Date: 1/01/2026 13:31:08
From: AussieDJ
ID: 2345987
Subject: US Politics 2026 #1
BREAKING: “GO F*CK YOURSELVES” — South Park writer who owns Trump Kennedy Center web domain profanely responds to legal pressure to give it up.
In what may be the pettiest culture-war skirmish of the year, South Park writer Toby Morton has apparently driven Donald Trump’s orbit into a full-blown meltdown — not with a protest, not with a lawsuit, but with a website and a sense of humor.
As we reported earlier, after Trump allies began floating plans to rechristen the Kennedy Center in his own image, Morton quietly snapped up the domain TrumpKennedyCenter.org and filled it with the kind of deadpan satire that hits hardest because it barely exaggerates reality. The result? A perfectly skewered monument to authoritarian vanity — and, reportedly, a flurry of legal threats from lawyers who did not appreciate the joke.
Morton’s response was swift, surgical, and devastatingly funny.
“Satire is protected speech,” he wrote. “Confusion is a legal requirement, not a feeling. Political parody is not infringement. Criticism is not cybersquatting, and trademark law isn’t a panic button for institutions that don’t like being laughed at. I’ll proceed accordingly while you go fuck yourselves. Dog bless.”
Ouch.
The mock website itself reads like a fever dream scripted by Kafka and produced by Fox News. Visitors are welcomed to “A National Institution Devoted to Power and Loyalty,” where “tradition is preserved, narratives are curated, and history is… selectively remembered.” The site promises future “ceremonies,” “sanctioned appearances,” and a chilling declaration: Participation is not required. Belonging is expected.
Even the visual gags cut deep — a faux logo invoking the Kennedy Center’s iconic silhouette, flanked by Trump’s name and a redacted reference to a “13-year-old girl,” a brutal satirical nod to the long, uncomfortable history surrounding Trump, Epstein, and institutional silence.
The pièce de résistance? A fake upcoming event promising a performance by the “Epstein Dancers.” It’s not subtle — and that’s the point.
What makes the whole episode sting is how little exaggeration is actually required. Morton didn’t invent authoritarian aesthetics or cultish loyalty. He simply mirrored them back, slightly sharpened, and let the reflection do the damage.
In response, Trump-world reportedly reached for lawyers instead of a sense of humor — proving the satire’s thesis in real time.
As Morton made clear, parody isn’t theft. It’s commentary. And judging by how hard this landed, the joke hit exactly where it was meant to.
Please like and share the joke!
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/17dKfEX72z/
Date: 1/01/2026 13:39:33
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2345989
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 1/01/2026 13:41:35
From: Ian
ID: 2345991
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
AussieDJ said:
BREAKING: “GO F*CK YOURSELVES” — South Park writer who owns Trump Kennedy Center web domain profanely responds to legal pressure to give it up.
In what may be the pettiest culture-war skirmish of the year, South Park writer Toby Morton has apparently driven Donald Trump’s orbit into a full-blown meltdown — not with a protest, not with a lawsuit, but with a website and a sense of humor.
As we reported earlier, after Trump allies began floating plans to rechristen the Kennedy Center in his own image, Morton quietly snapped up the domain TrumpKennedyCenter.org and filled it with the kind of deadpan satire that hits hardest because it barely exaggerates reality. The result? A perfectly skewered monument to authoritarian vanity — and, reportedly, a flurry of legal threats from lawyers who did not appreciate the joke.
Morton’s response was swift, surgical, and devastatingly funny.
“Satire is protected speech,” he wrote. “Confusion is a legal requirement, not a feeling. Political parody is not infringement. Criticism is not cybersquatting, and trademark law isn’t a panic button for institutions that don’t like being laughed at. I’ll proceed accordingly while you go fuck yourselves. Dog bless.”
Ouch.
The mock website itself reads like a fever dream scripted by Kafka and produced by Fox News. Visitors are welcomed to “A National Institution Devoted to Power and Loyalty,” where “tradition is preserved, narratives are curated, and history is… selectively remembered.” The site promises future “ceremonies,” “sanctioned appearances,” and a chilling declaration: Participation is not required. Belonging is expected.
Even the visual gags cut deep — a faux logo invoking the Kennedy Center’s iconic silhouette, flanked by Trump’s name and a redacted reference to a “13-year-old girl,” a brutal satirical nod to the long, uncomfortable history surrounding Trump, Epstein, and institutional silence.
The pièce de résistance? A fake upcoming event promising a performance by the “Epstein Dancers.” It’s not subtle — and that’s the point.
What makes the whole episode sting is how little exaggeration is actually required. Morton didn’t invent authoritarian aesthetics or cultish loyalty. He simply mirrored them back, slightly sharpened, and let the reflection do the damage.
In response, Trump-world reportedly reached for lawyers instead of a sense of humor — proving the satire’s thesis in real time.
As Morton made clear, parody isn’t theft. It’s commentary. And judging by how hard this landed, the joke hit exactly where it was meant to.
Please like and share the joke!
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/17dKfEX72z/
:)
Date: 1/01/2026 13:48:27
From: Michael V
ID: 2345993
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 1/01/2026 14:13:07
From: AussieDJ
ID: 2346005
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Smart move.
Oil tanker pursued by US now has a Russian flag painted on its side.
https://edition.cnn.com/2025/12/31/politics/oil-tanker-venezuela-russian-flag
Date: 1/01/2026 15:18:58
From: roughbarked
ID: 2346047
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
AussieDJ said:
BREAKING: “GO F*CK YOURSELVES” —
As Morton made clear, parody isn’t theft. It’s commentary. And judging by how hard this landed, the joke hit exactly where it was meant to.
Please like and share the joke!
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/17dKfEX72z/
Perfect.
Date: 1/01/2026 16:16:06
From: kii
ID: 2346054
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Meanwhile in NM…I hope the healthcare insurance bit is right. I know that the free childcare, school meals and free buses is real. Free animal adoptions worries me a bit, NM is a known place for illegal dog fights.

Date: 1/01/2026 18:08:09
From: buffy
ID: 2346074
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 1/01/2026 18:15:29
From: Michael V
ID: 2346078
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
““Trump’s rambling here is the political version of ‘you can’t fire me, I quit,’” Mr Newsom’s office said.
Donald Trump says National Guard being removed from Chicago, LA and Portland
I wish he would quit.
It’d be nice. We could find something else less exhausting to discuss.
Date: 1/01/2026 18:45:46
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2346084
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
In his more-than-eight-hour of testimony, Smith insisted he had no political motivations in indicting Trump, and said he believed “we had proof beyond a reasonable doubt in both cases” that he brought. “If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Republican or a Democrat,” he said in his opening statement. Smith later told an unnamed committee staffer he would have indicted Biden or Barack Obama over similar evidence.
Republicans have been in uproar after it emerged that federal investigators obtained data related to the phone usage of several members of Congress, which was used as part of Smith’s prosecutions. Smith hit back in his testimony, saying: “Recent narratives about my team’s work are false and misleading” and the “records were lawfully subpoenaed and were relevant to complete a comprehensive investigation”.
Date: 2/01/2026 10:15:38
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2346170
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Donald Trump has confirmed that he wore compression socks to treat his cankles amid growing scrutiny over his health as America’s oldest president.
In an explosive interview about his medical treatments, Trump also admitted that he applies makeup to his hands, saying that the large daily dose of aspirin he takes to thin his blood causes them to bruise easily.
Trump takes 325 milligrams of aspirin a day—a much larger dose than the usual 81 milligrams—for “cardiac prevention.”
https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-79-finally-admits-hes-wearing-compression-socks-and-makeup-to-hide-how-sick-he-is/
Compare this with
“ SUMMARY: President Trump remains in excellent health, exhibiting robust cardiac, pulmonary, neurological, and general physical function.”
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/2025/04/memorandum-from-the-white-house-physician/
Date: 2/01/2026 10:17:20
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2346171
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
And if you want a better source than The Daily Beast,
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/01/01/politics/aspirin-trump-health-dose-bruises-hand
Date: 2/01/2026 17:19:06
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2346319
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Alleged:
“The phrase “all the blacked-out text was an image layer” refers to a specific incident where confidential information, supposedly redacted in official documents (specifically related to the Jeffrey Epstein legal filings), was easily exposed.
The situation occurred when documents intended to protect sensitive information were improperly redacted using an image layer (like a black box overlaid on text in a PDF) instead of being properly sanitized.
This flawed redaction method meant that users could easily highlight and copy the text underneath the black boxes, revealing the supposedly secret information. The incident highlighted a significant failure in data handling protocols for sensitive legal documents. “
So who here has downloaded the files and had a look at all the text?
Date: 2/01/2026 17:24:10
From: Michael V
ID: 2346320
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
Alleged:
“The phrase “all the blacked-out text was an image layer” refers to a specific incident where confidential information, supposedly redacted in official documents (specifically related to the Jeffrey Epstein legal filings), was easily exposed.
The situation occurred when documents intended to protect sensitive information were improperly redacted using an image layer (like a black box overlaid on text in a PDF) instead of being properly sanitized.
This flawed redaction method meant that users could easily highlight and copy the text underneath the black boxes, revealing the supposedly secret information. The incident highlighted a significant failure in data handling protocols for sensitive legal documents. “
So who here has downloaded the files and had a look at all the text?
Not me.
Date: 2/01/2026 18:10:18
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2346330
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Alleged:
“The phrase “all the blacked-out text was an image layer” refers to a specific incident where confidential information, supposedly redacted in official documents (specifically related to the Jeffrey Epstein legal filings), was easily exposed.
The situation occurred when documents intended to protect sensitive information were improperly redacted using an image layer (like a black box overlaid on text in a PDF) instead of being properly sanitized.
This flawed redaction method meant that users could easily highlight and copy the text underneath the black boxes, revealing the supposedly secret information. The incident highlighted a significant failure in data handling protocols for sensitive legal documents. “
So who here has downloaded the files and had a look at all the text?
Not me.
no we didn’t either but is it bad if, were we tasked with redact release, we would totally add black rédaction boxes over white space
Date: 2/01/2026 19:29:00
From: kii
ID: 2346357
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 2/01/2026 19:32:15
From: party_pants
ID: 2346358
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
The Separation: Inside the Unraveling U.S.-Ukraine Partnership
Free NYT article, I am slowly trying to read it.

Who’s supposedly the idiot then?
Zelensky, Kellogg, or Lincoln??
Date: 2/01/2026 19:44:35
From: kii
ID: 2346364
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
kii said:
The Separation: Inside the Unraveling U.S.-Ukraine Partnership
Free NYT article, I am slowly trying to read it.

Who’s supposedly the idiot then?
Zelensky, Kellogg, or Lincoln??
Every accusation is a confession.
Date: 2/01/2026 19:48:22
From: Michael V
ID: 2346369
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
kii said:
The Separation: Inside the Unraveling U.S.-Ukraine Partnership
Free NYT article, I am slowly trying to read it.

Who’s supposedly the idiot then?
Zelensky, Kellogg, or Lincoln??
Trump.
Date: 3/01/2026 00:53:12
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2346410
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
party_pants said:
kii said:
The Separation: Inside the Unraveling U.S.-Ukraine Partnership
Free NYT article, I am slowly trying to read it.

Who’s supposedly the idiot then?
Zelensky, Kellogg, or Lincoln??
Every accusation is a confession.


Date: 3/01/2026 07:21:58
From: roughbarked
ID: 2346422
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Donald Trump says US will ‘come to their rescue’ if Iran kills protesters.
So how’s he going to rescue dead people?
Date: 3/01/2026 08:03:52
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2346423
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Donald Trump says US will ‘come to their rescue’ if Iran kills protesters.
So how’s he going to rescue dead people?
His healing hands.
Date: 3/01/2026 08:09:25
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2346424
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
NASA’s largest library at the Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, which has been a central research hub for the global space agency since 1959, will be permanently closing on Friday (Jan 2). The closure of the 100,000-volume library is part of the Donald Trump administration’s reorganisation drive, under which 13 buildings and over 100 science and engineering laboratories will be shut down on the 1.270-acre campus by March 2026
The NASA Goddard Information and Collaboration Center supported the development of major missions, including the Hubble Space Telescope and the James Webb Space Telescope. Jacob Richmond, a NASA spokesman, informed that the agency will review the library holdings over the next two months, and some of the material will be stored in a government warehouse, while the remaining items will be ‘tossed away’, according to a report in the New York Times.
https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/nasas-largest-library-to-permanently-close-on-jan-2-books-will-be-tossed-away-10170584
Date: 3/01/2026 08:17:25
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2346427
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
roughbarked said:
Donald Trump says US will ‘come to their rescue’ if Iran kills protesters.
So how’s he going to rescue dead people?
His healing hands.
Perhaps he will save them from a long and drawn out torturous death full of pain and suffering¡
Date: 3/01/2026 08:39:14
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2346431
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
fkn communist bastards
Tesla is under several federal safety investigations and other probes. In California, Tesla is at risk of temporarily losing its license to sell cars in the state after a judge there ruled it had misled customers about their safety.
Date: 3/01/2026 08:43:44
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2346432
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
fkn communist bastards
Tesla is under several federal safety investigations and other probes. In California, Tesla is at risk of temporarily losing its license to sell cars in the state after a judge there ruled it had misled customers about their safety.
Interesting. BYD are about to take over the #1 spot for bestselling EV worldwide, overtaking (heh) Tesla. But, BYD are not in the American market due to high tariffs etc.
Date: 3/01/2026 09:06:34
From: Michael V
ID: 2346438
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
NASA’s largest library at the Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, which has been a central research hub for the global space agency since 1959, will be permanently closing on Friday (Jan 2). The closure of the 100,000-volume library is part of the Donald Trump administration’s reorganisation drive, under which 13 buildings and over 100 science and engineering laboratories will be shut down on the 1.270-acre campus by March 2026
The NASA Goddard Information and Collaboration Center supported the development of major missions, including the Hubble Space Telescope and the James Webb Space Telescope. Jacob Richmond, a NASA spokesman, informed that the agency will review the library holdings over the next two months, and some of the material will be stored in a government warehouse, while the remaining items will be ‘tossed away’, according to a report in the New York Times.
https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/nasas-largest-library-to-permanently-close-on-jan-2-books-will-be-tossed-away-10170584
Only Trump comix allowed nowadays.
Date: 3/01/2026 12:13:32
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2346488
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Carrick Ryan
I’ve been doing a lot of research into a popular political movement in the US known as the “Dark Enlightenment”, led by a man named Curtis Yarvin.
Yarvin is a political theorist promoted by billionaire Peter Thiel. He argues that democracy has failed because the masses are ultimately incompetent, indecisive, and incapable of making difficult long-term decisions. He instead advocates for concentrating power in a strong executive or technocratic elite, even if that necessitates fascism.
He’s a man who has been referenced multiple times by Vice President JD Vance and is believed to be the ideological mentor to him and a growing list of tech-oligarchs.
The movement essentially envisions a society which is governed like a corporation, where concepts like civil liberties and welfare programs are dismantled to allow for rapid technological advancement, and power is removed from courts, NGO’s, the media, and universities, and placed exclusively in the hands of a powerful executive “elite” with no democratic accountability.
I kept wondering why this concept could possibly appeal to anyone who wasn’t already rich or powerful, and as such wouldn’t be part of the imagined “elite”. JD Vance, in particular, was a man who grew up poor. Why would he want to deconstruct democracy and hand power to an “elite” that has never shown any interest in the well being of the working class from which he was born?
But then I learned more about the darker side of this ideology. Yarvin is also an unapologetic advocate for the idea that intelligence varies greatly across races, thus creating a natural hierarchy in which the white race and certain asian races are placed above Africans and other supposedly less intelligent races.
Followers of the Dark Enlightenment regularly quote the controversial 1995 book by Charles Murray, The Bell Curve, which argues that intelligence is determined by genetics, and as such inequality is inevitable. But importantly, this book also argues that intelligence varies as a result of race, thus making inequality between races unavoidable.
Or to put it bluntly, Yarvin states himself “I doubt that all races are equally smart.”
It then starts to make a bit more sense… when these men talk about an authoritarian state led by “elites”… they mean led by a white minority. They believe democracy doesn’t work because “less intelligent” races are outnumbering white people, and as such cannot be trusted to govern.
They are essentially arguing for a fascist white minority rule like the apartheid society men like Thiel and Elon Musk grew up in, and continue to defend. These men are not just fringe internet “edge-lords”, they are among the richest and most powerful men in the world with one of their disciples next-in-line for the Presidency.
Date: 3/01/2026 12:18:02
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2346489
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Oregon’s Bay Area is feeling annoyed.
Nothing says “greatest victory for patient affordability” quite like raising drug prices. According to new data from health care research firm 3 Axis Advisors, first reported by Reuters, at least 350 medications are slated for price hikes in the U.S. in 2026, up from more than 250 drugs last year. The median increase? A tidy 4 percent, because apparently inflation is only “fake news” when it’s politically inconvenient.
This is happening, of course, right as the Trump administration is busy congratulating itself for its “most favored nation” (MFN) drug pricing policy. Under that plan, more than a dozen pharmaceutical companies voluntarily agreed, after being threatened with tariffs, to sell certain drugs to the U.S. at the lowest price they offer anywhere in the world. Trump has called it “the greatest victory for patient affordability in the history of American health care,” which is a bold claim given, well… the price hikes.
Some drugs expected to rise in price are made by companies that signed on to the MFN deal, including Pfizer and GSK. But don’t worry, the administration says a shiny direct-to-consumer platform called TrumpRx is coming in early 2026, to facilitate charging patients more for their medication.
There’s a catch the press conferences skip: the MFN pricing deals only apply to Medicaid. Most Americans are on commercial insurance plans, which means they’re largely excluded from the supposed savings. And since Medicaid already guarantees the lowest price offered to any commercial payer, MFN pricing may amount to little more than a rebranding exercise, like swapping pricing for affordability.
Reuters also notes the projected increases don’t even factor in the usual smoke-and-mirror rebates to pharmacy benefit managers, the same middlemen who help drugmakers keep list prices sky-high while everyone pretends no one’s responsible.
Economists have been blunt about what’s really going on. The Centre for Economic Policy Research argues the root problem isn’t foreign pricing or insufficient branding, but patent monopolies, which MFN pricing doesn’t touch, negotiations don’t challenge, and press releases can’t wish away.
So as the White House celebrates patriotic drug companies and prepares a logo-ready rollout, hundreds of medications are quietly getting more expensive. Turns out you can’t lower prices by applauding monopolies, even if they “love our country.”
Date: 3/01/2026 12:20:28
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2346491
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
Oregon’s Bay Area is feeling annoyed.
Nothing says “greatest victory for patient affordability” quite like raising drug prices. According to new data from health care research firm 3 Axis Advisors, first reported by Reuters, at least 350 medications are slated for price hikes in the U.S. in 2026, up from more than 250 drugs last year. The median increase? A tidy 4 percent, because apparently inflation is only “fake news” when it’s politically inconvenient.
This is happening, of course, right as the Trump administration is busy congratulating itself for its “most favored nation” (MFN) drug pricing policy. Under that plan, more than a dozen pharmaceutical companies voluntarily agreed, after being threatened with tariffs, to sell certain drugs to the U.S. at the lowest price they offer anywhere in the world. Trump has called it “the greatest victory for patient affordability in the history of American health care,” which is a bold claim given, well… the price hikes.
Some drugs expected to rise in price are made by companies that signed on to the MFN deal, including Pfizer and GSK. But don’t worry, the administration says a shiny direct-to-consumer platform called TrumpRx is coming in early 2026, to facilitate charging patients more for their medication.
There’s a catch the press conferences skip: the MFN pricing deals only apply to Medicaid. Most Americans are on commercial insurance plans, which means they’re largely excluded from the supposed savings. And since Medicaid already guarantees the lowest price offered to any commercial payer, MFN pricing may amount to little more than a rebranding exercise, like swapping pricing for affordability.
Reuters also notes the projected increases don’t even factor in the usual smoke-and-mirror rebates to pharmacy benefit managers, the same middlemen who help drugmakers keep list prices sky-high while everyone pretends no one’s responsible.
Economists have been blunt about what’s really going on. The Centre for Economic Policy Research argues the root problem isn’t foreign pricing or insufficient branding, but patent monopolies, which MFN pricing doesn’t touch, negotiations don’t challenge, and press releases can’t wish away.
So as the White House celebrates patriotic drug companies and prepares a logo-ready rollout, hundreds of medications are quietly getting more expensive. Turns out you can’t lower prices by applauding monopolies, even if they “love our country.”
Drugs are bad.
Date: 3/01/2026 13:06:22
From: Michael V
ID: 2346501
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
Carrick Ryan
I’ve been doing a lot of research into a popular political movement in the US known as the “Dark Enlightenment”, led by a man named Curtis Yarvin.
Yarvin is a political theorist promoted by billionaire Peter Thiel. He argues that democracy has failed because the masses are ultimately incompetent, indecisive, and incapable of making difficult long-term decisions. He instead advocates for concentrating power in a strong executive or technocratic elite, even if that necessitates fascism.
He’s a man who has been referenced multiple times by Vice President JD Vance and is believed to be the ideological mentor to him and a growing list of tech-oligarchs.
The movement essentially envisions a society which is governed like a corporation, where concepts like civil liberties and welfare programs are dismantled to allow for rapid technological advancement, and power is removed from courts, NGO’s, the media, and universities, and placed exclusively in the hands of a powerful executive “elite” with no democratic accountability.
I kept wondering why this concept could possibly appeal to anyone who wasn’t already rich or powerful, and as such wouldn’t be part of the imagined “elite”. JD Vance, in particular, was a man who grew up poor. Why would he want to deconstruct democracy and hand power to an “elite” that has never shown any interest in the well being of the working class from which he was born?
But then I learned more about the darker side of this ideology. Yarvin is also an unapologetic advocate for the idea that intelligence varies greatly across races, thus creating a natural hierarchy in which the white race and certain asian races are placed above Africans and other supposedly less intelligent races.
Followers of the Dark Enlightenment regularly quote the controversial 1995 book by Charles Murray, The Bell Curve, which argues that intelligence is determined by genetics, and as such inequality is inevitable. But importantly, this book also argues that intelligence varies as a result of race, thus making inequality between races unavoidable.
Or to put it bluntly, Yarvin states himself “I doubt that all races are equally smart.”
It then starts to make a bit more sense… when these men talk about an authoritarian state led by “elites”… they mean led by a white minority. They believe democracy doesn’t work because “less intelligent” races are outnumbering white people, and as such cannot be trusted to govern.
They are essentially arguing for a fascist white minority rule like the apartheid society men like Thiel and Elon Musk grew up in, and continue to defend. These men are not just fringe internet “edge-lords”, they are among the richest and most powerful men in the world with one of their disciples next-in-line for the Presidency.
Perfect, SNAFU.
Date: 3/01/2026 13:09:10
From: Michael V
ID: 2346503
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
Oregon’s Bay Area is feeling annoyed.
Nothing says “greatest victory for patient affordability” quite like raising drug prices. According to new data from health care research firm 3 Axis Advisors, first reported by Reuters, at least 350 medications are slated for price hikes in the U.S. in 2026, up from more than 250 drugs last year. The median increase? A tidy 4 percent, because apparently inflation is only “fake news” when it’s politically inconvenient.
This is happening, of course, right as the Trump administration is busy congratulating itself for its “most favored nation” (MFN) drug pricing policy. Under that plan, more than a dozen pharmaceutical companies voluntarily agreed, after being threatened with tariffs, to sell certain drugs to the U.S. at the lowest price they offer anywhere in the world. Trump has called it “the greatest victory for patient affordability in the history of American health care,” which is a bold claim given, well… the price hikes.
Some drugs expected to rise in price are made by companies that signed on to the MFN deal, including Pfizer and GSK. But don’t worry, the administration says a shiny direct-to-consumer platform called TrumpRx is coming in early 2026, to facilitate charging patients more for their medication.
There’s a catch the press conferences skip: the MFN pricing deals only apply to Medicaid. Most Americans are on commercial insurance plans, which means they’re largely excluded from the supposed savings. And since Medicaid already guarantees the lowest price offered to any commercial payer, MFN pricing may amount to little more than a rebranding exercise, like swapping pricing for affordability.
Reuters also notes the projected increases don’t even factor in the usual smoke-and-mirror rebates to pharmacy benefit managers, the same middlemen who help drugmakers keep list prices sky-high while everyone pretends no one’s responsible.
Economists have been blunt about what’s really going on. The Centre for Economic Policy Research argues the root problem isn’t foreign pricing or insufficient branding, but patent monopolies, which MFN pricing doesn’t touch, negotiations don’t challenge, and press releases can’t wish away.
So as the White House celebrates patriotic drug companies and prepares a logo-ready rollout, hundreds of medications are quietly getting more expensive. Turns out you can’t lower prices by applauding monopolies, even if they “love our country.”
Yet another; perfect, SNAFU.
Date: 3/01/2026 13:11:47
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2346504
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Drugs are bad.
#no tall drugs.
Date: 3/01/2026 13:26:14
From: party_pants
ID: 2346510
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
Carrick Ryan
I’ve been doing a lot of research into a popular political movement in the US known as the “Dark Enlightenment”, led by a man named Curtis Yarvin.
Yarvin is a political theorist promoted by billionaire Peter Thiel. He argues that democracy has failed because the masses are ultimately incompetent, indecisive, and incapable of making difficult long-term decisions. He instead advocates for concentrating power in a strong executive or technocratic elite, even if that necessitates fascism.
He’s a man who has been referenced multiple times by Vice President JD Vance and is believed to be the ideological mentor to him and a growing list of tech-oligarchs.
The movement essentially envisions a society which is governed like a corporation, where concepts like civil liberties and welfare programs are dismantled to allow for rapid technological advancement, and power is removed from courts, NGO’s, the media, and universities, and placed exclusively in the hands of a powerful executive “elite” with no democratic accountability.
I kept wondering why this concept could possibly appeal to anyone who wasn’t already rich or powerful, and as such wouldn’t be part of the imagined “elite”. JD Vance, in particular, was a man who grew up poor. Why would he want to deconstruct democracy and hand power to an “elite” that has never shown any interest in the well being of the working class from which he was born?
But then I learned more about the darker side of this ideology. Yarvin is also an unapologetic advocate for the idea that intelligence varies greatly across races, thus creating a natural hierarchy in which the white race and certain asian races are placed above Africans and other supposedly less intelligent races.
Followers of the Dark Enlightenment regularly quote the controversial 1995 book by Charles Murray, The Bell Curve, which argues that intelligence is determined by genetics, and as such inequality is inevitable. But importantly, this book also argues that intelligence varies as a result of race, thus making inequality between races unavoidable.
Or to put it bluntly, Yarvin states himself “I doubt that all races are equally smart.”
It then starts to make a bit more sense… when these men talk about an authoritarian state led by “elites”… they mean led by a white minority. They believe democracy doesn’t work because “less intelligent” races are outnumbering white people, and as such cannot be trusted to govern.
They are essentially arguing for a fascist white minority rule like the apartheid society men like Thiel and Elon Musk grew up in, and continue to defend. These men are not just fringe internet “edge-lords”, they are among the richest and most powerful men in the world with one of their disciples next-in-line for the Presidency.
I’m not sure a whole country can be run like a private members country club.
You could maybe scale it up to run a small town or city on that basis, but I don’t think ot could scale up to a whole country.
If history is any guide, this sort of thing inevitably leads to revolutions and elites being dragged out into the streets and executed. Has happened before.
Date: 3/01/2026 13:35:40
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2346513
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
JudgeMental said:
Carrick Ryan
I’ve been doing a lot of research into a popular political movement in the US known as the “Dark Enlightenment”, led by a man named Curtis Yarvin.
Yarvin is a political theorist promoted by billionaire Peter Thiel. He argues that democracy has failed because the masses are ultimately incompetent, indecisive, and incapable of making difficult long-term decisions. He instead advocates for concentrating power in a strong executive or technocratic elite, even if that necessitates fascism.
He’s a man who has been referenced multiple times by Vice President JD Vance and is believed to be the ideological mentor to him and a growing list of tech-oligarchs.
The movement essentially envisions a society which is governed like a corporation, where concepts like civil liberties and welfare programs are dismantled to allow for rapid technological advancement, and power is removed from courts, NGO’s, the media, and universities, and placed exclusively in the hands of a powerful executive “elite” with no democratic accountability.
I kept wondering why this concept could possibly appeal to anyone who wasn’t already rich or powerful, and as such wouldn’t be part of the imagined “elite”. JD Vance, in particular, was a man who grew up poor. Why would he want to deconstruct democracy and hand power to an “elite” that has never shown any interest in the well being of the working class from which he was born?
But then I learned more about the darker side of this ideology. Yarvin is also an unapologetic advocate for the idea that intelligence varies greatly across races, thus creating a natural hierarchy in which the white race and certain asian races are placed above Africans and other supposedly less intelligent races.
Followers of the Dark Enlightenment regularly quote the controversial 1995 book by Charles Murray, The Bell Curve, which argues that intelligence is determined by genetics, and as such inequality is inevitable. But importantly, this book also argues that intelligence varies as a result of race, thus making inequality between races unavoidable.
Or to put it bluntly, Yarvin states himself “I doubt that all races are equally smart.”
It then starts to make a bit more sense… when these men talk about an authoritarian state led by “elites”… they mean led by a white minority. They believe democracy doesn’t work because “less intelligent” races are outnumbering white people, and as such cannot be trusted to govern.
They are essentially arguing for a fascist white minority rule like the apartheid society men like Thiel and Elon Musk grew up in, and continue to defend. These men are not just fringe internet “edge-lords”, they are among the richest and most powerful men in the world with one of their disciples next-in-line for the Presidency.
If history is any guide, this sort of thing inevitably leads to revolutions and elites being dragged out into the streets and executed. Has happened before.
forms orderly queue for viewing area
Date: 3/01/2026 13:41:51
From: Michael V
ID: 2346517
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
JudgeMental said:
Carrick Ryan
I’ve been doing a lot of research into a popular political movement in the US known as the “Dark Enlightenment”, led by a man named Curtis Yarvin.
Yarvin is a political theorist promoted by billionaire Peter Thiel. He argues that democracy has failed because the masses are ultimately incompetent, indecisive, and incapable of making difficult long-term decisions. He instead advocates for concentrating power in a strong executive or technocratic elite, even if that necessitates fascism.
He’s a man who has been referenced multiple times by Vice President JD Vance and is believed to be the ideological mentor to him and a growing list of tech-oligarchs.
The movement essentially envisions a society which is governed like a corporation, where concepts like civil liberties and welfare programs are dismantled to allow for rapid technological advancement, and power is removed from courts, NGO’s, the media, and universities, and placed exclusively in the hands of a powerful executive “elite” with no democratic accountability.
I kept wondering why this concept could possibly appeal to anyone who wasn’t already rich or powerful, and as such wouldn’t be part of the imagined “elite”. JD Vance, in particular, was a man who grew up poor. Why would he want to deconstruct democracy and hand power to an “elite” that has never shown any interest in the well being of the working class from which he was born?
But then I learned more about the darker side of this ideology. Yarvin is also an unapologetic advocate for the idea that intelligence varies greatly across races, thus creating a natural hierarchy in which the white race and certain asian races are placed above Africans and other supposedly less intelligent races.
Followers of the Dark Enlightenment regularly quote the controversial 1995 book by Charles Murray, The Bell Curve, which argues that intelligence is determined by genetics, and as such inequality is inevitable. But importantly, this book also argues that intelligence varies as a result of race, thus making inequality between races unavoidable.
Or to put it bluntly, Yarvin states himself “I doubt that all races are equally smart.”
It then starts to make a bit more sense… when these men talk about an authoritarian state led by “elites”… they mean led by a white minority. They believe democracy doesn’t work because “less intelligent” races are outnumbering white people, and as such cannot be trusted to govern.
They are essentially arguing for a fascist white minority rule like the apartheid society men like Thiel and Elon Musk grew up in, and continue to defend. These men are not just fringe internet “edge-lords”, they are among the richest and most powerful men in the world with one of their disciples next-in-line for the Presidency.
I’m not sure a whole country can be run like a private members country club.
You could maybe scale it up to run a small town or city on that basis, but I don’t think ot could scale up to a whole country.
If history is any guide, this sort of thing inevitably leads to revolutions and elites being dragged out into the streets and executed. Has happened before.
I’ll say.
Date: 3/01/2026 13:48:56
From: Michael V
ID: 2346520
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
party_pants said:
JudgeMental said:
Carrick Ryan
I’ve been doing a lot of research into a popular political movement in the US known as the “Dark Enlightenment”, led by a man named Curtis Yarvin.
Yarvin is a political theorist promoted by billionaire Peter Thiel. He argues that democracy has failed because the masses are ultimately incompetent, indecisive, and incapable of making difficult long-term decisions. He instead advocates for concentrating power in a strong executive or technocratic elite, even if that necessitates fascism.
He’s a man who has been referenced multiple times by Vice President JD Vance and is believed to be the ideological mentor to him and a growing list of tech-oligarchs.
The movement essentially envisions a society which is governed like a corporation, where concepts like civil liberties and welfare programs are dismantled to allow for rapid technological advancement, and power is removed from courts, NGO’s, the media, and universities, and placed exclusively in the hands of a powerful executive “elite” with no democratic accountability.
I kept wondering why this concept could possibly appeal to anyone who wasn’t already rich or powerful, and as such wouldn’t be part of the imagined “elite”. JD Vance, in particular, was a man who grew up poor. Why would he want to deconstruct democracy and hand power to an “elite” that has never shown any interest in the well being of the working class from which he was born?
But then I learned more about the darker side of this ideology. Yarvin is also an unapologetic advocate for the idea that intelligence varies greatly across races, thus creating a natural hierarchy in which the white race and certain asian races are placed above Africans and other supposedly less intelligent races.
Followers of the Dark Enlightenment regularly quote the controversial 1995 book by Charles Murray, The Bell Curve, which argues that intelligence is determined by genetics, and as such inequality is inevitable. But importantly, this book also argues that intelligence varies as a result of race, thus making inequality between races unavoidable.
Or to put it bluntly, Yarvin states himself “I doubt that all races are equally smart.”
It then starts to make a bit more sense… when these men talk about an authoritarian state led by “elites”… they mean led by a white minority. They believe democracy doesn’t work because “less intelligent” races are outnumbering white people, and as such cannot be trusted to govern.
They are essentially arguing for a fascist white minority rule like the apartheid society men like Thiel and Elon Musk grew up in, and continue to defend. These men are not just fringe internet “edge-lords”, they are among the richest and most powerful men in the world with one of their disciples next-in-line for the Presidency.
If history is any guide, this sort of thing inevitably leads to revolutions and elites being dragged out into the streets and executed. Has happened before.
forms orderly queue for viewing area
LOL
:)
Date: 3/01/2026 13:49:40
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2346523
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
JudgeMental said:
Carrick Ryan
I’ve been doing a lot of research into a popular political movement in the US known as the “Dark Enlightenment”, led by a man named Curtis Yarvin.
Yarvin is a political theorist promoted by billionaire Peter Thiel. He argues that democracy has failed because the masses are ultimately incompetent, indecisive, and incapable of making difficult long-term decisions. He instead advocates for concentrating power in a strong executive or technocratic elite, even if that necessitates fascism.
He’s a man who has been referenced multiple times by Vice President JD Vance and is believed to be the ideological mentor to him and a growing list of tech-oligarchs.
The movement essentially envisions a society which is governed like a corporation, where concepts like civil liberties and welfare programs are dismantled to allow for rapid technological advancement, and power is removed from courts, NGO’s, the media, and universities, and placed exclusively in the hands of a powerful executive “elite” with no democratic accountability.
I kept wondering why this concept could possibly appeal to anyone who wasn’t already rich or powerful, and as such wouldn’t be part of the imagined “elite”. JD Vance, in particular, was a man who grew up poor. Why would he want to deconstruct democracy and hand power to an “elite” that has never shown any interest in the well being of the working class from which he was born?
But then I learned more about the darker side of this ideology. Yarvin is also an unapologetic advocate for the idea that intelligence varies greatly across races, thus creating a natural hierarchy in which the white race and certain asian races are placed above Africans and other supposedly less intelligent races.
Followers of the Dark Enlightenment regularly quote the controversial 1995 book by Charles Murray, The Bell Curve, which argues that intelligence is determined by genetics, and as such inequality is inevitable. But importantly, this book also argues that intelligence varies as a result of race, thus making inequality between races unavoidable.
Or to put it bluntly, Yarvin states himself “I doubt that all races are equally smart.”
It then starts to make a bit more sense… when these men talk about an authoritarian state led by “elites”… they mean led by a white minority. They believe democracy doesn’t work because “less intelligent” races are outnumbering white people, and as such cannot be trusted to govern.
They are essentially arguing for a fascist white minority rule like the apartheid society men like Thiel and Elon Musk grew up in, and continue to defend. These men are not just fringe internet “edge-lords”, they are among the richest and most powerful men in the world with one of their disciples next-in-line for the Presidency.
I’m not sure a whole country can be run like a private members country club.
You could maybe scale it up to run a small town or city on that basis, but I don’t think ot could scale up to a whole country.
If history is any guide, this sort of thing inevitably leads to revolutions and elites being dragged out into the streets and executed. Has happened before.
Phoaw, how good would that be while singing the Internationale.
Date: 3/01/2026 17:57:24
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2346580
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 3/01/2026 18:30:46
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2346586
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Venzie¡ Venzie¡ Venzie¡ Oil¡ Oil¡ Oil¡

Date: 3/01/2026 18:38:00
From: Michael V
ID: 2346587
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Venzie¡ Venzie¡ Venzie¡ Oil¡ Oil¡ Oil¡

Far Canal!
I guess DJT has given up on the tamed-nitroglycerin peace prize.
Date: 3/01/2026 19:56:57
From: Michael V
ID: 2346608
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
Venzie¡ Venzie¡ Venzie¡ Oil¡ Oil¡ Oil¡

Far Canal!
I guess DJT has given up on the tamed-nitroglycerin peace prize.
Here.
Date: 3/01/2026 20:04:18
From: Kingy
ID: 2346609
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
Venzie¡ Venzie¡ Venzie¡ Oil¡ Oil¡ Oil¡

Far Canal!
I guess DJT has given up on the tamed-nitroglycerin peace prize.
Here.
Absolute moronic dangerous clown.
Date: 3/01/2026 20:08:35
From: Michael V
ID: 2346611
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Kingy said:
Michael V said:
Michael V said:
Far Canal!
I guess DJT has given up on the tamed-nitroglycerin peace prize.
Here.
Absolute moronic dangerous clown.
Yeah.
What’s the difference between this and Ukraine?
Date: 3/01/2026 20:10:34
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2346613
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Kingy said:
Michael V said:
Michael V said:
Far Canal!
I guess DJT has given up on the tamed-nitroglycerin peace prize.
Here.
Absolute moronic dangerous clown.
Vile creature indeed.
Date: 3/01/2026 20:21:04
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2346615
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Kingy said:
Michael V said:
Here.
Absolute moronic dangerous clown.
Yeah.
What’s the difference between this and Ukraine?
Trump stopped that war.
Date: 3/01/2026 20:35:40
From: Michael V
ID: 2346619
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
Kingy said:
Absolute moronic dangerous clown.
Yeah.
What’s the difference between this and Ukraine?
Trump stopped that war.
So he says.
Date: 3/01/2026 20:36:50
From: roughbarked
ID: 2346620
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
Kingy said:
Absolute moronic dangerous clown.
Yeah.
What’s the difference between this and Ukraine?
Trump stopped that war.

Date: 3/01/2026 20:46:47
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2346622
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
Yeah.
What’s the difference between this and Ukraine?
Trump stopped that war.

New year, new war
Date: 3/01/2026 20:54:31
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2346623
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
>Donald Trump says US forces have captured Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro
Good if true. But what happens next?
Maduro is a dictator responsible for many human rights abuses. He’s a also a good chum and ally of Putin.
Date: 3/01/2026 21:00:14
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2346625
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Bubblecar said:
>Donald Trump says US forces have captured Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro
Good if true. But what happens next?
Maduro is a dictator responsible for many human rights abuses. He’s a also a good chum and ally of Putin.
The BBC are reporting it.
Date: 3/01/2026 21:13:24
From: Kingy
ID: 2346626
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Bubblecar said:
>Donald Trump says US forces have captured Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro
Good if true. But what happens next?
Maduro is a dictator responsible for many human rights abuses. He’s a also a good chum and ally of Putin.
Maduro won’t be a loss, but the odds of things improving in Venezuela have not increased.
Date: 3/01/2026 21:19:26
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2346627
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Kingy said:
Bubblecar said:
>Donald Trump says US forces have captured Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro
Good if true. But what happens next?
Maduro is a dictator responsible for many human rights abuses. He’s a also a good chum and ally of Putin.
Maduro won’t be a loss, but the odds of things improving in Venezuela have not increased.
He’s in the Ms., should Mamdani be worried?
Date: 3/01/2026 21:19:54
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2346628
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Kingy said:
Bubblecar said:
>Donald Trump says US forces have captured Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro
Good if true. But what happens next?
Maduro is a dictator responsible for many human rights abuses. He’s a also a good chum and ally of Putin.
Maduro won’t be a loss, but the odds of things improving in Venezuela have not increased.
May get a good deal worse, who knows.
Date: 3/01/2026 21:28:58
From: Neophyte
ID: 2346629
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Bubblecar said:
>Donald Trump says US forces have captured Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro
Good if true. But what happens next?
Maduro is a dictator responsible for many human rights abuses. He’s a also a good chum and ally of Putin.
And the US has a long history of backing right wing dictatorships.
Date: 3/01/2026 21:30:06
From: party_pants
ID: 2346630
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Kingy said:
Bubblecar said:
>Donald Trump says US forces have captured Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro
Good if true. But what happens next?
Maduro is a dictator responsible for many human rights abuses. He’s a also a good chum and ally of Putin.
Maduro won’t be a loss, but the odds of things improving in Venezuela have not increased.
Removing the leader of a badly misfunctioning country by outside military force always makes the situation worse.
Date: 3/01/2026 21:35:26
From: Kingy
ID: 2346633
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Kingy said:
Bubblecar said:
>Donald Trump says US forces have captured Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro
Good if true. But what happens next?
Maduro is a dictator responsible for many human rights abuses. He’s a also a good chum and ally of Putin.
Maduro won’t be a loss, but the odds of things improving in Venezuela have not increased.
He’s in the Ms., should Mamdani be worried?
I doubt trump knows the alphabet, so no.
Date: 3/01/2026 21:35:38
From: party_pants
ID: 2346634
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
Kingy said:
Bubblecar said:
>Donald Trump says US forces have captured Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro
Good if true. But what happens next?
Maduro is a dictator responsible for many human rights abuses. He’s a also a good chum and ally of Putin.
Maduro won’t be a loss, but the odds of things improving in Venezuela have not increased.
Removing the leader of a badly misfunctioning country by outside military force always makes the situation worse.
abd the place is already awash with guns.
Date: 3/01/2026 22:13:27
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2346637
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
When asked about whether he sought congressional approval for the military strikes he said.
“A lot of good planning and lot of great, great troops and great people,” Trump told the newspaper.
“It was a brilliant operation, actually.”
Date: 3/01/2026 22:24:39
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2346639
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
When asked about whether he sought congressional approval for the military strikes he said.
“A lot of good planning and lot of great, great troops and great people,” Trump told the newspaper.
“It was a brilliant operation, actually.”
I suppose we’ll have to wait until the main sources of news on this matter is not the shitgibbon.
Date: 3/01/2026 22:26:01
From: dv
ID: 2346641
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I don’t think you have to be a Maduro-fan to find this a troubling development.
Date: 3/01/2026 22:36:21
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2346643
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
When asked if kidnapping foreign leaders was legal, he said.
“A lot of good planning and lot of great, great troops and great people,” Trump told the newspaper.
“It was a brilliant operation, actually.”
Date: 3/01/2026 22:39:20
From: Kingy
ID: 2346644
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
When asked if kidnapping foreign leaders was legal, he said.
“A lot of good planning and lot of great, great troops and great people,” Trump told the newspaper.
“It was a brilliant operation, actually.”
Cool, so can Australia kidnap trump and chuck him in jail?
Date: 3/01/2026 22:57:52
From: party_pants
ID: 2346646
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
I don’t think you have to be a Maduro-fan to find this a troubling development.
It’s just bullying, plain and simple. Pick on somebody weak, for made up reasons.
Date: 3/01/2026 22:58:20
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2346648
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
party_pants said:
Kingy said:
Maduro won’t be a loss, but the odds of things improving in Venezuela have not increased.
Removing the leader of a badly misfunctioning country by outside military force always makes the situation worse.
abd the place is already awash with guns.
They will mess it up more, they excel at that.
Date: 3/01/2026 23:34:29
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2346657
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
dv said:
I don’t think you have to be a Maduro-fan to find this a troubling development.
It’s just bullying, plain and simple. Pick on somebody weak, for made up reasons.
Nothing like a sudden, arbitrary war to get people to forget about ‘files’ and things.
Odds against DT getting a Nobel Peace Prize just went through the roof, though.
Date: 4/01/2026 00:50:12
From: Ian
ID: 2346664
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
“FREEDOM MOVES FORWARD. LONG LIVE FREEDOM DAMMIT”.
Argentine president Javier Milei
.
Ah huh
Date: 4/01/2026 06:46:58
From: roughbarked
ID: 2346673
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
party_pants said:
dv said:
I don’t think you have to be a Maduro-fan to find this a troubling development.
It’s just bullying, plain and simple. Pick on somebody weak, for made up reasons.
Nothing like a sudden, arbitrary war to get people to forget about ‘files’ and things.
Odds against DT getting a Nobel Peace Prize just went through the roof, though.
Mr Trump gave few specifics about how the US would run Venezuela.
“We’re going to be running it with a group and we’re going to make sure it’s run properly,” he said.
He indicated his cabinet would initially be in charge.
“It’s largely going to be, for a period of time, the people that are standing behind me,” he told the press conference, where he was flanked by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and others.
Mr Trump also said the US was “ready to stage a second and much larger attack if we need to”.
Date: 4/01/2026 06:53:02
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2346674
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
Trump stopped that war.

New year, new war
exactly, they should give him the prize for all the good things he did in 2025, this is a separate matter
Date: 4/01/2026 06:55:56
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2346675
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
captain_spalding said:
party_pants said:
It’s just bullying, plain and simple. Pick on somebody weak, for made up reasons.
Nothing like a sudden, arbitrary war to get people to forget about ‘files’ and things.
Odds against DT getting a Nobel Peace Prize just went through the roof, though.
Mr Trump gave few specifics about how the US would run Venezuela.
“We’re going to be running it with a group and we’re going to make sure it’s run properly,” he said.
He indicated his cabinet would initially be in charge.
“It’s largely going to be, for a period of time, the people that are standing behind me,” he told the press conference, where he was flanked by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and others.
Mr Trump also said the US was “ready to stage a second and much larger attack if we need to”.
fuck CHINA and their foreign interfering independence disrespecting regional bullying
Date: 4/01/2026 07:13:30
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2346677
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
a troubling development
no it’s not, they told us he wasn’t a legitimate leader so this is all fine
Date: 4/01/2026 07:18:43
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2346678
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
dv said:
I don’t think you have to be a Maduro-fan to find this a troubling development.
It’s just bullying, plain and simple. Pick on somebody weak, for made up reasons.
It seems the US is wanting Venezuela’s oil. Trump: “we’re going in there with multibillion dollar companies going in to drill the oil”.
Kinda seems like the whole Iraq-Kuwait situation.
There’s other, political, reasons too, like implanting a US butt-kisser as president.
Date: 4/01/2026 07:20:36
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2346679
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
party_pants said:
dv said:
I don’t think you have to be a Maduro-fan to find this a troubling development.
It’s just bullying, plain and simple. Pick on somebody weak, for made up reasons.
It seems the US is wanting Venezuela’s oil. Trump: “we’re going in there with multibillion dollar companies going in to drill the oil”.
Kinda seems like the whole Iraq-Kuwait situation.
There’s other, political, reasons too, like implanting a US butt-kisser as president.
so it’s good news for the average Venezuelan on the street then, they get USSAmerican prosperity and stable good governance
Date: 4/01/2026 07:26:30
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2346681
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Divine Angel said:
party_pants said:
It’s just bullying, plain and simple. Pick on somebody weak, for made up reasons.
It seems the US is wanting Venezuela’s oil. Trump: “we’re going in there with multibillion dollar companies going in to drill the oil”.
Kinda seems like the whole Iraq-Kuwait situation.
There’s other, political, reasons too, like implanting a US butt-kisser as president.
so it’s good news for the average Venezuelan on the street then, they get USSAmerican prosperity and stable good governance
And we end up with films.

Date: 4/01/2026 07:43:06
From: Michael V
ID: 2346682
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Movies. That’d be right. They figured that out after WWII.
Date: 4/01/2026 07:45:15
From: roughbarked
ID: 2346684
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
dv said:
a troubling development
no it’s not, they told us he wasn’t a legitimate leader so this is all fine
and what’s so legitimate about Trump then?
Date: 4/01/2026 07:46:21
From: roughbarked
ID: 2346685
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
party_pants said:
dv said:
I don’t think you have to be a Maduro-fan to find this a troubling development.
It’s just bullying, plain and simple. Pick on somebody weak, for made up reasons.
It seems the US is wanting Venezuela’s oil. Trump: “we’re going in there with multibillion dollar companies going in to drill the oil”.
Kinda seems like the whole Iraq-Kuwait situation.
There’s other, political, reasons too, like implanting a US butt-kisser as president.
Yeah. Trump has been on about drill baby drill. Obviously pushed by his US oil interests
Date: 4/01/2026 07:46:38
From: roughbarked
ID: 2346686
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Divine Angel said:
party_pants said:
It’s just bullying, plain and simple. Pick on somebody weak, for made up reasons.
It seems the US is wanting Venezuela’s oil. Trump: “we’re going in there with multibillion dollar companies going in to drill the oil”.
Kinda seems like the whole Iraq-Kuwait situation.
There’s other, political, reasons too, like implanting a US butt-kisser as president.
so it’s good news for the average Venezuelan on the street then, they get USSAmerican prosperity and stable good governance
Ha.
Date: 4/01/2026 07:47:37
From: roughbarked
ID: 2346687
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
SCIENCE said:
Divine Angel said:
It seems the US is wanting Venezuela’s oil. Trump: “we’re going in there with multibillion dollar companies going in to drill the oil”.
Kinda seems like the whole Iraq-Kuwait situation.
There’s other, political, reasons too, like implanting a US butt-kisser as president.
so it’s good news for the average Venezuelan on the street then, they get USSAmerican prosperity and stable good governance
And we end up with films.

Over and over again.
Date: 4/01/2026 09:31:26
From: dv
ID: 2346698
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
US President Donald Trump said the United States will “run” Venezuela and tap its huge oil reserves after snatching leftist leader Nicolas Maduro out of the country during a bombing raid on Caracas.
Trump’s announcement came hours after a rapid attack in which special forces grabbed Maduro and his wife, while airstrikes pounded multiple sites, stunning the capital city.
Trump did not go into detail what he meant but told a press conference in Florida: “We’re going to be running it with a group.“q
“We’re designating people,” he said, mentioning that cabinet officials standing with him would be in charge.
In another surprise, Trump indicated that US troops could be deployed in Venezuela.
The US is “not afraid of boots on the ground,” he said.
Although the operation is being framed as a law-enforcement action, Trump made clear that regime change and Venezuela’s oil riches are the major goals.
“We’re going to have our very large United States oil companies, the biggest anywhere in the world, go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure,” he said.
“We’ll be selling large amounts of oil,” he said.
——
https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/us-run-venezuela-maduro/l4l6p8ky7
Refreshingly candid
Date: 4/01/2026 09:34:47
From: roughbarked
ID: 2346699
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
US President Donald Trump said the United States will “run” Venezuela and tap its huge oil reserves after snatching leftist leader Nicolas Maduro out of the country during a bombing raid on Caracas.
Trump’s announcement came hours after a rapid attack in which special forces grabbed Maduro and his wife, while airstrikes pounded multiple sites, stunning the capital city.
Trump did not go into detail what he meant but told a press conference in Florida: “We’re going to be running it with a group.“q
“We’re designating people,” he said, mentioning that cabinet officials standing with him would be in charge.
In another surprise, Trump indicated that US troops could be deployed in Venezuela.
The US is “not afraid of boots on the ground,” he said.
Although the operation is being framed as a law-enforcement action, Trump made clear that regime change and Venezuela’s oil riches are the major goals.
“We’re going to have our very large United States oil companies, the biggest anywhere in the world, go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure,” he said.
“We’ll be selling large amounts of oil,” he said.
——
https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/us-run-venezuela-maduro/l4l6p8ky7
Refreshingly candid
Indeed. It seems quite clear.
Date: 4/01/2026 09:41:35
From: Ian
ID: 2346700
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
dv said:
US President Donald Trump said the United States will “run” Venezuela and tap its huge oil reserves after snatching leftist leader Nicolas Maduro out of the country during a bombing raid on Caracas.
Trump’s announcement came hours after a rapid attack in which special forces grabbed Maduro and his wife, while airstrikes pounded multiple sites, stunning the capital city.
Trump did not go into detail what he meant but told a press conference in Florida: “We’re going to be running it with a group.“q
“We’re designating people,” he said, mentioning that cabinet officials standing with him would be in charge.
In another surprise, Trump indicated that US troops could be deployed in Venezuela.
The US is “not afraid of boots on the ground,” he said.
Although the operation is being framed as a law-enforcement action, Trump made clear that regime change and Venezuela’s oil riches are the major goals.
“We’re going to have our very large United States oil companies, the biggest anywhere in the world, go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure,” he said.
“We’ll be selling large amounts of oil,” he said.
——
https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/us-run-venezuela-maduro/l4l6p8ky7
Refreshingly candid
Indeed. It seems quite clear.
And they reckon Hitler was a cunt!
Date: 4/01/2026 09:59:53
From: buffy
ID: 2346701
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Ian said:
roughbarked said:
dv said:
US President Donald Trump said the United States will “run” Venezuela and tap its huge oil reserves after snatching leftist leader Nicolas Maduro out of the country during a bombing raid on Caracas.
Trump’s announcement came hours after a rapid attack in which special forces grabbed Maduro and his wife, while airstrikes pounded multiple sites, stunning the capital city.
Trump did not go into detail what he meant but told a press conference in Florida: “We’re going to be running it with a group.“q
“We’re designating people,” he said, mentioning that cabinet officials standing with him would be in charge.
In another surprise, Trump indicated that US troops could be deployed in Venezuela.
The US is “not afraid of boots on the ground,” he said.
Although the operation is being framed as a law-enforcement action, Trump made clear that regime change and Venezuela’s oil riches are the major goals.
“We’re going to have our very large United States oil companies, the biggest anywhere in the world, go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure,” he said.
“We’ll be selling large amounts of oil,” he said.
——
https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/us-run-venezuela-maduro/l4l6p8ky7
Refreshingly candid
Indeed. It seems quite clear.
And they reckon Hitler was a cunt!
So it’s an armed robbery and kidnapping.
Date: 4/01/2026 10:02:26
From: dv
ID: 2346702
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 4/01/2026 10:09:19
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2346703
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

I suppose shedding tears or not shedding tears is the only option people can expect from the UK in this matter.
Date: 4/01/2026 10:16:06
From: Ian
ID: 2346704
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 4/01/2026 10:17:22
From: Michael V
ID: 2346705
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Bubblecar said:
dv said:

I suppose shedding tears or not shedding tears is the only option people can expect from the UK in this matter.
To be fair, I can’t see most countries being able to do much. Russia and China could have a crack, but it’d end up as WWIII. Other countries could express displeasure, but that’s about the most extreme action that could be done.
Date: 4/01/2026 10:27:08
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2346708
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Bubblecar said:
dv said:

I suppose shedding tears or not shedding tears is the only option people can expect from the UK in this matter.
To be fair, I can’t see most countries being able to do much. Russia and China could have a crack, but it’d end up as WWIII. Other countries could express displeasure, but that’s about the most extreme action that could be done.
The UN is having a meeting about it as well.
Date: 4/01/2026 10:29:30
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2346710
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
Bubblecar said:
I suppose shedding tears or not shedding tears is the only option people can expect from the UK in this matter.
To be fair, I can’t see most countries being able to do much. Russia and China could have a crack, but it’d end up as WWIII. Other countries could express displeasure, but that’s about the most extreme action that could be done.
The UN is having a meeting about it as well.
USA doesn’t give a shit what anyone says. What ya gunna do about it?
Date: 4/01/2026 10:30:18
From: roughbarked
ID: 2346712
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
Bubblecar said:
I suppose shedding tears or not shedding tears is the only option people can expect from the UK in this matter.
To be fair, I can’t see most countries being able to do much. Russia and China could have a crack, but it’d end up as WWIII. Other countries could express displeasure, but that’s about the most extreme action that could be done.
The UN is having a meeting about it as well.
and possibly more than one.
Date: 4/01/2026 10:31:20
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2346715
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
To be fair, I can’t see most countries being able to do much. Russia and China could have a crack, but it’d end up as WWIII. Other countries could express displeasure, but that’s about the most extreme action that could be done.
The UN is having a meeting about it as well.
USA doesn’t give a shit what anyone says. What ya gunna do about it?
The UN doesn’t seem to do much except have meetings and condemn actions anyway.
Date: 4/01/2026 10:53:44
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2346718
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
When asked if he was going to run the oil rich country himself he said.
“A lot of good planning and lot of great, great troops and great people,” Trump told the newspaper.
“It was a brilliant operation, actually.”
Date: 4/01/2026 11:02:10
From: dv
ID: 2346720
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
There does seem to be some disagreement within the US admin, as Rubio is indicating that major operations are over, while DJT has run on talking about regime change and boots on the ground.
Maduro’s absence means his VP Delcy Rodriguez becomes acting President. The other arms of the government carry on.
Date: 4/01/2026 11:07:45
From: party_pants
ID: 2346721
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
There does seem to be some disagreement within the US admin, as Rubio is indicating that major operations are over, while DJT has run on talking about regime change and boots on the ground.
Maduro’s absence means his VP Delcy Rodriguez becomes acting President. The other arms of the government carry on.
I give it a week before the whole country falls apart and things turn to shit.
The country is awash with guns. The previous dictator handed out free AK-74s to his “supporters” during his reign. They have not been handed back. Expect different groups to start fighting amongst themselves for whatever spoils they can take from the collapse of the old regime.
Date: 4/01/2026 11:09:22
From: AussieDJ
ID: 2346723
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Once the Venezuelan oil starts flowing into the US, and likely reducing fuel prices (after the oil compnaies take their cut), the American public – especially trump’s maga supporters will be all for the action.
Date: 4/01/2026 11:12:04
From: party_pants
ID: 2346724
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
AussieDJ said:
Once the Venezuelan oil starts flowing into the US, and likely reducing fuel prices (after the oil compnaies take their cut), the American public – especially trump’s maga supporters will be all for the action.
Unlikely. The US is a net oil exporter and doesn’t need their oil. Most of it will probably be sold in Europe.
Date: 4/01/2026 11:19:10
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2346725
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
I give it a week before the whole country falls apart and things turn to shit.
The country is awash with guns. The previous dictator handed out free AK-74s to his “supporters” during his reign. They have not been handed back. Expect different groups to start fighting amongst themselves for whatever spoils they can take from the collapse of the old regime.
For a second I thought you were talking about the US.
Date: 4/01/2026 11:19:52
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2346726
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
dv said:
There does seem to be some disagreement within the US admin, as Rubio is indicating that major operations are over, while DJT has run on talking about regime change and boots on the ground.
Maduro’s absence means his VP Delcy Rodriguez becomes acting President. The other arms of the government carry on.
I give it a week before the whole country falls apart and things turn to shit.
The country is awash with guns. The previous dictator handed out free AK-74s to his “supporters” during his reign. They have not been handed back. Expect different groups to start fighting amongst themselves for whatever spoils they can take from the collapse of the old regime.
None of that matters to the US.
As long as the American oil and mining companies’ operations are not molested, the Venezuelans can slaughter each other as much as they like.
To that end, firms like Exxon and Newmont will probably pay bribes to various Venezuelan factions of various viewpoints to ensure that their operations aren’t interfered with. Of course, they’ll have their own ‘security’ like Academi (formerly Blackwater) on site, just to make sure.
I suggest that the American firms will move in very quickly, indeed, to take advantage of the chaos/celebrations caused by Maduro’s removal. While Democrat Senate minority leader Dick Schumer may not have been briefed on the planning for this military venture, i’d bet that the oil and mining firms were well aware of it.
Date: 4/01/2026 11:20:28
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2346727
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
party_pants said:
I give it a week before the whole country falls apart and things turn to shit.
The country is awash with guns. The previous dictator handed out free AK-74s to his “supporters” during his reign. They have not been handed back. Expect different groups to start fighting amongst themselves for whatever spoils they can take from the collapse of the old regime.
For a second I thought you were talking about the US.
No, you can’t get assault rifles for free in the US.
Not yet.
Date: 4/01/2026 11:21:36
From: party_pants
ID: 2346728
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
party_pants said:
I give it a week before the whole country falls apart and things turn to shit.
The country is awash with guns. The previous dictator handed out free AK-74s to his “supporters” during his reign. They have not been handed back. Expect different groups to start fighting amongst themselves for whatever spoils they can take from the collapse of the old regime.
For a second I thought you were talking about the US.
ha
Date: 4/01/2026 11:22:25
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2346729
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Divine Angel said:
party_pants said:
I give it a week before the whole country falls apart and things turn to shit.
The country is awash with guns. The previous dictator handed out free AK-74s to his “supporters” during his reign. They have not been handed back. Expect different groups to start fighting amongst themselves for whatever spoils they can take from the collapse of the old regime.
For a second I thought you were talking about the US.
No, you can’t get assault rifles for free in the US.
Not yet.
That was the bit where I realised it was Venezuela.
Date: 4/01/2026 11:24:26
From: dv
ID: 2346730
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 4/01/2026 11:42:53
From: Michael V
ID: 2346731
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
Bubblecar said:
I suppose shedding tears or not shedding tears is the only option people can expect from the UK in this matter.
To be fair, I can’t see most countries being able to do much. Russia and China could have a crack, but it’d end up as WWIII. Other countries could express displeasure, but that’s about the most extreme action that could be done.
The UN is having a meeting about it as well.
US has veto, so the UN is a toothless, paper tiger.
Date: 4/01/2026 11:48:09
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2346732
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
President Trump has just addressed the UN, he said.
“A lot of good planning and lot of great, great troops and great people,”
“It was a brilliant operation, actually.”
Date: 4/01/2026 11:58:15
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2346733
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
To be fair, I can’t see most countries being able to do much. Russia and China could have a crack, but it’d end up as WWIII. Other countries could express displeasure, but that’s about the most extreme action that could be done.
The UN is having a meeting about it as well.
US has veto, so the UN is a toothless, paper tiger.
That’s why, despite what Trump might threaten, the US can’t leave the UN.
Leave the UN, and lose the permanent power of veto on the Security Council.
It would leave the UK, France, China and Russia as the ‘permanent veto’ countries.
China and Russia could provoke all kinds of shenanigans on the Security Council. While France could generally be counted on to use its veto to counter such things…well, they are the French.
The same goes for the UK, but the Americans would be constantly applying enormous pressure to the UK to act as proxy for the US in Security Council votes. Even so, it’s not entirely inconceivable that the UK just might, one day, kick free and vote against America’s wishes.
A fifth country could be given a permanent seat and ‘permanent veto’ on the Council to replace the US, but it’s most unlikely, as it would need a complex amendment, approval by the General Assembly, and approval by all of the existing permanent members. Little chance of that.
Date: 4/01/2026 12:09:39
From: party_pants
ID: 2346734
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:
The UN is having a meeting about it as well.
US has veto, so the UN is a toothless, paper tiger.
That’s why, despite what Trump might threaten, the US can’t leave the UN.
Leave the UN, and lose the permanent power of veto on the Security Council.
It would leave the UK, France, China and Russia as the ‘permanent veto’ countries.
China and Russia could provoke all kinds of shenanigans on the Security Council. While France could generally be counted on to use its veto to counter such things…well, they are the French.
The same goes for the UK, but the Americans would be constantly applying enormous pressure to the UK to act as proxy for the US in Security Council votes. Even so, it’s not entirely inconceivable that the UK just might, one day, kick free and vote against America’s wishes.
A fifth country could be given a permanent seat and ‘permanent veto’ on the Council to replace the US, but it’s most unlikely, as it would need a complex amendment, approval by the General Assembly, and approval by all of the existing permanent members. Little chance of that.
Without the US as a member, the UN would become even less relevant, and would probably fall apart and be disbanded.
The permanent veto powers is what makes the UN so useless in the first place. None of the permanent members can be expected to act with virtue or principle, they use it as a vehicle to protect their own interests.
Date: 4/01/2026 12:20:20
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2346735
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
US has veto, so the UN is a toothless, paper tiger.
That’s why, despite what Trump might threaten, the US can’t leave the UN.
Leave the UN, and lose the permanent power of veto on the Security Council.
It would leave the UK, France, China and Russia as the ‘permanent veto’ countries.
China and Russia could provoke all kinds of shenanigans on the Security Council. While France could generally be counted on to use its veto to counter such things…well, they are the French.
The same goes for the UK, but the Americans would be constantly applying enormous pressure to the UK to act as proxy for the US in Security Council votes. Even so, it’s not entirely inconceivable that the UK just might, one day, kick free and vote against America’s wishes.
A fifth country could be given a permanent seat and ‘permanent veto’ on the Council to replace the US, but it’s most unlikely, as it would need a complex amendment, approval by the General Assembly, and approval by all of the existing permanent members. Little chance of that.
Without the US as a member, the UN would become even less relevant, and would probably fall apart and be disbanded.
The permanent veto powers is what makes the UN so useless in the first place. None of the permanent members can be expected to act with virtue or principle, they use it as a vehicle to protect their own interests.
They do. To some extent, that’s why they were given that power.
It ensures that they have reason to stay in the UN, that they have sufficient ‘buy-in’ to encourage them to remain part of the organisation.
Date: 4/01/2026 12:50:14
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2346740
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 4/01/2026 13:35:24
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2346742
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
U.S. Department of Labor
We will Never Surrender our fight to put AMERICANS FIRST!
We’re committed to continuing to deliver for American Workers this year by
—Creating even more jobs for AMERICAN-BORN Workers
—Continuing our crackdown on H-1B fraud
—Expanding access to apprenticeship programs
—Protecting the safety of our workers on the job
—Unleashing American Innovation and Industrial Dominance
—Ensuring American Jobs go to AMERICAN WORKERS
More winning to come, Patriots
Date: 4/01/2026 13:48:40
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2346743
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 4/01/2026 14:25:23
From: fsm
ID: 2346748
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 4/01/2026 14:33:31
From: kii
ID: 2346750
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
From Jim Wright aka Stonekettle Station:
Trump’s secure command center is just some black sheets draped over curtain poles around a card table with wooden dining room chairs in an unused Mar-a-Lago storeroom while the Minister of War reads some tweets from military geniuses like Field Marshal Catturd and Space Cadet Musk on the progress of the glorious operation.

Date: 4/01/2026 14:44:16
From: kii
ID: 2346755
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Whenever I see Marco Rubio standing near Trump listening to the obviously demented scumbag talking absolute bullshit, I wonder if he is thinking about what he’d be doing in that situation if he’d become president?
Date: 4/01/2026 14:52:09
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2346758
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
From Jim Wright aka Stonekettle Station:
Trump’s secure command center is just some black sheets draped over curtain poles around a card table with wooden dining room chairs in an unused Mar-a-Lago storeroom while the Minister of War reads some tweets from military geniuses like Field Marshal Catturd and Space Cadet Musk on the progress of the glorious operation.

sure but they got the dictator and justice will be served and oil will flow and the lives of Venezuelans and everyone else in the world will be better for it so what’s the problem
Date: 4/01/2026 14:53:31
From: Michael V
ID: 2346759
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
fsm said:

LOLOLOLOLOLOL
Uh-uh-uh.
LOLOLOLOLOLOL
Date: 4/01/2026 14:53:42
From: roughbarked
ID: 2346760
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
kii said:
From Jim Wright aka Stonekettle Station:
Trump’s secure command center is just some black sheets draped over curtain poles around a card table with wooden dining room chairs in an unused Mar-a-Lago storeroom while the Minister of War reads some tweets from military geniuses like Field Marshal Catturd and Space Cadet Musk on the progress of the glorious operation.

sure but they got the dictator and justice will be served and oil will flow and the lives of Venezuelans and everyone else in the world will be better for it so what’s the problem
A lot of AK-47’s
Date: 4/01/2026 14:57:54
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2346764
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
kii said:
From Jim Wright aka Stonekettle Station:
Trump’s secure command center is just some black sheets draped over curtain poles around a card table with wooden dining room chairs in an unused Mar-a-Lago storeroom while the Minister of War reads some tweets from military geniuses like Field Marshal Catturd and Space Cadet Musk on the progress of the glorious operation.

sure but they got the dictator and justice will be served and oil will flow and the lives of Venezuelans and everyone else in the world will be better for it so what’s the problem
A lot of AK-47’s
yeah but why should we care the local fuel station has dropped their prices today so life is good
Date: 4/01/2026 14:59:47
From: roughbarked
ID: 2346765
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
sure but they got the dictator and justice will be served and oil will flow and the lives of Venezuelans and everyone else in the world will be better for it so what’s the problem
A lot of AK-47’s
yeah but why should we care the local fuel station has dropped their prices today so life is good
Good my tank needs topping up.
Date: 4/01/2026 15:06:34
From: party_pants
ID: 2346771
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
A lot of AK-47’s
yeah but why should we care the local fuel station has dropped their prices today so life is good
Good my tank needs topping up.
you drive a tank?
Date: 4/01/2026 15:07:22
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2346773
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:
The UN is having a meeting about it as well.
US has veto, so the UN is a toothless, paper tiger.
That’s why, despite what Trump might threaten, the US can’t leave the UN.
Leave the UN, and lose the permanent power of veto on the Security Council.
It would leave the UK, France, China and Russia as the ‘permanent veto’ countries.
China and Russia could provoke all kinds of shenanigans on the Security Council. While France could generally be counted on to use its veto to counter such things…well, they are the French.
The same goes for the UK, but the Americans would be constantly applying enormous pressure to the UK to act as proxy for the US in Security Council votes. Even so, it’s not entirely inconceivable that the UK just might, one day, kick free and vote against America’s wishes.
A fifth country could be given a permanent seat and ‘permanent veto’ on the Council to replace the US, but it’s most unlikely, as it would need a complex amendment, approval by the General Assembly, and approval by all of the existing permanent members. Little chance of that.
New Zealand
Date: 4/01/2026 15:09:44
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2346775
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Divine Angel said:
party_pants said:
I give it a week before the whole country falls apart and things turn to shit.
The country is awash with guns. The previous dictator handed out free AK-74s to his “supporters” during his reign. They have not been handed back. Expect different groups to start fighting amongst themselves for whatever spoils they can take from the collapse of the old regime.
For a second I thought you were talking about the US.
No, you can’t get assault rifles for free in the US.
Not yet.
what if you say you support Charlie Kirk and it is as god wills
Date: 4/01/2026 15:15:25
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2346778
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Anyway Maduro is A-OK with how things are going

Date: 4/01/2026 15:18:26
From: Woodie
ID: 2346779
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
US has veto, so the UN is a toothless, paper tiger.
That’s why, despite what Trump might threaten, the US can’t leave the UN.
Leave the UN, and lose the permanent power of veto on the Security Council.
It would leave the UK, France, China and Russia as the ‘permanent veto’ countries.
China and Russia could provoke all kinds of shenanigans on the Security Council. While France could generally be counted on to use its veto to counter such things…well, they are the French.
The same goes for the UK, but the Americans would be constantly applying enormous pressure to the UK to act as proxy for the US in Security Council votes. Even so, it’s not entirely inconceivable that the UK just might, one day, kick free and vote against America’s wishes.
A fifth country could be given a permanent seat and ‘permanent veto’ on the Council to replace the US, but it’s most unlikely, as it would need a complex amendment, approval by the General Assembly, and approval by all of the existing permanent members. Little chance of that.
New Zealand
Isn’t there already a “revolving seat” on the UN Security Council?
Date: 4/01/2026 15:19:11
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2346780
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Anyway Maduro is A-OK with how things are going

“It’s fine, they let me wear my slippers.”
Date: 4/01/2026 15:22:10
From: Woodie
ID: 2346783
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Anyway Maduro is A-OK with how things are going

Those shoes/slippers look nice and comfy. With my dodgy feet, wish I could get a pair like that.
Date: 4/01/2026 15:44:12
From: Michael V
ID: 2346792
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Anyway Maduro is A-OK with how things are going

All thumbs up…
Date: 4/01/2026 15:55:57
From: Michael V
ID: 2346799
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:

:)
Goond one!
:)
Date: 4/01/2026 15:57:14
From: Michael V
ID: 2346801
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:

Ooh-aah!
Excellent.
Date: 4/01/2026 16:11:48
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2346812
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Anyway Maduro is A-OK with how things are going

Is that the Venezuelan luge team?
Date: 4/01/2026 16:12:35
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2346815
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Divine Angel said:
Anyway Maduro is A-OK with how things are going

Is that the Venezuelan luge team?
If it is there’s a lot of dentists in it.
Date: 4/01/2026 16:17:18
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2346818
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Someone’s put together the pic I couldn’t be arsed doing myself.
Three things in particular stick out in the bottom pic:
1. No military
2. Twitter on the screen behind them
3. The highly secure black curtains

Date: 4/01/2026 16:24:56
From: buffy
ID: 2346827
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Bubblecar said:
Divine Angel said:
Anyway Maduro is A-OK with how things are going

“It’s fine, they let me wear my slippers.”
Have they photoshopped out the newspaper. Shouldn’t the hostage be holding a newspaper in a proof of life photo?
Date: 4/01/2026 16:36:37
From: Michael V
ID: 2346833
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Bubblecar said:
Divine Angel said:
Anyway Maduro is A-OK with how things are going

“It’s fine, they let me wear my slippers.”
Have they photoshopped out the newspaper. Shouldn’t the hostage be holding a newspaper in a proof of life photo?
Ha!
Trump’s mob playing by the rules? That’d be unexpected.
Date: 4/01/2026 16:53:34
From: kii
ID: 2346840
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Bubblecar said:
Divine Angel said:
Anyway Maduro is A-OK with how things are going

“It’s fine, they let me wear my slippers.”
Have they photoshopped out the newspaper. Shouldn’t the hostage be holding a newspaper in a proof of life photo?
Lololol 😆
Date: 4/01/2026 17:16:18
From: dv
ID: 2346843
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Ah well I’m sure DJT is hoping this will keep the EpFiles out of the headlines for a few days.
Date: 4/01/2026 17:28:53
From: Michael V
ID: 2346849
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Ah well I’m sure DJT is hoping this will keep the EpFiles out of the headlines for a few days.
What was that?
Date: 4/01/2026 17:53:29
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2346862
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
dv said:
kii said:
Michael V said:
buffy said:
Bubblecar said:
Divine Angel said:
Divine Angel said:
Someone’s put together the pic I couldn’t be arsed doing myself.
Three things in particular stick out in the bottom pic:
1. No military
2. Twitter on the screen behind them
3. The highly secure black curtains

Anyway Maduro is A-OK with how things are going

“It’s fine, they let me wear my slippers.”
Have they photoshopped out the newspaper. Shouldn’t the hostage be holding a newspaper in a proof of life photo?
Ha!
Trump’s mob playing by the rules? That’d be unexpected.
Lololol 😆
Ah well I’m sure DJT is hoping this will keep the EpFiles out of the headlines for a few days.
What was that?
so looks like this was all planned and Maduro is in on it as well and got a nice deal out of it
Date: 4/01/2026 18:01:41
From: dv
ID: 2346867
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
dv said:
Ah well I’m sure DJT is hoping this will keep the EpFiles out of the headlines for a few days.
What was that?
What was what?
Date: 4/01/2026 18:04:35
From: kii
ID: 2346868
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Mexico is next…Cuba….Colombia
Link
Date: 4/01/2026 18:16:50
From: kii
ID: 2346871
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 4/01/2026 18:25:04
From: party_pants
ID: 2346873
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Bernie Sanders’ statement about Venezuela
Well, they need to impeach him, and at least half of his cabinet.
Date: 4/01/2026 18:31:43
From: Michael V
ID: 2346879
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Michael V said:
dv said:
Ah well I’m sure DJT is hoping this will keep the EpFiles out of the headlines for a few days.
What was that?
What was what?
I don’t know.
Nobody seems to remember what that was.
Date: 4/01/2026 18:36:04
From: Ian
ID: 2346883
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 4/01/2026 18:41:43
From: Michael V
ID: 2346887
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 4/01/2026 18:43:55
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2346888
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
kii said:
Bernie Sanders’ statement about Venezuela
Well, they need to impeach him, and at least half of his cabinet.
jftr but anyway
NEWS: Statement of Sen. Bernie Sanders on Venezuela
January 3, 2026
WASHINGTON, Jan. 3 – Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on Saturday condemned President Donald Trump’s unilateral military action against Venezuela as illegal and unconstitutional, warning that it violates international law, endangers global security and usurps Congress’ exclusive authority to declare war. Sanders called on Congress to immediately pass a War Powers resolution to end the operation.
Donald Trump has, once again, shown his contempt for the Constitution and the rule of law. The President of the United States does NOT have the right to unilaterally take this country to war, even against a corrupt and brutal dictator like Maduro. The United States does NOT have the right, as Trump stated this morning, to “run” Venezuela. Congress must immediately pass a War Powers resolution to end this illegal military operation and reassert its constitutional responsibilities.
Trump’s attack on Venezuela will make the United States and the world less safe. This brazen violation of international law gives a green light to any nation on earth that may wish to attack another country to seize their resources or change their governments. This is the horrific logic of force that Putin used to justify his brutal attack on Ukraine.
Trump and his administration have often said they want to revive the Monroe Doctrine, claiming the United States has the right to dominate the affairs of the hemisphere. They have spoken openly about controlling Venezuela’s oil reserves, the largest in the world. This is rank imperialism. It recalls the darkest chapters of U.S. interventions in Latin America, which have left a terrible legacy. It will and should be condemned by the democratic world.
Trump campaigned for president on an “America First” platform. He claimed to be the “peace candidate.” At a time when 60% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck, when our healthcare system is collapsing, when people cannot afford housing and when AI threatens millions of jobs, it is time for the president to focus on the crises facing this country and end this military adventurism abroad. Trump is failing in his job to “run” the United States. He should not be trying to “run” Venezuela.
Date: 4/01/2026 18:45:56
From: Michael V
ID: 2346890
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 4/01/2026 18:46:10
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2346891
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
kii said:
Bernie Sanders’ statement about Venezuela
Thanks for posting.
sure but did he act instead of just posting
Date: 4/01/2026 18:48:49
From: dv
ID: 2346892
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 4/01/2026 18:53:19
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2346894
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

So… fascist western-identified country invades and annexes neighbours, what next, far eastern powerhouse takes control of Republic of China and pushes across SEA and sea¿
Date: 4/01/2026 19:23:51
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2346898
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
alleged
Alejandro Velasco
@AleVelascoNYU
At this point, taking the actual operation, Trump’s press conference, and Delcy Rodriguez’s press conference into consideration, it seems fairly certain (though of course, unconfirmed) that Maduro was given up by the remaining government apparatus in a back channel deal. 1/x
9:30 AM · Jan 4, 2026
·
585.1K
Views
Alejandro Velasco
@AleVelascoNYU
·
9h
They likely used the only card they had to play: only we can ensure stability; the alternative – a full regime change with oppo installed in power – would result in chaos and bloodshed that the US would then have to manage with troops on the ground. 2/x
Alejandro Velasco
@AleVelascoNYU
·
9h
In exchange, they gave Trump two things: oil (for cash) and Maduro (for show). Plus ancillary players get some of what they wanted: Hegseth gets his macho moment and Rubio gets to strangle Cuba. 3/x
Alejandro Velasco
@AleVelascoNYU
·
9h
But, chest beating aside, the remaining Ven gov’t now has to do Trump’s bidding with a massive Damocles sword over its head. Not that they mind: ideology has long been dead for them. Of course, in geopolitics everything can change on a dime. 4/x
Alejandro Velasco
@AleVelascoNYU
·
9h
But that’s what it looks like to me as this long day turns to night, with MCM as the biggest loser among the notable players. And as always, those who will bear the biggest brunt are Venezuelans, in Ven and out. For them, the tragedy continues. FIN
Date: 4/01/2026 19:36:25
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2346902
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Putin: Kidnap the leader……….damn why didn’t I think of that…………….kidnap the leader…….oh well it’s too late now………bugger…
Date: 4/01/2026 19:39:15
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2346904
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Putin: Kidnap the leader……….damn why didn’t I think of that…………….kidnap the leader…….oh well it’s too late now………bugger…
blow up their pagers
Date: 4/01/2026 19:42:52
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2346906
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Donny and team must have known about this, the kidnapping, for some time.
No leaks, tight ship.
Date: 4/01/2026 19:49:09
From: buffy
ID: 2346909
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Donny and team must have known about this, the kidnapping, for some time.
No leaks, tight ship.
Or….it was just one his thought bubbles and someone thought he meant it.
Date: 4/01/2026 20:09:20
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2346916
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:

how good is Trump and all the fascists
Date: 4/01/2026 21:23:50
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2346934
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
CHINA Apologist Talks Trash
https://michaelwest.com.au/what-trump-venezuela-means-for-russia-china/
Modern China is unique for having a relatively peaceful rise as a superpower. The odd border skirmish with India, some elbowing in the South China Sea, nothing like the rivers of blood spilt by every other major power.
LOL ‘sif, they’ve been
uh
been
yeah wait
Date: 4/01/2026 21:29:45
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2346935
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
What can I say here? If this can be done to dictators, like that, then the United States of America know what they should do next.
damn

Date: 4/01/2026 22:41:30
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2346941
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Yeah but remember all the ones he stopped? Enough to get the FIFA Peace Prize!

Date: 4/01/2026 23:32:17
From: Michael V
ID: 2346945
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
What can I say here? If this can be done to dictators, like that, then the United States of America know what they should do next.
damn

Clever.
:)
Date: 5/01/2026 08:03:39
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2346960
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Someone here said yesterday something about leaking the info?

Date: 5/01/2026 08:52:28
From: Michael V
ID: 2346962
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Someone here said yesterday something about leaking the info?

Two opposite interpretations. Which is correct? Which is moral?
Gosh!
Date: 5/01/2026 09:02:32
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2346966
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:
Someone here said yesterday something about leaking the info?

Two opposite interpretations. Which is correct? Which is moral?
Gosh!
Old El Paso
Date: 5/01/2026 09:27:48
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2346979
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
This Venezuela thing really isn’t funny, but this raised a smile anyway:
“Trump is reasonably suspected of being a war criminal. So is Putin. And Netanyahu. Lukashenko cheated in the elections in Belarus. I never liked Fico much, and Starmer is criminally boring.”
From Quora.
Date: 5/01/2026 09:34:53
From: Michael V
ID: 2346980
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
This Venezuela thing really isn’t funny, but this raised a smile anyway:
“Trump is reasonably suspected of being a war criminal. So is Putin. And Netanyahu. Lukashenko cheated in the elections in Belarus. I never liked Fico much, and Starmer is criminally boring.”
From Quora.
:)
Date: 5/01/2026 09:49:00
From: dv
ID: 2346982
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
“What we’re not going to allow is for the oil industry in Venezuela to be controlled by adversaries of the United States. You have to understand, why does China need their oil? Why does Russia need their oil? Why does Iran need their oil? They’re not even in this continent,” Rubio said. “This is the Western Hemisphere. This is where we live, and we’re not going to allow the Western Hemisphere to be a base of operation for adversaries, competitors and rivals of the United States.”
—-https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/secretary-state-marco-rubio-us-capture-maduro-war-venezuela-elections-rcna252111
Date: 5/01/2026 10:00:18
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2346986
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
BREAKING
Trump has arrested Mamdani, says he will run New York.
more to come…….
Date: 5/01/2026 10:01:28
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2346987
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
BREAKING
Trump has arrested Mamdani, says he will run New York.
more to come…….
Only kidding, it’s not true, I made it up.
Date: 5/01/2026 10:02:08
From: Michael V
ID: 2346989
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
BREAKING
Trump has arrested Mamdani, says he will run New York.
more to come…….
Ref?
;)
Date: 5/01/2026 10:15:34
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2346997
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
This Venezuela thing really isn’t funny, but this raised a smile anyway:
“Trump is reasonably suspected of being a war criminal. So is Putin. And Netanyahu. Lukashenko cheated in the elections in Belarus. I never liked Fico much, and Starmer is criminally boring.”
From Quora.
:)
so what we need is a true expert in police statism to perform true enforcement functions across the world and arrest the true criminals
Date: 5/01/2026 10:28:33
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2347000
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
has…
… has this
“this incredible thing last night… We have to do it again. We can do it again, too. Nobody can stop us”
kind of thing happened before
¿
Date: 5/01/2026 10:47:36
From: Michael V
ID: 2347003
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
has…
… has this
“this incredible thing last night… We have to do it again. We can do it again, too. Nobody can stop us”
kind of thing happened before
¿
Something… something… something… Iran… failed… Operation Eagle Claw…
Date: 5/01/2026 15:06:06
From: Ian
ID: 2347070
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Trump says US military operation in Colombia ‘sounds good to me’
—
Man’s a menace.
Date: 5/01/2026 15:09:37
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2347072
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Ian said:
Trump says US military operation in Colombia ‘sounds good to me’
—
Man’s a menace.
unification is peace
Date: 5/01/2026 15:10:45
From: Cymek
ID: 2347076
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Ian said:
Trump says US military operation in Colombia ‘sounds good to me’
—
Man’s a menace.
unification is peace
Australia won’t say boo, suck up to the USA regardless of their actions.
Date: 5/01/2026 16:52:44
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2347100
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Team Sports Just For Plausible Deniability


Date: 5/01/2026 18:11:27
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2347119
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
if yous’r‘l looking for justifications, here’s an interesting historical contrast
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_Wars
Date: 5/01/2026 18:45:19
From: dv
ID: 2347127
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
if yous’r‘l looking for justifications, here’s an interesting historical contrast
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_Wars

Date: 5/01/2026 18:54:37
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2347130
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
SCIENCE said:
if yous’r‘l looking for justifications, here’s an interesting historical contrast
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_Wars

Distraction.
As Jeff Tiedrich put it in his online column:
“so, why did this thing have to happen in the dead of night during New Year’s weekend?
it’s all about the timing.
Congress is back in session this week, and they have a lot of stuff on their plate — stuff Donny doesn’t want them dealing with. like the Epstein Files, for which the DOJ just missed another deadline. then there are the Obamacare subsidies, which expired four days ago.
fuck’s sake, there’s another possible government shutdown looming on January 30 — that needs to be dealt with, too.
but now, all anyone is going to be talking about is Venezuela.
that’s pretty convenient, isn’t it?”
Date: 5/01/2026 18:56:13
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2347132
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
SCIENCE said:
if yous’r‘l looking for justifications, here’s an interesting historical contrast
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_Wars

I don’t think even Fox media is calling him a wily genius.
Date: 5/01/2026 19:03:43
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2347135
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
SCIENCE said:
if yous’r‘l looking for justifications, here’s an interesting historical contrast
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_Wars

Michael Bentine said I was a genius.
Date: 5/01/2026 19:05:29
From: Woodie
ID: 2347138
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tree on shed. Lucky the bushy bits at the top may have cushioned it a bit.

Date: 5/01/2026 19:06:08
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2347139
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Woodie said:
Tree on shed. Lucky the bushy bits at the top may have cushioned it a bit.

What’s in the shed?
Date: 5/01/2026 19:07:07
From: Brindabellas
ID: 2347140
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Bubblecar said:
Woodie said:
Tree on shed. Lucky the bushy bits at the top may have cushioned it a bit.

What’s in the shed?
ahem wrong Fred
And sorry Woodie- you aren’t having much luck
Date: 5/01/2026 19:07:21
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2347141
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Woodie said:
Tree on shed. Lucky the bushy bits at the top may have cushioned it a bit.

Bloody hell, I hope your chainsaw is sharp and not in the dam.
Date: 5/01/2026 19:09:51
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2347144
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:
SCIENCE said:
if yous’r‘l looking for justifications, here’s an interesting historical contrast
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_Wars

Michael Bentine said I was a genius.
Some context.
Michael Bentine, a founding member of The Goons, was known for “always calling everyone a genius,” a charming habit that his fellow performers, Harry Secombe and Peter Sellers, often joked about.
This habit even became part of Goon Show lore:
Bentine once sent an eccentric individual named Ruxton Hayward to meet Peter Sellers, giving him a specific phrase to use as an introduction: “Michael Bentine says I’m a genius”.
Unbeknownst to Hayward, this was a secret signal for Sellers to consider incorporating the man into his act.
Ruxton Hayward, a six-foot-two, red-bearded scoutmaster, is widely believed to have inspired Peter Sellers’ iconic character, the perpetually naive and put-upon Boy Scout Bluebottle.
Date: 5/01/2026 19:11:12
From: Woodie
ID: 2347145
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Bubblecar said:
Woodie said:
Tree on shed. Lucky the bushy bits at the top may have cushioned it a bit.

What’s in the shed?
Train set in one half. Tractor and car in the other half.
The bit that’s caved/smashed in is above the train set.
Date: 5/01/2026 19:15:45
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2347149
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Woodie said:
Bubblecar said:
Woodie said:
Tree on shed. Lucky the bushy bits at the top may have cushioned it a bit.

What’s in the shed?
Train set in one half. Tractor and car in the other half.
The bit that’s caved/smashed in is above the train set.
Damn, I suspected as much :/
Date: 5/01/2026 19:24:06
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2347159
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Not since Starlin liberated Czechoslovakia and Hitler liberated Poland have we seen such a bold move.
Date: 5/01/2026 19:30:54
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2347167
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Bubblecar said:
Woodie said:
Bubblecar said:
What’s in the shed?
Train set in one half. Tractor and car in the other half.
The bit that’s caved/smashed in is above the train set.
Damn, I suspected as much :/
we just drove past a pedestrian walking under a tree when it started cracking
Date: 5/01/2026 19:32:17
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2347170
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Not since Starlin liberated Czechoslovakia and Hitler liberated Poland have we seen such a bold move.
Of course, now that Putin or Xi get an urge to execute some kind of ‘police activity’ on one of their neighbours, the US isn’t likely to comment terribly negatively about it.
Date: 5/01/2026 19:52:59
From: Michael V
ID: 2347184
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
dv said:
SCIENCE said:
if yous’r‘l looking for justifications, here’s an interesting historical contrast
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_Wars

Distraction.
As Jeff Tiedrich put it in his online column:
“so, why did this thing have to happen in the dead of night during New Year’s weekend?
it’s all about the timing.
Congress is back in session this week, and they have a lot of stuff on their plate — stuff Donny doesn’t want them dealing with. like the Epstein Files, for which the DOJ just missed another deadline. then there are the Obamacare subsidies, which expired four days ago.
fuck’s sake, there’s another possible government shutdown looming on January 30 — that needs to be dealt with, too.
but now, all anyone is going to be talking about is Venezuela.
that’s pretty convenient, isn’t it?”
Nods.
Date: 5/01/2026 19:54:16
From: roughbarked
ID: 2347186
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Not since Starlin liberated Czechoslovakia and Hitler liberated Poland have we seen such a bold move.
Of course, now that Putin or Xi get an urge to execute some kind of ‘police activity’ on one of their neighbours, the US isn’t likely to comment terribly negatively about it.
Oh I don’t know, he just pardoned a real drug trafficker and arrested a perhaps a drug trafficker.
Date: 5/01/2026 19:55:25
From: Michael V
ID: 2347187
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Woodie said:
Tree on shed. Lucky the bushy bits at the top may have cushioned it a bit.

Cheeses!
Date: 5/01/2026 20:01:26
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2347192
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
captain_spalding said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Not since Starlin liberated Czechoslovakia and Hitler liberated Poland have we seen such a bold move.
Of course, now that Putin or Xi get an urge to execute some kind of ‘police activity’ on one of their neighbours, the US isn’t likely to comment terribly negatively about it.
Oh I don’t know, he just pardoned a real drug trafficker and arrested a perhaps a drug trafficker.
note of course that Venezuela was actually a country
Date: 5/01/2026 20:03:33
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2347195
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
captain_spalding said:
Of course, now that Putin or Xi get an urge to execute some kind of ‘police activity’ on one of their neighbours, the US isn’t likely to comment terribly negatively about it.
Oh I don’t know, he just pardoned a real drug trafficker and arrested a perhaps a drug trafficker.
note of course that Venezuela was actually a country
Trumpezuela now. Bordered by Trump Ocean.
Date: 5/01/2026 20:05:52
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2347197
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Not since Starlin liberated Czechoslovakia and Hitler liberated Poland have we seen such a bold move.
Of course, now that Putin or Xi get an urge to execute some kind of ‘police activity’ on one of their neighbours, the US isn’t likely to comment terribly negatively about it.
Oh I dunno. I can see a US government, of any stripe, being au fait with a little hypocrisy.
Date: 5/01/2026 20:09:08
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2347200
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
captain_spalding said:
Of course, now that Putin or Xi get an urge to execute some kind of ‘police activity’ on one of their neighbours, the US isn’t likely to comment terribly negatively about it.
Oh I don’t know, he just pardoned a real drug trafficker and arrested a perhaps a drug trafficker.
note of course that Venezuela was actually a country
Not some sort of renegade province that deserves to be brought into line?
Date: 5/01/2026 20:09:54
From: Michael V
ID: 2347201
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Bubblecar said:
Woodie said:
Train set in one half. Tractor and car in the other half.
The bit that’s caved/smashed in is above the train set.
Damn, I suspected as much :/
we just drove past a pedestrian walking under a tree when it started cracking
Bloody!
Date: 5/01/2026 23:13:22
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2347255
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
Oh I don’t know, he just pardoned a real drug trafficker and arrested a perhaps a drug trafficker.
note of course that Venezuela was actually a country
Trumpezuela now. Bordered by Trump Ocean.
KKKrasnograd
Date: 6/01/2026 00:46:32
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2347261
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
classic mainstream medium sensationalist engagement farming

Date: 6/01/2026 00:58:02
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2347263
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
we suspect 0 is somewhat of an exaggeration but the sentiment is there


also yes we’re aware these themes get recycled frequently
Date: 6/01/2026 01:16:36
From: kii
ID: 2347264
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 6/01/2026 09:25:24
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2347282
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
yeah mate don’t you worry
Who could Trump target next?
By Patrick Martin
The US president has already taken aim at other countries, including Colombia, Mexico and Cuba. He’s indicated America could take military action in Colombia. But Brian Fonseca, director of the Jack D. Gordon Institute for Public Policy at the University of Florida, said Trump’s comments were “grandstanding”. The US and Colombia have a long-standing relationship on several issues, including security, Mr Fonseca said. He believed the US president was more likely to be interested in intervening in Cuba and Nicaragua.
when Vlad threatened to take Uke it totally didn’t happen
Date: 6/01/2026 10:41:34
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2347298
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
so DPRK should evict all DPRNA bases from eastasia
“This is the Western Hemisphere,” he said. “This is where we live — and we’re not going to allow the Western Hemisphere to be a base of operation for adversaries, competitors, and rivals of the United States.”
Date: 6/01/2026 10:44:55
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2347299
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Hey we remember that time when
China has emerged as the country’s number one oil importer and in return has poured tens of billions of dollars into oil-for-loans deals — mainly for energy and infrastructure, filling critical voids and increasing reliance on Beijing.
countries that help build other countries and follow the rules
Instead, it’s likely China will use this attack to present itself as the only global powerhouse that adheres to international law and upholding a rules-based order. Chinese state media has been busy framing this attack as a “resource-grabbing power play” which will result in the US ceding moral high ground. “By any definition, the US military operation amounts to an invasion,” the China Daily wrote on Monday. “What the world is witnessing is not a rules-based order, but colonial pillaging.”
were painted as the bad guys and the arseholes who wouldn’t uphold the rules based international order that they were already allegedly winning peacefully and economically and overcapacitatingly by following the rules.
Date: 6/01/2026 12:47:04
From: dv
ID: 2347351
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Miller – “It has been the formal position of the U.S. government since the beginning of this administration, frankly, going back into the previous Trump administration, that Greenland should be part of the United States. The president has been very clear about that. That is the formal position of the U.S. government.”
Tapper – “Right. But can you say that military action against Greenland is off the table?”
Miller – “It wouldn’t be military action against Greenland. Greenland has a population of 30,000 people, Jake. The real question is by what right does Denmark assert control over Greenland? What is the basis of their territorial claim? What is their basis of having Greenland as a colony of Denmark?”
Jake Tapper interviews Stephen Miller, US Homeland Security Advisor
https://www.foxnews.com/media/stephen-miller-dismisses-idea-denmark-would-fight-greenland-claims-should-part-us
Date: 6/01/2026 12:51:15
From: roughbarked
ID: 2347352
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Miller – “It has been the formal position of the U.S. government since the beginning of this administration, frankly, going back into the previous Trump administration, that Greenland should be part of the United States. The president has been very clear about that. That is the formal position of the U.S. government.”
Tapper – “Right. But can you say that military action against Greenland is off the table?”
Miller – “It wouldn’t be military action against Greenland. Greenland has a population of 30,000 people, Jake. The real question is by what right does Denmark assert control over Greenland? What is the basis of their territorial claim? What is their basis of having Greenland as a colony of Denmark?”
Jake Tapper interviews Stephen Miller, US Homeland Security Advisor
https://www.foxnews.com/media/stephen-miller-dismisses-idea-denmark-would-fight-greenland-claims-should-part-us
This Miller person. Is his knowledge the basis of the back of a cornflakes packet?
Date: 6/01/2026 13:07:18
From: Michael V
ID: 2347362
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Miller – “It has been the formal position of the U.S. government since the beginning of this administration, frankly, going back into the previous Trump administration, that Greenland should be part of the United States. The president has been very clear about that. That is the formal position of the U.S. government.”
Tapper – “Right. But can you say that military action against Greenland is off the table?”
Miller – “It wouldn’t be military action against Greenland. Greenland has a population of 30,000 people, Jake. The real question is by what right does Denmark assert control over Greenland? What is the basis of their territorial claim? What is their basis of having Greenland as a colony of Denmark?”
Jake Tapper interviews Stephen Miller, US Homeland Security Advisor
https://www.foxnews.com/media/stephen-miller-dismisses-idea-denmark-would-fight-greenland-claims-should-part-us
FMD
Date: 6/01/2026 13:25:49
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2347372
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Miller – “It has been the formal position of the U.S. government since the beginning of this administration, frankly, going back into the previous Trump administration, that Greenland should be part of the United States. The president has been very clear about that. That is the formal position of the U.S. government.”
Tapper – “Right. But can you say that military action against Greenland is off the table?”
Miller – “It wouldn’t be military action against Greenland. Greenland has a population of 30,000 people, Jake. The real question is by what right does Denmark assert control over Greenland? What is the basis of their territorial claim? What is their basis of having Greenland as a colony of Denmark?”
Jake Tapper interviews Stephen Miller, US Homeland Security Advisor
https://www.foxnews.com/media/stephen-miller-dismisses-idea-denmark-would-fight-greenland-claims-should-part-us
Those Wikipedians are onto it
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proposed_United_States_acquisition_of_Greenland
Date: 6/01/2026 13:26:52
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2347373
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Miller – “It has been the formal position of the U.S. government since the beginning of this administration, frankly, going back into the previous Trump administration, that Greenland should be part of the United States. The president has been very clear about that. That is the formal position of the U.S. government.”
Tapper – “Right. But can you say that military action against Greenland is off the table?”
Miller – “It wouldn’t be military action against Greenland. Greenland has a population of 30,000 people, Jake. The real question is by what right does Denmark assert control over Greenland? What is the basis of their territorial claim? What is their basis of having Greenland as a colony of Denmark?”
Jake Tapper interviews Stephen Miller, US Homeland Security Advisor
https://www.foxnews.com/media/stephen-miller-dismisses-idea-denmark-would-fight-greenland-claims-should-part-us
Greenland can become a sunlit upland under US administration.
Men, enterprising men. can, through hard work, build thriving metropolis connected by roads and highways and rail lines.
Men who can tame this wild unproductive land.
Otherwise it will just rot and fester under the yolk of these woke Denmarkians.
Date: 6/01/2026 13:28:18
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2347374
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:
Miller – “It has been the formal position of the U.S. government since the beginning of this administration, frankly, going back into the previous Trump administration, that Greenland should be part of the United States. The president has been very clear about that. That is the formal position of the U.S. government.”
Tapper – “Right. But can you say that military action against Greenland is off the table?”
Miller – “It wouldn’t be military action against Greenland. Greenland has a population of 30,000 people, Jake. The real question is by what right does Denmark assert control over Greenland? What is the basis of their territorial claim? What is their basis of having Greenland as a colony of Denmark?”
Jake Tapper interviews Stephen Miller, US Homeland Security Advisor
https://www.foxnews.com/media/stephen-miller-dismisses-idea-denmark-would-fight-greenland-claims-should-part-us
Greenland can become a sunlit upland under US administration.
Men, enterprising men. can, through hard work, build thriving metropolis connected by roads and highways and rail lines.
Men who can tame this wild unproductive land.
Otherwise it will just rot and fester under the yolk of these woke Denmarkians.
Oil.
The US seems to want more oil, but they’re not silly enough to invade the Middle East. Not even poor little Kuwait.
Date: 6/01/2026 13:45:52
From: roughbarked
ID: 2347379
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:
Miller – “It has been the formal position of the U.S. government since the beginning of this administration, frankly, going back into the previous Trump administration, that Greenland should be part of the United States. The president has been very clear about that. That is the formal position of the U.S. government.”
Tapper – “Right. But can you say that military action against Greenland is off the table?”
Miller – “It wouldn’t be military action against Greenland. Greenland has a population of 30,000 people, Jake. The real question is by what right does Denmark assert control over Greenland? What is the basis of their territorial claim? What is their basis of having Greenland as a colony of Denmark?”
Jake Tapper interviews Stephen Miller, US Homeland Security Advisor
https://www.foxnews.com/media/stephen-miller-dismisses-idea-denmark-would-fight-greenland-claims-should-part-us
Greenland can become a sunlit upland under US administration.
Men, enterprising men. can, through hard work, build thriving metropolis connected by roads and highways and rail lines.
Men who can tame this wild unproductive land.
Otherwise it will just rot and fester under the yolk of these woke Denmarkians.
If the climate keeps warming, Greenland will indeed be the sunlit upland.
Date: 6/01/2026 13:47:13
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2347380
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:
Miller – “It has been the formal position of the U.S. government since the beginning of this administration, frankly, going back into the previous Trump administration, that Greenland should be part of the United States. The president has been very clear about that. That is the formal position of the U.S. government.”
Tapper – “Right. But can you say that military action against Greenland is off the table?”
Miller – “It wouldn’t be military action against Greenland. Greenland has a population of 30,000 people, Jake. The real question is by what right does Denmark assert control over Greenland? What is the basis of their territorial claim? What is their basis of having Greenland as a colony of Denmark?”
Jake Tapper interviews Stephen Miller, US Homeland Security Advisor
https://www.foxnews.com/media/stephen-miller-dismisses-idea-denmark-would-fight-greenland-claims-should-part-us
Greenland can become a sunlit upland under US administration.
Men, enterprising men. can, through hard work, build thriving metropolis connected by roads and highways and rail lines.
Men who can tame this wild unproductive land.
Otherwise it will just rot and fester under the yolk of these woke Denmarkians.
Oil.
The US seems to want more oil, but they’re not silly enough to invade the Middle East. Not even poor little Kuwait.

thankfully CHINA got its industry all over lithium iron phosphate powered 爱-driven minimunitions so it’s all good
Date: 6/01/2026 14:32:30
From: Cymek
ID: 2347406
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I do wonder if the USA needs a bloody nose from a “foe” to let them know perhaps a significant percentage of the world hates them.
Date: 6/01/2026 14:58:34
From: Michael V
ID: 2347413
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
I do wonder if the USA needs a bloody nose from a “foe” to let them know perhaps a significant percentage of the world hates them.
No. We don’t need WWIII.
Date: 6/01/2026 15:00:19
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2347414
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Cymek said:
I do wonder if the USA needs a bloody nose from a “foe” to let them know perhaps a significant percentage of the world hates them.
No. We don’t need WWIII.
so we need people to step up and enforce the rules based international order
Date: 6/01/2026 15:00:45
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2347416
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
plausible deniability, team sports style


good luck preventing war
Date: 6/01/2026 15:14:05
From: Woodie
ID: 2347424
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
Cymek said:
I do wonder if the USA needs a bloody nose from a “foe” to let them know perhaps a significant percentage of the world hates them.
No. We don’t need WWIII.
so we need people to step up and enforce the rules based international order
The Orange Shitgibbon couldn’t give a stuff about “International Law”. The US never has.
If “whoever” is serious about this “International Law” bizzo, then have him arrested the next time he steps foot on foreign soil.
Date: 6/01/2026 15:15:44
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2347426
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Woodie said:
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
No. We don’t need WWIII.
so we need people to step up and enforce the rules based international order
The Orange Shitgibbon couldn’t give a stuff about “International Law”. The US never has.
If “whoever” is serious about this “International Law” bizzo, then have him arrested the next time he steps foot on foreign soil.
As a convicted felon, he shouldn’t be allowed to step foot on (some) foreign soil.
Date: 6/01/2026 15:45:36
From: dv
ID: 2347434
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Does seem as though members of the administration (other than Miller) are openly defying the President. He is very plainly saying what the plan is and they are all putting out alternative plans).
Date: 6/01/2026 16:30:36
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2347441
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Does seem as though members of the administration (other than Miller) are openly defying the President. He is very plainly saying what the plan is and they are all putting out alternative plans).
so invade 1 and ambiguously threaten the other 100 then
Date: 6/01/2026 17:36:47
From: dv
ID: 2347463
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1


Situation is little changed after a small number of polls over the past couple of weeks but I present this snapshot as none of these polls was conducted after the apprehension of the Maduros.
Date: 6/01/2026 17:51:54
From: dv
ID: 2347469
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Seen a bit of this kind of thing on social media.
Russia and Iran are among the world’s major oil exporting nations. They don’t need oil from Venezuela.
Date: 6/01/2026 18:03:52
From: Cymek
ID: 2347471
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Seen a bit of this kind of thing on social media.
Russia and Iran are among the world’s major oil exporting nations. They don’t need oil from Venezuela.
Would this not be noticed
Date: 6/01/2026 18:07:32
From: AussieDJ
ID: 2347472
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Presidente Trumpito’s Inaugural Address
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v17aUGBAzF8
Link
Date: 6/01/2026 18:23:25
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2347474
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
dv said:
Seen a bit of this kind of thing on social media.
Russia and Iran are among the world’s major oil exporting nations. They don’t need oil from Venezuela.
Would this not be noticed
China buys most of Venzuela’s oil because:
- it’s heavy crude oil, rich in bitumen, which is useful for China and of which type of oil China does not have a great deal
- it’s part of a repayment scheme (oil for loans) to repay significant loans to Venezuela by China
- it help keep Venezuela’s oil industry stable, enabling it to be used as an economic tool/weapon against American oil interests
Date: 6/01/2026 18:23:57
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2347475
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Shows like Sesame Street will continue to be made, but will be exclusive to streaming and not FTA. PBS was mostly government funded, and we all know what the current administration thinks of wholesome, educational shows. Funding was cut, PBS couldn’t survive.
Date: 6/01/2026 18:28:18
From: Cymek
ID: 2347477
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Cymek said:
dv said:
Seen a bit of this kind of thing on social media.
Russia and Iran are among the world’s major oil exporting nations. They don’t need oil from Venezuela.
Would this not be noticed
China buys most of Venzuela’s oil because:
- it’s heavy crude oil, rich in bitumen, which is useful for China and of which type of oil China does not have a great deal
- it’s part of a repayment scheme (oil for loans) to repay significant loans to Venezuela by China
- it help keep Venezuela’s oil industry stable, enabling it to be used as an economic tool/weapon against American oil interests
So tit for tat in how the USA does it to mess with other nations.
All pathetic and likely a reflection of how inadequate they feel as men
Date: 6/01/2026 18:51:03
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2347480
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
fuck CHINA see what yous made US do
Date: 6/01/2026 19:46:51
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2347489
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:

Shows like Sesame Street will continue to be made, but will be exclusive to streaming and not FTA. PBS was mostly government funded, and we all know what the current administration thinks of wholesome, educational shows. Funding was cut, PBS couldn’t survive.
but this is good news, everyone knows that state owned media are just propaganda mouthpieces, private enterprise and oligarch interests are far better placed to provide meaningful information to the people
Date: 6/01/2026 20:28:43
From: dv
ID: 2347493
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 6/01/2026 20:34:17
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2347494
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 6/01/2026 20:56:12
From: Michael V
ID: 2347503
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:

LOLOLOLOLOL
Date: 6/01/2026 20:56:39
From: Michael V
ID: 2347504
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
FMD
Date: 6/01/2026 21:49:03
From: dv
ID: 2347519
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

(Rubs temples) that’s not how that works.
Why is the news so damned stupid these days…
Date: 6/01/2026 22:51:32
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2347531
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

(Rubs temples) that’s not how that works.
Why is the news so damned stupid these days…
¿ blame the news for the machinations of psychopaths=fascists=criminals=corruptioneers ?
Date: 6/01/2026 23:01:10
From: Ian
ID: 2347533
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 6/01/2026 23:07:52
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2347537
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Ian said:
Jon Stewart
Welcome to The Daily Show!
We are back, baby!
My name is Jon Stewart.
Welcome back. Merry Christmas.
Happy New Year. Happy Hanukkah.
Good yontiff.
Whatever it is, we got a show for you tonight.
Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona will be joining us.
Man!
Just today, just today, the Senator had his rank stripped
and his retirement pay docked by the Secretary
of Defense/War, Pete Hegseth/Homelander.
And the Senator will be joining us,
and I will ask him if he knows we do not pay our guests.
But let’s get right to the big story.
Ladies and gentlemen, this weekend, President Trump and
an elite team of Delta Force special operators
removed a dangerous foreign dictator from power.
Not that one.
They’re— they’re— they’re actually friends.
And quite frankly, I think business partners.
No, no.
Not that.
He’s— they’re also quite close.
That’s not— OK.
I believe these two have more of a heated rivalry vibe.
If you know what I mean.
So it’s not— not that one.
No, that’s— not that one.
No, that wasn’t us.
No, I’m talking about the now former president
of Venezuela, Nicolas Maduro, who was
reverse-ICE’d and imported.
He was actually imported to a jail in Brooklyn.
But don’t feel bad for him.
He was a feared and cruel dictator.
- Don’t worry #
- Be happy #
La, la, la, la, la, la, la
Bobby McFerrin karaoke?
You monster.
Look, I know that clip makes him seem benign, almost
kind of comical.
But the truth is, Maduro oversaw a repressive regime
that impoverished his nation, silenced dissent,
and killed thousands.
- La, la, la, la, la #
But his iron rule and a cappella terror
came to an end on Friday night when US Special Forces
raided Caracas, Venezuela’s only city as far as we know,
and snatched Nicolas Maduro out of his bedroom,
apparently before he could even take off his sleep mask.
His Oura Ring must have been like, you had a bad night.
You did not get good deep sleep.
And as it unfolded, Donald Trump
was overseeing it all from a secure location—
the Situation Tent at Mar-a-Lago.
I don’t want to be a dick or a nitpicker.
But is this the most secure location in Mar-a-Lago— behind
the curtain you throw up in front of the catering kitchen?
Bah!
This is a matter of utmost national security!
Desserts are going to have to come out
through the service entrance!
I was never here!
Whoop!
That was me acting as though I was coming out of a—
But honestly, despite the makeshift Command Center,
this was a highly technical and complex
operation that required months of training and preparation.
After months of work by our intelligence
teammates to find Maduro and understand how he moved,
where he lived, where he traveled, what he ate,
what he wore, what were his pets—
Well, that does explain this photo from the raid.
I hope you like eating kibble in Gitmo!
Daphne!
We debated before the show— is it mildly racist
that we gave him a chihuahua?
Is that—
Because basically we’re just— like, is
that— because the chihuahua’s from Mexico, this is Venezuela.
And I thought, well—
so there is some nuance to it, but still mildly racist.
You’re welcome.
Now, obviously, this is actually a very
fraught moment for the world.
It is highly unusual for any government,
any sovereign nation, to violate the airspace and
territory of another sovereign nation and hit the grab
and go on their president.
Explaining it will require the deft hand
of an accomplished statesman.
Let me get there.
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you
the President of the United States
addressing the nation in this solemn, solemn moment.
The United States Armed Forces
conducted an extraordinary military operation
in the capital of Venezuela.
It was dark, and it was deadly.
If you look back to the Jimmy Carter days,
they were different days.
Whether it’s in Washington, DC, where
we have a totally safe city—
Restaurants are opening.
Everyone’s happy. They’re going.
They’re walking their daughters.
They’re walking their children, their wives—
Restaurants— restaurants are opening
all over Washington, DC.
(IMITATING TRUMP) So in closing,
if we hadn’t grabbed Maduro, you’d still be
taking Ubers to Ruth’s Chris.
And lest you think I’m making our president look
cavalier in this moment, here’s Trump
describing how he experienced this consequential operation.
DONALD TRUMP: If you would have seen what happened—
I mean, I watched it literally like I was
watching a television show.
(IMITATING TRUMP) And then I flipped
over to see who was on Kimmel.
I mean, can you believe he still gets to interview
Millie Bobby Brown?
I mean, he’s got no talent!
Anyway, back to abducting the president of Venezuela.
Look, no one knows how this operation is going to work out.
But based on the United States’ track record,
my guess is we’re going to be really happy about this
for a couple of weeks.
And then 30 years from now, there
will be a Venezuelan leftist revolution,
and the new government will point
to this moment as the reason our embassy there is on fire.
And it will absolutely ruin a Democrats’ presidency.
Generally, that’s how this shit works.
And remember, the reason MAGA was so high on Donald Trump
was that he was the guy who wasn’t
going to get involved with this kind of shit anymore.
We do not seek war.
We do not seek nation building.
We do not seek regime change.
And we don’t want to be the world’s policeman.
(IMITATING TRUMP) We don’t want to be!
Those days are over now!
No more American boots on the ground!
We’re not afraid of boots on the ground.
No more rebuilding other countries’ infrastructure!
We have to rebuild their whole infrastructure.
Well, it’s not like we’re going to be running
someone else’s country.
We are going to run the country.
So— so let me get this.
This is a big change in America First policy, is it not?
And a change in policy this big is
going to need some of that Trump marketing
and branding magic.
And the Monroe Doctrine is a big deal.
But we’ve superseded it by a lot, by a real lot.
They now call it the “Donroe Doctrine.”
“Donroe Doctrine.”
That’s the one when someone calls it out,
you go, look, no bad ideas.
But honestly, (WHISPERING) not your best work.
The “Donroe Doctrine.”
It’s obviously a portmanteau of “Monroe” and “Donald.”
I guess it’s a spin-off of the Monroe Doctrine,
famously adopted by President James Monroe in 1823
when he warned colonial powers not to interfere
in our hemisphere.
Let me let a historian explain.
DONALD TRUMP: But you look over here.
That’s Monroe, the Monroe Doctrine.
Why is he up there?
DONALD TRUMP: I think the Monroe Doctrine was
pretty important, you know?
That was his claim to fame.
Claim to fame?
Like he ate 18 hot dogs in one sitting?
I mean, I guess it’s correct.
You can’t really name another thing Monroe was famous for.
But it’s not like everywhere Monroe went,
they’d be like, hey, aren’t you that guy from the doctrine?
Babe, get over here.
It’s the doctrine guy.
Hey.
What are you doing in our hemisphere?
I— I told you that would work.
A little Monroe Doctrine humor— slid it in.
Now, look, generally, in American history, when
we intervene in another country,
whether true or not, we come up with a high-minded pretense—
liberating a people, spreading democracy, introducing
baseball to the Japanese.
They complained at first, but it was totally worth it.
On what moral foundation will this conflict be framed?
We’re going to have a presence in Venezuela
as it pertains to oil.
We’re going to get the oil flowing the way it should be.
Seems a little on the nose.
Um.
Oil— precious commodity, certainly— but
not the reason a country, formed 250 years ago
on the ideas of liberty and self-determination,
would go into a country and snatch a man at night.
There must be a slightly more noble pretense.
We’re going to be taking out a tremendous amount
of wealth out of the ground.
We need total access.
We need access to the oil.
Sir, again— I see where we’re going here.
Do you mind just reframing that?
I’m not quite clear on the high-minded principle
behind this.
In other words, we’ll be selling oil.
Is this your first war?
I mean, what the ?
All right, let’s table this for now.
Senator Lindsey Graham, you’re an old hand at war mongering.
You’ve done this a bunch.
You’re on the plane.
Can you help this dude out with a casus belli
and keep Trump from bringing it back to oil?
There are going to be Americans alive today
because he shut down a narco-terrorist
state called Venezuela.
This is a good thing, not a bad thing.
And the oil companies are going to go
in and rebuild their system.
God damn it.
What?
We can’t even be conspiracy theorists now.
I think they did it for the oil.
Yeah, no, I did it for the oil.
Is there any other reason?
Can you give us anything?
There’s a lot of issues— human rights
violations, political prisoners down in Venezuela.
We could certainly free them and improve
the lives of dissidents.
Are you going to demand that Delcy Rodriguez
let opposition figures return or
free any political prisoners?
We haven’t gotten to that yet.
Right now, what we want to do is fix up the oil,
fix up the country.
Yes, we’ll get the people out of jail.
But first, we have to liberate the oil from its ground prison.
That oil’s been locked up for millions of years, yearning
to burn free.
Obviously, I’m being cynical.
It’s not purely for oil.
Even Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick on the plane
could tell you that on his way out of the bathroom.
They have steel.
You have minerals, right, all the critical minerals.
They have a great mining history that’s gone rusty.
So steel, aluminum, minerals—
These mother- are going full conquistador
in front of our eyes.
I mean, they got oil, steel, minerals.
Oh, and don’t forget about the spices, spices.
We’ll load our ships with cinnamon and cardamom,
oil and everything bagels.
You’ll see.
And they might have gotten away with it too.
But our country is a democracy.
So bad news, Don-roe.
Your little oil heist is going to have
to get past the Democrats and Inspector Schumer.
CHUCK SCHUMER: So I’ve been talking to so many
members of my caucus today.
Everybody is very, very just—
just totally, totally, totally troubled, worried.
- History has its eyes on #
Well, if it were two totallys and one very,
I’d say Trump is getting off scot free.
But three totallys ease and verys and trouble worried?
I don’t want to say the president
doesn’t respect the Democrats.
But he did not brief them before or after this attack.
Now, you could say that was in the interest
of national security and operational confidentiality,
if not for this one group he did speak to.
I have.
Yes.
Before and after.
And then I told Pepsi and Nabisco.
Cologuard— I don’t know why.
What’s the suitcase company on Instagram?
I told them.
I told Hims.
I told Hers.
I let the president of Zyn shoot some missiles.
I—
But I didn’t tell any of the Democrats.
I don’t feel bad for the Democrats.
They will be totally, totally, totally, very, very
fine, probably even gain a seat in the midterms.
The people I feel sorry for are the Trump defendants,
the defenders, the sycophants, who
haven’t received the memo that we
no longer have to frame our adventurism in the ideals
of our great country.
And this is a very strong way to support democracy.
Nothing greater than an American president
who liberates people.
Liberated them for— from a strong man who’s been holding,
by force and intimidation, this country hostage.
We’re not about nation building.
The president doesn’t want its natural resources.
We don’t want their oil.
Oh, poor sweet Brian Kilmeade, sweet, sweet Brian.
Trump already explicitly said he wants their oil.
And democracy?
Trump has already said he wants Venezuelans to freely choose
their leaders, as long as those leaders are acceptable to us.
He’s already said he’s going to select
who will be their next leader.
And guess what?
This ain’t a one-off.
Colombia is very sick too, run
by a sick man who likes making cocaine and selling
it to the United States.
And he’s not going to be doing it very long.
By the way, you have to do something with Mexico.
We need Greenland.
Cuba is ready to fall, you know?
Let the word go forth to a new generation of Americans
that if we need shit and it’s not too far away,
we are going to take it.
Anything else you want to take over?
I think there’s still some time to go after Warner
Brothers Discovery.
I mean, America doesn’t have Netflix money,
but we will after we get that sweet oil.
And by the way, Lindsey Graham.
Honestly, I have never seen him happier,
like a leprechaun in a bowl of Lucky Charms.
I think we’re going to go after Cuba. (IN SILLY VOICE)
Yeah, boss, yeah.
That sounds real good, boss, real good.
(IN REGULAR VOICE) Look, this is all exhausting and
exposes the Gulf of America—
not the body of water.
The real Gulf of America is the gap
between the high aspirations that
embody the founding of this country and
the thuggish gangsterism that this crew
thinks makes us great again.
And if I may offer the news media a New Year’s resolution—
it’s that I don’t ever want to hear again
about the ramifications of how Trump’s actions, however
counter to what he promised in his campaign or the files
that he might release, might alienate his base.
Do you expect to see some splits in the MAGA movement?
Will the MAGA base start to break away?
—widen the rift with his MAGA base.
How’s it going to play for MAGA?
It’ll play fine for MAGA.
They’ll love it.
Their fervor against intervention
will be only matched by their delight in this intervention.
There is no material on Earth more malleable
than the hive-mind connection between Donald Trump and
his acolytes.
And no matter how many times he betrays the principles
they claim to love him for, they will react over and over
with the exact same refrain.
- Don’t worry #
- Be happy #
- La, la, la, la, la, la, la #
Doh.
Date: 7/01/2026 00:25:18
From: dv
ID: 2347554
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/us-based-multinational-companies-exempt-182553390.html
WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. multinational corporations will be exempted from paying more corporate taxes overseas in a deal finalized by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
The OECD announced Monday that nearly 150 countries have agreed on the plan, initially crafted in 2021, to stop large global companies from shifting profits to low-tax countries, no matter where they operate in the world.
Date: 7/01/2026 00:42:04
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2347557
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/us-based-multinational-companies-exempt-182553390.html
WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. multinational corporations will be exempted from paying more corporate taxes overseas in a deal finalized by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
The OECD announced Monday that nearly 150 countries have agreed on the plan, initially crafted in 2021, to stop large global companies from shifting profits to low-tax countries, no matter where they operate in the world.
so 15% is too much
The amended version excludes large U.S.-based multinational corporations from the 15% global minimum tax after negotiations between President Donald Trump’s administration and other members of the Group of Seven wealthy nations.
hey at least they’ll be playing by the rules based international order
Date: 7/01/2026 10:30:19
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2347615
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Impeachment isn’t the big deal it once was. He’s already the most impeached president, what’s another one?

Besides, he’s already “joking” about canceling the midterms.
Date: 7/01/2026 10:34:25
From: dv
ID: 2347616
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 7/01/2026 10:53:01
From: Michael V
ID: 2347619
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

No. No I didn’t. Did I need to? No. Will I remember? Unlikely.
Date: 7/01/2026 10:56:05
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2347627
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
dv said:

No. No I didn’t. Did I need to? No. Will I remember? Unlikely.
It’s fodder for your next trivia night.
Date: 7/01/2026 10:56:46
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2347629
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
LOL

Date: 7/01/2026 10:58:19
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2347634
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Impeachment isn’t the big deal it once was. He’s already the most impeached president, what’s another one?

Besides, he’s already “joking” about canceling the midterms.
look they haven’t been cancelled until they’re cancelled, stop worrying
Date: 7/01/2026 10:58:26
From: Michael V
ID: 2347636
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
dv said:

No. No I didn’t. Did I need to? No. Will I remember? Unlikely.
It’s fodder for your next trivia night.
I haven’t been to a trivia night for probably a quarter of a century. I doubt I will ever go to one again.
:(
Date: 7/01/2026 10:59:54
From: roughbarked
ID: 2347639
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
No. No I didn’t. Did I need to? No. Will I remember? Unlikely.
It’s fodder for your next trivia night.
I haven’t been to a trivia night for probably a quarter of a century. I doubt I will ever go to one again.
:(
I wonder if it will end up on a Trivial Pursuit card?
Date: 7/01/2026 11:04:41
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2347645
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
No. No I didn’t. Did I need to? No. Will I remember? Unlikely.
It’s fodder for your next trivia night.
I haven’t been to a trivia night for probably a quarter of a century. I doubt I will ever go to one again.
:(
I’ll organise one based on questions about the forum. I’ll hold it one Saturday night live on the forum just because.
Date: 7/01/2026 11:05:20
From: roughbarked
ID: 2347646
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:
It’s fodder for your next trivia night.
I haven’t been to a trivia night for probably a quarter of a century. I doubt I will ever go to one again.
:(
I’ll organise one based on questions about the forum. I’ll hold it one Saturday night live on the forum just because.
Could be weirdly interesting.
Date: 7/01/2026 11:14:38
From: Michael V
ID: 2347653
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:
It’s fodder for your next trivia night.
I haven’t been to a trivia night for probably a quarter of a century. I doubt I will ever go to one again.
:(
I’ll organise one based on questions about the forum. I’ll hold it one Saturday night live on the forum just because.
Like.
:)
Date: 7/01/2026 11:20:35
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2347654
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

Fuck, shoot and marry?
Date: 7/01/2026 12:23:59
From: buffy
ID: 2347672
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I missed a Randy Rainbow just before Christmas. Here it is:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTNJQb2fV8I
Date: 7/01/2026 13:08:15
From: dv
ID: 2347677
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Kind of weird and sad but I suppose his fans will think this is genius.
Date: 7/01/2026 13:09:43
From: Cymek
ID: 2347679
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Kind of weird and sad but I suppose his fans will think this is genius.
Imagine the hole these 3rd world immigrants must come from to consider the USA a prime destination
Date: 7/01/2026 13:12:02
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2347682
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
dv said:
Kind of weird and sad but I suppose his fans will think this is genius.
Imagine the hole these 3rd world immigrants must come from to consider the USA a prime destination
they get to have more than 10 guns
Date: 7/01/2026 13:18:22
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2347687
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Kind of weird and sad but I suppose his fans will think this is genius.
Italy isn’t third world anymore so we can’t accuse SM of being a complete moron.
Date: 7/01/2026 13:54:04
From: AussieDJ
ID: 2347702
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
No. No I didn’t. Did I need to? No. Will I remember? Unlikely.
It’s fodder for your next trivia night.
I haven’t been to a trivia night for probably a quarter of a century. I doubt I will ever go to one again.
:(
We could have a virtual pud …
Date: 7/01/2026 14:00:33
From: Michael V
ID: 2347704
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
AussieDJ said:
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:
It’s fodder for your next trivia night.
I haven’t been to a trivia night for probably a quarter of a century. I doubt I will ever go to one again.
:(
We could have a virtual pud …
:)
Date: 7/01/2026 14:04:08
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2347705
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
AussieDJ said:
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:
It’s fodder for your next trivia night.
I haven’t been to a trivia night for probably a quarter of a century. I doubt I will ever go to one again.
:(
We could have a virtual pud …
Me and Mrs S had to stop going to trivia quizzes on a cruise ship. We won so often that there was murmurings of ‘fix’.
I was astonished at the ignorance of my fellow Australians, particularly about the world and current affairs. On a scale which reminded us of Americans.
Date: 7/01/2026 14:12:09
From: Cymek
ID: 2347707
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
AussieDJ said:
Michael V said:
I haven’t been to a trivia night for probably a quarter of a century. I doubt I will ever go to one again.
:(
We could have a virtual pud …
Me and Mrs S had to stop going to trivia quizzes on a cruise ship. We won so often that there was murmurings of ‘fix’.
I was astonished at the ignorance of my fellow Australians, particularly about the world and current affairs. On a scale which reminded us of Americans.
I hope they are least could point out on Austria on a map, it is their homeland.
Date: 7/01/2026 14:29:13
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2347720
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
I was astonished at the ignorance of my fellow Australians, particularly about the world and current affairs. On a scale which reminded us of Americans.
intended
Date: 7/01/2026 14:38:30
From: Woodie
ID: 2347731
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
I was astonished at the ignorance of my fellow Australians, particularly about the world and current affairs. On a scale which reminded us of Americans.
Well that’s what you get from those that go on cruises, I suppose. 😉
Date: 7/01/2026 14:40:21
From: dv
ID: 2347732
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.threads.com/@keneakers/post/DTMKPZVAdxq?xmt=AQF0OT7DhKyLRaJFc-08KTb3E9D1rCYE4iDP3YIp-548ghihIOWvQ23kw8SbpQ9sO-lWs72w&slof=1
Shocking footage of Jerry Lewis pretending he’s not being fellated.
Date: 7/01/2026 14:41:24
From: dv
ID: 2347733
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
AussieDJ said:
Michael V said:
I haven’t been to a trivia night for probably a quarter of a century. I doubt I will ever go to one again.
:(
We could have a virtual pud …
Me and Mrs S had to stop going to trivia quizzes on a cruise ship. We won so often that there was murmurings of ‘fix’.
I was astonished at the ignorance of my fellow Australians, particularly about the world and current affairs. On a scale which reminded us of Americans.
You’ve been spoiled by all the sophisticated and erudite forumers here.
Date: 7/01/2026 14:42:05
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2347735
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Woodie said:
captain_spalding said:
I was astonished at the ignorance of my fellow Australians, particularly about the world and current affairs. On a scale which reminded us of Americans.
Well that’s what you get from those that go on cruises, I suppose. 😉
LOL
On the cruise we went on earlier this year, they had a Simpsons trivia thing. I was seasick and didn’t attend (for some reason, that area of the ship always made me seasick) but Mini Me did. She got 8/10. The two she missed was Marge’s middle name, and the name of the alien in the X-Files episode. Which is a stupid question because it doesn’t have a name, it’s Mr Burns. But everyone who answered “Mr Burns” was incorrect.
Date: 7/01/2026 14:45:37
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2347737
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
captain_spalding said:
AussieDJ said:
We could have a virtual pud …
Me and Mrs S had to stop going to trivia quizzes on a cruise ship. We won so often that there was murmurings of ‘fix’.
I was astonished at the ignorance of my fellow Australians, particularly about the world and current affairs. On a scale which reminded us of Americans.
You’ve been spoiled by all the sophisticated and erudite forumers here.
awwww shucks.
Date: 7/01/2026 15:16:26
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2347749
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 7/01/2026 15:19:17
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2347750
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
LOL
https://www.whitehouse.gov/j6/
fucking LOL though
JFC
Date: 7/01/2026 15:31:45
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2347759
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
AussieDJ said:
Michael V said:
I haven’t been to a trivia night for probably a quarter of a century. I doubt I will ever go to one again.
:(
We could have a virtual pud …
Me and Mrs S had to stop going to trivia quizzes on a cruise ship. We won so often that there was murmurings of ‘fix’.
I was astonished at the ignorance of my fellow Australians, particularly about the world and current affairs. On a scale which reminded us of Americans.
Sounds like I’d fit right in there.
Date: 7/01/2026 15:40:58
From: dv
ID: 2347765
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 7/01/2026 16:48:30
From: Michael V
ID: 2347800
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

LOL
Date: 7/01/2026 17:49:49
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2347822
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
bunch of posts on extwitter abusing the grok爱 on images of kkk and various other politicians where they tell it to “remove the (criminal)” (or whatever) and instead of the bot coming up with some bullshit excuse it actually responds seemingly correctly
Date: 7/01/2026 19:48:59
From: dv
ID: 2347863
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

5 years ago.
Today Rubio looks like a defeated man no matter what’s happening. I hope I live long enough to find out what the hell happened here.
Date: 7/01/2026 21:32:02
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2347879
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

With psychiatrists.
Date: 7/01/2026 21:38:38
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2347882
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Who remembers spelling bees.
It was big in the US and here in the 50’s and 60’s.
It was on the Radio and TV (not so much) back then
Date: 8/01/2026 00:22:42
From: dv
ID: 2347895
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Who remembers spelling bees.
It was big in the US and here in the 50’s and 60’s.
It was on the Radio and TV (not so much) back then
I never took part in one but I’m sort of aware that such things took place.
Date: 8/01/2026 04:06:49
From: Michael V
ID: 2347901
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 8/01/2026 08:49:43
From: roughbarked
ID: 2347914
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 8/01/2026 08:51:16
From: roughbarked
ID: 2347915
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-01-08/us-immigration-agent-fatally-shoots-woman/106208464
A US immigration officer has fatally shot a woman in her car in Minneapolis, officials say.
The mayor says the Trump administration’s claim the incident was self-defence is not true, and told Immigration and Customs Enforcement to “get the f**k out of Minneapolis”.
Immigration agents have been involved in other similar shootings during the Trump administration’s crackdown.
Date: 8/01/2026 09:05:02
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2347918
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
roughbarked said:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-01-08/us-immigration-agent-fatally-shoots-woman/106208464
A US immigration officer has fatally shot a woman in her car in Minneapolis, officials say.
The mayor says the Trump administration’s claim the incident was self-defence is not true, and told Immigration and Customs Enforcement to “get the f**k out of Minneapolis”.
Immigration agents have been involved in other similar shootings during the Trump administration’s crackdown.
so which is happening first civil war or world war
Date: 8/01/2026 09:09:33
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2347922
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Who remembers spelling bees.
It was big in the US and here in the 50’s and 60’s.
It was on the Radio and TV (not so much) back then
I never took part in one but I’m sort of aware that such things took place.
“our faux fonetik alphabetic system is so bad that we need competitions testing kids’ abilities to rote all the exceptions they wrote”
Date: 8/01/2026 09:22:46
From: Michael V
ID: 2347929
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
roughbarked said:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-01-08/us-immigration-agent-fatally-shoots-woman/106208464
A US immigration officer has fatally shot a woman in her car in Minneapolis, officials say.
The mayor says the Trump administration’s claim the incident was self-defence is not true, and told Immigration and Customs Enforcement to “get the f**k out of Minneapolis”.
Immigration agents have been involved in other similar shootings during the Trump administration’s crackdown.
so which is happening first civil war or world war
War is always uncivil.
Date: 8/01/2026 10:50:04
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2347946
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
RFKjr unveils new dietary pyramid
The guidelines will set limits on added sugar and encourage diets that include meat and dairy.
“Protein and healthy fats are essential and were wrongly discouraged in prior dietary guidelines,” Kennedy said. “We are ending the war on saturated fats.”
As an introduction to the new guidelines, Kennedy and Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins called for a “dramatic reduction” in the consumption of “highly processed foods laden with refined carbohydrates, added sugars, excess sodium, unhealthy fats, and chemical additives.”
“This approach can change the health trajectory for so many Americans,” they wrote, pointing out that more than 70% of American adults are overweight or obese due to a diet that has “become reliant on highly processed foods and coupled with a sedentary lifestyle.”
For years, Americans have been advised to limit saturated fat, and the new pyramid is facing criticism.
“I’m very disappointed in the new pyramid that features red meat and saturated fat sources at the very top, as if that’s something to prioritize. It does go against decades and decades of evidence and research,” says Christopher Gardner, a nutrition expert at Stanford University. He was a member of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, which reviewed all the nutrition evidence.
The guidelines also elevate cheese and other dairy to the top of the pyramid, paving the way for the option of full-fat milk and other dairy products in school meals. There’s growing evidence, based on nutrition science, that dairy foods can be beneficial.
https://www.npr.org/2026/01/07/nx-s1-5667021/dietary-guidelines-rfk-jr-nutrition

Date: 8/01/2026 10:56:25
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2347948
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
RFKjr unveils new dietary pyramid
The guidelines will set limits on added sugar and encourage diets that include meat and dairy.
“Protein and healthy fats are essential and were wrongly discouraged in prior dietary guidelines,” Kennedy said. “We are ending the war on saturated fats.”
As an introduction to the new guidelines, Kennedy and Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins called for a “dramatic reduction” in the consumption of “highly processed foods laden with refined carbohydrates, added sugars, excess sodium, unhealthy fats, and chemical additives.”
“This approach can change the health trajectory for so many Americans,” they wrote, pointing out that more than 70% of American adults are overweight or obese due to a diet that has “become reliant on highly processed foods and coupled with a sedentary lifestyle.”
For years, Americans have been advised to limit saturated fat, and the new pyramid is facing criticism.
“I’m very disappointed in the new pyramid that features red meat and saturated fat sources at the very top, as if that’s something to prioritize. It does go against decades and decades of evidence and research,” says Christopher Gardner, a nutrition expert at Stanford University. He was a member of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, which reviewed all the nutrition evidence.
The guidelines also elevate cheese and other dairy to the top of the pyramid, paving the way for the option of full-fat milk and other dairy products in school meals. There’s growing evidence, based on nutrition science, that dairy foods can be beneficial.
https://www.npr.org/2026/01/07/nx-s1-5667021/dietary-guidelines-rfk-jr-nutrition

Is that for real?
It doesn’t sound totally stupid, so probably not.
Date: 8/01/2026 11:09:31
From: dv
ID: 2347952
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.threads.com/@factpostnews/post/DTN14ESDpgs?xmt=AQF0Sk4C-bOakh45wD2AAV5xqwfPOZ-S1UDrDK7_Kyoa6ISsP-3in4FM5ohUZnQVWHoQXARl&slof=1
House Speaker Michael Johnson tries to play off Rubio’s Greenland comments as a joke
Date: 8/01/2026 11:33:36
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2347961
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
Divine Angel said:
RFKjr unveils new dietary pyramid
The guidelines will set limits on added sugar and encourage diets that include meat and dairy.
“Protein and healthy fats are essential and were wrongly discouraged in prior dietary guidelines,” Kennedy said. “We are ending the war on saturated fats.”
As an introduction to the new guidelines, Kennedy and Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins called for a “dramatic reduction” in the consumption of “highly processed foods laden with refined carbohydrates, added sugars, excess sodium, unhealthy fats, and chemical additives.”
“This approach can change the health trajectory for so many Americans,” they wrote, pointing out that more than 70% of American adults are overweight or obese due to a diet that has “become reliant on highly processed foods and coupled with a sedentary lifestyle.”
For years, Americans have been advised to limit saturated fat, and the new pyramid is facing criticism.
“I’m very disappointed in the new pyramid that features red meat and saturated fat sources at the very top, as if that’s something to prioritize. It does go against decades and decades of evidence and research,” says Christopher Gardner, a nutrition expert at Stanford University. He was a member of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, which reviewed all the nutrition evidence.
The guidelines also elevate cheese and other dairy to the top of the pyramid, paving the way for the option of full-fat milk and other dairy products in school meals. There’s growing evidence, based on nutrition science, that dairy foods can be beneficial.
https://www.npr.org/2026/01/07/nx-s1-5667021/dietary-guidelines-rfk-jr-nutrition

Is that for real?
It doesn’t sound totally stupid, so probably not.
I wonder how hard they fought to stop Trump putting McDonald’s at the top of the inverted pyramid.
Note the omission of plant-based proteins like beans and lentils.
Date: 8/01/2026 11:41:11
From: Cymek
ID: 2347963
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Divine Angel said:
RFKjr unveils new dietary pyramid
The guidelines will set limits on added sugar and encourage diets that include meat and dairy.
“Protein and healthy fats are essential and were wrongly discouraged in prior dietary guidelines,” Kennedy said. “We are ending the war on saturated fats.”
As an introduction to the new guidelines, Kennedy and Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins called for a “dramatic reduction” in the consumption of “highly processed foods laden with refined carbohydrates, added sugars, excess sodium, unhealthy fats, and chemical additives.”
“This approach can change the health trajectory for so many Americans,” they wrote, pointing out that more than 70% of American adults are overweight or obese due to a diet that has “become reliant on highly processed foods and coupled with a sedentary lifestyle.”
For years, Americans have been advised to limit saturated fat, and the new pyramid is facing criticism.
“I’m very disappointed in the new pyramid that features red meat and saturated fat sources at the very top, as if that’s something to prioritize. It does go against decades and decades of evidence and research,” says Christopher Gardner, a nutrition expert at Stanford University. He was a member of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, which reviewed all the nutrition evidence.
The guidelines also elevate cheese and other dairy to the top of the pyramid, paving the way for the option of full-fat milk and other dairy products in school meals. There’s growing evidence, based on nutrition science, that dairy foods can be beneficial.
https://www.npr.org/2026/01/07/nx-s1-5667021/dietary-guidelines-rfk-jr-nutrition

Is that for real?
It doesn’t sound totally stupid, so probably not.
I wonder how hard they fought to stop Trump putting McDonald’s at the top of the inverted pyramid.
Note the omission of plant-based proteins like beans and lentils.
I remember that health promotions regarding food aren’t always easy to implement in the USA.
They are considered interference by government in business practices.
Doesn’t matter if they may help save lives or reduce preventable disease.
Date: 8/01/2026 11:47:45
From: Ian
ID: 2347965
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
RFKjr unveils new dietary pyramid
The guidelines will set limits on added sugar and encourage diets that include meat and dairy.
“Protein and healthy fats are essential and were wrongly discouraged in prior dietary guidelines,” Kennedy said. “We are ending the war on saturated fats.”
As an introduction to the new guidelines, Kennedy and Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins called for a “dramatic reduction” in the consumption of “highly processed foods laden with refined carbohydrates, added sugars, excess sodium, unhealthy fats, and chemical additives.”
“This approach can change the health trajectory for so many Americans,” they wrote, pointing out that more than 70% of American adults are overweight or obese due to a diet that has “become reliant on highly processed foods and coupled with a sedentary lifestyle.”
For years, Americans have been advised to limit saturated fat, and the new pyramid is facing criticism.
“I’m very disappointed in the new pyramid that features red meat and saturated fat sources at the very top, as if that’s something to prioritize. It does go against decades and decades of evidence and research,” says Christopher Gardner, a nutrition expert at Stanford University. He was a member of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, which reviewed all the nutrition evidence.
The guidelines also elevate cheese and other dairy to the top of the pyramid, paving the way for the option of full-fat milk and other dairy products in school meals. There’s growing evidence, based on nutrition science, that dairy foods can be beneficial.
https://www.npr.org/2026/01/07/nx-s1-5667021/dietary-guidelines-rfk-jr-nutrition

Where’s the road kill?
Date: 8/01/2026 11:49:16
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2347967
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Ian said:
Divine Angel said:
RFKjr unveils new dietary pyramid
The guidelines will set limits on added sugar and encourage diets that include meat and dairy.
“Protein and healthy fats are essential and were wrongly discouraged in prior dietary guidelines,” Kennedy said. “We are ending the war on saturated fats.”
As an introduction to the new guidelines, Kennedy and Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins called for a “dramatic reduction” in the consumption of “highly processed foods laden with refined carbohydrates, added sugars, excess sodium, unhealthy fats, and chemical additives.”
“This approach can change the health trajectory for so many Americans,” they wrote, pointing out that more than 70% of American adults are overweight or obese due to a diet that has “become reliant on highly processed foods and coupled with a sedentary lifestyle.”
For years, Americans have been advised to limit saturated fat, and the new pyramid is facing criticism.
“I’m very disappointed in the new pyramid that features red meat and saturated fat sources at the very top, as if that’s something to prioritize. It does go against decades and decades of evidence and research,” says Christopher Gardner, a nutrition expert at Stanford University. He was a member of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, which reviewed all the nutrition evidence.
The guidelines also elevate cheese and other dairy to the top of the pyramid, paving the way for the option of full-fat milk and other dairy products in school meals. There’s growing evidence, based on nutrition science, that dairy foods can be beneficial.
https://www.npr.org/2026/01/07/nx-s1-5667021/dietary-guidelines-rfk-jr-nutrition

Where’s the road kill?
splattered everywhere
Date: 8/01/2026 12:05:55
From: dv
ID: 2347971
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/ice-officer-shoots-woman-dead-in-dramatic-escalation-of-trump-crackdown-20260108-p5nsgn.html
Minneapolis: A US Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer has shot and killed a 37-year-old woman in Minneapolis, in a dramatic escalation of the Trump administration’s latest immigration crackdown in a major American city.
The woman, who city police said was not a target of an immigration operation, was shot in a car in front of a family member during a traffic stop in a snowy residential neighbourhood south of downtown Minneapolis. Local Democrat senator Tina Smith said she was a US citizen.
The New York Times identified the woman as Renee Nicole Good, according to two local officials with knowledge of the investigation. Local newspaper The Minnesota Star Tribune quoted family members as saying Good had a son aged four or five, whose father had died in 2023. Soft toys could be seen in photographs from the scene.
The deadly incident has fuelled a national debate over Trump’s efforts to send heavily armed federal agents into US cities in his push for mass deportations, with operations ramping up last year from Chicago to Los Angeles. Within hours, the Minneapolis killing ignited protests as far away as New York City.
L
Good’s mother, Donna Ganger, told the paper her daughter was “one of the kindest people I’ve ever known” and was probably “terrified” at the time of the shooting, which took place just a few blocks from some of the city’s oldest immigrant markets and 1.6 kilometres from where George Floyd was killed by police in 2020. The shooting quickly drew a crowd of hundreds of angry protesters.
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, while visiting Texas, described the incident as an “act of domestic terrorism” carried out against ICE officers by a woman who “attempted to run them over and rammed them with her vehicle”. She said the officer had shot her in defence, “to protect himself and the people around him”.
But Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey blasted that characterisation as “garbage”, saying he had seen video of the shooting that directly contradicted the government’s narrative, and it was “reckless” and unnecessary.
“They’re already trying to spin this as an action of self-defence,” a visibly angry Frey said. “Having seen the video myself, I want to tell everybody directly – that is bullshit.”
Videos of the shooting posted on social media and verified by Reuters raised doubts about the government’s account. One widely shared video shows a maroon Honda SUV partially blocking a road. As the clip begins, the driver inches forward before stopping to let another car drive past.
Footage posted on social media appears to show masked ICE agents approaching a car, before firing at the driver as they attempt to drive away.
The driver, with the window down, then appears to gesture to an approaching ute to go ahead as well. Instead, the ute stops, and two officers exit and approach the Honda on foot. As one of the agents orders the driver out of the SUV and grabs at the door handle, the vehicle reverses briefly, and a third agent comes around to the front of the car from the passenger side.
The driver then goes forward, turning the wheels to the right in what appears to be an effort to head up the street away from the officers. The agent in front of the car pulls his weapon, steps back and fires, with the left front bumper coming close to his legs.
He fires three shots, with at least one shot after the car’s front bumper has already passed him. It was not clear from the video whether the car made contact with the officer, who stayed on his feet throughout the encounter.
After the shots are fired, the car accelerates up the street and crashes into parked cars and a utility pole. Witnesses screamed obscenities, expressing shock at what they had seen.
Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara gave no indication that the woman was trying to harm anyone at the time of the shooting and said she had been shot in the head. Preliminary investigations indicated her vehicle was blocking traffic when a federal officer approached on foot, he said.
“The vehicle began to drive off,” he said. “At least two shots were fired. The vehicle then crashed on the side of the roadway.”
President Donald Trump said in a social media post he had viewed video footage of the incident and criticised the woman shot as acting “very disorderly, obstructing and resisting” and “then violently, wilfully, and viciously” running over the ICE officer.
“The situation is being studied, in its entirety, but the reason these incidents are happening is because the Radical Left is threatening, assaulting, and targeting our Law Enforcement Officers and ICE Agents on a daily basis,” Trump wrote. “They are just trying to do the job of MAKING AMERICA SAFE.”
A dark-coloured SUV with a bullet hole through its windshield and blood splattered across the headrest was seen rammed into a pole on a snowy street after the shooting.
Venus de Mars, who lives near the site of the shooting, described seeing paramedics perform CPR on a woman collapsed next to a snowbank near the crashed car. Shortly afterwards, they loaded her into an ambulance that drove away without its sirens on.
“There’s been lots of ICE activity, but nothing like this,” Mars said. “I’m so angry. I’m so angry, and I feel helpless.”
The shooting has drawn hundreds of protesters into the streets near the scene, some of whom were met by heavily armed federal agents wearing gas masks who fired chemical irritants at the demonstrators.
Addressing the media, Frey blasted Noem’s characterisation of the shooting and the federal deployment of more than 2000 officers as part of the immigration crackdown in the Twin Cities of Minneapolis and St Paul, telling ICE officers to “get the f—- out of Minneapolis”.
“They are not here to cause safety in this city. What they are doing is not to provide safety in America. What they are doing is causing chaos and distrust,” Frey said. “They’re ripping families apart. They’re sowing chaos on our streets and in this case quite literally killing people.”
Mayor tells ICE to get out of Minneapolis after fatal shooting
Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey has addressed the fatal shooting of a woman by federal agents.
However, he also urged residents to remain calm, as did state Governor Tim Walz, who criticised the immigration crackdown but called on people to protest peacefully.
“Do not take the bait,” he said. “Do not allow them to deploy federal troops into here. Do not allow them to invoke the Insurrection Act. Do not allow them to declare martial law.”
He said the shooting was “totally predictable” and “totally avoidable”.
Hours later, at an evening news conference in Minnesota, Noem didn’t back down, claiming the woman was part of a “mob of agitators”. She said the veteran officer who fired his gun had been rammed and dragged by an anti-ICE motorist in June.
“Any loss of life is a tragedy, and I think all of us can agree that in this situation, it was preventable,” Noem said, adding that the FBI would investigate.
The shooting marks a dramatic escalation of the latest in a series of immigration enforcement operations carried out in major American cities under the Trump administration. This incident marks at least the fifth time a person has been killed in a handful of states since 2024.
The Twin Cities have been on edge since DHS announced on Tuesday that it had launched the operation. More than 2000 agents and officers were expected to take part in the crackdown tied in part to allegations of fraud involving Somali residents, related to childcare and other social services.
Protesters at the scene after the shooting vented their anger at the local and federal officers who were there, including Gregory Bovino, a senior US Customs and Border Patrol official who has been the face of crackdowns in Los Angeles, Chicago and elsewhere.
In a scene that hearkened back to the Los Angeles and Chicago crackdowns, bystanders heckled the officers and blew whistles that have become ubiquitous during the operations.
“Shame! Shame! Shame!” and “ICE out of Minnesota!” they loudly chanted from behind the police tape.
During her Texas visit, Noem confirmed the DHS had deployed more than 2000 officers to the Twin Cities and they had already made “hundreds and hundreds” of arrests.
Immigration agents have been involved in other similar shootings during the Trump administration’s crackdown.
During “Operation Midway Blitz”, Trump’s immigration enforcement surge in Chicago last year, ICE agents shot and killed Silverio Villegas Gonzalez, a 38-year-old Mexican national. Gonzalez, a cook and father of two with no criminal record, was shot in his car after agents attempted to arrest him.
A DHS statement said Gonzalez had steered his car at agents, dragging one officer and causing him to fire out of fear for his life. Police bodycam footage obtained by Reuters complicated that narrative, with the ICE agent saying his injuries were “nothing major”.
Border Patrol agents also shot a woman in Chicago in October. DHS said the shooting was in self-defence after the woman, Marimar Martinez, rammed into the agents’ vehicle. But her lawyer said video footage showed the agents hit her car before opening fire.
In December, ICE agents fired at a van carrying two men they were targeting for arrest, leaving one with bullet wounds. A DHS statement said the men drove the van at ICE officers, prompting them to fire in self-defence.
For nearly a year, migrant rights advocates and neighbourhood activists across the Twin Cities have been preparing to mobilise in the event of an immigration enforcement surge. From houses of worship to caravan parks, they have set up very active online networks, scanned licence plates for possible federal vehicles and bought whistles and other noise-making devices to alert neighbourhoods of any enforcement presence.
Date: 8/01/2026 12:08:54
From: Cymek
ID: 2347972
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/ice-officer-shoots-woman-dead-in-dramatic-escalation-of-trump-crackdown-20260108-p5nsgn.html
Minneapolis: A US Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer has shot and killed a 37-year-old woman in Minneapolis, in a dramatic escalation of the Trump administration’s latest immigration crackdown in a major American city.
The woman, who city police said was not a target of an immigration operation, was shot in a car in front of a family member during a traffic stop in a snowy residential neighbourhood south of downtown Minneapolis. Local Democrat senator Tina Smith said she was a US citizen.
The New York Times identified the woman as Renee Nicole Good, according to two local officials with knowledge of the investigation. Local newspaper The Minnesota Star Tribune quoted family members as saying Good had a son aged four or five, whose father had died in 2023. Soft toys could be seen in photographs from the scene.
The deadly incident has fuelled a national debate over Trump’s efforts to send heavily armed federal agents into US cities in his push for mass deportations, with operations ramping up last year from Chicago to Los Angeles. Within hours, the Minneapolis killing ignited protests as far away as New York City.
L
Good’s mother, Donna Ganger, told the paper her daughter was “one of the kindest people I’ve ever known” and was probably “terrified” at the time of the shooting, which took place just a few blocks from some of the city’s oldest immigrant markets and 1.6 kilometres from where George Floyd was killed by police in 2020. The shooting quickly drew a crowd of hundreds of angry protesters.
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, while visiting Texas, described the incident as an “act of domestic terrorism” carried out against ICE officers by a woman who “attempted to run them over and rammed them with her vehicle”. She said the officer had shot her in defence, “to protect himself and the people around him”.
But Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey blasted that characterisation as “garbage”, saying he had seen video of the shooting that directly contradicted the government’s narrative, and it was “reckless” and unnecessary.
“They’re already trying to spin this as an action of self-defence,” a visibly angry Frey said. “Having seen the video myself, I want to tell everybody directly – that is bullshit.”
Videos of the shooting posted on social media and verified by Reuters raised doubts about the government’s account. One widely shared video shows a maroon Honda SUV partially blocking a road. As the clip begins, the driver inches forward before stopping to let another car drive past.
Footage posted on social media appears to show masked ICE agents approaching a car, before firing at the driver as they attempt to drive away.
The driver, with the window down, then appears to gesture to an approaching ute to go ahead as well. Instead, the ute stops, and two officers exit and approach the Honda on foot. As one of the agents orders the driver out of the SUV and grabs at the door handle, the vehicle reverses briefly, and a third agent comes around to the front of the car from the passenger side.
The driver then goes forward, turning the wheels to the right in what appears to be an effort to head up the street away from the officers. The agent in front of the car pulls his weapon, steps back and fires, with the left front bumper coming close to his legs.
He fires three shots, with at least one shot after the car’s front bumper has already passed him. It was not clear from the video whether the car made contact with the officer, who stayed on his feet throughout the encounter.
After the shots are fired, the car accelerates up the street and crashes into parked cars and a utility pole. Witnesses screamed obscenities, expressing shock at what they had seen.
Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara gave no indication that the woman was trying to harm anyone at the time of the shooting and said she had been shot in the head. Preliminary investigations indicated her vehicle was blocking traffic when a federal officer approached on foot, he said.
“The vehicle began to drive off,” he said. “At least two shots were fired. The vehicle then crashed on the side of the roadway.”
President Donald Trump said in a social media post he had viewed video footage of the incident and criticised the woman shot as acting “very disorderly, obstructing and resisting” and “then violently, wilfully, and viciously” running over the ICE officer.
“The situation is being studied, in its entirety, but the reason these incidents are happening is because the Radical Left is threatening, assaulting, and targeting our Law Enforcement Officers and ICE Agents on a daily basis,” Trump wrote. “They are just trying to do the job of MAKING AMERICA SAFE.”
A dark-coloured SUV with a bullet hole through its windshield and blood splattered across the headrest was seen rammed into a pole on a snowy street after the shooting.
Venus de Mars, who lives near the site of the shooting, described seeing paramedics perform CPR on a woman collapsed next to a snowbank near the crashed car. Shortly afterwards, they loaded her into an ambulance that drove away without its sirens on.
“There’s been lots of ICE activity, but nothing like this,” Mars said. “I’m so angry. I’m so angry, and I feel helpless.”
The shooting has drawn hundreds of protesters into the streets near the scene, some of whom were met by heavily armed federal agents wearing gas masks who fired chemical irritants at the demonstrators.
Addressing the media, Frey blasted Noem’s characterisation of the shooting and the federal deployment of more than 2000 officers as part of the immigration crackdown in the Twin Cities of Minneapolis and St Paul, telling ICE officers to “get the f—- out of Minneapolis”.
“They are not here to cause safety in this city. What they are doing is not to provide safety in America. What they are doing is causing chaos and distrust,” Frey said. “They’re ripping families apart. They’re sowing chaos on our streets and in this case quite literally killing people.”
Mayor tells ICE to get out of Minneapolis after fatal shooting
Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey has addressed the fatal shooting of a woman by federal agents.
However, he also urged residents to remain calm, as did state Governor Tim Walz, who criticised the immigration crackdown but called on people to protest peacefully.
“Do not take the bait,” he said. “Do not allow them to deploy federal troops into here. Do not allow them to invoke the Insurrection Act. Do not allow them to declare martial law.”
He said the shooting was “totally predictable” and “totally avoidable”.
Hours later, at an evening news conference in Minnesota, Noem didn’t back down, claiming the woman was part of a “mob of agitators”. She said the veteran officer who fired his gun had been rammed and dragged by an anti-ICE motorist in June.
“Any loss of life is a tragedy, and I think all of us can agree that in this situation, it was preventable,” Noem said, adding that the FBI would investigate.
The shooting marks a dramatic escalation of the latest in a series of immigration enforcement operations carried out in major American cities under the Trump administration. This incident marks at least the fifth time a person has been killed in a handful of states since 2024.
The Twin Cities have been on edge since DHS announced on Tuesday that it had launched the operation. More than 2000 agents and officers were expected to take part in the crackdown tied in part to allegations of fraud involving Somali residents, related to childcare and other social services.
Protesters at the scene after the shooting vented their anger at the local and federal officers who were there, including Gregory Bovino, a senior US Customs and Border Patrol official who has been the face of crackdowns in Los Angeles, Chicago and elsewhere.
In a scene that hearkened back to the Los Angeles and Chicago crackdowns, bystanders heckled the officers and blew whistles that have become ubiquitous during the operations.
“Shame! Shame! Shame!” and “ICE out of Minnesota!” they loudly chanted from behind the police tape.
During her Texas visit, Noem confirmed the DHS had deployed more than 2000 officers to the Twin Cities and they had already made “hundreds and hundreds” of arrests.
Immigration agents have been involved in other similar shootings during the Trump administration’s crackdown.
During “Operation Midway Blitz”, Trump’s immigration enforcement surge in Chicago last year, ICE agents shot and killed Silverio Villegas Gonzalez, a 38-year-old Mexican national. Gonzalez, a cook and father of two with no criminal record, was shot in his car after agents attempted to arrest him.
A DHS statement said Gonzalez had steered his car at agents, dragging one officer and causing him to fire out of fear for his life. Police bodycam footage obtained by Reuters complicated that narrative, with the ICE agent saying his injuries were “nothing major”.
Border Patrol agents also shot a woman in Chicago in October. DHS said the shooting was in self-defence after the woman, Marimar Martinez, rammed into the agents’ vehicle. But her lawyer said video footage showed the agents hit her car before opening fire.
In December, ICE agents fired at a van carrying two men they were targeting for arrest, leaving one with bullet wounds. A DHS statement said the men drove the van at ICE officers, prompting them to fire in self-defence.
For nearly a year, migrant rights advocates and neighbourhood activists across the Twin Cities have been preparing to mobilise in the event of an immigration enforcement surge. From houses of worship to caravan parks, they have set up very active online networks, scanned licence plates for possible federal vehicles and bought whistles and other noise-making devices to alert neighbourhoods of any enforcement presence.
This is in Nazi Germany right ?
Date: 8/01/2026 12:48:48
From: roughbarked
ID: 2347985
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
roughbarked said:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-01-08/us-immigration-agent-fatally-shoots-woman/106208464
A US immigration officer has fatally shot a woman in her car in Minneapolis, officials say.
The mayor says the Trump administration’s claim the incident was self-defence is not true, and told Immigration and Customs Enforcement to “get the f**k out of Minneapolis”.
Immigration agents have been involved in other similar shootings during the Trump administration’s crackdown.
so which is happening first civil war or world war
It is a wait and see job.
Date: 8/01/2026 12:55:03
From: roughbarked
ID: 2347990
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Divine Angel said:
RFKjr unveils new dietary pyramid
https://www.npr.org/2026/01/07/nx-s1-5667021/dietary-guidelines-rfk-jr-nutrition

Is that for real?
It doesn’t sound totally stupid, so probably not.
I wonder how hard they fought to stop Trump putting McDonald’s at the top of the inverted pyramid.
Note the omission of plant-based proteins like beans and lentils.
Pulses and grains. Very important foods.
Date: 8/01/2026 12:55:21
From: Cymek
ID: 2347991
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-01-08/us-immigration-agent-fatally-shoots-woman/106208464
A US immigration officer has fatally shot a woman in her car in Minneapolis, officials say.
The mayor says the Trump administration’s claim the incident was self-defence is not true, and told Immigration and Customs Enforcement to “get the f**k out of Minneapolis”.
Immigration agents have been involved in other similar shootings during the Trump administration’s crackdown.
so which is happening first civil war or world war
It is a wait and see job.
Civil war, they become the 4th Reich, expelling all non-whites.
Gear up to take over whomever they want.
Date: 8/01/2026 12:56:29
From: roughbarked
ID: 2347993
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Ian said:
Divine Angel said:
RFKjr unveils new dietary pyramid
The guidelines will set limits on added sugar and encourage diets that include meat and dairy.
“Protein and healthy fats are essential and were wrongly discouraged in prior dietary guidelines,” Kennedy said. “We are ending the war on saturated fats.”
As an introduction to the new guidelines, Kennedy and Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins called for a “dramatic reduction” in the consumption of “highly processed foods laden with refined carbohydrates, added sugars, excess sodium, unhealthy fats, and chemical additives.”
“This approach can change the health trajectory for so many Americans,” they wrote, pointing out that more than 70% of American adults are overweight or obese due to a diet that has “become reliant on highly processed foods and coupled with a sedentary lifestyle.”
For years, Americans have been advised to limit saturated fat, and the new pyramid is facing criticism.
“I’m very disappointed in the new pyramid that features red meat and saturated fat sources at the very top, as if that’s something to prioritize. It does go against decades and decades of evidence and research,” says Christopher Gardner, a nutrition expert at Stanford University. He was a member of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, which reviewed all the nutrition evidence.
The guidelines also elevate cheese and other dairy to the top of the pyramid, paving the way for the option of full-fat milk and other dairy products in school meals. There’s growing evidence, based on nutrition science, that dairy foods can be beneficial.
https://www.npr.org/2026/01/07/nx-s1-5667021/dietary-guidelines-rfk-jr-nutrition

Where’s the road kill?
splattered everywhere
comes under the meat part.
Date: 8/01/2026 13:19:03
From: Michael V
ID: 2348008
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/ice-officer-shoots-woman-dead-in-dramatic-escalation-of-trump-crackdown-20260108-p5nsgn.html
Minneapolis: A US Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer has shot and killed a 37-year-old woman in Minneapolis, in a dramatic escalation of the Trump administration’s latest immigration crackdown in a major American city.
The woman, who city police said was not a target of an immigration operation, was shot in a car in front of a family member during a traffic stop in a snowy residential neighbourhood south of downtown Minneapolis. Local Democrat senator Tina Smith said she was a US citizen.
The New York Times identified the woman as Renee Nicole Good, according to two local officials with knowledge of the investigation. Local newspaper The Minnesota Star Tribune quoted family members as saying Good had a son aged four or five, whose father had died in 2023. Soft toys could be seen in photographs from the scene.
…………snip…………
FMD.
:(
:(
:(
Date: 8/01/2026 13:26:44
From: dv
ID: 2348013
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Rep Ted Lieu: “If any military member, including the generals on down…participate in the use of military force against Greenland without congressional authorization, they are following illegal orders.”
Date: 8/01/2026 13:29:07
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2348014
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The story so far: US National Parks passes now feature both George Washington’s and Donald Trump’s faces on them.

People don’t mind George, don’t want Donald.
People were buying cute stickers to cover the passes.

Now Trump is throwing a tantrum, directing Park officials to turn away visitors and fine people with stickers on their passes.
https://www.thetravel.com/doi-sticker-ban-means-extra-charges-for-covering-trump-on-national-park-pass/
Date: 8/01/2026 13:40:02
From: Michael V
ID: 2348020
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Rep Ted Lieu: “If any military member, including the generals on down…participate in the use of military force against Greenland without congressional authorization, they are following illegal orders.”
Ep-what files?
Date: 8/01/2026 13:43:02
From: Michael V
ID: 2348021
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
The story so far: US National Parks passes now feature both George Washington’s and Donald Trump’s faces on them.
People don’t mind George, don’t want Donald.
People were buying cute stickers to cover the passes.

Now Trump is throwing a tantrum, directing Park officials to turn away visitors and fine people with stickers on their passes.
https://www.thetravel.com/doi-sticker-ban-means-extra-charges-for-covering-trump-on-national-park-pass/
Bloody.
Can I please have a quiet cry?
Date: 8/01/2026 13:43:34
From: Cymek
ID: 2348022
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
dv said:
Rep Ted Lieu: “If any military member, including the generals on down…participate in the use of military force against Greenland without congressional authorization, they are following illegal orders.”
Ep-what files?
So if the USA invades Greenland do they get kicked out of all US bases in Europe.
I’d assume its an act of war, like that other warning that fascist received about Poland
Date: 8/01/2026 13:48:41
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2348028
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
The story so far: US National Parks passes now feature both George Washington’s and Donald Trump’s faces on them.
People don’t mind George, don’t want Donald.
People were buying cute stickers to cover the passes.

Now Trump is throwing a tantrum, directing Park officials to turn away visitors and fine people with stickers on their passes.
https://www.thetravel.com/doi-sticker-ban-means-extra-charges-for-covering-trump-on-national-park-pass/
Trump could have least dressed like George.
Date: 8/01/2026 13:51:55
From: kii
ID: 2348033
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:
The story so far: US National Parks passes now feature both George Washington’s and Donald Trump’s faces on them.
People don’t mind George, don’t want Donald.
People were buying cute stickers to cover the passes.

Now Trump is throwing a tantrum, directing Park officials to turn away visitors and fine people with stickers on their passes.
https://www.thetravel.com/doi-sticker-ban-means-extra-charges-for-covering-trump-on-national-park-pass/
Bloody.
Can I please have a quiet cry?
I’ll join you. My heart hurts for mr kii’s country. I’m so glad he didn’t live to watch all this dreadful crap and days of nightmares.
Date: 8/01/2026 13:54:43
From: Cymek
ID: 2348036
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:
The story so far: US National Parks passes now feature both George Washington’s and Donald Trump’s faces on them.
People don’t mind George, don’t want Donald.
People were buying cute stickers to cover the passes.

