Were you serious about selling some? I’ve decided which frog I like so if it’s OK decide on a size.

bubba louie said:

Were you serious about selling some? I’ve decided which frog I like so if it’s OK decide on a size.

I’ll decide on a size.

bubba louie said:

Were you serious about selling some? I’ve decided which frog I like so if it’s OK decide on a size.

yeah why not eh? How would you like it printed on? I have done some shots in the past and printed them on canvass and that is pretty cool. Already stretched canvass that is.

I do have some canvass paper here that is A4, but you would need to frame it…

Or I could get some expensive paper or stuff?

painmaster said:

bubba louie said:

Were you serious about selling some? I’ve decided which frog I like so if it’s OK decide on a size.

yeah why not eh? How would you like it printed on? I have done some shots in the past and printed them on canvass and that is pretty cool. Already stretched canvass that is.

I do have some canvass paper here that is A4, but you would need to frame it…

Or I could get some expensive paper or stuff?

It’ll be framed and under glass, so what would you reccommend?

MrBL says good quality paper, A3 size.

Can you let me know a rough cost first?

bubba louie said:

MrBL says good quality paper, A3 size.

Can you let me know a rough cost first?

I can’t personally print A3… but I can check out a couple of places around town… printed on Archival paper. I’ll see.

what is the max. capture size of your camera?

For an A3 size printed at 300dpi, photo quality, file size of at least 4800 pixel x 3600 pixel is needed, that would be a file size of 49.4mb
some do it otherways on smaller file sizes but you will be settling for a lesser quality.

have you looked at colour management of capture to computer to print? If you source a print house they should provide you with colour correction files ie. a colour work space.

painmaster said:

bubba louie said:

MrBL says good quality paper, A3 size.

Can you let me know a rough cost first?

I can’t personally print A3… but I can check out a couple of places around town… printed on Archival paper. I’ll see.

Hold on, there’s been a change of plans. Now he’s thinking canvas. Can you do that about A3 size?

trichome said:

what is the max. capture size of your camera?

For an A3 size printed at 300dpi, photo quality, file size of at least 4800 pixel x 3600 pixel is needed, that would be a file size of 49.4mb
some do it otherways on smaller file sizes but you will be settling for a lesser quality.

have you looked at colour management of capture to computer to print? If you source a print house they should provide you with colour correction files ie. a colour work space.

the max capture size of my camera is 3720 × 2800 and around 11mb. Surely this will print to A3? I don’t know of a camera that can produce a 49mb image???

bubba louie said:

painmaster said:

bubba louie said:

MrBL says good quality paper, A3 size.

Can you let me know a rough cost first?

I can’t personally print A3… but I can check out a couple of places around town… printed on Archival paper. I’ll see.

Hold on, there’s been a change of plans. Now he’s thinking canvas. Can you do that about A3 size?

sorry, I can only print A4 at home… :(

pain master said:

trichome said:

what is the max. capture size of your camera?

For an A3 size printed at 300dpi, photo quality, file size of at least 4800 pixel x 3600 pixel is needed, that would be a file size of 49.4mb
some do it otherways on smaller file sizes but you will be settling for a lesser quality.

have you looked at colour management of capture to computer to print? If you source a print house they should provide you with colour correction files ie. a colour work space.

the max capture size of my camera is 3720 × 2800 and around 11mb. Surely this will print to A3? I don’t know of a camera that can produce a 49mb image???

Yeah the 11mb image can be interpolated to the A3 size, but at about 1/4th of professional quality, the interpolation software will guess at what pixels should have been there, instead of the capture being at full size. What is worse is when the shooter captures in .jpg and looses even more pixels in the .jpg compression. It does come as a shock just how many pixels are required, sometimes medium or large format cameras are needed for jobs.
Looking at camera capture specs. ie. max. capture size and looking at what camera manufacturer promotions departments say is often two different things.
The most important thing is that you are happy with your outcomes at present.

trichome said:

pain master said:

trichome said:

what is the max. capture size of your camera?

For an A3 size printed at 300dpi, photo quality, file size of at least 4800 pixel x 3600 pixel is needed, that would be a file size of 49.4mb
some do it otherways on smaller file sizes but you will be settling for a lesser quality.

have you looked at colour management of capture to computer to print? If you source a print house they should provide you with colour correction files ie. a colour work space.

the max capture size of my camera is 3720 × 2800 and around 11mb. Surely this will print to A3? I don’t know of a camera that can produce a 49mb image???

