spalding said:

Witty Rejoinder said:

It’s not up to me to explain to you how it would have worked. You explain to me what misunderstanding meant you voted no.

Who said i voted ‘no’?

So you voted yes to something you didn’t understand?

Perhaps.

Maybe i understood it better than most.

Maybe i was able to recognise what the right thing was, even if i didn’t fully understand why it was the right thing, and had to trust that it could be made to achieve the promised improvements.

Or, maybe i voted ‘no’.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 12:37:38
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094740
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

party_pants said:


Witty Rejoinder said:

captain_spalding said:

If it’s a straightforward matter, how about you set out your understanding of the way in which the Voice would be constituted, its roles, and the mechanisms by which it would achieve it’s desired purposes, and we can see whether or not that should have been enough to satisfy the voters?


It’s not up to me to explain to you how it would have worked. You explain to me what misunderstanding meant you voted no.

I live in an electorate that voted nearly 70% No. The feeling I got from talking to people was that they thought The Voice was some sort of trojan, that it was going to end up being something far more than just an advisory body. Also, people seemed to think it would do nothing to end Aboriginal disadvantage, particularly in remote areas.

The sheep can be more easily moved, as a flock.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 12:44:05
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094747
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

NT chief minister denies Woodside shares are a conflict of interest, amid growing scrutiny

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 12:47:41
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094750
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:


NT chief minister denies Woodside shares are a conflict of interest, amid growing scrutiny

Sorry about putting this here but this sort of thing really should be what politicians should be looking at.

Water stress pits beauty spot’s long-term residents against newcomers
ABC Gold Coast

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 12:57:14
From: Woodie
ID: 2094765
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Looks like Sir Humphrey is alive and well in Canberra these days.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-16/high-risk-infrastructure-project-funding-axed/103111144

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 13:01:05
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2094768
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Woodie said:


Looks like Sir Humphrey is alive and well in Canberra these days.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-16/high-risk-infrastructure-project-funding-axed/103111144

Could just be a minister actually listening to advice, rather than ignoring it in favour of promises made to good friends in the corporate world.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 13:05:36
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094774
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Woodie said:


Looks like Sir Humphrey is alive and well in Canberra these days.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-16/high-risk-infrastructure-project-funding-axed/103111144

He nailed it.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 13:10:26
From: buffy
ID: 2094775
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:


Witty Rejoinder said:

captain_spalding said:

The concept was simple, the mechanics were unknown.

What didn’t you understand?

If it’s a straightforward matter, how about you set out your understanding of the way in which the Voice would be constituted, its roles, and the mechanisms by which it would achieve it’s desired purposes, and we can see whether or not that should have been enough to satisfy the voters?

The question on the referendum was, paraphrased…How about we recognize that there were people living here before the Europeans came? And also, that our parliament sets up a system of getting their views on things that affect them specifically, but only in such a way that it is advice only. The fact that people seemed to want to know the workings suggests they think the parliamentarians – which we voted in – are not capable of coming up with legislation. That’s sort of odd really.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 13:13:03
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094776
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

buffy said:


captain_spalding said:

Witty Rejoinder said:

What didn’t you understand?

If it’s a straightforward matter, how about you set out your understanding of the way in which the Voice would be constituted, its roles, and the mechanisms by which it would achieve it’s desired purposes, and we can see whether or not that should have been enough to satisfy the voters?

The question on the referendum was, paraphrased…How about we recognize that there were people living here before the Europeans came? And also, that our parliament sets up a system of getting their views on things that affect them specifically, but only in such a way that it is advice only. The fact that people seemed to want to know the workings suggests they think the parliamentarians – which we voted in – are not capable of coming up with legislation. That’s sort of odd really.

It seems almost like a repeat of Terra nullius.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 13:15:17
From: buffy
ID: 2094778
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:


buffy said:

captain_spalding said:

If it’s a straightforward matter, how about you set out your understanding of the way in which the Voice would be constituted, its roles, and the mechanisms by which it would achieve it’s desired purposes, and we can see whether or not that should have been enough to satisfy the voters?

The question on the referendum was, paraphrased…How about we recognize that there were people living here before the Europeans came? And also, that our parliament sets up a system of getting their views on things that affect them specifically, but only in such a way that it is advice only. The fact that people seemed to want to know the workings suggests they think the parliamentarians – which we voted in – are not capable of coming up with legislation. That’s sort of odd really.

It seems almost like a repeat of Terra nullius.

It was supposed to be the final nail in that coffin.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 13:25:46
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094781
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

buffy said:


roughbarked said:

buffy said:

The question on the referendum was, paraphrased…How about we recognize that there were people living here before the Europeans came? And also, that our parliament sets up a system of getting their views on things that affect them specifically, but only in such a way that it is advice only. The fact that people seemed to want to know the workings suggests they think the parliamentarians – which we voted in – are not capable of coming up with legislation. That’s sort of odd really.

It seems almost like a repeat of Terra nullius.

It was supposed to be the final nail in that coffin.

:(

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 13:30:01
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094782
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:


buffy said:

roughbarked said:

It seems almost like a repeat of Terra nullius.

It was supposed to be the final nail in that coffin.

:(

Maybe people have noticed it about me or not but I cannot say I’m happy that the voice has been denied yet again.
Simple was how someone explained it and yes it was and always has been simple but yet it remains too complicated?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 13:32:24
From: party_pants
ID: 2094783
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

buffy said:


roughbarked said:

buffy said:

The question on the referendum was, paraphrased…How about we recognize that there were people living here before the Europeans came? And also, that our parliament sets up a system of getting their views on things that affect them specifically, but only in such a way that it is advice only. The fact that people seemed to want to know the workings suggests they think the parliamentarians – which we voted in – are not capable of coming up with legislation. That’s sort of odd really.

It seems almost like a repeat of Terra nullius.

It was supposed to be the final nail in that coffin.

The question was in two parts, I don’t think there is anyone who disagrees with the first part in acknowledging that some people were already living here when the first Europeans arrived. As I said, people I spoke to didn’t trust that this would be “advice only” in practice.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 13:34:42
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094785
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

party_pants said:


buffy said:

roughbarked said:

It seems almost like a repeat of Terra nullius.

It was supposed to be the final nail in that coffin.

The question was in two parts, I don’t think there is anyone who disagrees with the first part in acknowledging that some people were already living here when the first Europeans arrived. As I said, people I spoke to didn’t trust that this would be “advice only” in practice.

Yeah. Like they actually believed that the Abo’s want all their land back.
Erroneous even from the beginnings of our history in first contact with the local aborigine.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 13:39:44
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2094786
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:

party_pants said:

buffy said:

It was supposed to be the final nail in that coffin.

The question was in two parts, I don’t think there is anyone who disagrees with the first part in acknowledging that some people were already living here when the first Europeans arrived. As I said, people I spoke to didn’t trust that this would be “advice only” in practice.

Yeah. Like they actually believed that the Abo’s want all their land back.
Erroneous even from the beginnings of our history in first contact with the local aborigine.

Nah basically they didn’t want any advice to translate into action, theory into practice, all that¡

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 13:45:07
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094788
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

SCIENCE said:

roughbarked said:

party_pants said:

The question was in two parts, I don’t think there is anyone who disagrees with the first part in acknowledging that some people were already living here when the first Europeans arrived. As I said, people I spoke to didn’t trust that this would be “advice only” in practice.

Yeah. Like they actually believed that the Abo’s want all their land back.
Erroneous even from the beginnings of our history in first contact with the local aborigine.

Nah basically they didn’t want any advice to translate into action, theory into practice, all that¡

dickheads is what you are trying to say?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 13:49:38
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094790
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Anyway, I believe Australian politics should revolve around the multiple shire’s needs.
A living shoreline of saltmarsh and oyster beds is working to protect this town, naturally
ABC South East NSW
/ By James Tugwell

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 13:53:17
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094791
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:


Anyway, I believe Australian politics should revolve around the multiple shire’s needs.
A living shoreline of saltmarsh and oyster beds is working to protect this town, naturally
ABC South East NSW
/ By James Tugwell

People will do it. Show them the money trough and they’ll at least fill the form out to get the money.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 13:53:24
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2094792
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Woodie said:


Looks like Sir Humphrey is alive and well in Canberra these days.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-16/high-risk-infrastructure-project-funding-axed/103111144

“In a statement, Infrastructure and Transport Minister Catherine King said the government would focus its efforts on projects that would improve productivity and take pressure off inflation.”

I don’t know, I would have thought making electricity supply more sustainable would be worth some consideration as well.

(To be fiar, they did give “sustainability” a passing mention.)

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 13:54:47
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094793
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

The Rev Dodgson said:


Woodie said:

Looks like Sir Humphrey is alive and well in Canberra these days.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-16/high-risk-infrastructure-project-funding-axed/103111144

“In a statement, Infrastructure and Transport Minister Catherine King said the government would focus its efforts on projects that would improve productivity and take pressure off inflation.”

I don’t know, I would have thought making electricity supply more sustainable would be worth some consideration as well.

(To be fiar, they did give “sustainability” a passing mention.)

In exlpanation, they used the sus word.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 14:02:30
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2094795
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:

SCIENCE said:

roughbarked said:

Yeah. Like they actually believed that the Abo’s want all their land back.
Erroneous even from the beginnings of our history in first contact with the local aborigine.

Nah basically they didn’t want any advice to translate into action, theory into practice, all that¡

dickheads is what you are trying to say?

Right but we were trying to be polite,

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 14:12:37
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094798
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

and what are the pollies going to do about this?
Appliance rental store charges disability pensioner $6,760 for phone
7.30
/ By Raveen Hunjan and Lee Robinson
Posted 12m ago

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 14:14:53
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094801
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

SCIENCE said:

roughbarked said:

SCIENCE said:

Nah basically they didn’t want any advice to translate into action, theory into practice, all that¡

dickheads is what you are trying to say?

Right but we were trying to be polite,

link

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 14:34:17
From: PermeateFree
ID: 2094820
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:


NT chief minister denies Woodside shares are a conflict of interest, amid growing scrutiny

LOL

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 14:39:27
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2094822
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:


captain_spalding said:

JudgeMental said:

I think it showed how racist and ignorant a lot of australians are. so much for their easy going nature. lol.

I think a lot of them just wanted to know what they were voting for, how it would actually work, etc. There was a strong whiff of ‘now, just don’t you worry about that’ around it, as if the government didn’t really know, either.

This.. was quite obvious. In an absence of understanding what the oldest living race of humans actually want.

like I said, ignorant. the info was all out there. people couldn’t be arsed to read it. much easier to believe the racist shit that aligned more with their views. I saw it on lots of FB posts.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 14:40:24
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094824
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

JudgeMental said:


roughbarked said:

captain_spalding said:

I think a lot of them just wanted to know what they were voting for, how it would actually work, etc. There was a strong whiff of ‘now, just don’t you worry about that’ around it, as if the government didn’t really know, either.

This.. was quite obvious. In an absence of understanding what the oldest living race of humans actually want.

like I said, ignorant. the info was all out there. people couldn’t be arsed to read it. much easier to believe the racist shit that aligned more with their views. I saw it on lots of FB posts.

Exactamundo.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 14:42:33
From: roughbarked
ID: 2094826
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

JudgeMental said:


roughbarked said:

captain_spalding said:

I think a lot of them just wanted to know what they were voting for, how it would actually work, etc. There was a strong whiff of ‘now, just don’t you worry about that’ around it, as if the government didn’t really know, either.

This.. was quite obvious. In an absence of understanding what the oldest living race of humans actually want.

like I said, ignorant. the info was all out there. people couldn’t be arsed to read it. much easier to believe the racist shit that aligned more with their views. I saw it on lots of FB posts.

I didn’t need FB to see because it exists all around me. I am actually an island in a big pile of poo.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 19:19:07
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2094918
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Apparently Labor has agreed to Dutton’s amendments to the detention bill.
Good one Pete

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 19:21:27
From: Cymek
ID: 2094921
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Peak Warming Man said:


Apparently Labor has agreed to Dutton’s amendments to the detention bill.
Good one Pete

White Australia policy II – Rich Whities only thanks

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 19:23:09
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2094923
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Suth Africa have won the toss and will bat first

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 19:24:12
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2094925
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Peak Warming Man said:


Suth Africa have won the toss and will bat first

I’m tired.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 19:26:50
From: wookiemeister
ID: 2094927
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Cymek said:


Peak Warming Man said:

Apparently Labor has agreed to Dutton’s amendments to the detention bill.
Good one Pete

White Australia policy II – Rich Whities only thanks


They could start dishing out machetes and rocks to the communities in Australia to make things more like home I suppose. There’s a widow burning on next week

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 20:28:16
From: buffy
ID: 2094966
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

I hadn’t put this together, but Annabel did…

>>The shocking release of convicted criminals that so enrages Mr Dutton came about because the longstanding practice of indefinite detention (pioneered by the Coalition) was overturned by a High Court dominated by appointees of … the Coalition.<<

From here

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 20:50:58
From: dv
ID: 2094989
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

buffy said:


I hadn’t put this together, but Annabel did…

>>The shocking release of convicted criminals that so enrages Mr Dutton came about because the longstanding practice of indefinite detention (pioneered by the Coalition) was overturned by a High Court dominated by appointees of … the Coalition.<<

From here

Cool

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 20:52:31
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2094990
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:


buffy said:

I hadn’t put this together, but Annabel did…

>>The shocking release of convicted criminals that so enrages Mr Dutton came about because the longstanding practice of indefinite detention (pioneered by the Coalition) was overturned by a High Court dominated by appointees of … the Coalition.<<

From here

Cool

Just like in America.

It’s bloody infuriating when people do the jobs that you appointed them to do.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2023 22:00:54
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2095022
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

“Plans for the 2032 Brisbane Olympics will be significantly impacted by federal Labor’s “outrageous” infrastructure cuts, the Queensland government says.”

The minister should resign and the Olympic ambassador should be recalled.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/11/2023 12:19:24
From: sarahs mum
ID: 2095134
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

bloody Murdoch.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/11/2023 12:45:24
From: sarahs mum
ID: 2095136
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Independent Member for Clark, Andrew Wilkie, asked Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus KC the following in Question Time. Please see above for full question and response.

“Attorney given the catastrophic failings with DNA testing in Queensland and other alarming forensic failures like Keogh in South Australia, Eastman in the ACT and Neill-Fraser in Tasmania;

“…will you take the lead and work with the states and territories to improve and harmonise Australia’s forensic services to restore trust in our criminal justice system?

“This would include reviewing the National Institute of Forensic Science and the National Association of Testing Authorities.”

https://andrewwilkie.org/2023/11/forensic-services-need-their-own-forensic-going-over/

Reply Quote

Date: 17/11/2023 13:04:52
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2095147
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

sarahs mum said:


bloody Murdoch.

So what’s he done now to upset poor old roopert?

Met up with lots of overseas leaders?