Now Trump is throwing a tantrum, directing Park officials to turn away visitors and fine people with stickers on their passes.
https://www.thetravel.com/doi-sticker-ban-means-extra-charges-for-covering-trump-on-national-park-pass/
Bloody.
Can I please have a quiet cry?
I’ll join you. My heart hurts for mr kii’s country. I’m so glad he didn’t live to watch all this dreadful crap and days of nightmares.
It’s so nasty
How soulless must some people be to create all of this and for what
Date: 8/01/2026 13:58:13
From: dv
ID: 2348037
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

The claims that the driver was using the vehicle as a weapon have been debunked by images and video showing there were no officers in front of the car and the shooter was firing from the side.
Date: 8/01/2026 14:00:10
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2348038
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
The claims that the driver was using the vehicle as a weapon have been debunked by images and video showing there were no officers in front of the car and the shooter was firing from the side.
The dickhead that’s shooting was partially in front of the car when the car moved. It pushed him a tiny bit as he was getting out of the way.
Not a justification for murder though.
Date: 8/01/2026 14:01:50
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2348039
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
dv said:
The claims that the driver was using the vehicle as a weapon have been debunked by images and video showing there were no officers in front of the car and the shooter was firing from the side.
The dickhead that’s shooting was partially in front of the car when the car moved. It pushed him a tiny bit as he was getting out of the way.
Not a justification for murder though.
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgressiveHQ/comments/1q6oltf/ice_agents_shoots_a_person_who_attempts_to_drive/?utm_source=embedv2&utm_medium=post_embed&embed_host_url=https://www.ozclubbies.com.au/index.php
Date: 8/01/2026 14:10:26
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2348041
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
The claims that the driver was using the vehicle as a weapon have been debunked by images and video showing there were no officers in front of the car and the shooter was firing from the side.
Murderer, colder than ice.
Date: 8/01/2026 14:10:43
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348042
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
Michael V said:
dv said:
Rep Ted Lieu: “If any military member, including the generals on down…participate in the use of military force against Greenland without congressional authorization, they are following illegal orders.”
Ep-what files?
So if the USA invades Greenland do they get kicked out of all US bases in Europe.
I’d assume its an act of war, like that other warning that fascist received about Poland
don’t worry their bases elsewhere in the world are just fine
Date: 8/01/2026 14:16:23
From: Michael V
ID: 2348047
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
The claims that the driver was using the vehicle as a weapon have been debunked by images and video showing there were no officers in front of the car and the shooter was firing from the side.
:(
:(
:(
Date: 8/01/2026 14:18:19
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2348052
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Cymek said:
Michael V said:
Ep-what files?
So if the USA invades Greenland do they get kicked out of all US bases in Europe.
I’d assume its an act of war, like that other warning that fascist received about Poland
don’t worry their bases elsewhere in the world are just fine
If Trump seriously takes off Greenland by force with Danish casualties I expect Canada and Australia would seriously consider escorting Americans out of
NORAD and Pine Gap respectively.
Date: 8/01/2026 14:19:13
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2348053
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:
Cymek said:
So if the USA invades Greenland do they get kicked out of all US bases in Europe.
I’d assume its an act of war, like that other warning that fascist received about Poland
don’t worry their bases elsewhere in the world are just fine
If Trump seriously takes off Greenland by force with Danish casualties I expect Canada and Australia would seriously consider escorting Americans out of NORAD and Pine Gap respectively.
off=over
Date: 8/01/2026 14:19:58
From: roughbarked
ID: 2348054
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:
Cymek said:
So if the USA invades Greenland do they get kicked out of all US bases in Europe.
I’d assume its an act of war, like that other warning that fascist received about Poland
don’t worry their bases elsewhere in the world are just fine
If Trump seriously takes off Greenland by force with Danish casualties I expect Canada and Australia would seriously consider escorting Americans out of NORAD and Pine Gap respectively.
We don’t want a trump pass to the national parks.
Date: 8/01/2026 14:21:50
From: Michael V
ID: 2348058
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:
Cymek said:
So if the USA invades Greenland do they get kicked out of all US bases in Europe.
I’d assume its an act of war, like that other warning that fascist received about Poland
don’t worry their bases elsewhere in the world are just fine
If Trump seriously takes off Greenland by force with Danish casualties I expect Canada and Australia would seriously consider escorting Americans out of NORAD and Pine Gap respectively.
I hope that both countries would actually do that.
The Ep-what files?
Date: 8/01/2026 14:24:55
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348060
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:
don’t worry their bases elsewhere in the world are just fine
If Trump seriously takes off Greenland by force with Danish casualties I expect Canada and Australia would seriously consider escorting Americans out of NORAD and Pine Gap respectively.
off=over
sure they will, let’s hear what their dear leaders say
Prime Minister Mark Carney has said he’s not concerned about the future of Canadian oil even if Venezuela begins to produce more of the product following the US seizure of Nicolás Maduro. Speaking to reporters in Paris, Carney said Canadian oil remains competitive because it is “low risk”, “low cost” and “low carbon”. He said Canada welcomed the seizure of Maduro, which “creates the possibility for democratic transition in Venezuela”.
sounds good, these fellas should stand up to bullies just nicely
In a cautious statement, Anthony Albanese said the Australian government was “monitoring developments” in Venezuela, once Latin America’s richest country, and backed “international law and a peaceful, democratic transition” that reflected the will of the people. The response – coming as the US President threatens further action against democratically elected governments in Colombia, Greenland, and communist Cuba – fell short, according to Latin American affairs expert Dr Rodrigo Acuña, as Australia continued to back Ukraine. “It’s total hypocrisy, because if the government in Russia is going to be strongly condemned and there are going to be international sanctions for its invasion of Ukraine, then why can the United States conduct itself in that manner,” Dr Acuña said. “People would expect a stronger statement being made by the Australian Government,” he said. “What occurred was a clear violation of international law,” he said. “You cannot simply just bomb a country, send in your air force and your special operations teams, military teams, and kidnap a head of state and his wife on bogus charges.”
not quite so soft but yeah totally going to reject that fascism
Dr Acuña said the United States – between its threats to Greenland and Mexico, and operations by immigration agents – was “moving towards a pseudo fascist state”, presenting a dilemma for Australia and its Western allies, including the UK and Canada.
oh sorry they meant “pseudo fascist” because it’d be too much to accuse fascists of being fascists
Date: 8/01/2026 14:25:03
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2348061
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Is that for real?
It doesn’t sound totally stupid, so probably not.
I wonder how hard they fought to stop Trump putting McDonald’s at the top of the inverted pyramid.
Note the omission of plant-based proteins like beans and lentils.
Pulses and grains. Very important foods.
Pulses are good for life.
Date: 8/01/2026 14:26:29
From: roughbarked
ID: 2348063
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
I wonder how hard they fought to stop Trump putting McDonald’s at the top of the inverted pyramid.
Note the omission of plant-based proteins like beans and lentils.
Pulses and grains. Very important foods.
Pulses are good for life.
One sort of needs to have one.
Date: 8/01/2026 14:27:04
From: Cymek
ID: 2348064
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
dv said:
The claims that the driver was using the vehicle as a weapon have been debunked by images and video showing there were no officers in front of the car and the shooter was firing from the side.
Murderer, colder than ice.
Could immigrants wear a gold star to show ICE agents they are good
Date: 8/01/2026 14:27:20
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348066
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
If Trump seriously takes off Greenland by force with Danish casualties I expect Canada and Australia would seriously consider escorting Americans out of NORAD and Pine Gap respectively.
I hope that both countries would actually do that.
The Ep-what files?
reckon they won’t, here’s betting they’ll double down, always better to be the bully in the short term than trying to stand up to them
Date: 8/01/2026 14:27:44
From: roughbarked
ID: 2348067
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
dv said:
The claims that the driver was using the vehicle as a weapon have been debunked by images and video showing there were no officers in front of the car and the shooter was firing from the side.
Murderer, colder than ice.
Could immigrants wear a gold star to show ICE agents they are good
The ticket to the concentration camp?
Date: 8/01/2026 14:29:45
From: Cymek
ID: 2348072
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Cymek said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Murderer, colder than ice.
Could immigrants wear a gold star to show ICE agents they are good
The ticket to the concentration camp?
Pretty much
Date: 8/01/2026 14:30:55
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348075
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
JudgeMental said:
roughbarked said:
Pulses and grains. Very important foods.
Pulses are good for life.
One sort of needs to have one.
disagree
https://www.npr.org/2011/06/13/137029208/heart-with-no-beat-offers-hope-of-new-lease-on-life
well all right because “sort of” isn’t absolute so agree
Date: 8/01/2026 14:31:16
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2348076
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 8/01/2026 14:31:45
From: roughbarked
ID: 2348077
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
JudgeMental said:
Pulses are good for life.
One sort of needs to have one.
disagree
https://www.npr.org/2011/06/13/137029208/heart-with-no-beat-offers-hope-of-new-lease-on-life
well all right because “sort of” isn’t absolute so agree
;)
Date: 8/01/2026 14:32:19
From: roughbarked
ID: 2348078
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
Another couple of angles of the murder.
https://x.com/i/status/2008998756860219848
Like in Los Angeles and Washington DC, ordinary citizens and local organisers have formed networks of those who want
ICE gone and who are wiling to help.
They patrol the streets too, warning neighbourhoods of incoming ICE raids, documenting what happens and sometimes offering legal advice to those targeted.
Now, a US citizen has been fatally shot by an ICE agent, and according to a local council member and the area’s congressional representative, that person was one of the legal observers, who usually operate in a volunteer capacity.
Renee Nicole Good, 37, has been identified as the victim.
Date: 8/01/2026 14:40:44
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2348082
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Spiny Norman said:
Another couple of angles of the murder.
https://x.com/i/status/2008998756860219848
Like in Los Angeles and Washington DC, ordinary citizens and local organisers have formed networks of those who want ICE gone and who are wiling to help.
They patrol the streets too, warning neighbourhoods of incoming ICE raids, documenting what happens and sometimes offering legal advice to those targeted.
Now, a US citizen has been fatally shot by an ICE agent, and according to a local council member and the area’s congressional representative, that person was one of the legal observers, who usually operate in a volunteer capacity.
Renee Nicole Good, 37, has been identified as the victim.
ICE murdered a legal observer, they will get even more attention now.
Date: 8/01/2026 14:41:42
From: Michael V
ID: 2348084
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
Another couple of angles of the murder.
https://x.com/i/status/2008998756860219848
Unidentified masked people holding others hostage with guns? Who wouldn’t want to skedaddle?
Date: 8/01/2026 14:42:26
From: roughbarked
ID: 2348085
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Spiny Norman said:
Another couple of angles of the murder.
https://x.com/i/status/2008998756860219848
Unidentified masked people holding others hostage with guns? Who wouldn’t want to skedaddle?
I’d be off like a shot.
Date: 8/01/2026 14:47:12
From: Cymek
ID: 2348089
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
roughbarked said:
Spiny Norman said:
Another couple of angles of the murder.
https://x.com/i/status/2008998756860219848
Like in Los Angeles and Washington DC, ordinary citizens and local organisers have formed networks of those who want ICE gone and who are wiling to help.
They patrol the streets too, warning neighbourhoods of incoming ICE raids, documenting what happens and sometimes offering legal advice to those targeted.
Now, a US citizen has been fatally shot by an ICE agent, and according to a local council member and the area’s congressional representative, that person was one of the legal observers, who usually operate in a volunteer capacity.
Renee Nicole Good, 37, has been identified as the victim.
ICE murdered a legal observer, they will get even more attention now.
Murder seems to be on a sliding scale over there.
Seems any perceived threat no matter how improbable gets you off
Date: 8/01/2026 14:47:44
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348090
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
roughbarked said:
Spiny Norman said:
Another couple of angles of the murder.
https://x.com/i/status/2008998756860219848
Like in Los Angeles and Washington DC, ordinary citizens and local organisers have formed networks of those who want ICE gone and who are wiling to help.
They patrol the streets too, warning neighbourhoods of incoming ICE raids, documenting what happens and sometimes offering legal advice to those targeted.
Now, a US citizen has been fatally shot by an ICE agent, and according to a local council member and the area’s congressional representative, that person was one of the legal observers, who usually operate in a volunteer capacity.
Renee Nicole Good, 37, has been identified as the victim.
ICE murdered a legal observer, they will get even more attention now.
nah this is good it’ll deter those do gooders from getting in the way of proper law and order so the sturmabteilung can do its good work
Date: 8/01/2026 14:48:37
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348091
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
roughbarked said:
Like in Los Angeles and Washington DC, ordinary citizens and local organisers have formed networks of those who want ICE gone and who are wiling to help.
They patrol the streets too, warning neighbourhoods of incoming ICE raids, documenting what happens and sometimes offering legal advice to those targeted.
Now, a US citizen has been fatally shot by an ICE agent, and according to a local council member and the area’s congressional representative, that person was one of the legal observers, who usually operate in a volunteer capacity.
Renee Nicole Good, 37, has been identified as the victim.
ICE murdered a legal observer, they will get even more attention now.
Murder seems to be on a sliding scale over there.
Seems any perceived threat no matter how improbable gets you off
foreigners existing on sovereign USSA la land is a real and genuine that
Date: 8/01/2026 15:00:44
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348093
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
good, the world needs someone with guts and brains to stand up to those lying cheating wokist scientists
US will exit the foundational international agreement to address the climate crisis, cementing the US’s utter isolation from the global effort to confront dangerously escalating temperatures. In a presidential memorandum issued on Wednesday, Trump withdrew from the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), along with 65 other organizations, agencies and commissions, calling them “contrary to the interests of the United States”. The UNFCCC treaty forms the bedrock of international cooperation to deal with the climate crisis and has been agreed to by every country in the world since its inception 34 years ago. The US Senate ratified the treaty in October 1992. Underscoring the administration’s hostility to any measure to deal with a climate that is now hotter than at any point in human civilization, the White House memo also states that the US will pull out from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the UN’s top climate science body, as well as an assortment of other international environmental organizations, including the International Renewable Energy Association, the International Solar Alliance and the International Union for Conservation of Nature. Marco Rubio, the US secretary of state, said in a statement that the agreements jettisoned by the administration on Wednesday are “often dominated by progressive ideology and detached from national interests”.
Date: 8/01/2026 15:14:26
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348096
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
alleged

Date: 8/01/2026 15:24:16
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2348098
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
roughbarked said:
Spiny Norman said:
Another couple of angles of the murder.
https://x.com/i/status/2008998756860219848
Like in Los Angeles and Washington DC, ordinary citizens and local organisers have formed networks of those who want ICE gone and who are wiling to help.
They patrol the streets too, warning neighbourhoods of incoming ICE raids, documenting what happens and sometimes offering legal advice to those targeted.
Now, a US citizen has been fatally shot by an ICE agent, and according to a local council member and the area’s congressional representative, that person was one of the legal observers, who usually operate in a volunteer capacity.
Renee Nicole Good, 37, has been identified as the victim.
ICE murdered a legal observer, they will get even more attention now.
Maybe ICE, Police, security etc should be trained to not shoot at people running away or driving away?
Date: 8/01/2026 15:26:32
From: dv
ID: 2348099
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Seems as though no OISP (officer involved shooting protocol was followed. Shooter literally just walked off with his firearm, scene not secured. I realise ICE aren’t the police but I would hope there is some kind of similar protocol.
Date: 8/01/2026 15:30:30
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2348100
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Seems as though no OISP (officer involved shooting protocol was followed. Shooter literally just walked off with his firearm, scene not secured. I realise ICE aren’t the police but I would hope there is some kind of similar protocol.
Shows lack of training.
Shooting someone driving off is not a threat, or a reason to shoot.
Date: 8/01/2026 15:32:53
From: Cymek
ID: 2348101
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
dv said:
Seems as though no OISP (officer involved shooting protocol was followed. Shooter literally just walked off with his firearm, scene not secured. I realise ICE aren’t the police but I would hope there is some kind of similar protocol.
Shows lack of training.
Shooting someone driving off is not a threat, or a reason to shoot.
Should we assume ICE agents were chosen for low intelligence, racists undertones so they have no remorse and possible sociopathic tendencies so they get the job done.
What’s a few deaths between friends
Date: 8/01/2026 15:35:37
From: Michael V
ID: 2348102
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
good, the world needs someone with guts and brains to stand up to those lying cheating wokist scientists
US will exit the foundational international agreement to address the climate crisis, cementing the US’s utter isolation from the global effort to confront dangerously escalating temperatures. In a presidential memorandum issued on Wednesday, Trump withdrew from the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), along with 65 other organizations, agencies and commissions, calling them “contrary to the interests of the United States”. The UNFCCC treaty forms the bedrock of international cooperation to deal with the climate crisis and has been agreed to by every country in the world since its inception 34 years ago. The US Senate ratified the treaty in October 1992. Underscoring the administration’s hostility to any measure to deal with a climate that is now hotter than at any point in human civilization, the White House memo also states that the US will pull out from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the UN’s top climate science body, as well as an assortment of other international environmental organizations, including the International Renewable Energy Association, the International Solar Alliance and the International Union for Conservation of Nature. Marco Rubio, the US secretary of state, said in a statement that the agreements jettisoned by the administration on Wednesday are “often dominated by progressive ideology and detached from national interests”.
Cheeses!
Date: 8/01/2026 15:39:45
From: Michael V
ID: 2348103
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
alleged

Whatever the Dunny Trumpet says is unassailable truth. .
Date: 8/01/2026 15:53:22
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348104
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
has…
… has this
“this incredible thing last night… We have to do it again. We can do it again, too. Nobody can stop us”
kind of thing happened before
¿
Something… something… something… Iran… failed… Operation Eagle Claw…
¿ what about this incredible thing, that is being done again, has this kind of thing happened before ?
In 1936, after years of limitations imposed by the Versailles Treaty, military spending in Germany rose to 10% of GNP, higher than any other European country at the time, and, from 1936 onward, even higher than civilian investments. Hitler faced a choice between conflicting recommendations. On one side a “free market” technocratic faction within the government, centered around Reichsbank President Hjalmar Schacht, Minister of Economics Walther Funk and Price Commissioner Dr. Carl Friedrich Goerdeler calling for decreased military spending, free trade, and a moderation in state intervention in the economy. This faction was supported by some of Germany’s leading business executives, most notably Hermann Duecher of AEG, Robert Bosch of Robert Bosch GmbH, and Albert Voegeler of Vereinigte Stahlwerke. On the other side the more politicized faction favored autarkic policies and sustained military spending. Hitler hesitated before siding with the latter, which was much in line with his fundamental ideological tenets: social darwinism and Lebensraum’s aggressive policies. So in August 1936, Hitler issued his “Memorandum” requesting from Hermann Göring a series of Year’s Plans (the term “Four-Year Plan” was coined only later, in September) in order to mobilize the entire economy, within the next four years, and make it ready for war: maximizing autarchic policies, even at a cost for the German people, and having the armed forces fully operational and ready at the end of the four years period.
The year 1936 also represented a turning point for German trade policy. In September, Hjalmar Schacht was replaced by Hermann Göring, who was given the task to make Germany self-sufficient and able to wage war within four years. Measures enacted under Göring included slashing imports, instituting wage and price controls (with violations punishable by internment in a concentration camp), and restricting dividends to six percent on book capital. New strategic goals were introduced for the purpose of making Germany ready for war, including the construction of synthetic rubber plants, more steel plants, and automatic textile factories. Hitler called for Germany to have the world’s “first army” in terms of fighting power within the next four years and that “the extent of the military development of our resources cannot be too large, nor its pace too swift” and the role of the economy was simply to support “Germany’s self-assertion and the extension of her Lebensraum”. Hitler went on to write that given the magnitude of the coming struggle that the concerns expressed by members of the “free market” faction like Schacht and Goerdeler that the current level of military spending was bankrupting Germany were irrelevant. Hitler wrote that: “However well balanced the general pattern of a nation’s life ought to be, there must at particular times be certain disturbances of the balance at the expense of other less vital tasks. If we do not succeed in bringing the German army as rapidly as possible to the rank of premier army in the world … then Germany will be lost!” and “The nation does not live for the economy, for economic leaders, or for economic or financial theories; on the contrary, it is finance and the economy, economic leaders and theories, which all owe unqualified service in this struggle for the self-assertion of our nation”.
alleged

Date: 8/01/2026 16:04:56
From: Cymek
ID: 2348106
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
has…
… has this
“this incredible thing last night… We have to do it again. We can do it again, too. Nobody can stop us”
kind of thing happened before
¿
Something… something… something… Iran… failed… Operation Eagle Claw…
¿ what about this incredible thing, that is being done again, has this kind of thing happened before ?
In 1936, after years of limitations imposed by the Versailles Treaty, military spending in Germany rose to 10% of GNP, higher than any other European country at the time, and, from 1936 onward, even higher than civilian investments. Hitler faced a choice between conflicting recommendations. On one side a “free market” technocratic faction within the government, centered around Reichsbank President Hjalmar Schacht, Minister of Economics Walther Funk and Price Commissioner Dr. Carl Friedrich Goerdeler calling for decreased military spending, free trade, and a moderation in state intervention in the economy. This faction was supported by some of Germany’s leading business executives, most notably Hermann Duecher of AEG, Robert Bosch of Robert Bosch GmbH, and Albert Voegeler of Vereinigte Stahlwerke. On the other side the more politicized faction favored autarkic policies and sustained military spending. Hitler hesitated before siding with the latter, which was much in line with his fundamental ideological tenets: social darwinism and Lebensraum’s aggressive policies. So in August 1936, Hitler issued his “Memorandum” requesting from Hermann Göring a series of Year’s Plans (the term “Four-Year Plan” was coined only later, in September) in order to mobilize the entire economy, within the next four years, and make it ready for war: maximizing autarchic policies, even at a cost for the German people, and having the armed forces fully operational and ready at the end of the four years period.
The year 1936 also represented a turning point for German trade policy. In September, Hjalmar Schacht was replaced by Hermann Göring, who was given the task to make Germany self-sufficient and able to wage war within four years. Measures enacted under Göring included slashing imports, instituting wage and price controls (with violations punishable by internment in a concentration camp), and restricting dividends to six percent on book capital. New strategic goals were introduced for the purpose of making Germany ready for war, including the construction of synthetic rubber plants, more steel plants, and automatic textile factories. Hitler called for Germany to have the world’s “first army” in terms of fighting power within the next four years and that “the extent of the military development of our resources cannot be too large, nor its pace too swift” and the role of the economy was simply to support “Germany’s self-assertion and the extension of her Lebensraum”. Hitler went on to write that given the magnitude of the coming struggle that the concerns expressed by members of the “free market” faction like Schacht and Goerdeler that the current level of military spending was bankrupting Germany were irrelevant. Hitler wrote that: “However well balanced the general pattern of a nation’s life ought to be, there must at particular times be certain disturbances of the balance at the expense of other less vital tasks. If we do not succeed in bringing the German army as rapidly as possible to the rank of premier army in the world … then Germany will be lost!” and “The nation does not live for the economy, for economic leaders, or for economic or financial theories; on the contrary, it is finance and the economy, economic leaders and theories, which all owe unqualified service in this struggle for the self-assertion of our nation”.
alleged

I imagine due to ignorance he’d had support from the public to start World War 3.
They’d assume they would win easily as they haven’t really taken on anyone close to a threat to them
Could find those big aircraft carriers are sinkable.
If a few hundred missiles were all targeted at one would it survive.
Date: 8/01/2026 16:10:48
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2348107
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
Something… something… something… Iran… failed… Operation Eagle Claw…
¿ what about this incredible thing, that is being done again, has this kind of thing happened before ?
In 1936, after years of limitations imposed by the Versailles Treaty, military spending in Germany rose to 10% of GNP, higher than any other European country at the time, and, from 1936 onward, even higher than civilian investments. Hitler faced a choice between conflicting recommendations. On one side a “free market” technocratic faction within the government, centered around Reichsbank President Hjalmar Schacht, Minister of Economics Walther Funk and Price Commissioner Dr. Carl Friedrich Goerdeler calling for decreased military spending, free trade, and a moderation in state intervention in the economy. This faction was supported by some of Germany’s leading business executives, most notably Hermann Duecher of AEG, Robert Bosch of Robert Bosch GmbH, and Albert Voegeler of Vereinigte Stahlwerke. On the other side the more politicized faction favored autarkic policies and sustained military spending. Hitler hesitated before siding with the latter, which was much in line with his fundamental ideological tenets: social darwinism and Lebensraum’s aggressive policies. So in August 1936, Hitler issued his “Memorandum” requesting from Hermann Göring a series of Year’s Plans (the term “Four-Year Plan” was coined only later, in September) in order to mobilize the entire economy, within the next four years, and make it ready for war: maximizing autarchic policies, even at a cost for the German people, and having the armed forces fully operational and ready at the end of the four years period.
The year 1936 also represented a turning point for German trade policy. In September, Hjalmar Schacht was replaced by Hermann Göring, who was given the task to make Germany self-sufficient and able to wage war within four years. Measures enacted under Göring included slashing imports, instituting wage and price controls (with violations punishable by internment in a concentration camp), and restricting dividends to six percent on book capital. New strategic goals were introduced for the purpose of making Germany ready for war, including the construction of synthetic rubber plants, more steel plants, and automatic textile factories. Hitler called for Germany to have the world’s “first army” in terms of fighting power within the next four years and that “the extent of the military development of our resources cannot be too large, nor its pace too swift” and the role of the economy was simply to support “Germany’s self-assertion and the extension of her Lebensraum”. Hitler went on to write that given the magnitude of the coming struggle that the concerns expressed by members of the “free market” faction like Schacht and Goerdeler that the current level of military spending was bankrupting Germany were irrelevant. Hitler wrote that: “However well balanced the general pattern of a nation’s life ought to be, there must at particular times be certain disturbances of the balance at the expense of other less vital tasks. If we do not succeed in bringing the German army as rapidly as possible to the rank of premier army in the world … then Germany will be lost!” and “The nation does not live for the economy, for economic leaders, or for economic or financial theories; on the contrary, it is finance and the economy, economic leaders and theories, which all owe unqualified service in this struggle for the self-assertion of our nation”.
alleged

I imagine due to ignorance he’d had support from the public to start World War 3.
They’d assume they would win easily as they haven’t really taken on anyone close to a threat to them
Could find those big aircraft carriers are sinkable.
If a few hundred missiles were all targeted at one would it survive.
China has extremely accurate conventionally armed ballistic missiles specifically designed to strike aircraft carriers. They are too quick for any reasonable defence and a direct hit would at the very least destroy the flight deck and limit jet aircraft takeoff and landing.
Date: 8/01/2026 16:11:19
From: buffy
ID: 2348108
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
The story so far: US National Parks passes now feature both George Washington’s and Donald Trump’s faces on them.
People don’t mind George, don’t want Donald.
People were buying cute stickers to cover the passes.

Now Trump is throwing a tantrum, directing Park officials to turn away visitors and fine people with stickers on their passes.
https://www.thetravel.com/doi-sticker-ban-means-extra-charges-for-covering-trump-on-national-park-pass/
When I first saw that a couple of weeks ago, I thought it was made-up. It’s not a good photo of Trump. I really thought someone was having a laugh.
Date: 8/01/2026 16:16:15
From: roughbarked
ID: 2348110
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
good, the world needs someone with guts and brains to stand up to those lying cheating wokist scientists
US will exit the foundational international agreement to address the climate crisis, cementing the US’s utter isolation from the global effort to confront dangerously escalating temperatures. In a presidential memorandum issued on Wednesday, Trump withdrew from the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), along with 65 other organizations, agencies and commissions, calling them “contrary to the interests of the United States”. The UNFCCC treaty forms the bedrock of international cooperation to deal with the climate crisis and has been agreed to by every country in the world since its inception 34 years ago. The US Senate ratified the treaty in October 1992. Underscoring the administration’s hostility to any measure to deal with a climate that is now hotter than at any point in human civilization, the White House memo also states that the US will pull out from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the UN’s top climate science body, as well as an assortment of other international environmental organizations, including the International Renewable Energy Association, the International Solar Alliance and the International Union for Conservation of Nature. Marco Rubio, the US secretary of state, said in a statement that the agreements jettisoned by the administration on Wednesday are “often dominated by progressive ideology and detached from national interests”.
Cheeses!
This really is bad news for all of us other than those crazy nazi republicans. It ain’t going to help them either.
Date: 8/01/2026 16:21:52
From: roughbarked
ID: 2348111
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
alleged

Whatever the Dunny Trumpet says is unassailable truth. .
Yeah. Like this bullshit.
Trump jumped in with his own fact-free post lying that the shooter had been run over: “I have just viewed the clip of the event which took place in Minneapolis, Minnesota. It is a horrible thing to watch. The woman screaming was, obviously, a professional agitator, and the woman driving the car was very disorderly, obstructing and resisting, who then violently, willfully, and viciously ran over the ICE Officer, who seems to have shot at her in self defense. Based on the attached clip, it is hard to believe that he is alive, but is now recovering in the hospital. The situation is being studied, in its entirety, but the reason these incidents are happening is because the Radical Left is threatening, assaulting, and targeting our Law Enforcement Officers and ICE Agents on a daily basis. They are just trying to do the job of MAKING AMERICA SAFE. We need to stand by and protect our Law Enforcement Officers from this Radical Left Movement of Violence and Hate! PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP”
Date: 8/01/2026 16:26:42
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348115
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
¿ what about this incredible thing, that is being done again, has this kind of thing happened before ?
In 1936, after years of limitations imposed by the Versailles Treaty, military spending in Germany rose to 10% of GNP, higher than any other European country at the time, and, from 1936 onward, even higher than civilian investments. Hitler faced a choice between conflicting recommendations. On one side a “free market” technocratic faction within the government, centered around Reichsbank President Hjalmar Schacht, Minister of Economics Walther Funk and Price Commissioner Dr. Carl Friedrich Goerdeler calling for decreased military spending, free trade, and a moderation in state intervention in the economy. This faction was supported by some of Germany’s leading business executives, most notably Hermann Duecher of AEG, Robert Bosch of Robert Bosch GmbH, and Albert Voegeler of Vereinigte Stahlwerke. On the other side the more politicized faction favored autarkic policies and sustained military spending. Hitler hesitated before siding with the latter, which was much in line with his fundamental ideological tenets: social darwinism and Lebensraum’s aggressive policies. So in August 1936, Hitler issued his “Memorandum” requesting from Hermann Göring a series of Year’s Plans (the term “Four-Year Plan” was coined only later, in September) in order to mobilize the entire economy, within the next four years, and make it ready for war: maximizing autarchic policies, even at a cost for the German people, and having the armed forces fully operational and ready at the end of the four years period.
The year 1936 also represented a turning point for German trade policy. In September, Hjalmar Schacht was replaced by Hermann Göring, who was given the task to make Germany self-sufficient and able to wage war within four years. Measures enacted under Göring included slashing imports, instituting wage and price controls (with violations punishable by internment in a concentration camp), and restricting dividends to six percent on book capital. New strategic goals were introduced for the purpose of making Germany ready for war, including the construction of synthetic rubber plants, more steel plants, and automatic textile factories. Hitler called for Germany to have the world’s “first army” in terms of fighting power within the next four years and that “the extent of the military development of our resources cannot be too large, nor its pace too swift” and the role of the economy was simply to support “Germany’s self-assertion and the extension of her Lebensraum”. Hitler went on to write that given the magnitude of the coming struggle that the concerns expressed by members of the “free market” faction like Schacht and Goerdeler that the current level of military spending was bankrupting Germany were irrelevant. Hitler wrote that: “However well balanced the general pattern of a nation’s life ought to be, there must at particular times be certain disturbances of the balance at the expense of other less vital tasks. If we do not succeed in bringing the German army as rapidly as possible to the rank of premier army in the world … then Germany will be lost!” and “The nation does not live for the economy, for economic leaders, or for economic or financial theories; on the contrary, it is finance and the economy, economic leaders and theories, which all owe unqualified service in this struggle for the self-assertion of our nation”.
alleged

I imagine due to ignorance he’d had support from the public to start World War 3.
They’d assume they would win easily as they haven’t really taken on anyone close to a threat to them
Could find those big aircraft carriers are sinkable.
If a few hundred missiles were all targeted at one would it survive.
China has extremely accurate conventionally armed ballistic missiles specifically designed to strike aircraft carriers. They are too quick for any reasonable defence and a direct hit would at the very least destroy the flight deck and limit jet aircraft takeoff and landing.
and their proof of effectiveness in action is where
Date: 8/01/2026 16:28:13
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2348116
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Cymek said:
I imagine due to ignorance he’d had support from the public to start World War 3.
They’d assume they would win easily as they haven’t really taken on anyone close to a threat to them
Could find those big aircraft carriers are sinkable.
If a few hundred missiles were all targeted at one would it survive.
China has extremely accurate conventionally armed ballistic missiles specifically designed to strike aircraft carriers. They are too quick for any reasonable defence and a direct hit would at the very least destroy the flight deck and limit jet aircraft takeoff and landing.
and their proof of effectiveness in action is where
Western China.
Date: 8/01/2026 16:35:05
From: Cymek
ID: 2348120
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Cymek said:
I imagine due to ignorance he’d had support from the public to start World War 3.
They’d assume they would win easily as they haven’t really taken on anyone close to a threat to them
Could find those big aircraft carriers are sinkable.
If a few hundred missiles were all targeted at one would it survive.
China has extremely accurate conventionally armed ballistic missiles specifically designed to strike aircraft carriers. They are too quick for any reasonable defence and a direct hit would at the very least destroy the flight deck and limit jet aircraft takeoff and landing.
and their proof of effectiveness in action is where
When the shooting starts.
I would assume that you could overwhelm defences with enough missiles.
Plus defence you need to take out all of them, whilst attacking you could do serious damage with one or two hits.
Its like the idea of a defence network to take out nukes, only one needs to make a hit and your in trouble.
And in drones and distractions and you aren’t invulnerable anymore.
Date: 8/01/2026 16:57:32
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2348129
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 8/01/2026 16:58:35
From: Michael V
ID: 2348131
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:

LOLOLOLOL
:)
Date: 8/01/2026 16:59:40
From: roughbarked
ID: 2348133
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:

LOLOLOLOL
:)
It got a smile here as well.
Date: 8/01/2026 17:15:30
From: roughbarked
ID: 2348137
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
self defence or murder?
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-01-08/what-happened-in-minnesota-ice-shooting-abc-verify/106209188
Date: 8/01/2026 17:39:11
From: dv
ID: 2348148
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Obv this isn’t the first officer-involved shooting in the history of the US, or even the 100000th, but it is what happens next that’s important. Right now Homeland Security is running a purely defensive line. If they refuse to cooperate with law enforcement, if they don’t produce the suspect and/or take action on the others that didn’t properly secure the shooter and the scene, then it’s going to be a major turning point.
Date: 8/01/2026 17:43:22
From: Cymek
ID: 2348150
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Obv this isn’t the first officer-involved shooting in the history of the US, or even the 100000th, but it is what happens next that’s important. Right now Homeland Security is running a purely defensive line. If they refuse to cooperate with law enforcement, if they don’t produce the suspect and/or take action on the others that didn’t properly secure the shooter and the scene, then it’s going to be a major turning point.
Can Trump sign orders making their actions justified and above the law.
Date: 8/01/2026 17:48:52
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348153
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
dv said:
Obv this isn’t the first officer-involved shooting in the history of the US, or even the 100000th, but it is what happens next that’s important. Right now Homeland Security is running a purely defensive line. If they refuse to cooperate with law enforcement, if they don’t produce the suspect and/or take action on the others that didn’t properly secure the shooter and the scene, then it’s going to be a major turning point.
Can Trump sign orders making their actions justified and above the law.
doesn’t need to
Date: 8/01/2026 17:59:42
From: Cymek
ID: 2348154
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Cymek said:
dv said:
Obv this isn’t the first officer-involved shooting in the history of the US, or even the 100000th, but it is what happens next that’s important. Right now Homeland Security is running a purely defensive line. If they refuse to cooperate with law enforcement, if they don’t produce the suspect and/or take action on the others that didn’t properly secure the shooter and the scene, then it’s going to be a major turning point.
Can Trump sign orders making their actions justified and above the law.
doesn’t need to
Was wondering if they are counted as collateral damage and acceptable
Date: 8/01/2026 18:27:13
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2348165
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

May I suggest a mechanised seaborn landing of marines at Sisimiut and an airborne drop of 2 parra to land at Kulusuk to protect the eastern flank.
The marines can the rollup the western sector and take the high ground above Nuuk and bring the capital under sustained artillery fire, the rest of country can be liberated at their leisure.
But as Trump said it’s their Nuuk that they love.
Date: 8/01/2026 18:43:58
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2348177
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
China has extremely accurate conventionally armed ballistic missiles specifically designed to strike aircraft carriers. They are too quick for any reasonable defence and a direct hit would at the very least destroy the flight deck and limit jet aircraft takeoff and landing.
and their proof of effectiveness in action is where
When the shooting starts.
I would assume that you could overwhelm defences with enough missiles.
Plus defence you need to take out all of them, whilst attacking you could do serious damage with one or two hits.
Its like the idea of a defence network to take out nukes, only one needs to make a hit and your in trouble.
And in drones and distractions and you aren’t invulnerable anymore.
It’s not d though they haven’t been tested. IIRC there were mock carriers high in western China for this precise reason.
Date: 8/01/2026 18:48:23
From: roughbarked
ID: 2348179
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
and their proof of effectiveness in action is where
When the shooting starts.
I would assume that you could overwhelm defences with enough missiles.
Plus defence you need to take out all of them, whilst attacking you could do serious damage with one or two hits.
Its like the idea of a defence network to take out nukes, only one needs to make a hit and your in trouble.
And in drones and distractions and you aren’t invulnerable anymore.
It’s not d though they haven’t been tested. IIRC there were mock carriers high in western China for this precise reason.
There’s lots of stuff that goes on out in those far western reaches.
Date: 8/01/2026 19:01:25
From: buffy
ID: 2348186
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:

May I suggest a mechanised seaborn landing of marines at Sisimiut and an airborne drop of 2 parra to land at Kulusuk to protect the eastern flank.
The marines can the rollup the western sector and take the high ground above Nuuk and bring the capital under sustained artillery fire, the rest of country can be liberated at their leisure.
But as Trump said it’s their Nuuk that they love.
They might get distracted by Disko Bay and spend all their time dancing.
Date: 8/01/2026 19:02:54
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348187
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Cymek said:
When the shooting starts.
I would assume that you could overwhelm defences with enough missiles.
Plus defence you need to take out all of them, whilst attacking you could do serious damage with one or two hits.
Its like the idea of a defence network to take out nukes, only one needs to make a hit and your in trouble.
And in drones and distractions and you aren’t invulnerable anymore.
It’s not d though they haven’t been tested. IIRC there were mock carriers high in western China for this precise reason.
There’s lots of stuff that goes on out in those far western reaches.
wait are land targets with known locations easier to hit than assets of the greatest miliary force in the world doing their thing
Date: 8/01/2026 19:33:42
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348198
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Hey we’ve heard this
Stuart Rollo, from the University of Sydney’s Centre of International Security Studies, said the Trump administration’s refusal to rule out military action was likely a bargaining tactic. “I think it ties in very much with Trump’s general mode of practice, which is to take a maximalist aggressive position and then use that as a basis for negotiation,” said Dr Rollo. “I’m sure the US doesn’t actually want to militarily take Greenland but I think they’re very comfortable making the threat, with the intention that from there all of a sudden the purchase of Greenland looks relatively attractive — if those are the options.”
“they totally wouldn’t” thing before¡
It was early 2022 or something¡
Date: 8/01/2026 20:39:26
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2348207
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
It’s not d though they haven’t been tested. IIRC there were mock carriers high in western China for this precise reason.
There’s lots of stuff that goes on out in those far western reaches.
wait are land targets with known locations easier to hit than assets of the greatest miliary force in the world doing their thing
I think you are underestimating the ability of the
PLAN to locate a 300,000 tonne vessel.
Date: 8/01/2026 21:09:44
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2348209
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Denmark has started to protect Greenland.
Date: 8/01/2026 21:21:12
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2348212
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The ICE murderer has been identified as Steve Grove, from Minneapolis.
Date: 8/01/2026 21:49:30
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348223
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
There’s lots of stuff that goes on out in those far western reaches.
wait are land targets with known locations easier to hit than assets of the greatest miliary force in the world doing their thing
I think you are underestimating the ability of the PLAN to locate a 300,000 tonne vessel.
Yeah maybe, we’re not really wanting to see 5000 peeps sunk by some rockets from any side, but as some have noted CHINA has a history of being fat and weak (exempli gratia see previous references to opium wars andor recent world wars), so even beyond sinking 5000 peeps we’re wary of a possible outcome where all the gong beating turns out to be bosfaeces and a bunch of fascists with no qualms about bombing anyone else decides to thermonuclearise 1500000000 peeps and there’s no credible preventative measure.
Date: 9/01/2026 00:14:54
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2348245
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 9/01/2026 02:33:03
From: dv
ID: 2348247
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5677459-tillis-slams-white-house-adviser-steven-millers-comments-on-greenland-amateurish/
Republican Senator Thom Tillis excoriates Steven Miller’s comments as amateurish
—-
Republican Sen. Thom Tillis (N.C.) on Wednesday slammed senior White House adviser Stephen Miller’s comment that Greenland rightfully belongs to the U.S. and that no one is going to stop the Trump administration from seizing it.
Tillis called Miller’s remarks “amateurish” and suggested that White House advisers pushing a takeover of Greenland should lose their jobs.
The comment stirred speculation on Capitol Hill over whether President Trump might threaten military action to pressure Denmark, a NATO ally, into selling Greenland to the United States.
Tillis, the co-chair of the Senate NATO Observer Group, stood on the floor to blast what he called “amateurish behavior with respect to the treatment of our NATO allies.”
He said he was referring to an “interview that I saw with one of the president’s senior policy advisers, Stephen Miller, on CNN a couple of nights ago.”
“Mr. Miller said that (Greenland) should be part of the U.S. That is absurd,” Tillis declared on the Senate floor.
“I think it was an amateurish comment and something that a deputy chief of staff and senior policy adviser should not have taken the position on,” Tillis added, referring to Trump’s top policy aide. “He doesn’t speak for the U.S. government.
“He should talk to people like me who have an election certificate and a vote in the U.S. Senate,” he added. “I can’t imagine why he’d make the comments that he did the other night in a television interview.”
trending: Live updates: House vetoes Minneapolis shooting Trump vetoes ObamaCare subsidies
sponsored: Content from Google Cloud
Senate
Tillis slams White House adviser Stephen Miller’s comments on Greenland: ‘Amateurish’
by Sylvan Lane – 01/07/26 3:55 PM ET
Unmute
Fullscreen
Pause
NOW PLAYING
Rubio Confirms President Trump’s Longstanding …
Republican Sen. Thom Tillis (N.C.) on Wednesday slammed senior White House adviser Stephen Miller’s comment that Greenland rightfully belongs to the U.S. and that no one is going to stop the Trump administration from seizing it.
Tillis called Miller’s remarks “amateurish” and suggested that White House advisers pushing a takeover of Greenland should lose their jobs.
The comment stirred speculation on Capitol Hill over whether President Trump might threaten military action to pressure Denmark, a NATO ally, into selling Greenland to the United States.
Tillis, the co-chair of the Senate NATO Observer Group, stood on the floor to blast what he called “amateurish behavior with respect to the treatment of our NATO allies.”
He said he was referring to an “interview that I saw with one of the president’s senior policy advisers, Stephen Miller, on CNN a couple of nights ago.”
“Mr. Miller said that should be part of the U.S. That is absurd,” Tillis declared on the Senate floor.
“I think it was an amateurish comment and something that a deputy chief of staff and senior policy adviser should not have taken the position on,” Tillis added, referring to Trump’s top policy aide. “He doesn’t speak for the U.S. government.
Sign up for the Morning Report
The latest in politics and policy. Direct to your inbox.
Email address
By signing up, I agree to the Terms of Use, have reviewed the Privacy Policy, and to receive personalized offers and communications via email, on-site notifications, and targeted advertising using my email address from The Hill, Nexstar Media Inc., and its affiliates
“He should talk to people like me who have an election certificate and a vote in the U.S. Senate,” he added. “I can’t imagine why he’d make the comments that he did the other night in a television interview.”
Miller told CNN’s Jake Tapper in an interview that “nobody’s going to fight the United States militarily over the future of Greenland.”
“We live in a world, in the real world, Jake, that is governed by strength, that is governed by force, that is governed by power,” he declared.
Tillis said the comments, which have driven a wedge between the U.S. and a NATO ally, undermined an important national security relationship.
He noted that Denmark was one of NATO’s “most disproportionately high contributors” to the allied war in Afghanistan after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on New York and Washington.
He pointed out that Denmark deployed 18,000 of its soldiers to Afghanistan and 43 of them died fighting alongside American soldiers “defending our freedom and holding the Taliban and al Qaeda responsible for the events of Sept. 11.”
He said Trump should fire advisers who are pushing for a U.S. takeover of Greenland, which he called a “distraction” from the successful mission to capture Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.
“I want good advice for this president, because I want this president to have a good legacy. This nonsense is a distraction from the good work he’s doing and the amateurs who said it was a good idea should lose their jobs,” he said.
Tillis called the chatter about challenging Denmark’s control of Greenland as “stupid.”
“You know what makes me cranky? Stupid. What makes me cranky is when people don’t do their homework. What makes me cranky is when we tarnish the extraordinary execution of a mission I fully support in Venezuela by turning around and making insane comments about how it is our right to have territory owned by the Kingdom of Denmark,” he said.
Date: 9/01/2026 06:17:30
From: roughbarked
ID: 2348254
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
Denmark has started to protect Greenland.
Ha.
Date: 9/01/2026 06:56:09
From: Michael V
ID: 2348259
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
Denmark has started to protect Greenland.
LOLOL
Date: 9/01/2026 07:17:18
From: Michael V
ID: 2348264
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:

Good.
Date: 9/01/2026 07:24:47
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2348265
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 9/01/2026 07:38:56
From: Michael V
ID: 2348271
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:

Fair comment. Very fair.
Date: 9/01/2026 07:42:54
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348273
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:

Fair comment. Very fair.
no no no no no no no no didn’t the capitalist pigs tell you the stories were all about the big bad communists over there
Date: 9/01/2026 07:57:58
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2348274
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Alt National Park Service
Let’s talk about something. The fact that the ICE agent who murdered Renee Good was dragged by a moving vehicle in a prior incident is not a defense, it actually makes the situation much worse for him. In law-enforcement reviews, a previous similar incident doesn’t excuse later conduct; it establishes that the risk was known and that the officer had already been warned, reviewed, and retrained. Instead of supporting his justification, it raises the standard of care he was expected to follow.
ICE agents, like all federal law-enforcement officers, are trained not to place themselves in front of or alongside moving vehicles. Vehicles are treated as inherently dangerous, and standard training emphasizes creating distance, stepping out of the vehicle’s path, and avoiding positions where an officer could be struck or dragged.
Putting yourself in the way of a moving car is considered a violation of basic officer-safety principles.
Now consider the earlier incident where he was reportedly dragged. That would have triggered a formal after-action review and almost certainly required retraining focused specifically on vehicle encounters and positioning. At that point, the danger is no longer hypothetical it is documented, understood, and directly addressed through training or corrective action.
When the same officer later places himself in the path of a moving vehicle again, it looks significantly worse from a professional standpoint. It suggests he repeated conduct he had already been trained to avoid. In law-enforcement terms, that shows a failure to apply training and a pattern of negligent behavior, not a one-time mistake.
Finally, in use-of-force evaluations, officers generally cannot create their own danger and then rely on that danger to justify deadly force. If an officer acts contrary to training, puts himself in harm’s way, and then escalates force because of that self-created risk, investigators and courts view that as increased responsibility, not a valid excuse.
Date: 9/01/2026 08:00:23
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348275
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
classic
Boassen thinks the ultimate result won’t be a takeover but a so-called “free association” agreement where Greenland could become independent in exchange for granting the United States authority over its defence and foreign affairs. “That’s what the people of Greenland want,” he said, “to become independent — finally”.
that’s what independence means right, having USSA authority over defence and foreign affairs
just like freedom is a boot on your neck right
love the American propaganda
Date: 9/01/2026 08:00:45
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2348276
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
“That would have triggered a formal after-action review”
In a normal world… It seems a no-action Wild West out there at the moment. No one is being held accountable for anything.
Date: 9/01/2026 08:03:16
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2348277
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 9/01/2026 08:07:12
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2348278
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:

Meanwhile, people will bet on frigging anything.
Date: 9/01/2026 08:13:21
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348280
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
JudgeMental said:

Meanwhile, people will bet on frigging anything.
The Land Of Not Just Freedom But Opportunity¡
or opportunism or something
Date: 9/01/2026 09:01:22
From: Michael V
ID: 2348293
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
Alt National Park Service
Let’s talk about something. The fact that the ICE agent who murdered Renee Good was dragged by a moving vehicle in a prior incident is not a defense, it actually makes the situation much worse for him. In law-enforcement reviews, a previous similar incident doesn’t excuse later conduct; it establishes that the risk was known and that the officer had already been warned, reviewed, and retrained. Instead of supporting his justification, it raises the standard of care he was expected to follow.
ICE agents, like all federal law-enforcement officers, are trained not to place themselves in front of or alongside moving vehicles. Vehicles are treated as inherently dangerous, and standard training emphasizes creating distance, stepping out of the vehicle’s path, and avoiding positions where an officer could be struck or dragged.
Putting yourself in the way of a moving car is considered a violation of basic officer-safety principles.
Now consider the earlier incident where he was reportedly dragged. That would have triggered a formal after-action review and almost certainly required retraining focused specifically on vehicle encounters and positioning. At that point, the danger is no longer hypothetical it is documented, understood, and directly addressed through training or corrective action.
When the same officer later places himself in the path of a moving vehicle again, it looks significantly worse from a professional standpoint. It suggests he repeated conduct he had already been trained to avoid. In law-enforcement terms, that shows a failure to apply training and a pattern of negligent behavior, not a one-time mistake.
Finally, in use-of-force evaluations, officers generally cannot create their own danger and then rely on that danger to justify deadly force. If an officer acts contrary to training, puts himself in harm’s way, and then escalates force because of that self-created risk, investigators and courts view that as increased responsibility, not a valid excuse.
Let us hope that important people (investigators, prosecutors see thins that way.
But with the “What Trump says is Always Right” mass hypnotism, and the sycophants he encourages, then employs, I have my doubts.
Date: 9/01/2026 09:02:50
From: Michael V
ID: 2348294
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:

FMD
Date: 9/01/2026 09:12:13
From: dv
ID: 2348299
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/3339156/singapores-lee-hsien-loong-says-us-raid-venezuela-worrying-small-countries
Rare open rebuke of the US by Singapore
Date: 9/01/2026 10:20:56
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348317
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/3339156/singapores-lee-hsien-loong-says-us-raid-venezuela-worrying-small-countries
Rare open rebuke of the US by Singapore
nah it’s veiled ¡ support
He argued that the immediate consequences of the intervention might work in terms of being a “spectacular military success”
Date: 9/01/2026 11:01:43
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348322
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
rage

Date: 9/01/2026 11:06:54
From: Michael V
ID: 2348325
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
rage

Great reply.
(Even though it is missing a clarifying comma.)
Date: 9/01/2026 11:10:59
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2348328
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

May I suggest a seaborn landing by the marines at Tauranga followed by an air drop of 2 parra at Whangarei to protect the northern flank.
The marines can then roll up the southern sector and drive on Auckland where they can take the high ground around the city and begin enfilading artillery fire, resistance will be futile.
Air cover for the whole operation can be provided by the aircraft carrier the USS Donald Trump from the Bay of Plenty (soon to be renamed)
Date: 9/01/2026 11:15:48
From: Cymek
ID: 2348333
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:

May I suggest a seaborn landing by the marines at Tauranga followed by an air drop of 2 parra at Whangarei to protect the northern flank.
The marines can then roll up the southern sector and drive on Auckland where they can take the high ground around the city and begin enfilading artillery fire, resistance will be futile.
Air cover for the whole operation can be provided by the aircraft carrier the USS Donald Trump from the Bay of Plenty (soon to be renamed)
Apparently New Zealand have managed to build a number of rail guns that fire sheep.
So that carrier isn’t safe
Date: 9/01/2026 11:20:19
From: roughbarked
ID: 2348335
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
rage

Great reply.
(Even though it is missing a clarifying comma.)
Nods.
Date: 9/01/2026 11:21:45
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2348336
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
rage

Great reply.
(Even though it is missing a clarifying comma.)
Nods.
But who’d have thought that Arnie is really a wokist snowflake?
Date: 9/01/2026 11:25:49
From: roughbarked
ID: 2348338
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
Peak Warming Man said:

May I suggest a seaborn landing by the marines at Tauranga followed by an air drop of 2 parra at Whangarei to protect the northern flank.
The marines can then roll up the southern sector and drive on Auckland where they can take the high ground around the city and begin enfilading artillery fire, resistance will be futile.
Air cover for the whole operation can be provided by the aircraft carrier the USS Donald Trump from the Bay of Plenty (soon to be renamed)
Apparently New Zealand have managed to build a number of rail guns that fire sheep.
So that carrier isn’t safe
Send the script to Monty Python. ;)
Date: 9/01/2026 11:26:14
From: roughbarked
ID: 2348340
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
Great reply.
(Even though it is missing a clarifying comma.)
Nods.
But who’d have thought that Arnie is really a wokist snowflake?
Under that tough exterior.
Date: 9/01/2026 11:29:04
From: Cymek
ID: 2348341
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
roughbarked said:
Nods.
But who’d have thought that Arnie is really a wokist snowflake?
Under that tough exterior.
He had sensible gun reforms or attempted so when governator
Date: 9/01/2026 11:30:27
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2348342
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
roughbarked said:
Nods.
But who’d have thought that Arnie is really a wokist snowflake?
Under that tough exterior.
Just read TATE on Arnie.
A life-long republican, but happy to speak out against Trump and Co.
USA needs more people like him.
Date: 9/01/2026 11:31:13
From: roughbarked
ID: 2348343
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
“Two people are in the hospital following a shooting involving federal agents,” Portland Police said in a statement.
“Their conditions are unknown.”
An affiliate of the US ABC News network reported that agents involved in the shooting were US Customs and Border Protection agents and that the FBI was leading the probe into the incident.
Portland Police said in the statement that local officers were not involved.
“Officers have determined the two people were injured in the shooting involving federal agents,” the statement said.
Portland Police Chief Bob Day acknowledged the “heightened emotion and tension many are feeling in the wake of the shooting in Minneapolis”.
“But I am asking the community to remain calm as we work to learn more,” he said.
Date: 9/01/2026 11:37:22
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2348345
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
Peak Warming Man said:

May I suggest a seaborn landing by the marines at Tauranga followed by an air drop of 2 parra at Whangarei to protect the northern flank.
The marines can then roll up the southern sector and drive on Auckland where they can take the high ground around the city and begin enfilading artillery fire, resistance will be futile.
Air cover for the whole operation can be provided by the aircraft carrier the USS Donald Trump from the Bay of Plenty (soon to be renamed)
Apparently New Zealand have managed to build a number of rail guns that fire sheep.
So that carrier isn’t safe
RAMMING speed!!!
Date: 9/01/2026 11:38:46
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2348346
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
We will keep you updated of operations in the Doninican Republic.
Date: 9/01/2026 11:44:38
From: dv
ID: 2348347
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://abcnews.go.com/US/2-shot-federal-agents-portland-sources/story?id=129038573
Not ICE this time, Border Patrol.
Why Border Patrol are shooting people 700 km from the border will be left as an exercise for the reader.
Date: 9/01/2026 11:46:28
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2348348
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
Great reply.
(Even though it is missing a clarifying comma.)
Nods.
But who’d have thought that Arnie is really a wokist snowflake?
Arnie is a former Austrian, whose dad was a Nazi party member (but not in the SS, or complicit in war crimes), and who will tell you all about how the guilt over involvement in that lying, repressive, dominating, brutal, murderous regime completely destroyed his father.
Arnie’s not unfamiliar with MAGA/rightist/anti-woke shit, and what it leads to.
Date: 9/01/2026 11:53:07
From: Cymek
ID: 2348353
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
roughbarked said:
Nods.
But who’d have thought that Arnie is really a wokist snowflake?
Arnie is a former Austrian, whose dad was a Nazi party member (but not in the SS, or complicit in war crimes), and who will tell you all about how the guilt over involvement in that lying, repressive, dominating, brutal, murderous regime completely destroyed his father.
Arnie’s not unfamiliar with MAGA/rightist/anti-woke shit, and what it leads to.
The USA’s over the top patriotism borders on fascism and promotes USA (as a race) superiority.
If you look at the world no one culture is superior to another or not for long anyway.
All great powers die the same way it seems, corruption, complacency and over extension.
Date: 9/01/2026 12:31:00
From: dv
ID: 2348381
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
DHS officials privately express shock at department’s immediate response to Minneapolis shooting
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/01/08/politics/minneapolis-shooting-noem-dhs-reaction
DHS officials privately express shock at department’s immediate response to Minneapolis shooting
Multiple Department of Homeland Security officials privately expressed shock Wednesday over the department’s immediate response to the fatal shooting of a woman by an ICE agent in Minneapolis, seeing it as a break from precedent that generally points to an investigation before reaching a firm conclusion.
Multiple current and former Homeland Security officials initially privately questioned the officer’s conduct, though cautioned that the preceding events remained unclear and stressed that an investigation was necessary.
——
Date: 9/01/2026 12:39:14
From: roughbarked
ID: 2348384
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://abcnews.go.com/US/2-shot-federal-agents-portland-sources/story?id=129038573
Not ICE this time, Border Patrol.
Why Border Patrol are shooting people 700 km from the border will be left as an exercise for the reader.
The victims must have thrown their shoes at them or some lame defece.
Date: 9/01/2026 12:51:39
From: dv
ID: 2348389
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 9/01/2026 12:52:02
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2348390
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 9/01/2026 13:00:23
From: Michael V
ID: 2348395
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

I shouldn’t laugh, but I did.
No disrespect to the murdered woman intended.
Date: 9/01/2026 13:04:56
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2348399
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 9/01/2026 13:14:24
From: Michael V
ID: 2348402
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:

Nice work.
Date: 9/01/2026 15:19:02
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348417
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
dv said:

I shouldn’t laugh, but I did.
No disrespect to the murdered woman intended.

Date: 9/01/2026 15:29:26
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348427
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
The USA’s over the top patriotism borders on fascism and promotes USA (as a race) superiority.
from the interior side of the border
Date: 9/01/2026 15:53:11
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2348445
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 9/01/2026 15:55:43
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348448
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:

hey this seems like a good idea
Date: 9/01/2026 15:58:01
From: buffy
ID: 2348449
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:

I like the look on her face…
Date: 9/01/2026 15:58:42
From: Michael V
ID: 2348450
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:

Ha!
Date: 9/01/2026 16:00:05
From: Cymek
ID: 2348451
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:

The Northern half as well.
Royalty doesn’t need anymore inbred people
Date: 9/01/2026 16:13:13
From: Michael V
ID: 2348453
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
Divine Angel said:

The Northern half as well.
Royalty doesn’t need anymore inbred people
Frederick chose an Australian commoner for his wife. This may have reduced the risk inherent in inbreeding.
However, does that mean that Master Trump would receive half of Australia in the divorce settlement?
Date: 9/01/2026 16:15:54
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348457
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Frederick chose an Australian commoner for his wife. This may have reduced the risk inherent in inbreeding.
but to really minimise the inbreeding shouldn’t they have chosen an Indigenous Australian at least
Date: 9/01/2026 16:24:36
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2348459
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Cymek said:
Divine Angel said:

The Northern half as well.
Royalty doesn’t need anymore inbred people
Frederick chose an Australian commoner for his wife. This may have reduced the risk inherent in inbreeding.
However, does that mean that Master Trump would receive half of Australia in the divorce settlement?
No cos Mary renounced her Aussie status
Date: 9/01/2026 16:26:25
From: Michael V
ID: 2348460
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
Frederick chose an Australian commoner for his wife. This may have reduced the risk inherent in inbreeding.
but to really minimise the inbreeding shouldn’t they have chosen an Indigenous Australian at least
Sure, but I doubt that risk minimisation was the real reason that Mary was chosen by Frederik.
Date: 9/01/2026 16:27:22
From: Michael V
ID: 2348461
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
Cymek said:
The Northern half as well.
Royalty doesn’t need anymore inbred people
Frederick chose an Australian commoner for his wife. This may have reduced the risk inherent in inbreeding.
However, does that mean that Master Trump would receive half of Australia in the divorce settlement?
No cos Mary renounced her Aussie status
Phew.
Date: 9/01/2026 16:31:19
From: furious
ID: 2348466
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
Cymek said:
The Northern half as well.
Royalty doesn’t need anymore inbred people
Frederick chose an Australian commoner for his wife. This may have reduced the risk inherent in inbreeding.
However, does that mean that Master Trump would receive half of Australia in the divorce settlement?
No cos Mary renounced her Aussie status
Plus, you know, Mary isn’t in any way the owner of Australia…
Date: 9/01/2026 16:33:14
From: dv
ID: 2348467
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 9/01/2026 16:33:37
From: Michael V
ID: 2348468
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
furious said:
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
Frederick chose an Australian commoner for his wife. This may have reduced the risk inherent in inbreeding.
However, does that mean that Master Trump would receive half of Australia in the divorce settlement?
No cos Mary renounced her Aussie status
Plus, you know, Mary isn’t in any way the owner of Australia…
Joke, Joyce.
Date: 9/01/2026 16:35:43
From: roughbarked
ID: 2348470
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

They are still all lining up to stake claims on the oil under the melting ice cap.
Date: 9/01/2026 16:41:19
From: furious
ID: 2348473
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

That’s not without Risk…
Date: 9/01/2026 16:42:00
From: roughbarked
ID: 2348474
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
furious said:
dv said:

That’s not without Risk…
or rusk.
Date: 9/01/2026 16:42:33
From: roughbarked
ID: 2348475
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 9/01/2026 16:44:40
From: roughbarked
ID: 2348476
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-01-09/us-withdrawal-trump-united-nations-organisations/106210134
US President Donald Trump has pulled the US out of dozens of international organisations he deemed “wasteful, ineffective, or harmful”.
Almost half of those 66 organisations are devoted to upholding international law and protecting women and children from violence.
The organisations, according to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, now advance agendas “contrary” to the US.
“ a threat to our nation’s sovereignty, freedoms, and general prosperity,” he said in a statement announcing the decision.
Date: 9/01/2026 16:45:30
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2348477
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:

Well, yes. America’s goals are to make rich white men even richer. Screw everyone else, they’re of no use in the new world order.
Date: 9/01/2026 16:47:04
From: Cymek
ID: 2348478
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
roughbarked said:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-01-09/us-withdrawal-trump-united-nations-organisations/106210134
US President Donald Trump has pulled the US out of dozens of international organisations he deemed “wasteful, ineffective, or harmful”.
Almost half of those 66 organisations are devoted to upholding international law and protecting women and children from violence.
The organisations, according to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, now advance agendas “contrary” to the US.
“ a threat to our nation’s sovereignty, freedoms, and general prosperity,” he said in a statement announcing the decision.
Next time Trump attends the UN can everyone turn their backs on him in a Klingon type manner as he has no honour.
Date: 9/01/2026 16:48:58
From: roughbarked
ID: 2348479
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:

Well, yes. America’s goals are to make rich white men even richer. Screw everyone else, they’re of no use in the new world order.
to be rich and powerful.
“This is a reflection most clearly articulated by Stephen Miller. He makes these comments about this is effectively a ‘might is right’ world.
“ violence and power are the only indicators of strength and success.
“This is showing that the United States under Trump has no interest in building genuine peace, that military might and strength is all they’re interested in.”
‘America First’ means abandoning global agreements, say officials
Under Trump’s latest order, the US will stop “participating in and funding” all of the organisations on the list.

Date: 9/01/2026 16:49:07
From: Michael V
ID: 2348480
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
furious said:
dv said:

That’s not without Risk…
Ha!
Long time since I played that game.
Date: 9/01/2026 16:49:35
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2348481
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
roughbarked said:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-01-09/us-withdrawal-trump-united-nations-organisations/106210134
US President Donald Trump has pulled the US out of dozens of international organisations he deemed “wasteful, ineffective, or harmful”.
Almost half of those 66 organisations are devoted to upholding international law and protecting women and children from violence.
The organisations, according to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, now advance agendas “contrary” to the US.
“ a threat to our nation’s sovereignty, freedoms, and general prosperity,” he said in a statement announcing the decision.
Just to summarise, Trump himself has a documented history of violence against women. There’s mounting evidence of his involvement with underage girls, including rape. He has invaded Venezuela against international law, and the US Constitution. Of course these organisations are contrary to the US’ agenda.
Date: 9/01/2026 16:50:57
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2348482
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I do wonder though, who is really behind it. Trump might have a concept of a plan, but not the wherewithal to execute it.
Date: 9/01/2026 16:50:59
From: furious
ID: 2348483
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
roughbarked said:
roughbarked said:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-01-09/us-withdrawal-trump-united-nations-organisations/106210134
US President Donald Trump has pulled the US out of dozens of international organisations he deemed “wasteful, ineffective, or harmful”.
Almost half of those 66 organisations are devoted to upholding international law and protecting women and children from violence.
The organisations, according to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, now advance agendas “contrary” to the US.
“ a threat to our nation’s sovereignty, freedoms, and general prosperity,” he said in a statement announcing the decision.
Next time Trump attends the UN can everyone turn their backs on him in a Klingon type manner as he has no honour.

Date: 9/01/2026 16:51:10
From: Michael V
ID: 2348484
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:

Well, yes. America’s goals are to make rich white men even richer. Screw everyone else, they’re of no use in the new world order.
Sure seems like that.
Or maybe, Trump et. al. are just very nasty, petty-minded fuckwits.
Date: 9/01/2026 16:52:18
From: furious
ID: 2348485
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
I do wonder though, who is really behind it. Trump might have a concept of a plan, but not the wherewithal to execute it.
By all accounts it is Stephen Miller…
Date: 9/01/2026 16:53:53
From: Neophyte
ID: 2348486
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
furious said:
Divine Angel said:
I do wonder though, who is really behind it. Trump might have a concept of a plan, but not the wherewithal to execute it.
By all accounts it is Stephen Miller…
Yes, it’s not like Trump has any ideological agenda. He just wants the money.
Date: 9/01/2026 16:54:39
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2348487
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
I do wonder though, who is really behind it. Trump might have a concept of a plan, but not the wherewithal to execute it.
It’s more am amalgam of competing interests that has united around a populist in the usual manner.
It won’t end well for these morons as the US is diminished diplomatically and economically but it won’t be apparent for another ten years at the very least.
Date: 9/01/2026 16:56:07
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348488
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Neophyte said:
furious said:
Divine Angel said:
I do wonder though, who is really behind it. Trump might have a concept of a plan, but not the wherewithal to execute it.
By all accounts it is Stephen Miller…
Yes, it’s not like Trump has any ideological agenda. He just wants the money.
sounds like an ideology andor religion to us
Date: 9/01/2026 16:56:46
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2348489
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Divine Angel said:
I do wonder though, who is really behind it. Trump might have a concept of a plan, but not the wherewithal to execute it.
It’s more am amalgam of competing interests that has united around a populist in the usual manner.
It won’t end well for these morons as the US is diminished diplomatically and economically but it won’t be apparent for another ten years at the very least.
I saw something comparing the next administration to the Reconstruction.
Date: 9/01/2026 16:56:57
From: Cymek
ID: 2348490
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Divine Angel said:
I do wonder though, who is really behind it. Trump might have a concept of a plan, but not the wherewithal to execute it.
It’s more am amalgam of competing interests that has united around a populist in the usual manner.
It won’t end well for these morons as the US is diminished diplomatically and economically but it won’t be apparent for another ten years at the very least.
The world could also if it desires turn away from US culture, boycott movies and tv for a start.
Date: 9/01/2026 16:57:29
From: Cymek
ID: 2348491
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Neophyte said:
furious said:
By all accounts it is Stephen Miller…
Yes, it’s not like Trump has any ideological agenda. He just wants the money.
sounds like an ideology andor religion to us
Trump could also have a desire to watch the world burn.
Date: 9/01/2026 16:58:18
From: roughbarked
ID: 2348492
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:
roughbarked said:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-01-09/us-withdrawal-trump-united-nations-organisations/106210134
US President Donald Trump has pulled the US out of dozens of international organisations he deemed “wasteful, ineffective, or harmful”.
Almost half of those 66 organisations are devoted to upholding international law and protecting women and children from violence.
The organisations, according to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, now advance agendas “contrary” to the US.
“ a threat to our nation’s sovereignty, freedoms, and general prosperity,” he said in a statement announcing the decision.
Just to summarise, Trump himself has a documented history of violence against women. There’s mounting evidence of his involvement with underage girls, including rape. He has invaded Venezuela against international law, and the US Constitution. Of course these organisations are contrary to the US’ agenda.
What Epstein files?
Date: 9/01/2026 16:58:40
From: roughbarked
ID: 2348493
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
I do wonder though, who is really behind it. Trump might have a concept of a plan, but not the wherewithal to execute it.
project 2025
Date: 9/01/2026 17:03:51
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2348497
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
Neophyte said:
Yes, it’s not like Trump has any ideological agenda. He just wants the money.
sounds like an ideology andor religion to us
Trump could also have a desire to watch the world burn.
I wouldn’t doubt it.
What does also worry me greatly is what happens when Shitler dies and Couch Copulator gets the top job. And my usual theory that the R’s will keep on trying to cause chaos so that they can declare martial law and all the next elections will be cancelled.
Date: 9/01/2026 17:03:54
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2348498
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
furious said:
Divine Angel said:
I do wonder though, who is really behind it. Trump might have a concept of a plan, but not the wherewithal to execute it.
By all accounts it is Stephen Miller…
I’ve heard the name, now looked at a photo. He looks like Putin’s and Joseph Goebbels’ lovechild.
Date: 9/01/2026 17:07:00
From: Cymek
ID: 2348499
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
I do wonder though, who is really behind it. Trump might have a concept of a plan, but not the wherewithal to execute it.
project 2025
Or is could be quite simple.
These men are jealous the world is turning away from rich white man “wisdom”
Woman are gaining more rights worldwide, people who are different are gaining freedoms and rights as well.
People are demanding equality and they don’t like it.
Quite likely they have simple ideas the world is black and white, right and wrong is absolute.
All sorts of pathetic excuses to act absolutely horrible
Date: 9/01/2026 17:23:05
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2348501
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
When you order a small chips from Hungry Jack, they rooly mean small.
But the burgers are better.
Over.
Date: 9/01/2026 17:25:19
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2348502
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
When you order a small chips from Hungry Jack, they rooly mean small.
But the burgers are better.
Over.
Trump would argue Maccas is better.
Date: 9/01/2026 17:28:54
From: Michael V
ID: 2348504
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Peak Warming Man said:
When you order a small chips from Hungry Jack, they rooly mean small.
But the burgers are better.
Over.
Trump would argue Maccas is better.
He likely gets free Maccas.
Date: 9/01/2026 17:32:55
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2348509
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
It’s all about Trump in this thread, how about giving equal time to the Democrat leader………..it’s as if they haven’t even got one…………………never mind.
Date: 9/01/2026 17:34:27
From: Cymek
ID: 2348510
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Peak Warming Man said:
When you order a small chips from Hungry Jack, they rooly mean small.
But the burgers are better.
Over.
Trump would argue Maccas is better.
The Whopper has always been a good burger
Date: 9/01/2026 17:37:44
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2348512
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
It’s all about Trump in this thread, how about giving equal time to the Democrat leader………..it’s as if they haven’t even got one…………………never mind.
The bingbot says:
“The current leader of the Democrats is Ken Martin, who has been elected as the Chair of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) following the 2024 election. He replaces Jaime Harrison and aims to guide the party after a challenging election cycle.”
Date: 9/01/2026 17:39:46
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2348514
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
Peak Warming Man said:
It’s all about Trump in this thread, how about giving equal time to the Democrat leader………..it’s as if they haven’t even got one…………………never mind.
The bingbot says:
“The current leader of the Democrats is Ken Martin, who has been elected as the Chair of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) following the 2024 election. He replaces Jaime Harrison and aims to guide the party after a challenging election cycle.”
Oh, right. I forgot it’s not the leader of the party who gets nominated for presidency. I was thinking, I’ve never heard of those people.
Date: 9/01/2026 17:40:50
From: Michael V
ID: 2348515
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
It’s all about Trump in this thread, how about giving equal time to the Democrat leader………..it’s as if they haven’t even got one…………………never mind.
But that’s one thing we know Trump actually wants – everybody talking about him.
Date: 9/01/2026 17:42:11
From: roughbarked
ID: 2348516
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:
Peak Warming Man said:
When you order a small chips from Hungry Jack, they rooly mean small.
But the burgers are better.
Over.
Trump would argue Maccas is better.
He likely gets free Maccas.
He works there doesn’t he?
Date: 9/01/2026 17:42:53
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2348518
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
Peak Warming Man said:
It’s all about Trump in this thread, how about giving equal time to the Democrat leader………..it’s as if they haven’t even got one…………………never mind.
The bingbot says:
“The current leader of the Democrats is Ken Martin, who has been elected as the Chair of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) following the 2024 election. He replaces Jaime Harrison and aims to guide the party after a challenging election cycle.”
So he’s the bastard, shakes fist at Kenny.
Date: 9/01/2026 17:43:58
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2348520
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
Frederick chose an Australian commoner for his wife. This may have reduced the risk inherent in inbreeding.
but to really minimise the inbreeding shouldn’t they have chosen an Indigenous Australian at least
I really pity the brain space of Barron, all of those atomic particles in his brain are going through hell.
Date: 9/01/2026 17:44:08
From: roughbarked
ID: 2348521
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Peak Warming Man said:
It’s all about Trump in this thread, how about giving equal time to the Democrat leader………..it’s as if they haven’t even got one…………………never mind.
But that’s one thing we know Trump actually wants – everybody talking about him.
Yep.
Date: 9/01/2026 17:49:42
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2348523
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
Peak Warming Man said:
It’s all about Trump in this thread, how about giving equal time to the Democrat leader………..it’s as if they haven’t even got one…………………never mind.
But that’s one thing we know Trump actually wants – everybody talking about him.
Yep.
Then it’s going to be all about Barron.
Date: 9/01/2026 17:52:58
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2348524
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
I do wonder though, who is really behind it. Trump might have a concept of a plan, but not the wherewithal to execute it.
miller and thiel.
Date: 9/01/2026 17:54:27
From: roughbarked
ID: 2348526
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
Divine Angel said:
I do wonder though, who is really behind it. Trump might have a concept of a plan, but not the wherewithal to execute it.
miller and thiel.
The Gestapo chiefs?
Date: 9/01/2026 18:00:37
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2348530
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Peak Warming Man said:
It’s all about Trump in this thread, how about giving equal time to the Democrat leader………..it’s as if they haven’t even got one…………………never mind.
But that’s one thing we know Trump actually wants – everybody talking about him.
Everybody’s talkin’ at me
I don’t hear a word they’re sayin’
Only the squirrels in my mind
Date: 9/01/2026 18:03:46
From: roughbarked
ID: 2348531
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
Michael V said:
Peak Warming Man said:
It’s all about Trump in this thread, how about giving equal time to the Democrat leader………..it’s as if they haven’t even got one…………………never mind.
But that’s one thing we know Trump actually wants – everybody talking about him.
Everybody’s talkin’ at me
I don’t hear a word they’re sayin’
Only the squirrels in my mind
He must think he’s more popular than the Beatles and can sing any song he wants and they’ll still buy it.
Date: 9/01/2026 18:15:10
From: Kingy
ID: 2348534
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
Divine Angel said:
Peak Warming Man said:
When you order a small chips from Hungry Jack, they rooly mean small.
But the burgers are better.
Over.
Trump would argue Maccas is better.
The Whopper has always been a good burger
“It takes two hands to handle a whopper”, lol they fit in the palm of one hand these days.
Date: 9/01/2026 18:18:36
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2348538
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
furious said:
Divine Angel said:
I do wonder though, who is really behind it. Trump might have a concept of a plan, but not the wherewithal to execute it.
By all accounts it is Stephen Miller…
I’ve heard the name, now looked at a photo. He looks like Putin’s and Joseph Goebbels’ lovechild.
American political commentator Jeff Tiedrich refers to Miller as ‘Nosferatu McGoebbels’.
Date: 9/01/2026 18:41:43
From: Cymek
ID: 2348544
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Divine Angel said:
furious said:
By all accounts it is Stephen Miller…
I’ve heard the name, now looked at a photo. He looks like Putin’s and Joseph Goebbels’ lovechild.
American political commentator Jeff Tiedrich refers to Miller as ‘Nosferatu McGoebbels’.
Whilst Trump is the “Baron Harkonnen that John West reject”
Date: 9/01/2026 18:43:57
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348546
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Peak Warming Man said:
It’s all about Trump in this thread, how about giving equal time to the Democrat leader………..it’s as if they haven’t even got one…………………never mind.
The bingbot says:
“The current leader of the Democrats is Ken Martin, who has been elected as the Chair of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) following the 2024 election. He replaces Jaime Harrison and aims to guide the party after a challenging election cycle.”
Oh, right. I forgot it’s not the leader of the party who gets nominated for presidency. I was thinking, I’ve never heard of those people.
team sports so great
Date: 9/01/2026 18:45:19
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348548
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
I do wonder though, who is really behind it. Trump might have a concept of a plan, but not the wherewithal to execute it.
project 2025
Or is could be quite simple.
These men are jealous the world is turning away from rich white man “wisdom”
Woman are gaining more rights worldwide, people who are different are gaining freedoms and rights as well.
People are demanding equality and they don’t like it.
Quite likely they have simple ideas the world is black and white, right and wrong is absolute.
All sorts of pathetic excuses to act absolutely horrible
we thought that was what project 2025 was about
Date: 9/01/2026 18:48:47
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348551
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 9/01/2026 18:50:38
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2348553
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:

Blessed be the fruit
Date: 9/01/2026 19:20:38
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2348571
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 9/01/2026 19:24:37
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2348572
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:

IQ 48 standing next to IQ 45.
Date: 9/01/2026 19:27:36
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2348573
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:

Hogsbreath and Rubbisho.
Date: 9/01/2026 19:33:48
From: Kingy
ID: 2348576
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Divine Angel said:

Hogsbreath and Rubbisho.
Kegsbreath and Dubio.
Date: 9/01/2026 19:52:58
From: Michael V
ID: 2348580
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:

Not unexpected lies.
Date: 9/01/2026 19:59:45
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2348585
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:

Not unexpected lies.
One of the infuriating things is that they obviously don’t put any effort at all into their lies.
No preparation beforehand, to construct anything like a plausible premise. Just say whatever shit pops into your tiny malfunctioning brain at the time, and fully expect everyone to swallow it.
Date: 9/01/2026 20:06:30
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348586
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
oh for those simpler times

when anti fascists actually stood against fascists
Date: 9/01/2026 20:08:48
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2348587
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:

Not unexpected lies.
One of the infuriating things is that they obviously don’t put any effort at all into their lies.
No preparation beforehand, to construct anything like a plausible premise. Just say whatever shit pops into your tiny malfunctioning brain at the time, and fully expect everyone to swallow it.
They learned that from Trump.
Date: 9/01/2026 20:10:23
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348588
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
Not unexpected lies.
One of the infuriating things is that they obviously don’t put any effort at all into their lies.
No preparation beforehand, to construct anything like a plausible premise. Just say whatever shit pops into your tiny malfunctioning brain at the time, and fully expect everyone to swallow it.
They learned that from Trump.
exactly why wouldn’t they just do that when the voting majority lap it all up and put them into power again and again
Date: 9/01/2026 20:14:09
From: furious
ID: 2348589
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:

Not unexpected lies.
One of the infuriating things is that they obviously don’t put any effort at all into their lies.
No preparation beforehand, to construct anything like a plausible premise. Just say whatever shit pops into your tiny malfunctioning brain at the time, and fully expect everyone to swallow it.
I dont think rubio is dumb, he just sold his soul. The other guy, on the other hand, is both…
Date: 9/01/2026 20:37:23
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2348591
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
furious said:
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
Not unexpected lies.
One of the infuriating things is that they obviously don’t put any effort at all into their lies.
No preparation beforehand, to construct anything like a plausible premise. Just say whatever shit pops into your tiny malfunctioning brain at the time, and fully expect everyone to swallow it.
I dont think rubio is dumb, he just sold his soul. The other guy, on the other hand, is both…
No, i don’t think that Rubio is as…sycophantically zealous as are a lot of Trump’s appointees, either.
He’s just spotted a handy bandwagon, and jumped aboard, to his (so far) advantage.
He’s quite mercenary in his outlook, which my family history permits me to judge as not admirable. Not admirable, at all.
Date: 9/01/2026 21:05:39
From: dv
ID: 2348594
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.threads.com/@kaldexhar/post/DTRdC8_FKBe?xmt=AQF0DSYF74Q5tIu7e9dQzrggIbJjmNnT3guTFhtGLjhQssaekI8zqCP8v5ZtK7fgtFESFI0&slof=1
Okay we’ve heard from Schwarzenegger and Jesse Ventura, but what about the rest of the cast of Predator?
Date: 9/01/2026 21:13:45
From: kii
ID: 2348595
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
It’s 15 years since Gabby Giffords was shot in the head. This week her husband, Senator Mark Kelly, has been targeted by Trump and his goons.
I can’t imagine the trauma they are reliving after this murder in Minneapolis.
I feel so angry.
Date: 9/01/2026 22:01:43
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348601
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.threads.com/@kaldexhar/post/DTRdC8_FKBe?xmt=AQF0DSYF74Q5tIu7e9dQzrggIbJjmNnT3guTFhtGLjhQssaekI8zqCP8v5ZtK7fgtFESFI0&slof=1
Okay we’ve heard from Schwarzenegger and Jesse Ventura, but what about the rest of the cast of Predator?
but what do they think about illegal aliens though
ress.
Did it Did it make you feel better to have that conversation or what would you say?
No, I’m just saying as a graduate of Roosevelt High School and as the former governor of Minnesota, I’m so proud of Ro Roosevelt High School and how they stood up for what what is supposed to be America and freedom.
And freedom is not arresting people without warrants.
We have a system here.
It’s called a constitution.
And we have a party, the Republicans, who don’t seem to want to abide by the Constitution.
January 6th is a prime example of that.
And now they’re all free and they’re in charge.
You know what?
Maybe it’s time for Jesse.
I only did one term.
I’m owed a second.
Mer, can you tell us where you went to school here?
I went to school here.
I’m a 1969 graduate of Minneapolis Roosevelt.
I’m proud of them for what they did.
They made me proud as an alumni.
Go Teddy’s.
What are your thoughts?
I know we’re jumping in probably doubling up on some of his questions, but what are some of your thoughts about what unfolded yesterday and then after that what you saw?
Well, I’ve told I’ve told you already we’re a country of the Constitution.
We have an we have leadership now that has destroyed the Constitution.
They don’t follow it.
They could care less about it.
Am I right or wrong?
I took an oath to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
I view after January 6th, the Republican party is a domestic enemy to our Constitution.
I can’t get any bolder than that, can I?
And you obviously saw the video that the student shot outside here, and that obviously elicited a lot of emotions for you just watching.
What do you mean the student shot?
There were some students that shot the video of the chaos here yesterday.
No, I didn’t even see it.
Oh, you didn’t see it?
Okay.
I thought you didn’t see it.
Okay.
I The only thing I’ve seen is the murder.
So, so talk about you were a student here.
When did you graduate in 1969?
Have you been back here?
Talk about that.
This like first time back?
No.
Came back to homecoming two years ago?
No, no, no.
I I I’m a proud graduate.
I held three school records in swimming, two district 17 records.
Uh, our football team was undefeated.
Uh, we won back then there were no playoffs.
We played St.
Paul Central for the Twin City Championship and defeated them.
I think it was 21-6 and we did that at the old brick house if you remember that.
The old University of Minnesota.
That’s where they used to play the Twin City Championship game.
There weren’t playoffs then.
Dave Winfield was on that central team, wasn’t he?
Yep.
Okay.
Yeah.
Yep.
We we beat Dave Winfield and Sandra.
Just to be abundantly clear about what you’re doing, what what you wanted to do at at the school here today.
I just came here today to show my support as a graduate of Roosevelt and tell them how proud I was of what they did of keeping ice off of this campus.
This is a place of learning and you learn and you learn things like the Constitution.
You learn about warrants.
You learn about things of that nature.
And what we’re getting right now is violating all that what kids are being taught.
You want to know something?
I’ll give you a quote.
We’re a third world country now.
You want to know why?
I’m an expert.
I been to them.
I spent 17 months in Southeast Asia while the draft dodger was playing golf.
Right?
You know how I know we’re a third world country?
Because in third world countries, they have the military doing their police work in the cities.
When you walk around, I was in the Philippines the day Ferdinand Marcos declared martial law and went under dictatorship.
We went from nobody to a guy with a machine gun on every corner.
That’s what happens in a dictatorship.
In comes the military.
That’s what’s happening here.
and and people better wake up to it.
You want to read something, then read your history of Germany and start comparing the tactics of what happened in 1930s Germany to what’s happening here.
The first read history, you learn from history.
And this is nothing new.
This is all repeated.
This is a this is a game plan it looks like to me, you know, of what’s going on here.
How dare Minnesota?
We’ll take care of oursel.
We don’t need federal troops coming in here without warrants.
Some people have said this undermines local law enforcement.
It undermines the entire Constitution.
The military cannot be turned loose unless it’s a national emergency.
They’re going to tell me this is a national emergency.
Message for Trump and or message for Governor Walls.
Uh, who was that?
You mean the draft dodging coward?
I don’t saw call him by name.
He’s the draft dodging coward who when it was his time to serve his country, he did what all rich white boys did.
I wasn’t a rich white boy.
I grew up in South Minneapolis.
Most of me and all my friends are Vietnam veterans.
We had to go.
But the rich white boys never had to go, did they?
And he didn’t have to go, did he?
And yet he’s going to tell me what courage is.
Are you supporting Governor Walls and Mayor Fry the way they’ve been outspoken towards Absolutely.
Good for them and good for these people that stood up.
They’re teaching their students something that we are a country that we have to be a country of law and a country of the Constitution.
They’re all forgetting about the Constitution of the United States of America.
We don’t even have it anymore after January 6th.
Are you kidding me?
And then they all get turned loose and now they’re in charge.
I gave up on this country when this guy got I haven’t even watched the news since last November.
I stumbled onto this and now look what you’ve done to me.
Well, thank you for stopping.
Here I was leading a nice quiet life and now you’ve come now you’ve injected me back in here and probably going to make me the governor of Minnesota again.
And you seem fired up and motivated because somebody somebody needs to clean up what the Democrats and Republicans constantly wreck.
And you notice I lump them together.
You know, I should use my old name for them, the Democrats and the Republicans, which my apologies to the Crips and Bloods for using their name in that way.
And Governor, would you like to say anything about yesterday what happened?
A tragic situation.
Yeah, that’s anytime you have the loss of life that needlessly happens, that’s tragedy.
And what occurred yesterday did not have to happen.
There is no way.
I’ve seen the tape of it.
And uh who is this?
The governor of South Dakota.
Has she ever met a person of color?
Do they have any in South Dakota?
Thank you for stopping.
Appreciate you know who I’m talking about on that, right?
He’s gone.
Thank you very
Date: 9/01/2026 22:02:50
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348602
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 9/01/2026 22:52:49
From: furious
ID: 2348605
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.threads.com/@kaldexhar/post/DTRdC8_FKBe?xmt=AQF0DSYF74Q5tIu7e9dQzrggIbJjmNnT3guTFhtGLjhQssaekI8zqCP8v5ZtK7fgtFESFI0&slof=1
Okay we’ve heard from Schwarzenegger and Jesse Ventura, but what about the rest of the cast of Predator?

Date: 9/01/2026 23:50:25
From: furious
ID: 2348606
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
furious said:
dv said:
https://www.threads.com/@kaldexhar/post/DTRdC8_FKBe?xmt=AQF0DSYF74Q5tIu7e9dQzrggIbJjmNnT3guTFhtGLjhQssaekI8zqCP8v5ZtK7fgtFESFI0&slof=1
Okay we’ve heard from Schwarzenegger and Jesse Ventura, but what about the rest of the cast of Predator?

I didn’t break it, it was like that when I got here, have a running man reference instead…

Date: 10/01/2026 07:15:43
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348635
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
we suspect we may have posted this shot here before so apologies

and as a gesture of contrition please consider

progress
Date: 10/01/2026 07:19:12
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348637
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
alleged
7 Democrats just voted today to confirm a Trump judicial nominee who refused to say what happened on January 6 or answer who won the 2020 election:
Durbin
Hassan
Kaine
King
Klobuchar
Shaheen
Welch
Date: 10/01/2026 07:21:45
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348638
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
saying the fascist bits out loud
JD Vance: “It was a legitimate law enforcement operation. We were going door to door to try to find criminal illegal aliens and deport them from the United States … say a prayer for that agent … he deserves a debt of gratitude.”
allegedly
Date: 10/01/2026 07:35:08
From: roughbarked
ID: 2348640
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
analysis
Donald Trump is reshaping American power and the threat to international order is alarming
By Laura Tingle.
But this week Trump and his lieutenants have directly threatened both democratically and non-democratically elected governments — on the back of the internationally-illegal capture of now former president Nicolas Maduro of Venezuela.
Hubris unveiled the real reasons for these actions: Access to oil, but mostly because the United States can.
In a particularly agitated performance on CNN, White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller said that “we live in a world in which you can talk all you want about international niceties and everything else”.
“But we live in a world, in the real world … that is governed by strength, that is governed by force, that is governed by power,” Miller said.
“These are the iron laws of the world. We’re a superpower. And under President Trump, we are going to conduct ourselves as a superpower.”
In a subsequent interview with four journalists from the New York Times, Trump declared that his power as commander-in-chief is constrained only by his “own morality”.
Asked if there were any limits on his global powers, Trump said: “Yeah, there is one thing. My own morality. My own mind. It’s the only thing that can stop me.”
“I don’t need international law,” he added. “I’m not looking to hurt people.”
When pressed further by the Times about whether his administration needed to abide by international law, Trump said, “I do”.
But he made clear he would be the arbiter when such constraints applied to the United States.
“It depends what your definition of international law is,” he said.
Clearly flushed with the military success of the raid into Caracas, threats had been made against Colombia, Cuba, Mexico and Greenland (a semi-autonomous part of Denmark which is a close US ally).
Even as European leaders and commentators earnestly tried to consider vaguely legitimate means scenarios by which the US could “take over” Greenland, Stephen Miller had a straight forward response.
Asked to rule out the prospect — raised by Trump — of the US taking Greenland by force, Miller said that “nobody is gonna fight the US militarily over the future of Greenland”.
“The United States is the power of NATO. For the United States to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend NATO and NATO interests, obviously, Greenland should be part of the United States”.
Trump made clear to the Times that he wouldn’t be satisfied with just being able to, for example, re-open military bases in Greenland,
“Ownership is very important,” he said, “because that’s what I feel is psychologically needed for success”.
The New York Times interview occurred just hours after, at home in Minneapolis, a 37-year-old mother of three was shot three times in the face and killed by ICE agents in front of a phalanx of cameras.
Their actions were defended by Trump and his officials.
Local police subsequently reported that their efforts to investigate the incident were being blocked by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Cracks are showing
Both the developments in foreign policy — and rhetoric — as well as the shock of Americans and the world seeing the killing of Renee Good in Minneapolis seem to have produced some serious cracks in Donald Trump’s political base.
Republicans crossed the Senate floor to support legislation aimed at preventing him engaging in further military operations in Venezuela (though seems likely to be more demonstrative than effective), as well as a range of legislation in the House of Representatives.
State and city representatives in Minnesota — and other states — signalled they would both seek to prosecute the ICE agents involved under state laws, and escalate their attempts to remove from their jurisdictions.
Commentator Anne Applebaum noted that “if might makes right, if the US gets to do what it wants using any tools it wants in its own sphere, then there is no need for transparency, democracy, or legitimacy”.
That rule, it seems, applies both domestically and internationally.
Donald Trump has made clear his contempt for the powers of Congress to stop his foreign policy actions just as, according to Applebaum, “the concerns of ordinary people who live in smaller nations don’t need to be taken into account, because they will not be granted any agency”.
And what of larger nations? Notably Russia and China with whom Trump sees the world divided into three spheres of influence.
Carnegie Institute analyst Tong Zhao says the “claim that the erosion of international law and norms does not affect the behaviour of illiberal states such as China underestimates the universal human need to feel righteous — and the particular intensity with which illiberal systems manufacture self-righteousness”.
“Whatever their public or private statements, he says, “they often sincerely believe that their government’s policies are morally responsible and legally righteous — sometimes even more so than those of Western democracies”.
“Russian President Vladimir Putin would not lecture at length on his version of history — his sense of historical justice and legality — if he did not feel profoundly self-righteous. Chinese President Xi Jinping likewise appears genuinely convinced that he stands on the right side of history. “
“In this context, controversial US actions such as the Venezuela operation — and the international community’s tacit acceptance — matter greatly.
“They allow authoritarian leaders to lower their perceived thresholds of acceptable behaviour. Norms need not disappear entirely for the standard to become comparative rather than absolute.”
Date: 10/01/2026 07:44:25
From: Michael V
ID: 2348643
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
saying the fascist bits out loud
JD Vance: “It was a legitimate law enforcement operation. We were going door to door to try to find criminal illegal aliens and deport them from the United States … say a prayer for that agent … he deserves a debt of gratitude.”
allegedly
Grrrrrrr.
Date: 10/01/2026 07:46:45
From: roughbarked
ID: 2348644
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
saying the fascist bits out loud
JD Vance: “It was a legitimate law enforcement operation. We were going door to door to try to find criminal illegal aliens and deport them from the United States … say a prayer for that agent … he deserves a debt of gratitude.”
allegedly
Grrrrrrr.
Don’t you wish you could give the man a good telling off? Before shoving him in an orange jumpsuit?
Date: 10/01/2026 07:51:18
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2348646
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
saying the fascist bits out loud
JD Vance: “It was a legitimate law enforcement operation. We were going door to door to try to find criminal illegal aliens and deport them from the United States … say a prayer for that agent … he deserves a debt of gratitude.”
allegedly
Grrrrrrr.
He doesn’t appear to be the sharpest crayon in the box.
Date: 10/01/2026 07:55:47
From: roughbarked
ID: 2348647
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
saying the fascist bits out loud
JD Vance: “It was a legitimate law enforcement operation. We were going door to door to try to find criminal illegal aliens and deport them from the United States … say a prayer for that agent … he deserves a debt of gratitude.”
allegedly
Grrrrrrr.
He doesn’t appear to be the sharpest crayon in the box.
The USA needs to regurgitate all these toxins very soon. Turn them into pavement pizza.
Date: 10/01/2026 07:57:39
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2348651
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
Grrrrrrr.
He doesn’t appear to be the sharpest crayon in the box.
The USA needs to regurgitate all these toxins very soon. Turn them into pavement pizza.
Last night Mr Mutant and I were flicking through movies. Came across a WWII collection. I said, “we appear to be living in it, why do we need to watch a movie about it?” so we settled on a cheery documentary about toxins in our food instead.
Date: 10/01/2026 08:39:38
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2348662
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Alt National Park Service
WTF?!? It appears a new trend is starting. On Thursday, January 8, 2026, federal immigration agents from U.S. Customs and Border Protection shot a married couple in Portland, Oregon during a vehicle stop. The couple were both wounded (he was shot in the arm and she was shot in the chest) and were later transported to a hospital for treatment. According to Department of Homeland Security, agents were conducting what they described as a “targeted vehicle stop” in the parking lot of Adventist Health in Southeast Portland when the driver allegedly attempted to run over agents after they identified themselves. DHS claims “one agent fired defensive shots out of fear for their safety”. What has not been independently verified is whether the vehicle was actually used as a weapon.
What makes this so horrifying isn’t only that people were shot it’s how it happened, who did it, and what followed. Immigration enforcement is a civil function, not a battlefield operation. When federal agents open fire on civilians during a vehicle stop, it represents a dangerous escalation of power that goes far beyond routine enforcement.
Even if the federal government asserts self-defense, the threshold for using lethal force in a domestic, non-combat setting should be extraordinarily high, and the public has a right to see clear, independent evidence when that threshold is claimed to have been crossed.
The most disturbing detail comes after the gunfire. When Portland Police Bureau responded to a 911 call from the wounded man several miles away, no federal agents were present at the scene. The couple (both injured by gunfire) had to drive themselves to seek help and call emergency services on their own. Officers then provided aid and arranged hospital transport. In standard law-enforcement practice, once deadly force is used, officers are expected to render immediate medical aid and secure the scene. Leaving injured people to fend for themselves after shooting them is a profound violation of those expectations.
Beyond procedure, this incident strips people of basic human dignity. Even if authorities later attempt to justify the shooting, humanity does not end at justification. Shooting a married couple and then leaving them bleeding to seek their own help treats human lives as disposable. They became a threat narrative first and an afterthought second. That is why this incident hits so deeply at a human level.
It also undermines the rule of law. When armed federal agents can use deadly force, leave the scene, and then control the narrative afterward, accountability becomes fragile at best. The absence of immediate local oversight, combined with self-investigation by the same federal agencies involved, raises serious concerns about transparency and justice. No armed authority in a democratic society should be able to act violently and then disappear!!!
Date: 10/01/2026 08:49:07
From: roughbarked
ID: 2348664
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
Alt National Park Service
WTF?!? It appears a new trend is starting. On Thursday, January 8, 2026, federal immigration agents from U.S. Customs and Border Protection shot a married couple in Portland, Oregon during a vehicle stop. The couple were both wounded (he was shot in the arm and she was shot in the chest) and were later transported to a hospital for treatment. According to Department of Homeland Security, agents were conducting what they described as a “targeted vehicle stop” in the parking lot of Adventist Health in Southeast Portland when the driver allegedly attempted to run over agents after they identified themselves. DHS claims “one agent fired defensive shots out of fear for their safety”. What has not been independently verified is whether the vehicle was actually used as a weapon.
What makes this so horrifying isn’t only that people were shot it’s how it happened, who did it, and what followed. Immigration enforcement is a civil function, not a battlefield operation. When federal agents open fire on civilians during a vehicle stop, it represents a dangerous escalation of power that goes far beyond routine enforcement.
Even if the federal government asserts self-defense, the threshold for using lethal force in a domestic, non-combat setting should be extraordinarily high, and the public has a right to see clear, independent evidence when that threshold is claimed to have been crossed.
The most disturbing detail comes after the gunfire. When Portland Police Bureau responded to a 911 call from the wounded man several miles away, no federal agents were present at the scene. The couple (both injured by gunfire) had to drive themselves to seek help and call emergency services on their own. Officers then provided aid and arranged hospital transport. In standard law-enforcement practice, once deadly force is used, officers are expected to render immediate medical aid and secure the scene. Leaving injured people to fend for themselves after shooting them is a profound violation of those expectations.
Beyond procedure, this incident strips people of basic human dignity. Even if authorities later attempt to justify the shooting, humanity does not end at justification. Shooting a married couple and then leaving them bleeding to seek their own help treats human lives as disposable. They became a threat narrative first and an afterthought second. That is why this incident hits so deeply at a human level.
It also undermines the rule of law. When armed federal agents can use deadly force, leave the scene, and then control the narrative afterward, accountability becomes fragile at best. The absence of immediate local oversight, combined with self-investigation by the same federal agencies involved, raises serious concerns about transparency and justice. No armed authority in a democratic society should be able to act violently and then disappear!!!
When are the people of the USA going to vomit this toxic overload?
Date: 10/01/2026 09:59:24
From: Michael V
ID: 2348674
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
Alt National Park Service
WTF?!? It appears a new trend is starting. On Thursday, January 8, 2026, federal immigration agents from U.S. Customs and Border Protection shot a married couple in Portland, Oregon during a vehicle stop. The couple were both wounded (he was shot in the arm and she was shot in the chest) and were later transported to a hospital for treatment. According to Department of Homeland Security, agents were conducting what they described as a “targeted vehicle stop” in the parking lot of Adventist Health in Southeast Portland when the driver allegedly attempted to run over agents after they identified themselves. DHS claims “one agent fired defensive shots out of fear for their safety”. What has not been independently verified is whether the vehicle was actually used as a weapon.
What makes this so horrifying isn’t only that people were shot it’s how it happened, who did it, and what followed. Immigration enforcement is a civil function, not a battlefield operation. When federal agents open fire on civilians during a vehicle stop, it represents a dangerous escalation of power that goes far beyond routine enforcement.
Even if the federal government asserts self-defense, the threshold for using lethal force in a domestic, non-combat setting should be extraordinarily high, and the public has a right to see clear, independent evidence when that threshold is claimed to have been crossed.
The most disturbing detail comes after the gunfire. When Portland Police Bureau responded to a 911 call from the wounded man several miles away, no federal agents were present at the scene. The couple (both injured by gunfire) had to drive themselves to seek help and call emergency services on their own. Officers then provided aid and arranged hospital transport. In standard law-enforcement practice, once deadly force is used, officers are expected to render immediate medical aid and secure the scene. Leaving injured people to fend for themselves after shooting them is a profound violation of those expectations.
Beyond procedure, this incident strips people of basic human dignity. Even if authorities later attempt to justify the shooting, humanity does not end at justification. Shooting a married couple and then leaving them bleeding to seek their own help treats human lives as disposable. They became a threat narrative first and an afterthought second. That is why this incident hits so deeply at a human level.
It also undermines the rule of law. When armed federal agents can use deadly force, leave the scene, and then control the narrative afterward, accountability becomes fragile at best. The absence of immediate local oversight, combined with self-investigation by the same federal agencies involved, raises serious concerns about transparency and justice. No armed authority in a democratic society should be able to act violently and then disappear!!!
Far Canal!
Date: 10/01/2026 10:01:27
From: roughbarked
ID: 2348676
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
JudgeMental said:
Alt National Park Service
WTF?!? It appears a new trend is starting. On Thursday, January 8, 2026, federal immigration agents from U.S. Customs and Border Protection shot a married couple in Portland, Oregon during a vehicle stop. The couple were both wounded (he was shot in the arm and she was shot in the chest) and were later transported to a hospital for treatment. According to Department of Homeland Security, agents were conducting what they described as a “targeted vehicle stop” in the parking lot of Adventist Health in Southeast Portland when the driver allegedly attempted to run over agents after they identified themselves. DHS claims “one agent fired defensive shots out of fear for their safety”. What has not been independently verified is whether the vehicle was actually used as a weapon.
What makes this so horrifying isn’t only that people were shot it’s how it happened, who did it, and what followed. Immigration enforcement is a civil function, not a battlefield operation. When federal agents open fire on civilians during a vehicle stop, it represents a dangerous escalation of power that goes far beyond routine enforcement.
Even if the federal government asserts self-defense, the threshold for using lethal force in a domestic, non-combat setting should be extraordinarily high, and the public has a right to see clear, independent evidence when that threshold is claimed to have been crossed.
The most disturbing detail comes after the gunfire. When Portland Police Bureau responded to a 911 call from the wounded man several miles away, no federal agents were present at the scene. The couple (both injured by gunfire) had to drive themselves to seek help and call emergency services on their own. Officers then provided aid and arranged hospital transport. In standard law-enforcement practice, once deadly force is used, officers are expected to render immediate medical aid and secure the scene. Leaving injured people to fend for themselves after shooting them is a profound violation of those expectations.
Beyond procedure, this incident strips people of basic human dignity. Even if authorities later attempt to justify the shooting, humanity does not end at justification. Shooting a married couple and then leaving them bleeding to seek their own help treats human lives as disposable. They became a threat narrative first and an afterthought second. That is why this incident hits so deeply at a human level.
It also undermines the rule of law. When armed federal agents can use deadly force, leave the scene, and then control the narrative afterward, accountability becomes fragile at best. The absence of immediate local oversight, combined with self-investigation by the same federal agencies involved, raises serious concerns about transparency and justice. No armed authority in a democratic society should be able to act violently and then disappear!!!
Far Canal!
It is all straight out of the gestapo handbook.
Date: 10/01/2026 10:39:26
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348681
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
JudgeMental said:
Alt National Park Service
WTF?!? It appears a new trend is starting. On Thursday, January 8, 2026, federal immigration agents from U.S. Customs and Border Protection shot a married couple in Portland, Oregon during a vehicle stop. The couple were both wounded (he was shot in the arm and she was shot in the chest) and were later transported to a hospital for treatment. According to Department of Homeland Security, agents were conducting what they described as a “targeted vehicle stop” in the parking lot of Adventist Health in Southeast Portland when the driver allegedly attempted to run over agents after they identified themselves. DHS claims “one agent fired defensive shots out of fear for their safety”. What has not been independently verified is whether the vehicle was actually used as a weapon.
What makes this so horrifying isn’t only that people were shot it’s how it happened, who did it, and what followed. Immigration enforcement is a civil function, not a battlefield operation. When federal agents open fire on civilians during a vehicle stop, it represents a dangerous escalation of power that goes far beyond routine enforcement.
Even if the federal government asserts self-defense, the threshold for using lethal force in a domestic, non-combat setting should be extraordinarily high, and the public has a right to see clear, independent evidence when that threshold is claimed to have been crossed.
The most disturbing detail comes after the gunfire. When Portland Police Bureau responded to a 911 call from the wounded man several miles away, no federal agents were present at the scene. The couple (both injured by gunfire) had to drive themselves to seek help and call emergency services on their own. Officers then provided aid and arranged hospital transport. In standard law-enforcement practice, once deadly force is used, officers are expected to render immediate medical aid and secure the scene. Leaving injured people to fend for themselves after shooting them is a profound violation of those expectations.
Beyond procedure, this incident strips people of basic human dignity. Even if authorities later attempt to justify the shooting, humanity does not end at justification. Shooting a married couple and then leaving them bleeding to seek their own help treats human lives as disposable. They became a threat narrative first and an afterthought second. That is why this incident hits so deeply at a human level.
It also undermines the rule of law. When armed federal agents can use deadly force, leave the scene, and then control the narrative afterward, accountability becomes fragile at best. The absence of immediate local oversight, combined with self-investigation by the same federal agencies involved, raises serious concerns about transparency and justice. No armed authority in a democratic society should be able to act violently and then disappear!!!
Far Canal!
It is all straight out of the gestapo handbook.

Date: 10/01/2026 10:42:31
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2348683
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
Far Canal!
It is all straight out of the gestapo handbook.

Apparently, according to one MAGA I used to know, it’s a media conspiracy y not to report the “good news” of ordinary citizens stopping mass murders etc with their own guns.
Date: 10/01/2026 10:46:55
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2348685
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
It is all straight out of the gestapo handbook.

Apparently, according to one MAGA I used to know, it’s a media conspiracy y not to report the “good news” of ordinary citizens stopping mass murders etc with their own guns.
Ahhh that’s it! It makes perfect sense! Renee Good was definitely on her way to shoot up a primary school!!!
Date: 10/01/2026 10:48:32
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348686
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Divine Angel said:
SCIENCE said:

Apparently, according to one MAGA I used to know, it’s a media conspiracy y not to report the “good news” of ordinary citizens stopping mass murders etc with their own guns.
Ahhh that’s it! It makes perfect sense! Renee Good was definitely on her way to shoot up a primary school!!!
another massacre prevented, no wonder they’re pleased with themselves

oh wait nah maybe she was just one of those leftist wokist nonbinarist teachers trying to corrupt the minds of the young, same thing
Date: 10/01/2026 10:50:15
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348687
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 10/01/2026 10:59:34
From: dv
ID: 2348689
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://people.com/trump-reads-aloud-private-note-from-marco-rubio-during-televised-press-conference-11882834
President Donald Trump read aloud a private note from Secretary of State Marco Rubio during a Jan. 9 press conference at the White House.
Trump, who was meeting with oil and gas executives, read Rubio’s instruction to “go back to Chevron” in front of the whole room.
However, the president didn’t seem to fully comprehend Rubio’s instruction.
——
Date: 10/01/2026 11:05:27
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348691
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
look it hasn’t happened yet so we can’t say it’s happening

Date: 10/01/2026 11:10:05
From: Michael V
ID: 2348694
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
Far Canal!
It is all straight out of the gestapo handbook.

Fair and reasonable comment.
Date: 10/01/2026 11:35:19
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2348705
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
Alt National Park Service
WTF?!? It appears a new trend is starting. On Thursday, January 8, 2026, federal immigration agents from U.S. Customs and Border Protection shot a married couple in Portland, Oregon during a vehicle stop. The couple were both wounded (he was shot in the arm and she was shot in the chest) and were later transported to a hospital for treatment. According to Department of Homeland Security, agents were conducting what they described as a “targeted vehicle stop” in the parking lot of Adventist Health in Southeast Portland when the driver allegedly attempted to run over agents after they identified themselves. DHS claims “one agent fired defensive shots out of fear for their safety”. What has not been independently verified is whether the vehicle was actually used as a weapon.
What makes this so horrifying isn’t only that people were shot it’s how it happened, who did it, and what followed. Immigration enforcement is a civil function, not a battlefield operation. When federal agents open fire on civilians during a vehicle stop, it represents a dangerous escalation of power that goes far beyond routine enforcement.
Even if the federal government asserts self-defense, the threshold for using lethal force in a domestic, non-combat setting should be extraordinarily high, and the public has a right to see clear, independent evidence when that threshold is claimed to have been crossed.
The most disturbing detail comes after the gunfire. When Portland Police Bureau responded to a 911 call from the wounded man several miles away, no federal agents were present at the scene. The couple (both injured by gunfire) had to drive themselves to seek help and call emergency services on their own. Officers then provided aid and arranged hospital transport. In standard law-enforcement practice, once deadly force is used, officers are expected to render immediate medical aid and secure the scene. Leaving injured people to fend for themselves after shooting them is a profound violation of those expectations.
Beyond procedure, this incident strips people of basic human dignity. Even if authorities later attempt to justify the shooting, humanity does not end at justification. Shooting a married couple and then leaving them bleeding to seek their own help treats human lives as disposable. They became a threat narrative first and an afterthought second. That is why this incident hits so deeply at a human level.
It also undermines the rule of law. When armed federal agents can use deadly force, leave the scene, and then control the narrative afterward, accountability becomes fragile at best. The absence of immediate local oversight, combined with self-investigation by the same federal agencies involved, raises serious concerns about transparency and justice. No armed authority in a democratic society should be able to act violently and then disappear!!!
We are seeing laws being violated then legal action follows.
Seems to be a fundamental part of the Trump Administration.
Date: 10/01/2026 11:37:54
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2348707
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Divine Angel said:
Apparently, according to one MAGA I used to know, it’s a media conspiracy y not to report the “good news” of ordinary citizens stopping mass murders etc with their own guns.
Ahhh that’s it! It makes perfect sense! Renee Good was definitely on her way to shoot up a primary school!!!
another massacre prevented, no wonder they’re pleased with themselves

oh wait nah maybe she was just one of those leftist wokist nonbinarist teachers trying to corrupt the minds of the young, same thing
Celebrating racism is not a good thing to celebrate.
Date: 10/01/2026 11:42:12
From: party_pants
ID: 2348712
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
regime change now please …
Date: 10/01/2026 12:09:05
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2348723
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 10/01/2026 12:20:52
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348729
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:


this
this
Date: 10/01/2026 12:21:09
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348730
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
regime change now please …
who do we suggest should enact this
Date: 10/01/2026 12:21:49
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2348731
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
party_pants said:
regime change now please …
who do we suggest should enact this
Danish special forces.
Date: 10/01/2026 12:24:53
From: party_pants
ID: 2348734
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
party_pants said:
regime change now please …
who do we suggest should enact this
the preferred option would be for the Congress to impeach the lot of them and boot them out. Otherwise the military could do it, or the general population could just rise up and burn his house down. Or a foreign power could bomb him.
I’m not fussy.
Date: 10/01/2026 12:28:00
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2348735
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Omg I didn’t notice this earlier! Trump is wearing a Trump pin on his lapel LOL

Date: 10/01/2026 12:32:19
From: Michael V
ID: 2348736
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:


Very fair comments.
Date: 10/01/2026 12:35:19
From: Michael V
ID: 2348738
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Omg I didn’t notice this earlier! Trump is wearing a Trump pin on his lapel LOL

!!!
Date: 10/01/2026 13:51:34
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2348752
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
SCIENCE said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Ahhh that’s it! It makes perfect sense! Renee Good was definitely on her way to shoot up a primary school!!!
another massacre prevented, no wonder they’re pleased with themselves

oh wait nah maybe she was just one of those leftist wokist nonbinarist teachers trying to corrupt the minds of the young, same thing
Celebrating racism is not a good thing to celebrate.
Oops
Celebrating murder is not a good thing to celebrate.
The new fascism, shoot people dead, leave the scene, don’t render any assistance to those shot.
Date: 10/01/2026 14:43:19
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2348764
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
More for Friday Funnies, but still …
“Trump says he’s been wondering if he could slide down a helicopter rope like SEAL Team 6 — and says, with a straight face, that he wants to try it sometime.”
https://x.com/i/status/2009455769184555309
Date: 10/01/2026 14:46:46
From: party_pants
ID: 2348767
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
More for Friday Funnies, but still …
“Trump says he’s been wondering if he could slide down a helicopter rope like SEAL Team 6 — and says, with a straight face, that he wants to try it sometime.”
https://x.com/i/status/2009455769184555309
Oh, someone please let him try it!
Date: 10/01/2026 14:48:27
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2348770
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
More for Friday Funnies, but still …
“Trump says he’s been wondering if he could slide down a helicopter rope like SEAL Team 6 — and says, with a straight face, that he wants to try it sometime.”
https://x.com/i/status/2009455769184555309
Not half as much as i’d like to see him try it.
Date: 10/01/2026 14:58:45
From: roughbarked
ID: 2348773
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
More for Friday Funnies, but still …
“Trump says he’s been wondering if he could slide down a helicopter rope like SEAL Team 6 — and says, with a straight face, that he wants to try it sometime.”
https://x.com/i/status/2009455769184555309
He’ll be the best in the world at it before he actuaally does it. I really do hope he does give it a try.
Date: 10/01/2026 15:58:25
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348788
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Spiny Norman said:
More for Friday Funnies, but still …
“Trump says he’s been wondering if he could slide down a helicopter rope like SEAL Team 6 — and says, with a straight face, that he wants to try it sometime.”
https://x.com/i/status/2009455769184555309
He’ll be the best in the world at it before he actuaally does it. I really do hope he does give it a try.
^
Date: 10/01/2026 15:58:37
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348789
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Spiny Norman said:
More for Friday Funnies, but still …
“Trump says he’s been wondering if he could slide down a helicopter rope like SEAL Team 6 — and says, with a straight face, that he wants to try it sometime.”
https://x.com/i/status/2009455769184555309
Not half as much as i’d like to see him try it.
^
Date: 10/01/2026 15:58:48
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348790
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
Spiny Norman said:
More for Friday Funnies, but still …
“Trump says he’s been wondering if he could slide down a helicopter rope like SEAL Team 6 — and says, with a straight face, that he wants to try it sometime.”
https://x.com/i/status/2009455769184555309
Oh, someone please let him try it!
^
Date: 10/01/2026 17:30:27
From: dv
ID: 2348811
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 10/01/2026 17:39:25
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2348813
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

How?
Date: 10/01/2026 17:41:30
From: Michael V
ID: 2348815
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

…
Date: 10/01/2026 18:06:24
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348827
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
dv said:

How?
…
see this is the fucking thing about Americans we swear they think this is redeeming but consider that a seemingly innocent woman got fucking murdered by fascists leaving family and friends bereaved and their objection is all about face
Date: 10/01/2026 18:26:42
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2348830
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Looks like that ice shooter is up for first degree murder.
Date: 10/01/2026 18:36:42
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2348834
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
Looks like that ice shooter is up for first degree murder.
Nup.
Click bait.
Date: 10/01/2026 18:39:34
From: kii
ID: 2348835
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Jen Psaki’s piece on the Minneapolis shooting.
Link
Date: 11/01/2026 03:43:32
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348913
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
alleged

“feels like”
Date: 11/01/2026 04:11:57
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348915
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
alleged

“feels like”

Date: 11/01/2026 07:07:33
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348924
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
alleged and 2013 old
In response to criticism from civil liberties advocates and law enforcement groups alike, Law Enforcement Targets Inc.—a supplier of targets to the local, state, and federal law enforcement groups—has discontinued a line of targets that feature grandparents, a mother, a child, and a pregnant woman; all of them holding guns.

Date: 11/01/2026 11:39:04
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2348990
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
alleged
A 24-year-old man has been charged with murder after six people were killed in a series of shootings in north-east Mississippi. Clay County Sheriff Eddie Scott said the suspect was accused of shooting his father, brother and uncle fatally in the head on Friday evening, before stealing a truck and driving to a second site. There, he allegedly attempted to sexually assault a seven-year-old girl, who was also related to him, before fatally shooting her in the head.
Date: 11/01/2026 11:40:26
From: roughbarked
ID: 2348993
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
alleged
A 24-year-old man has been charged with murder after six people were killed in a series of shootings in north-east Mississippi. Clay County Sheriff Eddie Scott said the suspect was accused of shooting his father, brother and uncle fatally in the head on Friday evening, before stealing a truck and driving to a second site. There, he allegedly attempted to sexually assault a seven-year-old girl, who was also related to him, before fatally shooting her in the head.
There are no words…
Date: 11/01/2026 12:04:36
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2349010
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 11/01/2026 19:48:43
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2349159
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
saying the fascist bits out loud
JD Vance: “It was a legitimate law enforcement operation. We were going door to door to try to find criminal illegal aliens and deport them from the United States … say a prayer for that agent … he deserves a debt of gratitude.”
allegedly
Grrrrrrr.
He doesn’t appear to be the sharpest crayon in the box.
The USA needs to regurgitate all these toxins very soon. Turn them into pavement pizza.
Last night Mr Mutant and I were flicking through movies. Came across a WWII collection. I said, “we appear to be living in it, why do we need to watch a movie about it?” so we settled on a cheery documentary about toxins in our food instead.
Kristallnacht pt 2 won’t be long now.

The Gestapo at the door.
ah well lucky someone turned the clock back to 2025 so it’s not this bad yet
Date: 12/01/2026 09:06:57
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2349198
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Hey anyone heard the latest about Havana syndrome¿

Apparently it’s caused by USSA activity¿
Date: 12/01/2026 12:22:16
From: AussieDJ
ID: 2349263
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
(I’m not sure if this has been posted here previously)
Why does Trump want Greenland? His real-estate brain has decided it’s huge – and that it should belong to America!
You know that joke about how Trump wants Greenland because of the Mercator projection?
https://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2026/01/you-know-that-joke-about-how-trump-wants-greenland-because-of-the-mercator-projection
Date: 12/01/2026 14:16:26
From: Neophyte
ID: 2349300
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 12/01/2026 14:26:25
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2349304
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Neophyte said:

Not getting any more healthy there, Dunny.
Date: 12/01/2026 14:28:26
From: kii
ID: 2349306
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
My former neighbour, the Evangelical MAGA fuckwit, has posted a despicable AI video showing Renee Good doing what she “should” have done.
In the AI video Good gets out of her vehicle, holds her hands up to surrender and complies with the ICE agent. The video is based on the one from the murderer’s phone.
Again, I teeter on the edge of telling the former neighbour that she is a fucking insane bitch.
Date: 12/01/2026 14:29:53
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2349308
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
My former neighbour, the Evangelical MAGA fuckwit, has posted a despicable AI video showing Renee Good doing what she “should” have done.
In the AI video Good gets out of her vehicle, holds her hands up to surrender and complies with the ICE agent. The video is based on the one from the murderer’s phone.
Again, I teeter on the edge of telling the former neighbour that she is a fucking insane bitch.
If you like, you can give me her email address, and i’ll tell her.
Date: 12/01/2026 14:32:32
From: kii
ID: 2349310
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
kii said:
My former neighbour, the Evangelical MAGA fuckwit, has posted a despicable AI video showing Renee Good doing what she “should” have done.
In the AI video Good gets out of her vehicle, holds her hands up to surrender and complies with the ICE agent. The video is based on the one from the murderer’s phone.
Again, I teeter on the edge of telling the former neighbour that she is a fucking insane bitch.
If you like, you can give me her email address, and i’ll tell her.
Her Facebook profile is public. I unfriended her years ago, but I like to check her obvious insanity on a fairly regular basis.
Date: 12/01/2026 14:34:53
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2349311
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
captain_spalding said:
kii said:
My former neighbour, the Evangelical MAGA fuckwit, has posted a despicable AI video showing Renee Good doing what she “should” have done.
In the AI video Good gets out of her vehicle, holds her hands up to surrender and complies with the ICE agent. The video is based on the one from the murderer’s phone.
Again, I teeter on the edge of telling the former neighbour that she is a fucking insane bitch.
If you like, you can give me her email address, and i’ll tell her.
Her Facebook profile is public. I unfriended her years ago, but I like to check her obvious insanity on a fairly regular basis.
I like to think that when it’s obvious that someone has taken the time to search for someone’s email address, and then gone to the bother of writing them a private and personal message, it lends a degree of sincerity to calling them a fucking insane bitch.
Date: 12/01/2026 14:39:53
From: kii
ID: 2349313
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
kii said:
captain_spalding said:
If you like, you can give me her email address, and i’ll tell her.
Her Facebook profile is public. I unfriended her years ago, but I like to check her obvious insanity on a fairly regular basis.
I like to think that when it’s obvious that someone has taken the time to search for someone’s email address, and then gone to the bother of writing them a private and personal message, it lends a degree of sincerity to calling them a fucking insane bitch.
Lolsnort…..
Date: 12/01/2026 14:43:11
From: Cymek
ID: 2349315
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
captain_spalding said:
kii said:
Her Facebook profile is public. I unfriended her years ago, but I like to check her obvious insanity on a fairly regular basis.
I like to think that when it’s obvious that someone has taken the time to search for someone’s email address, and then gone to the bother of writing them a private and personal message, it lends a degree of sincerity to calling them a fucking insane bitch.
Lolsnort…..
If they are particularly nasty, sign then up to all sorts of spam.
Date: 12/01/2026 14:45:04
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2349316
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
kii said:
captain_spalding said:
I like to think that when it’s obvious that someone has taken the time to search for someone’s email address, and then gone to the bother of writing them a private and personal message, it lends a degree of sincerity to calling them a fucking insane bitch.
Lolsnort…..
If they are particularly nasty, sign then up to all sorts of spam.

Date: 12/01/2026 14:48:50
From: Michael V
ID: 2349318
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Neophyte said:

Ugh!
Date: 12/01/2026 15:45:33
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2349339
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The US attorney’s office in the District of Columbia has opened a criminal investigation into Jerome Powell, the chair of the Federal Reserve, in a move experts say could threaten the credibility of the American central bank.
LOL “could threaten the credibility of” seriously what the fornication
like deity’s fornicating son how much slack do these fascists get, the whole damn place is captured and reporting is still clinging to the idea that a few pockets of resistance* make everything AAA rated
*: we’re taking it at face value that
Mr Powell says he was threatened with criminal charges because he had set interest rates based on economic analysis rather than politics.
Date: 12/01/2026 15:53:59
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2349343
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 12/01/2026 19:10:02
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2349469
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
alleged
“I have asked the clergy of the diocese to make sure their affairs are in order and they have written their wills.,not the time for statements. It is time to put our bodies between the powers of this world and the most vulnerable”
- Bishop Rob
Date: 13/01/2026 22:51:23
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2349882
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
alleged

Date: 13/01/2026 23:14:06
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2349887
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
alleged


Date: 14/01/2026 09:14:21
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2349911
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 14/01/2026 09:26:59
From: roughbarked
ID: 2349913
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 14/01/2026 09:33:49
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2349914
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
LOL
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-01-14/clintons-refuse-to-testify-to-epstein-investigation/106226996
Late night TV hosts will rally around Bill, a few guest appearances, maybe play the sax for a bit.
I’ll be just like last time.
Date: 14/01/2026 09:59:28
From: fsm
ID: 2349921
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 14/01/2026 10:02:49
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2349922
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
fsm said:

OK so I think this is fake. Apart from this post on facebook, there’s no other evidence that this post exists. It’s not on Twitter, it’s not on Truth Social, there’s no discourse on any social media other than Facebook.
Then there’s actual fact checking:
https://en.royanews.tv/news/66596/Users-share-fake-screenshot-claiming-Trump-wants-alcohol-ban
Date: 14/01/2026 10:03:27
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2349923
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
…and the profile pic is not his current one on any platform.
Date: 14/01/2026 10:51:51
From: Michael V
ID: 2349929
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
fsm said:

OK so I think this is fake. Apart from this post on facebook, there’s no other evidence that this post exists. It’s not on Twitter, it’s not on Truth Social, there’s no discourse on any social media other than Facebook.
Then there’s actual fact checking:
https://en.royanews.tv/news/66596/Users-share-fake-screenshot-claiming-Trump-wants-alcohol-ban
Thanks for checking.
Date: 14/01/2026 12:37:27
From: buffy
ID: 2349968
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
fsm said:

OK so I think this is fake. Apart from this post on facebook, there’s no other evidence that this post exists. It’s not on Twitter, it’s not on Truth Social, there’s no discourse on any social media other than Facebook.
Then there’s actual fact checking:
https://en.royanews.tv/news/66596/Users-share-fake-screenshot-claiming-Trump-wants-alcohol-ban
Does it matter? He makes stuff up…so the precedent has been set by the highest…
Date: 14/01/2026 13:10:44
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2349989
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Divine Angel said:
fsm said:

OK so I think this is fake. Apart from this post on facebook, there’s no other evidence that this post exists. It’s not on Twitter, it’s not on Truth Social, there’s no discourse on any social media other than Facebook.
Then there’s actual fact checking:
https://en.royanews.tv/news/66596/Users-share-fake-screenshot-claiming-Trump-wants-alcohol-ban
Does it matter? He makes stuff up…so the precedent has been set by the highest…
Yeah, but Trump reckons that his opponents made stuff up first.
Date: 14/01/2026 13:12:15
From: dv
ID: 2349991
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I don’t even understand the motivation to make up stuff about Trump. His genuine words and actions are just about as bad as possible. There’s no need to gild the lily.
Date: 14/01/2026 13:20:36
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2349996
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
I don’t even understand the motivation to make up stuff about Trump. His genuine words and actions are just about as bad as possible. There’s no need to gild the lily.
^
sometimes we wonder if it’s not just an agents provocateurs disinformation play type of thing, paint the antifascists as deranged and making stuff up, try to trick them further off the rails and therefore by extension all objections to the fascists are deranged
ok that’s not true, we’re pretty confident that’s a thing, no need to wonder
Date: 14/01/2026 13:20:43
From: Cymek
ID: 2349997
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
I don’t even understand the motivation to make up stuff about Trump. His genuine words and actions are just about as bad as possible. There’s no need to gild the lily.
He’s really quite trash.
It’s like giving the keys to start World War 3 to a frat boy
Date: 14/01/2026 13:22:42
From: kii
ID: 2349999
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
I don’t even understand the motivation to make up stuff about Trump. His genuine words and actions are just about as bad as possible. There’s no need to gild the lily.
It’s targeting his diehard MAGA fans.
Date: 14/01/2026 13:27:44
From: Michael V
ID: 2350002
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
I don’t even understand the motivation to make up stuff about Trump. His genuine words and actions are just about as bad as possible. There’s no need to gild the lily.
Gild the lily? Nup.
“Shit on puke.”
Date: 14/01/2026 13:29:04
From: dv
ID: 2350004
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
dv said:
I don’t even understand the motivation to make up stuff about Trump. His genuine words and actions are just about as bad as possible. There’s no need to gild the lily.
Gild the lily? Nup.
“Shit on puke.”
befowl the Titan Arum
Date: 14/01/2026 13:30:21
From: roughbarked
ID: 2350006
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
dv said:
I don’t even understand the motivation to make up stuff about Trump. His genuine words and actions are just about as bad as possible. There’s no need to gild the lily.
Gild the lily? Nup.
“Shit on puke.”
Wouldn’t waste good shit or puke on him.
I’m wishin’ and a waitin’ and hopin’ that he’ll be defeated by the rule of law and the will of the people.
Date: 14/01/2026 13:30:23
From: Michael V
ID: 2350007
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Michael V said:
dv said:
I don’t even understand the motivation to make up stuff about Trump. His genuine words and actions are just about as bad as possible. There’s no need to gild the lily.
Gild the lily? Nup.
“Shit on puke.”
befowl the Titan Arum
:)
:)
:)
Date: 14/01/2026 13:32:59
From: Michael V
ID: 2350013
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
dv said:
Michael V said:
Gild the lily? Nup.
“Shit on puke.”
befowl the Titan Arum
:)
:)
:)
Actually, what have chooks got to do with it?
Befoul.
Date: 14/01/2026 13:34:35
From: dv
ID: 2350016
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Michael V said:
dv said:
befowl the Titan Arum
:)
:)
:)
Actually, what have chooks got to do with it?
Befoul.
got me
Date: 14/01/2026 13:42:10
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2350018
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Michael V said:
Michael V said:
dv said:
befowl the Titan Arum
:)
:)
:)
Actually, what have chooks got to do with it?
Befoul.
got me
anyway speaking of roosters and Amorphophallus we have a story, as yous know we pretty much have P2 respirator masks welded to our faces so when we went to see one of these hoping to see it first hand and get a whiff of faeces, we found there was literally no detectable odour at all
Date: 14/01/2026 14:18:35
From: Michael V
ID: 2350043
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
dv said:
Michael V said:
Actually, what have chooks got to do with it?
Befoul.
got me
anyway speaking of roosters and Amorphophallus we have a story, as yous know we pretty much have P2 respirator masks welded to our faces so when we went to see one of these hoping to see it first hand and get a whiff of faeces, we found there was literally no detectable odour at all
Because of the mask?
Or you couldn’t smell it even without the mask?
Date: 14/01/2026 14:33:31
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2350059
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
dv said:
got me
anyway speaking of roosters and Amorphophallus we have a story, as yous know we pretty much have P2 respirator masks welded to our faces so when we went to see one of these hoping to see it first hand and get a whiff of faeces, we found there was literally no detectable odour at all
Because of the mask?
Or you couldn’t smell it even without the mask?
Yeah presumably because of the mask, there were crowds and we weren’t about to take it off and inhale a whole bunch of potential aerosolised respiratory secretions. Got the pictures we wanted and learnt that the flower smell doesn’t go through the mask so we considered it a successful excursion.
Date: 14/01/2026 14:35:25
From: dv
ID: 2350061
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
anyway speaking of roosters and Amorphophallus we have a story, as yous know we pretty much have P2 respirator masks welded to our faces so when we went to see one of these hoping to see it first hand and get a whiff of faeces, we found there was literally no detectable odour at all
Because of the mask?
Or you couldn’t smell it even without the mask?
Yeah presumably because of the mask, there were crowds and we weren’t about to take it off and inhale a whole bunch of potential aerosolised respiratory secretions. Got the pictures we wanted and learnt that the flower smell doesn’t go through the mask so we considered it a successful excursion.
I’m sure you can just order faeces off Temu these days
Date: 14/01/2026 14:38:02
From: roughbarked
ID: 2350065
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
anyway speaking of roosters and Amorphophallus we have a story, as yous know we pretty much have P2 respirator masks welded to our faces so when we went to see one of these hoping to see it first hand and get a whiff of faeces, we found there was literally no detectable odour at all
Because of the mask?
Or you couldn’t smell it even without the mask?
Yeah presumably because of the mask, there were crowds and we weren’t about to take it off and inhale a whole bunch of potential aerosolised respiratory secretions. Got the pictures we wanted and learnt that the flower smell doesn’t go through the mask so we considered it a successful excursion.
good.
Date: 14/01/2026 15:00:01
From: Michael V
ID: 2350076
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
anyway speaking of roosters and Amorphophallus we have a story, as yous know we pretty much have P2 respirator masks welded to our faces so when we went to see one of these hoping to see it first hand and get a whiff of faeces, we found there was literally no detectable odour at all
Because of the mask?
Or you couldn’t smell it even without the mask?
Yeah presumably because of the mask, there were crowds and we weren’t about to take it off and inhale a whole bunch of potential aerosolised respiratory secretions. Got the pictures we wanted and learnt that the flower smell doesn’t go through the mask so we considered it a successful excursion.
Ta.
:)
Date: 14/01/2026 15:14:37
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2350085
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
A higher-resolution photo of Shitler giving the Ford plant worker the finger has been obtained.

Date: 14/01/2026 15:29:04
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2350090
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
anyway while yous were all having fun

(NEXSTAR) – Friday marked three weeks since the congressionally imposed Dec. 19 deadline for the Department of Justice to release the so-called “Epstein files,” and some lawmakers say they won’t let the issue fade as Washington’s focus shifts to the conflict in Venezuela. “Trump, J.D. Vance and Pam Bondi are engaged in one of the greatest cover-ups that we have seen when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said Friday as she left the Capitol.
Date: 14/01/2026 15:29:50
From: Woodie
ID: 2350092
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
Because of the mask?
Or you couldn’t smell it even without the mask?
Yeah presumably because of the mask, there were crowds and we weren’t about to take it off and inhale a whole bunch of potential aerosolised respiratory secretions. Got the pictures we wanted and learnt that the flower smell doesn’t go through the mask so we considered it a successful excursion.
I’m sure you can just order faeces off Temu these days
You are correct, Mr DV. Most stuff on Temu is shit.
Date: 14/01/2026 15:31:23
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2350094
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
anyway while yous were all having fun

(NEXSTAR) – Friday marked three weeks since the congressionally imposed Dec. 19 deadline for the Department of Justice to release the so-called “Epstein files,” and some lawmakers say they won’t let the issue fade as Washington’s focus shifts to the conflict in Venezuela. “Trump, J.D. Vance and Pam Bondi are engaged in one of the greatest cover-ups that we have seen when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said Friday as she left the Capitol.
If no one’s holding them accountable, why bother releasing the files?
Date: 14/01/2026 15:33:50
From: Michael V
ID: 2350096
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 14/01/2026 15:39:16
From: Michael V
ID: 2350099
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 14/01/2026 15:40:14
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2350100
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Ep-what files?
Save this image for future use

Date: 14/01/2026 15:44:33
From: Cymek
ID: 2350103
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
anyway while yous were all having fun

(NEXSTAR) – Friday marked three weeks since the congressionally imposed Dec. 19 deadline for the Department of Justice to release the so-called “Epstein files,” and some lawmakers say they won’t let the issue fade as Washington’s focus shifts to the conflict in Venezuela. “Trump, J.D. Vance and Pam Bondi are engaged in one of the greatest cover-ups that we have seen when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said Friday as she left the Capitol.
How would it be known if information is removed from the files.
Trust is somewhat non existent
Date: 14/01/2026 15:45:58
From: Cymek
ID: 2350105
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
SCIENCE said:
anyway while yous were all having fun

(NEXSTAR) – Friday marked three weeks since the congressionally imposed Dec. 19 deadline for the Department of Justice to release the so-called “Epstein files,” and some lawmakers say they won’t let the issue fade as Washington’s focus shifts to the conflict in Venezuela. “Trump, J.D. Vance and Pam Bondi are engaged in one of the greatest cover-ups that we have seen when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said Friday as she left the Capitol.
If no one’s holding them accountable, why bother releasing the files?
Would proof Trump is a child sex offender by what turns most if not all MAGA supporters away from him.
Date: 14/01/2026 15:46:24
From: Michael V
ID: 2350106
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
Ep-what files?
Save this image for future use

LOLOL
I will, thanks.
:)
Date: 14/01/2026 15:50:18
From: Woodie
ID: 2350108
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
Divine Angel said:
SCIENCE said:
anyway while yous were all having fun

(NEXSTAR) – Friday marked three weeks since the congressionally imposed Dec. 19 deadline for the Department of Justice to release the so-called “Epstein files,” and some lawmakers say they won’t let the issue fade as Washington’s focus shifts to the conflict in Venezuela. “Trump, J.D. Vance and Pam Bondi are engaged in one of the greatest cover-ups that we have seen when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said Friday as she left the Capitol.
If no one’s holding them accountable, why bother releasing the files?
Would proof Trump is a child sex offender by what turns most if not all MAGA supporters away from him.
It wouldn’t matter to the welded on MAGA supporter.
Date: 14/01/2026 16:13:41
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2350118
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Woodie said:
Cymek said:
Divine Angel said:
If no one’s holding them accountable, why bother releasing the files?
Would proof Trump is a child sex offender by what turns most if not all MAGA supporters away from him.
It wouldn’t matter to the welded on MAGA supporter.
exactly, fervent believers respond to information against their belief by believing more strongly
Date: 14/01/2026 16:19:16
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2350120
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
THE “$688 Billion” EXIT: Why China Just Sold US Debt at a Record Loss.
In this dossier, we expose the most important signal of escalating global conflict that almost no one is watching: China’s accelerated liquidation of U.S. Treasury debt. While headlines focus on aircraft carriers and military exercises, the real preparation for conflict is happening in the sovereign bond market — slow, deliberate, and irreversible.
Using the latest U.S. Treasury TIC data, this analysis explains why China has cut its U.S. debt holdings to $688 billion, the lowest level since 2009, and why this is not portfolio rebalancing — it is strategic disengagement.
We break down:
Why sovereign debt reveals intent better than military assets
How China liquidated nearly $600+ billion in U.S. Treasuries
Why selling at a loss signals preparation, not panic
How sanctions on Russia changed China’s risk calculus
Why U.S. allies are being forced to absorb China’s exit
The rise of the “Bagholder Alliance” (UK, Belgium, Japan)
How the Treasury market is becoming political, not economic
Why bonds are no longer risk-free assets
How China is converting paper claims into gold, oil, copper, and food
What a transition from financial reserves to physical stockpiles means
This is not a market event.
It is a geopolitical divorce.
When the second-largest holder of your debt decides it is a liability, the system is already breaking — it just hasn’t admitted it yet.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3LcG_tJ0rn4
Date: 14/01/2026 16:21:55
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2350121
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Woodie said:
dv said:
SCIENCE said:
Yeah presumably because of the mask, there were crowds and we weren’t about to take it off and inhale a whole bunch of potential aerosolised respiratory secretions. Got the pictures we wanted and learnt that the flower smell doesn’t go through the mask so we considered it a successful excursion.
I’m sure you can just order faeces off Temu these days
You are correct, Mr DV. Most stuff on Temu is shit.
dynamic lifter or kopi luwak
Date: 14/01/2026 16:32:35
From: Cymek
ID: 2350124
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
THE “$688 Billion” EXIT: Why China Just Sold US Debt at a Record Loss.
In this dossier, we expose the most important signal of escalating global conflict that almost no one is watching: China’s accelerated liquidation of U.S. Treasury debt. While headlines focus on aircraft carriers and military exercises, the real preparation for conflict is happening in the sovereign bond market — slow, deliberate, and irreversible.
Using the latest U.S. Treasury TIC data, this analysis explains why China has cut its U.S. debt holdings to $688 billion, the lowest level since 2009, and why this is not portfolio rebalancing — it is strategic disengagement.
We break down:
Why sovereign debt reveals intent better than military assets
How China liquidated nearly $600+ billion in U.S. Treasuries
Why selling at a loss signals preparation, not panic
How sanctions on Russia changed China’s risk calculus
Why U.S. allies are being forced to absorb China’s exit
The rise of the “Bagholder Alliance” (UK, Belgium, Japan)
How the Treasury market is becoming political, not economic
Why bonds are no longer risk-free assets
How China is converting paper claims into gold, oil, copper, and food
What a transition from financial reserves to physical stockpiles means
This is not a market event.
It is a geopolitical divorce.
When the second-largest holder of your debt decides it is a liability, the system is already breaking — it just hasn’t admitted it yet.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3LcG_tJ0rn4
China could conquer the world just by buying up everything
No death or destruction directly anyway and its all legal.
Everyone sells off assets for short term gain that appeals to greed
Date: 14/01/2026 16:46:55
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2350130
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
THE “$688 Billion” EXIT: Why China Just Sold US Debt at a Record Loss.
In this dossier, we expose the most important signal of escalating global conflict that almost no one is watching: China’s accelerated liquidation of U.S. Treasury debt. While headlines focus on aircraft carriers and military exercises, the real preparation for conflict is happening in the sovereign bond market — slow, deliberate, and irreversible.
Using the latest U.S. Treasury TIC data, this analysis explains why China has cut its U.S. debt holdings to $688 billion, the lowest level since 2009, and why this is not portfolio rebalancing — it is strategic disengagement.
We break down:
Why sovereign debt reveals intent better than military assets
How China liquidated nearly $600+ billion in U.S. Treasuries
Why selling at a loss signals preparation, not panic
How sanctions on Russia changed China’s risk calculus
Why U.S. allies are being forced to absorb China’s exit
The rise of the “Bagholder Alliance” (UK, Belgium, Japan)
How the Treasury market is becoming political, not economic
Why bonds are no longer risk-free assets
How China is converting paper claims into gold, oil, copper, and food
What a transition from financial reserves to physical stockpiles means
This is not a market event.
It is a geopolitical divorce.
When the second-largest holder of your debt decides it is a liability, the system is already breaking — it just hasn’t admitted it yet.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3LcG_tJ0rn4
Doesn’t the debt just get passed around the table?
Date: 14/01/2026 16:49:56
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2350134
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
‘We executed one of you’: Viral video shows Michigan CEO shouting at protestors
Jayden Scott resigns as CEO of Harmony Investment Group
A viral video showed a Michigan CEO shouting at protestors, calling some “f—king terrorists” and saying, “We executed one of you yesterday.”
Jayden Scott, of Bay City, was the CEO of Harmony Investment Group at the time of protests in Minneapolis following the death of Renee Nicole Good, who was shot by an ICE officer.
An Instagram video that has over 85,000 likes and nearly 20,00 comments shows Scott speaking with a megaphone on Jan. 8, 2026, near authorities and anti-ICE protestors.
Here’s what’s said in the video:
The storm is here. When we come one, we go all. No one can stop what is coming. Get here guys to Minnesota. These people are f—king terrorists.
Patriots get out here. We need the backup. And all of you liberal commie (expletive), keep your hands to yourself or you’re going to get hurt today, alright? We executed one of you yesterday. We executed one of you yesterday, you understand that? We executed one of you yesterday. Don’t get hurt. Don’t get hurt. Don’t get hurt.
You guys keep playing stupid games, you’re going to keep getting stupid prizes. You guys keep playing stupid games, you’re going to keep gettin stupid prizes.
Two days later, on Saturday, Jan. 10, Scott posted on LinkedIn that he’s resigning as the health care firm’s CEO.
Here’s what Scott said in his post:
It is with a sad heart I announce my departure and formal resignation of Harmony Investment Group,
With recent developments in America, the board and I have decieded, we have different views of the future of America.
It was a great run.
We built many great things.
Mountains were moved.
Fortunes were made.
Until next time,
So long my friends.
Thank you for everything.
https://www.clickondetroit.com/news/local/2026/01/13/we-executed-one-of-you-viral-video-shows-michigan-ceo-shouting-at-protestors/
Date: 14/01/2026 17:01:12
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2350136
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
‘We executed one of you’: Viral video shows Michigan CEO shouting at protestors
Jayden Scott resigns as CEO of Harmony Investment Group
A viral video showed a Michigan CEO shouting at protestors, calling some “f—king terrorists” and saying, “We executed one of you yesterday.”
Jayden Scott, of Bay City, was the CEO of Harmony Investment Group at the time of protests in Minneapolis following the death of Renee Nicole Good, who was shot by an ICE officer.
An Instagram video that has over 85,000 likes and nearly 20,00 comments shows Scott speaking with a megaphone on Jan. 8, 2026, near authorities and anti-ICE protestors.
Here’s what’s said in the video:
The storm is here. When we come one, we go all. No one can stop what is coming. Get here guys to Minnesota. These people are f—king terrorists.
Patriots get out here. We need the backup. And all of you liberal commie (expletive), keep your hands to yourself or you’re going to get hurt today, alright? We executed one of you yesterday. We executed one of you yesterday, you understand that? We executed one of you yesterday. Don’t get hurt. Don’t get hurt. Don’t get hurt.
You guys keep playing stupid games, you’re going to keep getting stupid prizes. You guys keep playing stupid games, you’re going to keep gettin stupid prizes.
Two days later, on Saturday, Jan. 10, Scott posted on LinkedIn that he’s resigning as the health care firm’s CEO.
Here’s what Scott said in his post:
It is with a sad heart I announce my departure and formal resignation of Harmony Investment Group,
With recent developments in America, the board and I have decieded, we have different views of the future of America.
It was a great run.
We built many great things.
Mountains were moved.
Fortunes were made.
Until next time,
So long my friends.
Thank you for everything.
https://www.clickondetroit.com/news/local/2026/01/13/we-executed-one-of-you-viral-video-shows-michigan-ceo-shouting-at-protestors/
Afraid of Luigi Mangione copycats?
Date: 14/01/2026 17:02:18
From: furious
ID: 2350137
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Spiny Norman said:
‘We executed one of you’: Viral video shows Michigan CEO shouting at protestors
Jayden Scott resigns as CEO of Harmony Investment Group
A viral video showed a Michigan CEO shouting at protestors, calling some “f—king terrorists” and saying, “We executed one of you yesterday.”
Jayden Scott, of Bay City, was the CEO of Harmony Investment Group at the time of protests in Minneapolis following the death of Renee Nicole Good, who was shot by an ICE officer.
An Instagram video that has over 85,000 likes and nearly 20,00 comments shows Scott speaking with a megaphone on Jan. 8, 2026, near authorities and anti-ICE protestors.
Here’s what’s said in the video:
The storm is here. When we come one, we go all. No one can stop what is coming. Get here guys to Minnesota. These people are f—king terrorists.
Patriots get out here. We need the backup. And all of you liberal commie (expletive), keep your hands to yourself or you’re going to get hurt today, alright? We executed one of you yesterday. We executed one of you yesterday, you understand that? We executed one of you yesterday. Don’t get hurt. Don’t get hurt. Don’t get hurt.
You guys keep playing stupid games, you’re going to keep getting stupid prizes. You guys keep playing stupid games, you’re going to keep gettin stupid prizes.
Two days later, on Saturday, Jan. 10, Scott posted on LinkedIn that he’s resigning as the health care firm’s CEO.
Here’s what Scott said in his post:
It is with a sad heart I announce my departure and formal resignation of Harmony Investment Group,
With recent developments in America, the board and I have decieded, we have different views of the future of America.
It was a great run.
We built many great things.
Mountains were moved.
Fortunes were made.
Until next time,
So long my friends.
Thank you for everything.
https://www.clickondetroit.com/news/local/2026/01/13/we-executed-one-of-you-viral-video-shows-michigan-ceo-shouting-at-protestors/
Afraid of Luigi Mangione copycats?
That line there tells you their priorities…
Date: 14/01/2026 17:14:21
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2350142
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
China could conquer the world just by buying up everything
¿ref
Date: 14/01/2026 17:19:29
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2350146
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
Spiny Norman said:
THE “$688 Billion” EXIT: Why China Just Sold US Debt at a Record Loss.
In this dossier, we expose the most important signal of escalating global conflict that almost no one is watching: China’s accelerated liquidation of U.S. Treasury debt. While headlines focus on aircraft carriers and military exercises, the real preparation for conflict is happening in the sovereign bond market — slow, deliberate, and irreversible.
Using the latest U.S. Treasury TIC data, this analysis explains why China has cut its U.S. debt holdings to $688 billion, the lowest level since 2009, and why this is not portfolio rebalancing — it is strategic disengagement.
We break down:
Why sovereign debt reveals intent better than military assets
How China liquidated nearly $600+ billion in U.S. Treasuries
Why selling at a loss signals preparation, not panic
How sanctions on Russia changed China’s risk calculus
Why U.S. allies are being forced to absorb China’s exit
The rise of the “Bagholder Alliance” (UK, Belgium, Japan)
How the Treasury market is becoming political, not economic
Why bonds are no longer risk-free assets
How China is converting paper claims into gold, oil, copper, and food
What a transition from financial reserves to physical stockpiles means
This is not a market event.
It is a geopolitical divorce.
When the second-largest holder of your debt decides it is a liability, the system is already breaking — it just hasn’t admitted it yet.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3LcG_tJ0rn4
China could conquer the world just by buying up everything
No death or destruction directly anyway and its all legal.
Everyone sells off assets for short term gain that appeals to greed
Maybe ten years ago that might have been an option but the finances of the PRC have deteriorated somewhat lately.
Date: 14/01/2026 17:27:22
From: dv
ID: 2350151
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Maga mindset is to want the USA to be white Iran
Date: 14/01/2026 17:30:35
From: dv
ID: 2350155
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Can’t confirm about the exact odor but the news about the constant outgassing has been reported widely and the repeated trips to the window to look at an imaginary wing are confirmed by the video evidence.
Date: 14/01/2026 17:52:03
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2350167
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

Maga mindset is to want the USA to be white Iran
seriously we do wonder what the expectations are of all the Iranians who allegedly cry out for kkk to save them
Date: 14/01/2026 17:52:41
From: Michael V
ID: 2350168
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Maga mindset is to want the USA to be white Iran
Sigh.
Date: 14/01/2026 18:10:25
From: Michael V
ID: 2350174
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
‘We executed one of you’: Viral video shows Michigan CEO shouting at protestors
Jayden Scott resigns as CEO of Harmony Investment Group
A viral video showed a Michigan CEO shouting at protestors, calling some “f—king terrorists” and saying, “We executed one of you yesterday.”
Jayden Scott, of Bay City, was the CEO of Harmony Investment Group at the time of protests in Minneapolis following the death of Renee Nicole Good, who was shot by an ICE officer.
An Instagram video that has over 85,000 likes and nearly 20,00 comments shows Scott speaking with a megaphone on Jan. 8, 2026, near authorities and anti-ICE protestors.
Here’s what’s said in the video:
The storm is here. When we come one, we go all. No one can stop what is coming. Get here guys to Minnesota. These people are f—king terrorists.
Patriots get out here. We need the backup. And all of you liberal commie (expletive), keep your hands to yourself or you’re going to get hurt today, alright? We executed one of you yesterday. We executed one of you yesterday, you understand that? We executed one of you yesterday. Don’t get hurt. Don’t get hurt. Don’t get hurt.
You guys keep playing stupid games, you’re going to keep getting stupid prizes. You guys keep playing stupid games, you’re going to keep gettin stupid prizes.
Two days later, on Saturday, Jan. 10, Scott posted on LinkedIn that he’s resigning as the health care firm’s CEO.
Here’s what Scott said in his post:
It is with a sad heart I announce my departure and formal resignation of Harmony Investment Group,
With recent developments in America, the board and I have decieded, we have different views of the future of America.
It was a great run.
We built many great things.
Mountains were moved.
Fortunes were made.
Until next time,
So long my friends.
Thank you for everything.
https://www.clickondetroit.com/news/local/2026/01/13/we-executed-one-of-you-viral-video-shows-michigan-ceo-shouting-at-protestors/
No thanks. I’d rather not watch this, having read that ^^.
I think I should go stick my head in the sand.
Date: 14/01/2026 18:17:14
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2350177
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Spiny Norman said:
‘We executed one of you’: Viral video shows Michigan CEO shouting at protestors
Jayden Scott resigns as CEO of Harmony Investment Group
A viral video showed a Michigan CEO shouting at protestors, calling some “f—king terrorists” and saying, “We executed one of you yesterday.”
Jayden Scott, of Bay City, was the CEO of Harmony Investment Group at the time of protests in Minneapolis following the death of Renee Nicole Good, who was shot by an ICE officer.
An Instagram video that has over 85,000 likes and nearly 20,00 comments shows Scott speaking with a megaphone on Jan. 8, 2026, near authorities and anti-ICE protestors.
Here’s what’s said in the video:
The storm is here. When we come one, we go all. No one can stop what is coming. Get here guys to Minnesota. These people are f—king terrorists.
Patriots get out here. We need the backup. And all of you liberal commie (expletive), keep your hands to yourself or you’re going to get hurt today, alright? We executed one of you yesterday. We executed one of you yesterday, you understand that? We executed one of you yesterday. Don’t get hurt. Don’t get hurt. Don’t get hurt.
You guys keep playing stupid games, you’re going to keep getting stupid prizes. You guys keep playing stupid games, you’re going to keep gettin stupid prizes.
Two days later, on Saturday, Jan. 10, Scott posted on LinkedIn that he’s resigning as the health care firm’s CEO.
Here’s what Scott said in his post:
It is with a sad heart I announce my departure and formal resignation of Harmony Investment Group,
With recent developments in America, the board and I have decieded, we have different views of the future of America.
It was a great run.
We built many great things.
Mountains were moved.
Fortunes were made.
Until next time,
So long my friends.
Thank you for everything.
https://www.clickondetroit.com/news/local/2026/01/13/we-executed-one-of-you-viral-video-shows-michigan-ceo-shouting-at-protestors/
No thanks. I’d rather not watch this, having read that ^^.
I think I should go stick my head in the sand.
Have this snorkel.
Date: 14/01/2026 18:26:47
From: Michael V
ID: 2350179
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
Michael V said:
Spiny Norman said:
‘We executed one of you’: Viral video shows Michigan CEO shouting at protestors
Jayden Scott resigns as CEO of Harmony Investment Group
A viral video showed a Michigan CEO shouting at protestors, calling some “f—king terrorists” and saying, “We executed one of you yesterday.”
Jayden Scott, of Bay City, was the CEO of Harmony Investment Group at the time of protests in Minneapolis following the death of Renee Nicole Good, who was shot by an ICE officer.
An Instagram video that has over 85,000 likes and nearly 20,00 comments shows Scott speaking with a megaphone on Jan. 8, 2026, near authorities and anti-ICE protestors.
Here’s what’s said in the video:
The storm is here. When we come one, we go all. No one can stop what is coming. Get here guys to Minnesota. These people are f—king terrorists.
Patriots get out here. We need the backup. And all of you liberal commie (expletive), keep your hands to yourself or you’re going to get hurt today, alright? We executed one of you yesterday. We executed one of you yesterday, you understand that? We executed one of you yesterday. Don’t get hurt. Don’t get hurt. Don’t get hurt.
You guys keep playing stupid games, you’re going to keep getting stupid prizes. You guys keep playing stupid games, you’re going to keep gettin stupid prizes.
Two days later, on Saturday, Jan. 10, Scott posted on LinkedIn that he’s resigning as the health care firm’s CEO.
Here’s what Scott said in his post:
It is with a sad heart I announce my departure and formal resignation of Harmony Investment Group,
With recent developments in America, the board and I have decieded, we have different views of the future of America.
It was a great run.
We built many great things.
Mountains were moved.
Fortunes were made.
Until next time,
So long my friends.
Thank you for everything.
https://www.clickondetroit.com/news/local/2026/01/13/we-executed-one-of-you-viral-video-shows-michigan-ceo-shouting-at-protestors/
No thanks. I’d rather not watch this, having read that ^^.
I think I should go stick my head in the sand.
Have this snorkel.
Ta.
Date: 14/01/2026 20:12:02
From: kii
ID: 2350195
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
‘We executed one of you’: Viral video shows Michigan CEO shouting at protestors
Jayden Scott resigns as CEO of Harmony Investment Group
A viral video showed a Michigan CEO shouting at protestors, calling some “f—king terrorists” and saying, “We executed one of you yesterday.”
Jayden Scott, of Bay City, was the CEO of Harmony Investment Group at the time of protests in Minneapolis following the death of Renee Nicole Good, who was shot by an ICE officer.
An Instagram video that has over 85,000 likes and nearly 20,00 comments shows Scott speaking with a megaphone on Jan. 8, 2026, near authorities and anti-ICE protestors.
Here’s what’s said in the video:
The storm is here. When we come one, we go all. No one can stop what is coming. Get here guys to Minnesota. These people are f—king terrorists.
Patriots get out here. We need the backup. And all of you liberal commie (expletive), keep your hands to yourself or you’re going to get hurt today, alright? We executed one of you yesterday. We executed one of you yesterday, you understand that? We executed one of you yesterday. Don’t get hurt. Don’t get hurt. Don’t get hurt.
You guys keep playing stupid games, you’re going to keep getting stupid prizes. You guys keep playing stupid games, you’re going to keep gettin stupid prizes.
Two days later, on Saturday, Jan. 10, Scott posted on LinkedIn that he’s resigning as the health care firm’s CEO.
Here’s what Scott said in his post:
It is with a sad heart I announce my departure and formal resignation of Harmony Investment Group,
With recent developments in America, the board and I have decieded, we have different views of the future of America.
It was a great run.
We built many great things.
Mountains were moved.
Fortunes were made.
Until next time,
So long my friends.
Thank you for everything.
https://www.clickondetroit.com/news/local/2026/01/13/we-executed-one-of-you-viral-video-shows-michigan-ceo-shouting-at-protestors/
What an absolute wanker.
Date: 14/01/2026 20:21:12
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2350197
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Spiny Norman said:
‘We executed one of you’: Viral video shows Michigan CEO shouting at protestors
Jayden Scott resigns as CEO of Harmony Investment Group
A viral video showed a Michigan CEO shouting at protestors, calling some “f—king terrorists” and saying, “We executed one of you yesterday.”
Jayden Scott, of Bay City, was the CEO of Harmony Investment Group at the time of protests in Minneapolis following the death of Renee Nicole Good, who was shot by an ICE officer.
An Instagram video that has over 85,000 likes and nearly 20,00 comments shows Scott speaking with a megaphone on Jan. 8, 2026, near authorities and anti-ICE protestors.
Here’s what’s said in the video:
The storm is here. When we come one, we go all. No one can stop what is coming. Get here guys to Minnesota. These people are f—king terrorists.
Patriots get out here. We need the backup. And all of you liberal commie (expletive), keep your hands to yourself or you’re going to get hurt today, alright? We executed one of you yesterday. We executed one of you yesterday, you understand that? We executed one of you yesterday. Don’t get hurt. Don’t get hurt. Don’t get hurt.
You guys keep playing stupid games, you’re going to keep getting stupid prizes. You guys keep playing stupid games, you’re going to keep gettin stupid prizes.
Two days later, on Saturday, Jan. 10, Scott posted on LinkedIn that he’s resigning as the health care firm’s CEO.
Here’s what Scott said in his post:
It is with a sad heart I announce my departure and formal resignation of Harmony Investment Group,
With recent developments in America, the board and I have decieded, we have different views of the future of America.
It was a great run.
We built many great things.
Mountains were moved.
Fortunes were made.
Until next time,
So long my friends.
Thank you for everything.
https://www.clickondetroit.com/news/local/2026/01/13/we-executed-one-of-you-viral-video-shows-michigan-ceo-shouting-at-protestors/
What an absolute wanker.
Agree.
A CEO supporting that activity is like aiding and abetting, by sharing the criminal intent, inciting violence and being reckless and destructive.
Not a good CEO.
Date: 14/01/2026 20:46:28
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2350204
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
kii said:
Spiny Norman said:
‘We executed one of you’: Viral video shows Michigan CEO shouting at protestors
Jayden Scott resigns as CEO of Harmony Investment Group
A viral video showed a Michigan CEO shouting at protestors, calling some “f—king terrorists” and saying, “We executed one of you yesterday.”
Jayden Scott, of Bay City, was the CEO of Harmony Investment Group at the time of protests in Minneapolis following the death of Renee Nicole Good, who was shot by an ICE officer.
An Instagram video that has over 85,000 likes and nearly 20,00 comments shows Scott speaking with a megaphone on Jan. 8, 2026, near authorities and anti-ICE protestors.
Here’s what’s said in the video:
The storm is here. When we come one, we go all. No one can stop what is coming. Get here guys to Minnesota. These people are f—king terrorists.
Patriots get out here. We need the backup. And all of you liberal commie (expletive), keep your hands to yourself or you’re going to get hurt today, alright? We executed one of you yesterday. We executed one of you yesterday, you understand that? We executed one of you yesterday. Don’t get hurt. Don’t get hurt. Don’t get hurt.
You guys keep playing stupid games, you’re going to keep getting stupid prizes. You guys keep playing stupid games, you’re going to keep gettin stupid prizes.
Two days later, on Saturday, Jan. 10, Scott posted on LinkedIn that he’s resigning as the health care firm’s CEO.
Here’s what Scott said in his post:
It is with a sad heart I announce my departure and formal resignation of Harmony Investment Group,
With recent developments in America, the board and I have decieded, we have different views of the future of America.
It was a great run.
We built many great things.
Mountains were moved.
Fortunes were made.
Until next time,
So long my friends.
Thank you for everything.
https://www.clickondetroit.com/news/local/2026/01/13/we-executed-one-of-you-viral-video-shows-michigan-ceo-shouting-at-protestors/
What an absolute wanker.
Agree.
A CEO supporting that activity is like aiding and abetting, by sharing the criminal intent, inciting violence and being reckless and destructive.
Not a good CEO.
what do you mean, the corporate military industrial fascism complex is what it’s all about
Date: 14/01/2026 21:10:22
From: dv
ID: 2350209
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2026/jan/04/ice-2025-deaths-timeline
There were 6 deaths among ICE detainees in December 2025, the highest monthly count on record. This brought the total such deaths in 2025 to 32. This is also the highest annual count on record, tied with 2004.
Date: 14/01/2026 21:20:55
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2350211
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Spiny Norman said:
‘We executed one of you’: Viral video shows Michigan CEO shouting at protestors
Jayden Scott resigns as CEO of Harmony Investment Group
A viral video showed a Michigan CEO shouting at protestors, calling some “f—king terrorists” and saying, “We executed one of you yesterday.”
Jayden Scott, of Bay City, was the CEO of Harmony Investment Group at the time of protests in Minneapolis following the death of Renee Nicole Good, who was shot by an ICE officer.
An Instagram video that has over 85,000 likes and nearly 20,00 comments shows Scott speaking with a megaphone on Jan. 8, 2026, near authorities and anti-ICE protestors.
Here’s what’s said in the video:
The storm is here. When we come one, we go all. No one can stop what is coming. Get here guys to Minnesota. These people are f—king terrorists.
Patriots get out here. We need the backup. And all of you liberal commie (expletive), keep your hands to yourself or you’re going to get hurt today, alright? We executed one of you yesterday. We executed one of you yesterday, you understand that? We executed one of you yesterday. Don’t get hurt. Don’t get hurt. Don’t get hurt.
You guys keep playing stupid games, you’re going to keep getting stupid prizes. You guys keep playing stupid games, you’re going to keep gettin stupid prizes.
Two days later, on Saturday, Jan. 10, Scott posted on LinkedIn that he’s resigning as the health care firm’s CEO.
Here’s what Scott said in his post:
It is with a sad heart I announce my departure and formal resignation of Harmony Investment Group,
With recent developments in America, the board and I have decieded, we have different views of the future of America.
It was a great run.
We built many great things.
Mountains were moved.
Fortunes were made.
Until next time,
So long my friends.
Thank you for everything.
https://www.clickondetroit.com/news/local/2026/01/13/we-executed-one-of-you-viral-video-shows-michigan-ceo-shouting-at-protestors/
What an absolute wanker.
You’re far too kind! Fucking moronic cnut springs to mind.
Date: 14/01/2026 22:35:20
From: kii
ID: 2350217
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
kii said:
Spiny Norman said:
‘We executed one of you’: Viral video shows Michigan CEO shouting at protestors
Jayden Scott resigns as CEO of Harmony Investment Group
A viral video showed a Michigan CEO shouting at protestors, calling some “f—king terrorists” and saying, “We executed one of you yesterday.”
Jayden Scott, of Bay City, was the CEO of Harmony Investment Group at the time of protests in Minneapolis following the death of Renee Nicole Good, who was shot by an ICE officer.
An Instagram video that has over 85,000 likes and nearly 20,00 comments shows Scott speaking with a megaphone on Jan. 8, 2026, near authorities and anti-ICE protestors.
Here’s what’s said in the video:
The storm is here. When we come one, we go all. No one can stop what is coming. Get here guys to Minnesota. These people are f—king terrorists.
Patriots get out here. We need the backup. And all of you liberal commie (expletive), keep your hands to yourself or you’re going to get hurt today, alright? We executed one of you yesterday. We executed one of you yesterday, you understand that? We executed one of you yesterday. Don’t get hurt. Don’t get hurt. Don’t get hurt.
You guys keep playing stupid games, you’re going to keep getting stupid prizes. You guys keep playing stupid games, you’re going to keep gettin stupid prizes.
Two days later, on Saturday, Jan. 10, Scott posted on LinkedIn that he’s resigning as the health care firm’s CEO.
Here’s what Scott said in his post:
It is with a sad heart I announce my departure and formal resignation of Harmony Investment Group,
With recent developments in America, the board and I have decieded, we have different views of the future of America.
It was a great run.
We built many great things.
Mountains were moved.
Fortunes were made.
Until next time,
So long my friends.
Thank you for everything.
https://www.clickondetroit.com/news/local/2026/01/13/we-executed-one-of-you-viral-video-shows-michigan-ceo-shouting-at-protestors/
What an absolute wanker.
Agree.
A CEO supporting that activity is like aiding and abetting, by sharing the criminal intent, inciting violence and being reckless and destructive.
Not a good CEO.
CEOs…..corporate psychopaths. There have been studies.
Date: 14/01/2026 22:37:13
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2350219
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
CEOs…..corporate psychopaths. There have been studies.
Don’t need studies.
A septic tank explains it all.
The biggest ones rise to the top.
Date: 15/01/2026 10:29:21
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2350321
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
LOL
free press
FBI agents have searched the home of Washington Post reporter Hannah Natanson, who has covered the Trump administration. The FBI told Ms Natanson she is not the focus of the probe, the Washington Post said.
free speech
oh and wait
An affidavit states the search is instead related to an investigation into leaking by a government contractor who allegedly took home classified documents.
is it not acceptable to take home classified documents
LOL
Date: 15/01/2026 10:32:17
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2350323
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
LOL
Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Antigua and Barbuda, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belize, Bhutan, Bosnia, Brazil, Burma, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Colombia, Congo, Cuba, Dominica, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Fiji, Gambia, Georgia, Ghana, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Haiti, Iran, Iraq, Ivory Coast, Jamaica, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Macedonia, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Nepal, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Pakistan, Republic of the Congo, Russia, Rwanda, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, Thailand, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Uruguay, Uzbekistan and Yemen
wait we thought CHINA was the enemy
LOL
Date: 15/01/2026 10:34:00
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2350324
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
LOL
free press
FBI agents have searched the home of Washington Post reporter Hannah Natanson, who has covered the Trump administration. The FBI told Ms Natanson she is not the focus of the probe, the Washington Post said.
free speech
oh and wait
An affidavit states the search is instead related to an investigation into leaking by a government contractor who allegedly took home classified documents.
is it not acceptable to take home classified documents
LOL
Of course it’s acceptable. If the former president can store classified documents in his bathroom, the average Joe can do it too. Average Joe, not sleepy Joe.
Date: 15/01/2026 10:44:54
From: Michael V
ID: 2350332
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
LOL
free press
FBI agents have searched the home of Washington Post reporter Hannah Natanson, who has covered the Trump administration. The FBI told Ms Natanson she is not the focus of the probe, the Washington Post said.
free speech
oh and wait
An affidavit states the search is instead related to an investigation into leaking by a government contractor who allegedly took home classified documents.
is it not acceptable to take home classified documents
LOL
Unless you are DJT. No rules or laws apply to DJT.
Date: 15/01/2026 10:46:45
From: Michael V
ID: 2350333
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
LOL
Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Antigua and Barbuda, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belize, Bhutan, Bosnia, Brazil, Burma, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Colombia, Congo, Cuba, Dominica, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Fiji, Gambia, Georgia, Ghana, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Haiti, Iran, Iraq, Ivory Coast, Jamaica, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Macedonia, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Nepal, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Pakistan, Republic of the Congo, Russia, Rwanda, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, Thailand, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Uruguay, Uzbekistan and Yemen
wait we thought CHINA was the enemy
LOL
Wait. What is that list? What is it about?
Date: 15/01/2026 10:47:55
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2350334
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
LOL
Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Antigua and Barbuda, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belize, Bhutan, Bosnia, Brazil, Burma, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Colombia, Congo, Cuba, Dominica, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Fiji, Gambia, Georgia, Ghana, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Haiti, Iran, Iraq, Ivory Coast, Jamaica, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Macedonia, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Nepal, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Pakistan, Republic of the Congo, Russia, Rwanda, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, Thailand, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Uruguay, Uzbekistan and Yemen
wait we thought CHINA was the enemy
LOL
Wait. What is that list? What is it about?
It’s a partial list of countries who didn’t invent Chinese special fried rice.
Date: 15/01/2026 11:02:53
From: Michael V
ID: 2350337
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
LOL
Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Antigua and Barbuda, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belize, Bhutan, Bosnia, Brazil, Burma, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Colombia, Congo, Cuba, Dominica, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Fiji, Gambia, Georgia, Ghana, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Haiti, Iran, Iraq, Ivory Coast, Jamaica, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Macedonia, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Nepal, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Pakistan, Republic of the Congo, Russia, Rwanda, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, Thailand, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Uruguay, Uzbekistan and Yemen
wait we thought CHINA was the enemy
LOL
Wait. What is that list? What is it about?
It’s a partial list of countries who didn’t invent Chinese special fried rice.
LOLOLOL
:)
Date: 15/01/2026 11:10:47
From: furious
ID: 2350342
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
Wait. What is that list? What is it about?
It’s a partial list of countries who didn’t invent Chinese special fried rice.
LOLOLOL
:)
Countries from which visas will no longer be processed…
Date: 15/01/2026 11:12:38
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2350344
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
LOL
free press
FBI agents have searched the home of Washington Post reporter Hannah Natanson, who has covered the Trump administration. The FBI told Ms Natanson she is not the focus of the probe, the Washington Post said.
free speech
oh and wait
An affidavit states the search is instead related to an investigation into leaking by a government contractor who allegedly took home classified documents.
is it not acceptable to take home classified documents
LOL
Unless you are DJT. No rules or laws apply to DJT.
Only his own conscience apparently. But in a ironic twist he thinks that the science of conning people.
Date: 15/01/2026 11:12:39
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2350345
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
And in other news, Godwin’s Law has now been downgraded to a mere irrelevant quip.
Date: 15/01/2026 11:27:12
From: Michael V
ID: 2350359
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
LOL
free press
FBI agents have searched the home of Washington Post reporter Hannah Natanson, who has covered the Trump administration. The FBI told Ms Natanson she is not the focus of the probe, the Washington Post said.
free speech
oh and wait
An affidavit states the search is instead related to an investigation into leaking by a government contractor who allegedly took home classified documents.
is it not acceptable to take home classified documents
LOL
Unless you are DJT. No rules or laws apply to DJT.
Only his own conscience apparently. But in a ironic twist he thinks that the science of conning people.
I don’t understand what you mean by the second sentence.
Date: 15/01/2026 11:29:18
From: roughbarked
ID: 2350361
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Michael V said:
Unless you are DJT. No rules or laws apply to DJT.
Only his own conscience apparently. But in a ironic twist he thinks that the science of conning people.
I don’t understand what you mean by the second sentence.
I think he meant the art of the deal?
Date: 15/01/2026 11:31:21
From: Michael V
ID: 2350365
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Only his own conscience apparently. But in a ironic twist he thinks that the science of conning people.
I don’t understand what you mean by the second sentence.
I think he meant the art of the deal?
I could think of several other things WR may have meant, but until he replies, they are all just guesses.
Date: 15/01/2026 11:32:37
From: roughbarked
ID: 2350367
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
I don’t understand what you mean by the second sentence.
I think he meant the art of the deal?
I could think of several other things WR may have meant, but until he replies, they are all just guesses.
nods
Date: 15/01/2026 11:41:46
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2350371
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Only his own conscience apparently. But in a ironic twist he thinks that the science of conning people.
I don’t understand what you mean by the second sentence.
I think he meant the art of the deal?
I could think of several other things WR may have meant, but until he replies, they are all just guesses.
nods
it was a pun and we’r‘n’t offended so it’s good
Date: 15/01/2026 12:22:49
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2350381
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
NATO Collapse and the Greenland Invasion Fantasy
People are convinced the United States is about to invade Greenland.
We’re not.
Not because we’re nice.
Not because we’re scared.
But because doing so would be one of the fastest ways to dismantle American global power without firing a shot back at us.
In this video, I break down why a U.S. invasion of Greenland makes no strategic sense, including:
How it would instantly fracture NATO
Why European bases are critical to U.S. power projection
What happens to U.S. pre-positioned equipment in Europe
How command, control, and intelligence sharing quietly collapse
And why China would love every second of it
Greenland already gives the U.S. what it needs: missile warning, Arctic access, and space tracking. All with Denmark’s permission. Burning down the house to steal your own TV isn’t strategy.
This video isn’t about politics. It’s about logistics, alliances, and how modern military power actually works.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TW_IqPcBdlk
Date: 15/01/2026 12:24:58
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2350384
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Michael V said:
Unless you are DJT. No rules or laws apply to DJT.
Only his own conscience apparently. But in a ironic twist he thinks that the science of conning people.
I don’t understand what you mean by the second sentence.
Conscience = ‘con science’.
Date: 15/01/2026 12:26:48
From: Boris
ID: 2350386
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Michael V said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Only his own conscience apparently. But in a ironic twist he thinks that the science of conning people.
I don’t understand what you mean by the second sentence.
Conscience = ‘con science’.
very witty, witty.
Date: 15/01/2026 12:27:04
From: Michael V
ID: 2350387
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
I could think of several other things WR may have meant, but until he replies, they are all just guesses.
nods
it was a pun and we’r‘n’t offended so it’s good
:)
Thanks. Well done. “it’s” missing…
Date: 15/01/2026 12:32:45
From: dv
ID: 2350388
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
NATO Collapse and the Greenland Invasion Fantasy
People are convinced the United States is about to invade Greenland.
We’re not.
Not because we’re nice.
Not because we’re scared.
But because doing so would be one of the fastest ways to dismantle American global power without firing a shot back at us.
In this video, I break down why a U.S. invasion of Greenland makes no strategic sense, including:
How it would instantly fracture NATO
Why European bases are critical to U.S. power projection
What happens to U.S. pre-positioned equipment in Europe
How command, control, and intelligence sharing quietly collapse
And why China would love every second of it
Greenland already gives the U.S. what it needs: missile warning, Arctic access, and space tracking. All with Denmark’s permission. Burning down the house to steal your own TV isn’t strategy.
This video isn’t about politics. It’s about logistics, alliances, and how modern military power actually works.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TW_IqPcBdlk
It’s a bit of a leap from “this idea makes no sense” to “the US is not going to do this”.
Date: 15/01/2026 12:40:40
From: Michael V
ID: 2350391
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
NATO Collapse and the Greenland Invasion Fantasy
People are convinced the United States is about to invade Greenland.
We’re not.
Not because we’re nice.
Not because we’re scared.
But because doing so would be one of the fastest ways to dismantle American global power without firing a shot back at us.
In this video, I break down why a U.S. invasion of Greenland makes no strategic sense, including:
How it would instantly fracture NATO
Why European bases are critical to U.S. power projection
What happens to U.S. pre-positioned equipment in Europe
How command, control, and intelligence sharing quietly collapse
And why China would love every second of it
Greenland already gives the U.S. what it needs: missile warning, Arctic access, and space tracking. All with Denmark’s permission. Burning down the house to steal your own TV isn’t strategy.
This video isn’t about politics. It’s about logistics, alliances, and how modern military power actually works.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TW_IqPcBdlk
What Ep-files?
Date: 15/01/2026 12:41:39
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2350394
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Spiny Norman said:
NATO Collapse and the Greenland Invasion Fantasy
People are convinced the United States is about to invade Greenland.
We’re not.
Not because we’re nice.
Not because we’re scared.
But because doing so would be one of the fastest ways to dismantle American global power without firing a shot back at us.
In this video, I break down why a U.S. invasion of Greenland makes no strategic sense, including:
How it would instantly fracture NATO
Why European bases are critical to U.S. power projection
What happens to U.S. pre-positioned equipment in Europe
How command, control, and intelligence sharing quietly collapse
And why China would love every second of it
Greenland already gives the U.S. what it needs: missile warning, Arctic access, and space tracking. All with Denmark’s permission. Burning down the house to steal your own TV isn’t strategy.
This video isn’t about politics. It’s about logistics, alliances, and how modern military power actually works.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TW_IqPcBdlk
What Ep-files?

Date: 15/01/2026 12:42:30
From: Michael V
ID: 2350395
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Michael V said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Only his own conscience apparently. But in a ironic twist he thinks that the science of conning people.
I don’t understand what you mean by the second sentence.
Conscience = ‘con science’.
Thank you. The missing “it is” confused my pea-sized brain.
Date: 15/01/2026 12:46:06
From: Michael V
ID: 2350398
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
Spiny Norman said:
NATO Collapse and the Greenland Invasion Fantasy
People are convinced the United States is about to invade Greenland.
We’re not.
Not because we’re nice.
Not because we’re scared.
But because doing so would be one of the fastest ways to dismantle American global power without firing a shot back at us.
In this video, I break down why a U.S. invasion of Greenland makes no strategic sense, including:
How it would instantly fracture NATO
Why European bases are critical to U.S. power projection
What happens to U.S. pre-positioned equipment in Europe
How command, control, and intelligence sharing quietly collapse
And why China would love every second of it
Greenland already gives the U.S. what it needs: missile warning, Arctic access, and space tracking. All with Denmark’s permission. Burning down the house to steal your own TV isn’t strategy.
This video isn’t about politics. It’s about logistics, alliances, and how modern military power actually works.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TW_IqPcBdlk
What Ep-files?

Ta.
Date: 15/01/2026 12:56:16
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2350404
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Three global superpowers collapsed in same pattern before. Spain. Britain. The Soviet Union.
Not by invasion, but by following the same hidden pattern. Today, the United States has already crossed Stage 5 of that exact sequence. This video breaks down the seven stages that destroy empires, why leaders always think they are different, and why history suggests America may be closer to collapse than anyone wants to admit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xs2nBl43hhs
Date: 15/01/2026 13:01:11
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2350410
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Renee Good’s family have hired a law firm who represented George Floyd’s family.
Her ex-FIL is a MAGAt who sides with ICE, said Renee was not “walking with God” now because she married a woman.
Trump said in a recorded message to Good’s biological father that he was “pleased” bio dad is a Trump supporter.
https://archive.md/2026.01.14-070922/https://www.thedailybeast.com/ice-victim-renee-goods-trump-supporting-father-in-law-breaks-silence
Date: 15/01/2026 13:08:46
From: Michael V
ID: 2350414
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Renee Good’s family have hired a law firm who represented George Floyd’s family.
Her ex-FIL is a MAGAt who sides with ICE, said Renee was not “walking with God” now because she married a woman.
Trump said in a recorded message to Good’s biological father that he was “pleased” bio dad is a Trump supporter.
https://archive.md/2026.01.14-070922/https://www.thedailybeast.com/ice-victim-renee-goods-trump-supporting-father-in-law-breaks-silence
:(
Date: 15/01/2026 13:48:40
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2350438
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 15/01/2026 14:12:21
From: Michael V
ID: 2350448
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
A good analysis of the recent shooting.
https://x.com/i/status/2011574791644594467
Ta.
Date: 15/01/2026 14:42:11
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2350457
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
“towards”
gotta love the American obsession

with willful ignorance and convenient blindness
“towards”
Date: 15/01/2026 14:52:23
From: dv
ID: 2350462
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.kgns.tv/2026/01/14/demonstrator-injured-after-federal-agent-fired-projectile-close-range-during-renee-good-protest/
A protester has been left blind in one eye after a DHS agent fired a non-lethal round at his face at close range.
Date: 15/01/2026 14:58:14
From: Michael V
ID: 2350465
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.kgns.tv/2026/01/14/demonstrator-injured-after-federal-agent-fired-projectile-close-range-during-renee-good-protest/
A protester has been left blind in one eye after a DHS agent fired a non-lethal round at his face at close range.
FMD!
Date: 15/01/2026 15:05:27
From: Neophyte
ID: 2350469
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
“towards”
gotta love the American obsession

with willful ignorance and convenient blindness
“towards”
They passed the “You are now entering…” sign some time ago.
Date: 15/01/2026 18:42:23
From: kii
ID: 2350567
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Link.
Trump mispronouncing the names of countries and US states.
Date: 15/01/2026 19:08:56
From: dv
ID: 2350572
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://x.com/LauraLoomer/status/2011131840174731624?s=20

Laura Loomer here is posting this to discredit Republican congressman Thomas Massie, showing a video of him responding to criticisms that he’s too close to the Democrats.
But in the video he says, “I thought you knew. I vote with Republicans 91% of the time, and the 9% I don’t, they’re taking up for pedophiles, starting another war, or bankrupting our country.”
He kind of comes off sounding like a champ.
Date: 15/01/2026 19:40:40
From: dv
ID: 2350577
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://youtu.be/EU0kBVqNM38?si=U1M5NKFCMFnASWX9
Legal Eagles: The DOJ continues to break the law
Date: 15/01/2026 19:45:12
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2350579
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://youtu.be/EU0kBVqNM38?si=U1M5NKFCMFnASWX9
Legal Eagles: The DOJ continues to break the law
Don’t worry, i sent them an e-mail yesterday, reminding them that they’re overdue on this.
Date: 15/01/2026 20:55:13
From: buffy
ID: 2350585
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
My Houston sister finds this amusing…
Link
Date: 15/01/2026 21:11:51
From: Michael V
ID: 2350587
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
My Houston sister finds this amusing…
Link
:)
Date: 15/01/2026 21:17:24
From: dv
ID: 2350588
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
dv said:
https://youtu.be/EU0kBVqNM38?si=U1M5NKFCMFnASWX9
Legal Eagles: The DOJ continues to break the law
Don’t worry, i sent them an e-mail yesterday, reminding them that they’re overdue on this.
In fairness they have a lot to report on lately
Date: 15/01/2026 21:17:52
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2350590
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
How many of Trump’s Administration staff will end up in jail?
Date: 15/01/2026 21:18:20
From: dv
ID: 2350591
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
‘like bad breath mixed with feces–I can’t describe it, but I’ll never forget it.’
— Ford plant worker describing Trump’s odor
Date: 15/01/2026 21:23:11
From: Michael V
ID: 2350593
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
‘like bad breath mixed with feces–I can’t describe it, but I’ll never forget it.’
— Ford plant worker describing Trump’s odor
Is that the guy he gave the finger to?
Date: 15/01/2026 21:24:06
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2350594
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
‘like bad breath mixed with feces–I can’t describe it, but I’ll never forget it.’
— Ford plant worker describing Trump’s odor
Maybe he doesn’t 🚿 🛁 ?
Date: 15/01/2026 22:08:15
From: party_pants
ID: 2350602
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
How many of Trump’s Administration staff will end up in jail?
Hopefully all those left after the main offenders are dragged out into the streets and put to death.
Date: 15/01/2026 22:12:24
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2350603
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 15/01/2026 23:49:25
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2350616
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
LOL

Trump says he doesn’t need Canada as Carney heads to China
As Prime Minister Mark Carney heads to China to ease trade tensions, President Donald Trump reiterated that the U.S. doesn’t need Canadian goods or the CUSMA. Carney was also urged by Ontario’s premier to not back down on tariffs for Chinese EVs.
Date: 15/01/2026 23:54:17
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2350617
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
can’t complain, can’t complain

Date: 16/01/2026 00:29:56
From: dv
ID: 2350620
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5689375-mitch-mcconnell-trump-greenland-threat/
Former Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) warned in a speech on the Senate floor Wednesday that President Trump’s talk of seizing Greenland by force threatens to “incinerate” the nation’s long-standing ties with NATO allies.
McConnell declared that burning the treaty organization that formed after World War II to contain Soviet aggression would be an “unprecedented act of strategic self-harm.”
“Unless and until the president can demonstrate otherwise, then the proposition at hand today is very straightforward: incinerating the hard-won trust of loyal allies in exchange for no meaningful change in U.S. access to the Arctic,” McConnell said on the Senate floor, delivering one of the strongest statements criticizing the Trump administration’s talk about potentially seizing Greenland by force.
Date: 16/01/2026 01:29:26
From: AussieDJ
ID: 2350621
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 16/01/2026 01:42:53
From: AussieDJ
ID: 2350622
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Invading Greenland will cost the US dearly: the NATO countries don’t have to pull a trigger to destroy the US military.
All they have to do is … dump nearly one and a half trillion dollars in US Treasury bonds and blow the US economy out of the water!
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/nUNIDBZhahk
Date: 16/01/2026 03:50:50
From: Michael V
ID: 2350626
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
AussieDJ said:

:)
Date: 16/01/2026 04:06:14
From: Michael V
ID: 2350627
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
AussieDJ said:

:)
It is real; it does work.
Date: 16/01/2026 06:57:48
From: roughbarked
ID: 2350629
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Michael V said:
AussieDJ said:

:)
It is real; it does work.
Sooner or later Mr Trump is going to become incensed about this.
Date: 16/01/2026 07:08:47
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2350630
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:Michael V said:
:)
It is real; it does work.
Sooner or later Mr Trump is going to become incensed about this.
good good
US President Donald Trump says he could invoke the Insurrection Act and deploy troops to the US city of Minneapolis as protests against his administration’s immigration crackdown roil the city.
Date: 16/01/2026 07:41:02
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2350632
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
It is real; it does work.
Sooner or later Mr Trump is going to become incensed about this.
good good
US President Donald Trump says he could invoke the Insurrection Act and deploy troops to the US city of Minneapolis as protests against his administration’s immigration crackdown roil the city.
excellent

Date: 16/01/2026 08:28:13
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2350642
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
tolerance for diversity in Australia is the problem
Several faculty groups have denounced the Trump administration’s efforts to obtain information about Jewish professors, staff and students at the University of Pennsylvania – including personal emails, phone numbers and home addresses – as government abuse with “ominous historical overtones”.
wait
ahahahahahahahaha
Date: 16/01/2026 08:32:27
From: roughbarked
ID: 2350643
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
tolerance for diversity in Australia is the problem
Several faculty groups have denounced the Trump administration’s efforts to obtain information about Jewish professors, staff and students at the University of Pennsylvania – including personal emails, phone numbers and home addresses – as government abuse with “ominous historical overtones”.
wait
ahahahahahahahaha
SBS have played the movie ‘the great dictator’ a number of times recently.
Date: 16/01/2026 09:10:36
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2350647
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
this is how this shit works
Venezuela’s opposition leader María Corina Machado says she has given her Nobel Peace Prize to US President Donald Trump.
status symbols
Date: 16/01/2026 09:10:36
From: roughbarked
ID: 2350648
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

What?
Date: 16/01/2026 09:10:53
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2350649
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 16/01/2026 09:13:01
From: Boris
ID: 2350652
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
What?
makes no difference. history won’t record he won it.
Date: 16/01/2026 09:14:26
From: roughbarked
ID: 2350654
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Boris said:
roughbarked said:
What?
makes no difference. history won’t record he won it.
True.
Date: 16/01/2026 09:14:41
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2350655
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Boris said:
roughbarked said:

What?
makes no difference. history won’t record he won it.
obviously the prize is trash but now it’s more trash
Date: 16/01/2026 09:15:12
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2350656
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
What?
Of course he’ll accept it. Probably hold a ticker tape parade down DC to show what a wonderful person he is and everyone knows it
Date: 16/01/2026 09:15:53
From: roughbarked
ID: 2350657
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Boris said:
roughbarked said:

What?
makes no difference. history won’t record he won it.
obviously the prize is trash but now it’s more trash
Trump has trashed everything he touches,
Date: 16/01/2026 09:16:17
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2350658
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
It was probably a bribe anyway. Remove whats-his-name, install me, you get my Peace Prize.
Date: 16/01/2026 09:18:56
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2350659
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
It was probably a bribe anyway. Remove whats-his-name, install me, you get my Peace Prize.
no way
surely not
Date: 16/01/2026 09:19:40
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2350660
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
Boris said:
makes no difference. history won’t record he won it.
obviously the prize is trash but now it’s more trash
Trump has trashed everything he touches,
pretty sure it’s been observed by others here before that there seems to be a historical pattern of using it as a legitimacy stamp to follow up with some atrocities
(or not even but yeah)
Date: 16/01/2026 09:21:22
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2350661
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I’m surprised he didn’t say he was offered TIME Person of the Year and turned it down… again.
Date: 16/01/2026 09:22:44
From: roughbarked
ID: 2350662
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
I’m surprised he didn’t say he was offered TIME Person of the Year and turned it down… again.
So that’s his excuse for not being the cover picture?
Date: 16/01/2026 09:25:03
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2350664
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
I’m surprised he didn’t say he was offered TIME Person of the Year and turned it down… again.
So that’s his excuse for not being the cover picture?
isn’t he the centerfold
Date: 16/01/2026 09:25:54
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2350665
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
I’m surprised he didn’t say he was offered TIME Person of the Year and turned it down… again.
So that’s his excuse for not being the cover picture?
Even Hitler was Man of the Year.
Date: 16/01/2026 09:26:12
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2350666
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
I’m surprised he didn’t say he was offered TIME Person of the Year and turned it down… again.
So that’s his excuse for not being the cover picture?
isn’t he the centerfold
Excuse me while I bleach my eyes.
Date: 16/01/2026 09:26:50
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2350667
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
US President Donald Trump says he could invoke the Insurrection Act and deploy troops to the US city of Minneapolis as protests against his administration’s immigration crackdown roil the city.
speaking of “observed by others here before” we think he hasn’t done this yet so it can’t possibly happen
Date: 16/01/2026 09:27:09
From: roughbarked
ID: 2350668
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
So that’s his excuse for not being the cover picture?
isn’t he the centerfold
Excuse me while I bleach my eyes.
!
Date: 16/01/2026 09:30:20
From: roughbarked
ID: 2350669
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
SCIENCE said:
US President Donald Trump says he could invoke the Insurrection Act and deploy troops to the US city of Minneapolis as protests against his administration’s immigration crackdown roil the city.
speaking of “observed by others here before” we think he hasn’t done this yet so it can’t possibly happen
When the people of Minneapolis. actually insurrect, maybe. However, they are beiing directed to not cause Trump any excuse.
Date: 16/01/2026 09:34:16
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2350671
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
SCIENCE said:
US President Donald Trump says he could invoke the Insurrection Act and deploy troops to the US city of Minneapolis as protests against his administration’s immigration crackdown roil the city.
speaking of “observed by others here before” we think he hasn’t done this yet so it can’t possibly happen
When the people of Minneapolis. actually insurrect, maybe. However, they are beiing directed to not cause Trump any excuse.
so just get rounded up
Date: 16/01/2026 09:34:21
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2350672
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
SCIENCE said:
US President Donald Trump says he could invoke the Insurrection Act and deploy troops to the US city of Minneapolis as protests against his administration’s immigration crackdown roil the city.
speaking of “observed by others here before” we think he hasn’t done this yet so it can’t possibly happen
When the people of Minneapolis. actually insurrect, maybe. However, they are beiing directed to not cause Trump any excuse.
Now’s a great time to watch Civil War, starring Kirsten Dunst.
My sister and I watched it when it was first released. My sister said, “pfft, that would never happen…” I replied, “It will if Trump loses the election”, which obviously he didn’t. But she rewatched it the other day and texted me that it was now like watching a documentary unfolding in real time.
Date: 16/01/2026 09:37:30
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2350674
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
I’m surprised he didn’t say he was offered TIME Person of the Year and turned it down… again.
So that’s his excuse for not being the cover picture?
Even Hitler was Man of the Year.
we thought their line was that they pay homage to the most influential main character of the global cast (the upper caste) and the unspoken bit was that influence and main are determined by the same measure that makes the most important figure of a household the real man who wears pants and brings home the bacon and not the woman in the kitchen raising the 15 children including her stepchildren
Date: 16/01/2026 09:41:19
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2350679
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
speaking of “observed by others here before” we think he hasn’t done this yet so it can’t possibly happen
When the people of Minneapolis. actually insurrect, maybe. However, they are beiing directed to not cause Trump any excuse.
Now’s a great time to watch Civil War, starring Kirsten Dunst.
My sister and I watched it when it was first released. My sister said, “pfft, that would never happen…” I replied, “It will if Trump loses the election”, which obviously he didn’t. But she rewatched it the other day and texted me that it was now like watching a documentary unfolding in real time.
but he won
Date: 16/01/2026 10:44:26
From: Michael V
ID: 2350696
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Divine Angel said:
It was probably a bribe anyway. Remove whats-his-name, install me, you get my Peace Prize.
no way
surely not
:)
Date: 16/01/2026 10:54:06
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2350698
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Can they make impeachment faster?
Date: 16/01/2026 10:55:08
From: roughbarked
ID: 2350700
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
Can they make impeachment faster?
Have to wait until the democrats get back in control of the senate?
Date: 16/01/2026 11:04:10
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2350708
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
Can they make impeachment faster?
Impeachment is a like a Tuesday. Doesn’t matter, he doesn’t care. Nothing happens.
Date: 16/01/2026 11:33:07
From: Cymek
ID: 2350732
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Something I remember being mentioned ages ago
You can start to see the beginnings of empires declining when they stop fixing basic infrastructure in the own nation.
To busy showing off with weapons and propaganda and showing the world a false version of the nation.
Date: 16/01/2026 13:04:12
From: dv
ID: 2350763
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 16/01/2026 13:06:15
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2350765
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

I thought it was already named the Dept of War? 🤔
Date: 16/01/2026 13:09:20
From: furious
ID: 2350767
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

Is that like an off brand Justice League?
Date: 16/01/2026 13:12:01
From: Cymek
ID: 2350768
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

Dear Mr Trump
The rest of the world (yes it does exist outside of the USA)
Has created a Board of Peace, except its Piss Off
Date: 16/01/2026 13:12:01
From: Michael V
ID: 2350769
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

Gourd!
Date: 16/01/2026 13:15:16
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2350771
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
dv said:

I thought it was already named the Dept of War? 🤔
You’re confusing Trump’s Board of Peace with Trump’s Platform of Aggression.
Date: 16/01/2026 13:26:52
From: Neophyte
ID: 2350773
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Divine Angel said:
dv said:

I thought it was already named the Dept of War? 🤔
You’re confusing Trump’s Board of Peace with Trump’s Platform of Aggression.
Given time (like with matters Greenlandish) it can be changed to Bored Of Peace
Date: 16/01/2026 13:41:41
From: Cymek
ID: 2350776
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Neophyte said:
captain_spalding said:
Divine Angel said:
I thought it was already named the Dept of War? 🤔
You’re confusing Trump’s Board of Peace with Trump’s Platform of Aggression.
Given time (like with matters Greenlandish) it can be changed to Bored Of Peace
I can imagine invading Greenland would be a very bad move.
War between NATO and the USA.
NATO and European leaders must find him a disgusting human to deal with.
The USA could find all military bases not on USA soil are closed and they are told to leave.
Aircraft carriers are no longer impenetrable and all their forward strike capability is lost
Date: 16/01/2026 13:43:26
From: Michael V
ID: 2350778
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Neophyte said:
captain_spalding said:
Divine Angel said:
I thought it was already named the Dept of War? 🤔
You’re confusing Trump’s Board of Peace with Trump’s Platform of Aggression.
Given time (like with matters Greenlandish) it can be changed to Bored Of Peace
Ha!
Date: 16/01/2026 14:09:05
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2350782
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Imagine a president who never washes himself.
No wonder there’s a smell problem.
Date: 16/01/2026 14:11:00
From: btm
ID: 2350783
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

War is peace!
Freedom is slavery!
Ignorance is strength!
Date: 16/01/2026 14:33:11
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2350786
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
btm said:
dv said:

War is peace!
Freedom is slavery!
Ignorance is strength!
0×7C0 is about the big bad dangers of communism and universal health care¡
Date: 16/01/2026 14:33:29
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2350787
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
Imagine a president who never washes himself.
No wonder there’s a smell problem.
out damned spot
Date: 16/01/2026 14:35:34
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2350789
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
furious said:
dv said:

Is that like an off brand Justice League?
it’s like the unpeace keepers
Date: 16/01/2026 14:36:55
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2350790
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Imagine a president who never washes himself.
No wonder there’s a smell problem.
out damned spot
And here I was just thinking that reading Macbeth in high school didn’t enrich my life in any meaningful way.
Date: 16/01/2026 14:55:39
From: Michael V
ID: 2350799
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Imagine a president who never washes himself.
No wonder there’s a smell problem.
out damned spot
LOL
Trump would definitely make a terrific Shakespearian study.
:)
Date: 16/01/2026 17:24:28
From: kii
ID: 2350872
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 16/01/2026 17:30:32
From: Neophyte
ID: 2350875
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Machado gives Trumpher Nobel Peace Prize.
She may just come to regret that…
Date: 16/01/2026 17:30:53
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2350876
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 16/01/2026 17:36:30
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2350879
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Neophyte said:
kii said:
Machado gives Trumpher Nobel Peace Prize.
She may just come to regret that…
how
Date: 16/01/2026 17:37:46
From: Michael V
ID: 2350880
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Machado gives Trumpher Nobel Peace Prize.
I wonder what is written there. I can’t seem to find a large enough copy to read it.
Date: 16/01/2026 17:39:02
From: Cymek
ID: 2350881
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
kii said:
Machado gives Trumpher Nobel Peace Prize.
Ugh, that shit eating grin
It’s only about a 5 or 6 on the Emperor Palpatine scale

Date: 16/01/2026 17:42:54
From: Michael V
ID: 2350883
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
kii said:
Machado gives Trumpher Nobel Peace Prize.
I wonder what is written there. I can’t seem to find a large enough copy to read it.
Got one now. Ugh. Such sickly sycophancy.
From: https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-gleefully-seizes-nobel-peace-prize-from-real-winner/#:~:text=Trump%20posted%20about%20the%20meeting%20on%20his,Such%20a%20wonderful%20gesture%20of%20mutual%20respect.