Yeah the 11mb image can be interpolated to the A3 size, but at about 1/4th of professional quality, the interpolation software will guess at what pixels should have been there, instead of the capture being at full size. What is worse is when the shooter captures in .jpg and looses even more pixels in the .jpg compression. It does come as a shock just how many pixels are required, sometimes medium or large format cameras are needed for jobs.
Looking at camera capture specs. ie. max. capture size and looking at what camera manufacturer promotions departments say is often two different things.
The most important thing is that you are happy with your outcomes at present.

Very well said, thanks trichome

pain master said:

bubba louie said:

painmaster said:

I can’t personally print A3… but I can check out a couple of places around town… printed on Archival paper. I’ll see.

Hold on, there’s been a change of plans. Now he’s thinking canvas. Can you do that about A3 size?

sorry, I can only print A4 at home… :(

I’ll consult MrBL and we’ll get back to you.

roughbarked said:

trichome said:

pain master said:

the max capture size of my camera is 3720 × 2800 and around 11mb. Surely this will print to A3? I don’t know of a camera that can produce a 49mb image???

Yeah the 11mb image can be interpolated to the A3 size, but at about 1/4th of professional quality, the interpolation software will guess at what pixels should have been there, instead of the capture being at full size. What is worse is when the shooter captures in .jpg and looses even more pixels in the .jpg compression. It does come as a shock just how many pixels are required, sometimes medium or large format cameras are needed for jobs.
Looking at camera capture specs. ie. max. capture size and looking at what camera manufacturer promotions departments say is often two different things.
The most important thing is that you are happy with your outcomes at present.

Very well said, thanks trichome

Yeah what Roughy said…

In my defence, I do shoot in the RAW which with my camera does have limited compression.

So what is a Medium or Large format camera? Are we talking full sensor?

painmaster said:

roughbarked said:

trichome said:

Yeah the 11mb image can be interpolated to the A3 size, but at about 1/4th of professional quality, the interpolation software will guess at what pixels should have been there, instead of the capture being at full size. What is worse is when the shooter captures in .jpg and looses even more pixels in the .jpg compression. It does come as a shock just how many pixels are required, sometimes medium or large format cameras are needed for jobs.
Looking at camera capture specs. ie. max. capture size and looking at what camera manufacturer promotions departments say is often two different things.
The most important thing is that you are happy with your outcomes at present.

Very well said, thanks trichome

Yeah what Roughy said…

In my defence, I do shoot in the RAW which with my camera does have limited compression.

So what is a Medium or Large format camera? Are we talking full sensor?

I seem to be hearing about a side of you that I never knew existed. Don’t ever put up a pic of yourself will you?

painmaster said:

So what is a Medium or Large format camera? Are we talking full sensor?

going back to film days the medium format cameras, eg. Hasselblad, took the 120 and 220 film size, these days they have the digital sensors larger than 35mm size.
Look at Pro’s like Annie Leibovitz for example she uses medium format for a lot of her shooting, amongst other types of camera, as do many others. Ansell Adams used large format and used to trek into the wilderness for many, many months at a time with a crew of people and donkeys just waiting for the perfect lighting conditions for the scenes he shot. I hung his exhibition in Toowoomba Regional Gallery when it visited from the Australian Gallery Canberra, on loan from Canada i think it was, some years back now, brilliant photos :)

Medium format

Large format took the 4×5 and 8×10 film and bigger size, today these large format digital sensors are much larger than the meduim format cameras.

Large format

just mentioning this to open up other information for you to perhaps add to the very good, really great photos i have seen here on screen from you. it is worth knowing about this and colour work spaces etc. because you do good work :)

i can imagine PM doing diploma of photography in the future :)

trichome said:

i can imagine PM doing diploma of photography in the future :)

thanks trichome, but I like my job too much…

i didn’t mean change jobs :)

trichome said:

i didn’t mean change jobs :)

i know… my job doesn’t give me enough time for my hobbies… so a dip in photography would take a bit of effort. More then I have..

trichome said:

painmaster said:

So what is a Medium or Large format camera? Are we talking full sensor?

going back to film days the medium format cameras, eg. Hasselblad, took the 120 and 220 film size, these days they have the digital sensors larger than 35mm size.
Look at Pro’s like Annie Leibovitz for example she uses medium format for a lot of her shooting, amongst other types of camera, as do many others. Ansell Adams used large format and used to trek into the wilderness for many, many months at a time with a crew of people and donkeys just waiting for the perfect lighting conditions for the scenes he shot. I hung his exhibition in Toowoomba Regional Gallery when it visited from the Australian Gallery Canberra, on loan from Canada i think it was, some years back now, brilliant photos :)

Medium format

Large format took the 4×5 and 8×10 film and bigger size, today these large format digital sensors are much larger than the meduim format cameras.