Reply Quote

Date: 17/11/2023 13:09:36
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2095148
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

The Rev Dodgson said:


sarahs mum said:

bloody Murdoch.

So what’s he done now to upset poor old roopert?

Met up with lots of overseas leaders?

and I have just learned that Sky News Australia is a totally separate entity from Sky News UK.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/11/2023 14:15:05
From: dv
ID: 2095176
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Here is the list of road and rail projects that lost federal funding in the recent review.


NSW
Blaxland Road/Balaclava Road intersection improvements
Bruxner Highway – Wollongbar to Goonellabah
Commuter carpark upgrade – T1 North Shore, Northern and Western Line – Kingswood
Commuter carpark upgrade – T1 North Shore, Northern and Western Line – St Marys
Commuter carpark upgrade – Woy Woy
Great Western Highway upgrade – Katoomba to Lithgow. Construction of east and west sections
Gwydir Highway improvements – planning
M7-M12 interchange
Mulgoa Road stage 2
Northern NSW inland port – Narrabri
Oxley Highway stage 2 – planning
Remembrance Driveway corridor upgrade – Camden Council
Southern Connector Road, Jindabyne
Sydney to Newcastle – Tuggerah-Wyong faster rail upgrade
Toowoomba to Seymour – Moree intermodal overpass
Werrington Arterial stage 2 – planning
Western City Road Transport Network Development – planning

—-

Some key disappoints there would be the Moree overpass, and the inland port facilities at Narrabri. Some GHGs would be saved by the latter. I can understand the axing of the Newcastle speed up since they are building a high speed rail link anyway.

—-


QLD

Beenleigh Station commuter carpark, Beenleigh
Emu Swamp Dam supporting infrastructure, Stanthorpe
High Road and Easterly Street, Waterford, upgrade
Kenmore roundabout upgrade
Loganlea Station commuter carpark
Mooloolah River interchange upgrade (packages 1 and 2)
New England Highway upgrade, Cabarlah
Nicklin Way-Third Avenue connection, Caloundra
Tennant Creek to Townsville corridor upgrade – Dingo Park Road intersection upgrade

—-

Bits and bobs, seems Qld got off lightly.

—-


Victoria
Business Case for Melbourne inland rail intermodal terminal
Calder Freeway-Gap Road to the M80 ring road
Camberwell Road / Monteath Avenue / Redern Road intersection upgrade
Frankston to Baxter rail upgrade
Geelong fast rail
Goulburn Valley Highway-Shepparton bypass stage 1
Improving connectivity to Port of Melbourne – business case
McKoy Street – Hume Freeway intersection upgrade
Mornington Peninsula Freeway upgrade
Rutherglen heavy vehicle alternative route
Victorian faster rail corridor investigations
Western Freeway Upgrade – M80 Ring Road to Ferris Road

—-


Geelong fast rail is a disappointment.
Not sure what they mean by saying they are not funding the business case for the Inland Rail Intermodal terminal… I assume the thing is still getting built .

—-


South Australia
Hahndorf Township improvements and access upgrade
Main South Road productivity package
Old Belair Road upgrade, Mitcham
Onkaparinga Valley Road-Tiers Road-Nairne Road intersection upgrade
Truro bypass

Western Australia
Future road and rail connections to Perth
Great Southern secondary freight network
Marble Bar Road upgrade
Moorine Rock to Mt Holland Road upgrades
Pinjarra Heavy Haulage Deviation – stages 1 and 2

Tasmania
Old Surrey Road/Massy-Greene Drive upgrade

Australian Capital Territory
Inner Canberra corridor planning package

Northern Territory
No projects

Reply Quote

Date: 17/11/2023 14:26:03
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2095183
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:


Here is the list of road and rail projects that lost federal funding in the recent review.


NSW
Blaxland Road/Balaclava Road intersection improvements
Bruxner Highway – Wollongbar to Goonellabah
Commuter carpark upgrade – T1 North Shore, Northern and Western Line – Kingswood
Commuter carpark upgrade – T1 North Shore, Northern and Western Line – St Marys
Commuter carpark upgrade – Woy Woy
Great Western Highway upgrade – Katoomba to Lithgow. Construction of east and west sections
Gwydir Highway improvements – planning
M7-M12 interchange
Mulgoa Road stage 2
Northern NSW inland port – Narrabri
Oxley Highway stage 2 – planning
Remembrance Driveway corridor upgrade – Camden Council
Southern Connector Road, Jindabyne
Sydney to Newcastle – Tuggerah-Wyong faster rail upgrade
Toowoomba to Seymour – Moree intermodal overpass
Werrington Arterial stage 2 – planning
Western City Road Transport Network Development – planning

—-

Some key disappoints there would be the Moree overpass, and the inland port facilities at Narrabri. Some GHGs would be saved by the latter. I can understand the axing of the Newcastle speed up since they are building a high speed rail link anyway.

—-


QLD

Beenleigh Station commuter carpark, Beenleigh
Emu Swamp Dam supporting infrastructure, Stanthorpe
High Road and Easterly Street, Waterford, upgrade
Kenmore roundabout upgrade
Loganlea Station commuter carpark
Mooloolah River interchange upgrade (packages 1 and 2)
New England Highway upgrade, Cabarlah
Nicklin Way-Third Avenue connection, Caloundra
Tennant Creek to Townsville corridor upgrade – Dingo Park Road intersection upgrade

—-

Bits and bobs, seems Qld got off lightly.

—-


Victoria
Business Case for Melbourne inland rail intermodal terminal
Calder Freeway-Gap Road to the M80 ring road
Camberwell Road / Monteath Avenue / Redern Road intersection upgrade
Frankston to Baxter rail upgrade
Geelong fast rail
Goulburn Valley Highway-Shepparton bypass stage 1
Improving connectivity to Port of Melbourne – business case
McKoy Street – Hume Freeway intersection upgrade
Mornington Peninsula Freeway upgrade
Rutherglen heavy vehicle alternative route
Victorian faster rail corridor investigations
Western Freeway Upgrade – M80 Ring Road to Ferris Road

—-


Geelong fast rail is a disappointment.
Not sure what they mean by saying they are not funding the business case for the Inland Rail Intermodal terminal… I assume the thing is still getting built .

—-


South Australia
Hahndorf Township improvements and access upgrade
Main South Road productivity package
Old Belair Road upgrade, Mitcham
Onkaparinga Valley Road-Tiers Road-Nairne Road intersection upgrade
Truro bypass

Western Australia
Future road and rail connections to Perth
Great Southern secondary freight network
Marble Bar Road upgrade
Moorine Rock to Mt Holland Road upgrades
Pinjarra Heavy Haulage Deviation – stages 1 and 2

Tasmania
Old Surrey Road/Massy-Greene Drive upgrade

Australian Capital Territory
Inner Canberra corridor planning package

Northern Territory
No projects

“I can understand the axing of the Newcastle speed up since they are building a high speed rail link anyway.”

Didn’t know that.

To be extended to Wollongong I trust.

Am I right in thinking this review was done by an independent group, and they are not actually reducing infrastructure spending?

Reply Quote

Date: 17/11/2023 14:30:21
From: dv
ID: 2095184
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

The Rev Dodgson said:


dv said:

Here is the list of road and rail projects that lost federal funding in the recent review.


NSW
Blaxland Road/Balaclava Road intersection improvements
Bruxner Highway – Wollongbar to Goonellabah
Commuter carpark upgrade – T1 North Shore, Northern and Western Line – Kingswood
Commuter carpark upgrade – T1 North Shore, Northern and Western Line – St Marys
Commuter carpark upgrade – Woy Woy
Great Western Highway upgrade – Katoomba to Lithgow. Construction of east and west sections
Gwydir Highway improvements – planning
M7-M12 interchange
Mulgoa Road stage 2
Northern NSW inland port – Narrabri
Oxley Highway stage 2 – planning
Remembrance Driveway corridor upgrade – Camden Council
Southern Connector Road, Jindabyne
Sydney to Newcastle – Tuggerah-Wyong faster rail upgrade
Toowoomba to Seymour – Moree intermodal overpass
Werrington Arterial stage 2 – planning
Western City Road Transport Network Development – planning

—-

Some key disappoints there would be the Moree overpass, and the inland port facilities at Narrabri. Some GHGs would be saved by the latter. I can understand the axing of the Newcastle speed up since they are building a high speed rail link anyway.

—-


QLD

Beenleigh Station commuter carpark, Beenleigh
Emu Swamp Dam supporting infrastructure, Stanthorpe
High Road and Easterly Street, Waterford, upgrade
Kenmore roundabout upgrade
Loganlea Station commuter carpark
Mooloolah River interchange upgrade (packages 1 and 2)
New England Highway upgrade, Cabarlah
Nicklin Way-Third Avenue connection, Caloundra
Tennant Creek to Townsville corridor upgrade – Dingo Park Road intersection upgrade

—-

Bits and bobs, seems Qld got off lightly.

—-


Victoria
Business Case for Melbourne inland rail intermodal terminal
Calder Freeway-Gap Road to the M80 ring road
Camberwell Road / Monteath Avenue / Redern Road intersection upgrade
Frankston to Baxter rail upgrade
Geelong fast rail
Goulburn Valley Highway-Shepparton bypass stage 1
Improving connectivity to Port of Melbourne – business case
McKoy Street – Hume Freeway intersection upgrade
Mornington Peninsula Freeway upgrade
Rutherglen heavy vehicle alternative route
Victorian faster rail corridor investigations
Western Freeway Upgrade – M80 Ring Road to Ferris Road

—-


Geelong fast rail is a disappointment.
Not sure what they mean by saying they are not funding the business case for the Inland Rail Intermodal terminal… I assume the thing is still getting built .

—-


South Australia
Hahndorf Township improvements and access upgrade
Main South Road productivity package
Old Belair Road upgrade, Mitcham
Onkaparinga Valley Road-Tiers Road-Nairne Road intersection upgrade
Truro bypass

Western Australia
Future road and rail connections to Perth
Great Southern secondary freight network
Marble Bar Road upgrade
Moorine Rock to Mt Holland Road upgrades
Pinjarra Heavy Haulage Deviation – stages 1 and 2

Tasmania
Old Surrey Road/Massy-Greene Drive upgrade

Australian Capital Territory
Inner Canberra corridor planning package

Northern Territory
No projects

“I can understand the axing of the Newcastle speed up since they are building a high speed rail link anyway.”

Didn’t know that.

To be extended to Wollongong I trust.

Am I right in thinking this review was done by an independent group, and they are not actually reducing infrastructure spending?

You are wrong in thinking that. This was a review by the Federal government and the loss of funding amounts to $12 billion.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/11/2023 14:43:20
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2095189
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

dv said:

Here is the list of road and rail projects that lost federal funding in the recent review.


NSW
Blaxland Road/Balaclava Road intersection improvements
Bruxner Highway – Wollongbar to Goonellabah
Commuter carpark upgrade – T1 North Shore, Northern and Western Line – Kingswood
Commuter carpark upgrade – T1 North Shore, Northern and Western Line – St Marys
Commuter carpark upgrade – Woy Woy
Great Western Highway upgrade – Katoomba to Lithgow. Construction of east and west sections
Gwydir Highway improvements – planning
M7-M12 interchange
Mulgoa Road stage 2
Northern NSW inland port – Narrabri
Oxley Highway stage 2 – planning
Remembrance Driveway corridor upgrade – Camden Council
Southern Connector Road, Jindabyne
Sydney to Newcastle – Tuggerah-Wyong faster rail upgrade
Toowoomba to Seymour – Moree intermodal overpass
Werrington Arterial stage 2 – planning
Western City Road Transport Network Development – planning

—-

Some key disappoints there would be the Moree overpass, and the inland port facilities at Narrabri. Some GHGs would be saved by the latter. I can understand the axing of the Newcastle speed up since they are building a high speed rail link anyway.

—-


QLD

Beenleigh Station commuter carpark, Beenleigh
Emu Swamp Dam supporting infrastructure, Stanthorpe
High Road and Easterly Street, Waterford, upgrade
Kenmore roundabout upgrade
Loganlea Station commuter carpark
Mooloolah River interchange upgrade (packages 1 and 2)
New England Highway upgrade, Cabarlah
Nicklin Way-Third Avenue connection, Caloundra
Tennant Creek to Townsville corridor upgrade – Dingo Park Road intersection upgrade

—-

Bits and bobs, seems Qld got off lightly.

—-


Victoria
Business Case for Melbourne inland rail intermodal terminal
Calder Freeway-Gap Road to the M80 ring road
Camberwell Road / Monteath Avenue / Redern Road intersection upgrade
Frankston to Baxter rail upgrade
Geelong fast rail
Goulburn Valley Highway-Shepparton bypass stage 1
Improving connectivity to Port of Melbourne – business case
McKoy Street – Hume Freeway intersection upgrade
Mornington Peninsula Freeway upgrade
Rutherglen heavy vehicle alternative route
Victorian faster rail corridor investigations
Western Freeway Upgrade – M80 Ring Road to Ferris Road

—-


Geelong fast rail is a disappointment.
Not sure what they mean by saying they are not funding the business case for the Inland Rail Intermodal terminal… I assume the thing is still getting built .

—-


South Australia
Hahndorf Township improvements and access upgrade
Main South Road productivity package
Old Belair Road upgrade, Mitcham
Onkaparinga Valley Road-Tiers Road-Nairne Road intersection upgrade
Truro bypass

Western Australia
Future road and rail connections to Perth
Great Southern secondary freight network
Marble Bar Road upgrade
Moorine Rock to Mt Holland Road upgrades
Pinjarra Heavy Haulage Deviation – stages 1 and 2

Tasmania
Old Surrey Road/Massy-Greene Drive upgrade

Australian Capital Territory
Inner Canberra corridor planning package

Northern Territory
No projects

“I can understand the axing of the Newcastle speed up since they are building a high speed rail link anyway.”

Didn’t know that.

To be extended to Wollongong I trust.

Am I right in thinking this review was done by an independent group, and they are not actually reducing infrastructure spending?

You are wrong in thinking that. This was a review by the Federal government and the loss of funding amounts to $12 billion.

OK, so the independent bit was just my assumption that the review would be done by some public service body.

But I’m sure I read somewhere that the money would be diverted into other infrastructure projects.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/11/2023 14:51:56
From: dv
ID: 2095193
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

The Rev Dodgson said:


dv said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

“I can understand the axing of the Newcastle speed up since they are building a high speed rail link anyway.”

Didn’t know that.

To be extended to Wollongong I trust.

Am I right in thinking this review was done by an independent group, and they are not actually reducing infrastructure spending?

You are wrong in thinking that. This was a review by the Federal government and the loss of funding amounts to $12 billion.

OK, so the independent bit was just my assumption that the review would be done by some public service body.

But I’m sure I read somewhere that the money would be diverted into other infrastructure projects.

I misread your question, they have indicated that there will be no reduction in infrastructure spending.

However, other comments seem to indicate that these changes will reduce future increases? Otherwise, for instance, the following makes no sense.