Date: 16/01/2026 17:44:42
From: kii
ID: 2350884
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
kii said:
Machado gives Trumpher Nobel Peace Prize.
I wonder what is written there. I can’t seem to find a large enough copy to read it.

Date: 16/01/2026 17:45:43
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2350885
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Machado gives Trumpher Nobel Peace Prize.
In a world of bickering and fighting among world leaders it refreshing to see two leaders come together in harmony and peace for the common good.
Date: 16/01/2026 17:46:46
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2350886
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Michael V said:
kii said:
Machado gives Trumpher Nobel Peace Prize.
I wonder what is written there. I can’t seem to find a large enough copy to read it.
Got one now. Ugh. Such sickly sycophancy.
From: https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-gleefully-seizes-nobel-peace-prize-from-real-winner/#:~:text=Trump%20posted%20about%20the%20meeting%20on%20his,Such%20a%20wonderful%20gesture%20of%20mutual%20respect.

🤮 🤮 🤮
Date: 16/01/2026 17:48:22
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2350887
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Michael V said:
kii said:
Machado gives Trumpher Nobel Peace Prize.
I wonder what is written there. I can’t seem to find a large enough copy to read it.

She’s only got a small tenuous grip on it; he’s got a two-handed death grip on it.
Date: 16/01/2026 17:50:48
From: Boris
ID: 2350888
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
he didn’t win it so it is a hollow jesture.
Date: 16/01/2026 18:11:34
From: Michael V
ID: 2350892
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Michael V said:
kii said:
Machado gives Trumpher Nobel Peace Prize.
I wonder what is written there. I can’t seem to find a large enough copy to read it.

Thanks.
Much easier to read.
:)
Date: 16/01/2026 18:21:29
From: Cymek
ID: 2350894
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
kii said:
Machado gives Trumpher Nobel Peace Prize.
In a world of bickering and fighting among world leaders it refreshing to see two leaders come together in harmony and peace for the common good.
It’s a pity various world leaders can’t be held accountable for their actions.
I assume it’s why hell was invented so people thought this prick will get his comeuppance once dead
Date: 16/01/2026 20:02:30
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2350911
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
Peak Warming Man said:
kii said:

Machado gives Trumpher Nobel Peace Prize.
In a world of bickering and fighting among world leaders it refreshing to see two leaders come together in harmony and peace for the common good.
It’s a pity various world leaders can’t be held accountable for their actions.
I assume it’s why hell was invented so people thought this prick will get his comeuppance once dead
pretty sure once you’re high up enough you only fall further upwards
Date: 16/01/2026 20:12:57
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2350914
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Cymek said:
Peak Warming Man said:
In a world of bickering and fighting among world leaders it refreshing to see two leaders come together in harmony and peace for the common good.
It’s a pity various world leaders can’t be held accountable for their actions.
I assume it’s why hell was invented so people thought this prick will get his comeuppance once dead
pretty sure once you’re high up enough you only fall further upwards
That’s how Qld Health works.
Date: 16/01/2026 20:17:45
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2350915
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Cymek said:
Peak Warming Man said:
In a world of bickering and fighting among world leaders it refreshing to see two leaders come together in harmony and peace for the common good.
It’s a pity various world leaders can’t be held accountable for their actions.
I assume it’s why hell was invented so people thought this prick will get his comeuppance once dead
pretty sure once you’re high up enough you only fall further upwards
Waiting for the Big Beautiful Obituary
Date: 16/01/2026 20:22:04
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2350917
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
SCIENCE said:
Cymek said:
It’s a pity various world leaders can’t be held accountable for their actions.
I assume it’s why hell was invented so people thought this prick will get his comeuppance once dead
pretty sure once you’re high up enough you only fall further upwards
Waiting for the Big Beautiful Obituary
Me, too.
Given the premise that you can’t libel the dead, there’s going to be so much stupid and nasty shit about Trump that will come to light.
Date: 16/01/2026 20:36:17
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2350918
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Divine Angel said:
SCIENCE said:
pretty sure once you’re high up enough you only fall further upwards
Waiting for the Big Beautiful Obituary
Me, too.
Given the premise that you can’t libel the dead, there’s going to be so much stupid and nasty shit about Trump that will come to light.
Considering the stuff we do know… shudder
Date: 16/01/2026 21:23:28
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2350926
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 17/01/2026 01:26:14
From: dv
ID: 2350940
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Turns out this is not the first time a Nobel Prize medal has been given away
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knut_Hamsun
Date: 17/01/2026 06:52:44
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2350944
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Turns out this is not the first time a Nobel Prize medal has been given away
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knut_Hamsun
apparently it involves an absolute Knut and high fascism every time
Date: 17/01/2026 06:55:26
From: roughbarked
ID: 2350945
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
dv said:
Turns out this is not the first time a Nobel Prize medal has been given away
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knut_Hamsun
apparently it involves an absolute Knut and high fascism every time
I see.
Date: 17/01/2026 06:56:18
From: roughbarked
ID: 2350946
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
US President Donald Trump says he may impose trade tariffs on countries that do not support his plans to take over Greenland, which is part of the territory of NATO ally Denmark.
“I may put a tariff on countries if they don’t go along with Greenland, because we need Greenland for national security,” he said at a health roundtable at the White House.
So if the penguins on Heard Island object again?
Date: 17/01/2026 07:09:35
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2350949
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 17/01/2026 07:12:33
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2350950
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
James Carville: Trump Smells SO BAD
so yous lot think it’s funny to poo poo on a poor weak old man but smelling worse than shit is something people can’t change just like personality and if you think it lessens the appeal of dear leader just remember
thousands of people flock to sniff Amorphophallus titanum in the days they’re open too
Date: 17/01/2026 07:36:14
From: roughbarked
ID: 2350951
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
James Carville: Trump Smells SO BAD
so yous lot think it’s funny to poo poo on a poor weak old man but smelling worse than shit is something people can’t change just like personality and if you think it lessens the appeal of dear leader just remember
thousands of people flock to sniff Amorphophallus titanum in the days they’re open too
But the corpse flower doesn’t smell nearly as bad as Trump does. It is more handsome as well.
Date: 17/01/2026 09:58:51
From: Michael V
ID: 2350966
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:

FMD!
Date: 17/01/2026 10:02:03
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2350969
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:

FMD!
It;s to hold the Trump bible, phone, guitar, sneakers, watch, fragrances for men and women etc.
Date: 17/01/2026 10:04:41
From: Michael V
ID: 2350970
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:

FMD!
It’s to hold the Trump bible, phone, guitar, sneakers, watch, fragrances for men and women etc.
Nooooooooo!
Date: 17/01/2026 10:06:55
From: roughbarked
ID: 2350971
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
FMD!
It’s to hold the Trump bible, phone, guitar, sneakers, watch, fragrances for men and women etc.
Nooooooooo!
and a model of the trump tower.
Date: 17/01/2026 10:20:40
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2350976
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:

FMD!
It;s to hold the Trump bible, phone, guitar, sneakers, watch, fragrances for men and women etc.
I had a look at the Trump guilt edged bible, it’s all there, the slaying of 1000 philistines with the ass bone of a Jew, and the eight commandments, he hasn’t left anything out, well not much.
Date: 17/01/2026 11:33:03
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2350999
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 17/01/2026 11:42:33
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2351007
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:

grab them by the pessary
Date: 17/01/2026 12:33:53
From: roughbarked
ID: 2351027
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 17/01/2026 12:45:27
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2351031
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:

Tony must be running short of folding money.
Date: 17/01/2026 13:39:47
From: dv
ID: 2351055
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
We are half a month into this damned year and there’s already so much awful shit out of the US and A.
Date: 17/01/2026 13:47:12
From: kii
ID: 2351060
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
We are half a month into this damned year and there’s already so much awful shit out of the US and A.
Yesterday I cried whilst watching a video about something that happened in the USA and I can’t remember what it was about because I was so upset.
Date: 17/01/2026 14:10:09
From: party_pants
ID: 2351064
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
We are half a month into this damned year and there’s already so much awful shit out of the US and A.
Yeah, they really are going downhill fast. There might be nothing much left of them by the mid-terms in November.
Date: 17/01/2026 14:15:15
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2351068
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
We are half a month into this damned year and there’s already so much awful shit out of the US and A.
It’s awful but it’s not our problem.
We can say, “Not our problem mate, sorry.”
Date: 17/01/2026 14:19:09
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2351070
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Bubblecar said:
dv said:
We are half a month into this damned year and there’s already so much awful shit out of the US and A.
It’s awful but it’s not our problem.
We can say, “Not our problem mate, sorry.”
I only hope it stays that way though. We still have US bases here. Pine Gap, etc.
Date: 17/01/2026 14:27:57
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2351073
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 17/01/2026 14:29:12
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2351074
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
Bubblecar said:
dv said:
We are half a month into this damned year and there’s already so much awful shit out of the US and A.
It’s awful but it’s not our problem.
We can say, “Not our problem mate, sorry.”
I only hope it stays that way though. We still have US bases here. Pine Gap, etc.
Hopefully Rudd’s last communiqué to Washington was something like, “We’re happy to continue hosting the bases but that may change if the moron invades Greenland.”
Date: 17/01/2026 14:31:10
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2351075
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
wait so what is it today
TARIFFS FOR EVERYONE!
Date: 17/01/2026 14:34:16
From: party_pants
ID: 2351077
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Bubblecar said:
dv said:
We are half a month into this damned year and there’s already so much awful shit out of the US and A.
It’s awful but it’s not our problem.
We can say, “Not our problem mate, sorry.”
Indirectly, it will become our problem
Date: 17/01/2026 14:34:33
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2351078
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:
wait so what is it today
TARIFFS FOR EVERYONE!
thought we’d sorted that 8 months ago
ah well
Date: 17/01/2026 14:34:39
From: party_pants
ID: 2351079
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
wait so what is it today
it’s Saturday.
Date: 17/01/2026 14:46:57
From: Michael V
ID: 2351084
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
Bubblecar said:
dv said:
We are half a month into this damned year and there’s already so much awful shit out of the US and A.
It’s awful but it’s not our problem.
We can say, “Not our problem mate, sorry.”
Indirectly, it will become our problem
But there’s bugger all you or can do about it.
Date: 17/01/2026 14:48:08
From: Boris
ID: 2351085
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 17/01/2026 14:51:26
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2351087
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Directly it’s my problem because Mr Mutant works for an American company. Not only that, the price of Ethereum is dictated by the American market, so if that tanks, we’re directly affected and Mr Mutant could be out of a job. When Trump was elected, the crypto market went up (briefly) because techno bros thought he’d be good for crypto. Good for Mr Mutant’s company, good for Mr Mutant.
Date: 17/01/2026 14:51:40
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2351088
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Boris said:

omg lol
Date: 17/01/2026 14:57:47
From: Michael V
ID: 2351089
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Boris said:

Snigger.
Date: 17/01/2026 14:59:14
From: party_pants
ID: 2351092
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
party_pants said:
Bubblecar said:
It’s awful but it’s not our problem.
We can say, “Not our problem mate, sorry.”
Indirectly, it will become our problem
But there’s bugger all you or can do about it.
All we can do is prepare for the worst.
Date: 17/01/2026 15:05:09
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2351094
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
🚨 kii, I’m about to post something in this thread that may trigger you. Don’t click on my next post 🚨
Date: 17/01/2026 15:05:58
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2351095
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 17/01/2026 15:11:18
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2351096
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

This aged not so well.
Date: 17/01/2026 15:13:39
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2351098
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
This aged not so well.
I wonder how that person is doing now.
Date: 17/01/2026 15:21:13
From: party_pants
ID: 2351099
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Spiny Norman said:
This aged not so well.
I wonder how that person is doing now.
probably works for ICE now as a professional thug.
Date: 17/01/2026 15:25:26
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2351101
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
Michael V said:
party_pants said:
Indirectly, it will become our problem
But there’s bugger all you or can do about it.
All we can do is prepare for the worst.
So what, pacifically, do you think we in Australia are likely to face due to Merican insanity?
Date: 17/01/2026 15:30:18
From: party_pants
ID: 2351102
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Bubblecar said:
party_pants said:
Michael V said:
But there’s bugger all you or can do about it.
All we can do is prepare for the worst.
So what, pacifically, do you think we in Australia are likely to face due to Merican insanity?
Massive collapse in our minerals exports to China and Asia. Unemployment, recession and all the stuff that goes along with that. A lot of what China makes from our minerals is exported to the USA to feed their huge consumer market. If that trade collapses then demand for our exports falls too.
Date: 17/01/2026 15:39:47
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2351103
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
Bubblecar said:
party_pants said:
All we can do is prepare for the worst.
So what, pacifically, do you think we in Australia are likely to face due to Merican insanity?
Massive collapse in our minerals exports to China and Asia. Unemployment, recession and all the stuff that goes along with that. A lot of what China makes from our minerals is exported to the USA to feed their huge consumer market. If that trade collapses then demand for our exports falls too.
Fair enough. But China itself will be facing massive change eventually. Dictatorships don’t last forever.
I don’t care about the USA. If they want to self-destruct, I’m happy to point and laugh.
Date: 17/01/2026 15:42:59
From: roughbarked
ID: 2351104
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Bubblecar said:
party_pants said:
Bubblecar said:
So what, pacifically, do you think we in Australia are likely to face due to Merican insanity?
Massive collapse in our minerals exports to China and Asia. Unemployment, recession and all the stuff that goes along with that. A lot of what China makes from our minerals is exported to the USA to feed their huge consumer market. If that trade collapses then demand for our exports falls too.
Fair enough. But China itself will be facing massive change eventually. Dictatorships don’t last forever.
I don’t care about the USA. If they want to self-destruct, I’m happy to point and laugh.
I suppose it won’t hurt to go back to the stone age for a bit.
Date: 17/01/2026 15:44:20
From: party_pants
ID: 2351105
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Bubblecar said:
party_pants said:
Bubblecar said:
So what, pacifically, do you think we in Australia are likely to face due to Merican insanity?
Massive collapse in our minerals exports to China and Asia. Unemployment, recession and all the stuff that goes along with that. A lot of what China makes from our minerals is exported to the USA to feed their huge consumer market. If that trade collapses then demand for our exports falls too.
Fair enough. But China itself will be facing massive change eventually. Dictatorships don’t last forever.
I don’t care about the USA. If they want to self-destruct, I’m happy to point and laugh.
Civilisation itself is complex and fragile. Every country has problems and every government everywhere is in a constant battle of keeping chaos at bay.
I think the concept of western civilisation as a common set of values is now dead. Expect it to fragment and split into multiple groups. I no longer feel like I am part of a shared culture with the US. I am not part of it, I am emotionally divorced from them. They are now “others” to me.
Date: 17/01/2026 15:44:33
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2351106
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Bubblecar said:
party_pants said:
Massive collapse in our minerals exports to China and Asia. Unemployment, recession and all the stuff that goes along with that. A lot of what China makes from our minerals is exported to the USA to feed their huge consumer market. If that trade collapses then demand for our exports falls too.
Fair enough. But China itself will be facing massive change eventually. Dictatorships don’t last forever.
I don’t care about the USA. If they want to self-destruct, I’m happy to point and laugh.
I suppose it won’t hurt to go back to the stone age for a bit.
Australia is hardier than you ‘Stralians seem to think.
Date: 17/01/2026 15:45:06
From: roughbarked
ID: 2351107
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 17/01/2026 15:46:08
From: roughbarked
ID: 2351108
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Bubblecar said:
roughbarked said:
Bubblecar said:
Fair enough. But China itself will be facing massive change eventually. Dictatorships don’t last forever.
I don’t care about the USA. If they want to self-destruct, I’m happy to point and laugh.
I suppose it won’t hurt to go back to the stone age for a bit.
Australia is hardier than you ‘Stralians seem to think.
So we can do without AUKUS than?
Date: 17/01/2026 15:47:10
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2351109
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Bubblecar said:
roughbarked said:
I suppose it won’t hurt to go back to the stone age for a bit.
Australia is hardier than you ‘Stralians seem to think.
So we can do without AUKUS than?
Probably.
Date: 17/01/2026 15:48:11
From: party_pants
ID: 2351110
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Bubblecar said:
roughbarked said:
I suppose it won’t hurt to go back to the stone age for a bit.
Australia is hardier than you ‘Stralians seem to think.
So we can do without AUKUS than?
I think so. The nuclear submarine part of it anyway. By the time we ever get any built the UK will be poor and impoverished and we’ll likely have overtaken them economically. Plus, by that time the US might not be our allies.
Date: 17/01/2026 15:55:01
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2351112
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
This aged not so well.
Well, he was never specific about whose peace and prosperity.
Date: 17/01/2026 15:57:24
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2351113
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:


Date: 17/01/2026 16:00:31
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2351114
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
roughbarked said:
Bubblecar said:
Australia is hardier than you ‘Stralians seem to think.
So we can do without AUKUS than?
I think so. The nuclear submarine part of it anyway. By the time we ever get any built the UK will be poor and impoverished and we’ll likely have overtaken them economically. Plus, by that time the US might not be our allies.
Better get on the phone to Tokyo, then.
Their new Taigei-class (conventional) subs are pretty shit-hot, and you can count on the Japanese delivering.
And, they are ‘examining’ the idea of making their own nuclear boats.
Date: 17/01/2026 16:02:13
From: party_pants
ID: 2351115
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
party_pants said:
roughbarked said:
So we can do without AUKUS than?
I think so. The nuclear submarine part of it anyway. By the time we ever get any built the UK will be poor and impoverished and we’ll likely have overtaken them economically. Plus, by that time the US might not be our allies.
Better get on the phone to Tokyo, then.
Their new Taigei-class (conventional) subs are pretty shit-hot, and you can count on the Japanese delivering.
And, they are ‘examining’ the idea of making their own nuclear boats.
It is what we should have done in the first place, all the way back in about 2014 when the Abbott government announced it.
Date: 17/01/2026 16:06:54
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2351116
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
captain_spalding said:
party_pants said:
I think so. The nuclear submarine part of it anyway. By the time we ever get any built the UK will be poor and impoverished and we’ll likely have overtaken them economically. Plus, by that time the US might not be our allies.
Better get on the phone to Tokyo, then.
Their new Taigei-class (conventional) subs are pretty shit-hot, and you can count on the Japanese delivering.
And, they are ‘examining’ the idea of making their own nuclear boats.
It is what we should have done in the first place, all the way back in about 2014 when the Abbott government announced it.
Yes, we could have had a whole new flotilla of Soryu-class subs by now, and they’re some of the best diesel-electric boats in the world. And, they have the capacity to be upgraded to lithium-ion battery storage, which would double their underwater endurance.
Shop around for nuclear subs, by all means, but we need something good, right now.
Date: 17/01/2026 16:11:28
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2351117
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
party_pants said:
roughbarked said:
So we can do without AUKUS than?
I think so. The nuclear submarine part of it anyway. By the time we ever get any built the UK will be poor and impoverished and we’ll likely have overtaken them economically. Plus, by that time the US might not be our allies.
Better get on the phone to Tokyo, then.
Their new Taigei-class (conventional) subs are pretty shit-hot, and you can count on the Japanese delivering.
And, they are ‘examining’ the idea of making their own nuclear boats.
That does sound like a much better thing.
Date: 17/01/2026 16:13:42
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2351121
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Yes, we could have had a whole new flotilla of Soryu-class subs by now, and they’re some of the best diesel-electric boats in the world. And, they have the capacity to be upgraded to lithium-ion battery storage, which would double their underwater endurance.
FWIW it seems that there’s a new battery chemistry out now that has about double* the performance of regular lithium batteries, so if fitted to those subs it’d be in the order of four times the underwater endurance.
Date: 17/01/2026 17:11:03
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2351133
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Bubblecar said:
party_pants said:
Massive collapse in our minerals exports to China and Asia. Unemployment, recession and all the stuff that goes along with that. A lot of what China makes from our minerals is exported to the USA to feed their huge consumer market. If that trade collapses then demand for our exports falls too.
Fair enough. But China itself will be facing massive change eventually. Dictatorships don’t last forever.
I don’t care about the USA. If they want to self-destruct, I’m happy to point and laugh.
I suppose it won’t hurt to go back to the stone age for a bit.
LOL @ persistent obsessions about demand driven economics
Date: 17/01/2026 18:28:24
From: Michael V
ID: 2351152
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
This aged not so well.
Pollies lie.
Date: 17/01/2026 20:50:51
From: Michael V
ID: 2351200
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
AussieDJ said:
Invading Greenland will cost the US dearly: the NATO countries don’t have to pull a trigger to destroy the US military.
All they have to do is … dump nearly one and a half trillion dollars in US Treasury bonds and blow the US economy out of the water!
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/nUNIDBZhahk
Interesting notion. Ta.
Date: 17/01/2026 21:09:01
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2351203
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 17/01/2026 22:07:42
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2351206
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:

I wonder if Eugene Stoner’s estate still gets a $1 royalty on every AR-15 mechanism that’s manufactured?
Date: 17/01/2026 23:09:40
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2351214
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:

You forgot to linkify the image! I’m not some sprightly 60yo who knows how to reverse image search.
Date: 17/01/2026 23:26:19
From: Boris
ID: 2351215
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:

You forgot to linkify the image! I’m not some sprightly 60yo who knows how to reverse image search.
Let a 70yo help you with that. though how reliable this is who knows.
https://x.com/WolfTheRed/status/1270369754432356352
Link
Date: 17/01/2026 23:30:29
From: Boris
ID: 2351216
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Boris said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:

You forgot to linkify the image! I’m not some sprightly 60yo who knows how to reverse image search.
Let a 70yo help you with that. though how reliable this is who knows.
https://x.com/WolfTheRed/status/1270369754432356352
Link
and this
https://www.decaturish.com/news/decatur/george-on-georgia-the-not-black-panthers/article_eced71d5-cc5b-5475-bc48-b89c0bd14e0d.html
Link
Date: 17/01/2026 23:31:16
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2351217
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Boris said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:

You forgot to linkify the image! I’m not some sprightly 60yo who knows how to reverse image search.
Let a 70yo help you with that. though how reliable this is who knows.
https://x.com/WolfTheRed/status/1270369754432356352
Link
Thank you kind Sir. Although I don’t approve of using Xtwitter… tut tut
I’ll see if our soon to be AI Overlords can confirm this:
Google AI
This image is from Atlanta, Georgia, and features members of a group identifying as the Black Panthers outside of the Atlanta City Hall building. The building sign visible in the background refers to the “City Hall Tower” located at 68 Mitchell Street SW.
The photo circulated widely online in June 2020 during the Black Lives Matter protests. Reports suggest the group was present to protect protestors. Some social media discussions indicated the individuals might have been models or actors organized for the photo, though their specific affiliation as the “Revolutionary Black Panther Party” was also mentioned.
Date: 18/01/2026 09:13:04
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2351237
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Team sports:
…
He stoked ‘deep state’ conspiracy theories. Now they’re coming back to haunt him.
Dan Bongino’s stint as the FBI’s deputy director has alienated some of his online followers as he relaunches his podcast career.
…
“Bongino has struck a defiant tone as he prepares to relaunch his podcast and radio show, dismissing his critics as having taken a “black pill” of cynicism and defeatism toward President Donald Trump’s administration. “Complaining and whining all the time. … It’s just like: Man, what team are you on?” he said in an interview this month with Hayley Caronia, a conservative podcaster, on his online media network Silverloch.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2026/01/17/dan-bongino-podcast-fbi/
Date: 18/01/2026 09:15:52
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2351240
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
alleged

Date: 18/01/2026 09:18:31
From: roughbarked
ID: 2351241
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Boris said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:

You forgot to linkify the image! I’m not some sprightly 60yo who knows how to reverse image search.
Let a 70yo help you with that. though how reliable this is who knows.
https://x.com/WolfTheRed/status/1270369754432356352
Link
The black panthers are back.
Date: 18/01/2026 09:21:00
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2351243
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
alleged

Own Greenland, own the libs
Date: 18/01/2026 09:23:51
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2351244
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Team sports:
…
He stoked ‘deep state’ conspiracy theories. Now they’re coming back to haunt him.
Dan Bongino’s stint as the FBI’s deputy director has alienated some of his online followers as he relaunches his podcast career.
…
“Bongino has struck a defiant tone as he prepares to relaunch his podcast and radio show, dismissing his critics as having taken a “black pill” of cynicism and defeatism toward President Donald Trump’s administration. “Complaining and whining all the time. … It’s just like: Man, what team are you on?” he said in an interview this month with Hayley Caronia, a conservative podcaster, on his online media network Silverloch.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2026/01/17/dan-bongino-podcast-fbi/
spare a thought for the poor hermit kingdom and heavily censored countries though how silly must they feel now when they’ve spent all their propaganda telling their citizens how bad the USSA are but citizens are like “we don’t believe your propaganda we’re going to leave” and then suddenly they get somewhere and it’s like “oh fuck it’s nowhere near as bad as they told us, it’s much much worse”
Date: 18/01/2026 09:26:38
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2351246
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
SCIENCE said:
alleged

Own Greenland, own the libs
but wait there’s more, then all the bots responded with the same line

Date: 18/01/2026 09:56:29
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2351254
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
SCIENCE said:
alleged

Own Greenland, own the libs
Hah.
Date: 18/01/2026 12:10:41
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2351315
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The lass is pretty pissed off about everything. And she’s right. Her comments on her neighbour are very worrying.
https://www.reddit.com/r/IThinkYouShouldLeave/comments/1qfswav/has_this_ever_happened_to_you/
Date: 18/01/2026 12:43:25
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2351340
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
In the early morning of 9 April 1940, (invading) forces occupied Denmark and (more), ostensibly as a preventive manoeuvre against a planned (the other team) occupation of (more)
Date: 18/01/2026 13:07:25
From: roughbarked
ID: 2351345
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 18/01/2026 13:23:35
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2351347
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Why Trump is panicking
Is he, though?
Date: 18/01/2026 13:32:19
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2351353
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Why Trump is panicking
“Republican senators are revolting.”
They have long been revolting.
Now they are revolting, they will be less revolting.
Date: 18/01/2026 13:34:49
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2351357
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
allegedly alleged

Date: 18/01/2026 13:58:03
From: dv
ID: 2351378
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/5688969-oglala-sioux-tribe-demands-action/
Date: 18/01/2026 15:07:20
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2351393
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Speak loudly and carry a big tarrif.
Date: 18/01/2026 16:04:42
From: dv
ID: 2351415
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

DJ Tea receives his first Grammy.
Date: 18/01/2026 16:06:53
From: Michael V
ID: 2351418
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
DJ Tea receives his first Grammy.
LOLOLOLOL
Date: 18/01/2026 16:12:19
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2351422
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
DJ Tea receives his first Grammy.
ROFL
Date: 18/01/2026 16:17:37
From: Neophyte
ID: 2351424
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
dv said:
DJ Tea receives his first Grammy.
LOLOLOLOL
Well, he contributed as much to the music as they did
Date: 18/01/2026 17:14:46
From: fsm
ID: 2351447
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 18/01/2026 17:28:54
From: Michael V
ID: 2351461
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
fsm said:

:)
Date: 18/01/2026 21:23:04
From: fsm
ID: 2351526
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 18/01/2026 22:13:04
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2351533
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
fsm said:

LOL
Date: 19/01/2026 00:54:48
From: kii
ID: 2351568
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 19/01/2026 04:51:01
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2351570
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Greenland Defense Front – The Hungry Giant
Polar bears, walruses, orcas…penguins!
… we mean if ICE can’t even handle a bit of snow on the road …
Date: 19/01/2026 10:03:35
From: Boris
ID: 2351603
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Oregon’s Bay Area
Long before an ICE agent fired into Renee Nicole Good’s car in Minneapolis, a 37-year-old U.S. citizen and mother of three who was shot and killed during a federal immigration enforcement operation in early January, long before emergency responders found her unresponsive with multiple gunshot wounds and life-saving measures failed at a downtown hospital, the federal government had already decided what kind of force it would deploy and how little accountability it would tolerate. Long before a detainee in Texas gasped, “I can’t breathe,” as guards struggled with him in a segregated detention unit later described by the medical examiner’s office as a likely homicide, and long before an off-duty federal agent shot Keith Porter Jr. outside his Los Angeles apartment on New Year’s Eve, the architecture of enforcement, from recruitment and training to public messaging and legal authority, had been reshaped in ways that made these outcomes not only possible but predictable.
That moment in Minneapolis did not occur in a vacuum. It unfolded against the backdrop of an aggressive federal immigration enforcement surge, touted as Operation Metro Surge, billed as the largest of its kind, that flooded Minneapolis with thousands of Border Patrol and ICE agents. Local officials described the operation as chaotic and unsafe, sparking protests and clashes, and even prompting a federal judge to issue an injunction barring federal agents from using nonlethal force, arbitrary detention, and retaliation against peaceful demonstrators exercising their First Amendment rights.
In 2025, ICE embarked on one of the most aggressive expansion campaigns in its history. Career expos promised instant job offers, signing bonuses worth tens of thousands of dollars, and a fast track into federal law enforcement. A journalist attending one of these events documented how cursory the vetting process had become: a six-minute interview, no meaningful background review, and no apparent concern for public statements openly hostile to ICE itself. Despite failing to complete required paperwork and consenting to no real screening, the journalist later discovered she had been formally hired anyway. The system did not merely miss red flags. It did not appear to be looking for them.
ICE’s leadership has increasingly framed immigration enforcement as a form of domestic warfare. Recruitment materials leaned heavily on nationalist imagery and racialized dog whistles, “Defend the Homeland,” “Stop the Invasion,” “Protect America”, language that collapses complex human realities into an us-versus-them struggle. In public statements, senior officials repeatedly portrayed immigrants, protesters, and even local officials as threats, while praising agents as frontline soldiers. The message was clear: restraint is weakness, and escalation is virtue.
That culture shapes how force is used in the field. In Minneapolis, thousands of ICE and Border Patrol agents were deployed under an operation branded as a security surge. The scale dwarfed local law enforcement capacity.
Residents described unmarked vehicles idling on residential streets, masked agents going door to door, people pulled from cars, windows smashed, chemical agents deployed at close range. Local police, tasked with preventing carjackings, shootings, and homicides, found themselves diverted to managing the chaos federal agents were creating.
It was in this environment that Renee Nicole Good was killed. Good was a U.S. citizen, a mother of three, trying to leave an encounter with federal agents when an ICE officer stepped into her path and fired into her vehicle. Within hours, federal officials labeled her a “domestic terrorist.” No evidence was provided, and the narrative hardened instantly, even as video footage contradicted official claims of imminent danger.
What made that killing especially damning was what emerged afterward. Weeks before Good’s death, the Department of Homeland Security had circulated internal guidance warning agents that vehicle extractions, forcibly removing people from cars, were inherently dangerous and that de-escalation was key. The memo instructed officers to avoid unsafe positioning and to block vehicles rather than confront them head-on. ICE has no formal, standardized policy defining vehicle extraction at all, despite its frequent use. In Minneapolis, that guidance was ignored. Publicly, DHS insisted the agent “followed his training.” Privately, it knew better.
In Texas, Geraldo Lunas Campos died in ICE custody after a struggle with guards. A fellow detainee reported hearing him cry out that he could not breathe as guards pressed on his neck and chest. The county medical examiner later indicated the death would likely be classified as a homicide due to asphyxia. DHS claimed instead that Campos died after attempting to take his own life.
In Los Angeles, Keith Porter Jr., a 43-year-old father of two, was shot and killed by an off-duty ICE agent outside his apartment complex on New Year’s Eve. Authorities claimed the agent acted in self-defense. There was no body-camera footage, and witness accounts were contested. Once again, federal silence replaced transparency.
ICE’s reach expanded beyond physical force into pervasive surveillance. Leaked documents revealed dozens of covert operations deploying plainclothes agents into transport vans, processing centers, and detention cells to gather intelligence not obtained through formal interviews. Every detainee became a potential informant, and every interaction became data. The aim was not merely enforcement, but total awareness, tying individuals to criminal or terrorist networks by default and using those associations to generate endless “follow-on targets.”
As protests erupted in Minneapolis, federal agents targeted observers, journalists, and peaceful demonstrators. Weapons were drawn, chemical agents were fired, and people were detained simply for filming. The chilling effect on First Amendment activity was unmistakable. Only after civil liberties groups sued did a federal judge step in, issuing a preliminary injunction barring ICE from retaliating against peaceful protest, deploying crowd-control munitions, or detaining people without cause. The court made clear that merely observing federal operations was not grounds for enforcement action.
But even that legal intervention exposed the fragility of democratic safeguards. Judges can issue orders, but they cannot enforce them alone. Compliance depends on institutions willing to be constrained.
The Department of Justice announced it was investigating Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey for allegedly conspiring to impede federal immigration agents, not through violence or threats, but through public criticism and warnings about public safety. A statute historically reserved for violent obstruction was repurposed to criminalize dissent. Senior DOJ officials issued statements that sounded less like legal analysis than intimidation.
Meanwhile, the ICE agent who killed Renee Good was not under criminal investigation.
To understand how serious the Justice Department’s investigation of Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey really is, not for acts of violence or obstruction, but for public criticism of federal enforcement, it helps to look at precedent. In the early American republic, fears of internal dissent produced the Sedition Act of 1798, which criminalized “false, scandalous, and malicious” criticism of the government and was used to prosecute editors and political opponents. Thomas Jefferson condemned it as a direct assault on free speech, and history has largely agreed. Similar impulses resurfaced during World War I, when the Espionage Act and related sedition provisions were used to imprison labor organizers and antiwar activists for speech deemed dangerous rather than conduct proven harmful. In the Cold War era, the Smith Act again stretched conspiracy law to punish political belief, until courts later narrowed its reach. Across these episodes, a pattern emerges: during moments of stress or polarization, the federal government has repeatedly expanded criminal law to suppress dissent, with lasting damage to civil liberties.
The current inquiry into Walz and Frey fits squarely within that pattern. The statute being invoked addressed violent conspiracies to obstruct federal officers, not to police rhetoric or policy disagreement. Repurposing it to scrutinize governors and mayors for warning about public safety or criticizing federal tactics marks a profound shift: dissent itself becomes suspect. The implications go beyond partisan conflict. When criminal law is used to intimidate elected officials for speech, the balance between federal authority and democratic debate tilts sharply toward the state, and away from the constitutional protections meant to restrain it.
This trajectory is not uniquely American. In interwar Europe, democratic systems collapsed not only through coups, but through legal erosion. In Weimar Germany, emergency powers under Article 48 were initially justified as temporary measures to restore order. Over time, they became routine. Civil liberties were suspended through legal mechanisms, political opposition was reframed as subversion, and democracy was hollowed out procedurally while its formal institutions remained intact. The lesson of Weimar is not that dictatorship arrives suddenly, but that it advances through normalization, investigations, prosecutions, and intimidation carried out under color of law.
More recent examples reinforce the warning. In post-Soviet Russia, Vladimir Putin rarely banned opposition outright in the early years. Instead, criminal investigations, extremism statutes, and corruption probes were used to sideline governors, mayors, journalists, and activists. Convictions were not always necessary; the process itself became the punishment. Hungary under Viktor Orbán has followed a similar path, using emergency powers and national-security rhetoric to criminalize assistance to migrants and frame criticism of state policy as collaboration with foreign threats. Across these cases, the pattern is consistent: when criticism is treated as obstruction and protest as conspiracy, the legal system ceases to check power and instead enforces it. Seen in this light, the DOJ’s investigation of Walz and Frey is not merely aggressive; it echoes a well-documented authoritarian strategy, made starker because the federal agent who killed Renee Nicole Good faces no criminal investigation at all. History does not repeat itself mechanically, but it does rhyme, and here, the rhyme is unmistakable.
Donald Trump’s renewed threat to invoke the Insurrection Act is not an impulsive reaction to events in Minneapolis. It is the culmination of a fixation that former senior officials say has shaped his thinking for nearly a decade. According to Miles Taylor, who served as chief of staff at the Department of Homeland Security during Trump’s first term, the president was repeatedly drawn to the Insurrection Act not as a last-resort constitutional tool, but as a source of what he openly described as “magical authority.” Trump, Taylor recounts, was less interested in the narrow legal conditions under which the law could be invoked than in the idea that it would allow him to deploy military force domestically, override state and local objections, and exercise power unconstrained by the checks he found so frustrating.
Taylor and other officials describe multiple moments during Trump’s first term when staff had to actively intervene to stop him from invoking the Insurrection Act without legal justification. On one occasion, on the eve of a State of the Union address, White House staff rushed to intercept him as he practiced his speech, preventing language invoking the Act from being entered into the teleprompter. At the time, Trump wanted to use the arrival of asylum seekers at the southern border as the pretext, a scenario that plainly did not meet the statute’s requirements of insurrection,
rebellion, or an invasion the states were unable or unwilling to control. Yet Trump’s interest did not fade. According to Taylor, it only intensified.
In private conversations late in Trump’s first term, Stephen Miller described a future “shock and awe” strategy should Trump regain power: invoke the Insurrection Act, deploy federal force aggressively, and rush the issue to the Supreme Court as quickly as possible. The goal was not careful legal deliberation, but speed and momentum, to force the judiciary to rule after the machinery of enforcement was already in motion. This was not about restoring order. It was about discovering the outer limits of executive power and daring the system to stop him.
What makes the current moment so dangerous is that Minneapolis appears, in the administration’s own telling, to supply the long-sought pretext. Federal agents flood the city. Their presence generates chaos. Protests erupt in response to shootings, beatings, and arbitrary detentions. The unrest created by federal action is then cited as evidence that order has collapsed and extraordinary measures are required. This inversion, manufacturing disorder and then invoking emergency authority to suppress it, is precisely the abuse of the Insurrection Act that legal scholars warn against, and one without clear historical precedent in the United States.
Taylor’s account also sheds light on Trump’s deeper misunderstanding of constitutional governance. He describes a president baffled and angered by the existence of checks and balances, frustrated that courts, Congress, and even officials within his own administration could constrain him. The Insurrection Act held particular appeal because, in Trump’s mind, it represented a realm where he was most powerful, where civilian oversight receded and obedience was expected. That obsession, Taylor says, was “creepy,” not merely because of its intensity, but because it revealed a desire to turn domestic law enforcement into something resembling a military occupation.
Seen in this context, the threat to invoke the Insurrection Act in Minneapolis is not an isolated escalation. It extends years of rhetoric, planning, and frustration with democratic limits. Combined with the criminalization of dissent, the targeting of elected officials, and the insulation of federal agents from accountability, it signals a governing philosophy that treats emergency powers not as safeguards, but as tools, tools to be deployed when consent fails and criticism becomes inconvenient.
This is why the moment feels so precarious. The American constitutional system did not assume a president would be relentlessly corrupt, openly authoritarian, or indifferent to democratic legitimacy. It was built on the expectation of good faith, on norms of restraint, respect for law, and an understanding that power would be exercised within limits even when those limits were imperfectly enforced. The guardrails of democracy were meant to be reinforced by character, not constantly tested by malice.
Donald Trump has exposed that design flaw with brutal clarity. He has treated laws not as boundaries, but as tools to be gamed; institutions not as coequal branches, but as obstacles to be overcome; and emergency powers not as last resorts, but as opportunities. The Insurrection Act, which exists to preserve constitutional order when it genuinely breaks down, is now being eyed as a mechanism to override that order, to suppress dissent, sidestep local authority, and normalize military force in civilian life.
What makes this especially dangerous is that the system still largely assumes a benevolent actor at the center. Each part of the machinery, the courts, Congress, the agencies, behaves as if escalation will be checked by prudence somewhere else. But when the person wielding executive power has spent years searching for “magical authority,” openly fantasizing about absolute control, and surrounding himself with enablers eager to operationalize that impulse, those assumptions collapse.
The warnings from former insiders matter precisely because they strip away any lingering illusion that this is mere rhetoric. This is not bluster meant for a rally or a cable-news hit. It is a long-standing project, articulated privately, rehearsed internally, and now approaching execution. The threat is not hypothetical.
In systems built on trust, a bad actor can do enormous damage before formal safeguards catch up, if they ever do. That is the danger the country is confronting now: not the sudden arrival of tyranny, but the slow realization that democracy’s defenses were never designed to withstand someone determined to hollow them out from the inside.
After Renee Nicole Good was killed, more than a million dollars poured into online fundraisers for the agent who shot her. Thousands of donors celebrated the killing as patriotic, and repeated the lie that she was a terrorist. They rewarded the act before any investigation, before any trial, before any accountability.
It told every armed agent exactly what the culture now values. If you wear the uniform, aim your violence at the approved targets, and serve the narrative, the system will protect you, and enrich you.
America has seen this before. From Ferguson to Sanford, from border detention centers to foreign war zones, the pattern repeats: dehumanize first, label second, kill third, justify forever. The language and the targets change, but the logic does not.
Calling this out is not radical or un-American. It was once uniquely American. What is un-American is turning death into a fundraiser. What is un-American is celebrating state violence and teaching the next generation that killing in the name of power leads to applause and a payday.
Renee Nicole Good is dead. Her children lost their mother. And the man who killed her, an ICE agent defended by federal authorities and lionized by online fundraisers, is being treated like a folk hero by strangers who will never say her name. If that does not outrage us, then the danger is no longer theoretical. It is here, embedded in policy, culture, and daily life.
A democracy does not collapse only when tanks roll through the streets. Sometimes it collapses when violence is normalized, accountability is abandoned, and power learns it can act without consequence.
That is the moment we are living in now, but this country has not yet capitulated. Across Minneapolis and cities from New York to Boston to Austin and beyond, people have taken to the streets to demand justice and an end to federal overreach. Thousands have protested, chanting her name, and organizing under banners like “ICE Out for Good,” a coordinated set of demonstrations that underscored the public’s refusal to be cowed into silence after her killing.
These protests, framed as peaceful expressions of civic outrage, are themselves acts of democratic defense, echoing the nationwide dissent that followed other high-profile police killings and reminding us that collective action still shapes public debate and pressure on authorities.
There are concrete ways forward, and they do not require abandoning peace or principle. We can flood Congress and state legislatures with calls and messages, insisting on independent investigations, meaningful use-of-force reforms, and accountability mechanisms that cannot be ignored or stonewalled. We can support legal actions and independent inquiries, like the one Renee Good’s family has initiated by hiring the firm that represented George Floyd’s family, and pressure prosecutors to pursue justice where federal entities have declined to act.
We can help document and share evidence where authorities have withheld it, mobilizing public recording of federal enforcement actions so that communities have real-time information and accountability even when official transparency fails. We can support civic participation and voter engagement, recognizing that elected officials, from mayors to governors to members of Congress, will be essential in reining in unaccountable use of force. And yes, we can organize peaceful economic and civic disruption, community walks, coordinated sit-ins, workplace slowdowns, and public vigils, that make clear we will not accept a society where state violence is both celebrated and rewarded.
These are not fringe ideas. They are the tools movements have always used to reclaim power from authorities that have lost their way. They are the actions that remind a republic what it means to be governed by the people, not by unaccountable force.
If this, the killing of a U.S. citizen on American soil, under the aegis of federal power and defended by the highest officials, does not inspire us to act, then the moral collapse is already complete.
But if it does outrage you, if it clarifies something in your mind, names a truth others are trying to bury, or awakens the sense that we cannot sit back and tolerate this, then act. Now, because waiting has already cost lives.
Date: 19/01/2026 10:07:55
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2351605
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Boris said:
Oregon’s Bay Area
Long before an ICE agent fired into Renee Nicole Good’s car in Minneapolis, a 37-year-old U.S. citizen and mother of three who was shot and killed during a federal immigration enforcement operation in early January, long before emergency responders found her unresponsive with multiple gunshot wounds and life-saving measures failed at a downtown hospital, the federal government had already decided what kind of force it would deploy and how little accountability it would tolerate. Long before a detainee in Texas gasped, “I can’t breathe,” as guards struggled with him in a segregated detention unit later described by the medical examiner’s office as a likely homicide, and long before an off-duty federal agent shot Keith Porter Jr. outside his Los Angeles apartment on New Year’s Eve, the architecture of enforcement, from recruitment and training to public messaging and legal authority, had been reshaped in ways that made these outcomes not only possible but predictable.
That moment in Minneapolis did not occur in a vacuum. It unfolded against the backdrop of an aggressive federal immigration enforcement surge, touted as Operation Metro Surge, billed as the largest of its kind, that flooded Minneapolis with thousands of Border Patrol and ICE agents. Local officials described the operation as chaotic and unsafe, sparking protests and clashes, and even prompting a federal judge to issue an injunction barring federal agents from using nonlethal force, arbitrary detention, and retaliation against peaceful demonstrators exercising their First Amendment rights.
In 2025, ICE embarked on one of the most aggressive expansion campaigns in its history. Career expos promised instant job offers, signing bonuses worth tens of thousands of dollars, and a fast track into federal law enforcement. A journalist attending one of these events documented how cursory the vetting process had become: a six-minute interview, no meaningful background review, and no apparent concern for public statements openly hostile to ICE itself. Despite failing to complete required paperwork and consenting to no real screening, the journalist later discovered she had been formally hired anyway. The system did not merely miss red flags. It did not appear to be looking for them.
ICE’s leadership has increasingly framed immigration enforcement as a form of domestic warfare. Recruitment materials leaned heavily on nationalist imagery and racialized dog whistles, “Defend the Homeland,” “Stop the Invasion,” “Protect America”, language that collapses complex human realities into an us-versus-them struggle. In public statements, senior officials repeatedly portrayed immigrants, protesters, and even local officials as threats, while praising agents as frontline soldiers. The message was clear: restraint is weakness, and escalation is virtue.
That culture shapes how force is used in the field. In Minneapolis, thousands of ICE and Border Patrol agents were deployed under an operation branded as a security surge. The scale dwarfed local law enforcement capacity.
Residents described unmarked vehicles idling on residential streets, masked agents going door to door, people pulled from cars, windows smashed, chemical agents deployed at close range. Local police, tasked with preventing carjackings, shootings, and homicides, found themselves diverted to managing the chaos federal agents were creating.
It was in this environment that Renee Nicole Good was killed. Good was a U.S. citizen, a mother of three, trying to leave an encounter with federal agents when an ICE officer stepped into her path and fired into her vehicle. Within hours, federal officials labeled her a “domestic terrorist.” No evidence was provided, and the narrative hardened instantly, even as video footage contradicted official claims of imminent danger.
What made that killing especially damning was what emerged afterward. Weeks before Good’s death, the Department of Homeland Security had circulated internal guidance warning agents that vehicle extractions, forcibly removing people from cars, were inherently dangerous and that de-escalation was key. The memo instructed officers to avoid unsafe positioning and to block vehicles rather than confront them head-on. ICE has no formal, standardized policy defining vehicle extraction at all, despite its frequent use. In Minneapolis, that guidance was ignored. Publicly, DHS insisted the agent “followed his training.” Privately, it knew better.
In Texas, Geraldo Lunas Campos died in ICE custody after a struggle with guards. A fellow detainee reported hearing him cry out that he could not breathe as guards pressed on his neck and chest. The county medical examiner later indicated the death would likely be classified as a homicide due to asphyxia. DHS claimed instead that Campos died after attempting to take his own life.
In Los Angeles, Keith Porter Jr., a 43-year-old father of two, was shot and killed by an off-duty ICE agent outside his apartment complex on New Year’s Eve. Authorities claimed the agent acted in self-defense. There was no body-camera footage, and witness accounts were contested. Once again, federal silence replaced transparency.
ICE’s reach expanded beyond physical force into pervasive surveillance. Leaked documents revealed dozens of covert operations deploying plainclothes agents into transport vans, processing centers, and detention cells to gather intelligence not obtained through formal interviews. Every detainee became a potential informant, and every interaction became data. The aim was not merely enforcement, but total awareness, tying individuals to criminal or terrorist networks by default and using those associations to generate endless “follow-on targets.”
As protests erupted in Minneapolis, federal agents targeted observers, journalists, and peaceful demonstrators. Weapons were drawn, chemical agents were fired, and people were detained simply for filming. The chilling effect on First Amendment activity was unmistakable. Only after civil liberties groups sued did a federal judge step in, issuing a preliminary injunction barring ICE from retaliating against peaceful protest, deploying crowd-control munitions, or detaining people without cause. The court made clear that merely observing federal operations was not grounds for enforcement action.
But even that legal intervention exposed the fragility of democratic safeguards. Judges can issue orders, but they cannot enforce them alone. Compliance depends on institutions willing to be constrained.
The Department of Justice announced it was investigating Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey for allegedly conspiring to impede federal immigration agents, not through violence or threats, but through public criticism and warnings about public safety. A statute historically reserved for violent obstruction was repurposed to criminalize dissent. Senior DOJ officials issued statements that sounded less like legal analysis than intimidation.
Meanwhile, the ICE agent who killed Renee Good was not under criminal investigation.
To understand how serious the Justice Department’s investigation of Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey really is, not for acts of violence or obstruction, but for public criticism of federal enforcement, it helps to look at precedent. In the early American republic, fears of internal dissent produced the Sedition Act of 1798, which criminalized “false, scandalous, and malicious” criticism of the government and was used to prosecute editors and political opponents. Thomas Jefferson condemned it as a direct assault on free speech, and history has largely agreed. Similar impulses resurfaced during World War I, when the Espionage Act and related sedition provisions were used to imprison labor organizers and antiwar activists for speech deemed dangerous rather than conduct proven harmful. In the Cold War era, the Smith Act again stretched conspiracy law to punish political belief, until courts later narrowed its reach. Across these episodes, a pattern emerges: during moments of stress or polarization, the federal government has repeatedly expanded criminal law to suppress dissent, with lasting damage to civil liberties.
The current inquiry into Walz and Frey fits squarely within that pattern. The statute being invoked addressed violent conspiracies to obstruct federal officers, not to police rhetoric or policy disagreement. Repurposing it to scrutinize governors and mayors for warning about public safety or criticizing federal tactics marks a profound shift: dissent itself becomes suspect. The implications go beyond partisan conflict. When criminal law is used to intimidate elected officials for speech, the balance between federal authority and democratic debate tilts sharply toward the state, and away from the constitutional protections meant to restrain it.
This trajectory is not uniquely American. In interwar Europe, democratic systems collapsed not only through coups, but through legal erosion. In Weimar Germany, emergency powers under Article 48 were initially justified as temporary measures to restore order. Over time, they became routine. Civil liberties were suspended through legal mechanisms, political opposition was reframed as subversion, and democracy was hollowed out procedurally while its formal institutions remained intact. The lesson of Weimar is not that dictatorship arrives suddenly, but that it advances through normalization, investigations, prosecutions, and intimidation carried out under color of law.
More recent examples reinforce the warning. In post-Soviet Russia, Vladimir Putin rarely banned opposition outright in the early years. Instead, criminal investigations, extremism statutes, and corruption probes were used to sideline governors, mayors, journalists, and activists. Convictions were not always necessary; the process itself became the punishment. Hungary under Viktor Orbán has followed a similar path, using emergency powers and national-security rhetoric to criminalize assistance to migrants and frame criticism of state policy as collaboration with foreign threats. Across these cases, the pattern is consistent: when criticism is treated as obstruction and protest as conspiracy, the legal system ceases to check power and instead enforces it. Seen in this light, the DOJ’s investigation of Walz and Frey is not merely aggressive; it echoes a well-documented authoritarian strategy, made starker because the federal agent who killed Renee Nicole Good faces no criminal investigation at all. History does not repeat itself mechanically, but it does rhyme, and here, the rhyme is unmistakable.
Donald Trump’s renewed threat to invoke the Insurrection Act is not an impulsive reaction to events in Minneapolis. It is the culmination of a fixation that former senior officials say has shaped his thinking for nearly a decade. According to Miles Taylor, who served as chief of staff at the Department of Homeland Security during Trump’s first term, the president was repeatedly drawn to the Insurrection Act not as a last-resort constitutional tool, but as a source of what he openly described as “magical authority.” Trump, Taylor recounts, was less interested in the narrow legal conditions under which the law could be invoked than in the idea that it would allow him to deploy military force domestically, override state and local objections, and exercise power unconstrained by the checks he found so frustrating.
Taylor and other officials describe multiple moments during Trump’s first term when staff had to actively intervene to stop him from invoking the Insurrection Act without legal justification. On one occasion, on the eve of a State of the Union address, White House staff rushed to intercept him as he practiced his speech, preventing language invoking the Act from being entered into the teleprompter. At the time, Trump wanted to use the arrival of asylum seekers at the southern border as the pretext, a scenario that plainly did not meet the statute’s requirements of insurrection,
rebellion, or an invasion the states were unable or unwilling to control. Yet Trump’s interest did not fade. According to Taylor, it only intensified.
In private conversations late in Trump’s first term, Stephen Miller described a future “shock and awe” strategy should Trump regain power: invoke the Insurrection Act, deploy federal force aggressively, and rush the issue to the Supreme Court as quickly as possible. The goal was not careful legal deliberation, but speed and momentum, to force the judiciary to rule after the machinery of enforcement was already in motion. This was not about restoring order. It was about discovering the outer limits of executive power and daring the system to stop him.
What makes the current moment so dangerous is that Minneapolis appears, in the administration’s own telling, to supply the long-sought pretext. Federal agents flood the city. Their presence generates chaos. Protests erupt in response to shootings, beatings, and arbitrary detentions. The unrest created by federal action is then cited as evidence that order has collapsed and extraordinary measures are required. This inversion, manufacturing disorder and then invoking emergency authority to suppress it, is precisely the abuse of the Insurrection Act that legal scholars warn against, and one without clear historical precedent in the United States.
Taylor’s account also sheds light on Trump’s deeper misunderstanding of constitutional governance. He describes a president baffled and angered by the existence of checks and balances, frustrated that courts, Congress, and even officials within his own administration could constrain him. The Insurrection Act held particular appeal because, in Trump’s mind, it represented a realm where he was most powerful, where civilian oversight receded and obedience was expected. That obsession, Taylor says, was “creepy,” not merely because of its intensity, but because it revealed a desire to turn domestic law enforcement into something resembling a military occupation.
Seen in this context, the threat to invoke the Insurrection Act in Minneapolis is not an isolated escalation. It extends years of rhetoric, planning, and frustration with democratic limits. Combined with the criminalization of dissent, the targeting of elected officials, and the insulation of federal agents from accountability, it signals a governing philosophy that treats emergency powers not as safeguards, but as tools, tools to be deployed when consent fails and criticism becomes inconvenient.
This is why the moment feels so precarious. The American constitutional system did not assume a president would be relentlessly corrupt, openly authoritarian, or indifferent to democratic legitimacy. It was built on the expectation of good faith, on norms of restraint, respect for law, and an understanding that power would be exercised within limits even when those limits were imperfectly enforced. The guardrails of democracy were meant to be reinforced by character, not constantly tested by malice.
Donald Trump has exposed that design flaw with brutal clarity. He has treated laws not as boundaries, but as tools to be gamed; institutions not as coequal branches, but as obstacles to be overcome; and emergency powers not as last resorts, but as opportunities. The Insurrection Act, which exists to preserve constitutional order when it genuinely breaks down, is now being eyed as a mechanism to override that order, to suppress dissent, sidestep local authority, and normalize military force in civilian life.
What makes this especially dangerous is that the system still largely assumes a benevolent actor at the center. Each part of the machinery, the courts, Congress, the agencies, behaves as if escalation will be checked by prudence somewhere else. But when the person wielding executive power has spent years searching for “magical authority,” openly fantasizing about absolute control, and surrounding himself with enablers eager to operationalize that impulse, those assumptions collapse.
The warnings from former insiders matter precisely because they strip away any lingering illusion that this is mere rhetoric. This is not bluster meant for a rally or a cable-news hit. It is a long-standing project, articulated privately, rehearsed internally, and now approaching execution. The threat is not hypothetical.
In systems built on trust, a bad actor can do enormous damage before formal safeguards catch up, if they ever do. That is the danger the country is confronting now: not the sudden arrival of tyranny, but the slow realization that democracy’s defenses were never designed to withstand someone determined to hollow them out from the inside.
After Renee Nicole Good was killed, more than a million dollars poured into online fundraisers for the agent who shot her. Thousands of donors celebrated the killing as patriotic, and repeated the lie that she was a terrorist. They rewarded the act before any investigation, before any trial, before any accountability.
It told every armed agent exactly what the culture now values. If you wear the uniform, aim your violence at the approved targets, and serve the narrative, the system will protect you, and enrich you.
America has seen this before. From Ferguson to Sanford, from border detention centers to foreign war zones, the pattern repeats: dehumanize first, label second, kill third, justify forever. The language and the targets change, but the logic does not.
Calling this out is not radical or un-American. It was once uniquely American. What is un-American is turning death into a fundraiser. What is un-American is celebrating state violence and teaching the next generation that killing in the name of power leads to applause and a payday.
Renee Nicole Good is dead. Her children lost their mother. And the man who killed her, an ICE agent defended by federal authorities and lionized by online fundraisers, is being treated like a folk hero by strangers who will never say her name. If that does not outrage us, then the danger is no longer theoretical. It is here, embedded in policy, culture, and daily life.
A democracy does not collapse only when tanks roll through the streets. Sometimes it collapses when violence is normalized, accountability is abandoned, and power learns it can act without consequence.
That is the moment we are living in now, but this country has not yet capitulated. Across Minneapolis and cities from New York to Boston to Austin and beyond, people have taken to the streets to demand justice and an end to federal overreach. Thousands have protested, chanting her name, and organizing under banners like “ICE Out for Good,” a coordinated set of demonstrations that underscored the public’s refusal to be cowed into silence after her killing.
These protests, framed as peaceful expressions of civic outrage, are themselves acts of democratic defense, echoing the nationwide dissent that followed other high-profile police killings and reminding us that collective action still shapes public debate and pressure on authorities.
There are concrete ways forward, and they do not require abandoning peace or principle. We can flood Congress and state legislatures with calls and messages, insisting on independent investigations, meaningful use-of-force reforms, and accountability mechanisms that cannot be ignored or stonewalled. We can support legal actions and independent inquiries, like the one Renee Good’s family has initiated by hiring the firm that represented George Floyd’s family, and pressure prosecutors to pursue justice where federal entities have declined to act.
We can help document and share evidence where authorities have withheld it, mobilizing public recording of federal enforcement actions so that communities have real-time information and accountability even when official transparency fails. We can support civic participation and voter engagement, recognizing that elected officials, from mayors to governors to members of Congress, will be essential in reining in unaccountable use of force. And yes, we can organize peaceful economic and civic disruption, community walks, coordinated sit-ins, workplace slowdowns, and public vigils, that make clear we will not accept a society where state violence is both celebrated and rewarded.
These are not fringe ideas. They are the tools movements have always used to reclaim power from authorities that have lost their way. They are the actions that remind a republic what it means to be governed by the people, not by unaccountable force.
If this, the killing of a U.S. citizen on American soil, under the aegis of federal power and defended by the highest officials, does not inspire us to act, then the moral collapse is already complete.
But if it does outrage you, if it clarifies something in your mind, names a truth others are trying to bury, or awakens the sense that we cannot sit back and tolerate this, then act. Now, because waiting has already cost lives.
seems like a lot of words to say “aha we’re 50% in” at a time they’re 90% in
Date: 19/01/2026 14:58:47
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2351672
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
This hat is selling well in Greenland, and elsewhere:

Date: 19/01/2026 15:01:29
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2351674
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
This hat is selling well in Greenland, and elsewhere:

Even a long time ago in a galaxy far far away.
Date: 19/01/2026 15:12:46
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2351677
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
captain_spalding said:
This hat is selling well in Greenland, and elsewhere:

Even a long time ago in a galaxy far far away.
sounds like they’re promoting violence
Date: 19/01/2026 15:16:57
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2351680
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
captain_spalding said:
This hat is selling well in Greenland, and elsewhere:

Even a long time ago in a galaxy far far away.
sounds like they’re promoting violence
They’ve weaponised their hats!
Open fire, evryone!!
Date: 19/01/2026 15:22:01
From: dv
ID: 2351681
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Eric Trump retweets graph showing Biden’s success at reducing Fentanyl deaths
Date: 19/01/2026 15:30:04
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2351687
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 19/01/2026 15:30:43
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2351688
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

I knew that wouldn’t work.
HTML rarely works for me.
Date: 19/01/2026 15:35:09
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2351689
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Xi is learning from the great man.
Date: 19/01/2026 15:40:55
From: Cymek
ID: 2351690
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Xi is learning from the great man.
Australia being a middling nation has very little bargaining power.
If the USA isn’t our bitch its China.
Can’t just tell them to go away as we don’t like how you operate.
Date: 19/01/2026 15:45:13
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2351692
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
captain_spalding said:

I knew that wouldn’t work.
HTML rarely works for me.
Try this
Date: 19/01/2026 15:48:45
From: Michael V
ID: 2351693
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
captain_spalding said:

I knew that wouldn’t work.
HTML rarely works for me.
Prez presents
Date: 19/01/2026 16:04:26
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2351699
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Eric Trump retweets graph showing Biden’s success at reducing Fentanyl deaths
That was nice of him.
Although I’m not sure what blowing shit out of boats has to do with it.
Date: 19/01/2026 16:07:21
From: Cymek
ID: 2351702
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
Eric Trump retweets graph showing Biden’s success at reducing Fentanyl deaths
That was nice of him.
Although I’m not sure what blowing shit out of boats has to do with it.
Stopping supply ?
Date: 19/01/2026 16:09:49
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2351704
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
Eric Trump retweets graph showing Biden’s success at reducing Fentanyl deaths
That was nice of him.
Although I’m not sure what blowing shit out of boats has to do with it.
Stopping supply ?
Do they use boats to transport it from Mexico then?
Date: 19/01/2026 16:16:08
From: Michael V
ID: 2351706
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
Cymek said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
That was nice of him.
Although I’m not sure what blowing shit out of boats has to do with it.
Stopping supply ?
Do they use boats to transport it from Mexico then?
Could it just as simple as “Eric Trump is not the sharpest tool in the shed”.
Date: 19/01/2026 16:18:15
From: kii
ID: 2351707
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
Cymek said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
That was nice of him.
Although I’m not sure what blowing shit out of boats has to do with it.
Stopping supply ?
Do they use boats to transport it from Mexico then?
Keep up! It was Venezuelan boats.
Date: 19/01/2026 16:19:25
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2351709
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Cymek said:
Stopping supply ?
Do they use boats to transport it from Mexico then?
Could it just as simple as “Eric Trump is not the sharpest tool in the shed”.
I’m sure he is every bit as much of a stable genius as his dad.
Date: 19/01/2026 16:24:10
From: roughbarked
ID: 2351710
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
Eric Trump retweets graph showing Biden’s success at reducing Fentanyl deaths
That was nice of him.
Although I’m not sure what blowing shit out of boats has to do with it.
Did the boats have Fentanyl on them? I doubt it.
Date: 19/01/2026 16:25:24
From: roughbarked
ID: 2351711
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Cymek said:
Stopping supply ?
Do they use boats to transport it from Mexico then?
Could it just as simple as “Eric Trump is not the sharpest tool in the shed”.
Clearly he’s so blunt he couldn’t cut butter.
Date: 19/01/2026 16:26:24
From: Cymek
ID: 2351712
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
Michael V said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Do they use boats to transport it from Mexico then?
Could it just as simple as “Eric Trump is not the sharpest tool in the shed”.
I’m sure he is every bit as much of a stable genius as his dad.
The USA used to have terrible or non existent harm minimisation in regards to illicit drug use.
Perhaps this has improved and addicts are treated decently so can be admitted to hospital (assuming they have insurance)
Date: 19/01/2026 16:27:42
From: roughbarked
ID: 2351713
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
Michael V said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Do they use boats to transport it from Mexico then?
Could it just as simple as “Eric Trump is not the sharpest tool in the shed”.
I’m sure he is every bit as much of a stable genius as his dad.
Heh.
Date: 19/01/2026 17:44:09
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2351736
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
The USA used to have terrible or non existent harm minimisation in regards to illicit drug use.
Perhaps this has improved and addicts are treated decently so can be admitted to hospital (assuming they have insurance)
LOL
Date: 19/01/2026 18:41:39
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2351763
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Waaa waaa waaa
He honestly sounds like a toddler who got told he can’t have chocolate milk for breakfast.

Date: 19/01/2026 18:43:23
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2351765
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Waaa waaa waaa
He honestly sounds like a toddler who got told he can’t have chocolate milk for breakfast.

what a legend
Date: 19/01/2026 18:44:12
From: Michael V
ID: 2351766
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Waaa waaa waaa
He honestly sounds like a toddler who got told he can’t have chocolate milk for breakfast.

Cheeses!
Date: 19/01/2026 18:48:54
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2351768
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Waaa waaa waaa
He honestly sounds like a toddler who got told he can’t have chocolate milk for breakfast.

“…only a boat that landed there hundreds of years ago…”
I wonder if anyone has ever explained ‘Columbus Day’ (Oct 12) to Trump?
Or the arrival of the Mayflower pilgrims in 1620?
Or the founding of Jamestown, Virginia in 1607?
Date: 19/01/2026 19:22:51
From: roughbarked
ID: 2351774
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Divine Angel said:
Waaa waaa waaa
He honestly sounds like a toddler who got told he can’t have chocolate milk for breakfast.

“…only a boat that landed there hundreds of years ago…”
I wonder if anyone has ever explained ‘Columbus Day’ (Oct 12) to Trump?
Or the arrival of the Mayflower pilgrims in 1620?
Or the founding of Jamestown, Virginia in 1607?
I don’t beliebe he’s read any history books. He can’t even hold the bible the right way up.
Date: 19/01/2026 19:24:19
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2351775
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Waaa waaa waaa
He honestly sounds like a toddler who got told he can’t have chocolate milk for breakfast.

I just hope that Albo, Starmer and Carney have the balls to stand up to him. Withdrawal from Greenland or Echelon will be disabled, NORAD shut down, Pine Gap emptied of Americans. If that doesn’t work Albo can authorise the Australian army to destroy the Pine Gap radar domes one by one until the US military is decapitated. Fucking moron needs to be down what real power is when you actually have the support of the overwhelming majority of your citizens.
Date: 19/01/2026 19:28:55
From: roughbarked
ID: 2351778
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Divine Angel said:
Waaa waaa waaa
He honestly sounds like a toddler who got told he can’t have chocolate milk for breakfast.

I just hope that Albo, Starmer and Carney have the balls to stand up to him. Withdrawal from Greenland or Echelon will be disabled, NORAD shut down, Pine Gap emptied of Americans. If that doesn’t work Albo can authorise the Australian army to destroy the Pine Gap radar domes one by one until the US military is decapitated. Fucking moron needs to be down what real power is when you actually have the support of the overwhelming majority of your citizens.
Definitely needs to put some backbone into it.
Date: 19/01/2026 19:30:13
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2351780
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Divine Angel said:
Waaa waaa waaa
He honestly sounds like a toddler who got told he can’t have chocolate milk for breakfast.

I just hope that Albo, Starmer and Carney have the balls to stand up to him. Withdrawal from Greenland or Echelon will be disabled, NORAD shut down, Pine Gap emptied of Americans. If that doesn’t work Albo can authorise the Australian army to destroy the Pine Gap radar domes one by one until the US military is decapitated. Fucking moron needs to be down what real power is when you actually have the support of the overwhelming majority of your citizens.
Now imagine if Dutton was PM
Date: 19/01/2026 19:32:31
From: roughbarked
ID: 2351781
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Divine Angel said:
Waaa waaa waaa
He honestly sounds like a toddler who got told he can’t have chocolate milk for breakfast.

I just hope that Albo, Starmer and Carney have the balls to stand up to him. Withdrawal from Greenland or Echelon will be disabled, NORAD shut down, Pine Gap emptied of Americans. If that doesn’t work Albo can authorise the Australian army to destroy the Pine Gap radar domes one by one until the US military is decapitated. Fucking moron needs to be down what real power is when you actually have the support of the overwhelming majority of your citizens.
Now imagine if Dutton was PM
Shakes head to get rid of that image.
Date: 19/01/2026 19:35:29
From: buffy
ID: 2351784
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Divine Angel said:
Waaa waaa waaa
He honestly sounds like a toddler who got told he can’t have chocolate milk for breakfast.

I just hope that Albo, Starmer and Carney have the balls to stand up to him. Withdrawal from Greenland or Echelon will be disabled, NORAD shut down, Pine Gap emptied of Americans. If that doesn’t work Albo can authorise the Australian army to destroy the Pine Gap radar domes one by one until the US military is decapitated. Fucking moron needs to be down what real power is when you actually have the support of the overwhelming majority of your citizens.
Actually, I wondered if the bases could function without the local cleaners, cooks etc. Maybe we just pull our workforce out.
Date: 19/01/2026 19:35:56
From: buffy
ID: 2351785
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Divine Angel said:
Waaa waaa waaa
He honestly sounds like a toddler who got told he can’t have chocolate milk for breakfast.

I just hope that Albo, Starmer and Carney have the balls to stand up to him. Withdrawal from Greenland or Echelon will be disabled, NORAD shut down, Pine Gap emptied of Americans. If that doesn’t work Albo can authorise the Australian army to destroy the Pine Gap radar domes one by one until the US military is decapitated. Fucking moron needs to be down what real power is when you actually have the support of the overwhelming majority of your citizens.
Now imagine if Dutton was PM
Or ScoMo…
Date: 19/01/2026 19:52:43
From: roughbarked
ID: 2351790
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Divine Angel said:
Waaa waaa waaa
He honestly sounds like a toddler who got told he can’t have chocolate milk for breakfast.

I just hope that Albo, Starmer and Carney have the balls to stand up to him. Withdrawal from Greenland or Echelon will be disabled, NORAD shut down, Pine Gap emptied of Americans. If that doesn’t work Albo can authorise the Australian army to destroy the Pine Gap radar domes one by one until the US military is decapitated. Fucking moron needs to be down what real power is when you actually have the support of the overwhelming majority of your citizens.
Actually, I wondered if the bases could function without the local cleaners, cooks etc. Maybe we just pull our workforce out.
Pull the rug from under their feet?
We’d have to pay the staff to stay home.
Alice Srings gets money spent in town by the base as well as providing jobs for the locals.
Date: 19/01/2026 19:54:05
From: buffy
ID: 2351792
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
buffy said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
I just hope that Albo, Starmer and Carney have the balls to stand up to him. Withdrawal from Greenland or Echelon will be disabled, NORAD shut down, Pine Gap emptied of Americans. If that doesn’t work Albo can authorise the Australian army to destroy the Pine Gap radar domes one by one until the US military is decapitated. Fucking moron needs to be down what real power is when you actually have the support of the overwhelming majority of your citizens.
Actually, I wondered if the bases could function without the local cleaners, cooks etc. Maybe we just pull our workforce out.
Pull the rug from under their feet?
We’d have to pay the staff to stay home.
Alice Srings gets money spent in town by the base as well as providing jobs for the locals.
I think that would be a good use of our taxes. And help them find other work.
Date: 19/01/2026 19:55:15
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2351793
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
roughbarked said:
buffy said:
Actually, I wondered if the bases could function without the local cleaners, cooks etc. Maybe we just pull our workforce out.
Pull the rug from under their feet?
We’d have to pay the staff to stay home.
Alice Srings gets money spent in town by the base as well as providing jobs for the locals.
I think that would be a good use of our taxes. And help them find other work.
pretty sure $368000000000 for no submarines in 30 years is a better spend
Date: 19/01/2026 19:56:47
From: buffy
ID: 2351795
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
buffy said:
roughbarked said:
Pull the rug from under their feet?
We’d have to pay the staff to stay home.
Alice Srings gets money spent in town by the base as well as providing jobs for the locals.
I think that would be a good use of our taxes. And help them find other work.
pretty sure $368000000000 for no submarines in 30 years is a better spend
You know the wind might change and your tongue will be forever stuck in your cheek…
Date: 19/01/2026 19:58:28
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2351797
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
allegations

Date: 19/01/2026 20:01:55
From: roughbarked
ID: 2351801
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
roughbarked said:
buffy said:
Actually, I wondered if the bases could function without the local cleaners, cooks etc. Maybe we just pull our workforce out.
Pull the rug from under their feet?
We’d have to pay the staff to stay home.
Alice Srings gets money spent in town by the base as well as providing jobs for the locals.
I think that would be a good use of our taxes. And help them find other work.
Agree.
Date: 19/01/2026 20:16:24
From: Michael V
ID: 2351807
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Divine Angel said:
Waaa waaa waaa
He honestly sounds like a toddler who got told he can’t have chocolate milk for breakfast.

I just hope that Albo, Starmer and Carney have the balls to stand up to him. Withdrawal from Greenland or Echelon will be disabled, NORAD shut down, Pine Gap emptied of Americans. If that doesn’t work Albo can authorise the Australian army to destroy the Pine Gap radar domes one by one until the US military is decapitated. Fucking moron needs to be down what real power is when you actually have the support of the overwhelming majority of your citizens.
Now imagine if Dutton was PM
Nooooooooo!
Date: 19/01/2026 20:19:38
From: Michael V
ID: 2351809
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
allegations

Bloody!
Date: 19/01/2026 21:10:44
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2351817
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
alleged
The small Minneapolis charter school where Renee Good sent her 6-year-old son has switched to online learning out of safety concerns after receiving multiple phone and email threats, the school told Sahan Journal. The school said it had reported some of these threats to local law enforcement. The threats to Southside Family Charter School came after New York Post articles describing the school’s social justice focus and a series of social media posts from right-wing commentators.
Date: 19/01/2026 21:58:54
From: Michael V
ID: 2351825
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
alleged
The small Minneapolis charter school where Renee Good sent her 6-year-old son has switched to online learning out of safety concerns after receiving multiple phone and email threats, the school told Sahan Journal. The school said it had reported some of these threats to local law enforcement. The threats to Southside Family Charter School came after New York Post articles describing the school’s social justice focus and a series of social media posts from right-wing commentators.
Shit.
Date: 19/01/2026 22:03:23
From: party_pants
ID: 2351827
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
allegations

Jesus fucking Christ.
It is time to drag the cunt out into the street and just fucking shoot him.
Date: 19/01/2026 22:14:12
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2351829
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 19/01/2026 22:19:01
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2351830
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 19/01/2026 22:27:21
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2351831
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
SCIENCE said:
party_pants said:
Jesus fucking Christ.
It is time to drag the cunt out into the street and just fucking shoot him.
so anyway we thought we’d better check
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/01/18/trump-minnesota-insurrection-act/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/2026/01/18/minnesota-immigration-crackdown/4c2a498c-f4a4-11f0-9ceb-4c268b6e1369_story.html
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/pentagon-readies-1500-soldiers-possibly-deploy-minnesota-washington-post-reports-2026-01-18/
oh cool
might go back and play some Pokémon this is all getting a bit wearing
just to clarify though


watch this space


force
But, they did buy Alaska from the Russians.
Date: 19/01/2026 23:23:50
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2351840
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
In the early morning of 9 April 1940, (invading) forces occupied Denmark and (more), ostensibly as a preventive manoeuvre against a planned (the other team) occupation of (more)
¿wait?
In the early morning of 9 April 1940 (Wesertag, “Weser Day”), German forces occupied Denmark and invaded Norway, ostensibly as a preventive manoeuvre against a planned …
Wait¡
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-01-19/trump-norway-prime-minister-no-longer-obligation-peace/106246538
WAIT
Date: 20/01/2026 01:43:43
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2351842
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 20/01/2026 02:52:29
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2351845
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
This Idea Totally Does Not Have Popular Support

Date: 20/01/2026 08:15:29
From: Boris
ID: 2351853
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Treaty of the Danish West Indies, signed August 4, 1916, was the formal agreement where Denmark sold its Caribbean colonies (St. Thomas, St. John, St. Croix) to the United States for $25 million in gold, a strategic move to secure the islands during World War I, leading to their renaming as the U.S. Virgin Islands in 1917. The treaty also included the U.S. recognizing Danish sovereignty over Greenland, solidifying Denmark’s Arctic claims.
Date: 20/01/2026 09:44:26
From: Michael V
ID: 2351858
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Boris said:
The Treaty of the Danish West Indies, signed August 4, 1916, was the formal agreement where Denmark sold its Caribbean colonies (St. Thomas, St. John, St. Croix) to the United States for $25 million in gold, a strategic move to secure the islands during World War I, leading to their renaming as the U.S. Virgin Islands in 1917. The treaty also included the U.S. recognizing Danish sovereignty over Greenland, solidifying Denmark’s Arctic claims.
Thanks. TIL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_the_Danish_West_Indies
Date: 20/01/2026 10:47:38
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2351872
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
alleged

Date: 20/01/2026 11:01:23
From: dv
ID: 2351874
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 20/01/2026 11:15:32
From: Michael V
ID: 2351878
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
alleged

‘Canal!
Date: 20/01/2026 11:19:03
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2351880
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
alleged

‘Canal!
I dunno. This sort of federal power grab will make things a lot easier when the next Democrat president has to line up all these MAGA morons up against the wall.
Date: 20/01/2026 11:20:49
From: Cymek
ID: 2351881
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
alleged

‘Canal!
I dunno. This sort of federal power grab will make things a lot easier when the next Democrat president has to line up all these MAGA morons up against the wall.
Could you get the boss MAGA to jump off a cliff and all the lemming MAGA’s follow
Date: 20/01/2026 11:54:50
From: Michael V
ID: 2351887
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
alleged

‘Canal!
I dunno. This sort of federal power grab will make things a lot easier when the next Democrat president has to line up all these MAGA morons up against the wall.
If the Democrats play by the same rules established by Trump et al, then really, they will be just as complicit in the destruction of the USA as MAGA.
Date: 20/01/2026 11:58:22
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2351890
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
This Idea Totally Does Not Have Popular Support

We might ponder on how much of Trump’s obsession with Greenland stems from Canada’s obstinate refusal of his invitation to become a part of the USA.
Having failed there, Trump may have decided to, out of spite, see that Canada has the United States to its south, its west, and to its east, too.
Date: 20/01/2026 12:02:59
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2351892
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Michael V said:
‘Canal!
I dunno. This sort of federal power grab will make things a lot easier when the next Democrat president has to line up all these MAGA morons up against the wall.
If the Democrats play by the same rules established by Trump et al, then really, they will be just as complicit in the destruction of the USA as MAGA.
That’s going to be a real problem for the Democrats.
There’s going to be so much Trump/MAGA shit to clear away, and so many things that will have to be re-built to get the US in any shape to have a future.
Along the way, they’re bound to uncover a lot of crimes committed by Trump and his minions. They can’t just ignore those crimes, but the have to find a way to demolish the rubbish that Trump leaves behind, and prosecute the criminals, in ways that the law requires, and which don’t look at all like petty revenge.
Date: 20/01/2026 12:16:44
From: Cymek
ID: 2351896
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
I dunno. This sort of federal power grab will make things a lot easier when the next Democrat president has to line up all these MAGA morons up against the wall.
If the Democrats play by the same rules established by Trump et al, then really, they will be just as complicit in the destruction of the USA as MAGA.
That’s going to be a real problem for the Democrats.
There’s going to be so much Trump/MAGA shit to clear away, and so many things that will have to be re-built to get the US in any shape to have a future.
Along the way, they’re bound to uncover a lot of crimes committed by Trump and his minions. They can’t just ignore those crimes, but the have to find a way to demolish the rubbish that Trump leaves behind, and prosecute the criminals, in ways that the law requires, and which don’t look at all like petty revenge.
I did wonder they other night if all of this is planned by a third party to weaken the various alliances around the world.
The USA upsets everyone so much acting like Nazis that we all turn away from the USA and they become isolated.
Not weak but less capable militarily as bases outside of USA territory are closed.
Carriers whilst forward projecting power aren’t invulnerable and get taken out.
Trump being stupid or compromised or both is acting a part
Date: 20/01/2026 12:18:03
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2351897
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Michael V said:
‘Canal!
I dunno. This sort of federal power grab will make things a lot easier when the next Democrat president has to line up all these MAGA morons up against the wall.
If the Democrats play by the same rules established by Trump et al, then really, they will be just as complicit in the destruction of the USA as MAGA.
It was in jest but Trump and his lackeys may venture in to treason territory that will have to countered by the impartial application of the role of law. Unfortunately there will be communities in the US that are too stupid to accept this and a Democrat president might need to call in the army and perhaps even apply the Insurrection Act in ways that will mirror the actions of the MAGA movement that they are trying to eradicate.
The only difference will be the support of the majority of Americans as opposed to the radical fringe minority that currently supports Trump’s actions. It will get messy.
Date: 20/01/2026 12:20:38
From: furious
ID: 2351899
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Michael V said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
I dunno. This sort of federal power grab will make things a lot easier when the next Democrat president has to line up all these MAGA morons up against the wall.
If the Democrats play by the same rules established by Trump et al, then really, they will be just as complicit in the destruction of the USA as MAGA.
It was in jest but Trump and his lackeys may venture in to treason territory that will have to countered by the impartial application of the role of law. Unfortunately there will be communities in the US that are too stupid to accept this and a Democrat president might need to call in the army and perhaps even apply the Insurrection Act in ways that will mirror the actions of the MAGA movement that they are trying to eradicate.
The only difference will be the support of the majority of Americans as opposed to the radical fringe minority that currently supports Trump’s actions. It will get messy.
It has been said that the reason they are being so outwardly evil is because they have no intention of giving up power when the time comes…
Date: 20/01/2026 12:48:22
From: Michael V
ID: 2351904
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
I dunno. This sort of federal power grab will make things a lot easier when the next Democrat president has to line up all these MAGA morons up against the wall.
If the Democrats play by the same rules established by Trump et al, then really, they will be just as complicit in the destruction of the USA as MAGA.
That’s going to be a real problem for the Democrats.
There’s going to be so much Trump/MAGA shit to clear away, and so many things that will have to be re-built to get the US in any shape to have a future.
Along the way, they’re bound to uncover a lot of crimes committed by Trump and his minions. They can’t just ignore those crimes, but the have to find a way to demolish the rubbish that Trump leaves behind, and prosecute the criminals, in ways that the law requires, and which don’t look at all like petty revenge.
Nods.
Date: 20/01/2026 12:50:58
From: Michael V
ID: 2351905
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
furious said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Michael V said:
If the Democrats play by the same rules established by Trump et al, then really, they will be just as complicit in the destruction of the USA as MAGA.
It was in jest but Trump and his lackeys may venture in to treason territory that will have to countered by the impartial application of the role of law. Unfortunately there will be communities in the US that are too stupid to accept this and a Democrat president might need to call in the army and perhaps even apply the Insurrection Act in ways that will mirror the actions of the MAGA movement that they are trying to eradicate.
The only difference will be the support of the majority of Americans as opposed to the radical fringe minority that currently supports Trump’s actions. It will get messy.
It has been said that the reason they are being so outwardly evil is because they have no intention of giving up power when the time comes…
There is that quite distinct possibility.
Date: 20/01/2026 12:53:46
From: Boris
ID: 2351906
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
furious said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Michael V said:
If the Democrats play by the same rules established by Trump et al, then really, they will be just as complicit in the destruction of the USA as MAGA.
It was in jest but Trump and his lackeys may venture in to treason territory that will have to countered by the impartial application of the role of law. Unfortunately there will be communities in the US that are too stupid to accept this and a Democrat president might need to call in the army and perhaps even apply the Insurrection Act in ways that will mirror the actions of the MAGA movement that they are trying to eradicate.
The only difference will be the support of the majority of Americans as opposed to the radical fringe minority that currently supports Trump’s actions. It will get messy.
It has been said that the reason they are being so outwardly evil is because they have no intention of giving up power when the time comes…
I alluded to this early last year considering the way things were appearing to go.
Date: 20/01/2026 12:54:07
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2351907
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Trump moves the center of attention to Greenland, nobody’s talking about Venezuela anymore, not even this forum.
Beautiful work.
Date: 20/01/2026 12:56:31
From: Cymek
ID: 2351908
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Boris said:
furious said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
It was in jest but Trump and his lackeys may venture in to treason territory that will have to countered by the impartial application of the role of law. Unfortunately there will be communities in the US that are too stupid to accept this and a Democrat president might need to call in the army and perhaps even apply the Insurrection Act in ways that will mirror the actions of the MAGA movement that they are trying to eradicate.
The only difference will be the support of the majority of Americans as opposed to the radical fringe minority that currently supports Trump’s actions. It will get messy.
It has been said that the reason they are being so outwardly evil is because they have no intention of giving up power when the time comes…
I alluded to this early last year considering the way things were appearing to go.
Lets hope Trump doesn’t have a scorched Earth policy or doomsday weapon
Date: 20/01/2026 12:56:49
From: Boris
ID: 2351909
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Trump moves the center of attention to Greenland, nobody’s talking about Venezuela anymore, not even this forum.
Beautiful work.
nothing stopping you from mentioning Venezuela. If you really care. but you don’t.
Date: 20/01/2026 12:59:23
From: Michael V
ID: 2351911
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Trump moves the center of attention to Greenland, nobody’s talking about Venezuela anymore, not even this forum.
Beautiful work.
Ep-what files?

Date: 20/01/2026 13:01:25
From: roughbarked
ID: 2351912
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Boris said:
furious said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
It was in jest but Trump and his lackeys may venture in to treason territory that will have to countered by the impartial application of the role of law. Unfortunately there will be communities in the US that are too stupid to accept this and a Democrat president might need to call in the army and perhaps even apply the Insurrection Act in ways that will mirror the actions of the MAGA movement that they are trying to eradicate.
The only difference will be the support of the majority of Americans as opposed to the radical fringe minority that currently supports Trump’s actions. It will get messy.
It has been said that the reason they are being so outwardly evil is because they have no intention of giving up power when the time comes…
I alluded to this early last year considering the way things were appearing to go.
the clue was when Trump said they wouldn’t need elections.
Date: 20/01/2026 13:11:00
From: Cymek
ID: 2351915
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Boris said:
furious said:
It has been said that the reason they are being so outwardly evil is because they have no intention of giving up power when the time comes…
I alluded to this early last year considering the way things were appearing to go.
the clue was when Trump said they wouldn’t need elections.
Change one letter and Melania breathes a sigh of relief
Date: 20/01/2026 13:11:59
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2351916
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Trump moves the center of attention to Greenland, nobody’s talking about Venezuela anymore, not even this forum.
Beautiful work.

Date: 20/01/2026 13:12:25
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2351917
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 20/01/2026 13:22:05
From: Michael V
ID: 2351923
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
LOL snap @ MV
:)
Date: 20/01/2026 14:09:40
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2351937
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
This Idea Totally Does Not Have Popular Support

alleged

I dunno. This sort of federal power grab will make things a lot easier when the next Democrat president has to line up all these MAGA morons up against the wall.
If the Democrats play by the same rules established by Trump et al, then really, they will be just as complicit in the destruction of the USA as MAGA.
That’s going to be a real problem for the Democrats.
There’s going to be so much Trump/MAGA shit to clear away, and so many things that will have to be re-built to get the US in any shape to have a future.
Along the way, they’re bound to uncover a lot of crimes committed by Trump and his minions. They can’t just ignore those crimes, but the have to find a way to demolish the rubbish that Trump leaves behind, and prosecute the criminals, in ways that the law requires, and which don’t look at all like petty revenge.
I dunno. This sort of federal power grab will make things a lot easier when the next Democrat president has to line up all these MAGA morons up against the wall.
If the Democrats play by the same rules established by Trump et al, then really, they will be just as complicit in the destruction of the USA as MAGA.
That’s going to be a real problem for the Democrats.
There’s going to be so much Trump/MAGA shit to clear away, and so many things that will have to be re-built to get the US in any shape to have a future.
Along the way, they’re bound to uncover a lot of crimes committed by Trump and his minions. They can’t just ignore those crimes, but the have to find a way to demolish the rubbish that Trump leaves behind, and prosecute the criminals, in ways that the law requires, and which don’t look at all like petty revenge.
I did wonder they other night if all of this is planned by a third party to weaken the various alliances around the world.
The USA upsets everyone so much acting like Nazis that we all turn away from the USA and they become isolated.
Not weak but less capable militarily as bases outside of USA territory are closed.
Carriers whilst forward projecting power aren’t invulnerable and get taken out.
Trump being stupid or compromised or both is acting a part
It was in jest but Trump and his lackeys may venture in to treason territory that will have to countered by the impartial application of the role of law. Unfortunately there will be communities in the US that are too stupid to accept this and a Democrat president might need to call in the army and perhaps even apply the Insurrection Act in ways that will mirror the actions of the MAGA movement that they are trying to eradicate.
The only difference will be the support of the majority of Americans as opposed to the radical fringe minority that currently supports Trump’s actions. It will get messy.
It has been said that the reason they are being so outwardly evil is because they have no intention of giving up power when the time comes…
There is that quite distinct possibility.
I alluded to this early last year considering the way things were appearing to go.
Lets hope Trump doesn’t have a scorched Earth policy or doomsday weapon
the clue was when Trump said they wouldn’t need elections.
Change one letter and Melania breathes a sigh of relief
sure and all very entertaining but LOL this part
The only difference will be the support of the majority of Americans as opposed to the radical fringe minority that currently supports Trump’s actions. It will get messy.
LOL
we’re going to say it now when push comes to shove the “radical fringe minority that currently supports Trump’s actions” is the majority of Americans …
Date: 20/01/2026 15:29:26
From: kii
ID: 2351959
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 20/01/2026 15:35:42
From: Michael V
ID: 2351965
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:

:)
I really hope that people are actually doing just this and similar.
Date: 20/01/2026 15:38:20
From: Cymek
ID: 2351967
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
kii said:

:)
I really hope that people are actually doing just this and similar.
Vasquez is also an illegal, she would kick some serious ICE arse though

Date: 20/01/2026 16:06:09
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2351975
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Trump promised an economic boom. That’s not quite what has happened
Stephen Bartholomeusz
Senior business columnist
January 20, 2026 — 11:56am
The first year of Donald Trump’s second term as US president has been tumultuous and extraordinarily disruptive for American society, the US economy and the rest of the world, but has it been successful?
After only a year in office, it could be argued that it is too early to tell, but Trump promised successes from “Day One”.
Trump’s tariffs – his trade war on the rest of the world –, the investment pledges he extracted using them as leverage, his disengagement of the US from multilateralism and its institutions, his deregulation, changes to the US tax system, the assault on the US bureaucracy, science and higher education and his adventurism abroad will, like many of the multitude of executive orders he has issued from the first day of his return to the Oval Office, have longer-term consequences.
He did, however, make numerous promises of near-immediate results during his successful 2024 campaign that have yet to be fulfilled.
Immigration
Among them were pledges to close the border and deport illegal immigrants, end inflation, lower interest rates, revive US manufacturing, particularly the auto industry, unwind Biden’s green energy initiatives, reduce US deficits and debt, lower the US trade deficit, spark a boom in the oil and gas industry that would lead to lower petrol prices and end the “affordability” crisis that played a major role in discrediting the Biden administration, and in Kamala Harris’ loss.
Inflation
He hasn’t conquered inflation, although it has declined, slightly. When Joe Biden left office the US inflation rate was 2.9 per cent. The most recent data says it is now 2.7 per cent.
Food inflation, however, has picked up and is now 3.1 per cent and rising, which feeds into the affordability issue that is front of mind for US households and voters and helps explain why Trump’s popularity has fallen over the year.
While his tariffs haven’t yet done what most economists expected and fed into inflation, that may be because their imposition was delayed, which gave importers time to build inventories and caused companies to absorb their cost until the regime settled.
Some tariffs were announced and then rolled back (as was the case with China) and there have been a raft of exemptions as the pain points in supply chains became more evident.
What could have been an average tariff rate in the mid-20 per cent range, or higher, had the rates initially announced held, is now an average rate of about 17 per cent – compared with about 2.5 per cent before Trump regained office.
The tariffs have been disruptive and bred uncertainty for businesses and households, leading to caution, inertia and lost investment and jobs even before their full effect on consumer prices and the economy is felt.
Job creation
US manufacturing industry activity and job creation has been steadily shrinking. The unemployment rate, 4.1 per cent when Biden departed, is now 4.6 per cent. There is no sign of a Trump manufacturing jobs boom.
The auto industry, targeted by Trump for revival, has been hit by higher costs from his 50 per cent steel and aluminium tariffs, disruption to supply chains and his assault on Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act, with its massive spending on clean energy measures, including incentives for electric vehicles and restrictions on emissions. Ford has written $US19.5 billion ($29 billion) off the value of its EV investments and GM $US7.1 billion.
Billions of dollars of investment in wind and solar energy plants have also been stranded (Trump hates wind turbines, which he calls windmills) even as the demand for electricity from the massive investments in data centres for artificial intelligence is ramping up and already feeding into energy prices.
Trump’s crackdown on illegal immigrants has been effective in closing the southern border, deporting non-citizens and deterring immigrants, but the brutal approach of his ICE teams to the rounding up of undocumented immigrants (and the odd US citizen) within the US is generating its own issues.
It’s also reducing the pool of labour, which might help explain why unemployment hasn’t increased even more sharply in a market where companies are either shrinking their employment bases or not hiring.
Interest rates
The question mark over the outlook for inflation while the jobs market is deteriorating has created a challenge for the US Federal Reserve Board, which has still cut rates three times in the past year, reducing the effective federal funds rate (akin to the Reserve Bank’s cash rate) from 4.48 per cent to about 3.72 per cent.
Trump has got lower rates, but that, of course, hasn’t satisfied him.
He wants something closer to 1 per cent and is determined to get his way by trying to mount a takeover of the Fed’s board of governors, targeting one governor (Lisa Cook) with allegation of mortgage fraud and, more recently, the Fed’s chair, Jerome Powell, with a flimsy allegation that he mislead Congress over renovations to the Fed’s Washington headquarters.
That could backfire, given that Powell’s term as chair expires in May and Trump can choose his successor. The usual protocol is that Fed chairs retire from the board once their term as chair ends, but Powell’s term as a governor doesn’t end until January 2028.
He might now be inclined to stay on, becoming a locus for opposition to any attempt to force rates lower than the econocrats within the Fed’s open market committee, which sets US monetary policy, believe they ought to be. Trump would then have to appoint an existing governor or displace his most recent appointee, White House insider Stephen Miran.
Oil
Trump’s energy policy – “drill, baby’ drill” – has produced some successes. US oil production has increased from Biden’s record levels of 13.3 million barrels a day to 13.6 million barrels a day and petrol prices have fallen from an average of just over $US3 a gallon at the end of Biden’s term to about $US2.84 a gallon.
The slump in global oil prices, as the OPEC+ cartel has returned millions of barrels a day of sidelined production to the market over the past year, has however driven oil prices down from about $US75 a barrel to about $US60 a barrel over the past year.
While that has helped lower petrol prices, it also places a question mark over the economics of onshore oil production in the US, where the breakeven price is about $US60 a barrel.
Sharemarket
The one obvious success Trump can claim is the sharemarket, which has risen about 14 per cent over the past year, driven by a 20 per cent surge in the value of the “Magnificent Seven” big tech stocks and their exposure to AI. In Biden’s last year, however, the overall market rose 24 per cent – it is AI, not the White House, underpinning the market’s rise.
Whether that AI-related surge is sustainable or not, the investment occurring in AI is staggering – about $US375 billion last year and likely to be at least $US450 billion this year.
That’s not only boosting stock prices but is also the major contributor to US economic growth.
GDP
US real GDP growth is running at about the same rate as the 2.8 per cent Biden presided over in 2024, although it was lifting towards the end of last year. The International Monetary Fund, however, this week forecast US growth of 2.4 per cent this year and only 2.1 per cent in 2027.
Whether Trump’s claims that he has negotiated more than $US20 trillion of investment pledges from other countries (using the tariffs as leverage) actually shows up as dollars on the ground – most analyses calculate the number in the mid-single-digit trillions, spread over years – might determine whether Trump’s promise to turbocharge growth eventuates.
Government debt
What Trump hasn’t been able to do is reduce US government debt, indeed his “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (OBBBA) has increased it.
While the budget deficit was roughly steady at $US1.8 trillion last financial year, US government debt has risen from $US36.1 trillion to more than $US38 trillion, even though revenue from tariffs soared by more than $US200 billion last year.
While the Congressional Budget Office has estimated that (if they survive the Supreme Court challenge) the tariffs will raise $US2.5 trillion over a decade, it has also said that the tax cuts in the OBBBA will cost $US3.4 trillion over the same period.
Trump has also promised to spend the tariff revenue, several times over, on $US2000 cheques to households, the abolition of income taxes, aid to farmers hurt by his trade wars, increased defence spending… and deficit and debt reduction.
The tariffs are, apparently, a magic pudding. The debt, however, is real and growing too quickly, a factor in a 9.3 per cent depreciation of the US dollar over the year as foreign investors decided to “Sell America” rather risk experiencing debasement of the debt via inflation and money printing.
Trump’s frenzied policymaking over the past year, an endless blitz of announcements and threats that is continuing, complicates effort to assess his performance and its impact on the US and global economies.
He would probably claim an A+ on his report card, but it is fair to say that an F remains a distinct possibility.
https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/trump-promised-an-economic-boom-that-s-not-quite-what-has-happened-20260120-p5nvcn.html
Date: 20/01/2026 16:17:50
From: buffy
ID: 2351976
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
kii said:

:)
I really hope that people are actually doing just this and similar.
And that they are using public phones to do it. Do they still have public phones in America? Ours are free (although sparse), so it would be the perfect way to do it here.
Date: 20/01/2026 16:26:14
From: buffy
ID: 2351977
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
>>That could backfire, given that Powell’s term as chair expires in May and Trump can choose his successor. The usual protocol is that Fed chairs retire from the board once their term as chair ends, but Powell’s term as a governor doesn’t end until January 2028.
He might now be inclined to stay on, becoming a locus for opposition to any attempt to force rates lower than the econocrats within the Fed’s open market committee, which sets US monetary policy, believe they ought to be. Trump would then have to appoint an existing governor or displace his most recent appointee, White House insider Stephen Miran.<<
From Witty’s post. That’s Quite Interesting.
Date: 20/01/2026 16:28:33
From: Kingy
ID: 2351979
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 20/01/2026 16:28:57
From: Cymek
ID: 2351980
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Trump promised an economic boom. That’s not quite what has happened
Stephen Bartholomeusz
Senior business columnist
January 20, 2026 — 11:56am
The first year of Donald Trump’s second term as US president has been tumultuous and extraordinarily disruptive for American society, the US economy and the rest of the world, but has it been successful?
After only a year in office, it could be argued that it is too early to tell, but Trump promised successes from “Day One”.
Trump’s tariffs – his trade war on the rest of the world –, the investment pledges he extracted using them as leverage, his disengagement of the US from multilateralism and its institutions, his deregulation, changes to the US tax system, the assault on the US bureaucracy, science and higher education and his adventurism abroad will, like many of the multitude of executive orders he has issued from the first day of his return to the Oval Office, have longer-term consequences.
He did, however, make numerous promises of near-immediate results during his successful 2024 campaign that have yet to be fulfilled.
Immigration
Among them were pledges to close the border and deport illegal immigrants, end inflation, lower interest rates, revive US manufacturing, particularly the auto industry, unwind Biden’s green energy initiatives, reduce US deficits and debt, lower the US trade deficit, spark a boom in the oil and gas industry that would lead to lower petrol prices and end the “affordability” crisis that played a major role in discrediting the Biden administration, and in Kamala Harris’ loss.
Inflation
He hasn’t conquered inflation, although it has declined, slightly. When Joe Biden left office the US inflation rate was 2.9 per cent. The most recent data says it is now 2.7 per cent.
Food inflation, however, has picked up and is now 3.1 per cent and rising, which feeds into the affordability issue that is front of mind for US households and voters and helps explain why Trump’s popularity has fallen over the year.
While his tariffs haven’t yet done what most economists expected and fed into inflation, that may be because their imposition was delayed, which gave importers time to build inventories and caused companies to absorb their cost until the regime settled.
Some tariffs were announced and then rolled back (as was the case with China) and there have been a raft of exemptions as the pain points in supply chains became more evident.
What could have been an average tariff rate in the mid-20 per cent range, or higher, had the rates initially announced held, is now an average rate of about 17 per cent – compared with about 2.5 per cent before Trump regained office.
The tariffs have been disruptive and bred uncertainty for businesses and households, leading to caution, inertia and lost investment and jobs even before their full effect on consumer prices and the economy is felt.
Job creation
US manufacturing industry activity and job creation has been steadily shrinking. The unemployment rate, 4.1 per cent when Biden departed, is now 4.6 per cent. There is no sign of a Trump manufacturing jobs boom.
The auto industry, targeted by Trump for revival, has been hit by higher costs from his 50 per cent steel and aluminium tariffs, disruption to supply chains and his assault on Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act, with its massive spending on clean energy measures, including incentives for electric vehicles and restrictions on emissions. Ford has written $US19.5 billion ($29 billion) off the value of its EV investments and GM $US7.1 billion.
Billions of dollars of investment in wind and solar energy plants have also been stranded (Trump hates wind turbines, which he calls windmills) even as the demand for electricity from the massive investments in data centres for artificial intelligence is ramping up and already feeding into energy prices.
Trump’s crackdown on illegal immigrants has been effective in closing the southern border, deporting non-citizens and deterring immigrants, but the brutal approach of his ICE teams to the rounding up of undocumented immigrants (and the odd US citizen) within the US is generating its own issues.
It’s also reducing the pool of labour, which might help explain why unemployment hasn’t increased even more sharply in a market where companies are either shrinking their employment bases or not hiring.
Interest rates
The question mark over the outlook for inflation while the jobs market is deteriorating has created a challenge for the US Federal Reserve Board, which has still cut rates three times in the past year, reducing the effective federal funds rate (akin to the Reserve Bank’s cash rate) from 4.48 per cent to about 3.72 per cent.
Trump has got lower rates, but that, of course, hasn’t satisfied him.
He wants something closer to 1 per cent and is determined to get his way by trying to mount a takeover of the Fed’s board of governors, targeting one governor (Lisa Cook) with allegation of mortgage fraud and, more recently, the Fed’s chair, Jerome Powell, with a flimsy allegation that he mislead Congress over renovations to the Fed’s Washington headquarters.
That could backfire, given that Powell’s term as chair expires in May and Trump can choose his successor. The usual protocol is that Fed chairs retire from the board once their term as chair ends, but Powell’s term as a governor doesn’t end until January 2028.
He might now be inclined to stay on, becoming a locus for opposition to any attempt to force rates lower than the econocrats within the Fed’s open market committee, which sets US monetary policy, believe they ought to be. Trump would then have to appoint an existing governor or displace his most recent appointee, White House insider Stephen Miran.
Oil
Trump’s energy policy – “drill, baby’ drill” – has produced some successes. US oil production has increased from Biden’s record levels of 13.3 million barrels a day to 13.6 million barrels a day and petrol prices have fallen from an average of just over $US3 a gallon at the end of Biden’s term to about $US2.84 a gallon.
The slump in global oil prices, as the OPEC+ cartel has returned millions of barrels a day of sidelined production to the market over the past year, has however driven oil prices down from about $US75 a barrel to about $US60 a barrel over the past year.
While that has helped lower petrol prices, it also places a question mark over the economics of onshore oil production in the US, where the breakeven price is about $US60 a barrel.
Sharemarket
The one obvious success Trump can claim is the sharemarket, which has risen about 14 per cent over the past year, driven by a 20 per cent surge in the value of the “Magnificent Seven” big tech stocks and their exposure to AI. In Biden’s last year, however, the overall market rose 24 per cent – it is AI, not the White House, underpinning the market’s rise.
Whether that AI-related surge is sustainable or not, the investment occurring in AI is staggering – about $US375 billion last year and likely to be at least $US450 billion this year.
That’s not only boosting stock prices but is also the major contributor to US economic growth.
GDP
US real GDP growth is running at about the same rate as the 2.8 per cent Biden presided over in 2024, although it was lifting towards the end of last year. The International Monetary Fund, however, this week forecast US growth of 2.4 per cent this year and only 2.1 per cent in 2027.
Whether Trump’s claims that he has negotiated more than $US20 trillion of investment pledges from other countries (using the tariffs as leverage) actually shows up as dollars on the ground – most analyses calculate the number in the mid-single-digit trillions, spread over years – might determine whether Trump’s promise to turbocharge growth eventuates.
Government debt
What Trump hasn’t been able to do is reduce US government debt, indeed his “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (OBBBA) has increased it.
While the budget deficit was roughly steady at $US1.8 trillion last financial year, US government debt has risen from $US36.1 trillion to more than $US38 trillion, even though revenue from tariffs soared by more than $US200 billion last year.
While the Congressional Budget Office has estimated that (if they survive the Supreme Court challenge) the tariffs will raise $US2.5 trillion over a decade, it has also said that the tax cuts in the OBBBA will cost $US3.4 trillion over the same period.
Trump has also promised to spend the tariff revenue, several times over, on $US2000 cheques to households, the abolition of income taxes, aid to farmers hurt by his trade wars, increased defence spending… and deficit and debt reduction.
The tariffs are, apparently, a magic pudding. The debt, however, is real and growing too quickly, a factor in a 9.3 per cent depreciation of the US dollar over the year as foreign investors decided to “Sell America” rather risk experiencing debasement of the debt via inflation and money printing.
Trump’s frenzied policymaking over the past year, an endless blitz of announcements and threats that is continuing, complicates effort to assess his performance and its impact on the US and global economies.
He would probably claim an A+ on his report card, but it is fair to say that an F remains a distinct possibility.
https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/trump-promised-an-economic-boom-that-s-not-quite-what-has-happened-20260120-p5nvcn.html
Repercussion from the rest of the world having had enough of Trump could spell long term trouble for the USA.
New alliances and trades partnerships formed bypassing the USA.
Date: 20/01/2026 16:36:29
From: dv
ID: 2351982
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jan/19/kremlin-says-putin-invited-join-trump-gaza-board-of-peace
Perfect
Date: 20/01/2026 16:39:34
From: roughbarked
ID: 2351983
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jan/19/kremlin-says-putin-invited-join-trump-gaza-board-of-peace
Perfect
Putin is also congratulating Trump on taking over Greenland.
Date: 20/01/2026 16:53:23
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2351986
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/trump-promised-an-economic-boom-that-s-not-quite-what-has-happened-20260120-p5nvcn.html
Repercussion from the rest of the world having had enough of Trump could spell long term trouble for the USA.
New alliances and trades partnerships formed bypassing the USA.
‘sif
why do you think the propaganda is so heated right now against countries that genocide millions of radical islamists in their western regions
Date: 20/01/2026 16:54:24
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2351987
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Kingy said:


pedunculated but not sessile
Date: 20/01/2026 16:58:20
From: dv
ID: 2351990
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jan/19/kremlin-says-putin-invited-join-trump-gaza-board-of-peace
Date: 20/01/2026 16:59:01
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2351991
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 20/01/2026 17:06:01
From: dv
ID: 2351994
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 20/01/2026 17:06:45
From: dv
ID: 2351995
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
dv said:
roughbarked said:
Putin is also congratulating Trump on taking over Greenland.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jan/19/kremlin-says-putin-invited-join-trump-gaza-board-of-peace
did he decline it the first time
Ha
Date: 20/01/2026 17:24:08
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2352002
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 20/01/2026 17:24:42
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2352003
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 20/01/2026 17:30:39
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2352006
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:

They have to be careful.
If they take over Venezuela, and other Central and South American countries, they’ll have to allow the people living in those territories, as US citizens, free movement within what will then be an expanded United States, as guaranteed in Article IV Section 2 of the US Constitution, and the the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution.
Trump will be unable to arrest or deport them. Wherever they are in the US, and however they got there, they’re legal.
Date: 20/01/2026 17:35:05
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2352007
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Divine Angel said:

They have to be careful.
If they take over Venezuela, and other Central and South American countries, they’ll have to allow the people living in those territories, as US citizens, free movement within what will then be an expanded United States, as guaranteed in Article IV Section 2 of the US Constitution, and the the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution.
Trump will be unable to arrest or deport them. Wherever they are in the US, and however they got there, they’re legal.
Sif he follows anything the Constitution says.
Date: 20/01/2026 17:37:13
From: Cymek
ID: 2352010
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:

Do you reckon if you were fast enough as a guest you could kill him
Date: 20/01/2026 17:38:24
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2352012
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
Divine Angel said:

Do you reckon if you were fast enough as a guest you could kill him
Do you reckon that anyone would try to stop you?
Date: 20/01/2026 17:47:40
From: furious
ID: 2352013
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Cymek said:
Divine Angel said:

Do you reckon if you were fast enough as a guest you could kill him
Do you reckon that anyone would try to stop you?
Biden should have done it, when he was still president, thanks to trump, he would have been immune…
Date: 20/01/2026 17:51:55
From: Cymek
ID: 2352014
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Cymek said:
Divine Angel said:

Do you reckon if you were fast enough as a guest you could kill him
Do you reckon that anyone would try to stop you?
I was wondering if the secret service agents would
Date: 20/01/2026 17:54:22
From: buffy
ID: 2352015
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
captain_spalding said:
Cymek said:
Do you reckon if you were fast enough as a guest you could kill him
Do you reckon that anyone would try to stop you?
I was wondering if the secret service agents would
Surely they would be too busy looking at their phones at such an inopportune moment….
Date: 20/01/2026 17:59:19
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2352017
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Cymek said:
captain_spalding said:
Do you reckon that anyone would try to stop you?
I was wondering if the secret service agents would
Surely they would be too busy looking at their phones at such an inopportune moment….
Remember when that kid too a shot at Trump?
And how bystanders said that they’d told ‘the authorities’ that they’d seen someone on the roof. They may have even told them that he had a gun.
But, no-one seemed to ‘react’ until after the poor schmuck had taken (and flubbed) his shot.
Date: 20/01/2026 18:08:20
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2352018
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
buffy said:
Cymek said:
I was wondering if the secret service agents would
Surely they would be too busy looking at their phones at such an inopportune moment….
Remember when that kid too a shot at Trump?
And how bystanders said that they’d told ‘the authorities’ that they’d seen someone on the roof. They may have even told them that he had a gun.
But, no-one seemed to ‘react’ until after the poor schmuck had taken (and flubbed) his shot.
……….and……..and then they killed him so he couldn’t talk…………
pulls on bong
Date: 20/01/2026 18:08:49
From: Michael V
ID: 2352019
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

Heh!
:)
Date: 20/01/2026 18:10:28
From: Michael V
ID: 2352020
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Divine Angel said:

They have to be careful.
If they take over Venezuela, and other Central and South American countries, they’ll have to allow the people living in those territories, as US citizens, free movement within what will then be an expanded United States, as guaranteed in Article IV Section 2 of the US Constitution, and the the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution.
Trump will be unable to arrest or deport them. Wherever they are in the US, and however they got there, they’re legal.
Since when do Trump and his handlers give a toss about laws.
Date: 20/01/2026 18:11:15
From: Michael V
ID: 2352021
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Divine Angel said:

They have to be careful.
If they take over Venezuela, and other Central and South American countries, they’ll have to allow the people living in those territories, as US citizens, free movement within what will then be an expanded United States, as guaranteed in Article IV Section 2 of the US Constitution, and the the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution.
Trump will be unable to arrest or deport them. Wherever they are in the US, and however they got there, they’re legal.

Date: 20/01/2026 18:12:22
From: Michael V
ID: 2352022
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Cymek said:
captain_spalding said:
Do you reckon that anyone would try to stop you?
I was wondering if the secret service agents would
Surely they would be too busy looking at their phones at such an inopportune moment….
One would hope so.
Date: 20/01/2026 18:21:49
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2352025
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
captain_spalding said:
buffy said:
Surely they would be too busy looking at their phones at such an inopportune moment….
Remember when that kid too a shot at Trump?
And how bystanders said that they’d told ‘the authorities’ that they’d seen someone on the roof. They may have even told them that he had a gun.
But, no-one seemed to ‘react’ until after the poor schmuck had taken (and flubbed) his shot.
……….and……..and then they killed him so he couldn’t talk…………
pulls on bong
Well, my point is, if Trump was about to be hit by a runaway dump truck, i don’t think that there’s a lot of people who would be all that perturbed about it.
Date: 20/01/2026 18:22:35
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2352026
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
captain_spalding said:
Divine Angel said:

They have to be careful.
If they take over Venezuela, and other Central and South American countries, they’ll have to allow the people living in those territories, as US citizens, free movement within what will then be an expanded United States, as guaranteed in Article IV Section 2 of the US Constitution, and the the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution.
Trump will be unable to arrest or deport them. Wherever they are in the US, and however they got there, they’re legal.
Since when do Trump and his handlers give a toss about laws.
are vassals citizens
Date: 20/01/2026 18:23:35
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2352028
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
captain_spalding said:
They have to be careful.
If they take over Venezuela, and other Central and South American countries, they’ll have to allow the people living in those territories, as US citizens, free movement within what will then be an expanded United States, as guaranteed in Article IV Section 2 of the US Constitution, and the the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution.
Trump will be unable to arrest or deport them. Wherever they are in the US, and however they got there, they’re legal.
Since when do Trump and his handlers give a toss about laws.
are vassals citizens
When it comes to creating/gerrymandering safe electorates for yourself, yes.
Date: 20/01/2026 18:33:18
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2352031
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 20/01/2026 18:38:09
From: furious
ID: 2352034
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

Unlike 88, 47 wouldn’‘t want to put the work in, he’d just want the certificate of graduation…
Date: 20/01/2026 18:40:32
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2352036
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
furious said:
captain_spalding said:

Unlike 88, 47 wouldn’‘t want to put the work in, he’d just want the certificate of graduation…
…and a little something in gold.
Date: 20/01/2026 18:51:11
From: Cymek
ID: 2352041
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

He does self portraits not landscapes
Date: 20/01/2026 18:51:15
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2352042
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The University of Sydney’s Stuart Rollo, whose research focuses on the US–China relationship, said the Trump administration alienating Europe was short-sighted. “The US could be really seriously overplaying its hand by thinking they can kick Europe around forever,” Dr Rollo said. “And it will just never explore closer relations with a country like China that are actually not really national security threats to them at all.”
Date: 20/01/2026 19:19:23
From: Michael V
ID: 2352047
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

:)
Date: 20/01/2026 20:24:42
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2352064
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
alleged

Date: 20/01/2026 22:47:12
From: dv
ID: 2352102
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Epstein Island (Little Saint James) was one of the islands that the US bought from Denmark in 1917.
Date: 20/01/2026 23:20:04
From: Michael V
ID: 2352109
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Epstein Island (Little Saint James) was one of the islands that the US bought from Denmark in 1917.
That’d be right.
Date: 20/01/2026 23:22:05
From: AussieDJ
ID: 2352110
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 20/01/2026 23:33:01
From: party_pants
ID: 2352111
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
AussieDJ said:

More likely, the whole administration are Russian agents.
Date: 20/01/2026 23:49:50
From: dv
ID: 2352112
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 20/01/2026 23:59:00
From: AussieDJ
ID: 2352113
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
(Did I see this here?)
Impeaching Trump under the 25th Amendment only replaces him with Vance, which is no solution.
Article 2, Section 4, of the Constitution needs to be invoked.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/LYsSDTazE3g
Date: 21/01/2026 01:02:50
From: dv
ID: 2352116
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Blistering hot take
Date: 21/01/2026 02:22:40
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2352122
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Blistering hot take
They always leave a mess. Although they do seem to have improved their regime changes.
The Venezuela regime change was much better than the Iraq one.
Date: 21/01/2026 05:14:26
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2352127
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
dv said:
Blistering hot take
They always leave a mess. Although they do seem to have improved their regime changes.
The Venezuela regime change was much better than the Iraq one.
I’ll give them 9/10 for Venezuela and 1/10 for Iraq.
Date: 21/01/2026 05:38:13
From: roughbarked
ID: 2352129
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
dv said:
Epstein Island (Little Saint James) was one of the islands that the US bought from Denmark in 1917.
That’d be right.
Then the US gov’t sold it to Epstein?
Date: 21/01/2026 05:47:06
From: roughbarked
ID: 2352130
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
AussieDJ said:
(Did I see this here?)
Impeaching Trump under the 25th Amendment only replaces him with Vance, which is no solution.
Article 2, Section 4, of the Constitution needs to be invoked.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/LYsSDTazE3g
Very good and the next video in line is this: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/ZWdFOb42xHc
Date: 21/01/2026 07:02:17
From: Michael V
ID: 2352140
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
dv said:
Epstein Island (Little Saint James) was one of the islands that the US bought from Denmark in 1917.
That’d be right.
Then the US gov’t sold it to Epstein?
No idea – but I do get the impression that that’s how private ownership of land usually happens.
The point of my “that’d be right” comment is that it’s one of the US Virgin Islands…
Date: 21/01/2026 07:08:06
From: roughbarked
ID: 2352143
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
That’d be right.
Then the US gov’t sold it to Epstein?
No idea – but I do get the impression that that’s how private ownership of land usually happens.
The point of my “that’d be right” comment is that it’s one of the US Virgin Islands…
Heh. Yeah the irony…
Date: 21/01/2026 07:27:05
From: roughbarked
ID: 2352148
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Donald Trump, the madman theory, and why even Australia is not safe
By Riley Stuart in London
Date: 21/01/2026 08:25:09
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2352154
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Do… Do Bears Shit In The Woods
“The reality that the US president has the reasoning power of a kindergarten child is probably more compelling than that he’s slipping into cognitive decline,” wrote former Australian foreign minister Bob Carr in a social media post this week. Could Trump take issue with the Albanese government’s freshly passed tighter gun laws and hate speech reforms, given his scepticism of those matters in the US? Could the president target Australia if it rejects its invitation to pay $US1 billion ($1.49 billion) and join his so-called global Board of Peace? When France declined, Trump threatened to introduce 200 per cent tariffs on its wine and champagne exports.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-01-21/donald-trump-greenland-threat-madman-theory-analysis/106251358
Date: 21/01/2026 08:50:44
From: Michael V
ID: 2352155
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
AussieDJ said:
(Did I see this here?)
Impeaching Trump under the 25th Amendment only replaces him with Vance, which is no solution.
Article 2, Section 4, of the Constitution needs to be invoked.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/LYsSDTazE3g
Interesting.
Thanks for posting.
There may be a meagre light at the end of the current USA tunnel.
A question for those that seem to know and understand the US constitution: Is this a realistic prospect and possible solution to the Trump et al problem?
Date: 21/01/2026 09:02:54
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2352156
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Donald Trump, the madman theory, and why even Australia is not safe
By Riley Stuart in London
How about ‘Moron’ Theory?
Date: 21/01/2026 09:11:14
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2352157
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
AussieDJ said:
(Did I see this here?)
Impeaching Trump under the 25th Amendment only replaces him with Vance, which is no solution.
Article 2, Section 4, of the Constitution needs to be invoked.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/LYsSDTazE3g
Interesting.
Thanks for posting.
There may be a meagre light at the end of the current USA tunnel.
A question for those that seem to know and understand the US constitution: Is this a realistic prospect and possible solution to the Trump et al problem?
It all depends on whether his Republican allies sycophants in Congress will abandon him if he goes too far. MTG saw the light but other GOP senators and members of the house might not be so principled.
Date: 21/01/2026 09:14:35
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2352158
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Michael V said:
AussieDJ said:
(Did I see this here?)
Impeaching Trump under the 25th Amendment only replaces him with Vance, which is no solution.
Article 2, Section 4, of the Constitution needs to be invoked.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/LYsSDTazE3g
Interesting.
Thanks for posting.
There may be a meagre light at the end of the current USA tunnel.
A question for those that seem to know and understand the US constitution: Is this a realistic prospect and possible solution to the Trump et al problem?
It all depends on whether his Republican allies sycophants in Congress will abandon him if he goes too far. MTG saw the light but other GOP senators and members of the house might not be so principled.
There’s also fear of retaliation. MTG might yet “fall out of a window”.
Date: 21/01/2026 11:08:08
From: buffy
ID: 2352174
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Michael V said:
AussieDJ said:
(Did I see this here?)
Impeaching Trump under the 25th Amendment only replaces him with Vance, which is no solution.
Article 2, Section 4, of the Constitution needs to be invoked.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/LYsSDTazE3g
Interesting.
Thanks for posting.
There may be a meagre light at the end of the current USA tunnel.
A question for those that seem to know and understand the US constitution: Is this a realistic prospect and possible solution to the Trump et al problem?
It all depends on whether his Republican allies sycophants in Congress will abandon him if he goes too far. MTG saw the light but other GOP senators and members of the house might not be so principled.
Well, there is a sentence I didn’t expect to see. MTG is principled…
Date: 21/01/2026 11:35:05
From: Boris
ID: 2352183
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 21/01/2026 13:00:43
From: kii
ID: 2352210
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Usha Vance is pregnant with 4th child.
Link
Lisa Lee Curtis aka Vägina Devil Magic:
“Anyway, Usha Vance is pregnant and, coincidentally enough, her due date is right around the human gestational period of timeframe from whatever the fuck is going on in this photo.”

The couch fucker with Charlie Kirk’s widow – EriKa KirK. (This is weeks after Charlie Kirk died, she’s in mourning, btw)
Date: 21/01/2026 13:04:54
From: Neophyte
ID: 2352211
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 21/01/2026 13:06:53
From: Cymek
ID: 2352212
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Neophyte said:

Would a trophy wife confuse him
Date: 21/01/2026 13:16:41
From: kii
ID: 2352218
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Morten Morland – Norwegian political cartoonist

Date: 21/01/2026 13:17:35
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2352219
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
Neophyte said:

Would a trophy wife confuse him
Melania could answer that.
Date: 21/01/2026 13:28:20
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2352222
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Cymek said:
Neophyte said:

Would a trophy wife confuse him
Melania could answer that.
isn’t there a movie about this
Date: 21/01/2026 13:35:20
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2352223
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Cymek said:
Neophyte said:

Would a trophy wife confuse him
Melania could answer that.
I think she’s got an engineering degree of some description.
Date: 21/01/2026 13:39:43
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2352224
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 21/01/2026 15:13:31
From: dv
ID: 2352239
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The DOJ has affirmed that there will be no investigation of Jonathan Ross’s shooting of Renee Good, even as it has come to light that ICE agents preventing medical personnel from attending the victim for 10 minutes after the shooting. Minnesota state officials have been barred from accessing crucial evidence in the case.
Date: 21/01/2026 15:15:16
From: Michael V
ID: 2352240
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 21/01/2026 15:16:35
From: Michael V
ID: 2352241
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
The DOJ has affirmed that there will be no investigation of Jonathan Ross’s shooting of Renee Good, even as it has come to light that ICE agents preventing medical personnel from attending the victim for 10 minutes after the shooting. Minnesota state officials have been barred from accessing crucial evidence in the case.
I’d be surprised if DOJ did investigate (properly).
Date: 21/01/2026 15:16:48
From: roughbarked
ID: 2352242
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
The DOJ has affirmed that there will be no investigation of Jonathan Ross’s shooting of Renee Good, even as it has come to light that ICE agents preventing medical personnel from attending the victim for 10 minutes after the shooting. Minnesota state officials have been barred from accessing crucial evidence in the case.
The place is being run by a lunatic despot and they jump to carry out his decrees.
Date: 21/01/2026 15:23:04
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2352245
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Greenlander talking about Trump’s proposition.
I remember Billy More shouting.
GREENLANDER GREENLANDER GREENLANDER
Date: 21/01/2026 15:26:18
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2352249
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
The DOJ has affirmed that there will be no investigation of Jonathan Ross’s shooting of Renee Good, even as it has come to light that ICE agents preventing medical personnel from attending the victim for 10 minutes after the shooting. Minnesota state officials have been barred from accessing crucial evidence in the case.
Tienanmen Square rules.
This never happened.
Date: 21/01/2026 15:31:15
From: dv
ID: 2352252
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.foxnews.com/us/minnesota-police-chiefs-allege-some-ice-agents-racially-profiled-us-citizens-including-off-duty-officers
Minnesota police chiefs allege some ICE agents racially profiled US citizens, including off-duty officers
A group of local Minnesota law enforcement chiefs on Tuesday said some American citizens, including off-duty police officers, have been racially profiled by federal immigration authorities in recent weeks amid the Trump administration’s illegal immigrant enforcement operations.
—-
Brooklyn Park Police Chief Mark Bruley said immigration enforcement was necessary but said he’s received complaints within the past two weeks that a small group of federal officers have stopped U.S. citizens and demanded they provide paperwork proving their citizenship.
“As this went on over the past two weeks, we started hearing from our police officers the same complaints as they fell victim to this while off duty,” he said. “Every one of these individuals is a person of color who has had this happen to them in Brooklyn Park.”
He said one officer was stopped while driving and was boxed in by authorities. When she attempted to record the interaction, her phone was knocked out of her hand, the chief said. The federal officers also had their weapons drawn, he said.
“Federal agents are pulling over off duty cops based on the color of their skin,” Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, a frequent critic of the ICE operations, wrote on X. “This is not a serious operation to enforce immigration law. It’s a performative show of force and it’s gotten way out of hand.”
Date: 21/01/2026 15:33:54
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2352258
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 21/01/2026 15:35:56
From: roughbarked
ID: 2352260
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.foxnews.com/us/minnesota-police-chiefs-allege-some-ice-agents-racially-profiled-us-citizens-including-off-duty-officers
Minnesota police chiefs allege some ICE agents racially profiled US citizens, including off-duty officers
A group of local Minnesota law enforcement chiefs on Tuesday said some American citizens, including off-duty police officers, have been racially profiled by federal immigration authorities in recent weeks amid the Trump administration’s illegal immigrant enforcement operations.
—-
Brooklyn Park Police Chief Mark Bruley said immigration enforcement was necessary but said he’s received complaints within the past two weeks that a small group of federal officers have stopped U.S. citizens and demanded they provide paperwork proving their citizenship.
“As this went on over the past two weeks, we started hearing from our police officers the same complaints as they fell victim to this while off duty,” he said. “Every one of these individuals is a person of color who has had this happen to them in Brooklyn Park.”
He said one officer was stopped while driving and was boxed in by authorities. When she attempted to record the interaction, her phone was knocked out of her hand, the chief said. The federal officers also had their weapons drawn, he said.
“Federal agents are pulling over off duty cops based on the color of their skin,” Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, a frequent critic of the ICE operations, wrote on X. “This is not a serious operation to enforce immigration law. It’s a performative show of force and it’s gotten way out of hand.”
They don’t get a star to put on their chest. It is the colour of their skin that stands them out.
Date: 21/01/2026 15:39:30
From: roughbarked
ID: 2352262
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 21/01/2026 15:53:24
From: Michael V
ID: 2352270
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Michael V said:
Greenlander talking about Trump’s proposition.
I remember Billy More shouting.
GREENLANDER GREENLANDER GREENLANDER
!!!
:)
Date: 21/01/2026 16:04:04
From: Michael V
ID: 2352276
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
dv said:
The DOJ has affirmed that there will be no investigation of Jonathan Ross’s shooting of Renee Good, even as it has come to light that ICE agents preventing medical personnel from attending the victim for 10 minutes after the shooting. Minnesota state officials have been barred from accessing crucial evidence in the case.
Tiananmen Square rules.
This never happened.
Sure seems like that.
Date: 21/01/2026 16:06:02
From: Michael V
ID: 2352278
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.foxnews.com/us/minnesota-police-chiefs-allege-some-ice-agents-racially-profiled-us-citizens-including-off-duty-officers
Minnesota police chiefs allege some ICE agents racially profiled US citizens, including off-duty officers
A group of local Minnesota law enforcement chiefs on Tuesday said some American citizens, including off-duty police officers, have been racially profiled by federal immigration authorities in recent weeks amid the Trump administration’s illegal immigrant enforcement operations.
—-
Brooklyn Park Police Chief Mark Bruley said immigration enforcement was necessary but said he’s received complaints within the past two weeks that a small group of federal officers have stopped U.S. citizens and demanded they provide paperwork proving their citizenship.
“As this went on over the past two weeks, we started hearing from our police officers the same complaints as they fell victim to this while off duty,” he said. “Every one of these individuals is a person of color who has had this happen to them in Brooklyn Park.”
He said one officer was stopped while driving and was boxed in by authorities. When she attempted to record the interaction, her phone was knocked out of her hand, the chief said. The federal officers also had their weapons drawn, he said.
“Federal agents are pulling over off duty cops based on the color of their skin,” Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, a frequent critic of the ICE operations, wrote on X. “This is not a serious operation to enforce immigration law. It’s a performative show of force and it’s gotten way out of hand.”
Mad as…
Date: 21/01/2026 16:09:27
From: Woodie
ID: 2352283
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
Neophyte said:

Would a trophy wife confuse him
oooooo yeew…….. Imagine that lump of orange shitgibbon rollin’ round on top of you. I’d spew.
Just put you off your dinner have I??
Date: 21/01/2026 16:11:32
From: roughbarked
ID: 2352285
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Woodie said:
Cymek said:
Neophyte said:

Would a trophy wife confuse him
oooooo yeew…….. Imagine that lump of orange shitgibbon rollin’ round on top of you. I’d spew.
Just put you off your dinner have I??
He smells like he’s been rolliing in human pewie poo.
Date: 21/01/2026 16:17:01
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2352289
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
The DOJ has affirmed that there will be no investigation of Jonathan Ross’s shooting of Renee Good, even as it has come to light that ICE agents preventing medical personnel from attending the victim for 10 minutes after the shooting. Minnesota state officials have been barred from accessing crucial evidence in the case.
😑
Date: 21/01/2026 16:18:55
From: roughbarked
ID: 2352290
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
The DOJ has affirmed that there will be no investigation of Jonathan Ross’s shooting of Renee Good, even as it has come to light that ICE agents preventing medical personnel from attending the victim for 10 minutes after the shooting. Minnesota state officials have been barred from accessing crucial evidence in the case.
😑
It fills me with loathing and I don’t like or want to do that.
Date: 21/01/2026 16:20:20
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2352291
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
The DOJ has affirmed that there will be no investigation of Jonathan Ross’s shooting of Renee Good, even as it has come to light that ICE agents preventing medical personnel from attending the victim for 10 minutes after the shooting. Minnesota state officials have been barred from accessing crucial evidence in the case.
😑
I keep thinking that it’s British TV person, Jonathon Ross:

Date: 21/01/2026 16:29:30
From: kii
ID: 2352295
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Meme thread or USA politics thread?

Date: 21/01/2026 16:30:58
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2352297
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Meme thread or USA politics thread?

‘Modern heroes’ thread.
Date: 21/01/2026 19:04:59
From: Boris
ID: 2352356
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.facebook.com/reel/868669989183208
Link
The Election Secret Trump Doesn’t Want You To Know
big money in US elections.
Date: 21/01/2026 19:20:45
From: Boris
ID: 2352364
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.facebook.com/reel/1557578321955106
Link
Batman and Robin get into politics.
Date: 21/01/2026 19:23:54
From: dv
ID: 2352367
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
It’s about a decade since we were discussing the rise of Chinand India, and I was concerned about what would happen when Russia and the US were still the major nuclear armed states but were no longer the dominant nations economical powers in other areas. This may end up not being a fun century.
Date: 21/01/2026 19:41:03
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2352372
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
It’s about a decade since we were discussing the rise of Chinand India, and I was concerned about what would happen when Russia and the US were still the major nuclear armed states but were no longer the dominant nations economical powers in other areas. This may end up not being a fun century.
It depends on who achieves practical nuclear fusion first.
If it is a liberal democracy like New Zealand or Australia the process will be gifted to the world and we can all look forward to a sunlit upland of prosperity for all, but I fear that it might be some self-centered Republican country that gets there first and enslaves the rest of the world.
Date: 21/01/2026 19:56:22
From: dv
ID: 2352373
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Reporter: “What goals do you have for 2026 for Congress in terms of getting your agenda through?”
Donald Trump: “I have great executive orders. Like, water coming out of a sink. The water wouldn’t come out. They had all sorts of ridiculous restrictions. I took them off. Straws. They don’t have to be paper anymore. I’d like to have that all confirmed by Congress.”
https://www.threads.com/@mywritingheart/post/DTwiVAvgL-P?xmt=AQF0JC4ajNjMGvxMzSHBi_sEbMZNEpJUBm5KyKPlt-nEi2yh2MY_JqCjioM1R1AZCuK9ZoqP&slof=1
Cool
Date: 21/01/2026 20:10:02
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2352380
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Reporter: “What goals do you have for 2026 for Congress in terms of getting your agenda through?”
Donald Trump: “I have great executive orders. Like, water coming out of a sink. The water wouldn’t come out. They had all sorts of ridiculous restrictions. I took them off. Straws. They don’t have to be paper anymore. I’d like to have that all confirmed by Congress.”
https://www.threads.com/@mywritingheart/post/DTwiVAvgL-P?xmt=AQF0JC4ajNjMGvxMzSHBi_sEbMZNEpJUBm5KyKPlt-nEi2yh2MY_JqCjioM1R1AZCuK9ZoqP&slof=1
Cool
Great men down the ages have all talked in parables.
Date: 21/01/2026 20:11:48
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2352381
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:
Reporter: “What goals do you have for 2026 for Congress in terms of getting your agenda through?”
Donald Trump: “I have great executive orders. Like, water coming out of a sink. The water wouldn’t come out. They had all sorts of ridiculous restrictions. I took them off. Straws. They don’t have to be paper anymore. I’d like to have that all confirmed by Congress.”
https://www.threads.com/@mywritingheart/post/DTwiVAvgL-P?xmt=AQF0JC4ajNjMGvxMzSHBi_sEbMZNEpJUBm5KyKPlt-nEi2yh2MY_JqCjioM1R1AZCuK9ZoqP&slof=1
Cool
Great men down the ages have all talked in parables.
The parable of the straw is deep, however.
Date: 21/01/2026 20:14:15
From: Michael V
ID: 2352382
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:
Reporter: “What goals do you have for 2026 for Congress in terms of getting your agenda through?”
Donald Trump: “I have great executive orders. Like, water coming out of a sink. The water wouldn’t come out. They had all sorts of ridiculous restrictions. I took them off. Straws. They don’t have to be paper anymore. I’d like to have that all confirmed by Congress.”
https://www.threads.com/@mywritingheart/post/DTwiVAvgL-P?xmt=AQF0JC4ajNjMGvxMzSHBi_sEbMZNEpJUBm5KyKPlt-nEi2yh2MY_JqCjioM1R1AZCuK9ZoqP&slof=1
Cool
Great men down the ages have all talked in parables.
The parable of the straw is deep, however.
As long as you don’t draw the short straw.
Date: 21/01/2026 20:19:14
From: Michael V
ID: 2352384
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
The lass is pretty pissed off about everything. And she’s right. Her comments on her neighbour are very worrying.
https://www.reddit.com/r/IThinkYouShouldLeave/comments/1qfswav/has_this_ever_happened_to_you/
Pharque!
Fair enough, too.
Date: 21/01/2026 20:31:01
From: Michael V
ID: 2352389
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:
Reporter: “What goals do you have for 2026 for Congress in terms of getting your agenda through?”
Donald Trump: “I have great executive orders. Like, water coming out of a sink. The water wouldn’t come out. They had all sorts of ridiculous restrictions. I took them off. Straws. They don’t have to be paper anymore. I’d like to have that all confirmed by Congress.”
https://www.threads.com/@mywritingheart/post/DTwiVAvgL-P?xmt=AQF0JC4ajNjMGvxMzSHBi_sEbMZNEpJUBm5KyKPlt-nEi2yh2MY_JqCjioM1R1AZCuK9ZoqP&slof=1
Cool
Great men down the ages have all talked in parables.
The parable of the straw is deep, however.
There’s a hole in my bucket…
Date: 21/01/2026 20:33:01
From: Michael V
ID: 2352390
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 21/01/2026 20:33:30
From: kii
ID: 2352391
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Spiny Norman said:
The lass is pretty pissed off about everything. And she’s right. Her comments on her neighbour are very worrying.
https://www.reddit.com/r/IThinkYouShouldLeave/comments/1qfswav/has_this_ever_happened_to_you/
Pharque!
Fair enough, too.
I recognise that passion.
When I’d talk to mr kii about wtf was happening in his country I’d stand on my soapbox in the kitchen waving my arms around, using this level of anger, not at him, but at the people supporting the fascists. He truly believed that the “checks and balances” would save the country. He died 3 months after January 6.
Date: 21/01/2026 20:36:12
From: kii
ID: 2352393
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Reporter: “What goals do you have for 2026 for Congress in terms of getting your agenda through?”
Donald Trump: “I have great executive orders. Like, water coming out of a sink. The water wouldn’t come out. They had all sorts of ridiculous restrictions. I took them off. Straws. They don’t have to be paper anymore. I’d like to have that all confirmed by Congress.”
https://www.threads.com/@mywritingheart/post/DTwiVAvgL-P?xmt=AQF0JC4ajNjMGvxMzSHBi_sEbMZNEpJUBm5KyKPlt-nEi2yh2MY_JqCjioM1R1AZCuK9ZoqP&slof=1
Cool
He. Is. Fucking. Insane.
I say this in my head at least once a day after reading about his latest bullshit brain farts.
Date: 21/01/2026 20:37:28
From: Michael V
ID: 2352394
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Michael V said:
Spiny Norman said:
The lass is pretty pissed off about everything. And she’s right. Her comments on her neighbour are very worrying.
https://www.reddit.com/r/IThinkYouShouldLeave/comments/1qfswav/has_this_ever_happened_to_you/
Pharque!
Fair enough, too.
I recognise that passion.
When I’d talk to mr kii about wtf was happening in his country I’d stand on my soapbox in the kitchen waving my arms around, using this level of anger, not at him, but at the people supporting the fascists. He truly believed that the “checks and balances” would save the country. He died 3 months after January 6.
I recognise it too. From my past.
But I am so tired now…
Date: 21/01/2026 20:38:32
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2352395
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 21/01/2026 20:41:33
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2352397
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:

Hold my gun.
Date: 21/01/2026 20:46:37
From: kii
ID: 2352398
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
kii said:
Michael V said:
Pharque!
Fair enough, too.
I recognise that passion.
When I’d talk to mr kii about wtf was happening in his country I’d stand on my soapbox in the kitchen waving my arms around, using this level of anger, not at him, but at the people supporting the fascists. He truly believed that the “checks and balances” would save the country. He died 3 months after January 6.
I recognise it too. From my past.
But I am so tired now…
Same here. I’ve been demonstrating against wars, dams, the patriarchy, violence against women, violence against LGBTQI people, mining, logging, unfair remuneration for early childhood educators etc since I was very young. I grew up listening to political discourse at the family dining table. I made 100s of protest placards for people to carry on marches.
Date: 21/01/2026 20:48:34
From: roughbarked
ID: 2352399
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:

I mean, is he sure?
Date: 21/01/2026 21:25:03
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2352402
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
It’s about a decade since we were discussing the rise of Chinand India, and I was concerned about what would happen when Russia and the US were still the major nuclear armed states but were no longer the dominant nations economical powers in other areas. This may end up not being a fun century.
boom
Date: 21/01/2026 21:26:27
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2352404
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Divine Angel said:

Hold my gun.
Why, are you Clinton¿
Date: 21/01/2026 21:28:43
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2352405
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:

I mean, is he sure?
look wise people told us that if it hasn’t happened then it isn’t happening and yous can only call it after it’s happened so calm down
Date: 21/01/2026 21:44:04
From: dv
ID: 2352408
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 21/01/2026 21:47:43
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2352410
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

…and i will be taking over the neighbours’ garage as my own personal realm.
Date: 21/01/2026 21:52:17
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2352412
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

so he’s the ugly mug
Date: 21/01/2026 22:59:42
From: Michael V
ID: 2352417
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

LOLOL
Date: 22/01/2026 00:06:20
From: btm
ID: 2352422
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Did you sort out your NYT subscription issue, AussieDJ?
Date: 22/01/2026 00:07:14
From: btm
ID: 2352423
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
btm said:
Did you sort out your NYT subscription issue, AussieDJ?
Sorry, that was meant to be in chat.
Date: 22/01/2026 03:07:06
From: dv
ID: 2352438
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Highlights of the DJT address
Says they wouldn’t have NATO if it wasn’t for him
Tells German speaking town they would be speaking German if not for the US
Says Iceland when he means Greenland half a dozen times
Date: 22/01/2026 03:30:34
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2352439
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Eric Trump retweets graph showing Biden’s success at reducing Fentanyl deaths
That was nice of him.
Although I’m not sure what blowing shit out of boats has to do with it.
Do they use boats to transport it from Mexico then?
Could it just as simple as “Eric Trump is not the sharpest tool in the shed”.
Keep up! It was Venezuelan boats.
I’m sure he is every bit as much of a stable genius as his dad.
Did the boats have Fentanyl on them? I doubt it.
Clearly he’s so blunt he couldn’t cut butter.
The USA used to have terrible or non existent harm minimisation in regards to illicit drug use.
Perhaps this has improved and addicts are treated decently so can be admitted to hospital (assuming they have insurance)

Date: 22/01/2026 08:12:52
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2352447
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 22/01/2026 08:14:38
From: Michael V
ID: 2352448
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
TACOs for everyone!
Perfect.
Date: 22/01/2026 08:19:43
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2352449
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Highlights of the DJT address
Says they wouldn’t have NATO if it wasn’t for him
Tells German speaking town they would be speaking German if not for the US
Says Iceland when he means Greenland half a dozen times
But no, he’s just acting as a madman.
Date: 22/01/2026 08:57:42
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2352451
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
Highlights of the DJT address
Says they wouldn’t have NATO if it wasn’t for him
Tells German speaking town they would be speaking German if not for the US
Says Iceland when he means Greenland half a dozen times
But no, he’s just acting as a madman.
it’s propaganda
Date: 22/01/2026 08:58:29
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2352453
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
TACOs for everyone!
Perfect.
got yous all distracted again
Date: 22/01/2026 08:58:45
From: roughbarked
ID: 2352454
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
Highlights of the DJT address
Says they wouldn’t have NATO if it wasn’t for him
Tells German speaking town they would be speaking German if not for the US
Says Iceland when he means Greenland half a dozen times
But no, he’s just acting as a madman.
it’s propaganda
Propaganda backed by military might.
Date: 22/01/2026 08:58:59
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2352455
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
Divine Angel said:
But no, he’s just acting as a madman.
it’s propaganda
Propaganda backed by military might.
give us a moment
Date: 22/01/2026 08:59:18
From: roughbarked
ID: 2352456
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
TACOs for everyone!
Perfect.
got yous all distracted again
What Epstein files?
Date: 22/01/2026 09:22:52
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2352458
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
Highlights of the DJT address
Says they wouldn’t have NATO if it wasn’t for him
Tells German speaking town they would be speaking German if not for the US
Says Iceland when he means Greenland half a dozen times
But no, he’s just acting as a madman.
Telling the Germans they’d be speaking German if not for US is pretty low, even by Trump standards.
Date: 22/01/2026 09:26:02
From: Boris
ID: 2352459
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
Highlights of the DJT address
Says they wouldn’t have NATO if it wasn’t for him
Tells German speaking town they would be speaking German if not for the US
Says Iceland when he means Greenland half a dozen times
But no, he’s just acting as a madman.
Telling the Germans they’d be speaking German if not for US is pretty low, even by Trump standards.
swiss .
Date: 22/01/2026 09:34:33
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2352461
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Boris said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Divine Angel said:
But no, he’s just acting as a madman.
Telling the Germans they’d be speaking German if not for US is pretty low, even by Trump standards.
swiss .
oops.
But they are German speaking Swiss, right?
Date: 22/01/2026 09:35:50
From: Boris
ID: 2352463
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
Boris said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Telling the Germans they’d be speaking German if not for US is pretty low, even by Trump standards.
swiss .
oops.
But they are German speaking Swiss, right?
correct.
Date: 22/01/2026 09:50:30
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2352471
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Boris said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Boris said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
Highlights of the DJT address
Says they wouldn’t have NATO if it wasn’t for him
Tells German speaking town they would be speaking German if not for the US
Says Iceland when he means Greenland half a dozen times
But no, he’s just acting as a madman.
Telling the Germans they’d be speaking German if not for US is pretty low, even by Trump standards.
swiss .
oops.
But they are German speaking Swiss, right?
correct.
say what you will and try to humiliate the legend but pretty sure it’s an accurate assessment of how influential the new world fascists have been
Date: 22/01/2026 09:58:57
From: Boris
ID: 2352476
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Gavin Newsom is in Davos this week, and he’s got a message for the gathered world leaders
“it’s time buck up. it’s time to get serious. stop being complicit. it’s time to stand tall and firm. have a backbone. I’ve seen this in the United States. playing Congress, playing both sides, saying one thing in a text or tweet, another publicly. it’s time to have principles. it’s time to stand tall. it’s time to stand united. have principles. I can’t take this complicity. people rolling over. I should have brought a bunch of knee pads for all the world leaders. I mean, handing out crowns, this is pathetic. Nobel Prizes that are being given away. it’s just pathetic. and I hope people understand how pathetic they look on the world stage. I mean, at least from an American perspective. it’s embarrassing. one thing they can’t do is what they’ve been doing, and they’ve been played. this guy’s playing folks for fools, and it’s embarrassing.”
Date: 22/01/2026 10:06:17
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2352481
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Boris said:
got a message for the gathered world leaders
“it’s time buck up. it’s time to get serious. stop being complicit. it’s time to stand tall and firm. have a backbone. I’ve seen this in the United States. playing Congress, playing both sides, saying one thing in a text or tweet, another publicly. it’s time to have principles. it’s time to stand tall. it’s time to stand united. have principles. I can’t take this complicity. people rolling over. I should have brought a bunch of knee pads for all the world leaders. I mean, handing out crowns, this is pathetic. Nobel Prizes that are being given away. it’s just pathetic. and I hope people understand how pathetic they look on the world stage. I mean, at least from an American perspective. it’s embarrassing. one thing they can’t do is what they’ve been doing, and they’ve been played. this guy’s playing folks for fools, and it’s embarrassing.”
right but get a load of this fucking idiot

mate seriously what the fuck
are we all stupid
“Achilles heel¿”
do any of yous know what happens when fucking fascists rack up shit loads of debt
fuck
Date: 22/01/2026 10:31:12
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2352486
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
Boris said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Telling the Germans they’d be speaking German if not for US is pretty low, even by Trump standards.
swiss .
oops.
But they are German speaking Swiss, right?
Few Germans would say the Swiss speak German.
Date: 22/01/2026 10:36:01
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2352488
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Boris said:
Gavin Newsom is in Davos this week, and he’s got a message for the gathered world leaders
“it’s time buck up. it’s time to get serious. stop being complicit. it’s time to stand tall and firm. have a backbone. I’ve seen this in the United States. playing Congress, playing both sides, saying one thing in a text or tweet, another publicly. it’s time to have principles. it’s time to stand tall. it’s time to stand united. have principles. I can’t take this complicity. people rolling over. I should have brought a bunch of knee pads for all the world leaders. I mean, handing out crowns, this is pathetic. Nobel Prizes that are being given away. it’s just pathetic. and I hope people understand how pathetic they look on the world stage. I mean, at least from an American perspective. it’s embarrassing. one thing they can’t do is what they’ve been doing, and they’ve been played. this guy’s playing folks for fools, and it’s embarrassing.”
What an arsehole. An American saying Europeans should be ashamed of their relationship with Trump is laughable.
Date: 22/01/2026 10:38:07
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2352489
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Boris said:
swiss .
oops.
But they are German speaking Swiss, right?
Few Germans would say the Swiss speak German.
It’s a bit like “Afrikaans” being “Dutch”. Started out the same, but evolved into something different. Not as extreme as the difference between Afrikaans and Dutch, I think.
Date: 22/01/2026 10:39:43
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2352490
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
oops.
But they are German speaking Swiss, right?
Few Germans would say the Swiss speak German.
It’s a bit like “Afrikaans” being “Dutch”. Started out the same, but evolved into something different. Not as extreme as the difference between Afrikaans and Dutch, I think.
And don’t get the French started on Québécois.
Date: 22/01/2026 10:47:44
From: Boris
ID: 2352491
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Divine Angel said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Few Germans would say the Swiss speak German.
It’s a bit like “Afrikaans” being “Dutch”. Started out the same, but evolved into something different. Not as extreme as the difference between Afrikaans and Dutch, I think.
And don’t get the French started on Québécois.
or the English on orstralian. An insult to the ears.
Date: 22/01/2026 10:48:15
From: Michael V
ID: 2352492
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Boris said:
got a message for the gathered world leaders
“it’s time buck up. it’s time to get serious. stop being complicit. it’s time to stand tall and firm. have a backbone. I’ve seen this in the United States. playing Congress, playing both sides, saying one thing in a text or tweet, another publicly. it’s time to have principles. it’s time to stand tall. it’s time to stand united. have principles. I can’t take this complicity. people rolling over. I should have brought a bunch of knee pads for all the world leaders. I mean, handing out crowns, this is pathetic. Nobel Prizes that are being given away. it’s just pathetic. and I hope people understand how pathetic they look on the world stage. I mean, at least from an American perspective. it’s embarrassing. one thing they can’t do is what they’ve been doing, and they’ve been played. this guy’s playing folks for fools, and it’s embarrassing.”
right but get a load of this fucking idiot

mate seriously what the fuck
are we all stupid
“Achilles heel¿”
do any of yous know what happens when fucking fascists rack up shit loads of debt
fuck

Date: 22/01/2026 10:50:15
From: roughbarked
ID: 2352493
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Boris said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Divine Angel said:
It’s a bit like “Afrikaans” being “Dutch”. Started out the same, but evolved into something different. Not as extreme as the difference between Afrikaans and Dutch, I think.
And don’t get the French started on Québécois.
or the English on orstralian. An insult to the ears.
Orsetralierans say fuck orf poms.
Date: 22/01/2026 12:25:51
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2352539
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Hey this sounds
“I feel this obligation more so than anything I’ve ever done in my life, to fight back against an unhinged president and a weaponization of the federal government against the constitutional rights of a million retired veterans,” Kelly said. He says multiple retired generals and admirals have told him they’ve started watching what they say out of fear Hegseth will go after them too. He’s been hearing from active service members too.
like free speech¡
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/01/21/politics/mark-kelly-pentagon-profile
Date: 22/01/2026 13:35:32
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2352581
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
This photo breaks my heart 💔

Date: 22/01/2026 13:38:44
From: Neophyte
ID: 2352582
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 22/01/2026 13:57:17
From: Michael V
ID: 2352587
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
This photo breaks my heart 💔

WTAF????
Cheeses!
Date: 22/01/2026 14:07:21
From: Michael V
ID: 2352591
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:
This photo breaks my heart 💔

WTAF????
Cheeses!
Several examples, including the one shown in the photo above from Minnesota Public Radio News:
https://www.mprnews.org/story/2026/01/21/ice-detains-5year-old-minnesota-boy-lawyer-says-agents-used-him-as-bait
Date: 22/01/2026 14:15:57
From: roughbarked
ID: 2352600
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
This photo breaks my heart 💔

The scoundrels. How dare they.
Date: 22/01/2026 14:17:05
From: dv
ID: 2352601
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Details of a memo distributed by Todd Lyons in May 2025 have come to light, authorising entry into homes without a warrant, consent or emergency pretext.
Date: 22/01/2026 14:46:22
From: buffy
ID: 2352607
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I may be a little behind on the news – I’ve been out walking in the bush. I am relieved to read this. At last some people are done with the sucking up.
>>Multiple news outlets reported that Lagarde walked out of a forum dinner during a speech critical of Europe by US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick.
The hosts called off the event before dessert, sources familiar with the matter said.
Lagarde was reported to have exited during a passage of heavy criticism levelled at Europe by Lutnick that drew heckling at the dinner.
UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer — one of the leaders who chose the sucking up approach last year — decided not to come to Davos.<<
The rest of Laura Tingle’s piece is here
Date: 22/01/2026 15:05:55
From: kii
ID: 2352614
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Not AI.

Date: 22/01/2026 15:06:05
From: kii
ID: 2352615
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Not AI.

Date: 22/01/2026 15:12:32
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2352619
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Not AI.

No intelligence at all, in fact.
Date: 22/01/2026 15:14:38
From: roughbarked
ID: 2352620
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
kii said:
Not AI.

No intelligence at all, in fact.
Facts are something that escape him.
Date: 22/01/2026 15:34:41
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2352624
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The fuck am I, is this the toilet? I done it anyway.

Date: 22/01/2026 15:36:47
From: roughbarked
ID: 2352627
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 22/01/2026 15:48:58
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2352633
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 22/01/2026 16:10:10
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2352655
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 22/01/2026 16:16:37
From: Cymek
ID: 2352658
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:

It’s like a parody of Homelander
Date: 22/01/2026 16:20:18
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2352659
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
Divine Angel said:

It’s like a parody of Homelander
With all the homoerotic tension to boot.
Date: 22/01/2026 16:24:47
From: roughbarked
ID: 2352660
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:

It is just ICK!
Date: 22/01/2026 16:29:42
From: Michael V
ID: 2352662
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:

Yes!
:)
Date: 22/01/2026 16:35:34
From: Michael V
ID: 2352665
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:

LOLOLOLOL
:)
Date: 22/01/2026 16:40:49
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2352669
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:

LOLOLOLOL
:)
no need to wonder
Date: 22/01/2026 16:43:06
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2352672
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
And now he’s a professional athlete.

Date: 22/01/2026 16:44:12
From: furious
ID: 2352674
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:

LOLOLOLOL
:)
no need to wonder
Hopefully, in time, he’ll get a deserved uniform with stripes…

Date: 22/01/2026 16:45:20
From: Michael V
ID: 2352675
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
And now he’s a professional athlete.

Frankly, yes. I don’t believe.
Actually I don’t believe anything he says until properly fact-checked and shown to be true.
He is a congenital liar.
Date: 22/01/2026 16:45:43
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2352676
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
And now he’s a professional athlete.

He has to hold onto things with both hands all the time, that could be a problem.
Date: 22/01/2026 16:46:45
From: Michael V
ID: 2352677
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
furious said:
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
LOLOLOLOL
:)
no need to wonder
Hopefully, in time, he’ll get a deserved uniform with stripes…

Seems only fair.
Date: 22/01/2026 16:48:18
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2352678
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:
And now he’s a professional athlete.

Frankly, yes. I don’t believe.
Actually I don’t believe anything he says until properly fact-checked and shown to be true.
He is a congenital liar.
Bring in permanent fact checking.
Date: 22/01/2026 16:49:48
From: Cymek
ID: 2352679
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:
And now he’s a professional athlete.

Frankly, yes. I don’t believe.
Actually I don’t believe anything he says until properly fact-checked and shown to be true.
He is a congenital liar.
Can imagine the original Enterprise comes back in time.
Kirk is telling Spock about Trump
Spock raises an eyebrow and says fascinating as they beam him into the sun, Prime Directive be damned
Date: 22/01/2026 16:55:06
From: dv
ID: 2352683
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Any chance we can cancel Aukus and go back to the frogs?
Emmanuel …. maaaaaate …
Date: 22/01/2026 16:58:55
From: roughbarked
ID: 2352684
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Any chance we can cancel Aukus and go back to the frogs?
Emmanuel …. maaaaaate …
Remember that the Poms are a part of AUKUS. I’m sure we could talk to them about it?
Date: 22/01/2026 17:11:32
From: buffy
ID: 2352686
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Any chance we can cancel Aukus and go back to the frogs?
Emmanuel …. maaaaaate …
Can we ask for our deposit back?
Date: 22/01/2026 17:30:04
From: Michael V
ID: 2352690
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
dv said:
Any chance we can cancel Aukus and go back to the frogs?
Emmanuel …. maaaaaate …
Can we ask for our deposit back?
That’d be nice.
But don’t expect the request to be agreed to.
Date: 22/01/2026 17:33:05
From: dv
ID: 2352692
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 22/01/2026 17:53:18
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2352698
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
dv said:
Any chance we can cancel Aukus and go back to the frogs?
Emmanuel …. maaaaaate …
Can we ask for our deposit back?
Just buy the new Japanese diesel-electric submarines for the foreseeable future.
Or, indeed, go back to the French, and buy the original (nuclear-powered) design of the boats (the French ‘Barracuda’ class).
It was the Australian government’s absolutely effing brilliant idea of selecting a nuclear-powered design, and insisting that it be altered to be a diesel-electric design, that caused a considerable amount of the kerfuffle with that deal.
Buy some Japanese boats for a high-class, good-value, quick-delivery replacements so that the Collins-class can be let go.
Then look at nuclear boats, at your leisure. Who knows, the Japanese are talking about building their own nuclear subs, and you can bet that they’ll be a top-notch design.
Date: 22/01/2026 17:59:21
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2352701
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
buffy said:
dv said:
Any chance we can cancel Aukus and go back to the frogs?
Emmanuel …. maaaaaate …
Can we ask for our deposit back?
Just buy the new Japanese diesel-electric submarines for the foreseeable future.
Or, indeed, go back to the French, and buy the original (nuclear-powered) design of the boats (the French ‘Barracuda’ class).
It was the Australian government’s absolutely effing brilliant idea of selecting a nuclear-powered design, and insisting that it be altered to be a diesel-electric design, that caused a considerable amount of the kerfuffle with that deal.
Buy some Japanese boats for a high-class, good-value, quick-delivery replacements so that the Collins-class can be let go.
Then look at nuclear boats, at your leisure. Who knows, the Japanese are talking about building their own nuclear subs, and you can bet that they’ll be a top-notch design.
pretty sure CHINA would be happy to have more allies with interoperable capability
Date: 22/01/2026 18:56:35
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2352713
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
A jury has acquitted former Uvalde, Texas, school police officer Adrian Gonzales for his response to the Robb Elementary shooting in May 2022.
After more than seven hours of deliberations, the jury returned a not guilty verdict Wednesday evening on all 29 counts of child endangerment.
As the verdict was read, Gonzalez bowed his head as he heard it. Several of those sitting in the gallery started crying. He hugged his lawyers, shook hands and appeared to be tearing up.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/uvalde-trial-verdict-reached-case-former-school-police/story?id=129274833
Date: 22/01/2026 20:10:14
From: dv
ID: 2352724
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
“Everyone talks about the minerals. There’s so many. There’s no such thing as rare earth. There’s rare processing. But there’s so much rare earth. And to get to this rare earth, you got to go through hundreds of feet of ice. That’s not the reason we need it. “
It’s still inconceivable to me that no one pulls the pin on this goomba.
Date: 22/01/2026 20:13:31
From: Michael V
ID: 2352727
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
“Everyone talks about the minerals. There’s so many. There’s no such thing as rare earth. There’s rare processing. But there’s so much rare earth. And to get to this rare earth, you got to go through hundreds of feet of ice. That’s not the reason we need it. “
It’s still inconceivable to me that no one pulls the pin on this goomba.
Where is John Kerr when you need him?
Date: 22/01/2026 20:25:19
From: btm
ID: 2352729
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
dv said:
“Everyone talks about the minerals. There’s so many. There’s no such thing as rare earth. There’s rare processing. But there’s so much rare earth. And to get to this rare earth, you got to go through hundreds of feet of ice. That’s not the reason we need it. “
It’s still inconceivable to me that no one pulls the pin on this goomba.
Where is John Kerr when you need him?
Still drunk at the Melbourne Cup, I think.
Date: 22/01/2026 20:27:53
From: Michael V
ID: 2352730
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
btm said:
Michael V said:
dv said:
“Everyone talks about the minerals. There’s so many. There’s no such thing as rare earth. There’s rare processing. But there’s so much rare earth. And to get to this rare earth, you got to go through hundreds of feet of ice. That’s not the reason we need it. “
It’s still inconceivable to me that no one pulls the pin on this goomba.
Where is John Kerr when you need him?
Still drunk at the Melbourne Cup, I think.
Ha!
:)
Date: 22/01/2026 22:29:04
From: AussieDJ
ID: 2352742
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 22/01/2026 22:35:08
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2352744
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 22/01/2026 23:37:32
From: Boris
ID: 2352751
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.facebook.com/reel/2028724481304381
Link
what to do if ICE shows up at your door.
Date: 22/01/2026 23:53:58
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2352756
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
497364621774925-dimensional nim

Date: 23/01/2026 00:18:45
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2352760
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Boris said:
https://www.facebook.com/reel/2028724481304381
Link
what to do if ICE shows up at your door.
oh, we thought the way to deal with ice snowflakes jamming up all your roads was to, uh, salt them
Date: 23/01/2026 06:13:56
From: roughbarked
ID: 2352764
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Boris said:
https://www.facebook.com/reel/2028724481304381
Link
what to do if ICE shows up at your door.
oh, we thought the way to deal with ice snowflakes jamming up all your roads was to, uh, salt them
Yeah a load of saltpetre up their arse.
Date: 23/01/2026 09:15:52
From: roughbarked
ID: 2352789
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I’m seeing people who normally don’t talk politics start using signatures like this.

Date: 23/01/2026 09:19:36
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2352792
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
I’m seeing people who normally don’t talk politics start using signatures like this.

see what did we say about “democracy” team sports and plausible deniability
now they don’t have any responsibility to do anything about it just shrug their shoulders someone else’s problem
Date: 23/01/2026 09:57:15
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2352805
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
silly communist pretends to understand democracy and writes about it
To summarise, here is what must happen:
A Democrat who can win has to make it to election day outside of federal custody
A Democrat must overcome attempts to suppress votes, and win the electoral college
They must overcome potential skullduggery by Dominion to manipulate vote counts
They must prevent local and state officials from refusing to certify the election
They must get SCOTUS to prevent ALL attempts to overturn election results
They may have to overcome another fake electors scheme
They must control the House of Representatives, despite all of the election challenges above (gerrymandering, end of the VRA, Dominion, polling place intimidation, fights over mail-in voting, etc…)
They must get the House of Representatives sworn in and seated by January 6th.
They must get the Vice President (presumably JD Vance) to certify the election
They will likely have to get Republican Senators to defy the administration at great personal risk to vote to certify the election
They must avoid or prevent Trump from using law enforcement, the military, or the mob to prevent Congress from certifying the election results
They must successfully get the Democratic nominee sworn in despite whatever efforts Trump and the GOP use to prevent it from occurring.
If any one of those things doesn’t happen, then a Republican ends up President regardless of how people voted.
Date: 23/01/2026 11:07:02
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2352819
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Oh dear …
Date: 23/01/2026 11:11:52
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2352821
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
Oh dear …
Umm…‘World Economic Forum’…California, 4th largest economy in the world…
Date: 23/01/2026 11:13:07
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2352822
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
Oh dear …
But, yeah, it’s a fairly typical representation of American geographical comprehension.
Date: 23/01/2026 11:17:08
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2352823
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Spiny Norman said:
Oh dear …
But, yeah, it’s a fairly typical representation of American geographical comprehension.
To be fair, he did expand Switzerland, as well as California.
But to balance things he really should have moved California out into the middle of the Pacific.
Date: 23/01/2026 11:19:08
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2352824
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
Oh dear …
I must have missed when Switzerland annexed Georgia and Southern Russia.
Date: 23/01/2026 11:22:25
From: Michael V
ID: 2352825
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
Oh dear …
It’s a simple representation of the US Education System. Generally, US-educated people have no comprehension of geography.
Date: 23/01/2026 11:23:42
From: Michael V
ID: 2352828
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Spiny Norman said:
Oh dear …
But, yeah, it’s a fairly typical representation of American geographical comprehension.
^
The Good Captain beat me to it.
Date: 23/01/2026 11:24:12
From: roughbarked
ID: 2352829
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Spiny Norman said:
Oh dear …
It’s a simple representation of the US Education System. Generally, US-educated people have no comprehension of geography.
It is poor comprehension for sure.
Date: 23/01/2026 11:27:19
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2352832
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Spiny Norman said:
Oh dear …
It’s a simple representation of the US Education System. Generally, US-educated people have no comprehension of geography.
To be fair, most of the Americans i’ve met are pretty good with geography, but then i’ve only ever met Americans outside of the US, so most of them knew where they where, how they got there, and where there was.
Reports of geographical ignorance among the at-home Americans are not hard to find, but it may (i hope) not be as bad as such reports suggest.
Date: 23/01/2026 11:27:54
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2352833
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Spiny Norman said:
Oh dear …
It’s a simple representation of the US Education System. Generally, US-educated people have no comprehension of geography.
As Samuel Clements (AKA Mark Twain) said, ‘the purpose of war is to teach Americans geography.”
(Maybe it was him, not 100% sure)
Date: 23/01/2026 11:28:11
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2352834
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
Spiny Norman said:
Oh dear …
It’s a simple representation of the US Education System. Generally, US-educated people have no comprehension of geography.
It is poor comprehension for sure.
It’s laziness, sloppiness, or both.
Date: 23/01/2026 11:34:24
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2352836
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
Spiny Norman said:
Oh dear …
It’s a simple representation of the US Education System. Generally, US-educated people have no comprehension of geography.
To be fair, most of the Americans i’ve met are pretty good with geography, but then i’ve only ever met Americans outside of the US, so most of them knew where they where, how they got there, and where there was.
Reports of geographical ignorance among the at-home Americans are not hard to find, but it may (i hope) not be as bad as such reports suggest.
Do any of you think you could accurately label all 50 states on a US map? All the countries in Europe? Countries in the Middle East?
I’ve got a general idea of where things are, but I couldn’t precisely label much on a map.
Date: 23/01/2026 11:36:02
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2352838
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I have mentioned here how, at the end of navigational chartwork exercise, i had to present the final position of my 2,700-ton destroyer escort as being in a paddock some nautical miles to the west of Bendigo.
So, i’m not really in a position to cast aspersions on the geographical understandings of others.
Date: 23/01/2026 11:39:01
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2352842
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
I have mentioned here how, at the end of navigational chartwork exercise, i had to present the final position of my 2,700-ton destroyer escort as being in a paddock some nautical miles to the west of Bendigo.
So, i’m not really in a position to cast aspersions on the geographical understandings of others.
Yeah but did you sink the other guy’s battleship?
Date: 23/01/2026 11:39:34
From: roughbarked
ID: 2352844
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
It’s a simple representation of the US Education System. Generally, US-educated people have no comprehension of geography.
To be fair, most of the Americans i’ve met are pretty good with geography, but then i’ve only ever met Americans outside of the US, so most of them knew where they where, how they got there, and where there was.
Reports of geographical ignorance among the at-home Americans are not hard to find, but it may (i hope) not be as bad as such reports suggest.
Do any of you think you could accurately label all 50 states on a US map? All the countries in Europe? Countries in the Middle East?
I’ve got a general idea of where things are, but I couldn’t precisely label much on a map.
All the ‘stans for examle.
Date: 23/01/2026 11:40:01
From: roughbarked
ID: 2352845
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
I have mentioned here how, at the end of navigational chartwork exercise, i had to present the final position of my 2,700-ton destroyer escort as being in a paddock some nautical miles to the west of Bendigo.
So, i’m not really in a position to cast aspersions on the geographical understandings of others.
Everyone is allowed one mistake. ;)
Date: 23/01/2026 11:41:12
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2352847
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
captain_spalding said:
I have mentioned here how, at the end of navigational chartwork exercise, i had to present the final position of my 2,700-ton destroyer escort as being in a paddock some nautical miles to the west of Bendigo.
So, i’m not really in a position to cast aspersions on the geographical understandings of others.
Yeah but did you sink the other guy’s battleship?
I believe that that game was suggested as being the limit of my navigational expertise.
I did get a bit better at it (navigation, not the game: i still stunk at that), later on.
Date: 23/01/2026 11:42:26
From: Michael V
ID: 2352848
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
Spiny Norman said:
Oh dear …
It’s a simple representation of the US Education System. Generally, US-educated people have no comprehension of geography.
To be fair, most of the Americans i’ve met are pretty good with geography, but then i’ve only ever met Americans outside of the US, so most of them knew where they where, how they got there, and where there was.
Reports of geographical ignorance among the at-home Americans are not hard to find, but it may (i hope) not be as bad as such reports suggest.
Oh, it’s bad. I was often complimented for my command of English, and how slight an accent I had. How easy I was to understand. Not what they had expected. After I told them I was from Australia. (They had thought Austria.) Many had no idea Australia even existed. Etc. Etc. Etc.
Date: 23/01/2026 11:42:35
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2352849
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
It’s a simple representation of the US Education System. Generally, US-educated people have no comprehension of geography.
To be fair, most of the Americans i’ve met are pretty good with geography, but then i’ve only ever met Americans outside of the US, so most of them knew where they where, how they got there, and where there was.
Reports of geographical ignorance among the at-home Americans are not hard to find, but it may (i hope) not be as bad as such reports suggest.
Do any of you think you could accurately label all 50 states on a US map? All the countries in Europe? Countries in the Middle East?
I’ve got a general idea of where things are, but I couldn’t precisely label much on a map.
Definitely not, but I do know that Switzerland is squeezed in between Italy and Germany, and that California does not include Mexico.
Date: 23/01/2026 11:45:25
From: Cymek
ID: 2352851
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
It’s a simple representation of the US Education System. Generally, US-educated people have no comprehension of geography.
To be fair, most of the Americans i’ve met are pretty good with geography, but then i’ve only ever met Americans outside of the US, so most of them knew where they where, how they got there, and where there was.
Reports of geographical ignorance among the at-home Americans are not hard to find, but it may (i hope) not be as bad as such reports suggest.
Do any of you think you could accurately label all 50 states on a US map? All the countries in Europe? Countries in the Middle East?
I’ve got a general idea of where things are, but I couldn’t precisely label much on a map.
The USA suffered from thinking everything they made was the best as they had no experience outside of their own nation.
It’s not true as is evident if you had that experience living elsewhere.
Date: 23/01/2026 11:45:48
From: esselte
ID: 2352853
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
It’s a simple representation of the US Education System. Generally, US-educated people have no comprehension of geography.
To be fair, most of the Americans i’ve met are pretty good with geography, but then i’ve only ever met Americans outside of the US, so most of them knew where they where, how they got there, and where there was.
Reports of geographical ignorance among the at-home Americans are not hard to find, but it may (i hope) not be as bad as such reports suggest.
Do any of you think you could accurately label all 50 states on a US map? All the countries in Europe? Countries in the Middle East?
I’ve got a general idea of where things are, but I couldn’t precisely label much on a map.
I could (hesitatingly) do all that but only because of the ungodly amount of time I’ve spent playing Seterra quizzes.
If I haven’t thought about it or played a quiz for a while I will struggle with mixing up stuff like Latvia/Lithuania, Armenia/Azerbaijan, Honduras/Guatemala/Nicaragua, USA/Denmark etc. Caribbean and South Pacific Islands are burned into my brain though because of the amount of time I spent learning them all.
Date: 23/01/2026 11:45:52
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2352854
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
Divine Angel said:
captain_spalding said:
To be fair, most of the Americans i’ve met are pretty good with geography, but then i’ve only ever met Americans outside of the US, so most of them knew where they where, how they got there, and where there was.
Reports of geographical ignorance among the at-home Americans are not hard to find, but it may (i hope) not be as bad as such reports suggest.
Do any of you think you could accurately label all 50 states on a US map? All the countries in Europe? Countries in the Middle East?
I’ve got a general idea of where things are, but I couldn’t precisely label much on a map.
Definitely not, but I do know that Switzerland is squeezed in between Italy and Germany, and that California does not include Mexico.
Same, but those areas on the map have been embiggened; California looks like it’s taking up the entire west coast and part of Canada.
- Embiggened is a perfectly cromulent word.
Date: 23/01/2026 11:50:12
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2352857
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
Divine Angel said:
captain_spalding said:
To be fair, most of the Americans i’ve met are pretty good with geography, but then i’ve only ever met Americans outside of the US, so most of them knew where they where, how they got there, and where there was.
Reports of geographical ignorance among the at-home Americans are not hard to find, but it may (i hope) not be as bad as such reports suggest.
Do any of you think you could accurately label all 50 states on a US map? All the countries in Europe? Countries in the Middle East?
I’ve got a general idea of where things are, but I couldn’t precisely label much on a map.
The USA suffered from thinking everything they made was the best as they had no experience outside of their own nation.
It’s not true as is evident if you had that experience living elsewhere.
I love that they think they’re the richest country in the world and that’s demonstrably not true.*
*It does depend on the source; Google AI tells me USA is the richest “by a wide margin” whereas none of the other lists by various sources list the US as #1. But here’s the Wikipedia link anyway, and it’s easily Googlable (or bingable if that’s your jam).
Date: 23/01/2026 11:52:27
From: buffy
ID: 2352859
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
It’s a simple representation of the US Education System. Generally, US-educated people have no comprehension of geography.
To be fair, most of the Americans i’ve met are pretty good with geography, but then i’ve only ever met Americans outside of the US, so most of them knew where they where, how they got there, and where there was.
Reports of geographical ignorance among the at-home Americans are not hard to find, but it may (i hope) not be as bad as such reports suggest.
Do any of you think you could accurately label all 50 states on a US map? All the countries in Europe? Countries in the Middle East?
I’ve got a general idea of where things are, but I couldn’t precisely label much on a map.
I’m like you. Sometimes a country is mentioned and I have to think very hard to remember which continent it is on. And I spent my childhood sitting facing a map of the world on the wall in the kitchen.
Date: 23/01/2026 11:53:55
From: roughbarked
ID: 2352862
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Divine Angel said:
captain_spalding said:
To be fair, most of the Americans i’ve met are pretty good with geography, but then i’ve only ever met Americans outside of the US, so most of them knew where they where, how they got there, and where there was.
Reports of geographical ignorance among the at-home Americans are not hard to find, but it may (i hope) not be as bad as such reports suggest.
Do any of you think you could accurately label all 50 states on a US map? All the countries in Europe? Countries in the Middle East?
I’ve got a general idea of where things are, but I couldn’t precisely label much on a map.
I’m like you. Sometimes a country is mentioned and I have to think very hard to remember which continent it is on. And I spent my childhood sitting facing a map of the world on the wall in the kitchen.
Brings to mind the old saying, Use it or lose it.
Date: 23/01/2026 11:56:06
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2352865
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
buffy said:
Divine Angel said:
Do any of you think you could accurately label all 50 states on a US map? All the countries in Europe? Countries in the Middle East?
I’ve got a general idea of where things are, but I couldn’t precisely label much on a map.
I’m like you. Sometimes a country is mentioned and I have to think very hard to remember which continent it is on. And I spent my childhood sitting facing a map of the world on the wall in the kitchen.
Brings to mind the old saying, Use it or lose it.
we think this is quite reasonable after all the biggest threat to Americans by far is Americans so really they should learn all about Americans and little else, whereas for any other country yous lot generally talk about the threat is from other countries so that’s what we learn about
Date: 23/01/2026 12:17:58
From: Michael V
ID: 2352880
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
buffy said:
I’m like you. Sometimes a country is mentioned and I have to think very hard to remember which continent it is on. And I spent my childhood sitting facing a map of the world on the wall in the kitchen.
Brings to mind the old saying, Use it or lose it.
we think this is quite reasonable after all the biggest threat to Americans by far is Americans so really they should learn all about Americans and little else, whereas for any other country yous lot generally talk about the threat is from other countries so that’s what we learn about
Ha!
:)
Interesting notion.
:)
Date: 23/01/2026 12:33:18
From: Michael V
ID: 2352882
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Gosh Lawyer_Oyer has lost weight. She’s looking quite gaunt. Not that she was noticeably fat before, but now she looks quite ill. Anyway a short and succinct video:
Contradictions in the way Trump et al deal with illegal drugs.
Date: 23/01/2026 12:46:25
From: furious
ID: 2352883
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
Divine Angel said:
captain_spalding said:
To be fair, most of the Americans i’ve met are pretty good with geography, but then i’ve only ever met Americans outside of the US, so most of them knew where they where, how they got there, and where there was.
Reports of geographical ignorance among the at-home Americans are not hard to find, but it may (i hope) not be as bad as such reports suggest.
Do any of you think you could accurately label all 50 states on a US map? All the countries in Europe? Countries in the Middle East?
I’ve got a general idea of where things are, but I couldn’t precisely label much on a map.
Definitely not, but I do know that Switzerland is squeezed in between Italy and Germany, and that California does not include Mexico.
Plus , the person who made the map didn’t have to guess, they were on a computer, making a map, and were so confident in their correctness that they didn’t stop and go: maybe I should open another window and just check this..
Date: 23/01/2026 12:48:49
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2352884
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
It’s a simple representation of the US Education System. Generally, US-educated people have no comprehension of geography.
To be fair, most of the Americans i’ve met are pretty good with geography, but then i’ve only ever met Americans outside of the US, so most of them knew where they where, how they got there, and where there was.
Reports of geographical ignorance among the at-home Americans are not hard to find, but it may (i hope) not be as bad as such reports suggest.
Do any of you think you could accurately label all 50 states on a US map? All the countries in Europe? Countries in the Middle East?
I’ve got a general idea of where things are, but I couldn’t precisely label much on a map.
Easy.
Date: 23/01/2026 13:13:35
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2352892
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 23/01/2026 13:26:02
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2352893
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:

I wonder if Trump will actually feel embarrassed when this endeavour fails abysmally? 5 bankruptcies didn’t.
Date: 23/01/2026 13:35:52
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2352895
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Divine Angel said:

I wonder if Trump will actually feel embarrassed when this endeavour fails abysmally? 5 bankruptcies didn’t.