Large format

just mentioning this to open up other information for you to perhaps add to the very good, really great photos i have seen here on screen from you. it is worth knowing about this and colour work spaces etc. because you do good work :)

Again, well said

Check this out PM. Would your resolution be enough?

http://deals.com.au/Brisbane

bubba louie said:

Check this out PM. Would your resolution be enough?

http://deals.com.au/Brisbane

Of course, if you’d rather not send a heap of strangers one of your photos I quite understand.

bubba louie said:

Check this out PM. Would your resolution be enough?

http://deals.com.au/Brisbane

I have just printed 3 photos off at A4 on canvass and they look pretty sweet! Stunning actually….

bubba louie said:

bubba louie said:

Check this out PM. Would your resolution be enough?

http://deals.com.au/Brisbane

Of course, if you’d rather not send a heap of strangers one of your photos I quite understand.

I have printed onto stretched canvass before, 30cm x 30cm using Go Fish or someone, and that has worked really well….

bubba louie said:

Check this out PM. Would your resolution be enough?

http://deals.com.au/Brisbane

that site is taking forever Bubba, sorry…

pain master said:

bubba louie said:

Check this out PM. Would your resolution be enough?

http://deals.com.au/Brisbane

I have just printed 3 photos off at A4 on canvass and they look pretty sweet! Stunning actually….

But would they be OK at the larger size?

pain master said:

bubba louie said:

bubba louie said:

Check this out PM. Would your resolution be enough?

http://deals.com.au/Brisbane

Of course, if you’d rather not send a heap of strangers one of your photos I quite understand.

I have printed onto stretched canvass before, 30cm x 30cm using Go Fish or someone, and that has worked really well….

How does the price compare?

pain master said:

bubba louie said:

Check this out PM. Would your resolution be enough?

http://deals.com.au/Brisbane

that site is taking forever Bubba, sorry…

Today’s Deal: Create your own masterpiece! Only $49 for a Large 60cm x 40cm canvas print plus get FREE DELIVERY plus a $60 voucher. Turn your snapshots into works of art. Valued at $189 from Canvas Lab.

It comes already mounted. I’d have to download your photo though.

bubba have you seen any work from this canvas labs ?

they simply recomend that you upload a photo, this sounds like very, very amatuerish stuff to me, simply uploading a .jpg and not working from raw and .tiff in my view will produce something laking, viewed from a distance it could appear ok but up closer it will probably look soft or appear like it is not focused.
PM might be able to produce a more professional canvas triptytch working from the full image file and will give a much better appearance, especially if this is for in a home or hung at exhibition :)

i should add that,yes, canvas will give a softer look, as opposed to sharp on paper, that is a characteristic of canvas, and with the right images looks good, but, add a 1/4 baked image to the mix = disaster.
they probably get away with it, saying that “oh, canvas gives a softer look” and to untrained eyes, well they just accept a lesser quality as being good.

trichome said:

i should add that,yes, canvas will give a softer look, as opposed to sharp on paper, that is a characteristic of canvas, and with the right images looks good, but, add a 1/4 baked image to the mix = disaster.
they probably get away with it, saying that “oh, canvas gives a softer look” and to untrained eyes, well they just accept a lesser quality as being good.

phew, for a minute there I thought you were referring to one of my shots when you said 1/4 baked image……

that was close.

no PM not refering to your images, but refering to those unaware that would nilly willy, or is it willy nilly, upload small .jpg’s to that site :)

trichome said:

no PM not refering to your images, but refering to those unaware that would nilly willy, or is it willy nilly, upload small .jpg’s to that site :)

I’d go with the willy before the nilly.

As a side, I printed off 6 jpegs once to a site just like mentioned and they were all 30×30cm stretched canvass. 5 of the 6 are fantastic and look great even up close. Look spectacular from a few feet away, however one was a pretty ordinary sized file and yeah, if you get too close to that one you can go ewwwww!

I have heard that my file size will print quite nicely to A3 with not too much image loss, although someone trying to be picky would be able to comment on it if they scrutinized the image closely. I think with what Bubba is wanting to achieve, then my format camera should be adequate. But I still have some other professionals to talk to during the week…

you do good work, just thought to bring to your attention the file sizes needed to produce good quality A3, yes they will all say that it can be done with smaller captures and indeed it can, but a professional photographer should have the information i am giving here, “A3 size printed at 300dpi, photo quality, file size of at least 4800 pixel x 3600 pixel is needed, that would be a file size of 49.4mb”.

