roughbarked said:
What I do know is that the number of people looking has increased. The detection methods have been enhanced. Luck has been a large part of it because we may well be lucky that some habitat exists so that the species has survived. Albeit in tiny numbers and without expanded habitat and compatible life forms, the system crashes mean that many more species will be lost or marooned.
Yes better detection methods. The early discoveries are largely due to the method of shoot first and ask questions later. Which hasn’t been permitted for nearly 50 years, except in special cases like lobsters.
The original article seems to refer to this
https://www.rewild.org/lost-species/top-25-most-wanted-lost-species
https://www.rewild.org/lost-species-faq
The Search for Lost Species program started in 2017.
“After launching in 2017, we are now on the second iteration of our top 25 most wanted lost species list. In 2022, we rotated the eight lost species that had been rediscovered—Jackson’s Climbing Salamander in Guatemala, Wallace’s Giant Bee in Indonesia, Velvet Pitcher Plant in Indonesia, Silver-backed Chevrotain in Vietnam, Somali Sengi in Djibouti, Fernandina Galápagos Tortoise in the Galápagos, Sierra Leone Crab in Sierra Leone, and Voeltzkow’s Chameleon in Madagascar—and rotated eight new lost species onto the list.”
“Two of our lists—lost birds and lost freshwater fishes—represent more comprehensive partnerships under the broader Search for Lost Species program.”
“Our lost legends list are those that are, in all likelihood, extinct, and are often declared as such on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, and are considered long-shots for rediscovery, but they live on in our collective imagination. Think Tasmanian Tiger and Ivory-billed Woodpecker—species that we hear about every few years when rumours of sightings make the headlines.”
On the other hand. This is a worry.
https://www.rewild.org/get-to-know/action-funds = 404 | Not Found