Date: 23/01/2026 13:40:31
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2352898
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I Tracked Down The Companies Bribing Trump
We took a deep dive into Trump’s tariffs, and his real approach became painfully clear. Make tariff threats, extract money from companies willing to pay, then grant exceptions to those who play the game. It’s another lucrative scam for a wildly corrupt president.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RPzcGeiNYvk
Date: 23/01/2026 13:41:33
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2352899
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Epstein Connection EVERYONE Keeps Missing
Jeffrey Epstein didn’t just have powerful friends—he had connections to intelligence agencies that protected him for decades. In this video, I break down who Epstein really was, how he got his start, the evidence suggesting he was working for foreign intelligence, and what we’re learning from the newly released files that dropped in December 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-pyGxThhEo
Date: 23/01/2026 13:46:08
From: Michael V
ID: 2352901
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:

LOL
Was Carney actually going to donate USD $1B to Trump et al for the prestige?
Date: 23/01/2026 14:40:37
From: Boris
ID: 2352907
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:

poor Carney, he must be gutted
Date: 23/01/2026 14:46:00
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2352909
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Supreme Court’s GOP-appointed supermajority spent much of 2025 clearing a path, albeit temporarily, for Trump to consolidate power over traditionally independent agencies by firing Democratic-appointed officials. But the conservatives telegraphed their desire to find some sort of exception when it came to the Federal Reserve, something made more clear at oral arguments today.
The justices suggested they are wary of Trump’s effort to fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook over unproven mortgage-fraud allegations, saying the move could upend the central bank’s independence and rattle markets. Trump’s own appointees were among the skeptics: Brett Kavanaugh said the president’s position would “weaken if not shatter the independence of the Federal Reserve.” Amy Coney Barrett asked whether the risk to financial markets was reason for “caution on our part.”
Bloomberg Email Newsletter
…
I’m the last person to want to see the Fed’s independence threatened but this SCOTUS can’t help but show how much they’re legislating from the bench with every decision they make.
Now either Trump has authority or not and I’d argue that he doesn’t, as he didn’t have authority to sack bosses of other independent agencies but this SCOTUS overturned 80 years of precedence when it suited them last year but are doing the opposite now.
The fact that giving Trump this authority of the Fed would be disastrous is immaterial as to whether Trump has authority. The hypocrisy of the conservative 6 on the current SCOTUS is unheard of for those in the role.
Date: 23/01/2026 14:54:56
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2352913
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I met a traveller from an antique land
Who said: Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
Stand in the desart. Near them, on the sand,
Half sunk, a shattered visage lies, whose frown,
And wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command,
Tell that its sculptor well those passions read
Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,
The hand that mocked them and the heart that fed:
And on the pedestal these words appear:
“I am the 47th President, King of Kings:
Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!”
No thing beside remains. Round the decay
Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare
The lone and level sands stretch far away.
Date: 24/01/2026 19:34:06
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353240
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
Boris said:
got a message for the gathered world leaders
“it’s time buck up. it’s time to get serious. stop being complicit. it’s time to stand tall and firm. have a backbone. I’ve seen this in the United States. playing Congress, playing both sides, saying one thing in a text or tweet, another publicly. it’s time to have principles. it’s time to stand tall. it’s time to stand united. have principles. I can’t take this complicity. people rolling over. I should have brought a bunch of knee pads for all the world leaders. I mean, handing out crowns, this is pathetic. Nobel Prizes that are being given away. it’s just pathetic. and I hope people understand how pathetic they look on the world stage. I mean, at least from an American perspective. it’s embarrassing. one thing they can’t do is what they’ve been doing, and they’ve been played. this guy’s playing folks for fools, and it’s embarrassing.”
right but get a load of this fucking idiot

mate seriously what the fuck
are we all stupid
“Achilles heel¿”
do any of yous know what happens when fucking fascists rack up shit loads of debt
fuck

underrated point
Date: 24/01/2026 20:39:15
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353259
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
don’t know why yous lot are still stuck in 2025 but anyway
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/jan/23/world-punches-back-donald-trump-went-too-far-davos
As the world finally punches back, was this the week Donald Trump went too far?
LOL you jokers that’s the whole point they groom your leaders they escalate in just small enough steps that it’s somehow tolerable, and then push a little further, it’s brilliant¡
Date: 24/01/2026 21:03:09
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353261
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 25/01/2026 07:53:31
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353315
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
nah

yeah

Date: 25/01/2026 07:54:40
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353316
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
LOL

Date: 25/01/2026 07:58:56
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353317
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
just another day in fascistan

Date: 25/01/2026 08:19:38
From: Michael V
ID: 2353318
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
nah

yeah

What has a penguin got to do with the US Department of War?
Date: 25/01/2026 08:20:53
From: Michael V
ID: 2353319
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
LOL

Say R. Say R again. R’s.
Date: 25/01/2026 08:25:27
From: Michael V
ID: 2353320
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
just another day in fascistan

Pharque.
I’m guessing that that person is being sprayed directly in the eyes with pepper spray whilst being held forcibly down by two others. Probably lose eyesight.
Pharque.
Date: 25/01/2026 08:30:55
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353321
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
nah

yeah

What has a penguin got to do with the US Department of War?
LOL
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2025-National-Security-Strategy.pdf
just kidding, we d’n‘o’, quick search didn’t find “penguin” in that document either
Date: 25/01/2026 08:53:05
From: dv
ID: 2353328
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 25/01/2026 08:57:36
From: dv
ID: 2353331
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
nah

yeah

What has a penguin got to do with the US Department of War?
Like the penguin, the War department’s plan to invade Greenland ain’t gonna fly
Date: 25/01/2026 09:07:49
From: dv
ID: 2353333
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
There has been another murder by ICE agents today in Minnesota, this time of an intensive care nurse called Alex Pretti
https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikestunson/2026/01/24/who-was-alex-pretti-man-shot-dead-by-border-patrol-agent-in-minneapolis/
Date: 25/01/2026 09:21:54
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353336
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
There has been another murder by ICE agents today in Minnesota, this time of an intensive care nurse called Alex Pretti
https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikestunson/2026/01/24/who-was-alex-pretti-man-shot-dead-by-border-patrol-agent-in-minneapolis/
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/24/alex-pretti-minneapolis-minnesota-shooting
Videos circulating online on Saturday show Pretti directing traffic and filming federal agents, his right hand holding up his phone and his left hand empty. Another video shows him being wrestled to the ground by several law enforcement officers before appearing to be shot several times. At least two officers can be seen with their weapons drawn. Other videos show Pretti seemingly coming to the defense of a legal observer who was shoved to the ground by a federal officer. That officer then sprays Pretti with a chemical agent, repeatedly, before tackling him to the street along with other agents. As at least five agents surround Pretti on the ground, one appears to fire a shot at him at close range, followed by a volley of more shots, after which his body goes still.
While not identifying Pretti as the shooting victim, Walz said he was a Minnesota resident and “all of us understand what happened this morning and the tragedy of it.” Moments earlier at a separate press conference, Gregory Bovino, who is leading Trump’s surge into Democratic-led cities, claimed he “wanted to do maximum damage to agents.” Meanwhile, Stephen Miller, deputy White House chief of staff and the mastermind behind Trump’s immigration strategy, said Pretti was a “would-be assassin” who “tried to murder federal law enforcement,” but did not provide any evidence to back up the claim.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2026/jan/24/minneapolis-shooting-live
At least seven more officers surround him. One is on Pretti’s back and another appears to strike a blow to his chest while holding a canister. Several officers try to bring his arms behind him. The officer holding the canister then strikes the man near his head several times. An officer is seen unholstering his gun, and another officer appears to be holding a pistol as he runs from the clash. A shot then rings out while officers are still struggling with Pretti, who then collapses. It’s unclear which officer fired. The officers then back off after the first shot, and at least nine other shots are heard as Pretti lies motionless on the street.
Date: 25/01/2026 09:30:10
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2353339
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

Very clever.
Date: 25/01/2026 09:37:34
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353341
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
dv said:
There has been another murder by ICE agents today in Minnesota, this time of an intensive care nurse called Alex Pretti
https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikestunson/2026/01/24/who-was-alex-pretti-man-shot-dead-by-border-patrol-agent-in-minneapolis/
Videos circulating online on Saturday show Pretti directing traffic and filming federal agents, his right hand holding up his phone and his left hand empty. Another video shows him being wrestled to the ground by several law enforcement officers before appearing to be shot several times. At least two officers can be seen with their weapons drawn. Other videos show Pretti seemingly coming to the defense of a legal observer who was shoved to the ground by a federal officer. That officer then sprays Pretti with a chemical agent, repeatedly, before tackling him to the street along with other agents. As at least five agents surround Pretti on the ground, one appears to fire a shot at him at close range, followed by a volley of more shots, after which his body goes still.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/24/alex-pretti-minneapolis-minnesota-shooting
While not identifying Pretti as the shooting victim, Walz said he was a Minnesota resident and “all of us understand what happened this morning and the tragedy of it.” Moments earlier at a separate press conference, Gregory Bovino, who is leading Trump’s surge into Democratic-led cities, claimed he “wanted to do maximum damage to agents.” Meanwhile, Stephen Miller, deputy White House chief of staff and the mastermind behind Trump’s immigration strategy, said Pretti was a “would-be assassin” who “tried to murder federal law enforcement,” but did not provide any evidence to back up the claim.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2026/jan/24/minneapolis-shooting-live
At least seven more officers surround him. One is on Pretti’s back and another appears to strike a blow to his chest while holding a canister. Several officers try to bring his arms behind him. The officer holding the canister then strikes the man near his head several times. An officer is seen unholstering his gun, and another officer appears to be holding a pistol as he runs from the clash. A shot then rings out while officers are still struggling with Pretti, who then collapses. It’s unclear which officer fired. The officers then back off after the first shot, and at least nine other shots are heard as Pretti lies motionless on the street.
alleged

now we’ve only had a very quick glimpse but from what we could see we did reach this as a high probability interpretation
Date: 25/01/2026 09:38:56
From: Michael V
ID: 2353343
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
There has been another murder by ICE agents today in Minnesota, this time of an intensive care nurse called Alex Pretti
https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikestunson/2026/01/24/who-was-alex-pretti-man-shot-dead-by-border-patrol-agent-in-minneapolis/
Ah, shit.
Date: 25/01/2026 09:42:57
From: Michael V
ID: 2353346
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
dv said:
There has been another murder by ICE agents today in Minnesota, this time of an intensive care nurse called Alex Pretti
https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikestunson/2026/01/24/who-was-alex-pretti-man-shot-dead-by-border-patrol-agent-in-minneapolis/
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/24/alex-pretti-minneapolis-minnesota-shooting
Videos circulating online on Saturday show Pretti directing traffic and filming federal agents, his right hand holding up his phone and his left hand empty. Another video shows him being wrestled to the ground by several law enforcement officers before appearing to be shot several times. At least two officers can be seen with their weapons drawn. Other videos show Pretti seemingly coming to the defense of a legal observer who was shoved to the ground by a federal officer. That officer then sprays Pretti with a chemical agent, repeatedly, before tackling him to the street along with other agents. As at least five agents surround Pretti on the ground, one appears to fire a shot at him at close range, followed by a volley of more shots, after which his body goes still.
While not identifying Pretti as the shooting victim, Walz said he was a Minnesota resident and “all of us understand what happened this morning and the tragedy of it.” Moments earlier at a separate press conference, Gregory Bovino, who is leading Trump’s surge into Democratic-led cities, claimed he “wanted to do maximum damage to agents.” Meanwhile, Stephen Miller, deputy White House chief of staff and the mastermind behind Trump’s immigration strategy, said Pretti was a “would-be assassin” who “tried to murder federal law enforcement,” but did not provide any evidence to back up the claim.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2026/jan/24/minneapolis-shooting-live
At least seven more officers surround him. One is on Pretti’s back and another appears to strike a blow to his chest while holding a canister. Several officers try to bring his arms behind him. The officer holding the canister then strikes the man near his head several times. An officer is seen unholstering his gun, and another officer appears to be holding a pistol as he runs from the clash. A shot then rings out while officers are still struggling with Pretti, who then collapses. It’s unclear which officer fired. The officers then back off after the first shot, and at least nine other shots are heard as Pretti lies motionless on the street.
:(
Pharque.
:(
Date: 25/01/2026 09:44:26
From: Michael V
ID: 2353347
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:

Very clever.
:)
Date: 25/01/2026 09:46:26
From: Boris
ID: 2353348
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 25/01/2026 09:49:45
From: Michael V
ID: 2353350
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Boris said:

F’real?
Date: 25/01/2026 09:50:43
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2353351
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Boris said:

George III would like a word.
Date: 25/01/2026 09:55:23
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353355
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Boris said:
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
nah

yeah

What has a penguin got to do with the US Department of War?
LOL
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2025-National-Security-Strategy.pdf
just kidding, we d’n‘o’, quick search didn’t find “penguin” in that document either

F’real?
yeah that’s what the Andrew Fox fella was also referring to
Date: 25/01/2026 10:03:30
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2353359
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
just another day in fascistan

Fascistan. Very good.
Date: 25/01/2026 10:30:46
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2353363
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
We few, we happy few, we band of brothers;
For he to-day that sheds his blood with me
Shall be my brother; be he ne’er so vile,
This day shall gentle his condition:
And Trump and men in the US now a-bed
Shall think themselves accursed they were not here,
And hold their manhoods cheap whiles any speaks
That fought with us upon Saint Crispin’s day.
Date: 25/01/2026 10:32:41
From: roughbarked
ID: 2353364
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
dv said:
There has been another murder by ICE agents today in Minnesota, this time of an intensive care nurse called Alex Pretti
https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikestunson/2026/01/24/who-was-alex-pretti-man-shot-dead-by-border-patrol-agent-in-minneapolis/
Ah, shit.
Ice is not nice.
Date: 25/01/2026 10:33:50
From: roughbarked
ID: 2353365
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Boris said:

Crawler.
Date: 25/01/2026 10:58:27
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353374
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
dv said:
There has been another murder by ICE agents today in Minnesota, this time of an intensive care nurse called Alex Pretti
https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikestunson/2026/01/24/who-was-alex-pretti-man-shot-dead-by-border-patrol-agent-in-minneapolis/
Ah, shit.
Ice is not nice.
alleged

Date: 25/01/2026 11:02:35
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2353376
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 25/01/2026 11:27:45
From: Michael V
ID: 2353377
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
Ah, shit.
Ice is not nice.
alleged

Cheeses!
Date: 25/01/2026 11:28:28
From: Michael V
ID: 2353378
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:

Gourd!
Date: 25/01/2026 11:28:56
From: buffy
ID: 2353379
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:

All part of the childishness really.
Date: 25/01/2026 11:30:47
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353380
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
Ice is not nice.
alleged

Cheeses!
that’s what the 2nd amendment means right
Date: 25/01/2026 11:35:42
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2353383
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Divine Angel said:

All part of the childishness really.
Something something guillotines and cake
Date: 25/01/2026 11:42:08
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2353386
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
There are no penguins in Greenland.

Date: 25/01/2026 11:44:08
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2353387
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 25/01/2026 11:57:23
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2353388
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 25/01/2026 11:57:43
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2353389
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

LOL
Date: 25/01/2026 12:10:24
From: dv
ID: 2353392
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I do have to tip my lid to these people. Negative 20 deg C temperatures would probably keep me from protesting, let alone the fear of being shot.
Date: 25/01/2026 12:31:38
From: roughbarked
ID: 2353396
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
I do have to tip my lid to these people. Negative 20 deg C temperatures would probably keep me from protesting, let alone the fear of being shot.
I hear you and concur.
Date: 25/01/2026 12:37:09
From: roughbarked
ID: 2353400
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
𝙰𝚜 𝚢𝚘𝚞’𝚛𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜, 𝚁𝚎𝚙𝚞𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚗𝚜 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚘 𝚝𝚊𝚔𝚎 𝚊𝚠𝚊𝚢 𝚢𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚛𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚝 𝚝𝚘 𝚟𝚘𝚝𝚎.
𝗤𝗨𝗜𝗖𝗞: 𝗖𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝗶𝗻 $𝟭𝟬 𝗯𝘆 𝟭𝟭:𝟱𝟵 𝗣𝗠 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗗𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗮𝘁𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗽𝗮𝘀𝘀 𝗔𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗩𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗥𝗲𝗴𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗻𝗱 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝘃𝗼𝘁𝗲 >> ff-r.com/557?t=8Kg13D
Jacqueline, Republicans have gone too far.
Since 2020, they’ve passed HUNDREDS of voter suppression bills all across the country.
It’s simple… 𝚃𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚠𝚊𝚗𝚝 𝚝𝚘 𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚙 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝚟𝚘𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐.
We can’t let them get away with this.
We’re racing to elect Democrats like Amy Klobuchar who will pass Automatic Voter Registration, which will UNDO decades of Republican voter suppression!
MAGA will be furious!!!
𝗕𝘂𝘁 𝘄𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗻’𝘁 𝗱𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂.
You’re one of our top supporters, so we’re turning to you.
We need to raise another $7,298 before midnight to hit our goal.
𝗤𝗨𝗜𝗖𝗞: 𝗖𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝗶𝗻 $𝟭𝟬 𝗯𝘆 𝟭𝟭:𝟱𝟵 𝗣𝗠 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗗𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗮𝘁𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗽𝗮𝘀𝘀 𝗔𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗩𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗥𝗲𝗴𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻
Date: 25/01/2026 12:40:44
From: buffy
ID: 2353401
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
𝙰𝚜 𝚢𝚘𝚞’𝚛𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜, 𝚁𝚎𝚙𝚞𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚗𝚜 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚘 𝚝𝚊𝚔𝚎 𝚊𝚠𝚊𝚢 𝚢𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚛𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚝 𝚝𝚘 𝚟𝚘𝚝𝚎.
𝗤𝗨𝗜𝗖𝗞: 𝗖𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝗶𝗻 $𝟭𝟬 𝗯𝘆 𝟭𝟭:𝟱𝟵 𝗣𝗠 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗗𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗮𝘁𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗽𝗮𝘀𝘀 𝗔𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗩𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗥𝗲𝗴𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗻𝗱 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝘃𝗼𝘁𝗲 >> ff-r.com/557?t=8Kg13D
Jacqueline, Republicans have gone too far.
Since 2020, they’ve passed HUNDREDS of voter suppression bills all across the country.
It’s simple… 𝚃𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚠𝚊𝚗𝚝 𝚝𝚘 𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚙 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝚟𝚘𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐.
We can’t let them get away with this.
We’re racing to elect Democrats like Amy Klobuchar who will pass Automatic Voter Registration, which will UNDO decades of Republican voter suppression!
MAGA will be furious!!!
𝗕𝘂𝘁 𝘄𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗻’𝘁 𝗱𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂.
You’re one of our top supporters, so we’re turning to you.
We need to raise another $7,298 before midnight to hit our goal.
𝗤𝗨𝗜𝗖𝗞: 𝗖𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝗶𝗻 $𝟭𝟬 𝗯𝘆 𝟭𝟭:𝟱𝟵 𝗣𝗠 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗗𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗮𝘁𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗽𝗮𝘀𝘀 𝗔𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗩𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗥𝗲𝗴𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻
Reads like a scam.
Date: 25/01/2026 12:41:57
From: roughbarked
ID: 2353402
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
roughbarked said:
𝙰𝚜 𝚢𝚘𝚞’𝚛𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜, 𝚁𝚎𝚙𝚞𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚗𝚜 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚘 𝚝𝚊𝚔𝚎 𝚊𝚠𝚊𝚢 𝚢𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚛𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚝 𝚝𝚘 𝚟𝚘𝚝𝚎.
𝗤𝗨𝗜𝗖𝗞: 𝗖𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝗶𝗻 $𝟭𝟬 𝗯𝘆 𝟭𝟭:𝟱𝟵 𝗣𝗠 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗗𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗮𝘁𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗽𝗮𝘀𝘀 𝗔𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗩𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗥𝗲𝗴𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗻𝗱 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝘃𝗼𝘁𝗲 >> ff-r.com/557?t=8Kg13D
Jacqueline, Republicans have gone too far.
Since 2020, they’ve passed HUNDREDS of voter suppression bills all across the country.
It’s simple… 𝚃𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚠𝚊𝚗𝚝 𝚝𝚘 𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚙 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝚟𝚘𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐.
We can’t let them get away with this.
We’re racing to elect Democrats like Amy Klobuchar who will pass Automatic Voter Registration, which will UNDO decades of Republican voter suppression!
MAGA will be furious!!!
𝗕𝘂𝘁 𝘄𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗻’𝘁 𝗱𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂.
You’re one of our top supporters, so we’re turning to you.
We need to raise another $7,298 before midnight to hit our goal.
𝗤𝗨𝗜𝗖𝗞: 𝗖𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝗶𝗻 $𝟭𝟬 𝗯𝘆 𝟭𝟭:𝟱𝟵 𝗣𝗠 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗗𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗮𝘁𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗽𝗮𝘀𝘀 𝗔𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗩𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗥𝗲𝗴𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻
Reads like a scam.
That’s what I thought too.
Date: 25/01/2026 12:43:48
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2353405
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
𝙰𝚜 𝚢𝚘𝚞’𝚛𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜, 𝚁𝚎𝚙𝚞𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚗𝚜 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚘 𝚝𝚊𝚔𝚎 𝚊𝚠𝚊𝚢 𝚢𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚛𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚝 𝚝𝚘 𝚟𝚘𝚝𝚎.
𝗤𝗨𝗜𝗖𝗞: 𝗖𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝗶𝗻 $𝟭𝟬 𝗯𝘆 𝟭𝟭:𝟱𝟵 𝗣𝗠 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗗𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗮𝘁𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗽𝗮𝘀𝘀 𝗔𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗩𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗥𝗲𝗴𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗻𝗱 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝘃𝗼𝘁𝗲 >> ff-r.com/557?t=8Kg13D
Jacqueline, Republicans have gone too far.
Since 2020, they’ve passed HUNDREDS of voter suppression bills all across the country.
It’s simple… 𝚃𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚠𝚊𝚗𝚝 𝚝𝚘 𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚙 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝚟𝚘𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐.
We can’t let them get away with this.
We’re racing to elect Democrats like Amy Klobuchar who will pass Automatic Voter Registration, which will UNDO decades of Republican voter suppression!
MAGA will be furious!!!
𝗕𝘂𝘁 𝘄𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗻’𝘁 𝗱𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂.
You’re one of our top supporters, so we’re turning to you.
We need to raise another $7,298 before midnight to hit our goal.
𝗤𝗨𝗜𝗖𝗞: 𝗖𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝗶𝗻 $𝟭𝟬 𝗯𝘆 𝟭𝟭:𝟱𝟵 𝗣𝗠 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗗𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗮𝘁𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗽𝗮𝘀𝘀 𝗔𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗩𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗥𝗲𝗴𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻
Sounds like a PeterT Ministries ad.
Date: 25/01/2026 12:44:39
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2353406
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
buffy said:
roughbarked said:
𝙰𝚜 𝚢𝚘𝚞’𝚛𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜, 𝚁𝚎𝚙𝚞𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚗𝚜 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚘 𝚝𝚊𝚔𝚎 𝚊𝚠𝚊𝚢 𝚢𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚛𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚝 𝚝𝚘 𝚟𝚘𝚝𝚎.
𝗤𝗨𝗜𝗖𝗞: 𝗖𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝗶𝗻 $𝟭𝟬 𝗯𝘆 𝟭𝟭:𝟱𝟵 𝗣𝗠 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗗𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗮𝘁𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗽𝗮𝘀𝘀 𝗔𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗩𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗥𝗲𝗴𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗻𝗱 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝘃𝗼𝘁𝗲 >> ff-r.com/557?t=8Kg13D
Jacqueline, Republicans have gone too far.
Since 2020, they’ve passed HUNDREDS of voter suppression bills all across the country.
It’s simple… 𝚃𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚠𝚊𝚗𝚝 𝚝𝚘 𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚙 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝚟𝚘𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐.
We can’t let them get away with this.
We’re racing to elect Democrats like Amy Klobuchar who will pass Automatic Voter Registration, which will UNDO decades of Republican voter suppression!
MAGA will be furious!!!
𝗕𝘂𝘁 𝘄𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗻’𝘁 𝗱𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂.
You’re one of our top supporters, so we’re turning to you.
We need to raise another $7,298 before midnight to hit our goal.
𝗤𝗨𝗜𝗖𝗞: 𝗖𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝗶𝗻 $𝟭𝟬 𝗯𝘆 𝟭𝟭:𝟱𝟵 𝗣𝗠 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗗𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗮𝘁𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗽𝗮𝘀𝘀 𝗔𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗩𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗥𝗲𝗴𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻
Reads like a scam.
That’s what I thought too.
US politics, scam.
Pretty much interchangeable terms.
Date: 25/01/2026 12:46:56
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353407
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
roughbarked said:
buffy said:
Reads like a scam.
That’s what I thought too.
US politics, scam.
Pretty much interchangeable terms.
^
Date: 25/01/2026 12:47:24
From: fsm
ID: 2353408
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
roughbarked said:
𝙰𝚜 𝚢𝚘𝚞’𝚛𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜, 𝚁𝚎𝚙𝚞𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚗𝚜 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚘 𝚝𝚊𝚔𝚎 𝚊𝚠𝚊𝚢 𝚢𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚛𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚝 𝚝𝚘 𝚟𝚘𝚝𝚎.
𝗤𝗨𝗜𝗖𝗞: 𝗖𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝗶𝗻 $𝟭𝟬 𝗯𝘆 𝟭𝟭:𝟱𝟵 𝗣𝗠 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗗𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗮𝘁𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗽𝗮𝘀𝘀 𝗔𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗩𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗥𝗲𝗴𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗻𝗱 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝘃𝗼𝘁𝗲 >> ff-r.com/557?t=8Kg13D
Jacqueline, Republicans have gone too far.
Since 2020, they’ve passed HUNDREDS of voter suppression bills all across the country.
It’s simple… 𝚃𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚠𝚊𝚗𝚝 𝚝𝚘 𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚙 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝚟𝚘𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐.
We can’t let them get away with this.
We’re racing to elect Democrats like Amy Klobuchar who will pass Automatic Voter Registration, which will UNDO decades of Republican voter suppression!
MAGA will be furious!!!
𝗕𝘂𝘁 𝘄𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗻’𝘁 𝗱𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂.
You’re one of our top supporters, so we’re turning to you.
We need to raise another $7,298 before midnight to hit our goal.
𝗤𝗨𝗜𝗖𝗞: 𝗖𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝗶𝗻 $𝟭𝟬 𝗯𝘆 𝟭𝟭:𝟱𝟵 𝗣𝗠 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗗𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗮𝘁𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗽𝗮𝘀𝘀 𝗔𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗩𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗥𝗲𝗴𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻
Reads like a scam.
The link goes to a legitimate fundraising page.
Date: 25/01/2026 12:48:57
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353409
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
dv said:
I do have to tip my lid to these people. Negative 20 deg C temperatures would probably keep me from protesting, let alone the fear of being shot.
I hear you and concur.
that’s what they’re 2nd amendment bargaining on, imagine the amount of bot agents appeaseteurs out there telling them just comply, you won’t be shot if you comply
Date: 25/01/2026 12:52:27
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353410
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Trump to skip Super Bowl in California, criticizes performers Bad Bunny and Green Day
their people won’t be there, if shit hasn’t gone down before then they’ll bomb it
Date: 25/01/2026 12:52:51
From: roughbarked
ID: 2353411
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
roughbarked said:
buffy said:
Reads like a scam.
That’s what I thought too.
US politics, scam.
Pretty much interchangeable terms.
Nods.
Date: 25/01/2026 12:55:11
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353413
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
captain_spalding said:
roughbarked said:
That’s what I thought too.
US politics, scam.
Pretty much interchangeable terms.
Nods.
this
Date: 25/01/2026 12:56:46
From: Boris
ID: 2353415
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
fsm said:
buffy said:
roughbarked said:
𝙰𝚜 𝚢𝚘𝚞’𝚛𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜, 𝚁𝚎𝚙𝚞𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚗𝚜 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚘 𝚝𝚊𝚔𝚎 𝚊𝚠𝚊𝚢 𝚢𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚛𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚝 𝚝𝚘 𝚟𝚘𝚝𝚎.
𝗤𝗨𝗜𝗖𝗞: 𝗖𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝗶𝗻 $𝟭𝟬 𝗯𝘆 𝟭𝟭:𝟱𝟵 𝗣𝗠 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗗𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗮𝘁𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗽𝗮𝘀𝘀 𝗔𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗩𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗥𝗲𝗴𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗻𝗱 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝘃𝗼𝘁𝗲 >> ff-r.com/557?t=8Kg13D
Jacqueline, Republicans have gone too far.
Since 2020, they’ve passed HUNDREDS of voter suppression bills all across the country.
It’s simple… 𝚃𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚠𝚊𝚗𝚝 𝚝𝚘 𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚙 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝚟𝚘𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐.
We can’t let them get away with this.
We’re racing to elect Democrats like Amy Klobuchar who will pass Automatic Voter Registration, which will UNDO decades of Republican voter suppression!
MAGA will be furious!!!
𝗕𝘂𝘁 𝘄𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗻’𝘁 𝗱𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂.
You’re one of our top supporters, so we’re turning to you.
We need to raise another $7,298 before midnight to hit our goal.
𝗤𝗨𝗜𝗖𝗞: 𝗖𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝗶𝗻 $𝟭𝟬 𝗯𝘆 𝟭𝟭:𝟱𝟵 𝗣𝗠 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗗𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗮𝘁𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗽𝗮𝘀𝘀 𝗔𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗩𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗥𝗲𝗴𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻
Reads like a scam.
The link goes to a legitimate fundraising page.
pffft, i prefer the conspiracy theories.
Date: 25/01/2026 13:00:05
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353417
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
There are no penguins in Greenland.

well Americans should know all about invasive species and illegal aliens
Date: 25/01/2026 13:10:37
From: party_pants
ID: 2353423
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
captain_spalding said:
There are no penguins in Greenland.

well Americans should know all about invasive species and illegal aliens
fucking stupid USAliens.
Date: 25/01/2026 13:16:11
From: kii
ID: 2353426
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
captain_spalding said:
US politics, scam.
Pretty much interchangeable terms.
Nods.
this
+1
Date: 25/01/2026 13:16:49
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353427
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
SCIENCE said:
captain_spalding said:
There are no penguins in Greenland.

well Americans should know all about invasive species and illegal aliens
fucking stupid USAliens.

Date: 25/01/2026 13:17:33
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353428
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
Nods.
this
+1
👍
Date: 25/01/2026 13:20:27
From: Kingy
ID: 2353433
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
kii said:
SCIENCE said:
this
+1
👍
yes
Date: 25/01/2026 13:33:23
From: dv
ID: 2353438
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 25/01/2026 13:35:08
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353439
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:


take home message: if you don’t want fascism you still have 141700000 arseholes to fight
Date: 25/01/2026 13:35:31
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353440
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
bro’s starting to wake up

Date: 25/01/2026 13:36:25
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2353441
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
There are no penguins in Greenland.

One night I dreamed I was walking along the beach with President Trump.
Many scenes from my life flashed across the sky.
In each scene I noticed footprints in the sand.
Sometimes there were two sets of footprints,
other times there were one set of footprints.
This bothered me because I noticed
that during the low periods of my life,
when I was suffering from
anguish, sorrow or defeat,
I could see only one set of footprints.
So I said to the President.
“You promised me Sir,
that if I followed you,
you would walk with me always.
But I have noticed that during
the most trying periods of my life
there have only been one
set of footprints in the sand.
Why, when I needed you most,
you have not been there for me?”
And Trump replied,
“The times when you have
seen only one set of footprints,
is when I carried you.”
Date: 25/01/2026 13:42:57
From: Michael V
ID: 2353443
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
captain_spalding said:
There are no penguins in Greenland.

One night I dreamed I was walking along the beach with President Trump.
Many scenes from my life flashed across the sky.
In each scene I noticed footprints in the sand.
Sometimes there were two sets of footprints,
other times there were one set of footprints.
This bothered me because I noticed
that during the low periods of my life,
when I was suffering from
anguish, sorrow or defeat,
I could see only one set of footprints.
So I said to the President.
“You promised me Sir,
that if I followed you,
you would walk with me always.
But I have noticed that during
the most trying periods of my life
there have only been one
set of footprints in the sand.
Why, when I needed you most,
you have not been there for me?”
And Trump replied,
“The times when you have
seen only one set of footprints,
is when I carried you.”
You can fuck right off with that nonsense.
Date: 25/01/2026 13:43:01
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353444
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
alleged

Date: 25/01/2026 13:46:42
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353445
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Trump to skip Super Bowl in California, criticizes performers Bad Bunny and Green Day
their people won’t be there, if shit hasn’t gone down before then they’ll bomb it
sorry, forgot link, fixed
also
BERLIN (AP) — A German soccer federation executive committee member says it’s time to consider a World Cup boycott because of the actions of U.S. President Donald Trump. “What were the justifications for the boycotts of the Olympic Games in the 1980s?” Göttlich said. “By my reckoning the potential threat is greater now than it was then. We need to have this discussion.”
those people won’t be there, if shit hasn’t gone down before then 0.5:0.5 they’ll discover weapons of mass destruction enemies of the state in the Mexico venue and lay down a couple of missiles
https://apnews.com/article/germany-boycott-world-cup-trump-6c27c98a5ebb312f5c9cc62316bc7dd6
Date: 25/01/2026 13:48:02
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2353446
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Bank of America and Citigroup are mulling new cards with a 10% rate to satisfy Trump’s call to cap credit card interest rates for one year. It’s arguably an easier path to mollifying the White House since offering new products is less complicated than reworking existing cards.
Trump’s effort to show he’s engaged with what’s been called a growing affordability crisis has included a flurry of demands and orders, many of which are outside his powers. Earlier this week, Trump seemed to acknowledge this when he said he would ask Congress to implement the credit card proposal.
Bank executives have decried the call for a cap, saying it will force lenders to pull credit lines for consumers. JPMorgan Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon said a cap would spell “economic disaster” for the US.
Bloomberg Email Newsletter
…
I look forward to procuring myself an American credit card.
Date: 25/01/2026 13:50:56
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353447
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
captain_spalding said:
There are no penguins in Greenland.

One night I dreamed I was walking along the beach with President Trump.
Many scenes from my life flashed across the sky.
In each scene I noticed footprints in the sand.
Sometimes there were two sets of footprints,
other times there were one set of footprints.
This bothered me because I noticed
that during the low periods of my life,
when I was suffering from
anguish, sorrow or defeat,
I could see only one set of footprints.
So I said to the President.
“You promised me Sir,
that if I followed you,
you would walk with me always.
But I have noticed that during
the most trying periods of my life
there have only been one
set of footprints in the sand.
Why, when I needed you most,
you have not been there for me?”
And Trump replied,
“The times when you have
seen only one set of footprints,
is when I carried you.”
You can fuck right off with that nonsense.
oh is this the allahu akbar إن شاء الله poem again, nice
The authorship of the poem is disputed, with a number of people claiming to have written it. In 2008, Rachel Aviv, in a Poetry Foundation article, discusses the claims of Burrell Webb, Mary Stevenson, Margaret Fishback Powers, and Carolyn Joyce Carty. Later that year, The Washington Post, covering a lawsuit between the claims of Stevenson, Powers, and Carty, said that “At least a dozen people” had claimed credit for the poem. The three authors who have most strenuously promoted their authorship are Margaret Powers (née Fishback), Carolyn Carty, and Mary Stevenson. Powers says she wrote the poem on Canadian Thanksgiving weekend, in mid-October 1964. Powers is among the contenders who have resorted to litigation in hopes of establishing a claim. She is occasionally confused with American writer Margaret Fishback. Powers published an autobiography in 1993. Carolyn Carty also claims to have written the poem in 1963 when she was six years old, based on an earlier work by her great-great aunt, a Sunday school teacher. She is known to be a hostile contender of the “Footprints” poem and declines to be interviewed about it, although she writes letters to those who write about the poem online. A collection of poetry by Carty with a claim to authorship of “Footprints” was published in 2004.
LOL hypercapitalist evangelism love it
Date: 25/01/2026 14:01:10
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2353448
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Bank of America and Citigroup are mulling new cards with a 10% rate to satisfy Trump’s call to cap credit card interest rates for one year. It’s arguably an easier path to mollifying the White House since offering new products is less complicated than reworking existing cards.
Trump’s effort to show he’s engaged with what’s been called a growing affordability crisis has included a flurry of demands and orders, many of which are outside his powers. Earlier this week, Trump seemed to acknowledge this when he said he would ask Congress to implement the credit card proposal.
Bank executives have decried the call for a cap, saying it will force lenders to pull credit lines for consumers. JPMorgan Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon said a cap would spell “economic disaster” for the US.
Bloomberg Email Newsletter
…
I look forward to procuring myself an American credit card.
It’ll probly have his face on it.
Date: 25/01/2026 14:03:35
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2353449
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
captain_spalding said:
There are no penguins in Greenland.

One night I dreamed I was walking along the beach with President Trump.
Many scenes from my life flashed across the sky.
In each scene I noticed footprints in the sand.
Sometimes there were two sets of footprints,
other times there were one set of footprints.
This bothered me because I noticed
that during the low periods of my life,
when I was suffering from
anguish, sorrow or defeat,
I could see only one set of footprints.
So I said to the President.
“You promised me Sir,
that if I followed you,
you would walk with me always.
But I have noticed that during
the most trying periods of my life
there have only been one
set of footprints in the sand.
Why, when I needed you most,
you have not been there for me?”
And Trump replied,
“The times when you have
seen only one set of footprints,
is when I carried you.”
So much to learn, so little time.
Date: 25/01/2026 14:03:58
From: party_pants
ID: 2353450
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Bank of America and Citigroup are mulling new cards with a 10% rate to satisfy Trump’s call to cap credit card interest rates for one year. It’s arguably an easier path to mollifying the White House since offering new products is less complicated than reworking existing cards.
Trump’s effort to show he’s engaged with what’s been called a growing affordability crisis has included a flurry of demands and orders, many of which are outside his powers. Earlier this week, Trump seemed to acknowledge this when he said he would ask Congress to implement the credit card proposal.
Bank executives have decried the call for a cap, saying it will force lenders to pull credit lines for consumers. JPMorgan Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon said a cap would spell “economic disaster” for the US.
Bloomberg Email Newsletter
…
I look forward to procuring myself an American credit card.
Yay, let’s solve the affordability crisis by issuing cheaper debt!
what could go wrong…?
Date: 25/01/2026 14:13:54
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2353452
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Here’s a video of the latest murder. It’s about a minute into the video. He’s got four of five goons on him but they decide to unload about ten rounds into him anyway.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Leakednews/comments/1qlvt7t/video_from_the_lady_in_the_pink_coat/
Date: 25/01/2026 14:14:47
From: party_pants
ID: 2353455
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
Here’s a video of the latest murder. It’s about a minute into the video. He’s got four of five goons on him but they decide to unload about ten rounds into him anyway.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Leakednews/comments/1qlvt7t/video_from_the_lady_in_the_pink_coat/
no thanks
Date: 25/01/2026 14:15:28
From: dv
ID: 2353457
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Once again there is plenty of video. He doesn’t brandish his wrapon. It was removed from the holster by the agent. He is unarmed at the time of shooting. His hands are palm down at the time of shooting.
He appears to be trying to protect another protestor at the time of shooting but I admit that’s open to interpretation.
Date: 25/01/2026 14:16:10
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2353458
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
Here’s a video of the latest murder. It’s about a minute into the video. He’s got four of five goons on him but they decide to unload about ten rounds into him anyway.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Leakednews/comments/1qlvt7t/video_from_the_lady_in_the_pink_coat/
Any cops so afraid of unarmed civilians they feel the need to shoot them in their supposed own defence is in the wrong profession. Fuckin’ cowards.
Date: 25/01/2026 14:16:38
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2353459
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
Spiny Norman said:
Here’s a video of the latest murder. It’s about a minute into the video. He’s got four of five goons on him but they decide to unload about ten rounds into him anyway.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Leakednews/comments/1qlvt7t/video_from_the_lady_in_the_pink_coat/
no thanks
+1
Date: 25/01/2026 14:17:34
From: Michael V
ID: 2353460
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
Here’s a video of the latest murder. It’s about a minute into the video. He’s got four of five goons on him but they decide to unload about ten rounds into him anyway.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Leakednews/comments/1qlvt7t/video_from_the_lady_in_the_pink_coat/
No thanks.
I don’t think I could handle it.
:(
Date: 25/01/2026 14:18:49
From: Michael V
ID: 2353462
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Once again there is plenty of video. He doesn’t brandish his wrapon. It was removed from the holster by the agent. He is unarmed at the time of shooting. His hands are palm down at the time of shooting.
He appears to be trying to protect another protestor at the time of shooting but I admit that’s open to interpretation.
…
:(
Date: 25/01/2026 14:19:42
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2353463
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Spiny Norman said:
Here’s a video of the latest murder. It’s about a minute into the video. He’s got four of five goons on him but they decide to unload about ten rounds into him anyway.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Leakednews/comments/1qlvt7t/video_from_the_lady_in_the_pink_coat/
No thanks.
I don’t think I could handle it.
:(
No value in engaging with material you know will affect you negatively.
Date: 25/01/2026 14:21:46
From: kii
ID: 2353465
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 25/01/2026 14:25:30
From: Michael V
ID: 2353466
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
Spiny Norman said:
Here’s a video of the latest murder. It’s about a minute into the video. He’s got four of five goons on him but they decide to unload about ten rounds into him anyway.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Leakednews/comments/1qlvt7t/video_from_the_lady_in_the_pink_coat/
No thanks.
I don’t think I could handle it.
:(
No value in engaging with material you know will affect you negatively.
Nods.
Date: 25/01/2026 14:26:43
From: Michael V
ID: 2353467
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:

Oh.
Shit.
:(
:(
:(
Date: 25/01/2026 14:27:10
From: kii
ID: 2353468
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
Spiny Norman said:
Here’s a video of the latest murder. It’s about a minute into the video. He’s got four of five goons on him but they decide to unload about ten rounds into him anyway.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Leakednews/comments/1qlvt7t/video_from_the_lady_in_the_pink_coat/
No thanks.
I don’t think I could handle it.
:(
No value in engaging with material you know will affect you negatively.
I watched it. There is value in witnessing the horror so I can speak to others about it.
Date: 25/01/2026 14:32:08
From: dv
ID: 2353470
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1A2wwKdvUm/
Veteran compares rules of engagement in Afghanistan with operations in the USA
Date: 25/01/2026 14:33:34
From: kii
ID: 2353471
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
From Robert Reich.
Link.
Alex Pretti.

Date: 25/01/2026 14:34:13
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2353472
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
A slightly different angle of the same thing. He seems to be kneeling down when they shoot him.
From what I’ve read elsewhere he did have a pistol but it had been taken from him a few seconds (?) earlier.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Leakednews/comments/1qm4pu7/stabilized_version/
Again, please don’t watch it if you don’t feel up to it.
Date: 25/01/2026 14:41:10
From: kii
ID: 2353473
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
A slightly different angle of the same thing. He seems to be kneeling down when they shoot him.
From what I’ve read elsewhere he did have a pistol but it had been taken from him a few seconds (?) earlier.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Leakednews/comments/1qm4pu7/stabilized_version/
Again, please don’t watch it if you don’t feel up to it.
I think the arse hole fascists have been directed to shoot anyone that is armed. There has been a lot of talk about the need for protestors to use their 2nd Amendment right to be armed.
IMO, this shooting is a deterrent to people doing just that.
Trump wants violent riots, so he can declare martial law and killing protestors is one way to push that along.
Date: 25/01/2026 14:44:42
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2353475
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Spiny Norman said:
A slightly different angle of the same thing. He seems to be kneeling down when they shoot him.
From what I’ve read elsewhere he did have a pistol but it had been taken from him a few seconds (?) earlier.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Leakednews/comments/1qm4pu7/stabilized_version/
Again, please don’t watch it if you don’t feel up to it.
I think the arse hole fascists have been directed to shoot anyone that is armed. There has been a lot of talk about the need for protestors to use their 2nd Amendment right to be armed.
IMO, this shooting is a deterrent to people doing just that.
Trump wants violent riots, so he can declare martial law and killing protestors is one way to push that along.
Yep. :(
Date: 25/01/2026 14:46:09
From: AussieDJ
ID: 2353476
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
kii said:
Spiny Norman said:
A slightly different angle of the same thing. He seems to be kneeling down when they shoot him.
From what I’ve read elsewhere he did have a pistol but it had been taken from him a few seconds (?) earlier.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Leakednews/comments/1qm4pu7/stabilized_version/
Again, please don’t watch it if you don’t feel up to it.
I think the arse hole fascists have been directed to shoot anyone that is armed. There has been a lot of talk about the need for protestors to use their 2nd Amendment right to be armed.
IMO, this shooting is a deterrent to people doing just that.
Trump wants violent riots, so he can declare martial law and killing protestors is one way to push that along.
Yep. :(
+1
Date: 25/01/2026 14:48:41
From: kii
ID: 2353477
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
There are no penguins in Greenland.

So many newly-informed people are posting that there are no penguins in the northern hemisphere, on some comment sections it’s 95% of the comments.
But there are penguins in the northern hemisphere! The Galapagos Islands has penguins and it lies across the Equator.

Date: 25/01/2026 14:49:55
From: kii
ID: 2353478
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
kii said:
Spiny Norman said:
A slightly different angle of the same thing. He seems to be kneeling down when they shoot him.
From what I’ve read elsewhere he did have a pistol but it had been taken from him a few seconds (?) earlier.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Leakednews/comments/1qm4pu7/stabilized_version/
Again, please don’t watch it if you don’t feel up to it.
I think the arse hole fascists have been directed to shoot anyone that is armed. There has been a lot of talk about the need for protestors to use their 2nd Amendment right to be armed.
IMO, this shooting is a deterrent to people doing just that.
Trump wants violent riots, so he can declare martial law and killing protestors is one way to push that along.
Yep. :(
For those not keeping up….it’s part of the plan to stop the midterm elections this year.
Date: 25/01/2026 14:50:47
From: party_pants
ID: 2353479
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Trump wants violent riots, so he can declare martial law and killing protestors is one way to push that along.
why does he want martial law then?
Date: 25/01/2026 14:51:16
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2353480
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Alex Pretti – who DHS labeled a domestic terrorist – honoring a veteran that passed away in the ICU.
https://www.reddit.com/r/law/comments/1qm3dpf/alex_pretti_who_dhs_labeled_a_domestic_terrorist/
Date: 25/01/2026 14:51:20
From: party_pants
ID: 2353481
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Spiny Norman said:
kii said:
I think the arse hole fascists have been directed to shoot anyone that is armed. There has been a lot of talk about the need for protestors to use their 2nd Amendment right to be armed.
IMO, this shooting is a deterrent to people doing just that.
Trump wants violent riots, so he can declare martial law and killing protestors is one way to push that along.
Yep. :(
For those not keeping up….it’s part of the plan to stop the midterm elections this year.
I’m not keeping up
Date: 25/01/2026 14:52:12
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2353482
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Spiny Norman said:
kii said:
I think the arse hole fascists have been directed to shoot anyone that is armed. There has been a lot of talk about the need for protestors to use their 2nd Amendment right to be armed.
IMO, this shooting is a deterrent to people doing just that.
Trump wants violent riots, so he can declare martial law and killing protestors is one way to push that along.
Yep. :(
For those not keeping up….it’s part of the plan to stop the midterm elections this year.
For sure. I’ve been saying that for over a year as well.
Date: 25/01/2026 14:52:45
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2353484
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
kii said:
Trump wants violent riots, so he can declare martial law and killing protestors is one way to push that along.
why does he want martial law then?
So he can suspend all elections. Then that’s it for the US, it’s all over.
Date: 25/01/2026 14:54:15
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2353485
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
kii said:
Trump wants violent riots, so he can declare martial law and killing protestors is one way to push that along.
why does he want martial law then?
Doesn’t explain everything, but it’s a start.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9qwez9zz7jo
Date: 25/01/2026 14:54:42
From: Boris
ID: 2353486
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 25/01/2026 14:55:38
From: party_pants
ID: 2353487
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
party_pants said:
kii said:
Trump wants violent riots, so he can declare martial law and killing protestors is one way to push that along.
why does he want martial law then?
So he can suspend all elections. Then that’s it for the US, it’s all over.
That will trigger a civil war, states will start declaring themselves independent of federal authority.
Also, there goes the 2026 FIFA World Cup, and Trump’s peace prize.
Date: 25/01/2026 14:56:05
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2353488
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Spiny Norman said:
kii said:
I think the arse hole fascists have been directed to shoot anyone that is armed. There has been a lot of talk about the need for protestors to use their 2nd Amendment right to be armed.
IMO, this shooting is a deterrent to people doing just that.
Trump wants violent riots, so he can declare martial law and killing protestors is one way to push that along.
Yep. :(
For those not keeping up….it’s part of the plan to stop the midterm elections this year.
Stop it you’ll make Diddly cry!
Date: 25/01/2026 14:56:11
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2353489
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
party_pants said:
kii said:
Trump wants violent riots, so he can declare martial law and killing protestors is one way to push that along.
why does he want martial law then?
So he can suspend all elections. Then that’s it for the US, it’s all over.
It’s worth noting that the US has held elections during wars. I’m not sure of the legality of postponing/cancelling elections due to insurrection or war, buuuuut Trump doesn’t care about the Constitution or laws anyway.
Date: 25/01/2026 14:57:21
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2353490
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
Spiny Norman said:
party_pants said:
why does he want martial law then?
So he can suspend all elections. Then that’s it for the US, it’s all over.
That will trigger a civil war, states will start declaring themselves independent of federal authority.
Also, there goes the 2026 FIFA World Cup, and Trump’s peace prize.
When’s that start? US summer?
Date: 25/01/2026 14:57:45
From: Michael V
ID: 2353491
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Boris said:

:)
Date: 25/01/2026 15:00:16
From: party_pants
ID: 2353492
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
party_pants said:
Spiny Norman said:
So he can suspend all elections. Then that’s it for the US, it’s all over.
That will trigger a civil war, states will start declaring themselves independent of federal authority.
Also, there goes the 2026 FIFA World Cup, and Trump’s peace prize.
When’s that start? US summer?
Yea, June and July.
Date: 25/01/2026 15:00:22
From: Michael V
ID: 2353493
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Spiny Norman said:
party_pants said:
why does he want martial law then?
So he can suspend all elections. Then that’s it for the US, it’s all over.
It’s worth noting that the US has held elections during wars. I’m not sure of the legality of postponing/cancelling elections due to insurrection or war, buuuuut Trump doesn’t care about the Constitution or laws anyway.
Sure, elections held during wartime. Most wars they have participated in were not on US soil.
But elections under Martial Law?
Date: 25/01/2026 15:01:58
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2353495
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:
Spiny Norman said:
So he can suspend all elections. Then that’s it for the US, it’s all over.
It’s worth noting that the US has held elections during wars. I’m not sure of the legality of postponing/cancelling elections due to insurrection or war, buuuuut Trump doesn’t care about the Constitution or laws anyway.
Sure, elections held during wartime. Most wars they have participated in were not on US soil.
But elections under Martial Law?
There was an election during the Civil War.
Date: 25/01/2026 15:05:00
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2353496
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:
It’s worth noting that the US has held elections during wars. I’m not sure of the legality of postponing/cancelling elections due to insurrection or war, buuuuut Trump doesn’t care about the Constitution or laws anyway.
Sure, elections held during wartime. Most wars they have participated in were not on US soil.
But elections under Martial Law?
There was an election during the Civil War.
Were the polling booths at the airports?
Date: 25/01/2026 15:07:08
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2353497
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Um, another angle with this one being from inside the car that was right next to the conflict.
https://x.com/i/status/2015257888063709345
Date: 25/01/2026 15:11:09
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2353498
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Video slowed down of recent ICE (ERO) shooting in Minneapolis showing man in gray jacket supposedly retrieving weapon from the shooting victim (gun was retrieved before shots fired) (57 seconds)
https://www.reddit.com/r/Leakednews/comments/1qm0×5b/video_slowed_down_of_recent_ice_ero_shooting_in/
Date: 25/01/2026 15:13:40
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2353499
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:
It’s worth noting that the US has held elections during wars. I’m not sure of the legality of postponing/cancelling elections due to insurrection or war, buuuuut Trump doesn’t care about the Constitution or laws anyway.
Sure, elections held during wartime. Most wars they have participated in were not on US soil.
But elections under Martial Law?
There was an election during the Civil War.
There’s very little chance that if ML were declared they would
still have the midterms: one is a direct corollary of the other. That said that there’s an outside chance that Trump and his cronies would establish federal authority over elections, institute only in person voting, establish universal voter ID laws and kick 20m Democrats of the rolls. They might chance it in that case.
Date: 25/01/2026 15:15:16
From: Michael V
ID: 2353501
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:
It’s worth noting that the US has held elections during wars. I’m not sure of the legality of postponing/cancelling elections due to insurrection or war, buuuuut Trump doesn’t care about the Constitution or laws anyway.
Sure, elections held during wartime. Most wars they have participated in were not on US soil.
But elections under Martial Law?
There was an election during the Civil War.
Huh!
Thanks for that.
Date: 25/01/2026 15:16:25
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2353502
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
Sure, elections held during wartime. Most wars they have participated in were not on US soil.
But elections under Martial Law?
There was an election during the Civil War.
There’s very little chance that if ML were declared they would still have the midterms: one is a direct corollary of the other. That said that there’s an outside chance that Trump and his cronies would establish federal authority over elections, institute only in person voting, establish universal voter ID laws and kick 20m Democrats of the rolls. They might chance it in that case.
I have absolutely no doubt Trump will do everything in his power (actual power or imaginary) to cancel elections.
Date: 25/01/2026 15:16:32
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2353503
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:

Two more people in the queue to piss on Trump’s grave.
At every opportunity they have.
Date: 25/01/2026 15:18:31
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2353504
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
Sure, elections held during wartime. Most wars they have participated in were not on US soil.
But elections under Martial Law?
There was an election during the Civil War.
Were the polling booths at the airports?
Yes, right between Gate A and baggage claim for lost muskets.
Date: 25/01/2026 15:21:27
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2353505
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Spiny Norman said:
Divine Angel said:
There was an election during the Civil War.
Were the polling booths at the airports?
Yes, right between Gate A and baggage claim for lost muskets.
My grandpappy used to hate having to take his abacus out of his trunk at the security station.
Date: 25/01/2026 15:22:33
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2353507
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Divine Angel said:
Spiny Norman said:
Were the polling booths at the airports?
Yes, right between Gate A and baggage claim for lost muskets.
My grandpappy used to hate having to take his abacus out of his trunk at the security station.
After parking at the long-term horse & cart parking station, it’s a real struggle.
Date: 25/01/2026 15:24:58
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2353511
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Trump might dream about bringing in martial law, but that quite obviously requires the obedience of the military.
It’s highly doubtful that very many in the higher levels of the US military are ardent fans of Trump or of his government.
Everyone in those services, from the highest ranked to the newest recruit is very well aware that they took an oath to ‘support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic’. And they all take that seriously. Quite seriously.
It will be up to the leaders of the US military to decide if orders issued by Trump present a threat to the Constitution that they’ve sworn to support and defend, and if they decide that those orders are a threat, then they may also decide that Trump is an enemy, domestic.
Date: 25/01/2026 15:27:28
From: party_pants
ID: 2353515
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
It will be up to the leaders of the US military to decide if orders issued by Trump present a threat to the Constitution that they’ve sworn to support and defend, and if they decide that those orders are a threat, then they may also decide that Trump is an enemy, domestic.
I wish they’d get on with it
Date: 25/01/2026 15:28:44
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2353518
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Trump might dream about bringing in martial law, but that quite obviously requires the obedience of the military.
It’s highly doubtful that very many in the higher levels of the US military are ardent fans of Trump or of his government.
Everyone in those services, from the highest ranked to the newest recruit is very well aware that they took an oath to ‘support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic’. And they all take that seriously. Quite seriously.
It will be up to the leaders of the US military to decide if orders issued by Trump present a threat to the Constitution that they’ve sworn to support and defend, and if they decide that those orders are a threat, then they may also decide that Trump is an enemy, domestic.
I very much agree.
The only thing that concerns me is that he’ll just keep on firing the senior staff until he gets down to the level where there’s a pathetic sycophant that will follow his orders.
Date: 25/01/2026 15:30:17
From: roughbarked
ID: 2353521
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
captain_spalding said:
Trump might dream about bringing in martial law, but that quite obviously requires the obedience of the military.
It’s highly doubtful that very many in the higher levels of the US military are ardent fans of Trump or of his government.
Everyone in those services, from the highest ranked to the newest recruit is very well aware that they took an oath to ‘support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic’. And they all take that seriously. Quite seriously.
It will be up to the leaders of the US military to decide if orders issued by Trump present a threat to the Constitution that they’ve sworn to support and defend, and if they decide that those orders are a threat, then they may also decide that Trump is an enemy, domestic.
I very much agree.
The only thing that concerns me is that he’ll just keep on firing the senior staff until he gets down to the level where there’s a pathetic sycophant that will follow his orders.
Bring on the midterms. They’ll all be looking after their own arses and Trump be buggered.
Date: 25/01/2026 15:33:32
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2353523
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
captain_spalding said:
It will be up to the leaders of the US military to decide if orders issued by Trump present a threat to the Constitution that they’ve sworn to support and defend, and if they decide that those orders are a threat, then they may also decide that Trump is an enemy, domestic.
I wish they’d get on with it
They wouldn’t act in anything that resembles haste. They’d want an iron-clad case for making what would be the most significant move in American history.
To use the phrase that so much appeals to Americans, they’d have to be able to unarguably demonstrate that Trump represents ‘a clear and present danger’ to the United States and the Constitution. It’d have to be so water-tight that there can be no question of the rightness of their move, now or ever.
Date: 25/01/2026 15:36:13
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2353527
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
It’d have to be so water-tight that there can be no question of the rightness of their move, now or ever.
Pretty sure they’ve had that since 2017.
Date: 25/01/2026 15:38:09
From: Michael V
ID: 2353528
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Trump might dream about bringing in martial law, but that quite obviously requires the obedience of the military.
It’s highly doubtful that very many in the higher levels of the US military are ardent fans of Trump or of his government.
Everyone in those services, from the highest ranked to the newest recruit is very well aware that they took an oath to ‘support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic’. And they all take that seriously. Quite seriously.
It will be up to the leaders of the US military to decide if orders issued by Trump present a threat to the Constitution that they’ve sworn to support and defend, and if they decide that those orders are a threat, then they may also decide that Trump is an enemy, domestic.
We can hope.
Date: 25/01/2026 15:39:58
From: party_pants
ID: 2353531
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
party_pants said:
captain_spalding said:
It will be up to the leaders of the US military to decide if orders issued by Trump present a threat to the Constitution that they’ve sworn to support and defend, and if they decide that those orders are a threat, then they may also decide that Trump is an enemy, domestic.
I wish they’d get on with it
They wouldn’t act in anything that resembles haste. They’d want an iron-clad case for making what would be the most significant move in American history.
To use the phrase that so much appeals to Americans, they’d have to be able to unarguably demonstrate that Trump represents ‘a clear and present danger’ to the United States and the Constitution. It’d have to be so water-tight that there can be no question of the rightness of their move, now or ever.
So pretty much never then.
Looks like their only hope is if he dies soon of natural causes. The longer he carries on in office the more damage he does to the country. If nobody is prepared to stop him then it just goes on and gets worse each day.
It may be too late already for the place to “get back to normal” after he departs the scene.
Date: 25/01/2026 15:41:27
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2353532
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
So pretty much never then.
Looks like their only hope is if he dies soon of natural causes. The longer he carries on in office the more damage he does to the country. If nobody is prepared to stop him then it just goes on and gets worse each day.
It may be too late already for the place to “get back to normal” after he departs the scene.
Then the next colossal problem starts – Couch Boy Vance will be running things and I cannot imagine in any way that going any better.
Date: 25/01/2026 15:42:20
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2353534
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
captain_spalding said:
party_pants said:
I wish they’d get on with it
They wouldn’t act in anything that resembles haste. They’d want an iron-clad case for making what would be the most significant move in American history.
To use the phrase that so much appeals to Americans, they’d have to be able to unarguably demonstrate that Trump represents ‘a clear and present danger’ to the United States and the Constitution. It’d have to be so water-tight that there can be no question of the rightness of their move, now or ever.
So pretty much never then.
Looks like their only hope is if he dies soon of natural causes. The longer he carries on in office the more damage he does to the country. If nobody is prepared to stop him then it just goes on and gets worse each day.
It may be too late already for the place to “get back to normal” after he departs the scene.
Yeah. That frog never thinks to jump out of the pot on the stovetop before it’s too late.
Date: 25/01/2026 15:42:35
From: Neophyte
ID: 2353535
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
party_pants said:
captain_spalding said:
It will be up to the leaders of the US military to decide if orders issued by Trump present a threat to the Constitution that they’ve sworn to support and defend, and if they decide that those orders are a threat, then they may also decide that Trump is an enemy, domestic.
I wish they’d get on with it
They wouldn’t act in anything that resembles haste. They’d want an iron-clad case for making what would be the most significant move in American history.
To use the phrase that so much appeals to Americans, they’d have to be able to unarguably demonstrate that Trump represents ‘a clear and present danger’ to the United States and the Constitution. It’d have to be so water-tight that there can be no question of the rightness of their move, now or ever.
Put Merrick Garland in charge of the military then.
Date: 25/01/2026 15:43:29
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2353536
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
party_pants said:
So pretty much never then.
Looks like their only hope is if he dies soon of natural causes. The longer he carries on in office the more damage he does to the country. If nobody is prepared to stop him then it just goes on and gets worse each day.
It may be too late already for the place to “get back to normal” after he departs the scene.
Then the next colossal problem starts – Couch Boy Vance will be running things and I cannot imagine in any way that going any better.
Will the cult dissolve under his influence?
Date: 25/01/2026 15:45:21
From: party_pants
ID: 2353538
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
party_pants said:
So pretty much never then.
Looks like their only hope is if he dies soon of natural causes. The longer he carries on in office the more damage he does to the country. If nobody is prepared to stop him then it just goes on and gets worse each day.
It may be too late already for the place to “get back to normal” after he departs the scene.
Then the next colossal problem starts – Couch Boy Vance will be running things and I cannot imagine in any way that going any better.
Yeah, I know.
Someone posted here a while back the order of succession for POTUS. The next cabs off the rank behind him are the Speakers of the House and Senate. Both of them are stooges too.
The best they can hope for is someone who will stop things getting worse and just maintain a level of shitiness.
Date: 25/01/2026 15:46:43
From: Michael V
ID: 2353540
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
captain_spalding said:
party_pants said:
I wish they’d get on with it
They wouldn’t act in anything that resembles haste. They’d want an iron-clad case for making what would be the most significant move in American history.
To use the phrase that so much appeals to Americans, they’d have to be able to unarguably demonstrate that Trump represents ‘a clear and present danger’ to the United States and the Constitution. It’d have to be so water-tight that there can be no question of the rightness of their move, now or ever.
So pretty much never then.
Looks like their only hope is if he dies soon of natural causes. The longer he carries on in office the more damage he does to the country. If nobody is prepared to stop him then it just goes on and gets worse each day.
It may be too late already for the place to “get back to normal” after he departs the scene.
It’d be even more wary of Vance. That guy has his faculties, he plays the game, he will say anything and is potentially a really nasty bugger.
Date: 25/01/2026 15:47:38
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2353541
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Spiny Norman said:
party_pants said:
So pretty much never then.
Looks like their only hope is if he dies soon of natural causes. The longer he carries on in office the more damage he does to the country. If nobody is prepared to stop him then it just goes on and gets worse each day.
It may be too late already for the place to “get back to normal” after he departs the scene.
Then the next colossal problem starts – Couch Boy Vance will be running things and I cannot imagine in any way that going any better.
Will the cult dissolve under his influence?
I have little doubt we’ll find out before the end of this year. Hopefully much earlier.
Date: 25/01/2026 15:48:13
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2353542
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
Spiny Norman said:
party_pants said:
So pretty much never then.
Looks like their only hope is if he dies soon of natural causes. The longer he carries on in office the more damage he does to the country. If nobody is prepared to stop him then it just goes on and gets worse each day.
It may be too late already for the place to “get back to normal” after he departs the scene.
Then the next colossal problem starts – Couch Boy Vance will be running things and I cannot imagine in any way that going any better.
Yeah, I know.
Someone posted here a while back the order of succession for POTUS. The next cabs off the rank behind him are the Speakers of the House and Senate. Both of them are stooges too.
The best they can hope for is someone who will stop things getting worse and just maintain a level of shitiness.
Aim high mate.
Date: 25/01/2026 15:51:18
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2353544
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Spiny Norman said:
party_pants said:
So pretty much never then.
Looks like their only hope is if he dies soon of natural causes. The longer he carries on in office the more damage he does to the country. If nobody is prepared to stop him then it just goes on and gets worse each day.
It may be too late already for the place to “get back to normal” after he departs the scene.
Then the next colossal problem starts – Couch Boy Vance will be running things and I cannot imagine in any way that going any better.
Will the cult dissolve under his influence?
It might.
It’s the ‘persona’ of Trump that created the MAGA cult, and which holds it together.
Him being a ‘TV celebrity’ and the squirrel-brained way that he does things, fomenting chaos every second of the day, being impossible to pin down to any particular narrative, constantly wandering and meandering and dithering and rambling, it presents an avalanche of nonsense and incomprehensibility from which his followers can pick whatever shiny pebbles appeal to them, whether it’s hating on immigrants, not liking trans people, disparaging Europe, blaming Biden and Obama (Obama, for God’s sake, he’s been gone for ten years now), threatening other countries, labelling people as ‘the Left’, whatever.
It’s unlikely that Vance can emulate that.
Date: 25/01/2026 15:53:03
From: party_pants
ID: 2353545
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
party_pants said:
Spiny Norman said:
Then the next colossal problem starts – Couch Boy Vance will be running things and I cannot imagine in any way that going any better.
Yeah, I know.
Someone posted here a while back the order of succession for POTUS. The next cabs off the rank behind him are the Speakers of the House and Senate. Both of them are stooges too.
The best they can hope for is someone who will stop things getting worse and just maintain a level of shitiness.
Aim high mate.
The other option is for the House of Reps to vote out the current speaker and replace him with someone sensible. Then the Congress impeach both president and vice president at the same time. Then Bingo, the aforementioned sensible person is next in line to become president.
Date: 25/01/2026 15:54:24
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2353547
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
Spiny Norman said:
party_pants said:
Yeah, I know.
Someone posted here a while back the order of succession for POTUS. The next cabs off the rank behind him are the Speakers of the House and Senate. Both of them are stooges too.
The best they can hope for is someone who will stop things getting worse and just maintain a level of shitiness.
Aim high mate.
The other option is for the House of Reps to vote out the current speaker and replace him with someone sensible. Then the Congress impeach both president and vice president at the same time. Then Bingo, the aforementioned sensible person is next in line to become president.
Well, there’s one reason Trump fears mid-term elections.
Date: 25/01/2026 15:54:32
From: Michael V
ID: 2353548
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
party_pants said:
captain_spalding said:
They wouldn’t act in anything that resembles haste. They’d want an iron-clad case for making what would be the most significant move in American history.
To use the phrase that so much appeals to Americans, they’d have to be able to unarguably demonstrate that Trump represents ‘a clear and present danger’ to the United States and the Constitution. It’d have to be so water-tight that there can be no question of the rightness of their move, now or ever.
So pretty much never then.
Looks like their only hope is if he dies soon of natural causes. The longer he carries on in office the more damage he does to the country. If nobody is prepared to stop him then it just goes on and gets worse each day.
It may be too late already for the place to “get back to normal” after he departs the scene.
Yeah. That frog never thinks to jump out of the pot on the stovetop before it’s too late.
Like this?
https://misschinesefood.com/the-spicy-bullfrog-hot-pot/

Date: 25/01/2026 15:57:47
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2353550
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
Spiny Norman said:
party_pants said:
Yeah, I know.
Someone posted here a while back the order of succession for POTUS. The next cabs off the rank behind him are the Speakers of the House and Senate. Both of them are stooges too.
The best they can hope for is someone who will stop things getting worse and just maintain a level of shitiness.
Aim high mate.
The other option is for the House of Reps to vote out the current speaker and replace him with someone sensible. Then the Congress impeach both president and vice president at the same time. Then Bingo, the aforementioned sensible person is next in line to become president.
Aim much higher. :(
Date: 25/01/2026 15:58:46
From: dv
ID: 2353552
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSaUGGAJa/
Impress me
Date: 25/01/2026 16:13:33
From: Kingy
ID: 2353563
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSaUGGAJa/
Impress me
Can’t watch it without installing the Chinese secret service app.
Date: 25/01/2026 16:13:51
From: Boris
ID: 2353564
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.facebook.com/reel/3126000030882437
Link
Jon Stewart
“I don’t give a f**k whose team he’s on. What blows my mind is our resignation in its aftermath.” Jon Stewart on the Minnesota shooting
Date: 25/01/2026 16:26:49
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353571
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Divine Angel said:
Spiny Norman said:
Then the next colossal problem starts – Couch Boy Vance will be running things and I cannot imagine in any way that going any better.
Will the cult dissolve under his influence?
It might.
It’s the ‘persona’ of Trump that created the MAGA cult, and which holds it together.
Him being a ‘TV celebrity’ and the squirrel-brained way that he does things, fomenting chaos every second of the day, being impossible to pin down to any particular narrative, constantly wandering and meandering and dithering and rambling, it presents an avalanche of nonsense and incomprehensibility from which his followers can pick whatever shiny pebbles appeal to them, whether it’s hating on immigrants, not liking trans people, disparaging Europe, blaming Biden and Obama (Obama, for God’s sake, he’s been gone for ten years now), threatening other countries, labelling people as ‘the Left’, whatever.
It’s unlikely that Vance can emulate that.
pretty sure there are any number of at least equally skilled rhetoricians
Date: 25/01/2026 16:32:22
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353575
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
kii said:
Spiny Norman said:
Yep. :(
For those not keeping up….it’s part of the plan to stop the midterm elections this year.
Stop it you’ll make Diddly cry!
look it hasn’t not happened yet, nobody can say it’s not not happened
Date: 25/01/2026 16:35:02
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353576
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
anyway we’re pretty sure bombing Iran will fix this
Date: 25/01/2026 16:51:23
From: AussieDJ
ID: 2353580
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 25/01/2026 16:58:16
From: Michael V
ID: 2353582
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
AussieDJ said:

FMD!
Cheeses!
“We’ll stop killing your people after yeo give us control of voting in your state.”
Date: 25/01/2026 17:01:33
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2353586
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
AussieDJ said:

Well, when you consider that Republican states like Texas and Florida have ‘illegal immigrant’ number in the millions (1.6 m and 2.1 m, respectively), while Minnesota’s numbers are less than 150,000, it doesn’t take much to work that out.
Date: 25/01/2026 17:07:46
From: AussieDJ
ID: 2353593
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Boris said:
https://www.facebook.com/reel/3126000030882437
Link
Jon Stewart
“I don’t give a f**k whose team he’s on. What blows my mind is our resignation in its aftermath.” Jon Stewart on the Minnesota shooting
That video is around 6 months old.
Still valid, though.
Date: 25/01/2026 17:10:42
From: dv
ID: 2353597
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
DHS is responsible for 67% of the homicides in Minneapolis so far in 2026.
Date: 25/01/2026 17:14:10
From: Boris
ID: 2353600
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
AussieDJ said:
Boris said:
https://www.facebook.com/reel/3126000030882437
Link
Jon Stewart
“I don’t give a f**k whose team he’s on. What blows my mind is our resignation in its aftermath.” Jon Stewart on the Minnesota shooting
That video is around 6 months old.
Still valid, though.
didn’t have a date on it.
Date: 25/01/2026 17:15:12
From: Michael V
ID: 2353601
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
DHS is responsible for 67% of the homicides in Minneapolis so far in 2026.
Bloody hell!
Time for Mrs V to check how her friend is doing. She lives in St Pauls. (Her daughter lives in Israel!)
Date: 25/01/2026 17:15:14
From: buffy
ID: 2353602
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
DHS is responsible for 67% of the homicides in Minneapolis so far in 2026.
That can’t be right! The reason for them being there is to make the populace safe from being murdered…
Date: 25/01/2026 17:23:12
From: AussieDJ
ID: 2353605
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Boris said:
AussieDJ said:
Boris said:
https://www.facebook.com/reel/3126000030882437
Link
Jon Stewart
“I don’t give a f**k whose team he’s on. What blows my mind is our resignation in its aftermath.” Jon Stewart on the Minnesota shooting
That video is around 6 months old.
Still valid, though.
didn’t have a date on it.
The comments did
Date: 25/01/2026 17:26:01
From: AussieDJ
ID: 2353606
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
AussieDJ said:

Pam Bondi makes SHOCKING announcement amid ICE shooting,
Brian Tyler Cohen – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgpNuu5gHSQ
Date: 25/01/2026 17:26:20
From: Boris
ID: 2353607
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
AussieDJ said:
Boris said:
AussieDJ said:
That video is around 6 months old.
Still valid, though.
didn’t have a date on it.
The comments did
I don’t read the comments as they usually don’t add to the story.
Date: 25/01/2026 17:33:56
From: AussieDJ
ID: 2353611
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Boris said:
AussieDJ said:
Boris said:
didn’t have a date on it.
The comments did
I don’t read the comments as they usually don’t add to the story.
You’re correct.
I just look at them, briefly, to check the date. – having been caught before
Date: 25/01/2026 17:37:04
From: AussieDJ
ID: 2353615
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Rubbish!
HE CAN’T STAND THE BOOING .
And terrified of being assassinated NOW
Ears only grow back so many times.

Date: 25/01/2026 17:59:45
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2353626
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
AussieDJ said:

Well, when you consider that Republican states like Texas and Florida have ‘illegal immigrant’ number in the millions (1.6 m and 2.1 m, respectively), while Minnesota’s numbers are less than 150,000, it doesn’t take much to work that out.
I would support handing over ALL those files.
With every name redacted.
Date: 25/01/2026 18:00:23
From: buffy
ID: 2353627
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
AussieDJ said:
Boris said:
AussieDJ said:
The comments did
I don’t read the comments as they usually don’t add to the story.
You’re correct.
I just look at them, briefly, to check the date. – having been caught before
You could tell it wasn’t right up to the minute because of the incident he was discussing. I couldn’t remember how long ago it was though, and I didn’t think to look at the comments.
Date: 25/01/2026 18:07:00
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2353632
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
captain_spalding said:
AussieDJ said:

Well, when you consider that Republican states like Texas and Florida have ‘illegal immigrant’ number in the millions (1.6 m and 2.1 m, respectively), while Minnesota’s numbers are less than 150,000, it doesn’t take much to work that out.
I would support handing over ALL those files.
With every name redacted.
“OK, Pam, a swap. We give you the voter database, you give us all of the Epstein files, totally unredacted. Sound good?”
Date: 25/01/2026 18:11:47
From: party_pants
ID: 2353633
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
AussieDJ said:
AussieDJ said:

Pam Bondi makes SHOCKING announcement amid ICE shooting,
Brian Tyler Cohen – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgpNuu5gHSQ
If she has actually said this then the Congress ought to impeach her and sack her from office.
Date: 25/01/2026 18:14:56
From: Boris
ID: 2353634
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
AussieDJ said:
Boris said:
I don’t read the comments as they usually don’t add to the story.
You’re correct.
I just look at them, briefly, to check the date. – having been caught before
You could tell it wasn’t right up to the minute because of the incident he was discussing. I couldn’t remember how long ago it was though, and I didn’t think to look at the comments.
do i look like someone who cares that it wasn’t “up to the minute”? still relevant in today’s climate and maybe, just maybe, not everyone had seen it.
Date: 25/01/2026 18:33:00
From: kii
ID: 2353637
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Boris said:
AussieDJ said:
Boris said:
didn’t have a date on it.
The comments did
I don’t read the comments as they usually don’t add to the story.
1. It did have a date on it.
2. Sometimes the comments have additional links, or are worthwhile for more information from sane people.
Date: 25/01/2026 18:43:50
From: dv
ID: 2353639
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Minneapolis mayor Jacob Frey asks judge for a temporary restraining order that would halt ICE operations in the city.
Date: 25/01/2026 18:52:49
From: buffy
ID: 2353642
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Minneapolis mayor Jacob Frey asks judge for a temporary restraining order that would halt ICE operations in the city.
I hope it was the judge mentioned in HCR piece.
>>Tonight, in a lawsuit against Homeland Security secretary Kristi Noem and other administration officials, Minnesota attorney general Keith Ellison asked a judge for a temporary restraining order to prevent DHS agents from destroying evidence related to the shooting. The suit noted the “astonishing” departure from normal investigations, seemingly trying not to preserve evidence but to destroy it. A judge, who was appointed to the bench by Trump, immediately granted the restraining order, barring the administration from “destroying or altering evidence” concerning the killing. <<
Date: 25/01/2026 20:32:08
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353654
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
dv said:
Minneapolis mayor Jacob Frey asks judge for a temporary restraining order that would halt ICE operations in the city.
I hope it was the judge mentioned in HCR piece.
>>Tonight, in a lawsuit against Homeland Security secretary Kristi Noem and other administration officials, Minnesota attorney general Keith Ellison asked a judge for a temporary restraining order to prevent DHS agents from destroying evidence related to the shooting. The suit noted the “astonishing” departure from normal investigations, seemingly trying not to preserve evidence but to destroy it. A judge, who was appointed to the bench by Trump, immediately granted the restraining order, barring the administration from “destroying or altering evidence” concerning the killing. <<
words
Date: 25/01/2026 20:33:58
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353656
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Boris said:
AussieDJ said:
The comments did
I don’t read the comments as they usually don’t add to the story.
1. It did have a date on it.
2. Sometimes the comments have additional links, or are worthwhile for more information from sane people.
thanks we’ll try to remember it for next time
Date: 25/01/2026 20:38:19
From: Boris
ID: 2353658
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
kii said:
Boris said:
I don’t read the comments as they usually don’t add to the story.
1. It did have a date on it.
2. Sometimes the comments have additional links, or are worthwhile for more information from sane people.
thanks we’ll try to remember it for next time
no date

Date: 25/01/2026 20:40:16
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353660
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Boris said:
SCIENCE said:
kii said:
1. It did have a date on it.
2. Sometimes the comments have additional links, or are worthwhile for more information from sane people.
thanks we’ll try to remember it for next time
no date


Date: 25/01/2026 20:47:19
From: kii
ID: 2353662
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Boris said:
SCIENCE said:
kii said:
1. It did have a date on it.
2. Sometimes the comments have additional links, or are worthwhile for more information from sane people.
thanks we’ll try to remember it for next time
no date

The link you posted took me to a Facebook page. The date was in the top right hand corner.
Date: 25/01/2026 22:38:24
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2353697
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Brave Americans protesting ICE in Minnesota are Pretti Good.
Date: 26/01/2026 00:07:56
From: Michael V
ID: 2353714
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Brave Americans protesting ICE in Minnesota are Pretti Good.
Uh-oh. I see what you did there…
Date: 26/01/2026 00:48:49
From: kii
ID: 2353719
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 26/01/2026 01:16:16
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2353722
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 26/01/2026 01:30:14
From: roughbarked
ID: 2353723
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

Please can it be sooner?
Date: 26/01/2026 05:04:05
From: AussieDJ
ID: 2353729
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
AI can be useful at times.
Q: What can I say about the Pumpkin Mussolini that hasn’t be said before.
Google AI Response: In 2026, the nickname “Pumpkin Mussolini” remains a staple of political satire, often used alongside variations like “Mango Mussolini” or “Cheetolini” to mock Donald Trump’s physical appearance and leadership style.
While the term is well-worn, here are new angles and context from 2025 and 2026 that haven’t been part of the historical conversation:
1. The “Mr. Tariff” Evolution
In early January 2026, Trump himself embraced a new persona, calling himself “Mr. Tariff” in Truth Social posts celebrating market highs. Critics have begun blending this with the “Pumpkin” moniker to suggest that while he sees himself as a “clean” economic force (akin to Mr. Clean), his trade policies are seen by others as “hollowing out” domestic stability like a jack-o’-lantern.
2. The “Daddy” Branding Conflict
By late 2025, a bizarre shift in branding occurred when the White House and some international allies (such as NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte) began using the term “Daddy” or “Daddy’s home” to describe Trump’s return to power. Satirists are now contrasting the “Pumpkin Mussolini” imagery—historically used to portray him as a buffoonish autocrat—with this new “paternalistic” branding to highlight the increasingly surreal nature of the 2026 political landscape.
3. Institutionalization of the Name
As of 2026, “Pumpkin Mussolini” is no longer just a hashtag; it has been cataloged in comprehensive lists of 120+ modern political insults alongside newer 2025 creations like “Farty-Seven” (referencing his status as the 47th president) and “John Cougar Feloncamp”.
4. Cultural Irony in 2026
You could point out the linguistic irony that “Pumpkin Mussolini” brings together:
Etymological clash: “Pumpkin” likely has Native American roots (pukun or pôhpukun, meaning “grows forth round”).
Historical clash: “Mussolini” comes from the Italian mussola (muslin), a fabric named after the city of Mosul in Iraq.
Result: Using the name in 2026 ironically combines a term for a New World indigenous crop with a surname rooted in the Middle East to describe an “America First” leader.
5. Recent Satirical Competitors
In 2025 and early 2026, professional satirists like Jon Stewart have begun suggesting even more specific nicknames to replace the “Pumpkin” era, such as “Repussicans” or “Hysterocrats”, arguing that the old vegetable-based insults are “finished” and unable to capture the 2026 administration’s unique chaos.
AI can make mistakes, so double-check responses.
Date: 26/01/2026 05:22:30
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353730
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
AussieDJ said:
AI can make mistakes, so double-check responses.
OK we will.
Date: 26/01/2026 05:27:48
From: Michael V
ID: 2353731
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

LOL
Date: 26/01/2026 09:11:21
From: roughbarked
ID: 2353748
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 26/01/2026 09:43:27
From: dv
ID: 2353749
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Freedom House is an independent body founded by Republican Wendell Wilkie and Democrat Eleanor Roosevelt, to advocate for human rights and civil liberties. It produces annual reports on the status of these in all countries based on objective criteria. These reports are called Freedom In The World.
I always read them when they are released. They give very detailed accounts for each country as well as overall scores on Civil Liberties and Political Rights.
I expect the 2026 edition, due out in a couple of weeks, will be doozy, and not just for the USA.
Date: 26/01/2026 09:49:13
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2353750
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Freedom House is an independent body founded by Republican Wendell Wilkie and Democrat Eleanor Roosevelt, to advocate for human rights and civil liberties. It produces annual reports on the status of these in all countries based on objective criteria. These reports are called Freedom In The World.
I always read them when they are released. They give very detailed accounts for each country as well as overall scores on Civil Liberties and Political Rights.
I expect the 2026 edition, due out in a couple of weeks, will be doozy, and not just for the USA.
If DJT knew such a thing existed he’d probably try to shut it down or something.
Date: 26/01/2026 10:09:45
From: roughbarked
ID: 2353754
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
Freedom House is an independent body founded by Republican Wendell Wilkie and Democrat Eleanor Roosevelt, to advocate for human rights and civil liberties. It produces annual reports on the status of these in all countries based on objective criteria. These reports are called Freedom In The World.
I always read them when they are released. They give very detailed accounts for each country as well as overall scores on Civil Liberties and Political Rights.
I expect the 2026 edition, due out in a couple of weeks, will be doozy, and not just for the USA.
If DJT knew such a thing existed he’d probably try to shut it down or something.
He believes he is freeing the world to move into the new world order.
Date: 26/01/2026 10:57:27
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353764
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
Freedom House is an independent body founded by Republican Wendell Wilkie and Democrat Eleanor Roosevelt, to advocate for human rights and civil liberties. It produces annual reports on the status of these in all countries based on objective criteria. These reports are called Freedom In The World.
I always read them when they are released. They give very detailed accounts for each country as well as overall scores on Civil Liberties and Political Rights.
I expect the 2026 edition, due out in a couple of weeks, will be doozy, and not just for the USA.
If DJT knew such a thing existed he’d probably try to shut it down or something.
He believes he is freeing the world to move into the new world order.
maybe they can be like the anti defamation league and tell us that a Roman salute by a fascist is just a happy neurodiversity moment by a great guy with a good heart
Date: 26/01/2026 11:33:50
From: dv
ID: 2353791
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
DHS have stated that the initial shooter was with Border Patrol, not ICE.
I guess it would be easier to tell if these people were required to bear proper insignia but okay.
Any official or non-official documents indicate that BP is authorised to operate within 100 miles of the border. Minneapolis is more than 200 miles from any land or maritime border of the USA. Also … not completely clear why BP would be involved in managing a protest?
Date: 26/01/2026 11:35:16
From: roughbarked
ID: 2353793
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
DHS have stated that the initial shooter was with Border Patrol, not ICE.
I guess it would be easier to tell if these people were required to bear proper insignia but okay.
Any official or non-official documents indicate that BP is authorised to operate within 100 miles of the border. Minneapolis is more than 200 miles from any land or maritime border of the USA. Also … not completely clear why BP would be involved in managing a protest?
They wore a mish mash of uniforms, some had police on the front but they weren’t police.
Date: 26/01/2026 11:41:33
From: dv
ID: 2353798
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://youtu.be/nDEAWxG7Bq8?si=C_gcquoIl-_uDER2
LegalEagles: the execution of Alex Pretti was an inexcusable state-sanctioned murder
Date: 26/01/2026 11:55:35
From: Michael V
ID: 2353805
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
DHS have stated that the initial shooter was with Border Patrol, not ICE.
I guess it would be easier to tell if these people were required to bear proper insignia but okay.
Any official or non-official documents indicate that BP is authorised to operate within 100 miles of the border. Minneapolis is more than 200 miles from any land or maritime border of the USA. Also … not completely clear why BP would be involved in managing a protest?
Because…Trump et al.
Date: 26/01/2026 11:57:15
From: roughbarked
ID: 2353808
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
dv said:
DHS have stated that the initial shooter was with Border Patrol, not ICE.
I guess it would be easier to tell if these people were required to bear proper insignia but okay.
Any official or non-official documents indicate that BP is authorised to operate within 100 miles of the border. Minneapolis is more than 200 miles from any land or maritime border of the USA. Also … not completely clear why BP would be involved in managing a protest?
Because…Trump et al.
The Kennedy Centre is now the Trump Kennedy Centre.
Date: 26/01/2026 12:03:33
From: Michael V
ID: 2353810
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://youtu.be/nDEAWxG7Bq8?si=C_gcquoIl-_uDER2
LegalEagles: the execution of Alex Pretti was an inexcusable state-sanctioned murder
Oh.
:(
Very moving. Very moving.
:(
Date: 26/01/2026 12:19:18
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353820
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
dv said:
DHS have stated that the initial shooter was with Border Patrol, not ICE.
I guess it would be easier to tell if these people were required to bear proper insignia but okay.
Any official or non-official documents indicate that BP is authorised to operate within 100 miles of the border. Minneapolis is more than 200 miles from any land or maritime border of the USA. Also … not completely clear why BP would be involved in managing a protest?
Because…Trump et al.
The Kennedy Centre is now the Trump Kennedy Centre.
why don’t they just secede to ensure that border patrols are actually near borders
Date: 26/01/2026 12:22:40
From: dv
ID: 2353822
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I guess it’s easy to criticise from the cheap seats but if I were at these protests I’d probably be using a stack of those personal bodycams… like $30 off Temu, they can store hours of footage. Probably chain them to a harness so they can’t easily be grabbed?
Just so you don’t have to use two hands holding a phone to shoot footage.
Date: 26/01/2026 12:24:12
From: roughbarked
ID: 2353823
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
I guess it’s easy to criticise from the cheap seats but if I were at these protests I’d probably be using a stack of those personal bodycams… like $30 off Temu, they can store hours of footage. Probably chain them to a harness so they can’t easily be grabbed?
Just so you don’t have to use two hands holding a phone to shoot footage.
Thumbsup
Date: 26/01/2026 12:30:55
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353829
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
dv said:
I guess it’s easy to criticise from the cheap seats but if I were at these protests I’d probably be using a stack of those personal bodycams… like $30 off Temu, they can store hours of footage. Probably chain them to a harness so they can’t easily be grabbed?
Just so you don’t have to use two hands holding a phone to shoot footage.
Thumbsup
leave the dash cams on, buy cheap CHINA cameras that send all the secret data to a reliable 3rd party like dirty CHINA so there’s a record, lots of options
Date: 26/01/2026 12:49:16
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2353833
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
dv said:
I guess it’s easy to criticise from the cheap seats but if I were at these protests I’d probably be using a stack of those personal bodycams… like $30 off Temu, they can store hours of footage. Probably chain them to a harness so they can’t easily be grabbed?
Just so you don’t have to use two hands holding a phone to shoot footage.
Thumbsup
leave the dash cams on, buy cheap CHINA cameras that send all the secret data to a reliable 3rd party like dirty CHINA so there’s a record, lots of options
To China?
Not likely.
China’s quite expert at making video of confrontations between protesters and ‘authorities’ disappear, when it suits the political leaders.
Date: 26/01/2026 13:05:46
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353844
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
Thumbsup
leave the dash cams on, buy cheap CHINA cameras that send all the secret data to a reliable 3rd party like dirty CHINA so there’s a record, lots of options
To China?
Not likely.
China’s quite expert at making video of confrontations between protesters and ‘authorities’ disappear, when it suits the political leaders.
but this is the other way around they probably love it isn’t that what tiktok was for
Date: 26/01/2026 13:36:00
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353861
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
yeah that too but what’s the second two in reference to

Date: 26/01/2026 13:57:26
From: kii
ID: 2353873
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
From Mike Ingram for Everyone’s Facebook page:
Speaking of exceptionally rad photos from #minneapolis, this one has been going around, along with a quote from the 70yr old seen enveloped in ICE-deployed tear gas: “I’m okay. I’m just fucking angry.”
Turns out this incredible man owns DreamHaven Books and Comics on 38th, just a couple of miles from where Alex Pretti was executed by ICE thugs.
My wife and I stumbled into it on a trip up there a few years ago and I remember it being welcoming and lovely.
Their web site is crashing at the moment from traffic, but their socials are still up.
FB is at 7.1k.
Bet we could get it to 10k today.
From my experience, he seems akin to a lot of small bookshop owners.
Others that I know who would be right there next to him include Jane Addams Book Shop, Hartfield Book Co., The Literary, Firestorm Books, Malaprop’s Bookstore/Cafe, Bobzbay Books, Read Between The Lynes, Irvington Vinyl & Books, and a bunch more I’m sure I’m forgetting. Tell me about your favorites.
📷 – Theia Chatelle

Date: 26/01/2026 14:06:09
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2353879
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

You’re a goddamn genius, Gump.
Date: 26/01/2026 14:09:37
From: Boris
ID: 2353881
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
You’re a goddamn genius, Gump.
I mean, even if the manufacturer paid it they would still add that cost to the price. either way you pay it.it ain’t hard Dan.
Date: 26/01/2026 14:21:33
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2353888
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Boris said:
Spiny Norman said:

You’re a goddamn genius, Gump.
I mean, even if the manufacturer paid it they would still add that cost to the price. either way you pay it.it ain’t hard Dan.
surely if the price goes up then the demand is less or the manufacturer drops their margin c’m‘on this isn’t Artemis 2 engineering
Date: 26/01/2026 15:44:36
From: dv
ID: 2353919
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Nice to see Libertarians doing some liberty but I don’t know why that person took the name Nuremberg 2.0
Date: 26/01/2026 19:53:31
From: dv
ID: 2354053
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/22/ice-jewelry-heist-suspect-self-deport

Date: 26/01/2026 20:01:25
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2354058
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/22/ice-jewelry-heist-suspect-self-deport

The Training, won’t anyone think of the Training.
And with all that intensive training they deport crimos and shoot American citizens.
Date: 26/01/2026 20:30:49
From: dv
ID: 2354070
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/17xZyD5Dh7/
National Guard in Minnesota
Date: 26/01/2026 20:34:50
From: Michael V
ID: 2354073
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/17xZyD5Dh7/
National Guard in Minnesota
:)
Good.
Date: 26/01/2026 23:27:04
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354128
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

Nice to see Libertarians doing some liberty but I don’t know why that person took the name Nuremberg 2.0
we thought all of them are wearing false colours and waving false flags so who the bot knows
Date: 27/01/2026 01:02:11
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354135
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
LOL

Date: 27/01/2026 01:05:17
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2354136
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 27/01/2026 01:05:36
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354137
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
LOL

LOL

Date: 27/01/2026 02:17:10
From: AussieDJ
ID: 2354139
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 27/01/2026 02:21:05
From: kii
ID: 2354140
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

That’s Pete Hegseth on the right.
Date: 27/01/2026 02:30:15
From: dv
ID: 2354141
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Chris Madel ends GOP bid for governor, says he can’t support federal ‘retribution’ against Minnesota
His exit comes as some other Republicans have started to distance themselves from the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown in the state.
https://www.startribune.com/chris-madel-ends-gop-bid-for-governor-says-he-cant-support-federal-retribution-against-minnesota/601570793
Date: 27/01/2026 03:28:39
From: Michael V
ID: 2354146
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Chris Madel ends GOP bid for governor, says he can’t support federal ‘retribution’ against Minnesota
His exit comes as some other Republicans have started to distance themselves from the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown in the state.
https://www.startribune.com/chris-madel-ends-gop-bid-for-governor-says-he-cant-support-federal-retribution-against-minnesota/601570793
Good.
Date: 27/01/2026 04:55:25
From: dv
ID: 2354149
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.threads.com/@factpostnews/post/DT-zKMflUeF?xmt=AQF03m7TqGXyp6sI2aS8e7H3rMSirsvMC4vPcUiWuZEijsbSzJd4c_fAFbvJ3JR9kjoYqKg&slof=1
They’re losing Fox news
Date: 27/01/2026 05:42:06
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354150
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
yeah
he attributed his inflammatory actions, including making profoundly offensive statements and selling T-shirts bearing swastikas, to his bipolar-1 disorder, which he said he developed as a result of medical oversight failing to diagnose a frontal-lobe injury sustained in a car crash
sure
Date: 27/01/2026 07:30:49
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2354160
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Apparently nurses are staging a walk-out on Jan 30 to protest his murder

Date: 27/01/2026 08:21:41
From: Boris
ID: 2354164
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Carrick Ryan
The most disturbing part of this photo isn’t actually the murder of a US citizen by a violent paramilitary force loyal to the President, it’s that the American public can look at this same image, this same event, filmed at close proximity from at least thee different angles, and somehow see completely different things.
In fact, with almost perfect consistency, how anyone in the world perceives this act, not just morally, but factually, is determined by whether or not they support Donald Trump.
How does a society talk through their divisions if they can look upon the same sight and see different things? How can you find a common truth when eyes are capable of lying?
Whichever side of the discourse you are on in this debate, we must share the horror of the revelation of voluntarily self-deception due to ideological devotion on such a scale as this. How far apart have our moral centres diverged that the we can witness a man being killed with such ethical polarity?
What does this do to a nation already teetering on the edge of collapse into unrestrained political violence when murder is so easily forgiven, or deemed necessary? When one person’s activist is another person’s “domestic terrorist”?
This moment made it clear that society is no longer simply divided by different political perspectives, but by different realities. I don’t know how we unpick that.
But if you are a Trump supporter and disagree with the official narrative, then don’t just condemn the Federal Officers for their crime, condemn the Trump administration for having the audacity to lie to our faces about it.
They didn’t wait for an independent investigation, they didn’t even wait until they saw all the footage. They came out straight away and called this man an “assassin” and accused him of planning a massacre. Without a second thought, they defamed their own victim, and millions of the MAGA faithful ate it up without even chewing.
It’s not just the barbarity of the act of, it’s their callousness that should unsettle you. Their unapologetic indifference to the truth and the arrogance to know that it will not hurt them. Surely the malevolence of this act is just as clear to you now?
Is this not the point where you see who they are?
Date: 27/01/2026 08:26:16
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2354165
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Yesterday there was a thread on Reddit asking people who voted for Trump, and have changed their views, what made them do it?
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/s/RmIzLeH5jQ
Many people said the conservatives in their life just didn’t acknowledge prior support.
My hypothesis is that, in general, people don’t like to admit they are/were wrong.
Date: 27/01/2026 08:26:28
From: roughbarked
ID: 2354166
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Boris said:
Carrick Ryan
The most disturbing part of this photo isn’t actually the murder of a US citizen by a violent paramilitary force loyal to the President, it’s that the American public can look at this same image, this same event, filmed at close proximity from at least thee different angles, and somehow see completely different things.
In fact, with almost perfect consistency, how anyone in the world perceives this act, not just morally, but factually, is determined by whether or not they support Donald Trump.
How does a society talk through their divisions if they can look upon the same sight and see different things? How can you find a common truth when eyes are capable of lying?
Whichever side of the discourse you are on in this debate, we must share the horror of the revelation of voluntarily self-deception due to ideological devotion on such a scale as this. How far apart have our moral centres diverged that the we can witness a man being killed with such ethical polarity?
What does this do to a nation already teetering on the edge of collapse into unrestrained political violence when murder is so easily forgiven, or deemed necessary? When one person’s activist is another person’s “domestic terrorist”?
This moment made it clear that society is no longer simply divided by different political perspectives, but by different realities. I don’t know how we unpick that.
But if you are a Trump supporter and disagree with the official narrative, then don’t just condemn the Federal Officers for their crime, condemn the Trump administration for having the audacity to lie to our faces about it.
They didn’t wait for an independent investigation, they didn’t even wait until they saw all the footage. They came out straight away and called this man an “assassin” and accused him of planning a massacre. Without a second thought, they defamed their own victim, and millions of the MAGA faithful ate it up without even chewing.
It’s not just the barbarity of the act of, it’s their callousness that should unsettle you. Their unapologetic indifference to the truth and the arrogance to know that it will not hurt them. Surely the malevolence of this act is just as clear to you now?
Is this not the point where you see who they are?
Salient.
Date: 27/01/2026 08:29:04
From: roughbarked
ID: 2354167
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Yesterday there was a thread on Reddit asking people who voted for Trump, and have changed their views, what made them do it?
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/s/RmIzLeH5jQ
Many people said the conservatives in their life just didn’t acknowledge prior support.
My hypothesis is that, in general, people don’t like to admit they are/were wrong.
My father-n-law told me decades past. “You are only wasting your time trying to convince them. You should instead steer the conversation so as to cause them to believe that they thought of thhe solution themselves”.
Date: 27/01/2026 08:32:14
From: roughbarked
ID: 2354168
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Note the emphasis on ‘could’. The trump admin will likely change their mind several times yet.

Date: 27/01/2026 09:10:07
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2354172
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Boris said:
Carrick Ryan
The most disturbing part of this photo isn’t actually the murder of a US citizen by a violent paramilitary force loyal to the President, it’s that the American public can look at this same image, this same event, filmed at close proximity from at least thee different angles, and somehow see completely different things.
In fact, with almost perfect consistency, how anyone in the world perceives this act, not just morally, but factually, is determined by whether or not they support Donald Trump.
How does a society talk through their divisions if they can look upon the same sight and see different things? How can you find a common truth when eyes are capable of lying?
Whichever side of the discourse you are on in this debate, we must share the horror of the revelation of voluntarily self-deception due to ideological devotion on such a scale as this. How far apart have our moral centres diverged that the we can witness a man being killed with such ethical polarity?
What does this do to a nation already teetering on the edge of collapse into unrestrained political violence when murder is so easily forgiven, or deemed necessary? When one person’s activist is another person’s “domestic terrorist”?
This moment made it clear that society is no longer simply divided by different political perspectives, but by different realities. I don’t know how we unpick that.
But if you are a Trump supporter and disagree with the official narrative, then don’t just condemn the Federal Officers for their crime, condemn the Trump administration for having the audacity to lie to our faces about it.
They didn’t wait for an independent investigation, they didn’t even wait until they saw all the footage. They came out straight away and called this man an “assassin” and accused him of planning a massacre. Without a second thought, they defamed their own victim, and millions of the MAGA faithful ate it up without even chewing.
It’s not just the barbarity of the act of, it’s their callousness that should unsettle you. Their unapologetic indifference to the truth and the arrogance to know that it will not hurt them. Surely the malevolence of this act is just as clear to you now?
Is this not the point where you see who they are?
Salient.
Federal sanctioned murder.
Federal sanctioned false information.
Lying on that level should be criminal offence.
Date: 27/01/2026 09:25:55
From: roughbarked
ID: 2354178
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
roughbarked said:
Boris said:
Carrick Ryan
The most disturbing part of this photo isn’t actually the murder of a US citizen by a violent paramilitary force loyal to the President, it’s that the American public can look at this same image, this same event, filmed at close proximity from at least thee different angles, and somehow see completely different things.
In fact, with almost perfect consistency, how anyone in the world perceives this act, not just morally, but factually, is determined by whether or not they support Donald Trump.
How does a society talk through their divisions if they can look upon the same sight and see different things? How can you find a common truth when eyes are capable of lying?
Whichever side of the discourse you are on in this debate, we must share the horror of the revelation of voluntarily self-deception due to ideological devotion on such a scale as this. How far apart have our moral centres diverged that the we can witness a man being killed with such ethical polarity?
What does this do to a nation already teetering on the edge of collapse into unrestrained political violence when murder is so easily forgiven, or deemed necessary? When one person’s activist is another person’s “domestic terrorist”?
This moment made it clear that society is no longer simply divided by different political perspectives, but by different realities. I don’t know how we unpick that.
But if you are a Trump supporter and disagree with the official narrative, then don’t just condemn the Federal Officers for their crime, condemn the Trump administration for having the audacity to lie to our faces about it.
They didn’t wait for an independent investigation, they didn’t even wait until they saw all the footage. They came out straight away and called this man an “assassin” and accused him of planning a massacre. Without a second thought, they defamed their own victim, and millions of the MAGA faithful ate it up without even chewing.
It’s not just the barbarity of the act of, it’s their callousness that should unsettle you. Their unapologetic indifference to the truth and the arrogance to know that it will not hurt them. Surely the malevolence of this act is just as clear to you now?
Is this not the point where you see who they are?
Salient.
Federal sanctioned murder.
Federal sanctioned false information.
Lying on that level should be criminal offence.
It is a criminal offence.
Date: 27/01/2026 09:29:45
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2354181
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
roughbarked said:
Salient.
Federal sanctioned murder.
Federal sanctioned false information.
Lying on that level should be criminal offence.
It is a criminal offence.
They are Ignoring the law, so there is contempt as well.
Date: 27/01/2026 09:41:51
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2354182
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
roughbarked said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Federal sanctioned murder.
Federal sanctioned false information.
Lying on that level should be criminal offence.
It is a criminal offence.
They are Ignoring the law, so there is contempt as well.
The law’s only as good as the people enforcing it.
Like, there’s all sorts of bizarre laws such as in Tennessee, it’s illegal for frogs to croak after 11pm, or in Alaska, kangaroos are not allowed in barber shops.
Reference
Who the dickens is enforcing those laws?
Taxi cabs in Queensland are required to carry a bale of hay in the trunk, but I’ve never checked. I wonder if Uber drivers are exempt?
Reference
Date: 27/01/2026 09:51:48
From: roughbarked
ID: 2354184
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
roughbarked said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Federal sanctioned murder.
Federal sanctioned false information.
Lying on that level should be criminal offence.
It is a criminal offence.
They are Ignoring the law, so there is contempt as well.
It is an offence to not report a crime you are aware of. If you get caught doing that.
Date: 27/01/2026 10:09:43
From: dv
ID: 2354186
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Chris Madel ends GOP bid for governor, says he can’t support federal ‘retribution’ against Minnesota
His exit comes as some other Republicans have started to distance themselves from the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown in the state.
https://www.startribune.com/chris-madel-ends-gop-bid-for-governor-says-he-cant-support-federal-retribution-against-minnesota/601570793
Here’s a video he made about it
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1C7DdLxygn/
Date: 27/01/2026 10:41:30
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354191
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
roughbarked said:
Boris said:
Carrick Ryan
The most disturbing part of this photo isn’t actually the murder of a US citizen by a violent paramilitary force loyal to the President, it’s that the American public can look at this same image, this same event, filmed at close proximity from at least thee different angles, and somehow see completely different things.
In fact, with almost perfect consistency, how anyone in the world perceives this act, not just morally, but factually, is determined by whether or not they support Donald Trump.
How does a society talk through their divisions if they can look upon the same sight and see different things? How can you find a common truth when eyes are capable of lying?
Whichever side of the discourse you are on in this debate, we must share the horror of the revelation of voluntarily self-deception due to ideological devotion on such a scale as this. How far apart have our moral centres diverged that the we can witness a man being killed with such ethical polarity?
What does this do to a nation already teetering on the edge of collapse into unrestrained political violence when murder is so easily forgiven, or deemed necessary? When one person’s activist is another person’s “domestic terrorist”?
This moment made it clear that society is no longer simply divided by different political perspectives, but by different realities. I don’t know how we unpick that.
But if you are a Trump supporter and disagree with the official narrative, then don’t just condemn the Federal Officers for their crime, condemn the Trump administration for having the audacity to lie to our faces about it.
They didn’t wait for an independent investigation, they didn’t even wait until they saw all the footage. They came out straight away and called this man an “assassin” and accused him of planning a massacre. Without a second thought, they defamed their own victim, and millions of the MAGA faithful ate it up without even chewing.
It’s not just the barbarity of the act of, it’s their callousness that should unsettle you. Their unapologetic indifference to the truth and the arrogance to know that it will not hurt them. Surely the malevolence of this act is just as clear to you now?
Is this not the point where you see who they are?
Salient.
Federal sanctioned murder.
Federal sanctioned false information.
Lying on that level should be criminal offence.
they’ve just discovered that there are conspiracy theorists nice one what genius
Date: 27/01/2026 10:43:44
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354193
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Note the emphasis on ‘could’. The trump admin will likely change their mind several times yet.

he’s going to be such a hero, stopping yet another war
Date: 27/01/2026 10:44:54
From: dv
ID: 2354194
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
“In fact, with almost perfect consistency, how anyone in the world perceives this act, not just morally, but factually, is determined by whether or not they support Donald Trump.”
This appears not to be the case. A lot of conservative people who still support the president are describing the events factually, saying that he never brandished a gun, that he was unarmed when shot apart from holding a phone, that he was protecting another protester from spray, that no one touched or reached for his gun other than the officer who took it out of his holster etc.
Date: 27/01/2026 10:47:05
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354195
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Yesterday there was a thread on Reddit asking people who voted for Trump, and have changed their views, what made them do it?
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/s/RmIzLeH5jQ
Many people said the conservatives in their life just didn’t acknowledge prior support.
My hypothesis is that, in general, people don’t like to admit they are/were wrong.
As in they buy the whole rugged individualism freedom wild west manifest destiny thing¿
Date: 27/01/2026 10:47:50
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354196
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Apparently nurses are staging a walk-out on Jan 30 to protest his murder

what about physiotherapists and doctors and orderlies
Date: 27/01/2026 11:06:41
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2354204
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Divine Angel said:
Apparently nurses are staging a walk-out on Jan 30 to protest his murder

what about physiotherapists and doctors and orderlies
Doctors don’t do the actual to-patient dispensing of medications, or change dressings, or record observations, or monitor patient well-being, or many other care tasks. If doctors stop, nursing care continues.
Neither do orderlies, or physios, or admin staff, or cleaners, or others, do any of that stuff.
When the nurses walk out, care stops, just like that.
Date: 27/01/2026 12:22:10
From: Michael V
ID: 2354227
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Boris said:
Carrick Ryan
The most disturbing part of this photo isn’t actually the murder of a US citizen by a violent paramilitary force loyal to the President, it’s that the American public can look at this same image, this same event, filmed at close proximity from at least thee different angles, and somehow see completely different things.
In fact, with almost perfect consistency, how anyone in the world perceives this act, not just morally, but factually, is determined by whether or not they support Donald Trump.
How does a society talk through their divisions if they can look upon the same sight and see different things? How can you find a common truth when eyes are capable of lying?
Whichever side of the discourse you are on in this debate, we must share the horror of the revelation of voluntarily self-deception due to ideological devotion on such a scale as this. How far apart have our moral centres diverged that the we can witness a man being killed with such ethical polarity?
What does this do to a nation already teetering on the edge of collapse into unrestrained political violence when murder is so easily forgiven, or deemed necessary? When one person’s activist is another person’s “domestic terrorist”?
This moment made it clear that society is no longer simply divided by different political perspectives, but by different realities. I don’t know how we unpick that.
But if you are a Trump supporter and disagree with the official narrative, then don’t just condemn the Federal Officers for their crime, condemn the Trump administration for having the audacity to lie to our faces about it.
They didn’t wait for an independent investigation, they didn’t even wait until they saw all the footage. They came out straight away and called this man an “assassin” and accused him of planning a massacre. Without a second thought, they defamed their own victim, and millions of the MAGA faithful ate it up without even chewing.
It’s not just the barbarity of the act of, it’s their callousness that should unsettle you. Their unapologetic indifference to the truth and the arrogance to know that it will not hurt them. Surely the malevolence of this act is just as clear to you now?
Is this not the point where you see who they are?
I wonder at times whether Trump’s weird-sounding voice causes mass hypnotism.
It is really the only complete explanation I can find. But it seems silly.
Date: 27/01/2026 12:22:54
From: Michael V
ID: 2354228
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Yesterday there was a thread on Reddit asking people who voted for Trump, and have changed their views, what made them do it?
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/s/RmIzLeH5jQ
Many people said the conservatives in their life just didn’t acknowledge prior support.
My hypothesis is that, in general, people don’t like to admit they are/were wrong.
I think that that is a general truism.
Date: 27/01/2026 12:24:31
From: kii
ID: 2354231
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Greg Bovino has been removed as BP “commander at large”.
Date: 27/01/2026 12:26:20
From: buffy
ID: 2354233
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Greg Bovino has been removed as BP “commander at large”.
Scapegoating?
Date: 27/01/2026 12:28:22
From: kii
ID: 2354235
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
James Fell : “Gestapo Caillou has lost his job. You could say he’s been downsized. Because he fell short.”

Date: 27/01/2026 12:28:47
From: Cymek
ID: 2354236
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Boris said:
Carrick Ryan
The most disturbing part of this photo isn’t actually the murder of a US citizen by a violent paramilitary force loyal to the President, it’s that the American public can look at this same image, this same event, filmed at close proximity from at least thee different angles, and somehow see completely different things.
In fact, with almost perfect consistency, how anyone in the world perceives this act, not just morally, but factually, is determined by whether or not they support Donald Trump.
How does a society talk through their divisions if they can look upon the same sight and see different things? How can you find a common truth when eyes are capable of lying?
Whichever side of the discourse you are on in this debate, we must share the horror of the revelation of voluntarily self-deception due to ideological devotion on such a scale as this. How far apart have our moral centres diverged that the we can witness a man being killed with such ethical polarity?
What does this do to a nation already teetering on the edge of collapse into unrestrained political violence when murder is so easily forgiven, or deemed necessary? When one person’s activist is another person’s “domestic terrorist”?
This moment made it clear that society is no longer simply divided by different political perspectives, but by different realities. I don’t know how we unpick that.
But if you are a Trump supporter and disagree with the official narrative, then don’t just condemn the Federal Officers for their crime, condemn the Trump administration for having the audacity to lie to our faces about it.
They didn’t wait for an independent investigation, they didn’t even wait until they saw all the footage. They came out straight away and called this man an “assassin” and accused him of planning a massacre. Without a second thought, they defamed their own victim, and millions of the MAGA faithful ate it up without even chewing.
It’s not just the barbarity of the act of, it’s their callousness that should unsettle you. Their unapologetic indifference to the truth and the arrogance to know that it will not hurt them. Surely the malevolence of this act is just as clear to you now?
Is this not the point where you see who they are?
I wonder at times whether Trump’s weird-sounding voice causes mass hypnotism.
It is really the only complete explanation I can find. But it seems silly.
I assume as the USA is full of under the surface racists.
Not quite brave enough to admit it until others do.
Anything that reinforces this, lies don’t matter
Date: 27/01/2026 12:31:47
From: Michael V
ID: 2354238
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Greg Bovino has been removed as BP “commander at large”.
Good.
Date: 27/01/2026 12:31:57
From: kii
ID: 2354239
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Greg Bovino has been removed as BP “commander at large”.

Date: 27/01/2026 12:33:09
From: kii
ID: 2354240
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
kii said:
Greg Bovino has been removed as BP “commander at large”.
Scapegoating?
Dwarf throwing?
smacks self

Date: 27/01/2026 12:33:26
From: buffy
ID: 2354241
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
kii said:
Greg Bovino has been removed as BP “commander at large”.

Is he liable for what his staff do/did? As in, the buck stops with the boss.
Date: 27/01/2026 12:34:59
From: Michael V
ID: 2354244
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
kii said:
Greg Bovino has been removed as BP “commander at large”.

Definitely not full accountability.
Date: 27/01/2026 12:37:33
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354246
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
kii said:
kii said:
Greg Bovino has been removed as BP “commander at large”.

Definitely not full accountability.
will it be immunity or pardon
Date: 27/01/2026 12:38:59
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354247
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
so we d’n‘o’ if making fun of people’s growth achievement is also cool we guess it is
Date: 27/01/2026 12:39:27
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354248
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:
Yesterday there was a thread on Reddit asking people who voted for Trump, and have changed their views, what made them do it?
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/s/RmIzLeH5jQ
Many people said the conservatives in their life just didn’t acknowledge prior support.
My hypothesis is that, in general, people don’t like to admit they are/were wrong.
I think that that is a general truism.
^
Date: 27/01/2026 12:42:06
From: Boris
ID: 2354249
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
so we d’n‘o’ if making fun of people’s growth achievement is also cool we guess it is
all depends on who does it.
Date: 27/01/2026 12:48:32
From: roughbarked
ID: 2354252
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
kii said:

Definitely not full accountability.
will it be immunity or pardon
Yes but he’s got the sack for embarrassing Trump
Date: 27/01/2026 12:49:39
From: Michael V
ID: 2354254
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
kii said:

Definitely not full accountability.
will it be immunity or pardon
F’k nose.
Date: 27/01/2026 12:50:03
From: kii
ID: 2354255
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
so we d’n‘o’ if making fun of people’s growth achievement is also cool we guess it is
I already castigated and smacked myself for making fun of the tiny fascist.
Date: 27/01/2026 12:50:47
From: roughbarked
ID: 2354258
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
Definitely not full accountability.
will it be immunity or pardon
F’k nose.
I’ll bet he hasn’t got many friends in California.
Date: 27/01/2026 12:53:11
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354259
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Boris said:
SCIENCE said:
so we d’n‘o’ if making fun of people’s growth achievement is also cool we guess it is
all depends on who does it.
I already castigated and smacked myself for making fun of the tiny fascist.
legit’ we mean if people take on an identity embrace their identity play the identity then we’re pretty sure it’s fair play to play their identity as well, that’s how team sports works
but yes independent of physical size we agree we don’t like fascists
Date: 27/01/2026 12:55:28
From: roughbarked
ID: 2354260
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
kii said:
Boris said:
all depends on who does it.
I already castigated and smacked myself for making fun of the tiny fascist.
legit’ we mean if people take on an identity embrace their identity play the identity then we’re pretty sure it’s fair play to play their identity as well, that’s how team sports works
but yes independent of physical size we agree we don’t like fascists
Nobody other than fascists like fascists.
Date: 27/01/2026 12:56:41
From: kii
ID: 2354261
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Boris said:
SCIENCE said:
so we d’n‘o’ if making fun of people’s growth achievement is also cool we guess it is
all depends on who does it.
I am not perfect, nor have I ever claimed to be perfect.
Incorrect humour is a release valve for my stressed out brain – the nightmares about the last few years have fucked up my normally “nice and normal” self. The filter was broken. IDGAF about idiots and wannabes.
Apply your skewed parameters on someone else in this forum. Hint: he has a track record of abusive verbal behaviour towards me.
Date: 27/01/2026 13:02:07
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354263
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Boris said:
SCIENCE said:
so we d’n‘o’ if making fun of people’s growth achievement is also cool we guess it is
all depends on who does it.
I am not perfect, nor have I ever claimed to be perfect.
Incorrect humour is a release valve for my stressed out brain – the nightmares about the last few years have fucked up my normally “nice and normal” self. The filter was broken. IDGAF about idiots and wannabes.
Apply your skewed parameters on someone else in this forum. Hint: he has a track record of abusive verbal behaviour towards me.
well we’re sorry and we’ll be second to admit we’re going to do it again next time we have a mental health moment
Date: 27/01/2026 13:07:04
From: Boris
ID: 2354265
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
kii said:
Boris said:
all depends on who does it.
I am not perfect, nor have I ever claimed to be perfect.
Incorrect humour is a release valve for my stressed out brain – the nightmares about the last few years have fucked up my normally “nice and normal” self. The filter was broken. IDGAF about idiots and wannabes.
Apply your skewed parameters on someone else in this forum. Hint: he has a track record of abusive verbal behaviour towards me.
well we’re sorry and we’ll be second to admit we’re going to do it again next time we have a mental health moment
she is the first to abuse people for their “incorrect humour”, and other perceived slights. But I guess playing the victim doesn’t allow for that.
Date: 27/01/2026 13:08:15
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354269
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
Definitely not full accountability.
will it be immunity or pardon
Yes but he’s got the sack for embarrassing Trump
the gut sack or the nut sack
Date: 27/01/2026 13:09:45
From: roughbarked
ID: 2354271
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
will it be immunity or pardon
Yes but he’s got the sack for embarrassing Trump
the gut sack or the nut sack
His nut sack definitely need to be gutted but that’s not my job.
Date: 27/01/2026 13:09:56
From: dv
ID: 2354272
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
will it be immunity or pardon
F’k nose.
I’ll bet he hasn’t got many friends in California.
La bovino revenas hejmen.
It’s a shame three people died to get to this point but at least people can’t say protests don’t achieve anything.
Date: 27/01/2026 13:12:35
From: Boris
ID: 2354277
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
Yes but he’s got the sack for embarrassing Trump
the gut sack or the nut sack
His nut sack definitely need to be gutted but that’s not my job.

Date: 27/01/2026 13:13:23
From: kii
ID: 2354280
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Boris said:
SCIENCE said:
kii said:
I am not perfect, nor have I ever claimed to be perfect.
Incorrect humour is a release valve for my stressed out brain – the nightmares about the last few years have fucked up my normally “nice and normal” self. The filter was broken. IDGAF about idiots and wannabes.
Apply your skewed parameters on someone else in this forum. Hint: he has a track record of abusive verbal behaviour towards me.
well we’re sorry and we’ll be second to admit we’re going to do it again next time we have a mental health moment
she is the first to abuse people for their “incorrect humour”, and other perceived slights. But I guess playing the victim doesn’t allow for that.
You’re so funny.

Date: 27/01/2026 13:13:59
From: roughbarked
ID: 2354281
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Boris said:
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
the gut sack or the nut sack
His nut sack definitely need to be gutted but that’s not my job.

Trouble is, you still have to touch his sack to put the ring on.
Date: 27/01/2026 13:15:55
From: kii
ID: 2354283
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 27/01/2026 13:16:25
From: Boris
ID: 2354284
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Boris said:
roughbarked said:
His nut sack definitely need to be gutted but that’s not my job.

Trouble is, you still have to touch his sack to put the ring on.

Date: 27/01/2026 13:18:06
From: roughbarked
ID: 2354285
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Boris said:
roughbarked said:
Boris said:

Trouble is, you still have to touch his sack to put the ring on.

I see you’ve come prepared.
Date: 27/01/2026 13:49:12
From: kii
ID: 2354296
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
F’k nose.
I’ll bet he hasn’t got many friends in California.
La bovino revenas hejmen.
It’s a shame three people died to get to this point but at least people can’t say protests don’t achieve anything.

Date: 27/01/2026 16:01:45
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354327
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
Divine Angel said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:
yeah
he attributed his inflammatory actions, including making profoundly offensive statements and selling T-shirts bearing swastikas, to his bipolar-1 disorder, which he said he developed as a result of medical oversight failing to diagnose a frontal-lobe injury sustained in a car crash
sure
Kanye West takes out Wall Street Journal ad to apologise for antisemitism h
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-01-27/kanye-west-apologises-antisemitism-wall-street-journal-ad/106272660
It’s an interesting take, blaming racism on an acquired brain injury.
But you know, someone greenlit the swastika-on-T-shirt idea of his and sent it to print.
He has no problems with hobbits
medical excuses are the best excuses to privatise gains then socialise losses
yeah
oh wait was he going to donate any profits from the sales and songs and licences and sponsorships, to healthcare, to make it just
sure
Date: 27/01/2026 16:37:53
From: dv
ID: 2354339
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 27/01/2026 16:54:06
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2354345
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

HAHAHAHAHAHA
Date: 27/01/2026 16:57:09
From: kii
ID: 2354347
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
From White Rose Resistance…
“Don’t repeatedly call the ICE hotline and play audio clips from the Nuremberg trials when someone picks up. That would be childish.
Not 1-866-347-2423 from US or Canada nor 1-802-872-6199 from other areas around the globe.”
Date: 27/01/2026 17:08:00
From: Michael V
ID: 2354351
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

IDGI
Date: 27/01/2026 17:08:46
From: Michael V
ID: 2354352
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
From White Rose Resistance…
“Don’t repeatedly call the ICE hotline and play audio clips from the Nuremberg trials when someone picks up. That would be childish.
Not 1-866-347-2423 from US or Canada nor 1-802-872-6199 from other areas around the globe.”
LOLOLOL
Like!
:)
Date: 27/01/2026 17:12:15
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2354353
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
dv said:

IDGI
It’s from a movie called One Battle After Another. Sean Penn’s character is “promoted” to a nice office (pictured). Soon after, the office turns into a gas chamber and Sean Penn dies.
Date: 27/01/2026 17:12:25
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2354354
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
dv said:

IDGI
I believe it’s like the Russian chaps that keep on ‘accidentally’ falling out windows.
Date: 27/01/2026 17:12:32
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2354355
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 27/01/2026 17:17:46
From: Michael V
ID: 2354356
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
dv said:

IDGI
It’s from a movie called One Battle After Another. Sean Penn’s character is “promoted” to a nice office (pictured). Soon after, the office turns into a gas chamber and Sean Penn dies.
Thanks for the explanation.
Date: 27/01/2026 17:19:22
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2354357
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
IDGI
It’s from a movie called One Battle After Another. Sean Penn’s character is “promoted” to a nice office (pictured). Soon after, the office turns into a gas chamber and Sean Penn dies.
Thanks for the explanation.
I only know because I watched the movie a week or so ago. Otherwise I’d be clueless too.
Date: 27/01/2026 17:19:49
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2354358
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
kii said:
From White Rose Resistance…
“Don’t repeatedly call the ICE hotline and play audio clips from the Nuremberg trials when someone picks up. That would be childish.
Not 1-866-347-2423 from US or Canada nor 1-802-872-6199 from other areas around the globe.”
LOLOLOL
Like!
:)
At Centrelink in the 1990s, a memo was circulated ‘for comment’ which put forward a management philosophy (i.e. latest management fad doing the rounds) central to which was the idea that, basically, there was not such thing as a bad idea or a stupid order by management, and any failures of or damage caused by actions arising from those ideas/orders was the responsibility of underlings who failed to understand them and implement them properly.
Seems that this concept had some appeal for management.
I commented that a similar idea had been put forward by Herman Goring at the Nuremberg trials. He called it ‘the Leadership Principle’ and declared that authority was a top-down thing, and responsibility was a bottom-up thing, thus no blame attached to the Nazi leadership for ‘excesses’ that occurred during the war (explained it with a bit more detail than that, but that’s the bones of it).
Didn’t hear anything about that particular fad again.
Date: 27/01/2026 17:54:28
From: roughbarked
ID: 2354387
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
kii said:
From White Rose Resistance…
“Don’t repeatedly call the ICE hotline and play audio clips from the Nuremberg trials when someone picks up. That would be childish.
Not 1-866-347-2423 from US or Canada nor 1-802-872-6199 from other areas around the globe.”
LOLOLOL
Like!
:)
At Centrelink in the 1990s, a memo was circulated ‘for comment’ which put forward a management philosophy (i.e. latest management fad doing the rounds) central to which was the idea that, basically, there was not such thing as a bad idea or a stupid order by management, and any failures of or damage caused by actions arising from those ideas/orders was the responsibility of underlings who failed to understand them and implement them properly.
Seems that this concept had some appeal for management.
I commented that a similar idea had been put forward by Herman Goring at the Nuremberg trials. He called it ‘the Leadership Principle’ and declared that authority was a top-down thing, and responsibility was a bottom-up thing, thus no blame attached to the Nazi leadership for ‘excesses’ that occurred during the war (explained it with a bit more detail than that, but that’s the bones of it).
Didn’t hear anything about that particular fad again.
Good.
Date: 27/01/2026 17:55:22
From: roughbarked
ID: 2354389
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Donald Trump’s presidency is increasingly being described as at a turning point that compels the Congress to take action to restrain him.
The political mishandling of an escalating ICE crisis in Minneapolis — on top of a series of foreign policy threats and reversals — resulted in a poll by The Economist/YouGov finding an extraordinary 71 per cent of Americans reporting they felt like the country is “out of control”.
More than 60 per cent say the country is on the wrong track, and 58 per cent are dissatisfied with the way democracy is working.
And just in case you think this might simply reflect one side of politics in an increasingly bitterly divided America, 50 per cent of those saying they felt things were out of control identified themselves as conservatives.
What is more extraordinary is that these findings were compiled between January 16 and January 19 — before the killing of intensive care nurse Alex Pretti by ICE agents in Minneapolis on Saturday.
Snap polling taken since Pretti’s killing shows public opinion only turning further against the Trump administration’s tactics.
By global affairs editor Laura Tingle
Date: 27/01/2026 17:55:44
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2354391
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 27/01/2026 18:07:15
From: dv
ID: 2354397
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Dutch is a beautiful language, I wish I could read it
Date: 27/01/2026 18:08:18
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2354398
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 27/01/2026 18:13:08
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2354399
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
Who is cortalyn baski ?
Sounds like a species of liverwort.
Date: 27/01/2026 18:13:21
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2354400
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Killing of Alex Pretti
At 34min in HCR talks about three people
One of whom sounds like cortalyn baski?
Date: 27/01/2026 18:13:58
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2354401
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Who is cortalyn baski ?
Sounds like a species of liverwort.
Google gives me a plant specis.
Date: 27/01/2026 18:18:21
From: Michael V
ID: 2354403
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

LOLOL
Date: 27/01/2026 18:52:24
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2354408
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Without regard to anything else he may have done, this alone is reason enough to put him against a wall without the benefit of a blindfold:

Date: 27/01/2026 18:53:41
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2354409
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Without regard to anything else he may have done, this alone is reason enough to put him against a wall without the benefit of a blindfold:

Then again, it may just be AI shit.
Date: 27/01/2026 18:55:51
From: buffy
ID: 2354411
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
captain_spalding said:
Without regard to anything else he may have done, this alone is reason enough to put him against a wall without the benefit of a blindfold:

Then again, it may just be AI shit.
Or the consultant was Franco Cozzo.
:)
Date: 27/01/2026 18:58:13
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2354412
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Without regard to anything else he may have done, this alone is reason enough to put him against a wall without the benefit of a blindfold:

That is ghastly
Date: 27/01/2026 18:58:18
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2354413
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
The Killing of Alex Pretti
At 34min in HCR talks about three people
One of whom sounds like cortalyn baski?
OK the name is
Corey Lewandowski – another right wing butter.
I turned on captions which got the spelling wrong.
But a Google search corrected it for me.
Geez.
Date: 27/01/2026 18:59:48
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2354414
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
captain_spalding said:
captain_spalding said:
Without regard to anything else he may have done, this alone is reason enough to put him against a wall without the benefit of a blindfold:

Then again, it may just be AI shit.
Or the consultant was Franco Cozzo.
:)
Definitely an influence.
Date: 27/01/2026 19:00:38
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2354415
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
captain_spalding said:
Without regard to anything else he may have done, this alone is reason enough to put him against a wall without the benefit of a blindfold:

That is ghastly
Trump decor is that.
Date: 27/01/2026 19:03:44
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2354417
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
The Killing of Alex Pretti
At 34min in HCR talks about three people
One of whom sounds like cortalyn baski?
OK the name is
Corey Lewandowski – another right wing butter.
I turned on captions which got the spelling wrong.
But a Google search corrected it for me.
Geez.
Butter = nutter.
That’s a 30 min search I will never get back.
Date: 27/01/2026 19:06:08
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354419
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Donald Trump’s presidency is increasingly being described as at a turning point that compels the Congress to take action to restrain him.
The political mishandling of an escalating ICE crisis in Minneapolis — on top of a series of foreign policy threats and reversals — resulted in a poll by The Economist/YouGov finding an extraordinary 71 per cent of Americans reporting they felt like the country is “out of control”.
More than 60 per cent say the country is on the wrong track, and 58 per cent are dissatisfied with the way democracy is working.
And just in case you think this might simply reflect one side of politics in an increasingly bitterly divided America, 50 per cent of those saying they felt things were out of control identified themselves as conservatives.
What is more extraordinary is that these findings were compiled between January 16 and January 19 — before the killing of intensive care nurse Alex Pretti by ICE agents in Minneapolis on Saturday.
Snap polling taken since Pretti’s killing shows public opinion only turning further against the Trump administration’s tactics.
By global affairs editor Laura Tingle
ah well at least they recognise that this is how their democracy is working
Date: 27/01/2026 19:07:22
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354420
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
kii said:
From White Rose Resistance…
“Don’t repeatedly call the ICE hotline and play audio clips from the Nuremberg trials when someone picks up. That would be childish.
Not 1-866-347-2423 from US or Canada nor 1-802-872-6199 from other areas around the globe.”
LOLOLOL
Like!
:)
At Centrelink in the 1990s, a memo was circulated ‘for comment’ which put forward a management philosophy (i.e. latest management fad doing the rounds) central to which was the idea that, basically, there was not such thing as a bad idea or a stupid order by management, and any failures of or damage caused by actions arising from those ideas/orders was the responsibility of underlings who failed to understand them and implement them properly.
Seems that this concept had some appeal for management.
I commented that a similar idea had been put forward by Herman Goring at the Nuremberg trials. He called it ‘the Leadership Principle’ and declared that authority was a top-down thing, and responsibility was a bottom-up thing, thus no blame attached to the Nazi leadership for ‘excesses’ that occurred during the war (explained it with a bit more detail than that, but that’s the bones of it).
Didn’t hear anything about that particular fad again.
WTF
Date: 27/01/2026 19:08:08
From: Boris
ID: 2354421
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
captain_spalding said:
Without regard to anything else he may have done, this alone is reason enough to put him against a wall without the benefit of a blindfold:

That is ghastly
A thing of beauty is a joy forever
Date: 27/01/2026 19:15:15
From: dv
ID: 2354422
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2026/jan/27/turnbull-albanese-australia-trump-global-political-reality
Turnbull urges Albanese to acknowledge new global political reality under ‘bully’ Trump
Exclusive: Former PM says Labor must stop ‘pretending nothing has changed’ and should outline how Australia will deal with the United States going forward
Date: 27/01/2026 19:34:53
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2354423
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2026/jan/27/turnbull-albanese-australia-trump-global-political-reality
Turnbull urges Albanese to acknowledge new global political reality under ‘bully’ Trump
Exclusive: Former PM says Labor must stop ‘pretending nothing has changed’ and should outline how Australia will deal with the United States going forward
World leaders need to stand up to him and not become weak with his bullying tactics.
Date: 27/01/2026 19:40:36
From: dv
ID: 2354427
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
Who is cortalyn baski ?
The closest I can find is Cordyline banksii, a large plant found in NZ.
Date: 27/01/2026 19:51:54
From: AussieDJ
ID: 2354428
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Funny .. but not funny

Date: 27/01/2026 19:54:44
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2354429
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
AussieDJ said:
Funny .. but not funny

Jail those who think Justice is optional.
Date: 27/01/2026 19:57:11
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2354430
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Who is cortalyn baski ?
The closest I can find is Cordyline banksii, a large plant found in NZ.
I found the correct spelling,
Corey Lewandowski
I wish I had not bothered.
Grrr.
Date: 27/01/2026 20:13:38
From: kii
ID: 2354433
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Who is cortalyn baski ?
The closest I can find is Cordyline banksii, a large plant found in NZ.
Excellent plant for basket weaving.
Date: 27/01/2026 20:14:36
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2354434
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 27/01/2026 20:39:26
From: dv
ID: 2354436
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 27/01/2026 20:40:06
From: dv
ID: 2354437
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
dv said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Who is cortalyn baski ?
The closest I can find is Cordyline banksii, a large plant found in NZ.
I found the correct spelling,
Corey Lewandowski
I wish I had not bothered.
Grrr.
I don’t know what to say
Date: 27/01/2026 20:48:44
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354438
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
dv said:
The closest I can find is Cordyline banksii, a large plant found in NZ.
I found the correct spelling,
Corey Lewandowski
I wish I had not bothered.
Grrr.
I don’t know what to say
What Would Lady Mondegreen Say
Date: 27/01/2026 20:50:42
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 2354439
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
dv said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
I found the correct spelling,
Corey Lewandowski
I wish I had not bothered.
Grrr.
I don’t know what to say
What Would Lady Mondegreen Say
don’t ask me.
Date: 27/01/2026 20:52:15
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354442
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 27/01/2026 20:59:47
From: dv
ID: 2354444
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Hot take
Date: 27/01/2026 20:59:55
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2354445
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 27/01/2026 21:03:27
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2354449
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Hot take
I see he goes to the Andrew Tate School of Everyone’s Gay Except Me.
Date: 27/01/2026 21:25:31
From: Neophyte
ID: 2354452
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
Hot take
I see he goes to the Andrew Tate School of Everyone’s Gay Except Me.
He’s like Caleb Bond, only with a gun.
Date: 27/01/2026 21:26:16
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354453
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
dv said:

Hot take
I see he goes to the Andrew Tate School of Everyone’s Gay Except Me.
this is the quality management with which a country should be run, propounding insightful debate and enlightened rhetoric
Date: 27/01/2026 21:56:24
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2354457
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
Hot take
I see he goes to the Andrew Tate School of Everyone’s Gay Except Me.
They both need to settle down with a nice young man called Sebastian.
Date: 28/01/2026 01:29:47
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354475
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
alleged
Some 10,109 doctoral-trained experts in science and related fields left their jobs last year as President Donald Trump dramatically shrank the overall federal workforce. That exodus was only 3% of the 335,192 federal workers who exited last year but represents 14% of the total number of Ph.D.s in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) or health fields employed at the end of 2024 as then-President Joe Biden prepared to leave office.
Date: 28/01/2026 01:51:31
From: dv
ID: 2354477
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

The bots are not sophisticated
Date: 28/01/2026 02:13:30
From: kii
ID: 2354480
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 28/01/2026 02:28:16
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2354482
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:

Diaper Man looks confused.
Date: 28/01/2026 02:56:53
From: dv
ID: 2354483
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/01/27/europe/italy-ice-agents-security-olympics-intl
Uh what?
Why would US Immigration officers be on duty at the Milan Olympics?
Date: 28/01/2026 04:13:42
From: roughbarked
ID: 2354484
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
kii said:

Diaper Man looks confused.
Looks like another surprise landed in his underpants. Old runny bum.
Date: 28/01/2026 04:20:20
From: roughbarked
ID: 2354486
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Trump administration’s military campaign of striking boats in the Caribbean and Pacific oceans is facing its first legal challenge through the US courts.
Families of two men, Chad Joseph and Rishi Samaroo, allege the pair were murdered while returning to the Caribbean island nation of Trinidad during a strike on October 14 last year.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-01-28/trump-administration-sued-over-venezuelan-boat-strike/106276738
Date: 28/01/2026 04:37:03
From: roughbarked
ID: 2354487
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
The Trump administration’s military campaign of striking boats in the Caribbean and Pacific oceans is facing its first legal challenge through the US courts.
Families of two men, Chad Joseph and Rishi Samaroo, allege the pair were murdered while returning to the Caribbean island nation of Trinidad during a strike on October 14 last year.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-01-28/trump-administration-sued-over-venezuelan-boat-strike/106276738
Civil rights lawyers filed the lawsuit in Boston’s federal court, marking the first court challenge to one of the 36 US missile strikes on vessels in the Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean authorised by President Donald Trump’s administration that have killed more than 120 people since September.
Family members of Chad Joseph and Rishi Samaroo — two Trinidadian men who were among six killed during an October 14 strike — allege in the lawsuit that the two men did fishing and farm work in Venezuela and had been returning to their homes in Las Cuevas, Trinidad when they were attacked.
“These are lawless killings in cold blood; killings for sport and killings for theatre, which is why we need a court of law to proclaim what is true and constrain what is lawless,” Baher Azmy, a lawyer for the plaintiffs at the Center for Constitutional Rights, said in a statement.
Date: 28/01/2026 08:17:19
From: roughbarked
ID: 2354493
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
In response to a reporter’s question, Mr Trump said he did not think Mr Pretti was acting as an assassin, but added: “With that being said, you can’t have guns, you can’t walk in with guns.”
What?
Was he not pro gun to get the backing of the gun lobby?
Date: 28/01/2026 08:26:44
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2354494
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
In response to a reporter’s question, Mr Trump said he did not think Mr Pretti was acting as an assassin, but added: “With that being said, you can’t have guns, you can’t walk in with guns.”
What?
Was he not pro gun to get the backing of the gun lobby?
He’s just a complete and utter moron. Don’t expect any reason from him.
Date: 28/01/2026 08:28:48
From: roughbarked
ID: 2354495
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
roughbarked said:
In response to a reporter’s question, Mr Trump said he did not think Mr Pretti was acting as an assassin, but added: “With that being said, you can’t have guns, you can’t walk in with guns.”
What?
Was he not pro gun to get the backing of the gun lobby?
He’s just a complete and utter moron. Don’t expect any reason from him.
I’m beginning to think he has the same brain worms as his mate RFK.
Date: 28/01/2026 09:35:42
From: dv
ID: 2354506
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/01/the-neighbors-defending-minnesota-from-ice/685769/
Date: 28/01/2026 11:36:22
From: kii
ID: 2354562
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Something I have read about in 3 places: Alex Pretti was assaulted a week or so before he was murdered. ICE/BP broke one of his ribs when they jumped on him as he was alerting a family using a whistle etc. It seems that he may have been targeted by ICE/BP.
Date: 28/01/2026 11:45:23
From: Michael V
ID: 2354577
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Something I have read about in 3 places: Alex Pretti was assaulted a week or so before he was murdered. ICE/BP broke one of his ribs when they jumped on him as he was alerting a family using a whistle etc. It seems that he may have been targeted by ICE/BP.
If properly verified, we can only hope that the perpetrators are held accountable, along with their bosses and their bosses bosses etc.
Date: 28/01/2026 11:51:45
From: kii
ID: 2354592
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
A comment on a thread about the Trump administration appearing to flop around about the 2nd amendment etc. after the Pretti murder.
“2A or not 2A?”
Date: 28/01/2026 11:58:31
From: Michael V
ID: 2354602
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
A comment on a thread about the Trump administration appearing to flop around about the 2nd amendment etc. after the Pretti murder.
“2A or not 2A?”
:)
Date: 28/01/2026 12:01:12
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354604
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
kii said:
A comment on a thread about the Trump administration appearing to flop around about the 2nd amendment etc. after the Pretti murder.
“2A or not 2A?”
:)
yeah but slings or arrows though
Date: 28/01/2026 12:02:52
From: dv
ID: 2354607
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
kii said:
A comment on a thread about the Trump administration appearing to flop around about the 2nd amendment etc. after the Pretti murder.
“2A or not 2A?”
:)
yeah but slings or arrows though
we’ll remember this next time they true to hawk 2A. But I do have to credit quite a lot of conservative commentators who are being consistent on this.
Date: 28/01/2026 12:03:01
From: kii
ID: 2354608
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
From A Mighty Girl’s Facebook page:
Diana’s nose wouldn’t stop bleeding. No matter what her worried parents tried, the blood kept coming. By morning, they decided to take her straight to urgent care. When Yohendry and Darianny Crespo arrived at Portland Adventist Health with their 7-year-old, they never made it inside.
Three unmarked vehicles surrounded their car in the hospital parking lot. Border Patrol agents forced them out. The parents pleaded with the agents — pleaded — to let Diana see a doctor. She was still bleeding. She needed help.
The agents refused, denying medical treatment to a sick 7-year-old girl.
They arrested the family, handcuffed Diana’s parents, and sent them all to a detention camp in Texas. Diana soon spiked a fever that lasted for days. It would be nearly a week before she was finally allowed to see a doctor.
This is what the federal government did to a sick child.
For generations, Americans have told ourselves a story about who we are. A shining city on a hill. A beacon of hope. A force for good in a world of tyrants and evildoers. We’ve told ourselves we stand for something — that our values mean something — that when the world looks to America, they see the best of what humanity can be.
That story is no longer true. Not if this is how federal agents, working in the name of the American people, treat the children among us. Not if this is what America has become.
The Trump administration’s justification for such cruelty has always been the same. “The worst of the worst.” Killers. Rapists. Gang members. Terrorists. Pedophiles. The drumbeat is endless, the rhetoric relentless.
It has always been a lie.
The Crespo González family has no criminal record. They came to this country legally, entering through a port of entry. They have a pending asylum case with a scheduled court date. They were given work permits.
They did everything right, followed every rule, and none of it mattered. None of it protected them from federal agents who wouldn’t let a 7-year-old girl see a doctor before hauling the crying child off to a detention camp with her handcuffed parents.
This is the “worst of the worst.” A second-grader who loves to paint. Her university-educated parents who fled Venezuela fearing government persecution.
And they are far from alone. According to ICE’s own data, nearly three-quarters of people booked into custody since October had no criminal convictions. Just 5 percent had any type of violent conviction.
The share of detainees with any criminal conviction has collapsed — from 62 percent in January to 31 percent by November — and even those with records are overwhelmingly traffic violations and misdemeanors. Overall, the number of non-criminal detainees arrested by ICE has surged 2,500 percent since Trump took office.
This isn’t about public safety. This is about quotas. Stephen Miller has demanded 3,000 arrests per day — “a floor, not a ceiling” — and reportedly threatened to fire field office leaders who don’t keep up. When ICE officials pushed back, citing claims that deportation efforts would target criminals, Miller was confused. “What do you mean you’re going after criminals?” he demanded. “Why aren’t you at Home Depot? Why aren’t you at 7-Eleven?”
So they fill their quotas with easy pickings. Families taking their children to the hospital. Parents dropping kids off at school. The vulnerable, the accessible, the law-abiding.
One of Trump’s very first acts in office was to rescind the policy protecting “sensitive locations” — hospitals, schools, churches — from immigration enforcement. The protections had been in place since 2011, maintained by presidents of both parties, including Trump himself during his first term. On day one, he tore them up.
The cruelty was the point from the beginning.
Like packs of vultures, ICE and Border Patrol agents now stalk the places where vulnerable people have no choice but to go. They circle schools. They surveil hospitals. They wait in parking lots.
In Minneapolis, where federal agents have killed two American citizens in the past three weeks, schools have been forced into lockdown. Nearly a third of students in one district have stayed home out of fear. A pregnant woman missed her checkup, too afraid to visit a clinic — a nurse found her at home, already in labor. A diabetic was too scared to pick up his insulin. Eighty-four percent of healthcare workers surveyed report significant decreases in patient visits since last January.
“ICE agents have been roaming our neighborhoods, circling our schools, following our buses, coming into our parking lots and taking our children,” said Zena Stenvik, superintendent of Columbia Heights Public Schools in Minnesota. “Students are watching abductions on their way to school, on their way home and through their windows.”
This is the America we have become.
The Crespo González family is now being detained at the South Texas Family Residential Center in Dilley, Texas — the same facility holding 5-year-old Liam, the Minnesota boy whose photo in the hands of a federal agent went viral last week.
This detention camp for children and parents has a documented record of horrors: families report denial of critical medical care, food infested with worms and mold, children becoming ill, lights that stay on all night so kids can’t sleep. Court documents describe children who are “weak, faint, pale, and often crying because they are so hungry.” Hospitals have confirmed that children are consistently released with health issues they’ve dubbed “Dilley-ish.”
The National Center for Youth Law has sued the Trump administration over the wretched conditions at the detention camp. Neha Desai, the organization’s managing director, observed that “the current conditions at Dilley are fundamentally unsafe for anyone, let alone young children.”
This is where they sent Diana. A family that had been working, paying their own way, contributing to their community — now imprisoned at the expense of American taxpayers.
“Alarming, chilling, and deeply shameful” is how the Oregon Nurses Association described the detention of a family seeking medical care for their child. “No parent should ever be forced to weigh their child’s health against the risk of detention.”
And this is happening everywhere. Not just in Minnesota, not just in Oregon, but across the country. Countless stories of hardworking people — many of them in the country legally — being detained, terrified, torn from their lives to meet Stephen Miller’s quotas.
This isn’t making America safer. This is making America crueler.
It’s not just the lives of these families at stake. It’s the heart and soul of this country. It’s who we are and what we stand for.
We are better than this. We are better than denying medical care to a sick child. We are better than handcuffing a little girl’s pleading parents as they beg armed men to let her see a doctor. We are better than masked agents in parking lots, hunting families seeking help.
Or at least, we used to tell ourselves we were.
Diana Crespo is 7 years old. She likes to paint and play with friends. She had a nosebleed that wouldn’t stop, and her parents tried to take her to the doctor.
For that, they were arrested. For that, they sit in detention. For that, a little girl went days without medical care while running a fever in an American detention camp for children.
Don’t look away.
This has to stop.
Enough is enough.
—> If you’ve had enough of the cruelty and the lies, here’s how to take action.
For Senators: Demand no DHS funding until ICE and Border Patrol are reined in and an independent investigation is launched into their widespread abuses. You can call (202) 224-3121 or use the action alert at https://5calls.org/issue/dhs-budget-ice-defund/
For Representatives: Call (202) 224-3121 and demand real oversight of these lawless agencies — and the launch of an independent investigation into the activities of ICE and the killings of American citizens by DHS agents.
—> To help Diana and her parents with legal support, there is a GoFundMe campaign at https://www.gofundme.com/f/ayuda-humanitaria-para-la-familia-crespo-gonzalez
—> To help immigrants who have been arrested or detained, you can support the critical work of the National Immigrant Justice Center at https://immigrantjustice.org/ways-to-help/
If you’re looking for ways to take action and counter ICE overreach, supporting civil rights organizations like the ACLU that challenge their tactics in the courts has emerged as one of the most successful means of constraining ICE’s rapidly expanding enforcement powers — learn more at https://www.aclu.org/issues/immigrants-rights/immigrants-rights-and-detention
——
For children’s books that encourage empathy and understanding of Mighty Girl immigrants of the past and present, visit our blog post, “A New Land, A New Life: 25 Mighty Girl Books About the Immigrant Experience” at https://www.amightygirl.com/blog?p=12855
For books for children and teens about the importance of standing up for truth, decency, and justice, even in dark times, visit our blog post, “Dissent Is Patriotic: 50 Books About Women Who Fought for Change,” at https://www.amightygirl.com/blog?p=14364
For books for tweens and teens about girls living under real-life authoritarian regimes throughout history that will help them appreciate how precious democracy truly is, visit our blog post “The Fragility of Freedom: Mighty Girl Books About Life Under Authoritarianism” at https://www.amightygirl.com/blog?p=32426
To stay connected with A Mighty Girl, you can sign-up for A Mighty Girl’s free email newsletter at https://www.amightygirl.com/forms/newsletter
To read more about Diana’s detention, visit https://www.opb.org/article/2026/01/23/gresham-family-seeking-medical-care-child-detained-immigration-officers/
Date: 28/01/2026 12:08:32
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354613
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
:)
yeah but slings or arrows though
we’ll remember this next time they true to hawk 2A. But I do have to credit quite a lot of conservative commentators who are being consistent on this.
guess there had to be a red line for them somewhere, apparently right to bear arms for now
Date: 28/01/2026 12:19:42
From: Michael V
ID: 2354624
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
From A Mighty Girl’s Facebook page:
Diana’s nose wouldn’t stop bleeding. No matter what her worried parents tried, the blood kept coming. By morning, they decided to take her straight to urgent care. When Yohendry and Darianny Crespo arrived at Portland Adventist Health with their 7-year-old, they never made it inside.
Three unmarked vehicles surrounded their car in the hospital parking lot. Border Patrol agents forced them out. The parents pleaded with the agents — pleaded — to let Diana see a doctor. She was still bleeding. She needed help.
The agents refused, denying medical treatment to a sick 7-year-old girl.
They arrested the family, handcuffed Diana’s parents, and sent them all to a detention camp in Texas. Diana soon spiked a fever that lasted for days. It would be nearly a week before she was finally allowed to see a doctor.
This is what the federal government did to a sick child.
For generations, Americans have told ourselves a story about who we are. A shining city on a hill. A beacon of hope. A force for good in a world of tyrants and evildoers. We’ve told ourselves we stand for something — that our values mean something — that when the world looks to America, they see the best of what humanity can be.
That story is no longer true. Not if this is how federal agents, working in the name of the American people, treat the children among us. Not if this is what America has become.
The Trump administration’s justification for such cruelty has always been the same. “The worst of the worst.” Killers. Rapists. Gang members. Terrorists. Pedophiles. The drumbeat is endless, the rhetoric relentless.
It has always been a lie.
The Crespo González family has no criminal record. They came to this country legally, entering through a port of entry. They have a pending asylum case with a scheduled court date. They were given work permits.
They did everything right, followed every rule, and none of it mattered. None of it protected them from federal agents who wouldn’t let a 7-year-old girl see a doctor before hauling the crying child off to a detention camp with her handcuffed parents.
This is the “worst of the worst.” A second-grader who loves to paint. Her university-educated parents who fled Venezuela fearing government persecution.
And they are far from alone. According to ICE’s own data, nearly three-quarters of people booked into custody since October had no criminal convictions. Just 5 percent had any type of violent conviction.
The share of detainees with any criminal conviction has collapsed — from 62 percent in January to 31 percent by November — and even those with records are overwhelmingly traffic violations and misdemeanors. Overall, the number of non-criminal detainees arrested by ICE has surged 2,500 percent since Trump took office.
This isn’t about public safety. This is about quotas. Stephen Miller has demanded 3,000 arrests per day — “a floor, not a ceiling” — and reportedly threatened to fire field office leaders who don’t keep up. When ICE officials pushed back, citing claims that deportation efforts would target criminals, Miller was confused. “What do you mean you’re going after criminals?” he demanded. “Why aren’t you at Home Depot? Why aren’t you at 7-Eleven?”
So they fill their quotas with easy pickings. Families taking their children to the hospital. Parents dropping kids off at school. The vulnerable, the accessible, the law-abiding.
One of Trump’s very first acts in office was to rescind the policy protecting “sensitive locations” — hospitals, schools, churches — from immigration enforcement. The protections had been in place since 2011, maintained by presidents of both parties, including Trump himself during his first term. On day one, he tore them up.
The cruelty was the point from the beginning.
Like packs of vultures, ICE and Border Patrol agents now stalk the places where vulnerable people have no choice but to go. They circle schools. They surveil hospitals. They wait in parking lots.
In Minneapolis, where federal agents have killed two American citizens in the past three weeks, schools have been forced into lockdown. Nearly a third of students in one district have stayed home out of fear. A pregnant woman missed her checkup, too afraid to visit a clinic — a nurse found her at home, already in labor. A diabetic was too scared to pick up his insulin. Eighty-four percent of healthcare workers surveyed report significant decreases in patient visits since last January.
“ICE agents have been roaming our neighborhoods, circling our schools, following our buses, coming into our parking lots and taking our children,” said Zena Stenvik, superintendent of Columbia Heights Public Schools in Minnesota. “Students are watching abductions on their way to school, on their way home and through their windows.”
This is the America we have become.
The Crespo González family is now being detained at the South Texas Family Residential Center in Dilley, Texas — the same facility holding 5-year-old Liam, the Minnesota boy whose photo in the hands of a federal agent went viral last week.
This detention camp for children and parents has a documented record of horrors: families report denial of critical medical care, food infested with worms and mold, children becoming ill, lights that stay on all night so kids can’t sleep. Court documents describe children who are “weak, faint, pale, and often crying because they are so hungry.” Hospitals have confirmed that children are consistently released with health issues they’ve dubbed “Dilley-ish.”
The National Center for Youth Law has sued the Trump administration over the wretched conditions at the detention camp. Neha Desai, the organization’s managing director, observed that “the current conditions at Dilley are fundamentally unsafe for anyone, let alone young children.”
This is where they sent Diana. A family that had been working, paying their own way, contributing to their community — now imprisoned at the expense of American taxpayers.
“Alarming, chilling, and deeply shameful” is how the Oregon Nurses Association described the detention of a family seeking medical care for their child. “No parent should ever be forced to weigh their child’s health against the risk of detention.”
And this is happening everywhere. Not just in Minnesota, not just in Oregon, but across the country. Countless stories of hardworking people — many of them in the country legally — being detained, terrified, torn from their lives to meet Stephen Miller’s quotas.
This isn’t making America safer. This is making America crueler.
It’s not just the lives of these families at stake. It’s the heart and soul of this country. It’s who we are and what we stand for.
We are better than this. We are better than denying medical care to a sick child. We are better than handcuffing a little girl’s pleading parents as they beg armed men to let her see a doctor. We are better than masked agents in parking lots, hunting families seeking help.
Or at least, we used to tell ourselves we were.
Diana Crespo is 7 years old. She likes to paint and play with friends. She had a nosebleed that wouldn’t stop, and her parents tried to take her to the doctor.
For that, they were arrested. For that, they sit in detention. For that, a little girl went days without medical care while running a fever in an American detention camp for children.
Don’t look away.
This has to stop.
Enough is enough.
—> If you’ve had enough of the cruelty and the lies, here’s how to take action.
For Senators: Demand no DHS funding until ICE and Border Patrol are reined in and an independent investigation is launched into their widespread abuses. You can call (202) 224-3121 or use the action alert at https://5calls.org/issue/dhs-budget-ice-defund/
For Representatives: Call (202) 224-3121 and demand real oversight of these lawless agencies — and the launch of an independent investigation into the activities of ICE and the killings of American citizens by DHS agents.
—> To help Diana and her parents with legal support, there is a GoFundMe campaign at https://www.gofundme.com/f/ayuda-humanitaria-para-la-familia-crespo-gonzalez
—> To help immigrants who have been arrested or detained, you can support the critical work of the National Immigrant Justice Center at https://immigrantjustice.org/ways-to-help/
If you’re looking for ways to take action and counter ICE overreach, supporting civil rights organizations like the ACLU that challenge their tactics in the courts has emerged as one of the most successful means of constraining ICE’s rapidly expanding enforcement powers — learn more at https://www.aclu.org/issues/immigrants-rights/immigrants-rights-and-detention
——
For children’s books that encourage empathy and understanding of Mighty Girl immigrants of the past and present, visit our blog post, “A New Land, A New Life: 25 Mighty Girl Books About the Immigrant Experience” at https://www.amightygirl.com/blog?p=12855
For books for children and teens about the importance of standing up for truth, decency, and justice, even in dark times, visit our blog post, “Dissent Is Patriotic: 50 Books About Women Who Fought for Change,” at https://www.amightygirl.com/blog?p=14364
For books for tweens and teens about girls living under real-life authoritarian regimes throughout history that will help them appreciate how precious democracy truly is, visit our blog post “The Fragility of Freedom: Mighty Girl Books About Life Under Authoritarianism” at https://www.amightygirl.com/blog?p=32426
To stay connected with A Mighty Girl, you can sign-up for A Mighty Girl’s free email newsletter at https://www.amightygirl.com/forms/newsletter
To read more about Diana’s detention, visit https://www.opb.org/article/2026/01/23/gresham-family-seeking-medical-care-child-detained-immigration-officers/
!!!
Date: 28/01/2026 12:26:09
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2354632
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Trump finally OUTED in BIGGEST SCAM YET
Dina Doll reports on how Trump has already grifted roughly $1.5 billion off the presidency. Produced by Francis Maxwell.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1GfwpIpBRX0
Date: 28/01/2026 12:29:01
From: dv
ID: 2354635
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
A Minnesota judge has taken the extraordinary step of ordering the head of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to face court and explain why his agency keeps ignoring court orders.
Declaring his “court’s patience is at an end”, Judge Patrick Schiltz said ICE acting director Todd Lyons must appear in person to give reasons why he should not be held in contempt.
“The court acknowledges that ordering the head of a federal agency to personally appear is an extraordinary step, but the extent of ICE’s violation of court orders is likewise extraordinary,” the judge wrote.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-01-28/minnesota-judge-orders-ice-head-to-face-court/106276814
Date: 28/01/2026 12:29:38
From: buffy
ID: 2354636
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
A Minnesota judge has taken the extraordinary step of ordering the head of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to face court and explain why his agency keeps ignoring court orders.
Declaring his “court’s patience is at an end”, Judge Patrick Schiltz said ICE acting director Todd Lyons must appear in person to give reasons why he should not be held in contempt.
“The court acknowledges that ordering the head of a federal agency to personally appear is an extraordinary step, but the extent of ICE’s violation of court orders is likewise extraordinary,” the judge wrote.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-01-28/minnesota-judge-orders-ice-head-to-face-court/106276814
Just noticed that. I’ll read it all.
Date: 28/01/2026 12:39:40
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2354646
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/01/27/europe/italy-ice-agents-security-olympics-intl
Uh what?
Why would US Immigration officers be on duty at the Milan Olympics?
They are there to shoot people who drive off or help people get up.
Date: 28/01/2026 12:43:41
From: dv
ID: 2354648
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
dv said:
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/01/27/europe/italy-ice-agents-security-olympics-intl
Uh what?
Why would US Immigration officers be on duty at the Milan Olympics?
They are there to shoot people who drive off or help people get up.
I mean they will probably find it a rich hunting ground for people who are not American citizens
Date: 28/01/2026 12:47:49
From: furious
ID: 2354649
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
dv said:
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/01/27/europe/italy-ice-agents-security-olympics-intl
Uh what?
Why would US Immigration officers be on duty at the Milan Olympics?
They are there to shoot people who drive off or help people get up.
I mean they will probably find it a rich hunting ground for people who are not American citizens
I mean, the obvious answer is you can’t have winter Olympics without some ice…
Date: 28/01/2026 12:49:59
From: Michael V
ID: 2354651
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
dv said:
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/01/27/europe/italy-ice-agents-security-olympics-intl
Uh what?
Why would US Immigration officers be on duty at the Milan Olympics?
They are there to shoot people who drive off or help people get up.
I mean they will probably find it a rich hunting ground for people who are not American citizens
Ha!
Anyway, it seems all pretty much all fucked up to me.
Heck, the powers that be in the USA who made this decision must be completely aware of ICE’s badly damaged worldwide reputation. I wonder why they did so?
Date: 28/01/2026 12:50:13
From: Michael V
ID: 2354652
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
furious said:
dv said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
They are there to shoot people who drive off or help people get up.
I mean they will probably find it a rich hunting ground for people who are not American citizens
I mean, the obvious answer is you can’t have winter Olympics without some ice…
LOL
Date: 28/01/2026 12:54:46
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2354655
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
dv said:
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/01/27/europe/italy-ice-agents-security-olympics-intl
Uh what?
Why would US Immigration officers be on duty at the Milan Olympics?
They are there to shoot people who drive off or help people get up.
I mean they will probably find it a rich hunting ground for people who are not American citizens
Lots of potential customers, so many people to shoot, will make them happy.
Trigger happy too.
Date: 28/01/2026 12:55:56
From: kii
ID: 2354656
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
furious said:
dv said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
They are there to shoot people who drive off or help people get up.
I mean they will probably find it a rich hunting ground for people who are not American citizens
I mean, the obvious answer is you can’t have winter Olympics without some ice…
Exactly 😆 🤣 🙄
Date: 28/01/2026 12:58:51
From: dv
ID: 2354657
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Should be remembered that Pretti’s killer was not ICE. It breaks my heart to see the good name of that organisation besmirched. He was shot by Customs and Border Protection staff.
Date: 28/01/2026 13:06:26
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2354660
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
furious said:
dv said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
They are there to shoot people who drive off or help people get up.
I mean they will probably find it a rich hunting ground for people who are not American citizens
I mean, the obvious answer is you can’t have winter Olympics without some ice…
:)
Date: 28/01/2026 13:07:20
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354661
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
maybe they’re hoping that Stephen can play Benito and have a rerun
Date: 28/01/2026 13:08:24
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2354663
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Should be remembered that Pretti’s killer was not ICE. It breaks my heart to see the good name of that organisation besmirched. He was shot by Customs and Border Protection staff.
Immigrants and American citizens are too confusing for them.
Must be the training.
Date: 28/01/2026 13:27:59
From: Michael V
ID: 2354677
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Should be remembered that Pretti’s killer was not ICE. It breaks my heart to see the good name of that organisation besmirched. He was shot by Customs and Border Protection staff.
Where’s my sarcasm detector when I need it?
Date: 28/01/2026 14:12:03
From: kii
ID: 2354684
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
LOLOLOLOL
(For some reason the photos accompanying this article reminded me of those assignments we all did in primary school.)
Date: 28/01/2026 14:48:55
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2354692
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
FTR the company is Cupcake Polish.

Date: 28/01/2026 15:05:31
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354693
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
FTR the company is Cupcake Polish.

sorry we don’t understand, if democracy is, then that is the basis of telling people not to be political
Date: 28/01/2026 15:09:14
From: kii
ID: 2354694
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 28/01/2026 15:10:18
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2354695
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Divine Angel said:
FTR the company is Cupcake Polish.

sorry we don’t understand, if democracy is, then that is the basis of telling people not to be political
People don’t like when brands get political. “I’m following you cos I like the glittery pink, I don’t wanna hear about politics!”
Date: 28/01/2026 15:33:07
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2354702
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
85 seconds to midnight
https://thebulletin.org/doomsday-clock/2026-statement/
Date: 28/01/2026 15:34:53
From: roughbarked
ID: 2354706
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
85 seconds to midnight
https://thebulletin.org/doomsday-clock/2026-statement/
Trump and Putin are trying to race each other to knock off tiime.
Date: 28/01/2026 15:36:11
From: Michael V
ID: 2354708
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
FTR the company is Cupcake Polish.

100%
Date: 28/01/2026 15:39:18
From: Michael V
ID: 2354710
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 28/01/2026 15:58:32
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354715
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
85 seconds to midnight
https://thebulletin.org/doomsday-clock/2026-statement/
bet they’re wishing they’d chosen a Lorentz type scale by now, or at least some kind of Zeno-logarithmic one
Date: 28/01/2026 17:28:34
From: dv
ID: 2354744
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
“Everything I’ve done, I’ve done at the direction of the president and Stephen”. – Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem
https://www.axios.com/2026/01/27/trump-stephen-miller-massacre-minnesota-shooting
Date: 28/01/2026 17:32:28
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2354745
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Ol’ Donny doesn’t seem very happy about this roast.
https://x.com/mariaagold/status/2015801935518200276
Good.
Date: 28/01/2026 17:37:28
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2354747
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
16 Republicans could stop ice today.
23 Republicans could impeach Trump today.
HCR.
Date: 28/01/2026 17:47:29
From: roughbarked
ID: 2354750
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 28/01/2026 17:50:07
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354752
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:

What Would Sergei Skripal Do
Date: 28/01/2026 17:55:14
From: roughbarked
ID: 2354755
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:

What Would Sergei Skripal Do
Survive?
Date: 28/01/2026 18:01:48
From: fsm
ID: 2354757
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 28/01/2026 18:25:45
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2354760
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
“Everything I’ve done, I’ve done at the direction of the president and Stephen”. – Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem
https://www.axios.com/2026/01/27/trump-stephen-miller-massacre-minnesota-shooting
So, it’s back to Nuremberg again?
“I vas chust followink mine orders!”
Date: 28/01/2026 18:31:11
From: kii
ID: 2354761
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Stella Carson has been interviewed by Anderson Cooper. She is the woman in the pink coat who filmed Alex Pretti’s murder.
Date: 28/01/2026 18:32:20
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2354762
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Stella Carson has been interviewed by Anderson Cooper. She is the woman in the pink coat who filmed Alex Pretti’s murder.
Well, at least she hasn’t been ‘disappeared’. At least, not yet.
Date: 28/01/2026 18:39:06
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354763
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
dv said:
“Everything I’ve done, I’ve done at the direction of the president and Stephen”. – Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem
https://www.axios.com/2026/01/27/trump-stephen-miller-massacre-minnesota-shooting
So, it’s back to Nuremberg again?
“I vas chust followink mine orders!”
and the beauty of it is, plausible democracy deniability, we were just answering to the real people in charge, the voters, it’s their fault
Date: 28/01/2026 18:40:46
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2354764
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Alex Pretti wasn’t killed because he had a gun.
He wasn’t killed because he was a ‘terrorist’.
He was killed because he was much more dangerous than that, in the eyes of Trump’s regime.
He was killed because he had a camera. Because he was a witness.
In a monologue on The Daily Show regarding the fatal shooting of Alex Pretti by ICE agents, Jon Stewart described cameras as “a handheld, aluminum, 1080p, 60fps, weapon of mass illumination”.
Stewart argued that for a regime or administration “predicated on lies,” a camera is the most dangerous tool a citizen can possess because it acts as a witness that captures the truth.
Date: 28/01/2026 18:49:26
From: Cymek
ID: 2354766
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
captain_spalding said:
dv said:
“Everything I’ve done, I’ve done at the direction of the president and Stephen”. – Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem
https://www.axios.com/2026/01/27/trump-stephen-miller-massacre-minnesota-shooting
So, it’s back to Nuremberg again?
“I vas chust followink mine orders!”
and the beauty of it is, plausible democracy deniability, we were just answering to the real people in charge, the voters, it’s their fault
It the USA expands its territory by force then its leader likely has the same military capability as Hitler
Date: 28/01/2026 19:05:05
From: Michael V
ID: 2354769
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
“Everything I’ve done, I’ve done at the direction of the president and Stephen”. – Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem
https://www.axios.com/2026/01/27/trump-stephen-miller-massacre-minnesota-shooting
Rats and sinking ship?
Date: 28/01/2026 19:07:30
From: Michael V
ID: 2354770
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
fsm said:

Hmmmmm.
Date: 28/01/2026 19:26:45
From: dv
ID: 2354772
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15504293/ICE-agent-Ecuador-consulate-Minneapolis.html
Date: 28/01/2026 19:34:36
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2354773
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15504293/ICE-agent-Ecuador-consulate-Minneapolis.html
Oh, no, he’s not asking them to give him asylum so that he can harangue the press from their balcony for four or five years, is he?
Date: 28/01/2026 19:36:43
From: dv
ID: 2354774
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
‘Latinas for Trump’ co-founder: Trump ‘will lose the midterms because of Stephen Miller’
by Julia Mueller 01/27/26 04:25 PM ET
Florida state Sen. Ileana Garcia ®, co-founder of Latinas for Trump, blasted President Trump’s immigration crackdown, warning he “will lose the midterms” because of White House adviser Stephen Miller.
“I do think that he will lose the midterms because of Stephen Miller,” Garcia told The New York Times in an interview published Tuesday.
Though Garcia was openly supportive of Trump’s plans to close the border, she placed blame on Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff, for the aggressive tactics used during the current crackdown.
Her comments come after federal agents in Minneapolis over the weekend shot and killed 37-year-old Alex Pretti amid a protest against the administration’s immigration action, weeks after an ICE officer shot and killed 37-year-old Renee Good in the city earlier this month.
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said Pretti “attacked” federal law enforcement, while Miller described Pretti as “a would-be assassin” who “tried to murder federal law enforcement.”
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Monday distanced Trump from those remarks, saying she had not heard the president “characterize Mr. Pretti in that way” and deferring to the investigation.
“Distorting, politicizing, slandering – justifying what happened to Alex Pretti contradicts the American values the administration campaigned on. He was neither a domestic terrorist nor an assassin,” Garcia wrote in a Monday post on the social platform X, responding to Miller’s characterization of the incident.
“Allowing individuals like Stephen Miller, among others, who represent the government and make hard-line decisions, to make such comments will have long term consequences. … This is not what I voted for!” she continued.
Garcia, who rallied support from Latina voters to help get Trump elected in 2016 and served in Trump’s Department of Homeland Security during his first term, has blasted what she last year called “inhumane” tactics to meet deportation goals.
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5708999-garcia-criticizes-trump-midterms/
I’m really fascinated by these people. DJT is exactly what he promised to be.
Date: 28/01/2026 19:40:05
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354777
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
dv said:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15504293/ICE-agent-Ecuador-consulate-Minneapolis.html
Oh, no, he’s not asking them to give him asylum so that he can harangue the press from their balcony for four or five years, is he?
sorry we don’t understand
how did international law prevent infringements in say Venezuela of late
Date: 28/01/2026 19:41:21
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354778
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5708999-garcia-criticizes-trump-midterms/
I’m really fascinated by these people. DJT is exactly what he promised to be.
rationalise rationalise rationalise
Date: 28/01/2026 19:43:20
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2354780
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
captain_spalding said:
dv said:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15504293/ICE-agent-Ecuador-consulate-Minneapolis.html
Oh, no, he’s not asking them to give him asylum so that he can harangue the press from their balcony for four or five years, is he?
sorry we don’t understand
how did international law prevent infringements in say Venezuela of late
Julian Assange took refuge in Ecuador’s London embassy in 2012 to avoid extradition, living there for seven years under asylum before Ecuador revoked it in April 2019, leading to his arrest.
During his stay, he received Ecuadorian citizenship in 2018, which was later revoked in 2021 due to irregularities, and he occasionally delivered addresses to the media from a balcony of the embassy.
Date: 28/01/2026 19:47:49
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354782
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
SCIENCE said:
captain_spalding said:
Oh, no, he’s not asking them to give him asylum so that he can harangue the press from their balcony for four or five years, is he?
sorry we don’t understand
how did international law prevent infringements in say Venezuela of late
Julian Assange took refuge in Ecuador’s London embassy in 2012 to avoid extradition, living there for seven years under asylum before Ecuador revoked it in April 2019, leading to his arrest.
During his stay, he received Ecuadorian citizenship in 2018, which was later revoked in 2021 due to irregularities, and he occasionally delivered addresses to the media from a balcony of the embassy.
yeah sorry we meant the Ecuador staff thinking they would be able to stop the fascist mercenaries, as if they wouldn’t have gone straight in if they wanted to
we suppose the people on the run basically ended up in a different country videre licet self deported anyway so it was fine
Date: 28/01/2026 20:00:02
From: kii
ID: 2354788
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
kii said:
Stella Carson has been interviewed by Anderson Cooper. She is the woman in the pink coat who filmed Alex Pretti’s murder.
Well, at least she hasn’t been ‘disappeared’. At least, not yet.
She has lawyers, and her phone with the footage of Pretti’s murder.
Date: 28/01/2026 20:12:09
From: buffy
ID: 2354789
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Stella Carson has been interviewed by Anderson Cooper. She is the woman in the pink coat who filmed Alex Pretti’s murder.
I sat in the car listening to that interview. Weeping.
Date: 28/01/2026 20:14:22
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2354790
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
This video (about 1 minute) explains the Alex Pretti thing quite compehensively:
https://img-9gag-fun.9cache.com/photo/a9ywXM1_460svvp9.webm
Date: 28/01/2026 20:50:21
From: dv
ID: 2354791
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
captain_spalding said:
dv said:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15504293/ICE-agent-Ecuador-consulate-Minneapolis.html
Oh, no, he’s not asking them to give him asylum so that he can harangue the press from their balcony for four or five years, is he?
sorry we don’t understand
how did international law prevent infringements in say Venezuela of late
Good thinking, Venezuela should have declared the whole country to be a consulate
Date: 28/01/2026 20:56:03
From: kii
ID: 2354792
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
kii said:
Stella Carson has been interviewed by Anderson Cooper. She is the woman in the pink coat who filmed Alex Pretti’s murder.
I sat in the car listening to that interview. Weeping.
Yep, its been very difficult for me to cry since waves hands around all that’s happened to me since 2021. I’ve cried a few times since Renee Good was murdered, this interview hit me hard.
Date: 28/01/2026 20:58:36
From: kii
ID: 2354793
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
This video (about 1 minute) explains the Alex Pretti thing quite compehensively:
https://img-9gag-fun.9cache.com/photo/a9ywXM1_460svvp9.webm
Perfect.
Date: 28/01/2026 21:02:15
From: kii
ID: 2354794
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 28/01/2026 22:22:50
From: dv
ID: 2354807
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 29/01/2026 01:08:32
From: dv
ID: 2354813
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 29/01/2026 01:59:36
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2354814
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 29/01/2026 03:05:59
From: kii
ID: 2354815
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 29/01/2026 04:48:18
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354818
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Good news, these labour market contractions should deliver not just miscarriages of justice but also lower inflation ¡
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-01-29/amazon-accidentally-announces-layoffs/106280800
Date: 29/01/2026 07:17:56
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 2354824
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Alt National Park Service
After the murder of Alex Pretti by our own government was witnessed by the public, officials could no longer spin the propaganda machine. A preliminary review by U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s internal watchdog office found that Alex Pretti was shot by two federal officers after “resisting arrest,” but did not indicate that he brandished a weapon during the encounter, according to an email sent to Congress. The review makes no mention of the Department of Homeland Security’s earlier claims that Mr. Pretti, a U.S. citizen, “wanted to do maximum damage and massacre law enforcement.”
Here’s the full report to Congress shared by Camilo Montoya-Galvez, CBS News immigration reporter:
The following statement pertains to an in-custody death that occurred on Saturday, January 24, 2026, in Minneapolis, MN. This information is based on a preliminary review by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) Investigative Operations Directorate (IOD) and may be updated and clarified as additional details become available. It is being provided to Committee staff concurrently with CBP senior leadership to ensure timely reporting.
CBP OPR IOD established the following information and timeline based on a preliminary review of body worn camera footage and CBP documentation.
On January 24, 2026, United States Border Patrol (USBP) Border Patrol Agents (BPAs) and Customs and Border Protection Officers (CBPOs) supporting Operation Metro Surge were conducting enforcement actions near the intersection of Nicollet Ave. and 26th St. in Minneapolis, MN. Several civilians were in the area yelling and blowing whistles. BPAs and CBPOs made several verbal requests for the civilians to stay on the sidewalks and out of the roadway.
At approximately 9:00 a.m., a CBPO was confronted by two female civilians blowing whistles. The CBPO ordered the female civilians to move out of the roadway, and the female civilians did not move. The CBPO pushed them both away and one of the females ran to a male, later identified as 37-year-old Alex Jeffrey Pretti, a US citizen. The CBPO attempted to move the woman and Pretti out of the roadway. The woman and Pretti did not move. The CBPO deployed his oleoresin capsicum (OC) spray towards both Pretti and the woman.
CBP personnel attempted to take Pretti into custody. Pretti resisted CBP personnel’s efforts and a struggle ensued. During the struggle, a BPA yelled, “He’s got a gun!” multiple times. Approximately five seconds later, a BPA discharged his CBP-issued Glock 19 and a CBPO also discharged his CBP-issued Glock 47 at Pretti. After the shooting, a BPA advised he had possession of Pretti’s firearm. The BPA subsequently cleared and secured Pretti’s firearm in his vehicle.
At approximately 9:02 a.m., CBP personnel cut Pretti’s clothing and provided medical aid to him by placing chest seals on his wounds. At approximately 9:05 a.m., Minneapolis Fire Department Emergency Medical Services (MFD EMS) emergency medical technicians (EMTs) arrived and assumed primary medical care for Pretti.
At approximately 9:14 a.m., MFD EMTs placed Pretti in an MFD EMS ambulance and he was subsequently transported to Hennepin County Medical Center (HCMC). At approximately 9:32 a.m., HCMC medical personnel pronounced Pretti deceased.
CBP OPR IOD was advised that an autopsy would be conducted by medical personnel from the Hennepin County Medical Examiner’s Office. CBP OPR IOD will request the official findings upon completion.
Homeland Security Investigations is investigating the incident and CBP OPR IOD is reviewing it. The Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General was notified.
Now let’s review what this statement is basically saying that according to the government’s own preliminary report to Congress, federal agents shot Alex Pretti during an attempted arrest after he resisted and while an agent shouted “He’s got a gun.” However, the report does not present evidence in the letter that Pretti ever brandished that gun before he was shot, and in fact one agent secured the firearm at the scene before Alex was shot. Alex Pretti legally carried firearm, exercising rights protected under state and federal law. That firearm was taken and secured by an agent during the struggle before the shots that killed him were fired. Neither resisting arrest nor legally carrying a firearm are lawful justifications for the government to execute a U.S. citizen. Meaning Alex was murdered/ executed by our own government.
Date: 29/01/2026 07:36:58
From: Michael V
ID: 2354831
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

Understandable…
Date: 29/01/2026 07:54:23
From: roughbarked
ID: 2354837
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
dv said:

Understandable…
I’d be going on the eyeballs.
Date: 29/01/2026 08:13:45
From: roughbarked
ID: 2354852
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Some users reported not being able to use the word “Epstein” in direct messages on the app, sparking speculation that discussion of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, who had ties to Mr Trump, was being censored on TikTok.
“We don’t have rules against sharing the name ‘Epstein’ in direct messages and are investigating why some users are experiencing issues,” TikTok’s spokesperson said.
“TikTok
USA is broken,” is how technology news website The Verge summed it up.