It is astonishing to many who pay into the thousand$ for 35mm equivalent SLR camera and lenses to find that their max. capture size in professional terms doesn’t equate to all that big as such in terms of print size, (most don’t even know this and print big anyway), although the newest camera’s may well just be up there a little further these days, i haven’t checked out the high end SLR specs. for a while now.
Many say, but, but, but, and the answer is yes good quality photography is expensive, pro’s need even more eqiuipment to produce larger, big, prints, that is why photography to purchase is expensive. Unless of course the online type we print’em for ya mob suck them in to a lesser quality. Pro. print house all the way.

to take your photography further do you have a hand held exposure meter to do incident rather than reflected readings to produce the desired aperature/fstop combo for the outcome?

Pro. print house all the way.
<<<
and i don’t mean the local mini-lab digital photo shop either :)

trichome said:

you do good work, just thought to bring to your attention the file sizes needed to produce good quality A3, yes they will all say that it can be done with smaller captures and indeed it can, but a professional photographer should have the information i am giving here, “A3 size printed at 300dpi, photo quality, file size of at least 4800 pixel x 3600 pixel is needed, that would be a file size of 49.4mb”.

It is astonishing to many who pay into the thousand$ for 35mm equivalent SLR camera and lenses to find that their max. capture size in professional terms doesn’t equate to all that big as such in terms of print size, (most don’t even know this and print big anyway), although the newest camera’s may well just be up there a little further these days, i haven’t checked out the high end SLR specs. for a while now.
Many say, but, but, but, and the answer is yes good quality photography is expensive, pro’s need even more eqiuipment to produce larger, big, prints, that is why photography to purchase is expensive. Unless of course the online type we print’em for ya mob suck them in to a lesser quality. Pro. print house all the way.

to take your photography further do you have a hand held exposure meter to do incident rather than reflected readings to produce the desired aperature/fstop combo for the outcome?

well said. I went to the Portrait Gallery last year to see the National Portrait prize in photography… This was some mind-blowing huge images up on the wall, and many mentioned full frame sensors and the like…

Would a photographer even make a return on his/her’s investment if they went the whole hog? The general public today will accept a A3 print from a Canon or an Nikon by a local photo guy who’s shooting weddings on a weekend. The amount of DSLRs now out there in the general populace means the local wedding-shooter is charging less and less just to get a job for the weekend!

and no I don’t have a meter, and I don’t use a tripod… It was never my intent to become professional, nor to make any money from this gig. I just wanted it to be fun….

trichome said:

bubba have you seen any work from this canvas labs ?

they simply recomend that you upload a photo, this sounds like very, very amatuerish stuff to me, simply uploading a .jpg and not working from raw and .tiff in my view will produce something laking, viewed from a distance it could appear ok but up closer it will probably look soft or appear like it is not focused.
PM might be able to produce a more professional canvas triptytch working from the full image file and will give a much better appearance, especially if this is for in a home or hung at exhibition :)

Quite possibly. I was just tossing the idea in there because of the price, and size.

The reason I went with canvas was because I wanted the frog to look more “real” not encased in a frame. I want it to look like it’s about to jump off the wall, if you know what I mean. And it has to be A3 to work in the spot I want it. Any suggestions on how to achieve that without breaking the bank gratefully accepted, otherwise I’ll have to rethink the whole thing.

I definately want some of your work PM so if you can’t do the frog at that size I’ll wait until we furnish downstairs and go for flowers or birds.

bubba louie said:

The reason I went with canvas was because I wanted the frog to look more “real” not encased in a frame. I want it to look like it’s about to jump off the wall, if you know what I mean. And it has to be A3 to work in the spot I want it. Any suggestions on how to achieve that without breaking the bank gratefully accepted, otherwise I’ll have to rethink the whole thing.

I definately want some of your work PM so if you can’t do the frog at that size I’ll wait until we furnish downstairs and go for flowers or birds.

I’d much rather pay you and have the pleasure of knowing the “artist” than some anonymous print.

bubba louie said:

bubba louie said:

The reason I went with canvas was because I wanted the frog to look more “real” not encased in a frame. I want it to look like it’s about to jump off the wall, if you know what I mean. And it has to be A3 to work in the spot I want it. Any suggestions on how to achieve that without breaking the bank gratefully accepted, otherwise I’ll have to rethink the whole thing.