“The review, unveiled by Infrastructure Minister Catherine King in Canberra on Thursday, found the former government’s approach did not reflect “current market capacity”, given infrastructure expenditure is projected to continue growing. “

Reply Quote

Date: 17/11/2023 14:56:07
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2095194
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

dv said:

You are wrong in thinking that. This was a review by the Federal government and the loss of funding amounts to $12 billion.

OK, so the independent bit was just my assumption that the review would be done by some public service body.

But I’m sure I read somewhere that the money would be diverted into other infrastructure projects.

I misread your question, they have indicated that there will be no reduction in infrastructure spending.

However, other comments seem to indicate that these changes will reduce future increases? Otherwise, for instance, the following makes no sense.

“The review, unveiled by Infrastructure Minister Catherine King in Canberra on Thursday, found the former government’s approach did not reflect “current market capacity”, given infrastructure expenditure is projected to continue growing. “

Oh well.

They will have to increase infrastructure spending, and increase taxes, soon enough to do all the stuff that needs to be donne to reduce GHG emissions.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/11/2023 15:06:27
From: dv
ID: 2095196
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

The Rev Dodgson said:


dv said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

OK, so the independent bit was just my assumption that the review would be done by some public service body.

But I’m sure I read somewhere that the money would be diverted into other infrastructure projects.

I misread your question, they have indicated that there will be no reduction in infrastructure spending.

However, other comments seem to indicate that these changes will reduce future increases? Otherwise, for instance, the following makes no sense.

“The review, unveiled by Infrastructure Minister Catherine King in Canberra on Thursday, found the former government’s approach did not reflect “current market capacity”, given infrastructure expenditure is projected to continue growing. “

Oh well.

They will have to increase infrastructure spending, and increase taxes, soon enough to do all the stuff that needs to be donne to reduce GHG emissions.

They still haven’t really addressed the fact that federal revenue is not well-linked to growth.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/11/2023 15:15:35
From: sarahs mum
ID: 2095198
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Undoing His Legacy

friendlyjordies

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twUp9B4pQEk

Reply Quote

Date: 17/11/2023 15:18:37
From: sarahs mum
ID: 2095200
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

sarahs mum said:


Undoing His Legacy

friendlyjordies

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twUp9B4pQEk

@hebonky7495
10 minutes ago
Calling sky news “performance art” is a little bit too generous.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/11/2023 15:21:15
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2095201
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

sarahs mum said:


sarahs mum said:

Undoing His Legacy

friendlyjordies

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twUp9B4pQEk

@hebonky7495
10 minutes ago
Calling sky news “performance art” is a little bit too generous.

I’d call Sky News “base propaganda at its most shitty and shameless”.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/11/2023 15:49:48
From: roughbarked
ID: 2095211
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Narrabri inland port. Is that the name of a wine?

Reply Quote

Date: 17/11/2023 16:32:31
From: dv
ID: 2095230
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:


Narrabri inland port. Is that the name of a wine?

Most amusing

Reply Quote

Date: 17/11/2023 16:38:37
From: dv
ID: 2095235
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

There is a by election in the division of Mulgrave tomorrow to elect replace Dan Andrews. Shouldn’t be particularly close.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/11/2023 16:50:46
From: roughbarked
ID: 2095244
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:


roughbarked said:

Narrabri inland port. Is that the name of a wine?

Most amusing

It pleases me that you thought so.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/11/2023 18:31:57
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2095281
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

QUT claims the suitability assessment is based on the Queensland Public Service Commission’s hiring strategy.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-17/qut-defends-removing-merit-from-hiring-policy/103114562

So maybe we’re idiots but of all the possible stakeholders,

The ABC attempted to reach the QUT Liberal National Club and Young LNP for comment.

why the fuck these specific¿

Reply Quote

Date: 17/11/2023 22:20:12
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2095337
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

SCIENCE said:

QUT claims the suitability assessment is based on the Queensland Public Service Commission’s hiring strategy.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-17/qut-defends-removing-merit-from-hiring-policy/103114562

So maybe we’re idiots but of all the possible stakeholders,

The ABC attempted to reach the QUT Liberal National Club and Young LNP for comment.

why the fuck these specific¿

So Nobody Knows What A Surprise

Reply Quote

Date: 17/11/2023 22:53:51
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2095346
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Reply Quote

Date: 18/11/2023 00:31:05
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2095350
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

SCIENCE said:


“Australia is now looking to jail the first person in relation to war crimes in Afghanistan, except it is not a war criminal but a person who helped expose them.”

Reply Quote

Date: 18/11/2023 04:53:37
From: Michael V
ID: 2095357
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

SCIENCE said:

SCIENCE said:

QUT claims the suitability assessment is based on the Queensland Public Service Commission’s hiring strategy.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-17/qut-defends-removing-merit-from-hiring-policy/103114562

So maybe we’re idiots but of all the possible stakeholders,

The ABC attempted to reach the QUT Liberal National Club and Young LNP for comment.

why the fuck these specific¿

So Nobody Knows What A Surprise

To try to stir up controversy?

Reply Quote

Date: 18/11/2023 05:18:04
From: Michael V
ID: 2095359
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

SCIENCE said:

SCIENCE said:


“Australia is now looking to jail the first person in relation to war crimes in Afghanistan, except it is not a war criminal but a person who helped expose them.”

Yeah.

:( :( :( :(

Reply Quote

Date: 18/11/2023 05:53:18
From: roughbarked
ID: 2095360
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Michael V said:


SCIENCE said:

SCIENCE said:


“Australia is now looking to jail the first person in relation to war crimes in Afghanistan, except it is not a war criminal but a person who helped expose them.”

Yeah.

:( :( :( :(

?
So we let the detainees out and jail the whistleblowers?

Reply Quote

Date: 18/11/2023 08:30:15
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2095379
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:

Michael V said:

SCIENCE said:

“Australia is now looking to jail the first person in relation to war crimes in Afghanistan, except it is not a war criminal but a person who helped expose them.”

Yeah.

:( :( :( :(

?
So we let the detainees out and jail the whistleblowers?

As long as you
Don’t rock the boat
You can stop them
All you like

Reply Quote

Date: 18/11/2023 08:40:11
From: roughbarked
ID: 2095381
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

I note that before they lost the election, “We are the best financial managers” after the election it is “Coalitiion seats face the biggest funding cuts”. So in reality it was all pork barrelling with money they didn’t have.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/11/2023 09:15:45
From: Michael V
ID: 2095385
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Bloody!

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-18/confusion-over-high-court-indefinite-detention-ruling-response/103119836

Reply Quote

Date: 18/11/2023 12:26:16
From: dv
ID: 2095442
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-17/fact-check-airbus-albo-international-trips-coalition/103113758

Ahead of this week’s APEC summit in San Francisco, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese faced stinging criticism for elevating his supposed penchant for international travel above solving domestic issues.

Coalition efforts to paint Mr Albanese as ‘Airbus Albo’ began within five weeks of the 2022 election, as the newly sworn-in prime minister was planning to make his third rapid-fire overseas visit.

So, how does he compare to other recent PMs?

Including his current jaunt, Mr Albanese’s tally of overseas prime ministerial trips has risen to 18 since he was elected roughly 18 months ago.

That nudges him slightly ahead of former prime ministers Scott Morrison (17 trips) and Tony Abbott (16) at the same point in their tenure.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/11/2023 12:34:18
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2095445
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:


https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-17/fact-check-airbus-albo-international-trips-coalition/103113758

Ahead of this week’s APEC summit in San Francisco, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese faced stinging criticism for elevating his supposed penchant for international travel above solving domestic issues.

Coalition efforts to paint Mr Albanese as ‘Airbus Albo’ began within five weeks of the 2022 election, as the newly sworn-in prime minister was planning to make his third rapid-fire overseas visit.

So, how does he compare to other recent PMs?

Including his current jaunt, Mr Albanese’s tally of overseas prime ministerial trips has risen to 18 since he was elected roughly 18 months ago.

That nudges him slightly ahead of former prime ministers Scott Morrison (17 trips) and Tony Abbott (16) at the same point in their tenure.


I remember back in the 1970s when Whitlam was accused of the same thing, by much the same sorts of people and media.

I wonder if George Christensen still the chief seat warmer on airliners between Australia and the Philippines, now that he’s not in Parliament?

Reply Quote

Date: 18/11/2023 18:15:58
From: sarahs mum
ID: 2095509
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

If you have a go, do you get a go?
And speaking of frustration, the former prime minister Scott Morrison is bored of sitting on the backbench and feels as if he has done his time in silence – so you’ll be hearing a lot more from him from now on. Sources close to Morrison say his exit from politics is shelved for the time being. The private sector has not exactly been beating down his door and the speaking circuit has a full roster of former leaders wanting to inform well-paying guests how they’d respond to global and domestic issues. Not only has the New Daily noted his increased profile in recent weeks, Dutton was photographed chatting to his predecessor in the chamber on Thursday. This is the political version of a hard launch.

But the biggest sign Morrison feels he has done his penance isn’t in the media interviews, the tour de regret documentaries or the brotherhood of the travelling former prime ministers – it’s in his question time interjections. Morrison has gone from silent and glued to his iPhone with his head stuck in papers to heckling while glued to his iPhone with his head stuck in papers.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/nov/18/the-week-in-parliament-political-debate-sinks-to-new-lows-as-scott-morrison-begins-hard-relaunch

Reply Quote

Date: 18/11/2023 18:16:57
From: sarahs mum
ID: 2095510
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Reply Quote

Date: 18/11/2023 18:39:39
From: Michael V
ID: 2095514
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

sarahs mum said:



LOLOLOLOL

Reply Quote

Date: 18/11/2023 19:14:36
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2095523
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

sarahs mum said:

‘…former leaders wanting to inform well-paying guests how they’d respond to global and domestic issues.’

‘How would you respond to a major domestic emergency?’

Go on holiday to somewhere nice.

How would you react to a global crisis, impacting populations around the world?

Get on a tax-payer funded air force jet and go to Europe to do some digging into my family tree. And some shopping.

Yeah, nah, who else has the agency got?

Reply Quote

Date: 19/11/2023 11:27:00
From: sarahs mum
ID: 2095655
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Those who support mutual obligations, which includes successive governments, have stood by the system amid criticism.

“There is strong international and Australian evidence that mutual obligation requirements speed entry into employment,” the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations wrote in a submission to a parliamentary inquiry earlier this year.

“ also help target income support payments to those who are genuinely unable to support themselves.”

However, others say mutual obligations are a stressor that often lowers job search capability.

“There are questions about whether this system … actually helps people find work, because there’s evidence mounting ,” Dr Klein said.

Research has suggested those doing mutual obligations can take longer to become re-employed and spend less time in employment compared to those not doing mutual obligations — and if they did find work, it was in comparatively “lower quality” jobs.

When mutual obligations were temporarily lifted at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, a survey of JobSeeker recipients indicated they were able to interact more meaningfully with the labour market.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-19/factors-impacting-unemployment/103048120

Reply Quote

Date: 19/11/2023 12:04:30
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2095668
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Hey serious question which we notify in advance, but something we in our lack of intellect aren’t quite understanding.

Earlier in court, McBride’s defence was that the over-investigation, as he saw it, of special forces soldiers in Afghanistan may have been illegal. He believed he had a duty to disclose information in the public interest because of the oath he swore to the queen when he joined the military.

So was this guy raising concerns that war crimes may have been committed and the investigations were strongly suggesting that was the case,

or was this guy raising concerns that investigations for war crimes were excessive and we shouldn’t be looking for evidence of war crimes¿

Reply Quote

Date: 19/11/2023 14:22:21
From: buffy
ID: 2095730
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

I’m not really sure if this should be in this thread. But…the numbers are vastly different at the marches and picnics being held here around the Gaza situation.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-19/pro-palestinian-pro-israeli-rallies-across-australia/103123204

And while I think of it…when this started, there were quite a lot of Gazans at work over the border in Israel who were not able to return home. I wonder how they have been faring – in some ways they also are hostages.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/11/2023 14:43:52
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2095742
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

buffy said:

I’m not really sure if this should be in this thread. But…the numbers are vastly different at the marches and picnics being held here around the Gaza situation.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-19/pro-palestinian-pro-israeli-rallies-across-australia/103123204

And while I think of it…when this started, there were quite a lot of Gazans at work over the border in Israel who were not able to return home. I wonder how they have been faring – in some ways they also are hostages.

Paid hostages¿

Reply Quote

Date: 19/11/2023 17:45:55
From: buffy
ID: 2095782
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

SCIENCE said:

buffy said:

I’m not really sure if this should be in this thread. But…the numbers are vastly different at the marches and picnics being held here around the Gaza situation.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-19/pro-palestinian-pro-israeli-rallies-across-australia/103123204

And while I think of it…when this started, there were quite a lot of Gazans at work over the border in Israel who were not able to return home. I wonder how they have been faring – in some ways they also are hostages.

Paid hostages¿

Well, last I saw in the news, a day or so after the raids of the music festival and kibbutz, they had been put into a hall somewhere. Like gathered up from the work sites and put into a hall.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/11/2023 18:30:26
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2095784
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

buffy said:

SCIENCE said:

buffy said:

I’m not really sure if this should be in this thread. But…the numbers are vastly different at the marches and picnics being held here around the Gaza situation.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-19/pro-palestinian-pro-israeli-rallies-across-australia/103123204

And while I think of it…when this started, there were quite a lot of Gazans at work over the border in Israel who were not able to return home. I wonder how they have been faring – in some ways they also are hostages.

Paid hostages¿

Well, last I saw in the news, a day or so after the raids of the music festival and kibbutz, they had been put into a hall somewhere. Like gathered up from the work sites and put into a hall.

Ah, internment then, we hadn’t heard this time around but sounds bad.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/11/2023 18:45:39
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2095787
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

SCIENCE said:

buffy said:

SCIENCE said:

Paid hostages¿

Well, last I saw in the news, a day or so after the raids of the music festival and kibbutz, they had been put into a hall somewhere. Like gathered up from the work sites and put into a hall.

Ah, internment then, we hadn’t heard this time around but sounds bad.

Possibly some concern for their safety mixed in there, too.

Being a Palestinian ‘on the loose’ in an Israeli town would NOT have been the safest identity in the immediate aftermath of the Hamas attack.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/11/2023 18:57:16
From: Michael V
ID: 2095796
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:


SCIENCE said:

buffy said:

Well, last I saw in the news, a day or so after the raids of the music festival and kibbutz, they had been put into a hall somewhere. Like gathered up from the work sites and put into a hall.

Ah, internment then, we hadn’t heard this time around but sounds bad.

Possibly some concern for their safety mixed in there, too.

Being a Palestinian ‘on the loose’ in an Israeli town would NOT have been the safest identity in the immediate aftermath of the Hamas attack.

