Date: 12/06/2024 10:23:29
From: roughbarked
ID: 2164109
Subject: The forgotten Greenhouse gas emissions

Over the past three years … we’ve seen an even faster growth rate of accumulation of N2O into the atmosphere, almost 30 per cent faster than the previous decade.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/06/2024 10:28:18
From: dv
ID: 2164113
Subject: re: The forgotten Greenhouse gas emissions

roughbarked said:


Over the past three years … we’ve seen an even faster growth rate of accumulation of N2O into the atmosphere, almost 30 per cent faster than the previous decade.

I did forget about that one.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/06/2024 10:31:18
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2164115
Subject: re: The forgotten Greenhouse gas emissions

dv said:


roughbarked said:

Over the past three years … we’ve seen an even faster growth rate of accumulation of N2O into the atmosphere, almost 30 per cent faster than the previous decade.

I did forget about that one.

LOL. Errr sorry about that. Too much Nos.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/06/2024 11:16:36
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2164132
Subject: re: The forgotten Greenhouse gas emissions

dv said:


roughbarked said:

Over the past three years … we’ve seen an even faster growth rate of accumulation of N2O into the atmosphere, almost 30 per cent faster than the previous decade.

I did forget about that one.

“Over the same period there was a 95 per cent increase in nitrogen fertiliser production which went from 12.94 million tonnes to 122.74 million tonnes per year.”

109.8/12.94 = 95% ??

Reply Quote

Date: 12/06/2024 11:23:55
From: dv
ID: 2164138
Subject: re: The forgotten Greenhouse gas emissions

The Rev Dodgson said:


dv said:

roughbarked said:

Over the past three years … we’ve seen an even faster growth rate of accumulation of N2O into the atmosphere, almost 30 per cent faster than the previous decade.

I did forget about that one.

“Over the same period there was a 95 per cent increase in nitrogen fertiliser production which went from 12.94 million tonnes to 122.74 million tonnes per year.”

109.8/12.94 = 95% ??

Good catch

Reply Quote