I definately want some of your work PM so if you can’t do the frog at that size I’ll wait until we furnish downstairs and go for flowers or birds.

I’d much rather pay you and have the pleasure of knowing the “artist” than some anonymous print.

and you’d be getting a limited edition, not something that is sold throughout a chain store.

Hey Bubba, can I chat to you over on fb?

pain master said:

Would a photographer even make a return on his/her’s investment if they went the whole hog?

I just wanted it to be fun….

Going the whole hog yes, but it would turn into a job :)
Yeah keep it fun, but with a litle extra knowledge great things can be done is my guess :)

pain master said:

The amount of DSLRs now out there in the general populace means the local wedding-shooter is charging less and less just to get a job for the weekend!

Yes lots more cameras out there now, lots of point and shoot models too. I ask, do they know how to use these DSLR’s? In the most the answer is no. Many still rely on the Canon, Nikon or other brand in camera auto exposure controls, so its really the camera manufacturer algorithm doing the exposure control and in the most auto focusingas well. These can be good as such, but a professional or experienced amatuer can take advantage of photographic knowledge and use the camera in a different way often with a hand held exposure meter. This way the shooter has much more control and artistic license over their work. The DSLR shooter in the crowd at a wedding may not compose in a good way resulting in cut off feet or even heads, or not filling the frame when it should be, they only see what is on the focusing screen and often only use the centre focus, and not look for distracting backgrounds or indeed decide how they want the back ground to be, ie. way in or way out of focus or even how to produce this. The photographer may have fast prime lenses that can capture in much lower light, or indeed use very little depth of field for a certain effect, in the main this is not that achievable with the slower kit type zoom lenses. They don’t have the same shooting angles as the photographer who should command the job of covering the wedding, as there are a range of certain types of shots that need to be captured including the secret locations for more personal wedding images that the main throng of people are not invited too. A chance to use the incident readings for expposue and have a little fun as well.
Professionals should have themselves or via pro print house advanced post capture editing skills, a bit like the old dark room skills. This stands them out from the crowd because the images are captured full size and printed with the full amount of pixels, not usually found among the amatuers. I supose there are some who would not strictly adhere to these principles, but they should. They would also have their line of photo album both paper and digital and retain copyright to the images, where extra copies may be ordered. So, the professional photographer is expensive, check out the city prices for good photographers, and i must say that those who do a few weddings on the side that charge less, may not have all the skills, maybe do some good work, it varies, but essentially they are prostituting the business, if they have the skills then they should charge the same. It is a very special day, therefore couples should suss out photographers and endure some cost to get the best outcome. And on and on it goes…

Email for you PM.

bubba louie said:

Email for you PM.

Ignore all but the last one. I got hold of them by phone and sorted it.

Another email heading your way PM. :(

bubba louie said:

Another email heading your way PM. :(

grrrr… nother email back at ya.

you seen any sign of it yet Bubba?

pain master said:

you seen any sign of it yet Bubba?

No. They did say about 3 weeks.

I got a reply from Sam and Froggy will arrive soon after the hols.

bubba louie said:

I got a reply from Sam and Froggy will arrive soon after the hols.

Yay team! I hope it is up to your expectations?

pain master said:

bubba louie said:

I got a reply from Sam and Froggy will arrive soon after the hols.

Yay team! I hope it is up to your expectations?

OUR expectations. :)

I think you’re more concerned than me.

bubba louie said:

pain master said:

bubba louie said:

I got a reply from Sam and Froggy will arrive soon after the hols.

Yay team! I hope it is up to your expectations?

OUR expectations. :)

I think you’re more concerned than me.

I am.

pain master said:

bubba louie said:

pain master said:

Yay team! I hope it is up to your expectations?

OUR expectations. :)

I think you’re more concerned than me.

I am.

Well you shouldn’t be. You did your bit. :)

Anything else is between me and Sam.

Hey Bubba, I have an exhibition next year and I am thinking of printing some photos to around the same size to which we did for you and your frog shot. What do you think of that size and how clear has the shot come up and if you saw it in an exhibition, would you buy it????

pain master said:

Hey Bubba, I have an exhibition next year and I am thinking of printing some photos to around the same size to which we did for you and your frog shot. What do you think of that size and how clear has the shot come up and if you saw it in an exhibition, would you buy it????

The size is good. I’m happy with the frog because it suits the spot but it’d probably be a bit dark for a lot of people. It’s pretty clear.