Agree.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/11/2023 18:58:31
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2095798
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:

SCIENCE said:

buffy said:

Well, last I saw in the news, a day or so after the raids of the music festival and kibbutz, they had been put into a hall somewhere. Like gathered up from the work sites and put into a hall.

Ah, internment then, we hadn’t heard this time around but sounds bad.

Possibly some concern for their safety mixed in there, too.

Being a Palestinian ‘on the loose’ in an Israeli town would NOT have been the safest identity in the immediate aftermath of the Hamas attack.

Possibly, there must be some propaganda value in showing the world how well you’re treating your captives in contrast to your opponents, surely.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/11/2023 07:34:16
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2095968
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Ain’t Got Nothin’ On Hamas

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-20/nsw-sydney-new-complex-motorway-rozelle-interchange/103103666

But Still Plenty Of People Condemning WasteConnex

Reply Quote

Date: 20/11/2023 07:40:19
From: roughbarked
ID: 2095970
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

SCIENCE said:

Ain’t Got Nothin’ On Hamas

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-20/nsw-sydney-new-complex-motorway-rozelle-interchange/103103666

But Still Plenty Of People Condemning WasteConnex

Send Israel in to bomb it.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/11/2023 07:47:13
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2095972
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

SCIENCE said:

Ain’t Got Nothin’ On Hamas

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-20/nsw-sydney-new-complex-motorway-rozelle-interchange/103103666

But Still Plenty Of People Condemning WasteConnex

“In total, about 20,000 construction workers have been involved in the project since building began four years ago.”

If they counted the people who sit on their arse and play with a computer, that includes me.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/11/2023 08:42:04
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2095977
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Good News¡ Supply Problems Solved¡

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-20/job-ads-dive-in-australia-s-most-populous-states/103119460

by decreasing demand

The Economy Must Grown¡

Reply Quote

Date: 20/11/2023 08:44:23
From: roughbarked
ID: 2095979
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

SCIENCE said:

Good News¡ Supply Problems Solved¡

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-20/job-ads-dive-in-australia-s-most-populous-states/103119460

by decreasing demand

The Economy Must Groan¡

Fixed.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/11/2023 08:46:55
From: roughbarked
ID: 2095980
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

In short:
•A new report argues Australian private schools are overfunded by $800 million this year while there is a funding shortfall of $4.5 billion for public schools.
•The Australian Education Union says not one of Tasmania’s public schools receives what governments have agreed is the minimum level of funding, and all of its private schools are overfunded.
•What’s next? The Australian Education Union says Tasmania’s educational performance — which lags other states — will not increase without proper funding of public schools.

Report reveals growing funding divide between the haves and have-nots across the nation’s education system

Reply Quote

Date: 20/11/2023 08:54:36
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2095981
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:


In short:
•A new report argues Australian private schools are overfunded by $800 million this year while there is a funding shortfall of $4.5 billion for public schools.
•The Australian Education Union says not one of Tasmania’s public schools receives what governments have agreed is the minimum level of funding, and all of its private schools are overfunded.
•What’s next? The Australian Education Union says Tasmania’s educational performance — which lags other states — will not increase without proper funding of public schools.

Report reveals growing funding divide between the haves and have-nots across the nation’s education system

But how can Australia emulate the distinguished class system of the Mother Cuntry without generous support of private schools?

Reply Quote

Date: 20/11/2023 08:56:05
From: roughbarked
ID: 2095982
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

The Rev Dodgson said:


roughbarked said:

In short:
•A new report argues Australian private schools are overfunded by $800 million this year while there is a funding shortfall of $4.5 billion for public schools.
•The Australian Education Union says not one of Tasmania’s public schools receives what governments have agreed is the minimum level of funding, and all of its private schools are overfunded.
•What’s next? The Australian Education Union says Tasmania’s educational performance — which lags other states — will not increase without proper funding of public schools.

Report reveals growing funding divide between the haves and have-nots across the nation’s education system

But how can Australia emulate the distinguished class system of the Mother Cuntry without generous support of private schools?

By becoming a republic, we could perchance leave all that shyte behind us?

Reply Quote

Date: 20/11/2023 09:26:04
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2095987
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

roughbarked said:

In short:
•A new report argues Australian private schools are overfunded by $800 million this year while there is a funding shortfall of $4.5 billion for public schools.
•The Australian Education Union says not one of Tasmania’s public schools receives what governments have agreed is the minimum level of funding, and all of its private schools are overfunded.
•What’s next? The Australian Education Union says Tasmania’s educational performance — which lags other states — will not increase without proper funding of public schools.

Report reveals growing funding divide between the haves and have-nots across the nation’s education system

But how can Australia emulate the distinguished class system of the Mother Cuntry without generous support of private schools?

By becoming a republic, we could perchance leave all that shyte behind us?

The US is a republic, and there’s underfunded public schools and wealthy private schools there, too.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/11/2023 09:28:21
From: roughbarked
ID: 2095988
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:


roughbarked said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

But how can Australia emulate the distinguished class system of the Mother Cuntry without generous support of private schools?

By becoming a republic, we could perchance leave all that shyte behind us?

The US is a republic, and there’s underfunded public schools and wealthy private schools there, too.

OK. So chuck that idea then. :)

Reply Quote

Date: 20/11/2023 09:31:07
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2095989
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

The Rev Dodgson said:


roughbarked said:

In short:
•A new report argues Australian private schools are overfunded by $800 million this year while there is a funding shortfall of $4.5 billion for public schools.
•The Australian Education Union says not one of Tasmania’s public schools receives what governments have agreed is the minimum level of funding, and all of its private schools are overfunded.
•What’s next? The Australian Education Union says Tasmania’s educational performance — which lags other states — will not increase without proper funding of public schools.

Report reveals growing funding divide between the haves and have-nots across the nation’s education system

But how can Australia emulate the distinguished class system of the Mother Cuntry without generous support of private schools?


I don’t think elite schools in the UK receive any public funding.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/11/2023 09:35:20
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2095991
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Witty Rejoinder said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

roughbarked said:

In short:
•A new report argues Australian private schools are overfunded by $800 million this year while there is a funding shortfall of $4.5 billion for public schools.
•The Australian Education Union says not one of Tasmania’s public schools receives what governments have agreed is the minimum level of funding, and all of its private schools are overfunded.
•What’s next? The Australian Education Union says Tasmania’s educational performance — which lags other states — will not increase without proper funding of public schools.

Report reveals growing funding divide between the haves and have-nots across the nation’s education system

But how can Australia emulate the distinguished class system of the Mother Cuntry without generous support of private schools?


I don’t think elite schools in the UK receive any public funding.

So, our ‘elite’ are a jump ahead of their counterparts in ‘the old country’.

The fees charged by our private schools keep out the riff-raff, and they can also provide even better facilities than the fees would afford, thanks to government funding.

How to have your cake, and eat it, too.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/11/2023 09:39:39
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2095994
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

As i understand it, government funding for private schools goes back to the earylish-/middlish-19th century, when colonial governments weren’t really all that interested in setting up a school system, so they gave the job to churches, especially the Anglican church, and subsidised whatever the churches would provide with money and land grants, which is how the Anglican church came to own a large swathe of what is now inner-city Sydney, among other places. And the money has been paid to the churches ever since.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/11/2023 09:48:20
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2095995
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:


roughbarked said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

But how can Australia emulate the distinguished class system of the Mother Cuntry without generous support of private schools?

By becoming a republic, we could perchance leave all that shyte behind us?

The US is a republic, and there’s underfunded public schools and wealthy private schools there, too.

The US France and Hati are republics and don’t get me started on the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
All busted arse countries.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/11/2023 09:50:24
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2095996
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:


As i understand it, government funding for private schools goes back to the earylish-/middlish-19th century, when colonial governments weren’t really all that interested in setting up a school system, so they gave the job to churches, especially the Anglican church, and subsidised whatever the churches would provide with money and land grants, which is how the Anglican church came to own a large swathe of what is now inner-city Sydney, among other places. And the money has been paid to the churches ever since.

I dunno about that. The system as it now is mainly started with Whitlam establishing funding for poor Catholic schools which did much to end the DLP as a political force.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/11/2023 09:52:48
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2095998
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Peak Warming Man said:


captain_spalding said:

roughbarked said:

By becoming a republic, we could perchance leave all that shyte behind us?

The US is a republic, and there’s underfunded public schools and wealthy private schools there, too.

The US France and Hati are republics and don’t get me started on the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
All busted arse countries.

And the French can’t even speak English FFS.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/11/2023 09:55:14
From: roughbarked
ID: 2095999
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Peak Warming Man said:


Peak Warming Man said:

captain_spalding said:

The US is a republic, and there’s underfunded public schools and wealthy private schools there, too.

The US France and Hati are republics and don’t get me started on the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
All busted arse countries.

And the French can’t even speak English FFS.

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 20/11/2023 11:03:41
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2096014
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Witty Rejoinder said:


captain_spalding said:

As i understand it, government funding for private schools goes back to the earylish-/middlish-19th century, when colonial governments weren’t really all that interested in setting up a school system, so they gave the job to churches, especially the Anglican church, and subsidised whatever the churches would provide with money and land grants, which is how the Anglican church came to own a large swathe of what is now inner-city Sydney, among other places. And the money has been paid to the churches ever since.

I dunno about that. The system as it now is mainly started with Whitlam establishing funding for poor Catholic schools which did much to end the DLP as a political force.

Not quite on the money, so to speak.

There was, indeed, government funding for denominational schools in the 19th century. (see, for example, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284936124_%27Money_Made_Us%27_A_Short_History_of_Government_Funds_for_Australian_Schools, and https://www.nma.gov.au/defining-moments/resources/free-education-introduced and ‘Education Prior to 1872’ https://www.emelbourne.net.au/biogs/EM00507b.htm)

That funding was ended by all the colonies in the late 19th century, beginning with Victoria’s ‘Education Act 1872’. Private schools were without Federal government funds for many years afterwards.

It was Robert Menzies who saw a chance to capture the votes of Catholic voters, and in 1964 the Menzies government passed an Act that brought in federal funding for independent and religious schools. This happened after decades of lobbying by Catholic schools.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/11/2023 12:35:00
From: dv
ID: 2096415
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

ALP only 3.4% ahead, this their worst status since the 2022 election.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/11/2023 12:40:29
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2096418
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:

ALP only 3.4% ahead, this their worst status since the 2022 election.

Typical corruption¡

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-21/nsw-police-daniel-keneally-court-guilty-evidence/103129882

Reply Quote

Date: 22/11/2023 19:33:16
From: buffy
ID: 2096768
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Well, there’s a surprise…

Emergency powers regarding people released from immigration facing High Court challenge, less than a week after passing parliament

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2023 00:21:43
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2096811
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

buffy said:

Well, there’s a surprise…

Emergency powers regarding people released from immigration facing High Court challenge, less than a week after passing parliament

Democracy Doin’ Its Thing ¡


Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2023 08:47:19
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2096833
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Ah yes

Under legislation expected to be introduced to parliament in the next fortnight, television manufacturers would be forced to ensure free Australian services sit at the top of the queue for viewers.

we’ve heard

The Australian Subscription Television and Radio Association (ASTRA) is leading the campaign against the proposal. “Prominence means that a group of providers will get some sort of special access or dominance at the expense of another,” said Patrick Delany, ASTRA chairman and chief executive of Foxtel. “If you’re doing roadblocks or preferred apps, and manipulating search results — I’m sorry, but that’s control, and we’re not hearing any differently from the government,” Mr Delany said.

this one before, it’s called “defending free speech“¡

Wait.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/11/2023 19:02:00
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2096977
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

The court heard Mr Davis had been drinking “a substantial amount” at the time of committing the offence, having checked into a room at The Star hotel in Pyrmont.

The Crown opposed Mr Davis’s application to have the matter dismissed under mental health legislation but conceded “there is a mental illness”.

The magistrate said this was one of the occasions where a person “labouring under mental health affliction could be diverted from the justice system for the benefit of the defendant but also for the community”.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2023 16:15:10
From: roughbarked
ID: 2097279
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Federal Opposition Leader Peter Dutton raised the prospect of a “catastrophic outcome” as the result of Palestinians receiving visitor visas to come to Australia amid the Israel-Gaza war.

He would say that.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2023 16:18:40
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2097281
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:

Federal Opposition Leader Peter Dutton raised the prospect of a “catastrophic outcome” as the result of Palestinians receiving visitor visas to come to Australia amid the Israel-Gaza war.

He would say that.

It’s true that peace is a catastrophic outcome for warmongers and disaster capitalists.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2023 16:45:01
From: buffy
ID: 2097300
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

I was too young for the Vietnam Moratorium walks, but I think it was young people then too. And there were a fair number of middleaged women also, from SOS (Save Our Sons) and others.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-24/students-walk-out-of-school-in-strike-for-palestine-730/103141070

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2023 17:09:20
From: sarahs mum
ID: 2097308
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

buffy said:


I was too young for the Vietnam Moratorium walks, but I think it was young people then too. And there were a fair number of middleaged women also, from SOS (Save Our Sons) and others.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-24/students-walk-out-of-school-in-strike-for-palestine-730/103141070

I wanted to go the moratorium march. But I was sure somehow Dad would see me and that would not have been a good thing.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2023 17:26:01
From: buffy
ID: 2097311
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

sarahs mum said:


buffy said:

I was too young for the Vietnam Moratorium walks, but I think it was young people then too. And there were a fair number of middleaged women also, from SOS (Save Our Sons) and others.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-24/students-walk-out-of-school-in-strike-for-palestine-730/103141070

I wanted to go the moratorium march. But I was sure somehow Dad would see me and that would not have been a good thing.

My mother wanted to go, but she had four of us under 10 years of age. It wasn’t possible.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2023 18:13:53
From: kii
ID: 2097318
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

buffy said:


sarahs mum said:

buffy said:

I was too young for the Vietnam Moratorium walks, but I think it was young people then too. And there were a fair number of middleaged women also, from SOS (Save Our Sons) and others.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-24/students-walk-out-of-school-in-strike-for-palestine-730/103141070

I wanted to go the moratorium march. But I was sure somehow Dad would see me and that would not have been a good thing.

My mother wanted to go, but she had four of us under 10 years of age. It wasn’t possible.

Mum went and think she took some of the older kids with her.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2023 18:16:58
From: roughbarked
ID: 2097321
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

buffy said:


I was too young for the Vietnam Moratorium walks, but I think it was young people then too. And there were a fair number of middleaged women also, from SOS (Save Our Sons) and others.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-24/students-walk-out-of-school-in-strike-for-palestine-730/103141070

I was saved from Vietnam by Gough winning the ‘lection.
The moratorium marches showed which way they’d vote.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2023 19:08:16
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2097333
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:


buffy said:

I was too young for the Vietnam Moratorium walks, but I think it was young people then too. And there were a fair number of middleaged women also, from SOS (Save Our Sons) and others.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-24/students-walk-out-of-school-in-strike-for-palestine-730/103141070

I was saved from Vietnam by Gough winning the ‘lection.
The moratorium marches showed which way they’d vote.