Date: 29/01/2026 08:20:30
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2354856
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Some users reported not being able to use the word “Epstein” in direct messages on the app, sparking speculation that discussion of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, who had ties to Mr Trump, was being censored on TikTok.
“We don’t have rules against sharing the name ‘Epstein’ in direct messages and are investigating why some users are experiencing issues,” TikTok’s spokesperson said.
“TikTok USA is broken,” is how technology news website The Verge summed it up.

It’s not just Epstein. I’m reading reports of videos critical of Trump or ICE being removed too.
Date: 29/01/2026 08:21:54
From: Michael V
ID: 2354857
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:
Some users reported not being able to use the word “Epstein” in direct messages on the app, sparking speculation that discussion of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, who had ties to Mr Trump, was being censored on TikTok.
“We don’t have rules against sharing the name ‘Epstein’ in direct messages and are investigating why some users are experiencing issues,” TikTok’s spokesperson said.
“TikTok USA is broken,” is how technology news website The Verge summed it up.

It’s not just Epstein. I’m reading reports of videos critical of Trump or ICE being removed too.
Hmmmmm.
Date: 29/01/2026 08:25:20
From: Michael V
ID: 2354859
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
This video (about 1 minute) explains the Alex Pretti thing quite compehensively:
https://img-9gag-fun.9cache.com/photo/a9ywXM1_460svvp9.webm
That is very well done. Thanks for sharing, captain_s.
Date: 29/01/2026 08:35:34
From: roughbarked
ID: 2354861
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:
Some users reported not being able to use the word “Epstein” in direct messages on the app, sparking speculation that discussion of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, who had ties to Mr Trump, was being censored on TikTok.
“We don’t have rules against sharing the name ‘Epstein’ in direct messages and are investigating why some users are experiencing issues,” TikTok’s spokesperson said.
“TikTok USA is broken,” is how technology news website The Verge summed it up.

It’s not just Epstein. I’m reading reports of videos critical of Trump or ICE being removed too.
My only hope is that this Trump bullshit comes to an end soon.
Date: 29/01/2026 08:36:50
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2354864
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Not really politics but it is Trump’s lackeys being petty.

Date: 29/01/2026 08:37:08
From: Michael V
ID: 2354865
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:
Some users reported not being able to use the word “Epstein” in direct messages on the app, sparking speculation that discussion of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, who had ties to Mr Trump, was being censored on TikTok.
“We don’t have rules against sharing the name ‘Epstein’ in direct messages and are investigating why some users are experiencing issues,” TikTok’s spokesperson said.
“TikTok USA is broken,” is how technology news website The Verge summed it up.

It’s not just Epstein. I’m reading reports of videos critical of Trump or ICE being removed too.
My only hope is that this Trump bullshit comes to an end soon.
One year down. Three to go.
Date: 29/01/2026 08:38:58
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2354866
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Not really politics but it is Trump’s lackeys being petty.

It’s in the employee break room, not in a customer area wtf
Date: 29/01/2026 08:47:07
From: Michael V
ID: 2354869
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Not really politics but it is Trump’s lackeys being petty.

Maybe ice-cream service 24/7 might generate more good reviews.
That’s like telling a child that you will continue belting them until they stop crying.
Date: 29/01/2026 10:42:51
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354887
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:
Not really politics but it is Trump’s lackeys being petty.

Maybe ice-cream service 24/7 might generate more good reviews.
That’s like telling a child that you will continue belting them until they stop crying.
but it’s branded Taylor they can’t be happy with that
Date: 29/01/2026 10:45:59
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354891
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:
Some users reported not being able to use the word “Epstein” in direct messages on the app, sparking speculation that discussion of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, who had ties to Mr Trump, was being censored on TikTok.
“We don’t have rules against sharing the name ‘Epstein’ in direct messages and are investigating why some users are experiencing issues,” TikTok’s spokesperson said.
“TikTok USA is broken,” is how technology news website The Verge summed it up.

It’s not just Epstein. I’m reading reports of videos critical of Trump or ICE being removed too.
Hmmmmm.
wait we thought CHINA were the big bad police state who were going to abuse their control of tiktok when they owned it, what are these lies about fascist USSA doing it better
Date: 29/01/2026 12:12:17
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354937
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
alleged
The two agents who fatally shot a man in Minneapolis over the weekend have been on administrative leave since Saturday, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said on Wednesday, as Donald Trump tried to quell the backlash even while immigration raids in the city continued.
Date: 29/01/2026 12:18:43
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354941
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 29/01/2026 12:22:37
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2354946
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
what a legend and a great defender of women
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-01-29/barron-trump-intervention-helps-convict-russian-man-of-assault/106281372
Matvei Rumiantsev, obviously one of them foreigners.
Date: 29/01/2026 12:37:55
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2354950
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Posted yesterday by Hakeem Jeffries (Democrat Minority Leader of the U.S House of Representatives) on the Threads conversational app

(https://www.threads.com/@repjeffries/post/DUBgWNhEfUJ):
Date: 29/01/2026 12:50:19
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2354956
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Apparently China is drafting laws for the United States now:
Trump in Iowa on Tuesday:

https://youtu.be/efhzHSVDkNM
(He’s talking about changing the law to allow petrol with 15% ethanol in it to be sold year-round in the US, because for no sane reason at all, that isn’t the case at the moment.)
Date: 29/01/2026 12:55:11
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2354957
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
At the same rally, he claimed that people who protested against his government’s ‘policies’ and actions could be identified as ‘paid actors’ because they carried signs which appeared to have been professionally printed.
His mental faculties have been in obvious decline for a long time, but it now appears that his eyesight is also failing significantly.
Date: 29/01/2026 12:58:45
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2354960
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
At the same rally, he claimed that people who protested against his government’s ‘policies’ and actions could be identified as ‘paid actors’ because they carried signs which appeared to have been professionally printed.
His mental faculties have been in obvious decline for a long time, but it now appears that his eyesight is also failing significantly.
Oh no!
Anyway…
Date: 29/01/2026 12:59:55
From: Cymek
ID: 2354962
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Posted yesterday by Hakeem Jeffries (Democrat Minority Leader of the U.S House of Representatives) on the Threads conversational app

(https://www.threads.com/@repjeffries/post/DUBgWNhEfUJ):
So its numbers that matter when killing ones own citizens
Iran is bad and I don’t think people disagree, so a carrier fleet is sent to stop it.
Imagine if someone sent a fleet to the USA to do the same.
Date: 29/01/2026 13:00:08
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2354963
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
captain_spalding said:
At the same rally, he claimed that people who protested against his government’s ‘policies’ and actions could be identified as ‘paid actors’ because they carried signs which appeared to have been professionally printed.
His mental faculties have been in obvious decline for a long time, but it now appears that his eyesight is also failing significantly.
Oh no!
Anyway…
Yes, it’s of little import.
He’ll be dead soon.
Date: 29/01/2026 13:00:42
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2354964
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
captain_spalding said:
Posted yesterday by Hakeem Jeffries (Democrat Minority Leader of the U.S House of Representatives) on the Threads conversational app

(https://www.threads.com/@repjeffries/post/DUBgWNhEfUJ):
So its numbers that matter when killing ones own citizens
Iran is bad and I don’t think people disagree, so a carrier fleet is sent to stop it.
Imagine if someone sent a fleet to the USA to do the same.
Well, if we still had an aircraft carrier or two…
Date: 29/01/2026 13:40:11
From: fsm
ID: 2354979
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 29/01/2026 13:43:00
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2354981
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
fsm said:

Can you deport a movie?
Date: 29/01/2026 13:46:57
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354982
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Apparently China is drafting laws for the United States now:
Trump in Iowa on Tuesday:

https://youtu.be/efhzHSVDkNM
(He’s talking about changing the law to allow petrol with 15% ethanol in it to be sold year-round in the US, because for no sane reason at all, that isn’t the case at the moment.)
sorry we don’t get it what does it have to do with CHINA even if they’re dirty
but yes it’s mildly amusing yet quite horrifying that “CHINA” is the actual kill switch for any higher brain function whatsoever, the thought-terminating cliche, if you want your fascists to drop everything and stare to attention just say “CHINA CHINA CHINA” and like magic the misdirection hypnosis is in play
Date: 29/01/2026 13:48:12
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354983
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
fsm said:

Can you deport a movie?
American Cultural Exports Great
Date: 29/01/2026 13:56:35
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2354985
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Seems there’s an embargo on official reviews. Never a good sign. Actual reviews will be hard to come by as people will brigade to Rotten Tomatoes, IMDb, Letterboxd etc to negatively review it. Those early reviews won’t be available to see as the film hasn’t been released yet.
Unfortunately it was released too late to qualify for this year’s Golden Raspberry Awards.
Can’t wait for the shit to hit the industrial floor fan 🍿 I don’t plan on watching it myself.
Date: 29/01/2026 14:11:02
From: Cymek
ID: 2354987
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
captain_spalding said:
Apparently China is drafting laws for the United States now:
Trump in Iowa on Tuesday:

https://youtu.be/efhzHSVDkNM
(He’s talking about changing the law to allow petrol with 15% ethanol in it to be sold year-round in the US, because for no sane reason at all, that isn’t the case at the moment.)
sorry we don’t get it what does it have to do with CHINA even if they’re dirty
but yes it’s mildly amusing yet quite horrifying that “CHINA” is the actual kill switch for any higher brain function whatsoever, the thought-terminating cliche, if you want your fascists to drop everything and stare to attention just say “CHINA CHINA CHINA” and like magic the misdirection hypnosis is in play
I’m not quite sure how the world expects China to act.
I’m not pro-China but they aren’t some faceless evil empire.
Some of the actions of so called friendly nations over the years have been abhorrent.
Do people really not have a clue of the bigger picture of human civilisation.
So much underhanded and overt action to maintain the status quo.
Devalue the enemy so your population believe they don’t have human feelings
Date: 29/01/2026 14:24:32
From: dv
ID: 2354992
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://youtu.be/ZgRTyKbkDUo?si=3s26b191nlgwbYPE
The effects of NY congestion pricing, 12 months on
Date: 29/01/2026 14:49:48
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354995
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
captain_spalding said:
Apparently China is drafting laws for the United States now:
Trump in Iowa on Tuesday:

https://youtu.be/efhzHSVDkNM
(He’s talking about changing the law to allow petrol with 15% ethanol in it to be sold year-round in the US, because for no sane reason at all, that isn’t the case at the moment.)
sorry we don’t get it what does it have to do with CHINA even if they’re dirty
but yes it’s mildly amusing yet quite horrifying that “CHINA” is the actual kill switch for any higher brain function whatsoever, the thought-terminating cliche, if you want your fascists to drop everything and stare to attention just say “CHINA CHINA CHINA” and like magic the misdirection hypnosis is in play
I’m not quite sure how the world expects China to act.
I’m not pro-China but they aren’t some faceless evil empire.
Some of the actions of so called friendly nations over the years have been abhorrent.
Do people really not have a clue of the bigger picture of human civilisation.
So much underhanded and overt action to maintain the status quo.
Devalue the enemy so your population believe they don’t have human feelings
nah we’re more simple minded than that, we’re just saying it seems easy to blame everything on the bogeyman CHINAman, but then when it turns out they’ve been propping up everyone’s standards of living and freedoms and access and opportunities for 20 years and nobody realises so they try to cut themselves off from CHINA what’s the plan after that
Date: 29/01/2026 14:54:29
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2354996
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
sorry we don’t get it what does it have to do with CHINA even if they’re dirty
but yes it’s mildly amusing yet quite horrifying that “CHINA” is the actual kill switch for any higher brain function whatsoever, the thought-terminating cliche, if you want your fascists to drop everything and stare to attention just say “CHINA CHINA CHINA” and like magic the misdirection hypnosis is in play
I’m not quite sure how the world expects China to act.
I’m not pro-China but they aren’t some faceless evil empire.
Some of the actions of so called friendly nations over the years have been abhorrent.
Do people really not have a clue of the bigger picture of human civilisation.
So much underhanded and overt action to maintain the status quo.
Devalue the enemy so your population believe they don’t have human feelings
nah we’re more simple minded than that, we’re just saying it seems easy to blame everything on the bogeyman CHINAman, but then when it turns out they’ve been propping up everyone’s standards of living and freedoms and access and opportunities for 20 years and nobody realises so they try to cut themselves off from CHINA what’s the plan after that
India.
Date: 29/01/2026 15:00:14
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354997
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:
Cymek said:
I’m not quite sure how the world expects China to act.
I’m not pro-China but they aren’t some faceless evil empire.
Some of the actions of so called friendly nations over the years have been abhorrent.
Do people really not have a clue of the bigger picture of human civilisation.
So much underhanded and overt action to maintain the status quo.
Devalue the enemy so your population believe they don’t have human feelings
nah we’re more simple minded than that, we’re just saying it seems easy to blame everything on the bogeyman CHINAman, but then when it turns out they’ve been propping up everyone’s standards of living and freedoms and access and opportunities for 20 years and nobody realises so they try to cut themselves off from CHINA what’s the plan after that
India.
good luck with that white replacement concern
Date: 29/01/2026 15:10:19
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2354998
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
SCIENCE said:
captain_spalding said:
dv said:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15504293/ICE-agent-Ecuador-consulate-Minneapolis.html
Oh, no, he’s not asking them to give him asylum so that he can harangue the press from their balcony for four or five years, is he?
sorry we don’t understand
how did international law prevent infringements in say Venezuela of late
Good thinking, Venezuela should have declared the whole country to be a consulate
alleged
The captain and first officer of a Russian-flagged oil tanker have been taken out of UK territory by US Coast Guards. The Americans seized the vessel, the Marinera, on 7 January south of Iceland before sailing it to the Moray coast, east of Inverness. The US Department of Justice told Scottish authorities on Tuesday morning that the skipper, Avtandil Kalandadze, and his unnamed colleague were on board the US Coast Guard vessel Munro. Scotland’s Justice Secretary Angela Constance said the episode had shown a lack of respect for “Scottish jurisdiction and Scots law”.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgqep9pvygko
Date: 29/01/2026 15:26:20
From: Michael V
ID: 2355004
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Seems there’s an embargo on official reviews. Never a good sign. Actual reviews will be hard to come by as people will brigade to Rotten Tomatoes, IMDb, Letterboxd etc to negatively review it. Those early reviews won’t be available to see as the film hasn’t been released yet.
Unfortunately it was released too late to qualify for this year’s Golden Raspberry Awards.
Can’t wait for the shit to hit the industrial floor fan 🍿 I don’t plan on watching it myself.
Fk Trump.
Date: 29/01/2026 15:47:11
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2355017
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
seems a proportionate response

Date: 29/01/2026 19:05:56
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2355121
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
alleged

apparently they made laws to protect conscientious objection so the provider is now conscientiously objecting
Date: 29/01/2026 20:46:12
From: dv
ID: 2355144
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 29/01/2026 21:37:17
From: dv
ID: 2355152
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 29/01/2026 21:40:34
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2355153
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

Never heard of Greg Bovino
Date: 29/01/2026 21:44:21
From: roughbarked
ID: 2355154
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:

Never heard of Greg Bovino
Isn’t he that bloke who Trump sacked?
Date: 29/01/2026 21:56:05
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 2355160
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
David Hollis is feeling angry in Minneapolis, MN, United States.
MAGA is having a full-on toddler tantrum because some hipster coffee shops and breweries in Minneapolis are slapping “NO ICE SERVED HERE” signs in their windows like it’s the new “No Shirt, No Shoes, No Service” rule. And the meltdown? Chef’s kiss levels of delicious irony.
These are the same people who spent YEARS screaming from the rooftops: “Businesses have RIGHTS! They shouldn’t be FORCED to bake cakes or design websites for people whose lifestyles offend their delicate sensibilities! First Amendment! Religious freedom! SCOTUS said so in 303 Creative! WOOHOO!”
They popped champagne when the Supreme Court basically gave a golden high-five to any creative business owner who wanted to say, “Sorry, my deeply held beliefs mean I can’t serve you.” They called it liberty. They called it winning. They called anyone who disagreed a communist tyrant.
Fast-forward to 2026: ICE agents are rolling through Minneapolis like it’s a Call of Duty map—smashing car windows, detaining folks, tragic shootings (RIP Renee Good and others caught in the crossfire), schools locking down, businesses bleeding customers because nobody wants to shop next to masked feds with guns.
And now? Local spots are like, “Nah, bro. No warrant? No latte. No judicial signature? No craft IPA. Private property, baby—your rules, remember?”
And suddenly the same crowd that cheered “let bakers be bakers” is clutching their pearls: “This is DISCRIMINATION! Boycott these woke fascists! How DARE they refuse service to hardworking law enforcement!” Ted Nugent’s out here funding DoorDash for ICE like it’s a GoFundMe for persecuted heroes. Influencers are filming themselves getting turned away at Hilton desks, crying into their phones about “the rule of law” while conveniently forgetting they spent half a decade arguing the exact opposite.
Bro.
You literally sued for the constitutional right to tell certain people “no thanks” based on your beliefs. You won! You got the green light from the highest court in the land! And now that the shoe is on the other foot—except this time it’s not about who someone loves, it’s about who someone works for—you’re losing your minds? You’re melting down harder than a snowman in a sauna?
This is peak 2026 energy. You asked for businesses to have the freedom to discriminate on principle. You got it. Now businesses are using that freedom to say, “Principle: We don’t vibe with masked dudes raiding our neighborhoods and shooting unarmed locals. Door’s that way.” And you’re mad? Cry me a river of Freedom Fries, my dudes.
You can’t have it both ways. Either private businesses get to say “no” when it offends their conscience… or they don’t. Pick a lane. Because right now, the only thing melting faster than your outrage is your credibility.
Keep seething. The popcorn’s on me.
Date: 29/01/2026 21:59:41
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2355162
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ChrispenEvan said:
David Hollis is feeling angry in Minneapolis, MN, United States.
MAGA is having a full-on toddler tantrum because some hipster coffee shops and breweries in Minneapolis are slapping “NO ICE SERVED HERE” signs in their windows like it’s the new “No Shirt, No Shoes, No Service” rule. And the meltdown? Chef’s kiss levels of delicious irony.
These are the same people who spent YEARS screaming from the rooftops: “Businesses have RIGHTS! They shouldn’t be FORCED to bake cakes or design websites for people whose lifestyles offend their delicate sensibilities! First Amendment! Religious freedom! SCOTUS said so in 303 Creative! WOOHOO!”
They popped champagne when the Supreme Court basically gave a golden high-five to any creative business owner who wanted to say, “Sorry, my deeply held beliefs mean I can’t serve you.” They called it liberty. They called it winning. They called anyone who disagreed a communist tyrant.
Fast-forward to 2026: ICE agents are rolling through Minneapolis like it’s a Call of Duty map—smashing car windows, detaining folks, tragic shootings (RIP Renee Good and others caught in the crossfire), schools locking down, businesses bleeding customers because nobody wants to shop next to masked feds with guns.
And now? Local spots are like, “Nah, bro. No warrant? No latte. No judicial signature? No craft IPA. Private property, baby—your rules, remember?”
And suddenly the same crowd that cheered “let bakers be bakers” is clutching their pearls: “This is DISCRIMINATION! Boycott these woke fascists! How DARE they refuse service to hardworking law enforcement!” Ted Nugent’s out here funding DoorDash for ICE like it’s a GoFundMe for persecuted heroes. Influencers are filming themselves getting turned away at Hilton desks, crying into their phones about “the rule of law” while conveniently forgetting they spent half a decade arguing the exact opposite.
Bro.
You literally sued for the constitutional right to tell certain people “no thanks” based on your beliefs. You won! You got the green light from the highest court in the land! And now that the shoe is on the other foot—except this time it’s not about who someone loves, it’s about who someone works for—you’re losing your minds? You’re melting down harder than a snowman in a sauna?
This is peak 2026 energy. You asked for businesses to have the freedom to discriminate on principle. You got it. Now businesses are using that freedom to say, “Principle: We don’t vibe with masked dudes raiding our neighborhoods and shooting unarmed locals. Door’s that way.” And you’re mad? Cry me a river of Freedom Fries, my dudes.
You can’t have it both ways. Either private businesses get to say “no” when it offends their conscience… or they don’t. Pick a lane. Because right now, the only thing melting faster than your outrage is your credibility.
Keep seething. The popcorn’s on me.
so they’ve discovered that there is a solution to the paradox of tolerance and that is that reality is not an idealized set theory
Date: 29/01/2026 22:04:48
From: roughbarked
ID: 2355163
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
ChrispenEvan said:
This is peak 2026 energy. You asked for businesses to have the freedom to discriminate on principle. You got it. Now businesses are using that freedom to say, “Principle: We don’t vibe with masked dudes raiding our neighborhoods and shooting unarmed locals. Door’s that way.” And you’re mad? Cry me a river of Freedom Fries, my dudes.
You can’t have it both ways. Either private businesses get to say “no” when it offends their conscience… or they don’t. Pick a lane. Because right now, the only thing melting faster than your outrage is your credibility.
Keep seething. The popcorn’s on me.
so they’ve discovered that there is a solution to the paradox of tolerance and that is that reality is not an idealized set theory
You say you want a revolution
Date: 29/01/2026 22:08:44
From: Michael V
ID: 2355165
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ChrispenEvan said:
David Hollis is feeling angry in Minneapolis, MN, United States.
MAGA is having a full-on toddler tantrum because some hipster coffee shops and breweries in Minneapolis are slapping “NO ICE SERVED HERE” signs in their windows like it’s the new “No Shirt, No Shoes, No Service” rule. And the meltdown? Chef’s kiss levels of delicious irony.
These are the same people who spent YEARS screaming from the rooftops: “Businesses have RIGHTS! They shouldn’t be FORCED to bake cakes or design websites for people whose lifestyles offend their delicate sensibilities! First Amendment! Religious freedom! SCOTUS said so in 303 Creative! WOOHOO!”
They popped champagne when the Supreme Court basically gave a golden high-five to any creative business owner who wanted to say, “Sorry, my deeply held beliefs mean I can’t serve you.” They called it liberty. They called it winning. They called anyone who disagreed a communist tyrant.
Fast-forward to 2026: ICE agents are rolling through Minneapolis like it’s a Call of Duty map—smashing car windows, detaining folks, tragic shootings (RIP Renee Good and others caught in the crossfire), schools locking down, businesses bleeding customers because nobody wants to shop next to masked feds with guns.
And now? Local spots are like, “Nah, bro. No warrant? No latte. No judicial signature? No craft IPA. Private property, baby—your rules, remember?”
And suddenly the same crowd that cheered “let bakers be bakers” is clutching their pearls: “This is DISCRIMINATION! Boycott these woke fascists! How DARE they refuse service to hardworking law enforcement!” Ted Nugent’s out here funding DoorDash for ICE like it’s a GoFundMe for persecuted heroes. Influencers are filming themselves getting turned away at Hilton desks, crying into their phones about “the rule of law” while conveniently forgetting they spent half a decade arguing the exact opposite.
Bro.
You literally sued for the constitutional right to tell certain people “no thanks” based on your beliefs. You won! You got the green light from the highest court in the land! And now that the shoe is on the other foot—except this time it’s not about who someone loves, it’s about who someone works for—you’re losing your minds? You’re melting down harder than a snowman in a sauna?
This is peak 2026 energy. You asked for businesses to have the freedom to discriminate on principle. You got it. Now businesses are using that freedom to say, “Principle: We don’t vibe with masked dudes raiding our neighborhoods and shooting unarmed locals. Door’s that way.” And you’re mad? Cry me a river of Freedom Fries, my dudes.
You can’t have it both ways. Either private businesses get to say “no” when it offends their conscience… or they don’t. Pick a lane. Because right now, the only thing melting faster than your outrage is your credibility.
Keep seething. The popcorn’s on me.
:)
Date: 29/01/2026 23:09:47
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2355176
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 29/01/2026 23:11:33
From: roughbarked
ID: 2355177
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:

Please miss flight attendant.. Parachute please.
Date: 29/01/2026 23:28:05
From: roughbarked
ID: 2355180
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Carney didn’t flinch. It upset the Trump camp
Trump Official MELTS DOWN After Carney Exposed His Lie on TV
Date: 29/01/2026 23:29:31
From: dv
ID: 2355181
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:

Never heard of Greg Bovino
He’s been mentioned 16 times in this thread alone, but not everyone is a completist. I too miss much.
Date: 29/01/2026 23:44:06
From: kii
ID: 2355183
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:

Never heard of Greg Bovino
And he’s probably never heard of you.
Date: 30/01/2026 06:49:00
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2355195
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
fsm said:

Can you deport a movie?
American Cultural Exports Great
Only to Slovenia.
Date: 30/01/2026 06:58:16
From: Neophyte
ID: 2355196
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
SCIENCE said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Can you deport a movie?
American Cultural Exports Great
Only to Slovenia.

Date: 30/01/2026 07:10:42
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2355197
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Neophyte said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
SCIENCE said:
American Cultural Exports Great
Only to Slovenia.

:)
Date: 30/01/2026 07:43:45
From: fsm
ID: 2355199
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 30/01/2026 07:53:45
From: roughbarked
ID: 2355200
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
fsm said:

Send her the Nurmeberg trials video.
Date: 30/01/2026 07:57:04
From: Michael V
ID: 2355203
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
fsm said:

Riiiiight.
Date: 30/01/2026 07:59:26
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2355205
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
fsm said:

Send her the Nurmeberg trials video.
alleged
Historically, the plea of superior orders has been used both before and after the Nuremberg Trials, with inconsistent rulings, up to the final ruling of International Criminal Court in the Prosecutor v Ntaganda case.
Date: 30/01/2026 08:11:06
From: roughbarked
ID: 2355211
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
fsm said:

Send her the Nurmeberg trials video.
alleged
Historically, the plea of superior orders has been used both before and after the Nuremberg Trials, with inconsistent rulings, up to the final ruling of International Criminal Court in the Prosecutor v Ntaganda case.
OK well send her that one.
Date: 30/01/2026 08:30:44
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 2355220
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Carrick Ryan
It’s worth remembering that while Trump demands Iran “make a deal” with him, they already made one with Obama more than a decade ago – Trump tore it up. Importantly, the deal not only had the support of Iran, but the rest of the world.
The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) was a deal signed by Iran and the U.S., U.K., France, Russia, China, and Germany, with the explicit intention of preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon while simultaneously reintroducing the regime into the international community.
It was essentially a collection of technical limitations on Iran’s nuclear program, designed to extend the “breakout time”, the time required for Iran to produce enough fissile material for a weapon, to at least 12 months.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was to be guaranteed access to inspect and monitor sites, and even potentially “undeclared” sites through a defined dispute resolution system.
In return, Iran would receive substantial sanctions relief, including the unfreezing of billions of dollars in Iranian assets and foreign currency reserves.
Of course, it wasn’t perfect. It relied on a lot of trust. But most experts agreed that while the deal may have strengthened the regime economically, it would have made it incredibly difficult for Iran to develop a nuclear weapon without early detection.
It was the result of true diplomacy. A brilliant and well constructed attempt by a genuine statesman to literally bring traditional adversaries to the table and find common ground in the pursuit of global peace.
So… why did it fail?
Fox News and other right wing media railed against the deal and propagated a lie that Obama had literally paid the Iranians billions of dollars (he had actually just returned Iran’s own money that had been frozen as a result or sanctions).
Netenyahu, in particular, aggressively criticised the deal as a “historic mistake”, and urged Republicans to oppose the deal during a speech to Congress (while Obama was still President!).
Then… in 2018, Trump withdrew from the deal, calling it “the worst deal ever.”
The Europeans, Chinese, and Russians attempted to continue the deal without the U.S., but Trump not only reimposed sanctions — he added new ones.
Iran initially complied, but after about a year of inaction, it began incrementally breaching the agreement and recommenced enrichment programs that had been ceased under the deal.
Perhaps most tragically, the Iranian President who had signed the deal, Hassan Rouhani, was a moderate who had hung his reputation on this engagement with the West. He advocated for the deal within Iran as an alternate path to indefinite hostility. He and Obama seemed to genuinely believe that a new relationship was possible.
Trump demonstrated to the Iranian people that any deal with the USA was meaningless. In the next election, a hardline and anti-Western cleric named Ebrahim Raisi was elected President of Iran, riding a wave of resentment from this American betrayal.
Raisi dramatically intensified Iran’s hostile posture toward the West and increased military support for its proxies across the region, while also accelerating Iran’s nuclear program.
So much of the instability in the region today — in Israel, Yemen, Lebanon, and even Sudan — can be attributed, to some degree, to Trump’s reckless unilateral decision to tear up Obama’s nuclear deal… seemingly out of spite more than anything.
Iran could have been brought in from the cold and become a stabilising presence in the region. Instead, they’re providing drones to bomb Ukrainian cities, fighting proxy wars through Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis… and are now at war with Israel.
The big question now is why on earth would the Iranians trust any new deal with the US will be honoured when the last one was simply torn up by the next President?
Date: 30/01/2026 08:37:31
From: Michael V
ID: 2355222
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ChrispenEvan said:
Carrick Ryan
It’s worth remembering that while Trump demands Iran “make a deal” with him, they already made one with Obama more than a decade ago – Trump tore it up. Importantly, the deal not only had the support of Iran, but the rest of the world.
The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) was a deal signed by Iran and the U.S., U.K., France, Russia, China, and Germany, with the explicit intention of preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon while simultaneously reintroducing the regime into the international community.
It was essentially a collection of technical limitations on Iran’s nuclear program, designed to extend the “breakout time”, the time required for Iran to produce enough fissile material for a weapon, to at least 12 months.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was to be guaranteed access to inspect and monitor sites, and even potentially “undeclared” sites through a defined dispute resolution system.
In return, Iran would receive substantial sanctions relief, including the unfreezing of billions of dollars in Iranian assets and foreign currency reserves.
Of course, it wasn’t perfect. It relied on a lot of trust. But most experts agreed that while the deal may have strengthened the regime economically, it would have made it incredibly difficult for Iran to develop a nuclear weapon without early detection.
It was the result of true diplomacy. A brilliant and well constructed attempt by a genuine statesman to literally bring traditional adversaries to the table and find common ground in the pursuit of global peace.
So… why did it fail?
Fox News and other right wing media railed against the deal and propagated a lie that Obama had literally paid the Iranians billions of dollars (he had actually just returned Iran’s own money that had been frozen as a result or sanctions).
Netenyahu, in particular, aggressively criticised the deal as a “historic mistake”, and urged Republicans to oppose the deal during a speech to Congress (while Obama was still President!).
Then… in 2018, Trump withdrew from the deal, calling it “the worst deal ever.”
The Europeans, Chinese, and Russians attempted to continue the deal without the U.S., but Trump not only reimposed sanctions — he added new ones.
Iran initially complied, but after about a year of inaction, it began incrementally breaching the agreement and recommenced enrichment programs that had been ceased under the deal.
Perhaps most tragically, the Iranian President who had signed the deal, Hassan Rouhani, was a moderate who had hung his reputation on this engagement with the West. He advocated for the deal within Iran as an alternate path to indefinite hostility. He and Obama seemed to genuinely believe that a new relationship was possible.
Trump demonstrated to the Iranian people that any deal with the USA was meaningless. In the next election, a hardline and anti-Western cleric named Ebrahim Raisi was elected President of Iran, riding a wave of resentment from this American betrayal.
Raisi dramatically intensified Iran’s hostile posture toward the West and increased military support for its proxies across the region, while also accelerating Iran’s nuclear program.
So much of the instability in the region today — in Israel, Yemen, Lebanon, and even Sudan — can be attributed, to some degree, to Trump’s reckless unilateral decision to tear up Obama’s nuclear deal… seemingly out of spite more than anything.
Iran could have been brought in from the cold and become a stabilising presence in the region. Instead, they’re providing drones to bomb Ukrainian cities, fighting proxy wars through Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis… and are now at war with Israel.
The big question now is why on earth would the Iranians trust any new deal with the US will be honoured when the last one was simply torn up by the next President?
Very fair summation.
Date: 30/01/2026 08:43:43
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2355223
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ChrispenEvan said:
Carrick Ryan
It’s worth remembering that while Trump demands Iran “make a deal” with him, they already made one with Obama more than a decade ago – Trump tore it up. Importantly, the deal not only had the support of Iran, but the rest of the world.
The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) was a deal signed by Iran and the U.S., U.K., France, Russia, China, and Germany, with the explicit intention of preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon while simultaneously reintroducing the regime into the international community.
It was essentially a collection of technical limitations on Iran’s nuclear program, designed to extend the “breakout time”, the time required for Iran to produce enough fissile material for a weapon, to at least 12 months.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was to be guaranteed access to inspect and monitor sites, and even potentially “undeclared” sites through a defined dispute resolution system.
In return, Iran would receive substantial sanctions relief, including the unfreezing of billions of dollars in Iranian assets and foreign currency reserves.
Of course, it wasn’t perfect. It relied on a lot of trust. But most experts agreed that while the deal may have strengthened the regime economically, it would have made it incredibly difficult for Iran to develop a nuclear weapon without early detection.
It was the result of true diplomacy. A brilliant and well constructed attempt by a genuine statesman to literally bring traditional adversaries to the table and find common ground in the pursuit of global peace.
So… why did it fail?
Fox News and other right wing media railed against the deal and propagated a lie that Obama had literally paid the Iranians billions of dollars (he had actually just returned Iran’s own money that had been frozen as a result or sanctions).
Netenyahu, in particular, aggressively criticised the deal as a “historic mistake”, and urged Republicans to oppose the deal during a speech to Congress (while Obama was still President!).
Then… in 2018, Trump withdrew from the deal, calling it “the worst deal ever.”
The Europeans, Chinese, and Russians attempted to continue the deal without the U.S., but Trump not only reimposed sanctions — he added new ones.
Iran initially complied, but after about a year of inaction, it began incrementally breaching the agreement and recommenced enrichment programs that had been ceased under the deal.
Perhaps most tragically, the Iranian President who had signed the deal, Hassan Rouhani, was a moderate who had hung his reputation on this engagement with the West. He advocated for the deal within Iran as an alternate path to indefinite hostility. He and Obama seemed to genuinely believe that a new relationship was possible.
Trump demonstrated to the Iranian people that any deal with the USA was meaningless. In the next election, a hardline and anti-Western cleric named Ebrahim Raisi was elected President of Iran, riding a wave of resentment from this American betrayal.
Raisi dramatically intensified Iran’s hostile posture toward the West and increased military support for its proxies across the region, while also accelerating Iran’s nuclear program.
So much of the instability in the region today — in Israel, Yemen, Lebanon, and even Sudan — can be attributed, to some degree, to Trump’s reckless unilateral decision to tear up Obama’s nuclear deal… seemingly out of spite more than anything.
Iran could have been brought in from the cold and become a stabilising presence in the region. Instead, they’re providing drones to bomb Ukrainian cities, fighting proxy wars through Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis… and are now at war with Israel.
The big question now is why on earth would the Iranians trust any new deal with the US will be honoured when the last one was simply torn up by the next President?
Because…
There’s a beautiful armada, beautifully sailing, with beautiful people, beautiful ships with beautiful jets will drop beautiful bombs, if they don’t sign my beautiful deal.
Date: 30/01/2026 09:00:28
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 2355226
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Jermaine Fowler
January 28, 2026 (Wednesday)
If they were going to build state-sponsored media in America, they wouldn’t announce it.
For months, the warnings spread like rumor. Delete it. Get your kids off it. The Chinese are watching. The algorithm is feeding them propaganda, depression, rage. A hundred and fifty million Americans on a single app, scrolling ninety-five minutes a day, and the servers sat in Beijing. Lawmakers called it a national security threat. Parents called it digital fentanyl. TikTok is spying on your children, they said. TikTok is brainwashing a generation.
The dread was real. The danger may have been real. So they forced a sale.
And five days ago, the app that terrified them changed hands. Now the dread has a different shape.
Yesterday, a woman in a Chicago salon, still in her smock between clients, propped her iPhone against the mirror and recorded a video about ICE. Thirty seconds. Posted it. Went back to work.
An hour later: zero views.
She deleted it. Recorded again, this time using emojis. 🧊 instead of ICE, thinking maybe the algorithm flags certain words. Posted it. Checked again before bed, the screen bright in her hand.
Still zero.
The next morning, she posted a video of her latte. Three thousand views by noon.
Across the country, similar reports. A father in Minneapolis, 400,000 followers, posting about Palestine: zero views. A physical therapist in New Jersey typing “Epstein” into a direct message, watching the app freeze, a warning appearing: This message may be in violation of our Community Guidelines. CNBC reporters reproduced the error on camera, typing the same name, getting the same block.
TikTok blamed a power outage at a data center.
Users described an outage that seemed to know the difference between British users and American users. An outage that triggered when you typed a name. An outage that affected political content but not dance videos, ICE but not coffee, Gaza but not lipstick tutorials.
This was the app that showed Minneapolis burning when the networks cut away.
For ten minutes on May 25, 2020, a seventeen-year-old named Darnella Frazier held her phone steady and recorded a police officer kneeling on George Floyd’s neck. She posted it. It spread. The world saw what the official story would have buried: that he called for his mother, that bystanders begged the officer to stop, that it took eight minutes and forty-six seconds for a man to die on a sidewalk in America.
TikTok didn’t break that story. But TikTok became the place where stories like it couldn’t be contained. Gaza, when the networks looked away. ICE raids filmed in real time. Protests before the press arrived. For five years, it was the camera that couldn’t be managed, the signal that couldn’t be jammed, the place where ordinary people could make power visible without asking permission.
A hundred and fifty million Americans opened it every day. A third of teenagers said it was their primary news source. Not CNN. Not the Times. The algorithm.
And now the algorithm answers to someone new.
On January 22, 2026, a pop-up appeared on a hundred and fifty million American phones. A new privacy policy. Most people clicked through without reading. But the language had changed. TikTok now lists what it collects: racial or ethnic origin, national origin, religious beliefs, sexual orientation, citizenship, immigration status. That data existed before. But before, it flowed to ByteDance, a Chinese company with no stake in American deportation policy.
Now it flows to a different owner.
The consortium is led by Larry Ellison, executive chairman of Oracle, host to Trump at his Rancho Mirage estate.
In September 2024, Ellison told investors what kind of future he imagined. “Citizens will be on their best behavior,” he said, “because we are constantly recording and reporting everything that’s going on.”
This is the man whose company now sits closest to the infrastructure.
Within seventy-two hours of the ownership transfer, creators reported anti-Trump content throttled, videos about ICE stuck at zero, the word “Epstein” blocked in DMs. The same name the Justice Department was legally required to release files about forty days ago—and hasn’t. BBC and Guardian videos appeared visible in London, invisible in Los Angeles.
Uninstalls spiked, if only by anecdote: screenshots, goodbye posts, friends telling friends to delete it. On social media, people began describing the same sensation in different words: the feed felt newly policed. “I got rid of it,” one user wrote. “Nice side effect is a calmer brain.”
In an interview that fall, Netanyahu had been blunt: “The most important purchase that is going on right now is TikTok. I hope it goes through because it can be consequential.”
It went through.
People didn’t need proof of intent. They only needed the sensation: that the room had gained a guard.
Orwell didn’t imagine censorship as a bonfire. He imagined it as clerical work.
In 1984, when a man named Withers falls out of favor, he isn’t arrested in the square. He becomes an “unperson.” The records are edited. The photographs altered. “Withers, then, did not exist: he had never existed.” The newspaper still prints. The world still turns. But the public record has been silently revised, and no one can prove it was ever different.
State-sponsored media doesn’t announce itself. It looks like the app you already use, doing what apps already do: sorting content, recommending videos, deciding what spreads and what disappears. The difference is whose hand is on the dial. State-sponsored media is when the algorithm answers to power, when the content that vanishes is the content power wants vanished, when the glitch is always the explanation.
The woman in Chicago can watch her video on her own phone. It exists. But zero views means zero reach means zero presence in the public reality.
She wasn’t banned. She was just never there.
How would you know if it was intentional?
The algorithm has always been opaque. Content has always risen and fallen for reasons no one could explain. That opacity is the camouflage. Beneath it, suppression becomes indistinguishable from bad luck. It cannot be named, cannot be fought, cannot be proven.
The most effective censorship doesn’t delete. It throttles. It shadowbans. It lets your voice exist while ensuring no one hears it. And eventually, you stop posting what doesn’t spread. You learn which words the algorithm won’t carry. You try emojis. You try euphemisms. You watch what works for other people and start to mimic it. You censor yourself before anyone has to do it for you.
The woman in Chicago has started noticing patterns. Her videos about rent do fine. Her videos about traffic do fine. Anything about policy, about power, about the government doing something to someone: zero views. She doesn’t know if it’s real. She doesn’t know if she’s paranoid. She just knows what happens when she posts, and what doesn’t.
The threat was China. That’s what they said for years. A foreign adversary controlling the algorithm, manipulating what Americans see, collecting data on a hundred and fifty million citizens. A national security risk so severe it justified forcing a sale.
So they forced a sale.
And the platform that documented Minneapolis, that broadcast Gaza, that showed ICE raids in real time—now belongs to a man who dreams of constant surveillance, backed by a president who calls his consortium “Great American Patriots,” financed in part by twenty billion dollars from the United Arab Emirates.
The data collection hasn’t stopped. The algorithm still runs. Only now it’s American.
So it’s safe.
TikTok says the glitch has been resolved. The servers are stable.
The woman in Chicago checked her phone again this morning. The screen was bright in her hand. The video about ICE: still zero views. The video about her latte: twelve thousand.
She typed a caption about a raid in her neighborhood. Stopped. Deleted it. Typed it again. Deleted it again. Her thumb hovered over the post button, then drifted to the home screen instead.
She hasn’t posted about ICE since.
Date: 30/01/2026 09:22:53
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2355231
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
ChrispenEvan said:
Carrick Ryan
It’s worth remembering that while Trump demands Iran “make a deal” with him, they already made one with Obama more than a decade ago – Trump tore it up. Importantly, the deal not only had the support of Iran, but the rest of the world.
The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) was a deal signed by Iran and the U.S., U.K., France, Russia, China, and Germany, with the explicit intention of preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon while simultaneously reintroducing the regime into the international community.
It was essentially a collection of technical limitations on Iran’s nuclear program, designed to extend the “breakout time”, the time required for Iran to produce enough fissile material for a weapon, to at least 12 months.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was to be guaranteed access to inspect and monitor sites, and even potentially “undeclared” sites through a defined dispute resolution system.
In return, Iran would receive substantial sanctions relief, including the unfreezing of billions of dollars in Iranian assets and foreign currency reserves.
Of course, it wasn’t perfect. It relied on a lot of trust. But most experts agreed that while the deal may have strengthened the regime economically, it would have made it incredibly difficult for Iran to develop a nuclear weapon without early detection.
It was the result of true diplomacy. A brilliant and well constructed attempt by a genuine statesman to literally bring traditional adversaries to the table and find common ground in the pursuit of global peace.
So… why did it fail?
Fox News and other right wing media railed against the deal and propagated a lie that Obama had literally paid the Iranians billions of dollars (he had actually just returned Iran’s own money that had been frozen as a result or sanctions).
Netenyahu, in particular, aggressively criticised the deal as a “historic mistake”, and urged Republicans to oppose the deal during a speech to Congress (while Obama was still President!).
Then… in 2018, Trump withdrew from the deal, calling it “the worst deal ever.”
The Europeans, Chinese, and Russians attempted to continue the deal without the U.S., but Trump not only reimposed sanctions — he added new ones.
Iran initially complied, but after about a year of inaction, it began incrementally breaching the agreement and recommenced enrichment programs that had been ceased under the deal.
Perhaps most tragically, the Iranian President who had signed the deal, Hassan Rouhani, was a moderate who had hung his reputation on this engagement with the West. He advocated for the deal within Iran as an alternate path to indefinite hostility. He and Obama seemed to genuinely believe that a new relationship was possible.
Trump demonstrated to the Iranian people that any deal with the USA was meaningless. In the next election, a hardline and anti-Western cleric named Ebrahim Raisi was elected President of Iran, riding a wave of resentment from this American betrayal.
Raisi dramatically intensified Iran’s hostile posture toward the West and increased military support for its proxies across the region, while also accelerating Iran’s nuclear program.
So much of the instability in the region today — in Israel, Yemen, Lebanon, and even Sudan — can be attributed, to some degree, to Trump’s reckless unilateral decision to tear up Obama’s nuclear deal… seemingly out of spite more than anything.
Iran could have been brought in from the cold and become a stabilising presence in the region. Instead, they’re providing drones to bomb Ukrainian cities, fighting proxy wars through Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis… and are now at war with Israel.
The big question now is why on earth would the Iranians trust any new deal with the US will be honoured when the last one was simply torn up by the next President?
Because…
There’s a beautiful armada, beautifully sailing, with beautiful people, beautiful ships with beautiful jets will drop beautiful bombs, if they don’t sign my beautiful deal.
This highlights the problem with narcissism.
Date: 30/01/2026 09:32:59
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2355236
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ChrispenEvan said:
Jermaine Fowler
January 28, 2026 (Wednesday)
If they were going to build state-sponsored media in America, they wouldn’t announce it.
For months, the warnings spread like rumor. Delete it. Get your kids off it. The Chinese are watching. The algorithm is feeding them propaganda, depression, rage. A hundred and fifty million Americans on a single app, scrolling ninety-five minutes a day, and the servers sat in Beijing. Lawmakers called it a national security threat. Parents called it digital fentanyl. TikTok is spying on your children, they said. TikTok is brainwashing a generation.
The dread was real. The danger may have been real. So they forced a sale.
And five days ago, the app that terrified them changed hands. Now the dread has a different shape.
Yesterday, a woman in a Chicago salon, still in her smock between clients, propped her iPhone against the mirror and recorded a video about ICE. Thirty seconds. Posted it. Went back to work.
An hour later: zero views.
She deleted it. Recorded again, this time using emojis. 🧊 instead of ICE, thinking maybe the algorithm flags certain words. Posted it. Checked again before bed, the screen bright in her hand.
Still zero.
The next morning, she posted a video of her latte. Three thousand views by noon.
Across the country, similar reports. A father in Minneapolis, 400,000 followers, posting about Palestine: zero views. A physical therapist in New Jersey typing “Epstein” into a direct message, watching the app freeze, a warning appearing: This message may be in violation of our Community Guidelines. CNBC reporters reproduced the error on camera, typing the same name, getting the same block.
TikTok blamed a power outage at a data center.
Users described an outage that seemed to know the difference between British users and American users. An outage that triggered when you typed a name. An outage that affected political content but not dance videos, ICE but not coffee, Gaza but not lipstick tutorials.
This was the app that showed Minneapolis burning when the networks cut away.
For ten minutes on May 25, 2020, a seventeen-year-old named Darnella Frazier held her phone steady and recorded a police officer kneeling on George Floyd’s neck. She posted it. It spread. The world saw what the official story would have buried: that he called for his mother, that bystanders begged the officer to stop, that it took eight minutes and forty-six seconds for a man to die on a sidewalk in America.
TikTok didn’t break that story. But TikTok became the place where stories like it couldn’t be contained. Gaza, when the networks looked away. ICE raids filmed in real time. Protests before the press arrived. For five years, it was the camera that couldn’t be managed, the signal that couldn’t be jammed, the place where ordinary people could make power visible without asking permission.
A hundred and fifty million Americans opened it every day. A third of teenagers said it was their primary news source. Not CNN. Not the Times. The algorithm.
And now the algorithm answers to someone new.
On January 22, 2026, a pop-up appeared on a hundred and fifty million American phones. A new privacy policy. Most people clicked through without reading. But the language had changed. TikTok now lists what it collects: racial or ethnic origin, national origin, religious beliefs, sexual orientation, citizenship, immigration status. That data existed before. But before, it flowed to ByteDance, a Chinese company with no stake in American deportation policy.
Now it flows to a different owner.
The consortium is led by Larry Ellison, executive chairman of Oracle, host to Trump at his Rancho Mirage estate.
In September 2024, Ellison told investors what kind of future he imagined. “Citizens will be on their best behavior,” he said, “because we are constantly recording and reporting everything that’s going on.”
This is the man whose company now sits closest to the infrastructure.
Within seventy-two hours of the ownership transfer, creators reported anti-Trump content throttled, videos about ICE stuck at zero, the word “Epstein” blocked in DMs. The same name the Justice Department was legally required to release files about forty days ago—and hasn’t. BBC and Guardian videos appeared visible in London, invisible in Los Angeles.
Uninstalls spiked, if only by anecdote: screenshots, goodbye posts, friends telling friends to delete it. On social media, people began describing the same sensation in different words: the feed felt newly policed. “I got rid of it,” one user wrote. “Nice side effect is a calmer brain.”
In an interview that fall, Netanyahu had been blunt: “The most important purchase that is going on right now is TikTok. I hope it goes through because it can be consequential.”
It went through.
People didn’t need proof of intent. They only needed the sensation: that the room had gained a guard.
Orwell didn’t imagine censorship as a bonfire. He imagined it as clerical work.
In 1984, when a man named Withers falls out of favor, he isn’t arrested in the square. He becomes an “unperson.” The records are edited. The photographs altered. “Withers, then, did not exist: he had never existed.” The newspaper still prints. The world still turns. But the public record has been silently revised, and no one can prove it was ever different.
State-sponsored media doesn’t announce itself. It looks like the app you already use, doing what apps already do: sorting content, recommending videos, deciding what spreads and what disappears. The difference is whose hand is on the dial. State-sponsored media is when the algorithm answers to power, when the content that vanishes is the content power wants vanished, when the glitch is always the explanation.
The woman in Chicago can watch her video on her own phone. It exists. But zero views means zero reach means zero presence in the public reality.
She wasn’t banned. She was just never there.
How would you know if it was intentional?
The algorithm has always been opaque. Content has always risen and fallen for reasons no one could explain. That opacity is the camouflage. Beneath it, suppression becomes indistinguishable from bad luck. It cannot be named, cannot be fought, cannot be proven.
The most effective censorship doesn’t delete. It throttles. It shadowbans. It lets your voice exist while ensuring no one hears it. And eventually, you stop posting what doesn’t spread. You learn which words the algorithm won’t carry. You try emojis. You try euphemisms. You watch what works for other people and start to mimic it. You censor yourself before anyone has to do it for you.
The woman in Chicago has started noticing patterns. Her videos about rent do fine. Her videos about traffic do fine. Anything about policy, about power, about the government doing something to someone: zero views. She doesn’t know if it’s real. She doesn’t know if she’s paranoid. She just knows what happens when she posts, and what doesn’t.
The threat was China. That’s what they said for years. A foreign adversary controlling the algorithm, manipulating what Americans see, collecting data on a hundred and fifty million citizens. A national security risk so severe it justified forcing a sale.
So they forced a sale.
And the platform that documented Minneapolis, that broadcast Gaza, that showed ICE raids in real time—now belongs to a man who dreams of constant surveillance, backed by a president who calls his consortium “Great American Patriots,” financed in part by twenty billion dollars from the United Arab Emirates.
The data collection hasn’t stopped. The algorithm still runs. Only now it’s American.
So it’s safe.
TikTok says the glitch has been resolved. The servers are stable.
The woman in Chicago checked her phone again this morning. The screen was bright in her hand. The video about ICE: still zero views. The video about her latte: twelve thousand.
She typed a caption about a raid in her neighborhood. Stopped. Deleted it. Typed it again. Deleted it again. Her thumb hovered over the post button, then drifted to the home screen instead.
She hasn’t posted about ICE since.
see
it’s CHINA’s fault
Date: 30/01/2026 09:56:24
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2355240
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
holy shit do the free passes never end

it’s been a fucking year and they’re still arguing on whether an antiantifa a fascist makes
Date: 30/01/2026 10:23:53
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2355248
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
was he born in the USSA though
I wrote this song on Saturday, recorded it yesterday and released it to you today in response to the state terror being visited on the city of Minneapolis. It’s dedicated to the people of Minneapolis, our innocent immigrant neighbors and in memory of Alex Pretti and Renee Good.

Through the winter’s ice and cold
Down Nicollet Avenue
A city aflame fought fire and ice
‘Neath an occupier’s boots
King Trump’s private army from the DHS
Guns belted to their coats
Came to Minneapolis to enforce the law
Or so their story goes
Against smoke and rubber bullets
By the dawn’s early light
Citizens stood for justice
Their voices ringing through the night
And there were bloody footprints
Where mercy should have stood
And two dead left to die on snow-filled streets
Alex Pretti and Renee Good
Oh our Minneapolis, I hear your voice
Singing through the bloody mist
We’ll take our stand for this land
And the stranger in our midst
Here in our home they killed and roamed
In the winter of ’26
We’ll remember the names of those who died
On the streets of Minneapolis
Trump’s federal thugs beat up on
His face and his chest
Then we heard the gunshots
And Alex Pretti lay in the snow, dead
Their claim was self defense, sir
Just don’t believe your eyes
It’s our blood and bones
And these whistles and phones
Against Miller and Noem’s dirty lies
Oh our Minneapolis, I hear your voice
Crying through the bloody mist
We’ll remember the names of those who died
On the streets of Minneapolis
Now they say they’re here to uphold the law
But they trample on our rights
If your skin is black or brown my friend
You can be questioned or deported on sight
In chants of ICE out now
Our city’s heart and soul persists
Through broken glass and bloody tears
On the streets of Minneapolis
Oh our Minneapolis, I hear your voice
Singing through the bloody mist
Here in our home they killed and roamed
In the winter of ’26
We’ll take our stand for this land
And the stranger in our midst
We’ll remember the names of those who died
On the streets of Minneapolis
We’ll remember the names of those who died
On the streets of Minneapolis
Date: 30/01/2026 10:49:26
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2355261
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
was he born in the USSA though
I wrote this song on Saturday, recorded it yesterday and released it to you today in response to the state terror being visited on the city of Minneapolis. It’s dedicated to the people of Minneapolis, our innocent immigrant neighbors and in memory of Alex Pretti and Renee Good.

With a name like Bruce?
Obviously not.
Date: 30/01/2026 10:54:16
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2355266
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
allegedly apple cider vinegar eh
Date: 30/01/2026 10:55:26
From: dv
ID: 2355268
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Did the syringe have a needle?
Date: 30/01/2026 11:00:42
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2355273
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Did the syringe have a needle?
reckon have to be a damn big scary needle to get a stream like that

Date: 30/01/2026 11:01:41
From: dv
ID: 2355275
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
dv said:
Did the syringe have a needle?
reckon have to be a damn big scary needle to get a stream like that

Okay so we are probably looking at a mister meaner and a small fine.
Date: 30/01/2026 11:15:04
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2355291
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
SCIENCE said:
dv said:
Did the syringe have a needle?
reckon have to be a damn big scary needle to get a stream like that

Okay so we are probably looking at a mister meaner and a small fine.
found a clearer shot

so maybe it was a damn big needle after all
Date: 30/01/2026 11:27:20
From: Michael V
ID: 2355301
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Did the syringe have a needle?
One would hope not.
Date: 30/01/2026 11:30:23
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2355305
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
dv said:
SCIENCE said:
reckon have to be a damn big scary needle to get a stream like that

Okay so we are probably looking at a mister meaner and a small fine.
found a clearer shot

so maybe it was a damn big needle after all
nope should have gone with our original interpretation, guess it was a catheter syringe

Date: 30/01/2026 13:08:25
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2355337
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
oh look fkn CHINA is foreign interfering again
https://www.independent.co.uk/bulletin/news/alberta-canada-separatist-group-trump-officials-b2910271.html
no wait this is just the good guys advocating for freedom and democracy so poor Canadians don’t have to be subject to some historical naval empire in its geriatric decline
Date: 30/01/2026 14:28:44
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2355364
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 30/01/2026 14:46:14
From: Michael V
ID: 2355378
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:

Ep-who?
Date: 30/01/2026 14:48:28
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2355383
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:


Ep-who?
we hate this shit but we do have to acknowledge that they’ve been pretty good at coming up with repeated distractions, and we’re not saying the distractions will work, but that we haven’t been able to predict what every next bullshit was going to be
Date: 30/01/2026 15:06:14
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2355395
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:

Well, he’d better have some shit-hot evidence to back up his blatherings.
It’s not like there hasn’t been a whole lot of people before him who’ve said exactly the same thing. But, in none of those cases were they able to provide incontrovertible proof of their claims.
Now, it may be that Trump is uniquely positioned to provide that proof. But, unless he does that, and allows it to be examined or tested or queried to show that it’s beyond contradiction, then he’ll just be another voice saying the same old things, and it’ll be quite obvious that it’s just another Epstein-distraction, and the most desperate one. So far.
Date: 30/01/2026 15:12:09
From: Michael V
ID: 2355399
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Divine Angel said:

Well, he’d better have some shit-hot evidence to back up his blatherings.
It’s not like there hasn’t been a whole lot of people before him who’ve said exactly the same thing. But, in none of those cases were they able to provide incontrovertible proof of their claims.
Now, it may be that Trump is uniquely positioned to provide that proof. But, unless he does that, and allows it to be examined or tested or queried to show that it’s beyond contradiction, then he’ll just be another voice saying the same old things, and it’ll be quite obvious that it’s just another Epstein-distraction, and the most desperate one. So far.
Evidence? evidence?
Trump doesn’t need evidence!
It is well documented that DJT is a congenital liar. He’ll just make shit up, and a substantial proportion of the population of the USA will unhesitatingly believe him.
Date: 30/01/2026 15:13:23
From: roughbarked
ID: 2355400
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 30/01/2026 15:14:12
From: roughbarked
ID: 2355401
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
City of Heroes – Bily Bragg
I wrote this song yesterday as a tribute to the bravery of the people of Minneapolis who, knowing that these trigger happy ICE thugs operate with seeming impunity in their midst, are still willing to put themselves in harms way to defend their community. Their resistance is an inspiration to us all.
CITY OF HEROES
The ghost of Martin Niemöller
Haunts the halls of history
When they came for the communists
He said “It’s nothing to do with me”
When they came for the democrats
He had nothing to say
And when they came for the Jews
He just looked the other way
His silence didn’t save him
When they came for him as well
There was no one to speak out for him
Resistance had been quelled
What excuses would you tell yourself
If this ever happened to you?
Well I live in a city of heroes
I know what I would do
When they came for the immigrants
I got in their face
When they came for the refugees
I got in their face
When they came for the five-year-olds
I got in their face
When they came to my neighbourhood
I just got in their face
They use tear gas and pepper spray
Against our whistles and our phones
But in this city of heroes
We will protect our home
When they dragged people from their cars
I got in their face
When they took families from their homes
I got in their face
When they murdered our sister
I got in their face
When they murdered our brother
I still got in their face
In Dachau Martin Niemöller
Suffered for his complicity
But in this city of heroes
We learn the lessons of history
I will bear witness to terror
I will bear witness to tyranny
I will bear witness to murder
I will bear witness to fascism
Words and Music by Billy Bragg
Engineered, recorded and mixed by Jamie Parker at Echo Town Studio, Dorset
Date: 30/01/2026 15:16:58
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2355402
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
captain_spalding said:
Divine Angel said:

Well, he’d better have some shit-hot evidence to back up his blatherings.
It’s not like there hasn’t been a whole lot of people before him who’ve said exactly the same thing. But, in none of those cases were they able to provide incontrovertible proof of their claims.
Now, it may be that Trump is uniquely positioned to provide that proof. But, unless he does that, and allows it to be examined or tested or queried to show that it’s beyond contradiction, then he’ll just be another voice saying the same old things, and it’ll be quite obvious that it’s just another Epstein-distraction, and the most desperate one. So far.
Evidence? evidence?
Trump doesn’t need evidence!
It is well documented that DJT is a congenital liar. He’ll just make shit up, and a substantial proportion of the population of the USA will unhesitatingly believe him.
Not as many as before. The polls over recent months have shown that there’s a lot of Republicans/MAGAs who are willing to put aside their ‘faith’ in Trump on some things, and who want to see the files released.
If he’d been able to just say, ‘don’t believe all that files stuff’, and that was good enough for those wavering fans, he probably wouldn’t be so anxiously putting out distraction after distraction.
Date: 30/01/2026 15:53:45
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 2355435
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 30/01/2026 15:55:38
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2355437
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ChrispenEvan said:

apparently it’s true
Date: 30/01/2026 15:58:01
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2355438
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
the USSA are always afraid to look in the mirror



Date: 30/01/2026 16:04:01
From: roughbarked
ID: 2355444
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
ChrispenEvan said:

apparently it’s true
Even so. It isn’t worth half a dozen bullets in you.
Date: 30/01/2026 16:11:33
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 2355449
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
ChrispenEvan said:

apparently it’s true
Even so. It isn’t worth half a dozen bullets in you.
I think that is the point. it is just gaslighting.
Date: 30/01/2026 16:14:38
From: roughbarked
ID: 2355452
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 30/01/2026 16:31:06
From: dv
ID: 2355458
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
ChrispenEvan said:

apparently it’s true
Even so. It isn’t worth half a dozen bullets in you.
More to the point, this turns this event into premeditated murder rather than an isolated incident of poor discipline.
Date: 30/01/2026 16:41:30
From: roughbarked
ID: 2355467
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 30/01/2026 17:05:53
From: Michael V
ID: 2355488
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
apparently it’s true
Even so. It isn’t worth half a dozen bullets in you.
More to the point, this turns this event into premeditated murder rather than an isolated incident of poor discipline.
Very fair point.
Date: 30/01/2026 17:11:03
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2355493
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
dv said:
roughbarked said:
Even so. It isn’t worth half a dozen bullets in you.
More to the point, this turns this event into premeditated murder rather than an isolated incident of poor discipline.
Very fair point.
Not long after the shooting, there was mention of an earlier confrontation between Pretti and ICE, and a suggestion that the protagonist on the ICE side in the shooting had also been prominent in the earlier incident.
Date: 30/01/2026 17:14:23
From: roughbarked
ID: 2355497
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
dv said:
roughbarked said:
Even so. It isn’t worth half a dozen bullets in you.
More to the point, this turns this event into premeditated murder rather than an isolated incident of poor discipline.
Very fair point.
Yes.
Date: 30/01/2026 17:34:00
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2355513
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
CNN has a detailed breakdown of the Pretti shooting here (WARNING: there’s not much blurred out in the video)
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/01/29/politics/video/immigration-agents-shooting-alex-pretti-vid-invs (5 min 30 secs).
It may have been murder at the first shot. It may not have been.
But, every shot of the following nine: they were all ‘murder’, and nothing but.
Date: 30/01/2026 20:38:24
From: dv
ID: 2355574
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
US Senate votes to block the bill to continue funding for ICE, 55-45.
Senate Democrats were joined by 7 Republicans, including the Senate Majority Leader John Thune.
Date: 30/01/2026 20:41:20
From: Michael V
ID: 2355577
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
US Senate votes to block the bill to continue funding for ICE, 55-45.
Senate Democrats were joined by 7 Republicans, including the Senate Majority Leader John Thune.
Good.
Now Trump know seven more Republicans to retaliate against, or jail or similar.
Date: 30/01/2026 21:56:29
From: Ian
ID: 2355602
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 30/01/2026 22:22:28
From: dv
ID: 2355613
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
One indicator of how messed up things are with the US govt is that scandals occur that would normally be calamitous, career-ending, big enough to fill newspaper headlines for months.
But instead it’s just “yeah that sounds about right “ and it is just moved past after one news cycle.
Like it’s about 10 days since it emerged that France and the Ukraine were withholding information from the US because the latter was sharing it with Russia. Heads should roll for this. But it just washes away in the tumult of all the stories of corruption, cruelty and incompetence emanating from this regime.
Date: 30/01/2026 22:24:54
From: Kingy
ID: 2355614
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
One indicator of how messed up things are with the US govt is that scandals occur that would normally be calamitous, career-ending, big enough to fill newspaper headlines for months.
But instead it’s just “yeah that sounds about right “ and it is just moved past after one news cycle.
Like it’s about 10 days since it emerged that France and the Ukraine were withholding information from the US because the latter was sharing it with Russia. Heads should roll for this. But it just washes away in the tumult of all the stories of corruption, cruelty and incompetence emanating from this regime.
The decline and fall of the US empire.
I was not expecting to watch it in real time, but here we are.
Date: 30/01/2026 22:30:00
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2355616
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
One indicator of how messed up things are with the US govt is that scandals occur that would normally be calamitous, career-ending, big enough to fill newspaper headlines for months.
But instead it’s just “yeah that sounds about right “ and it is just moved past after one news cycle.
Like it’s about 10 days since it emerged that France and the Ukraine were withholding information from the US because the latter was sharing it with Russia. Heads should roll for this. But it just washes away in the tumult of all the stories of corruption, cruelty and incompetence emanating from this regime.
Like tears in the rain.
Date: 30/01/2026 22:34:21
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2355619
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
One indicator of how messed up things are with the US govt is that scandals occur that would normally be calamitous, career-ending, big enough to fill newspaper headlines for months.
But instead it’s just “yeah that sounds about right “ and it is just moved past after one news cycle.
Like it’s about 10 days since it emerged that France and the Ukraine were withholding information from the US because the latter was sharing it with Russia. Heads should roll for this. But it just washes away in the tumult of all the stories of corruption, cruelty and incompetence emanating from this regime.
It’s actually a strategy.
Steve Bannon

Trump’s ‘former White House chief strategist’ (who always looks like he slept under a highway overpass last night, and forgot how many shirts he put on this morning) put it forward as such during the 2024 planning for Trump’s campaign.
In brief summary, and in Bannon’s own words, the strategy is to ‘flood the scene with shit’.
The idea is to keep up a tireless rapid-fire sequence of utterly egregious actions and consequences, to have them come so thick and fast there simply isn’t enough time for anyone, media, Congress, voters, anyone, to absorb what’s happened, consider it, or take action and demand answers, before the next one comes along and catches them off-balance..
Date: 30/01/2026 22:43:53
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2355621
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
One indicator of how messed up things are with the US govt is that scandals occur that would normally be calamitous, career-ending, big enough to fill newspaper headlines for months.
But instead it’s just “yeah that sounds about right “ and it is just moved past after one news cycle.
Like it’s about 10 days since it emerged that France and the Ukraine were withholding information from the US because the latter was sharing it with Russia. Heads should roll for this. But it just washes away in the tumult of all the stories of corruption, cruelty and incompetence emanating from this regime.
that said in that specific case we saw further claims that it was exaggerated and for the most part there was open dialogue so we’re undecided in that specific case
it’s true that the system needed some disruption but you hope that the result is improvement; we suppose it’s not a given though
Date: 30/01/2026 23:25:53
From: kii
ID: 2355631
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
dv said:
One indicator of how messed up things are with the US govt is that scandals occur that would normally be calamitous, career-ending, big enough to fill newspaper headlines for months.
But instead it’s just “yeah that sounds about right “ and it is just moved past after one news cycle.
Like it’s about 10 days since it emerged that France and the Ukraine were withholding information from the US because the latter was sharing it with Russia. Heads should roll for this. But it just washes away in the tumult of all the stories of corruption, cruelty and incompetence emanating from this regime.
It’s actually a strategy.
Steve Bannon

Trump’s ‘former White House chief strategist’ (who always looks like he slept under a highway overpass last night, and forgot how many shirts he put on this morning) put it forward as such during the 2024 planning for Trump’s campaign.
In brief summary, and in Bannon’s own words, the strategy is to ‘flood the scene with shit’.
The idea is to keep up a tireless rapid-fire sequence of utterly egregious actions and consequences, to have them come so thick and fast there simply isn’t enough time for anyone, media, Congress, voters, anyone, to absorb what’s happened, consider it, or take action and demand answers, before the next one comes along and catches them off-balance..
Ages ago, when I read this comment of Bannon’s I felt deep nausea and I nearly cried.
I follow quite a few political commentators and I haven’t noticed Bannon being discussed for ages.
Date: 30/01/2026 23:28:29
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2355633
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
captain_spalding said:
dv said:
One indicator of how messed up things are with the US govt is that scandals occur that would normally be calamitous, career-ending, big enough to fill newspaper headlines for months.
But instead it’s just “yeah that sounds about right “ and it is just moved past after one news cycle.
Like it’s about 10 days since it emerged that France and the Ukraine were withholding information from the US because the latter was sharing it with Russia. Heads should roll for this. But it just washes away in the tumult of all the stories of corruption, cruelty and incompetence emanating from this regime.
It’s actually a strategy.
Steve Bannon

Trump’s ‘former White House chief strategist’ (who always looks like he slept under a highway overpass last night, and forgot how many shirts he put on this morning) put it forward as such during the 2024 planning for Trump’s campaign.
In brief summary, and in Bannon’s own words, the strategy is to ‘flood the scene with shit’.
The idea is to keep up a tireless rapid-fire sequence of utterly egregious actions and consequences, to have them come so thick and fast there simply isn’t enough time for anyone, media, Congress, voters, anyone, to absorb what’s happened, consider it, or take action and demand answers, before the next one comes along and catches them off-balance..
Ages ago, when I read this comment of Bannon’s I felt deep nausea and I nearly cried.
I follow quite a few political commentators and I haven’t noticed Bannon being discussed for ages.
Nah, he’s on the outer with Trump these days, but his ideas are still in use.
Date: 30/01/2026 23:33:03
From: party_pants
ID: 2355634
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I think I would like to grab Melania by the pussy. Just to see how Trump and all his little piglets react.
Am I allowed to say this aloud yet…?
Date: 30/01/2026 23:48:39
From: dv
ID: 2355640
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Of the $40m budget for Melania, $28m is Melania Trump’s fee. The promotional budget is in the vicinity of $30m. It is expected to make around $5m in ticket sales worldwide.
—-
Julie Cohen, who co-directed RBG and My Name Is Pauli Murray (2021), criticized the film as having “no artistic or journalistic integrity” due to Melania’s editorial control and questioned the high price Amazon paid saying “I think that would suggest that Amazon is buying something else for their money. That’s a big problem”.
Melania Trump was reportedly paid $28 million for the film, a sum comparable to some of the highest salaries ever earned by actors for a single movie, which would be unprecedented for a documentary and would represent the largest part of the film’s budget. This led commentators such as Jimmy Kimmel and Desi Lydic to describe the operation as a “bribe” from Amazon founder Jeff Bezos to the Trump family. Ted Hope who helped establish Amazon’s film division was quoted by the New York Times as saying “How can it not be equated with currying favor or an outright bribe?”.
—-
Date: 31/01/2026 00:39:59
From: Ian
ID: 2355649
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
dv said:
One indicator of how messed up things are with the US govt is that scandals occur that would normally be calamitous, career-ending, big enough to fill newspaper headlines for months.
But instead it’s just “yeah that sounds about right “ and it is just moved past after one news cycle.
Like it’s about 10 days since it emerged that France and the Ukraine were withholding information from the US because the latter was sharing it with Russia. Heads should roll for this. But it just washes away in the tumult of all the stories of corruption, cruelty and incompetence emanating from this regime.
It’s actually a strategy.
Steve Bannon

Trump’s ‘former White House chief strategist’ (who always looks like he slept under a highway overpass last night, and forgot how many shirts he put on this morning) put it forward as such during the 2024 planning for Trump’s campaign.
In brief summary, and in Bannon’s own words, the strategy is to ‘flood the scene with shit’.
The idea is to keep up a tireless rapid-fire sequence of utterly egregious actions and consequences, to have them come so thick and fast there simply isn’t enough time for anyone, media, Congress, voters, anyone, to absorb what’s happened, consider it, or take action and demand answers, before the next one comes along and catches them off-balance..
Well, Bannon and co didn’t reckon with the speed of the internet this forum dv.
Date: 31/01/2026 08:53:23
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2355691
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 31/01/2026 08:58:11
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2355693
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
In order to seek the death penalty, prosecutors needed to show that Mr Mangione killed Mr Thompson while committing another “crime of violence”. Stalking does not fit that definition, Judge Garnett wrote in her opinion, citing case law and legal precedents.
Date: 31/01/2026 09:00:53
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2355695
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 31/01/2026 09:02:06
From: roughbarked
ID: 2355697
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 31/01/2026 09:26:15
From: roughbarked
ID: 2355707
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
TRUMP Stunned as His 50% Tariffs on Canadian Aircraft COLLAPSE”:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AalqfnLBlOU
Date: 31/01/2026 09:26:43
From: roughbarked
ID: 2355708
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 31/01/2026 09:30:35
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2355710
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
SCIENCE said:
yeah no shit
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-01-31/melania-trump-movie-and-why-we-might-need-to-follow-the-money/106285248
Trump Says The ‘Melania’ Movie Is ‘Selling Out, Fast‘—But Is It?
Looks like it’s going to be a flop. Flopity Floppy Flop.
Like I said. Trump doesn’t care. The bribe money has been paid.
Seems a strange way to pay a bribe.
Date: 31/01/2026 09:31:43
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2355711
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 31/01/2026 09:34:18
From: roughbarked
ID: 2355713
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
roughbarked said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Trump Says The ‘Melania’ Movie Is ‘Selling Out, Fast‘—But Is It?
Looks like it’s going to be a flop. Flopity Floppy Flop.
Like I said. Trump doesn’t care. The bribe money has been paid.
Seems a strange way to pay a bribe.
Everything about Trump is strange.
Date: 31/01/2026 09:35:03
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2355714
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 31/01/2026 09:35:49
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2355715
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
roughbarked said:
Like I said. Trump doesn’t care. The bribe money has been paid.
Seems a strange way to pay a bribe.
Everything about Trump is strange.
Very true.
Date: 31/01/2026 09:37:20
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2355718
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
Divine Angel said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Trump Says The ‘Melania’ Movie Is ‘Selling Out, Fast‘—But Is It?
Looks like it’s going to be a flop. Flopity Floppy Flop.
Oh no!
Anyway…
I won’t be watching it.
Neither. But I did pay for it because we subscribe to Amazon Prime.
Date: 31/01/2026 09:39:20
From: roughbarked
ID: 2355721
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Divine Angel said:
Oh no!
Anyway…
I won’t be watching it.
Neither. But I did pay for it because we subscribe to Amazon Prime.
I missed out on paying for it. :)
Date: 31/01/2026 09:41:39
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2355722
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
roughbarked said:
TRUMP Stunned as His 50% Tariffs on Canadian Aircraft COLLAPSE
oops.. fixed
One of the comments…
Trump is like a migraine that doesn’t go away.
Date: 31/01/2026 09:41:51
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2355723
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
I won’t be watching it.
Neither. But I did pay for it because we subscribe to Amazon Prime.
I missed out on paying for it. :)
and while everyone wasn’t watching, they dropped more redactions
Date: 31/01/2026 09:46:06
From: Michael V
ID: 2355729
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
Neither. But I did pay for it because we subscribe to Amazon Prime.
I missed out on paying for it. :)
and while everyone wasn’t watching, they dropped more redactions
I saw that. Supposedly 2 million more documents have been released. I await the commentary. I do not intend to read them all.
Date: 31/01/2026 09:53:19
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2355733
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
I missed out on paying for it. :)
and while everyone wasn’t watching, they dropped more redactions
I saw that. Supposedly 2 million more documents have been released. I await the commentary. I do not intend to read them all.
This lot contains emails between Epstein and Elon Musk discussing a planned visit to the island 🤮
Date: 31/01/2026 09:56:35
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2355736
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
and while everyone wasn’t watching, they dropped more redactions
I saw that. Supposedly 2 million more documents have been released. I await the commentary. I do not intend to read them all.
This lot contains emails between Epstein and Elon Musk discussing a planned visit to the island 🤮
how else did he know that kkk was in the files, obviously he was just doing his job as an inside agent, trying to expose the criminal clients not the victims, never put a foot wrong
Date: 31/01/2026 09:59:56
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2355740
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
I saw that. Supposedly 2 million more documents have been released. I await the commentary. I do not intend to read them all.
This lot contains emails between Epstein and Elon Musk discussing a planned visit to the island 🤮
how else did he know that kkk was in the files, obviously he was just doing his job as an inside agent, trying to expose the criminal clients not the victims, never put a foot wrong
Trump’s role as an elite CIA agent taking it to Mossad and Epstein will soon come to light: and Exonerate him Completely! Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Date: 31/01/2026 10:01:43
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2355741
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:
Divine Angel said:
This lot contains emails between Epstein and Elon Musk discussing a planned visit to the island 🤮
how else did he know that kkk was in the files, obviously he was just doing his job as an inside agent, trying to expose the criminal clients not the victims, never put a foot wrong
Trump’s role as an elite CIA agent taking it to Mossad and Epstein will soon come to light: and Exonerate him Completely! Thank you for your attention to this matter.
What’s going to happen with Epstein Island?
Date: 31/01/2026 10:11:30
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2355744
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
IMDb have turned off ratings for Melania, which they also did for live-action Snow White to prevent brigading (people giving low ratings without seeing the film). However, IMDb is owned by Amazon.
Per The Hollywood Reporter, whose website is crashing my browser, this review from The Independent is my current fave:
“To call Melania vapid would do a disservice to the plumes of florid vape smoke that linger around British teenagers. She calls herself a ‘mother, wife, daughter, friend,’ yet is only depicted preening and scowling … Trump himself is an instantly more charismatic presence on screen. His scenes offer a relief from Melania’s mask of pure nothingness … It will exist as a striking artifact — like The Birth of a Nation or Triumph of the Will — of a time when Americans willingly subordinated themselves to a political and economic oligopoly.”
Date: 31/01/2026 10:13:19
From: roughbarked
ID: 2355746
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
IMDb have turned off ratings for Melania, which they also did for live-action Snow White to prevent brigading (people giving low ratings without seeing the film). However, IMDb is owned by Amazon.
Per The Hollywood Reporter, whose website is crashing my browser, this review from The Independent is my current fave:
“To call Melania vapid would do a disservice to the plumes of florid vape smoke that linger around British teenagers. She calls herself a ‘mother, wife, daughter, friend,’ yet is only depicted preening and scowling … Trump himself is an instantly more charismatic presence on screen. His scenes offer a relief from Melania’s mask of pure nothingness … It will exist as a striking artifact — like The Birth of a Nation or Triumph of the Will — of a time when Americans willingly subordinated themselves to a political and economic oligopoly.”
It is a good summation.
Date: 31/01/2026 10:14:43
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2355748
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
roughbarked said:
TRUMP Stunned as His 50% Tariffs on Canadian Aircraft COLLAPSE
oops.. fixed
Canada makes water bombers and how bad will the next fire season be in America?
Date: 31/01/2026 10:20:15
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2355751
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:
Divine Angel said:
This lot contains emails between Epstein and Elon Musk discussing a planned visit to the island 🤮
how else did he know that kkk was in the files, obviously he was just doing his job as an inside agent, trying to expose the criminal clients not the victims, never put a foot wrong
Trump’s role as an elite CIA agent taking it to Mossad and Epstein will soon come to light: and Exonerate him Completely! Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Last night I learned about John Casablancas. He ran a “modelling” agency specialising in teenage girls. In the early 90s, he was “business associates” with both Trump and Epstein. Casablancas was open about his sexual preference for young teenage girls. Melania was known as a model at the time. It is alleged Melania was sold/trafficked to Epstein before Trump.
Date: 31/01/2026 10:21:55
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2355753
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
IMDb have turned off ratings for Melania, which they also did for live-action Snow White to prevent brigading (people giving low ratings without seeing the film). However, IMDb is owned by Amazon.
Per The Hollywood Reporter, whose website is crashing my browser, this review from The Independent is my current fave:
“To call Melania vapid would do a disservice to the plumes of florid vape smoke that linger around British teenagers. She calls herself a ‘mother, wife, daughter, friend,’ yet is only depicted preening and scowling … Trump himself is an instantly more charismatic presence on screen. His scenes offer a relief from Melania’s mask of pure nothingness … It will exist as a striking artifact — like The Birth of a Nation or Triumph of the Will — of a time when Americans willingly subordinated themselves to a political and economic oligopoly.”
She’s just an old boiler, a six pack and a cooked chook and she’s any bodies.
Date: 31/01/2026 10:25:23
From: Michael V
ID: 2355756
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
I saw that. Supposedly 2 million more documents have been released. I await the commentary. I do not intend to read them all.
This lot contains emails between Epstein and Elon Musk discussing a planned visit to the island 🤮
how else did he know that kkk was in the files, obviously he was just doing his job as an inside agent, trying to expose the criminal clients not the victims, never put a foot wrong
That’s what some of the MAGAs are saying.
Date: 31/01/2026 10:27:44
From: roughbarked
ID: 2355757
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Divine Angel said:
IMDb have turned off ratings for Melania, which they also did for live-action Snow White to prevent brigading (people giving low ratings without seeing the film). However, IMDb is owned by Amazon.
Per The Hollywood Reporter, whose website is crashing my browser, this review from The Independent is my current fave:
“To call Melania vapid would do a disservice to the plumes of florid vape smoke that linger around British teenagers. She calls herself a ‘mother, wife, daughter, friend,’ yet is only depicted preening and scowling … Trump himself is an instantly more charismatic presence on screen. His scenes offer a relief from Melania’s mask of pure nothingness … It will exist as a striking artifact — like The Birth of a Nation or Triumph of the Will — of a time when Americans willingly subordinated themselves to a political and economic oligopoly.”
She’s just an old boiler, a six pack and a cooked chook and she’s any bodies.
Service without a smile.
Date: 31/01/2026 10:28:30
From: Michael V
ID: 2355759
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:
Divine Angel said:
This lot contains emails between Epstein and Elon Musk discussing a planned visit to the island 🤮
how else did he know that kkk was in the files, obviously he was just doing his job as an inside agent, trying to expose the criminal clients not the victims, never put a foot wrong
Trump’s role as an elite CIA agent taking it to Mossad and Epstein will soon come to light: and Exonerate him Completely! Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Fantastic!
Date: 31/01/2026 10:31:25
From: Michael V
ID: 2355761
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
IMDb have turned off ratings for Melania, which they also did for live-action Snow White to prevent brigading (people giving low ratings without seeing the film). However, IMDb is owned by Amazon.
Per The Hollywood Reporter, whose website is crashing my browser, this review from The Independent is my current fave:
“To call Melania vapid would do a disservice to the plumes of florid vape smoke that linger around British teenagers. She calls herself a ‘mother, wife, daughter, friend,’ yet is only depicted preening and scowling … Trump himself is an instantly more charismatic presence on screen. His scenes offer a relief from Melania’s mask of pure nothingness … It will exist as a striking artifact — like The Birth of a Nation or Triumph of the Will — of a time when Americans willingly subordinated themselves to a political and economic oligopoly.”
LOLOLOLOL
Thanks. I needed that laugh.
:)
Date: 31/01/2026 10:32:18
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2355762
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Apparently Malenia made a previous movie with another female actress, about love and togetherness.
I won’t be watching that one either.
Date: 31/01/2026 10:32:43
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2355763
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
In response to Witty’s comment yesterday about Austin, Texas, being somewhat liberal, I looked into the most conservative/MAGA regions in Texas. Settling on Burleson, I looked at the local cinema’s screening of Melania. Across five sessions, in a 60 seat cinema, fifty six seats have been pre-sold. The most popular showing is 11.20am with 18 seats sold.
Date: 31/01/2026 10:34:52
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2355764
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
Apparently Malenia made a previous movie with another female actress, about love and togetherness.
I won’t be watching that one either.
How many other women went from sex worker to first lady?
🤔
Is that a first for the white house?
Date: 31/01/2026 10:34:54
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2355766
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
Apparently Malenia made a previous movie with another female actress, about love and togetherness.
I won’t be watching that one either.
I am loving the shitshow surrounding the film though, as one may have guessed. Everyone needs an amusing hobby during dark times.
Date: 31/01/2026 10:35:43
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2355767
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Apparently Malenia made a previous movie with another female actress, about love and togetherness.
I won’t be watching that one either.
How many other women went from sex worker to first lady?
🤔
Is that a first for the white house?
Depends of you believe the rumours about Nancy Reagan 🤫
Date: 31/01/2026 10:36:17
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2355768
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
In response to Witty’s comment yesterday about Austin, Texas, being somewhat liberal, I looked into the most conservative/MAGA regions in Texas. Settling on Burleson, I looked at the local cinema’s screening of Melania. Across five sessions, in a 60 seat cinema, fifty six seats have been pre-sold. The most popular showing is 11.20am with 18 seats sold.
Her chances of getting an Oscar have fallen dramatically.
Date: 31/01/2026 10:38:17
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2355769
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
Apparently Malenia made a previous movie with another female actress, about love and togetherness.
I won’t be watching that one either.
She’s a witch, and what do we do with witches boys and girls, that’s right we burn them.
Date: 31/01/2026 10:38:20
From: Neophyte
ID: 2355770
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
Divine Angel said:
In response to Witty’s comment yesterday about Austin, Texas, being somewhat liberal, I looked into the most conservative/MAGA regions in Texas. Settling on Burleson, I looked at the local cinema’s screening of Melania. Across five sessions, in a 60 seat cinema, fifty six seats have been pre-sold. The most popular showing is 11.20am with 18 seats sold.
Her chances of getting an Oscar have fallen dramatically.
Definitely Razzie material, though.
Date: 31/01/2026 10:39:25
From: Michael V
ID: 2355771
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
In response to Witty’s comment yesterday about Austin, Texas, being somewhat liberal, I looked into the most conservative/MAGA regions in Texas. Settling on Burleson, I looked at the local cinema’s screening of Melania. Across five sessions, in a 60 seat cinema, fifty six seats have been pre-sold. The most popular showing is 11.20am with 18 seats sold.
Nice work.
Date: 31/01/2026 11:07:04
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2355779
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 31/01/2026 11:13:25
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2355780
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Neophyte said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Divine Angel said:
In response to Witty’s comment yesterday about Austin, Texas, being somewhat liberal, I looked into the most conservative/MAGA regions in Texas. Settling on Burleson, I looked at the local cinema’s screening of Melania. Across five sessions, in a 60 seat cinema, fifty six seats have been pre-sold. The most popular showing is 11.20am with 18 seats sold.
Her chances of getting an Oscar have fallen dramatically.
Definitely Razzie material, though.
What are her odds for a Nobel Peace Prize?
(better than Donnie’s, i suspect.)
Date: 31/01/2026 11:14:20
From: btm
ID: 2355781
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Apparently Malenia made a previous movie with another female actress, about love and togetherness.
I won’t be watching that one either.
How many other women went from sex worker to first lady?
🤔
Is that a first for the white house?
Depends of you believe the rumours about Nancy Reagan 🤫
I remember a sketch comedy film from about 1988 called Amazon Women on the Moon, a segment of which featured a first lady who’d formerly been a sex worker. It was supposed to be comedy, not prognostication.
Date: 31/01/2026 11:15:47
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2355782
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Neophyte said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Divine Angel said:
In response to Witty’s comment yesterday about Austin, Texas, being somewhat liberal, I looked into the most conservative/MAGA regions in Texas. Settling on Burleson, I looked at the local cinema’s screening of Melania. Across five sessions, in a 60 seat cinema, fifty six seats have been pre-sold. The most popular showing is 11.20am with 18 seats sold.
Her chances of getting an Oscar have fallen dramatically.
Definitely Razzie material, though.
Yes great biological geometry.
Horrible taste in men.
Date: 31/01/2026 11:19:32
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2355784
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
Since I know you people want the troof, the whole troof, and nothing but the troof:
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/laughingindisbelief/2021/03/fact-check-melania-was-a-sex-worker-in-amsterdam/
From the link
Melania Trump was and still is a registered sex worker in the Dutch city of Amsterdam.
Busy life.
Date: 31/01/2026 11:20:00
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2355785
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Since I know you people want the troof, the whole troof, and nothing but the troof:
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/laughingindisbelief/2021/03/fact-check-melania-was-a-sex-worker-in-amsterdam/
From the link
Melania Trump was and still is a registered sex worker in the Dutch city of Amsterdam.
Busy life.
You’ve got to have a ‘Plan B’.
Date: 31/01/2026 11:29:56
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2355789
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Since I know you people want the troof, the whole troof, and nothing but the troof:
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/laughingindisbelief/2021/03/fact-check-melania-was-a-sex-worker-in-amsterdam/
From the link
Melania Trump was and still is a registered sex worker in the Dutch city of Amsterdam.
Busy life.
To be fair to Melania, we should all read the end of the article where it is explained why she is a registered sex worker in Amsterdam.
Date: 31/01/2026 11:32:14
From: Michael V
ID: 2355791
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
Since I know you people want the troof, the whole troof, and nothing but the troof:
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/laughingindisbelief/2021/03/fact-check-melania-was-a-sex-worker-in-amsterdam/
LOL
Date: 31/01/2026 11:34:29
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2355794
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Since I know you people want the troof, the whole troof, and nothing but the troof:
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/laughingindisbelief/2021/03/fact-check-melania-was-a-sex-worker-in-amsterdam/
From the link
Melania Trump was and still is a registered sex worker in the Dutch city of Amsterdam.
Busy life.
To be fair to Melania, we should all read the end of the article where it is explained why she is a registered sex worker in Amsterdam.
>>To be fair to Melania,
That’s not how things work around these here parts pilgrim.
Date: 31/01/2026 11:35:18
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2355795
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
From the link
Melania Trump was and still is a registered sex worker in the Dutch city of Amsterdam.
Busy life.
To be fair to Melania, we should all read the end of the article where it is explained why she is a registered sex worker in Amsterdam.
>>To be fair to Melania,
That’s not how things work around these here parts pilgrim.
Not how they work in Minneapolis, either.
Date: 31/01/2026 11:37:54
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2355796
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 31/01/2026 11:47:09
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2355799
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Excuse me while I bleach my brain

Date: 31/01/2026 11:49:39
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2355801
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Since I know you people want the troof, the whole troof, and nothing but the troof:
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/laughingindisbelief/2021/03/fact-check-melania-was-a-sex-worker-in-amsterdam/

ref¿
No one is holding a gun to Mrs. Trump’s head
so the stories about the f… fell… fellow who always chickens out are true then
Date: 31/01/2026 11:51:15
From: Michael V
ID: 2355804
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Since I know you people want the troof, the whole troof, and nothing but the troof:
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/laughingindisbelief/2021/03/fact-check-melania-was-a-sex-worker-in-amsterdam/

LOL.
Date: 31/01/2026 11:51:31
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2355805
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Since I know you people want the troof, the whole troof, and nothing but the troof:
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/laughingindisbelief/2021/03/fact-check-melania-was-a-sex-worker-in-amsterdam/

LOL
Date: 31/01/2026 11:51:41
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2355806
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Since I know you people want the troof, the whole troof, and nothing but the troof:
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/laughingindisbelief/2021/03/fact-check-melania-was-a-sex-worker-in-amsterdam/
From the link
Melania Trump was and still is a registered sex worker in the Dutch city of Amsterdam.
Busy life.
To be fair to Melania, we should all read the end of the article where it is explained why she is a registered sex worker in Amsterdam.
Ahhh Amsterdam. Who wasn’t a registered sex worker there in their misspent youth?
Date: 31/01/2026 11:54:54
From: Michael V
ID: 2355810
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
From the link
Melania Trump was and still is a registered sex worker in the Dutch city of Amsterdam.
Busy life.
To be fair to Melania, we should all read the end of the article where it is explained why she is a registered sex worker in Amsterdam.
Ahhh Amsterdam. Who wasn’t a registered sex worker there in their misspent youth?
Me.
Date: 31/01/2026 11:56:54
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 2355811
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
To be fair to Melania, we should all read the end of the article where it is explained why she is a registered sex worker in Amsterdam.
Ahhh Amsterdam. Who wasn’t a registered sex worker there in their misspent youth?
Me.
and yet you claimed to be a swinger in your younger days…
Date: 31/01/2026 12:04:25
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2355813
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ChrispenEvan said:
Michael V said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Ahhh Amsterdam. Who wasn’t a registered sex worker there in their misspent youth?
Me.
and yet you claimed to be a swinger in your younger days…
probably they meant it wasn’t misspent youth, whether that’s because they weren’t young or they didn’t spend it mis, we leave to the reader
Date: 31/01/2026 12:05:28
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2355814
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Since I know you people want the troof, the whole troof, and nothing but the troof:
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/laughingindisbelief/2021/03/fact-check-melania-was-a-sex-worker-in-amsterdam/
From the link
Melania Trump was and still is a registered sex worker in the Dutch city of Amsterdam.
Busy life.
You’ve got to have a ‘Plan B’.
Which comes with an honorary position.
Date: 31/01/2026 12:06:46
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2355815
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

And apparently the bitches English is shit.
And as a bonus I’ve thrown in the worst French aircraft ever built, there’s been a few.
Date: 31/01/2026 12:06:49
From: Michael V
ID: 2355816
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ChrispenEvan said:
Michael V said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Ahhh Amsterdam. Who wasn’t a registered sex worker there in their misspent youth?
Me.
and yet you claimed to be a swinger in your younger days…
Nope. Not me.
Date: 31/01/2026 12:08:19
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2355817
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
captain_spalding said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
From the link
Melania Trump was and still is a registered sex worker in the Dutch city of Amsterdam.
Busy life.
You’ve got to have a ‘Plan B’.
Which comes with an honorary position.
Well, she might have to pass some sort of proficiency test…
Date: 31/01/2026 12:14:24
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2355818
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
how unfair is it that we totally believe William
In an email sent on July 18, 2013, Jeffrey Epstein appears to express his disappointment at tech billionaire Bill Gates ending his friendship with him over an “accident” implying Gates got a sexually transmitted disease.
“I cannot believe that you have chosen to disregard our friendship developed of over the last 6 years . I am aware that Accidents happen , it is how each of us has chosen to deal with this unfortunate event that has me dismayed beyond comprehension.” “TO add insult to injury you them implore me to please delete the emails mails regarding your std, your request that I provide you antibiotics that you can surreptitiously give to Melinda and the description of your penis.”
Epstein also accused Gates of making him participate in “morally inappropriate” and “ethically unsound” activities, adding that he helped Gates get drugs to deal with “consequences of sex with Russian girls” and “facilictating illict trysts, wth married women”. A spokesperson for Gates denied the claims as “absurd and completely false”. “The only thing these documents demonstrate is Epstein’s frustration that he did not have an ongoing relationship with Gates and the lengths he would go to entrap and defame,” they said.
but nobody believes kkk
A list of tips compiled in an FBI email thread detail several allegations against US President Donald Trump and his family, as well as several other notable figures. The thread notes that some of the reports were not made by the alleged victims, but with second-hand information. Here are some of the key allegations made against Trump:
A person reported their friend was forced to perform oral sex on Trump when she was about 13 or 14 years old, and was hit in the face when she bit him.
Trump and former president Bill Clinton were named as attendees of “big orgy parties” that involved 14- and 16-year-old girls.
An alleged victim of and witness to a sex trafficking ring said Trump threatened she would “end up as fertilizer for the back nine holes like the other c***s” if she ever talked about what she had seen.
An alleged victim said she was forced to perform sex acts when she was 13 years old and pregnant, and that Trump was present when her uncle murdered her newborn daughter.
An alleged victim reported that Epstein brought children to “calendar girls” parties at Mar-a-Lago, who Trump would “auction off”. She said Trump “measured the children’s vulvas and vaginas” and “rated the children on tightness”, and that she was forced to perform oral sex on him.
Trump has on several occassions denied any wrongdoing, and claims to have severed his ties with Epstein before allegations came to light.
wait
A statement by the Department of Justice said some documents released today may contain “untrue” claims.
“To be clear, the claims are unfounded and false, and if they have a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponized against President Trump already.”
ah yes that must be the way to tell if something is true or false
Date: 31/01/2026 12:21:17
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2355822
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
how unfair is it that we totally believe William
In an email sent on July 18, 2013, Jeffrey Epstein appears to express his disappointment at tech billionaire Bill Gates ending his friendship with him over an “accident” implying Gates got a sexually transmitted disease.
“I cannot believe that you have chosen to disregard our friendship developed of over the last 6 years . I am aware that Accidents happen , it is how each of us has chosen to deal with this unfortunate event that has me dismayed beyond comprehension.” “TO add insult to injury you them implore me to please delete the emails mails regarding your std, your request that I provide you antibiotics that you can surreptitiously give to Melinda and the description of your penis.”
Epstein also accused Gates of making him participate in “morally inappropriate” and “ethically unsound” activities, adding that he helped Gates get drugs to deal with “consequences of sex with Russian girls” and “facilictating illict trysts, wth married women”. A spokesperson for Gates denied the claims as “absurd and completely false”. “The only thing these documents demonstrate is Epstein’s frustration that he did not have an ongoing relationship with Gates and the lengths he would go to entrap and defame,” they said.
but nobody believes kkk
A list of tips compiled in an FBI email thread detail several allegations against US President Donald Trump and his family, as well as several other notable figures. The thread notes that some of the reports were not made by the alleged victims, but with second-hand information. Here are some of the key allegations made against Trump:
A person reported their friend was forced to perform oral sex on Trump when she was about 13 or 14 years old, and was hit in the face when she bit him.
Trump and former president Bill Clinton were named as attendees of “big orgy parties” that involved 14- and 16-year-old girls.
An alleged victim of and witness to a sex trafficking ring said Trump threatened she would “end up as fertilizer for the back nine holes like the other c***s” if she ever talked about what she had seen.
An alleged victim said she was forced to perform sex acts when she was 13 years old and pregnant, and that Trump was present when her uncle murdered her newborn daughter.
An alleged victim reported that Epstein brought children to “calendar girls” parties at Mar-a-Lago, who Trump would “auction off”. She said Trump “measured the children’s vulvas and vaginas” and “rated the children on tightness”, and that she was forced to perform oral sex on him.
Trump has on several occassions denied any wrongdoing, and claims to have severed his ties with Epstein before allegations came to light.
wait
A statement by the Department of Justice said some documents released today may contain “untrue” claims.
“To be clear, the claims are unfounded and false, and if they have a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponized against President Trump already.”
ah yes that must be the way to tell if something is true or false
OMG, we can all believe that Bill Clinton was involved, he’s got form, but Donald Trump………shakes head.
Date: 31/01/2026 12:33:11
From: Michael V
ID: 2355823
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
And apparently the bitches English is shit.
And as a bonus I’ve thrown in the worst French aircraft ever built, there’s been a few.
Well, it’s not her native language. I’ll bet your Slovene is not that brilliant either.
Date: 31/01/2026 12:37:31
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2355825
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Peak Warming Man said:
And apparently the bitches English is shit.
And as a bonus I’ve thrown in the worst French aircraft ever built, there’s been a few.
Well, it’s not her native language. I’ll bet your Slovene is not that brilliant either.
In my brief stint with Westpac, there was a lady from Vietnam on our team.
Someone criticised her command of English (not to her face, of course). Someone else pointed out that, as she spoke Vietnamese, English, French, and Chinese, she had a lot to remember.
Date: 31/01/2026 12:38:29
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2355826
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
Peak Warming Man said:

And apparently the bitches English is shit.
And as a bonus I’ve thrown in the worst French aircraft ever built, there’s been a few.
Well, it’s not her native language. I’ll bet your Slovene is not that brilliant either.
In my brief stint with Westpac, there was a lady from Vietnam on our team.
Someone criticised her command of English (not to her face, of course). Someone else pointed out that, as she spoke Vietnamese, English, French, and Chinese, she had a lot to remember.
silence you cancel cultists
the master race speaks English so that’s all there is to it
Date: 31/01/2026 12:43:08
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2355827
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I’m always impressed by polyglots.
Standing waiting for a bus in Kota Kinabalu (Malaysia), and overhearing two young women having a chat.
In the course of one spoken sentence, i heard one of them employ English, Chinese, Bahasa Malaysia, then back to English. All mixed into the one sentence, which flowed seamlessly. And her companion seemed to understand it, no problem.
I was reeling from this when they parted with ‘Ciao!’.
Date: 31/01/2026 12:47:23
From: Michael V
ID: 2355828
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
Peak Warming Man said:
And apparently the bitches English is shit.
And as a bonus I’ve thrown in the worst French aircraft ever built, there’s been a few.
Well, it’s not her native language. I’ll bet your Slovene is not that brilliant either.
In my brief stint with Westpac, there was a lady from Vietnam on our team.
Someone criticised her command of English (not to her face, of course). Someone else pointed out that, as she spoke Vietnamese, English, French, and Chinese, she had a lot to remember.
Fair.
Date: 31/01/2026 12:51:13
From: party_pants
ID: 2355829
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
how unfair is it that we totally believe William
In an email sent on July 18, 2013, Jeffrey Epstein appears to express his disappointment at tech billionaire Bill Gates ending his friendship with him over an “accident” implying Gates got a sexually transmitted disease.
“I cannot believe that you have chosen to disregard our friendship developed of over the last 6 years . I am aware that Accidents happen , it is how each of us has chosen to deal with this unfortunate event that has me dismayed beyond comprehension.” “TO add insult to injury you them implore me to please delete the emails mails regarding your std, your request that I provide you antibiotics that you can surreptitiously give to Melinda and the description of your penis.”
Epstein also accused Gates of making him participate in “morally inappropriate” and “ethically unsound” activities, adding that he helped Gates get drugs to deal with “consequences of sex with Russian girls” and “facilictating illict trysts, wth married women”. A spokesperson for Gates denied the claims as “absurd and completely false”. “The only thing these documents demonstrate is Epstein’s frustration that he did not have an ongoing relationship with Gates and the lengths he would go to entrap and defame,” they said.
but nobody believes kkk
A list of tips compiled in an FBI email thread detail several allegations against US President Donald Trump and his family, as well as several other notable figures. The thread notes that some of the reports were not made by the alleged victims, but with second-hand information. Here are some of the key allegations made against Trump:
A person reported their friend was forced to perform oral sex on Trump when she was about 13 or 14 years old, and was hit in the face when she bit him.
Trump and former president Bill Clinton were named as attendees of “big orgy parties” that involved 14- and 16-year-old girls.
An alleged victim of and witness to a sex trafficking ring said Trump threatened she would “end up as fertilizer for the back nine holes like the other c***s” if she ever talked about what she had seen.
An alleged victim said she was forced to perform sex acts when she was 13 years old and pregnant, and that Trump was present when her uncle murdered her newborn daughter.
An alleged victim reported that Epstein brought children to “calendar girls” parties at Mar-a-Lago, who Trump would “auction off”. She said Trump “measured the children’s vulvas and vaginas” and “rated the children on tightness”, and that she was forced to perform oral sex on him.
Trump has on several occassions denied any wrongdoing, and claims to have severed his ties with Epstein before allegations came to light.
wait
A statement by the Department of Justice said some documents released today may contain “untrue” claims.
“To be clear, the claims are unfounded and false, and if they have a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponized against President Trump already.”
ah yes that must be the way to tell if something is true or false
In this day and age you just decide what you want to be true, and go with that.
Date: 31/01/2026 12:52:06
From: buffy
ID: 2355830
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Peak Warming Man said:
And apparently the bitches English is shit.
And as a bonus I’ve thrown in the worst French aircraft ever built, there’s been a few.
Well, it’s not her native language. I’ll bet your Slovene is not that brilliant either.
How long has she been living in America? I’ll bet her husband doesn’t speak Slovene with her at home. I suspect (but of course I don’t know) her offspring speak only English. She should have a fair command by now.
Date: 31/01/2026 13:00:50
From: btm
ID: 2355831
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
I’m always impressed by polyglots.
Standing waiting for a bus in Kota Kinabalu (Malaysia), and overhearing two young women having a chat.
In the course of one spoken sentence, i heard one of them employ English, Chinese, Bahasa Malaysia, then back to English. All mixed into the one sentence, which flowed seamlessly. And her companion seemed to understand it, no problem.
I was reeling from this when they parted with ‘Ciao!’.
Oliver Sacks told (in Seeing Voices) of a visit to somewhere in Martha’s Vineyard where a significant proportion of the residents are deaf; in consequence everyone there, deaf and hearing, speak sign (ASL.) He talked about watching a woman asleep on a porch who was muttering in her sleep, then suddenly stopped and started waving her hands around, then dropped her hands and started muttering again. She was talking in her sleep in sign.
Date: 31/01/2026 13:02:48
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2355832
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
btm said:
captain_spalding said:
I’m always impressed by polyglots.
Standing waiting for a bus in Kota Kinabalu (Malaysia), and overhearing two young women having a chat.
In the course of one spoken sentence, i heard one of them employ English, Chinese, Bahasa Malaysia, then back to English. All mixed into the one sentence, which flowed seamlessly. And her companion seemed to understand it, no problem.
I was reeling from this when they parted with ‘Ciao!’.
Oliver Sacks told (in Seeing Voices) of a visit to somewhere in Martha’s Vineyard where a significant proportion of the residents are deaf; in consequence everyone there, deaf and hearing, speak sign (ASL.) He talked about watching a woman asleep on a porch who was muttering in her sleep, then suddenly stopped and started waving her hands around, then dropped her hands and started muttering again. She was talking in her sleep in sign.
I have had dreams in French.
Date: 31/01/2026 13:03:09
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2355833
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
To be fair to Melania, we should all read the end of the article where it is explained why she is a registered sex worker in Amsterdam.
Ahhh Amsterdam. Who wasn’t a registered sex worker there in their misspent youth?
Me.
And here I had you pictured as some sort of cross between ‘Midnight Cowboy’ and ‘ The Adventures of Barry McKenzie’.
:-)
Date: 31/01/2026 13:05:44
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2355834
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
btm said:
captain_spalding said:
I’m always impressed by polyglots.
Standing waiting for a bus in Kota Kinabalu (Malaysia), and overhearing two young women having a chat.
In the course of one spoken sentence, i heard one of them employ English, Chinese, Bahasa Malaysia, then back to English. All mixed into the one sentence, which flowed seamlessly. And her companion seemed to understand it, no problem.
I was reeling from this when they parted with ‘Ciao!’.
Oliver Sacks told (in Seeing Voices) of a visit to somewhere in Martha’s Vineyard where a significant proportion of the residents are deaf; in consequence everyone there, deaf and hearing, speak sign (ASL.) He talked about watching a woman asleep on a porch who was muttering in her sleep, then suddenly stopped and started waving her hands around, then dropped her hands and started muttering again. She was talking in her sleep in sign.
I have had dreams in French.
I’ve had those dreams too, when I was younger.
Date: 31/01/2026 13:13:48
From: Michael V
ID: 2355835
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Michael V said:
Peak Warming Man said:
And apparently the bitches English is shit.
And as a bonus I’ve thrown in the worst French aircraft ever built, there’s been a few.
Well, it’s not her native language. I’ll bet your Slovene is not that brilliant either.
How long has she been living in America? I’ll bet her husband doesn’t speak Slovene with her at home. I suspect (but of course I don’t know) her offspring speak only English. She should have a fair command by now.
Apparently Barron is fluent in Slovene.
Date: 31/01/2026 13:15:01
From: Michael V
ID: 2355836
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
btm said:
captain_spalding said:
I’m always impressed by polyglots.
Standing waiting for a bus in Kota Kinabalu (Malaysia), and overhearing two young women having a chat.
In the course of one spoken sentence, i heard one of them employ English, Chinese, Bahasa Malaysia, then back to English. All mixed into the one sentence, which flowed seamlessly. And her companion seemed to understand it, no problem.
I was reeling from this when they parted with ‘Ciao!’.
Oliver Sacks told (in Seeing Voices) of a visit to somewhere in Martha’s Vineyard where a significant proportion of the residents are deaf; in consequence everyone there, deaf and hearing, speak sign (ASL.) He talked about watching a woman asleep on a porch who was muttering in her sleep, then suddenly stopped and started waving her hands around, then dropped her hands and started muttering again. She was talking in her sleep in sign.
I have had dreams in French.
And I in German after being in Germany for just three nights.
Date: 31/01/2026 13:15:52
From: Michael V
ID: 2355837
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Michael V said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Ahhh Amsterdam. Who wasn’t a registered sex worker there in their misspent youth?
Me.
And here I had you pictured as some sort of cross between ‘Midnight Cowboy’ and ‘ The Adventures of Barry McKenzie’.
:-)
I have been known to “Point Percy at the Porcelain”.
Date: 31/01/2026 13:16:45
From: Michael V
ID: 2355838
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
captain_spalding said:
btm said:
Oliver Sacks told (in Seeing Voices) of a visit to somewhere in Martha’s Vineyard where a significant proportion of the residents are deaf; in consequence everyone there, deaf and hearing, speak sign (ASL.) He talked about watching a woman asleep on a porch who was muttering in her sleep, then suddenly stopped and started waving her hands around, then dropped her hands and started muttering again. She was talking in her sleep in sign.
I have had dreams in French.
I’ve had those dreams too, when I was younger.
That’s acute.
Date: 31/01/2026 13:17:38
From: buffy
ID: 2355839
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
buffy said:
Michael V said:
Well, it’s not her native language. I’ll bet your Slovene is not that brilliant either.
How long has she been living in America? I’ll bet her husband doesn’t speak Slovene with her at home. I suspect (but of course I don’t know) her offspring speak only English. She should have a fair command by now.
Apparently Barron is fluent in Slovene.
I didn’t know that. Is there a community of immigrants where they can practice their native tongue? I thought the Trumps moved in different circles.
Date: 31/01/2026 13:19:57
From: kii
ID: 2355841
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Michael V said:
buffy said:
How long has she been living in America? I’ll bet her husband doesn’t speak Slovene with her at home. I suspect (but of course I don’t know) her offspring speak only English. She should have a fair command by now.
Apparently Barron is fluent in Slovene.
I didn’t know that. Is there a community of immigrants where they can practice their native tongue? I thought the Trumps moved in different circles.
His grandparents and his mother. Gma is dead now.
Date: 31/01/2026 13:23:29
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2355842
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Peak Warming Man said:
captain_spalding said:
I have had dreams in French.
I’ve had those dreams too, when I was younger.
That’s acute.
No , it’s aigu.
Date: 31/01/2026 13:30:12
From: kii
ID: 2355843
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Since I know you people want the troof, the whole troof, and nothing but the troof:
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/laughingindisbelief/2021/03/fact-check-melania-was-a-sex-worker-in-amsterdam/
From the link
Melania Trump was and still is a registered sex worker in the Dutch city of Amsterdam.
Busy life.
To be fair to Melania, we should all read the end of the article where it is explained why she is a registered sex worker in Amsterdam.
Perfect! Yes, I read to the end 😃
Date: 31/01/2026 13:30:32
From: Michael V
ID: 2355844
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Michael V said:
buffy said:
How long has she been living in America? I’ll bet her husband doesn’t speak Slovene with her at home. I suspect (but of course I don’t know) her offspring speak only English. She should have a fair command by now.
Apparently Barron is fluent in Slovene.
I didn’t know that. Is there a community of immigrants where they can practice their native tongue? I thought the Trumps moved in different circles.
No idea, sorry.
I only learnt about Barron’s Slovene today.
Date: 31/01/2026 13:32:33
From: Michael V
ID: 2355846
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
Peak Warming Man said:
I’ve had those dreams too, when I was younger.
That’s acute.
No , it’s aigu.
I was pointing out a French letter, in English. He had the dreams, after all.
Date: 31/01/2026 13:47:57
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2355855
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
That’s acute.
No , it’s aigu.
I was pointing out a French letter, in English. He had the dreams, after all.
My poor attempt at a joke.
Date: 31/01/2026 13:53:24
From: Michael V
ID: 2355860
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
captain_spalding said:
No , it’s aigu.
I was pointing out a French letter, in English. He had the dreams, after all.
My poor attempt at a joke.
Looks like both ours jokes fell flat, then.
Ah well.
Date: 31/01/2026 14:00:09
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2355863
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
I was pointing out a French letter, in English. He had the dreams, after all.
My poor attempt at a joke.
Looks like both ours jokes fell flat, then.
Ah well.
No comedy-writing partnership for us, then.
Date: 31/01/2026 14:02:27
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2355864
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Pedophiles, pedophiles everywhere.
Date: 31/01/2026 14:16:18
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2355867
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
captain_spalding said:
My poor attempt at a joke.
Looks like both ours jokes fell flat, then.
Ah well.
No comedy-writing partnership for us, then.
Certainly no The Two Ronnies
Date: 31/01/2026 14:16:55
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2355868
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Pedophiles, pedophiles everywhere.
One way to distance himself is throwing away the ouija board.
Date: 31/01/2026 14:55:46
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2355874
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
“Washington: Katherine Keating, daughter of former prime minister Paul Keating, has spoken out about her “unfortunate” friendship with Jeffrey Epstein after a long trail of emails between her and the convicted sex offender featured in the latest release of documents by the US Department of Justice.”
ONG, and what was Paul up to, I guess it will all come out.
Date: 31/01/2026 15:10:55
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2355876
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
captain_spalding said:
btm said:
Oliver Sacks told (in Seeing Voices) of a visit to somewhere in Martha’s Vineyard where a significant proportion of the residents are deaf; in consequence everyone there, deaf and hearing, speak sign (ASL.) He talked about watching a woman asleep on a porch who was muttering in her sleep, then suddenly stopped and started waving her hands around, then dropped her hands and started muttering again. She was talking in her sleep in sign.
I have had dreams in French.
I’ve had those dreams too, when I was younger.
we heard that ol’ Oli admitted recently that they were by and large confabulations
Date: 31/01/2026 15:14:16
From: btm
ID: 2355878
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Peak Warming Man said:
captain_spalding said:
I have had dreams in French.
I’ve had those dreams too, when I was younger.
we heard that ol’ Oli admitted recently that they were by and large confabulations
Well, since he died more than ten years ago, for him to have said anything recently he must have been speaking through a medium.
Date: 31/01/2026 15:17:55
From: Michael V
ID: 2355879
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
captain_spalding said:
My poor attempt at a joke.
Looks like both ours jokes fell flat, then.
Ah well.
No comedy-writing partnership for us, then.
Sure looks like it.
:)
Date: 31/01/2026 15:18:51
From: Michael V
ID: 2355880
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Pedophiles, pedophiles everywhere.
One way to distance himself is throwing away the ouija board.
:)
Date: 31/01/2026 16:43:51
From: dv
ID: 2355899
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.the-express.com/news/politics/197748/donald-trump-accused-measuring-kids-genitals-fingers-auction-epstein-files
Alleged
Date: 31/01/2026 16:50:41
From: buffy
ID: 2355905
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.the-express.com/news/politics/197748/donald-trump-accused-measuring-kids-genitals-fingers-auction-epstein-files
Alleged
So, muddying the waters with added stuff to drown out the real stuff?
Date: 31/01/2026 16:56:37
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2355907
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.the-express.com/news/politics/197748/donald-trump-accused-measuring-kids-genitals-fingers-auction-epstein-files
Alleged
JFC just when you think it can’t get worse, somehow it does
Date: 31/01/2026 17:00:32
From: roughbarked
ID: 2355908
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
https://www.the-express.com/news/politics/197748/donald-trump-accused-measuring-kids-genitals-fingers-auction-epstein-files
Alleged
JFC just when you think it can’t get worse, somehow it does
If we ever get the full files unredacted, Trump will feature quite prominently.
Date: 31/01/2026 17:03:13
From: kii
ID: 2355909
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Also, consider the reports of him abusing boys.
People focus on Ivanka and Trump’s lecherous focus on her.
I bet he’s also done stuff to Donald Jr and Eric when they were kids. Junior’s drug habit could be his way of coping with that. Who remembers Eric, recently, calling Trump “Daddy” and saying he’s a good boy? I forget the context.
Date: 31/01/2026 17:04:28
From: party_pants
ID: 2355910
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
https://www.the-express.com/news/politics/197748/donald-trump-accused-measuring-kids-genitals-fingers-auction-epstein-files
Alleged
JFC just when you think it can’t get worse, somehow it does
If we ever get the full files unredacted, Trump will feature quite prominently.
Yeah. I don’t think he can use it to harm his political opponents without harming himself.
He was stupid to say he was ever going to release it to discredit the Dems. Besides, the Clintons are no longer in such influence as they once were.
Date: 31/01/2026 17:12:08
From: party_pants
ID: 2355911
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Anyway, it will be interesting to see how the hypocrites in the fundamentalist evangelical churches spin this to defend their demi-god, or try to make it sound morally acceptable.
Date: 31/01/2026 17:16:55
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 2355912
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
Anyway, it will be interesting to see how the hypocrites in the fundamentalist evangelical churches spin this to defend their demi-god, or try to make it sound morally acceptable.
Suffer little children, and forbid them not, to come unto me: for of such is the kingdom of heaven,
Date: 31/01/2026 17:17:16
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2355913
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
Anyway, it will be interesting to see how the hypocrites in the fundamentalist evangelical churches spin this to defend their demi-god, or try to make it sound morally acceptable.
Deep fake, fake news, AI etc.
There is a distinction between “in” the files and in the files. UK singer Adele is mentioned in the context that her name is in emails between Epstein and his publicist, not that she had any personal connection with him, the island, or minors. As opposed to photos of Bill Clinton in hot tubs with girls.
Date: 31/01/2026 17:18:14
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2355914
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Also, consider the reports of him abusing boys.
People focus on Ivanka and Trump’s lecherous focus on her.
I bet he’s also done stuff to Donald Jr and Eric when they were kids. Junior’s drug habit could be his way of coping with that. Who remembers Eric, recently, calling Trump “Daddy” and saying he’s a good boy? I forget the context.
Trump is/was possibly doing what was done to him.
Fred Trump Sr. was a really, really nasty shit, who put an inordinate amount of effort into belittling and demeaning his children, especially his sons. He managed every tiny details of their lives, and seemed hell-bent on denying them any say in their own existences, and on preventing anything which resembled joy being known to them.
Fred Trump Jr, his eldest son, tried several times to go against his old man, but all it got him was chronic alcoholism and and early grave from a heart attack. After which Fred Sr., ably abetted by Donald, moved heaven and earth to see that Fred Jr.‘s family received just about nothing in the way of assistance from the Trump family.
Donald is probably the biggest shit in the world because that’s what his father taught him to be. And he’s constantly still trying to prove to dead ol’ dad that he’s turned out the way that father wanted.
Date: 31/01/2026 17:18:29
From: dv
ID: 2355915
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
It was only a few weeks ago that Musk was insisting that the only correspondence was him refusing an invitation to go to the island.
This was not correct.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/30/elon-musk-epstein-files-island-visits

girls FTW!
He’s an odd fellow.
Date: 31/01/2026 17:19:13
From: dv
ID: 2355916
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
https://www.the-express.com/news/politics/197748/donald-trump-accused-measuring-kids-genitals-fingers-auction-epstein-files
Alleged
JFC just when you think it can’t get worse, somehow it does
Allegedly
Date: 31/01/2026 17:23:09
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2355917
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 31/01/2026 17:25:41
From: roughbarked
ID: 2355919
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
https://www.the-express.com/news/politics/197748/donald-trump-accused-measuring-kids-genitals-fingers-auction-epstein-files
Alleged
JFC just when you think it can’t get worse, somehow it does
Allegedly
Former PM Kevin Rudd says he declined Epstein invitation after latest document dump.
Date: 31/01/2026 17:26:23
From: roughbarked
ID: 2355920
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
dv said:
Divine Angel said:
JFC just when you think it can’t get worse, somehow it does
Allegedly
Former PM Kevin Rudd says he declined Epstein invitation after latest document dump.
Dr Rudd’s name has appeared in multiple emails sent to and from Epstein, in the latest documents released by the US Justice Department (DOJ).
The documents reveal how third-party individuals attempted to secure Dr Rudd’s attendance to various events with Epstein, including at his New York house, and the illustrate how the Epstein network courted people with power or influence.
‘No introduction ever took place’, says Rudd’s office
Date: 31/01/2026 17:32:00
From: kii
ID: 2355921
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
kii said:
Also, consider the reports of him abusing boys.
People focus on Ivanka and Trump’s lecherous focus on her.
I bet he’s also done stuff to Donald Jr and Eric when they were kids. Junior’s drug habit could be his way of coping with that. Who remembers Eric, recently, calling Trump “Daddy” and saying he’s a good boy? I forget the context.
Trump is/was possibly doing what was done to him.
Fred Trump Sr. was a really, really nasty shit, who put an inordinate amount of effort into belittling and demeaning his children, especially his sons. He managed every tiny details of their lives, and seemed hell-bent on denying them any say in their own existences, and on preventing anything which resembled joy being known to them.
Fred Trump Jr, his eldest son, tried several times to go against his old man, but all it got him was chronic alcoholism and and early grave from a heart attack. After which Fred Sr., ably abetted by Donald, moved heaven and earth to see that Fred Jr.‘s family received just about nothing in the way of assistance from the Trump family.
Donald is probably the biggest shit in the world because that’s what his father taught him to be. And he’s constantly still trying to prove to dead ol’ dad that he’s turned out the way that father wanted.
Mary Trump has lots to say about this.
And, yes, abusers come from abusers.
Date: 31/01/2026 17:43:05
From: roughbarked
ID: 2355922
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I’m not at all surprised to see Woody Allen’s name mentioned.
Date: 31/01/2026 17:44:56
From: roughbarked
ID: 2355923
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
When the stories broke, Mr Rudd and Mr Rød-Larsen both had senior roles at the International Peace Institute.
Reports at that time claimed Epstein had donated hundreds of thousands of US dollars to the think tank over an eight-year period between 2011 and 2019.
In 2020, when it emerged that the CEO had taken an undisclosed personal loan from Epstein, Dr Rudd then accepted the CEO’s resignation.
“At Dr Rudd’s initiative, the Board commissioned a forensic audit of IPI’s finances by KPMG to remove the possibility of any further donations or irregularities,” his office’s statement released on Saturday said.
Responding to this reporting in 2020, Mr Rudd issued a statement saying that he had convened several board meetings at the think tank to take “immediate” action after learning about the Epstein link.
He recommended that the board donate to charity an amount comparable to Epstein’s donations to the IPI, and told the ABC that he regarding Epstein as an “odious character in the extreme”. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-01-31/kevin-rudd-refred-to-in-latest-epstein-files-dump/106290858
Date: 31/01/2026 17:52:08
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2355924
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
When the stories broke, Mr Rudd and Mr Rød-Larsen both had senior roles at the International Peace Institute.
Reports at that time claimed Epstein had donated hundreds of thousands of US dollars to the think tank over an eight-year period between 2011 and 2019.
In 2020, when it emerged that the CEO had taken an undisclosed personal loan from Epstein, Dr Rudd then accepted the CEO’s resignation.
“At Dr Rudd’s initiative, the Board commissioned a forensic audit of IPI’s finances by KPMG to remove the possibility of any further donations or irregularities,” his office’s statement released on Saturday said.
Responding to this reporting in 2020, Mr Rudd issued a statement saying that he had convened several board meetings at the think tank to take “immediate” action after learning about the Epstein link.
He recommended that the board donate to charity an amount comparable to Epstein’s donations to the IPI, and told the ABC that he regarding Epstein as an “odious character in the extreme”. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-01-31/kevin-rudd-refred-to-in-latest-epstein-files-dump/106290858
so basically anything called “peace” in this day and age is just a front for fascism andor paedophilia, mostly the “and” conjuction
Date: 31/01/2026 17:53:00
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2355925
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
dv said:
Divine Angel said:
JFC just when you think it can’t get worse, somehow it does
Allegedly
Former PM Kevin Rudd says he declined Epstein invitation after latest document dump.
we mean plenty of people get spam emails, it’s a thing, right
Date: 31/01/2026 17:54:48
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2355926
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
It was only a few weeks ago that Musk was insisting that the only correspondence was him refusing an invitation to go to the island.
This was not correct.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/30/elon-musk-epstein-files-island-visits

girls FTW!
He’s an odd fellow.
what’s the timestamp on that, the phrasing seems different to the other released mails that we’ve read
Date: 31/01/2026 18:09:14
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2355930
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
btm said:
SCIENCE said:
Peak Warming Man said:
I’ve had those dreams too, when I was younger.
we heard that ol’ Oli admitted recently that they were by and large confabulations
Well, since he died more than ten years ago, for him to have said anything recently he must have been speaking through a medium.
you’re right, we confabulated like an expert
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2025/12/15/oliver-sacks-put-himself-into-his-case-studies-what-was-the-cost
he admitted recently
Date: 31/01/2026 18:16:26
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2355931
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
kii said:
Also, consider the reports of him abusing boys.
People focus on Ivanka and Trump’s lecherous focus on her.
I bet he’s also done stuff to Donald Jr and Eric when they were kids. Junior’s drug habit could be his way of coping with that. Who remembers Eric, recently, calling Trump “Daddy” and saying he’s a good boy? I forget the context.
Trump is/was possibly doing what was done to him.
Fred Trump Sr. was a really, really nasty shit, who put an inordinate amount of effort into belittling and demeaning his children, especially his sons. He managed every tiny details of their lives, and seemed hell-bent on denying them any say in their own existences, and on preventing anything which resembled joy being known to them.
Fred Trump Jr, his eldest son, tried several times to go against his old man, but all it got him was chronic alcoholism and and early grave from a heart attack. After which Fred Sr., ably abetted by Donald, moved heaven and earth to see that Fred Jr.‘s family received just about nothing in the way of assistance from the Trump family.
Donald is probably the biggest shit in the world because that’s what his father taught him to be. And he’s constantly still trying to prove to dead ol’ dad that he’s turned out the way that father wanted.
word on the street is that he’s into snuff content and hence all the warmongering is another boost beyond the mere typical perks of presidency
Date: 31/01/2026 19:04:22
From: dv
ID: 2355945
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
$12000
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1K9fp3BYja/
Date: 31/01/2026 19:09:32
From: roughbarked
ID: 2355948
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
$12000
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1K9fp3BYja/
Did you watch the next video?
Date: 31/01/2026 19:11:45
From: kii
ID: 2355950
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
$12000
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1K9fp3BYja/
Yes.
Date: 31/01/2026 19:14:42
From: dv
ID: 2355953
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
dv said:
$12000
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1K9fp3BYja/
Did you watch the next video?
I can’t really tell which video is “next” in your queue so perhaps pls post the link.
Date: 31/01/2026 19:16:24
From: roughbarked
ID: 2355955
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
roughbarked said:
dv said:
$12000
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1K9fp3BYja/
Did you watch the next video?
I can’t really tell which video is “next” in your queue so perhaps pls post the link.
Not my queue. It was your link. I don’t have a queue at facebook.
Date: 31/01/2026 19:17:43
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2355956
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
dv said:
roughbarked said:
Did you watch the next video?
I can’t really tell which video is “next” in your queue so perhaps pls post the link.
Not my queue. It was your link. I don’t have a queue at facebook.
The algorithm chooses the next video for each person; yours won’t be the same as his or mine.
Date: 31/01/2026 19:18:35
From: dv
ID: 2355957
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
dv said:
roughbarked said:
Did you watch the next video?
I can’t really tell which video is “next” in your queue so perhaps pls post the link.
Not my queue. It was your link. I don’t have a queue at facebook.
Okay then let me rephrase. There’s no “next” video in that link as seen by me.
Date: 31/01/2026 19:23:49
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2355961
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
dv said:
roughbarked said:
Did you watch the next video?
I can’t really tell which video is “next” in your queue so perhaps pls post the link.
Not my queue. It was your link. I don’t have a queue at facebook.
https://youtu.be/Rl-cIblInSk Next video.
Date: 31/01/2026 19:36:31
From: kii
ID: 2355965
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
dv said:
roughbarked said:
Did you watch the next video?
I can’t really tell which video is “next” in your queue so perhaps pls post the link.
Not my queue. It was your link. I don’t have a queue at facebook.

Date: 31/01/2026 19:39:26
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 2355966
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
roughbarked said:
dv said:
I can’t really tell which video is “next” in your queue so perhaps pls post the link.
Not my queue. It was your link. I don’t have a queue at facebook.

LOL😁😁
Date: 31/01/2026 19:42:24
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2355968
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
$12000
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1K9fp3BYja/
He seems a little unhappy with the system.
Date: 31/01/2026 19:44:25
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 2355970
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
$12000
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1K9fp3BYja/
He seems a little unhappy with the system.
understandably so. the government should do something about it!
Date: 31/01/2026 20:11:18
From: dv
ID: 2355974
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
$12000
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1K9fp3BYja/
He seems a little unhappy with the system.
Yeah I was picking that up too.
Date: 31/01/2026 20:27:27
From: dv
ID: 2355975
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Allegedly
Date: 31/01/2026 20:31:36
From: roughbarked
ID: 2355976
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:
dv said:
I can’t really tell which video is “next” in your queue so perhaps pls post the link.
Not my queue. It was your link. I don’t have a queue at facebook.
The algorithm chooses the next video for each person; yours won’t be the same as his or mine.
It dosen’t know me.
Date: 31/01/2026 20:32:03
From: roughbarked
ID: 2355977
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
roughbarked said:
dv said:
I can’t really tell which video is “next” in your queue so perhaps pls post the link.
Not my queue. It was your link. I don’t have a queue at facebook.
Okay then let me rephrase. There’s no “next” video in that link as seen by me.
I wob’t click on any more.
Date: 31/01/2026 20:40:26
From: dv
ID: 2355980
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:
Not my queue. It was your link. I don’t have a queue at facebook.
The algorithm chooses the next video for each person; yours won’t be the same as his or mine.
It dosen’t know me.
Cool story bro but just share the URL of the video you are referring to so I can see what you’re talking about
Date: 31/01/2026 20:54:19
From: dv
ID: 2355982
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Melania has a 99% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes


Date: 31/01/2026 20:57:05
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2355983
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Melania has a 99% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes


$35 million of Bezos’s money presumably included some provision for reviews from shills.
Date: 31/01/2026 20:57:28
From: dv
ID: 2355984
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Ehud Barak and Jeffrey Epstein
Date: 31/01/2026 20:57:41
From: kii
ID: 2355985
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Melania has a 99% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes


Melanie…..LOLOLOLOL 😆
Date: 31/01/2026 20:57:49
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 2355986
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Melania has a 99% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes


put that in your pipe dissers!!!
Date: 31/01/2026 21:25:54
From: dv
ID: 2355989
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The list includes numerous allegations of sexual abuse made against Trump, Epstein and other high-profile figures.
Trump has consistently denied any wrongdoing in relation to Epstein and has not been accused of any crimes by Epstein’s victims.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cevnmxyy4wjo
Having a bit of trouble getting my head around that last part, BBC.
Date: 31/01/2026 21:55:56
From: dv
ID: 2355996
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
There’s also a claim in there that Robin Leach, of Lifestyles of the rich and famous, strangled a lass
Date: 31/01/2026 23:19:14
From: dv
ID: 2356006
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 31/01/2026 23:30:46
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2356012
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 31/01/2026 23:35:06
From: kii
ID: 2356016
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

🤣😂🙄
Date: 31/01/2026 23:51:26
From: dv
ID: 2356019
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Srsly … why blank this person’s name?
Date: 1/02/2026 00:01:24
From: party_pants
ID: 2356020
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Srsly … why blank this person’s name?
to protect the guilty
Date: 1/02/2026 00:11:33
From: roughbarked
ID: 2356027
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
The algorithm chooses the next video for each person; yours won’t be the same as his or mine.
It dosen’t know me.
Cool story bro but just share the URL of the video you are referring to so I can see what you’re talking about
Too late. Dumped it ages ago. Don’t even recall what it was about. Want me to dig through history I can. But the moment passed when you suggested it was my feed rather than yours. Wasn’t anything nasty. just a bt weird.
Date: 1/02/2026 00:30:03
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356036
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
$12000
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1K9fp3BYja/
He seems a little unhappy with the system.
Yeah I was picking that up too.
if you don’t like it then leave
Date: 1/02/2026 00:31:08
From: roughbarked
ID: 2356038
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
dv said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
He seems a little unhappy with the system.
Yeah I was picking that up too.
if you don’t like it then leave
kii did and more power to her for getting the fuck out of there.
Date: 1/02/2026 00:33:21
From: roughbarked
ID: 2356039
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Isn’t this one of the many wars Trump has stopped?

Date: 1/02/2026 00:39:26
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356041
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
dv said:
Yeah I was picking that up too.
if you don’t like it then leave
kii did and more power to her for getting the fuck out of there.
why, did she pay $12k for blood work
Date: 1/02/2026 00:42:08
From: roughbarked
ID: 2356043
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
if you don’t like it then leave
kii did and more power to her for getting the fuck out of there.
why, did she pay $12k for blood work
You waste a lot of my time writing posts like that for me to read. I do wish you wouldn’t.
Date: 1/02/2026 01:17:32
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356054
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
kii did and more power to her for getting the fuck out of there.
why, did she pay $12k for blood work
You waste a lot of my time writing posts like that for me to read. I do wish you wouldn’t.
you’re right though everyone else has 爱 to do this for them now, yous don’t need us
Date: 1/02/2026 01:19:41
From: roughbarked
ID: 2356056
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
why, did she pay $12k for blood work
You waste a lot of my time writing posts like that for me to read. I do wish you wouldn’t.
you’re right though everyone else has 爱 to do this for them now, yous don’t need us
Whooze us?
Date: 1/02/2026 01:20:34
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356058
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
You waste a lot of my time writing posts like that for me to read. I do wish you wouldn’t.
you’re right though everyone else has 爱 to do this for them now, yous don’t need us
Whooze us?
SCIENCE
Date: 1/02/2026 01:24:36
From: kii
ID: 2356060
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 1/02/2026 01:25:30
From: roughbarked
ID: 2356061
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
you’re right though everyone else has 爱 to do this for them now, yous don’t need us
Whooze us?
SCIENCE
What did the SCIENCE ever do for us?
Date: 1/02/2026 01:33:04
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356066
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
surprise


total surprise
Date: 1/02/2026 01:54:22
From: Ian
ID: 2356071
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Howard Nutlick, currently serving as Trump’s US secretary of commerce, arranged to visit Jeffrey Epstein’s island in 2012, according to Epstein-related files released by the Department of Justice on Friday.
According to the newly released documents, on 20 November 2012, Epstein’s longtime assistant emailed Lutnick saying that “Jeffrey Epstein understands you will be down in St Thomas some over the holidays” and that “Jeffrey requested I please pass along some phone numbers to you so the two of you can possibly get together.”
Date: 1/02/2026 02:13:01
From: AussieDJ
ID: 2356072
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 1/02/2026 03:01:25
From: dv
ID: 2356073
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
dv said:
roughbarked said:
It dosen’t know me.
Cool story bro but just share the URL of the video you are referring to so I can see what you’re talking about
Too late. Dumped it ages ago. Don’t even recall what it was about. Want me to dig through history I can. But the moment passed when you suggested it was my feed rather than yours. Wasn’t anything nasty. just a bt weird.
To be clear… it 100% was your feed. There is no universal “next video”.
Date: 1/02/2026 06:42:32
From: roughbarked
ID: 2356075
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
roughbarked said:
dv said:
Cool story bro but just share the URL of the video you are referring to so I can see what you’re talking about
Too late. Dumped it ages ago. Don’t even recall what it was about. Want me to dig through history I can. But the moment passed when you suggested it was my feed rather than yours. Wasn’t anything nasty. just a bt weird.
To be clear… it 100% was your feed. There is no universal “next video”.
Do you remember B&W TV with the vertical hold?
Well these bloody youtube short things of you move your mouse towards the bottom of the screen the next video flips up like gtom the botom?
Well that’s what I mean by the next video.
Date: 1/02/2026 06:57:00
From: roughbarked
ID: 2356078
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
dv said:
roughbarked said:
Too late. Dumped it ages ago. Don’t even recall what it was about. Want me to dig through history I can. But the moment passed when you suggested it was my feed rather than yours. Wasn’t anything nasty. just a bt weird.
To be clear… it 100% was your feed. There is no universal “next video”.
Do you remember B&W TV with the vertical hold?
Well these bloody youtube short things of you move your mouse towards the bottom of the screen the next video flips up like gtom the botom?
Well that’s what I mean by the next video.
like from he bottom
I really should turn the light on so I can see the keyboard.
Date: 1/02/2026 10:37:32
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356131
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
roughbarked said:
dv said:
Cool story bro but just share the URL of the video you are referring to so I can see what you’re talking about
Too late. Dumped it ages ago. Don’t even recall what it was about. Want me to dig through history I can. But the moment passed when you suggested it was my feed rather than yours. Wasn’t anything nasty. just a bt weird.
To be clear… it 100% was your feed. There is no universal “next video”.
that’s what the moguls want yous to think
Date: 1/02/2026 10:42:38
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356134
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 1/02/2026 10:46:11
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356137
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
dv said:
roughbarked said:
Too late. Dumped it ages ago. Don’t even recall what it was about. Want me to dig through history I can. But the moment passed when you suggested it was my feed rather than yours. Wasn’t anything nasty. just a bt weird.
To be clear… it 100% was your feed. There is no universal “next video”.
that’s what the moguls want yous to think
like speaking clearly instead of being vague and cryptic, being engagement farms and engines for mass manipulation of public opinion, the nature of “the algorithm” on these media platforms must naturally funnel viewers into similar sequences of propaganda, so maybe there is no strictly universal absolutely 100% next but we expect it to become more and more correlated
prove us wrong
Date: 1/02/2026 11:29:48
From: Michael V
ID: 2356159
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ChrispenEvan said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
$12000
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1K9fp3BYja/
He seems a little unhappy with the system.
understandably so. the government should do something about it!
Bet they don’t, though.
Date: 1/02/2026 11:33:46
From: dv
ID: 2356163
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Right on queue… that’s Brett Ratner, who made the Melania movie
Date: 1/02/2026 11:35:35
From: roughbarked
ID: 2356164
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Right on queue… that’s Brett Ratner, who made the Melania movie
and in the middle, a sixteen year old?
Date: 1/02/2026 11:40:40
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2356166
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
dv said:
Right on queue… that’s Brett Ratner, who made the Melania movie
and in the middle, a sixteen year old?
If that
Date: 1/02/2026 12:19:09
From: dv
ID: 2356183
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 1/02/2026 12:22:04
From: dv
ID: 2356184
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 1/02/2026 12:23:59
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2356185
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

If i ask for ‘extra anchovies’ and get a 15-year-old cutie instead, you’d better believe that there’s going to be complaints!
Date: 1/02/2026 12:24:30
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2356186
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

Elon: TRUMP IS IN THE EPSTEIN FILES!
Also Elon: if you’re looking for him, you won’t see me 🙈
Date: 1/02/2026 12:47:46
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2356193
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
It’s not really politics, but…
CNN:
‘New York — Luigi Mangione will not face the death penalty for allegedly killing UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in December 2024, a federal district judge ruled Friday, dealing a blow to US prosecutors who were adamant about pursuing the ultimate sentence.
US District Judge Margaret Garnett dismissed the murder charge in Mangione’s federal indictment, which was the only count in any of the cases brought against him that could have carried a possible death sentence. He still faces two counts of stalking – which carry a maximum possible sentence of life in prison without parole – in the federal case. ‘
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/01/30/us/luigi-mangione-case-rulings-trial
Date: 1/02/2026 12:51:55
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2356194
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
It’s not really politics, but…
CNN:
‘New York — Luigi Mangione will not face the death penalty for allegedly killing UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in December 2024, a federal district judge ruled Friday, dealing a blow to US prosecutors who were adamant about pursuing the ultimate sentence.
US District Judge Margaret Garnett dismissed the murder charge in Mangione’s federal indictment, which was the only count in any of the cases brought against him that could have carried a possible death sentence. He still faces two counts of stalking – which carry a maximum possible sentence of life in prison without parole – in the federal case. ‘
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/01/30/us/luigi-mangione-case-rulings-trial
That’s the federal charges. He’s still up for murder in New York state.
Date: 1/02/2026 12:55:37
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2356196
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
captain_spalding said:
It’s not really politics, but…
CNN:
‘New York — Luigi Mangione will not face the death penalty for allegedly killing UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in December 2024, a federal district judge ruled Friday, dealing a blow to US prosecutors who were adamant about pursuing the ultimate sentence.
US District Judge Margaret Garnett dismissed the murder charge in Mangione’s federal indictment, which was the only count in any of the cases brought against him that could have carried a possible death sentence. He still faces two counts of stalking – which carry a maximum possible sentence of life in prison without parole – in the federal case. ‘
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/01/30/us/luigi-mangione-case-rulings-trial
That’s the federal charges. He’s still up for murder in New York state.
Well, it gets the Trump puppets out of the murder case, anyway.
Date: 1/02/2026 14:04:21
From: buffy
ID: 2356216
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
US judge orders Liam Conejo Ramos, 5, and father released from ICE detention
From that ABC news article, some things the judge had to say:
US District Judge Fred Biery, who sits in San Antonio and was appointed by former Democratic president Bill Clinton, said in his ruling that “the case has its genesis in the ill-conceived and incompetently-implemented government pursuit of daily deportation quotas, apparently even if it requires traumatising children”.
Judge Biery had previously ruled that the boy and his father, Adrian Conejo Arias, could not be removed from the US, at least for now.
In his Saturday order, he said: “apparent also is the government’s ignorance of an American historical document called the Declaration of Independence,”
Judge Biery also included in his ruling a photo of Liam Conejo Ramos and references to two lines in the Bible: “Jesus said, ‘Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these,” and “Jesus wept”.
Date: 1/02/2026 15:11:29
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2356235
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Trump said in November that “a dividend of at least $2,000 a person (not including high income people!) will be paid” from tariff revenue collected by Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents.
“All money left over from the $2000 payments made to low and middle income USA Citizens, from the massive Tariff Income pouring into our Country from foreign countries, which will be substantial, will be used to SUBSTANTIALLY PAY DOWN NATIONAL DEBT,” Trump said on his Truth Social platform.
The White House has not laid out a clear plan for the tariffs, which Trump has repeatedly claimed are making the U.S. a lot of money. It’s also not clear who exactly would qualify for tariff stimulus checks.
In a January interview with The New York Times, Trump questioned whether he had made that promise.
“You’ve promised $2,000 checks to Americans based off of your tariff revenues. When can they expect those?” New York Times reporter Katie Rogers asked.
“I did do that? When did I do that?” Trump responded.
Trump later backtracked, saying that tariff rebate checks could be sent out “toward the end of the year.” However, a possible Supreme Court ruling against his tariffs later this year could force the U.S. to send back any revenue made from the tariffs.
https://www.nj.com/politics/2026/01/trump-keeps-promising-americans-stimulus-checks-but-heres-what-youre-actually-getting.html
Date: 1/02/2026 15:18:03
From: kii
ID: 2356236
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Who wore it better?

Date: 1/02/2026 15:30:33
From: dv
ID: 2356241
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
captain_spalding said:
It’s not really politics, but…
CNN:
‘New York — Luigi Mangione will not face the death penalty for allegedly killing UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in December 2024, a federal district judge ruled Friday, dealing a blow to US prosecutors who were adamant about pursuing the ultimate sentence.
US District Judge Margaret Garnett dismissed the murder charge in Mangione’s federal indictment, which was the only count in any of the cases brought against him that could have carried a possible death sentence. He still faces two counts of stalking – which carry a maximum possible sentence of life in prison without parole – in the federal case. ‘
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/01/30/us/luigi-mangione-case-rulings-trial
That’s the federal charges. He’s still up for murder in New York state.
Well, it gets the Trump puppets out of the murder case, anyway.
NY State doesn’t apply the death penalty
Date: 1/02/2026 15:34:59
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2356243
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
captain_spalding said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
That’s the federal charges. He’s still up for murder in New York state.
Well, it gets the Trump puppets out of the murder case, anyway.
NY State doesn’t apply the death penalty
Everything’s coming up Luigi!
Date: 1/02/2026 15:55:52
From: kii
ID: 2356253
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I love this woman.
Morgan Evelyn Cook
Date: 1/02/2026 16:11:31
From: Woodie
ID: 2356257
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
US judge orders Liam Conejo Ramos, 5, and father released from ICE detention
From that ABC news article, some things the judge had to say:
US District Judge Fred Biery, who sits in San Antonio and was appointed by former Democratic president Bill Clinton, said in his ruling that “the case has its genesis in the ill-conceived and incompetently-implemented government pursuit of daily deportation quotas, apparently even if it requires traumatising children”.
Judge Biery had previously ruled that the boy and his father, Adrian Conejo Arias, could not be removed from the US, at least for now.
In his Saturday order, he said: “apparent also is the government’s ignorance of an American historical document called the Declaration of Independence,”
Judge Biery also included in his ruling a photo of Liam Conejo Ramos and references to two lines in the Bible: “Jesus said, ‘Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these,” and “Jesus wept”.
I don’t know why you lot are jumping up and down about this sorta thing happening in the US.
The same thing happens here, ya know.. What about that Tamil refugee family from Biloela?
Date: 1/02/2026 16:38:26
From: Michael V
ID: 2356272
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Woodie said:
buffy said:
US judge orders Liam Conejo Ramos, 5, and father released from ICE detention
From that ABC news article, some things the judge had to say:
US District Judge Fred Biery, who sits in San Antonio and was appointed by former Democratic president Bill Clinton, said in his ruling that “the case has its genesis in the ill-conceived and incompetently-implemented government pursuit of daily deportation quotas, apparently even if it requires traumatising children”.
Judge Biery had previously ruled that the boy and his father, Adrian Conejo Arias, could not be removed from the US, at least for now.
In his Saturday order, he said: “apparent also is the government’s ignorance of an American historical document called the Declaration of Independence,”
Judge Biery also included in his ruling a photo of Liam Conejo Ramos and references to two lines in the Bible: “Jesus said, ‘Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these,” and “Jesus wept”.
I don’t know why you lot are jumping up and down about this sorta thing happening in the US.
The same thing happens here, ya know.. What about that Tamil refugee family from Biloela?
I seem to remember jumping up and down about them, too. Remember that Dutton bloke? It was his doing. IIRC, Albo righted it.
Date: 1/02/2026 17:39:55
From: dv
ID: 2356289
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 1/02/2026 17:43:02
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356293
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
we mean at the end of the day wasn’t it all true, rich and powerful arseholes were all connected in an international paedophile ring
Date: 1/02/2026 17:46:41
From: Michael V
ID: 2356297
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
we mean at the end of the day wasn’t it all true, rich and powerful arseholes were all connected in an international paedophile ring
Is that a Q?
Date: 1/02/2026 18:28:51
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356309
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
we mean at the end of the day wasn’t it all true, rich and powerful arseholes were all connected in an international paedophile ring
Is that a Q?
well we just aren’t sure what the conspiracy theoretics were about, were they hoping to point the finger away from themselves which seems a high risk move given the breadth of this, or were they hoping to paint it as just deranged delusions of a bunch of whack jobs so that nobody would believe it, also high risk because you end up with a nation of critical unthinkers
maybe it’s just a happy* coincidence that it turned out to be true
*: irony, sarcasm, et cetera
Date: 1/02/2026 19:22:44
From: Michael V
ID: 2356320
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 1/02/2026 19:27:05
From: roughbarked
ID: 2356322
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 1/02/2026 19:57:24
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2356332
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 1/02/2026 20:06:28
From: dv
ID: 2356336
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.threads.com/@omyliaa/post/DUNZLs_DqLt?xmt=AQF0cc3NV_93kpweuRxXaFiGNWvJZHI8Wal41iNoNFNa_XHmpfDakT-N7th4OYL_Ut3ZoB3R&slof=1
Former asst US Attorney Elie Honig discusses the redactions
Date: 1/02/2026 20:33:18
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356341
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

so he’s not in the
he is there
Date: 1/02/2026 21:09:13
From: dv
ID: 2356346
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

whoops
Date: 1/02/2026 21:11:28
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2356348
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Do you reckon we might see an unredacted copy of the files ‘leaked’?
Date: 1/02/2026 21:19:37
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2356350
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Do you reckon we might see an unredacted copy of the files ‘leaked’?
I hope so.
Date: 1/02/2026 21:37:38
From: dv
ID: 2356354
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

In fairness it isn’t called the Board of Freedom
Date: 1/02/2026 21:39:04
From: dv
ID: 2356355
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Do you reckon we might see an unredacted copy of the files ‘leaked’?
That doesn’t seem to be much of a thing any more. Anonymous and Wikileaks were great for getting DJT elected but I guess that was enough.
Date: 1/02/2026 21:59:47
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356359
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
In fairness it isn’t called the Board of Freedom
exactly team sports are team fights which are the antithesis of peace
Date: 1/02/2026 23:42:59
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2356385
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 1/02/2026 23:45:38
From: Kingy
ID: 2356387
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

It didn’t work the first time…
Date: 1/02/2026 23:51:52
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356389
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

try Komodo
Date: 1/02/2026 23:51:53
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356390
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

try Komodo
Date: 1/02/2026 23:52:50
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356391
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Kingy said:
captain_spalding said:

It didn’t work the first time…
that’s because 0/4 of the ones there are not captured
Date: 1/02/2026 23:58:50
From: kii
ID: 2356392
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Yesterday I finally posted a response on my former neighbour’s Facebook page. The one who wanted to kill all liberals, ban abortions for every woman amongst other things. She then moved to Texas.
She posts so much really dumb stuff, but yesterday’s effort was just so incorrect that I wanted to yell at her.

I am a non-citizen and I still have a valid Green Card, therefore
I posted this as part of my response. She didn’t address me directly, but she squirmed around and pointed fingers at other things. (Also she never returned the puppy crate we loaned her for a puppy that she adopted.)
Key Constitutional Protections for Green Card Holders
Due Process & Equal Protection: Guaranteed by the 14th Amendment to “any person,” protecting against arbitrary government action.
Freedom of Speech and Religion: Protects the right to express views, including political protests, similar to citizens.
Protection from Unreasonable Searches: Generally require a warrant or probable cause.
Legal Counsel: Right to an attorney if charged with a crime. I have a lot of rights under the US Constitution.
Date: 2/02/2026 00:08:45
From: dv
ID: 2356396
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality_Winner
Reminder from 8 years ago.
Date: 2/02/2026 00:35:40
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356398
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
alleged

Date: 2/02/2026 00:37:29
From: dv
ID: 2356399
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15516349/Epsteins-sex-empire-KGB-honeytrap-Paedophile-financier-Putin-Russian-girls.html
Date: 2/02/2026 00:39:34
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356400
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality_Winner
Reminder from 8 years ago.
oh are they good guys or bad guys
Date: 2/02/2026 01:09:51
From: dv
ID: 2356402
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 2/02/2026 01:13:56
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356403
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
epstein barr virus something something
Date: 2/02/2026 01:22:24
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2356404
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality_Winner
Reminder from 8 years ago.
Deny everything Baldrick.
Date: 2/02/2026 01:34:22
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356405
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
alleged

Date: 2/02/2026 01:45:33
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356406
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
what is that last redaction and why

Date: 2/02/2026 07:19:45
From: buffy
ID: 2356410
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
what is that last redaction and why

And why redact a link to the NYT?
Date: 2/02/2026 07:26:10
From: dv
ID: 2356412
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 2/02/2026 07:57:32
From: buffy
ID: 2356414
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I’m not sure why, but I never connected Ghislaine Maxwell with Robert Maxwell in my brain.
Date: 2/02/2026 08:00:42
From: roughbarked
ID: 2356416
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
I’m not sure why, but I never connected Ghislaine Maxwell with Robert Maxwell in my brain.
I’m sure it is connected now then.
Date: 2/02/2026 09:59:17
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356441
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
buffy said:
I’m not sure why, but I never connected Ghislaine Maxwell with Robert Maxwell in my brain.
I’m sure it is connected now then.
what about James Clerk Maxwell or is that unrelated
Date: 2/02/2026 10:39:05
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2356450
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
This is very entertaining.
‘The Room Next Door’ with British comedian Michael Spicer. He plays the role of an advisor who’s supposed to guide Trump through his speeches via an earpiece.
It’s a bit ‘Clarke and Dawe’.
In this one, he’s a new advisor, and, in the course of Trump’s tour-de-force at Davos he consults with the chap who he recently replaced.
It’s nearly 14 minutes long, but it moves along nicely, and is rather funny.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gDH0Tz8Yb9I
Date: 2/02/2026 10:50:02
From: dv
ID: 2356454
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
buffy said:
I’m not sure why, but I never connected Ghislaine Maxwell with Robert Maxwell in my brain.
I’m sure it is connected now then.
what about James Clerk Maxwell or is that unrelated
smart
Date: 2/02/2026 10:53:35
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2356457
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
I’m sure it is connected now then.
what about James Clerk Maxwell or is that unrelated
smart
Robert (‘Cap’n Bob’) Maxwell’s gin-palace ‘yacht’, from which he disappeared into the Atlantic, was named ‘Lady Ghislaine’.
Date: 2/02/2026 10:56:04
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2356460
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I wonder how many days Ghislaine Maxwell has left in this world?
There’s a lot of black lines in those released files, and she’s someone who could ‘fill in a lot of the blanks’.
Date: 2/02/2026 10:57:29
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356464
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
I wonder how many days Ghislaine Maxwell has left in this world?
There’s a lot of black lines in those released files, and she’s someone who could ‘fill in a lot of the blanks’.
we thought they were incentivising her not to
Date: 2/02/2026 10:58:34
From: dv
ID: 2356467
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
I wonder how many days Ghislaine Maxwell has left in this world?
There’s a lot of black lines in those released files, and she’s someone who could ‘fill in a lot of the blanks’.
17 years ago this drawing of a suspect was announced
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2009-08-09/viable-australian-leads-in-madeleine-mccann-case/1384222
Date: 2/02/2026 10:59:52
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2356468
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
captain_spalding said:
I wonder how many days Ghislaine Maxwell has left in this world?
There’s a lot of black lines in those released files, and she’s someone who could ‘fill in a lot of the blanks’.
we thought they were incentivising her not to
Yes. But, while she’s above ground, she’s a rather…persistent sort of threat.
One that could be permanently resolved.
Date: 2/02/2026 11:07:22
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2356472
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The files are just a ruse to get attention away from the ball room and you people have fallen for it hook line and sinker.
Date: 2/02/2026 11:11:41
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2356475
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
The files are just a ruse to get attention away from the ball room and you people have fallen for it hook line and sinker.
The Jeffrey Epstein Memorial Ballroom.
The ‘Trump’-class ‘battleships’.
Two projects that Trump will never live to see completed, and quite possibly never live to see started.
Date: 2/02/2026 11:12:49
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356478
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Peak Warming Man said:
The files are just a ruse to get attention away from the ball room and you people have fallen for it hook line and sinker.
The Jeffrey Epstein Memorial Ballroom.
The ‘Trump’-class ‘battleships’.
Two projects that Trump will never live to see completed, and quite possibly never live to see started.
we don’t get all yous jokers’ obsessions with diversion distraction oh this is just a feint a false flag a fuckup
no
it’s a fork
Date: 2/02/2026 11:16:21
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2356483
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
captain_spalding said:
Peak Warming Man said:
The files are just a ruse to get attention away from the ball room and you people have fallen for it hook line and sinker.
The Jeffrey Epstein Memorial Ballroom.
The ‘Trump’-class ‘battleships’.
Two projects that Trump will never live to see completed, and quite possibly never live to see started.
we don’t get all yous jokers’ obsessions with diversion distraction oh this is just a feint a false flag a fuckup
no
it’s a fork
Probably closer to the truth. It’s just whatever bee that Trump wakes up with in his bonnet on any given day.
Now he wants to build ‘a 100,000 seat stadium’ across the street from the White House.
Date: 2/02/2026 11:17:11
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356485
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
SCIENCE said:
captain_spalding said:
I wonder how many days Ghislaine Maxwell has left in this world?
There’s a lot of black lines in those released files, and she’s someone who could ‘fill in a lot of the blanks’.
we thought they were incentivising her not to
Yes. But, while she’s above ground, she’s a rather…persistent sort of threat.
One that could be permanently resolved.
Fair point though perhaps along similar if antiparallel lines we don’t get how these thousand enablers and abusers in the Epstein circle, not a single one has raised enough of a flag in 15 years to have this looked at until now. Maybe they have and like the victims’ voices they were just silenced but it’s odd that rich powerful arseholes could be silenced as easily as sex slaves.
Date: 2/02/2026 11:19:32
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356488
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
SCIENCE said:
captain_spalding said:
The Jeffrey Epstein Memorial Ballroom.
The ‘Trump’-class ‘battleships’.
Two projects that Trump will never live to see completed, and quite possibly never live to see started.
we don’t get all yous jokers’ obsessions with diversion distraction oh this is just a feint a false flag a fuckup
no
it’s a fork
Probably closer to the truth. It’s just whatever bee that Trump wakes up with in his bonnet on any given day.
Now he wants to build ‘a 100,000 seat stadium’ across the street from the White House.
and they told us insisted adamantly swore that it’s not just team sports
Date: 2/02/2026 11:20:16
From: Cymek
ID: 2356489
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
SCIENCE said:
captain_spalding said:
The Jeffrey Epstein Memorial Ballroom.
The ‘Trump’-class ‘battleships’.
Two projects that Trump will never live to see completed, and quite possibly never live to see started.
we don’t get all yous jokers’ obsessions with diversion distraction oh this is just a feint a false flag a fuckup
no
it’s a fork
Probably closer to the truth. It’s just whatever bee that Trump wakes up with in his bonnet on any given day.
Now he wants to build ‘a 100,000 seat stadium’ across the street from the White House.
The Trump class battleship was extremely ambitious
Date: 2/02/2026 11:22:11
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2356490
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Peak Warming Man said:
The files are just a ruse to get attention away from the ball room and you people have fallen for it hook line and sinker.
The Jeffrey Epstein Memorial Ballroom.
The ‘Trump’-class ‘battleships’.
Two projects that Trump will never live to see completed, and quite possibly never live to see started.
If that’s the case I think we should declare March 1 International President Trump Day?
Date: 2/02/2026 11:22:12
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2356491
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Peak Warming Man said:
The files are just a ruse to get attention away from the ball room and you people have fallen for it hook line and sinker.
The Jeffrey Epstein Memorial Ballroom.
The ‘Trump’-class ‘battleships’.
Two projects that Trump will never live to see completed, and quite possibly never live to see started.
If that’s the case I think we should declare March 1 International President Trump Day?
Date: 2/02/2026 11:22:27
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2356492
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
SCIENCE said:
captain_spalding said:
The Jeffrey Epstein Memorial Ballroom.
The ‘Trump’-class ‘battleships’.
Two projects that Trump will never live to see completed, and quite possibly never live to see started.
we don’t get all yous jokers’ obsessions with diversion distraction oh this is just a feint a false flag a fuckup
no
it’s a fork
Probably closer to the truth. It’s just whatever bee that Trump wakes up with in his bonnet on any given day.
Now he wants to build ‘a 100,000 seat stadium’ across the street from the White House.
Some men see things as they are and asks why, Trump dreams things that never were and ask why not.
Date: 2/02/2026 11:23:01
From: Cymek
ID: 2356494
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
captain_spalding said:
SCIENCE said:
we thought they were incentivising her not to
Yes. But, while she’s above ground, she’s a rather…persistent sort of threat.
One that could be permanently resolved.
Fair point though perhaps along similar if antiparallel lines we don’t get how these thousand enablers and abusers in the Epstein circle, not a single one has raised enough of a flag in 15 years to have this looked at until now. Maybe they have and like the victims’ voices they were just silenced but it’s odd that rich powerful arseholes could be silenced as easily as sex slaves.
If guilty they should be executed
Running sex slaves and possibly murdering them as well is a crime you don’t get away with
Date: 2/02/2026 11:25:20
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2356498
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
captain_spalding said:
SCIENCE said:
we don’t get all yous jokers’ obsessions with diversion distraction oh this is just a feint a false flag a fuckup
no
it’s a fork
Probably closer to the truth. It’s just whatever bee that Trump wakes up with in his bonnet on any given day.
Now he wants to build ‘a 100,000 seat stadium’ across the street from the White House.
The Trump class battleship was extremely ambitious
I think that you mean ‘absurd’. None will ever begin construction, let alone be completed. Even if a start is made on one (to keep the Trump White House happy), it will dawdle along and never get past the first step or two (so that only basic, easily-reused elements are laid down).
It was one of those things where they just let Trump stand behind a podium and say his self-aggrandising daydreams out loud. No-one took it seriously.
Date: 2/02/2026 11:25:59
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356499
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
captain_spalding said:
Yes. But, while she’s above ground, she’s a rather…persistent sort of threat.
One that could be permanently resolved.
Fair point though perhaps along similar if antiparallel lines we don’t get how these thousand enablers and abusers in the Epstein circle, not a single one has raised enough of a flag in 15 years to have this looked at until now. Maybe they have and like the victims’ voices they were just silenced but it’s odd that rich powerful arseholes could be silenced as easily as sex slaves.
If guilty they should be executed
Running sex slaves and possibly murdering them as well is a crime you don’t get away with
look people are understandably squeamish about capital punishment, we propose a better solution and that is to give them what they want, lock them up for life with an interminable form of Grok trained on their own bullshit and let them entertain themselves to death
Date: 2/02/2026 11:26:01
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2356500
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
captain_spalding said:
Yes. But, while she’s above ground, she’s a rather…persistent sort of threat.
One that could be permanently resolved.
Fair point though perhaps along similar if antiparallel lines we don’t get how these thousand enablers and abusers in the Epstein circle, not a single one has raised enough of a flag in 15 years to have this looked at until now. Maybe they have and like the victims’ voices they were just silenced but it’s odd that rich powerful arseholes could be silenced as easily as sex slaves.
If guilty they should be executed
Running sex slaves and possibly murdering them as well is a crime you don’t get away with
Yeah, but only after she gives us the names.
Date: 2/02/2026 11:26:24
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2356501
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
captain_spalding said:
SCIENCE said:
we don’t get all yous jokers’ obsessions with diversion distraction oh this is just a feint a false flag a fuckup
no
it’s a fork
Probably closer to the truth. It’s just whatever bee that Trump wakes up with in his bonnet on any given day.
Now he wants to build ‘a 100,000 seat stadium’ across the street from the White House.
Some men see things as they are and asks why, Trump dreams things that never were and ask why not.
And he does suggest things, then denies ever saying them. “Did I say that? When did I say that?” I guess it’s hard to remember everything you’ve tweeted at 3am while you’re on the loo.
Date: 2/02/2026 11:32:43
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356507
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
saw it in the other thread,
“If Miss Z had tried to climb up, the brain-wave record would have showed a pattern of interference. And that was exactly what it did show.”
“he totally hanged himself, if anything else had happened like some kind of foul play the cameras would have showed signs of interference. And that was exactly wait what oh”
Date: 2/02/2026 11:46:08
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 2356514
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 2/02/2026 11:47:45
From: Cymek
ID: 2356515
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ChrispenEvan said:

Does it have a huge Speer type dome
Date: 2/02/2026 11:50:49
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2356517
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
ChrispenEvan said:

Does it have a huge Speer type dome
Maybe not, but, by Christ, it’s going to have a shitload of fake gold filigree on very possible surface.
Date: 2/02/2026 11:55:35
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356518
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
ChrispenEvan said:

Does it have a huge Speer type dome
it’s the greatest and it’s Trump, you must certainly mean a huge spear
Date: 2/02/2026 11:55:48
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2356519
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ChrispenEvan said:

Nothing to do with the mass exodus of people cancelling their appearances then
Date: 2/02/2026 11:57:35
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2356521
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ChrispenEvan said:

also I’m surprised he knows the word “bastion”
Date: 2/02/2026 11:57:59
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 2356523
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ChrispenEvan said:

beauty of this plan they can get rid of the kennedy bit…
Date: 2/02/2026 11:58:45
From: dv
ID: 2356524
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
ChrispenEvan said:

also I’m surprised he knows the word “bastion”
I’m not sure who wrote this, but Trump’s own missives are full of random capitalisations and typos.
Date: 2/02/2026 11:58:53
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356525
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
ChrispenEvan said:

also I’m surprised he knows the word “bastion”
bâtion
Date: 2/02/2026 12:03:35
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2356527
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Divine Angel said:
ChrispenEvan said:

also I’m surprised he knows the word “bastion”
I’m not sure who wrote this, but Trump’s own missives are full of random capitalisations and typos.
In particular, the first paragraph screams dictation, a stream of consciousness. But that doesn’t explain the capitalisations.
Date: 2/02/2026 12:04:49
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2356528
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Cymek said:
ChrispenEvan said:

Does it have a huge Speer type dome
Maybe not, but, by Christ, it’s going to have a shitload of fake gold filigree on very possible surface.
A good word filigree.
Date: 2/02/2026 12:05:02
From: dv
ID: 2356529
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The capitalisation of Highly Respected Experts is no doubt a reference to the Holy Roman Empire.
Date: 2/02/2026 12:05:09
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356530
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
Divine Angel said:
also I’m surprised he knows the word “bastion”
I’m not sure who wrote this, but Trump’s own missives are full of random capitalisations and typos.
In particular, the first paragraph screams dictation, a stream of consciousness. But that doesn’t explain the capitalisations.
does anything explain it, pretty sure he just doesn’t care
Date: 2/02/2026 12:09:20
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2356532
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
I’m not sure who wrote this, but Trump’s own missives are full of random capitalisations and typos.
In particular, the first paragraph screams dictation, a stream of consciousness. But that doesn’t explain the capitalisations.
does anything explain it, pretty sure he just doesn’t care
Oh look, by the end of the post, he’s probably forgotten what he wrote at the beginning. Just like the guy in his first term hired to sticky tape important documents back together, there’s probably a staffer who edits out some of the ramblings. For a post like this, there’s probably several pages worth of rambled utterances about the benefits of this Center to the acquisition of that place with the penguins, you know, Greenland, or how this Center will absolve him of the Epstein files.
Date: 2/02/2026 12:12:33
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2356533
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Did anyone here watch the video where Trump audibly shat himself? Incontinence itself is no laughing matter, but what is funny is the immediate aftermath.
https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/1qstu0i/trump_audibly_shits_himself_on_tv_immediately/
Date: 2/02/2026 12:15:57
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356534
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Divine Angel said:
ChrispenEvan said:

also I’m surprised he knows the word “bastion”
bâtion
tough crowd, we’d‘ve thought there was no shortage of wokists here clamouring to call him a wankeur so it would make sense he was a master of such wordplay
Date: 2/02/2026 12:16:25
From: roughbarked
ID: 2356535
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
captain_spalding said:
I wonder how many days Ghislaine Maxwell has left in this world?
There’s a lot of black lines in those released files, and she’s someone who could ‘fill in a lot of the blanks’.
17 years ago this drawing of a suspect was announced
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2009-08-09/viable-australian-leads-in-madeleine-mccann-case/1384222
Are you suggesting she looks like Ghislaine?
Date: 2/02/2026 12:19:09
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356536
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
dv said:
captain_spalding said:
I wonder how many days Ghislaine Maxwell has left in this world?
There’s a lot of black lines in those released files, and she’s someone who could ‘fill in a lot of the blanks’.
17 years ago this drawing of a suspect was announced
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2009-08-09/viable-australian-leads-in-madeleine-mccann-case/1384222
Are you suggesting she looks like Ghislaine?
holy shit
Date: 2/02/2026 12:20:12
From: dv
ID: 2356537
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
dv said:
captain_spalding said:
I wonder how many days Ghislaine Maxwell has left in this world?
There’s a lot of black lines in those released files, and she’s someone who could ‘fill in a lot of the blanks’.
17 years ago this drawing of a suspect was announced
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2009-08-09/viable-australian-leads-in-madeleine-mccann-case/1384222
Are you suggesting she looks like Ghislaine?
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Date: 2/02/2026 12:22:32
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2356539
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
ChrispenEvan said:

also I’m surprised he knows the word “bastion”
I very much doubt that he wrote that spiel.
Date: 2/02/2026 12:24:46
From: roughbarked
ID: 2356540
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Did anyone here watch the video where Trump audibly shat himself? Incontinence itself is no laughing matter, but what is funny is the immediate aftermath.
https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/1qstu0i/trump_audibly_shits_himself_on_tv_immediately/
Not sure I want to observe that.
Think I’ll just take your word on it.
Date: 2/02/2026 12:24:48
From: Cymek
ID: 2356541
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I’d assume with Epstein and his cronies that is all completely true and possibly far worse than suspected.
Kidnapping and sexual abuse of children who are then murdered.
Sworn to secrecy on pain of death of the perpetrator and family members
All agree and fund it to make it work.
Infiltrate and coerce departments/organisations who can upset everything.
Murder anyone that finds out about it
Date: 2/02/2026 12:27:21
From: roughbarked
ID: 2356542
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
I’d assume with Epstein and his cronies that is all completely true and possibly far worse than suspected.
Kidnapping and sexual abuse of children who are then murdered.
Sworn to secrecy on pain of death of the perpetrator and family members
All agree and fund it to make it work.
Infiltrate and coerce departments/organisations who can upset everything.
Murder anyone that finds out about it
From what I can read into it. Epstein engineered a lot of stuff iin ordrt to implicate and therefore give a blackmail hold over all sorts of influential people.
Date: 2/02/2026 12:28:01
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356543
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
I’d assume with Epstein and his cronies that is all completely true and possibly far worse than suspected.
Kidnapping and sexual abuse of children who are then murdered.
Sworn to secrecy on pain of death of the perpetrator and family members
All agree and fund it to make it work.
Infiltrate and coerce departments/organisations who can upset everything.
Murder anyone that finds out about it
well at least that’s better than the Russians who will just lethally poison you for opposing the state
Date: 2/02/2026 12:28:38
From: Cymek
ID: 2356544
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Cymek said:
I’d assume with Epstein and his cronies that is all completely true and possibly far worse than suspected.
Kidnapping and sexual abuse of children who are then murdered.
Sworn to secrecy on pain of death of the perpetrator and family members
All agree and fund it to make it work.
Infiltrate and coerce departments/organisations who can upset everything.
Murder anyone that finds out about it
From what I can read into it. Epstein engineered a lot of stuff iin ordrt to implicate and therefore give a blackmail hold over all sorts of influential people.
That would make sense wouldn’t it.
Date: 2/02/2026 12:34:11
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2356546
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
Did anyone here watch the video where Trump audibly shat himself? Incontinence itself is no laughing matter, but what is funny is the immediate aftermath.
https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/1qstu0i/trump_audibly_shits_himself_on_tv_immediately/
Not sure I want to observe that.
Think I’ll just take your word on it.
Press conference. Trump poops his diaper. Staffers start holding their noses and making faces. Other staffers shove attended journos out the door.
Date: 2/02/2026 12:42:46
From: roughbarked
ID: 2356548
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
Did anyone here watch the video where Trump audibly shat himself? Incontinence itself is no laughing matter, but what is funny is the immediate aftermath.
https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/1qstu0i/trump_audibly_shits_himself_on_tv_immediately/
Not sure I want to observe that.
Think I’ll just take your word on it.
Press conference. Trump poops his diaper. Staffers start holding their noses and making faces. Other staffers shove attended journos out the door.
Keeping their jobs.
Date: 2/02/2026 12:43:42
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2356549
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:
Not sure I want to observe that.
Think I’ll just take your word on it.
Press conference. Trump poops his diaper. Staffers start holding their noses and making faces. Other staffers shove attended journos out the door.
Keeping their jobs.
An, unfortunately, Trump keeps his.
Date: 2/02/2026 12:45:32
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2356551
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Can you imagine the absolute furore that would have erupted in the American media if old creaky sleepy Joe Biden had actually shat himself in front of the assembled media?
Date: 2/02/2026 12:48:30
From: roughbarked
ID: 2356552
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Can you imagine the absolute furore that would have erupted in the American media if old creaky sleepy Joe Biden had actually shat himself in front of the assembled media?
Trump would have been the first to tweet “sleepy joe SHAT HIMSELF!!!”
Date: 2/02/2026 12:51:57
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2356553
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 2/02/2026 12:53:57
From: roughbarked
ID: 2356554
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

He’s the dog that hasn’t barked.
Date: 2/02/2026 12:54:15
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2356555
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 2/02/2026 12:55:04
From: roughbarked
ID: 2356556
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

Ghislaine isn’t one of the girls.
Date: 2/02/2026 13:04:53
From: dv
ID: 2356557
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-02/us-deputy-attorney-general-downplays-more-epstein-files-charges/106294066
US Deputy Attorney-General says further charges from Epstein files unlikely
Date: 2/02/2026 13:09:02
From: roughbarked
ID: 2356559
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-02/us-deputy-attorney-general-downplays-more-epstein-files-charges/106294066
US Deputy Attorney-General says further charges from Epstein files unlikely
Because they’d have to charge too many of Trump’s admin?
Date: 2/02/2026 13:09:30
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2356560
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

I’m no statistician but that seems abnormally high.
Date: 2/02/2026 13:11:03
From: roughbarked
ID: 2356562
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
captain_spalding said:

I’m no statistician but that seems abnormally high.
So is the number of criminals that Trump has pardoned.
Date: 2/02/2026 13:36:31
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2356565
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-02/us-deputy-attorney-general-downplays-more-epstein-files-charges/106294066
US Deputy Attorney-General says further charges from Epstein files unlikely
Yeah.
I remember them saying this, too:

Date: 2/02/2026 13:39:12
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2356568
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Yvette Cendes is an astronomer based in Oregon.

Date: 2/02/2026 13:57:37
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2356574
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
captain_spalding said:
Can you imagine the absolute furore that would have erupted in the American media if old creaky sleepy Joe Biden had actually shat himself in front of the assembled media?
Trump would have been the first to tweet “sleepy joe SHAT HIMSELF!!!”
But it’s OK for diaper man to shit himself.
Date: 2/02/2026 14:05:49
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2356575
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
roughbarked said:
captain_spalding said:
Can you imagine the absolute furore that would have erupted in the American media if old creaky sleepy Joe Biden had actually shat himself in front of the assembled media?
Trump would have been the first to tweet “sleepy joe SHAT HIMSELF!!!”
But it’s OK for diaper man to shit himself.
It seems to be a leftwing thing to make up stories about opponents shitting themselves.
Date: 2/02/2026 14:08:51
From: dv
ID: 2356577
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
roughbarked said:
Trump would have been the first to tweet “sleepy joe SHAT HIMSELF!!!”
But it’s OK for diaper man to shit himself.
It seems to be a leftwing thing to make up stories about opponents shitting themselves.
Not this one, though. It’s been commented on by captains of industry, former members of his cabinet, people who worked with him on his reality TV shows. (shrugs)
Date: 2/02/2026 14:12:48
From: roughbarked
ID: 2356578
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
But it’s OK for diaper man to shit himself.
It seems to be a leftwing thing to make up stories about opponents shitting themselves.
Not this one, though. It’s been commented on by captains of industry, former members of his cabinet, people who worked with him on his reality TV shows. (shrugs)
Old smelly bum.
Date: 2/02/2026 14:16:07
From: Cymek
ID: 2356580
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
dv said:
Peak Warming Man said:
It seems to be a leftwing thing to make up stories about opponents shitting themselves.
Not this one, though. It’s been commented on by captains of industry, former members of his cabinet, people who worked with him on his reality TV shows. (shrugs)
Old smelly bum.
Do you reckon the ancestor simulation is running a comedy/tragedy sub-routine
Date: 2/02/2026 14:28:26
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2356581
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
If you can’t zoom in, the picture is made up of thousands of pics of Epstein.

Date: 2/02/2026 14:31:37
From: roughbarked
ID: 2356582
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
If you can’t zoom in, the picture is made up of thousands of pics of Epstein.

Giving Trump something to frown about.
Date: 2/02/2026 14:39:24
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356586
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
dv said:
Peak Warming Man said:
It seems to be a leftwing thing to make up stories about opponents shitting themselves.
Not this one, though. It’s been commented on by captains of industry, former members of his cabinet, people who worked with him on his reality TV shows. (shrugs)
Old smelly bum.
that’s the trouble with wokists isn’t it, they treat disability like a badge of honour, a source of pride, a special feature that makes weaklings an invalid target for bullying and invalids a weak target for humiliation, when everyone with an iq of over 400 knows that if you’re a big strong antiantifa and have an incontinence episode then you need all your worshippers to cover that shit up or your ruling authority loses any legitimacy it ever had
Date: 2/02/2026 14:41:55
From: roughbarked
ID: 2356588
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
dv said:
Not this one, though. It’s been commented on by captains of industry, former members of his cabinet, people who worked with him on his reality TV shows. (shrugs)
Old smelly bum.
that’s the trouble with wokists isn’t it, they treat disability like a badge of honour, a source of pride, a special feature that makes weaklings an invalid target for bullying and invalids a weak target for humiliation, when everyone with an iq of over 400 knows that if you’re a big strong antiantifa and have an incontinence episode then you need all your worshippers to cover that shit up or your ruling authority loses any legitimacy it ever had
We all have stinky bums.
Date: 2/02/2026 14:56:28
From: dv
ID: 2356593
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The former Duchess of York – who has faced her own Epstein controversies – is seen praising the late convicted sex offender as the “brother I have always wished for”.
There is also more insight into her financial dealings with Epstein, and her requests for money from him.
Her daughters are also dragged into the scandal, including with one extraordinary exchange where an unnamed person mentions Eugenie’s “shagging weekend” in an email to Epstein.
The exchanges are all dated after Epstein was convicted in 2008 for prostituting minors.
The emails do not indicate any wrongdoing.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cddgv9nvj9zo
Date: 2/02/2026 14:59:59
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2356594
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 2/02/2026 15:14:41
From: Cymek
ID: 2356597
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
The former Duchess of York – who has faced her own Epstein controversies – is seen praising the late convicted sex offender as the “brother I have always wished for”.
There is also more insight into her financial dealings with Epstein, and her requests for money from him.
Her daughters are also dragged into the scandal, including with one extraordinary exchange where an unnamed person mentions Eugenie’s “shagging weekend” in an email to Epstein.
The exchanges are all dated after Epstein was convicted in 2008 for prostituting minors.
The emails do not indicate any wrongdoing.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cddgv9nvj9zo
The Royals are quite trashy, no class at all.
Date: 2/02/2026 15:53:22
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2356601
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
If you can’t zoom in, the picture is made up of thousands of pics of Epstein.

