https://x.com/OceanTerra/status/1726342052961493328?s=20

https://x.com/OceanTerra/status/1726342052961493328?s=20

So it’s peaked¿
Well Those 66% Should Get Their Act Together And Help The Economy Grow More Instead Of Being All Tight And Limited With Their Emissions
Excellent News ¡
https://www.unep.org/resources/emissions-gap-report-2023
Today, the projected increase is 3 per cent. However, predicted 2030 greenhouse gas emissions still must fall by 28 per cent for the Paris Agreement 2°C pathway and 42 per cent for the 1.5°C pathway.
But More Fun In Title ¡
Energy modeller Rystad says accelerated transition to clean technologies puts global climate goals ‘within reach’
but a lack of ambition all around means nobody is going to put up their hands¡
SCIENCE said:
Energy modeller Rystad says accelerated transition to clean technologies puts global climate goals ‘within reach’
but a lack of ambition all around means nobody is going to put up their hands¡
Many refuse to encompass change, even though it is clear that the change is necessary for their children’s survival.
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:Energy modeller Rystad says accelerated transition to clean technologies puts global climate goals ‘within reach’
but a lack of ambition all around means nobody is going to put up their hands¡
Many refuse to encompass change, even though it is clear that the change is necessary for their children’s survival.
Here’s Helen Dalton trying to make sure that she stays one of the elite water hoggers.
Sorry We Thought Drowning Was Oh Wait Look Over There
>>On November 17 and 18, the world was, on average, 2 degrees Celsius warmer than pre-industrial levels for the first time in modern recorded history.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2023-11-24/earth-2-degrees-celsius-warmer-two-days-climate-change-threshold/103129020
PermeateFree said:
>>On November 17 and 18, the world was, on average, 2 degrees Celsius warmer than pre-industrial levels for the first time in modern recorded history.
So it’s cooling again.
PermeateFree said:
>>On November 17 and 18, the world was, on average, 2 degrees Celsius warmer than pre-industrial levels for the first time in modern recorded history.https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2023-11-24/earth-2-degrees-celsius-warmer-two-days-climate-change-threshold/103129020
I can’t see Tambora on that second graph, it doesn’t go back far enough. But I think I can see Krakatoa. What happened in the early 1960s? I presume that last dip is Pinatubo.
Guess We Know How Much More Lobbying And Corruption Money They’re Willing To Throw Down Before Calling It A Day
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/net-zero-risks-wiping-3-152142339.html

Net zero risks wiping $3 trillion from oil and gas companies
World, Crumbling


SCIENCE said:
It seems they didn’t bother asking in Australia, and New Zealand has sunk below sea level already.
The Rev Dodgson said:
SCIENCE said:
It seems they didn’t bother asking in Australia, and New Zealand has sunk below sea level already.
Seems like the whole of the Pacific and islands has done while parts of Russia and North America have also disappeared beneath the waves.
roughbarked said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
SCIENCE said:
It seems they didn’t bother asking in Australia, and New Zealand has sunk below sea level already.
Seems like the whole of the Pacific and islands has done while parts of Russia and North America have also disappeared beneath the waves.
PF lies!
Getting better with them though looks convincing
SCIENCE said:
Not a great map. There’s little contrast between 50-50 and “no data”.
Because investing in
While the plan has won approval from renewable energy developers and environmentalists, it has also come under fire from the federal opposition over claims it will expose taxpayers to too much risk.
obsolete technologies that pollute and global warm and poison and are slow to respond and are dangerous to extract for is the definition of defensive ¡
I love it!
Particularly that 45% in the USA.
Could it be that people in the USA have more knowledge about Al Gore?

mollwollfumble said:
I love it!Particularly that 45% in the USA.
Could it be that people in the USA have more knowledge about Al Gore?
I haven’t actually checked his background, but I’m pretty sure that Al Gore is not a climate scientist, and does not claim to be one.
The Rev Dodgson said:
mollwollfumble said:
I love it!Particularly that 45% in the USA.
Could it be that people in the USA have more knowledge about Al Gore?
I haven’t actually checked his background, but I’m pretty sure that Al Gore is not a climate scientist, and does not claim to be one.
He pretended to be one, with his “Inconvenient Truth” video. Predicting a collapse of the Greenland ice sheet and a flood of refugees into the USA.
mollwollfumble said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
mollwollfumble said:
I love it!Particularly that 45% in the USA.
Could it be that people in the USA have more knowledge about Al Gore?
I haven’t actually checked his background, but I’m pretty sure that Al Gore is not a climate scientist, and does not claim to be one.
He pretended to be one, with his “Inconvenient Truth” video. Predicting a collapse of the Greenland ice sheet and a flood of refugees into the USA.
I didn’t actually watch it, but I’d imagine it was presented as a report on what climate scientists were saying, rather than the work of someone who actually was a climate scientist.
So how confident are you that continuing GHG emissions will not increase the probability of the Greenland ice sheet collapsing, with a resulting huge increase in the number of refugees?
Given the consequences of the event, the probability would have to be very close to zero to justify doing nothing, wouldn’t it?
The Rev Dodgson said:
mollwollfumble said:
The Rev Dodgson said:I haven’t actually checked his background, but I’m pretty sure that Al Gore is not a climate scientist, and does not claim to be one.
He pretended to be one, with his “Inconvenient Truth” video. Predicting a collapse of the Greenland ice sheet and a flood of refugees into the USA.
I didn’t actually watch it, but I’d imagine it was presented as a report on what climate scientists were saying, rather than the work of someone who actually was a climate scientist.
So how confident are you that continuing GHG emissions will not increase the probability of the Greenland ice sheet collapsing, with a resulting huge increase in the number of refugees?
Given the consequences of the event, the probability would have to be very close to zero to justify doing nothing, wouldn’t it?