Date: 29/03/2024 00:30:35
From: PermeateFree
ID: 2140102
Subject: We may need a new 'Category 6' hurricane level for winds over 192 mph, study suggests

Scientists argue that adding a Category 6 to the hurricane scale will be needed as the climate changes.


We see a huge hurricane over Earth in a photo taken from space.
Hurricane Sam churns in the Atlantic Ocean in the fall of 2021.

Five categories may not be enough to convey the power of hurricanes that occur in a warming world, new research finds.

The current scale for communicating hurricane risk, the Saffir-Simpson Wind Scale, categorizes storms using wind speeds. The mildest category, Category 1, involves wind speeds between 74 and 95 mph (119 to 153 km/h), while the strongest, Category 5, involves wind speeds of 158 mph (254 km/h) or higher.

Warm ocean temperatures strengthen hurricanes because the storms pull moisture more easily from warmer oceans. This means both more rainfall and stronger winds when storms make landfall. As ocean temperatures increase and feed stronger hurricanes, it may be necessary to add a Category 6 to describe storms with winds of 192 mph (309 km/h) or higher, researchers said Feb. 5 in the journal PNAS.

“Our motivation is to reconsider how the open-endedness of the Saffir-Simpson Scale can lead to underestimation of risk, and, in particular, how this underestimation becomes increasingly problematic in a warming world,” study co-author Michael Werner, a climate scientist at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, said in a statement.

The scientists first looked at wind speeds in hurricanes between 1980 and 2021, tracking trends over time. They found that five storms had winds of over 192 mph, and that all five of those storms occurred in the nine years before 2021.

The researchers then conducted simulations to see how future warming might affect hurricanes and their Pacific Ocean iterations, typhoons. They found that the risk of a typhoon with winds over 192 mph increases by 50% near the Philippines with 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit (2 degrees Celsius) of warming above pre-industrial temperatures. This is the temperature threshold that signatories to the 2015 Paris Agreement pledged not to cross; it’s uncertain when the mercury will rise that high.

In a world warmed by 3.6 F, the risk of a storm with more than 192 mph winds would also double in the Gulf of Mexico, the researchers found. The Philippines, Gulf of Mexico and Southeast Asia were most at risk of getting these “Category 6” storms.

The Saffir-Simpson Winds Scale is also limited by its focus on wind speeds, whereas storm surge and flooding can be a major danger to life and property during tropical storms, hurricanes and typhoons, James Kossin, a climate scientist at the University of Wisconsin, said in the statement. A Category 6 would not address that issue but might bring awareness to the increased risk from storms overall under a warming climate, he added.

“Our results are not meant to propose changes to this scale, but rather to raise awareness that the wind-hazard risk from storms presently designated as Category 5 has increased and will continue to increase under climate change,” he said.

https://www.livescience.com/planet-earth/hurricanes/we-may-need-a-new-category-6-hurricane-level-for-winds-over-192-mph-study-suggests

Reply Quote

Date: 8/04/2024 06:13:40
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 2143033
Subject: re: We may need a new 'Category 6' hurricane level for winds over 192 mph, study suggests

It’s amazing how quickly hurricanes lose wind speed as they come on shore.

It can drop in intensity by 2 or 3 categories just by approaching land. Which means that small offshore islands are at by far the greatest risk.

Reply Quote

Date: 8/04/2024 08:00:09
From: Tamb
ID: 2143041
Subject: re: We may need a new 'Category 6' hurricane level for winds over 192 mph, study suggests

mollwollfumble said:


It’s amazing how quickly hurricanes lose wind speed as they come on shore.

It can drop in intensity by 2 or 3 categories just by approaching land. Which means that small offshore islands are at by far the greatest risk.


Australia’s Willis Island regularly had its wind speed instrument blown away.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/04/2024 14:16:06
From: ScarlettaPimpernella
ID: 2145548
Subject: re: We may need a new 'Category 6' hurricane level for winds over 192 mph, study suggests

EGADS!

Category 6!

Reply Quote

Date: 17/04/2024 14:20:26
From: Bogsnorkler
ID: 2145554
Subject: re: We may need a new 'Category 6' hurricane level for winds over 192 mph, study suggests

ScarlettaPimpernella said:


EGADS!

Category 6!

should go up to 11.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/04/2024 14:22:55
From: ScarlettaPimpernella
ID: 2145557
Subject: re: We may need a new 'Category 6' hurricane level for winds over 192 mph, study suggests

Bogsnorkler said:


ScarlettaPimpernella said:

EGADS!

Category 6!

should go up to 11.

Really?

Are you taking the piss?

I am gullible about these things.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/04/2024 14:23:39
From: Tamb
ID: 2145559
Subject: re: We may need a new 'Category 6' hurricane level for winds over 192 mph, study suggests

ScarlettaPimpernella said:


EGADS!

Category 6!


I’m happy to have a Cat 6 on the list.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/04/2024 14:26:44
From: ScarlettaPimpernella
ID: 2145561
Subject: re: We may need a new 'Category 6' hurricane level for winds over 192 mph, study suggests

Tamb said:


ScarlettaPimpernella said:

EGADS!

Category 6!


I’m happy to have a Cat 6 on the list.

The weather is changing so much, is everyone jaded? Or too tired?

Reply Quote

Date: 17/04/2024 14:35:41
From: Bogsnorkler
ID: 2145565
Subject: re: We may need a new 'Category 6' hurricane level for winds over 192 mph, study suggests

ScarlettaPimpernella said:


Bogsnorkler said:

ScarlettaPimpernella said:

EGADS!

Category 6!

should go up to 11.

Really?

Are you taking the piss?

I am gullible about these things.

it is a spinal tap reference.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/04/2024 14:38:19
From: ScarlettaPimpernella
ID: 2145570
Subject: re: We may need a new 'Category 6' hurricane level for winds over 192 mph, study suggests

Bogsnorkler said:


ScarlettaPimpernella said:

Bogsnorkler said:

should go up to 11.

Really?

Are you taking the piss?

I am gullible about these things.

it is a spinal tap reference.

Sorry I missed the reference when you were being funny.

My funny bone has been temporarily turned off.

Reply Quote