Get AI to do another one using all the millions of Epstein files.
Date: 2/02/2026 16:53:12
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356610
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

so it’s fraud
Date: 2/02/2026 17:00:37
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2356614
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
captain_spalding said:

so it’s fraud
What, connected with the current US government in any way, shape, or form, do you imagine is notfraud??
Date: 2/02/2026 17:08:39
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356620
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
SCIENCE said:
captain_spalding said:

so it’s fraud
What, connected with the current US government in any way, shape, or form, do you imagine is notfraud??
Fair point, though we acknowledge they have one feature that is worth something: they did much of what they said they’d do. It’s concerning to us that politicians only dare to do what they say when they’re doing fascism, but chicken out* when they actually say they’ll do good things.
*: yes we’re aware that kkk also chickens out when he threatens a whole bunch of stupid shit
Date: 2/02/2026 17:11:26
From: Kingy
ID: 2356626
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 2/02/2026 18:49:22
From: dv
ID: 2356718
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Sleuths have worked out the person who gave Epstein permission to kill Olga was Susan Hamblin, former head of Kids2Families.
https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/us-news/susan-hamblin-epstein-files-internet-speculates-over-permission-to-kill-message-101769898911567.html
Also turns out that the person JE thanks for the torture video is Benjamin Netanyahu.
Date: 2/02/2026 18:57:13
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2356725
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Baby Throws Tantrum, more at 11.
Donald Trump lashed out at the 2026 Grammy Awards moments after the CBS telecast ended, blasting the show as “virtually unwatchable” and targeting host Trevor Noah over a joke referencing Trump’s past association with Jeffrey Epstein.
Posting on Truth Social, Trump accused Noah of making a “false and defamatory” claim on air after the comedian quipped that Trump had been to Epstein’s island. Trump forcefully denied that, writing that he has “never been to Epstein Island, nor anywhere close,” and said he had never previously been accused of being there.
Trump’s post focused heavily on Noah, calling him “a total loser” and comparing him to late-night host Jimmy Kimmel. He also threatened potential legal action, writing that he would be “sending my lawyers to sue this poor, pathetic, talentless, dope of an M.C.” and warning Noah to “get his facts straight, and get them straight fast.”
The remark that set off Trump’s reaction came after Billie Eilish won Song of the Year for “Wildflower.” During the live broadcast, Noah joked: “That’s a Grammy that every artist wants — almost as much as Trump wants Greenland. Which makes sense because, since Epstein’s gone, he needs a new island to hang out with Bill Clinton.”
Trump denied the insinuation and said he could not “speak for Bill,” but insisted the claim about him was untrue. He did not comment directly on Eilish’s win in his post.
Notably, Trump also avoided mentioning one of the night’s biggest milestones: Bad Bunny’s Album of the Year victory for “Debí Tirar Más Fotos,” the first Spanish-language album to take the Grammys’ top prize. The win came just days before Bad Bunny’s scheduled Super Bowl halftime performance — a booking Trump had previously criticized.
In an October appearance on NewsMax’s “Greg Kelly Reports,” Trump said of Bad Bunny: “I’ve never heard of him. I don’t know who he is… I don’t know why they’re doing it. It’s crazy.”
Trump’s Truth Social post quickly circulated online, adding a political flashpoint to a Grammy night that was already drawing attention for its jokes, historic wins and high-profile performances.
https://newzsquare.com/trump-slams-grammys-threatens-to-sue-trevor-noah-after-on-air-epstein-joke-during-awards-show/

Date: 2/02/2026 19:12:52
From: Michael V
ID: 2356732
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Baby Throws Tantrum, more at 11.
Donald Trump lashed out at the 2026 Grammy Awards moments after the CBS telecast ended, blasting the show as “virtually unwatchable” and targeting host Trevor Noah over a joke referencing Trump’s past association with Jeffrey Epstein.
Posting on Truth Social, Trump accused Noah of making a “false and defamatory” claim on air after the comedian quipped that Trump had been to Epstein’s island. Trump forcefully denied that, writing that he has “never been to Epstein Island, nor anywhere close,” and said he had never previously been accused of being there.
Trump’s post focused heavily on Noah, calling him “a total loser” and comparing him to late-night host Jimmy Kimmel. He also threatened potential legal action, writing that he would be “sending my lawyers to sue this poor, pathetic, talentless, dope of an M.C.” and warning Noah to “get his facts straight, and get them straight fast.”
The remark that set off Trump’s reaction came after Billie Eilish won Song of the Year for “Wildflower.” During the live broadcast, Noah joked: “That’s a Grammy that every artist wants — almost as much as Trump wants Greenland. Which makes sense because, since Epstein’s gone, he needs a new island to hang out with Bill Clinton.”
Trump denied the insinuation and said he could not “speak for Bill,” but insisted the claim about him was untrue. He did not comment directly on Eilish’s win in his post.
Notably, Trump also avoided mentioning one of the night’s biggest milestones: Bad Bunny’s Album of the Year victory for “Debí Tirar Más Fotos,” the first Spanish-language album to take the Grammys’ top prize. The win came just days before Bad Bunny’s scheduled Super Bowl halftime performance — a booking Trump had previously criticized.
In an October appearance on NewsMax’s “Greg Kelly Reports,” Trump said of Bad Bunny: “I’ve never heard of him. I don’t know who he is… I don’t know why they’re doing it. It’s crazy.”
Trump’s Truth Social post quickly circulated online, adding a political flashpoint to a Grammy night that was already drawing attention for its jokes, historic wins and high-profile performances.
https://newzsquare.com/trump-slams-grammys-threatens-to-sue-trevor-noah-after-on-air-epstein-joke-during-awards-show/

Distant man-made trench-like waterway!
Date: 2/02/2026 19:27:02
From: buffy
ID: 2356738
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Aaand for anyone interested…Planet America is back tonight. 9.45pm on ABC. I hope they drop it onto iView at 9.00am like they were doing last year when it was scheduled late.
Date: 2/02/2026 20:02:22
From: dv
ID: 2356748
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 2/02/2026 20:04:21
From: Michael V
ID: 2356750
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

!!!
Date: 2/02/2026 20:37:26
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2356760
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Aaand for anyone interested…Planet America is back tonight. 9.45pm on ABC. I hope they drop it onto iView at 9.00am like they were doing last year when it was scheduled late.
But what about Media Watch?
Date: 2/02/2026 20:54:56
From: buffy
ID: 2356761
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
buffy said:
Aaand for anyone interested…Planet America is back tonight. 9.45pm on ABC. I hope they drop it onto iView at 9.00am like they were doing last year when it was scheduled late.
But what about Media Watch?
We rarely watch Media Watch these days.
Date: 2/02/2026 21:16:28
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2356765
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
“First Lady Melania Trump’s documentary, named Melania, has smashed its dismal box office sales estimates during opening weekend – much to the shock of Hollywood.
The movie earned $7million in ticket sales across the US and Canada, making it the best-performing theatrical release for a documentary, outside of concert films, since 2012.
The film’s strong performance surprised Hollywood critics, who gave it brutal reviews. Initial projections for ticket sales were $3million to $5million, based on the pace of ticket sales last week. “
Date: 2/02/2026 22:36:32
From: dv
ID: 2356783
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 2/02/2026 22:44:58
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2356784
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

There’s a point where you have to say, ‘hang on for a second…’.
I mean, someone might turn up a photo of Epstein in a taxi cab.
Doesn’t automatically make the cab driver a paedophile.
Date: 2/02/2026 22:52:41
From: dv
ID: 2356785
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
dv said:

There’s a point where you have to say, ‘hang on for a second…’.
I mean, someone might turn up a photo of Epstein in a taxi cab.
Doesn’t automatically make the cab driver a paedophile.
I mean I assume most of the people who associated with him aren’t.
OTOH I’m probably not going to associate with someone who has been jailed for sex trafficking and soliciting a child for prostitution.
Date: 2/02/2026 22:55:42
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2356786
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
captain_spalding said:
dv said:

There’s a point where you have to say, ‘hang on for a second…’.
I mean, someone might turn up a photo of Epstein in a taxi cab.
Doesn’t automatically make the cab driver a paedophile.
I mean I assume most of the people who associated with him aren’t.
OTOH I’m probably not going to associate with someone who has been jailed for sex trafficking and soliciting a child for prostitution.
No, i doubt that may of us would, if we were aware of that. And, even then, you may find yourself in situations where you don’t have a lot of say in whether or not you’re in their proximity.
Date: 2/02/2026 23:15:32
From: Kingy
ID: 2356789
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

One is leaning towards, one is leaning away.
Date: 3/02/2026 00:30:06
From: dv
ID: 2356800
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1KXE66Ehqq/
Epstein, 4chan, Qanon, Pizzagate, Trump
Date: 3/02/2026 00:42:40
From: roughbarked
ID: 2356801
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Baby Throws Tantrum, more at 11.
Donald Trump lashed out at the 2026 Grammy Awards moments after the CBS telecast ended, blasting the show as “virtually unwatchable” and targeting host Trevor Noah over a joke referencing Trump’s past association with Jeffrey Epstein.
Posting on Truth Social, Trump accused Noah of making a “false and defamatory” claim on air after the comedian quipped that Trump had been to Epstein’s island. Trump forcefully denied that, writing that he has “never been to Epstein Island, nor anywhere close,” and said he had never previously been accused of being there.
Trump’s post focused heavily on Noah, calling him “a total loser” and comparing him to late-night host Jimmy Kimmel. He also threatened potential legal action, writing that he would be “sending my lawyers to sue this poor, pathetic, talentless, dope of an M.C.” and warning Noah to “get his facts straight, and get them straight fast.”
The remark that set off Trump’s reaction came after Billie Eilish won Song of the Year for “Wildflower.” During the live broadcast, Noah joked: “That’s a Grammy that every artist wants — almost as much as Trump wants Greenland. Which makes sense because, since Epstein’s gone, he needs a new island to hang out with Bill Clinton.”
Trump denied the insinuation and said he could not “speak for Bill,” but insisted the claim about him was untrue. He did not comment directly on Eilish’s win in his post.
Notably, Trump also avoided mentioning one of the night’s biggest milestones: Bad Bunny’s Album of the Year victory for “Debí Tirar Más Fotos,” the first Spanish-language album to take the Grammys’ top prize. The win came just days before Bad Bunny’s scheduled Super Bowl halftime performance — a booking Trump had previously criticized.
In an October appearance on NewsMax’s “Greg Kelly Reports,” Trump said of Bad Bunny: “I’ve never heard of him. I don’t know who he is… I don’t know why they’re doing it. It’s crazy.”
Trump’s Truth Social post quickly circulated online, adding a political flashpoint to a Grammy night that was already drawing attention for its jokes, historic wins and high-profile performances.
https://newzsquare.com/trump-slams-grammys-threatens-to-sue-trevor-noah-after-on-air-epstein-joke-during-awards-show/

Ha ha ha. There are photos of him on the plane with the girls.
Date: 3/02/2026 01:59:39
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356808
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
we mean at the end of the day wasn’t it all true, rich and powerful arseholes were all connected in an international paedophile ring
Is that a Q?
well we just aren’t sure what the conspiracy theoretics were about, were they hoping to point the finger away from themselves which seems a high risk move given the breadth of this, or were they hoping to paint it as just deranged delusions of a bunch of whack jobs so that nobody would believe it, also high risk because you end up with a nation of critical unthinkers
maybe it’s just a happy* coincidence that it turned out to be true
*: irony, sarcasm, et cetera
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1KXE66Ehqq/
Epstein, 4chan, Qanon, Pizzagate, Trump
yes
Date: 3/02/2026 02:21:02
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356809
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
dv said:
captain_spalding said:
There’s a point where you have to say, ‘hang on for a second…’.
I mean, someone might turn up a photo of Epstein in a taxi cab.
Doesn’t automatically make the cab driver a paedophile.
I mean I assume most of the people who associated with him aren’t.
OTOH I’m probably not going to associate with someone who has been jailed for sex trafficking and soliciting a child for prostitution.
No, i doubt that may of us would, if we were aware of that. And, even then, you may find yourself in situations where you don’t have a lot of say in whether or not you’re in their proximity.
Yes. Subsequent to that association, are we to assume that everyone who unwittingly associated with abusers
- never had a second thought regarding, never came across any information pertaining to, remained completely ignorant of, the crimes that their associate was
accused convicted of
- were spoken to and strongly incentivised to never mention anything about these crimes
or what¿
Date: 3/02/2026 06:06:56
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356812
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
captain_spalding said:
dv said:
I mean I assume most of the people who associated with him aren’t.
OTOH I’m probably not going to associate with someone who has been jailed for sex trafficking and soliciting a child for prostitution.
No, i doubt that may of us would, if we were aware of that. And, even then, you may find yourself in situations where you don’t have a lot of say in whether or not you’re in their proximity.
Yes. Subsequent to that association, are we to assume that everyone who unwittingly associated with abusers
- never had a second thought regarding, never came across any information pertaining to, remained completely ignorant of, the crimes that their associate was
accused convicted of
- were spoken to and strongly incentivised to never mention anything about these crimes
or what¿
wait so there
However, the relationship soured after the former Duchess of York apologised for her friendship and financial dealings with Epstein in a 2011 interview, saying she “abhorred paedophilia” and was cutting ties with the American financier.
were signals
then what
Soon after, emails exchanged between Epstein and his publicist, Mike Sitrick, discuss the need for Ms Ferguson to apologise, with Epstein saying that she should declare “I am not a pedo”. Multiple UK charities last year severed their links with Ms Ferguson after The Mail on Sunday revealed that a month after claiming to have cut ties with Epstein, she apologised to him in a 2011 email, calling the billionaire a “steadfast, generous and supreme friend”.
so all they have to do is take back their words and there’s nothing more to see there
Date: 3/02/2026 07:45:01
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2356825
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 3/02/2026 08:43:51
From: dv
ID: 2356843
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1



The asst Attorney General says it’s a closed matter and there will be no further investigations or prosecutions but I hope some of these dudes remain under some kind of scrutiny.
I
Date: 3/02/2026 08:48:21
From: dv
ID: 2356845
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:


The asst Attorney General says it’s a closed matter and there will be no further investigations or prosecutions but I hope some of these dudes remain under some kind of scrutiny.
I
Actually Jean Luc already killed himself so I guess that problem is solved
Date: 3/02/2026 08:51:25
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2356849
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
My greatest wish is that those girls grew up to have amazing lives surrounded by awesome people who love and respect them.
It’s one thing to know the monsters involved, it’s entirely another to have this part of your young life splashed in the headlines.
Date: 3/02/2026 10:18:04
From: roughbarked
ID: 2356879
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Donald Trump’s name appears hundreds of times in the most recent release of the Epstein files — including on an FBI list of men who are named as subjects of “salacious information”.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-03/donald-trump-mentioned-in-epstein-files-thousands-of-times/106297878
Date: 3/02/2026 12:14:29
From: kii
ID: 2356927
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 3/02/2026 12:33:45
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356928
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:

but they still get away with it while people laugh so it’s fine
Date: 3/02/2026 12:45:08
From: kii
ID: 2356932
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
kii said:

but they still get away with it while people laugh so it’s fine
The set-up with these people always behind him has reminded me of a nurse in my allergy doctor’s office. She told me about these filters that you can insert in your nostrils to help “clean” the air as you inhale. I never looked for them, but I wonder if RFK Jr and company use something similar.
I’ll Google.
Date: 3/02/2026 12:47:57
From: buffy
ID: 2356935
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:

Has there been a “formal” denial of what was happening there?
Date: 3/02/2026 12:52:13
From: Cymek
ID: 2356937
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
SCIENCE said:
kii said:

but they still get away with it while people laugh so it’s fine
The set-up with these people always behind him has reminded me of a nurse in my allergy doctor’s office. She told me about these filters that you can insert in your nostrils to help “clean” the air as you inhale. I never looked for them, but I wonder if RFK Jr and company use something similar.
I’ll Google.
Its astonishing this is all real
Its like someone is running comedy/tragedy mode on human civilisation
Date: 3/02/2026 12:54:18
From: kii
ID: 2356938
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
SCIENCE said:
kii said:

but they still get away with it while people laugh so it’s fine
The set-up with these people always behind him has reminded me of a nurse in my allergy doctor’s office. She told me about these filters that you can insert in your nostrils to help “clean” the air as you inhale. I never looked for them, but I wonder if RFK Jr and company use something similar.
I’ll Google.
They exist.
A wide range of them.
I like the first one the best.


Date: 3/02/2026 13:01:44
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2356939
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
kii said:
SCIENCE said:
but they still get away with it while people laugh so it’s fine
The set-up with these people always behind him has reminded me of a nurse in my allergy doctor’s office. She told me about these filters that you can insert in your nostrils to help “clean” the air as you inhale. I never looked for them, but I wonder if RFK Jr and company use something similar.
I’ll Google.
Its astonishing this is all real
Its like someone is running comedy/tragedy mode on human civilisation
The League of Shadows is employing farce this time.
Date: 3/02/2026 13:05:02
From: kii
ID: 2356940
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
kii said:
SCIENCE said:
but they still get away with it while people laugh so it’s fine
The set-up with these people always behind him has reminded me of a nurse in my allergy doctor’s office. She told me about these filters that you can insert in your nostrils to help “clean” the air as you inhale. I never looked for them, but I wonder if RFK Jr and company use something similar.
I’ll Google.
Its astonishing this is all real
Its like someone is running comedy/tragedy mode on human civilisation
During the first term I often noted that he could have a future career as a stand-up comic. His “humour” has definite appeal to some people.
Date: 3/02/2026 13:29:25
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2356949
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
“Bill and Hillary Clinton have agreed to testify before US Congress about their connections to Jeffrey Epstein, a decision that will spare the couple from possible prison time.
The former president and first lady said they would appear for depositions after previously refusing to testify.
The House of Representatives was scheduled to hold a vote charging the two with contempt of Congress tomorrow.”
Playing the saxophone on late night talk shows helped reconstruct him last time, he could try it I suppose, but Hillary?
Date: 3/02/2026 13:31:06
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 2356952
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
“Bill and Hillary Clinton have agreed to testify before US Congress about their connections to Jeffrey Epstein, a decision that will spare the couple from possible prison time.
The former president and first lady said they would appear for depositions after previously refusing to testify.
The House of Representatives was scheduled to hold a vote charging the two with contempt of Congress tomorrow.”
Playing the saxophone on late night talk shows helped reconstruct him last time, he could try it I suppose, but Hillary?
Hillary is to testify via email. apparently.
Date: 3/02/2026 13:34:07
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2356955
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Hillary’s put up with his shit for a long time.
I haven’t heard anything about her mentions in the files. Covering up other people’s sexual abusing habits doesn’t usually warrant depositions or jail time.
Date: 3/02/2026 13:37:31
From: dv
ID: 2356960
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
One name that popped up in this tranch of data that I was not familiar with was Daniel Siad, who referred a certain girlfinder called Tigran to Epstein, saying that he used to be a scout for Trump. Tigran it emerges is Tigran Khachatrian:
Trump Model Management operated from the 14th floor of Trump Tower, recruiting models from Eastern Europe and Latin America. The agency promised young women from poor countries a chance at American success. But the modeling industry’s dark side (promises of visas, pressure for “favors,” and exploitation of desperate young women) was an open secret. Trump’s agencies needed scouts, people who could identify and recruit beautiful young women from remote places like Siberian villages or Brazilian favelas.
Enter Tigran Khachatrian.
On July 16, 2010, Daniel Siad, a facilitator operating from Ibiza, sent Jeffrey Epstein an email that would later prove explosive:
“A great friend of mine rented Huge House in Ibiza so invited a lots of girls from Russia all models… with and great scout named Tigrane He use to scout For Trump but he deosnt work for him any more he coming with 12 girls the first weeck 22th of Jully then 13 others the second weeck…”
Epstein’s response revealed his priorities: “tigran has the best taste next to you… i am happy to meet him”
Through cross-referencing Getty Images archives and BBC documentation, I identified “Tigrane” as Tigran Khachatrian, who ran Noah Models in Russia. His operation wasn’t subtle. In 2014, he organized what he called a “giant cast for Top Model” in Novosibirsk, Siberia, photographing hundreds of young women. The following year, the BBC featured him in their documentary “Teen Model Factory,” which exposed how modeling scouts recruited girls as young as 13 from Russia’s poorest regions with promises of international careers.
Date: 3/02/2026 13:37:33
From: Cymek
ID: 2356961
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Hillary’s put up with his shit for a long time.
I haven’t heard anything about her mentions in the files. Covering up other people’s sexual abusing habits doesn’t usually warrant depositions or jail time.
If anyone is convicted I’d hope they’d get imprisonment.
Considering in WA and I assume all of Australia you can be jailed for possession of child pornography
So actual sexual abuse should be prison no question
Date: 3/02/2026 14:06:04
From: dv
ID: 2356968
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I’m not going in for the “distraction” theory. It’s all real, it’s all bad: the threats to NATO allies, the ex judice murders by DHS staff, the corruption of the DOJ, the scores of deaths in detention facilities, the child sex racket … none of it is intended as a distraction. It just feels like it because it is so much.
Date: 3/02/2026 14:06:39
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356969
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Cymek said:
kii said:
The set-up with these people always behind him has reminded me of a nurse in my allergy doctor’s office. She told me about these filters that you can insert in your nostrils to help “clean” the air as you inhale. I never looked for them, but I wonder if RFK Jr and company use something similar.
I’ll Google.
Its astonishing this is all real
Its like someone is running comedy/tragedy mode on human civilisation
During the first term I often noted that he could have a future career as a stand-up comic. His “humour” has definite appeal to some people.
plug them all into their redbluepill matrix and let them entertain themselves to death
fk it
Date: 3/02/2026 14:07:59
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356971
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
I’m not going in for the “distraction” theory. It’s all real, it’s all bad: the threats to NATO allies, the ex judice murders by DHS staff, the corruption of the DOJ, the scores of deaths in detention facilities, the child sex racket … none of it is intended as a distraction. It just feels like it because it is so much.
so it’s a fork
Date: 3/02/2026 14:15:09
From: Cymek
ID: 2356972
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
I’m not going in for the “distraction” theory. It’s all real, it’s all bad: the threats to NATO allies, the ex judice murders by DHS staff, the corruption of the DOJ, the scores of deaths in detention facilities, the child sex racket … none of it is intended as a distraction. It just feels like it because it is so much.
Plus the uncertainty when his time is up and if it results in insurrection.
Date: 3/02/2026 14:40:17
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2356974
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 3/02/2026 14:46:02
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356977
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:


distract deny divert disinform
Date: 3/02/2026 14:58:11
From: dv
ID: 2356979
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Divine Angel said:


distract deny divert disinform
Someone needs to watch this thing so that we can add a synopsis to the WP entry.
Most of the reviews are saying that the film gives absolutely no insight to the titular figure: that it is an informational void, that we learn nothing about her background or personality or character. No stories or photos from her youth, nothing about how she came to meet and marry Donald etc. Even people who, for some reason, are interested in learning more about MT are likely to be disappointed.
Date: 3/02/2026 15:02:25
From: Cymek
ID: 2356984
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
SCIENCE said:
Divine Angel said:


distract deny divert disinform
Someone needs to watch this thing so that we can add a synopsis to the WP entry.
Most of the reviews are saying that the film gives absolutely no insight to the titular figure: that it is an informational void, that we learn nothing about her background or personality or character. No stories or photos from her youth, nothing about how she came to meet and marry Donald etc. Even people who, for some reason, are interested in learning more about MT are likely to be disappointed.
Does she hide in an attic from her husband and liken her experience to avoiding the Nazis
Date: 3/02/2026 15:02:43
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356985
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
man this shotgun net is hitting everything

Date: 3/02/2026 15:04:37
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2356986
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
dv said:
SCIENCE said:
distract deny divert disinform
Someone needs to watch this thing so that we can add a synopsis to the WP entry.
Most of the reviews are saying that the film gives absolutely no insight to the titular figure: that it is an informational void, that we learn nothing about her background or personality or character. No stories or photos from her youth, nothing about how she came to meet and marry Donald etc. Even people who, for some reason, are interested in learning more about MT are likely to be disappointed.
Does she hide in an attic from her husband and liken her experience to avoiding the Nazis
of all the psyop-like things that are psyops we’re going to say this is one of the more probable actual psyops, quality of psyop be damned
Date: 3/02/2026 15:16:49
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 2356997
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
SCIENCE said:
Divine Angel said:


distract deny divert disinform
Someone needs to watch this thing so that we can add a synopsis to the WP entry.
Most of the reviews are saying that the film gives absolutely no insight to the titular figure: that it is an informational void, that we learn nothing about her background or personality or character. No stories or photos from her youth, nothing about how she came to meet and marry Donald etc. Even people who, for some reason, are interested in learning more about MT are likely to be disappointed.
so, vacuous would be a good descriptor?
Date: 3/02/2026 15:17:27
From: dv
ID: 2356998
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ChrispenEvan said:
dv said:
SCIENCE said:
distract deny divert disinform
Someone needs to watch this thing so that we can add a synopsis to the WP entry.
Most of the reviews are saying that the film gives absolutely no insight to the titular figure: that it is an informational void, that we learn nothing about her background or personality or character. No stories or photos from her youth, nothing about how she came to meet and marry Donald etc. Even people who, for some reason, are interested in learning more about MT are likely to be disappointed.
so, vacuous would be a good descriptor?
Going by the reviews, yes.
Date: 3/02/2026 15:18:44
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 2357000
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
ChrispenEvan said:
dv said:
Someone needs to watch this thing so that we can add a synopsis to the WP entry.
Most of the reviews are saying that the film gives absolutely no insight to the titular figure: that it is an informational void, that we learn nothing about her background or personality or character. No stories or photos from her youth, nothing about how she came to meet and marry Donald etc. Even people who, for some reason, are interested in learning more about MT are likely to be disappointed.
so, vacuous would be a good descriptor?
Going by the reviews, yes.
excellent. i needed to get vacuous out of my system. been ages since I used that word.
Date: 3/02/2026 15:39:07
From: kii
ID: 2357001
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
I’m not going in for the “distraction” theory. It’s all real, it’s all bad: the threats to NATO allies, the ex judice murders by DHS staff, the corruption of the DOJ, the scores of deaths in detention facilities, the child sex racket … none of it is intended as a distraction. It just feels like it because it is so much.
Yes.
Date: 3/02/2026 15:53:11
From: roughbarked
ID: 2357006
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
I’m not going in for the “distraction” theory. It’s all real, it’s all bad: the threats to NATO allies, the ex judice murders by DHS staff, the corruption of the DOJ, the scores of deaths in detention facilities, the child sex racket … none of it is intended as a distraction. It just feels like it because it is so much.
Seems like the air is full of shit.
Date: 3/02/2026 15:54:01
From: Cymek
ID: 2357007
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
dv said:
I’m not going in for the “distraction” theory. It’s all real, it’s all bad: the threats to NATO allies, the ex judice murders by DHS staff, the corruption of the DOJ, the scores of deaths in detention facilities, the child sex racket … none of it is intended as a distraction. It just feels like it because it is so much.
Yes.
I’m not a fan of the USA as a collective.
It’s self aggrandization is tiring and they are a bully and caused so many problems in the name of national security.
The world should turn away from relying on them.
The metric of success shouldn’t be military and economic power as they are about death dealing and exploitation.
Its why the Earth is in the state it is, not just them but the pursuit of wealth and power at any cost.
Date: 3/02/2026 16:15:21
From: buffy
ID: 2357014
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
SCIENCE said:
Divine Angel said:


distract deny divert disinform
Someone needs to watch this thing so that we can add a synopsis to the WP entry.
Most of the reviews are saying that the film gives absolutely no insight to the titular figure: that it is an informational void, that we learn nothing about her background or personality or character. No stories or photos from her youth, nothing about how she came to meet and marry Donald etc. Even people who, for some reason, are interested in learning more about MT are likely to be disappointed.
I thought it was touted to be confined to the days around the inauguration. Not a life story.
Date: 3/02/2026 16:19:59
From: roughbarked
ID: 2357015
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
dv said:
SCIENCE said:
distract deny divert disinform
Someone needs to watch this thing so that we can add a synopsis to the WP entry.
Most of the reviews are saying that the film gives absolutely no insight to the titular figure: that it is an informational void, that we learn nothing about her background or personality or character. No stories or photos from her youth, nothing about how she came to meet and marry Donald etc. Even people who, for some reason, are interested in learning more about MT are likely to be disappointed.
I thought it was touted to be confined to the days around the inauguration. Not a life story.
At the GP’s surgery the TV told me that it has been released in Australia.
Date: 3/02/2026 16:23:32
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2357017
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
dv said:
SCIENCE said:
distract deny divert disinform
Someone needs to watch this thing so that we can add a synopsis to the WP entry.
Most of the reviews are saying that the film gives absolutely no insight to the titular figure: that it is an informational void, that we learn nothing about her background or personality or character. No stories or photos from her youth, nothing about how she came to meet and marry Donald etc. Even people who, for some reason, are interested in learning more about MT are likely to be disappointed.
I thought it was touted to be confined to the days around the inauguration. Not a life story.
I’ve seen user reviews (not critics) say it looks like a 1.5hr perfume commercial
Date: 3/02/2026 16:28:32
From: dv
ID: 2357021
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
I thought it was touted to be confined to the days around the inauguration. Not a life story.
Normally in such a thing there’d be some kind of background or context given. The descriptions seem to indicate it is literally just her choosing place settings, clothing and decor, doing some light hosting.
She doesn’t live with her husband, doesn’t appear beside him except at official events, and never has physical contact with him. I suppose there’s not much background that they can give. They probably hardly know each other.
“I met him when I was a model at the Kitkat Club and he was a married man with four kids. We had an affair for a year and then he divorced his wife, we got married and had a baby and he immediately cheated on me lol. Since then I’ve been counting down the days til his death but it seems neither God nor Satan wants him. “
Date: 3/02/2026 16:29:14
From: dv
ID: 2357022
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
buffy said:
dv said:
Someone needs to watch this thing so that we can add a synopsis to the WP entry.
Most of the reviews are saying that the film gives absolutely no insight to the titular figure: that it is an informational void, that we learn nothing about her background or personality or character. No stories or photos from her youth, nothing about how she came to meet and marry Donald etc. Even people who, for some reason, are interested in learning more about MT are likely to be disappointed.
I thought it was touted to be confined to the days around the inauguration. Not a life story.
I’ve seen user reviews (not critics) say it looks like a 1.5hr perfume commercial
1.5 hr, well I suppose that’s mercifully brief.
I think you should take one for the team and go see this damned thing.
Date: 3/02/2026 16:34:14
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2357025
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Divine Angel said:
buffy said:
I thought it was touted to be confined to the days around the inauguration. Not a life story.
I’ve seen user reviews (not critics) say it looks like a 1.5hr perfume commercial
1.5 hr, well I suppose that’s mercifully brief.
I think you should take one for the team and go see this damned thing.
The worst movie I’ve ever seen is Kirk Cameron Saves Christmas, wonder if it’s worse than that.
Date: 3/02/2026 16:34:42
From: buffy
ID: 2357026
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Divine Angel said:
buffy said:
I thought it was touted to be confined to the days around the inauguration. Not a life story.
I’ve seen user reviews (not critics) say it looks like a 1.5hr perfume commercial
1.5 hr, well I suppose that’s mercifully brief.
I think you should take one for the team and go see this damned thing.
Only if you don’t have to pay to go and they give you some free popcorn to throw at the screen.
Date: 3/02/2026 16:35:02
From: roughbarked
ID: 2357027
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Divine Angel said:
buffy said:
I thought it was touted to be confined to the days around the inauguration. Not a life story.
I’ve seen user reviews (not critics) say it looks like a 1.5hr perfume commercial
1.5 hr, well I suppose that’s mercifully brief.
I think you should take one for the team and go see this damned thing.
I’ll watch it if I can get a free copy but I’m not giving Trump any money
Date: 3/02/2026 16:35:32
From: roughbarked
ID: 2357028
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
Divine Angel said:
I’ve seen user reviews (not critics) say it looks like a 1.5hr perfume commercial
1.5 hr, well I suppose that’s mercifully brief.
I think you should take one for the team and go see this damned thing.
The worst movie I’ve ever seen is Kirk Cameron Saves Christmas, wonder if it’s worse than that.
From what I’ve heard you may be bored stiff.
Date: 3/02/2026 16:35:46
From: roughbarked
ID: 2357029
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
dv said:
Divine Angel said:
I’ve seen user reviews (not critics) say it looks like a 1.5hr perfume commercial
1.5 hr, well I suppose that’s mercifully brief.
I think you should take one for the team and go see this damned thing.
Only if you don’t have to pay to go and they give you some free popcorn to throw at the screen.
This.
Date: 3/02/2026 16:38:11
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2357032
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
dv said:
Divine Angel said:
I’ve seen user reviews (not critics) say it looks like a 1.5hr perfume commercial
1.5 hr, well I suppose that’s mercifully brief.
I think you should take one for the team and go see this damned thing.
I’ll watch it if I can get a free copy but I’m not giving Trump any money
We have a subscription to Amazon Prime, the streaming platform it will be released on, so I could watch it there. Wouldn’t want to mess up my algorithm of classic movies to get drivel though.
Date: 3/02/2026 16:41:48
From: dv
ID: 2357035
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
“In September 1998, Zampolli introduced Melania to the real estate mogul Donald Trump at a party. Donald had a date to the event, Celina Midelfart. “
lol
Date: 3/02/2026 16:44:59
From: roughbarked
ID: 2357036
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
“In September 1998, Zampolli introduced Melania to the real estate mogul Donald Trump at a party. Donald had a date to the event, Celina Midelfart. “
lol
Probably better than top or bottomfart.
Date: 3/02/2026 17:16:14
From: Cymek
ID: 2357045
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
Divine Angel said:
I’ve seen user reviews (not critics) say it looks like a 1.5hr perfume commercial
1.5 hr, well I suppose that’s mercifully brief.
I think you should take one for the team and go see this damned thing.
The worst movie I’ve ever seen is Kirk Cameron Saves Christmas, wonder if it’s worse than that.
I can imagine it was awful, him being a born again Christian
Though how long does that title last if its decades later
Date: 3/02/2026 17:20:14
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2357048
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I’ll put this here since it’s the US that is largely to blame for all this:
…
It used to be, when markets were in turmoil, investors knew which defensive assets offered safe haven. Gold. Treasuries. The dollar, yen and Swiss franc. And, of course, everyone’s favorite digital gold: Bitcoin.
These trades are being turned on their heads at a time when investors are facing the riskiest geopolitical environment for decades.
Gold — instead of being a reliably boring store of value — is behaving like a meme stock. After surging 30% this year to touch almost $5,600 an ounce, the precious metal plunged as much as 18% in just two trading sessions.
“Gold, it’s a symbol of stability, but such a move is not a symbol of stability,” said Dominik Sperzel, the head of trading at Heraeus Precious Metals, a leading bullion refiner. “In my career it’s definitely the wildest that I have seen.”
Silver is even more volatile — sinking as much as 36% on Friday after a 70% run up in January. It fell as much as 16% on Monday.
So far, so wild. But gold and silver rallied because they were supposed to be the safe alternative to Treasuries and the dollar as investors quit US assets over President Donald Trump’s controversial policies — the so-called debasement trade.
Despite a rebound in the greenback, many market participants are warning of further weakness. DoubleLine Capital CEOJeffrey Gundlach said last week the greenback hadn’t acted like a haven currency for a while.
What about the yen? The Japanese currency has been under pressure amid concern Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s stimulus plans will spark a bond selloff. Over the weekend Takaichi talked up the benefits of a weaker yen, further undermining its outlook, before walking back her comments.
Bitcoin, meanwhile, is approaching its weakest level since Trump retook the White House more than a year ago. That leaves the Swiss franc as favored haven. Even then, the currency’s 10-day volatility has surged to one of its highest levels in the past five years. Shelter, right now, is hard to find. —Richard Frost
Bloomberg Email Newsletter.
Date: 3/02/2026 17:32:58
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2357051
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
I’ll put this here since it’s the US that is largely to blame for all this:
…
It used to be, when markets were in turmoil, investors knew which defensive assets offered safe haven. Gold. Treasuries. The dollar, yen and Swiss franc. And, of course, everyone’s favorite digital gold: Bitcoin.
These trades are being turned on their heads at a time when investors are facing the riskiest geopolitical environment for decades.
Gold — instead of being a reliably boring store of value — is behaving like a meme stock. After surging 30% this year to touch almost $5,600 an ounce, the precious metal plunged as much as 18% in just two trading sessions.
“Gold, it’s a symbol of stability, but such a move is not a symbol of stability,” said Dominik Sperzel, the head of trading at Heraeus Precious Metals, a leading bullion refiner. “In my career it’s definitely the wildest that I have seen.”
Silver is even more volatile — sinking as much as 36% on Friday after a 70% run up in January. It fell as much as 16% on Monday.
So far, so wild. But gold and silver rallied because they were supposed to be the safe alternative to Treasuries and the dollar as investors quit US assets over President Donald Trump’s controversial policies — the so-called debasement trade.
Despite a rebound in the greenback, many market participants are warning of further weakness. DoubleLine Capital CEOJeffrey Gundlach said last week the greenback hadn’t acted like a haven currency for a while.
What about the yen? The Japanese currency has been under pressure amid concern Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s stimulus plans will spark a bond selloff. Over the weekend Takaichi talked up the benefits of a weaker yen, further undermining its outlook, before walking back her comments.
Bitcoin, meanwhile, is approaching its weakest level since Trump retook the White House more than a year ago. That leaves the Swiss franc as favored haven. Even then, the currency’s 10-day volatility has surged to one of its highest levels in the past five years. Shelter, right now, is hard to find. —Richard Frost
Bloomberg Email Newsletter.
so we should buy renewables
wait
Date: 3/02/2026 20:59:58
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2357081
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 3/02/2026 21:37:12
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2357086
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Ricky Gervais has again called out celebrities for making political speeches at a big awards show.
The Grammy Awards in Los Angeles on 2 February saw winners like Bad Bunny and Billie Eilish making speeches denouncing US president Donald Trump’s increasingly unpopular immigration crackdown.
Gervais didn’t seem impressed by any of it. “They’re still not listening,” the comedian wrote on X, along with a snippet of his 2020 Golden Globes monologue telling the gathered celebrities not to use their acceptance speeches to make political points.
“If you do win an award tonight, don’t use it as a political platform to make a political speech. You’re in no position to lecture the public about anything. You know nothing about the real world. Most of you spent less time in school than Greta Thunberg,”
Date: 3/02/2026 21:51:17
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2357090
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Ricky Gervais has again called out celebrities for making political speeches at a big awards show.
The Grammy Awards in Los Angeles on 2 February saw winners like Bad Bunny and Billie Eilish making speeches denouncing US president Donald Trump’s increasingly unpopular immigration crackdown.
Gervais didn’t seem impressed by any of it. “They’re still not listening,” the comedian wrote on X, along with a snippet of his 2020 Golden Globes monologue telling the gathered celebrities not to use their acceptance speeches to make political points.
“If you do win an award tonight, don’t use it as a political platform to make a political speech. You’re in no position to lecture the public about anything. You know nothing about the real world. Most of you spent less time in school than Greta Thunberg,”
Wanker.
Date: 3/02/2026 22:04:53
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2357092
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Ricky Gervais has again called out celebrities for making political speeches at a big awards show.
The Grammy Awards in Los Angeles on 2 February saw winners like Bad Bunny and Billie Eilish making speeches denouncing US president Donald Trump’s increasingly unpopular immigration crackdown.
Gervais didn’t seem impressed by any of it. “They’re still not listening,” the comedian wrote on X, along with a snippet of his 2020 Golden Globes monologue telling the gathered celebrities not to use their acceptance speeches to make political points.
“If you do win an award tonight, don’t use it as a political platform to make a political speech. You’re in no position to lecture the public about anything. You know nothing about the real world. Most of you spent less time in school than Greta Thunberg,”
Hello, pot? This is kettle.
Date: 3/02/2026 22:09:17
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2357096
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Ricky Gervais has again called out celebrities for making political speeches at a big awards show.
The Grammy Awards in Los Angeles on 2 February saw winners like Bad Bunny and Billie Eilish making speeches denouncing US president Donald Trump’s increasingly unpopular immigration crackdown.
Gervais didn’t seem impressed by any of it. “They’re still not listening,” the comedian wrote on X, along with a snippet of his 2020 Golden Globes monologue telling the gathered celebrities not to use their acceptance speeches to make political points.
“If you do win an award tonight, don’t use it as a political platform to make a political speech. You’re in no position to lecture the public about anything. You know nothing about the real world. Most of you spent less time in school than Greta Thunberg,”
Wanker.
Hello, pot? This is kettle.
a master of the bastion
but seriously do they believe it’s democracy¿ Hello, then the people are political
fascist
Date: 3/02/2026 22:09:59
From: party_pants
ID: 2357097
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Ricky Gervais has again called out celebrities for making political speeches at a big awards show.
The Grammy Awards in Los Angeles on 2 February saw winners like Bad Bunny and Billie Eilish making speeches denouncing US president Donald Trump’s increasingly unpopular immigration crackdown.
Gervais didn’t seem impressed by any of it. “They’re still not listening,” the comedian wrote on X, along with a snippet of his 2020 Golden Globes monologue telling the gathered celebrities not to use their acceptance speeches to make political points.
“If you do win an award tonight, don’t use it as a political platform to make a political speech. You’re in no position to lecture the public about anything. You know nothing about the real world. Most of you spent less time in school than Greta Thunberg,”
Bullshit.
I only know who won the awards because it was reported that they made political points in their speeches. If they had just done the normal boring thanking everyone including their cat it would not have been so widely reported and I would have missed it.
Date: 3/02/2026 22:13:17
From: Michael V
ID: 2357101
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 3/02/2026 22:14:11
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2357102
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:
dv said:
1.5 hr, well I suppose that’s mercifully brief.
I think you should take one for the team and go see this damned thing.
I’ll watch it if I can get a free copy but I’m not giving Trump any money
We have a subscription to Amazon Prime, the streaming platform it will be released on, so I could watch it there. Wouldn’t want to mess up my algorithm of classic movies to get drivel though.
we thought they were going to pay yous all to sleep through it
Date: 3/02/2026 22:14:22
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2357103
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
“In this country, we have no ‘other people.’ We are American people, all of is.” This 1940s film warning against bigotry and fascism is more relevant now than ever.
https://www.facebook.com/reel/1405585260890218
Date: 3/02/2026 22:30:03
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2357105
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Ricky Gervais has again called out celebrities for making political speeches at a big awards show.
The Grammy Awards in Los Angeles on 2 February saw winners like Bad Bunny and Billie Eilish making speeches denouncing US president Donald Trump’s increasingly unpopular immigration crackdown.
Gervais didn’t seem impressed by any of it. “They’re still not listening,” the comedian wrote on X, along with a snippet of his 2020 Golden Globes monologue telling the gathered celebrities not to use their acceptance speeches to make political points.
“If you do win an award tonight, don’t use it as a political platform to make a political speech. You’re in no position to lecture the public about anything. You know nothing about the real world. Most of you spent less time in school than Greta Thunberg,”
Hello, pot? This is kettle.
There are times when they ought to be told to STFU.
The classic one is when some ‘celebrity’ tells all that we need to care about the environment, reduce our impact on nature, and then they get into their private jet and fly away.
In April 2025, Katy Perry said,“It won’t be about me; it will be about this beautiful Earth. I think from up there, we will think, ‘Oh my God, we have to protect our mother,’”.
Then she got aboard a Blue Origin rocket, which burnt 498 tonnes of fuel to give her an 11 minute space ride.
Date: 3/02/2026 22:35:04
From: kii
ID: 2357107
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:
dv said:
1.5 hr, well I suppose that’s mercifully brief.
I think you should take one for the team and go see this damned thing.
I’ll watch it if I can get a free copy but I’m not giving Trump any money
We have a subscription to Amazon Prime, the streaming platform it will be released on, so I could watch it there. Wouldn’t want to mess up my algorithm of classic movies to get drivel though.
Watching it on Prime will show support. Especially because Amazon put $$$$$ into it.
Date: 3/02/2026 22:35:47
From: btm
ID: 2357108
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
… Most of you spent less time in school than Greta Thunberg,”
I think he’s probably right about that. I mean, how many of his audience have spent any time in Greta Thunberg?
Date: 3/02/2026 22:40:18
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2357109
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Divine Angel said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Ricky Gervais has again called out celebrities for making political speeches at a big awards show.
The Grammy Awards in Los Angeles on 2 February saw winners like Bad Bunny and Billie Eilish making speeches denouncing US president Donald Trump’s increasingly unpopular immigration crackdown.
Gervais didn’t seem impressed by any of it. “They’re still not listening,” the comedian wrote on X, along with a snippet of his 2020 Golden Globes monologue telling the gathered celebrities not to use their acceptance speeches to make political points.
“If you do win an award tonight, don’t use it as a political platform to make a political speech. You’re in no position to lecture the public about anything. You know nothing about the real world. Most of you spent less time in school than Greta Thunberg,”
Hello, pot? This is kettle.
There are times when they ought to be told to STFU.
The classic one is when some ‘celebrity’ tells all that we need to care about the environment, reduce our impact on nature, and then they get into their private jet and fly away.
In April 2025, Katy Perry said,“It won’t be about me; it will be about this beautiful Earth. I think from up there, we will think, ‘Oh my God, we have to protect our mother,’”.
Then she got aboard a Blue Origin rocket, which burnt 498 tonnes of fuel to give her an 11 minute space ride.
Literally as I was reading that, a newsreader on this Apollo 13 doco was talking about their story becoming a parable reminding us that this is the only home we’ve got, we need to protect it.
It’s quite a good doco btw.
Date: 3/02/2026 22:45:36
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 2357113
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Divine Angel said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Ricky Gervais has again called out celebrities for making political speeches at a big awards show.
The Grammy Awards in Los Angeles on 2 February saw winners like Bad Bunny and Billie Eilish making speeches denouncing US president Donald Trump’s increasingly unpopular immigration crackdown.
Gervais didn’t seem impressed by any of it. “They’re still not listening,” the comedian wrote on X, along with a snippet of his 2020 Golden Globes monologue telling the gathered celebrities not to use their acceptance speeches to make political points.
“If you do win an award tonight, don’t use it as a political platform to make a political speech. You’re in no position to lecture the public about anything. You know nothing about the real world. Most of you spent less time in school than Greta Thunberg,”
Hello, pot? This is kettle.
There are times when they ought to be told to STFU.
The classic one is when some ‘celebrity’ tells all that we need to care about the environment, reduce our impact on nature, and then they get into their private jet and fly away.
In April 2025, Katy Perry said,“It won’t be about me; it will be about this beautiful Earth. I think from up there, we will think, ‘Oh my God, we have to protect our mother,’”.
Then she got aboard a Blue Origin rocket, which burnt 498 tonnes of fuel to give her an 11 minute space ride.
the fuel was LOX and liquid hydrogen. waste is water. so while water vapour is a greenhouse gas it is less polluting than other fuels.
Date: 3/02/2026 22:54:37
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2357116
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
dv said:
I’m not going in for the “distraction” theory. It’s all real, it’s all bad: the threats to NATO allies, the ex judice murders by DHS staff, the corruption of the DOJ, the scores of deaths in detention facilities, the child sex racket … none of it is intended as a distraction. It just feels like it because it is so much.
Yes.
this
Date: 3/02/2026 22:56:49
From: roughbarked
ID: 2357118
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
btm said:
Peak Warming Man said:… Most of you spent less time in school than Greta Thunberg,”
I think he’s probably right about that. I mean, how many of his audience have spent any time in Greta Thunberg?
C’mon, she’s just a kid.
Date: 3/02/2026 22:57:18
From: roughbarked
ID: 2357119
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
captain_spalding said:
Divine Angel said:
Hello, pot? This is kettle.
There are times when they ought to be told to STFU.
The classic one is when some ‘celebrity’ tells all that we need to care about the environment, reduce our impact on nature, and then they get into their private jet and fly away.
In April 2025, Katy Perry said,“It won’t be about me; it will be about this beautiful Earth. I think from up there, we will think, ‘Oh my God, we have to protect our mother,’”.
Then she got aboard a Blue Origin rocket, which burnt 498 tonnes of fuel to give her an 11 minute space ride.
Literally as I was reading that, a newsreader on this Apollo 13 doco was talking about their story becoming a parable reminding us that this is the only home we’ve got, we need to protect it.
It’s quite a good doco btw.
Spacedhip earth.
Date: 3/02/2026 22:58:42
From: party_pants
ID: 2357120
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
btm said:
Peak Warming Man said:… Most of you spent less time in school than Greta Thunberg,”
I think he’s probably right about that. I mean, how many of his audience have spent any time in Greta Thunberg?
C’mon, she’s just a kid.
She early-to-mid-20s by now
Date: 3/02/2026 22:59:08
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2357122
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ChrispenEvan said:
the fuel was LOX and liquid hydrogen. waste is water. so while water vapour is a greenhouse gas it is less polluting than other fuels.
That’s true.
It also produces nitrous oxide, which, while it only makes up about 6% of greenhouse gases, is 270 times more potent a greenhouse gas than is carbon dioxide.
https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/press-release/rise-nitrous-oxide-emissions-endangers-pathway-15degc-ozone-layer
Date: 3/02/2026 23:00:17
From: roughbarked
ID: 2357124
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
roughbarked said:
btm said:
I think he’s probably right about that. I mean, how many of his audience have spent any time in Greta Thunberg?
C’mon, she’s just a kid.
She early-to-mid-20s by now
Yeah she’s still way too young. My children are 30 years older than her.
Date: 3/02/2026 23:16:48
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 2357128
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
ChrispenEvan said:
the fuel was LOX and liquid hydrogen. waste is water. so while water vapour is a greenhouse gas it is less polluting than other fuels.
That’s true.
It also produces nitrous oxide, which, while it only makes up about 6% of greenhouse gases, is 270 times more potent a greenhouse gas than is carbon dioxide.
https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/press-release/rise-nitrous-oxide-emissions-endangers-pathway-15degc-ozone-layer
how much is emitted? and by what process is it produced in a rocket burn?
Date: 3/02/2026 23:43:52
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2357130
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ChrispenEvan said:
how much is emitted? and by what process is it produced in a rocket burn?
There’s no specifics as to how much was emitted.
A hunt around found some information on the processes that might be involved. Seems that any high-temperature burn converts atmospheric nitrogen to nitrous oxide:
Nitrous oxide (\(N_{2}O\)) is generally not a direct product of the ideal stoichiometric reaction between pure liquid oxygen (LOX) and liquid hydrogen (\(LH_{2}\)), which produces only water (\(H_{2}O\)) and heat.
However, \(N_{2}O\) can be produced in rocket combustion environments or specialized, non-stoichiometric reactions involving nitrogenous impurities, high-temperature combustion, or specific catalytic conditions. Here is how nitrous oxide is formed in the context of high-energy hydrogen/oxygen reactions:
1. High-Temperature Thermal \(NO_{x}\) Mechanism (Combustion)
In real-world combustion (like in a rocket engine), the combustion chamber can reach temperatures where nitrogen, if present (e.g., from ambient air leakage or inpurities), reacts with oxygen and hydrogen.
Initial Step: At high temperatures (\(>1300^{\circ }\text{C}\)), molecular nitrogen (\(N_{2}\)) and oxygen (\(O_{2}\)) dissociate into atomic states.
Reaction Path: The formation of \(N_{2}O\) often occurs through the oxidation of nitric oxide (\(NO\)) or via nitrogen-containing radicals, specifically:\(NCO+NO\rightarrow N_{2}O+CO\)\(NH+NO\rightarrow N_{2}O+H\)
Role of Hydrogen: The presence of hydrogen can promote the formation of oxygenated radicals (\(O,OH,HO_{2}\)), which influence the consumption of \(NO\) and promote \(N_{2}O\) production in certain mixing ratios.
2. Impurity-Driven Reactions
If the cryogenic hydrogen or oxygen is not perfectly pure and contains nitrogen compounds (like nitrogen gas or ammonia), the high-temperature, high-pressure reaction can produce \(N_{2}O\) as a minor byproduct.
Ammonia (\(NH_{3}\)) can form, which then reacts with oxygen to form nitric oxide (\(NO\)), which can further react to produce \(N_{2}O\).
3. Decomposition of Intermediate Compounds
Nitramide (\(O_{2}NNH_{2}\)): In certain combustion, \(N_{2}O\) is formed through the decomposition of nitramide, which can arise from nitrogen-hydrogen-oxygen interactions.Hyponitrous Acid (\(H_{2}N_{2}O_{2}\)): Intermediate formation of nitrogen-oxygen-hydrogen species can lead to the release of \(N_{2}O\).
You might like this article, which reports on the potential impacts of short space flights:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/blue-origins-11-minute-space-flight-produced-more-carbon-emissions-than-most-people-will-in-a-lifetime/ar-AA1D8dyz#:~:text=Emily’s%20environmental%20concerns%20echoed%20those%20of%20others,to%20be%20in%20the%20250%2D1%2C000%20tonnes%20range.’s%20environmental%20concerns%20echoed%20those%20of%20others,to%20be%20in%20the%20250%2D1%2C000%20tonnes%20range.
Date: 3/02/2026 23:44:49
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2357131
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ChrispenEvan said:
captain_spalding said:
ChrispenEvan said:
captain_spalding said:
Divine Angel said:
Hello, pot? This is kettle.
There are times when they ought to be told to STFU.
The classic one is when some ‘celebrity’ tells all that we need to care about the environment, reduce our impact on nature, and then they get into their private jet and fly away.
In April 2025, Katy Perry said,“It won’t be about me; it will be about this beautiful Earth. I think from up there, we will think, ‘Oh my God, we have to protect our mother,’”.
Then she got aboard a Blue Origin rocket, which burnt 498 tonnes of fuel to give her an 11 minute space ride.
the fuel was LOX and liquid hydrogen. waste is water. so while water vapour is a greenhouse gas it is less polluting than other fuels.
That’s true.
It also produces nitrous oxide, which, while it only makes up about 6% of greenhouse gases, is 270 times more potent a greenhouse gas than is carbon dioxide.
https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/press-release/rise-nitrous-oxide-emissions-endangers-pathway-15degc-ozone-layer
how much is emitted? and by what process is it produced in a rocket burn?
so as long as we water wash our emissions by the final common fuel pathway being hydrogen then it’s all good
Date: 3/02/2026 23:52:29
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2357132
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Nitrous oxide (\(N_{2}O\)) is generally not a direct product of the ideal stoichiometric reaction between pure liquid oxygen (LOX) and liquid hydrogen (\(LH_{2}\)), which produces only water (\(H_{2}O\)) and heat.
However, \(N_{2}O\) can be produced in rocket combustion environments or specialized, non-stoichiometric reactions involving nitrogenous impurities, high-temperature combustion, or specific catalytic conditions. Here is how nitrous oxide is formed in the context of high-energy hydrogen/oxygen reactions:
1. High-Temperature Thermal \(NO_{x}\) Mechanism (Combustion)
In real-world combustion (like in a rocket engine), the combustion chamber can reach temperatures where nitrogen, if present (e.g., from ambient air leakage or inpurities), reacts with oxygen and hydrogen.
Initial Step: At high temperatures (\(>1300^{\circ }\text{C}\)), molecular nitrogen (\(N_{2}\)) and oxygen (\(O_{2}\)) dissociate into atomic states.
Reaction Path: The formation of \(N_{2}O\) often occurs through the oxidation of nitric oxide (\(NO\)) or via nitrogen-containing radicals, specifically:\(NCO+NO\rightarrow N_{2}O+CO\)\(NH+NO\rightarrow N_{2}O+H\)
Role of Hydrogen: The presence of hydrogen can promote the formation of oxygenated radicals (\(O,OH,HO_{2}\)), which influence the consumption of \(NO\) and promote \(N_{2}O\) production in certain mixing ratios.
2. Impurity-Driven Reactions
If the cryogenic hydrogen or oxygen is not perfectly pure and contains nitrogen compounds (like nitrogen gas or ammonia), the high-temperature, high-pressure reaction can produce \(N_{2}O\) as a minor byproduct.
Ammonia (\(NH_{3}\)) can form, which then reacts with oxygen to form nitric oxide (\(NO\)), which can further react to produce \(N_{2}O\).
3. Decomposition of Intermediate Compounds
Nitramide (\(O_{2}NNH_{2}\)): In certain combustion, \(N_{2}O\) is formed through the decomposition of nitramide, which can arise from nitrogen-hydrogen-oxygen interactions.Hyponitrous Acid (\(H_{2}N_{2}O_{2}\)): Intermediate formation of nitrogen-oxygen-hydrogen species can lead to the release of \(N_{2}O\).
lifetime/ar-AA1D8dyz#:~:text=Emily’s%20environmental%20concerns
your 爱 is showing
Date: 3/02/2026 23:55:49
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2357133
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
your 爱 is showing
Yeah, i know.
I recalled reading all that stuff in some specific website last year, but i wasn’t going to spend the rest of the evening hunting for it, so i let AI round up the gist of it for me.
It seems congruent with what i remember reading.
Date: 4/02/2026 00:05:41
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2357136
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ouch

Date: 4/02/2026 00:08:03
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 2357137
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
You might like this article, which reports on the potential impacts of short space flights:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/blue-origins-11-minute-space-flight-produced-more-carbon-emissions-than-most-people-will-in-a-lifetime/ar-AA1D8dyz#:~:text=Emily’s%20environmental%20concerns%20echoed%20those%20of%20others,to%20be%20in%20the%20250%2D1%2C000%20tonnes%20range.’s%20environmental%20concerns%20echoed%20those%20of%20others,to%20be%20in%20the%20250%2D1%2C000%20tonnes%20range.
is that just the emissions from the trip or total emissions from the production of the fuels plus trip etc?
Date: 4/02/2026 00:10:24
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2357138
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ChrispenEvan said:
captain_spalding said:
You might like this article, which reports on the potential impacts of short space flights:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/blue-origins-11-minute-space-flight-produced-more-carbon-emissions-than-most-people-will-in-a-lifetime/ar-AA1D8dyz#:~:text=Emily’s%20environmental%20concerns%20echoed%20those%20of%20others,to%20be%20in%20the%20250%2D1%2C000%20tonnes%20range.’s%20environmental%20concerns%20echoed%20those%20of%20others,to%20be%20in%20the%20250%2D1%2C000%20tonnes%20range.
is that just the emissions from the trip or total emissions from the production of the fuels plus trip etc?
Yeah, that’s not all that clear from how it’s written, is it?
In any case, whether it’s the trip alone, or the trip and ‘associated’ emissions, it’s a lot of carbon etc. that was generated simply to give some ladies a brief (if memorable) amusement.
Date: 4/02/2026 00:16:09
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2357139
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I think that it’s time to retire.
17 deg with an easterly wind, it’s actually feeling a little chilly here.
And, twice now, i’ve nearly clicked on the Wordle posts, which would spoil my morning routine.
So, i’d better go.
Date: 4/02/2026 00:30:30
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2357142
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
ChrispenEvan said:
captain_spalding said:
You might like this article, which reports on the potential impacts of short space flights:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/blue-origins-11-minute-space-flight-produced-more-carbon-emissions-than-most-people-will-in-a-lifetime/ar-AA1D8dyz#:~:text=Emily’s%20environmental%20concerns%20echoed%20those%20of%20others,to%20be%20in%20the%20250%2D1%2C000%20tonnes%20range.’s%20environmental%20concerns%20echoed%20those%20of%20others,to%20be%20in%20the%20250%2D1%2C000%20tonnes%20range.
is that just the emissions from the trip or total emissions from the production of the fuels plus trip etc?
Yeah, that’s not all that clear from how it’s written, is it?
In any case, whether it’s the trip alone, or the trip and ‘associated’ emissions, it’s a lot of carbon etc. that was generated simply to give some ladies a brief (if memorable) amusement.
what about the emissions from unnecessary use of generative 爱 to respond
Date: 4/02/2026 00:30:50
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2357143
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
so who silenced this fella

Date: 4/02/2026 01:19:46
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2357147
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 4/02/2026 04:08:51
From: Michael V
ID: 2357154
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 4/02/2026 07:04:57
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2357162
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Ricky Gervais has again called out celebrities for making political speeches at a big awards show.
The Grammy Awards in Los Angeles on 2 February saw winners like Bad Bunny and Billie Eilish making speeches denouncing US president Donald Trump’s increasingly unpopular immigration crackdown.
Gervais didn’t seem impressed by any of it. “They’re still not listening,” the comedian wrote on X, along with a snippet of his 2020 Golden Globes monologue telling the gathered celebrities not to use their acceptance speeches to make political points.
“If you do win an award tonight, don’t use it as a political platform to make a political speech. You’re in no position to lecture the public about anything. You know nothing about the real world. Most of you spent less time in school than Greta Thunberg,”
An excellent political speech it was too.
Date: 4/02/2026 09:43:57
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2357182
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 4/02/2026 10:29:36
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2357191
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
¿dem fella doth protest too much, ya reckon?

The following email is what I sent my team last night. I sent a similar version to my patients, also.
***
You’ve put your trust, your credibility, and your hard work into what we have built together, and I take that responsibility seriously. You deserve a complete and honest account of what did and did not happen. I apologize that I did not get this out sooner, but I want to be thorough.
The purpose of the DOJ releasing these documents is clear: to identify individuals who participated in criminal activity, enabled it, or witnessed it. I am not in any of those categories, and there is no evidence to the contrary.
To be clear:
1. I was not involved in any criminal activity.
2. My interactions with Epstein had nothing to do with his sexual abuse or exploitation of anyone.
3. I was never on his plane, never on his island, and never present at any sex parties.
That said, I apologize and regret putting myself in a position where emails, some of them embarrassing, tasteless, and indefensible, are now public, and that is on me. I accept that reality and the humiliation that comes with it.
***
I want to start by directly addressing the email thread that I’ve been asked about the most.
In June 2015, I sent Epstein an email with the subject line “Got a fresh shipment.” The email contained a photograph of bottles of metformin, a medication I had just received from the pharmacy for my own use. The subject line referred to the picture of the bottles of medication.
He replied with the words “me too” and attached a photograph of an adult woman. I responded with crude, tasteless banter. Reading that exchange now is very embarrassing, and I will not defend it. I’m ashamed of myself for everything about this. At the time, I understood this exchange as juvenile, not a reference to anything dark or harmful.
At that point in my career, I had little exposure to prominent people, and that level of access was novel to me. Everything about him seemed excessive and exclusive, including the fact that he lived in the largest home in all of Manhattan, owned a Boeing 727, and hosted parties with the most powerful and prominent leaders in business and politics. I treated that access as something to be quiet about rather than discussed freely with others. One line in that exchange, about his life being outrageous and me not being able to tell anyone, is being interpreted as awareness of wrongdoing. That is not how I meant it at all. What I was referring to, poorly and flippantly, was the discretion commanded by those social and professional circles–the idea that you don’t talk about who you meet, the dinners you attend and the power and influence of the people in those settings. What I wrote in that email reads terribly, and I own that.
***
I met Epstein in 2014 through a prominent female healthcare leader while I was raising funds for scientific research. At that time, he was widely known in academic and philanthropic circles as a funder of science and moved openly among credible institutions and public figures.
Between summer 2014 and spring 2019, I met with him on approximately seven or eight occasions at his New York City home, regarding research studies and to meet others he introduced me to. I never visited his island or ranch, and I never flew on any of his planes. When I was at his home, it was either meeting with him directly, meeting with small groups of scientists, doctors, or business leaders, and once at a dinner in 2015 with a number of guests including prominent heads of state. In retrospect, the presence and credibility of such venerable people in different orbits led me to make assumptions about him that clouded my judgment in ways it shouldn’t have.
I was not his doctor, though several times I answered general medical questions and recommended other providers to him.
Shortly after we met, I asked him directly about his 2008 conviction. He characterized it as prostitution-related charges. In 2018, I came to learn this was grossly minimized (more on this below). I was incredibly naïve to believe him. I mistook his social acceptance in the eyes of the credible people I saw him with for acceptability, and that was a serious error in my judgment. To be clear, I never witnessed illegal behavior and never saw anyone who appeared underage in his presence.
***
In November 2018 I read the Miami Herald investigative article. I was repulsed by what I learned. Nauseated. It marked a clear and irreversible line between what I knew before and what I understood afterward.
At that point, I told him directly he needed to accept responsibility for what he did.
Hoping to provide the victims from the Herald piece with support, I contacted a residential trauma facility to understand what funding comprehensive care for many victims would require. (Those communications were between me and the facility and were therefore not part of the document release.) I spoke with him and shared that information and insisted that he fund their care, beginning with residential treatment and followed by lifelong therapy.
In hindsight, even attempting to facilitate accountability was a mistake and once again reflected just how naïve I was at the time. Once the full scope of his actions was clear, disengagement should have been the only appropriate response. My intent does not change that, and I regret not drawing that boundary immediately.
***
Nothing in this letter is meant to minimize the harm suffered by the young women Epstein abused. Their trauma is permanent.
I am not asking for a pass from you. I am not asking anyone to ignore the emails or pretend they aren’t ugly. They simply are.
The man I am today, roughly ten years later, would not write them and would not associate with Epstein at all. Whatever growth I’ve had over the past decade does not erase the emails I wrote then.
I recognize that my actions and words have consequences for the people I care deeply about, including all of you. I regret the cost this has placed on you, and I take responsibility for it.
I won’t ask anyone to defend me or explain this on my behalf. If you have questions or concerns, I’ll address them directly with you, my team.
Date: 4/02/2026 11:08:26
From: dv
ID: 2357198
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

izmo@mindspring is the address used by Mark Epstein, his brother.
Date: 4/02/2026 11:14:04
From: dv
ID: 2357202
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Ricky Gervais has again called out celebrities for making political speeches at a big awards show.
The Grammy Awards in Los Angeles on 2 February saw winners like Bad Bunny and Billie Eilish making speeches denouncing US president Donald Trump’s increasingly unpopular immigration crackdown.
Gervais didn’t seem impressed by any of it. “They’re still not listening,” the comedian wrote on X, along with a snippet of his 2020 Golden Globes monologue telling the gathered celebrities not to use their acceptance speeches to make political points.
“If you do win an award tonight, don’t use it as a political platform to make a political speech. You’re in no position to lecture the public about anything. You know nothing about the real world. Most of you spent less time in school than Greta Thunberg,”
An excellent political speech it was too.
All he does is lecture these days
Date: 4/02/2026 11:21:46
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2357207
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
look all you alarmist doomer leftist wokist crazies
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-04/donald-trump-says-republicans-should-nationalise-us-elections/106302586
it hasn’t happened yet so it won’t
This would be a tremendous own goal by the GOP. The Democrats would love federal control of elections.
Date: 4/02/2026 11:32:26
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2357214
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 4/02/2026 11:33:49
From: Cymek
ID: 2357215
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:
look all you alarmist doomer leftist wokist crazies
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-04/donald-trump-says-republicans-should-nationalise-us-elections/106302586
it hasn’t happened yet so it won’t
This would be a tremendous own goal by the GOP. The Democrats would love federal control of elections.
Could they be sponsored by Coke or Pepsi
Date: 4/02/2026 11:34:43
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2357217
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:
look all you alarmist doomer leftist wokist crazies
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-04/donald-trump-says-republicans-should-nationalise-us-elections/106302586
it hasn’t happened yet so it won’t
This would be a tremendous own goal by the GOP. The Democrats would love federal control of elections.
The way the Republicans might set it up, i don’t think that the Democrats would love it so much.
David Pakman explains the danger in this 5 min 51 sec video, released just 2 hours ago:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-itKAX6h3uQ
Date: 4/02/2026 11:37:32
From: Michael V
ID: 2357220
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
izmo@mindspring is the address used by Mark Epstein, his brother.
!!!
Date: 4/02/2026 11:38:08
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2357221
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:

doesn’t that come out the other face
Date: 4/02/2026 11:48:15
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2357226
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:
look all you alarmist doomer leftist wokist crazies
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-04/donald-trump-says-republicans-should-nationalise-us-elections/106302586
it hasn’t happened yet so it won’t
This would be a tremendous own goal by the GOP. The Democrats would love federal control of elections.
Could they be sponsored by Coke or Pepsi
Coke or Pepsi could sponsor the midterms and Jack Daniels could sponsor the federal election.
Date: 4/02/2026 11:50:09
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2357228
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:
look all you alarmist doomer leftist wokist crazies
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-04/donald-trump-says-republicans-should-nationalise-us-elections/106302586
it hasn’t happened yet so it won’t
This would be a tremendous own goal by the GOP. The Democrats would love federal control of elections.
The way the Republicans might set it up, i don’t think that the Democrats would love it so much.
David Pakman explains the danger in this 5 min 51 sec video, released just 2 hours ago:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-itKAX6h3uQ
Thanks. I pretty much disagree with almost all of that. He credits Trump with far too much intelligence and foresight and falls to understand how flawed US elections are compared to the rest of the world.
Date: 4/02/2026 11:53:51
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2357232
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
captain_spalding said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
This would be a tremendous own goal by the GOP. The Democrats would love federal control of elections.
The way the Republicans might set it up, i don’t think that the Democrats would love it so much.
David Pakman explains the danger in this 5 min 51 sec video, released just 2 hours ago:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-itKAX6h3uQ
Thanks. I pretty much disagree with almost all of that. He credits Trump with far too much intelligence and foresight and falls to understand how flawed US elections are compared to the rest of the world.
Trump himself isn’t as smart as a bowl of custard. And, he’ll be dead fairly soon.
But, that doesn’t mean that there aren’t more wily characters in the White House and the Republican Party who will explore any means to solidify their hold on power.
Date: 4/02/2026 12:05:06
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2357237
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
captain_spalding said:
The way the Republicans might set it up, i don’t think that the Democrats would love it so much.
David Pakman explains the danger in this 5 min 51 sec video, released just 2 hours ago:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-itKAX6h3uQ
Thanks. I pretty much disagree with almost all of that. He credits Trump with far too much intelligence and foresight and falls to understand how flawed US elections are compared to the rest of the world.
Trump himself isn’t as smart as a bowl of custard. And, he’ll be dead fairly soon.
But, that doesn’t mean that there aren’t more wily characters in the White House and the Republican Party who will explore any means to solidify their hold on power.
Worst case scenario is the GOP do their absolute worst, shit his the fan, Democrats regain power and now they have the ability to adapt their election processes by emulating other countries who do it better.
Date: 4/02/2026 12:07:24
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2357240
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
captain_spalding said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Thanks. I pretty much disagree with almost all of that. He credits Trump with far too much intelligence and foresight and falls to understand how flawed US elections are compared to the rest of the world.
Trump himself isn’t as smart as a bowl of custard. And, he’ll be dead fairly soon.
But, that doesn’t mean that there aren’t more wily characters in the White House and the Republican Party who will explore any means to solidify their hold on power.
Worst case scenario is the GOP do their absolute worst, shit his the fan, Democrats regain power and now they have the ability to adapt their election processes by emulating other countries who do it better.
I very much doubt there’ll be another election there any time soon.
As I’ve been saying for over a year, Shitler will keep on prodding the public to provoke them, and then declare martial law and suspend all elections.
Date: 4/02/2026 12:08:46
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2357242
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
captain_spalding said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Thanks. I pretty much disagree with almost all of that. He credits Trump with far too much intelligence and foresight and falls to understand how flawed US elections are compared to the rest of the world.
Trump himself isn’t as smart as a bowl of custard. And, he’ll be dead fairly soon.
But, that doesn’t mean that there aren’t more wily characters in the White House and the Republican Party who will explore any means to solidify their hold on power.
Worst case scenario is the GOP do their absolute worst, shit his the fan, Democrats regain power and now they have the ability to adapt their election processes by emulating other countries who do it better.
That would be a good outcome.
But, it seems to be predicated on the Democrats obtaining control of the government before the Republicans put in place whatever scheme they come up with to ensure that they never lose another election.
Once that horse has bolted, it’s no good thinking about the stable door.
Date: 4/02/2026 12:13:05
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 2357248
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 4/02/2026 12:14:51
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2357249
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ChrispenEvan said:

Yeah, it’s all pretty flimsy, so far. They got nuthin’.
Date: 4/02/2026 12:15:31
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2357250
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
captain_spalding said:
Trump himself isn’t as smart as a bowl of custard. And, he’ll be dead fairly soon.
But, that doesn’t mean that there aren’t more wily characters in the White House and the Republican Party who will explore any means to solidify their hold on power.
Worst case scenario is the GOP do their absolute worst, shit his the fan, Democrats regain power and now they have the ability to adapt their election processes by emulating other countries who do it better.
That would be a good outcome.
But, it seems to be predicated on the Democrats obtaining control of the government before the Republicans put in place whatever scheme they come up with to ensure that they never lose another election.
Once that horse has bolted, it’s no good thinking about the stable door.
There is no way that the US electorate would put up with a election rigged by the
GOP hardliners. This is when the shit will hit the fan and the US will have transitioned to the end of the beginning of Trumpism.
Date: 4/02/2026 12:18:14
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2357251
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
captain_spalding said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Worst case scenario is the GOP do their absolute worst, shit his the fan, Democrats regain power and now they have the ability to adapt their election processes by emulating other countries who do it better.
That would be a good outcome.
But, it seems to be predicated on the Democrats obtaining control of the government before the Republicans put in place whatever scheme they come up with to ensure that they never lose another election.
Once that horse has bolted, it’s no good thinking about the stable door.
There is no way that the US electorate would put up with a election rigged by the GOP hardliners. This is when the shit will hit the fan and the US will have transitioned to the end of the beginning of Trumpism.
They are ruing the day they became a republic.
Date: 4/02/2026 12:19:35
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2357252
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
captain_spalding said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Worst case scenario is the GOP do their absolute worst, shit his the fan, Democrats regain power and now they have the ability to adapt their election processes by emulating other countries who do it better.
That would be a good outcome.
But, it seems to be predicated on the Democrats obtaining control of the government before the Republicans put in place whatever scheme they come up with to ensure that they never lose another election.
Once that horse has bolted, it’s no good thinking about the stable door.
There is no way that the US electorate would put up with a election rigged by the GOP hardliners. This is when the shit will hit the fan and the US will have transitioned to the end of the beginning of Trumpism.
was there any way a bunch of nice decent Europeans would have put up with strong proud men and boys taking over on a hardline antisemitic platform
Date: 4/02/2026 12:21:08
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2357253
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
captain_spalding said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Worst case scenario is the GOP do their absolute worst, shit his the fan, Democrats regain power and now they have the ability to adapt their election processes by emulating other countries who do it better.
That would be a good outcome.
But, it seems to be predicated on the Democrats obtaining control of the government before the Republicans put in place whatever scheme they come up with to ensure that they never lose another election.
Once that horse has bolted, it’s no good thinking about the stable door.
There is no way that the US electorate would put up with a election rigged by the GOP hardliners. This is when the shit will hit the fan and the US will have transitioned to the end of the beginning of Trumpism.
I do hope that you’re right.
But, it only has to work once.
If they can pull it off just one time, then it’s ‘game over’. They’ll be in power forever, with ‘opposition’ party/parties maybe tolerated because the mechanism is set so that the opposition can never win, so they’re no threat. Elections may continue, but they’ll be farcical shams. Popular discontent and uprisings would be dealt with be expanded and draconian ‘security’ forces, in the name of ‘defending freedom’ and ‘protecting America’.
But, i do hope that you’re right.
Date: 4/02/2026 12:21:09
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 2357254
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
ChrispenEvan said:

Yeah, it’s all pretty flimsy, so far. They got nuthin’.
no
yeah,
Date: 4/02/2026 12:24:24
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 2357255
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
captain_spalding said:
That would be a good outcome.
But, it seems to be predicated on the Democrats obtaining control of the government before the Republicans put in place whatever scheme they come up with to ensure that they never lose another election.
Once that horse has bolted, it’s no good thinking about the stable door.
There is no way that the US electorate would put up with a election rigged by the GOP hardliners. This is when the shit will hit the fan and the US will have transitioned to the end of the beginning of Trumpism.
was there any way a bunch of nice decent Europeans would have put up with strong proud men and boys taking over on a hardline antisemitic platform
the AfD?
Date: 4/02/2026 12:28:31
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2357258
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
captain_spalding said:
That would be a good outcome.
But, it seems to be predicated on the Democrats obtaining control of the government before the Republicans put in place whatever scheme they come up with to ensure that they never lose another election.
Once that horse has bolted, it’s no good thinking about the stable door.
There is no way that the US electorate would put up with a election rigged by the GOP hardliners. This is when the shit will hit the fan and the US will have transitioned to the end of the beginning of Trumpism.
They are ruing the day they became a republic.
They should hold a referendum to become a Constitutional Monarchy like Australia Norway Canada etc etc, proper countries.
Date: 4/02/2026 12:32:15
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2357260
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
If they can pull it off just one time, then it’s ‘game over’. They’ll be in power forever,
we mean pedanticism aside so we take that as “for a generation” even then that’s not how it worked historically is it
but it might if too many sycophants and useful idiots decide to go along with it and for example double down on $368000000000 protection money
Date: 4/02/2026 12:45:00
From: Michael V
ID: 2357263
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 4/02/2026 12:45:30
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 2357264
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
There is no way that the US electorate would put up with a election rigged by the GOP hardliners. This is when the shit will hit the fan and the US will have transitioned to the end of the beginning of Trumpism.
They are ruing the day they became a republic.
They should hold a referendum to become a Constitutional Monarchy like Australia Norway Canada etc etc, proper countries.
King Donald the First?
Date: 4/02/2026 12:52:55
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2357267
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
captain_spalding said:
If they can pull it off just one time, then it’s ‘game over’. They’ll be in power forever,
we mean pedanticism aside so we take that as “for a generation” even then that’s not how it worked historically is it
but it might if too many sycophants and useful idiots decide to go along with it and for example double down on $368000000000 protection money
LOL
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-04/defence-to-sell-leeuwin-irwin-barracks-in-perth-aukus/106304108
Date: 4/02/2026 13:11:45
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2357271
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ChrispenEvan said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Peak Warming Man said:
They are ruing the day they became a republic.
They should hold a referendum to become a Constitutional Monarchy like Australia Norway Canada etc etc, proper countries.
King Donald the First?
A titular king.
Date: 4/02/2026 13:18:26
From: dv
ID: 2357273
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Like whoever sent this.
Surely the authorities could at least have a conversation with this fellow about the context of these comments…
Date: 4/02/2026 13:25:05
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2357275
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Like whoever sent this.
Surely the authorities could at least have a conversation with this fellow about the context of these comments…
what if they are the authorities
Date: 4/02/2026 13:39:03
From: kryten
ID: 2357281
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
ChrispenEvan said:
Peak Warming Man said:
They should hold a referendum to become a Constitutional Monarchy like Australia Norway Canada etc etc, proper countries.
King Donald the First?
A titular king.
wrong a tit of a king
Date: 4/02/2026 13:52:45
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2357284
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
word on the street is that they didn’t redact his outlook password
Date: 4/02/2026 14:03:09
From: Michael V
ID: 2357286
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ChrispenEvan said:

:)
Date: 4/02/2026 14:08:50
From: Michael V
ID: 2357288
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ChrispenEvan said:
captain_spalding said:
ChrispenEvan said:

Yeah, it’s all pretty flimsy, so far. They got nuthin’.
no

yeah,
:)
Date: 4/02/2026 14:25:52
From: Michael V
ID: 2357293
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
ChrispenEvan said:
Peak Warming Man said:
They should hold a referendum to become a Constitutional Monarchy like Australia Norway Canada etc etc, proper countries.
King Donald the First?
A titular king.
He certainly thinks he is very entitled.
Date: 4/02/2026 14:31:38
From: dv
ID: 2357294
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
A DOJ attorney has requested to be held in contempt of court so that she can rest, seemingly rhetorically.
—
A federal judge in Minnesota hauled government attorneys to his courtroom to find out why Immigration and Customs Enforcement is failing to comply with court orders to swiftly release wrongly detained immigrants arrested during the Trump administration’s surge.
District Judge Jerry R. Blackwell wanted to hear from the government why he shouldn’t be holding officials in contempt for their “alarming” failures.
A federal judge in Minnesota hauled government attorneys to his courtroom to find out why Immigration and Customs Enforcement is failing to comply with court orders to swiftly release wrongly detained immigrants arrested during the Trump administration’s surge.
District Judge Jerry R. Blackwell wanted to hear from the government why he shouldn’t be holding officials in contempt for their “alarming” failures.
A lawyer working for the Department of Justice told the judge Tuesday that “the system sucks.”
“I wish you would just hold me in contempt of court so I can get 24 hours of sleep,” said Julie Le, according to Minnesota’s FOX 9, which observed Tuesday’s hearing. “The system sucks, this job sucks, I am trying with every breath I have to get you what I need.”
Le, a private practice attorney who volunteered to help the U.S. Attorney’s Office last month, has been named as the government’s attorney on more than 80 immigration cases since Donald Trump’s administration sent more than 3,000 federal officers into the state last month for Operation Metro Surge.
She is simply “overwhelmed” by the number of legal challenges that are coming out of it.
“I am here to make sure the agency understands how important it is to comply with court orders,” said Le, who appeared visibly upset during the hearing.
Federal courts in the state are swimming in cases alleging unlawful arrests of immigrants and citizens alike swept up in the Trump administration’s mass deportation dragnet.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/minnesota-ice-court-hearing-judge-blackwell-b2913385.html
Date: 4/02/2026 14:39:20
From: Michael V
ID: 2357299
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
A DOJ attorney has requested to be held in contempt of court so that she can rest, seemingly rhetorically.
—
A federal judge in Minnesota hauled government attorneys to his courtroom to find out why Immigration and Customs Enforcement is failing to comply with court orders to swiftly release wrongly detained immigrants arrested during the Trump administration’s surge.
District Judge Jerry R. Blackwell wanted to hear from the government why he shouldn’t be holding officials in contempt for their “alarming” failures.
A federal judge in Minnesota hauled government attorneys to his courtroom to find out why Immigration and Customs Enforcement is failing to comply with court orders to swiftly release wrongly detained immigrants arrested during the Trump administration’s surge.
District Judge Jerry R. Blackwell wanted to hear from the government why he shouldn’t be holding officials in contempt for their “alarming” failures.
A lawyer working for the Department of Justice told the judge Tuesday that “the system sucks.”
“I wish you would just hold me in contempt of court so I can get 24 hours of sleep,” said Julie Le, according to Minnesota’s FOX 9, which observed Tuesday’s hearing. “The system sucks, this job sucks, I am trying with every breath I have to get you what I need.”
Le, a private practice attorney who volunteered to help the U.S. Attorney’s Office last month, has been named as the government’s attorney on more than 80 immigration cases since Donald Trump’s administration sent more than 3,000 federal officers into the state last month for Operation Metro Surge.
She is simply “overwhelmed” by the number of legal challenges that are coming out of it.
“I am here to make sure the agency understands how important it is to comply with court orders,” said Le, who appeared visibly upset during the hearing.
Federal courts in the state are swimming in cases alleging unlawful arrests of immigrants and citizens alike swept up in the Trump administration’s mass deportation dragnet.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/minnesota-ice-court-hearing-judge-blackwell-b2913385.html
Heck!
Date: 4/02/2026 15:16:40
From: fsm
ID: 2357304
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Oh dear!

Date: 4/02/2026 15:33:57
From: kii
ID: 2357305
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 4/02/2026 15:47:43
From: Cymek
ID: 2357307
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
fsm said:
Oh dear!

They work for tips
Date: 4/02/2026 16:17:38
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2357310
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
fsm said:
Oh dear!

Trump doesn’t pay people who do work for him?
Gosh, who could have expected that?!!
Date: 4/02/2026 16:59:27
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2357333
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 4/02/2026 17:47:57
From: roughbarked
ID: 2357356
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The last treaty limiting the nuclear arms of the United States and Russia expires this week, even as the US pressures Iran over its nuclear capabilities, creating a new level of uncertainty at a time of increasing strategic competition around the globe.
The New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) — originally negotiated by then-president Barack Obama in 2010 — not only put limitations on warheads but contained a detailed framework of notification, inspection, verification and compliance mechanisms between the two nations that possess 87 per cent of the world’s nuclear weapons.
It was the latest in a series of treaties signed by the two superpowers going back to the Cold War.
President Donald Trump has expressed little interest in the potential implications of the end of the treaty, saying last month “if it expires, it expires”.
But there is deep foreboding among long-term nuclear arms watchers.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-04/start-treaty-russia-america-donald-trump-nuclear-arms-race/106303426
Laura Tingle analysis.
Date: 4/02/2026 18:44:14
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2357372
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Alija Rahman, a Minneapolis resident who was pulled from her car by ICE agents while she was on her way to a medical appointment, testified before lawmakers on Capitol Hill Tuesday.
thanks
Thank you, members for taking time to be here today and thank you staff for making this happen.
My name is Alia Rahman.
and I am a resident of South Minneapolis I’m a Bangladeshi American born in northern Wisconsin and I’m a disabled person with autism and a traumatic brain injury.
Not all autistic brains do this, but mine fixates on sounds, numbers, and patterns.
And while what the world saw happened to me exactly 3 weeks ago today on video was a terrible violation.
It is still nothing compared to the horrific practices I saw inside the Whipple Center.
So I am here today with a duty to the people who have not had the privilege of coming home and I offer this data because these practices must end now.
On January 13th, on the way to my thirty-ninth appointment at Hennepin County’s traumatic brain injury Center.
I encountered a traffic jam caused by ice vehicles and no signs indicating how to get around it.
I had not wanted to pull into a blocked chaotic intersection, but verbally agreed to do so and rolled down my window after an agent yelled, Move!
I will break your effing window.
His first instruction Agents on all sides of my vehicle yelled conflicting threats and instructions that I could not process while watching for pedestrians.
Then the glass of the passenger side window flew across my face.
I yelled, I’m disabled at the hands grabbing at me and an agent said, Too late.
I felt immersed in a pattern and I thought of Genoa Donald, an autistic black man.
killed by police during a traffic stop in 2021.
I remembered Mr.
Sliberio Via Gonzalez.
who was killed by ice in his vehicle last year.
An agent pulled a large combat knife in front of my face, which I thought was for cutting me.
and later learned was used to cut off my seat belt.
Shooting pain went through my head, neck, and wrists.
When I hit the ground face first, and people leaned on my back.
I felt the pattern and I thought of Mr.
George Floyd, who was killed 4 blocks away.
I was carried face down through the street by my cuffed arms and legs while yelling that I had a brain injury and was disabled.
I now cannot lift my arms normally.
I was never asked for ID.
never told I was under arrest.
Never read my rights.
and never charged with a crime.
Approaching the Whipple Center, I saw black and brown bodies shackled together, chained together, being marched by yelling agents outdoors.
I continue to hear the word bodies, because that is how agents refer to us.
We’re bringing in a body They’re bringing in bodies 78 at a time.
Where do I put them?
We can’t use that room, there’s already a body in there.
You have no reason to believe you will make it out alive if you are being called a body.
Agents repeatedly had to stop and ask how to do tasks.
I received no medical screening, phone call, or access to a lawyer.
I was denied a communication navigator when my speech began to slur Asians laughed as I tried to immobilize my own neck I asked for my cane and was told no, pulled up my, my arms and prodded forward and leg irons by agents laughing and saying, walk, you can do it, walk.
Asians did not know if the facility had a wheelchair.
When I was finally placed in one to be taken to interrogation, an agent taunted you were driving, right?
So your legs do work.
I pleaded for emergency medical care for over an hour after my vision had become blurry, my heart rate went through the roof and the pain in my neck and head became unbearable.
It was denied when I became unable to speak, my cellmate pleaded for me.
The last sounds I remember before I blacked out on the cell floor where my cellmate banging on the door, pleading for a medic and a voice outside saying, we don’t want to step on ISI’s toes.
When I opened my eyes at Hennepin County’s emergency room, I learned I was brought there to be treated for assault.
The impacts of DHS detention on my physical, mental, and financial well-being and safety have been very severe, but I do not deserve more humane treatment than anyone else US citizen or not.
And I am here today with a strong spirit.
and a duty to the many people who haven’t had the privilege to tell their stories or see their loved ones come home.
I am extremely distressed by the pattern that violence from law enforcement has been happening to black and indigenous communities for centuries.
And to DHS survivors for over 20 years.
We call ourselves a civilized nation, but we lack rules and accountability around what a person claiming to be law enforcement is permitted to do to another human being.
I am not afraid, and I’m not afraid to keep working on this problem even after ICE is gone.
Thank you for your time
Date: 4/02/2026 18:47:24
From: roughbarked
ID: 2357374
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 4/02/2026 19:03:55
From: Michael V
ID: 2357382
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
kii said:
Alija Rahman, a Minneapolis resident who was pulled from her car by ICE agents while she was on her way to a medical appointment, testified before lawmakers on Capitol Hill Tuesday.
thanks
Thank you, members for taking time to be here today and thank you staff for making this happen.
My name is Alia Rahman.
and I am a resident of South Minneapolis I’m a Bangladeshi American born in northern Wisconsin and I’m a disabled person with autism and a traumatic brain injury.
Not all autistic brains do this, but mine fixates on sounds, numbers, and patterns.
And while what the world saw happened to me exactly 3 weeks ago today on video was a terrible violation.
It is still nothing compared to the horrific practices I saw inside the Whipple Center.
So I am here today with a duty to the people who have not had the privilege of coming home and I offer this data because these practices must end now.
On January 13th, on the way to my thirty-ninth appointment at Hennepin County’s traumatic brain injury Center.
I encountered a traffic jam caused by ice vehicles and no signs indicating how to get around it.
I had not wanted to pull into a blocked chaotic intersection, but verbally agreed to do so and rolled down my window after an agent yelled, Move!
I will break your effing window.
His first instruction Agents on all sides of my vehicle yelled conflicting threats and instructions that I could not process while watching for pedestrians.
Then the glass of the passenger side window flew across my face.
I yelled, I’m disabled at the hands grabbing at me and an agent said, Too late.
I felt immersed in a pattern and I thought of Genoa Donald, an autistic black man.
killed by police during a traffic stop in 2021.
I remembered Mr.
Sliberio Via Gonzalez.
who was killed by ice in his vehicle last year.
An agent pulled a large combat knife in front of my face, which I thought was for cutting me.
and later learned was used to cut off my seat belt.
Shooting pain went through my head, neck, and wrists.
When I hit the ground face first, and people leaned on my back.
I felt the pattern and I thought of Mr.
George Floyd, who was killed 4 blocks away.
I was carried face down through the street by my cuffed arms and legs while yelling that I had a brain injury and was disabled.
I now cannot lift my arms normally.
I was never asked for ID.
never told I was under arrest.
Never read my rights.
and never charged with a crime.
Approaching the Whipple Center, I saw black and brown bodies shackled together, chained together, being marched by yelling agents outdoors.
I continue to hear the word bodies, because that is how agents refer to us.
We’re bringing in a body They’re bringing in bodies 78 at a time.
Where do I put them?
We can’t use that room, there’s already a body in there.
You have no reason to believe you will make it out alive if you are being called a body.
Agents repeatedly had to stop and ask how to do tasks.
I received no medical screening, phone call, or access to a lawyer.
I was denied a communication navigator when my speech began to slur Asians laughed as I tried to immobilize my own neck I asked for my cane and was told no, pulled up my, my arms and prodded forward and leg irons by agents laughing and saying, walk, you can do it, walk.
Asians did not know if the facility had a wheelchair.
When I was finally placed in one to be taken to interrogation, an agent taunted you were driving, right?
So your legs do work.
I pleaded for emergency medical care for over an hour after my vision had become blurry, my heart rate went through the roof and the pain in my neck and head became unbearable.
It was denied when I became unable to speak, my cellmate pleaded for me.
The last sounds I remember before I blacked out on the cell floor where my cellmate banging on the door, pleading for a medic and a voice outside saying, we don’t want to step on ISI’s toes.
When I opened my eyes at Hennepin County’s emergency room, I learned I was brought there to be treated for assault.
The impacts of DHS detention on my physical, mental, and financial well-being and safety have been very severe, but I do not deserve more humane treatment than anyone else US citizen or not.
And I am here today with a strong spirit.
and a duty to the many people who haven’t had the privilege to tell their stories or see their loved ones come home.
I am extremely distressed by the pattern that violence from law enforcement has been happening to black and indigenous communities for centuries.
And to DHS survivors for over 20 years.
We call ourselves a civilized nation, but we lack rules and accountability around what a person claiming to be law enforcement is permitted to do to another human being.
I am not afraid, and I’m not afraid to keep working on this problem even after ICE is gone.
Thank you for your time
:(
:(
:(
:)
Asians = Agents, I surmise.
Date: 4/02/2026 19:50:23
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2357404
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 4/02/2026 19:57:12
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2357407
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

True.
Date: 4/02/2026 19:57:47
From: roughbarked
ID: 2357409
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

succinct.
Date: 4/02/2026 20:04:24
From: Michael V
ID: 2357411
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

LOLOLOL
Date: 4/02/2026 20:19:59
From: buffy
ID: 2357423
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
fsm said:
Oh dear!

They work for tips
I think I read somewhere that the hiring bonuses were never going to be paid immediately anyway. Some months before they were “due”. Or something. And that people hadn’t read the small print when they signed on.
Date: 4/02/2026 22:13:48
From: dv
ID: 2357447
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1FvEiFtNYa/
Ted Lieu contradicts asst Attorney General Todd Blanche on the law regarding attendance at underage human trafficking parties.
Date: 5/02/2026 01:03:31
From: dv
ID: 2357466
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Blistering hot take
Date: 5/02/2026 03:23:01
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2357468
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Cymek said:
fsm said:
Oh dear!

They work for tips
I think I read somewhere that the hiring bonuses were never going to be paid immediately anyway. Some months before they were “due”. Or something. And that people hadn’t read the small print when they signed on.
well there you go just don’t pay them and they’ll leave
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-05/ice-to-pull-700-officers-out-of-minnesota/106306958
Date: 5/02/2026 03:28:23
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2357470
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-05/ice-to-pull-700-officers-out-of-minnesota/106306958
wow fuck that doublespeak
“Was it a perfect operation? No. No. We created one unified chain of command to make sure everybody is on the same page. And make sure we follow the rules. I don’t think anybody, purposely, didn’t do something they should have done.”
Date: 5/02/2026 09:16:52
From: dv
ID: 2357509
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I know you all are tiring of this but some of it still shocks me. These people really don’t think of things the way we do.

Date: 5/02/2026 09:19:17
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2357511
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
I know you all are tiring of this but some of it still shocks me. These people really don’t think of things the way we do.

They think of the money.
Date: 5/02/2026 09:25:50
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2357515
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
I know you all are tiring of this but some of it still shocks me. These people really don’t think of things the way we do.

And did the five sets of parents/caregivers know about this?
Date: 5/02/2026 09:38:17
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2357517
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
I know you all are tiring of this but some of it still shocks me. These people really don’t think of things the way we do.

And did the five sets of parents/caregivers know about this?
Grooming by Ghislaine Maxwell would hide the real intention.
Date: 5/02/2026 09:43:44
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2357519
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
I know you all are tiring of this but some of it still shocks me. These people really don’t think of things the way we do.

And did the five sets of parents/caregivers know about this?
Grooming by Ghislaine Maxwell would hide the real intention.
Promises of becoming a model would fool a lot of parents.
Date: 5/02/2026 09:53:31
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2357528
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
I know you all are tiring of this but some of it still shocks me. These people really don’t think of things the way we do.

And did the five sets of parents/caregivers know about this?
Grooming by Ghislaine Maxwell would hide the real intention.
Promises of becoming a model would fool a lot of parents.
don’t forget their place in your society
nobles/royals did it, but mostly for political or inheritance reasons.
And even in those cases they often waited for years to consummate
yeah
Constance of France
Married at approx. 15–17; first recorded child born at approx. 30.
Cecile of France
Married at approx. 9; first recorded child born at approx. 22.
Empress Matilda
Married at 8; first recorded child born at 31.
Isabella of Hainault
Married at 10; first recorded child born at 17.
St Elizabeth of Portugal
Married at 11–12; first recorded child born at 19.
Isabella of France
Married at 12; first recorded child born at 17.
Bianca of Savoy
Married at 13; first recorded child born at 14.
Isabella of Valois
Married at 6; first recorded child born at 19 (second marriage).
Lady Margaret Beaufort
Married at 6-7; first recorded child born at 13.
Lucrezia Borgia
Married at 13 (first marriage annulled, not consummated); first recorded child born at 19 (second marriage).
Date: 5/02/2026 11:55:16
From: roughbarked
ID: 2357584
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
I know you all are tiring of this but some of it still shocks me. These people really don’t think of things the way we do.

And did the five sets of parents/caregivers know about this?
They probably do now.
Date: 5/02/2026 17:28:19
From: roughbarked
ID: 2357738
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The US has been gripped by cold weather in recent weeks, but pundits say it is in Texas where hell has truly frozen over.
District 9 of the state senate has for three decades been considered out of reach for Democrats.
The electorate voted resoundingly in favour of US President Donald Trump when it went to the polls in 2024, with a margin of about 17 points.
A 20-point margin separated GOP candidate Kelly Hancock from his Democrat rival at the last state senate election in 2022.
But in a recent election, that trend was overturned.
A blue wave swept the electorate with a 14-point swing to the Democrats.
For some Republicans, it is a worrying sign.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-05/texas-special-runoff-election-results/106308914
Date: 5/02/2026 17:50:38
From: Cymek
ID: 2357739
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
The US has been gripped by cold weather in recent weeks, but pundits say it is in Texas where hell has truly frozen over.
District 9 of the state senate has for three decades been considered out of reach for Democrats.
The electorate voted resoundingly in favour of US President Donald Trump when it went to the polls in 2024, with a margin of about 17 points.
A 20-point margin separated GOP candidate Kelly Hancock from his Democrat rival at the last state senate election in 2022.
But in a recent election, that trend was overturned.
A blue wave swept the electorate with a 14-point swing to the Democrats.
For some Republicans, it is a worrying sign.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-05/texas-special-runoff-election-results/106308914
Has he taken all their cheap labour away when he deported immigrants
Date: 5/02/2026 17:51:22
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2357740
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
The US has been gripped by cold weather in recent weeks, but pundits say it is in Texas where hell has truly frozen over.
District 9 of the state senate has for three decades been considered out of reach for Democrats.
The electorate voted resoundingly in favour of US President Donald Trump when it went to the polls in 2024, with a margin of about 17 points.
A 20-point margin separated GOP candidate Kelly Hancock from his Democrat rival at the last state senate election in 2022.
But in a recent election, that trend was overturned.
A blue wave swept the electorate with a 14-point swing to the Democrats.
For some Republicans, it is a worrying sign.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-05/texas-special-runoff-election-results/106308914
Good news.
OTOH, I was just reading this morning that Democrat approval is down around 15-20%.
Date: 5/02/2026 22:43:53
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2357786
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 6/02/2026 07:33:32
From: roughbarked
ID: 2357804
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 6/02/2026 10:48:10
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2357842
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
LOL
There are many, many questions that a lot of influential, potentially compromised, people in Epstein’s web of connections have never answered, and need to.
“potentially” you out there doin’ big work though, “potentially”
Date: 6/02/2026 12:53:11
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2357897
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
From a genuine anti Trumper conservative intellectual:
…
One path to U.S. fiscal disaster is most alarming — and most likely
The national debt is nearing $39 trillion. Dire consequences are coming.
George F. Will
February 4, 2026 at 7:00 a.m. ESTFebruary 4, 2026
As the national debt is a few months from reaching $39 trillion, and perhaps $40 trillion by the end of this year, it is puzzling how unperturbed the political class is. Or perhaps not. Writer and political agitator Upton Sinclair (1878-1968) said: “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.”
The conversations animating the Editorial Board, delivered to your inbox every Tuesday
Or pretending not to. A bipartisan congressional consensus, more alarming than partisan rancor, is: There are no long-term fiscal gains without intense short-term political pains. So, because today’s congressional careers do not yet seem likely to coincide with coming dire consequences, let them come.
In 2016, a budget expert was allotted 20 minutes to brief Donald Trump on those possible consequences. After five minutes, Trump said, “Yeah, but I’ll be gone.” He was perfectly in sync with the political mainstream he professes to supplant.
Nevertheless, the undiscourageable Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget persists. Although few others think mere information can galvanize congressional action to forestall a darkening fiscal future, the committee recently described six possible crisis scenarios. Five are dramatic. The sixth is less so, but most alarming, and most likely.
Upwardly spiraling debt could provoke a financial crisis. Investors anxious about the U.S. fiscal outlook would demand sharply higher interest rates to entice them to purchase Treasurys. This would ignite a self-reinforcing debt spiral: Higher interest rates would slow economic growth, reducing government revenue while increasing government spending on debt service. Higher interest rates on new debt would reduce the value of the much larger amount of existing debt. This would weaken the balance sheets of banks and other financial institutions. Because these would be deemed “too big to fail,” bailouts and spending to stimulate the sputtering economy would exacerbate the financial crisis.
An Everest of debt is an incentive for an inflation crisis to reduce the value of existing debt by paying lenders with debased dollars. But inflation would become baked into the expectations of investors, who would demand higher interest rates. Then R>G would bite: When interest rates paid on debt exceed the rate of economic growth, a crisis intensifies as rising interest rates depress economic growth.
An austerity crisis would occur with a large and abrupt combination of tax increases and spending reductions. Unemployment would increase, and the Federal Reserve would have little ability to combat economic contraction by reducing interest rates. Austerity is, however, rare in nations accustomed to assuming its opposite — an unending expectation, indeed entitlement, to opulence. The Economist says that “only once in the era of universal suffrage has a G7 economy” — a leading developed nation — “achieved a big fall in debt primarily by tightening its belt” (Canada in the 1990s).
A currency crisis would result from a depreciating dollar incentivizing foreign governments and private investors to diversify away from U.S. debt. A default crisis, although unlikely, would have the merit of bluntness: continuing to repay principal but not interest, or “restructuring,” which is government-speak for not repaying some debt.
The most probable, and most ominous, outcome would be a gradual crisis. In 2021, debt service consumed less than 10 percent of federal revenue. In 2025: 18 percent. By being gradual, a protracted crisis would mean a demoralized nation slowly accommodating perpetual economic sluggishness, waning investments in research and development, social stagnation, diminished contribution from the entrepreneurial energies of talented immigrants, and waning U.S. geopolitical influence.
A gradual crisis would be anesthetizing, rather than an action-forcing, cymbal-crash event that could stimulate recuperative reforms of U.S. political culture. Instead, this culture would become more toxic. Political power would be fought for, and wielded, with the desperate ruthlessness of a zero-sum competition in which one faction’s gains must equal other factions’ losses.
So, government would simultaneously become more powerful, more divisive and less legitimate. The currency is how everyone meets the government every day through the unstated — because presumably obvious — government promise that the currency it issues is trustworthy.
Nothing unsettles a middle-class nation more rapidly than inflation, a component of all of these crises. By it, people are reminded daily that the currency is failing as a store of value. This unnerves the public as much as crime, today’s deportation mayhem and other disorders. Inflation is disorder. Its quiet ubiquity is especially sinister, making everyone feel powerless.
“Dystopian” is the antonym of “utopian.” “Utopia” was derived from Greek roots to denote something imaginary — “nowhere.” The dystopian consequences of U.S. debt could someday be everywhere.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/02/04/congress-national-debt-trillions-crises/
Date: 6/02/2026 14:06:32
From: Michael V
ID: 2357922
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 6/02/2026 15:42:12
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2357938
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
From a genuine anti Trumper conservative intellectual:
…
One path to U.S. fiscal disaster is most alarming — and most likely
The national debt is nearing $39 trillion. Dire consequences are coming.
George F. Will
February 4, 2026 at 7:00 a.m. ESTFebruary 4, 2026
As the national debt is a few months from reaching $39 trillion, and perhaps $40 trillion by the end of this year, it is puzzling how unperturbed the political class is. Or perhaps not. Writer and political agitator Upton Sinclair (1878-1968) said: “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.”
The conversations animating the Editorial Board, delivered to your inbox every Tuesday
Or pretending not to. A bipartisan congressional consensus, more alarming than partisan rancor, is: There are no long-term fiscal gains without intense short-term political pains. So, because today’s congressional careers do not yet seem likely to coincide with coming dire consequences, let them come.
In 2016, a budget expert was allotted 20 minutes to brief Donald Trump on those possible consequences. After five minutes, Trump said, “Yeah, but I’ll be gone.” He was perfectly in sync with the political mainstream he professes to supplant.
Nevertheless, the undiscourageable Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget persists. Although few others think mere information can galvanize congressional action to forestall a darkening fiscal future, the committee recently described six possible crisis scenarios. Five are dramatic. The sixth is less so, but most alarming, and most likely.
Upwardly spiraling debt could provoke a financial crisis. Investors anxious about the U.S. fiscal outlook would demand sharply higher interest rates to entice them to purchase Treasurys. This would ignite a self-reinforcing debt spiral: Higher interest rates would slow economic growth, reducing government revenue while increasing government spending on debt service. Higher interest rates on new debt would reduce the value of the much larger amount of existing debt. This would weaken the balance sheets of banks and other financial institutions. Because these would be deemed “too big to fail,” bailouts and spending to stimulate the sputtering economy would exacerbate the financial crisis.
An Everest of debt is an incentive for an inflation crisis to reduce the value of existing debt by paying lenders with debased dollars. But inflation would become baked into the expectations of investors, who would demand higher interest rates. Then R>G would bite: When interest rates paid on debt exceed the rate of economic growth, a crisis intensifies as rising interest rates depress economic growth.
An austerity crisis would occur with a large and abrupt combination of tax increases and spending reductions. Unemployment would increase, and the Federal Reserve would have little ability to combat economic contraction by reducing interest rates. Austerity is, however, rare in nations accustomed to assuming its opposite — an unending expectation, indeed entitlement, to opulence. The Economist says that “only once in the era of universal suffrage has a G7 economy” — a leading developed nation — “achieved a big fall in debt primarily by tightening its belt” (Canada in the 1990s).
A currency crisis would result from a depreciating dollar incentivizing foreign governments and private investors to diversify away from U.S. debt. A default crisis, although unlikely, would have the merit of bluntness: continuing to repay principal but not interest, or “restructuring,” which is government-speak for not repaying some debt.
The most probable, and most ominous, outcome would be a gradual crisis. In 2021, debt service consumed less than 10 percent of federal revenue. In 2025: 18 percent. By being gradual, a protracted crisis would mean a demoralized nation slowly accommodating perpetual economic sluggishness, waning investments in research and development, social stagnation, diminished contribution from the entrepreneurial energies of talented immigrants, and waning U.S. geopolitical influence.
A gradual crisis would be anesthetizing, rather than an action-forcing, cymbal-crash event that could stimulate recuperative reforms of U.S. political culture. Instead, this culture would become more toxic. Political power would be fought for, and wielded, with the desperate ruthlessness of a zero-sum competition in which one faction’s gains must equal other factions’ losses.
So, government would simultaneously become more powerful, more divisive and less legitimate. The currency is how everyone meets the government every day through the unstated — because presumably obvious — government promise that the currency it issues is trustworthy.
Nothing unsettles a middle-class nation more rapidly than inflation, a component of all of these crises. By it, people are reminded daily that the currency is failing as a store of value. This unnerves the public as much as crime, today’s deportation mayhem and other disorders. Inflation is disorder. Its quiet ubiquity is especially sinister, making everyone feel powerless.
“Dystopian” is the antonym of “utopian.” “Utopia” was derived from Greek roots to denote something imaginary — “nowhere.” The dystopian consequences of U.S. debt could someday be everywhere.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/02/04/congress-national-debt-trillions-crises/
so 39000000000000 of debt is a special number in a way that 24924618593485 is not
Date: 6/02/2026 16:47:23
From: dv
ID: 2357960
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

I found this one a bit odd.
Is it possible he said “I don think” (typo or abbrev) and the redactors autoredact any instance of Don?
I guess that can’t be right because we have seen the name elsewhere. So what the heck are they redacting?
Date: 6/02/2026 16:56:01
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2357963
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
I found this one a bit odd.
Is it possible he said “I don think” (typo or abbrev) and the redactors autoredact any instance of Don?
I guess that can’t be right because we have seen the name elsewhere. So what the heck are they redacting?
The full sentence reads “I Donald J Trump raped girls think my body can handle it!”
It’s also possible autoredact missed things in the gajillion pages of files.
Date: 6/02/2026 16:58:30
From: roughbarked
ID: 2357965
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
I found this one a bit odd.
Is it possible he said “I don think” (typo or abbrev) and the redactors autoredact any instance of Don?
I guess that can’t be right because we have seen the name elsewhere. So what the heck are they redacting?
That is odd.
Date: 6/02/2026 17:01:22
From: furious
ID: 2357967
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
I found this one a bit odd.
Is it possible he said “I don think” (typo or abbrev) and the redactors autoredact any instance of Don?
I guess that can’t be right because we have seen the name elsewhere. So what the heck are they redacting?
The full sentence reads “I Donald J Trump raped girls think my body can handle it!”
It’s also possible autoredact missed things in the gajillion pages of files.
The redacted text was likely the same as the writers name, so the algorithm thought it was a self reference. Could have been Don, not necessarily Trump…
Date: 6/02/2026 20:01:51
From: dv
ID: 2358054
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/05/trump-religious-right-republicans
—
Oof.
I suppose it was inevitable that an athiest would destroy organised religion in America.
Date: 6/02/2026 20:36:05
From: kii
ID: 2358064
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/05/trump-religious-right-republicans
—
Oof.
I suppose it was inevitable that an athiest would destroy organised religion in America.
Tom Cruise…
LOLOLOLOL 😆 🤣 😂
Today I saw a random poll of people’s least favourite actor..so many people hate Tom Cruise.
Date: 6/02/2026 21:29:16
From: kii
ID: 2358090
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Sickening creep.

Date: 6/02/2026 21:39:58
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2358098
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Sickening creep.

well she shouldn’t have used that tone of voice, who does she think she is
Date: 7/02/2026 11:00:59
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 2358192
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 7/02/2026 11:03:38
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2358195
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
totally not foreign interference
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-07/trump-endorses-japan-pm-takaichi-ahead-of-sunday-election/106317102
The US president has increasingly sought to shape foreign elections. He backed Argentine President Javier Milei, highlighting US financial support as a factor in Mr Milei’s 2025 legislative success. On Thursday, he endorsed Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban for a vote there in April. Analysts say such interventions signal a growing pattern of aligning with right-wing leaders abroad.
Date: 7/02/2026 11:03:53
From: Michael V
ID: 2358196
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ChrispenEvan said:

What particular harmful incident is this particular mad Abbott going off (or on) about?
Date: 7/02/2026 12:08:11
From: roughbarked
ID: 2358217
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
ChrispenEvan said:

What particular harmful incident is this particular mad Abbott going off (or on) about?
Disruptive walkouts.
Date: 7/02/2026 12:09:31
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 2358219
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ChrispenEvan said:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBJk-VoKHKw
Link
Man arrested after altercation with minors during student protest against ICE in Texas
Date: 7/02/2026 12:18:41
From: roughbarked
ID: 2358220
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ChrispenEvan said:
ChrispenEvan said:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBJk-VoKHKw
Link
Man arrested after altercation with minors during student protest against ICE in Texas
They don’t like his curriculum either.
Date: 7/02/2026 12:26:10
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2358221
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 7/02/2026 13:15:25
From: Michael V
ID: 2358235
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ChrispenEvan said:
ChrispenEvan said:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBJk-VoKHKw
Link
Man arrested after altercation with minors during student protest against ICE in Texas
Thank you.
Date: 7/02/2026 13:15:51
From: Michael V
ID: 2358236
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

:)
Date: 7/02/2026 13:31:44
From: roughbarked
ID: 2358245
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 7/02/2026 17:24:54
From: dv
ID: 2358303
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
How’s it going, Party Of Lincoln?

Date: 7/02/2026 18:59:06
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2358338
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 7/02/2026 19:44:34
From: dv
ID: 2358342
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1CBMsC9FzA/
Vulture Capitalism
Date: 7/02/2026 19:51:36
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2358343
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1CBMsC9FzA/
Vulture Capitalism
And if you buy my book I’ll throw in a free set of steak knives.
Date: 7/02/2026 20:00:22
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2358344
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1CBMsC9FzA/
Vulture Capitalism
well we’re glad that the lid is off the smoking water pipe of evidence demonstrating what we knew all along
Date: 7/02/2026 20:03:00
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2358346
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

^
but while yous may laugh at the foolishness or rotten luck of the writers we contend that the actual deep state conspirators now revealed had intended to make it work like that and were merely hoping it would last them longer
Date: 7/02/2026 20:07:53
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2358349
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
alleged


Date: 7/02/2026 20:09:01
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2358351
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 7/02/2026 20:09:14
From: poikilotherm
ID: 2358352
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1CBMsC9FzA/
Vulture Capitalism
So really, it’s governments fault from the start… if it never had those assets to begin with, it wouldn’t have been able to do (let rich people know what’s coming up for sale) what the video outlined?
Date: 7/02/2026 20:11:02
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2358354
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
poikilotherm said:
dv said:
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1CBMsC9FzA/
Vulture Capitalism
So really, it’s governments fault from the start… if it never had those assets to begin with, it wouldn’t have been able to do (let rich people know what’s coming up for sale) what the video outlined?
so capitalism is just a bastardised form of communism
Date: 7/02/2026 20:14:52
From: poikilotherm
ID: 2358358
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
poikilotherm said:
dv said:
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1CBMsC9FzA/
Vulture Capitalism
So really, it’s governments fault from the start… if it never had those assets to begin with, it wouldn’t have been able to do (let rich people know what’s coming up for sale) what the video outlined?
so capitalism is just a bastardised form of communism
Only for those that shit their pants during press conferences.
Date: 7/02/2026 20:20:37
From: Michael V
ID: 2358361
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

:)
Date: 7/02/2026 20:25:10
From: Michael V
ID: 2358364
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1CBMsC9FzA/
Vulture Capitalism
I suspect that many of us realised all that ages ago. She shows that we now have proof.
Date: 7/02/2026 20:26:42
From: Michael V
ID: 2358366
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
alleged


Good.
Date: 7/02/2026 20:28:36
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2358367
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
dv said:
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1CBMsC9FzA/
Vulture Capitalism
well we’re glad that the lid is off the smoking water pipe of evidence demonstrating what we knew all along
I suspect that many of us realised all that ages ago. She shows that we now have proof.
this
“free speech absolutist”
they lie
“free market absolutist”
they lie
they lie
Date: 7/02/2026 22:06:53
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2358393
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
wait wasn’t Spartacus Bulgarian not Mexican though

Date: 7/02/2026 22:19:04
From: Michael V
ID: 2358394
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
wait wasn’t Spartacus Bulgarian not Mexican though

Mexican flags – ICE fishing.
:)
Like.
:)
Date: 8/02/2026 15:36:24
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2358578
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 8/02/2026 16:25:30
From: Michael V
ID: 2358599
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

LOLOLOL
Good one!
:)
Date: 8/02/2026 19:16:16
From: dv
ID: 2358655
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/ice-employees-vent-reddit-saying-theyre-not-getting-paid-still-no-insurance-despite-promises-1775650
Certainly on brand for this administration
Date: 8/02/2026 19:55:36
From: Michael V
ID: 2358662
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/ice-employees-vent-reddit-saying-theyre-not-getting-paid-still-no-insurance-despite-promises-1775650
Certainly on brand for this administration
Ha!
Date: 8/02/2026 20:02:21
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2358665
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 8/02/2026 20:04:51
From: Michael V
ID: 2358666
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:

Good.
Date: 8/02/2026 21:10:16
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2358672
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
dv said:

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/ice-employees-vent-reddit-saying-theyre-not-getting-paid-still-no-insurance-despite-promises-1775650
Certainly on brand for this administration
Ha!
don’t worry it still won’t stop them from falling for the next trick
Date: 8/02/2026 21:23:07
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2358677
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
captain_spalding said:

LOLOLOL
Good one!
:)
^
Date: 8/02/2026 21:31:37
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2358681
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
dv said:

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/ice-employees-vent-reddit-saying-theyre-not-getting-paid-still-no-insurance-despite-promises-1775650
Certainly on brand for this administration
Ha!
don’t worry it still won’t stop them from falling for the next trick
What do they want? I mean, they get given guns, they don’t have to pay for bullets, they can shoot whoever they like, if that’s not the American dream, i don’t know what is, they should be paying the government.
Date: 9/02/2026 13:09:50
From: dv
ID: 2358859
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 9/02/2026 13:16:38
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2358860
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

Do we know if he’s the only governor to be’uninvited’?
Date: 9/02/2026 13:27:42
From: buffy
ID: 2358868
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:

So the Democrats are picking up the bits and pieces around the place at the moment. And by lots. This must be worrying Trump’s lot. Does this apparent taste amongst the voters for Democrats translate from the lower levels to the higher levels for later in the year? The pundits still seem to be saying the Democrats are on the nose for not doing anything.
Date: 9/02/2026 13:32:09
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2358873
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Divine Angel said:

So the Democrats are picking up the bits and pieces around the place at the moment. And by lots. This must be worrying Trump’s lot. Does this apparent taste amongst the voters for Democrats translate from the lower levels to the higher levels for later in the year? The pundits still seem to be saying the Democrats are on the nose for not doing anything.
It may well be the Democrats’ strategy that they don’t haveto do anything.
Just stay out of the way, and let the Clown-in-Chief and his merry band of deranged dirtbags fuck themselves firmly into a corner they can’t get out of.
Date: 9/02/2026 13:33:43
From: btm
ID: 2358875
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

So the Democrats are picking up the bits and pieces around the place at the moment. And by lots. This must be worrying Trump’s lot. Does this apparent taste amongst the voters for Democrats translate from the lower levels to the higher levels for later in the year? The pundits still seem to be saying the Democrats are on the nose for not doing anything.
I note that this is a State election, not Federal, and the state seat was held by a Democrat, Chad Brown.
Date: 9/02/2026 13:35:25
From: buffy
ID: 2358877
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
btm said:

So the Democrats are picking up the bits and pieces around the place at the moment. And by lots. This must be worrying Trump’s lot. Does this apparent taste amongst the voters for Democrats translate from the lower levels to the higher levels for later in the year? The pundits still seem to be saying the Democrats are on the nose for not doing anything.
I note that this is a State election, not Federal, and the state seat was held by a Democrat, Chad Brown.
Yes, I saw that, but most recently apparently that area was quite Trumpy. I don’t know how long since the previous Dem was elected.
Date: 9/02/2026 13:37:24
From: btm
ID: 2358880
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
btm said:
buffy said:
So the Democrats are picking up the bits and pieces around the place at the moment. And by lots. This must be worrying Trump’s lot. Does this apparent taste amongst the voters for Democrats translate from the lower levels to the higher levels for later in the year? The pundits still seem to be saying the Democrats are on the nose for not doing anything.
I note that this is a State election, not Federal, and the state seat was held by a Democrat, Chad Brown.
Yes, I saw that, but most recently apparently that area was quite Trumpy. I don’t know how long since the previous Dem was elected.
Sorry, I seem to have broken the quotes. This should fix it.
Date: 9/02/2026 13:39:15
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2358881
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
btm said:
buffy said:
btm said:
I note that this is a State election, not Federal, and the state seat was held by a Democrat, Chad Brown.
Yes, I saw that, but most recently apparently that area was quite Trumpy. I don’t know how long since the previous Dem was elected.
Sorry, I seem to have broken the quotes. This should fix it.
I did that the other day.
I don’t think that anyone noticed.
Because i don’t think anyone reads my posts.
Date: 9/02/2026 13:44:26
From: Michael V
ID: 2358882
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

!!!
Date: 9/02/2026 13:54:16
From: kii
ID: 2358883
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 9/02/2026 13:55:51
From: btm
ID: 2358884
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
btm said:
buffy said:
Yes, I saw that, but most recently apparently that area was quite Trumpy. I don’t know how long since the previous Dem was elected.
Sorry, I seem to have broken the quotes. This should fix it.
I did that the other day.
I don’t think that anyone noticed.
Because i don’t think anyone reads my posts.
I know what you mean. I certainly don’t.
I’ve read, in several places, that many (enough?) Americans think it best to vote Democrat for state government and Republican for federal; this would seem consistent with Martinez’s (and Chad’s) election and the Republican dominance at the federal election. Chad was elected in 2016, taking over from Karen St Germain — another Democrat.
Date: 9/02/2026 13:58:43
From: kii
ID: 2358885
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
I did that the other day.
I don’t think that anyone noticed.
Because i don’t think anyone reads my posts.
Same.
^This
+1
Date: 9/02/2026 13:59:44
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2358886
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
btm said:
captain_spalding said:
btm said:
buffy said:
btm said:
buffy said:
Divine Angel said:

So the Democrats are picking up the bits and pieces around the place at the moment. And by lots. This must be worrying Trump’s lot. Does this apparent taste amongst the voters for Democrats translate from the lower levels to the higher levels for later in the year? The pundits still seem to be saying the Democrats are on the nose for not doing anything.
I note that this is a State election, not Federal, and the state seat was held by a Democrat, Chad Brown.
Yes, I saw that, but most recently apparently that area was quite Trumpy. I don’t know how long since the previous Dem was elected.
Sorry, I seem to have broken the quotes. This should fix it.
I did that the other day.
I don’t think that anyone noticed.
Because i don’t think anyone reads my posts.
I know what you mean. I certainly don’t.
I’ve read, in several places, that many (enough?) Americans think it best to vote Democrat for state government and Republican for federal; this would seem consistent with Martinez’s (and Chad’s) election and the Republican dominance at the federal election. Chad was elected in 2016, taking over from Karen St Germain — another Democrat.
how do they flip a seat from democrat to democrat
Date: 9/02/2026 14:00:22
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2358887
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
captain_spalding said:
I did that the other day.
I don’t think that anyone noticed.
Because i don’t think anyone reads my posts.
Same.
^This
+1
nobody reads epsteins emails
Date: 9/02/2026 14:10:25
From: roughbarked
ID: 2358888
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
kii said:
captain_spalding said:
I did that the other day.
I don’t think that anyone noticed.
Because i don’t think anyone reads my posts.
Same.
^This
+1
nobody reads epsteins emails
People in them have read many.
Date: 9/02/2026 14:23:12
From: Cymek
ID: 2358891
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
btm said:
captain_spalding said:
I did that the other day.
I don’t think that anyone noticed.
Because i don’t think anyone reads my posts.
I know what you mean. I certainly don’t.
I’ve read, in several places, that many (enough?) Americans think it best to vote Democrat for state government and Republican for federal; this would seem consistent with Martinez’s (and Chad’s) election and the Republican dominance at the federal election. Chad was elected in 2016, taking over from Karen St Germain — another Democrat.
how do they flip a seat from democrat to democrat
Prioritise arm day at the gym
Date: 9/02/2026 14:31:11
From: kii
ID: 2358895
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
btm said:
I know what you mean. I certainly don’t.
I’ve read, in several places, that many (enough?) Americans think it best to vote Democrat for state government and Republican for federal; this would seem consistent with Martinez’s (and Chad’s) election and the Republican dominance at the federal election. Chad was elected in 2016, taking over from Karen St Germain — another Democrat.
how do they flip a seat from democrat to democrat
Prioritise arm day at the gym
A genuine laugh from me.
Date: 9/02/2026 14:33:57
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2358896
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
btm said:
captain_spalding said:
btm said:
Sorry, I seem to have broken the quotes. This should fix it.
I did that the other day.
I don’t think that anyone noticed.
Because i don’t think anyone reads my posts.
I know what you mean. I certainly don’t.
I’ve read, in several places, that many (enough?) Americans think it best to vote Democrat for state government and Republican for federal; this would seem consistent with Martinez’s (and Chad’s) election and the Republican dominance at the federal election. Chad was elected in 2016, taking over from Karen St Germain — another Democrat.
It usually depends whether the election in question is a state-wide or local office: for example the Governor is chosen by the state at large where the majority of the electorate is Republican while local offices like state representatives my be competing in an election in a district that is majority Democrat. There are exceptions of course like moderate Republicans in New England and conservative Democrats in the South.
Date: 9/02/2026 14:42:25
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2358899
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
how do they flip a seat from democrat to democrat
Prioritise arm day at the gym
A genuine laugh from me.
^
Date: 9/02/2026 16:00:20
From: Woodie
ID: 2358907
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
btm said:

So the Democrats are picking up the bits and pieces around the place at the moment. And by lots. This must be worrying Trump’s lot. Does this apparent taste amongst the voters for Democrats translate from the lower levels to the higher levels for later in the year? The pundits still seem to be saying the Democrats are on the nose for not doing anything.
I note that this is a State election, not Federal, and the state seat was held by a Democrat, Chad Brown.
Why does it say GOP for Brad Daigle instead of REP???
Date: 9/02/2026 16:20:17
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2358912
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Woodie said:
btm said:
said:
said:

So the Democrats are picking up the bits and pieces around the place at the moment. And by lots. This must be worrying Trump’s lot. Does this apparent taste amongst the voters for Democrats translate from the lower levels to the higher levels for later in the year? The pundits still seem to be saying the Democrats are on the nose for not doing anything.
I note that this is a State election, not Federal, and the state seat was held by a Democrat, Chad Brown.
Why does it say GOP for Brad Daigle instead of REP???
ang f aedophiles
Date: 9/02/2026 16:26:58
From: dv
ID: 2358915
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15539609/Statement-announcing-Jeffrey-Epsteins-death-wrong-date.html
Some conspiracy theorists are latching on to the fact that the statement about Epstein’s death was dated a day before his death but I think the simplest explanation is clerical error.

Date: 9/02/2026 16:29:28
From: dv
ID: 2358916
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 9/02/2026 16:40:59
From: Michael V
ID: 2358918
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

Will that be Trumped?
Date: 9/02/2026 16:41:22
From: Michael V
ID: 2358919
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Woodie said:
btm said:
I note that this is a State election, not Federal, and the state seat was held by a Democrat, Chad Brown.
Why does it say GOP for Brad Daigle instead of REP???
ang f aedophiles
Ha!
:)
Date: 9/02/2026 16:42:57
From: Cymek
ID: 2358920
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15539609/Statement-announcing-Jeffrey-Epsteins-death-wrong-date.html
Some conspiracy theorists are latching on to the fact that the statement about Epstein’s death was dated a day before his death but I think the simplest explanation is clerical error.

Him being murdered or killing himself are equally viable
He’d have been absolute toast in prison I imagine.
Could have been a hit or just someone(s) got to him
Date: 9/02/2026 16:59:36
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2358924
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 9/02/2026 17:02:59
From: buffy
ID: 2358926
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
btm said:
captain_spalding said:
btm said:
Sorry, I seem to have broken the quotes. This should fix it.
I did that the other day.
I don’t think that anyone noticed.
Because i don’t think anyone reads my posts.
I know what you mean. I certainly don’t.
I’ve read, in several places, that many (enough?) Americans think it best to vote Democrat for state government and Republican for federal; this would seem consistent with Martinez’s (and Chad’s) election and the Republican dominance at the federal election. Chad was elected in 2016, taking over from Karen St Germain — another Democrat.
Yes, but that was before the current mess. Was this a big swing?
Date: 9/02/2026 17:03:50
From: Cymek
ID: 2358927
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

He should just retire and do Planet of the Apes musicals as Dr Zaius
Date: 9/02/2026 17:04:43
From: buffy
ID: 2358928
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
btm said:
captain_spalding said:
I did that the other day.
I don’t think that anyone noticed.
Because i don’t think anyone reads my posts.
I know what you mean. I certainly don’t.
I’ve read, in several places, that many (enough?) Americans think it best to vote Democrat for state government and Republican for federal; this would seem consistent with Martinez’s (and Chad’s) election and the Republican dominance at the federal election. Chad was elected in 2016, taking over from Karen St Germain — another Democrat.
how do they flip a seat from democrat to democrat
This one wasn’t a flip. I think the one last week was though.
Date: 9/02/2026 17:15:06
From: Michael V
ID: 2358930
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

Great summary!
:)
Date: 9/02/2026 19:07:50
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2358979
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 9/02/2026 19:11:48
From: party_pants
ID: 2358980
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

They must have a lot of morally bankrupt fuckwits then.
Date: 9/02/2026 19:23:21
From: buffy
ID: 2358983
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I must have skimmed the news today. Apparently Trump didn’t like the entertainment at some sports game. Probably because he doesn’t speak Spanish and was worried that he didn’t know what the guy was saying?
Date: 9/02/2026 19:31:13
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2358984
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
captain_spalding said:

They must have a lot of morally bankrupt fuckwits then.
That may very well be the case.
Date: 9/02/2026 19:34:57
From: roughbarked
ID: 2358986
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
party_pants said:
captain_spalding said:

They must have a lot of morally bankrupt fuckwits then.
That may very well be the case.
I’m not sure you could be any of those and still vote for Trump.
Date: 9/02/2026 20:00:06
From: Michael V
ID: 2358994
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

Very fair comment.
Date: 9/02/2026 20:39:23
From: Woodie
ID: 2359001
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Woodie said:
Woodie said:
btm said:

So the Democrats are picking up the bits and pieces around the place at the moment. And by lots. This must be worrying Trump’s lot. Does this apparent taste amongst the voters for Democrats translate from the lower levels to the higher levels for later in the year? The pundits still seem to be saying the Democrats are on the nose for not doing anything.
I note that this is a State election, not Federal, and the state seat was held by a Democrat, Chad Brown.
Why does it say GOP for Brad Daigle instead of REP???
Well? It’s not that hard of a question, is it?
Date: 9/02/2026 20:41:52
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2359002
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Woodie said:
Woodie said:
Woodie said:
So the Democrats are picking up the bits and pieces around the place at the moment. And by lots. This must be worrying Trump’s lot. Does this apparent taste amongst the voters for Democrats translate from the lower levels to the higher levels for later in the year? The pundits still seem to be saying the Democrats are on the nose for not doing anything.
I note that this is a State election, not Federal, and the state seat was held by a Democrat, Chad Brown.
Why does it say GOP for Brad Daigle instead of REP???
Well? It’s not that hard of a question, is it?
‘Grand Old Party’ is a nickname for the Republican party.
If the Democrats were also known as the ‘Fabulous Old Party’, it might well say ‘FOP’ as well.
But, they’re not known as that, and probably mighty glad of it.
Date: 9/02/2026 20:47:13
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2359003
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Woodie said:
Woodie said:
Woodie said:
So the Democrats are picking up the bits and pieces around the place at the moment. And by lots. This must be worrying Trump’s lot. Does this apparent taste amongst the voters for Democrats translate from the lower levels to the higher levels for later in the year? The pundits still seem to be saying the Democrats are on the nose for not doing anything.
I note that this is a State election, not Federal, and the state seat was held by a Democrat, Chad Brown.
Why does it say GOP for Brad Daigle instead of REP???
Well? It’s not that hard of a question, is it?
My guess is perhaps the MSM in question thought that REP might be confused with ‘Representative’.
Date: 9/02/2026 21:40:12
From: dv
ID: 2359021
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
These special elections tend to end up as protest votes so don’t get too excited.
Date: 9/02/2026 22:16:26
From: dv
ID: 2359028
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Quite apart from which, it’s not China that’s threatening to eat up chunks of Western nations. We are past the stage of assuming the president is joking about annexations.
Date: 9/02/2026 22:26:40
From: buffy
ID: 2359034
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
These special elections tend to end up as protest votes so don’t get too excited.
I suspect that all elections in the USA are tending to protest votes now.
Date: 9/02/2026 23:03:27
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2359042
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Quite apart from which, it’s not China that’s threatening to eat up chunks of Western nations. We are past the stage of assuming the president is joking about annexations.
but Taiwan belongs to the USSA so
Date: 10/02/2026 00:12:39
From: kii
ID: 2359058
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Is the couch fucker really so dimwitted or is he deliberately cruel?
Probably both.

Date: 10/02/2026 00:24:46
From: kii
ID: 2359059
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Woodie said:
Woodie said:
Why does it say GOP for Brad Daigle instead of REP???
Well? It’s not that hard of a question, is it?
My guess is perhaps the MSM in question thought that REP might be confused with ‘Representative’.
In my experience they always say GOP,. The Republican Party is never abbreviated to REP.
Date: 10/02/2026 09:04:03
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2359084
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
From Quora, and no, it’s not satire:
“Obama chose to keep his presidential salary, and Michelle Obama reportedly had a staff of 23. By contrast, Trump donated his entire salary, and Melania operated with a staff of just four. That difference isn’t accidental it reflects two very different views of leadership, priorities, and respect for taxpayer dollars.”
Date: 10/02/2026 09:09:18
From: roughbarked
ID: 2359085
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
From Quora, and no, it’s not satire:
“Obama chose to keep his presidential salary, and Michelle Obama reportedly had a staff of 23. By contrast, Trump donated his entire salary, and Melania operated with a staff of just four. That difference isn’t accidental it reflects two very different views of leadership, priorities, and respect for taxpayer dollars.”
How much money did Obama make off shifting tariffs around?
I’ll bet all Melania’s staffers do is her manicures and makeup.
Date: 10/02/2026 09:50:49
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2359096
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
From Quora, and no, it’s not satire:
“Obama chose to keep his presidential salary, and Michelle Obama reportedly had a staff of 23. By contrast, Trump donated his entire salary, and Melania operated with a staff of just four. That difference isn’t accidental it reflects two very different views of leadership, priorities, and respect for taxpayer dollars.”
How much money did Obama make off shifting tariffs around?
I’ll bet all Melania’s staffers do is her manicures and makeup.
we mean we agree: it sounds like Obama holds a principle that good work should be fairly remunerated, and sets an example of how that may be done with meaningful contributions from taxpayers; while kkk is well aware that he needs no further pocket money on top of the nepotismic grift, feels that receiving money from taxpayers is beneath him, and doesn’t require a large staff to do what is basically cosmetic worship
Date: 10/02/2026 09:55:47
From: roughbarked
ID: 2359102
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
From Quora, and no, it’s not satire:
“Obama chose to keep his presidential salary, and Michelle Obama reportedly had a staff of 23. By contrast, Trump donated his entire salary, and Melania operated with a staff of just four. That difference isn’t accidental it reflects two very different views of leadership, priorities, and respect for taxpayer dollars.”
How much money did Obama make off shifting tariffs around?
I’ll bet all Melania’s staffers do is her manicures and makeup.
we mean we agree: it sounds like Obama holds a principle that good work should be fairly remunerated, and sets an example of how that may be done with meaningful contributions from taxpayers; while kkk is well aware that he needs no further pocket money on top of the nepotismic grift, feels that receiving money from taxpayers is beneath him, and doesn’t require a large staff to do what is basically cosmetic worship
It was another of his feints. Taking gobfuls with the other hand while pretending to look good.
Date: 10/02/2026 09:58:53
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2359104
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
How much money did Obama make off shifting tariffs around?
I’ll bet all Melania’s staffers do is her manicures and makeup.
we mean we agree: it sounds like Obama holds a principle that good work should be fairly remunerated, and sets an example of how that may be done with meaningful contributions from taxpayers; while kkk is well aware that he needs no further pocket money on top of the nepotismic grift, feels that receiving money from taxpayers is beneath him, and doesn’t require a large staff to do what is basically cosmetic worship
It was another of his feints. Taking gobfuls with the other hand while pretending to look good.
we still remember: when apologists everywhere would insist and tell us that politicians get paid so much as a way of buttressing them against the lure of corruption
we ask the apologists: is that still the case, is it still a valid strategy
we suggest: it being the case, then when a politician turns down the buttress-against-corruption-pay, what are they planning
Date: 10/02/2026 10:04:42
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2359106
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
we mean we agree: it sounds like Obama holds a principle that good work should be fairly remunerated, and sets an example of how that may be done with meaningful contributions from taxpayers; while kkk is well aware that he needs no further pocket money on top of the nepotismic grift, feels that receiving money from taxpayers is beneath him, and doesn’t require a large staff to do what is basically cosmetic worship
It was another of his feints. Taking gobfuls with the other hand while pretending to look good.
we still remember: when apologists everywhere would insist and tell us that politicians get paid so much as a way of buttressing them against the lure of corruption
we ask the apologists: is that still the case, is it still a valid strategy
we suggest: it being the case, then when a politician turns down the buttress-against-corruption-pay, what are they planning
I remember when Australia was run by graziers, rich graziers who used to get dressed for dinner and everything.
Date: 10/02/2026 10:05:57
From: roughbarked
ID: 2359110
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
It was another of his feints. Taking gobfuls with the other hand while pretending to look good.
we still remember: when apologists everywhere would insist and tell us that politicians get paid so much as a way of buttressing them against the lure of corruption
we ask the apologists: is that still the case, is it still a valid strategy
we suggest: it being the case, then when a politician turns down the buttress-against-corruption-pay, what are they planning
I remember when Australia was run by graziers, rich graziers who used to get dressed for dinner and everything.
Now it is run by rich miners who also happen to be rich graziers.
Date: 10/02/2026 10:09:20
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2359118
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Peak Warming Man said:
SCIENCE said:
we still remember: when apologists everywhere would insist and tell us that politicians get paid so much as a way of buttressing them against the lure of corruption
we ask the apologists: is that still the case, is it still a valid strategy
we suggest: it being the case, then when a politician turns down the buttress-against-corruption-pay, what are they planning
I remember when Australia was run by graziers, rich graziers who used to get dressed for dinner and everything.
Now it is run by rich miners who also happen to be rich graziers.
Gina is more a competitive eater than a grazier.
Date: 10/02/2026 10:13:44
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2359121
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ginas grazers grifters what’s the difference
Date: 10/02/2026 10:15:22
From: roughbarked
ID: 2359122
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
roughbarked said:
Peak Warming Man said:
I remember when Australia was run by graziers, rich graziers who used to get dressed for dinner and everything.
Now it is run by rich miners who also happen to be rich graziers.
Gina is more a competitive eater than a grazier.
I’ll pay that one. :)
Date: 10/02/2026 10:16:40
From: roughbarked
ID: 2359123
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
ginas grazers grifters what’s the difference
None. They are all gobblers tthat begin with g.
Date: 10/02/2026 10:40:25
From: Michael V
ID: 2359126
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
roughbarked said:
Peak Warming Man said:
I remember when Australia was run by graziers, rich graziers who used to get dressed for dinner and everything.
Now it is run by rich miners who also happen to be rich graziers.
Gina is more a competitive eater than a grazier.
:)
Date: 10/02/2026 12:02:59
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2359173
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
but before we go, some news from the eastern front, things are going great

don’t worry we’re crushing the fascists in donbas, the Ukrainians will surrender in 3 days
Date: 10/02/2026 12:13:17
From: Michael V
ID: 2359178
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
but before we go, some news from the eastern front, things are going great

don’t worry we’re crushing the fascists in donbas, the Ukrainians will surrender in 3 days
Ha!
Date: 10/02/2026 14:20:34
From: kii
ID: 2359218
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Oh my goddess! Loomer is such an idiot dummy.

Date: 10/02/2026 15:16:01
From: dv
ID: 2359225
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
A DOJ attorney has requested to be held in contempt of court so that she can rest, seemingly rhetorically.
—
A federal judge in Minnesota hauled government attorneys to his courtroom to find out why Immigration and Customs Enforcement is failing to comply with court orders to swiftly release wrongly detained immigrants arrested during the Trump administration’s surge.
District Judge Jerry R. Blackwell wanted to hear from the government why he shouldn’t be holding officials in contempt for their “alarming” failures.
A federal judge in Minnesota hauled government attorneys to his courtroom to find out why Immigration and Customs Enforcement is failing to comply with court orders to swiftly release wrongly detained immigrants arrested during the Trump administration’s surge.
District Judge Jerry R. Blackwell wanted to hear from the government why he shouldn’t be holding officials in contempt for their “alarming” failures.
A lawyer working for the Department of Justice told the judge Tuesday that “the system sucks.”
“I wish you would just hold me in contempt of court so I can get 24 hours of sleep,” said Julie Le, according to Minnesota’s FOX 9, which observed Tuesday’s hearing. “The system sucks, this job sucks, I am trying with every breath I have to get you what I need.”
Le, a private practice attorney who volunteered to help the U.S. Attorney’s Office last month, has been named as the government’s attorney on more than 80 immigration cases since Donald Trump’s administration sent more than 3,000 federal officers into the state last month for Operation Metro Surge.
She is simply “overwhelmed” by the number of legal challenges that are coming out of it.
“I am here to make sure the agency understands how important it is to comply with court orders,” said Le, who appeared visibly upset during the hearing.
Federal courts in the state are swimming in cases alleging unlawful arrests of immigrants and citizens alike swept up in the Trump administration’s mass deportation dragnet.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/minnesota-ice-court-hearing-judge-blackwell-b2913385.html
LegalEagles have broken down this situation.
https://youtu.be/p6o-_2thaI8?si=g9XSbrLZWAunLDq0
Interesting to learn that most of these situations involve people who were in the USA legally. Per Devin’s analysis, it was unconstitutional to stop them without cause, unconstitutional to hold them without a warrant, unconstitutional to refuse to release them when ordered by a judge. Finding the person to punish for these illegal actions is proving difficult.
Date: 10/02/2026 16:34:23
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 2359265
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 10/02/2026 16:36:53
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2359266
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ChrispenEvan said:

Mayb I should finally read that book, generate my own memes.
Date: 10/02/2026 16:39:06
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2359267
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
ChrispenEvan said:

Mayb I should finally read that book, generate my own memes.
I’ll see you in the place where there is no darkness.
Date: 10/02/2026 16:39:19
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2359269
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ChrispenEvan said:

I think he wrote it earlier than that.
Date: 10/02/2026 17:22:39
From: Woodie
ID: 2359292
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ChrispenEvan said:

I think you’ll find he didn’t say that in 1984. More like 1947 – 48.
Date: 10/02/2026 17:50:21
From: Michael V
ID: 2359312
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 10/02/2026 18:07:11
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2359317
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
What the dickens is he on about now

Date: 10/02/2026 18:13:07
From: Michael V
ID: 2359319
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
What the dickens is he on about now

Well, he’s not building bridges with Canada, and he wants China to steal their Puck. Very Shakespearianly theatrical.
Date: 10/02/2026 18:17:59
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2359320
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
What the dickens is he on about now


Date: 10/02/2026 18:18:22
From: Cymek
ID: 2359321
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
What the dickens is he on about now

Canada probably don’t want to build half a bridge as cars would tend to fall off.
It really is weird ravings.
Would cost be shared for bridge that crosses boarders into another nation
Date: 10/02/2026 18:28:13
From: buffy
ID: 2359326
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
What the dickens is he on about now

He forgot to initial it…must be fake…
Date: 10/02/2026 18:34:59
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2359327
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
“The revenues generated because of the US market will be astronomical…”
It’s like he imagines that this bridge is the first, best, and only avenue for Canadian products to find their way into the US.
All those highways, all that Great Lakes shipping, all the coastal shipping…what?, are they just for tourists? No commercial activity at all? Like, Canadian goods can only now, and only via this bridge, enter the US?
Date: 10/02/2026 18:46:33
From: Michael V
ID: 2359328
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
“The revenues generated because of the US market will be astronomical…”
It’s like he imagines that this bridge is the first, best, and only avenue for Canadian products to find their way into the US.
All those highways, all that Great Lakes shipping, all the coastal shipping…what?, are they just for tourists? No commercial activity at all? Like, Canadian goods can only now, and only via this bridge, enter the US?
Sure. Yes. Sure.
Date: 10/02/2026 18:47:49
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2359329
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Now unless this bridge will have tolls that only Ontario receives because they own it all, Trump is essentially complaining that the Canadians built a bridge that the US gets to use for free. Fuck he’s stupid beyond words…🙄
Date: 10/02/2026 18:50:06
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2359330
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
captain_spalding said:
“The revenues generated because of the US market will be astronomical…”
It’s like he imagines that this bridge is the first, best, and only avenue for Canadian products to find their way into the US.
All those highways, all that Great Lakes shipping, all the coastal shipping…what?, are they just for tourists? No commercial activity at all? Like, Canadian goods can only now, and only via this bridge, enter the US?
Sure. Yes. Sure.
“Yes, Mr. President, you sure showed them, you told those Canadians a thing or two, yes. They’ll do as you say, otherwise they’ll never be able to get their products into the USA, not if you don’t let them open that bridge. Now, let’s change your nappy, and get you your pills, and snuggle you down with Teddy bear.”
Date: 10/02/2026 18:50:28
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2359331
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Now unless this bridge will have tolls that only Ontario receives because they own it all, Trump is essentially complaining that the Canadians built a bridge that the US gets to use for free. Fuck he’s stupid beyond words…🙄
The Canadian half pays tariffs.
Date: 10/02/2026 18:51:09
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2359332
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Now unless this bridge will have tolls that only Ontario receives because they own it all, Trump is essentially complaining that the Canadians built a bridge that the US gets to use for free. Fuck he’s stupid beyond words…🙄
Google AI tells me it is to have tolls but there seems to be a joint transnational authority that is running the thing.
Date: 10/02/2026 18:52:52
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2359334
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Now unless this bridge will have tolls that only Ontario receives because they own it all, Trump is essentially complaining that the Canadians built a bridge that the US gets to use for free. Fuck he’s stupid beyond words…🙄
I suspect that the English language is in need of of a new word.
There’s words like ‘idiotic’ and ‘imbecilic’ and ‘moronic’, but we’re in need of a more powerful term, for which the standard dictionary definition would be ‘Donald J Trump’s level of stupidity’.
Date: 10/02/2026 18:55:11
From: Cymek
ID: 2359335
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I wonder why the Chinese would ban ice hockey
Unless Trump is thinking ice skating musicals and Winnie the Pooh is some how involved and the Chinese banned him.
Date: 10/02/2026 18:58:03
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2359336
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Funnily enough he wasn’t so enthused at using US steel when Mexico was paying for the wall.
Date: 10/02/2026 18:58:33
From: dv
ID: 2359337
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

EFTA00133623.pdf
Date: 10/02/2026 19:00:38
From: Michael V
ID: 2359338
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
captain_spalding said:
“The revenues generated because of the US market will be astronomical…”
It’s like he imagines that this bridge is the first, best, and only avenue for Canadian products to find their way into the US.
All those highways, all that Great Lakes shipping, all the coastal shipping…what?, are they just for tourists? No commercial activity at all? Like, Canadian goods can only now, and only via this bridge, enter the US?
Sure. Yes. Sure.
“Yes, Mr. President, you sure showed them, you told those Canadians a thing or two, yes. They’ll do as you say, otherwise they’ll never be able to get their products into the USA, not if you don’t let them open that bridge. Now, let’s change your nappy, and get you your pills, and snuggle you down with Teddy bear.”
:)
Date: 10/02/2026 19:01:00
From: Michael V
ID: 2359339
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Now unless this bridge will have tolls that only Ontario receives because they own it all, Trump is essentially complaining that the Canadians built a bridge that the US gets to use for free. Fuck he’s stupid beyond words…🙄
Nailed it.
Date: 10/02/2026 19:01:14
From: furious
ID: 2359340
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
I wonder why the Chinese would ban ice hockey
Unless Trump is thinking ice skating musicals and Winnie the Pooh is some how involved and the Chinese banned him.
The majority of countries that trade with China do not have professional ice hockey teams. Coincidence? You be the judge…
Date: 10/02/2026 19:04:07
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2359343
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Divine Angel said:
What the dickens is he on about now

He forgot to initial it…must be fake…
it’s that neurolinguistique programming thing isn’t it, trigger words, human drones
Date: 10/02/2026 19:07:17
From: Michael V
ID: 2359344
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

EFTA00133623.pdf
Conspiracy food!
Date: 10/02/2026 19:27:22
From: kii
ID: 2359348
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
I wonder why the Chinese would ban ice hockey
Unless Trump is thinking ice skating musicals and Winnie the Pooh is some how involved and the Chinese banned him.
Yes.
Date: 10/02/2026 23:24:16
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2359409
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Now unless this bridge will have tolls that only Ontario receives because they own it all, Trump is essentially complaining that the Canadians built a bridge that the US gets to use for free. Fuck he’s stupid beyond words…🙄
I suspect that the English language is in need of of a new word.
There’s words like ‘idiotic’ and ‘imbecilic’ and ‘moronic’, but we’re in need of a more powerful term, for which the standard dictionary definition would be ‘Donald J Trump’s level of stupidity’.
American
Date: 10/02/2026 23:47:47
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2359414
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
dv said:
A DOJ attorney has requested to be held in contempt of court so that she can rest, seemingly rhetorically.
—
A federal judge in Minnesota hauled government attorneys to his courtroom to find out why Immigration and Customs Enforcement is failing to comply with court orders to swiftly release wrongly detained immigrants arrested during the Trump administration’s surge.
District Judge Jerry R. Blackwell wanted to hear from the government why he shouldn’t be holding officials in contempt for their “alarming” failures.
A federal judge in Minnesota hauled government attorneys to his courtroom to find out why Immigration and Customs Enforcement is failing to comply with court orders to swiftly release wrongly detained immigrants arrested during the Trump administration’s surge.
District Judge Jerry R. Blackwell wanted to hear from the government why he shouldn’t be holding officials in contempt for their “alarming” failures.
A lawyer working for the Department of Justice told the judge Tuesday that “the system sucks.”
“I wish you would just hold me in contempt of court so I can get 24 hours of sleep,” said Julie Le, according to Minnesota’s FOX 9, which observed Tuesday’s hearing. “The system sucks, this job sucks, I am trying with every breath I have to get you what I need.”
Le, a private practice attorney who volunteered to help the U.S. Attorney’s Office last month, has been named as the government’s attorney on more than 80 immigration cases since Donald Trump’s administration sent more than 3,000 federal officers into the state last month for Operation Metro Surge.
She is simply “overwhelmed” by the number of legal challenges that are coming out of it.
“I am here to make sure the agency understands how important it is to comply with court orders,” said Le, who appeared visibly upset during the hearing.
Federal courts in the state are swimming in cases alleging unlawful arrests of immigrants and citizens alike swept up in the Trump administration’s mass deportation dragnet.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/minnesota-ice-court-hearing-judge-blackwell-b2913385.html
LegalEagles have broken down this situation.
https://youtu.be/p6o-_2thaI8?si=g9XSbrLZWAunLDq0
Interesting to learn that most of these situations involve people who were in the USA legally. Per Devin’s analysis, it was unconstitutional to stop them without cause, unconstitutional to hold them without a warrant, unconstitutional to refuse to release them when ordered by a judge. Finding the person to punish for these illegal actions is proving difficult.
why a the person and not many people
Date: 11/02/2026 00:44:20
From: kii
ID: 2359434
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 11/02/2026 06:11:31
From: Michael V
ID: 2359443
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:

LOLOL
Date: 11/02/2026 13:58:04
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2359512
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 11/02/2026 15:20:50
From: dv
ID: 2359526
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The National Prayer Breakfast was founded in 1953, when President Dwight Eisenhower accepted an invitation to join members of Congress to break bread together. Every president since has participated, regardless of party or religious persuasion. It offers an opportunity, according to its organizers, for political leaders to gather and pray collectively for our nation “in the spirit of love and reconciliation as Jesus of Nazareth taught 2,000 years ago.”
Donald Trump never got that memo—or, if he did, he’s found ways to ignore it.
In a rambling, 75-minute speech at the Prayer Breakfast yesterday, we saw the quintessential Trump. His comments were grievance-filled, narcissistic, conspiratorial, factually false, divisive, and insulting. He referred to his critics as “lunatics.” He engaged in projection, comparing them to “dictators” and “the gestapo.” He labeled Republican Representative Thomas Massie a “moron” because he won’t cast legislative votes the way Trump wants. Joe Biden is “Crooked Joe,” while Jacob Frey is “the horrible fake mayor” of Minneapolis. Trump praised El Salvador’s authoritarian President Nayib Bukele—Bukele has referred to himself as “the world’s coolest dictator”—for his “very strong prisons.” (The prison that Trump celebrates, Centro de Confinamiento del Terrorismo, known as CECOT, is notorious for its cruel and inhumane conditions.) Trump emphasized that Bukele—who also spoke at the National Prayer Breakfast—is “one of my favorite people.”
Trump took credit for churches “coming back stronger than ever” and for religion being “hotter than ever.” He claimed he has “done more for religion than any other president”—apparently, before the age of Trump, Christians couldn’t say “Merry Christmas” in public—and argued that his predecessors in the White House “bailed out” on religion. “I don’t know how a person of faith can vote for a Democrat. I really don’t,” he said, adding, “They cheat.”
The spirit of love and reconciliation that Jesus of Nazareth taught 2,000 years ago was not particularly evident in the words of the president. Of course, it never has been. No matter. The audience of some 3,500—the great majority of whom undoubtedly claim to be followers of Jesus—responded to Trump’s remarks with a standing ovation.
It is testimony to the marketing genius of Donald Trump that he never sold himself to Christians as one of them—pious, devoted, merciful, forgiving, irenic, biblically literate, a faithful husband and father, a man of high moral standards. Instead, he sold himself as their protector. He didn’t hide his cruelty or his belief that the ends justify the means; doing so would have been impossible for him because they are central features of his personality. So he did the opposite: He presented himself to Christians as a fierce, even ruthless, warrior on their behalf. It worked. He built a huge, loyal, fanatical following.
At the National Prayer Breakfast, Trump recounted comments made about him by Robert Jeffress, the senior pastor of the First Baptist Church in Dallas and a stalwart Trump ally for a decade.
According to Trump, the case Jeffress made on his behalf in 2016 went like this: “He may not have ever read the Bible, but he will be a much stronger messenger for us.” It was Jeffress who said at the time, “I want the meanest, toughest SOB I can find to protect this nation.”
Jerry Falwell Jr., then the president of Liberty University, put it this way in a 2018 tweet: “Conservatives & Christians need to stop electing ‘nice guys’. They might make great Christian leaders but the US needs street fighters like @realDonaldTrump at every level of government b/c the liberal fascists Dems are playing for keeps & many Repub leaders are a bunch of wimps!”
Tony Perkins, an ordained Southern Baptist minister and the president of the Family Research Council, a prominent evangelical activist group, admitted in 2018 that he and other evangelicals gave Trump a “mulligan” on his multiple affairs and hush-money payments to a porn star for a simple reason: Evangelicals “were tired of being kicked around by Barack Obama and his leftists. And I think they are finally glad that there’s somebody on the playground that is willing to punch the bully.” When asked what happened to turning the other cheek, Perkins replied, “You know, you only have two cheeks. Look, Christianity is not all about being a welcome mat which people can just stomp their feet on.”
They thrill to watch Trump savage his critics, and their devotion grows with every dehumanizing word, with every merciless act.
If Henry VIII earned the title “Defender of the Faith,” why not Donald Trump?
It is odd to see the very same evangelicals who claim the Bible is inerrant and who criticize fellow Christians about matters such as ordaining women—on the grounds that they are being unfaithful to what Paul wrote in one of his Epistles, an interpretation that many biblical scholars dispute—dismiss Jesus’s most famous sermon. For these Christians, the teachings of the son of God take a back seat to the pronouncements of the king of Mar-a-Lago.
Much of today’s evangelical world sees Trump’s viciousness not as a vice but as a virtue, so long as it is employed against those they perceive as their enemies, against those whom they resent and for whom they have a seething hatred. Unless you’ve spent time in the evangelical world, fully appreciating the level of antipathy that exists toward Democrats and progressives is difficult. The only thing that exceeds it is the loathing reserved for the Christians and conservatives who broke with Trump because their commitment to their faith, and to cherished moral truths, required them to speak out against him.
What i am describing isn’t true of all Christians, thankfully. Some have found the cumulative effect of Trump’s assault on Christian ethics too much. The Catholic Church and its American pope, Leo XIV, are speaking out prudentially but forcefully against the actions of the Trump administration. Mainline denominations, including the United Methodists, are stepping up. My friend Mark Labberton, a former president of Fuller Theological Seminary and a Presbyterian (PCUSA) pastor, traveled to Minneapolis to express solidarity with the people of that city after an ICE agent killed Renee Good. He joined many others in peaceful protests in subzero temperatures. Other pastors and theologians I respect, several of whom were formative in my journey of faith, signed a statement titled “Christ Alone: A Call to Faithful Resistance.” It nowhere mentions the president or his party, but it does take a prophetic stance “in a time of fear and capitulation in both the Church and in our civic life.”
“In this moment we specifically call on the Church and peoples across the political spectrum to recognize the clear and present danger of rising authoritarian rule to all of us, especially the most vulnerable,” the statement says. “We commit ourselves to resisting cruel or oppressive means of control and to standing in solidarity with the oppressed, the marginalized, and the silenced.”
Even among evangelicals, support for Trump is hardly universal, and many pastors I know are quite disturbed by the damage he and his administration are doing. Yet they know full well that many within their congregations voted for Trump and still align themselves with the Republican Party. These ministers are therefore hesitant to speak out not only from the pulpit but in any capacity. They want to keep their head down.
That’s understandable. The best pastors I know are instinctively wary about speaking out politically; that’s not why they got into ministry in the first place. They don’t feel that it’s their job to offer political commentary, nor do many of them feel especially equipped to do so. They also realize that many people go to church seeking a safe haven from politics. They believe, too, and with some justification, that to take a stand, even with great care, might well split a congregation.
Evangelical denominations and pastors, though, even those who are not deeply immersed in politics, are generally willing to speak out on culture-war issues that have political and sometimes legislative implications. I’ve seen this happen many times over the years.
So the reluctance to take a prophetic stance in the realm of politics and culture is less a principled unwillingness than a selective one. Ministers, like most of the rest of us, are likely to wade into controversial waters only when it’s safe—in their case, when there is overwhelming agreement within a congregation on a set of issues. They speak out when the response from those in the pews is a resounding “Amen!” rather than even a handful of voices saying, “Oh no you don’t!”
I don’t pretend these are easy matters for pastors to face. A minister of a conservative congregation might tell himself that the downside to speaking out against the sins of the authoritarian right, even judiciously and without partisan rancor, is too costly. They may fear that their ministry will be damaged, that offended parishioners will tune them out, and that they will gain nothing concrete.
But aren’t prophets esteemed precisely for their willingness to tell difficult truths to the people of God? For being steadfast in the face of fierce criticism; for denouncing social injustice and idolatry, including political idolatry, when it’s unfashionable to do so; for issuing warnings when others fall silent; and for calling people to repentance during times of moral blindness?
Non-maga evangelical pastors are going to face a set of difficult questions during the next three years: Under what conditions, if any, are you willing to speak out when a president and his administration repeatedly violate Christian ethics? Will you stay silent even when acts of cruelty, lawlessness, and injustice aren’t the exception but the norm? How much more indecency do you need to see before you act?
My colleague Jonathan Rauch, an eminently fair-minded, reasonable, and wise writer, recently explained why,
Jonathan Rauch: Yes, it’s fascism
Even if you disagree with Rauch’s conclusion, it’s still worth wrestling with his catalog of the president’s misdeeds, broken into 18 categories. And the case Rauch makes—that although America is not a fascist country, it has a fascist president—will almost certainly become stronger over time.
At some point, then, it may become nearly impossible for pastors who are not fully on board with MAGA to look away, to stall for more time, to let others do the heavy lifting, or to tell themselves that things aren’t so bad, that silence is golden. A healthy church culture, like a healthy family culture, brings things into the open. It doesn’t avoid or close off conversations.
Labberton, the Presbyterian pastor, once told me that the more highly contentious an issue is, the more likely he is to want to discuss it with his congregation in a way that is honest, open, and biblically informed. Of course, there will be a diversity of opinions. That’s not something to run from; it’s something to learn from.
“Our reality is sufficiently complex that we need to invite one another along for the journey,” Labberton said. We need to invite one another into respectful conversations. “Together we need to instigate a long journey into God’s mercy and justice.” Pastors, and the congregations they lead, have to hope that we can summon the courage to go where God’s mercy and justice lead us.
“Seldom, if ever, do I pause to answer criticism of my work and ideas,” Martin Luther King Jr. wrote. But when a group of white Alabama clergymen declared him an outside agitator whose efforts were “unwise and untimely,” he decided to respond. The result was “Letter From Birmingham Jail,” one of the most important documents in U.S. history.
This letter, like all of King’s greatest works, cannot be understood apart from his Christian faith. Faith shaped his views on ethics and human dignity. It also gave him the courage to create tension in the cause of justice. “I am grateful to God that, through the influence of the Negro church, the way of nonviolence became an integral part of our struggle,” he wrote.
The white pastors in Birmingham had a case to make. They didn’t want what they called “days of new hope” in Birmingham to be undone by “extreme measures” that would cause divisions. King, one of America’s great prophets, saw things differently. He wept over the laxity of the Church and reminded it of its high calling—not to be the master or the servant of the state, but rather its conscience.
I imagine that all of the white pastors I know think that if they had been a minister at that time—especially if they were a minister of churches that were made up of white segregationists—they would have found a way to speak up rather than be silent, would have stood with King instead of those who urged caution in the name of unity.
The question now comes again in our time: What does it mean for the Church to be the conscience of the state?
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/02/evangelicals-trump-national-prayer-breakfast/685908/
Date: 11/02/2026 15:28:21
From: roughbarked
ID: 2359528
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
\\
Donald Trump never got that memo—or, if he did, he’s found ways to ignore it.
They thrill to watch Trump savage his critics, and their devotion grows with every dehumanizing word, with every merciless act.
If Henry VIII earned the title “Defender of the Faith,” why not Donald Trump?
egad!
Date: 11/02/2026 17:45:26
From: Michael V
ID: 2359550
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
The National Prayer Breakfast was founded in 1953, when President Dwight Eisenhower accepted an invitation to join members of Congress to break bread together. Every president since has participated, regardless of party or religious persuasion. It offers an opportunity, according to its organizers, for political leaders to gather and pray collectively for our nation “in the spirit of love and reconciliation as Jesus of Nazareth taught 2,000 years ago.”
Donald Trump never got that memo—or, if he did, he’s found ways to ignore it.
In a rambling, 75-minute speech at the Prayer Breakfast yesterday, we saw the quintessential Trump. His comments were grievance-filled, narcissistic, conspiratorial, factually false, divisive, and insulting. He referred to his critics as “lunatics.” He engaged in projection, comparing them to “dictators” and “the gestapo.” He labeled Republican Representative Thomas Massie a “moron” because he won’t cast legislative votes the way Trump wants. Joe Biden is “Crooked Joe,” while Jacob Frey is “the horrible fake mayor” of Minneapolis. Trump praised El Salvador’s authoritarian President Nayib Bukele—Bukele has referred to himself as “the world’s coolest dictator”—for his “very strong prisons.” (The prison that Trump celebrates, Centro de Confinamiento del Terrorismo, known as CECOT, is notorious for its cruel and inhumane conditions.) Trump emphasized that Bukele—who also spoke at the National Prayer Breakfast—is “one of my favorite people.”
Trump took credit for churches “coming back stronger than ever” and for religion being “hotter than ever.” He claimed he has “done more for religion than any other president”—apparently, before the age of Trump, Christians couldn’t say “Merry Christmas” in public—and argued that his predecessors in the White House “bailed out” on religion. “I don’t know how a person of faith can vote for a Democrat. I really don’t,” he said, adding, “They cheat.”
The spirit of love and reconciliation that Jesus of Nazareth taught 2,000 years ago was not particularly evident in the words of the president. Of course, it never has been. No matter. The audience of some 3,500—the great majority of whom undoubtedly claim to be followers of Jesus—responded to Trump’s remarks with a standing ovation.
It is testimony to the marketing genius of Donald Trump that he never sold himself to Christians as one of them—pious, devoted, merciful, forgiving, irenic, biblically literate, a faithful husband and father, a man of high moral standards. Instead, he sold himself as their protector. He didn’t hide his cruelty or his belief that the ends justify the means; doing so would have been impossible for him because they are central features of his personality. So he did the opposite: He presented himself to Christians as a fierce, even ruthless, warrior on their behalf. It worked. He built a huge, loyal, fanatical following.
At the National Prayer Breakfast, Trump recounted comments made about him by Robert Jeffress, the senior pastor of the First Baptist Church in Dallas and a stalwart Trump ally for a decade.
According to Trump, the case Jeffress made on his behalf in 2016 went like this: “He may not have ever read the Bible, but he will be a much stronger messenger for us.” It was Jeffress who said at the time, “I want the meanest, toughest SOB I can find to protect this nation.”
Jerry Falwell Jr., then the president of Liberty University, put it this way in a 2018 tweet: “Conservatives & Christians need to stop electing ‘nice guys’. They might make great Christian leaders but the US needs street fighters like @realDonaldTrump at every level of government b/c the liberal fascists Dems are playing for keeps & many Repub leaders are a bunch of wimps!”
Tony Perkins, an ordained Southern Baptist minister and the president of the Family Research Council, a prominent evangelical activist group, admitted in 2018 that he and other evangelicals gave Trump a “mulligan” on his multiple affairs and hush-money payments to a porn star for a simple reason: Evangelicals “were tired of being kicked around by Barack Obama and his leftists. And I think they are finally glad that there’s somebody on the playground that is willing to punch the bully.” When asked what happened to turning the other cheek, Perkins replied, “You know, you only have two cheeks. Look, Christianity is not all about being a welcome mat which people can just stomp their feet on.”
They thrill to watch Trump savage his critics, and their devotion grows with every dehumanizing word, with every merciless act.
If Henry VIII earned the title “Defender of the Faith,” why not Donald Trump?
It is odd to see the very same evangelicals who claim the Bible is inerrant and who criticize fellow Christians about matters such as ordaining women—on the grounds that they are being unfaithful to what Paul wrote in one of his Epistles, an interpretation that many biblical scholars dispute—dismiss Jesus’s most famous sermon. For these Christians, the teachings of the son of God take a back seat to the pronouncements of the king of Mar-a-Lago.
Much of today’s evangelical world sees Trump’s viciousness not as a vice but as a virtue, so long as it is employed against those they perceive as their enemies, against those whom they resent and for whom they have a seething hatred. Unless you’ve spent time in the evangelical world, fully appreciating the level of antipathy that exists toward Democrats and progressives is difficult. The only thing that exceeds it is the loathing reserved for the Christians and conservatives who broke with Trump because their commitment to their faith, and to cherished moral truths, required them to speak out against him.
What i am describing isn’t true of all Christians, thankfully. Some have found the cumulative effect of Trump’s assault on Christian ethics too much. The Catholic Church and its American pope, Leo XIV, are speaking out prudentially but forcefully against the actions of the Trump administration. Mainline denominations, including the United Methodists, are stepping up. My friend Mark Labberton, a former president of Fuller Theological Seminary and a Presbyterian (PCUSA) pastor, traveled to Minneapolis to express solidarity with the people of that city after an ICE agent killed Renee Good. He joined many others in peaceful protests in subzero temperatures. Other pastors and theologians I respect, several of whom were formative in my journey of faith, signed a statement titled “Christ Alone: A Call to Faithful Resistance.” It nowhere mentions the president or his party, but it does take a prophetic stance “in a time of fear and capitulation in both the Church and in our civic life.”
“In this moment we specifically call on the Church and peoples across the political spectrum to recognize the clear and present danger of rising authoritarian rule to all of us, especially the most vulnerable,” the statement says. “We commit ourselves to resisting cruel or oppressive means of control and to standing in solidarity with the oppressed, the marginalized, and the silenced.”
Even among evangelicals, support for Trump is hardly universal, and many pastors I know are quite disturbed by the damage he and his administration are doing. Yet they know full well that many within their congregations voted for Trump and still align themselves with the Republican Party. These ministers are therefore hesitant to speak out not only from the pulpit but in any capacity. They want to keep their head down.
That’s understandable. The best pastors I know are instinctively wary about speaking out politically; that’s not why they got into ministry in the first place. They don’t feel that it’s their job to offer political commentary, nor do many of them feel especially equipped to do so. They also realize that many people go to church seeking a safe haven from politics. They believe, too, and with some justification, that to take a stand, even with great care, might well split a congregation.
Evangelical denominations and pastors, though, even those who are not deeply immersed in politics, are generally willing to speak out on culture-war issues that have political and sometimes legislative implications. I’ve seen this happen many times over the years.
So the reluctance to take a prophetic stance in the realm of politics and culture is less a principled unwillingness than a selective one. Ministers, like most of the rest of us, are likely to wade into controversial waters only when it’s safe—in their case, when there is overwhelming agreement within a congregation on a set of issues. They speak out when the response from those in the pews is a resounding “Amen!” rather than even a handful of voices saying, “Oh no you don’t!”
I don’t pretend these are easy matters for pastors to face. A minister of a conservative congregation might tell himself that the downside to speaking out against the sins of the authoritarian right, even judiciously and without partisan rancor, is too costly. They may fear that their ministry will be damaged, that offended parishioners will tune them out, and that they will gain nothing concrete.
But aren’t prophets esteemed precisely for their willingness to tell difficult truths to the people of God? For being steadfast in the face of fierce criticism; for denouncing social injustice and idolatry, including political idolatry, when it’s unfashionable to do so; for issuing warnings when others fall silent; and for calling people to repentance during times of moral blindness?
Non-maga evangelical pastors are going to face a set of difficult questions during the next three years: Under what conditions, if any, are you willing to speak out when a president and his administration repeatedly violate Christian ethics? Will you stay silent even when acts of cruelty, lawlessness, and injustice aren’t the exception but the norm? How much more indecency do you need to see before you act?
My colleague Jonathan Rauch, an eminently fair-minded, reasonable, and wise writer, recently explained why,
Jonathan Rauch: Yes, it’s fascism
Even if you disagree with Rauch’s conclusion, it’s still worth wrestling with his catalog of the president’s misdeeds, broken into 18 categories. And the case Rauch makes—that although America is not a fascist country, it has a fascist president—will almost certainly become stronger over time.
At some point, then, it may become nearly impossible for pastors who are not fully on board with MAGA to look away, to stall for more time, to let others do the heavy lifting, or to tell themselves that things aren’t so bad, that silence is golden. A healthy church culture, like a healthy family culture, brings things into the open. It doesn’t avoid or close off conversations.
Labberton, the Presbyterian pastor, once told me that the more highly contentious an issue is, the more likely he is to want to discuss it with his congregation in a way that is honest, open, and biblically informed. Of course, there will be a diversity of opinions. That’s not something to run from; it’s something to learn from.
“Our reality is sufficiently complex that we need to invite one another along for the journey,” Labberton said. We need to invite one another into respectful conversations. “Together we need to instigate a long journey into God’s mercy and justice.” Pastors, and the congregations they lead, have to hope that we can summon the courage to go where God’s mercy and justice lead us.
“Seldom, if ever, do I pause to answer criticism of my work and ideas,” Martin Luther King Jr. wrote. But when a group of white Alabama clergymen declared him an outside agitator whose efforts were “unwise and untimely,” he decided to respond. The result was “Letter From Birmingham Jail,” one of the most important documents in U.S. history.
This letter, like all of King’s greatest works, cannot be understood apart from his Christian faith. Faith shaped his views on ethics and human dignity. It also gave him the courage to create tension in the cause of justice. “I am grateful to God that, through the influence of the Negro church, the way of nonviolence became an integral part of our struggle,” he wrote.
The white pastors in Birmingham had a case to make. They didn’t want what they called “days of new hope” in Birmingham to be undone by “extreme measures” that would cause divisions. King, one of America’s great prophets, saw things differently. He wept over the laxity of the Church and reminded it of its high calling—not to be the master or the servant of the state, but rather its conscience.
I imagine that all of the white pastors I know think that if they had been a minister at that time—especially if they were a minister of churches that were made up of white segregationists—they would have found a way to speak up rather than be silent, would have stood with King instead of those who urged caution in the name of unity.
The question now comes again in our time: What does it mean for the Church to be the conscience of the state?
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/02/evangelicals-trump-national-prayer-breakfast/685908/
Excellent stuff.
One thing I noticed about the US when I was driving around studying the rocks, was the proliferation of ultra right-wing Christian radio stations. They pump out Old Testament fire-and-brimstone-type hate messages: us vs them, whites vs blacks, hetero vs homo, poor vs rich, donate to us stuff. Awful, nasty, bigoted stuff. Definitely not rooted in “turn the other cheek” and understanding or thoughtfulness, or love.
Date: 11/02/2026 18:07:45
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2359572
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
dv said:
The question now comes again in our time: What does it mean for the Church to be the conscience of the state?
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/02/evangelicals-trump-national-prayer-breakfast/685908/
Excellent stuff.
One thing I noticed about the US when I was driving around studying the rocks, was the proliferation of ultra right-wing Christian radio stations. They pump out Old Testament fire-and-brimstone-type hate messages: us vs them, whites vs blacks, hetero vs homo, poor vs rich, donate to us stuff. Awful, nasty, bigoted stuff. Definitely not rooted in “turn the other cheek” and understanding or thoughtfulness, or love.
atheism good
Date: 11/02/2026 18:14:15
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2359579
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
dv said:
The question now comes again in our time: What does it mean for the Church to be the conscience of the state?
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/02/evangelicals-trump-national-prayer-breakfast/685908/
Excellent stuff.
One thing I noticed about the US when I was driving around studying the rocks, was the proliferation of ultra right-wing Christian radio stations. They pump out Old Testament fire-and-brimstone-type hate messages: us vs them, whites vs blacks, hetero vs homo, poor vs rich, donate to us stuff. Awful, nasty, bigoted stuff. Definitely not rooted in “turn the other cheek” and understanding or thoughtfulness, or love.
atheism good
Atheism definitely not as harmful as religion.
Date: 11/02/2026 18:17:24
From: Michael V
ID: 2359582
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
dv said:
The question now comes again in our time: What does it mean for the Church to be the conscience of the state?
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/02/evangelicals-trump-national-prayer-breakfast/685908/
Excellent stuff.
One thing I noticed about the US when I was driving around studying the rocks, was the proliferation of ultra right-wing Christian radio stations. They pump out Old Testament fire-and-brimstone-type hate messages: us vs them, whites vs blacks, hetero vs homo, poor vs rich, donate to us stuff. Awful, nasty, bigoted stuff. Definitely not rooted in “turn the other cheek” and understanding or thoughtfulness, or love.
atheism good
Nods.
Date: 11/02/2026 18:18:33
From: Cymek
ID: 2359584
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
Excellent stuff.
One thing I noticed about the US when I was driving around studying the rocks, was the proliferation of ultra right-wing Christian radio stations. They pump out Old Testament fire-and-brimstone-type hate messages: us vs them, whites vs blacks, hetero vs homo, poor vs rich, donate to us stuff. Awful, nasty, bigoted stuff. Definitely not rooted in “turn the other cheek” and understanding or thoughtfulness, or love.
atheism good
Atheism definitely not as harmful as religion.
I remember in the movie The Witch they were constantly apologising to god for existing.
Afraid of offending him being alive, its a movie of course, but I imagine it was based on religion at the time
Date: 11/02/2026 18:21:47
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2359586
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Latest rumour:
Jeffrey Epstein to be Republicans’ 2028 Presidential candidate.
Date: 11/02/2026 19:08:52
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2359604
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Soz if repost

Date: 11/02/2026 19:25:15
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2359608
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Soz if repost

wait what about Diddy though
Date: 11/02/2026 19:34:10
From: Michael V
ID: 2359611
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Soz if repost

Snort.
What a reply!
Date: 11/02/2026 21:05:19
From: dv
ID: 2359628
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1CLLyaxDyj/
Romans 13
Date: 11/02/2026 21:17:51
From: Michael V
ID: 2359638
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1CLLyaxDyj/
Romans 13
Fair.
Date: 11/02/2026 22:16:29
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2359653
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 11/02/2026 22:21:03
From: Michael V
ID: 2359655
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

Giggle.
Good one.
:)
Date: 11/02/2026 22:23:53
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2359656
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
captain_spalding said:

Giggle.
Good one.
:)
Just read a good description of ‘Kid Rock’:

“…looks like 200 pounds of wet cigarette butts packed into a scrotum”.
Date: 11/02/2026 22:27:23
From: kii
ID: 2359657
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

Why do so many of these racist pricks want to be as brown as the people they pick on?
Date: 11/02/2026 22:40:03
From: dv
ID: 2359659
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1


This is real
Date: 11/02/2026 22:44:25
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2359660
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

This is real
‘$TRUMP’?
Are the suckers customers known as ‘$TRUMPETS’?
Date: 11/02/2026 23:30:10
From: kii
ID: 2359669
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Meanwhile…
Aviation geeks are stunned: “He’s going to bomb Juárez, isn’t he?”, “Never seen anything like this.”
The airport, which handled 3.49 million passengers in the first 11 months of 2025, confirmed the development in a travel advisory issued on social media, saying that all flights “including commercial, cargo and general aviation” were grounded.
“This is insane, and honestly, quite concerning. A 10 day TFR, no exemptions, from ground to 18,000, no warning in advance to ELP ATC or Albuquerque/ZAB ARTCC or carriers, passengers, and even the military..
Seriously, WTF is going on?”
https://www.reddit.com/r/ADSB/comments/1r1pqnp/10_day_tfr_issued_in_el_paso_due_to_special/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=Being_Liberal&utm_campaign=pub&utm_term=beingliberal.substack.com

Date: 12/02/2026 00:43:11
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2359680
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Meanwhile…
Aviation geeks are stunned: “He’s going to bomb Juárez, isn’t he?”, “Never seen anything like this.”
The airport, which handled 3.49 million passengers in the first 11 months of 2025, confirmed the development in a travel advisory issued on social media, saying that all flights “including commercial, cargo and general aviation” were grounded.
“This is insane, and honestly, quite concerning. A 10 day TFR, no exemptions, from ground to 18,000, no warning in advance to ELP ATC or Albuquerque/ZAB ARTCC or carriers, passengers, and even the military..
Seriously, WTF is going on?”
https://www.reddit.com/r/ADSB/comments/1r1pqnp/10_day_tfr_issued_in_el_paso_due_to_special/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=Being_Liberal&utm_campaign=pub&utm_term=beingliberal.substack.com

probably just spraying some chemtrails to cover up another paedophile scandal
Date: 12/02/2026 01:22:37
From: kii
ID: 2359683
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
kii said:
Meanwhile…
Aviation geeks are stunned: “He’s going to bomb Juárez, isn’t he?”, “Never seen anything like this.”
The airport, which handled 3.49 million passengers in the first 11 months of 2025, confirmed the development in a travel advisory issued on social media, saying that all flights “including commercial, cargo and general aviation” were grounded.
“This is insane, and honestly, quite concerning. A 10 day TFR, no exemptions, from ground to 18,000, no warning in advance to ELP ATC or Albuquerque/ZAB ARTCC or carriers, passengers, and even the military..
Seriously, WTF is going on?”
https://www.reddit.com/r/ADSB/comments/1r1pqnp/10_day_tfr_issued_in_el_paso_due_to_special/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=Being_Liberal&utm_campaign=pub&utm_term=beingliberal.substack.com

probably just spraying some chemtrails to cover up another paedophile scandal
Probably. The chemtrails are pretty spectacular in that area….lololol 🤣
Date: 12/02/2026 01:43:23
From: kii
ID: 2359684
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Aliens? War with Mexico? Drug cartels? Nuclear weapons testing up around Santa Teresa? The deportation of 1,000s of people?
Nup…just a psychological test on the population.