I knew a bloke who avoided Vietnam by joining the RAN Reserve. He was sure that his birthday would be drawn.

The final hurdle was the interview.

‘Why do you want to join the RANR?’, they asked him.

‘If i don’t, the Army will conscript me, send me to Vietnam, and the Viet Cong will kill me.’

“hmmph..sounds like a good reason. All right, you’re in. If the Army starts bothering you, tell ‘em you belong to us.’

His birthday was drawn.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/11/2023 23:01:31
From: AussieDJ
ID: 2097397
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

buffy said:


sarahs mum said:

buffy said:

I was too young for the Vietnam Moratorium walks, but I think it was young people then too. And there were a fair number of middleaged women also, from SOS (Save Our Sons) and others.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-24/students-walk-out-of-school-in-strike-for-palestine-730/103141070

I wanted to go the moratorium march. But I was sure somehow Dad would see me and that would not have been a good thing.

My mother wanted to go, but she had four of us under 10 years of age. It wasn’t possible.


I went to all of the moratorium marches held in Melbourne. It was a strange experience sitting down in the middle of a city intersection.

(Don’t mind me .. I’m just catching up on the day’s reading.)

Reply Quote

Date: 25/11/2023 02:16:15
From: AussieDJ
ID: 2097407
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:


buffy said:

I was too young for the Vietnam Moratorium walks, but I think it was young people then too. And there were a fair number of middleaged women also, from SOS (Save Our Sons) and others.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-24/students-walk-out-of-school-in-strike-for-palestine-730/103141070

I was saved from Vietnam by Gough winning the ‘lection.
The moratorium marches showed which way they’d vote.

In the last year or so before the election of the Whitlam government, the mood in the electorate was beginning to change away from being gung-ho (sorry) about Australia’s involvement in the Vietnam War.

There’d already been court cases involving people who’d refused to register for the Draft and who, subsequently were sentenced to two years’ jail. One name I still remember was Simon Townsend, later of the TV series ‘Simon Townsend’s Wonder World’.

I knew of other draft resisters who kept relatively low profiles. One, who lived in inner Melbourne, told of having the Federal Police drive along his street about once a week, checking out his house. He said he would, occasionally, offer them a friendly wave. They just kept on driving past the house.

You were generally okay if you kept quiet and didn’t make a nuisance of yourself.

Reply Quote

Date: 25/11/2023 03:14:29
From: roughbarked
ID: 2097408
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

AussieDJ said:


roughbarked said:

buffy said:

I was too young for the Vietnam Moratorium walks, but I think it was young people then too. And there were a fair number of middleaged women also, from SOS (Save Our Sons) and others.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-24/students-walk-out-of-school-in-strike-for-palestine-730/103141070

I was saved from Vietnam by Gough winning the ‘lection.
The moratorium marches showed which way they’d vote.

In the last year or so before the election of the Whitlam government, the mood in the electorate was beginning to change away from being gung-ho (sorry) about Australia’s involvement in the Vietnam War.

There’d already been court cases involving people who’d refused to register for the Draft and who, subsequently were sentenced to two years’ jail. One name I still remember was Simon Townsend, later of the TV series ‘Simon Townsend’s Wonder World’.

I knew of other draft resisters who kept relatively low profiles. One, who lived in inner Melbourne, told of having the Federal Police drive along his street about once a week, checking out his house. He said he would, occasionally, offer them a friendly wave. They just kept on driving past the house.

You were generally okay if you kept quiet and didn’t make a nuisance of yourself.

It was a nasty time indeed. Males were genuinely concerned that they’d be sent to a war that had no meaning, before they were allowed to vote against such crimes. They were made criminals if they objected and the ones who went to that murderous fisaco came home to no heroes welcome.
I also know of people from the USA who escaped to here and changed their names

Reply Quote

Date: 25/11/2023 05:29:45
From: roughbarked
ID: 2097413
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:


roughbarked said:

buffy said:

I was too young for the Vietnam Moratorium walks, but I think it was young people then too. And there were a fair number of middleaged women also, from SOS (Save Our Sons) and others.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-24/students-walk-out-of-school-in-strike-for-palestine-730/103141070

I was saved from Vietnam by Gough winning the ‘lection.
The moratorium marches showed which way they’d vote.

I knew a bloke who avoided Vietnam by joining the RAN Reserve. He was sure that his birthday would be drawn.

The final hurdle was the interview.

‘Why do you want to join the RANR?’, they asked him.

‘If i don’t, the Army will conscript me, send me to Vietnam, and the Viet Cong will kill me.’

“hmmph..sounds like a good reason. All right, you’re in. If the Army starts bothering you, tell ‘em you belong to us.’

His birthday was drawn.

Sensible move. Hope he wasn’y on the HMAS Sydney

Reply Quote

Date: 25/11/2023 06:13:07
From: buffy
ID: 2097428
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

AussieDJ said:


roughbarked said:

buffy said:

I was too young for the Vietnam Moratorium walks, but I think it was young people then too. And there were a fair number of middleaged women also, from SOS (Save Our Sons) and others.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-24/students-walk-out-of-school-in-strike-for-palestine-730/103141070

I was saved from Vietnam by Gough winning the ‘lection.
The moratorium marches showed which way they’d vote.

In the last year or so before the election of the Whitlam government, the mood in the electorate was beginning to change away from being gung-ho (sorry) about Australia’s involvement in the Vietnam War.

There’d already been court cases involving people who’d refused to register for the Draft and who, subsequently were sentenced to two years’ jail. One name I still remember was Simon Townsend, later of the TV series ‘Simon Townsend’s Wonder World’.

I knew of other draft resisters who kept relatively low profiles. One, who lived in inner Melbourne, told of having the Federal Police drive along his street about once a week, checking out his house. He said he would, occasionally, offer them a friendly wave. They just kept on driving past the house.

You were generally okay if you kept quiet and didn’t make a nuisance of yourself.

I think the SOS women had a network for hiding people?

Reply Quote

Date: 25/11/2023 06:18:46
From: roughbarked
ID: 2097432
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

buffy said:


AussieDJ said:

roughbarked said:

I was saved from Vietnam by Gough winning the ‘lection.
The moratorium marches showed which way they’d vote.

In the last year or so before the election of the Whitlam government, the mood in the electorate was beginning to change away from being gung-ho (sorry) about Australia’s involvement in the Vietnam War.

There’d already been court cases involving people who’d refused to register for the Draft and who, subsequently were sentenced to two years’ jail. One name I still remember was Simon Townsend, later of the TV series ‘Simon Townsend’s Wonder World’.

I knew of other draft resisters who kept relatively low profiles. One, who lived in inner Melbourne, told of having the Federal Police drive along his street about once a week, checking out his house. He said he would, occasionally, offer them a friendly wave. They just kept on driving past the house.

You were generally okay if you kept quiet and didn’t make a nuisance of yourself.

I think the SOS women had a network for hiding people?

There were conscriptees going AWOL everywhere.

Reply Quote

Date: 25/11/2023 11:03:27
From: dv
ID: 2097476
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

I ain’t no legal expert but it certainly seems to me that it is now obvious that Lehrmann perjured himself on at least two matters in the original rape trial.

Reply Quote

Date: 25/11/2023 11:07:27
From: wookiemeister
ID: 2097478
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:


I ain’t no legal expert but it certainly seems to me that it is now obvious that Lehrmann perjured himself on at least two matters in the original rape trial.

This is suggesting a pattern of behaviour

Reply Quote

Date: 25/11/2023 12:03:48
From: sarahs mum
ID: 2097493
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:


buffy said:

AussieDJ said:

In the last year or so before the election of the Whitlam government, the mood in the electorate was beginning to change away from being gung-ho (sorry) about Australia’s involvement in the Vietnam War.

There’d already been court cases involving people who’d refused to register for the Draft and who, subsequently were sentenced to two years’ jail. One name I still remember was Simon Townsend, later of the TV series ‘Simon Townsend’s Wonder World’.

I knew of other draft resisters who kept relatively low profiles. One, who lived in inner Melbourne, told of having the Federal Police drive along his street about once a week, checking out his house. He said he would, occasionally, offer them a friendly wave. They just kept on driving past the house.

You were generally okay if you kept quiet and didn’t make a nuisance of yourself.

I think the SOS women had a network for hiding people?

There were conscriptees going AWOL everywhere.

I know a person who was persecuted for running away…but decades later still suffering from PTSD he was forgiven.

Reply Quote

Date: 25/11/2023 12:10:23
From: party_pants
ID: 2097494
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:


I ain’t no legal expert but it certainly seems to me that it is now obvious that Lehrmann perjured himself on at least two matters in the original rape trial.

Makes me wonder why he even bothered to sue.

Reply Quote

Date: 25/11/2023 12:17:24
From: roughbarked
ID: 2097498
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:


I ain’t no legal expert but it certainly seems to me that it is now obvious that Lehrmann perjured himself on at least two matters in the original rape trial.

My impression as well. The courts frown on liars.

Reply Quote

Date: 25/11/2023 12:23:14
From: roughbarked
ID: 2097500
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Loved this headline:

After seeing an ad in the paper, Tony has agreed to donate his dead body for art.

Reply Quote

Date: 25/11/2023 14:15:31
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2097526
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

party_pants said:

dv said:

I ain’t no legal expert but it certainly seems to me that it is now obvious that Lehrmann perjured himself on at least two matters in the original rape trial.

Makes me wonder why he even bothered to sue.

Bankrolled¡

Reply Quote

Date: 25/11/2023 14:33:25
From: Michael V
ID: 2097533
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Australian Antarctic Division is given a very big serve by the Australian Transport Safety Bureau.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-25/everest-ship-fire-at-sea-april-2021-atsb-report/103113482

Reply Quote

Date: 25/11/2023 14:48:27
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2097536
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Michael V said:


Australian Antarctic Division is given a very big serve by the Australian Transport Safety Bureau.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-25/everest-ship-fire-at-sea-april-2021-atsb-report/103113482

Some years back, there was a chap who’d worked with the AAD in Antarctica, and he gave a talk in Bundaberg on his experiences in the Antarctic.

He had slides, some videos, and some examples of clothing and equipment used there, It was very entertaining and informative.

At the tea-and-bikkies afterwards, he was chatting and answering questions, and he was asked what the AAD was like to worker for, employer-wise.

He hesitated, and then said that it was something like a private club, run by ‘the right people’ for ‘the right people’. Like the Aust. Olympic Committee? asked someone, and he said, yeah, probably a lot like that.

Apparently, if you were one of ‘the right people’, or approved by one of them, you could count on support and equipment and funding for your work, but otherwise it was a tooth-and-nail fight for the scraps.

But that was quite a while back, things might be different these days

Reply Quote

Date: 25/11/2023 15:49:13
From: dv
ID: 2097544
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

SCIENCE said:

party_pants said:

dv said:

I ain’t no legal expert but it certainly seems to me that it is now obvious that Lehrmann perjured himself on at least two matters in the original rape trial.

Makes me wonder why he even bothered to sue.

Bankrolled¡

Does seem like a weird decision.

You’d think someone who a) escaped justice because of a mistrial and b) is currently on trial in another rape case, would try and keep his head down a bit.

Reply Quote

Date: 25/11/2023 15:55:07
From: party_pants
ID: 2097545
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:


SCIENCE said:

party_pants said:

Makes me wonder why he even bothered to sue.

Bankrolled¡

Does seem like a weird decision.

You’d think someone who a) escaped justice because of a mistrial and b) is currently on trial in another rape case, would try and keep his head down a bit.

That’s what I was thinking. But the group-think in those circles is that he is somehow the victim of left-wing media bias, so he needs to sue them for every last dollar to punish them. Guess he was not strong enough to say no, or he was very badly advised, or he is part of the group-think club.

Reply Quote

Date: 25/11/2023 16:05:33
From: Kingy
ID: 2097546
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Michael V said:


Australian Antarctic Division is given a very big serve by the Australian Transport Safety Bureau.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-25/everest-ship-fire-at-sea-april-2021-atsb-report/103113482

Sounds like a great design feature, having the fuel overflow into the engine room exhaust ventilation casing. I wonder who thought that up?

Reply Quote

Date: 25/11/2023 16:08:51
From: roughbarked
ID: 2097549
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:


SCIENCE said:

party_pants said:

Makes me wonder why he even bothered to sue.

Bankrolled¡

Does seem like a weird decision.

You’d think someone who a) escaped justice because of a mistrial and b) is currently on trial in another rape case, would try and keep his head down a bit.

Seems he has political backing in the misogyny stakes.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/11/2023 12:54:02
From: sarahs mum
ID: 2097844
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Honest Government Ad | How to rig elections

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3WTlyuhDs0

Reply Quote

Date: 26/11/2023 13:41:08
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2097865
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

sarahs mum said:

Honest Government Ad | How to rig elections

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3WTlyuhDs0

+1

actually + as many candidates as it takes

at least until STEMocracy

Reply Quote

Date: 26/11/2023 16:02:32
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2097881
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Good to hear all options being kept on the table¡

“Nuclear for Australia is a fantasy wrapped in delusion accompanied by pipedream,” Mr Bowen said.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/11/2023 16:46:43
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2097885
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

https://www.smh.com.au/national/europe-is-in-racial-turmoil-what-could-it-learn-from-australia-20231124-p5emkm.html

Europe is in racial turmoil. What could it learn from Australia?

Parnell Palme McGuinness

Got some vacillation there eh, a bit of hesitation before the vortex.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/11/2023 10:22:21
From: dv
ID: 2097984
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-26/can-younger-workers-compete-with-generation-landlord/103151724

Opinion piece on housing in Australia

Reply Quote

Date: 27/11/2023 11:50:55
From: Woodie
ID: 2097998
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:


https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-26/can-younger-workers-compete-with-generation-landlord/103151724

Opinion piece on housing in Australia

It’s outrageous!! I am absolutely appalled!! This is nothing less than a violation of human rights. A humanitarian disaster. Urgent aid is needed and must be provided for those in this diabolical and unprecedented crisis. I call for an immediate and peaceful resolution to the conflict and determine the best way forward from here, to address this travesty of injustice. A Senate inquiry will be set up, with full Terms of Reference, which are yet to be determined. A report from the Acting Deputy Commissioner is due by end 2032.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/11/2023 12:11:31
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2098002
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Woodie said:


dv said:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-26/can-younger-workers-compete-with-generation-landlord/103151724

Opinion piece on housing in Australia

It’s outrageous!! I am absolutely appalled!! This is nothing less than a violation of human rights. A humanitarian disaster. Urgent aid is needed and must be provided for those in this diabolical and unprecedented crisis. I call for an immediate and peaceful resolution to the conflict and determine the best way forward from here, to address this travesty of injustice. A Senate inquiry will be set up, with full Terms of Reference, which are yet to be determined. A report from the Acting Deputy Commissioner is due by end 2032.

