Cyclion – Harnessing tech to turn the waste bound for landfill or the …
Cyclion’s science-led system costs less, is modular and therefore scalable, and has negligible emissions. Embark on a recycling revolution, where minimal …
Cyclion – Harnessing tech to turn the waste bound for landfill or the …
Cyclion’s science-led system costs less, is modular and therefore scalable, and has negligible emissions. Embark on a recycling revolution, where minimal …
It’s The Method (particularly chemical) which concerns me
since having read more (…and more to the point LESS)
about it https://www.cyclion.energy/ I was immediately
struck by the total lack of information I found about it
…other than “we’ll just Liquify It” …and of course
WHOOPEE! more money + less bulk waste…
Ogmog said:
It’s The Method (particularly chemical) which concerns me
since having read more (…and more to the point LESS)
about it https://www.cyclion.energy/ I was immediately
struck by the total lack of information I found about it
…other than “we’ll just Liquify It” …and of course
WHOOPEE! more money + less bulk waste…
He makes claims that aren’t explained well enough for me and if it was that easy, why hasn’t every country already got one or more of them?
roughbarked said:
Ogmog said:
It’s The Method (particularly chemical) which concerns me
since having read more (…and more to the point LESS)
about it https://www.cyclion.energy/ I was immediately
struck by the total lack of information I found about it
…other than “we’ll just Liquify It” …and of course
WHOOPEE! more money + less bulk waste…He makes claims that aren’t explained well enough for me and if it was that easy, why hasn’t every country already got one or more of them?
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131897
Leads to
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959652622015074?via%3Dihub
roughbarked said:
roughbarked said:
Ogmog said:
It’s The Method (particularly chemical) which concerns me
since having read more (…and more to the point LESS)
about it https://www.cyclion.energy/ I was immediately
struck by the total lack of information I found about it
…other than “we’ll just Liquify It” …and of course
WHOOPEE! more money + less bulk waste…He makes claims that aren’t explained well enough for me and if it was that easy, why hasn’t every country already got one or more of them?
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131897
Leads to
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959652622015074?via%3Dihub
Cyclion is a climate tech venture in the pre revenue research phase with a Patent Pending (No 2023900407C). The business will employ proprietary next generation technology referred to as the ’Cyclion Catalytic Fluid’ (CCF) process (or the ‘Cyclion Process’) to liquify plastics and organic rubbish and convert it into fuel or electricity in a much more environmentally friendly, sustainable, and profitable manner.
Still and all the research is done in Queensland at QUT.
the IDEA is good
breaking down (liquifying) biomass is one thing, however my concern is the toxic chemical additives
that went into the initial production of the plastic softeners.
furthermore, what kind of chemicals that needs to be added to that to liquify them
from there, the proposition to utilize it for fuel brings up the concern of putting them into the atmosphere.
remember
FRACKING was also sold to us as a cheap way to get an available inexpensive fuel source……….. OPPS! /-:
the whole proposition of selling the scheme as lets learn by building the facilities in order to learn
where and why we shouldn’t have invested in it in the first place.
iow
I’d like to learn more about the process before taking a vote on it
We swear every time we see this thread it feels like someone is trying to recycle Zyklon.
SCIENCE said:
We swear every time we see this thread it feels like someone is trying to recycle Zyklon.
I’ll give you a B for that.