Date: 12/02/2026 03:53:51
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2359685
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
kii said:
SCIENCE said:
kii said:
Meanwhile…
Aviation geeks are stunned: “He’s going to bomb Juárez, isn’t he?”, “Never seen anything like this.”
The airport, which handled 3.49 million passengers in the first 11 months of 2025, confirmed the development in a travel advisory issued on social media, saying that all flights “including commercial, cargo and general aviation” were grounded.
“This is insane, and honestly, quite concerning. A 10 day TFR, no exemptions, from ground to 18,000, no warning in advance to ELP ATC or Albuquerque/ZAB ARTCC or carriers, passengers, and even the military..
Seriously, WTF is going on?”
https://www.reddit.com/r/ADSB/comments/1r1pqnp/10_day_tfr_issued_in_el_paso_due_to_special/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=Being_Liberal&utm_campaign=pub&utm_term=beingliberal.substack.com

probably just spraying some chemtrails to cover up another paedophile scandal
Probably. The chemtrails are pretty spectacular in that area….lololol 🤣
Aliens? War with Mexico? Drug cartels? Nuclear weapons testing up around Santa Teresa? The deportation of 1,000s of people?
Nup…just a psychological test on the population.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-12/faa-closes-airspace-around-el-paso-airport/106333810
so they’re blaming drugs
US officials say a sudden airspace closure was implemented around El Paso International Airport after cartel drones from nearby Mexico breached American airspace.
going to be exciting when any human and its canid can just launch little propeller craft and shut down local airports anywhere
Date: 12/02/2026 08:08:56
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2359699
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
baby

Date: 12/02/2026 08:10:48
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2359700
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
baby

wait
pretty sure nobody

could have predicted this, or actually predicted this
Date: 12/02/2026 09:01:47
From: roughbarked
ID: 2359708
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Ms Bondi clashed with Democrats who pushed for an apology at a congressional hearing as a group of Epstein’s victims watched from the public gallery.
It took place as survivors vowed to keep the DOJ under pressure to expose other alleged abusers, and the brother of one prominent victim told the ABC that the Trump administration was continually “gaslighting us”.
Ms Bondi’s first appearance before Congress since the release of the Epstein files was dominated by discussion of the documents and punctuated by heated shouting matches and personal insults.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-12/pam-bondi-faces-congress-questions-over-epstein-files/106329688
Date: 12/02/2026 10:44:42
From: dv
ID: 2359744
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://fox17.com/news/nation-world/ag-bondi-clashed-with-rep-jerry-nadler-regarding-epsteins-co-conspirators
Lawmaker calls on AG Bondi to resign, accuses her of lying under oath about Epstein
-
https://www.cleveland.com/news/2026/02/rep-massie-confronts-ag-bondi-over-redaction-of-les-wexners-name-in-epstein-files.html
During the hearing, Massie, a Kentucky Republican discussed what he said was a heavily redacted FBI document with the title “child sex trafficking,” where the names of alleged co-conspirators were heavily redacted. He said Wexner’s name appeared in the document but was initially redacted by the DOJ.
Who’s responsible? Are you able to track who in your organization?” Massie asked. “Are you able to track who it was that obscured Les Wexner’s name as a co-conspirator in an FBI document?”
Maryland Rep. Jamie Raskin, the top Democrat on the committee, also addressed the handling of Epstein documents during the hearing, drawing a comparison to President Trump’s lawsuit against the government over leaked tax returns. Trump is seeking $10 billion from the Internal Revenue Service for failing to protect his tax filings.
Raskin noted that the DOJ had released survivors’ names despite federal law protecting their privacy.
“How much do you think the claims of these survivors are worth?” Raskin asked.
—-
Although Bondi is having a torrid time as Attorney General, it is worth remembering that DJT’s first pick for AG was Matt Gaetz. The GOP’s own committee determined that Gaetz had sex with minors and used cocaine and ecstasy while in Congress, and tried to use his position to block investigations. There’s a slightly different universe in which the Senate just let Trump have his pick.
Date: 12/02/2026 13:00:05
From: kii
ID: 2359774
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 12/02/2026 13:05:42
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2359775
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 12/02/2026 13:07:31
From: Cymek
ID: 2359776
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 12/02/2026 13:09:56
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2359777
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 12/02/2026 15:37:46
From: dv
ID: 2359841
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1BqMs8QJua/
Pastor Paul Drees
On the cruelty and indifference of the Trump epoch
Date: 12/02/2026 16:31:05
From: dv
ID: 2359860
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 12/02/2026 16:32:45
From: Michael V
ID: 2359862
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

‘Canal!
:)
Date: 12/02/2026 16:43:57
From: kii
ID: 2359869
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
On being neighborly | Local News | reformer.com https://share.google/962JP4R4siWGjfdW0
Becca Balint, the representative who Pam Bondi insulted.
Date: 12/02/2026 16:44:07
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2359870
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

Me IRL
Date: 12/02/2026 16:45:55
From: kii
ID: 2359875
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
dv said:

Me IRL
Why the fuck would you make a joke about this? Have you seen what Bondi did?
Date: 12/02/2026 16:46:48
From: dv
ID: 2359876
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Bondi should be reminded that while Nixon got a blanket pardon, his Attorney General did 19 months in federal prison.
Date: 12/02/2026 16:51:30
From: Cymek
ID: 2359877
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Bondi should be reminded that while Nixon got a blanket pardon, his Attorney General did 19 months in federal prison.
Nixon’s misdemeanour wouldn’t even make news today
Date: 12/02/2026 17:07:26
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2359881
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Divine Angel said:
dv said:

Me IRL
Why the fuck would you make a joke about this? Have you seen what Bondi did?
you’re right, someone admitting that their memory is deficient and they would need to rifle palm cards to insult others isn’t a description of a disability they should receive empathy for, but a joke
Date: 12/02/2026 17:13:05
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2359884
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
alleged

Date: 12/02/2026 17:25:24
From: Michael V
ID: 2359891
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
On being neighborly | Local News | reformer.com https://share.google/962JP4R4siWGjfdW0
Becca Balint, the representative who Pam Bondi insulted.
We are learning that Bondi is an arse.
Date: 12/02/2026 17:26:49
From: Michael V
ID: 2359892
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Bondi should be reminded that while Nixon got a blanket pardon, his Attorney General did 19 months in federal prison.
Great idea, St George!
Date: 12/02/2026 17:50:55
From: kii
ID: 2359903
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
kii said:
On being neighborly | Local News | reformer.com https://share.google/962JP4R4siWGjfdW0
Becca Balint, the representative who Pam Bondi insulted.
We are learning that Bondi is an arse.
It’s been known for years that she’s a dreadful pos. Google her history with Epstein and Trump.
Date: 12/02/2026 17:52:50
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2359906
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
kii said:
On being neighborly | Local News | reformer.com https://share.google/962JP4R4siWGjfdW0
Becca Balint, the representative who Pam Bondi insulted.
We are learning that Bondi is an arse.
Trump hires nothing else.
Date: 12/02/2026 17:56:49
From: kii
ID: 2359909
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 12/02/2026 17:57:50
From: Michael V
ID: 2359910
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
kii said:
On being neighborly | Local News | reformer.com https://share.google/962JP4R4siWGjfdW0
Becca Balint, the representative who Pam Bondi insulted.
We are learning that Bondi is an arse.
Trump hires nothing else.
I might be a slow learner. More likely, I was being kind…
Date: 12/02/2026 18:09:02
From: Michael V
ID: 2359914
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:

LOL
Date: 12/02/2026 19:40:57
From: kii
ID: 2359941
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Melanie Stansbury, US Representative for NM.
I can hear her voice cracking with the emotion of this. She has access to the unredacted files.
Date: 12/02/2026 20:36:00
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2359975
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Melanie Stansbury, US Representative for NM.
I can hear her voice cracking with the emotion of this. She has access to the unredacted files.
thanks
Date: 12/02/2026 20:39:34
From: kii
ID: 2359978
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
kii said:
Melanie Stansbury, US Representative for NM.
I can hear her voice cracking with the emotion of this. She has access to the unredacted files.
thanks
It’s such an enormous task to take on. So many people are going through their own private hell with this.
Date: 12/02/2026 20:45:14
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2359983
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
SCIENCE said:
kii said:
Melanie Stansbury, US Representative for NM.
I can hear her voice cracking with the emotion of this. She has access to the unredacted files.
thanks
It’s such an enormous task to take on. So many people are going through their own private hell with this.
yeah you(1,1,1) read about this shit and obviously it goes through the justice system and you(1,1,1) wonder how fucked up it must be for the police who find the material and the legal teams that have to go through it
Date: 12/02/2026 21:26:12
From: kii
ID: 2360013
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
kii said:
SCIENCE said:
thanks
It’s such an enormous task to take on. So many people are going through their own private hell with this.
yeah you(1,1,1) read about this shit and obviously it goes through the justice system and you(1,1,1) wonder how fucked up it must be for the police who find the material and the legal teams that have to go through it
I don’t know how people can do this work. Witnessing the depravity and evil.
My brain has been revisiting the many lecherous men that I worked for when I was younger. A surgeon that I babysat for, a pharmacist who owned a chemist shop in Bondi Junction, the husband of my mum’s friend – another babysitting gig. Many others. Also the men in parks and playgrounds who would try to lure me away from the other kids.
Such a fucked up world.
Date: 13/02/2026 02:29:36
From: dv
ID: 2360043
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
A monthslong immigration enforcement crackdown that roiled Minnesota, led to the deaths of two US citizens and triggered widespread outrage is coming to an end, White House border czar Tom Homan announced today.
“I have proposed and President Trump has concurred that this surge operation conclude,” Homan said.
At its peak, about 3,000 immigration officers were surged into the area, initially under the control of Border Patrol Commander-at-Large Gregory Bovino. Homan took over the operation on January 26 after the Trump administration faced political backlash to the deadly shootings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti, anti-ICE protesters who were US citizens.
Homan announced on February 4 he would “immediately” withdraw 700 federal law enforcement personnel from the area, a decision he said was possible due to increased cooperation from local sheriffs holding suspected undocumented immigrants in their jails.
https://edition.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-administration-news-02-12-26?post-id=cmljixqqh0000356pnlqyhlj7
Date: 13/02/2026 10:17:47
From: roughbarked
ID: 2360115
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
In short:
The Trump administration has revoked a scientific finding that has been the central basis for US action to fight climate change.
It is the same finding that led to the determination that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare.
What’s next?
The repeal will remove the regulatory requirements to measure, report, certify, and comply with federal greenhouse gas emission standards for cars.
Date: 13/02/2026 10:19:54
From: roughbarked
ID: 2360117
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
In short:
The Trump administration has revoked a scientific finding that has been the central basis for US action to fight climate change.
It is the same finding that led to the determination that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare.
What’s next?
The repeal will remove the regulatory requirements to measure, report, certify, and comply with federal greenhouse gas emission standards for cars.
“Under the process just completed by the
EPA, we are officially terminating the so-called endangerment finding, a disastrous Obama-era policy that severely damaged the American auto industry and drove up prices for American consumers,”
Mr Trump said.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-13/trump-revokes-basis-of-us-climate-regulation-ends-vehicle-emissi/106339598
Date: 13/02/2026 10:23:39
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2360126
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
roughbarked said:
In short:
The Trump administration has revoked a scientific finding that has been the central basis for US action to fight climate change.
It is the same finding that led to the determination that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare.
What’s next?
The repeal will remove the regulatory requirements to measure, report, certify, and comply with federal greenhouse gas emission standards for cars.
“Under the process just completed by the EPA, we are officially terminating the so-called endangerment finding, a disastrous Obama-era policy that severely damaged the American auto industry and drove up prices for American consumers,”
Mr Trump said. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-13/trump-revokes-basis-of-us-climate-regulation-ends-vehicle-emissi/106339598
c’m‘on let’s be honest here for a change
was it a scientific finding or a political finding
Date: 13/02/2026 10:31:34
From: roughbarked
ID: 2360132
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
roughbarked said:
In short:
The Trump administration has revoked a scientific finding that has been the central basis for US action to fight climate change.
It is the same finding that led to the determination that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare.
What’s next?
The repeal will remove the regulatory requirements to measure, report, certify, and comply with federal greenhouse gas emission standards for cars.
“Under the process just completed by the EPA, we are officially terminating the so-called endangerment finding, a disastrous Obama-era policy that severely damaged the American auto industry and drove up prices for American consumers,”
Mr Trump said. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-13/trump-revokes-basis-of-us-climate-regulation-ends-vehicle-emissi/106339598
c’m‘on let’s be honest here for a change
was it a scientific finding or a political finding
It was scientific finding that led to a political decision?
Date: 13/02/2026 10:47:19
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2360135
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
“Under the process just completed by the EPA, we are officially terminating the so-called endangerment finding, a disastrous Obama-era policy that severely damaged the American auto industry and drove up prices for American consumers,”
Mr Trump said. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-13/trump-revokes-basis-of-us-climate-regulation-ends-vehicle-emissi/106339598
c’m‘on let’s be honest here for a change
was it a scientific finding or a political finding
It was scientific finding that led to a political decision?
we mean the word “revoked” is deliberately used, so was it deliberately used to confuse or to clarify the matter
Date: 13/02/2026 11:02:08
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2360139
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
c’m‘on let’s be honest here for a change
was it a scientific finding or a political finding
It was scientific finding that led to a political decision?
we mean the word “revoked” is deliberately used, so was it deliberately used to confuse or to clarify the matter
From September last year:
Tesla ‘respectfully encourages’ the Trump administration to preserve key climate finding
Didn’t find any Musk comments on the latest news.
Date: 13/02/2026 12:29:51
From: buffy
ID: 2360195
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
roughbarked said:
In short:
The Trump administration has revoked a scientific finding that has been the central basis for US action to fight climate change.
It is the same finding that led to the determination that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare.
What’s next?
The repeal will remove the regulatory requirements to measure, report, certify, and comply with federal greenhouse gas emission standards for cars.
“Under the process just completed by the EPA, we are officially terminating the so-called endangerment finding, a disastrous Obama-era policy that severely damaged the American auto industry and drove up prices for American consumers,”
Mr Trump said. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-13/trump-revokes-basis-of-us-climate-regulation-ends-vehicle-emissi/106339598
They might find exporting autos a bit challenging then.
Date: 13/02/2026 12:34:46
From: Michael V
ID: 2360199
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
roughbarked said:
roughbarked said:
In short:
The Trump administration has revoked a scientific finding that has been the central basis for US action to fight climate change.
It is the same finding that led to the determination that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare.
What’s next?
The repeal will remove the regulatory requirements to measure, report, certify, and comply with federal greenhouse gas emission standards for cars.
“Under the process just completed by the EPA, we are officially terminating the so-called endangerment finding, a disastrous Obama-era policy that severely damaged the American auto industry and drove up prices for American consumers,”
Mr Trump said. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-13/trump-revokes-basis-of-us-climate-regulation-ends-vehicle-emissi/106339598
They might find exporting autos a bit challenging then.
How to kill markets for your cars in one swift move. Most definitely.
Date: 13/02/2026 12:38:31
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2360202
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
buffy said:
roughbarked said:
“Under the process just completed by the EPA, we are officially terminating the so-called endangerment finding, a disastrous Obama-era policy that severely damaged the American auto industry and drove up prices for American consumers,”
Mr Trump said. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-13/trump-revokes-basis-of-us-climate-regulation-ends-vehicle-emissi/106339598
They might find exporting autos a bit challenging then.
How to kill markets for your cars in one swift move. Most definitely.
so the tariffs didn’t work well enough
Date: 13/02/2026 12:40:34
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2360203
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Marimar Martinez, a teaching assistant and U.S. citizen, was shot five times by a Border Patrol agent in October while in her vehicle. She was charged with a felony after Homeland Security officials accused her of trying to ram agents with her vehicle. But the case was dismissed after videos emerged showing an agent steering his vehicle into Martinez’s vehicle.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/lawyers-of-chicago-woman-shot-by-federal-agents-say-documents-show-how-dhs-lies-about-investigations
Body camera video, text messages and other evidence released Tuesday shed new light on details in the case of Marimar Martinez, who was shot five times by a Border Patrol agent in Chicago last year. Martinez was accused of using her car to assault federal law enforcement before the case was dismissed in November.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/marimar-martinez-border-patrol-exum-body-cam-texts-released-rcna258549
Date: 13/02/2026 13:44:46
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2360215
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
just another fun day in the USSA
PHOENIX, Calif. (KABC) — New video shows the moments leading up to a police shooting in Phoenix that ended with the death of a man who was trying to subdue an armed suspect who broke into his home. A portion of the struggle was captured by a surveillance camera on the home’s porch as two people try to disarm the man near the open front door and a woman runs outside screaming for help. Moments later, a man also runs outside while on the phone with 911.
The deadly incident unfolded Jan. 26 after several frantic calls to 911. A man and woman who called for help are heard on dispatch audio saying that someone was shooting inside the home. Responding officers arrived with their weapons drawn. Neighbors pointed them to the home, telling them there were children inside and someone was shooting a gun. Moments later, an officer opened fire. The man who was shot was a father who had just disarmed the intruder.
The man who was killed has been identified as Christian Diaz Rendon. He was sitting on top of Edgar Garcia, the man he had just disarmed. Garcia is now facing multiple charges, including first-degree murder, burglary, kidnapping and aggravated assault. The officer who opened fire is a 5-year veteran of the Phoenix Police Department. Multiple use-of-force investigations are now underway.
https://abc7.com/post/phoenix-police-shoot-kill-man-was-subduing-armed-intruder-video-shows/18592126/
Date: 13/02/2026 13:46:36
From: Michael V
ID: 2360216
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
just another fun day in the USSA
PHOENIX, Calif. (KABC) — New video shows the moments leading up to a police shooting in Phoenix that ended with the death of a man who was trying to subdue an armed suspect who broke into his home. A portion of the struggle was captured by a surveillance camera on the home’s porch as two people try to disarm the man near the open front door and a woman runs outside screaming for help. Moments later, a man also runs outside while on the phone with 911.
The deadly incident unfolded Jan. 26 after several frantic calls to 911. A man and woman who called for help are heard on dispatch audio saying that someone was shooting inside the home. Responding officers arrived with their weapons drawn. Neighbors pointed them to the home, telling them there were children inside and someone was shooting a gun. Moments later, an officer opened fire. The man who was shot was a father who had just disarmed the intruder.
The man who was killed has been identified as Christian Diaz Rendon. He was sitting on top of Edgar Garcia, the man he had just disarmed. Garcia is now facing multiple charges, including first-degree murder, burglary, kidnapping and aggravated assault. The officer who opened fire is a 5-year veteran of the Phoenix Police Department. Multiple use-of-force investigations are now underway.
https://abc7.com/post/phoenix-police-shoot-kill-man-was-subduing-armed-intruder-video-shows/18592126/
Pharque!
Date: 13/02/2026 15:11:00
From: kii
ID: 2360235
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
White identity being erased…
Oh, this is good.
What a dumbshit.
Date: 13/02/2026 16:11:45
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2360262
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Not any more it isn’t, Pammy.


Date: 13/02/2026 16:15:29
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2360265
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Not any more it isn’t, Pammy.


The Bingbot tells me that the DJI is up 2,793.52%
Date: 13/02/2026 16:32:35
From: dv
ID: 2360275
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
captain_spalding said:
Not any more it isn’t, Pammy.


The Bingbot tells me that the DJI is up 2,793.52%
I mean on a long enough time frame, that’s correct.
Date: 13/02/2026 16:35:30
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2360279
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
captain_spalding said:
Not any more it isn’t, Pammy.


The Bingbot tells me that the DJI is up 2,793.52%
I mean on a long enough time frame, that’s correct.
They said that was “all time”, although I suspect that was exaggerating a little.
Date: 13/02/2026 17:23:14
From: dv
ID: 2360299
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Key Republican senators say a grand jury made the right decision by rejecting an effort by the Department of Justice (DOJ) to indict six Democratic lawmakers, including Sens. Mark Kelly (Ariz.) and Elissa Slotkin (Mich.), on criminal charges for recording a video last year urging military service members to disobey unlawful orders.
Republican senators by and large agree the video urging members of the military and the nation’s intelligence agencies to refuse unlawful orders was inappropriate, because they thought it encouraged insubordination.
But GOP lawmakers were surprised by the bombshell revelation Tuesday that Jeanine Pirro, the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, had attempted to secure a criminal indictment against Kelly, Slotkin and other Democrats, and they expressed relief that the aggressive move failed.
“I think the grand jury made the right decision,” said Senate Armed Services Committee Chair Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), whose panel includes Kelly and Slotkin as members.
Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), a member of the Judiciary Committee, offered stronger words, applauding the grand jury’s decision to reject what he called “lawfare.”
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5734392-republican-senators-defend-democrats/
Date: 13/02/2026 17:29:03
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2360301
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Key Republican senators say a grand jury made the right decision by rejecting an effort by the Department of Justice (DOJ) to indict six Democratic lawmakers, including Sens. Mark Kelly (Ariz.) and Elissa Slotkin (Mich.), on criminal charges for recording a video last year urging military service members to disobey unlawful orders.
Republican senators by and large agree the video urging members of the military and the nation’s intelligence agencies to refuse unlawful orders was inappropriate, because they thought it encouraged insubordination.
But GOP lawmakers were surprised by the bombshell revelation Tuesday that Jeanine Pirro, the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, had attempted to secure a criminal indictment against Kelly, Slotkin and other Democrats, and they expressed relief that the aggressive move failed.
“I think the grand jury made the right decision,” said Senate Armed Services Committee Chair Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), whose panel includes Kelly and Slotkin as members.
Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), a member of the Judiciary Committee, offered stronger words, applauding the grand jury’s decision to reject what he called “lawfare.”
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5734392-republican-senators-defend-democrats/
There might have been a little bit of payback attempted against Roger Wicker there, too.
A few days back, he made it clear to Kristi Noem that she was not going to put an ICE detention centre in his electorate:
https://x.com/SenatorWicker/status/2019820750900002820
Date: 13/02/2026 18:10:01
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2360332
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Because Republicans have nothing better to do…
House Republicans call to investigate Bad Bunny Super Bowl halftime show over ‘widespread twerking, grinding, pelvic thrusts’
https://ew.com/house-republicans-call-for-investigation-of-bad-bunny-super-bowl-halftime-show-11904174
Date: 13/02/2026 18:16:06
From: kii
ID: 2360334
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 13/02/2026 18:16:19
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2360335
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Because Republicans have nothing better to do…
House Republicans call to investigate Bad Bunny Super Bowl halftime show over ‘widespread twerking, grinding, pelvic thrusts’
https://ew.com/house-republicans-call-for-investigation-of-bad-bunny-super-bowl-halftime-show-11904174
Yes, forget all that ‘years of sexual abuse of minors by the rich and famous’, and concentrate on the important things, like how some bloke did a dance on TV for a few minutes.
In a few years, it will be ‘don’t worry about how we lined your neighbours up and shot them, have you seen how this woman in Nantucket is wearing her hat?!’.
Date: 13/02/2026 18:33:48
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2360339
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Divine Angel said:
Because Republicans have nothing better to do…
House Republicans call to investigate Bad Bunny Super Bowl halftime show over ‘widespread twerking, grinding, pelvic thrusts’
https://ew.com/house-republicans-call-for-investigation-of-bad-bunny-super-bowl-halftime-show-11904174
Yes, forget all that ‘years of sexual abuse of minors by the rich and famous’, and concentrate on the important things, like how some bloke did a dance on TV for a few minutes.
In a few years, it will be ‘don’t worry about how we lined your neighbours up and shot them, have you seen how this woman in Nantucket is wearing her hat?!’.
so Neil Postman was right still
Date: 13/02/2026 18:44:15
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2360340
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:

LOL
makes sense though you have a violent and paranoid country with the guiding principle that the cruelty is the point why wouldn’t they feel threatened by birthday balloons and flex their firearms and poop the party pop the balloons and shoot all the fun down in flames
Date: 13/02/2026 18:49:13
From: kii
ID: 2360342
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
kii said:

LOL
makes sense though you have a violent and paranoid country with the guiding principle that the cruelty is the point why wouldn’t they feel threatened by birthday balloons and flex their firearms and poop the party pop the balloons and shoot all the fun down in flames
Shiny bright things in the desert landscape are very noticeable.
I just remembered that not far from El Paso we were doing a hike through similar terrain and I spotted a deflated Happy Birthday balloon caught on a mesquite bush.
I took photos of it, as it seemed surreal.
Date: 13/02/2026 18:59:39
From: Michael V
ID: 2360347
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Because Republicans have nothing better to do…
House Republicans call to investigate Bad Bunny Super Bowl halftime show over ‘widespread twerking, grinding, pelvic thrusts’
https://ew.com/house-republicans-call-for-investigation-of-bad-bunny-super-bowl-halftime-show-11904174
Weird.
Date: 13/02/2026 19:39:32
From: Cymek
ID: 2360351
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Perhaps we count ourselves lucky Trump hasn’t so far decided to covert any other lands besides Greenland.
Date: 13/02/2026 19:41:15
From: furious
ID: 2360354
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
Perhaps we count ourselves lucky Trump hasn’t so far decided to covert any other lands besides Greenland.
And Canada, and Panama, and Venezuela, and the whole hemisphere…
Date: 13/02/2026 19:47:02
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2360355
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
furious said:
Cymek said:
Perhaps we count ourselves lucky Trump hasn’t so far decided to covert any other lands besides Greenland.
And Canada, and Panama, and Venezuela, and the whole hemisphere…
covert, is that like secretions
Date: 13/02/2026 19:50:24
From: Cymek
ID: 2360357
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
furious said:
Cymek said:
Perhaps we count ourselves lucky Trump hasn’t so far decided to covert any other lands besides Greenland.
And Canada, and Panama, and Venezuela, and the whole hemisphere…
covert, is that like secretions
I wonder if they burn his chairs
Date: 13/02/2026 19:52:27
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2360358
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
furious said:
And Canada, and Panama, and Venezuela, and the whole hemisphere…
covert, is that like secretions
I wonder if they burn his chairs
won’t they have enough life in them to suffer a second time under the caress of JD Vance probably
Date: 13/02/2026 19:55:21
From: Michael V
ID: 2360361
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
furious said:
Cymek said:
Perhaps we count ourselves lucky Trump hasn’t so far decided to covert any other lands besides Greenland.
And Canada, and Panama, and Venezuela, and the whole hemisphere…
covert, is that like secretions
More like operations.
Date: 13/02/2026 19:55:49
From: dv
ID: 2360362
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
covert, is that like secretions
I wonder if they burn his chairs
won’t they have enough life in them to suffer a second time under the caress of JD Vance probably
Is this what Bannon ordered all the H2SO4 for?
Date: 13/02/2026 20:21:46
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2360371
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
SCIENCE said:
Cymek said:
I wonder if they burn his chairs
won’t they have enough life in them to suffer a second time under the caress of JD Vance probably
Is this what Bannon ordered all the H2SO4 for?

Date: 14/02/2026 00:26:10
From: kii
ID: 2360432
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 14/02/2026 00:38:48
From: Kingy
ID: 2360433
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:

Yes please. It’s only fair.
Date: 14/02/2026 07:38:33
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2360440
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:

That’s a good suggestion,
Also,
Make sure they are put into detention before deportation.
Date: 14/02/2026 07:46:47
From: roughbarked
ID: 2360442
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Because Republicans have nothing better to do…
House Republicans call to investigate Bad Bunny Super Bowl halftime show over ‘widespread twerking, grinding, pelvic thrusts’
https://ew.com/house-republicans-call-for-investigation-of-bad-bunny-super-bowl-halftime-show-11904174
Republicans would do well to be reminded of Elvis the pelvis.
Date: 14/02/2026 12:29:10
From: dv
ID: 2360526
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 14/02/2026 12:49:22
From: roughbarked
ID: 2360532
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

and he’s a Republican.
Date: 14/02/2026 12:50:24
From: dv
ID: 2360535
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.kcur.org/politics-elections-and-government/2026-02-13/missouri-house-unanimously-passes-bill-removing-barrier-for-pregnant-women-seeking-divorce
Pregnant women in Missouri can seek a divorce under current law. However, a judge can prevent it from being finalized. The bill the House passed removes that barrier.
—-
Date: 14/02/2026 12:51:38
From: kii
ID: 2360538
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
dv said:

and he’s a Republican.
Lololol 😆
Date: 14/02/2026 12:52:06
From: roughbarked
ID: 2360539
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.kcur.org/politics-elections-and-government/2026-02-13/missouri-house-unanimously-passes-bill-removing-barrier-for-pregnant-women-seeking-divorce
Pregnant women in Missouri can seek a divorce under current law. However, a judge can prevent it from being finalized. The bill the House passed removes that barrier.
—-
The important fact is that this is Missouri.
Date: 14/02/2026 12:54:00
From: Michael V
ID: 2360542
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

‘canal!
Date: 14/02/2026 12:55:52
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2360544
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
roughbarked said:
dv said:

and he’s a Republican.
Lololol 😆
seriously? 😂😂
Date: 14/02/2026 12:57:55
From: roughbarked
ID: 2360549
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
kii said:
roughbarked said:
and he’s a Republican.
Lololol 😆
seriously? 😂😂
Well, yes. It is at least cromulent.
Date: 14/02/2026 12:59:56
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2360552
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
JudgeMental said:
kii said:
Lololol 😆
seriously? 😂😂
Well, yes. It is at least cromulent.
well yes, when your party is questioning your MO it probably means something.
Date: 14/02/2026 13:13:03
From: furious
ID: 2360557
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Ummm… Mr Raskin is a Democrat…
Date: 14/02/2026 13:14:24
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2360559
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
furious said:
Ummm… Mr Raskin is a Democrat…
even better.
Date: 14/02/2026 13:22:39
From: kii
ID: 2360564
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
furious said:
Ummm… Mr Raskin is a Democrat…

Date: 14/02/2026 13:29:32
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2360565
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.kcur.org/politics-elections-and-government/2026-02-13/missouri-house-unanimously-passes-bill-removing-barrier-for-pregnant-women-seeking-divorce
Pregnant women in Missouri can seek a divorce under current law. However, a judge can prevent it from being finalized. The bill the House passed removes that barrier.
—-
wHaT AboUT tHe CHiLdReN
I read about that bill this morning. Someone linked another article, which of course now I can’t find, about one case in particular where a judge deemed the woman “too emotional” to make such a decision while pregnant. Because, obviously, she’d clearly woken up one morning, decided to trundle off to the court and demand a divorce right there and then 🙄
Date: 14/02/2026 15:44:50
From: roughbarked
ID: 2360631
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 14/02/2026 16:14:21
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2360645
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 14/02/2026 16:39:40
From: Michael V
ID: 2360657
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Pam Bondi, as a waitress:
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/sm3jfvB5Y5o?feature=share
Ha!
:)
Well done.
Date: 14/02/2026 18:20:56
From: kii
ID: 2360667
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 14/02/2026 18:26:51
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2360669
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
The Fat Orange Monster and Pam.
I’ve opened that link four times now, and got a different video every time, none of them anything to do with Trump.
Date: 14/02/2026 18:32:35
From: kii
ID: 2360672
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
kii said:
The Fat Orange Monster and Pam.
I’ve opened that link four times now, and got a different video every time, none of them anything to do with Trump.
Dang…Google nickmuller73, he’s on Tiktok and has a wide range of stuff. The Faat Orange Monster one is recent.
I don’t use Tiktok in my daily life.
Date: 14/02/2026 18:36:26
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2360673
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
captain_spalding said:
kii said:
The Fat Orange Monster and Pam.
I’ve opened that link four times now, and got a different video every time, none of them anything to do with Trump.
Dang…Google nickmuller73, he’s on Tiktok and has a wide range of stuff. The Faat Orange Monster one is recent.
I don’t use Tiktok in my daily life.
Nor me.
Date: 14/02/2026 18:38:49
From: roughbarked
ID: 2360674
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
kii said:
captain_spalding said:
I’ve opened that link four times now, and got a different video every time, none of them anything to do with Trump.
Dang…Google nickmuller73, he’s on Tiktok and has a wide range of stuff. The Faat Orange Monster one is recent.
I don’t use Tiktok in my daily life.
Nor me.
I don’t use it in my nightly life either.
Date: 14/02/2026 18:45:12
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2360676
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
captain_spalding said:
kii said:
Dang…Google nickmuller73, he’s on Tiktok and has a wide range of stuff. The Faat Orange Monster one is recent.
I don’t use Tiktok in my daily life.
Nor me.
I don’t use it in my nightly life either.
what is it
Date: 14/02/2026 18:53:06
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2360678
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 14/02/2026 18:57:24
From: party_pants
ID: 2360681
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

Another one who’s gunna be writing her memoirs from prison.
Date: 14/02/2026 18:58:43
From: Michael V
ID: 2360682
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

LOL
Date: 14/02/2026 18:59:53
From: kii
ID: 2360684
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
captain_spalding said:
kii said:
Dang…Google nickmuller73, he’s on Tiktok and has a wide range of stuff. The Faat Orange Monster one is recent.
I don’t use Tiktok in my daily life.
Nor me.
I don’t use it in my nightly life either.
You just can’t help yourself, can you?
Date: 14/02/2026 19:25:37
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2360690
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
roughbarked said:
captain_spalding said:
Nor me.
I don’t use it in my nightly life either.
You just can’t help yourself, can you?
^
wait
oh shit
Date: 14/02/2026 19:41:45
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2360692
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
roughbarked said:
captain_spalding said:
Nor me.
I don’t use it in my nightly life either.
You just can’t help yourself, can you?
You neither by the looks.
Date: 14/02/2026 19:50:50
From: kii
ID: 2360693
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
kii said:
roughbarked said:
I don’t use it in my nightly life either.
You just can’t help yourself, can you?
You neither by the looks.
Lololol 😆
Nor you…
Date: 14/02/2026 19:52:20
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2360694
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
JudgeMental said:
SCIENCE said:
kii said:
roughbarked said:
I don’t use it in my nightly life either.
You just can’t help yourself, can you?
^
wait
oh shit
You neither by the looks.
Lololol 😆
Nor you…
that makes 7 of us ahahaha
Date: 14/02/2026 19:52:37
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2360695
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
anyway apparently AOC is the next big thing
Date: 14/02/2026 19:57:33
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2360697
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
JudgeMental said:
kii said:
You just can’t help yourself, can you?
You neither by the looks.
Lololol 😆
Nor you…
at least i don’t start it. plus I like mocking you.
Date: 14/02/2026 20:18:56
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2360708
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
kii said:
JudgeMental said:
You neither by the looks.
Lololol 😆
Nor you…
at least i don’t start it. plus I like mocking you.
Harry Truman, Doris Day, Red China, Johnnie Ray
South Pacific, Walter Winchell, Joe DiMaggio
Joe McCarthy, Richard Nixon, Studebaker, television
North Korea, South Korea, Marilyn Monroe
Rosenbergs, H-bomb, Sugar Ray, Panmunjom
Brando, “The King and I”, and “The Catcher in the Rye”
Eisenhower, Vaccine, England’s got a new queen
Marciano, Liberace, Santayana, goodbye
Joseph Stalin, Malenkov, Nasser and Prokofiev
Rockefeller, Campanella, Communist Bloc
Roy Cohn, Juan Peron, Toscanini, Dacron
Dien Bien Phu falls, “Rock Around the Clock”
Einstein, James Dean, Brooklyn’s got a winning team
Davy Crockett, Peter Pan, Elvis Presley, Disneyland
Bardot, Budapest, Alabama, Krushchev
Princess Grace, Peyton Place, Trouble in the Suez
Little Rock, Pasternak, Mickey Mantle, Kerouac
Sputnik, Chou En-Lai, “Bridge on the River Kwai”
Lebanon, Charles de Gaulle, California baseball
Starkweather homicide, children of thalidomide
Buddy Holly, Ben Hur, space monkey, mafia
Hula hoops, Castro, Edsel is a no-go
U2, Syngman Rhee, Payola and Kennedy
Chubby Checker, Psycho, Belgians in the Congo
Hemingway, Eichmann, “Stranger in a Strange Land”
Dylan, Berlin, Bay of Pigs invasion
“Lawrence of Arabia”, British Beatlemania
Ole Miss, John Glenn, Liston beats Patterson
Pope Paul, Malcolm X, British politician sex
JFK – blown away, what else do I have to say?
Birth control, Ho Chi Minh, Richard Nixon back again
Moonshot, Woodstock, Watergate, punk rock
Begin, Reagan, Palestine, terror on the airline
Ayatollah’s in Iran, Russians in Afghanistan
“Wheel of Fortune”, Sally Ride, heavy metal suicide
Foreign debts, homeless vets, AIDS, crack, Bernie Goetz
Hypodermics on the shore, China’s under martial law
Rock and roller, cola wars, I can’t take it anymore
Date: 14/02/2026 20:22:55
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2360710
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
JudgeMental said:
kii said:
Lololol 😆
Nor you…
at least i don’t start it. plus I like mocking you.
Harry Truman, Doris Day, Red China, Johnnie Ray
South Pacific, Walter Winchell, Joe DiMaggio
Joe McCarthy, Richard Nixon, Studebaker, television
North Korea, South Korea, Marilyn Monroe
Rosenbergs, H-bomb, Sugar Ray, Panmunjom
Brando, “The King and I”, and “The Catcher in the Rye”
Eisenhower, Vaccine, England’s got a new queen
Marciano, Liberace, Santayana, goodbye
Joseph Stalin, Malenkov, Nasser and Prokofiev
Rockefeller, Campanella, Communist Bloc
Roy Cohn, Juan Peron, Toscanini, Dacron
Dien Bien Phu falls, “Rock Around the Clock”
Einstein, James Dean, Brooklyn’s got a winning team
Davy Crockett, Peter Pan, Elvis Presley, Disneyland
Bardot, Budapest, Alabama, Krushchev
Princess Grace, Peyton Place, Trouble in the Suez
Little Rock, Pasternak, Mickey Mantle, Kerouac
Sputnik, Chou En-Lai, “Bridge on the River Kwai”
Lebanon, Charles de Gaulle, California baseball
Starkweather homicide, children of thalidomide
Buddy Holly, Ben Hur, space monkey, mafia
Hula hoops, Castro, Edsel is a no-go
U2, Syngman Rhee, Payola and Kennedy
Chubby Checker, Psycho, Belgians in the Congo
Hemingway, Eichmann, “Stranger in a Strange Land”
Dylan, Berlin, Bay of Pigs invasion
“Lawrence of Arabia”, British Beatlemania
Ole Miss, John Glenn, Liston beats Patterson
Pope Paul, Malcolm X, British politician sex
JFK – blown away, what else do I have to say?
Birth control, Ho Chi Minh, Richard Nixon back again
Moonshot, Woodstock, Watergate, punk rock
Begin, Reagan, Palestine, terror on the airline
Ayatollah’s in Iran, Russians in Afghanistan
“Wheel of Fortune”, Sally Ride, heavy metal suicide
Foreign debts, homeless vets, AIDS, crack, Bernie Goetz
Hypodermics on the shore, China’s under martial law
Rock and roller, cola wars, I can’t take it anymore
The good old pre Trump days, good times good times.
Date: 14/02/2026 21:02:38
From: kii
ID: 2360712
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
kii said:
JudgeMental said:
You neither by the looks.
Lololol 😆
Nor you…
at least i don’t start it. plus I like mocking you.
Oh, didums. Someone has to start something to liven the place up. Otherwise it is just roughbarked responding to every fricking post (often with nonsense, remember Raskin?), all the food that Bubblecar eats, DA’s boring broken arm saga etc, and weather reports. Life is generally pretty dull when people talk about the weather.
The burnt saucepan thread was a nice change.
PS…I like mocking roughbarked
Date: 15/02/2026 16:34:45
From: dv
ID: 2360972
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.wral.com/news/ap/d7138-prosecutors-move-to-dismiss-charges-against-men-accused-of-hitting-ice-officer-with-broom-and-shovel/
Prosecutors move to dismiss charges against men accused of hitting ICE officer with broom and shovel
MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — Federal prosecutors in Minneapolis have moved to drop felony assault charges against two Venezuelan men, including one shot in the leg by a immigration officer, after new evidence emerged undercutting the government’s version of events
—-
This is pretty rare, for prosecutors to ask for their own case to be dismissed with prejudice, meaning it can’t later be tried under different conditions.
Date: 15/02/2026 16:39:35
From: roughbarked
ID: 2360975
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.wral.com/news/ap/d7138-prosecutors-move-to-dismiss-charges-against-men-accused-of-hitting-ice-officer-with-broom-and-shovel/
Prosecutors move to dismiss charges against men accused of hitting ICE officer with broom and shovel
MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — Federal prosecutors in Minneapolis have moved to drop felony assault charges against two Venezuelan men, including one shot in the leg by a immigration officer, after new evidence emerged undercutting the government’s version of events
—-
This is pretty rare, for prosecutors to ask for their own case to be dismissed with prejudice, meaning it can’t later be tried under different conditions.
They had no case when it was clear the evidence was a different story.
Date: 15/02/2026 17:01:39
From: kii
ID: 2360979
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.wral.com/news/ap/d7138-prosecutors-move-to-dismiss-charges-against-men-accused-of-hitting-ice-officer-with-broom-and-shovel/
Prosecutors move to dismiss charges against men accused of hitting ICE officer with broom and shovel
MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — Federal prosecutors in Minneapolis have moved to drop felony assault charges against two Venezuelan men, including one shot in the leg by a immigration officer, after new evidence emerged undercutting the government’s version of events
—-
This is pretty rare, for prosecutors to ask for their own case to be dismissed with prejudice, meaning it can’t later be tried under different conditions.
This drives me nuts! I keep seeing people writing “a immigration” etc. Also listen carefully – people say it that way too.
Date: 15/02/2026 17:13:47
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2360984
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
dv said:
https://www.wral.com/news/ap/d7138-prosecutors-move-to-dismiss-charges-against-men-accused-of-hitting-ice-officer-with-broom-and-shovel/
Prosecutors move to dismiss charges against men accused of hitting ICE officer with broom and shovel
MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — Federal prosecutors in Minneapolis have moved to drop felony assault charges against two Venezuelan men, including one shot in the leg by a immigration officer, after new evidence emerged undercutting the government’s version of events
—-
This is pretty rare, for prosecutors to ask for their own case to be dismissed with prejudice, meaning it can’t later be tried under different conditions.
This drives me nuts! I keep seeing people writing “a immigration” etc. Also listen carefully – people say it that way too.
Oh, kii, you ol’ fuddy-duddy, it’s just one of those ‘English-is-a-living-language’ things, where ‘you know what i meant’ absolves one from all linguistic sins, and silly rules about grammar, and pronunciation, and spelling just hold back the natural and easy regression of the language to grunts and moans and gestures, so popularly hoped for by the mentally lazy.
Date: 15/02/2026 17:18:00
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2360987
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
kii said:
dv said:
https://www.wral.com/news/ap/d7138-prosecutors-move-to-dismiss-charges-against-men-accused-of-hitting-ice-officer-with-broom-and-shovel/
Prosecutors move to dismiss charges against men accused of hitting ICE officer with broom and shovel
MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — Federal prosecutors in Minneapolis have moved to drop felony assault charges against two Venezuelan men, including one shot in the leg by a immigration officer, after new evidence emerged undercutting the government’s version of events
—-
This is pretty rare, for prosecutors to ask for their own case to be dismissed with prejudice, meaning it can’t later be tried under different conditions.
This drives me nuts! I keep seeing people writing “a immigration” etc. Also listen carefully – people say it that way too.
Oh, kii, you ol’ fuddy-duddy, it’s just one of those ‘English-is-a-living-language’ things, where ‘you know what i meant’ absolves one from all linguistic sins, and silly rules about grammar, and pronunciation, and spelling just hold back the natural and easy regression of the language to grunts and moans and gestures, so popularly hoped for by the mentally lazy.
no need to go all murray gell-mann over language rules.
Date: 15/02/2026 18:08:12
From: Michael V
ID: 2361015
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
kii said:
dv said:
https://www.wral.com/news/ap/d7138-prosecutors-move-to-dismiss-charges-against-men-accused-of-hitting-ice-officer-with-broom-and-shovel/
Prosecutors move to dismiss charges against men accused of hitting ICE officer with broom and shovel
MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — Federal prosecutors in Minneapolis have moved to drop felony assault charges against two Venezuelan men, including one shot in the leg by a immigration officer, after new evidence emerged undercutting the government’s version of events
—-
This is pretty rare, for prosecutors to ask for their own case to be dismissed with prejudice, meaning it can’t later be tried under different conditions.
This drives me nuts! I keep seeing people writing “a immigration” etc. Also listen carefully – people say it that way too.
Oh, kii, you ol’ fuddy-duddy, it’s just one of those ‘English-is-a-living-language’ things, where ‘you know what i meant’ absolves one from all linguistic sins, and silly rules about grammar, and pronunciation, and spelling just hold back the natural and easy regression of the language to grunts and moans and gestures, so popularly hoped for by the mentally lazy.
Ugh!
Date: 15/02/2026 19:18:43
From: KJW
ID: 2361033
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
This drives me nuts! I keep seeing people writing “a immigration” etc. Also listen carefully – people say it that way too.
I don’t often hear or see this type of error. However, it does bother me to hear or see something like “an historic”. Whether the “h” is silent or not, it sounds wrong, albeit for different reasons.
An while on the subject of grammatical errors, two things that are commonly regarded as grammatical errors are not grammatical errors:
1: Ending a sentence with a preposition. (That is the house I live in.)
2: Split infinitive. (to boldly go where no man has gone before)
Date: 15/02/2026 19:21:19
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2361037
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
KJW said:
kii said:This drives me nuts! I keep seeing people writing “a immigration” etc. Also listen carefully – people say it that way too.
I don’t often hear or see this type of error. However, it does bother me to hear or see something like “an historic”. Whether the “h” is silent or not, it sounds wrong, albeit for different reasons.
An while on the subject of grammatical errors, two things that are commonly regarded as grammatical errors are not grammatical errors:
1: Ending a sentence with a preposition. (That is the house I live in.)
2: Split infinitive. (to boldly go where no man has gone before)
3: irregardless.
Date: 15/02/2026 19:21:49
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2361038
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
captain_spalding said:
kii said:
This drives me nuts! I keep seeing people writing “a immigration” etc. Also listen carefully – people say it that way too.
Oh, kii, you ol’ fuddy-duddy, it’s just one of those ‘English-is-a-living-language’ things, where ‘you know what i meant’ absolves one from all linguistic sins, and silly rules about grammar, and pronunciation, and spelling just hold back the natural and easy regression of the language to grunts and moans and gestures, so popularly hoped for by the mentally lazy.
no need to go all murray gell-mann over language rules.
wait is there ambiguity over the difference between a a and a an or an a or an an what about when the the comes before an word with an soft vowel sound maybe we could introduce an palatising modifier as well
Date: 15/02/2026 19:24:44
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2361042
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
KJW said:
kii said:This drives me nuts! I keep seeing people writing “a immigration” etc. Also listen carefully – people say it that way too.
I don’t often hear or see this type of error. However, it does bother me to hear or see something like “an historic”. Whether the “h” is silent or not, it sounds wrong, albeit for different reasons.
An while on the subject of grammatical errors, two things that are commonly regarded as grammatical errors are not grammatical errors:
1: Ending a sentence with a preposition. (That is the house I live in.)
2: Split infinitive. (to boldly go where no man has gone before)
3: irregardless.
denonunirregardless
Date: 16/02/2026 08:21:29
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2361112
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Alt National Park Service
We posted about this when it happened, and at the time it was already clear that the original ICE account didn’t hold up and now the official record is catching up. We’re glad that video evidence has come out to shine light on what really happened, because that footage has now directly contradicted the narrative ICE and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) initially put forward.
In mid-January, during a federal immigration enforcement operation in Minneapolis an ICE agent shot and injured a Venezuelan man, Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis. Initial statements from DHS and ICE described the encounter as violent and claimed the man and others attacked officers with a snow shovel and broom handle, justifying the shooting as self-defense. Prosecutors even filed felony assault charges against Sosa-Celis and another man based on that narrative.
However, newly reviewed video footage and evidence failed to support those claims. A joint review by immigration officials and the U.S. Department of Justice found that two ICE officers’ sworn testimony was “materially inconsistent” with what the available evidence showed. As a result, federal prosecutors moved to dismiss all charges with prejudice, meaning the government cannot refile the same charges against the men.
In addition to the dropped charges, Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons and other federal officials acknowledged that the officers made “untruthful statements under oath.” Those officers have been placed on administrative leave and are now the focus of a criminal perjury investigation by the Justice Department, which could lead to termination and prosecution.
This reversal from declaring an “attempted murder” of federal officers to acknowledging false testimony shows the growing concerns about how some law enforcement narratives(lies) have been used to justify aggressive actions. In several recent federal immigration enforcement incidents in Minneapolis, video evidence has contradicted official accounts, raising serious questions about the credibility of claims that have real life-altering consequences for the people involved.
We are posting this to bring attention to the lies spread by DHS and want to see these officers face criminal charges. These officers should be facing potential charges that match the seriousness of what happened not just perjury. If investigators confirm they lied and used unjustified force, that could include perjury for false sworn statements, making false statements or obstruction of justice for misleading investigators, assault or battery, and evidence tampering if any reports or footage were altered or withheld. At a minimum, a full criminal review is warranted so the charges reflect the actual harm done and the impact on public trust.
Date: 16/02/2026 08:31:33
From: roughbarked
ID: 2361113
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
Alt National Park Service
We posted about this when it happened, and at the time it was already clear that the original ICE account didn’t hold up and now the official record is catching up. We’re glad that video evidence has come out to shine light on what really happened, because that footage has now directly contradicted the narrative ICE and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) initially put forward.
In mid-January, during a federal immigration enforcement operation in Minneapolis an ICE agent shot and injured a Venezuelan man, Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis. Initial statements from DHS and ICE described the encounter as violent and claimed the man and others attacked officers with a snow shovel and broom handle, justifying the shooting as self-defense. Prosecutors even filed felony assault charges against Sosa-Celis and another man based on that narrative.
However, newly reviewed video footage and evidence failed to support those claims. A joint review by immigration officials and the U.S. Department of Justice found that two ICE officers’ sworn testimony was “materially inconsistent” with what the available evidence showed. As a result, federal prosecutors moved to dismiss all charges with prejudice, meaning the government cannot refile the same charges against the men.
In addition to the dropped charges, Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons and other federal officials acknowledged that the officers made “untruthful statements under oath.” Those officers have been placed on administrative leave and are now the focus of a criminal perjury investigation by the Justice Department, which could lead to termination and prosecution.
This reversal from declaring an “attempted murder” of federal officers to acknowledging false testimony shows the growing concerns about how some law enforcement narratives(lies) have been used to justify aggressive actions. In several recent federal immigration enforcement incidents in Minneapolis, video evidence has contradicted official accounts, raising serious questions about the credibility of claims that have real life-altering consequences for the people involved.
We are posting this to bring attention to the lies spread by DHS and want to see these officers face criminal charges. These officers should be facing potential charges that match the seriousness of what happened not just perjury. If investigators confirm they lied and used unjustified force, that could include perjury for false sworn statements, making false statements or obstruction of justice for misleading investigators, assault or battery, and evidence tampering if any reports or footage were altered or withheld. At a minimum, a full criminal review is warranted so the charges reflect the actual harm done and the impact on public trust.
I wonder whether Trump will nnow continue to claim that ICE members are being assaulted by alleged immigrants.
Date: 16/02/2026 08:35:40
From: Michael V
ID: 2361114
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
Alt National Park Service
We posted about this when it happened, and at the time it was already clear that the original ICE account didn’t hold up and now the official record is catching up. We’re glad that video evidence has come out to shine light on what really happened, because that footage has now directly contradicted the narrative ICE and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) initially put forward.
In mid-January, during a federal immigration enforcement operation in Minneapolis an ICE agent shot and injured a Venezuelan man, Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis. Initial statements from DHS and ICE described the encounter as violent and claimed the man and others attacked officers with a snow shovel and broom handle, justifying the shooting as self-defense. Prosecutors even filed felony assault charges against Sosa-Celis and another man based on that narrative.
However, newly reviewed video footage and evidence failed to support those claims. A joint review by immigration officials and the U.S. Department of Justice found that two ICE officers’ sworn testimony was “materially inconsistent” with what the available evidence showed. As a result, federal prosecutors moved to dismiss all charges with prejudice, meaning the government cannot refile the same charges against the men.
In addition to the dropped charges, Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons and other federal officials acknowledged that the officers made “untruthful statements under oath.” Those officers have been placed on administrative leave and are now the focus of a criminal perjury investigation by the Justice Department, which could lead to termination and prosecution.
This reversal from declaring an “attempted murder” of federal officers to acknowledging false testimony shows the growing concerns about how some law enforcement narratives(lies) have been used to justify aggressive actions. In several recent federal immigration enforcement incidents in Minneapolis, video evidence has contradicted official accounts, raising serious questions about the credibility of claims that have real life-altering consequences for the people involved.
We are posting this to bring attention to the lies spread by DHS and want to see these officers face criminal charges. These officers should be facing potential charges that match the seriousness of what happened not just perjury. If investigators confirm they lied and used unjustified force, that could include perjury for false sworn statements, making false statements or obstruction of justice for misleading investigators, assault or battery, and evidence tampering if any reports or footage were altered or withheld. At a minimum, a full criminal review is warranted so the charges reflect the actual harm done and the impact on public trust.
The Good and Pretti cases were as life-altering as you can get. They had similar “narratives (lies)” with video coverage. I wonder when (if?) those “apparent murderers” will get charged.
Date: 16/02/2026 08:42:02
From: roughbarked
ID: 2361115
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
JudgeMental said:
Alt National Park Service
We posted about this when it happened, and at the time it was already clear that the original ICE account didn’t hold up and now the official record is catching up. We’re glad that video evidence has come out to shine light on what really happened, because that footage has now directly contradicted the narrative ICE and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) initially put forward.
In mid-January, during a federal immigration enforcement operation in Minneapolis an ICE agent shot and injured a Venezuelan man, Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis. Initial statements from DHS and ICE described the encounter as violent and claimed the man and others attacked officers with a snow shovel and broom handle, justifying the shooting as self-defense. Prosecutors even filed felony assault charges against Sosa-Celis and another man based on that narrative.
However, newly reviewed video footage and evidence failed to support those claims. A joint review by immigration officials and the U.S. Department of Justice found that two ICE officers’ sworn testimony was “materially inconsistent” with what the available evidence showed. As a result, federal prosecutors moved to dismiss all charges with prejudice, meaning the government cannot refile the same charges against the men.
In addition to the dropped charges, Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons and other federal officials acknowledged that the officers made “untruthful statements under oath.” Those officers have been placed on administrative leave and are now the focus of a criminal perjury investigation by the Justice Department, which could lead to termination and prosecution.
This reversal from declaring an “attempted murder” of federal officers to acknowledging false testimony shows the growing concerns about how some law enforcement narratives(lies) have been used to justify aggressive actions. In several recent federal immigration enforcement incidents in Minneapolis, video evidence has contradicted official accounts, raising serious questions about the credibility of claims that have real life-altering consequences for the people involved.
We are posting this to bring attention to the lies spread by DHS and want to see these officers face criminal charges. These officers should be facing potential charges that match the seriousness of what happened not just perjury. If investigators confirm they lied and used unjustified force, that could include perjury for false sworn statements, making false statements or obstruction of justice for misleading investigators, assault or battery, and evidence tampering if any reports or footage were altered or withheld. At a minimum, a full criminal review is warranted so the charges reflect the actual harm done and the impact on public trust.
The Good and Pretti cases were as life-altering as you can get. They had similar “narratives (lies)” with video coverage. I wonder when (if?) those “apparent murderers” will get charged.
The question on many people’s lips.
Date: 16/02/2026 10:22:56
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2361154
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
alleged

Date: 16/02/2026 11:29:48
From: kii
ID: 2361182
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
LOLOLOLOL 😆 leopards and faces
“The 54-year-old did not realize that his status as a Mexican immigrant made him ineligible to vote in any U.S. election, despite having been casting ballots since 1991. Ceballos also acknowledged that he “probably” voted for Kobach and former president Donald Trump several times because he automatically selects the candidates with an “R” beside their names.”
“I haven’t seen Mexico since I was four, …I don’t speak Spanish anymore. If I get deported, it would wreck my life.”
Another Republican who suddenly cares about the issues when it personally effects them.

Date: 16/02/2026 12:35:35
From: dv
ID: 2361195
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Democrats are basically where they were a month ago, still about 5 and a half points ahead.

DJT maintains his slow downward trajectory.
Date: 16/02/2026 13:14:41
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2361213
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
LOLOLOLOL 😆 leopards and faces
“The 54-year-old did not realize that his status as a Mexican immigrant made him ineligible to vote in any U.S. election, despite having been casting ballots since 1991. Ceballos also acknowledged that he “probably” voted for Kobach and former president Donald Trump several times because he automatically selects the candidates with an “R” beside their names.”
“I haven’t seen Mexico since I was four, …I don’t speak Spanish anymore. If I get deported, it would wreck my life.”
Another Republican who suddenly cares about the issues when it personally effects them.

but is that a effects or an affects or a affects or an effects
Date: 16/02/2026 13:19:44
From: buffy
ID: 2361217
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
kii said:
LOLOLOLOL 😆 leopards and faces
“The 54-year-old did not realize that his status as a Mexican immigrant made him ineligible to vote in any U.S. election, despite having been casting ballots since 1991. Ceballos also acknowledged that he “probably” voted for Kobach and former president Donald Trump several times because he automatically selects the candidates with an “R” beside their names.”
“I haven’t seen Mexico since I was four, …I don’t speak Spanish anymore. If I get deported, it would wreck my life.”
Another Republican who suddenly cares about the issues when it personally effects them.

but is that a effects or an affects or a affects or an effects
How did he manage to enroll? I enrolled here when I turned 18, and I can’t remember what was required, but I presume it was an extract of birth certificate (which I think I had so I could get a learners permit) or something. From the AEC site, it seems the present state of affairs is
You will need to provide one of the following
Australian driver license number
Australian passport number
Medicare card details
Australian citizenship number
Someone who is currently enrolled confirm your identity.
18+ or Proof of Age cards are not accepted.
Date: 16/02/2026 13:22:31
From: kii
ID: 2361219
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
SCIENCE said:
kii said:
LOLOLOLOL 😆 leopards and faces
“The 54-year-old did not realize that his status as a Mexican immigrant made him ineligible to vote in any U.S. election, despite having been casting ballots since 1991. Ceballos also acknowledged that he “probably” voted for Kobach and former president Donald Trump several times because he automatically selects the candidates with an “R” beside their names.”
“I haven’t seen Mexico since I was four, …I don’t speak Spanish anymore. If I get deported, it would wreck my life.”
Another Republican who suddenly cares about the issues when it personally effects them.

but is that a effects or an affects or a affects or an effects
How did he manage to enroll? I enrolled here when I turned 18, and I can’t remember what was required, but I presume it was an extract of birth certificate (which I think I had so I could get a learners permit) or something. From the AEC site, it seems the present state of affairs is
You will need to provide one of the following
Australian driver license number
Australian passport number
Medicare card details
Australian citizenship number
Someone who is currently enrolled confirm your identity.
18+ or Proof of Age cards are not accepted.
From comments in the Reddit thread it seems that registering to vote was easier back when he did it, it’s different in every state. Just show up and say you want to vote. Or something.
Date: 16/02/2026 13:25:57
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2361222
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
LOLOLOLOL 😆 leopards and faces
“The 54-year-old did not realize that his status as a Mexican immigrant made him ineligible to vote in any U.S. election, despite having been casting ballots since 1991. Ceballos also acknowledged that he “probably” voted for Kobach and former president Donald Trump several times because he automatically selects the candidates with an “R” beside their names.”
“I haven’t seen Mexico since I was four, …I don’t speak Spanish anymore. If I get deported, it would wreck my life.”
Another Republican who suddenly cares about the issues when it personally effects them.

Here’s another chap who’s wondering if a different result might not have been more to his benefit:
https://img-9gag-fun.9cache.com/photo/awy2n1W_460svvp9.webm
Date: 16/02/2026 13:40:13
From: Michael V
ID: 2361227
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
kii said:
LOLOLOLOL 😆 leopards and faces
“The 54-year-old did not realize that his status as a Mexican immigrant made him ineligible to vote in any U.S. election, despite having been casting ballots since 1991. Ceballos also acknowledged that he “probably” voted for Kobach and former president Donald Trump several times because he automatically selects the candidates with an “R” beside their names.”
“I haven’t seen Mexico since I was four, …I don’t speak Spanish anymore. If I get deported, it would wreck my life.”
Another Republican who suddenly cares about the issues when it personally effects them.

Here’s another chap who’s wondering if a different result might not have been more to his benefit:
https://img-9gag-fun.9cache.com/photo/awy2n1W_460svvp9.webm
He seems slightly upset that he will miss out on his $936,000. (Probably just tired and emotional.)
Strangely, I missed out on mine, too.
Date: 16/02/2026 13:40:28
From: buffy
ID: 2361228
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
kii said:
LOLOLOLOL 😆 leopards and faces
“The 54-year-old did not realize that his status as a Mexican immigrant made him ineligible to vote in any U.S. election, despite having been casting ballots since 1991. Ceballos also acknowledged that he “probably” voted for Kobach and former president Donald Trump several times because he automatically selects the candidates with an “R” beside their names.”
“I haven’t seen Mexico since I was four, …I don’t speak Spanish anymore. If I get deported, it would wreck my life.”
Another Republican who suddenly cares about the issues when it personally effects them.

Here’s another chap who’s wondering if a different result might not have been more to his benefit:
https://img-9gag-fun.9cache.com/photo/awy2n1W_460svvp9.webm
Of course, to be fair – that guy may not be a Trump voter.
Date: 16/02/2026 13:42:33
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2361230
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
captain_spalding said:
kii said:
LOLOLOLOL 😆 leopards and faces
“The 54-year-old did not realize that his status as a Mexican immigrant made him ineligible to vote in any U.S. election, despite having been casting ballots since 1991. Ceballos also acknowledged that he “probably” voted for Kobach and former president Donald Trump several times because he automatically selects the candidates with an “R” beside their names.”
“I haven’t seen Mexico since I was four, …I don’t speak Spanish anymore. If I get deported, it would wreck my life.”
Another Republican who suddenly cares about the issues when it personally effects them.

Here’s another chap who’s wondering if a different result might not have been more to his benefit:
https://img-9gag-fun.9cache.com/photo/awy2n1W_460svvp9.webm
Of course, to be fair – that guy may not be a Trump voter.
He did say at the start that ‘we found out’. But, he may be speaking of farmers in general.
Date: 16/02/2026 13:42:48
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2361231
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
captain_spalding said:
kii said:
LOLOLOLOL 😆 leopards and faces
“The 54-year-old did not realize that his status as a Mexican immigrant made him ineligible to vote in any U.S. election, despite having been casting ballots since 1991. Ceballos also acknowledged that he “probably” voted for Kobach and former president Donald Trump several times because he automatically selects the candidates with an “R” beside their names.”
“I haven’t seen Mexico since I was four, …I don’t speak Spanish anymore. If I get deported, it would wreck my life.”
Another Republican who suddenly cares about the issues when it personally effects them.

Here’s another chap who’s wondering if a different result might not have been more to his benefit:
https://img-9gag-fun.9cache.com/photo/awy2n1W_460svvp9.webm
Of course, to be fair – that guy may not be a Trump voter.
Well he’s got a gun don’t he?
Date: 16/02/2026 16:20:34
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2361264
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.mpr.org/stories/2026/02/13/meet-bathrobe-lady-sam-stroozas-mpr-news
Link
That’s how you do journalism.
Date: 16/02/2026 16:30:20
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2361267
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
https://www.mpr.org/stories/2026/02/13/meet-bathrobe-lady-sam-stroozas-mpr-news
Link
That’s how you do journalism.
maybe but more importantly 爱 could go in there without putting human lives at risk so it’d be an even better journalismer
Date: 16/02/2026 16:55:17
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2361269
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
alleged but we haven’t seen or checked the source at all


Date: 16/02/2026 16:57:38
From: buffy
ID: 2361270
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
alleged but we haven’t seen or checked the source at all


That bottom one is a bit awful.
Date: 16/02/2026 17:01:00
From: kii
ID: 2361271
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
SCIENCE said:
alleged but we haven’t seen or checked the source at all


That bottom one is a bit awful.
And it will get worse.
Date: 16/02/2026 17:03:17
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2361273
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
buffy said:
SCIENCE said:
alleged but we haven’t seen or checked the source at all


That bottom one is a bit awful.
And it will get worse.
…because the cruelty is the point.
Date: 16/02/2026 17:08:11
From: Michael V
ID: 2361275
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
SCIENCE said:
alleged but we haven’t seen or checked the source at all


That bottom one is a bit awful.
It a bit worse than First Nations women in Australia, which is pretty bad.
Date: 16/02/2026 17:11:06
From: Cymek
ID: 2361277
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
buffy said:
SCIENCE said:
alleged but we haven’t seen or checked the source at all


That bottom one is a bit awful.
And it will get worse.
That’s with the paying many 10’s of thousands as well isn’t it
Date: 16/02/2026 17:20:49
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2361281
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Who had the most contact with Jeffrey Epstein?
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Bsv2Sxj_rRs
Date: 16/02/2026 17:21:45
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2361282
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
alleged but we haven’t seen or checked the source at all


shakes fist at Trump
Date: 16/02/2026 17:31:36
From: Cymek
ID: 2361284
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
SCIENCE said:
alleged but we haven’t seen or checked the source at all


shakes fist at Trump
I’d assume it breakdowns the list into various ethnicity
Perhaps with the USA it includes all the woman giving birth without any sort of support as they don’t have insurance
So the risk factors and situations are like giving birth in some 3rd nation
Date: 16/02/2026 17:49:53
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2361286
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
Peak Warming Man said:
SCIENCE said:
alleged but we haven’t seen or checked the source at all


shakes fist at Trump
I’d assume it breakdowns the list into various ethnicity
Perhaps with the USA it includes all the woman giving birth without any sort of support as they don’t have insurance
So the risk factors and situations are like giving birth in some 3rd nation
The bingbot says:
In 2023, Australia recorded 2 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births, marking a significant decline from previous years. This represents a decrease from 4.00 deaths per 100,000 live births in 2022 and 5.00 deaths per 100,000 live births in 2020. The maternal mortality ratio has shown a positive trend, indicating improvements in maternal health outcomes in Australia.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare
+2
Date: 16/02/2026 18:24:11
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2361296
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Unconfirmed if legit, but it is the sort of monstrous shit he believes in.
Date: 16/02/2026 18:25:49
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2361298
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
Unconfirmed if legit, but it is the sort of monstrous shit he believes in.
I bet RFKjr believes laughter is the best medicine. Don’t bother with vaccines, just have a giggle.
Date: 16/02/2026 21:26:37
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2361321
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Apologies if it’s been posted.
Sanctioned US govt chatbot, Grok, is giving questionable health advice.
https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/us-government-grok-nutrition

Date: 16/02/2026 21:33:15
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2361323
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Apologies if it’s been posted.
Sanctioned US govt chatbot, Grok, is giving questionable health advice.
https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/us-government-grok-nutrition

fancy a bit of Italian then zuchini is for you. Rather some french get a courgette.
Date: 16/02/2026 23:29:19
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2361332
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
“The Discombobulator” is the name former U.S. President Donald Trump has used to refer to a secret, classified U.S. military capability he claims was used in the January 2026 raid to capture Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro.
According to Trump, this “weapon” can:
Instantly shut down enemy systems, including Russian and Chinese-made radar and rocket launchers.
Cause communications to fail and weapons to stop responding without any explosions or physical damage.
Incapacitate both machines and people.
Expert Analysis and Speculation
The Pentagon has not confirmed the existence of a single, standalone device named “The Discombobulator”. Military analysts and U.S. officials suggest that the term is likely a name coined by Trump that refers to a coordinated deployment of existing technologies rather than a single futuristic weapon.
Possible technologies that experts believe may be involved include:
Electronic warfare systems and cyberattacks to disrupt command networks and jam radar systems.
Directed energy weapons, such as high-powered microwave (HPM) systems like the U.S. military’s CHAMP (Counter-electronics High-powered Microwave Advanced Missile Project) missile, which is capable of disabling electronics without destroying infrastructure.
Acoustic devices which can cause disorientation, dizziness, and other neurological symptoms.
For now, the existence of “The Discombobulator” as a singular device is a topic of speculation, and the U.S. government has not released technical details or official confirmation of its nature.
Date: 17/02/2026 01:16:38
From: dv
ID: 2361341
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

The US has lost jobs since the tariff regime came in in April.
Date: 17/02/2026 06:10:14
From: buffy
ID: 2361347
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
“The Discombobulator” is the name former U.S. President Donald Trump has used to refer to a secret, classified U.S. military capability he claims was used in the January 2026 raid to capture Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro.
According to Trump, this “weapon” can:
Instantly shut down enemy systems, including Russian and Chinese-made radar and rocket launchers.
Cause communications to fail and weapons to stop responding without any explosions or physical damage.
Incapacitate both machines and people.
Expert Analysis and Speculation
The Pentagon has not confirmed the existence of a single, standalone device named “The Discombobulator”. Military analysts and U.S. officials suggest that the term is likely a name coined by Trump that refers to a coordinated deployment of existing technologies rather than a single futuristic weapon.
Possible technologies that experts believe may be involved include:
Electronic warfare systems and cyberattacks to disrupt command networks and jam radar systems.
Directed energy weapons, such as high-powered microwave (HPM) systems like the U.S. military’s CHAMP (Counter-electronics High-powered Microwave Advanced Missile Project) missile, which is capable of disabling electronics without destroying infrastructure.
Acoustic devices which can cause disorientation, dizziness, and other neurological symptoms.
For now, the existence of “The Discombobulator” as a singular device is a topic of speculation, and the U.S. government has not released technical details or official confirmation of its nature.
This reads like someone has spent waaay too much time immersed in online games.
Date: 17/02/2026 06:15:40
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2361348
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
JudgeMental said:
“The Discombobulator” is the name former U.S. President Donald Trump has used to refer to a secret, classified U.S. military capability he claims was used in the January 2026 raid to capture Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro.
According to Trump, this “weapon” can:
Instantly shut down enemy systems, including Russian and Chinese-made radar and rocket launchers.
Cause communications to fail and weapons to stop responding without any explosions or physical damage.
Incapacitate both machines and people.
Expert Analysis and Speculation
The Pentagon has not confirmed the existence of a single, standalone device named “The Discombobulator”. Military analysts and U.S. officials suggest that the term is likely a name coined by Trump that refers to a coordinated deployment of existing technologies rather than a single futuristic weapon.
Possible technologies that experts believe may be involved include:
Electronic warfare systems and cyberattacks to disrupt command networks and jam radar systems.
Directed energy weapons, such as high-powered microwave (HPM) systems like the U.S. military’s CHAMP (Counter-electronics High-powered Microwave Advanced Missile Project) missile, which is capable of disabling electronics without destroying infrastructure.
Acoustic devices which can cause disorientation, dizziness, and other neurological symptoms.
For now, the existence of “The Discombobulator” as a singular device is a topic of speculation, and the U.S. government has not released technical details or official confirmation of its nature.
This reads like someone has spent waaay too much time immersed in online games.
I doubt that Trump either has the attention span needed for any online game, or that he would play a game that he couldn’t rig so that he ‘wins’.
I suggest that it’s more likely that the term ‘discombobulator’ was something that someone who was briefing him on the operation included as part of the dumbing-down necessary to get any small amount of information past Trump’s natural stupidity and the dementia that fogs his brain, and the word just appealed to him, as it might to a small child.
Date: 17/02/2026 06:24:55
From: buffy
ID: 2361350
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
buffy said:
JudgeMental said:
“The Discombobulator” is the name former U.S. President Donald Trump has used to refer to a secret, classified U.S. military capability he claims was used in the January 2026 raid to capture Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro.
According to Trump, this “weapon” can:
Instantly shut down enemy systems, including Russian and Chinese-made radar and rocket launchers.
Cause communications to fail and weapons to stop responding without any explosions or physical damage.
Incapacitate both machines and people.
Expert Analysis and Speculation
The Pentagon has not confirmed the existence of a single, standalone device named “The Discombobulator”. Military analysts and U.S. officials suggest that the term is likely a name coined by Trump that refers to a coordinated deployment of existing technologies rather than a single futuristic weapon.
Possible technologies that experts believe may be involved include:
Electronic warfare systems and cyberattacks to disrupt command networks and jam radar systems.
Directed energy weapons, such as high-powered microwave (HPM) systems like the U.S. military’s CHAMP (Counter-electronics High-powered Microwave Advanced Missile Project) missile, which is capable of disabling electronics without destroying infrastructure.
Acoustic devices which can cause disorientation, dizziness, and other neurological symptoms.
For now, the existence of “The Discombobulator” as a singular device is a topic of speculation, and the U.S. government has not released technical details or official confirmation of its nature.
This reads like someone has spent waaay too much time immersed in online games.
I doubt that Trump either has the attention span needed for any online game, or that he would play a game that he couldn’t rig so that he ‘wins’.
I suggest that it’s more likely that the term ‘discombobulator’ was something that someone who was briefing him on the operation included as part of the dumbing-down necessary to get any small amount of information past Trump’s natural stupidity and the dementia that fogs his brain, and the word just appealed to him, as it might to a small child.
Oh, I didn’t mean him. I meant the journos etc trying to understand the 3 year old. They believe way too much that he says.
Date: 17/02/2026 07:13:26
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2361356
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
A security deal that might not deliver submarines
The latest report from the US Congressional Research Service explores an alternative to the current plan. Instead of selling boats to Australia, the United States would keep the Virginia class submarines and operate them from Australian bases under a shared “division of labor”, while Australia pours money into other military capabilities such as long-range missiles and drones.
The same report highlights a stubborn problem. US shipyards have struggled to build Virginia-class submarines at the intended rate of two per year and in recent years have averaged closer to about 1.1 to 1.2 boats annually, leaving the US fleet below its own target numbers.
Under US law, no submarine can be transferred to Australia if the US Navy believes it needs that vessel for its own forces.
https://www.ecoticias.com/en/goodbye-to-nuclear-submarines-australia-signed-a-368-billion-deal-with-the-united-states-to-receive-them-but-a-new-congressional-report-makes-it-clear-that-they-may-never-arrive/27225/#google_vignette
Date: 17/02/2026 07:18:27
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2361360
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
SCIENCE said:
SCIENCE said:
good, good
The government estimates it could generate nearly $2 billion, which would be redirected back into the ADF. “This is an important step to take because right now we are spending a lot of money on properties that we fundamentally don’t use,” Marles says on Channel Seven. “We simply cannot continue to spend money securing property that we don’t use, and this has been put in the too-hard basket for a very long time,” he says.
now tell us about spending a fuck load of money on sunk assets that you fundamentally don’t have
oh
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-16/australia-high-speed-rail-uk-hs2-delays-cost-blow-outs/106075750
hey want to know something else about countries that build things quickly and efficiently, and something else else about other countries promising sinking ships for high sunk costs
wait
A security deal that might not deliver submarines
The latest report from the US Congressional Research Service explores an alternative to the current plan. Instead of selling boats to Australia, the United States would keep the Virginia class submarines and operate them from Australian bases under a shared “division of labor”, while Australia pours money into other military capabilities such as long-range missiles and drones.
The same report highlights a stubborn problem. US shipyards have struggled to build Virginia-class submarines at the intended rate of two per year and in recent years have averaged closer to about 1.1 to 1.2 boats annually, leaving the US fleet below its own target numbers.
Under US law, no submarine can be transferred to Australia if the US Navy believes it needs that vessel for its own forces.
https://www.ecoticias.com/en/goodbye-to-nuclear-submarines-australia-signed-a-368-billion-deal-with-the-united-states-to-receive-them-but-a-new-congressional-report-makes-it-clear-that-they-may-never-arrive/27225/#google_vignette
any deal against those planet saving tree planting rules basing inflation limiting jobs making electric car manufacturing renewables building CHINA wokists communists is a good deal
Date: 17/02/2026 07:44:30
From: roughbarked
ID: 2361363
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 17/02/2026 07:45:57
From: roughbarked
ID: 2361364
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 17/02/2026 08:12:27
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2361366
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
That is AI I think. Plus that YouTube channel is a peddler of conspiracy theories.
Date: 17/02/2026 08:15:08
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2361367
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
roughbarked said:roughbarked said:
Donald Trump is underimpeachment threat from his own people
No Way out for Trump
That is AI I think. Plus that YouTube channel is a peddler of conspiracy theories.
but clickbait engagement farming honeypots are so addictive we want more
Date: 17/02/2026 08:20:40
From: roughbarked
ID: 2361368
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
That is AI I think. Plus that YouTube channel is a peddler of conspiracy theories.
It certainly looks that way..
Date: 17/02/2026 08:21:58
From: roughbarked
ID: 2361369
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
roughbarked said:
No Way out for Trump
That is AI I think. Plus that YouTube channel is a peddler of conspiracy theories.
but clickbait engagement farming honeypots are so addictive we want more
I’d so love it to be true. But this is: “Carney WALKS OUT — Trump Tariff BACKFIRES, 420K Jobs at Risk | Rachel Maddow”:
Date: 17/02/2026 08:23:33
From: roughbarked
ID: 2361370
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
That is AI I think. Plus that YouTube channel is a peddler of conspiracy theories.
but clickbait engagement farming honeypots are so addictive we want more
I’d so love it to be true. But this is: “Carney WALKS OUT — Trump Tariff BACKFIRES, 420K Jobs at Risk | Rachel Maddow”:
The link
Date: 17/02/2026 08:23:42
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2361371
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
roughbarked said:
No Way out for Trump
That is AI I think. Plus that YouTube channel is a peddler of conspiracy theories.
but clickbait engagement farming honeypots are so addictive we want more
AI donkey porn is just not as good as the real thing.
Date: 17/02/2026 08:27:20
From: roughbarked
ID: 2361372
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
That is AI I think. Plus that YouTube channel is a peddler of conspiracy theories.
but clickbait engagement farming honeypots are so addictive we want more
AI donkey porn is just not as good as the real thing.
Never tried real donkey porn. It might be a real thing but it isn’t my thing.
Date: 17/02/2026 08:36:45
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2361373
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:
but clickbait engagement farming honeypots are so addictive we want more
AI donkey porn is just not as good as the real thing.
Never tried real donkey porn. It might be a real thing but it isn’t my thing.
How do you say your not German by not saying you’re not German…
Date: 17/02/2026 08:57:39
From: Michael V
ID: 2361374
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
A security deal that might not deliver submarines
The latest report from the US Congressional Research Service explores an alternative to the current plan. Instead of selling boats to Australia, the United States would keep the Virginia class submarines and operate them from Australian bases under a shared “division of labor”, while Australia pours money into other military capabilities such as long-range missiles and drones.
The same report highlights a stubborn problem. US shipyards have struggled to build Virginia-class submarines at the intended rate of two per year and in recent years have averaged closer to about 1.1 to 1.2 boats annually, leaving the US fleet below its own target numbers.
Under US law, no submarine can be transferred to Australia if the US Navy believes it needs that vessel for its own forces.
https://www.ecoticias.com/en/goodbye-to-nuclear-submarines-australia-signed-a-368-billion-deal-with-the-united-states-to-receive-them-but-a-new-congressional-report-makes-it-clear-that-they-may-never-arrive/27225/#google_vignette
I suppose Australia won’t get its pre-payments back either.
Date: 17/02/2026 09:05:20
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2361375
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:
A security deal that might not deliver submarines
The latest report from the US Congressional Research Service explores an alternative to the current plan. Instead of selling boats to Australia, the United States would keep the Virginia class submarines and operate them from Australian bases under a shared “division of labor”, while Australia pours money into other military capabilities such as long-range missiles and drones.
The same report highlights a stubborn problem. US shipyards have struggled to build Virginia-class submarines at the intended rate of two per year and in recent years have averaged closer to about 1.1 to 1.2 boats annually, leaving the US fleet below its own target numbers.
Under US law, no submarine can be transferred to Australia if the US Navy believes it needs that vessel for its own forces.
https://www.ecoticias.com/en/goodbye-to-nuclear-submarines-australia-signed-a-368-billion-deal-with-the-united-states-to-receive-them-but-a-new-congressional-report-makes-it-clear-that-they-may-never-arrive/27225/#google_vignette
I suppose Australia won’t get its pre-payments back either.
did we keep the receipt?
Date: 17/02/2026 09:11:56
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2361377
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:
A security deal that might not deliver submarines
The latest report from the US Congressional Research Service explores an alternative to the current plan. Instead of selling boats to Australia, the United States would keep the Virginia class submarines and operate them from Australian bases under a shared “division of labor”, while Australia pours money into other military capabilities such as long-range missiles and drones.
The same report highlights a stubborn problem. US shipyards have struggled to build Virginia-class submarines at the intended rate of two per year and in recent years have averaged closer to about 1.1 to 1.2 boats annually, leaving the US fleet below its own target numbers.
Under US law, no submarine can be transferred to Australia if the US Navy believes it needs that vessel for its own forces.
https://www.ecoticias.com/en/goodbye-to-nuclear-submarines-australia-signed-a-368-billion-deal-with-the-united-states-to-receive-them-but-a-new-congressional-report-makes-it-clear-that-they-may-never-arrive/27225/#google_vignette
I suppose Australia won’t get its pre-payments back either.
did we keep the receipt?
Asking the bingbot how much we have spent already, it tells me that just yesterday the gov. “pledged” to spend US$2.7 billion to get things going.
Presumably they haven’t posted the cheque yet though.
Date: 17/02/2026 10:05:51
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2361384
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
well they should have spoken more politely

Date: 17/02/2026 10:06:40
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2361385
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
JudgeMental said:
Michael V said:
I suppose Australia won’t get its pre-payments back either.
did we keep the receipt?
Asking the bingbot how much we have spent already, it tells me that just yesterday the gov. “pledged” to spend US$2.7 billion to get things going.
Presumably they haven’t posted the cheque yet though.
we thought they’d already sunk like maybe $6000000000 into this thing
Date: 17/02/2026 10:09:20
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2361387
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
nice uh
Former U.S. president Barack Obama took to Instagram on Sunday to clarify comments he’d made on a podcast about aliens being real, saying he did not see evidence that aliens have made contact with us. The statement came in the wake of social media buzz following a video showing Obama’s answer to a lightning round of questions with podcast host Brian Tyler Cohen, when the former U.S. president was asked: “Are aliens real?” “They’re real, but I haven’t seen them, and they’re not being kept in Area 51. There’s no underground facility. Unless, there’s this enormous conspiracy, and they hid it from the president of the United States,” Obama answered.
backflip we guess
Obama’s Instagram post added more context to his answer. “I was trying to stick with the spirit of the speed round, but since it’s gotten attention let me clarify. Statistically, the universe is so vast that the odds are good there’s life out there. But the distances between solar systems are so great that the chances we’ve been visited by aliens is low, and I saw no evidence during my presidency that extraterrestrials have made contact with us. Really!” Obama wrote in the post.
Date: 17/02/2026 10:16:58
From: Michael V
ID: 2361390
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
JudgeMental said:
Michael V said:
I suppose Australia won’t get its pre-payments back either.
did we keep the receipt?
Asking the bingbot how much we have spent already, it tells me that just yesterday the gov. “pledged” to spend US$2.7 billion to get things going.
Presumably they haven’t posted the cheque yet though.
That was for the Adelaide shipbuilding yard.
It is possible that two up-front payments of $800M have already been made to the US. But the search engine results are unclear.
Date: 17/02/2026 10:26:33
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2361396
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
JudgeMental said:
did we keep the receipt?
Asking the bingbot how much we have spent already, it tells me that just yesterday the gov. “pledged” to spend US$2.7 billion to get things going.
Presumably they haven’t posted the cheque yet though.
we thought they’d already sunk like maybe $6000000000 into this thing
That was for the Adelaide shipbuilding yard.
It is possible that two up-front payments of $800M have already been made to the US. But the search engine results are unclear.
dude
(1) https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/feb/08/trump-very-aware-supportive-of-aukus-says-pete-hegseth-as-australia-pays-down-800m-on-submarine-deal
(2) https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jul/23/australia-payment-us-aukus-trump-administration-review
(3) https://thewest.com.au/politics/world-politics/exclusive-australia-quietly-sent-non-refundable-15-billion-to-us-for-aukus-down-payment-last-month-c-21183261
(1 2 3) https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/australia-quietly-pays-us-another-800-million-for-aukus-despite-review-20250723-p5mh8y.html
This masthead confirmed the second payment was made in the second quarter of this year, per the agreed schedule. By the end of 2025, Canberra will have paid $US2 billion, or just over $3 billion, to the American shipbuilding industry to boost submarine production. While Australia’s first $800 million payment was announced with fanfare in February, when Defence Minister Richard Marles met his US counterpart, Pete Hegseth, in Washington, the second payment was not announced. However, in February, officials told a Senate estimates hearing the payment would proceed as per an agreed schedule – before the end of the 2024-25 financial year – and that $2 billion would be paid by the end of 2025.
(4) https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-15/down-payment-for-30b-adelaide-submarine-shipyard/106346484
Date: 17/02/2026 10:59:55
From: Michael V
ID: 2361406
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
we thought they’d already sunk like maybe $6000000000 into this thing
That was for the Adelaide shipbuilding yard.
It is possible that two up-front payments of $800M have already been made to the US. But the search engine results are unclear.
dude
(1) https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/feb/08/trump-very-aware-supportive-of-aukus-says-pete-hegseth-as-australia-pays-down-800m-on-submarine-deal
(2) https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jul/23/australia-payment-us-aukus-trump-administration-review
(3) https://thewest.com.au/politics/world-politics/exclusive-australia-quietly-sent-non-refundable-15-billion-to-us-for-aukus-down-payment-last-month-c-21183261
(1 2 3) https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/australia-quietly-pays-us-another-800-million-for-aukus-despite-review-20250723-p5mh8y.html
This masthead confirmed the second payment was made in the second quarter of this year, per the agreed schedule. By the end of 2025, Canberra will have paid $US2 billion, or just over $3 billion, to the American shipbuilding industry to boost submarine production. While Australia’s first $800 million payment was announced with fanfare in February, when Defence Minister Richard Marles met his US counterpart, Pete Hegseth, in Washington, the second payment was not announced. However, in February, officials told a Senate estimates hearing the payment would proceed as per an agreed schedule – before the end of the 2024-25 financial year – and that $2 billion would be paid by the end of 2025.
(4) https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-15/down-payment-for-30b-adelaide-submarine-shipyard/106346484
Thanks.
“Pay your money for nothing and your ships aren’t free”
Date: 17/02/2026 12:07:27
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2361414
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
That was for the Adelaide shipbuilding yard.
It is possible that two up-front payments of $800M have already been made to the US. But the search engine results are unclear.
dude
(1) https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/feb/08/trump-very-aware-supportive-of-aukus-says-pete-hegseth-as-australia-pays-down-800m-on-submarine-deal
(2) https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jul/23/australia-payment-us-aukus-trump-administration-review
(3) https://thewest.com.au/politics/world-politics/exclusive-australia-quietly-sent-non-refundable-15-billion-to-us-for-aukus-down-payment-last-month-c-21183261
(1 2 3) https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/australia-quietly-pays-us-another-800-million-for-aukus-despite-review-20250723-p5mh8y.html
This masthead confirmed the second payment was made in the second quarter of this year, per the agreed schedule. By the end of 2025, Canberra will have paid $US2 billion, or just over $3 billion, to the American shipbuilding industry to boost submarine production. While Australia’s first $800 million payment was announced with fanfare in February, when Defence Minister Richard Marles met his US counterpart, Pete Hegseth, in Washington, the second payment was not announced. However, in February, officials told a Senate estimates hearing the payment would proceed as per an agreed schedule – before the end of the 2024-25 financial year – and that $2 billion would be paid by the end of 2025.
(4) https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-15/down-payment-for-30b-adelaide-submarine-shipyard/106346484
Thanks.
“Pay your money for nothing and your ships aren’t free”
“Monkeys get nothing but the chimps get three”
Date: 17/02/2026 12:19:38
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2361416
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I can’t see why we can’t go back to the French and say, yeah, well, sorry about all that, it was pretty stupid of us to ask you to take a perfectly good design for a nuclear-driven submarine and change it into a diesel-electric design, and yeah, we behaved like dicks when we backed out of the deal and said we’d rather have nuclear boats from the Americans, but, ummm, do you reckon we could talk again, maybe with an eye to the nuclear-powered design?
Of course, the French would be utterly insufferable about it, but…
Date: 17/02/2026 12:26:02
From: buffy
ID: 2361418
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
but clickbait engagement farming honeypots are so addictive we want more
I’d so love it to be true. But this is: “Carney WALKS OUT — Trump Tariff BACKFIRES, 420K Jobs at Risk | Rachel Maddow”:
The link
Not sure about that link. Is it real?
Date: 17/02/2026 12:30:18
From: roughbarked
ID: 2361419
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
roughbarked said:
roughbarked said:
I’d so love it to be true. But this is: “Carney WALKS OUT — Trump Tariff BACKFIRES, 420K Jobs at Risk | Rachel Maddow”:
The link
Not sure about that link. Is it real?
?
Date: 17/02/2026 12:30:42
From: Michael V
ID: 2361420
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
I can’t see why we can’t go back to the French and say, yeah, well, sorry about all that, it was pretty stupid of us to ask you to take a perfectly good design for a nuclear-driven submarine and change it into a diesel-electric design, and yeah, we behaved like dicks when we backed out of the deal and said we’d rather have nuclear boats from the Americans, but, ummm, do you reckon we could talk again, maybe with an eye to the nuclear-powered design?
Of course, the French would be utterly insufferable about it, but…
And you can blame ScoMo for the bad behaviour, because, well, it is demonstrably true.
Date: 17/02/2026 12:33:22
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2361421
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
roughbarked said:
roughbarked said:
I’d so love it to be true. But this is: “Carney WALKS OUT — Trump Tariff BACKFIRES, 420K Jobs at Risk | Rachel Maddow”:
The link
Not sure about that link. Is it real?
doesn’t appear to be her usual self. doesn’t sound like her also.
Date: 17/02/2026 12:33:57
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2361422
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
buffy said:
roughbarked said:
The link
Not sure about that link. Is it real?
doesn’t appear to be her usual self. doesn’t sound like her also.
Dodgy.
Date: 17/02/2026 12:36:46
From: roughbarked
ID: 2361424
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
JudgeMental said:
buffy said:
Not sure about that link. Is it real?
doesn’t appear to be her usual self. doesn’t sound like her also.
Dodgy.
Gotta be careful these days.
Date: 17/02/2026 12:38:01
From: buffy
ID: 2361425
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
New Randy Rainbow link that I hadn’t seen before:
Link
Date: 17/02/2026 12:42:43
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2361428
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
more commentators going woke


Date: 17/02/2026 12:43:03
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2361429
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
captain_spalding said:
JudgeMental said:
doesn’t appear to be her usual self. doesn’t sound like her also.
Dodgy.
Gotta be careful these days.
Possibly a Russian disinformation account, trying to keeps the division alive.
Date: 17/02/2026 12:45:58
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2361432
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
more commentators going woke


He sounds foreign.
Date: 17/02/2026 12:50:34
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2361433
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
SCIENCE said:
more commentators going woke


He sounds foreign.
And opinionated.
Don’t fancy his chances.
Date: 17/02/2026 14:29:17
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2361475
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
President Donald Trump has mocked Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez following her inaccurate claim at the Munich Security Conference that Venezuela lies “below the equator,” calling her remarks damaging to America’s image abroad.
Date: 17/02/2026 14:43:28
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2361483
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
President Donald Trump has mocked Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez following her inaccurate claim at the Munich Security Conference that Venezuela lies “below the equator,” calling her remarks damaging to America’s image abroad.
Americas 250 birthday is going to include an Arc de Trump apparently.
Date: 17/02/2026 16:44:17
From: buffy
ID: 2361535
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
JudgeMental said:
buffy said:
Not sure about that link. Is it real?
doesn’t appear to be her usual self. doesn’t sound like her also.
Dodgy.
I went back to this and Snopes has nothing on this one in particular, but she has been plagued by deep fake stuff over the past 6-8 months.
Date: 17/02/2026 16:47:57
From: roughbarked
ID: 2361536
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
captain_spalding said:
JudgeMental said:
doesn’t appear to be her usual self. doesn’t sound like her also.
Dodgy.
I went back to this and Snopes has nothing on this one in particular, but she has been plagued by deep fake stuff over the past 6-8 months.
Seems like fakes are commonplace. Well fake watches have been commonplace so fake videos much of a muchness.
Date: 17/02/2026 16:50:30
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2361538
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
buffy said:
captain_spalding said:
Dodgy.
I went back to this and Snopes has nothing on this one in particular, but she has been plagued by deep fake stuff over the past 6-8 months.
Seems like fakes are commonplace. Well fake watches have been commonplace so fake videos much of a muchness.
The video itself is marked: altered or synthetic content
Date: 17/02/2026 16:54:33
From: roughbarked
ID: 2361543
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Bubblecar said:
roughbarked said:
buffy said:
I went back to this and Snopes has nothing on this one in particular, but she has been plagued by deep fake stuff over the past 6-8 months.
Seems like fakes are commonplace. Well fake watches have been commonplace so fake videos much of a muchness.
The video itself is marked: altered or synthetic content
A lot do for other languages etc.
Date: 17/02/2026 17:27:26
From: kii
ID: 2361549
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Bubblecar said:
roughbarked said:
Seems like fakes are commonplace. Well fake watches have been commonplace so fake videos much of a muchness.
The video itself is marked: altered or synthetic content
A lot do for other languages etc.
Are you sure? I’ve never seen that.
Date: 17/02/2026 17:30:09
From: roughbarked
ID: 2361551
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
roughbarked said:
Bubblecar said:
The video itself is marked: altered or synthetic content
A lot do for other languages etc.
Are you sure? I’ve never seen that.
It is a bit like the mirror things may be closer than you think.. The one on my car is on the left side.
Just because you haven’t seen it doesn’t mean it isn’t there.
Date: 17/02/2026 17:31:32
From: Neophyte
ID: 2361552
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
kii said:
roughbarked said:
A lot do for other languages etc.
Are you sure? I’ve never seen that.
It is a bit like the mirror things may be closer than you think.. The one on my car is on the left side.
Just because you haven’t seen it doesn’t mean it isn’t there.
And once you do you’ll never look back
Date: 17/02/2026 17:50:27
From: kii
ID: 2361553
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
kii said:
roughbarked said:
A lot do for other languages etc.
Are you sure? I’ve never seen that.
It is a bit like the mirror things may be closer than you think.. The one on my car is on the left side.
Just because you haven’t seen it doesn’t mean it isn’t there.
No, it’s nothing like the mirror thing. It’s on the left because, from my understanding, it is on the passenger side of the car.
Date: 17/02/2026 18:02:55
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2361555
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Neophyte said:
roughbarked said:
kii said:
Are you sure? I’ve never seen that.
It is a bit like the mirror things may be closer than you think.. The one on my car is on the left side.
Just because you haven’t seen it doesn’t mean it isn’t there.
And once you do you’ll never look back
except in anger.
Date: 17/02/2026 18:03:37
From: roughbarked
ID: 2361556
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
roughbarked said:
kii said:
Are you sure? I’ve never seen that.
It is a bit like the mirror things may be closer than you think.. The one on my car is on the left side.
Just because you haven’t seen it doesn’t mean it isn’t there.
No, it’s nothing like the mirror thing. It’s on the left because, from my understanding, it is on the passenger side of the car.
Then why the comment about only in the USA?
Date: 17/02/2026 18:09:04
From: Michael V
ID: 2361557
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 17/02/2026 18:21:02
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2361559
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
Neophyte said:
roughbarked said:
It is a bit like the mirror things may be closer than you think.. The one on my car is on the left side.
Just because you haven’t seen it doesn’t mean it isn’t there.
And once you do you’ll never look back
except in anger.
they were in town recently
Date: 17/02/2026 19:07:20
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2361575
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 17/02/2026 20:44:02
From: kii
ID: 2361593
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Whoosh.
Which whoosh?
You? Me? roughbarked?
My brain is confused.
Date: 17/02/2026 20:53:03
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2361595
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Michael V said:
Whoosh.
Which whoosh?
You? Me? roughbarked?
My brain is confused.
us
Date: 17/02/2026 22:00:06
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2361613
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev. Jesse Jackson has gone to hear the choir invisible.
Date: 17/02/2026 22:27:11
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2361615
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
The Rev. Jesse Jackson has gone to hear the choir invisible.
Here are some silent prayers.
Date: 17/02/2026 22:48:31
From: dv
ID: 2361620
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
Peak Warming Man said:
The Rev. Jesse Jackson has gone to hear the choir invisible.
Here are some silent prayers.
A life well led
Date: 17/02/2026 22:53:20
From: kii
ID: 2361621
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
The Rev. Jesse Jackson has gone to hear the choir invisible.
Robert Duvall carked it on Sunday.
Date: 18/02/2026 11:28:45
From: buffy
ID: 2361715
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Stephen Colbert says CBS barred interview with Democrat
I heard about this on NewsRadio in the car this morning. Apparently CBS pulled the story, but it was put up on YouTube. Where it has had more views than it would have had if they had simply run it in the show. Consequences, people, consequences.
Date: 18/02/2026 11:35:21
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2361718
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Stephen Colbert says CBS barred interview with Democrat
I heard about this on NewsRadio in the car this morning. Apparently CBS pulled the story, but it was put up on YouTube. Where it has had more views than it would have had if they had simply run it in the show. Consequences, people, consequences.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiTJ7Pz_59A
Date: 18/02/2026 11:53:07
From: buffy
ID: 2361723
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
buffy said:
Stephen Colbert says CBS barred interview with Democrat
I heard about this on NewsRadio in the car this morning. Apparently CBS pulled the story, but it was put up on YouTube. Where it has had more views than it would have had if they had simply run it in the show. Consequences, people, consequences.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiTJ7Pz_59A
Thanks. I haven’t watched it, I was tickled by it reaching more people by being jumped on by the administration.
Date: 18/02/2026 12:04:06
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2361733
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
captain_spalding said:
buffy said:
Stephen Colbert says CBS barred interview with Democrat
I heard about this on NewsRadio in the car this morning. Apparently CBS pulled the story, but it was put up on YouTube. Where it has had more views than it would have had if they had simply run it in the show. Consequences, people, consequences.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiTJ7Pz_59A
Thanks. I haven’t watched it, I was tickled by it reaching more people by being jumped on by the administration.
maybe that was the plan all along
Date: 18/02/2026 12:06:06
From: kii
ID: 2361735
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
buffy said:
Stephen Colbert says CBS barred interview with Democrat
I heard about this on NewsRadio in the car this morning. Apparently CBS pulled the story, but it was put up on YouTube. Where it has had more views than it would have had if they had simply run it in the show. Consequences, people, consequences.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiTJ7Pz_59A
My crazy former neighbour moved to Texas because she felt it would be a better place for her Christian nationalism views.
Date: 18/02/2026 12:07:07
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2361736
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
captain_spalding said:
buffy said:
Stephen Colbert says CBS barred interview with Democrat
I heard about this on NewsRadio in the car this morning. Apparently CBS pulled the story, but it was put up on YouTube. Where it has had more views than it would have had if they had simply run it in the show. Consequences, people, consequences.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiTJ7Pz_59A
My crazy former neighbour moved to Texas because she felt it would be a better place for her Christian nationalism views.
Just like secure wards in mental hospitals are better places for deranged killers.
Date: 18/02/2026 12:09:00
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2361739
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
kii said:
captain_spalding said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiTJ7Pz_59A
My crazy former neighbour moved to Texas because she felt it would be a better place for her Christian nationalism views.
Just like secure wards in mental hospitals are better places for deranged killers.
what about ranged ones
Date: 18/02/2026 12:09:14
From: kii
ID: 2361740
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
kii said:
captain_spalding said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiTJ7Pz_59A
My crazy former neighbour moved to Texas because she felt it would be a better place for her Christian nationalism views.
Just like secure wards in mental hospitals are better places for deranged killers.
Yep. She’s the one who posted on Facebook that she wanted to shoot all liberals.
Date: 18/02/2026 12:15:00
From: Cymek
ID: 2361750
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
captain_spalding said:
kii said:
My crazy former neighbour moved to Texas because she felt it would be a better place for her Christian nationalism views.
Just like secure wards in mental hospitals are better places for deranged killers.
Yep. She’s the one who posted on Facebook that she wanted to shoot all liberals.
Some post on Facebook had a guy using the n word and when I called him out for it he called me liberal.
He was from Texas, I likened it to some place were people have a sister wife
Date: 18/02/2026 12:41:12
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2361776
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
alleged

Date: 18/02/2026 12:43:00
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2361777
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
fkn global warming

Date: 18/02/2026 12:44:26
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2361779
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
fkn global warming

So, nothing like this has ever happened at the end of any previous winter in NY?
Date: 18/02/2026 12:45:48
From: Cymek
ID: 2361780
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
fkn global warming

That snow looks nasty
Date: 18/02/2026 12:48:03
From: kryten
ID: 2361782
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
fkn global warming

That snow looks nasty
It’s alright it’s not yellow
Date: 18/02/2026 12:51:20
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2361785
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
SCIENCE said:
fkn global warming

So, nothing like this has ever happened at the end of any previous winter in NY?
don’t know we never watched snow melt in NY but the person who posted the screen capture also wrote words to the effect of
they really have nothing on Mamdani so they have this
(not verbatim, we didn’t copypaste that)
Date: 18/02/2026 12:55:17
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2361788
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
captain_spalding said:
SCIENCE said:
fkn global warming

So, nothing like this has ever happened at the end of any previous winter in NY?
don’t know we never watched snow melt in NY but the person who posted the screen capture also wrote words to the effect of
they really have nothing on Mamdani so they have this
(not verbatim, we didn’t copypaste that)
There’s bound to be people who say that it’s Mamdani’s fault, how all the ‘liberals’ went out and bought dogs, maybe multiple dogs each, and fed them high-fibre diets just so they could make maximum poop, because they felt entitled to do that because Mamdani is mayor, and there was never, ever a dog poo problem when Giuliani was mayor, no, sir.
Date: 18/02/2026 14:08:04
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2361810
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiTJ7Pz_59A
Link
Rep. James Talarico On Confronting Christian Nationalism, And Strange Days In The Texas Legislature
The Late Show with Stephen Colbert
Date: 18/02/2026 17:10:25
From: dv
ID: 2361856
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

I think I need to have my contracts made in a more stable currency.
Date: 18/02/2026 17:32:18
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2361864
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

I think I need to have my contracts made in a more stable currency.
happy CNY ¡ then

Date: 19/02/2026 08:44:06
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2361942
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Carrick Ryan
This is the official US Department of War social media page, the man on stage with the Secretary or War Pete Hegseth is his pastor, Doug Wilson.
Wilson is a self-declared Christian Nationalist and theonomist. He believes that biblical law, specifically the judicial and moral laws of the Old Testament, remains binding and should form the basis of modern civil government and society.
I listened to a two hour interview with Wilson on Sam Harris’ podcast, convinced that there must be a more reasonable context to his beliefs than what was reported.
Instead, I heard Wilson argue in favour of a future US State in which only the men in each household could vote, that slavery wasn’t immoral and could return, and that executing individuals for defying biblical law was theologically obligatory.
It appears he is now giving sermons at the Pentagon.

Date: 19/02/2026 08:46:59
From: roughbarked
ID: 2361943
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
Carrick Ryan
This is the official US Department of War social media page, the man on stage with the Secretary or War Pete Hegseth is his pastor, Doug Wilson.
Wilson is a self-declared Christian Nationalist and theonomist. He believes that biblical law, specifically the judicial and moral laws of the Old Testament, remains binding and should form the basis of modern civil government and society.
I listened to a two hour interview with Wilson on Sam Harris’ podcast, convinced that there must be a more reasonable context to his beliefs than what was reported.
Instead, I heard Wilson argue in favour of a future US State in which only the men in each household could vote, that slavery wasn’t immoral and could return, and that executing individuals for defying biblical law was theologically obligatory.
It appears he is now giving sermons at the Pentagon.

This God bloke, he wouldn’t be the Trump of the golden age would he?
Date: 19/02/2026 09:05:55
From: Michael V
ID: 2361952
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
Carrick Ryan
This is the official US Department of War social media page, the man on stage with the Secretary or War Pete Hegseth is his pastor, Doug Wilson.
Wilson is a self-declared Christian Nationalist and theonomist. He believes that biblical law, specifically the judicial and moral laws of the Old Testament, remains binding and should form the basis of modern civil government and society.
I listened to a two hour interview with Wilson on Sam Harris’ podcast, convinced that there must be a more reasonable context to his beliefs than what was reported.
Instead, I heard Wilson argue in favour of a future US State in which only the men in each household could vote, that slavery wasn’t immoral and could return, and that executing individuals for defying biblical law was theologically obligatory.
It appears he is now giving sermons at the Pentagon.

FMD.
Date: 19/02/2026 09:34:57
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2361958
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
JudgeMental said:
Carrick Ryan
This is the official US Department of War social media page, the man on stage with the Secretary or War Pete Hegseth is his pastor, Doug Wilson.
Wilson is a self-declared Christian Nationalist and theonomist. He believes that biblical law, specifically the judicial and moral laws of the Old Testament, remains binding and should form the basis of modern civil government and society.
I listened to a two hour interview with Wilson on Sam Harris’ podcast, convinced that there must be a more reasonable context to his beliefs than what was reported.
Instead, I heard Wilson argue in favour of a future US State in which only the men in each household could vote, that slavery wasn’t immoral and could return, and that executing individuals for defying biblical law was theologically obligatory.
It appears he is now giving sermons at the Pentagon.

FMD.
what happens when National Socialist Germany and Taliban Afghanistan have a bastard child
Date: 19/02/2026 09:35:41
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2361959
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
alleged

Date: 19/02/2026 10:36:42
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2361974
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
BBC Report of President Donald Trump’s prolific sexual abuse allegations.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Uhrk4HdILA
From Panorama 2018.
Date: 19/02/2026 10:45:33
From: roughbarked
ID: 2361976
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
BBC Report of President Donald Trump’s prolific sexual abuse allegations.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Uhrk4HdILA
From Panorama 2018.
As everyone is aware, yet half of American voters voted him in.
Date: 19/02/2026 10:46:31
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2361978
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Spiny Norman said:
BBC Report of President Donald Trump’s prolific sexual abuse allegations.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Uhrk4HdILA
From Panorama 2018.
As everyone is aware, yet half of American voters voted him in.
system working as intended
Date: 19/02/2026 11:12:04
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2361985
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
Spiny Norman said:
BBC Report of President Donald Trump’s prolific sexual abuse allegations.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Uhrk4HdILA
From Panorama 2018.
As everyone is aware, yet half of American voters voted him in.
system working as intended
Better than the alternative.
Date: 19/02/2026 11:31:40
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2361995
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
As everyone is aware, yet half of American voters voted him in.
system working as intended
Better than the alternative.
correct Kamala Harris is shit
Date: 19/02/2026 14:38:29
From: dv
ID: 2362095
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Go back Antioch, Meletios!
Date: 19/02/2026 15:15:21
From: dv
ID: 2362112
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

What
Date: 19/02/2026 15:20:18
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2362115
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 19/02/2026 15:24:46
From: Michael V
ID: 2362117
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:

Snort.
That’s brilliant!
Date: 19/02/2026 15:46:03
From: Cymek
ID: 2362120
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
What
Is that like a Femputer ?
Date: 19/02/2026 15:47:12
From: Cymek
ID: 2362121
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:

Makes sense if vaccines cause autism, schools cause shootings
Date: 19/02/2026 16:20:16
From: buffy
ID: 2362135
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
What
Having read the Reuters piece on this, I think this might actually be helpful even though there is no enforcement method. Some journalists need to start watching this and publicising the results.
Date: 19/02/2026 19:22:50
From: dv
ID: 2362207
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 19/02/2026 19:53:33
From: Kingy
ID: 2362209
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Air Farce One has been repainted to blend in with the people in it.

Date: 19/02/2026 20:19:42
From: Michael V
ID: 2362213
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Kingy said:
Air Farce One has been repainted to blend in with the people in it.

LOL
Date: 20/02/2026 06:37:00
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2362274
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Kingy said:
Air Farce One has been repainted to blend in with the people in it.

yeah but
She did the movie and it has become the biggest selling documentary in 20 years, can you believe it? The theaters are all packed. Women especially they go back and they see it 2 or 3 times.”
Date: 20/02/2026 07:09:20
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2362279
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
alleged



let us guess, they didn’t vote for this either
Date: 20/02/2026 07:32:00
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2362280
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
alleged



let us guess, they didn’t vote for this either
I propose a voting change.
Votes for four years should be able to be redirected at any time.
Date: 20/02/2026 07:33:37
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2362281
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
SCIENCE said:
alleged



let us guess, they didn’t vote for this either
I propose a voting change.
Votes for four years should be able to be redirected at any time.
Would that shake things up.
Date: 20/02/2026 07:35:06
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2362283
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
SCIENCE said:
alleged



let us guess, they didn’t vote for this either
I propose a voting change.
Votes for four years should be able to be redirected at any time.
Would that shake things up.
so the government of the day should simply be the one ahead in the opinion polls
Date: 20/02/2026 07:38:50
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2362285
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
I propose a voting change.
Votes for four years should be able to be redirected at any time.
Would that shake things up.
so the government of the day should simply be the one ahead in the opinion polls
It would be interesting to see how quickly the Harris Admin would take over.
Date: 20/02/2026 07:44:31
From: Michael V
ID: 2362286
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
alleged



let us guess, they didn’t vote for this either
Huh!
I was not previously aware that anything, let alone glyphosate, was used as a wheat crop desiccant. When I worked in this industry, that was the sun’s job.
The use of herbicides was limited because they were very expensive. The place I worked on used a wide-winged chisel plough and rod weeder instead of pre-emergent herbicide. It was single-pass working of the soil, and seeds were drilled at the same time. We hand-weeded each bay in the irrigation (total 800 acres) instead of using a post-emergent herbicide. We had a high-level river licence for a further 2,000 acres, and dry-land farmed another 2,500 acres. All of that was planted and hand-weeded too, but only during reasonable to good seasons. We were generally able to produce premium grain – predominantly Prime Hard with some NH3 (now called something else).
Date: 20/02/2026 07:46:24
From: Michael V
ID: 2362287
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
alleged



let us guess, they didn’t vote for this either
Huh!
I was not previously aware that anything, let alone glyphosate, was used as a wheat crop desiccant. When I worked in this industry, that was the sun’s job.
The use of herbicides was limited because they were very expensive. The place I worked on used a wide-winged chisel plough and rod weeder instead of pre-emergent herbicide. It was single-pass working of the soil, and seeds were drilled at the same time. We hand-weeded each bay in the irrigation (total 800 acres) instead of using a post-emergent herbicide. We had a high-level river licence for a further 2,000 acres, and dry-land farmed another 2,500 acres. All of that was planted and hand-weeded too, but only during reasonable to good seasons. We were generally able to produce premium grain – predominantly Prime Hard with some NH3 (now called something else).
So, I thank you for fuelling that insight.
:)
Date: 20/02/2026 08:02:44
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2362288
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
I propose a voting change.
Votes for four years should be able to be redirected at any time.
Would that shake things up.
so the government of the day should simply be the one ahead in the opinion polls
It would mean governments take their voters more seriously,
It would mean voters have more power to change things.
It would certainly change things.
Date: 20/02/2026 08:04:36
From: Michael V
ID: 2362289
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 20/02/2026 08:40:04
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2362303
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Epstein files – The Book, will be a very long read…
Like encyclopedia britannica.
Date: 20/02/2026 08:41:55
From: roughbarked
ID: 2362304
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
The Epstein files – The Book, will be a very long read…
Like encyclopedia britannica.
Encyclopedia pedophilia.
Date: 20/02/2026 08:42:54
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2362305
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
The Epstein files – The Book, will be a very long read…
Like encyclopedia britannica.
encyclopædophilia
fixed
Date: 20/02/2026 08:43:39
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2362306
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
The Epstein files – The Book, will be a very long read…
Like encyclopedia britannica.
Encyclopedia pedophilia.
You nailed it, spot on.
Date: 20/02/2026 08:44:06
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2362307
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
The Epstein files – The Book, will be a very long read…
Like encyclopedia britannica.
encyclopædophilia
fixed
:)
Date: 20/02/2026 08:50:16
From: ruby
ID: 2362309
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
alleged



let us guess, they didn’t vote for this either
Huh!
I was not previously aware that anything, let alone glyphosate, was used as a wheat crop desiccant. When I worked in this industry, that was the sun’s job.
The use of herbicides was limited because they were very expensive. The place I worked on used a wide-winged chisel plough and rod weeder instead of pre-emergent herbicide. It was single-pass working of the soil, and seeds were drilled at the same time. We hand-weeded each bay in the irrigation (total 800 acres) instead of using a post-emergent herbicide. We had a high-level river licence for a further 2,000 acres, and dry-land farmed another 2,500 acres. All of that was planted and hand-weeded too, but only during reasonable to good seasons. We were generally able to produce premium grain – predominantly Prime Hard with some NH3 (now called something else).
Good farming practices there MV…..a nice way not to develop herbicide resistant weeds as a bonus.
I chat to my Hunter Valley meat producer about all sorts of farming stuff, and she said years ago they decided to diversify a little and signed up to produce a crop of beans. Come harvest time and the contract they signed said they had to spray with Roundup to kill off the plants before they harvested. So that was their one and only crop of beans.
Little do vegetarians know that the healthy tin of beans they eat for dinner comes with a sprinkling of Roundup. But JFK jr says relax it’s all OK
Date: 20/02/2026 09:20:09
From: ruby
ID: 2362317
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
I really like this light-projection-based, non-destructive political grafitti.
Yes, some great use of imagery. Clever and well done and very very sad
Date: 20/02/2026 12:38:06
From: kii
ID: 2362464
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Well, this is nice.
Trump describing baby Barron.
WTF?
Date: 20/02/2026 13:55:39
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2362490
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 20/02/2026 14:07:02
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2362493
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
In an extraordinary and illegal move, Trump says he’s transferring 10 billion dollars from the US government to his “Board of Peace,” which he chairs and can therefore use the funds as he wishes.
https://www.reddit.com/r/UnderReportedNews/comments/1r98y5z/in_an_extraordinary_and_illegal_move_trump_says/
Date: 20/02/2026 14:08:46
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2362494
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
In an extraordinary and illegal move, Trump says he’s transferring 10 billion dollars from the US government to his “Board of Peace,” which he chairs and can therefore use the funds as he wishes.
https://www.reddit.com/r/UnderReportedNews/comments/1r98y5z/in_an_extraordinary_and_illegal_move_trump_says/
Ha, I was just reading that, about to post.
Laws are only good if they’re enforced.
Date: 20/02/2026 14:12:15
From: Cymek
ID: 2362495
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Spiny Norman said:
In an extraordinary and illegal move, Trump says he’s transferring 10 billion dollars from the US government to his “Board of Peace,” which he chairs and can therefore use the funds as he wishes.
https://www.reddit.com/r/UnderReportedNews/comments/1r98y5z/in_an_extraordinary_and_illegal_move_trump_says/
Ha, I was just reading that, about to post.
Laws are only good if they’re enforced.
Probably so he can hide out in Margeandtina when the fourth Reich falls
Date: 20/02/2026 14:28:46
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2362505
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
Divine Angel said:
Spiny Norman said:
In an extraordinary and illegal move, Trump says he’s transferring 10 billion dollars from the US government to his “Board of Peace,” which he chairs and can therefore use the funds as he wishes.
https://www.reddit.com/r/UnderReportedNews/comments/1r98y5z/in_an_extraordinary_and_illegal_move_trump_says/
Ha, I was just reading that, about to post.
Laws are only good if they’re enforced.
Probably so he can hide out in Margeandtina when the fourth Reich falls
laws are made by the lawmakers who are
wait wait
oh shit
Date: 20/02/2026 14:30:13
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2362507
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:


don’t worry they can always blame it on the aliens

Date: 20/02/2026 14:49:21
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2362512
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
holy shit how high can these hedges be
The Board of Peace meant to rebuild Gaza may well end up as another monument to Donald Trump
Following the inaugural meeting of the so-called Board of Peace a key question now stands out more than ever: is this a force of good or is it a Donald Trump vanity project?
Based on Trump’s own speech to launch the board, it increasingly appears to be an unaccountable vanity project which takes the United States even further from its traditional allies.
it says everything you need to know that authoritarian regimes such as Belarus and Saudi Arabia are members but democracies such as Australia, the UK, France and Canada are not. There’s some merit to that argument, but surely it’s a good thing
It’s this sort of “getting stars to go there” that could leave this Board of Peace open to suggestions that it is flaky and unfocused.
How can it be dedicated to the rebuilding of Gaza when Israel — which has essentially destroyed Gaza as a viable community — is a member of the board but there is not a single Palestinian representative on the board?
Unless this Board of Peace quickly begins to focus and genuinely tries to make the world a better place, this may well prove to be yet another monument to Donald Trump.
totally yeah sure thing
oh and this
This is not to say that some good may not come out of the board. Supporters of the board say that in an increasingly precarious world, any forums in which as many countries as possible sit down to discuss global problems is good.
yeah ¿ Hey if that’s such a great idea why not just propose it to CHINA and get them to chair* a Panel Against Conflict** and charge everyone $0000000000 fee instead
*: be a permanent member of
**: a security council
wait
Date: 20/02/2026 14:49:59
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2362513
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
holy shit how high can these hedges be
The Board of Peace meant to rebuild Gaza may well end up as another monument to Donald Trump
Following the inaugural meeting of the so-called Board of Peace a key question now stands out more than ever: is this a force of good or is it a Donald Trump vanity project?
Based on Trump’s own speech to launch the board, it increasingly appears to be an unaccountable vanity project which takes the United States even further from its traditional allies.
it says everything you need to know that authoritarian regimes such as Belarus and Saudi Arabia are members but democracies such as Australia, the UK, France and Canada are not. There’s some merit to that argument, but surely it’s a good thing
It’s this sort of “getting stars to go there” that could leave this Board of Peace open to suggestions that it is flaky and unfocused.
How can it be dedicated to the rebuilding of Gaza when Israel — which has essentially destroyed Gaza as a viable community — is a member of the board but there is not a single Palestinian representative on the board?
Unless this Board of Peace quickly begins to focus and genuinely tries to make the world a better place, this may well prove to be yet another monument to Donald Trump.
totally yeah sure thing
oh and this
This is not to say that some good may not come out of the board. Supporters of the board say that in an increasingly precarious world, any forums in which as many countries as possible sit down to discuss global problems is good.
yeah ¿ Hey if that’s such a great idea why not just propose it to CHINA and get them to chair* a Panel Against Conflict** and charge everyone $0000000000 fee instead
*: be a permanent member of
**: a security council
wait
sorry now with link
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-20/donald-trumps-gaza-board-of-peace-speech-leaves-questions/106367958
Date: 20/02/2026 15:00:23
From: Cymek
ID: 2362515
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
SCIENCE said:
holy shit how high can these hedges be
The Board of Peace meant to rebuild Gaza may well end up as another monument to Donald Trump
Following the inaugural meeting of the so-called Board of Peace a key question now stands out more than ever: is this a force of good or is it a Donald Trump vanity project?
Based on Trump’s own speech to launch the board, it increasingly appears to be an unaccountable vanity project which takes the United States even further from its traditional allies.
it says everything you need to know that authoritarian regimes such as Belarus and Saudi Arabia are members but democracies such as Australia, the UK, France and Canada are not. There’s some merit to that argument, but surely it’s a good thing
It’s this sort of “getting stars to go there” that could leave this Board of Peace open to suggestions that it is flaky and unfocused.
How can it be dedicated to the rebuilding of Gaza when Israel — which has essentially destroyed Gaza as a viable community — is a member of the board but there is not a single Palestinian representative on the board?
Unless this Board of Peace quickly begins to focus and genuinely tries to make the world a better place, this may well prove to be yet another monument to Donald Trump.
totally yeah sure thing
oh and this
This is not to say that some good may not come out of the board. Supporters of the board say that in an increasingly precarious world, any forums in which as many countries as possible sit down to discuss global problems is good.
yeah ¿ Hey if that’s such a great idea why not just propose it to CHINA and get them to chair* a Panel Against Conflict** and charge everyone $0000000000 fee instead
*: be a permanent member of
**: a security council
wait
sorry now with link
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-20/donald-trumps-gaza-board-of-peace-speech-leaves-questions/106367958
They could do away with security council and just have a form
Invade this middle eastern country, bomb it back to the stone age, all other priorities recinded
Vested interests A OK
Date: 20/02/2026 15:05:04
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2362517
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
what a legend

Date: 20/02/2026 15:08:39
From: Cymek
ID: 2362518
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
what a legend

These sorts of displays are like fascism 101
Date: 20/02/2026 15:21:39
From: Michael V
ID: 2362522
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:

Yes.
Date: 20/02/2026 15:45:45
From: Michael V
ID: 2362535
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
In an extraordinary and illegal move, Trump says he’s transferring 10 billion dollars from the US government to his “Board of Peace,” which he chairs and can therefore use the funds as he wishes.
https://www.reddit.com/r/UnderReportedNews/comments/1r98y5z/in_an_extraordinary_and_illegal_move_trump_says/
Gosh.
Date: 20/02/2026 15:54:12
From: Michael V
ID: 2362541
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
what a legend

Trump is looking down on you.
Date: 20/02/2026 18:23:58
From: roughbarked
ID: 2362584
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
what a legend

These sorts of displays are like fascism 101
Doon’t the Americans remember what happened to all the Saddam Hussein statues and images?
Date: 20/02/2026 18:33:41
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2362591
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
what a legend

These sorts of displays are like fascism 101
Doon’t the Americans remember what happened to all the Saddam Hussein statues and images?
yes please
Date: 20/02/2026 19:21:46
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2362605
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
what a legend

Trump is looking down on you.

Date: 20/02/2026 19:23:15
From: furious
ID: 2362606
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
what a legend

Trump is looking down on you.

Simon was popular back in the day…
Date: 20/02/2026 19:23:16
From: furious
ID: 2362607
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
what a legend

Trump is looking down on you.

Simon was popular back in the day…
Date: 20/02/2026 19:26:14
From: Michael V
ID: 2362609
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
what a legend

Trump is looking down on you.

Yes, yes (etc)?
Date: 20/02/2026 19:38:59
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2362613
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

He’ll probably soon rename it the Trump Ministry Department of Love.
Date: 20/02/2026 21:39:48
From: buffy
ID: 2362620
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 20/02/2026 21:54:00
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2362621
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Trump wants federal agencies to release files on UFOs and extraterrestrials
You could almost think Obama was up to a bit of mischief…
…and, next on the ‘attempts to distract from Epstein’ list is…
“Trump wants federal agencies to release files on UFOs and extraterrestrials”:
Date: 20/02/2026 21:59:14
From: buffy
ID: 2362624
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
buffy said:
Trump wants federal agencies to release files on UFOs and extraterrestrials
You could almost think Obama was up to a bit of mischief…
…and, next on the ‘attempts to distract from Epstein’ list is…
“Trump wants federal agencies to release files on UFOs and extraterrestrials”:
No, I think this one is more FOMO. Obama said there might be extraterrestrials and we wouldn’t want to be left behind.
:)
Date: 20/02/2026 22:16:43
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2362628
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 20/02/2026 23:07:56
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2362635
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I see that they’ve decided on the paint job for Trump’ s Qatari ‘gift plane’:

Date: 20/02/2026 23:52:16
From: roughbarked
ID: 2362637
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
I see that they’ve decided on the paint job for Trump’ s Qatari ‘gift plane’:

People are afraid of clowns.
Date: 20/02/2026 23:58:06
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2362638
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
captain_spalding said:
I see that they’ve decided on the paint job for Trump’ s Qatari ‘gift plane’:

People are afraid of clowns.
Not sufficiently, sometimes.
Date: 21/02/2026 00:09:29
From: roughbarked
ID: 2362640
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
roughbarked said:
captain_spalding said:
I see that they’ve decided on the paint job for Trump’ s Qatari ‘gift plane’:

People are afraid of clowns.
Not sufficiently, sometimes.
Not enough of them?
Date: 21/02/2026 00:25:25
From: roughbarked
ID: 2362642
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
captain_spalding said:
buffy said:
Trump wants federal agencies to release files on UFOs and extraterrestrials
You could almost think Obama was up to a bit of mischief…
…and, next on the ‘attempts to distract from Epstein’ list is…
“Trump wants federal agencies to release files on UFOs and extraterrestrials”:
No, I think this one is more FOMO. Obama said there might be extraterrestrials and we wouldn’t want to be left behind.
:)
Trump really does want Federal agencies to release files on Aliens.

Date: 21/02/2026 00:55:58
From: dv
ID: 2362644
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 21/02/2026 01:33:12
From: dv
ID: 2362645
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 21/02/2026 04:40:35
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2362647
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 21/02/2026 04:41:27
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2362648
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

¿that it’s all about international rules based orderings?
Date: 21/02/2026 04:42:50
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2362649
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
buffy said:
captain_spalding said:
…and, next on the ‘attempts to distract from Epstein’ list is…
“Trump wants federal agencies to release files on UFOs and extraterrestrials”:
No, I think this one is more FOMO. Obama said there might be extraterrestrials and we wouldn’t want to be left behind.
:)
Trump really does want Federal agencies to release files on Aliens.
so another fork that serves more than one purpose damn this is genius
Date: 21/02/2026 04:46:23
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2362650
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
captain_spalding said:
roughbarked said:
People are afraid of clowns.
Not sufficiently, sometimes.
Not enough of them?
https://youtu.be/TQfATDZY5Y4?t=55
Date: 21/02/2026 06:01:35
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2362651
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCOTUS has struck down Trump’s tariffs in 6-3 ruling:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-21/supreme-court-rules-against-donald-trumps-tariffs/106371286
Date: 21/02/2026 06:04:41
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2362652
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 21/02/2026 06:06:28
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2362653
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
SCIENCE said:
holy shit how high can these hedges be
The Board of Peace meant to rebuild Gaza may well end up as another monument to Donald Trump
Following the inaugural meeting of the so-called Board of Peace a key question now stands out more than ever: is this a force of good or is it a Donald Trump vanity project?
Based on Trump’s own speech to launch the board, it increasingly appears to be an unaccountable vanity project which takes the United States even further from its traditional allies.
it says everything you need to know that authoritarian regimes such as Belarus and Saudi Arabia are members but democracies such as Australia, the UK, France and Canada are not. There’s some merit to that argument, but surely it’s a good thing
It’s this sort of “getting stars to go there” that could leave this Board of Peace open to suggestions that it is flaky and unfocused.
How can it be dedicated to the rebuilding of Gaza when Israel — which has essentially destroyed Gaza as a viable community — is a member of the board but there is not a single Palestinian representative on the board?
Unless this Board of Peace quickly begins to focus and genuinely tries to make the world a better place, this may well prove to be yet another monument to Donald Trump.
totally yeah sure thing
oh and this
This is not to say that some good may not come out of the board. Supporters of the board say that in an increasingly precarious world, any forums in which as many countries as possible sit down to discuss global problems is good.
yeah ¿ Hey if that’s such a great idea why not just propose it to CHINA and get them to chair* a Panel Against Conflict** and charge everyone $0000000000 fee instead
*: be a permanent member of
**: a security council
wait
sorry now with link
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-20/donald-trumps-gaza-board-of-peace-speech-leaves-questions/106367958
They could do away with security council and just have a form
Invade this middle eastern country, bomb it back to the stone age, all other priorities recinded
Vested interests A OK

Date: 21/02/2026 07:13:28
From: buffy
ID: 2362655
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCOTUS has struck down Trump’s tariffs in 6-3 ruling:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-21/supreme-court-rules-against-donald-trumps-tariffs/106371286
Excellent news to wake up to. Now for the beginning of cleaning up the mess. It won’t be easy. But at least this shows the legal system is beginning to stand up to him.
Date: 21/02/2026 07:40:17
From: roughbarked
ID: 2362656
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCOTUS has struck down Trump’s tariffs in 6-3 ruling:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-21/supreme-court-rules-against-donald-trumps-tariffs/106371286
Excellent news to wake up to. Now for the beginning of cleaning up the mess. It won’t be easy. But at least this shows the legal system is beginning to stand up to him.
Best news I’ve had all day.
Date: 21/02/2026 11:17:18
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2362692
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 21/02/2026 11:19:02
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2362695
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 21/02/2026 11:40:29
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2362707
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Ooh, close but not quite right.
Date: 21/02/2026 11:42:19
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2362708
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
Ooh, close but not quite right.
That date isn’t quite right either
Date: 21/02/2026 11:44:44
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2362710
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Spiny Norman said:
Ooh, close but not quite right.
That date isn’t quite right either
It does make me think it’s fake, but it is something that he’d do though.
Date: 21/02/2026 11:47:01
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2362711
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
Divine Angel said:
Spiny Norman said:
Ooh, close but not quite right.
That date isn’t quite right either
It does make me think it’s fake, but it is something that he’d do though.
The watermark doesn’t give it away?
Date: 21/02/2026 11:50:07
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2362713
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I know he’s considered pre-emptive pardons to his family members, but I don’t know if he actually went through with anything.
Date: 21/02/2026 11:55:09
From: roughbarked
ID: 2362718
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
SCIENCE said:
alleged

https://www.independent.co.uk/bulletin/news/trump-medal-of-honor-iraq-b2924346.html
I’m sure FIFA would award him one if he asked nicely.
“Given the sacrifices of actual recipients”
Hah and this is the man who called them all losers.
Date: 21/02/2026 11:56:29
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2362720
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Spiny Norman said:
Divine Angel said:
That date isn’t quite right either
It does make me think it’s fake, but it is something that he’d do though.
The watermark doesn’t give it away?
oh c’m‘on people are always putting ironic stuff in clips of reality to keep a hold on plausible deniability so they can pretend that it’s fake
wait
Date: 21/02/2026 11:57:39
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2362723
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
SCIENCE said:
alleged

https://www.independent.co.uk/bulletin/news/trump-medal-of-honor-iraq-b2924346.html
I’m sure FIFA would award him one if he asked nicely.
“Given the sacrifices of actual recipients”
Hah and this is the man who called them all losers.
“acknowledged it would be “a stretch”“ and then modestly pointed out that he’s the best stretcher in the world in the universe
Date: 21/02/2026 11:59:42
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2362724
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Spiny Norman said:
Divine Angel said:
That date isn’t quite right either
It does make me think it’s fake, but it is something that he’d do though.
The watermark doesn’t give it away?
D’oh!!!
Date: 21/02/2026 12:00:33
From: roughbarked
ID: 2362726
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
Divine Angel said:
Spiny Norman said:
It does make me think it’s fake, but it is something that he’d do though.
The watermark doesn’t give it away?
D’oh!!!
Who is Mrs Putin anuway?
Date: 21/02/2026 12:01:05
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2362727
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
SCIENCE said:
alleged

https://www.independent.co.uk/bulletin/news/trump-medal-of-honor-iraq-b2924346.html
I’m sure FIFA would award him one if he asked nicely.
“Given the sacrifices of actual recipients”
Hah and this is the man who called them all losers.
He immediately tried to back out of this by claiming that ‘the fake news media’ wouldn’t understand that he was just kidding, ‘making a joke’.
He’ll do that, talk himself into a corner and then realises what he’s done.
His brain seems to be rather like two people in a rowboat.
One is happily rowing, while the other is asleep in the stern.
Eventually, the sleeping one wakes up to find that the rower has paddled them out far from shore, into deep and difficult water, and he says, WTF, why did you bring us out here, you idiot, gimme those oars, i gotta get us out of this mess somehow.
Date: 21/02/2026 12:03:30
From: roughbarked
ID: 2362729
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
I’m sure FIFA would award him one if he asked nicely.
“Given the sacrifices of actual recipients”
Hah and this is the man who called them all losers.
He immediately tried to back out of this by claiming that ‘the fake news media’ wouldn’t understand that he was just kidding, ‘making a joke’.
He’ll do that, talk himself into a corner and then realises what he’s done.
His brain seems to be rather like two people in a rowboat.
One is happily rowing, while the other is asleep in the stern.
Eventually, the sleeping one wakes up to find that the rower has paddled them out far from shore, into deep and difficult water, and he says, WTF, why did you bring us out here, you idiot, gimme those oars, i gotta get us out of this mess somehow.
and he finds that one arm is still asleep and he rows around and around in ever decreasing circles.
Date: 21/02/2026 12:05:48
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2362733
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
buffy said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCOTUS has struck down Trump’s tariffs in 6-3 ruling:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-21/supreme-court-rules-against-donald-trumps-tariffs/106371286
Excellent news to wake up to. Now for the beginning of cleaning up the mess. It won’t be easy. But at least this shows the legal system is beginning to stand up to him.
Best news I’ve had all day.
ah yes it’s proof
The decision by the Supreme Court to strike down Trump’s tariff policy by a 6-3 majority proves that one institution has retained independence: the Supreme Court.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-21/supreme-court-tariff-decision-confirms-democracy-isnt-dead/106371496
well as yous well know the intellectuals say
μία χελιδὼν ἔαρ οὐ ποιεῖ
but Republicans always swallow when a Trump they fell…
never mind
Date: 21/02/2026 12:28:52
From: roughbarked
ID: 2362748
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Trump described the decision as “disappointing”.
“I’m ashamed of certain members of the court,” he said.
But of Justice Kavanaugh, the Trump appointee who wrote a dissenting opinion, the president said: “I’m so proud of him.”
The six justices who voted to strike down the Trump tariffs were Chief Justice John Roberts, Neil Gorsuch, Amy Coney Barrett, Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.
These six people will feel the brunt of Trump’s disappoinment in them.
Hopefully a team of people proud to be of annoyment to Trump eill grow exponentially.
Date: 21/02/2026 12:31:38
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2362750
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
These six people will feel the brunt of Trump’s disappoinment in them.
Hopefully a team of people proud to be of annoyment to Trump eill grow exponentially.
exactly they say brunt of Trump’s disappoinment as if it’s a bad thing
Date: 21/02/2026 12:32:59
From: roughbarked
ID: 2362752
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
These six people will feel the brunt of Trump’s disappoinment in them.
Hopefully a team of people proud to be of annoyment to Trump eill grow exponentially.
exactly they say brunt of Trump’s disappoinment as if it’s a bad thing
Epstein felt the full brunt of Trump’s disappointment.
Date: 21/02/2026 12:34:46
From: Michael V
ID: 2362753
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
Ooh, close but not quite right.
LOLOLOL
:)
Date: 21/02/2026 12:35:41
From: roughbarked
ID: 2362756
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Spiny Norman said:
Ooh, close but not quite right.
LOLOLOL
:)
The Queen can no longer do this and her son is unlikely to.
Date: 21/02/2026 12:37:23
From: Michael V
ID: 2362758
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Spiny Norman said:
Divine Angel said:
That date isn’t quite right either
It does make me think it’s fake, but it is something that he’d do though.
The watermark doesn’t give it away?
And the name?
Date: 21/02/2026 15:07:00
From: dv
ID: 2362856
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://youtu.be/ZRZoGc3Wdpo?si=svPumvyohK-bB_Ph
The Martinez shooting
Even these days, this is an incredible case. The DOJ is a criminal organisation.
Date: 21/02/2026 20:29:23
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2362980
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 21/02/2026 21:14:46
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2362990
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

would sponsor some of yous to go
Date: 21/02/2026 21:17:54
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2362992
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
captain_spalding said:

would sponsor some of yous to go
I can see some people doing serious damage to their bank accounts with something like that.
Date: 21/02/2026 21:23:26
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2362994
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
SCIENCE said:
captain_spalding said:

would sponsor some of yous to go
I can see some people doing serious damage to their bank accounts with something like that.
we mean if we went to Europe we’d be paying to use the amenities anyway and we wouldn’t be going to the USSA while the fascist is still alive, but even we could spare $200 for some of yous to represent us
also the exchange rate is relatively good for now
Date: 21/02/2026 21:28:23
From: dv
ID: 2362997
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 22/02/2026 13:06:15
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2363119
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 22/02/2026 13:11:31
From: Michael V
ID: 2363120
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:

Good on them!
Date: 22/02/2026 13:15:58
From: Neophyte
ID: 2363121
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:

Good on them!
So, it’s ICE agents, but Antifa thugs…
Date: 22/02/2026 13:19:19
From: roughbarked
ID: 2363122
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:

hurrahh
Date: 22/02/2026 13:19:57
From: roughbarked
ID: 2363123
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Neophyte said:
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:

Good on them!
So, it’s ICE agents, but Antifa thugs…
As it was for the French resistance.
Date: 22/02/2026 14:32:12
From: dv
ID: 2363127
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 22/02/2026 14:55:55
From: Woodie
ID: 2363130
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

I doubt that’s real.
Date: 22/02/2026 15:27:49
From: Michael V
ID: 2363131
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

LOLOLOLOL
Date: 22/02/2026 15:30:00
From: Michael V
ID: 2363132
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Woodie said:
dv said:

I doubt that’s real.
Even if it’s not, it’s funny. Well, it tickles my gutter mind, anyway.
Date: 22/02/2026 15:47:15
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2363136
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Doubt this is real either but it’s hard to tell these days

Date: 22/02/2026 15:51:48
From: Michael V
ID: 2363138
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Doubt this is real either but it’s hard to tell these days

Maybe they can also take care of the sick people in their own country with its third world medical system.
Date: 22/02/2026 17:49:01
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2363153
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Michael V said:Woodie said:
dv said:

I doubt that’s real.
LOLOLOLOL
Even if it’s not, it’s funny. Well, it tickles my gutter mind, anyway.

FUCAKIACEA ¿ what does that mean
Date: 22/02/2026 17:59:20
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2363154
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
As SCIENCE would say, alleged

Date: 22/02/2026 18:02:31
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2363156
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
As SCIENCE would say, alleged

but according to the AAN he should have had 14 of them so that can’t be right

“Since thinking skills are the most sensitive indicator of brain function and they can be tested cost-effectively, this creates an enormous opportunity to improve neurologic care,” said author Norman L. Foster, MD, of the University of Utah in Salt Lake City and a Fellow of the American Academy of Neurology. “The American Academy of Neurology is recommending the measurement of annual cognitive screenings for everyone age 65 and older because age itself is a significant risk factor for cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment is increasingly prevalent with older age. The measure complements past American Academy of Neurology quality measures released for Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis and stroke, and allows for a doctor to meet the measure with a recommended periodic three-minute cognitive test.”
https://www.aan.com/PressRoom/Home/PressRelease/2748
Date: 22/02/2026 18:05:26
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2363157
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
But if he does have memory problems, he mightn’t remember taking 14 of them.
Date: 22/02/2026 18:08:57
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2363159
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Doubt this is real either but it’s hard to tell these days

OK well Reuters is reporting this so I guess it’s real
Date: 22/02/2026 18:16:24
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2363162
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Divine Angel said:
Doubt this is real either but it’s hard to tell these days

OK well Reuters is reporting this so I guess it’s real
yeah not sure about this thing when fascist states send doctors to places that they invade
Date: 22/02/2026 18:23:41
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2363164
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Doubt this is real either but it’s hard to tell these days

Trump ‘can’t’ (won’t) provide free health care to American citizens, but he’ll send a ship to provide just that to the people in a territory of Denmark (which already has free health care).
Date: 22/02/2026 18:42:28
From: dv
ID: 2363174
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Woodie said:
dv said:

I doubt that’s real.
https://legiscan.com/NJ/bill/A4446/2026
You lost that bet
Date: 22/02/2026 18:44:44
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2363175
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Divine Angel said:
Doubt this is real either but it’s hard to tell these days

Trump ‘can’t’ (won’t) provide free health care to American citizens, but he’ll send a ship to provide just that to the people in a territory of Denmark (which already has free health care).
and why not, that way he can spend and do nothing, but make a song and dance about it
Date: 22/02/2026 18:53:20
From: Michael V
ID: 2363180
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
But if he does have memory problems, he mightn’t remember taking 14 of them.
Fair comment…
Date: 22/02/2026 19:06:39
From: Michael V
ID: 2363189
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Woodie said:
dv said:

I doubt that’s real.
https://legiscan.com/NJ/bill/A4446/2026
You lost that bet
:)
Date: 23/02/2026 07:16:23
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2363255
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
RFK Hospital, a parody by The Late Show
https://fb.watch/Fr7mRn3VjA/?
Date: 23/02/2026 11:01:58
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2363290
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Trump’s blatherings about the hospital ship for Greenland:
“Working with the fantastic Governor of Louisiana, Jeff Landry, we are going to send a great hospital boat to Greenland to take care of the many people who are sick, and not being taken care of there. It’s on the way!!! President DJT”
‘…on the way…’ is a phrase that’s being used in a rather…liberal sense here.
Both of the United States two hospital ships are currently in a shipyard in Mobile, Alabama, undergoing extended assisted maintenance periods.
Neither of them is going anywhere until the first one expected to complete its AMP, USNS Comfort, comes out of the shipyard in April.
So, about 5 weeks, minimum. More likely anywhere from 6 -8 weeks before they even start the engines.
Date: 23/02/2026 11:06:56
From: roughbarked
ID: 2363292
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Trump’s blatherings about the hospital ship for Greenland:
“Working with the fantastic Governor of Louisiana, Jeff Landry, we are going to send a great hospital boat to Greenland to take care of the many people who are sick, and not being taken care of there. It’s on the way!!! President DJT”
‘…on the way…’ is a phrase that’s being used in a rather…liberal sense here.
Both of the United States two hospital ships are currently in a shipyard in Mobile, Alabama, undergoing extended assisted maintenance periods.
Neither of them is going anywhere until the first one expected to complete its AMP, USNS Comfort, comes out of the shipyard in April.
So, about 5 weeks, minimum. More likely anywhere from 6 -8 weeks before they even start the engines.
and why do they need a hospital ship for anyway?
Date: 23/02/2026 11:09:16
From: roughbarked
ID: 2363293
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
captain_spalding said:
Trump’s blatherings about the hospital ship for Greenland:
“Working with the fantastic Governor of Louisiana, Jeff Landry, we are going to send a great hospital boat to Greenland to take care of the many people who are sick, and not being taken care of there. It’s on the way!!! President DJT”
‘…on the way…’ is a phrase that’s being used in a rather…liberal sense here.
Both of the United States two hospital ships are currently in a shipyard in Mobile, Alabama, undergoing extended assisted maintenance periods.
Neither of them is going anywhere until the first one expected to complete its AMP, USNS Comfort, comes out of the shipyard in April.
So, about 5 weeks, minimum. More likely anywhere from 6 -8 weeks before they even start the engines.
and why do they need a hospital ship for anyway?
Apparently they don’t.
on the Guardian: Greenland says ‘no, thanks’ to Trump’s US hospital boat
Leaders of both Denmark and Arctic territory rebuff US president’s claim that islanders are ‘not being taken care of’
Date: 23/02/2026 11:11:39
From: Cymek
ID: 2363294
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
captain_spalding said:
Trump’s blatherings about the hospital ship for Greenland:
“Working with the fantastic Governor of Louisiana, Jeff Landry, we are going to send a great hospital boat to Greenland to take care of the many people who are sick, and not being taken care of there. It’s on the way!!! President DJT”
‘…on the way…’ is a phrase that’s being used in a rather…liberal sense here.
Both of the United States two hospital ships are currently in a shipyard in Mobile, Alabama, undergoing extended assisted maintenance periods.
Neither of them is going anywhere until the first one expected to complete its AMP, USNS Comfort, comes out of the shipyard in April.
So, about 5 weeks, minimum. More likely anywhere from 6 -8 weeks before they even start the engines.
and why do they need a hospital ship for anyway?
Full of marines for Bay Of Pigs 2 – Electric Boogaloo
Date: 23/02/2026 11:13:12
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2363296
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
captain_spalding said:
Trump’s blatherings about the hospital ship for Greenland:
“Working with the fantastic Governor of Louisiana, Jeff Landry, we are going to send a great hospital boat to Greenland to take care of the many people who are sick, and not being taken care of there. It’s on the way!!! President DJT”
‘…on the way…’ is a phrase that’s being used in a rather…liberal sense here.
Both of the United States two hospital ships are currently in a shipyard in Mobile, Alabama, undergoing extended assisted maintenance periods.
Neither of them is going anywhere until the first one expected to complete its AMP, USNS Comfort, comes out of the shipyard in April.
So, about 5 weeks, minimum. More likely anywhere from 6 -8 weeks before they even start the engines.
and why do they need a hospital ship for anyway?
No-one knows.
The White House has not responded to questions about whose idea it was, about what prompted the idea, or about precisely what the ship will do when (if) it gets there.
Denmark says that Greenland’s health care system is doing fine, there’s good facilities and people in Greenland, and any cases beyond those capabilities get transferred to Denmark (just like Tasmanians get sent to Melbourne).
Date: 23/02/2026 11:16:27
From: Cymek
ID: 2363298
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
roughbarked said:
captain_spalding said:
Trump’s blatherings about the hospital ship for Greenland:
“Working with the fantastic Governor of Louisiana, Jeff Landry, we are going to send a great hospital boat to Greenland to take care of the many people who are sick, and not being taken care of there. It’s on the way!!! President DJT”
‘…on the way…’ is a phrase that’s being used in a rather…liberal sense here.
Both of the United States two hospital ships are currently in a shipyard in Mobile, Alabama, undergoing extended assisted maintenance periods.
Neither of them is going anywhere until the first one expected to complete its AMP, USNS Comfort, comes out of the shipyard in April.
So, about 5 weeks, minimum. More likely anywhere from 6 -8 weeks before they even start the engines.
and why do they need a hospital ship for anyway?
No-one knows.
The White House has not responded to questions about whose idea it was, about what prompted the idea, or about precisely what the ship will do when (if) it gets there.
Denmark says that Greenland’s health care system is doing fine, there’s good facilities and people in Greenland, and any cases beyond those capabilities get transferred to Denmark (just like Tasmanians get sent to Melbourne).
It could be full of health insurance broker missionaires
“Do you have time to talk about our heavenly father – private health insurance man, heavenly fathers loves you if you have insurance”
Date: 23/02/2026 11:20:37
From: Michael V
ID: 2363300
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Trump’s blatherings about the hospital ship for Greenland:
“Working with the fantastic Governor of Louisiana, Jeff Landry, we are going to send a great hospital boat to Greenland to take care of the many people who are sick, and not being taken care of there. It’s on the way!!! President DJT”
‘…on the way…’ is a phrase that’s being used in a rather…liberal sense here.
Both of the United States two hospital ships are currently in a shipyard in Mobile, Alabama, undergoing extended assisted maintenance periods.
Neither of them is going anywhere until the first one expected to complete its AMP, USNS Comfort, comes out of the shipyard in April.
So, about 5 weeks, minimum. More likely anywhere from 6 -8 weeks before they even start the engines.
FMD.
Date: 23/02/2026 11:21:47
From: roughbarked
ID: 2363302
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
captain_spalding said:
roughbarked said:
and why do they need a hospital ship for anyway?
No-one knows.
The White House has not responded to questions about whose idea it was, about what prompted the idea, or about precisely what the ship will do when (if) it gets there.
Denmark says that Greenland’s health care system is doing fine, there’s good facilities and people in Greenland, and any cases beyond those capabilities get transferred to Denmark (just like Tasmanians get sent to Melbourne).
It could be full of health insurance broker missionaires
“Do you have time to talk about our heavenly father – private health insurance man, heavenly fathers loves you if you have insurance”
Our Heaven sent holy father Donald Trump who wishes to rename Greenland to Trumpland.
Date: 23/02/2026 11:29:18
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2363306
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 23/02/2026 11:33:49
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2363307
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
roughbarked said:
captain_spalding said:
Trump’s blatherings about the hospital ship for Greenland:
“Working with the fantastic Governor of Louisiana, Jeff Landry, we are going to send a great hospital boat to Greenland to take care of the many people who are sick, and not being taken care of there. It’s on the way!!! President DJT”
‘…on the way…’ is a phrase that’s being used in a rather…liberal sense here.
Both of the United States two hospital ships are currently in a shipyard in Mobile, Alabama, undergoing extended assisted maintenance periods.
Neither of them is going anywhere until the first one expected to complete its AMP, USNS Comfort, comes out of the shipyard in April.
So, about 5 weeks, minimum. More likely anywhere from 6 -8 weeks before they even start the engines.
and why do they need a hospital ship for anyway?
Full of marines for Bay Of Pigs 2 – Electric Boogaloo
Fracti bello fatisque repulsi
ductores Danaum, tot iam labentibus annis,
instar montis equum divina Palladis arte
aedificant, sectaque intexunt abiete costas:
votum pro reditu simulant; ea fama vagatur.
Huc delecta virum sortiti corpora furtim
includunt caeco lateri, penitusque cavernas
ingentis uterumque armato milite complent.
Date: 23/02/2026 11:34:16
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2363308
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Trump’s blatherings about the hospital ship for Greenland:
“Working with the fantastic Governor of Louisiana, Jeff Landry, we are going to send a great hospital boat to Greenland to take care of the many people who are sick, and not being taken care of there. It’s on the way!!! President DJT”
‘…on the way…’ is a phrase that’s being used in a rather…liberal sense here.
Both of the United States two hospital ships are currently in a shipyard in Mobile, Alabama, undergoing extended assisted maintenance periods.
Neither of them is going anywhere until the first one expected to complete its AMP, USNS Comfort, comes out of the shipyard in April.
So, about 5 weeks, minimum. More likely anywhere from 6 -8 weeks before they even start the engines.
hey we heard some nuclear submarines were on the way
Date: 23/02/2026 11:38:18
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2363309
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Cymek said:
roughbarked said:
and why do they need a hospital ship for anyway?
Full of marines for Bay Of Pigs 2 – Electric Boogaloo
Fracti bello fatisque repulsi
ductores Danaum, tot iam labentibus annis,
instar montis equum divina Palladis arte
aedificant, sectaque intexunt abiete costas:
votum pro reditu simulant; ea fama vagatur.
Huc delecta virum sortiti corpora furtim
includunt caeco lateri, penitusque cavernas
ingentis uterumque armato milite complent.
“Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.”
Date: 23/02/2026 11:45:50
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2363310
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:

If they want to premedite to murder people then maybe its those politicians who should get the death penalty.
Date: 23/02/2026 12:07:19
From: Cymek
ID: 2363312
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
Spiny Norman said:

If they want to premedite to murder people then maybe its those politicians who should get the death penalty.
Anti abortionists are usually pro-gun, pro-death penalty, war mongers, racists and don’t believe in universal health care
Date: 23/02/2026 12:11:14
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2363314
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
captain_spalding said:
Trump’s blatherings about the hospital ship for Greenland:
“Working with the fantastic Governor of Louisiana, Jeff Landry, we are going to send a great hospital boat to Greenland to take care of the many people who are sick, and not being taken care of there. It’s on the way!!! President DJT”
‘…on the way…’ is a phrase that’s being used in a rather…liberal sense here.
Both of the United States two hospital ships are currently in a shipyard in Mobile, Alabama, undergoing extended assisted maintenance periods.
Neither of them is going anywhere until the first one expected to complete its AMP, USNS Comfort, comes out of the shipyard in April.
So, about 5 weeks, minimum. More likely anywhere from 6 -8 weeks before they even start the engines.
hey we heard some nuclear submarines were on the way
Oh, those are already there.
Some hours before Trump’s bizarre announcement about the hospital ship, there was news reports that the Danish forces in Greenland had transported a member of a USN submarine’s crew to hospital in Greenland’s capital, Nuuk, from a rendezvous seven nautical miles offshore.
(It’s not unusual for subs to be there: keeping guard on the sea gaps between Greenland, Iceland, and the UK is a long-standing part of NATO strategy.)
Date: 23/02/2026 12:25:54
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2363319
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
SCIENCE said:
captain_spalding said:
Trump’s blatherings about the hospital ship for Greenland:
“Working with the fantastic Governor of Louisiana, Jeff Landry, we are going to send a great hospital boat to Greenland to take care of the many people who are sick, and not being taken care of there. It’s on the way!!! President DJT”
‘…on the way…’ is a phrase that’s being used in a rather…liberal sense here.
Both of the United States two hospital ships are currently in a shipyard in Mobile, Alabama, undergoing extended assisted maintenance periods.
Neither of them is going anywhere until the first one expected to complete its AMP, USNS Comfort, comes out of the shipyard in April.
So, about 5 weeks, minimum. More likely anywhere from 6 -8 weeks before they even start the engines.
hey we heard some nuclear submarines were on the way
Oh, those are already there.
Some hours before Trump’s bizarre announcement about the hospital ship, there was news reports that the Danish forces in Greenland had transported a member of a USN submarine’s crew to hospital in Greenland’s capital, Nuuk, from a rendezvous seven nautical miles offshore.
(It’s not unusual for subs to be there: keeping guard on the sea gaps between Greenland, Iceland, and the UK is a long-standing part of NATO strategy.)
fair though in the spirit of before they even start the engines we meant the ones that totally won’t cost more than $368000000000 on the Australian taxpayer
Date: 23/02/2026 12:27:28
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2363320
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Spiny Norman said:

If they want to premedite to murder people then maybe its those politicians who should get the death penalty.
Anti abortionists are usually pro-gun, pro-death penalty, war mongers, racists and don’t believe in universal health care
well how else do you procure provide for produce cheap and easy live targets
Date: 23/02/2026 12:28:38
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2363321
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
SCIENCE said:
Cymek said:
Full of marines for Bay Of Pigs 2 – Electric Boogaloo
Fracti bello fatisque repulsi
ductores Danaum, tot iam labentibus annis,
instar montis equum divina Palladis arte
aedificant, sectaque intexunt abiete costas:
votum pro reditu simulant; ea fama vagatur.
Huc delecta virum sortiti corpora furtim
includunt caeco lateri, penitusque cavernas
ingentis uterumque armato milite complent.
“Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.”
If one examines postconstructivist discourse, one is faced with a choice:
either reject materialist narrative or conclude that narrative is a product of
communication, given that the premise of material neotextual theory is valid.
In a sense, Sontag promotes the use of cultural narrative to attack and analyse
sexual identity. If material neotextual theory holds, we have to choose between
precapitalist structuralist theory and neocultural nationalism.
It could be said that any number of dematerialisms concerning the futility,
and eventually the genre, of deconstructivist consciousness may be revealed.
The subject is interpolated into a material neotextual theory that includes art
as a reality.
However, Foucault suggests the use of materialist narrative to challenge
sexism. Finnis suggests that we have to choose between
precapitalist discourse and cultural narrative.
But Bataille uses the term ‘material neotextual theory’ to denote a
mythopoetical totality. Several desublimations concerning postconstructive
dialectic theory exist.
Date: 23/02/2026 12:29:02
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2363322
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
fair though in the spirit of before they even start the engines we meant the ones that totally won’t cost more than $368000000000 on the Australian taxpayer
Really, just write off whatever we’ve paid the Americans so far as ‘experience’, and start talking with the Japanese. They’re thinking about building nuclear subs, and a partnership might nudge them along.
Date: 23/02/2026 12:29:35
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2363324
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
JudgeMental said:
SCIENCE said:
Fracti bello fatisque repulsi
ductores Danaum, tot iam labentibus annis,
instar montis equum divina Palladis arte
aedificant, sectaque intexunt abiete costas:
votum pro reditu simulant; ea fama vagatur.
Huc delecta virum sortiti corpora furtim
includunt caeco lateri, penitusque cavernas
ingentis uterumque armato milite complent.
“Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.”
If one examines postconstructivist discourse, one is faced with a choice:
either reject materialist narrative or conclude that narrative is a product of
communication, given that the premise of material neotextual theory is valid.
In a sense, Sontag promotes the use of cultural narrative to attack and analyse
sexual identity. If material neotextual theory holds, we have to choose between
precapitalist structuralist theory and neocultural nationalism.
It could be said that any number of dematerialisms concerning the futility,
and eventually the genre, of deconstructivist consciousness may be revealed.
The subject is interpolated into a material neotextual theory that includes art
as a reality.
However, Foucault suggests the use of materialist narrative to challenge
sexism. Finnis suggests that we have to choose between
precapitalist discourse and cultural narrative.
But Bataille uses the term ‘material neotextual theory’ to denote a
mythopoetical totality. Several desublimations concerning postconstructive
dialectic theory exist.
That’s a wildly inaccurate translation.
Date: 23/02/2026 12:36:47
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2363325
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
SCIENCE said:
JudgeMental said:
“Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.”
If one examines postconstructivist discourse, one is faced with a choice:
either reject materialist narrative or conclude that narrative is a product of
communication, given that the premise of material neotextual theory is valid.
In a sense, Sontag promotes the use of cultural narrative to attack and analyse
sexual identity. If material neotextual theory holds, we have to choose between
precapitalist structuralist theory and neocultural nationalism.
It could be said that any number of dematerialisms concerning the futility,
and eventually the genre, of deconstructivist consciousness may be revealed.
The subject is interpolated into a material neotextual theory that includes art
as a reality.
However, Foucault suggests the use of materialist narrative to challenge
sexism. Finnis suggests that we have to choose between
precapitalist discourse and cultural narrative.
But Bataille uses the term ‘material neotextual theory’ to denote a
mythopoetical totality. Several desublimations concerning postconstructive
dialectic theory exist.
That’s a wildly inaccurate translation.
what they both look like fluff to us, perfect for filling the belly of a horse or the busy work required to make hundreds of thousands of millions look legit’ a price to pay
Date: 23/02/2026 12:37:28
From: Cymek
ID: 2363326
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
captain_spalding said:
SCIENCE said:
hey we heard some nuclear submarines were on the way
Oh, those are already there.
Some hours before Trump’s bizarre announcement about the hospital ship, there was news reports that the Danish forces in Greenland had transported a member of a USN submarine’s crew to hospital in Greenland’s capital, Nuuk, from a rendezvous seven nautical miles offshore.
(It’s not unusual for subs to be there: keeping guard on the sea gaps between Greenland, Iceland, and the UK is a long-standing part of NATO strategy.)
fair though in the spirit of before they even start the engines we meant the ones that totally won’t cost more than $368000000000 on the Australian taxpayer
Military spending is really quite strange
They may never get used for their main purpose.
They could be destroyed in a battle first time out.
Manufacturers sulk if you decide to choose someone else.
Date: 23/02/2026 12:38:32
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2363327
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
captain_spalding said:
Oh, those are already there.
Some hours before Trump’s bizarre announcement about the hospital ship, there was news reports that the Danish forces in Greenland had transported a member of a USN submarine’s crew to hospital in Greenland’s capital, Nuuk, from a rendezvous seven nautical miles offshore.
(It’s not unusual for subs to be there: keeping guard on the sea gaps between Greenland, Iceland, and the UK is a long-standing part of NATO strategy.)
fair though in the spirit of before they even start the engines we meant the ones that totally won’t cost more than $368000000000 on the Australian taxpayer
Military spending is really quite strange
They may never get used for their main purpose.
They could be destroyed in a battle first time out.
Manufacturers sulk if you decide to choose someone else.
what is their main purpose
Date: 23/02/2026 12:41:57
From: Cymek
ID: 2363328
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
fair though in the spirit of before they even start the engines we meant the ones that totally won’t cost more than $368000000000 on the Australian taxpayer
Military spending is really quite strange
They may never get used for their main purpose.
They could be destroyed in a battle first time out.
Manufacturers sulk if you decide to choose someone else.
what is their main purpose
I’d have thought to fight in a battle.
Deterrence is another, which they do
I suppose its that they could sit at home, rarely get used and become obsolete.
Date: 23/02/2026 12:45:18
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2363329
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
Cymek said:
Military spending is really quite strange
They may never get used for their main purpose.
They could be destroyed in a battle first time out.
Manufacturers sulk if you decide to choose someone else.
what is their main purpose
I’d have thought to fight in a battle.
Deterrence is another, which they do
I suppose its that they could sit at home, rarely get used and become obsolete.
yeah we generally figure the primary purpose is deterrence and the ostensible fight purpose is secondary
Date: 23/02/2026 12:53:47
From: roughbarked
ID: 2363330
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Spiny Norman said:

If they want to premedite to murder people then maybe its those politicians who should get the death penalty.
Anti abortionists are usually pro-gun, pro-death penalty, war mongers, racists and don’t believe in universal health care
and detestable.
Date: 23/02/2026 12:55:39
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2363331
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
Cymek said:
Military spending is really quite strange
They may never get used for their main purpose.
They could be destroyed in a battle first time out.
Manufacturers sulk if you decide to choose someone else.
what is their main purpose
I’d have thought to fight in a battle.
Deterrence is another, which they do
I suppose its that they could sit at home, rarely get used and become obsolete.
You have to have forces ‘in being’ even if you don’t foresee a need for them for a very long time.
Because when the time comes that you do need them, it’s no time to be starting from scratch.
There’s an awful lot that goes into creating an effective military, and most people only see the tip of the iceberg. There’s industry and skills that are needed to acquire, maintain, and operate the equipment, strategy, tactics, and logistics of military forces.
Those industries and skills simply cannot be quickly acquired and put into use. They have to be kept alive, even when there’s no immediate threat, because if they’re allowed to die out, there’s going to be no-one to supply them when they’re urgently needed.
Australia has either never had, or has lost, a lot of skills and industries. We’ve never had a worthwhile aircraft-designing or -making industry, our shipbuilding industry is very nearly extinct, and our military has lost skills (like operating naval aviation) that are going to cost more to recover than they would have to maintain.
Many service people will retire without ever being involved in a conflict. Many vehicles and ships and aircraft will do the same. But they’ve done their job – they’ve kept the knowledge alive for those who may really need to have it.
Date: 23/02/2026 12:57:58
From: Cymek
ID: 2363332
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Cymek said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
If they want to premedite to murder people then maybe its those politicians who should get the death penalty.
Anti abortionists are usually pro-gun, pro-death penalty, war mongers, racists and don’t believe in universal health care
and detestable.
Yes
Something I notice is USA tv rarely mentions it and the woman have the child from unwanted pregnancies.
They are judged for being a single mum as well, so they can’t win
Date: 23/02/2026 12:58:16
From: roughbarked
ID: 2363333
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
what is their main purpose
I’d have thought to fight in a battle.
Deterrence is another, which they do
I suppose its that they could sit at home, rarely get used and become obsolete.
You have to have forces ‘in being’ even if you don’t foresee a need for them for a very long time.
Because when the time comes that you do need them, it’s no time to be starting from scratch.
There’s an awful lot that goes into creating an effective military, and most people only see the tip of the iceberg. There’s industry and skills that are needed to acquire, maintain, and operate the equipment, strategy, tactics, and logistics of military forces.
Those industries and skills simply cannot be quickly acquired and put into use. They have to be kept alive, even when there’s no immediate threat, because if they’re allowed to die out, there’s going to be no-one to supply them when they’re urgently needed.
Australia has either never had, or has lost, a lot of skills and industries. We’ve never had a worthwhile aircraft-designing or -making industry, our shipbuilding industry is very nearly extinct, and our military has lost skills (like operating naval aviation) that are going to cost more to recover than they would have to maintain.
Many service people will retire without ever being involved in a conflict. Many vehicles and ships and aircraft will do the same. But they’ve done their job – they’ve kept the knowledge alive for those who may really need to have it.
So the days of shaking our spears at the intruders is still with us?
Date: 23/02/2026 13:01:30
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2363334
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
So the days of shaking our spears at the intruders is still with us?
It’s not about shaking the spears.
It’s more about having some sharp spears in the cupboard, and knowing how to use them.
And that the intruders know about that, too.
Date: 23/02/2026 13:01:42
From: Cymek
ID: 2363335
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
what is their main purpose
I’d have thought to fight in a battle.
Deterrence is another, which they do
I suppose its that they could sit at home, rarely get used and become obsolete.
You have to have forces ‘in being’ even if you don’t foresee a need for them for a very long time.
Because when the time comes that you do need them, it’s no time to be starting from scratch.
There’s an awful lot that goes into creating an effective military, and most people only see the tip of the iceberg. There’s industry and skills that are needed to acquire, maintain, and operate the equipment, strategy, tactics, and logistics of military forces.
Those industries and skills simply cannot be quickly acquired and put into use. They have to be kept alive, even when there’s no immediate threat, because if they’re allowed to die out, there’s going to be no-one to supply them when they’re urgently needed.
Australia has either never had, or has lost, a lot of skills and industries. We’ve never had a worthwhile aircraft-designing or -making industry, our shipbuilding industry is very nearly extinct, and our military has lost skills (like operating naval aviation) that are going to cost more to recover than they would have to maintain.
Many service people will retire without ever being involved in a conflict. Many vehicles and ships and aircraft will do the same. But they’ve done their job – they’ve kept the knowledge alive for those who may really need to have it.
Yeah I’ve noticed this myself
Something also today is it seems you could never defeat a nuclear power
You could beat them back to their own territory but you invade and they could launch their entire arsenal
Date: 23/02/2026 13:06:39
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2363336
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
You could beat them back to their own territory but you invade and they could launch their entire arsenal
That’s a question that’s been getting asked of themselves by nuclear powers since 1945.
Using nuclear weapons on ‘enemy’ lands, is a very problematic idea just on its own.
But, just what would it take, what line would we draw, to make the decision to use our nukes on our territory?
Date: 23/02/2026 13:13:00
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2363339
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
roughbarked said:
Cymek said:
Anti abortionists are usually pro-gun, pro-death penalty, war mongers, racists and don’t believe in universal health care
and detestable.
Yes
Something I notice is USA tv rarely mentions it and the woman have the child from unwanted pregnancies.
They are judged for being a single mum as well, so they can’t win
I’ll wait till JudgeMental has something to say.
Date: 23/02/2026 13:17:39
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2363341
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
roughbarked said:
So the days of shaking our spears at the intruders is still with us?
It’s not about shaking the spears.
It’s more about having some sharp spears in the cupboard, and knowing how to use them.
And that the intruders know about that, too.
We’ve got submarines coming, big nuclear submarines with missiles and everything.
Date: 23/02/2026 13:22:43
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2363342
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Cymek said:
roughbarked said:
and detestable.
Yes
Something I notice is USA tv rarely mentions it and the woman have the child from unwanted pregnancies.
They are judged for being a single mum as well, so they can’t win
I’ll wait till JudgeMental has something to say.
pretty sure women need to be under a male guardian whose consent is required for the important decisions
Date: 23/02/2026 13:26:19
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2363343
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
captain_spalding said:
roughbarked said:
So the days of shaking our spears at the intruders is still with us?
It’s not about shaking the spears.
It’s more about having some sharp spears in the cupboard, and knowing how to use them.
And that the intruders know about that, too.
We’ve got submarines coming, big nuclear submarines with missiles and everything.
Should have bought Japanese diesel-electrics, for the short term, at least.
We could get British Astute-class nuclear subs, go back to the French for Suffren/Barracuda class subs, or see what the Japanese have in mind, for longer term plans. Give up the US as more problems than they’re worth.
Date: 23/02/2026 13:32:42
From: dv
ID: 2363344
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
“Louisiana is currently facing a severe, multifaceted public health crisis, ranking among the lowest in the U.S. for overall health in 2026 due to extreme rates of chronic disease, pollution-related illnesses, and infectious disease outbreaks. Key issues include a “quademic” of surging respiratory illnesses (flu, COVID-19, RSV), high heart disease/cancer rates, and systemic healthcare access barriers.”
This is the circumstances under which the Governor of Louisiana is coordinating to send a Hospital Ship to Greenland.
Date: 23/02/2026 13:41:06
From: Cymek
ID: 2363345
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Peak Warming Man said:
captain_spalding said:
It’s not about shaking the spears.
It’s more about having some sharp spears in the cupboard, and knowing how to use them.
And that the intruders know about that, too.
We’ve got submarines coming, big nuclear submarines with missiles and everything.
Should have bought Japanese diesel-electrics, for the short term, at least.
We could get British Astute-class nuclear subs, go back to the French for Suffren/Barracuda class subs, or see what the Japanese have in mind, for longer term plans. Give up the US as more problems than they’re worth.
They can’t keep up with their own needs let alone build ours.
Date: 23/02/2026 13:41:45
From: kii
ID: 2363346
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 23/02/2026 13:42:06
From: Cymek
ID: 2363347
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
“Louisiana is currently facing a severe, multifaceted public health crisis, ranking among the lowest in the U.S. for overall health in 2026 due to extreme rates of chronic disease, pollution-related illnesses, and infectious disease outbreaks. Key issues include a “quademic” of surging respiratory illnesses (flu, COVID-19, RSV), high heart disease/cancer rates, and systemic healthcare access barriers.”
This is the circumstances under which the Governor of Louisiana is coordinating to send a Hospital Ship to Greenland.
You’d think a third world nation would look after itself first
Date: 23/02/2026 13:48:17
From: roughbarked
ID: 2363349
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Cymek said:
Yes
Something I notice is USA tv rarely mentions it and the woman have the child from unwanted pregnancies.
They are judged for being a single mum as well, so they can’t win
I’ll wait till JudgeMental has something to say.
pretty sure women need to be under a male guardian whose consent is required for the important decisions
A Pakistani mullah I happened to know through grafting citrus trees had a wife back home and some 12 years after he arrived, he managed to get his wife here. He came and asked my permission to allow my wife to teach his wife how to speak Australian. I had to say, first thing about Australia is that you don’t need to ask my permission. You need to ask her.
Date: 23/02/2026 13:49:01
From: roughbarked
ID: 2363350
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Peak Warming Man said:
captain_spalding said:
It’s not about shaking the spears.
It’s more about having some sharp spears in the cupboard, and knowing how to use them.
And that the intruders know about that, too.
We’ve got submarines coming, big nuclear submarines with missiles and everything.
Should have bought Japanese diesel-electrics, for the short term, at least.
We could get British Astute-class nuclear subs, go back to the French for Suffren/Barracuda class subs, or see what the Japanese have in mind, for longer term plans. Give up the US as more problems than they’re worth.
We should have learned that from the F-111 and ohers since.
Date: 23/02/2026 13:49:35
From: roughbarked
ID: 2363351
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
captain_spalding said:
Peak Warming Man said:
We’ve got submarines coming, big nuclear submarines with missiles and everything.
Should have bought Japanese diesel-electrics, for the short term, at least.
We could get British Astute-class nuclear subs, go back to the French for Suffren/Barracuda class subs, or see what the Japanese have in mind, for longer term plans. Give up the US as more problems than they’re worth.
They can’t keep up with their own needs let alone build ours.
The idea is that we build it here to their specs?
Date: 23/02/2026 13:53:12
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2363352
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
Peak Warming Man said:
I’ll wait till JudgeMental has something to say.
pretty sure women need to be under a male guardian whose consent is required for the important decisions
A Pakistani mullah I happened to know through grafting citrus trees had a wife back home and some 12 years after he arrived, he managed to get his wife here. He came and asked my permission to allow my wife to teach his wife how to speak Australian. I had to say, first thing about Australia is that you don’t need to ask my permission. You need to ask her.
good
Date: 23/02/2026 13:57:50
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2363353
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
captain_spalding said:
Peak Warming Man said:
We’ve got submarines coming, big nuclear submarines with missiles and everything.
Should have bought Japanese diesel-electrics, for the short term, at least.
We could get British Astute-class nuclear subs, go back to the French for Suffren/Barracuda class subs, or see what the Japanese have in mind, for longer term plans. Give up the US as more problems than they’re worth.
We should have learned that from the F-111 and ohers since.
The F111 was a fine plane
Date: 23/02/2026 13:58:15
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2363354
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
captain_spalding said:
Peak Warming Man said:
We’ve got submarines coming, big nuclear submarines with missiles and everything.
Should have bought Japanese diesel-electrics, for the short term, at least.
We could get British Astute-class nuclear subs, go back to the French for Suffren/Barracuda class subs, or see what the Japanese have in mind, for longer term plans. Give up the US as more problems than they’re worth.
They can’t keep up with their own needs let alone build ours.
That’s the problem with the US.
It’s a reason why the ‘Trump-class battleships’ (‘scuse me, i have to go outside and attempt to vomit and laugh at the same time) won’t get built. The yards they have which have the capability to build ships of that size are already backed up with orders for submarines and for the new Gerald R. Ford class aircraft carriers.
While shipyard space is a problem everywhere, Britain, France, and Japan all have more availability than does the US both now and into the near-to-mid future.
Date: 23/02/2026 14:00:44
From: Cymek
ID: 2363355
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
pretty sure women need to be under a male guardian whose consent is required for the important decisions
A Pakistani mullah I happened to know through grafting citrus trees had a wife back home and some 12 years after he arrived, he managed to get his wife here. He came and asked my permission to allow my wife to teach his wife how to speak Australian. I had to say, first thing about Australia is that you don’t need to ask my permission. You need to ask her.
good
Yes
It should be something mentioned.
We respect your culture however in Australia women are equal unless you vote Liberal, are a white man radio talk show host or wage equality.
Date: 23/02/2026 14:01:04
From: Cymek
ID: 2363356
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
roughbarked said:
captain_spalding said:
Should have bought Japanese diesel-electrics, for the short term, at least.
We could get British Astute-class nuclear subs, go back to the French for Suffren/Barracuda class subs, or see what the Japanese have in mind, for longer term plans. Give up the US as more problems than they’re worth.
We should have learned that from the F-111 and ohers since.
The F111 was a fine plane
It’s sexy looking as well
Date: 23/02/2026 14:02:27
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2363357
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
captain_spalding said:
Peak Warming Man said:
We’ve got submarines coming, big nuclear submarines with missiles and everything.
Should have bought Japanese diesel-electrics, for the short term, at least.
We could get British Astute-class nuclear subs, go back to the French for Suffren/Barracuda class subs, or see what the Japanese have in mind, for longer term plans. Give up the US as more problems than they’re worth.
We should have learned that from the F-111 and ohers since.
The F-111s were a problem at first, no doubt about it.
The US gave the RAAF F-4 Phantoms to use while F-111 delivery was sorted out (and the RAAF liked them, too), but there’s no ‘loan vehicles’ on offer with the sub deal.
Once the RAAF got the F-111s, they did make very good use of them. They were an extremely capable aircraft. And they had the Indonesians shit-scared for a longtime.
Date: 23/02/2026 14:02:54
From: roughbarked
ID: 2363358
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
pretty sure women need to be under a male guardian whose consent is required for the important decisions
A Pakistani mullah I happened to know through grafting citrus trees had a wife back home and some 12 years after he arrived, he managed to get his wife here. He came and asked my permission to allow my wife to teach his wife how to speak Australian. I had to say, first thing about Australia is that you don’t need to ask my permission. You need to ask her.
good
Mrs rb spent a lot of time with her and they became good friends. Later he bought a farm over at Leeton and I did go and grafft some citrus for him and plant windbreaks of natives. Sadly not long after, he suffered a heart attack and died.
Date: 23/02/2026 14:03:20
From: roughbarked
ID: 2363359
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
roughbarked said:
captain_spalding said:
Should have bought Japanese diesel-electrics, for the short term, at least.
We could get British Astute-class nuclear subs, go back to the French for Suffren/Barracuda class subs, or see what the Japanese have in mind, for longer term plans. Give up the US as more problems than they’re worth.
We should have learned that from the F-111 and ohers since.
The F111 was a fine plane
After a lot of expensive refits.
Date: 23/02/2026 14:06:13
From: roughbarked
ID: 2363360
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
roughbarked said:
captain_spalding said:
Should have bought Japanese diesel-electrics, for the short term, at least.
We could get British Astute-class nuclear subs, go back to the French for Suffren/Barracuda class subs, or see what the Japanese have in mind, for longer term plans. Give up the US as more problems than they’re worth.
We should have learned that from the F-111 and ohers since.
The F-111s were a problem at first, no doubt about it.
The US gave the RAAF F-4 Phantoms to use while F-111 delivery was sorted out (and the RAAF liked them, too), but there’s no ‘loan vehicles’ on offer with the sub deal.
Once the RAAF got the F-111s, they did make very good use of them. They were an extremely capable aircraft. And they had the Indonesians shit-scared for a longtime.
The concept of the F-111 was awesome. I had oone zoom over me as I climbed up and stuck my head up from Murchison gorge.
Date: 23/02/2026 14:10:39
From: Michael V
ID: 2363362
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
what is their main purpose
I’d have thought to fight in a battle.
Deterrence is another, which they do
I suppose its that they could sit at home, rarely get used and become obsolete.
You have to have forces ‘in being’ even if you don’t foresee a need for them for a very long time.
Because when the time comes that you do need them, it’s no time to be starting from scratch.
There’s an awful lot that goes into creating an effective military, and most people only see the tip of the iceberg. There’s industry and skills that are needed to acquire, maintain, and operate the equipment, strategy, tactics, and logistics of military forces.
Those industries and skills simply cannot be quickly acquired and put into use. They have to be kept alive, even when there’s no immediate threat, because if they’re allowed to die out, there’s going to be no-one to supply them when they’re urgently needed.
Australia has either never had, or has lost, a lot of skills and industries. We’ve never had a worthwhile aircraft-designing or -making industry, our shipbuilding industry is very nearly extinct, and our military has lost skills (like operating naval aviation) that are going to cost more to recover than they would have to maintain.
Many service people will retire without ever being involved in a conflict. Many vehicles and ships and aircraft will do the same. But they’ve done their job – they’ve kept the knowledge alive for those who may really need to have it.
Thank you for that explanation.
Date: 23/02/2026 14:15:11
From: Michael V
ID: 2363366
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
“Louisiana is currently facing a severe, multifaceted public health crisis, ranking among the lowest in the U.S. for overall health in 2026 due to extreme rates of chronic disease, pollution-related illnesses, and infectious disease outbreaks. Key issues include a “quademic” of surging respiratory illnesses (flu, COVID-19, RSV), high heart disease/cancer rates, and systemic healthcare access barriers.”
This is the circumstances under which the Governor of Louisiana is coordinating to send a Hospital Ship to Greenland.
Oh what a fabulous country.
Land of the free.
Date: 23/02/2026 14:15:45
From: Michael V
ID: 2363367
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:

LOLOLOLOL
Date: 23/02/2026 14:20:19
From: Michael V
ID: 2363368
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
SCIENCE said:
captain_spalding said:
Trump’s blatherings about the hospital ship for Greenland:
“Working with the fantastic Governor of Louisiana, Jeff Landry, we are going to send a great hospital boat to Greenland to take care of the many people who are sick, and not being taken care of there. It’s on the way!!! President DJT”
‘…on the way…’ is a phrase that’s being used in a rather…liberal sense here.
Both of the United States two hospital ships are currently in a shipyard in Mobile, Alabama, undergoing extended assisted maintenance periods.
Neither of them is going anywhere until the first one expected to complete its AMP, USNS Comfort, comes out of the shipyard in April.
So, about 5 weeks, minimum. More likely anywhere from 6 -8 weeks before they even start the engines.
hey we heard some nuclear submarines were on the way
Oh, those are already there.
Some hours before Trump’s bizarre announcement about the hospital ship, there was news reports that the Danish forces in Greenland had transported a member of a USN submarine’s crew to hospital in Greenland’s capital, Nuuk, from a rendezvous seven nautical miles offshore.
(It’s not unusual for subs to be there: keeping guard on the sea gaps between Greenland, Iceland, and the UK is a long-standing part of NATO strategy.)
Not just the usual Trump brain fart, but a Seriously Gigantic Trump Brain Fart.
With the knowledge you provided, I think I now understand how and why.
Date: 23/02/2026 14:24:49
From: Michael V
ID: 2363373
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
roughbarked said:
captain_spalding said:
Should have bought Japanese diesel-electrics, for the short term, at least.
We could get British Astute-class nuclear subs, go back to the French for Suffren/Barracuda class subs, or see what the Japanese have in mind, for longer term plans. Give up the US as more problems than they’re worth.
We should have learned that from the F-111 and ohers since.
The F111 was a fine plane
Once they figured out how to stop the wings falling off.
Date: 23/02/2026 14:26:12
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2363375
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Peak Warming Man said:
roughbarked said:
We should have learned that from the F-111 and ohers since.
The F111 was a fine plane
Once they figured out how to stop the wings falling off.
Old joke: how to you get to own a F-111?
A: buy some land, and wait.
Date: 23/02/2026 14:30:19
From: AussieDJ
ID: 2363377
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
Peak Warming Man said:
The F111 was a fine plane
Once they figured out how to stop the wings falling off.
Old joke: how to you get to own a F-111?
A: buy some land, and wait.
:)
Date: 23/02/2026 14:31:22
From: Michael V
ID: 2363380
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
Peak Warming Man said:
The F111 was a fine plane
Once they figured out how to stop the wings falling off.
Old joke: how to you get to own a F-111?
A: buy some land, and wait.
:)
Date: 23/02/2026 14:32:14
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2363381
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Spiny Norman said:

If they want to premedite to murder people then maybe its those politicians who should get the death penalty.
Anti abortionists are usually pro-gun, pro-death penalty, war mongers, racists and don’t believe in universal health care
They are committing a crime by premeditation with intent to murder.
What it us based on? Hatred? Religion? Some other messed up ideology?
What makes lawmakers above the law?
They have indicated intent to murder innocent people.
Date: 23/02/2026 14:36:30
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2363382
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
Cymek said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
If they want to premedite to murder people then maybe its those politicians who should get the death penalty.
Anti abortionists are usually pro-gun, pro-death penalty, war mongers, racists and don’t believe in universal health care
They are committing a crime by premeditation with intent to murder.
What it us based on? Hatred? Religion? Some other messed up ideology?
What makes lawmakers above the law?
They have indicated intent to murder innocent people.
I think that makes them criminals.
If someone has intent to murder people then that should be of public interest and of interest to the police even if they are elected lawmakers.
Date: 23/02/2026 14:40:14
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2363384
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Another old joke:
Man rings up Airfix to complain about the F-111 model he’s making.
Can’t get the wings to stay on.
Date: 23/02/2026 14:44:43
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2363386
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
Cymek said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
If they want to premedite to murder people then maybe its those politicians who should get the death penalty.
Anti abortionists are usually pro-gun, pro-death penalty, war mongers, racists and don’t believe in universal health care
They are committing a crime by premeditation with intent to murder.
What it us based on? Hatred? Religion? Some other messed up ideology?
What makes lawmakers above the law?
They have indicated intent to murder innocent people.
It’s all about judging people. And appealing to voters who like to judge other people.
Judge women who contemplate abortions as being dirty, worthless sluts, we’re better than them, we’re good God-fearing morally-upright people, women who think of abortions are whores who need to be punished by decent people like us, God likes us, he doesn’t like them.
Date: 23/02/2026 14:51:00
From: Cymek
ID: 2363387
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Cymek said:
Anti abortionists are usually pro-gun, pro-death penalty, war mongers, racists and don’t believe in universal health care
They are committing a crime by premeditation with intent to murder.
What it us based on? Hatred? Religion? Some other messed up ideology?
What makes lawmakers above the law?
They have indicated intent to murder innocent people.
It’s all about judging people. And appealing to voters who like to judge other people.
Judge women who contemplate abortions as being dirty, worthless sluts, we’re better than them, we’re good God-fearing morally-upright people, women who think of abortions are whores who need to be punished by decent people like us, God likes us, he doesn’t like them.
Sounds about true.
I imagine they would also send gay and lesbian children off to conversion camps, a truly disgusting act
Date: 23/02/2026 15:03:44
From: Michael V
ID: 2363392
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Another old joke:
Man rings up Airfix to complain about the F-111 model he’s making.
Can’t get the wings to stay on.
:)
Date: 23/02/2026 15:05:33
From: kryten
ID: 2363395
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Cymek said:
Anti abortionists are usually pro-gun, pro-death penalty, war mongers, racists and don’t believe in universal health care
They are committing a crime by premeditation with intent to murder.
What it us based on? Hatred? Religion? Some other messed up ideology?
What makes lawmakers above the law?
They have indicated intent to murder innocent people.
I think that makes them criminals.
If someone has intent to murder people then that should be of public interest and of interest to the police even if they are elected lawmakers.
It seems funny to me that they only want to punish the women, I mean from my rudimentary studies into human reproduction, it takes two to create a fetus
Date: 23/02/2026 15:24:00
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2363399
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
Peak Warming Man said:
The F111 was a fine plane
Once they figured out how to stop the wings falling off.
Old joke: how to you get to own a F-111?
A: buy some land, and wait.
No!
We only had the F-111C’s, which had different (longer) wings than the other models. When we bought some more off the US they were F-111K’s I think, I’m not sure if they swapped the wings over for them though.
Date: 23/02/2026 17:03:34
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2363423
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
captain_spalding said:
Michael V said:
Once they figured out how to stop the wings falling off.
Old joke: how to you get to own a F-111?
A: buy some land, and wait.
No!
We only had the F-111C’s, which had different (longer) wings than the other models. When we bought some more off the US they were F-111K’s I think, I’m not sure if they swapped the wings over for them though.
Ahem…
(dons the Cap of Pedantry)
Australia bought 24 F-111Cs, which were much the same as the USAF’s F-111As, but which had the longer wing of the USN’s cancelled F-111B shipboard variant.
50 F-111Ks were to be built for the RAF, but that order was also cancelled. Two F-111K airframes were more or less completed, but went to the USAF as test rigs, and were eventually broken up for parts.
Australia bought some replacements for lost aircraft, but these were F-111As modified to F-111C standard, and, later on, some F-111Gs were also purchased.
(removes the Cap of Pedantry)
Date: 23/02/2026 17:13:23
From: roughbarked
ID: 2363428
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Spiny Norman said:
captain_spalding said:
Old joke: how to you get to own a F-111?
A: buy some land, and wait.
No!
We only had the F-111C’s, which had different (longer) wings than the other models. When we bought some more off the US they were F-111K’s I think, I’m not sure if they swapped the wings over for them though.
Ahem…
(dons the Cap of Pedantry)
Australia bought 24 F-111Cs, which were much the same as the USAF’s F-111As, but which had the longer wing of the USN’s cancelled F-111B shipboard variant.
50 F-111Ks were to be built for the RAF, but that order was also cancelled. Two F-111K airframes were more or less completed, but went to the USAF as test rigs, and were eventually broken up for parts.
Australia bought some replacements for lost aircraft, but these were F-111As modified to F-111C standard, and, later on, some F-111Gs were also purchased.
(removes the Cap of Pedantry)
As I said. We should have learned the lesson then.
Date: 23/02/2026 17:16:10
From: Cymek
ID: 2363431
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
captain_spalding said:
Spiny Norman said:
No!
We only had the F-111C’s, which had different (longer) wings than the other models. When we bought some more off the US they were F-111K’s I think, I’m not sure if they swapped the wings over for them though.
Ahem…
(dons the Cap of Pedantry)
Australia bought 24 F-111Cs, which were much the same as the USAF’s F-111As, but which had the longer wing of the USN’s cancelled F-111B shipboard variant.
50 F-111Ks were to be built for the RAF, but that order was also cancelled. Two F-111K airframes were more or less completed, but went to the USAF as test rigs, and were eventually broken up for parts.
Australia bought some replacements for lost aircraft, but these were F-111As modified to F-111C standard, and, later on, some F-111Gs were also purchased.
(removes the Cap of Pedantry)
As I said. We should have learned the lesson then.
I suppose we will see how the F35 go over time and if we are held to ransom over spare parts and software upgrades or if they hobble the software
Date: 23/02/2026 17:20:00
From: roughbarked
ID: 2363435
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
roughbarked said:
captain_spalding said:
Ahem…
(dons the Cap of Pedantry)
Australia bought 24 F-111Cs, which were much the same as the USAF’s F-111As, but which had the longer wing of the USN’s cancelled F-111B shipboard variant.
50 F-111Ks were to be built for the RAF, but that order was also cancelled. Two F-111K airframes were more or less completed, but went to the USAF as test rigs, and were eventually broken up for parts.
Australia bought some replacements for lost aircraft, but these were F-111As modified to F-111C standard, and, later on, some F-111Gs were also purchased.
(removes the Cap of Pedantry)
As I said. We should have learned the lesson then.
I suppose we will see how the F35 go over time and if we are held to ransom over spare parts and software upgrades or if they hobble the software
Looks to be the way the cookies crumbles.
Date: 23/02/2026 17:35:30
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2363447
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Spiny Norman said:
captain_spalding said:
Old joke: how to you get to own a F-111?
A: buy some land, and wait.
No!
We only had the F-111C’s, which had different (longer) wings than the other models. When we bought some more off the US they were F-111K’s I think, I’m not sure if they swapped the wings over for them though.
Ahem…
(dons the Cap of Pedantry)
Australia bought 24 F-111Cs, which were much the same as the USAF’s F-111As, but which had the longer wing of the USN’s cancelled F-111B shipboard variant.
50 F-111Ks were to be built for the RAF, but that order was also cancelled. Two F-111K airframes were more or less completed, but went to the USAF as test rigs, and were eventually broken up for parts.
Australia bought some replacements for lost aircraft, but these were F-111As modified to F-111C standard, and, later on, some F-111Gs were also purchased.
(removes the Cap of Pedantry)
Ah-huh! Thanks for the info, no I know for sure.
Date: 23/02/2026 17:45:54
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2363454
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
captain_spalding said:
Spiny Norman said:
No!
We only had the F-111C’s, which had different (longer) wings than the other models. When we bought some more off the US they were F-111K’s I think, I’m not sure if they swapped the wings over for them though.
Ahem…
(dons the Cap of Pedantry)
Australia bought 24 F-111Cs, which were much the same as the USAF’s F-111As, but which had the longer wing of the USN’s cancelled F-111B shipboard variant.
50 F-111Ks were to be built for the RAF, but that order was also cancelled. Two F-111K airframes were more or less completed, but went to the USAF as test rigs, and were eventually broken up for parts.
Australia bought some replacements for lost aircraft, but these were F-111As modified to F-111C standard, and, later on, some F-111Gs were also purchased.
(removes the Cap of Pedantry)
Ah-huh! Thanks for the info, no I know for sure.
I feel rather presumptuous in ‘correcting’ you, of all people, on something like this, Bill, but pedantry is a merciless mistress.
Date: 23/02/2026 17:47:23
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2363455
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Cymek said:
roughbarked said:
As I said. We should have learned the lesson then.
I suppose we will see how the F35 go over time and if we are held to ransom over spare parts and software upgrades or if they hobble the software
Looks to be the way the cookies crumbles.
F-35 software can be hacked. The Yanks’ ‘backdoors’ can be negated.
Date: 23/02/2026 17:52:46
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2363457
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
roughbarked said:
Cymek said:
I suppose we will see how the F35 go over time and if we are held to ransom over spare parts and software upgrades or if they hobble the software
Looks to be the way the cookies crumbles.
F-35 software can be hacked. The Yanks’ ‘backdoors’ can be negated.
wouldn’t that void the warranty though?
Date: 23/02/2026 17:57:24
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2363458
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Spiny Norman said:
captain_spalding said:
Ahem…
(dons the Cap of Pedantry)
Australia bought 24 F-111Cs, which were much the same as the USAF’s F-111As, but which had the longer wing of the USN’s cancelled F-111B shipboard variant.
50 F-111Ks were to be built for the RAF, but that order was also cancelled. Two F-111K airframes were more or less completed, but went to the USAF as test rigs, and were eventually broken up for parts.
Australia bought some replacements for lost aircraft, but these were F-111As modified to F-111C standard, and, later on, some F-111Gs were also purchased.
(removes the Cap of Pedantry)
Ah-huh! Thanks for the info, no I know for sure.
I feel rather presumptuous in ‘correcting’ you, of all people, on something like this, Bill, but pedantry is a merciless mistress.
Not a problem mate, I’d rather be corrected to make my knowledge correct.
Date: 23/02/2026 18:10:18
From: Cymek
ID: 2363463
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
roughbarked said:
Cymek said:
I suppose we will see how the F35 go over time and if we are held to ransom over spare parts and software upgrades or if they hobble the software
Looks to be the way the cookies crumbles.
F-35 software can be hacked. The Yanks’ ‘backdoors’ can be negated.
That’s good
Date: 23/02/2026 18:18:30
From: Michael V
ID: 2363472
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
captain_spalding said:
roughbarked said:
Looks to be the way the cookies crumbles.
F-35 software can be hacked. The Yanks’ ‘backdoors’ can be negated.
wouldn’t that void the warranty though?
Warranty? You expect a warranty for your $140 million?
Date: 23/02/2026 18:36:49
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2363481
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 23/02/2026 18:39:45
From: Michael V
ID: 2363486
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

:)
Date: 23/02/2026 19:47:57
From: dv
ID: 2363490
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
A fourth registered Republican has tried to kill Trump.
They aren’t much good at this.
Date: 23/02/2026 20:04:26
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2363491
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
A fourth registered Republican has tried to kill Trump.
They aren’t much good at this.
Assassination isn’t the answer, it’d make him a martyr.
Date: 23/02/2026 20:08:07
From: dv
ID: 2363493
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
A fourth registered Republican has tried to kill Trump.
They aren’t much good at this.
Assassination isn’t the answer, it’d make him a martyr.
I mean given that the calls are all coming from inside the house, that might be the point.
Date: 23/02/2026 20:16:03
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2363494
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
A fourth registered Republican has tried to kill Trump.
They aren’t much good at this.
Assassination isn’t the answer, it’d make him a martyr.
I’m willing to take that risk.
Date: 23/02/2026 20:18:47
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2363495
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
A fourth registered Republican has tried to kill Trump.
They aren’t much good at this.
Assassination isn’t the answer, it’d make him a martyr.
I’m willing to take that risk.
What are you planning on using Whitty?
Date: 23/02/2026 20:21:33
From: kii
ID: 2363497
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Divine Angel said:
Assassination isn’t the answer, it’d make him a martyr.
I’m willing to take that risk.
What are you planning on using Whitty?
I’d go all wild mama dog and use my teeth to rip his throat out.
Or something.
Date: 23/02/2026 20:25:20
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2363498
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Trump is over the moon because of the hocky results at the Olympics
They kicked Canadas butt.
Date: 23/02/2026 20:34:02
From: kii
ID: 2363499
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
This guy is amazing.
Branhattan doing trump.
Date: 23/02/2026 20:45:07
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2363500
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Divine Angel said:
Assassination isn’t the answer, it’d make him a martyr.
I’m willing to take that risk.
What are you planning on using Whitty?
Beef Wellington. A certain forumite is helping formulate my plans.
Date: 23/02/2026 21:03:33
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2363504
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
A fourth registered Republican has tried to kill Trump.
They aren’t much good at this.
No training.
Date: 23/02/2026 21:15:00
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2363505
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kryten said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
They are committing a crime by premeditation with intent to murder.
What it us based on? Hatred? Religion? Some other messed up ideology?
What makes lawmakers above the law?
They have indicated intent to murder innocent people.
I think that makes them criminals.
If someone has intent to murder people then that should be of public interest and of interest to the police even if they are elected lawmakers.
It seems funny to me that they only want to punish the women, I mean from my rudimentary studies into human reproduction, it takes two to create a fetus
It does seem strange.
When the punishment is premeditated murder.
Not very good lawmakers.
Date: 23/02/2026 21:15:00
From: buffy
ID: 2363506
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
I’m willing to take that risk.
What are you planning on using Whitty?
Beef Wellington. A certain forumite is helping formulate my plans.
It’s very easy to misidentify Galerina for Psilocybe subauruginosa. Same toxin as the deathcap. It’s not mushroom season at the moment though.
Date: 23/02/2026 22:00:15
From: party_pants
ID: 2363510
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
A fourth registered Republican has tried to kill Trump.
They aren’t much good at this.
Assassination isn’t the answer, it’d make him a martyr.
Better for him to be a martyr than a live and active participant.
Date: 23/02/2026 22:02:36
From: party_pants
ID: 2363511
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Peak Warming Man said:
What are you planning on using Whitty?
Beef Wellington. A certain forumite is helping formulate my plans.
It’s very easy to misidentify Galerina for Psilocybe subauruginosa. Same toxin as the deathcap. It’s not mushroom season at the moment though.
how does Buffy know so much about poisons…?
Date: 23/02/2026 22:18:45
From: buffy
ID: 2363514
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
buffy said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Beef Wellington. A certain forumite is helping formulate my plans.
It’s very easy to misidentify Galerina for Psilocybe subauruginosa. Same toxin as the deathcap. It’s not mushroom season at the moment though.
how does Buffy know so much about poisons…?
Dragons know these things.
Date: 23/02/2026 22:31:24
From: kryten
ID: 2363515
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Peak Warming Man said:
What are you planning on using Whitty?
Beef Wellington. A certain forumite is helping formulate my plans.
It’s very easy to misidentify Galerina for Psilocybe subauruginosa. Same toxin as the deathcap. It’s not mushroom season at the moment though.
I’m not dead yet
Date: 24/02/2026 08:17:00
From: roughbarked
ID: 2363540
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
A fourth registered Republican has tried to kill Trump.
They aren’t much good at this.
Assassination isn’t the answer, it’d make him a martyr.
I’m willing to take that risk.
He needs to die of syphyllis or on of the other STD’s
Date: 24/02/2026 09:34:25
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2363561
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
A fourth registered Republican has tried to kill Trump.
They aren’t much good at this.
Training them might help.
Gun clubs should see a rise of membership with Republican misfit male teens.
Date: 24/02/2026 09:42:12
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2363563
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
A fourth registered Republican has tried to kill Trump.
They aren’t much good at this.
He wasn’t even there, oh well, at least he tried.
He doesn’t have to dwell on his failure.
Date: 24/02/2026 10:03:57
From: roughbarked
ID: 2363571
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I didn’t know that Anthony Albanese is Jewish. For what other reason would he be seen on TV wearing a kippah?
Date: 24/02/2026 10:09:44
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2363577
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 24/02/2026 10:11:41
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2363578
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
I didn’t know that Anthony Albanese is Jewish. For what other reason would he be seen on TV wearing a kippah?
The Jewish vote.
Date: 24/02/2026 10:16:08
From: roughbarked
ID: 2363580
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
roughbarked said:
I didn’t know that Anthony Albanese is Jewish. For what other reason would he be seen on TV wearing a kippah?
The Jewish vote.
Are voters that easy to sway?
Date: 24/02/2026 10:25:00
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2363582
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 24/02/2026 10:25:49
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2363583
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 24/02/2026 10:33:24
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2363584
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

We’ve got the reactors locked in, every day it gets better and better for AUKUS
Date: 24/02/2026 10:40:16
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2363586
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
We’ve got the reactors locked in, every day it gets better and better for AUKUS
They seem awfully cheap, still Arthur Daley’s Nuclear Reactors and Mowing Services has some good references according to their web site.
Date: 24/02/2026 10:43:06
From: Michael V
ID: 2363588
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 24/02/2026 10:49:15
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2363590
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Peak Warming Man said:
We’ve got the reactors locked in, every day it gets better and better for AUKUS
They seem awfully cheap, still Arthur Daley’s Nuclear Reactors and Mowing Services has some good references according to their web site.
A Nuclear powered mower, for the tough grass.
Date: 24/02/2026 10:53:35
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2363592
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
I didn’t know that Anthony Albanese is Jewish. For what other reason would he be seen on TV wearing a kippah?
It’s not unusual for gentiles to wear one in a synagogue.
Date: 24/02/2026 11:04:50
From: roughbarked
ID: 2363594
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
roughbarked said:
I didn’t know that Anthony Albanese is Jewish. For what other reason would he be seen on TV wearing a kippah?
It’s not unusual for gentiles to wear one in a synagogue.
The little I know about synagogues.
Date: 24/02/2026 12:05:13
From: buffy
ID: 2363610
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
roughbarked said:
I didn’t know that Anthony Albanese is Jewish. For what other reason would he be seen on TV wearing a kippah?
It’s not unusual for gentiles to wear one in a synagogue.
Ah, I see I don’t need to answer this one.
Date: 24/02/2026 12:11:19
From: Cymek
ID: 2363613
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
roughbarked said:
I didn’t know that Anthony Albanese is Jewish. For what other reason would he be seen on TV wearing a kippah?
It’s not unusual for gentiles to wear one in a synagogue.
Ah, I see I don’t need to answer this one.
The more props and rituals you add to religion the more it legitimises it as something real
As opposed to something made up
Date: 24/02/2026 16:17:00
From: kii
ID: 2363692
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Some people to keep an eye on in the upcoming primaries for the November 26 elections.
Kris and her husband are military veterans and have a lot of insight into current issues. Worth following on social media.
I thought dv might find this filum interesting.
Date: 24/02/2026 17:18:45
From: Neophyte
ID: 2363750
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 24/02/2026 17:20:02
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2363754
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Neophyte said:

Centre square: falls asleep
Date: 24/02/2026 17:23:48
From: Michael V
ID: 2363761
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Neophyte said:

:)
Excellent.
:)
Date: 24/02/2026 17:24:32
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2363763
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Neophyte said:

Would make a great drinking game, but i’d have to warn the hospital first.
Date: 24/02/2026 17:26:08
From: buffy
ID: 2363767
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Neophyte said:

Oh, I like that. Should be full in the first 5 minutes. And then just repeat, repeat, repeat.
Date: 24/02/2026 17:26:15
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2363768
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Neophyte said:

Centre square: falls asleep
Or some sort of ‘covfefe’ episode.
Date: 24/02/2026 17:26:19
From: kii
ID: 2363770
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Neophyte said:

I’m looking forward to the many memes that are created from Dear Leader’s brain flatulence.
Date: 24/02/2026 20:05:48
From: kii
ID: 2363829
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
So much cringe.