It’ll still probably be published before Barnaby produces that drought report.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/11/2023 15:25:21
From: wookiemeister
ID: 2098018
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:


Woodie said:

dv said:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-26/can-younger-workers-compete-with-generation-landlord/103151724

Opinion piece on housing in Australia

It’s outrageous!! I am absolutely appalled!! This is nothing less than a violation of human rights. A humanitarian disaster. Urgent aid is needed and must be provided for those in this diabolical and unprecedented crisis. I call for an immediate and peaceful resolution to the conflict and determine the best way forward from here, to address this travesty of injustice. A Senate inquiry will be set up, with full Terms of Reference, which are yet to be determined. A report from the Acting Deputy Commissioner is due by end 2032.

It’ll still probably be published before Barnaby produces that drought report.


He’ll be on to mistress number 3 by then

Reply Quote

Date: 27/11/2023 15:27:09
From: Michael V
ID: 2098020
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

More dodgy answers…

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-27/bruce-lehrmann-defamation-trial-cross-examination-continues/103153368

Reply Quote

Date: 27/11/2023 15:35:30
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2098025
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Michael V said:


More dodgy answers…

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-27/bruce-lehrmann-defamation-trial-cross-examination-continues/103153368

Yeah, well, Bruce’s powers of recollection have been proven to be unreliable, at best.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/11/2023 16:10:05
From: sarahs mum
ID: 2098026
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGhgyMwTgiQ

Reply Quote

Date: 27/11/2023 16:19:21
From: Woodie
ID: 2098027
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

sarahs mum said:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGhgyMwTgiQ

That bloke looks like charisma incorporated. NOT.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/11/2023 16:32:22
From: dv
ID: 2098030
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

sarahs mum said:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGhgyMwTgiQ

Well duh

Reply Quote

Date: 27/11/2023 16:43:56
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2098035
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

https://theshot.net.au/news/general-news/lies-exposed-in-bruce-lehrmanns-case-against-lisa-wilkinson/

Link

Reply Quote

Date: 27/11/2023 16:51:29
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2098041
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

https://theshot.net.au/news/general-news/australian-media-annihilated-by-someone-who-knows-what-theyre-talking-about/

Link

Reply Quote

Date: 27/11/2023 17:10:00
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2098044
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

These Authoritarian Communist Police States Oh Wait


Reply Quote

Date: 27/11/2023 17:14:48
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2098046
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:

Michael V said:

More dodgy answers…

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-27/bruce-lehrmann-defamation-trial-cross-examination-continues/103153368

Yeah, well, Bruce’s powers of recollection have been proven to be unreliable, at best.

Sorry we have never met the dude so we wouldn’t know but legit’ or not ¿


Reply Quote

Date: 27/11/2023 17:52:06
From: roughbarked
ID: 2098053
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

JudgeMental said:


https://theshot.net.au/news/general-news/lies-exposed-in-bruce-lehrmanns-case-against-lisa-wilkinson/

Link


Bruce Lehrmann denies evading questions from chief of staff about Parliament House entry on night of alleged rape

Link

Reply Quote

Date: 27/11/2023 17:52:54
From: roughbarked
ID: 2098054
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

SCIENCE said:

captain_spalding said:

Michael V said:

More dodgy answers…

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-27/bruce-lehrmann-defamation-trial-cross-examination-continues/103153368

Yeah, well, Bruce’s powers of recollection have been proven to be unreliable, at best.

Sorry we have never met the dude so we wouldn’t know but legit’ or not ¿



Ah. I see it is all covered.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/11/2023 18:35:29
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2098069
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

JudgeMental said:


https://theshot.net.au/news/general-news/lies-exposed-in-bruce-lehrmanns-case-against-lisa-wilkinson/

Link

Better get (another) lawyer son. Better get a r-e-e-e-a-l good one.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/11/2023 19:00:06
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2098071
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

“Poll results show that Albanese is an incompetent leader”

Sky News Australia

Reply Quote

Date: 27/11/2023 19:02:32
From: Michael V
ID: 2098072
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

The Rev Dodgson said:


“Poll results show that Albanese is an incompetent leader”

Sky News Australia

Yeah, right.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/11/2023 19:02:52
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2098073
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

The Rev Dodgson said:


“Poll results show that Albanese is an incompetent leader”

Sky News Australia

You’ll get that kind of result when you restrict your sample base to people named ‘Murdoch’, ‘Dutton’, ‘Bolt’, and ‘Credlin’.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/11/2023 19:03:31
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2098074
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

“Poll results show that Albanese is an incompetent leader”

Sky News Australia

You’ll get that kind of result when you restrict your sample base to people named ‘Murdoch’, ‘Dutton’, ‘Bolt’, and ‘Credlin’.

And only selected representatives of those groups, at that.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/11/2023 19:03:31
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2098075
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

“Poll results show that Albanese is an incompetent leader”

Sky News Australia

You’ll get that kind of result when you restrict your sample base to people named ‘Murdoch’, ‘Dutton’, ‘Bolt’, and ‘Credlin’.

And only selected representatives of those groups, at that.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/11/2023 19:37:09
From: poikilotherm
ID: 2098081
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

As popular as potatoes.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/11/2023 20:22:08
From: dv
ID: 2098098
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Rumours of a Lib leadership spill. Should make Albo worried.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/11/2023 20:25:28
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2098099
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:


Rumours of a Lib leadership spill. Should make Albo worried.

Get him worried that they Libs have found someone competent?

If so, they’ve been keeping him/her bloody well camouflaged up until now.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/11/2023 20:30:18
From: sarahs mum
ID: 2098100
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:


Rumours of a Lib leadership spill. Should make Albo worried.

Bridget?

Reply Quote

Date: 27/11/2023 20:34:00
From: dv
ID: 2098101
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

sarahs mum said:


dv said:

Rumours of a Lib leadership spill. Should make Albo worried.

Bridget?

IDK

Ley, possibly

Reply Quote

Date: 27/11/2023 20:39:40
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2098102
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:


Rumours of a Lib leadership spill. Should make Albo worried.

Dutton seems to have his line and length about right.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/11/2023 20:42:56
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2098104
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

sarahs mum said:


dv said:

Rumours of a Lib leadership spill. Should make Albo worried.

Bridget?

Well, yeah, maybe.

Better to have her inside the tent pissing out, rather than outside pissing in, to put it quite crudely.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/11/2023 22:37:47
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2098126
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Overwhelming majority of Australians support a First Nations voice despite referendum defeat, finds ANU survey

Reply Quote

Date: 27/11/2023 22:56:29
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2098130
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Bubblecar said:


Overwhelming majority of Australians support a First Nations voice despite referendum defeat, finds ANU survey

QI, but I think the headline is very misleading. People saying that indigenous people should be treated fairly and should have their views heard does not mean that they support a “First Nations voice”, if they think they already have these privileges, which apparently many people do.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/11/2023 23:02:41
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2098133
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

The Rev Dodgson said:


Bubblecar said:

Overwhelming majority of Australians support a First Nations voice despite referendum defeat, finds ANU survey

QI, but I think the headline is very misleading. People saying that indigenous people should be treated fairly and should have their views heard does not mean that they support a “First Nations voice”, if they think they already have these privileges, which apparently many people do.

True but the headline will annoy the antis so I don’t mind.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/11/2023 23:10:26
From: dv
ID: 2098136
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Bubblecar said:


Overwhelming majority of Australians support a First Nations voice despite referendum defeat, finds ANU survey

(Shrugs) I kind of believe the actual vote over any survey.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 08:15:15
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2098158
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:

Bubblecar said:

Overwhelming majority of Australians support a First Nations voice despite referendum defeat, finds ANU survey

(Shrugs) I kind of believe the actual vote over any survey.

Overwhelming Majority Of Democratic People’s Republic Of Koreans Support A Kim Jong Un
Despite Result Of Surveys On Defectors

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 09:32:42
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2098167
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Bubblecar said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

Bubblecar said:

Overwhelming majority of Australians support a First Nations voice despite referendum defeat, finds ANU survey

QI, but I think the headline is very misleading. People saying that indigenous people should be treated fairly and should have their views heard does not mean that they support a “First Nations voice”, if they think they already have these privileges, which apparently many people do.

True but the headline will annoy the antis so I don’t mind.

The exact same headline is now all over the Internet & ABC.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 09:46:17
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2098168
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

The Rev Dodgson said:


Bubblecar said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

QI, but I think the headline is very misleading. People saying that indigenous people should be treated fairly and should have their views heard does not mean that they support a “First Nations voice”, if they think they already have these privileges, which apparently many people do.

True but the headline will annoy the antis so I don’t mind.

The exact same headline is now all over the Internet & ABC.

As i’ve said before, if people, of any ilk, want to be able to express their views on political and social issues, to have those views given due recognition and reception in the appropriate quarters, and have them reflected in policies and legislation that address those issues, then they ought to move to some country where that sort of nonsense is tolerated.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 09:59:48
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2098169
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

Bubblecar said:

True but the headline will annoy the antis so I don’t mind.

The exact same headline is now all over the Internet & ABC.

As i’ve said before, if people, of any ilk, want to be able to express their views on political and social issues, to have those views given due recognition and reception in the appropriate quarters, and have them reflected in policies and legislation that address those issues, then they ought to move to some country where that sort of nonsense is tolerated.

Any suggestions?

Or does it require relocating universes?

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 10:01:08
From: Tamb
ID: 2098170
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

Bubblecar said:

True but the headline will annoy the antis so I don’t mind.

The exact same headline is now all over the Internet & ABC.

As i’ve said before, if people, of any ilk, want to be able to express their views on political and social issues, to have those views given due recognition and reception in the appropriate quarters, and have them reflected in policies and legislation that address those issues, then they ought to move to some country where that sort of nonsense is tolerated.

Very much like the high court detainee ruling. “You must do this. We’ll explain why later”

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 10:03:57
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2098171
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Tamb said:


captain_spalding said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

The exact same headline is now all over the Internet & ABC.

As i’ve said before, if people, of any ilk, want to be able to express their views on political and social issues, to have those views given due recognition and reception in the appropriate quarters, and have them reflected in policies and legislation that address those issues, then they ought to move to some country where that sort of nonsense is tolerated.

Very much like the high court detainee ruling. “You must do this. We’ll explain why later”

Does a high court ruling saying that people should not be detained indefinitely without trial really need explaining?

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 10:03:57
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2098172
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Tamb said:


captain_spalding said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

The exact same headline is now all over the Internet & ABC.

As i’ve said before, if people, of any ilk, want to be able to express their views on political and social issues, to have those views given due recognition and reception in the appropriate quarters, and have them reflected in policies and legislation that address those issues, then they ought to move to some country where that sort of nonsense is tolerated.

Very much like the high court detainee ruling. “You must do this. We’ll explain why later”

Does a high court ruling saying that people should not be detained indefinitely without trial really need explaining?

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 10:04:29
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2098173
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

The Rev Dodgson said:


Bubblecar said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

QI, but I think the headline is very misleading. People saying that indigenous people should be treated fairly and should have their views heard does not mean that they support a “First Nations voice”, if they think they already have these privileges, which apparently many people do.

True but the headline will annoy the antis so I don’t mind.

The exact same headline is now all over the Internet & ABC.

“If Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people tried harder, they could be just as well off as non-Indigenous Australians.”

if only they acted like white people.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 10:05:19
From: Tamb
ID: 2098174
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

The Rev Dodgson said:


Tamb said:

captain_spalding said:

As i’ve said before, if people, of any ilk, want to be able to express their views on political and social issues, to have those views given due recognition and reception in the appropriate quarters, and have them reflected in policies and legislation that address those issues, then they ought to move to some country where that sort of nonsense is tolerated.

Very much like the high court detainee ruling. “You must do this. We’ll explain why later”

Does a high court ruling saying that people should not be detained indefinitely without trial really need explaining?


Yes.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 10:05:38
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2098175
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

The Rev Dodgson said:


Tamb said:

captain_spalding said:

As i’ve said before, if people, of any ilk, want to be able to express their views on political and social issues, to have those views given due recognition and reception in the appropriate quarters, and have them reflected in policies and legislation that address those issues, then they ought to move to some country where that sort of nonsense is tolerated.

Very much like the high court detainee ruling. “You must do this. We’ll explain why later”

Does a high court ruling saying that people should not be detained indefinitely without trial really need explaining?

exactly.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 10:07:19
From: diddly-squat
ID: 2098176
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:


Bubblecar said:

Overwhelming majority of Australians support a First Nations voice despite referendum defeat, finds ANU survey

(Shrugs) I kind of believe the actual vote over any survey.

^this..

it’s clear as day that an overwhelming majority of people do not support a first nations voice…

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 10:07:45
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2098177
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Tamb said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

Tamb said:

Very much like the high court detainee ruling. “You must do this. We’ll explain why later”

Does a high court ruling saying that people should not be detained indefinitely without trial really need explaining?


Yes.

Why?

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 10:08:55
From: diddly-squat
ID: 2098178
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

The Rev Dodgson said:


Tamb said:

captain_spalding said:

As i’ve said before, if people, of any ilk, want to be able to express their views on political and social issues, to have those views given due recognition and reception in the appropriate quarters, and have them reflected in policies and legislation that address those issues, then they ought to move to some country where that sort of nonsense is tolerated.

Very much like the high court detainee ruling. “You must do this. We’ll explain why later”

Does a high court ruling saying that people should not be detained indefinitely without trial really need explaining?

all high court rulings require a detailed explanation of the ruling.. it’s kind of the point…

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 10:11:08
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2098179
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

diddly-squat said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

Tamb said:

Very much like the high court detainee ruling. “You must do this. We’ll explain why later”

Does a high court ruling saying that people should not be detained indefinitely without trial really need explaining?

all high court rulings require a detailed explanation of the ruling.. it’s kind of the point…

The reasons are what make it legal.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 10:11:57
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2098180
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

diddly-squat said:


dv said:

Bubblecar said:

Overwhelming majority of Australians support a First Nations voice despite referendum defeat, finds ANU survey

(Shrugs) I kind of believe the actual vote over any survey.

^this..

it’s clear as day that an overwhelming majority of people do not support a first nations voice…

Well certainly Bolt, Mundine, Murdoch and mates convinced a sizeable portion of the electorate, who were inclined to vote yes, that they should vote no.

I’m not sure that really means “an overwhelming majority of people do not support a first nations voice”

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 10:12:09
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2098181
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

A voice?
It’s vibe, it’s the Mabo.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 10:12:42
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2098182
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

they just haven’t given the reason yet. it will be given at some point.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 10:15:04
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2098183
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:


diddly-squat said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

Does a high court ruling saying that people should not be detained indefinitely without trial really need explaining?

all high court rulings require a detailed explanation of the ruling.. it’s kind of the point…

The reasons are what make it legal.

No doubt they will tidy up the details in due course.

The fact remains, the reason why this detention was against the basic principles of the law is obvious.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 10:16:41
From: diddly-squat
ID: 2098185
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

The Rev Dodgson said:


diddly-squat said:

dv said:

(Shrugs) I kind of believe the actual vote over any survey.