I’d buy one.

bubba louie said:

pain master said:

Hey Bubba, I have an exhibition next year and I am thinking of printing some photos to around the same size to which we did for you and your frog shot. What do you think of that size and how clear has the shot come up and if you saw it in an exhibition, would you buy it????

The size is good. I’m happy with the frog because it suits the spot but it’d probably be a bit dark for a lot of people. It’s pretty clear.

I’d buy one.

Cool, might have to think about that size for other shots for the exhibition.

pain master said:

bubba louie said:

pain master said:

Hey Bubba, I have an exhibition next year and I am thinking of printing some photos to around the same size to which we did for you and your frog shot. What do you think of that size and how clear has the shot come up and if you saw it in an exhibition, would you buy it????

The size is good. I’m happy with the frog because it suits the spot but it’d probably be a bit dark for a lot of people. It’s pretty clear.

I’d buy one.

Cool, might have to think about that size for other shots for the exhibition.

Wouldn’t you do a variety of sizes?

bubba louie said:

pain master said:

bubba louie said:

The size is good. I’m happy with the frog because it suits the spot but it’d probably be a bit dark for a lot of people. It’s pretty clear.

I’d buy one.

Cool, might have to think about that size for other shots for the exhibition.

Wouldn’t you do a variety of sizes?

It is a small gallery and I thought I’d go with consistent size and not so many…. Or maybe, I may do a few triptychs to squeeze in a few more?

pain master said:

bubba louie said:

pain master said:

Cool, might have to think about that size for other shots for the exhibition.

Wouldn’t you do a variety of sizes?

It is a small gallery and I thought I’d go with consistent size and not so many…. Or maybe, I may do a few triptychs to squeeze in a few more?

Much excitement in the Painmaster camp. A great opportunity. I don’t know how on earth you can select just a few of your photos for a showing. Therein lies a dilemma for you.

That’s fantastic PM!!! very happy for you :)

What are you going to show ?

Happy Potter said:

That’s fantastic PM!!! very happy for you :)

What are you going to show ?

thank you Potter and Pom, I have no idea… perhaps you guys could suggests some of your faves?

pain master said:

Happy Potter said:

That’s fantastic PM!!! very happy for you :)

What are you going to show ?

thank you Potter and Pom, I have no idea… perhaps you guys could suggests some of your faves?

There were so many. Two that stand out in my memory…the dewdrops on lattice. Maybe the dew was on leaves but I’m sure there was lattice in there somewhere. The other one was a blue butterfly and Vireya flowers.

pain master said:

Happy Potter said:

That’s fantastic PM!!! very happy for you :)

What are you going to show ?

thank you Potter and Pom, I have no idea… perhaps you guys could suggests some of your faves?

The water reflective photos are fab, especially the waterlily, yeah go the waterlily!!!!
But mainly, show what you love best because that’s what reflects your personality. I’m so rapt for you :)

I think I might just have to try and get up there to see this.:)

pomolo said:

pain master said:

Happy Potter said:

That’s fantastic PM!!! very happy for you :)

What are you going to show ?

thank you Potter and Pom, I have no idea… perhaps you guys could suggests some of your faves?

There were so many. Two that stand out in my memory…the dewdrops on lattice. Maybe the dew was on leaves but I’m sure there was lattice in there somewhere. The other one was a blue butterfly and Vireya flowers.

I know of the dew drop one you speak of. But Vireya? Hmmm?

pomolo said:

pain master said:

Happy Potter said:

That’s fantastic PM!!! very happy for you :)

What are you going to show ?

thank you Potter and Pom, I have no idea… perhaps you guys could suggests some of your faves?

There were so many. Two that stand out in my memory…the dewdrops on lattice. Maybe the dew was on leaves but I’m sure there was lattice in there somewhere. The other one was a blue butterfly and Vireya flowers.

Oh yes, the Ulysses on the Rhody up at Paluma… I recall now.

Happy Potter said:

pain master said:

Happy Potter said:

That’s fantastic PM!!! very happy for you :)

What are you going to show ?

thank you Potter and Pom, I have no idea… perhaps you guys could suggests some of your faves?

The water reflective photos are fab, especially the waterlily, yeah go the waterlily!!!!
But mainly, show what you love best because that’s what reflects your personality. I’m so rapt for you :)

you know I am partial to a waterlily shot?

bubba louie said:

I think I might just have to try and get up there to see this.:)

oh wow… book your holidays for May I hear.