^this..

it’s clear as day that an overwhelming majority of people do not support a first nations voice…

Well certainly Bolt, Mundine, Murdoch and mates convinced a sizeable portion of the electorate, who were inclined to vote yes, that they should vote no.

I’m not sure that really means “an overwhelming majority of people do not support a first nations voice”

I think that, for the most part, is not true…

I don’t think there was a plurality of yes voters that were convinced to vote no by the media. I think for the most part Australian people don’t like the idea of constitutional change.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 10:21:40
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2098190
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

diddly-squat said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

diddly-squat said:

^this..

it’s clear as day that an overwhelming majority of people do not support a first nations voice…

Well certainly Bolt, Mundine, Murdoch and mates convinced a sizeable portion of the electorate, who were inclined to vote yes, that they should vote no.

I’m not sure that really means “an overwhelming majority of people do not support a first nations voice”

I think that, for the most part, is not true…

I don’t think there was a plurality of yes voters that were convinced to vote no by the media. I think for the most part Australian people don’t like the idea of constitutional change.

Well I haven’t actually spoken to many of the people who voted directly, but the surveys over the course of the campaign did seem to show a pretty clear trend from yes to no.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 10:26:21
From: dv
ID: 2098191
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Honestly Rev I don’t understand the distinction you are making. It’s hard to accept that there were a couple of million people who really wanted something but voted against it when given the opportunity.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 10:32:30
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2098192
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:


Honestly Rev I don’t understand the distinction you are making. It’s hard to accept that there were a couple of million people who really wanted something but voted against it when given the opportunity.

I’m not making a distinction.

I’m suggesting there were a large number who were convinced to change their minds by people with a political agenda that had nothing to do with improving the well being of the whole population, including those of indigenous heritage.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 10:32:54
From: dv
ID: 2098193
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 10:34:01
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2098194
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:


Honestly Rev I don’t understand the distinction you are making. It’s hard to accept that there were a couple of million people who really wanted something but voted against it when given the opportunity.

I wonder if it was the ‘i won’t be to blame’ mindset that was part of it?

Where people would like to see a particular outcome, but fear that it might not work out well, and absolve themselves of responsibility for it by actually voting against it, confident that the ‘right’ outcome is assured by the fact that it’s so obviously right, everyone else will vote for it.

I think that Britain’s Brexit vote had some of this. Some people voted to leave, confident that the majority would vote to remain, and then when the usual gripes about ‘bloody Brussels’ resurfaced, they could declare ‘werl, yer can’t blame me, i voted to leave’.

Unfortunately, there were too many like that.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 10:34:27
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2098195
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

The Rev Dodgson said:


dv said:

Honestly Rev I don’t understand the distinction you are making. It’s hard to accept that there were a couple of million people who really wanted something but voted against it when given the opportunity.

I’m not making a distinction.

I’m suggesting there were a large number who were convinced to change their minds by people with a political agenda that had nothing to do with improving the well being of the whole population, including those of indigenous heritage.

Opposition for the sake of opposition.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 10:43:59
From: roughbarked
ID: 2098196
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

diddly-squat said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

diddly-squat said:

^this..

it’s clear as day that an overwhelming majority of people do not support a first nations voice…

Well certainly Bolt, Mundine, Murdoch and mates convinced a sizeable portion of the electorate, who were inclined to vote yes, that they should vote no.

I’m not sure that really means “an overwhelming majority of people do not support a first nations voice”

I think that, for the most part, is not true…

I don’t think there was a plurality of yes voters that were convinced to vote no by the media. I think for the most part Australian people don’t like the idea of constitutional change.

There’s a bit of both in that.
Australians are easily convinced not to cause constitutional change.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 10:45:32
From: roughbarked
ID: 2098197
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:



Like the man doesn’t seem to have many fans.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 10:46:32
From: roughbarked
ID: 2098198
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:


dv said:

Honestly Rev I don’t understand the distinction you are making. It’s hard to accept that there were a couple of million people who really wanted something but voted against it when given the opportunity.

I wonder if it was the ‘i won’t be to blame’ mindset that was part of it?

Where people would like to see a particular outcome, but fear that it might not work out well, and absolve themselves of responsibility for it by actually voting against it, confident that the ‘right’ outcome is assured by the fact that it’s so obviously right, everyone else will vote for it.

I think that Britain’s Brexit vote had some of this. Some people voted to leave, confident that the majority would vote to remain, and then when the usual gripes about ‘bloody Brussels’ resurfaced, they could declare ‘werl, yer can’t blame me, i voted to leave’.

Unfortunately, there were too many like that.

Too easily convinced. Many people only watch the stations that spruke the lies.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 10:46:51
From: roughbarked
ID: 2098199
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:


captain_spalding said:

dv said:

Honestly Rev I don’t understand the distinction you are making. It’s hard to accept that there were a couple of million people who really wanted something but voted against it when given the opportunity.

I wonder if it was the ‘i won’t be to blame’ mindset that was part of it?

Where people would like to see a particular outcome, but fear that it might not work out well, and absolve themselves of responsibility for it by actually voting against it, confident that the ‘right’ outcome is assured by the fact that it’s so obviously right, everyone else will vote for it.

I think that Britain’s Brexit vote had some of this. Some people voted to leave, confident that the majority would vote to remain, and then when the usual gripes about ‘bloody Brussels’ resurfaced, they could declare ‘werl, yer can’t blame me, i voted to leave’.

Unfortunately, there were too many like that.

Too easily convinced. Many people only watch the stations that spruke the lies.

spruike?

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 10:48:02
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2098200
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:


captain_spalding said:

dv said:

Honestly Rev I don’t understand the distinction you are making. It’s hard to accept that there were a couple of million people who really wanted something but voted against it when given the opportunity.

I wonder if it was the ‘i won’t be to blame’ mindset that was part of it?

Where people would like to see a particular outcome, but fear that it might not work out well, and absolve themselves of responsibility for it by actually voting against it, confident that the ‘right’ outcome is assured by the fact that it’s so obviously right, everyone else will vote for it.

I think that Britain’s Brexit vote had some of this. Some people voted to leave, confident that the majority would vote to remain, and then when the usual gripes about ‘bloody Brussels’ resurfaced, they could declare ‘werl, yer can’t blame me, i voted to leave’.

Unfortunately, there were too many like that.

Too easily convinced. Many people only watch the stations that spruke the lies.

that’s why i don’t have a TV. I’m too gullible.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 10:51:23
From: roughbarked
ID: 2098201
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

JudgeMental said:


roughbarked said:

captain_spalding said:

I wonder if it was the ‘i won’t be to blame’ mindset that was part of it?

Where people would like to see a particular outcome, but fear that it might not work out well, and absolve themselves of responsibility for it by actually voting against it, confident that the ‘right’ outcome is assured by the fact that it’s so obviously right, everyone else will vote for it.

I think that Britain’s Brexit vote had some of this. Some people voted to leave, confident that the majority would vote to remain, and then when the usual gripes about ‘bloody Brussels’ resurfaced, they could declare ‘werl, yer can’t blame me, i voted to leave’.

Unfortunately, there were too many like that.

Too easily convinced. Many people only watch the stations that spruke the lies.

that’s why i don’t have a TV. I’m too gullible.

I know why you said that even though you aren’t really gullible, TV has that propensity.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 10:54:52
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2098203
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

A lot of people believed in Gullibles Travels.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 10:55:46
From: roughbarked
ID: 2098204
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Peak Warming Man said:


A lot of people believed in Gullibles Travels.

D’you mean there’s no Lilliput?

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 10:57:50
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2098205
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:


Peak Warming Man said:

A lot of people believed in Gullibles Travels.

D’you mean there’s no Lilliput?

I’ve got an open mind.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 11:00:44
From: kii
ID: 2098206
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:



I need to catch up on this.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 11:06:56
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2098207
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

One of the first things an incoming government has to do is reallocate the water in the Murray, darling.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 11:09:12
From: roughbarked
ID: 2098208
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Peak Warming Man said:


One of the first things an incoming government has to do is reallocate the water in the Murray, darling.

This is true.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 11:38:44
From: Woodie
ID: 2098213
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:


JudgeMental said:

roughbarked said:

Too easily convinced. Many people only watch the stations that spruke the lies.

that’s why i don’t have a TV. I’m too gullible.

I know why you said that even though you aren’t really gullible, TV has that propensity.

Did you know the word “gullible” is not in the dictionary?

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 11:42:13
From: Michael V
ID: 2098214
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Woodie said:


roughbarked said:

JudgeMental said:

that’s why i don’t have a TV. I’m too gullible.

I know why you said that even though you aren’t really gullible, TV has that propensity.

Did you know the word “gullible” is not in the dictionary?

LOL

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 11:45:55
From: kii
ID: 2098215
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Michael V said:


Woodie said:

roughbarked said:

I know why you said that even though you aren’t really gullible, TV has that propensity.

Did you know the word “gullible” is not in the dictionary?

LOL

When I was a kid my older brothers taunted me with that word.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 11:54:46
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2098217
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:

captain_spalding said:

dv said:

Honestly Rev I don’t understand the distinction you are making. It’s hard to accept that there were a couple of million people who really wanted something but voted against it when given the opportunity.

I wonder if it was the ‘i won’t be to blame’ mindset that was part of it?

Where people would like to see a particular outcome, but fear that it might not work out well, and absolve themselves of responsibility for it by actually voting against it, confident that the ‘right’ outcome is assured by the fact that it’s so obviously right, everyone else will vote for it.

I think that Britain’s Brexit vote had some of this. Some people voted to leave, confident that the majority would vote to remain, and then when the usual gripes about ‘bloody Brussels’ resurfaced, they could declare ‘werl, yer can’t blame me, i voted to leave’.

Unfortunately, there were too many like that.

Too easily convinced. Many people only watch the stations that spruke the lies.

Sure so tell us a station not pumping out bullshit.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 11:57:41
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2098218
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Woodie said:


roughbarked said:

JudgeMental said:

that’s why i don’t have a TV. I’m too gullible.

I know why you said that even though you aren’t really gullible, TV has that propensity.

Did you know the word “gullible” is not in the dictionary?

If you say so, that’s good enough for me.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 11:57:42
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2098219
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Woodie said:


roughbarked said:

JudgeMental said:

that’s why i don’t have a TV. I’m too gullible.

I know why you said that even though you aren’t really gullible, TV has that propensity.

Did you know the word “gullible” is not in the dictionary?

If you say so, that’s good enough for me.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 11:58:52
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2098221
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

The Rev Dodgson said:

Woodie said:

roughbarked said:

I know why you said that even though you aren’t really gullible, TV has that propensity.

Did you know the word “gullible” is not in the dictionary?

If you say so, that’s good enough for me.

If you say it one more time, it’s true¡

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 12:00:49
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2098222
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

JudgeMental said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

Bubblecar said:

True but the headline will annoy the antis so I don’t mind.

The exact same headline is now all over the Internet & ABC.

“If Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people tried harder, they could be just as well off as non-Indigenous Australians.”

if only they acted like white people.

Rich white people, it’s also the case that people in poverty just need to work harder and they’ll be quadrillionaires.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 12:20:08
From: diddly-squat
ID: 2098225
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

The Rev Dodgson said:


dv said:

Honestly Rev I don’t understand the distinction you are making. It’s hard to accept that there were a couple of million people who really wanted something but voted against it when given the opportunity.

I’m not making a distinction.

I’m suggesting there were a large number who were convinced to change their minds by people with a political agenda that had nothing to do with improving the well being of the whole population, including those of indigenous heritage.

I simply don’t think that is the case

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 12:24:40
From: diddly-squat
ID: 2098226
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

diddly-squat said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

dv said:

Honestly Rev I don’t understand the distinction you are making. It’s hard to accept that there were a couple of million people who really wanted something but voted against it when given the opportunity.

I’m not making a distinction.

I’m suggesting there were a large number who were convinced to change their minds by people with a political agenda that had nothing to do with improving the well being of the whole population, including those of indigenous heritage.

I simply don’t think that is the case

Having said that, I do think that the decision was easier to justify for people that lean to the right by the position of the two centre right parties.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 14:17:40
From: Michael V
ID: 2098247
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

More looseness with the truth…

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-28/lehrmann-says-lisa-wilkinson-higgins-interview-prejudiced-trial/103157760

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 14:20:36
From: diddly-squat
ID: 2098250
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Michael V said:


More looseness with the truth…

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-28/lehrmann-says-lisa-wilkinson-higgins-interview-prejudiced-trial/103157760

that’s an interesting argument given it was mistrial and no judgement was made

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 14:40:43
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2098259
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 14:46:07
From: Michael V
ID: 2098262
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

SCIENCE said:


:(

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 15:00:18
From: Michael V
ID: 2098269
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

High court unanimous about immigration detention decision (more to come):

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-28/high-court-full-reasons-indefinite-immigration-detention/103158998

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 15:05:11
From: dv
ID: 2098271
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

The Rev Dodgson said:


dv said:

Honestly Rev I don’t understand the distinction you are making. It’s hard to accept that there were a couple of million people who really wanted something but voted against it when given the opportunity.

I’m not making a distinction.

I’m suggesting there were a large number who were convinced to change their minds by people with a political agenda that had nothing to do with improving the well being of the whole population, including those of indigenous heritage.

Sure.

But change their mind they did

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 15:12:02
From: dv
ID: 2098276
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

SCIENCE said:


The Libs haven’t replaced Marise Payne yet.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 15:28:49
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2098283
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

dv said:

Honestly Rev I don’t understand the distinction you are making. It’s hard to accept that there were a couple of million people who really wanted something but voted against it when given the opportunity.

I’m not making a distinction.

I’m suggesting there were a large number who were convinced to change their minds by people with a political agenda that had nothing to do with improving the well being of the whole population, including those of indigenous heritage.

Sure.

But change their mind they did

These Aren’t The Voices You’re Looking For

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 15:34:34
From: Woodie
ID: 2098284
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

It’s sipdisting down here!!

Gawn, Mr MacQuarie Make that ya stuffin word of the year. Nobody knows what that means either.

Bet you lot know what it means, hey what but!!

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 15:37:30
From: roughbarked
ID: 2098286
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

diddly-squat said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

dv said:

Honestly Rev I don’t understand the distinction you are making. It’s hard to accept that there were a couple of million people who really wanted something but voted against it when given the opportunity.

I’m not making a distinction.

I’m suggesting there were a large number who were convinced to change their minds by people with a political agenda that had nothing to do with improving the well being of the whole population, including those of indigenous heritage.

I simply don’t think that is the case

I do. The single largest no vote in my region was at the Aboriginal community centre.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 16:13:17
From: diddly-squat
ID: 2098296
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:


diddly-squat said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

I’m not making a distinction.

I’m suggesting there were a large number who were convinced to change their minds by people with a political agenda that had nothing to do with improving the well being of the whole population, including those of indigenous heritage.

I simply don’t think that is the case

I do. The single largest no vote in my region was at the Aboriginal community centre.

Rev’s argument seemed to be that it was the traditional right-aligned media of bolt and sky and the murdoch press that flipped the dial. I could be wrong, but I don’t image that sky after dark is playing on the tellys down at the local aboriginal community centre

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 16:14:57
From: roughbarked
ID: 2098297
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

diddly-squat said:


roughbarked said:

diddly-squat said:

I simply don’t think that is the case

I do. The single largest no vote in my region was at the Aboriginal community centre.

Rev’s argument seemed to be that it was the traditional right-aligned media of bolt and sky and the murdoch press that flipped the dial. I could be wrong, but I don’t image that sky after dark is playing on the tellys down at the local aboriginal community centre

You can imagine all you like but until you go and see for yourself, you are only speculating.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 16:26:17
From: Woodie
ID: 2098299
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:


diddly-squat said:

roughbarked said:

I do. The single largest no vote in my region was at the Aboriginal community centre.

Rev’s argument seemed to be that it was the traditional right-aligned media of bolt and sky and the murdoch press that flipped the dial. I could be wrong, but I don’t image that sky after dark is playing on the tellys down at the local aboriginal community centre

You can imagine all you like but until you go and see for yourself, you are only speculating.

I have five aboriginals in my literacy class. When I raised “The Voice” in discussion with them, they had a look in their eyes as if I’d asked them to explain Darwin’s theory of relativity.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 16:31:33
From: roughbarked
ID: 2098300
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Woodie said:


roughbarked said:

diddly-squat said:

Rev’s argument seemed to be that it was the traditional right-aligned media of bolt and sky and the murdoch press that flipped the dial. I could be wrong, but I don’t image that sky after dark is playing on the tellys down at the local aboriginal community centre

You can imagine all you like but until you go and see for yourself, you are only speculating.

I have five aboriginals in my literacy class. When I raised “The Voice” in discussion with them, they had a look in their eyes as if I’d asked them to explain Darwin’s theory of relativity.

Exactly.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 16:33:17
From: diddly-squat
ID: 2098301
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:


diddly-squat said:

roughbarked said:

I do. The single largest no vote in my region was at the Aboriginal community centre.

Rev’s argument seemed to be that it was the traditional right-aligned media of bolt and sky and the murdoch press that flipped the dial. I could be wrong, but I don’t image that sky after dark is playing on the tellys down at the local aboriginal community centre

You can imagine all you like but until you go and see for yourself, you are only speculating.

so sky after dark is playing on the TV at the community centres?

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 16:35:59
From: roughbarked
ID: 2098302
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

diddly-squat said:


roughbarked said:

diddly-squat said:

Rev’s argument seemed to be that it was the traditional right-aligned media of bolt and sky and the murdoch press that flipped the dial. I could be wrong, but I don’t image that sky after dark is playing on the tellys down at the local aboriginal community centre

You can imagine all you like but until you go and see for yourself, you are only speculating.

so sky after dark is playing on the TV at the community centres?

No, it is playing in the homes.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/11/2023 17:44:38
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2098307
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:

diddly-squat said:

roughbarked said:

You can imagine all you like but until you go and see for yourself, you are only speculating.

so sky after dark is playing on the TV at the community centres?

No, it is playing in the homes.

Right maybe but as dv says: the only poll that sees for itself is the one on the day.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/11/2023 11:06:10
From: roughbarked
ID: 2098428
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/nov/29/nsw-drug-law-overhaul-would-allow-six-marijuana-plants-for-personal-use

Reply Quote

Date: 29/11/2023 11:11:01
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2098431
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:


https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/nov/29/nsw-drug-law-overhaul-would-allow-six-marijuana-plants-for-personal-use

What, for the whole State?

Reply Quote

Date: 29/11/2023 15:34:30
From: roughbarked
ID: 2098486
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:


roughbarked said:

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/nov/29/nsw-drug-law-overhaul-would-allow-six-marijuana-plants-for-personal-use

What, for the whole State?

each.
and you’ll be able to give it to your friends but not sell it.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/11/2023 15:57:41
From: roughbarked
ID: 2098489
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:


captain_spalding said:

roughbarked said:

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/nov/29/nsw-drug-law-overhaul-would-allow-six-marijuana-plants-for-personal-use

What, for the whole State?

each.
and you’ll be able to give it to your friends but not sell it.

Legalise Cannabis Party MLC Jeremy Buckingham has produced a bud of cannabis in NSW parliament, while introducing a bill to legalise the drug.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/11/2023 15:58:58
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2098491
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:

roughbarked said:

captain_spalding said:

What, for the whole State?

each.
and you’ll be able to give it to your friends but not sell it.

Legalise Cannabis Party MLC Jeremy Buckingham has produced a bud of cannabis in NSW parliament, while introducing a bill to legalise the drug.

So the next goal is to develop the biggest baddest cannabis plant.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/11/2023 16:10:03
From: roughbarked
ID: 2098493
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

SCIENCE said:

roughbarked said:

roughbarked said:

each.
and you’ll be able to give it to your friends but not sell it.

Legalise Cannabis Party MLC Jeremy Buckingham has produced a bud of cannabis in NSW parliament, while introducing a bill to legalise the drug.

So the next goal is to develop the biggest baddest cannabis plant.

Already been done.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/11/2023 16:36:00
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2098496
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:

SCIENCE said:

roughbarked said:

Legalise Cannabis Party MLC Jeremy Buckingham has produced a bud of cannabis in NSW parliament, while introducing a bill to legalise the drug.

So the next goal is to develop the biggest baddest cannabis plant.

Already been done.

You mean we could grow 6 plants and have 50000 kg of cannabis legally¿¡

Reply Quote

Date: 29/11/2023 16:37:41
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2098497
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-29/nsw-legalise-cannabis-party-bill-parliament/103166710

Extremists Are All The Same

Reply Quote

Date: 29/11/2023 16:40:19
From: roughbarked
ID: 2098498
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

SCIENCE said:

roughbarked said:

SCIENCE said:

So the next goal is to develop the biggest baddest cannabis plant.

Already been done.

You mean we could grow 6 plants and have 50000 kg of cannabis legally¿¡

and people say I talk shit…. Clearly they musn’t read your posts.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/11/2023 16:41:02
From: roughbarked
ID: 2098499
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

SCIENCE said:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-29/nsw-legalise-cannabis-party-bill-parliament/103166710

Extremists Are All The Same

There’s a difference. Scomo didn’t have a medical prescription for his coal addiction.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/11/2023 16:46:50
From: sarahs mum
ID: 2098501
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:


captain_spalding said:

roughbarked said:

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/nov/29/nsw-drug-law-overhaul-would-allow-six-marijuana-plants-for-personal-use

What, for the whole State?

each.
and you’ll be able to give it to your friends but not sell it.

Which is the charge-supply.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/11/2023 16:53:06
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2098504
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

roughbarked said:

SCIENCE said:

roughbarked said:

Already been done.

You mean we could grow 6 plants and have 50000 kg of cannabis legally¿¡

and people say I talk shit…. Clearly they musn’t read your posts.

Fair point, our envelope was faulty, the estimated most massive land plant currently is like 2000 kg so we revise our legal stockpile to 10000 kg.

We plead the engineer defense.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/11/2023 17:26:26
From: roughbarked
ID: 2098514
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

sarahs mum said:


roughbarked said:

captain_spalding said:

What, for the whole State?

each.
and you’ll be able to give it to your friends but not sell it.

Which is the charge-supply.

At the moment, yes.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/11/2023 20:04:41
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2098565
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Seems the Sam Newmans of the nation are making the most of the referendum result:

Aboriginal elders hurt after Northern Areas Council removes Acknowledgement of Country

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-29/aboriginal-elders-northern-areas-council-acknowledgement-country/103165102

Reply Quote

Date: 30/11/2023 12:06:24
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2098725
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Hey Karl, What The Fuck Is The Definition Of Inflation ¿

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-30/harvey-norman-boss-gerry-harvey-price-increase-profits-inflation/103167312

Harvey says businesses are justified in passing on cost increases through higher prices to maintain their profit margins and prevent bankruptcies, despite the Reserve Bank warning it could lead to higher inflation.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/11/2023 12:20:13
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2098730
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

SCIENCE said:

Hey Karl, What The Fuck Is The Definition Of Inflation ¿

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-30/harvey-norman-boss-gerry-harvey-price-increase-profits-inflation/103167312

Harvey says businesses are justified in passing on cost increases through higher prices to maintain their profit margins and prevent bankruptcies, despite the Reserve Bank warning it could lead to higher inflation.

Now, now, we all know that the sole cause of inflation is ridiculous wage demands by greedy workers.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/11/2023 12:24:50
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2098732
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:

SCIENCE said:

Hey Karl, What The Fuck Is The Definition Of Inflation ¿

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-30/harvey-norman-boss-gerry-harvey-price-increase-profits-inflation/103167312

Harvey says businesses are justified in passing on cost increases through higher prices to maintain their profit margins and prevent bankruptcies, despite the Reserve Bank warning it could lead to higher inflation.

Now, now, we all know that the sole cause of inflation is ridiculous wage demands by greedy workers.

Exactly, get a load of these communist fools, everyone knows that

in Trickle-Down Economics®, inflation is magic because it doesn’t Trickle-Down at all ¡

Reply Quote

Date: 30/11/2023 12:28:23
From: Cymek
ID: 2098735
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

captain_spalding said:


SCIENCE said:

Hey Karl, What The Fuck Is The Definition Of Inflation ¿

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-30/harvey-norman-boss-gerry-harvey-price-increase-profits-inflation/103167312

Harvey says businesses are justified in passing on cost increases through higher prices to maintain their profit margins and prevent bankruptcies, despite the Reserve Bank warning it could lead to higher inflation.

Now, now, we all know that the sole cause of inflation is ridiculous wage demands by greedy workers.

How dare they want to be able to afford basic needs

Reply Quote

Date: 30/11/2023 12:32:26
From: diddly-squat
ID: 2098739
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

SCIENCE said:

captain_spalding said:

SCIENCE said:

Hey Karl, What The Fuck Is The Definition Of Inflation ¿

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-30/harvey-norman-boss-gerry-harvey-price-increase-profits-inflation/103167312

Harvey says businesses are justified in passing on cost increases through higher prices to maintain their profit margins and prevent bankruptcies, despite the Reserve Bank warning it could lead to higher inflation.

Now, now, we all know that the sole cause of inflation is ridiculous wage demands by greedy workers.

Exactly, get a load of these communist fools, everyone knows that

in Trickle-Down Economics®, inflation is magic because it doesn’t Trickle-Down at all ¡

Not sure anyone is arguing that the stage 3 tax cuts won’t be inflationary, but it’s fair to say that a very board cross section of the working population get tax relief specifically through these cuts so it’s not all “the big end of town”

There is Buckley’s chance that the Labs will walk back the tax cuts – especially given where they are in the polls – and in my view this is a good thing for everyone as I think it will lead to a more holistic review and discussion of tax reform.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/11/2023 12:50:05
From: buffy
ID: 2098742
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

Have we done this one this morning? It seems the coalition doesn’t like what the review found.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-30/unemployment-services-review-recommends-reinvention-compliance/103165740

I liked this comment from the chair of the parliamentary enquiry committee. Which the ABC highlighted.

“We have an inefficient outsourced fragmented social security compliance management system that sometimes gets someone a job against all odds.”

Reply Quote

Date: 30/11/2023 19:24:27
From: dv
ID: 2098844
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-30/sunshine-coast-brisbane-2032-olympics/103169818

Federal government says Sunshine Coast rail is ‘priority’ ahead of Brisbane 2032 Olympics, weeks after questions raised over costs

The federal government has said it will “prioritise” the Sunshine Coast rail extension ahead of the Brisbane 2032 Olympic Games, just weeks after saying it had no “confidence or assurance” about its cost.

Another $160 million has been reserved for a “business case, planning and early works”.

Earlier this month, nine Queensland infrastructure projects were canned.

Asked about the Sunshine Coast rail project at the time, federal Infrastructure Minister Catherine King said it had gone billions of dollars over what was “previously stated,” and was one of several projects nationally “undergoing a proper planning process that was not previously carried out”.

This week state Infrastructure Minister Steven Miles and Queensland mayors and industry leaders met with Ms King in Canberra.

Ms King said the government’s position on the Sunshine Coast rail project “hasn’t changed”.

“We have already made significant commitments to help ensure the success of the Brisbane 2032 Olympics,” she said in a statement.

“The importance of rail and of the role of the Direct Sunshine Coast Rail Line as part of the transport infrastructure for the Olympics is why our commitment to it hasn’t changed.”

Mr Miles welcomed the funding, adding that the Sunshine Coast needed direct rail.

“Not only will a new rail line on the Sunny Coast make a huge difference for the 2032 Games, it will also mean less time in the car and commuting for lots of people on the Sunshine Coast,” he said.

The design has yet to be finalised but the planning notes include the following:

Reply Quote

Date: 1/12/2023 09:54:06
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2098961
Subject: re: Australian Politics - November 2023

dv said:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-30/sunshine-coast-brisbane-2032-olympics/103169818

Federal government says Sunshine Coast rail is ‘priority’ ahead of Brisbane 2032 Olympics, weeks after questions raised over costs

The federal government has said it will “prioritise” the Sunshine Coast rail extension ahead of the Brisbane 2032 Olympic Games, just weeks after saying it had no “confidence or assurance” about its cost.

Another $160 million has been reserved for a “business case, planning and early works”.

Earlier this month, nine Queensland infrastructure projects were canned.

Asked about the Sunshine Coast rail project at the time, federal Infrastructure Minister Catherine King said it had gone billions of dollars over what was “previously stated,” and was one of several projects nationally “undergoing a proper planning process that was not previously carried out”.

This week state Infrastructure Minister Steven Miles and Queensland mayors and industry leaders met with Ms King in Canberra.

Ms King said the government’s position on the Sunshine Coast rail project “hasn’t changed”.

“We have already made significant commitments to help ensure the success of the Brisbane 2032 Olympics,” she said in a statement.

“The importance of rail and of the role of the Direct Sunshine Coast Rail Line as part of the transport infrastructure for the Olympics is why our commitment to it hasn’t changed.”

Mr Miles welcomed the funding, adding that the Sunshine Coast needed direct rail.

“Not only will a new rail line on the Sunny Coast make a huge difference for the 2032 Games, it will also mean less time in the car and commuting for lots of people on the Sunshine Coast,” he said.

The design has yet to be finalised but the planning notes include the following:

  • new electrified rail 37 km long
  • seven new stations including the terminus at Maroochydore
  • joins the existing electric line north of Beerwah through-running to Brisbane

Wait, what happened ¿

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-12-01/rozelle-interchange-explainer-first-week-congestion/103172454

We thought everyone knew that if you build a big new road then traffic gets lighter ¿¡

Reply Quote