Date: 25/02/2026 14:11:37
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2364037
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Cymek said:
Cymek said:
If we suppport Ukraine our ally, doesn’t logic mixed with politics dictate Communist type states would support each other.
Do feel a little bit sorry for Russia, going from a dominant power and top dog communist to almost begging for scraps
The USSR isn’t coming back Putin
Perhaps a whole new terminator movie, Russian built terminator goes back in time to kill Gorbachev
Freedom fighter that looks like Reagan comes back to save him and they develop a love affair
nah in the same way we don’t feel sorry for the Greater (3rd) German Reich fucking themselves by opening up bilateral fronts
or the USSA fucking themselves by proliferating theocratic conspiracy disinformation and child sexual and misogynistic abuse and street gang style governance
we don’t really feel sorry for a Russia diving into a deep Ukrainian type of Waterloo and ending up in the shit
relevant
Over coffee at a Starbucks just outside Austin, Texas, Del Bigtree told me he wants his teenage son to catch polio. Measles, too. He’s considered driving his unvaccinated family to South Carolina, which is in the midst of a historic outbreak, so that they can all be exposed. He prefers pertussis—whooping cough—to the pertussis vaccine, which he later described to me as a “crime against children.” It’s not the diseases that Americans should be afraid of, Bigtree insists: It’s the shots that stop them.
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/2026/02/del-bigtree-pro-infection-polio-measles/686092/

Date: 25/02/2026 14:15:07
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2364039
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
SCIENCE said:
Cymek said:
Do feel a little bit sorry for Russia, going from a dominant power and top dog communist to almost begging for scraps
The USSR isn’t coming back Putin
Perhaps a whole new terminator movie, Russian built terminator goes back in time to kill Gorbachev
Freedom fighter that looks like Reagan comes back to save him and they develop a love affair
nah in the same way we don’t feel sorry for the Greater (3rd) German Reich fucking themselves by opening up bilateral fronts
or the USSA fucking themselves by proliferating theocratic conspiracy disinformation and child sexual and misogynistic abuse and street gang style governance
we don’t really feel sorry for a Russia diving into a deep Ukrainian type of Waterloo and ending up in the shit
relevant
Over coffee at a Starbucks just outside Austin, Texas, Del Bigtree told me he wants his teenage son to catch polio. Measles, too. He’s considered driving his unvaccinated family to South Carolina, which is in the midst of a historic outbreak, so that they can all be exposed. He prefers pertussis—whooping cough—to the pertussis vaccine, which he later described to me as a “crime against children.” It’s not the diseases that Americans should be afraid of, Bigtree insists: It’s the shots that stop them.
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/2026/02/del-bigtree-pro-infection-polio-measles/686092/

Those poor kids :(
As for the adults, go ahead and catch those diseases. Often, they’re much worse in adults than kids. On their deathbed, they’ll still defend their choices while the kids are orphaned.
Date: 25/02/2026 14:18:28
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2364041
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
SCIENCE said:
Cymek said:
Do feel a little bit sorry for Russia, going from a dominant power and top dog communist to almost begging for scraps
The USSR isn’t coming back Putin
Perhaps a whole new terminator movie, Russian built terminator goes back in time to kill Gorbachev
Freedom fighter that looks like Reagan comes back to save him and they develop a love affair
nah in the same way we don’t feel sorry for the Greater (3rd) German Reich fucking themselves by opening up bilateral fronts
or the USSA fucking themselves by proliferating theocratic conspiracy disinformation and child sexual and misogynistic abuse and street gang style governance
we don’t really feel sorry for a Russia diving into a deep Ukrainian type of Waterloo and ending up in the shit
relevant
Over coffee at a Starbucks just outside Austin, Texas, Del Bigtree told me he wants his teenage son to catch polio. Measles, too. He’s considered driving his unvaccinated family to South Carolina, which is in the midst of a historic outbreak, so that they can all be exposed. He prefers pertussis—whooping cough—to the pertussis vaccine, which he later described to me as a “crime against children.” It’s not the diseases that Americans should be afraid of, Bigtree insists: It’s the shots that stop them.
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/2026/02/del-bigtree-pro-infection-polio-measles/686092/

TATE says of Bigtree:
His frequent public speaking engagements and an influx of funding in 2017 have made Bigtree, who has no medical training, one of the most prominent voices in the anti-vaccination movement. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Bigtree propagated conspiracy theories about the origin of the virus and COVID vaccines, and urged his audience to ignore the advice of health authorities.
Date: 25/02/2026 14:19:07
From: Cymek
ID: 2364042
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
SCIENCE said:
Cymek said:
Do feel a little bit sorry for Russia, going from a dominant power and top dog communist to almost begging for scraps
The USSR isn’t coming back Putin
Perhaps a whole new terminator movie, Russian built terminator goes back in time to kill Gorbachev
Freedom fighter that looks like Reagan comes back to save him and they develop a love affair
nah in the same way we don’t feel sorry for the Greater (3rd) German Reich fucking themselves by opening up bilateral fronts
or the USSA fucking themselves by proliferating theocratic conspiracy disinformation and child sexual and misogynistic abuse and street gang style governance
we don’t really feel sorry for a Russia diving into a deep Ukrainian type of Waterloo and ending up in the shit
relevant
Over coffee at a Starbucks just outside Austin, Texas, Del Bigtree told me he wants his teenage son to catch polio. Measles, too. He’s considered driving his unvaccinated family to South Carolina, which is in the midst of a historic outbreak, so that they can all be exposed. He prefers pertussis—whooping cough—to the pertussis vaccine, which he later described to me as a “crime against children.” It’s not the diseases that Americans should be afraid of, Bigtree insists: It’s the shots that stop them.
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/2026/02/del-bigtree-pro-infection-polio-measles/686092/

We have all had the luxury of not seeing some of these diseases in action so the stupid people get complacent or they are just stupid.
Smallpox looks absolutely terrifying and whose to say modern strains of chicken pox, measles, mumps, etc aren’t far more deadly than the ones of the past.
Date: 25/02/2026 14:20:08
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2364044
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
alleged

Date: 25/02/2026 14:23:38
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2364046
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Divine Angel said:
SCIENCE said:
SCIENCE said:
nah in the same way we don’t feel sorry for the Greater (3rd) German Reich fucking themselves by opening up bilateral fronts
or the USSA fucking themselves by proliferating theocratic conspiracy disinformation and child sexual and misogynistic abuse and street gang style governance
we don’t really feel sorry for a Russia diving into a deep Ukrainian type of Waterloo and ending up in the shit
relevant
Over coffee at a Starbucks just outside Austin, Texas, Del Bigtree told me he wants his teenage son to catch polio. Measles, too. He’s considered driving his unvaccinated family to South Carolina, which is in the midst of a historic outbreak, so that they can all be exposed. He prefers pertussis—whooping cough—to the pertussis vaccine, which he later described to me as a “crime against children.” It’s not the diseases that Americans should be afraid of, Bigtree insists: It’s the shots that stop them.
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/2026/02/del-bigtree-pro-infection-polio-measles/686092/

Those poor kids :(
As for the adults, go ahead and catch those diseases. Often, they’re much worse in adults than kids. On their deathbed, they’ll still defend their choices while the kids are orphaned.
TATE says of Bigtree:
His frequent public speaking engagements and an influx of funding in 2017 have made Bigtree, who has no medical training, one of the most prominent voices in the anti-vaccination movement. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Bigtree propagated conspiracy theories about the origin of the virus and COVID vaccines, and urged his audience to ignore the advice of health authorities.
We have all had the luxury of not seeing some of these diseases in action so the stupid people get complacent or they are just stupid.
Smallpox looks absolutely terrifying and whose to say modern strains of chicken pox, measles, mumps, etc aren’t far more deadly than the ones of the past.
see this is americans for yous, they fetishise their firearms but can’t stand a tiny little needle, it’s compensation like anything
so we’re still concerned that Australian whackjobs will import the dereliction of public health but so far the firearms situation gives us hope
Date: 25/02/2026 14:23:53
From: Cymek
ID: 2364047
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
SCIENCE said:
SCIENCE said:
nah in the same way we don’t feel sorry for the Greater (3rd) German Reich fucking themselves by opening up bilateral fronts
or the USSA fucking themselves by proliferating theocratic conspiracy disinformation and child sexual and misogynistic abuse and street gang style governance
we don’t really feel sorry for a Russia diving into a deep Ukrainian type of Waterloo and ending up in the shit
relevant
Over coffee at a Starbucks just outside Austin, Texas, Del Bigtree told me he wants his teenage son to catch polio. Measles, too. He’s considered driving his unvaccinated family to South Carolina, which is in the midst of a historic outbreak, so that they can all be exposed. He prefers pertussis—whooping cough—to the pertussis vaccine, which he later described to me as a “crime against children.” It’s not the diseases that Americans should be afraid of, Bigtree insists: It’s the shots that stop them.
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/2026/02/del-bigtree-pro-infection-polio-measles/686092/

TATE says of Bigtree:
His frequent public speaking engagements and an influx of funding in 2017 have made Bigtree, who has no medical training, one of the most prominent voices in the anti-vaccination movement. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Bigtree propagated conspiracy theories about the origin of the virus and COVID vaccines, and urged his audience to ignore the advice of health authorities.
The problem I suppose is both vaccinations and viruses could be used as weapons and I assume haven’t been as even the worst governments aren’t that stupid.
Date: 25/02/2026 14:32:24
From: Michael V
ID: 2364049
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
SCIENCE said:
Cymek said:
Do feel a little bit sorry for Russia, going from a dominant power and top dog communist to almost begging for scraps
The USSR isn’t coming back Putin
Perhaps a whole new terminator movie, Russian built terminator goes back in time to kill Gorbachev
Freedom fighter that looks like Reagan comes back to save him and they develop a love affair
nah in the same way we don’t feel sorry for the Greater (3rd) German Reich fucking themselves by opening up bilateral fronts
or the USSA fucking themselves by proliferating theocratic conspiracy disinformation and child sexual and misogynistic abuse and street gang style governance
we don’t really feel sorry for a Russia diving into a deep Ukrainian type of Waterloo and ending up in the shit
relevant
Over coffee at a Starbucks just outside Austin, Texas, Del Bigtree told me he wants his teenage son to catch polio. Measles, too. He’s considered driving his unvaccinated family to South Carolina, which is in the midst of a historic outbreak, so that they can all be exposed. He prefers pertussis—whooping cough—to the pertussis vaccine, which he later described to me as a “crime against children.” It’s not the diseases that Americans should be afraid of, Bigtree insists: It’s the shots that stop them.
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/2026/02/del-bigtree-pro-infection-polio-measles/686092/

FMD
This makes me really, really angry. He wants his kids on crutches or in an iron lung for the rest of their lives? If his son gets a bad dose of measles, he could end up with brain damage. He wants that?
What a dreadful bit of work he is.
Unfortunately other people give these idiots space to make their nasty, vile, uninformed noises.
Date: 25/02/2026 14:34:35
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2364050
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Sensible parents answer: “Goodo, always happy to make dangerous morons cry.”
Date: 25/02/2026 14:39:55
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2364051
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
The problem I suppose is both vaccinations and viruses could be used as weapons and I assume haven’t been as even the worst governments aren’t that stupid.
pretty sure they have and are
Date: 25/02/2026 14:45:02
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2364052
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
The problem I suppose is both vaccinations and viruses could be used as weapons and I assume haven’t been as even the worst governments aren’t that stupid.
I have a vague recollection that using viruses as biological weapons was the plot of a Michael Crichton novel. In the mid 90s when ebola became a big problem, it was suggested then that someone might cross the common cold with ebola to enhance its contagiousness. (Or was that the plot of a Michael Crichton novel? My brain is overcrowded today; things are getting muddled.)
Date: 25/02/2026 15:19:11
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2364068
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 25/02/2026 16:36:42
From: dv
ID: 2364089
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 25/02/2026 16:39:11
From: Cymek
ID: 2364093
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:


Date: 25/02/2026 16:43:04
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2364096
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 25/02/2026 16:44:05
From: furious
ID: 2364097
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
dv said:


Ha!
Date: 25/02/2026 18:15:14
From: Ian
ID: 2364113
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 25/02/2026 18:35:09
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2364116
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

shakes head
And he’s got a ponytail.
Date: 25/02/2026 18:42:44
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2364117
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Carrick Ryan
“The fundamental weakness of Western civilisation is empathy.” Elon Musk.
Why do these men fear empathy? Let’s unpack it.
Within the MAGA movement is a faction or ethno-nationalists who hold the sincere belief that undocumented migrants pose an existential threat to Western Civilisation.
These convictions that are based on an adherence to ideologies that stretch far beyond the standard Republican anti-immigrant rhetoric.
These men fear that lesser races are diluting American society, and they desperately want to return to a state where white men maintained electoral control in the country. With the shifting demographics likely to induce an end to white majority within the next twenty years, this is seen as an urgent crisis demanding urgent measures.
It’s within this end that Stephen Millers brutal pursuit of mass deportations is being pursued. Miller has consistently embraced dehumanising language as he refers to undocumented migrants who have lived peacefully in the country for decades as “invaders” while setting ICE a quota of “a minimum of 3,000 arrests every day”.
Departing from the policies of the Obama administration, who generally only deported undocumented migrants who came to the attention of law enforcement, this radical expansion saw ICE raids at shopping centres, work places, and deep within immigrant communities, detaining anyone who fit the racial profile and was unable to prove their citizenship on the spot.
The Department of Homeland Security proudly announced that “…criminals will no longer be able to hide in America’s schools and churches to avoid arrest” while a whistle-blower revealed a secret internal memo advised federal officers that they had the power to enter private homes without a warrant (they do not).
77% of those in detaiined by ICE in 2025 had no criminal convictions, and most convicted “offenses” were non-violent immigration or traffic violations. These were mums and dads, loved members of the community, peaceful people who had spent the largest part of their lives in the USA.
The ethno-nationalists knew the implementation of this policy would necessitate a certain level of callousness, cruelty, and even violence. That’s why they built an army of ideologically committed loyalists to carry out these orders… they knew that what they planned on doing was going to get ugly.
To be fair to them, Trump made it very clear what the plan was, this was a core election promise.
He twice proclaimed during the 2024 election campaign that immigrants were “…poisoning the blood of our country”, another time adding “You know, now a murderer — I believe this — it’s in their genes. And we got a lot of bad genes in our country right now.”
He unequivocally promised “we will carry out the largest domestic deportation operation in American history.”
…and he won the election, in no small part thanks to that promise.
But there is a palpable fear among the ethno-nationalist faction that when enough Americans see the human cost of this policy, if enough people find the tears of migrants compelling… or if they begin to feel empathy for their suffering… they may withdraw their support for the mass deportations that this faction believes are essential to preventing the erasure of white civilisation.
They fear the change of heart as Trump’s voters watch the unapologetic execution of protesters on the streets of local towns, with victims denounced as “insurrectionists” and “terrorists” and the fearless rejection of accountability or any hint of regret.
They fear it might make them question what they voted for….what they’ve created… and feel shame for what they’d become.
Men like Musk, Miller, Vance, Thiel, and Bannon, look at anyone that has that revelation as weak… unreliable… and traitors to their race.
I see these kind of people to be the most noble minds possible. Those who will allow their conscience to evolve, and to recognise the immorality in what you once thought good. What a beautiful example of self-awareness to recognise your own mistake (even if never publicly conceded).
Recent polls suggest that 58% of Americans believe ICE had gone too far in its crackdown, with only 26% approving of the current policy. Trump’s approval for handling of immigration has dropped from around 51% to below 38%. Thus indicating that the fear of prevailing empathy, even amongst Trump supporters, was well founded.
How Trump’s administration reacts to this collapse of public support will provide an insight into the remaining power structures of the Republican Party. Men like Musk and Miller still see this issue as an existential one. The only obstacle standing before the full implementation of their policy before Trump’s term ends in 2029 is the mid-term elections this year.
If the public continue to recoil in horror in response to the actions of ICE, the Democrats stand a real chance of winning both the House and the Senate; making impeachment almost inevitable. So I expect the next nine months to be substantially less confrontational in their deportation methodology.
After that? Some within the administration will be thinking about the 2028 elections. Others will not care how much empathy emerges within the public conscience… in their eyes, this is their one shot.
For the Democrats… November might be their one shot.
Date: 25/02/2026 18:54:47
From: Cymek
ID: 2364124
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
Carrick Ryan
“The fundamental weakness of Western civilisation is empathy.” Elon Musk.
Why do these men fear empathy? Let’s unpack it.
Within the MAGA movement is a faction or ethno-nationalists who hold the sincere belief that undocumented migrants pose an existential threat to Western Civilisation.
These convictions that are based on an adherence to ideologies that stretch far beyond the standard Republican anti-immigrant rhetoric.
These men fear that lesser races are diluting American society, and they desperately want to return to a state where white men maintained electoral control in the country. With the shifting demographics likely to induce an end to white majority within the next twenty years, this is seen as an urgent crisis demanding urgent measures.
It’s within this end that Stephen Millers brutal pursuit of mass deportations is being pursued. Miller has consistently embraced dehumanising language as he refers to undocumented migrants who have lived peacefully in the country for decades as “invaders” while setting ICE a quota of “a minimum of 3,000 arrests every day”.
Departing from the policies of the Obama administration, who generally only deported undocumented migrants who came to the attention of law enforcement, this radical expansion saw ICE raids at shopping centres, work places, and deep within immigrant communities, detaining anyone who fit the racial profile and was unable to prove their citizenship on the spot.
The Department of Homeland Security proudly announced that “…criminals will no longer be able to hide in America’s schools and churches to avoid arrest” while a whistle-blower revealed a secret internal memo advised federal officers that they had the power to enter private homes without a warrant (they do not).
77% of those in detaiined by ICE in 2025 had no criminal convictions, and most convicted “offenses” were non-violent immigration or traffic violations. These were mums and dads, loved members of the community, peaceful people who had spent the largest part of their lives in the USA.
The ethno-nationalists knew the implementation of this policy would necessitate a certain level of callousness, cruelty, and even violence. That’s why they built an army of ideologically committed loyalists to carry out these orders… they knew that what they planned on doing was going to get ugly.
To be fair to them, Trump made it very clear what the plan was, this was a core election promise.
He twice proclaimed during the 2024 election campaign that immigrants were “…poisoning the blood of our country”, another time adding “You know, now a murderer — I believe this — it’s in their genes. And we got a lot of bad genes in our country right now.”
He unequivocally promised “we will carry out the largest domestic deportation operation in American history.”
…and he won the election, in no small part thanks to that promise.
But there is a palpable fear among the ethno-nationalist faction that when enough Americans see the human cost of this policy, if enough people find the tears of migrants compelling… or if they begin to feel empathy for their suffering… they may withdraw their support for the mass deportations that this faction believes are essential to preventing the erasure of white civilisation.
They fear the change of heart as Trump’s voters watch the unapologetic execution of protesters on the streets of local towns, with victims denounced as “insurrectionists” and “terrorists” and the fearless rejection of accountability or any hint of regret.
They fear it might make them question what they voted for….what they’ve created… and feel shame for what they’d become.
Men like Musk, Miller, Vance, Thiel, and Bannon, look at anyone that has that revelation as weak… unreliable… and traitors to their race.
I see these kind of people to be the most noble minds possible. Those who will allow their conscience to evolve, and to recognise the immorality in what you once thought good. What a beautiful example of self-awareness to recognise your own mistake (even if never publicly conceded).
Recent polls suggest that 58% of Americans believe ICE had gone too far in its crackdown, with only 26% approving of the current policy. Trump’s approval for handling of immigration has dropped from around 51% to below 38%. Thus indicating that the fear of prevailing empathy, even amongst Trump supporters, was well founded.
How Trump’s administration reacts to this collapse of public support will provide an insight into the remaining power structures of the Republican Party. Men like Musk and Miller still see this issue as an existential one. The only obstacle standing before the full implementation of their policy before Trump’s term ends in 2029 is the mid-term elections this year.
If the public continue to recoil in horror in response to the actions of ICE, the Democrats stand a real chance of winning both the House and the Senate; making impeachment almost inevitable. So I expect the next nine months to be substantially less confrontational in their deportation methodology.
After that? Some within the administration will be thinking about the 2028 elections. Others will not care how much empathy emerges within the public conscience… in their eyes, this is their one shot.
For the Democrats… November might be their one shot.
Empathy doesn’t fit in with US capitalism.
I imagine its seen as weakness and anathema to profit.
I bet Trump and his ilk don’t even think of most USA citizens let alone world citizens as people
Only a couple of steps below sending people off to the gas chambers
Date: 25/02/2026 18:57:15
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2364125
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
JudgeMental said:
Carrick Ryan
“The fundamental weakness of Western civilisation is empathy.” Elon Musk.
Why do these men fear empathy? Let’s unpack it.
Empathy doesn’t fit in with US capitalism.
I imagine its seen as weakness and anathema to profit.
I bet Trump and his ilk don’t even think of most USA citizens let alone world citizens as people
Only a couple of steps below sending people off to the gas chambers
plot twist empathy is actually the strength
capitalism is weakness
Date: 25/02/2026 19:11:02
From: Cymek
ID: 2364130
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Cymek said:
JudgeMental said:
Carrick Ryan
“The fundamental weakness of Western civilisation is empathy.” Elon Musk.
Why do these men fear empathy? Let’s unpack it.
Empathy doesn’t fit in with US capitalism.
I imagine its seen as weakness and anathema to profit.
I bet Trump and his ilk don’t even think of most USA citizens let alone world citizens as people
Only a couple of steps below sending people off to the gas chambers
plot twist empathy is actually the strength
capitalism is weakness
For sure
Human empathy is what makes us great
You see if with the care people show for abused animals.
Kindness for another living creature for no reason except they care.
Society in general values the wrong things, money, power and fame
Date: 25/02/2026 19:15:48
From: Michael V
ID: 2364131
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 25/02/2026 19:21:05
From: Michael V
ID: 2364132
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Cymek said:
JudgeMental said:
Carrick Ryan
“The fundamental weakness of Western civilisation is empathy.” Elon Musk.
Why do these men fear empathy? Let’s unpack it.
Empathy doesn’t fit in with US capitalism.
I imagine its seen as weakness and anathema to profit.
I bet Trump and his ilk don’t even think of most USA citizens let alone world citizens as people
Only a couple of steps below sending people off to the gas chambers
plot twist empathy is actually the strength
capitalism is weakness
Fair.
Date: 25/02/2026 20:59:11
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2364156
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
why stand for something when you can bend over to kiss the ring

Date: 26/02/2026 08:15:36
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2364205
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 26/02/2026 08:19:04
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2364206
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:

First it’s the Trump Kennedy Center, now it’s the Trump Kennedy Cuban Missile Crisis.
Date: 26/02/2026 08:28:26
From: roughbarked
ID: 2364209
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
JudgeMental said:

First it’s the Trump Kennedy Center, now it’s the Trump Kennedy Cuban Missile Crisis.
and soon after, the removal of Kennedy.
Date: 26/02/2026 08:33:56
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2364210
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
JudgeMental said:

First it’s the Trump Kennedy Center, now it’s the Trump Kennedy Cuban Missile Crisis.
more Bay of Pigs.
Date: 26/02/2026 08:39:04
From: Michael V
ID: 2364211
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:

Big speedboat. Very big. Ten people on board!
Date: 26/02/2026 09:45:51
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2364222
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
Divine Angel said:
JudgeMental said:

First it’s the Trump Kennedy Center, now it’s the Trump Kennedy Cuban Missile Crisis.
more Bay of Pigs.
The only thing I know about the Bay of Pigs invasion is the mention in Billy Joel’s We Didn’t Start the Fire.
Date: 26/02/2026 11:26:09
From: Michael V
ID: 2364274
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
JudgeMental said:

Big speedboat. Very big. Ten people on board!
Here it is; ten could fit, but not very comfortably. It’s hardly a speedboat, more like an upmarket large recreational fishing boat. Single motor, probably in the 200+ hp range might at a pinch push it to 65 km/h:

Date: 26/02/2026 11:30:43
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2364278
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Michael V said:
JudgeMental said:

Big speedboat. Very big. Ten people on board!
Here it is; ten could fit, but not very comfortably. It’s hardly a speedboat, more like an upmarket large recreational fishing boat. Single motor, probably in the 200+ hp range might at a pinch push it to 65 km/h:

Have we considered the possibility that PWM wanted the boat?
Date: 26/02/2026 11:32:57
From: Michael V
ID: 2364282
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Michael V said:
Michael V said:
Big speedboat. Very big. Ten people on board!
Here it is; ten could fit, but not very comfortably. It’s hardly a speedboat, more like an upmarket large recreational fishing boat. Single motor, probably in the 200+ hp range might at a pinch push it to 65 km/h:

Have we considered the possibility that PWM wanted the boat?
I hadn’t. My bad.
Date: 26/02/2026 11:46:22
From: dv
ID: 2364289
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Dr Oz: “We’re announcing a 6 month national moratorium blocking all new enrollments for durable medical equipment — prosthesis, orthotics — supplies across the board.”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2026/feb/25/donald-trump-state-of-the-union-us-politics-iran-latest-news-updates
Date: 26/02/2026 11:57:05
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2364296
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Dr Oz: “We’re announcing a 6 month national moratorium blocking all new enrollments for durable medical equipment — prosthesis, orthotics — supplies across the board.”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2026/feb/25/donald-trump-state-of-the-union-us-politics-iran-latest-news-updates
“For decades, Medicare fraud has drained billions from American taxpayers—that ends now,” said Secretary Kennedy. “We are replacing the old ‘pay and chase’ model with a real-time ‘detect and deploy’ strategy, using advanced AI tools to identify fraud instantly and stop improper payments before they go out the door.”
“CMS is done trying to catch fraudsters with their hands in the cookie jar—instead, we’re padlocking the jar and letting them starve,” said Administrator Oz. “This proactive approach will help us crush fraud, protect taxpayer dollars, and make sure the vulnerable Americans who depend on our programs get the care they need.”
Link.
Letting them starve is an interesting way to put it.
Date: 26/02/2026 12:02:19
From: Michael V
ID: 2364297
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
Dr Oz: “We’re announcing a 6 month national moratorium blocking all new enrollments for durable medical equipment — prosthesis, orthotics — supplies across the board.”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2026/feb/25/donald-trump-state-of-the-union-us-politics-iran-latest-news-updates
“For decades, Medicare fraud has drained billions from American taxpayers—that ends now,” said Secretary Kennedy. “We are replacing the old ‘pay and chase’ model with a real-time ‘detect and deploy’ strategy, using advanced AI tools to identify fraud instantly and stop improper payments before they go out the door.”
“CMS is done trying to catch fraudsters with their hands in the cookie jar—instead, we’re padlocking the jar and letting them starve,” said Administrator Oz. “This proactive approach will help us crush fraud, protect taxpayer dollars, and make sure the vulnerable Americans who depend on our programs get the care they need.”
Link.
Letting them starve is an interesting way to put it.
Well, it’s kicking people while they are down. It’s what they like to do.
Take from the most vulnerable and give to the richest.
Date: 26/02/2026 12:03:38
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2364299
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
Dr Oz: “We’re announcing a 6 month national moratorium blocking all new enrollments for durable medical equipment — prosthesis, orthotics — supplies across the board.”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2026/feb/25/donald-trump-state-of-the-union-us-politics-iran-latest-news-updates
“For decades, Medicare fraud has drained billions from American taxpayers—that ends now,” said Secretary Kennedy. “We are replacing the old ‘pay and chase’ model with a real-time ‘detect and deploy’ strategy, using advanced AI tools to identify fraud instantly and stop improper payments before they go out the door.”
“CMS is done trying to catch fraudsters with their hands in the cookie jar—instead, we’re padlocking the jar and letting them starve,” said Administrator Oz. “This proactive approach will help us crush fraud, protect taxpayer dollars, and make sure the vulnerable Americans who depend on our programs get the care they need.”
Link.
Letting them starve is an interesting way to put it.
So, they’re going to, essentially, stop spending the money on the medical equipment that Americans need.
I expect that the money will, instead, be used to fund Trump’s vanity projects, or be directed in some way to both his billionaire pals and himself.
Date: 26/02/2026 12:03:48
From: roughbarked
ID: 2364300
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
Dr Oz: “We’re announcing a 6 month national moratorium blocking all new enrollments for durable medical equipment — prosthesis, orthotics — supplies across the board.”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2026/feb/25/donald-trump-state-of-the-union-us-politics-iran-latest-news-updates
“For decades, Medicare fraud has drained billions from American taxpayers—that ends now,” said Secretary Kennedy. “We are replacing the old ‘pay and chase’ model with a real-time ‘detect and deploy’ strategy, using advanced AI tools to identify fraud instantly and stop improper payments before they go out the door.”
“CMS is done trying to catch fraudsters with their hands in the cookie jar—instead, we’re padlocking the jar and letting them starve,” said Administrator Oz. “This proactive approach will help us crush fraud, protect taxpayer dollars, and make sure the vulnerable Americans who depend on our programs get the care they need.”
Link.
Letting them starve is an interesting way to put it.
Shows their true colours.
Date: 26/02/2026 12:04:55
From: roughbarked
ID: 2364301
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
Dr Oz: “We’re announcing a 6 month national moratorium blocking all new enrollments for durable medical equipment — prosthesis, orthotics — supplies across the board.”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2026/feb/25/donald-trump-state-of-the-union-us-politics-iran-latest-news-updates
“For decades, Medicare fraud has drained billions from American taxpayers—that ends now,” said Secretary Kennedy. “We are replacing the old ‘pay and chase’ model with a real-time ‘detect and deploy’ strategy, using advanced AI tools to identify fraud instantly and stop improper payments before they go out the door.”
“CMS is done trying to catch fraudsters with their hands in the cookie jar—instead, we’re padlocking the jar and letting them starve,” said Administrator Oz. “This proactive approach will help us crush fraud, protect taxpayer dollars, and make sure the vulnerable Americans who depend on our programs get the care they need.”
Link.
Letting them starve is an interesting way to put it.
So, they’re going to, essentially, stop spending the money on the medical equipment that Americans need.
I expect that the money will, instead, be used to fund Trump’s vanity projects, or be directed in some way to both his billionaire pals and himself.
They’ll be celebrating with gold plated champagne flutes.
Date: 26/02/2026 12:55:54
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2364330
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Texas public school teachers are now required to post the 10 Commandments in their classroom. Here’s how one teacher is handling it.
Date: 26/02/2026 13:03:02
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2364331
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
Texas public school teachers are now required to post the 10 Commandments in their classroom. Here’s how one teacher is handling it.
Is there a minimum size the 10 C’s have to be? Could one print it on something the size a postage stamp, for instance?
Date: 26/02/2026 13:04:16
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2364332
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Spiny Norman said:
Texas public school teachers are now required to post the 10 Commandments in their classroom. Here’s how one teacher is handling it.
Is there a minimum size the 10 C’s have to be? Could one print it on something the size a postage stamp, for instance?
The first step of that is me giving enough of a shit to find out.
So we’ll never know! :)
Date: 26/02/2026 13:05:26
From: roughbarked
ID: 2364334
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
Texas public school teachers are now required to post the 10 Commandments in their classroom. Here’s how one teacher is handling it.
Resist.
Date: 26/02/2026 13:05:49
From: roughbarked
ID: 2364335
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Spiny Norman said:
Texas public school teachers are now required to post the 10 Commandments in their classroom. Here’s how one teacher is handling it.
Is there a minimum size the 10 C’s have to be? Could one print it on something the size a postage stamp, for instance?
Yep
Date: 26/02/2026 13:08:23
From: Michael V
ID: 2364336
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
Texas public school teachers are now required to post the 10 Commandments in their classroom. Here’s how one teacher is handling it.
Good.
Date: 26/02/2026 13:11:16
From: Cymek
ID: 2364337
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
Divine Angel said:
Spiny Norman said:
Texas public school teachers are now required to post the 10 Commandments in their classroom. Here’s how one teacher is handling it.
Is there a minimum size the 10 C’s have to be? Could one print it on something the size a postage stamp, for instance?
The first step of that is me giving enough of a shit to find out.
So we’ll never know! :)
Texas really is a special needs state (no offence to special needs people)
Jesus is a cowboy with open carry weapons, a klan hood, with anti abortion stickers, god hates …. stickers on his shirt
Date: 26/02/2026 13:15:50
From: roughbarked
ID: 2364339
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
Spiny Norman said:
Divine Angel said:
Is there a minimum size the 10 C’s have to be? Could one print it on something the size a postage stamp, for instance?
The first step of that is me giving enough of a shit to find out.
So we’ll never know! :)
Texas really is a special needs state (no offence to special needs people)
Jesus is a cowboy with open carry weapons, a klan hood, with anti abortion stickers, god hates …. stickers on his shirt
I didn’t know that God hates stickers.
Date: 26/02/2026 13:17:35
From: Michael V
ID: 2364340
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
Divine Angel said:
Spiny Norman said:
Texas public school teachers are now required to post the 10 Commandments in their classroom. Here’s how one teacher is handling it.
Is there a minimum size the 10 C’s have to be? Could one print it on something the size a postage stamp, for instance?
The first step of that is me giving enough of a shit to find out.
So we’ll never know! :)
I googled the first sentence of your post.

Date: 26/02/2026 13:20:16
From: roughbarked
ID: 2364341
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Spiny Norman said:
Divine Angel said:
Is there a minimum size the 10 C’s have to be? Could one print it on something the size a postage stamp, for instance?
The first step of that is me giving enough of a shit to find out.
So we’ll never know! :)
I googled the first sentence of your post.

Gotta pay for them out of petty cash.
Date: 26/02/2026 13:21:17
From: roughbarked
ID: 2364342
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
Spiny Norman said:
The first step of that is me giving enough of a shit to find out.
So we’ll never know! :)
I googled the first sentence of your post.

Gotta pay for them out of petty cash.
I suppose you could put up a 16× 20 inch poster and have small print.
Date: 26/02/2026 13:22:52
From: Cymek
ID: 2364343
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Cymek said:
Spiny Norman said:
The first step of that is me giving enough of a shit to find out.
So we’ll never know! :)
Texas really is a special needs state (no offence to special needs people)
Jesus is a cowboy with open carry weapons, a klan hood, with anti abortion stickers, god hates …. stickers on his shirt
I didn’t know that God hates stickers.
It was a rude word for gay people that a church had outside on its signage
Date: 26/02/2026 13:23:33
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2364344
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
I googled the first sentence of your post.

Gotta pay for them out of petty cash.
I suppose you could put up a 16× 20 inch poster and have small print.
Using only the text of the 10 Cs and out-of-context pictures.
Date: 26/02/2026 13:24:00
From: Michael V
ID: 2364345
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
Spiny Norman said:
The first step of that is me giving enough of a shit to find out.
So we’ll never know! :)
I googled the first sentence of your post.

Gotta pay for them out of petty cash.
I don’t think that that’s the notion.
I’d guess it’s to make sure that churches don’t donate them, as a method of trying to circumvent the US constitution.
Date: 26/02/2026 13:24:08
From: Cymek
ID: 2364346
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
I googled the first sentence of your post.

Gotta pay for them out of petty cash.
I suppose you could put up a 16× 20 inch poster and have small print.
Could be done in terrible colours so you can’t read it easily or rainbow colours
Date: 26/02/2026 13:30:18
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2364347
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
roughbarked said:
roughbarked said:
Gotta pay for them out of petty cash.
I suppose you could put up a 16× 20 inch poster and have small print.
Could be done in terrible colours so you can’t read it easily or rainbow colours
Yellow on white paper
But that teacher did a pretty good job of adhering to the rules.
Date: 26/02/2026 13:34:20
From: buffy
ID: 2364348
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Spiny Norman said:
Texas public school teachers are now required to post the 10 Commandments in their classroom. Here’s how one teacher is handling it.
Is there a minimum size the 10 C’s have to be? Could one print it on something the size a postage stamp, for instance?
On the head of a pin, perhaps?
Date: 26/02/2026 13:48:16
From: roughbarked
ID: 2364349
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
roughbarked said:
Cymek said:
Texas really is a special needs state (no offence to special needs people)
Jesus is a cowboy with open carry weapons, a klan hood, with anti abortion stickers, god hates …. stickers on his shirt
I didn’t know that God hates stickers.
It was a rude word for gay people that a church had outside on its signage
Oh them Wesley Baptists?
Date: 26/02/2026 13:49:46
From: roughbarked
ID: 2364351
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
roughbarked said:
roughbarked said:
Gotta pay for them out of petty cash.
I suppose you could put up a 16× 20 inch poster and have small print.
Could be done in terrible colours so you can’t read it easily or rainbow colours
or in light shades of grey and use the excuse that you are also testing the children’s depth perception.
Date: 26/02/2026 14:00:56
From: Cymek
ID: 2364352
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Cymek said:
roughbarked said:
I didn’t know that God hates stickers.
It was a rude word for gay people that a church had outside on its signage
Oh them Wesley Baptists?
Yes
I thought it was in Texas but its Kansas
Same difference
The hate filled evil Christians whose version of Jesus is likely the same
Date: 26/02/2026 14:14:45
From: kii
ID: 2364356
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Jim Wright aka Stonekettle Station:

Casey Means, Trump’s Surgeon General Nominee: “I do believe that Americans are ready to hear about spirituality as it pertains to medicine.”
She believes Americans are ready to hear about the spirits instead of actual science.
Oh, I see you, back there in last row, all yellow-eyed and red faced, getting mad on behalf of your religion. Tell you what, before you you start shouting hosannahs, calmly and rationally explain to me the exact biological mechanism whereby the spirits lower blood pressure, remove an inflamed appendix, or treat stage IV lung cancer. Because unless you can prove using standard forensic methodology that “spirituality as it pertains to medicine” has any measurable impact on health in any fashion, I’m calling shenanigans.
For bonus points: Explain to me the mechanism whereby your medical insurance approves payments for those treatments to a spiritualist. You may use Insurance Company AI if you like.
Casey Means is one of RFK Jr’s raw milk loons. AND she thinks birth control is immoral. Immoral. Raw Milk. Antivax. And no birth control. Let that sink in.
There are “doctors” who pledged an oath to do no harm, doing harm every day and Casey Means is one of them.
Senate Confirmation Hearing today, Senator Tim Kaine: Last month, Secretary Kennedy stated ‘there is no evidence the flu vaccine prevents serious disease or hospitalization or deaths in children.’ Do you agree with that statement?
Surgeon General Nominee Casey Means: I believe vaccines save lives.
Kaine: I want to be scrupulous. Do you agree with him?
Means: I have not personally seen that quote.
Kaine: There is a mountain of evidence about this. This is an easy one.
But Means refused to give a direct answer or contradict RFK Jr’s wacko antivax MAHA bullshit. Refusal to refute the Administration’s antivax position makes her complicit. Makes her a coconspirator. Refusal to answer the question is directly harming human beings and she knows it. You don’t have to look any further than the measles outbreaks in South Carolina, Utah, Florida, Arizona, Georgia, Texas, etc, to see it.
Means actually has a medical degree from Stanford, and she was a surgeon for a while but never completed her residency. She has never been board certified. She gave up any right to the title “Medical Doctor” when she became a grifting wellness influencer who peddles snake oil and RFK Jr’s ridiculous ill informed harmful MAHA nonsense.
She doesn’t even currently have an active medical license.
The fact that this con artist is any serious nominee for Surgeon General is a goddamn travesty, even for Trump.
Date: 26/02/2026 14:23:28
From: Cymek
ID: 2364361
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Jim Wright aka Stonekettle Station:

Casey Means, Trump’s Surgeon General Nominee: “I do believe that Americans are ready to hear about spirituality as it pertains to medicine.”
She believes Americans are ready to hear about the spirits instead of actual science.
Oh, I see you, back there in last row, all yellow-eyed and red faced, getting mad on behalf of your religion. Tell you what, before you you start shouting hosannahs, calmly and rationally explain to me the exact biological mechanism whereby the spirits lower blood pressure, remove an inflamed appendix, or treat stage IV lung cancer. Because unless you can prove using standard forensic methodology that “spirituality as it pertains to medicine” has any measurable impact on health in any fashion, I’m calling shenanigans.
For bonus points: Explain to me the mechanism whereby your medical insurance approves payments for those treatments to a spiritualist. You may use Insurance Company AI if you like.
Casey Means is one of RFK Jr’s raw milk loons. AND she thinks birth control is immoral. Immoral. Raw Milk. Antivax. And no birth control. Let that sink in.
There are “doctors” who pledged an oath to do no harm, doing harm every day and Casey Means is one of them.
Senate Confirmation Hearing today, Senator Tim Kaine: Last month, Secretary Kennedy stated ‘there is no evidence the flu vaccine prevents serious disease or hospitalization or deaths in children.’ Do you agree with that statement?
Surgeon General Nominee Casey Means: I believe vaccines save lives.
Kaine: I want to be scrupulous. Do you agree with him?
Means: I have not personally seen that quote.
Kaine: There is a mountain of evidence about this. This is an easy one.
But Means refused to give a direct answer or contradict RFK Jr’s wacko antivax MAHA bullshit. Refusal to refute the Administration’s antivax position makes her complicit. Makes her a coconspirator. Refusal to answer the question is directly harming human beings and she knows it. You don’t have to look any further than the measles outbreaks in South Carolina, Utah, Florida, Arizona, Georgia, Texas, etc, to see it.
Means actually has a medical degree from Stanford, and she was a surgeon for a while but never completed her residency. She has never been board certified. She gave up any right to the title “Medical Doctor” when she became a grifting wellness influencer who peddles snake oil and RFK Jr’s ridiculous ill informed harmful MAHA nonsense.
She doesn’t even currently have an active medical license.
The fact that this con artist is any serious nominee for Surgeon General is a goddamn travesty, even for Trump.
She has a Karen face
Date: 26/02/2026 14:27:14
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2364363
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
kii said:
Jim Wright aka Stonekettle Station:

Casey Means, Trump’s Surgeon General Nominee: “I do believe that Americans are ready to hear about spirituality as it pertains to medicine.”
She believes Americans are ready to hear about the spirits instead of actual science.
Oh, I see you, back there in last row, all yellow-eyed and red faced, getting mad on behalf of your religion. Tell you what, before you you start shouting hosannahs, calmly and rationally explain to me the exact biological mechanism whereby the spirits lower blood pressure, remove an inflamed appendix, or treat stage IV lung cancer. Because unless you can prove using standard forensic methodology that “spirituality as it pertains to medicine” has any measurable impact on health in any fashion, I’m calling shenanigans.
For bonus points: Explain to me the mechanism whereby your medical insurance approves payments for those treatments to a spiritualist. You may use Insurance Company AI if you like.
Casey Means is one of RFK Jr’s raw milk loons. AND she thinks birth control is immoral. Immoral. Raw Milk. Antivax. And no birth control. Let that sink in.
There are “doctors” who pledged an oath to do no harm, doing harm every day and Casey Means is one of them.
Senate Confirmation Hearing today, Senator Tim Kaine: Last month, Secretary Kennedy stated ‘there is no evidence the flu vaccine prevents serious disease or hospitalization or deaths in children.’ Do you agree with that statement?
Surgeon General Nominee Casey Means: I believe vaccines save lives.
Kaine: I want to be scrupulous. Do you agree with him?
Means: I have not personally seen that quote.
Kaine: There is a mountain of evidence about this. This is an easy one.
But Means refused to give a direct answer or contradict RFK Jr’s wacko antivax MAHA bullshit. Refusal to refute the Administration’s antivax position makes her complicit. Makes her a coconspirator. Refusal to answer the question is directly harming human beings and she knows it. You don’t have to look any further than the measles outbreaks in South Carolina, Utah, Florida, Arizona, Georgia, Texas, etc, to see it.
Means actually has a medical degree from Stanford, and she was a surgeon for a while but never completed her residency. She has never been board certified. She gave up any right to the title “Medical Doctor” when she became a grifting wellness influencer who peddles snake oil and RFK Jr’s ridiculous ill informed harmful MAHA nonsense.
She doesn’t even currently have an active medical license.
The fact that this con artist is any serious nominee for Surgeon General is a goddamn travesty, even for Trump.
She has a Karen face

Date: 26/02/2026 14:34:57
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2364365
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
There are “doctors” who pledged an oath to do no harm, doing harm every day and Casey Means is one of them.
Senate Confirmation Hearing today, Senator Tim Kaine: Last month, Secretary Kennedy stated ‘there is no evidence the flu vaccine prevents serious disease or hospitalization or deaths in children.’ Do you agree with that statement?
Surgeon General Nominee Casey Means: I believe vaccines save lives.
Kaine: I want to be scrupulous. Do you agree with him?
Means: I have not personally seen that quote.
Kaine: There is a mountain of evidence about this. This is an easy one.
But Means refused to give a direct answer or contradict RFK Jr’s wacko antivax MAHA bullshit. Refusal to refute the Administration’s antivax position makes her complicit. Makes her a coconspirator. Refusal to answer the question is directly harming human beings and she knows it. You don’t have to look any further than the measles outbreaks in South Carolina, Utah, Florida, Arizona, Georgia, Texas, etc, to see it.
always good to hear that the libertarian sovereign citizen don’t tread on us we’re not sheep crowd are always so good at standing up to authority and not toeing lines
Date: 26/02/2026 14:36:00
From: Michael V
ID: 2364366
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Jim Wright aka Stonekettle Station:

Casey Means, Trump’s Surgeon General Nominee: “I do believe that Americans are ready to hear about spirituality as it pertains to medicine.”
She believes Americans are ready to hear about the spirits instead of actual science.
Oh, I see you, back there in last row, all yellow-eyed and red faced, getting mad on behalf of your religion. Tell you what, before you you start shouting hosannahs, calmly and rationally explain to me the exact biological mechanism whereby the spirits lower blood pressure, remove an inflamed appendix, or treat stage IV lung cancer. Because unless you can prove using standard forensic methodology that “spirituality as it pertains to medicine” has any measurable impact on health in any fashion, I’m calling shenanigans.
For bonus points: Explain to me the mechanism whereby your medical insurance approves payments for those treatments to a spiritualist. You may use Insurance Company AI if you like.
Casey Means is one of RFK Jr’s raw milk loons. AND she thinks birth control is immoral. Immoral. Raw Milk. Antivax. And no birth control. Let that sink in.
There are “doctors” who pledged an oath to do no harm, doing harm every day and Casey Means is one of them.
Senate Confirmation Hearing today, Senator Tim Kaine: Last month, Secretary Kennedy stated ‘there is no evidence the flu vaccine prevents serious disease or hospitalization or deaths in children.’ Do you agree with that statement?
Surgeon General Nominee Casey Means: I believe vaccines save lives.
Kaine: I want to be scrupulous. Do you agree with him?
Means: I have not personally seen that quote.
Kaine: There is a mountain of evidence about this. This is an easy one.
But Means refused to give a direct answer or contradict RFK Jr’s wacko antivax MAHA bullshit. Refusal to refute the Administration’s antivax position makes her complicit. Makes her a coconspirator. Refusal to answer the question is directly harming human beings and she knows it. You don’t have to look any further than the measles outbreaks in South Carolina, Utah, Florida, Arizona, Georgia, Texas, etc, to see it.
Means actually has a medical degree from Stanford, and she was a surgeon for a while but never completed her residency. She has never been board certified. She gave up any right to the title “Medical Doctor” when she became a grifting wellness influencer who peddles snake oil and RFK Jr’s ridiculous ill informed harmful MAHA nonsense.
She doesn’t even currently have an active medical license.
The fact that this con artist is any serious nominee for Surgeon General is a goddamn travesty, even for Trump.

Date: 26/02/2026 14:36:31
From: buffy
ID: 2364367
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
kii said:
There are “doctors” who pledged an oath to do no harm, doing harm every day and Casey Means is one of them.
Senate Confirmation Hearing today, Senator Tim Kaine: Last month, Secretary Kennedy stated ‘there is no evidence the flu vaccine prevents serious disease or hospitalization or deaths in children.’ Do you agree with that statement?
Surgeon General Nominee Casey Means: I believe vaccines save lives.
Kaine: I want to be scrupulous. Do you agree with him?
Means: I have not personally seen that quote.
Kaine: There is a mountain of evidence about this. This is an easy one.
But Means refused to give a direct answer or contradict RFK Jr’s wacko antivax MAHA bullshit. Refusal to refute the Administration’s antivax position makes her complicit. Makes her a coconspirator. Refusal to answer the question is directly harming human beings and she knows it. You don’t have to look any further than the measles outbreaks in South Carolina, Utah, Florida, Arizona, Georgia, Texas, etc, to see it.
always good to hear that the libertarian sovereign citizen don’t tread on us we’re not sheep crowd are always so good at standing up to authority and not toeing lines
Have they not got a Surgeon General at the moment?
Date: 26/02/2026 14:40:01
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2364368
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Divine Angel said:
Spiny Norman said:

Texas public school teachers are now required to post the 10 Commandments in their classroom. Here’s how one teacher is handling it.
Is there a minimum size the 10 C’s have to be? Could one print it on something the size a postage stamp, for instance?
On the head of a pin, perhaps?
post them with rgba(0,0,0,0) on a rgba(255,255,255,1) background
Date: 26/02/2026 15:06:06
From: Cymek
ID: 2364377
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
False medical claims, medicines, etc is a shit way to make money.
Taking hope away from pain, disease, relief for a quick buck is a low act
Date: 26/02/2026 15:09:22
From: roughbarked
ID: 2364382
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Jim Wright aka Stonekettle Station:

Casey Means, Trump’s Surgeon General Nominee: “I do believe that Americans are ready to hear about spirituality as it pertains to medicine.”
She believes Americans are ready to hear about the spirits instead of actual science.
Oh, I see you, back there in last row, all yellow-eyed and red faced, getting mad on behalf of your religion. Tell you what, before you you start shouting hosannahs, calmly and rationally explain to me the exact biological mechanism whereby the spirits lower blood pressure, remove an inflamed appendix, or treat stage IV lung cancer. Because unless you can prove using standard forensic methodology that “spirituality as it pertains to medicine” has any measurable impact on health in any fashion, I’m calling shenanigans.
For bonus points: Explain to me the mechanism whereby your medical insurance approves payments for those treatments to a spiritualist. You may use Insurance Company AI if you like.
Casey Means is one of RFK Jr’s raw milk loons. AND she thinks birth control is immoral. Immoral. Raw Milk. Antivax. And no birth control. Let that sink in.
There are “doctors” who pledged an oath to do no harm, doing harm every day and Casey Means is one of them.
Senate Confirmation Hearing today, Senator Tim Kaine: Last month, Secretary Kennedy stated ‘there is no evidence the flu vaccine prevents serious disease or hospitalization or deaths in children.’ Do you agree with that statement?
Surgeon General Nominee Casey Means: I believe vaccines save lives.
Kaine: I want to be scrupulous. Do you agree with him?
Means: I have not personally seen that quote.
Kaine: There is a mountain of evidence about this. This is an easy one.
But Means refused to give a direct answer or contradict RFK Jr’s wacko antivax MAHA bullshit. Refusal to refute the Administration’s antivax position makes her complicit. Makes her a coconspirator. Refusal to answer the question is directly harming human beings and she knows it. You don’t have to look any further than the measles outbreaks in South Carolina, Utah, Florida, Arizona, Georgia, Texas, etc, to see it.
Means actually has a medical degree from Stanford, and she was a surgeon for a while but never completed her residency. She has never been board certified. She gave up any right to the title “Medical Doctor” when she became a grifting wellness influencer who peddles snake oil and RFK Jr’s ridiculous ill informed harmful MAHA nonsense.
She doesn’t even currently have an active medical license.
The fact that this con artist is any serious nominee for Surgeon General is a goddamn travesty, even for Trump.
Whatever Casey Means, it just is not correct.
Date: 26/02/2026 15:20:48
From: roughbarked
ID: 2364386
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 26/02/2026 17:37:21
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2364418
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 26/02/2026 17:41:23
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2364421
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

Be funny if Californian secedes, just sayin
Date: 26/02/2026 17:43:49
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2364422
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
captain_spalding said:

Be funny if Californian secedes, just sayin
They have left Greenland off.
Date: 26/02/2026 18:12:36
From: Michael V
ID: 2364440
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

One can only hope everyone in those states sees it that way too and votes sensibly in the mid-terms.
Date: 26/02/2026 22:36:22
From: dv
ID: 2364509
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.ktvu.com/news/americans-cant-sue-usps-even-mail-is-intentionally-not-delivered-supreme-court-rules
Americans can’t sue USPS, even if mail is intentionally not delivered, Supreme Court rules
United States Postal Service v. Lebene Konan
The backstory:
The case involves Euless, Texas landlord Lebene Konan, who’s also a real estate agent and an insurance agent. She claims two employees at her local post office deliberately held back mail belonging to her and her tenants. She said it’s because they didn’t like that she is Black and rents properties to white people.
The dispute started when the mailbox key for one of Konan’s rental properties was changed without her permission. When she contacted the local post office, she was told she would have to prove she owned the property in order to receive a new key. She showed them proof, but the mail delivery problems persisted, eventually costing her rental income when tenants moved out because of the mail situation, she claimed.
How They Voted:
Supreme Court justices voted 5-4 in favor of the Postal Service. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the majority opinion for the five conservative justices. Conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch joined the high court’s three liberal colleagues in dissent.
What they’re saying:
Thomas said the federal law that generally shields the Postal Service from lawsuits over missing, lost and undelivered mail includes “the intentional nondelivery of mail.”
The other side:
In the dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that while the protection against lawsuits is broad, it doesn’t cover a decision not to deliver mail that’s “driven by malicious reasons.”
Konan filed more than 50 complaints to USPS before she sued under the Federal Tort Claims Act, which allows some lawsuits against the government.
Date: 27/02/2026 00:43:03
From: dv
ID: 2364534
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/02/26/us/shah-alam-blind-refugee-border-patrol-hnk
Date: 27/02/2026 07:09:51
From: Michael V
ID: 2364551
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.ktvu.com/news/americans-cant-sue-usps-even-mail-is-intentionally-not-delivered-supreme-court-rules
Americans can’t sue USPS, even if mail is intentionally not delivered, Supreme Court rules
United States Postal Service v. Lebene Konan
The backstory:
The case involves Euless, Texas landlord Lebene Konan, who’s also a real estate agent and an insurance agent. She claims two employees at her local post office deliberately held back mail belonging to her and her tenants. She said it’s because they didn’t like that she is Black and rents properties to white people.
The dispute started when the mailbox key for one of Konan’s rental properties was changed without her permission. When she contacted the local post office, she was told she would have to prove she owned the property in order to receive a new key. She showed them proof, but the mail delivery problems persisted, eventually costing her rental income when tenants moved out because of the mail situation, she claimed.
How They Voted:
Supreme Court justices voted 5-4 in favor of the Postal Service. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the majority opinion for the five conservative justices. Conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch joined the high court’s three liberal colleagues in dissent.
What they’re saying:
Thomas said the federal law that generally shields the Postal Service from lawsuits over missing, lost and undelivered mail includes “the intentional nondelivery of mail.”
The other side:
In the dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that while the protection against lawsuits is broad, it doesn’t cover a decision not to deliver mail that’s “driven by malicious reasons.”
Konan filed more than 50 complaints to USPS before she sued under the Federal Tort Claims Act, which allows some lawsuits against the government.
That’s seriously unfair.
Date: 27/02/2026 10:25:32
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2364579
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Hilary looked them all straight in the eye and said I never had sex with that woman.
Date: 27/02/2026 10:27:50
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2364580
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Hilary looked them all straight in the eye and said I never had sex with that woman.
is that because woman is the adult term
Date: 27/02/2026 12:09:18
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2364600
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
LOL

Date: 27/02/2026 12:15:38
From: Cymek
ID: 2364603
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
LOL

Assuming we aren’t fighting the Fourth Reich with Fuhrer Trump I wonder if the damage he’s done can be reparable.
Date: 27/02/2026 12:24:09
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2364605
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
LOL

Assuming we aren’t fighting the Fourth Reich with Fuhrer Trump I wonder if the damage he’s done can be reparable.
I remain confident that the current madness afflicting the USA will see it emerge more equitable and better governed once a few of the ringleaders are put against the wall.
Date: 27/02/2026 12:24:10
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2364606
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
LOL

Assuming we aren’t fighting the Fourth Reich with Fuhrer Trump I wonder if the damage he’s done can be reparable.
I remain confident that the current madness afflicting the USA will see it emerge more equitable and better governed once a few of the ringleaders are put against the wall.
Date: 27/02/2026 12:31:40
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2364608
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
LOL

Assuming we aren’t fighting the Fourth Reich with Fuhrer Trump I wonder if the damage he’s done can be reparable.
I remain confident that the current madness afflicting the USA will see it emerge more equitable and better governed once a few of the ringleaders are put against the wall.
so there’s a broad sense that like last time they took down the fascists it involved a coordinated global effort
Date: 27/02/2026 12:34:14
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2364609
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Cymek said:
Assuming we aren’t fighting the Fourth Reich with Fuhrer Trump I wonder if the damage he’s done can be reparable.
I remain confident that the current madness afflicting the USA will see it emerge more equitable and better governed once a few of the ringleaders are put against the wall.
so there’s a broad sense that like last time they took down the fascists it involved a coordinated global effort
No I think the Americans will have to work this thing out on their own. There is very little the rest of the world can do bar the diplomatic equivalent of pointing and laughing.
Date: 27/02/2026 12:38:23
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2364610
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
LOL

Assuming we aren’t fighting the Fourth Reich with Fuhrer Trump I wonder if the damage he’s done can be reparable.
I remain confident that the current madness afflicting the USA will see it emerge more equitable and better governed once a few of the ringleaders are put against the wall.
I think it’s all over for them. Too many have gone down too many rabbit holes and firmly believe all the bullshit.
Date: 27/02/2026 12:40:17
From: roughbarked
ID: 2364612
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Bubblecar said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Cymek said:
Assuming we aren’t fighting the Fourth Reich with Fuhrer Trump I wonder if the damage he’s done can be reparable.
I remain confident that the current madness afflicting the USA will see it emerge more equitable and better governed once a few of the ringleaders are put against the wall.
I think it’s all over for them. Too many have gone down too many rabbit holes and firmly believe all the bullshit.
So those who depicted the MAGA great as being put through the grater were on the ball.
Date: 27/02/2026 12:48:51
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2364616
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
I remain confident that the current madness afflicting the USA will see it emerge more equitable and better governed once a few of the ringleaders are put against the wall.
so there’s a broad sense that like last time they took down the fascists it involved a coordinated global effort
No I think the Americans will have to work this thing out on their own. There is very little the rest of the world can do bar the diplomatic equivalent of pointing and laughing.
what if they try to annex / invade neighbouring European nations and open other fronts in collaboration with for example a Pacific island nation
Date: 27/02/2026 12:56:57
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2364621
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:
so there’s a broad sense that like last time they took down the fascists it involved a coordinated global effort
No I think the Americans will have to work this thing out on their own. There is very little the rest of the world can do bar the diplomatic equivalent of pointing and laughing.
what if they try to annex / invade neighbouring European nations and open other fronts in collaboration with for example a Pacific island nation
It’s what we’ve all been dreading.
The US-Nauru axis of evil.
Date: 27/02/2026 13:06:01
From: Cymek
ID: 2364625
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
To be fair NATO should be able to stand up to Russia without the USA.
Trump bullshit seems to have forced this to occur.
With the various military manufacturers in Europe it should mean they are quite capable.
Harder to counter different types of defence systems I imagine
Date: 27/02/2026 13:11:58
From: roughbarked
ID: 2364628
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
To be fair NATO should be able to stand up to Russia without the USA.
Trump bullshit seems to have forced this to occur.
With the various military manufacturers in Europe it should mean they are quite capable.
Harder to counter different types of defence systems I imagine
Who is the USA going to sell its vast weapons manufacture to? Only Israel?
Date: 27/02/2026 13:15:44
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2364629
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Cymek said:
To be fair NATO should be able to stand up to Russia without the USA.
Trump bullshit seems to have forced this to occur.
With the various military manufacturers in Europe it should mean they are quite capable.
Harder to counter different types of defence systems I imagine
Who is the USA going to sell its vast weapons manufacture to? Only Israel?
The Economy Must Grow ¡ Use It Or Lose It ¡
Date: 27/02/2026 13:20:18
From: Cymek
ID: 2364631
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
Cymek said:
To be fair NATO should be able to stand up to Russia without the USA.
Trump bullshit seems to have forced this to occur.
With the various military manufacturers in Europe it should mean they are quite capable.
Harder to counter different types of defence systems I imagine
Who is the USA going to sell its vast weapons manufacture to? Only Israel?
The Economy Must Grow ¡ Use It Or Lose It ¡
That’s the downside for them isn’t it
He likely didn’t think that through.
Could find its a permanent arrangement as making weapons in house makes sense.
Date: 27/02/2026 13:32:20
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2364635
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
Who is the USA going to sell its vast weapons manufacture to? Only Israel?
The Economy Must Grow ¡ Use It Or Lose It ¡
That’s the downside for them isn’t it
He likely didn’t think that through.
Could find its a permanent arrangement as making weapons in house makes sense.
silly people always complain about dual use technology because of how much harm the wrong agents could do with it
but they always forget about how good dual use technology is when you’re actually happily fighting a war
it means that when the good guys (with guns) win, that dual use technology is ready to go for rebuilding (no need, war never set anyone back) and making a country great again (as if it ever wasn’t), and The Economy Will Must Grow super quickly
Date: 27/02/2026 13:40:47
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2364636
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:
so there’s a broad sense that like last time they took down the fascists it involved a coordinated global effort
No I think the Americans will have to work this thing out on their own. There is very little the rest of the world can do bar the diplomatic equivalent of pointing and laughing.
what if they try to annex / invade neighbouring European nations and open other fronts in collaboration with for example a Pacific island nation
He’s given up on Greenland so I don’t think he has any other foreign adventures in mind.
Date: 27/02/2026 13:46:36
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2364637
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
No I think the Americans will have to work this thing out on their own. There is very little the rest of the world can do bar the diplomatic equivalent of pointing and laughing.
what if they try to annex / invade neighbouring European nations and open other fronts in collaboration with for example a Pacific island nation
He’s given up on Greenland so I don’t think he has any other foreign adventures in mind.
Diego Garcia.
Date: 27/02/2026 13:59:25
From: Cymek
ID: 2364638
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:
what if they try to annex / invade neighbouring European nations and open other fronts in collaboration with for example a Pacific island nation
He’s given up on Greenland so I don’t think he has any other foreign adventures in mind.
Diego Garcia.
Eldorado or Atlantis perhaps
Date: 27/02/2026 14:02:58
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2364640
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
SCIENCE said:
what if they try to annex / invade neighbouring European nations and open other fronts in collaboration with for example a Pacific island nation
He’s given up on Greenland so I don’t think he has any other foreign adventures in mind.
Diego Garcia.
Trump probably thinks that a city in Mexico.
Date: 27/02/2026 14:10:52
From: kii
ID: 2364642
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Lololol 😆 it happened again 😆 except this time it’s a drone belonging to CBP.

Date: 27/02/2026 14:20:30
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2364646
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
JudgeMental said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
He’s given up on Greenland so I don’t think he has any other foreign adventures in mind.
Diego Garcia.
Trump probably thinks that a city in Mexico.
or some latin american that needs to be deported
Date: 27/02/2026 14:46:10
From: Cymek
ID: 2364651
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
JudgeMental said:
Diego Garcia.
Trump probably thinks that a city in Mexico.
or some latin american that needs to be deported
Dora the Explorer was sent back by ICE agents
Date: 27/02/2026 14:51:12
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2364653
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Trump, seeking executive power over elections, is urged to declare emergency
Activists who say they are in coordination with the White House are circulating a draft executive order that would unlock extraordinary presidential power over voting.
Updated
February 26, 2026 at 3:05 p.m. ESTtoday at 3:05 p.m. EST
By Isaac Arnsdorf
Pro-Trump activists who say they are in coordination with the White House are circulating a 17-page draft executive order that claims China interfered in the 2020 election as a basis to declare a national emergency that would unlock extraordinary presidential power over voting.
President Donald Trump has repeatedly previewed a plan to mandate voter ID and ban mail ballots in November’s midterm elections, and the activists expect their draft will figure into Trump’s promised executive order on the issue. The White House declined to elaborate on Trump’s plans.
“Under the Constitution, it’s the legislatures and states that really control how a state conducts its elections, and the president doesn’t have any power to do that,” said Peter Ticktin, a Florida lawyer who is advocating for the draft executive order. Ticktin attended the New York Military Academy with Trump and was part of his legal team that filed an unsuccessful 2022 lawsuit accusing Democrats of conspiring to damage him with allegations that his 2016 campaign colluded with Russia.
“But here we have a situation where the president is aware that there are foreign interests that are interfering in our election processes,” Ticktin went on. “That causes a national emergency where the president has to be able to deal with it.”
The emergency would empower the president to ban mail ballots and voting machines as the vectors of foreign interference, Ticktin argued.
The idea of claiming emergency executive powers based on allegations of foreign interference attaches new significance to the administration’s actions to reinvestigate the 2020 election. Trump has never accepted defeat, while never finding evidence of widespread fraud. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard is leading a review of election security that officials said focuses on foreign influence.
A 2021 intelligence review concluded that China considered efforts to influence the election but did not go through with them.
Ticktin said he’s had “certain coordination” with White House officials but declined to specify, citing safety concerns. But his input has successfully led to a presidential action before. Ticktin represents Tina Peters, a former Colorado county clerk imprisoned on state charges arising from breaking into voting equipment, whom Trump said he pardoned in December. (The presidential pardon did not free Peters from her nine-year prison term because the president has no power over state crimes.)
A White House official said the staff is regularly in communication with a variety of outside advocates who want to share their policy ideas with the president, but any speculation about his actions or announcements is just speculation.
“I have searched the depths of Legal Arguments not yet articulated or vetted on this subject, and will be presenting an irrefutable one in the very near future,” Trump said on social media Feb. 13. “I will be presenting them shortly, in the form of an Executive Order,” he added the same day.
Trump is pressuring Republicans to pass legislation to require proof of citizenship for voter registration and ID to cast ballots. The measure, called the Save America Act, passed the House but faces obstacles in the Senate, where Republican leaders have rejected Trump’s demand to change the chamber’s rules to move the legislation forward.
“President Trump is committed to ensuring that Americans have full confidence in the administration of elections, and that includes totally accurate and up-to-date voter rolls free of errors and unlawfully registered non-citizen voters,” White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said. “The President has urged Congress to pass the SAVE Act and other legislative proposals that would establish a uniform standard of photo ID for voting, prohibit no-excuse mail-in voting, and end the practice of ballot harvesting.”
Trump has said that if the bill fails, he will act unilaterally to impose the changes for the midterms. What that executive order could look like and the draft circulating among activists have not been previously reported.
An early version of the proposed draft, obtained by The Washington Post, cites a 2018 executive order that declared an emergency to impose sanctions on foreign entities targeting election infrastructure. President Joe Biden repeatedly extended that emergency, and in 2024, the Treasury Department used the order to place Iranian and Russian entities under sanctions.
“There is now clear and compelling evidence from court cases and forensic analysis that these threats have not been mitigated but instead have intensified,” reads the proposed draft, dated April 2025. “This constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States.”
Last June, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) released FBI records showing an initial tip alleging a Chinese effort to produce fraudulent driver’s licenses for mail ballots. Suspicions of Chinese ballots spurred the hunt for bamboo fibers in Arizona ballots during a Republican-led audit in 2021, which reaffirmed Joe Biden’s victory in the state.
Gabbard recently was present when the FBI searched a warehouse in Fulton County, Georgia, to seize ballots from the 2020 election there. The affidavit submitted to obtain the search warrant, however, did not allege foreign interference. Her office also examined voting machines used in Puerto Rico looking for cybersecurity vulnerabilities, in coordination with the FBI and the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security, according to a spokesperson for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. That inquiry was first reported by Reuters.
“The stage is largely being set by the revelations coming out of foreign powers being involved in influencing the 2020 election,” said Jerome Corsi, who circulated the draft executive order in July. Corsi helped spread the “birtherism” smear against Barack Obama and a conspiracy theory involving slain Democratic staffer Seth Rich, for which he later apologized. Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III investigated Corsi as a possible link between WikiLeaks and Roger Stone during the 2016 campaign, which Corsi denied.
“If there was a provable foreign intrusion, that would be a national security emergency and the order could be issued under his powers as commander in chief,” Corsi added.
Sen. Mark R. Warner of Virginia, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said there is no national emergency.
“We’ve been raising the alarm for weeks about President Trump’s attacks on our elections and now we’re seeing reports that outline how they may be planning to do it,” Warner said in a statement in response to this article. “This is a plot to interfere with the will of voters and undermine both the rule of law and public confidence in our elections.”
The measures listed in the 2025 draft of the proposed executive order include requiring hand-marked and hand-counted paper ballots, requiring voters to register anew for the 2026 midterms with proof of citizenship, and restricting mail ballots to limited circumstances. The draft also proposes authorizing the Justice Department, U.S. Citizen and Immigration Services, the Social Security Administration and the Postal Service to have a role in identifying ineligible voters.
The draft cites emergency authority from laws including the National Emergencies Act of 1976, the Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014 and the Defense Production Act of 1950.
Article I, Section 4 of the Constitution assigns power to regulate elections to state legislatures and Congress, with no role for the president. A presidential emergency on elections has never been tested in court.
Trump also signed an executive order last March to require proof of citizenship on voter registration forms and withhold funding from states accepting mail ballots after Election Day. Courts in five cases blocked parts of the order, with three of them pending appeal and another awaiting a ruling, according to a litigation tracker compiled by the legal website Just Security.
“The conduct of our elections is not for any president to decide. And it must never be manipulated to serve a political agenda,” the League of Women Voters, which brought one of the lawsuits against the 2025 order, said in a statement. “We will challenge any executive action that suppresses voters, undermines free and fair elections, or violates the constitutional framework that protects our democracy.”
A Washington Post-ABC News-Ipsos poll this month found 54 percent of American adults, and 55 percent of independents, oppose Trump’s stated desire for the federal government to take over election administration and vote-counting in certain states. Twenty-three percent of adults said they supported it, and the same proportion said they had no opinion.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/02/26/trump-elections-executive-order-activists/
Date: 27/02/2026 14:55:05
From: buffy
ID: 2364655
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
JudgeMental said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
He’s given up on Greenland so I don’t think he has any other foreign adventures in mind.
Diego Garcia.
Eldorado or Atlantis perhaps
Please, someone whisper Atlantis in his ear.
Date: 27/02/2026 14:57:53
From: Neophyte
ID: 2364656
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Cymek said:
JudgeMental said:
Diego Garcia.
Eldorado or Atlantis perhaps
Please, someone whisper Atlantis in his ear.
Way dow-w-w-w-w-n, below the ocean
Wher-r-r-r-e we wanna see, Trump to be
Date: 27/02/2026 15:00:27
From: Tamb
ID: 2364658
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Cymek said:
JudgeMental said:
Diego Garcia.
Eldorado or Atlantis perhaps
Please, someone whisper Atlantis in his ear.
He’s heard of
NATO. Just tell him it’s the North Atlantis OverThrow Organization.
Date: 27/02/2026 15:02:03
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2364661
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 27/02/2026 15:06:08
From: buffy
ID: 2364662
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Neophyte said:
buffy said:
Cymek said:
Eldorado or Atlantis perhaps
Please, someone whisper Atlantis in his ear.
Way dow-w-w-w-w-n, below the ocean
Wher-r-r-r-e we wanna see, Trump to be
Oh, I’d just like to see him start talking about it as if it was real.
Date: 27/02/2026 15:24:27
From: buffy
ID: 2364668
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Trump, seeking executive power over elections, is urged to declare emergency
Activists who say they are in coordination with the White House are circulating a draft executive order that would unlock extraordinary presidential power over voting.
Updated
February 26, 2026 at 3:05 p.m. ESTtoday at 3:05 p.m. EST
By Isaac Arnsdorf
Pro-Trump activists who say they are in coordination with the White House are circulating a 17-page draft executive order that claims China interfered in the 2020 election as a basis to declare a national emergency that would unlock extraordinary presidential power over voting.
President Donald Trump has repeatedly previewed a plan to mandate voter ID and ban mail ballots in November’s midterm elections, and the activists expect their draft will figure into Trump’s promised executive order on the issue. The White House declined to elaborate on Trump’s plans.
“Under the Constitution, it’s the legislatures and states that really control how a state conducts its elections, and the president doesn’t have any power to do that,” said Peter Ticktin, a Florida lawyer who is advocating for the draft executive order. Ticktin attended the New York Military Academy with Trump and was part of his legal team that filed an unsuccessful 2022 lawsuit accusing Democrats of conspiring to damage him with allegations that his 2016 campaign colluded with Russia.
“But here we have a situation where the president is aware that there are foreign interests that are interfering in our election processes,” Ticktin went on. “That causes a national emergency where the president has to be able to deal with it.”
The emergency would empower the president to ban mail ballots and voting machines as the vectors of foreign interference, Ticktin argued.
The idea of claiming emergency executive powers based on allegations of foreign interference attaches new significance to the administration’s actions to reinvestigate the 2020 election. Trump has never accepted defeat, while never finding evidence of widespread fraud. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard is leading a review of election security that officials said focuses on foreign influence.
A 2021 intelligence review concluded that China considered efforts to influence the election but did not go through with them.
Ticktin said he’s had “certain coordination” with White House officials but declined to specify, citing safety concerns. But his input has successfully led to a presidential action before. Ticktin represents Tina Peters, a former Colorado county clerk imprisoned on state charges arising from breaking into voting equipment, whom Trump said he pardoned in December. (The presidential pardon did not free Peters from her nine-year prison term because the president has no power over state crimes.)
A White House official said the staff is regularly in communication with a variety of outside advocates who want to share their policy ideas with the president, but any speculation about his actions or announcements is just speculation.
“I have searched the depths of Legal Arguments not yet articulated or vetted on this subject, and will be presenting an irrefutable one in the very near future,” Trump said on social media Feb. 13. “I will be presenting them shortly, in the form of an Executive Order,” he added the same day.
Trump is pressuring Republicans to pass legislation to require proof of citizenship for voter registration and ID to cast ballots. The measure, called the Save America Act, passed the House but faces obstacles in the Senate, where Republican leaders have rejected Trump’s demand to change the chamber’s rules to move the legislation forward.
“President Trump is committed to ensuring that Americans have full confidence in the administration of elections, and that includes totally accurate and up-to-date voter rolls free of errors and unlawfully registered non-citizen voters,” White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said. “The President has urged Congress to pass the SAVE Act and other legislative proposals that would establish a uniform standard of photo ID for voting, prohibit no-excuse mail-in voting, and end the practice of ballot harvesting.”
Trump has said that if the bill fails, he will act unilaterally to impose the changes for the midterms. What that executive order could look like and the draft circulating among activists have not been previously reported.
An early version of the proposed draft, obtained by The Washington Post, cites a 2018 executive order that declared an emergency to impose sanctions on foreign entities targeting election infrastructure. President Joe Biden repeatedly extended that emergency, and in 2024, the Treasury Department used the order to place Iranian and Russian entities under sanctions.
“There is now clear and compelling evidence from court cases and forensic analysis that these threats have not been mitigated but instead have intensified,” reads the proposed draft, dated April 2025. “This constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States.”
Last June, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) released FBI records showing an initial tip alleging a Chinese effort to produce fraudulent driver’s licenses for mail ballots. Suspicions of Chinese ballots spurred the hunt for bamboo fibers in Arizona ballots during a Republican-led audit in 2021, which reaffirmed Joe Biden’s victory in the state.
Gabbard recently was present when the FBI searched a warehouse in Fulton County, Georgia, to seize ballots from the 2020 election there. The affidavit submitted to obtain the search warrant, however, did not allege foreign interference. Her office also examined voting machines used in Puerto Rico looking for cybersecurity vulnerabilities, in coordination with the FBI and the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security, according to a spokesperson for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. That inquiry was first reported by Reuters.
“The stage is largely being set by the revelations coming out of foreign powers being involved in influencing the 2020 election,” said Jerome Corsi, who circulated the draft executive order in July. Corsi helped spread the “birtherism” smear against Barack Obama and a conspiracy theory involving slain Democratic staffer Seth Rich, for which he later apologized. Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III investigated Corsi as a possible link between WikiLeaks and Roger Stone during the 2016 campaign, which Corsi denied.
“If there was a provable foreign intrusion, that would be a national security emergency and the order could be issued under his powers as commander in chief,” Corsi added.
Sen. Mark R. Warner of Virginia, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said there is no national emergency.
“We’ve been raising the alarm for weeks about President Trump’s attacks on our elections and now we’re seeing reports that outline how they may be planning to do it,” Warner said in a statement in response to this article. “This is a plot to interfere with the will of voters and undermine both the rule of law and public confidence in our elections.”
The measures listed in the 2025 draft of the proposed executive order include requiring hand-marked and hand-counted paper ballots, requiring voters to register anew for the 2026 midterms with proof of citizenship, and restricting mail ballots to limited circumstances. The draft also proposes authorizing the Justice Department, U.S. Citizen and Immigration Services, the Social Security Administration and the Postal Service to have a role in identifying ineligible voters.
The draft cites emergency authority from laws including the National Emergencies Act of 1976, the Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014 and the Defense Production Act of 1950.
Article I, Section 4 of the Constitution assigns power to regulate elections to state legislatures and Congress, with no role for the president. A presidential emergency on elections has never been tested in court.
Trump also signed an executive order last March to require proof of citizenship on voter registration forms and withhold funding from states accepting mail ballots after Election Day. Courts in five cases blocked parts of the order, with three of them pending appeal and another awaiting a ruling, according to a litigation tracker compiled by the legal website Just Security.
“The conduct of our elections is not for any president to decide. And it must never be manipulated to serve a political agenda,” the League of Women Voters, which brought one of the lawsuits against the 2025 order, said in a statement. “We will challenge any executive action that suppresses voters, undermines free and fair elections, or violates the constitutional framework that protects our democracy.”
A Washington Post-ABC News-Ipsos poll this month found 54 percent of American adults, and 55 percent of independents, oppose Trump’s stated desire for the federal government to take over election administration and vote-counting in certain states. Twenty-three percent of adults said they supported it, and the same proportion said they had no opinion.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/02/26/trump-elections-executive-order-activists/
They really do need to have an independent Electoral Commission like we have.
Date: 27/02/2026 15:31:23
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2364671
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Trump, seeking executive power over elections, is urged to declare emergency
Activists who say they are in coordination with the White House are circulating a draft executive order that would unlock extraordinary presidential power over voting.
Updated
February 26, 2026 at 3:05 p.m. ESTtoday at 3:05 p.m. EST
By Isaac Arnsdorf
Pro-Trump activists who say they are in coordination with the White House are circulating a 17-page draft executive order that claims China interfered in the 2020 election as a basis to declare a national emergency that would unlock extraordinary presidential power over voting.
President Donald Trump has repeatedly previewed a plan to mandate voter ID and ban mail ballots in November’s midterm elections, and the activists expect their draft will figure into Trump’s promised executive order on the issue. The White House declined to elaborate on Trump’s plans.
“Under the Constitution, it’s the legislatures and states that really control how a state conducts its elections, and the president doesn’t have any power to do that,” said Peter Ticktin, a Florida lawyer who is advocating for the draft executive order. Ticktin attended the New York Military Academy with Trump and was part of his legal team that filed an unsuccessful 2022 lawsuit accusing Democrats of conspiring to damage him with allegations that his 2016 campaign colluded with Russia.
“But here we have a situation where the president is aware that there are foreign interests that are interfering in our election processes,” Ticktin went on. “That causes a national emergency where the president has to be able to deal with it.”
The emergency would empower the president to ban mail ballots and voting machines as the vectors of foreign interference, Ticktin argued.
The idea of claiming emergency executive powers based on allegations of foreign interference attaches new significance to the administration’s actions to reinvestigate the 2020 election. Trump has never accepted defeat, while never finding evidence of widespread fraud. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard is leading a review of election security that officials said focuses on foreign influence.
A 2021 intelligence review concluded that China considered efforts to influence the election but did not go through with them.
Ticktin said he’s had “certain coordination” with White House officials but declined to specify, citing safety concerns. But his input has successfully led to a presidential action before. Ticktin represents Tina Peters, a former Colorado county clerk imprisoned on state charges arising from breaking into voting equipment, whom Trump said he pardoned in December. (The presidential pardon did not free Peters from her nine-year prison term because the president has no power over state crimes.)
A White House official said the staff is regularly in communication with a variety of outside advocates who want to share their policy ideas with the president, but any speculation about his actions or announcements is just speculation.
“I have searched the depths of Legal Arguments not yet articulated or vetted on this subject, and will be presenting an irrefutable one in the very near future,” Trump said on social media Feb. 13. “I will be presenting them shortly, in the form of an Executive Order,” he added the same day.
Trump is pressuring Republicans to pass legislation to require proof of citizenship for voter registration and ID to cast ballots. The measure, called the Save America Act, passed the House but faces obstacles in the Senate, where Republican leaders have rejected Trump’s demand to change the chamber’s rules to move the legislation forward.
“President Trump is committed to ensuring that Americans have full confidence in the administration of elections, and that includes totally accurate and up-to-date voter rolls free of errors and unlawfully registered non-citizen voters,” White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said. “The President has urged Congress to pass the SAVE Act and other legislative proposals that would establish a uniform standard of photo ID for voting, prohibit no-excuse mail-in voting, and end the practice of ballot harvesting.”
Trump has said that if the bill fails, he will act unilaterally to impose the changes for the midterms. What that executive order could look like and the draft circulating among activists have not been previously reported.
An early version of the proposed draft, obtained by The Washington Post, cites a 2018 executive order that declared an emergency to impose sanctions on foreign entities targeting election infrastructure. President Joe Biden repeatedly extended that emergency, and in 2024, the Treasury Department used the order to place Iranian and Russian entities under sanctions.
“There is now clear and compelling evidence from court cases and forensic analysis that these threats have not been mitigated but instead have intensified,” reads the proposed draft, dated April 2025. “This constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States.”
Last June, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) released FBI records showing an initial tip alleging a Chinese effort to produce fraudulent driver’s licenses for mail ballots. Suspicions of Chinese ballots spurred the hunt for bamboo fibers in Arizona ballots during a Republican-led audit in 2021, which reaffirmed Joe Biden’s victory in the state.
Gabbard recently was present when the FBI searched a warehouse in Fulton County, Georgia, to seize ballots from the 2020 election there. The affidavit submitted to obtain the search warrant, however, did not allege foreign interference. Her office also examined voting machines used in Puerto Rico looking for cybersecurity vulnerabilities, in coordination with the FBI and the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security, according to a spokesperson for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. That inquiry was first reported by Reuters.
“The stage is largely being set by the revelations coming out of foreign powers being involved in influencing the 2020 election,” said Jerome Corsi, who circulated the draft executive order in July. Corsi helped spread the “birtherism” smear against Barack Obama and a conspiracy theory involving slain Democratic staffer Seth Rich, for which he later apologized. Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III investigated Corsi as a possible link between WikiLeaks and Roger Stone during the 2016 campaign, which Corsi denied.
“If there was a provable foreign intrusion, that would be a national security emergency and the order could be issued under his powers as commander in chief,” Corsi added.
Sen. Mark R. Warner of Virginia, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said there is no national emergency.
“We’ve been raising the alarm for weeks about President Trump’s attacks on our elections and now we’re seeing reports that outline how they may be planning to do it,” Warner said in a statement in response to this article. “This is a plot to interfere with the will of voters and undermine both the rule of law and public confidence in our elections.”
The measures listed in the 2025 draft of the proposed executive order include requiring hand-marked and hand-counted paper ballots, requiring voters to register anew for the 2026 midterms with proof of citizenship, and restricting mail ballots to limited circumstances. The draft also proposes authorizing the Justice Department, U.S. Citizen and Immigration Services, the Social Security Administration and the Postal Service to have a role in identifying ineligible voters.
The draft cites emergency authority from laws including the National Emergencies Act of 1976, the Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014 and the Defense Production Act of 1950.
Article I, Section 4 of the Constitution assigns power to regulate elections to state legislatures and Congress, with no role for the president. A presidential emergency on elections has never been tested in court.
Trump also signed an executive order last March to require proof of citizenship on voter registration forms and withhold funding from states accepting mail ballots after Election Day. Courts in five cases blocked parts of the order, with three of them pending appeal and another awaiting a ruling, according to a litigation tracker compiled by the legal website Just Security.
“The conduct of our elections is not for any president to decide. And it must never be manipulated to serve a political agenda,” the League of Women Voters, which brought one of the lawsuits against the 2025 order, said in a statement. “We will challenge any executive action that suppresses voters, undermines free and fair elections, or violates the constitutional framework that protects our democracy.”
A Washington Post-ABC News-Ipsos poll this month found 54 percent of American adults, and 55 percent of independents, oppose Trump’s stated desire for the federal government to take over election administration and vote-counting in certain states. Twenty-three percent of adults said they supported it, and the same proportion said they had no opinion.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/02/26/trump-elections-executive-order-activists/
They really do need to have an independent Electoral Commission like we have.
We all live in hope I think.
Date: 27/02/2026 17:13:18
From: roughbarked
ID: 2364721
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Trump probably thinks that a city in Mexico.
or some latin american that needs to be deported
Dora the Explorer was sent back by ICE agents
Did they find Wally?
Date: 27/02/2026 20:36:58
From: dv
ID: 2364828
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2026/feb/26/brady-tkachuk-decries-white-houses-ai-video-of-him-insulting-canadians-after-us-gold
US ice hockey star Brady Tkachuk has said he does not appreciate an AI video released by the White House that shows him insulting Canadians.
Tkachuk played in the Americans’ victory over Canada at the Winter Olympics on Sunday, which secured the US men their first gold medal since 1980. In the wake of that win, the White House’s TikTok account published video of Tkachuk saying: “They booed our national anthem, so I had to come out and teach those maple syrup eating fuckers a lesson.”
Tkachuk never said those words and the video, which has had more than 10m views, is labelled as AI-generated.
Date: 27/02/2026 20:41:24
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2364830
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2026/feb/26/brady-tkachuk-decries-white-houses-ai-video-of-him-insulting-canadians-after-us-gold
US ice hockey star Brady Tkachuk has said he does not appreciate an AI video released by the White House that shows him insulting Canadians.
Tkachuk played in the Americans’ victory over Canada at the Winter Olympics on Sunday, which secured the US men their first gold medal since 1980. In the wake of that win, the White House’s TikTok account published video of Tkachuk saying: “They booed our national anthem, so I had to come out and teach those maple syrup eating fuckers a lesson.”
Tkachuk never said those words and the video, which has had more than 10m views, is labelled as AI-generated.
Maybe he’s just upset he wasn’t invited to the White House to eat Maccas.
Date: 28/02/2026 06:50:02
From: dv
ID: 2364872
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The economy’s never been better.
Also

Date: 28/02/2026 06:50:43
From: buffy
ID: 2364873
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
The economy’s never been better.
Also

Dear, oh, dear.
Date: 28/02/2026 06:53:13
From: buffy
ID: 2364874
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Bill Clinton at Congress deposition
I’m rather tickled by the idea mentioned in this piece that the Clintons showing up sets a precedent for a President to appear.
Date: 28/02/2026 07:18:51
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2364875
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
The economy’s never been better.
Also


Date: 28/02/2026 07:59:43
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2364877
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/s/Cr9EGmdVdP
Hillary Clinton said she’s never met Epstein, knows Ghislaine casually.
Date: 28/02/2026 08:52:33
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2364881
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
The economy’s never been better.
Also

It’s the chianti that kills the budget though.
Date: 28/02/2026 11:22:09
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2364910
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
dv said:
The economy’s never been better.
Also

It’s the chianti that kills the budget though.
we mean the economy usually measures the people who have spare cash to dabble in shares right but fair play to them everyone knows there wouldn’t be a housing problem in Australia if only the yupsters stopped smashing their avocados
Date: 28/02/2026 12:42:41
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2364943
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Has this been mentioned here?

https://www.newsweek.com/ice-agents-keep-accidentally-shooting-themselves-11540132
I was offered a pretty well paid job in a Gulf state, teaching people to shoot.
Someone who was already working in the region dissuaded me from it, assuring me that it would be a short path to the looney bin.
He said, if you leave six of those f***wits alone a room with a loaded revolver for ten minutes, you’ll come back and find six dead f***wits.
Date: 28/02/2026 12:51:55
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2364951
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Has this been mentioned here?

https://www.newsweek.com/ice-agents-keep-accidentally-shooting-themselves-11540132
I was offered a pretty well paid job in a Gulf state, teaching people to shoot.
Someone who was already working in the region dissuaded me from it, assuring me that it would be a short path to the looney bin.
He said, if you leave six of those f***wits alone a room with a loaded revolver for ten minutes, you’ll come back and find six dead f***wits.
“country that epitomises shooting oneself in the foot appears to have an epidemic of ice shooting themselves in the feet”
Date: 28/02/2026 12:53:28
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2364952
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Has this been mentioned here?

https://www.newsweek.com/ice-agents-keep-accidentally-shooting-themselves-11540132
I was offered a pretty well paid job in a Gulf state, teaching people to shoot.
Someone who was already working in the region dissuaded me from it, assuring me that it would be a short path to the looney bin.
He said, if you leave six of those f***wits alone a room with a loaded revolver for ten minutes, you’ll come back and find six dead f***wits.
Good news.
Making themselves useful.
Date: 28/02/2026 12:58:47
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2364958
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
captain_spalding said:
Has this been mentioned here?

https://www.newsweek.com/ice-agents-keep-accidentally-shooting-themselves-11540132
I was offered a pretty well paid job in a Gulf state, teaching people to shoot.
Someone who was already working in the region dissuaded me from it, assuring me that it would be a short path to the looney bin.
He said, if you leave six of those f***wits alone a room with a loaded revolver for ten minutes, you’ll come back and find six dead f***wits.
Good news.
Making themselves useful.
fair point surely you should have done your bit for greater humanity and left them in a room with a loaded revolver for 20 minutes to be sure
Date: 28/02/2026 13:01:35
From: roughbarked
ID: 2364960
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
captain_spalding said:
Has this been mentioned here?

https://www.newsweek.com/ice-agents-keep-accidentally-shooting-themselves-11540132
I was offered a pretty well paid job in a Gulf state, teaching people to shoot.
Someone who was already working in the region dissuaded me from it, assuring me that it would be a short path to the looney bin.
He said, if you leave six of those f***wits alone a room with a loaded revolver for ten minutes, you’ll come back and find six dead f***wits.
Good news.
Making themselves useful.
fair point surely you should have done your bit for greater humanity and left them in a room with a loaded revolver for 20 minutes to be sure
Many groups of six…
Date: 28/02/2026 14:45:11
From: dv
ID: 2365006
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/feb/26/what-to-know-cuba-boat-attack
Marx said that history repeats: firstly as tragedy, secondly as farce.
But even the original Bay of Pigs invasion was a farce, so this is like meta-farce.
Date: 28/02/2026 16:49:21
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2365031
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Oops, that’s expensive.
Date: 28/02/2026 17:29:06
From: dv
ID: 2365034
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Could be a mistake, could be the first shot of the civil war…
Date: 28/02/2026 17:29:55
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2365035
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Bangs head against the brick wall
Date: 28/02/2026 17:30:20
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2365036
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Could be a mistake, could be the first shot of the civil war…
Look at my previous post.
Date: 28/02/2026 17:40:09
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2365040
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
Bangs head against the brick wall
Deport them to Greenland?
Date: 28/02/2026 17:42:17
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2365041
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Spiny Norman said:
Bangs head against the brick wall
Deport them to Greenland?
There’s a non-zero chance they’d be deported to Mumbai.
Date: 28/02/2026 17:48:07
From: dv
ID: 2365042
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Speaking in Corpus Christi, Texas, on Friday (Feb 27), US President Donald Trump delivered his first post-State of the Union address, where he boasted about the administration’s economic achievements. During the speech, Trump shared an anecdote about an NYPD officer who allegedly told him that the “roaring” stock market had significantly improved his sex life and marriage by transforming his financial reputation at home.
“There’s this wonderful, tough policeman from New York, he’s taking good care of us, and he said, ‘Sir, it’s so good. My married life has gotten so much better,’” said Trump, as per the New York Post.
The Republican leader, known for veering off-script, quoted the cop as telling him: “My wife thought I was a loser financially. I couldn’t make any money because my 401(k) was dying for years. And now she thinks I’m the smartest financial genius ever. It’s made my sex life good, it’s given me a tremendous boost in life.”
—-
https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/donald-trump-claims-nypd-policemans-sex-life-improved-by-roaring-economy-11148136
He’s so weird
Date: 28/02/2026 17:49:48
From: dv
ID: 2365043
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
dv said:
Could be a mistake, could be the first shot of the civil war…
Look at my previous post.
Ok
Date: 28/02/2026 17:52:53
From: Michael V
ID: 2365044
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
Oops, that’s expensive.
Was that a couple of weeks back?
Date: 28/02/2026 18:04:01
From: kii
ID: 2365048
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Spiny Norman said:
Oops, that’s expensive.
Was that a couple of weeks back?
A day or so ago. The other one was party balloons.
Date: 28/02/2026 18:12:32
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2365049
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
Bangs head against the brick wall

Date: 28/02/2026 18:21:07
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2365051
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Spiny Norman said:
Oops, that’s expensive.
Was that a couple of weeks back?
More recently I think.
Date: 28/02/2026 18:35:00
From: kii
ID: 2365053
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
Bangs head against the brick wall
He’s a typical Texas alpha male. I bet he thinks he’d make a fantastic president, because he has a great head of hair.
From a little Googling I see that he has 4 kids, and is divorced.
Date: 28/02/2026 18:37:21
From: buffy
ID: 2365055
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Spiny Norman said:
Bangs head against the brick wall
He’s a typical Texas alpha male. I bet he thinks he’d make a fantastic president, because he has a great head of hair.
From a little Googling I see that he has 4 kids, and is divorced.
I hope she sent him packing with a suitcase of his own dirty clothes. I thought that was one of the best things my sister did.
Date: 28/02/2026 18:38:14
From: kii
ID: 2365056
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tehran is being bombed, according to the MeidasTouch people.
Date: 28/02/2026 18:39:23
From: buffy
ID: 2365057
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Tehran is being bombed, according to the MeidasTouch people.
ABC’s got it too now
Date: 28/02/2026 18:48:00
From: Michael V
ID: 2365058
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Michael V said:
Spiny Norman said:
Oops, that’s expensive.
Was that a couple of weeks back?
A day or so ago. The other one was party balloons.
Thanks.
Date: 28/02/2026 19:27:00
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2365079
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
damn they must have found something heavy in them files
Date: 28/02/2026 19:46:09
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2365083
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
damn they must have found something heavy in them files
Mini black hole?
Date: 28/02/2026 19:58:56
From: Michael V
ID: 2365086
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
damn they must have found something heavy in them files
I’ll say.
Date: 28/02/2026 20:03:55
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2365087
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
damn they must have found something heavy in them files
I’ll say.
Fell through the Earth and then kept going.
Date: 28/02/2026 20:07:53
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2365088
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
damn they must have found something heavy in them files
Someone in Iran has a copy.
Date: 28/02/2026 20:18:21
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2365089
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
No Nobel Peace Prize for Donny this year, then
Date: 28/02/2026 20:21:36
From: dv
ID: 2365092
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Operation Epstein Fury

Date: 28/02/2026 20:26:51
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2365097
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Operation Epstein Fury

Someone suggested Operation Golden Shower.
Date: 28/02/2026 20:36:31
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2365102
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Donald Trump, 2013:

Date: 28/02/2026 20:42:40
From: ruby
ID: 2365107
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Operation Epstein Fury

:))
Operation Epic Furry
Date: 28/02/2026 20:45:50
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2365110
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ruby said:
dv said:
Operation Epstein Fury

:))
Operation Epic Furry
Operation Epic Furphy.
Date: 28/02/2026 21:00:51
From: ruby
ID: 2365111
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
ruby said:
dv said:
Operation Epstein Fury

:))
Operation Epic Furry
Operation Epic Furphy.
:))
Date: 28/02/2026 21:04:27
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2365112
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Operation Epstein Fury

More beautiful than Operation Shock and Awe.
Date: 28/02/2026 21:08:35
From: party_pants
ID: 2365113
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
dv said:
Operation Epstein Fury

More beautiful than Operation Shock and Awe.
Operation Epic Tantrum
Date: 28/02/2026 21:21:08
From: Michael V
ID: 2365118
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Donald Trump, 2013:

Clearly shows his thinking then and now, for him.
Date: 28/02/2026 21:37:23
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2365126
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The good news this week is, of course, that by calling Bill and Hilary Clinton to testify to the House Oversight Committee, the Republicans have established the precedent that a former President and a former ‘First Lady’ can be compelled to appear before such an inquiry.
And, with just a little bit of luck, Trump won’t be President forever, and the Republicans won’t control the government.
As someone else has said, Melania had better start polishing up her English.
Date: 28/02/2026 21:43:27
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2365130
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
>>Trump won’t be President forever
Well he is getting on a bit.
I reckon he’s only got a max of two terms left.
Date: 28/02/2026 21:45:45
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2365132
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
>>Trump won’t be President forever
Well he is getting on a bit.
I reckon he’s only got a max of two terms left.
He might fall down some stairs on Airforce One.
Date: 28/02/2026 21:45:50
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2365133
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
>>Trump won’t be President forever
Well he is getting on a bit.
I reckon he’s only got a max of two terms left.
There’s keen interest in betting markets in the prospect that he won’t make it to 2027.
Date: 28/02/2026 21:47:47
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2365135
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Peak Warming Man said:
>>Trump won’t be President forever
Well he is getting on a bit.
I reckon he’s only got a max of two terms left.
There’s keen interest in betting markets in the prospect that he won’t make it to 2027.
If I were a betting gal, I woulda put money on him not seeing Christmas 2025.
Date: 28/02/2026 21:49:26
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2365136
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Peak Warming Man said:
>>Trump won’t be President forever
Well he is getting on a bit.
I reckon he’s only got a max of two terms left.
There’s keen interest in betting markets in the prospect that he won’t make it to 2027.
Well JD, as Vance likes to be called, is OK but he’s just not the Donald.
Date: 28/02/2026 21:51:38
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2365137
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
captain_spalding said:
Peak Warming Man said:
>>Trump won’t be President forever
Well he is getting on a bit.
I reckon he’s only got a max of two terms left.
There’s keen interest in betting markets in the prospect that he won’t make it to 2027.
If I were a betting gal, I woulda put money on him not seeing Christmas 2025.
William Hill would give you pretty generous odds about that.
Date: 28/02/2026 21:54:28
From: Kingy
ID: 2365138
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
Peak Warming Man said:
>>Trump won’t be President forever
Well he is getting on a bit.
I reckon he’s only got a max of two terms left.
He might fall down some stairs on Airforce One.
The emergency exit stairs, in flight.
Just to outdo putins defenestration height record.
Date: 1/03/2026 15:49:43
From: kii
ID: 2365333
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 1/03/2026 18:21:07
From: buffy
ID: 2365383
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
A contribution from my sister in Texas:
Facebook link, George Bush
Date: 1/03/2026 20:43:47
From: kii
ID: 2365427
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Wait. What?
Trump works for our ABC under one of his aliases?
🤣🤣
Date: 1/03/2026 22:56:15
From: kii
ID: 2365446
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Heather Delaney Reese.
A new political commentator for me. The video is worth watching. Mainly focusing on the recent Angel Family event at the White House.
Date: 2/03/2026 10:41:46
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2365495
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Carrick Ryan
As the US stumbles into another war, it’s worth taking stock at just how rapidly the US media ecosystem is falling under Trump’s control.
Paramount Skydance are set to spend an eye watering $111 billion to buy Warner Bros. But before I explain why this is alarming so many people, let’s take a step back.
Skydance was a company led by David Ellison and financially backed by his tech billionaire father, Larry Ellison, who happens to be a close Trump ally and major Republican donor. In 2025, Skydance was seeking to merge with Paramount Pictures, owners of CBS News.
Before Trump’s FTC would sign off on the merger, Paramount agreed to pay Trump a $16 million settlement over a “60 Minutes” interview with former vice president Kamala Harris, with Trump claiming that the network had engaged in election interference in the way the program was edited.
This payment prompted widespread criticism, including from within CBS, with The Late Show’s Stephen Colbert attracting Trump’s fury when he called the payment a “big fat bribe”. Colbert’s show was cancelled almost immediately after, with Trump ominously warning that fellow Trump critic Jimmy Kimmel would be next (…he was).
In October, Ellison spent $150 million to acquire the right-leaning outlet “The Free Press” and made its co-founder, Bari Weiss, the editor-in-chief of CBS News. One of her first moves was to intervene to block a 60 Minutes story on the Trump administration’s deportation policies just hours before broadcast.
Multiple veteran journalists and producers have left CBS News as a result, with a long-serving executive producer among those publicly claiming that staff were instructed to tailor reporting toward a “specific political viewpoint”.
According to recent reports, CBS News has now officially replaced its longstanding, detailed 38-page editorial standards handbook with a streamlined set of five principles under Weiss’s leadership. One of which is an explicit “We love America” editorial stance.
It’s within this context that the owners of CBS, Paramount Skydance, has just bought Warner Bros… the owners of CNN.
What raises even further concern is the fact this hostile takeover appears to be largely funded by the sovereign wealth funds of Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Qatar.
If this deal goes through, it will bring Trump one step closer to complete media control. Just as we’ve witnessed in Russia, Turkey, Hungary, and countless other examples, regimes secure control over their people by ensuring regime aligned oligarchs are in control of the nations media.
Soon, David Ellison will control CBS and CNN.
Larry Elison now controls Tik Tok (after Trump forced the Chinese owners to sell).
Elon Musk controls “X”, and has been proven to manipulate the algorithms on the platform to promote Trump and far right narratives.
Mark Zuckerberg controls Facebook and Instagram, and announced they would stop fact-checking on the platforms right before attending Trump’s inauguration. He then added Trump loyalists to the Meta Board and to senior policy positions.
Jeff Bezos controls the Washington Post, and personally blocked a draft endorsement of Kamala Harris before the 2024 election, and then announced that The Washington Post’s opinion section would limit viewpoints to those aligned with “personal liberties and free markets”… i.e. no longer publish content critical of Trump.
The Sinclair Family (major Republican donors) controls 185 local TV stations across the country, and mandated that these stations air political commentary segments hosted by former Trump Advisors, reaching about 40% of US households.
Rupert Murdoch controls Fox News, the Wall St Journal and New York Post. A media company that was successfully sued for $787.5 million after court filings revealed that top Fox hosts and executives promoted Trump’s false “election fraud” claims despite knowing they were lies.
Trump also signed Executive Orders that slashed funding of public broadcasters PBS and NPR, after he alleged a bias against him. Funding was also cut to the international pro-democracy media outlets, Voice of America, Radio Free Europe, and Radio Free Asia (although Congress has recently restored some of this funding).
The Associated Press have been barred from covering certain White House and presidential events, such as Oval Office speeches and trips on Air Force One, because they refused to refer to the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America.
Trump routinely makes public statements demanding journalists and media identities be fired, and recently demanded that Netflix remove board member Susan Rice, a former national security adviser, accusing her of being biased and threatening unspecified “consequences” if she was remained.
More recently, the FCC launched the “Pledge America” campaign, encouraging broadcasters to air patriotic content like the Pledge of Allegiance and the national anthem daily. Part of a concerted effort to target any content critical of Trump by framing it as unpatriotic.
This is all taking place as we continue to witness extraordinary personal attacks on journalists that ask questions he dislikes, including threatening an Australian journalist that his question about his personal business dealings would harm Australia’s prospects in upcoming trade and military negotiations.
Meanwhile, the White House has handed press credentials to a comical list of right-wing online influencers, turning some press conferences into a cringe worthy performance of platitudes that would make Putin embarrassed.
None of this is normal, and it’s happened in just over 12 months. He has three years to go… this is just the first step.
Date: 2/03/2026 12:58:28
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2365518
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
so all you have to do is announce that you grab them by the purulent, and suddenly it’s not illegal
Donald Trump on Saturday appeared to link the massive attack he ordered against Iran to his persistent claims about his 2020 election loss to former president Joe Biden, in a social media post about allegations that Tehran’s government interfered in the US president elections. “Iran tried to interfere in 2020, 2024 elections to stop Trump,” his Truth Social post said, “and now faces renewed war with United States”.
Date: 2/03/2026 17:54:35
From: AussieDJ
ID: 2365622
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 2/03/2026 18:22:55
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2365628
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
AussieDJ said:

^
Date: 2/03/2026 18:24:42
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2365629
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
AussieDJ said:

^
Date: 2/03/2026 18:30:06
From: roughbarked
ID: 2365630
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
AussieDJ said:

^
Yeah well, he was spot on wasn’t he or she who made that image.
Date: 2/03/2026 18:32:44
From: roughbarked
ID: 2365632
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
AussieDJ said:

^
Yeah well, he was spot on wasn’t he or she who made that image.
Bernard Hage is a he. I think.
Date: 2/03/2026 18:57:07
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2365635
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
^
Yeah well, he was spot on wasn’t he or she who made that image.
Bernard Hage is a he. I think.
terrible to think that even in death the legacy of jeevacation involves fucking up 100 school girls a day
Date: 3/03/2026 08:20:54
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2365765
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The corpse is starting to rot away. Hopefully not long to go now.
His ear looks pretty good for one that’s been hit by a bullet.

Date: 3/03/2026 10:13:17
From: roughbarked
ID: 2365782
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 3/03/2026 12:25:09
From: fsm
ID: 2365826
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
The corpse is starting to rot away. Hopefully not long to go now.
His ear looks pretty good for one that’s been hit by a bullet.

That’s where the holy water hit him.
Date: 3/03/2026 12:29:28
From: Cymek
ID: 2365828
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
fsm said:
Spiny Norman said:
The corpse is starting to rot away. Hopefully not long to go now.
His ear looks pretty good for one that’s been hit by a bullet.

That’s where the holy water hit him.
I wonder if the marks on his neck were some weird sex choking thing with Putin
Date: 3/03/2026 13:04:06
From: Michael V
ID: 2365844
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
fsm said:
Spiny Norman said:
The corpse is starting to rot away. Hopefully not long to go now.
His ear looks pretty good for one that’s been hit by a bullet.

That’s where the holy water hit him.
Just a droplet, I take it. A whole bottle of it would have killed him, I reckon.
Date: 3/03/2026 13:11:06
From: buffy
ID: 2365847
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
fsm said:
Spiny Norman said:
The corpse is starting to rot away. Hopefully not long to go now.
His ear looks pretty good for one that’s been hit by a bullet.

That’s where the holy water hit him.
Just a droplet, I take it. A whole bottle of it would have killed him, I reckon.
This was the proof of concept…
Date: 3/03/2026 13:17:42
From: roughbarked
ID: 2365848
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Michael V said:
fsm said:
That’s where the holy water hit him.
Just a droplet, I take it. A whole bottle of it would have killed him, I reckon.
This was the proof of concept…
He’d go off in a puff of smoke.
Date: 3/03/2026 13:52:14
From: roughbarked
ID: 2365858
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

What cream was he using? Super deep heat?
Date: 3/03/2026 14:05:28
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2365863
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:

What cream was he using? Super deep heat?
He’s not a typical redneck who get their redneck from working in the field, driving the tractor, clearing land, and at night read the bible by oil lamp. Good god-fearing wholesome lives.
Date: 3/03/2026 14:07:27
From: Michael V
ID: 2365865
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Michael V said:
fsm said:
That’s where the holy water hit him.
Just a droplet, I take it. A whole bottle of it would have killed him, I reckon.
This was the proof of concept…
We can but hope.
Date: 3/03/2026 14:15:23
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2365869
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
roughbarked said:
buffy said:
Michael V said:
Cymek said:
fsm said:
Spiny Norman said:
The corpse is starting to rot away. Hopefully not long to go now.
His ear looks pretty good for one that’s been hit by a bullet.

That’s where the holy water hit him.
I wonder if the marks on his neck were some weird sex choking thing with Putin
Just a droplet, I take it. A whole bottle of it would have killed him, I reckon.
This was the proof of concept…
He’d go off in a puff of smoke.

What cream was he using? Super deep heat?
grab them by the cervix
Date: 4/03/2026 01:21:54
From: kii
ID: 2366134
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The History Wizard is worth your time. Has a master’s degree in the Holocaust and Genocide Studies.
Date: 4/03/2026 02:54:47
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2366137
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
The History Wizard is worth your time. Has a master’s degree in the Holocaust and Genocide Studies.
what’s your favourite episode
Date: 4/03/2026 10:16:53
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2366162
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 4/03/2026 10:25:29
From: Michael V
ID: 2366165
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:

War is awful.
USA is awful.
Date: 4/03/2026 10:30:18
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2366168
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Goodo, another crusade.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/mar/03/us-israel-iran-war-christian-rhetoric
Link
Date: 4/03/2026 10:41:53
From: Michael V
ID: 2366175
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
Goodo, another crusade.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/mar/03/us-israel-iran-war-christian-rhetoric
Link
Maybe worse. The Administrations is initiating a war because they want Armageddon, and believe that it’s Trump’s God-given job to start it.
Date: 4/03/2026 12:54:57
From: buffy
ID: 2366220
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Seems I missed a Randy Rainbow song last week.
The Fate of Melania
Date: 4/03/2026 13:13:00
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2366228
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
JudgeMental said:
Goodo, another crusade.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/mar/03/us-israel-iran-war-christian-rhetoric
Link
Maybe worse. The Administrations is initiating a war because they want Armageddon, and believe that it’s Trump’s God-given job to start it.
we feel sick
not surprised just sick
Date: 4/03/2026 13:15:36
From: roughbarked
ID: 2366229
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
JudgeMental said:
Goodo, another crusade.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/mar/03/us-israel-iran-war-christian-rhetoric
Link
Maybe worse. The Administrations is initiating a war because they want Armageddon, and believe that it’s Trump’s God-given job to start it.
we feel sick
not surprised just sick
It isn’t sitting well with many.
Date: 4/03/2026 13:20:13
From: Cymek
ID: 2366230
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
JudgeMental said:
Goodo, another crusade.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/mar/03/us-israel-iran-war-christian-rhetoric
Link
Maybe worse. The Administrations is initiating a war because they want Armageddon, and believe that it’s Trump’s God-given job to start it.
we feel sick
not surprised just sick
I’d believe that
Thinking Christians come out on top and then off they go and ascend to heaven during the rapture.
Have three religions involved don’t we, a modern version of the crusades still going on
Date: 4/03/2026 13:21:55
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2366231
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
Maybe worse. The Administrations is initiating a war because they want Armageddon, and believe that it’s Trump’s God-given job to start it.
we feel sick
not surprised just sick
It isn’t sitting well with many.
we mean cutting to the chase how is this not state sponsored religious extremist terrorism plain and simple
Date: 4/03/2026 13:23:33
From: roughbarked
ID: 2366232
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
we feel sick
not surprised just sick
It isn’t sitting well with many.
we mean cutting to the chase how is this not state sponsored religious extremist terrorism plain and simple
I’m not arguing. However, I don’t believe that Trump is the messiah.
Date: 4/03/2026 13:26:07
From: Cymek
ID: 2366233
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
we feel sick
not surprised just sick
It isn’t sitting well with many.
we mean cutting to the chase how is this not state sponsored religious extremist terrorism plain and simple
It certainly is, might is right doctrine
Its because if we are honest, many people don’t think Muslims are humans and are all terrorists so killing them is like pest control.
You only have to read comments all over the internet to realise the disgusting view people hold.
One was people agreeing that giving Muslim beggars condoms because they have too many children was completely justified.
Date: 4/03/2026 13:27:39
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2366234
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
If Trump was to pop his clogs today (and, tis a consummation / devoutly to be wish’d), would JD Vance carry on with the Operation Epstein Distraction, or declare ‘mission accomplished’ and abandon it?
Date: 4/03/2026 13:35:01
From: Cymek
ID: 2366235
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
If Trump was to pop his clogs today (and, tis a consummation / devoutly to be wish’d), would JD Vance carry on with the Operation Epstein Distraction, or declare ‘mission accomplished’ and abandon it?
I wonder what they are hoping the result will be
I imagine Iranian society isn’t going to become democratic anytime soon
They aren’t a fantastic society with how they work but has any outside interference since WW2 fixed a repressive nation
It just shifts the power balance and fragments its
Date: 4/03/2026 13:35:39
From: Michael V
ID: 2366236
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
JudgeMental said:
Goodo, another crusade.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/mar/03/us-israel-iran-war-christian-rhetoric
Link
Maybe worse. The Administration is initiating a war because they want Armageddon, and believe that it’s Trump’s God-given job to start it.
we feel sick
not surprised just sick
Empathy.
:(
Date: 4/03/2026 13:45:16
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2366238
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ah well guess it’s not all bad news, while the abrahamics go at each other it’s possible to leave the pacific and eastasia to their own devices and have another shot at the largest contiguous empire in history
Date: 4/03/2026 14:39:18
From: Michael V
ID: 2366246
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
If Trump was to pop his clogs today (and, tis a consummation / devoutly to be wish’d), would JD Vance carry on with the Operation Epstein Distraction, or declare ‘mission accomplished’ and abandon it?
Interesting question. I suppose it depends whether his keepers/sponsors/advisors are mentioned nefariously.
Date: 4/03/2026 14:56:42
From: kii
ID: 2366249
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
JudgeMental said:
Goodo, another crusade.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/mar/03/us-israel-iran-war-christian-rhetoric
Link
Maybe worse. The Administrations is initiating a war because they want Armageddon, and believe that it’s Trump’s God-given job to start it.
we feel sick
not surprised just sick
After associating with a few Evangelican USAians I came to this conclusion a few years back.
Look at the religious nutters that Trump surrounds himself with. His fairly recent comments about not getting into heaven. Add his malignant narcissism and that most likely means he will have a massive narcissistic meltdown* and destroy everything.
*there’s a term for it…I’ll have to Google.
Date: 4/03/2026 15:06:15
From: kii
ID: 2366251
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Narcissistic collapse is the term that came up when I googled. His niece, Mary, has described it a few times. Her description of it made me feel ill, imagining Trump’s collapse.
Date: 4/03/2026 15:12:29
From: Cymek
ID: 2366253
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Narcissistic collapse is the term that came up when I googled. His niece, Mary, has described it a few times. Her description of it made me feel ill, imagining Trump’s collapse.
I also wonder if Trump has a scorched Earth policy when his term is up
Assuming he gives up at all.
He’s got cronies everywhere I imagine and could create false flag attacks that require him to stay on as Commander and Quiff
Date: 4/03/2026 15:30:13
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2366255
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
captain_spalding said:
If Trump was to pop his clogs today (and, tis a consummation / devoutly to be wish’d), would JD Vance carry on with the Operation Epstein Distraction, or declare ‘mission accomplished’ and abandon it?
I wonder what they are hoping the result will be
I imagine Iranian society isn’t going to become democratic anytime soon
They aren’t a fantastic society with how they work but has any outside interference since WW2 fixed a repressive nation
It just shifts the power balance and fragments its
Sets count down counter for Khamenei No 2.
Date: 4/03/2026 15:34:23
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2366256
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
Cymek said:
captain_spalding said:
If Trump was to pop his clogs today (and, tis a consummation / devoutly to be wish’d), would JD Vance carry on with the Operation Epstein Distraction, or declare ‘mission accomplished’ and abandon it?
I wonder what they are hoping the result will be
I imagine Iranian society isn’t going to become democratic anytime soon
They aren’t a fantastic society with how they work but has any outside interference since WW2 fixed a repressive nation
It just shifts the power balance and fragments its
Sets count down counter for Khamenei No 2.
pretty sure the policy is that countries and their people should have the right to choose their own government as long as they choose the government that the true leaders of the world want them to choose
Date: 4/03/2026 15:53:41
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2366262
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Cymek said:
I wonder what they are hoping the result will be
I imagine Iranian society isn’t going to become democratic anytime soon
They aren’t a fantastic society with how they work but has any outside interference since WW2 fixed a repressive nation
It just shifts the power balance and fragments its
Sets count down counter for Khamenei No 2.
pretty sure the policy is that countries and their people should have the right to choose their own government as long as they choose the government that the true leaders of the world want them to choose
Yep, must be a true leader of choice.
Date: 4/03/2026 18:44:19
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2366299
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
And speaking of Jesus Christ, Superstar…

Date: 4/03/2026 18:47:39
From: Cymek
ID: 2366301
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
And speaking of Jesus Christ, Superstar…

I suppose we may see if Iran has any nukes before this conflict is over
Date: 4/03/2026 18:51:06
From: furious
ID: 2366302
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
Divine Angel said:
And speaking of Jesus Christ, Superstar…

I suppose we may see if Iran has any nukes before this conflict is over
Even if they don’t, they might be tempted to spread their enriched uranium across the region…
Date: 4/03/2026 18:55:17
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2366303
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
Divine Angel said:
And speaking of Jesus Christ, Superstar…

I suppose we may see if Iran has any nukes before this conflict is over
🫤
Harrison Mann, a 13-year veteran of the U.S. Army who served under President Barack Obama, during Trump’s first term and under President Joe Biden, told HuffPost that for soldiers, there “isn’t much of a difference” inside the military — at least “culturally speaking” — even when presidents are “doing some really crazy stuff” publicly, he said. Because of that, he argues it may be too soon to say whether Hegseth can actually inflict permanent damage to the military. Mann is, however, deeply worried about what happens to the public perception of the troops in the meantime. “There’s danger in commanders telling soldiers they only vouch for Christians, whites or MAGA supporters. When the public starts to view the military that way too, then you get to a much more dangerous place where they no longer have trust in them,” he said.
feels like all these huff pieces and every other outlet as well they’re kind of missing the oil tanker
bit like the paedo files, isn’t it, once people are actually talking about it, it’s already been happening for decades and many victims have been abused and they’ve gotten away with 100 lifetimes of crime
Date: 4/03/2026 19:04:00
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2366305
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
furious said:
Cymek said:
Divine Angel said:
And speaking of Jesus Christ, Superstar…

I suppose we may see if Iran has any nukes before this conflict is over
Even if they don’t, they might be tempted to spread their enriched uranium across the region…
well that’s counterproductive, seems very much the opposite of enrichment
Date: 4/03/2026 19:12:25
From: Cymek
ID: 2366308
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
furious said:
Cymek said:
Divine Angel said:
And speaking of Jesus Christ, Superstar…

I suppose we may see if Iran has any nukes before this conflict is over
Even if they don’t, they might be tempted to spread their enriched uranium across the region…
Yes
Date: 4/03/2026 19:14:09
From: Cymek
ID: 2366309
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Cymek said:
Divine Angel said:
And speaking of Jesus Christ, Superstar…

I suppose we may see if Iran has any nukes before this conflict is over
🫤
Harrison Mann, a 13-year veteran of the U.S. Army who served under President Barack Obama, during Trump’s first term and under President Joe Biden, told HuffPost that for soldiers, there “isn’t much of a difference” inside the military — at least “culturally speaking” — even when presidents are “doing some really crazy stuff” publicly, he said. Because of that, he argues it may be too soon to say whether Hegseth can actually inflict permanent damage to the military. Mann is, however, deeply worried about what happens to the public perception of the troops in the meantime. “There’s danger in commanders telling soldiers they only vouch for Christians, whites or MAGA supporters. When the public starts to view the military that way too, then you get to a much more dangerous place where they no longer have trust in them,” he said.
feels like all these huff pieces and every other outlet as well they’re kind of missing the oil tanker
bit like the paedo files, isn’t it, once people are actually talking about it, it’s already been happening for decades and many victims have been abused and they’ve gotten away with 100 lifetimes of crime
Yes I can see why hell was invented to punish the truly wicked as death wasn’t enough
Date: 4/03/2026 20:07:12
From: roughbarked
ID: 2366330
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
It isn’t sitting well with many.
we mean cutting to the chase how is this not state sponsored religious extremist terrorism plain and simple
It certainly is, might is right doctrine
Its because if we are honest, many people don’t think Muslims are humans and are all terrorists so killing them is like pest control.
You only have to read comments all over the internet to realise the disgusting view people hold.
One was people agreeing that giving Muslim beggars condoms because they have too many children was completely justified.
Islam is a peaceful religion.
Date: 4/03/2026 21:16:16
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2366357
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
we mean cutting to the chase how is this not state sponsored religious extremist terrorism plain and simple
It certainly is, might is right doctrine
Its because if we are honest, many people don’t think Muslims are humans and are all terrorists so killing them is like pest control.
You only have to read comments all over the internet to realise the disgusting view people hold.
One was people agreeing that giving Muslim beggars condoms because they have too many children was completely justified.
Islam is a peaceful religion.
note of course that
Rohingya people have been persecuted on a regular basis by the government and Buddhist nationalists. In late 2016, Myanmar’s armed forces and police launched a major crackdown against the people in Rakhine State which is located in the country’s northwestern region. The Burmese military was accused of committing ethnic cleansing and genocide by various United Nations agencies, International Criminal Court officials, human rights groups, journalists, and governments. The UN found evidence of wide-scale human rights violations, including extrajudicial killings; summary executions; gang rapes; arson of Rohingya villages, businesses, and schools; and infanticides. At least 6,700 Rohingya were killed in the first month of attacks, between 25 August and 24 September 2017. The Burmese government dismissed these findings by stating they are “exaggerations”. Using statistical extrapolations which were based on surveys which were conducted with a total of 3,321 Rohingya refugee households in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh, a study which was conducted in January 2018 estimated that the military and the local Rakhine population killed at least 25,000 Rohingya people and perpetrated gang rapes and other forms of sexual violence against 18,000 Rohingya women and girls. They estimated that 116,000 Rohingya were beaten, and 36,000 were thrown into fires. The military operations displaced a large number of people, triggering a refugee crisis. The largest wave of Rohingya refugees fled Myanmar in 2017, resulting in the largest human exodus in Asia since the Vietnam War. According to UN reports, over 700,000 people fled or were driven out of Rakhine State, and took shelter in neighbouring Bangladesh as refugees as of September 2018.
nobody cares about shit like this because buddhism is peace and ASIANS are unimportant so genociding 25k of them is just a good solution to whatever problem they were trying to solve

oh interesting

Date: 4/03/2026 22:01:23
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2366365
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

https://newlinesmag.com/essays/pete-hegseths-tattoos-and-the-crusading-obsession-of-the-far-right/
Link
Date: 5/03/2026 03:07:10
From: AussieDJ
ID: 2366393
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Robert F Kennedy Jr: 1 year of failure
In his first speech as Secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Robert F Kennedy Jr laid out a plan to restore trust. The COVID-19 pandemic saw public faith in Federal health and science plummet—between April, 2020, and September, 2023, the percentage of polling respondents who trusted coronavirus and vaccine information from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) “a great deal” or “a fair amount”, fell from 83% to 63%—and the HHS employees to whom he was speaking were facing devastating mass lay-offs and funding cuts. Although Kennedy did not mince words about the likely fate of staff resistant to his ambitions, he promised open and honest engagement with everyone willing to work towards making the USA healthy again. To the Senate committee who confirmed his nomination, Kennedy promised a receptive and collaborative relationship, and to the public from whom he claims his mandate, he promised a new era of unbiased science without hidden conflicts of interest, secrecy, or profiteering. Radical transparency, gold-standard science, ethics, compassion, competency, and pride would restore to HHS the unimpeachable authority that the USA needs and deserves. Politicians are known to break promises, but Kennedy’s record, 1 year in, has been a failure by most measures, especially his own.
10 days after his speech about trust and openness, HHS rescinded a 54-year-old policy of soliciting public comments for new rules and regulations, silencing the voices of many of the stakeholders he pledged to serve. Kennedy has summarily dismissed advisers and experts, communicated policy changes on pay-walled media, fired a whistleblower, and overseen the revisions of guidelines and recommendations, contradicting decades of established science, often to the benefit of industries he formerly condemned. Under Kennedy’s leadership, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) shuttered programmes studying the health effects of air pollution, HHS withheld a report linking alcohol consumption to cancer, and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) withdrew warnings of potential harm from consuming products (such as raw milk and chlorine dioxide) falsely marketed as treatments for autism. His changes at CDC have driven 26 states to reject official guidance on vaccine policy, and in December the CDC awarded an unsolicited $1·6 million grant to conduct a vaccine study in Guinea-Bissau that raised so many ethical concerns—the design would have risked exposing thousands of unvaccinated children to hepatitis B—that it has been compared to the infamous Untreated Syphilis Study at Tuskegee.
HHS under Kennedy has made a habit of throwing good money after bad science. Amid the Trump administration’s cuts to research funding and personnel there has been a harmful shift in priorities. Cutting-edge discoveries and clinical investigations—on subjects ranging from mRNA vaccines to diabetes and dementia—are denied crucial resources while junk science and fringe beliefs are elevated without justifiable explanation. Under Kennedy’s leadership, politicisation at the NIH, FDA, and CDC is imperilling the future of US science and innovation and throttling the public health enterprise that keeps the country safe today.
The mechanisms maintained by the Federal Government to monitor and report health concerns such as drug overdoses, maternal mortality, and food security have been as beleaguered as the doctors and scientists who rely on them; thousands of datasets are no longer publicly available, leaving Americans—and the world—unprepared to respond to future crises. And crises are looming: in November, 2025, the first human infection (and death) from the H5N5 strain of avian flu was recorded in Washington state; pertussis, which killed 13 people in the USA in 2025, continues to spread across the country; and the measles outbreak that began in January of last year now threatens the elimination status of the USA and Mexico.
Despite these developments, Kennedy has continued to spread misinformation and push politicised agendas at the expense of the country’s most vulnerable. When called to account for his decisions by Congress, he has been evasive and combative. The destruction that Kennedy has wrought in 1 year might take generations to repair, and there is little hope for US health and science while he remains at the helm. Calls for his resignation now number in the thousands. Congress must exercise its duty of oversight and hold Kennedy accountable for his record, or else accept responsibility for endorsing President Trump’s decision to let him “run wild on health”.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(26)00414-9/fulltext
Date: 5/03/2026 08:22:27
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2366400
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:

https://newlinesmag.com/essays/pete-hegseths-tattoos-and-the-crusading-obsession-of-the-far-right/
Link
Hey we know yous read widely so we also pat ourselves on the back and ask, did someone mention how this could not possibly be state sponsored religious extremist terrorism¿
8^))))))))))))))))
Date: 5/03/2026 08:29:41
From: roughbarked
ID: 2366401
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
JudgeMental said:

https://newlinesmag.com/essays/pete-hegseths-tattoos-and-the-crusading-obsession-of-the-far-right/
Link
Hey we know yous read widely so we also pat ourselves on the back and ask, did someone mention how this could not possibly be state sponsored religious extremist terrorism¿
8^))))))))))))))))
Yes. You were observed mouthing such obscenities against our dear leader of the new world order.
Date: 5/03/2026 09:09:45
From: fsm
ID: 2366408
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
AussieDJ said:
Robert F Kennedy Jr: 1 year of failure
In his first speech as Secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Robert F Kennedy Jr laid out a plan to restore trust. The COVID-19 pandemic saw public faith in Federal health and science plummet—between April, 2020, and September, 2023, the percentage of polling respondents who trusted coronavirus and vaccine information from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) “a great deal” or “a fair amount”, fell from 83% to 63%—and the HHS employees to whom he was speaking were facing devastating mass lay-offs and funding cuts. Although Kennedy did not mince words about the likely fate of staff resistant to his ambitions, he promised open and honest engagement with everyone willing to work towards making the USA healthy again. To the Senate committee who confirmed his nomination, Kennedy promised a receptive and collaborative relationship, and to the public from whom he claims his mandate, he promised a new era of unbiased science without hidden conflicts of interest, secrecy, or profiteering. Radical transparency, gold-standard science, ethics, compassion, competency, and pride would restore to HHS the unimpeachable authority that the USA needs and deserves. Politicians are known to break promises, but Kennedy’s record, 1 year in, has been a failure by most measures, especially his own.
10 days after his speech about trust and openness, HHS rescinded a 54-year-old policy of soliciting public comments for new rules and regulations, silencing the voices of many of the stakeholders he pledged to serve. Kennedy has summarily dismissed advisers and experts, communicated policy changes on pay-walled media, fired a whistleblower, and overseen the revisions of guidelines and recommendations, contradicting decades of established science, often to the benefit of industries he formerly condemned. Under Kennedy’s leadership, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) shuttered programmes studying the health effects of air pollution, HHS withheld a report linking alcohol consumption to cancer, and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) withdrew warnings of potential harm from consuming products (such as raw milk and chlorine dioxide) falsely marketed as treatments for autism. His changes at CDC have driven 26 states to reject official guidance on vaccine policy, and in December the CDC awarded an unsolicited $1·6 million grant to conduct a vaccine study in Guinea-Bissau that raised so many ethical concerns—the design would have risked exposing thousands of unvaccinated children to hepatitis B—that it has been compared to the infamous Untreated Syphilis Study at Tuskegee.
HHS under Kennedy has made a habit of throwing good money after bad science. Amid the Trump administration’s cuts to research funding and personnel there has been a harmful shift in priorities. Cutting-edge discoveries and clinical investigations—on subjects ranging from mRNA vaccines to diabetes and dementia—are denied crucial resources while junk science and fringe beliefs are elevated without justifiable explanation. Under Kennedy’s leadership, politicisation at the NIH, FDA, and CDC is imperilling the future of US science and innovation and throttling the public health enterprise that keeps the country safe today.
The mechanisms maintained by the Federal Government to monitor and report health concerns such as drug overdoses, maternal mortality, and food security have been as beleaguered as the doctors and scientists who rely on them; thousands of datasets are no longer publicly available, leaving Americans—and the world—unprepared to respond to future crises. And crises are looming: in November, 2025, the first human infection (and death) from the H5N5 strain of avian flu was recorded in Washington state; pertussis, which killed 13 people in the USA in 2025, continues to spread across the country; and the measles outbreak that began in January of last year now threatens the elimination status of the USA and Mexico.
Despite these developments, Kennedy has continued to spread misinformation and push politicised agendas at the expense of the country’s most vulnerable. When called to account for his decisions by Congress, he has been evasive and combative. The destruction that Kennedy has wrought in 1 year might take generations to repair, and there is little hope for US health and science while he remains at the helm. Calls for his resignation now number in the thousands. Congress must exercise its duty of oversight and hold Kennedy accountable for his record, or else accept responsibility for endorsing President Trump’s decision to let him “run wild on health”.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(26)00414-9/fulltext

Date: 5/03/2026 10:55:11
From: buffy
ID: 2366421
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 5/03/2026 11:08:59
From: roughbarked
ID: 2366423
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
The House Oversight Committee voted to question Pam Bondi over her handling of files regarding the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking investigation. Republicans joined Democrats to support the subpoena.
Ms Bondi has defended the department’s handling of the files and has accused Democrats of using the Epstein files to distract from Mr Trump’s successes.
Hah everyone else thinks that she’s using the files to exonerate Trump.
Date: 5/03/2026 11:13:09
From: Cymek
ID: 2366426
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
buffy said:
The House Oversight Committee voted to question Pam Bondi over her handling of files regarding the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking investigation. Republicans joined Democrats to support the subpoena.
Ms Bondi has defended the department’s handling of the files and has accused Democrats of using the Epstein files to distract from Mr Trump’s successes.
Hah everyone else thinks that she’s using the files to exonerate Trump.
Bondi, Pam Bondi, fawning Trump sycophant and secret agent 00 nothing
Date: 5/03/2026 11:47:53
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2366433
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
roughbarked said:
buffy said:
The House Oversight Committee voted to question Pam Bondi over her handling of files regarding the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking investigation. Republicans joined Democrats to support the subpoena.
Ms Bondi has defended the department’s handling of the files and has accused Democrats of using the Epstein files to distract from Mr Trump’s successes.
Hah everyone else thinks that she’s using the files to exonerate Trump.
Bondi, Pam Bondi, fawning Trump sycophant and secret agent 00 nothing
Unfortunately, the Committee does not have the power to unilaterally find that a witness is in contempt of the Committee (and we can be sure that Pammy B. will do little else but behave in a contemptuous and contemptible manner). That would require a recommendation from the Committee to the House of Representatives, and a full House vote. So, as things are right now, that has no chance of occurring.
Date: 5/03/2026 13:25:08
From: buffy
ID: 2366469
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
Cymek said:
roughbarked said:
Ms Bondi has defended the department’s handling of the files and has accused Democrats of using the Epstein files to distract from Mr Trump’s successes.
Hah everyone else thinks that she’s using the files to exonerate Trump.
Bondi, Pam Bondi, fawning Trump sycophant and secret agent 00 nothing
Unfortunately, the Committee does not have the power to unilaterally find that a witness is in contempt of the Committee (and we can be sure that Pammy B. will do little else but behave in a contemptuous and contemptible manner). That would require a recommendation from the Committee to the House of Representatives, and a full House vote. So, as things are right now, that has no chance of occurring.
Unless Trump is ready to trade her in on a younger model by now.
Date: 5/03/2026 17:00:45
From: dv
ID: 2366534
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 5/03/2026 17:02:19
From: roughbarked
ID: 2366535
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

Do they have rhinos in Texas?
Date: 5/03/2026 17:38:24
From: kii
ID: 2366552
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Anyone posted about the Montana politician involved in the breaking of Marine’s arm in a scuffle at an oversight committee meeting?
Date: 5/03/2026 18:35:54
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2366575
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Anyone posted about the Montana politician involved in the breaking of Marine’s arm in a scuffle at an oversight committee meeting?
saw something elsewhere but not here
Date: 5/03/2026 18:39:29
From: kii
ID: 2366578
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
kii said:
Anyone posted about the Montana politician involved in the breaking of Marine’s arm in a scuffle at an oversight committee meeting?
saw something elsewhere but not here
The video is horrifying, you can hear the snapping of his arm.
Date: 5/03/2026 18:42:40
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2366580
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
SCIENCE said:
kii said:
Anyone posted about the Montana politician involved in the breaking of Marine’s arm in a scuffle at an oversight committee meeting?
saw something elsewhere but not here
The video is horrifying, you can hear the snapping of his arm.
always good to hear brutality at work in the great free country of opportunity
Date: 5/03/2026 18:54:17
From: buffy
ID: 2366581
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
My Houston sister has posted some political posts.


Date: 5/03/2026 18:58:42
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2366582
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:

LOL
Date: 5/03/2026 19:16:03
From: Michael V
ID: 2366584
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Anyone posted about the Montana politician involved in the breaking of Marine’s arm in a scuffle at an oversight committee meeting?
Not that I have seen.
Date: 5/03/2026 19:17:16
From: kii
ID: 2366585
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
“A Trump quote without his voice or face – Trump without Trump. This is for folks who might normally tune out or refuse to listen to Trump. Everyone should hear this quote. This is from his meeting on 3/3/26 with the German Chancellor Friedrich Merz.”
Juliet Jeske, also on Instagram.
Link
Date: 5/03/2026 19:17:45
From: Michael V
ID: 2366586
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
My Houston sister has posted some political posts.


Like them both.
:)
Date: 5/03/2026 19:41:50
From: roughbarked
ID: 2366594
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
buffy said:
My Houston sister has posted some political posts.


Like them both.
:)
. :) Couldn’t he have thought of a worse plague?
Date: 5/03/2026 19:46:48
From: Michael V
ID: 2366596
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
buffy said:
My Houston sister has posted some political posts.


Like them both.
:)
. :) Couldn’t he have thought of a worse plague?
He obviously did; Trump.
Date: 5/03/2026 19:47:19
From: kii
ID: 2366597
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
kii said:
Anyone posted about the Montana politician involved in the breaking of Marine’s arm in a scuffle at an oversight committee meeting?
Not that I have seen.
Jolly Good Ginger, more detail than the other posts I’ve seen.
Date: 5/03/2026 19:52:42
From: roughbarked
ID: 2366598
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
Like them both.
:)
. :) Couldn’t he have thought of a worse plague?
He obviously did; Trump.
There is no God to send Trump. So Trump cannot blame God.
Date: 5/03/2026 19:53:57
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2366599
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
roughbarked said:
. :) Couldn’t he have thought of a worse plague?
He obviously did; Trump.
There is no God to send Trump. So Trump cannot blame God.
don’t forget about the rest of the paedophiles
Date: 5/03/2026 19:54:46
From: roughbarked
ID: 2366600
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
He obviously did; Trump.
There is no God to send Trump. So Trump cannot blame God.
don’t forget about the rest of the paedophiles
There is a plague of them.
Date: 5/03/2026 20:25:21
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2366601
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
There is no God to send Trump. So Trump cannot blame God.
don’t forget about the rest of the paedophiles
There is a plague of them.
Eliminate the plague, nothing good about them.
Date: 5/03/2026 21:10:55
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2366605
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tau.Neutrino said:
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
don’t forget about the rest of the paedophiles
There is a plague of them.
Eliminate the plague, nothing good about them.
Kyle Sandilands (on air) joked about the rape of a 12 year old girl.
You have to wonder about his intelligence because that’s nothing to joke about.
That’s probably something paedophiles joke about otherwise its alpha male stupidity.
Date: 6/03/2026 06:23:55
From: buffy
ID: 2366660
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 6/03/2026 07:24:51
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2366666
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Interesting ABC news item to wake up to.
Donald Trump fires Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem
Good.
Date: 6/03/2026 07:57:10
From: roughbarked
ID: 2366677
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Interesting ABC news item to wake up to.
Donald Trump fires Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem
“A MAGA Warrior, and former undefeated professional MMA fighter, Markwayne truly gets along well with people,” Mr Trump said.
“Markwayne will work tirelessly to Keep our Border Secure, Stop Migrant Crime, Murderers, and other Criminals from illegally entering our Country, End Scourge of Illegal Drugs and, MAKE AMERICAN SAFE AGAIN.”
Date: 6/03/2026 08:10:15
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2366682
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
buffy said:
Interesting ABC news item to wake up to.
Donald Trump fires Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem
“A MAGA Warrior, and former undefeated professional MMA fighter, Markwayne truly gets along well with people,” Mr Trump said.
“Markwayne will work tirelessly to Keep our Border Secure, Stop Migrant Crime, Murderers, and other Criminals from illegally entering our Country, End Scourge of Illegal Drugs and, MAKE AMERICAN SAFE AGAIN.”
It’s like that reality show, Dog The Bounty Hunter, x1000.
Date: 6/03/2026 08:11:38
From: roughbarked
ID: 2366684
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:
buffy said:
Interesting ABC news item to wake up to.
Donald Trump fires Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem
“A MAGA Warrior, and former undefeated professional MMA fighter, Markwayne truly gets along well with people,” Mr Trump said.
“Markwayne will work tirelessly to Keep our Border Secure, Stop Migrant Crime, Murderers, and other Criminals from illegally entering our Country, End Scourge of Illegal Drugs and, MAKE AMERICAN SAFE AGAIN.”
It’s like that reality show, Dog The Bounty Hunter, x1000.
Yesh it must be the cameras. As long as they can see a camera, they think they are the star in a TV show.
Date: 6/03/2026 08:12:39
From: roughbarked
ID: 2366685
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:
“A MAGA Warrior, and former undefeated professional MMA fighter, Markwayne truly gets along well with people,” Mr Trump said.
“Markwayne will work tirelessly to Keep our Border Secure, Stop Migrant Crime, Murderers, and other Criminals from illegally entering our Country, End Scourge of Illegal Drugs and, MAKE AMERICAN SAFE AGAIN.”
It’s like that reality show, Dog The Bounty Hunter, x1000.
Yesh it must be the cameras. As long as they can see a camera, they think they are the star in a TV show.
Which in reality is true, the horror movie, the 6:30 news.
Date: 6/03/2026 08:13:52
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2366687
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
It’s like that reality show, Dog The Bounty Hunter, x1000.
Yesh it must be the cameras. As long as they can see a camera, they think they are the star in a TV show.
Which in reality is true, the horror movie, the 6:30 news.
https://health.clevelandclinic.org/what-to-know-about-main-character-syndrome
Date: 6/03/2026 08:15:59
From: roughbarked
ID: 2366689
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:
roughbarked said:
Yesh it must be the cameras. As long as they can see a camera, they think they are the star in a TV show.
Which in reality is true, the horror movie, the 6:30 news.
https://health.clevelandclinic.org/what-to-know-about-main-character-syndrome
That’s the one.
Date: 6/03/2026 08:21:49
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2366692
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:
roughbarked said:
Yesh it must be the cameras. As long as they can see a camera, they think they are the star in a TV show.
Which in reality is true, the horror movie, the 6:30 news.
https://health.clevelandclinic.org/what-to-know-about-main-character-syndrome
seriously though it’s the USSA it’s all about their main character syndrome
Date: 6/03/2026 09:50:37
From: Michael V
ID: 2366709
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:
roughbarked said:
Yesh it must be the cameras. As long as they can see a camera, they think they are the star in a TV show.
Which in reality is true, the horror movie, the 6:30 news.
https://health.clevelandclinic.org/what-to-know-about-main-character-syndrome
Gosh. I’ve never before heard of such a thing.
Date: 6/03/2026 10:18:56
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2366730
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Scandal overshadows Texas congressional race
Perhaps the most closely watched House primary will also be in Texas, where a reelection bid from Rep. Tony Gonzales ® has been rocked by allegations that he had an affair with a staffer who lit herself on fire and died. Gonzales faces a rematch against Brandon Herrera, a hard-right firearms manufacturer and YouTuber whose 4 million followers know him as “the AK Guy.”
…
Ahhh Texas.
Date: 6/03/2026 10:35:28
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2366745
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
alleged

but the enemy of our enemy is our friend
Date: 6/03/2026 10:49:44
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2366764
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
alleged

but the enemy of our enemy is our friend
How is that anti-Jewish particularly?
Surely it’s more anti-Hindu and anti-Buddhist.
Date: 6/03/2026 10:57:18
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2366765
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
SCIENCE said:
alleged

but the enemy of our enemy is our friend
How is that anti-Jewish particularly?
Surely it’s more anti-Hindu and anti-Buddhist.
I suppose the poster thinks these clowns should be lauding the long-cited Judeo-Christian values the West supposedly shares and not just Christianity.
Date: 6/03/2026 11:00:39
From: roughbarked
ID: 2366766
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
SCIENCE said:
alleged

but the enemy of our enemy is our friend
How is that anti-Jewish particularly?
Surely it’s more anti-Hindu and anti-Buddhist.
Many are not Christians
Including the Muslims, semites whom are also not mentioned.
Date: 6/03/2026 11:01:20
From: roughbarked
ID: 2366767
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
SCIENCE said:
alleged

but the enemy of our enemy is our friend
How is that anti-Jewish particularly?
Surely it’s more anti-Hindu and anti-Buddhist.
I suppose the poster thinks these clowns should be lauding the long-cited Judeo-Christian values the West supposedly shares and not just Christianity.
‘Under God’, is the American view of Christianity.
Date: 6/03/2026 13:24:25
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2366863
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 6/03/2026 16:06:18
From: dv
ID: 2366970
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5764784-kristi-noem-kennedy-ad-campaign/
$220million for that nonsense.
Date: 6/03/2026 16:25:46
From: dv
ID: 2366987
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 6/03/2026 16:36:07
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2366988
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

Snopes says it’s true:
httphttps://www.snopes.com/fact-check/republican-dean-browning-gay/s
(not what he said, that he said it)
Date: 6/03/2026 16:48:42
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2366995
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:

Snopes says it’s true:
httphttps://www.snopes.com/fact-check/republican-dean-browning-gay/s
(not what he said, that he said it)
but it’s the impression he keeps saying it every year that seems less believable
Date: 6/03/2026 16:49:44
From: Michael V
ID: 2366999
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

Ha!
Date: 6/03/2026 17:29:31
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2367024
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 6/03/2026 18:20:11
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2367054
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 6/03/2026 18:23:37
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2367056
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
LOL
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-03-06/cuba-may-be-trumps-next-focus-after-iran-war/106424006
Really wants to follow in JFK’s footsteps hey. If only there’s someone willing to follow in Lee Harvey Oswald’s footsteps…
Date: 6/03/2026 18:37:16
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2367063
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
SCIENCE said:
LOL
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-03-06/cuba-may-be-trumps-next-focus-after-iran-war/106424006
Really wants to follow in JFK’s footsteps hey. If only there’s someone willing to follow in Lee Harvey Oswald’s footsteps…
but they’ve staged a few fatal attempts already to deter that
Date: 6/03/2026 18:48:46
From: Michael V
ID: 2367069
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
SCIENCE said:
LOL
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-03-06/cuba-may-be-trumps-next-focus-after-iran-war/106424006
Really wants to follow in JFK’s footsteps hey. If only there’s someone willing to follow in Lee Harvey Oswald’s footsteps…
We wish. But then the world ends up inheriting the couch-fucker.
Date: 6/03/2026 21:22:17
From: dv
ID: 2367103
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/house-kills-effort-release-congressional-sexual-misconduct-harassment-rcna261679
House kills effort to release all congressional sexual misconduct and harassment reports
—-
But in a 357-65 vote, the House voted to refer the Mace resolution to committee — a move that effectively killed it.
The Ethics Committee had encouraged members to vote to refer the resolution. In a joint statement, the Republican and Democratic leaders of the committee argued it “could chill victim cooperation and witness participation in ongoing and future investigations” and would make it harder for the committee “to investigate and eliminate sexual misconduct in the House.”
“Here and elsewhere, perpetrators of sexual misconduct should never be shielded from responsibility for their misdeeds,” Chairman Michael Guest, R-Miss., and ranking member Mark DeSaulnier, D-Calif., said.
But, they added, “victims may be retraumatized by public disclosures of interim work product, excerpts of interview transcripts, and certain exhibits. And witnesses, who often only speak to the Committee confidentially or on condition of future anonymity, could fear retaliation if their cooperation is made public.”
Date: 6/03/2026 21:34:33
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2367106
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
They’re MISSING a CRITICAL symptom
Photos of Donald Trump’s ear appear to show a diagonal earlobe crease sometimes associated with cardiovascular disease
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygqYvDY6XdU
Date: 6/03/2026 21:53:33
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2367109
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
They’re MISSING a CRITICAL symptom
Photos of Donald Trump’s ear appear to show a diagonal earlobe crease sometimes associated with cardiovascular disease
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygqYvDY6XdU
Yeah yeah the guy’s at death’s door. That door ain’t opening fast enough
Date: 6/03/2026 21:55:18
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2367110
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/house-kills-effort-release-congressional-sexual-misconduct-harassment-rcna261679
House kills effort to release all congressional sexual misconduct and harassment reports
—-
But in a 357-65 vote, the House voted to refer the Mace resolution to committee — a move that effectively killed it.
The Ethics Committee had encouraged members to vote to refer the resolution. In a joint statement, the Republican and Democratic leaders of the committee argued it “could chill victim cooperation and witness participation in ongoing and future investigations” and would make it harder for the committee “to investigate and eliminate sexual misconduct in the House.”
“Here and elsewhere, perpetrators of sexual misconduct should never be shielded from responsibility for their misdeeds,” Chairman Michael Guest, R-Miss., and ranking member Mark DeSaulnier, D-Calif., said.
But, they added, “victims may be retraumatized by public disclosures of interim work product, excerpts of interview transcripts, and certain exhibits. And witnesses, who often only speak to the Committee confidentially or on condition of future anonymity, could fear retaliation if their cooperation is made public.”
I saw this in my FB feed. Though it sounds bad, one reply posted a reply by AOC which gave good reasons why it was defeated. I cannot remember what feed it was or what platform AOC post was on.
Date: 7/03/2026 01:42:54
From: dv
ID: 2367131
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/mar/06/february-jobs-report
The US lost 92,000 jobs in February, a major slackening in the labor market that came just before Donald Trump threw the global economy into upheaval with his conflict in Iran.
The unemployment rate edged up to 4.4% in February. In comparison, the US added a revised 126,000 jobs in January, far surpassing expectations of 70,000 jobs but still less than January 2025. Economists predicted an increase of 60,000 jobs added in February and a steady unemployment rate of 4.3%.
Date: 7/03/2026 04:01:35
From: AussieDJ
ID: 2367134
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 7/03/2026 08:01:38
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2367141
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I went to the US’s peak MAGA conference to gauge the state of movement. Here’s what I found
A year into Donald Trump’s second term as president, a visit to the annual conservative AmericaFest convention reveals a splintering of the MAGA movement.
Michael Koziol
March 7, 2026
It’s 9pm in downtown Phoenix, Arizona and the city is overrun by loud, enthusiastic Donald Trump supporters. Young men in cheap suits are ambling across Central Avenue in and out of hotels, women with overly made-up faces are clacking their heels down the sidewalk. Make America Great Again caps and badges abound.
This is the first night of AmericaFest, an annual festival of all things Christian and nationalist, run by Turning Point USA – the creation of assassinated activist Charlie Kirk. It’s only a week before Christmas, and the rest of the country is winding down and heading home after a chaotic year. But 30,000 conservatives have flocked to the desert to spend four days basking in their collective victory and debating America’s future.
I’ve come here to gauge the state of the MAGA movement after a year of Trump’s return to the White House, at a time when the focus of many young foot soldiers is turning to what – or who – comes next. But sitting at the bar at Hanny’s, a dimly lit, upmarket joint a block from the vast convention centre where AmericaFest is held, Nora Christine warns me I might already be too late. “I don’t want to say I’m part of MAGA because I think MAGA’s kind of dead,” she says. Christine, a conservative activist from Florida with a fledgling podcast, casts her eyes around the bar. “They’re not going to tell you that.”
The conservative coalition that propelled Trump back to the White House a year earlier has had a rocky few months. Some of it stems from people breaking with Trump over policy decisions; his bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities or his fraternising with regime change in Venezuela; his fondness for Big Tech and foreign worker visas, his initial reluctance to release the Jeffrey Epstein files.
The Heritage Foundation, a large and important conservative think tank, imploded over its president Kevin Roberts’ decision to support broadcaster Tucker Carlson after he lent his massive online platform to young white supremacist Nick Fuentes. As well as prompting mass walkouts and resignations at Heritage, the episode put a spotlight on antisemitism in the MAGA movement, and sparked a debate about how wide the coalition’s “big tent” could be.
Lurking in the background is another question: can this hodgepodge collection of Trump Republicans, working-class and less-educated voters, evangelicals, young men, the online right and others stay united beyond Donald Trump? And who would be the best person to try to hold that bloc together?
Erika Kirk, who became chief executive of Turning Point after her husband Charlie was killed, answers that question emphatically in her opening address. “We are going to get my husband’s friend J.D. Vance elected for 48 in the most resounding way possible,” she tells the cheering crowd.
But back at the bar, Nora Christine isn’t so sure. “I think we’re too fractured,” she says. “We’ve fractured over multiple issues, from Israel to Marjorie Taylor Greene to even now with Erika Kirk and Candace Owens. I think we’re very, very fractured.”
With Trump in power and a country to run, it feels like there should be bigger fish to fry than the internecine squabbles between MAGA television personalities and online activists. But no. “People are losing friendships over it,” Christine says. “It is pretty serious.”
On a street near the convention centre, two eye-popping vehicles are parked a block from one another. A van splashed in neon pink writing offers a QR code for Unmasking the Mark, a multipart film purporting that the COVID-19 pandemic was calculated to bring about the End Times. Up the road, a Tesla Cybertruck has been repainted as a monument to Charlie Kirk and Turning Point USA.
Inside, it’s a jungle. People cram onto escalators heading down towards the main ballroom, the exhibition hall and “media row”, where the nation’s myriad conservative networks and podcasters have temporary studios to broadcast to their niche but growing audiences. Fox Nation is here, as is The Daily Wire, One America News and Steve Bannon’s War Room. A fledgling brand called FourG Media also has a stand; the four “Gs” in question are: “God, Gas, Guns and Glory.”
To understand the contours of the MAGA movement, you first have to understand its magnitude. People come to it from any and all corners of this sprawling country, from Trump loyalists to old-school Republicans who drank the Kool-Aid, from TikTok influencers and grifters to the far-flung nooks and crannies of the conspiratorial alt-right. Plenty of them are here at AmericaFest.
US political analysts talk constantly about the duelling Republican and Democratic coalitions: who is in them, and whether they will be motivated to show up to vote. In presidential elections, the coalitions can swing significantly depending on the individual; Joe Biden rallied support from black and Latino men, but they did not turn out for Kamala Harris, for example.
The MAGA coalition is a broad church. There is a theory among some conservative thinkers that the movement should have “no enemies to our right” – that is, it should welcome, or at least not ostracise, fringe dwellers who deal in conspiracy theories, antisemitism and bigotry of many stripes. When Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts released a video defending Tucker Carlson for platforming a white supremacist, he said: “The American people expect us to be focusing on our political adversaries on the left, not attacking our friends on the right.”
At AmericaFest, that assertion was directly challenged from the opening beat. Ben Shapiro, a high-pitched, fast-talking Jewish conservative who co-founded The Daily Wire and has more than eight million followers on X, told the capacity crowd they had an obligation to clarity, honesty, specificity in public debate – and to condemn and call out people in the movement who failed to do so.
“The conservative movement is in serious danger … from charlatans who claim to speak in the name of principle but actually traffic in conspiracy and dishonesty, who offer nothing but bile and despair,” he said. “These people are frauds, and they are grifters, and they do not deserve your time. And they are something worse than that – a danger to the only movement capable of stopping the left from wrecking the country wholesale.”
Shapiro went on to call Candace Owens’ pronouncements “retarded” and dismiss MAGA stalwart Steve Bannon as “a man who was once a PR flak for Jeffrey Epstein”. He shamed Tucker Carlson for giving a platform to Nick Fuentes, Andrew Tate and Nazi apologist Darryl Cooper: “Hosts are indeed responsible for the guests they choose and the questions they ask those guests.”
Carlson, who spoke later that evening, said he couldn’t believe he was hearing calls for people to be denounced and de-platformed at a Turning Point USA event. “I thought that was the whole reason we were against the left,” he guffawed. “We did everything we could to usher in a new time – where you could have an actual debate. This kind of was the whole point of Charlie Kirk’s public life, and I think that he died for it.”
Kirk loved fielding questions from audience members; it’s what he was doing when he was shot and killed at a university campus in Utah in September. After Shapiro’s fiery speech, a young man in a blazer, crisp white shirt and jeans approached the microphone and asked why Shapiro considered Israel’s attack on the USS Liberty in 1967, during the Six-Day War, to be irrelevant to the US’s modern-day relationship with Israel.
The US government accepts that the attack, which killed 34 Americans, was a mistake caused by Israel wrongly identifying the ship. But it remains a staple of antisemitic conspiracies and one frequently cited by Fuentes on his livestreams. Shapiro pushed back, querying the man’s motives for bringing up a six-decade-old incident.
The young man didn’t give a clear answer and disappeared into the crowd. But The Atlantic tracked him down – his name was Nicky Rudd, a student from a Christian university in Texas, and he told the magazine that while he didn’t agree with everything Fuentes said, “To deny the influence of Nick Fuentes is to deny what millions of Americans are thinking.” In a recent video on his Instagram, Rudd claims Americans have woken up to the reality that Israel is “subverting our sovereignty”. Shapiro, he says, is “Israel First”.
Of the issues dividing the MAGA world, Israel is arguably the most potent – particularly in the way it cleaves young from old. In August, a University of Maryland poll found about one in five Republicans aged 18 to 34 felt the Trump administration’s policy was too pro-Israel, and that Israel’s actions in Gaza were genocide or akin to genocide. Another 14 per cent said Israel was committing major war crimes, but it did not amount to genocide. On both questions, another 30 to 40 per cent of young Republicans were uncertain.
That is a potent audience for someone like Fuentes. The 27-year-old may not be a household name across middle America, but here in MAGA heartland, everyone knows him. He has branded his own army of fans, the “Groypers”, who unite around a reactionary, trolling, supposedly edgy blend of antisemitism, misogyny, racism and homophobia.
Candace Owens, another conspiratorial right-wing podcaster and influencer, has suggested the man charged with killing Charlie Kirk was not acting alone and could have been in cahoots with foreign entities such as the French or Israelis. Her unsubstantiated claims, made in the immediate aftermath of a tragedy, have contributed much to the rift in the MAGA/conservative ecosystem since Kirk’s death.
At Hanny’s bar, I meet 30-year-old Mark Lukridge, an articulate fintech guy from Dallas who, a few weeks after AmericaFest, becomes communications director for the Dallas Young Republicans. He says he listened to Nick Fuentes’ appearance on Carlson’s show and reckons the young white supremacist “doesn’t come off that bad”.
But wait a minute: isn’t this the same guy who reckons “Hitler was awesome”? Lukridge jumps right in. “Oh, he loves Joseph Stalin … and he’s obviously an extreme misogynist. You listen to the guy speak, right – OK, clearly I don’t agree with what he’s saying here, but he does command the attention of a lot of people who are just pissed off with mainstream politics of being politically correct, especially young white men. That’s why he’s attracted such an audience – because there’s a space for that.”
Lukridge keeps a foot in both camps. He doesn’t subscribe to the Candace Owens conspiracy about Mossad being involved in Kirk’s assassination; there’s not enough evidence. But he likes Tucker Carlson, saying Carlson doesn’t bow to the dogma to always “praise Israel” or that everything the US does should benefit Israel.
“If you really look at Israel and their objectives – and truthfully, I don’t know a lot about the Israeli movement and our core relationship with them – but I stand firmly in the belief that we vote our officials in office to make decisions on behalf of us,” Lukridge says. “I’d like to know that our tax dollars go toward decision-making that promotes us and has our best interests in mind, rather than a foreign nation.”
By contrast, Nora Christine, the woman who said MAGA was fractured and “kind of dead”, clearly believes the conspiracies around Kirk’s death. She won’t tell me exactly what she thinks, but she makes a salient point: in right-wing circles, the advent of conspiracy theories has shaped a conspiratorial mindset.
“You told us to question COVID,” she says. “You told us to question JFK’s assassination. You told us to question the election. And now you’re telling us not to question the biggest assassination since JFK? That’s a problem. And I think that’s what’s going on right now.”
As I walk into the conference the next day, a volunteer hands me a copy of an evangelical book titled Freedom: Truth Wins. I ignore a stall offering me the opportunity to “debate a Libtard”, and bypass several signs inviting me to “pray here”, to head to the exhibition hall: an alternative universe where you can join the conservative phone network Patriot Mobile (“mobilising freedom”) or sign up to Frontline21, a ministry preaching “biblical masculinity” through five core tenets: moral courage, servant leadership, sexual integrity (no porn), brotherhood and stewardship.
I’m momentarily surprised to see several US government sponsors with stalls: the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and the Secret Service. They’re on a recruiting drive. An ICE agent in khaki uniform won’t tell me his name but does pose for a photograph in front of a “special response team” armoured vehicle, used in immigration raids in cities such as Los Angeles and Minneapolis.
When Trump tells us what he wants next in Iran, we should probably believe him
Nearby, there’s a tent called Prove Me Wrong, where young influencers or budding politicians can debate their peers. It’s what Charlie Kirk was doing when he was shot at Utah Valley University; there’s also a photo of that event, taken in the minutes before his death. The spectacle is a little macabre.
Conservative commentator Michael Knowles, another Daily Wire personality who boasts more than a million followers, is seated on a small stage fielding questions from students. One young woman introduces herself as Chelsea from New Jersey and asks whether the US should implement free healthcare, as in Canada or the UK.
Knowles is incredulous. “Should America have universal socialised healthcare like Canada?” he repeats, as the crowd erupts in loud boos. He says the US system is bad but still preferable to Canada’s, citing its tolerance of medically assisted dying, which accounts for about 5 per cent of all deaths. “I’ve long observed that Canada is America’s evil top hat,” Knowles says. “We should leave them be and not adopt their terrible practices.”
Internet personalities are everywhere, marked by their VIP lanyards. Xaviaer DuRousseau, an African American influencer wearing sparkly pinstripe pants and black sunglasses, tells me how he turned from a lifelong liberal who marched in the Black Lives Matter protests and voted for Bernie Sanders into a card-carrying MAGA enthusiast after watching right-wing videos and realising “the truth”.
Another man is dressed top-to-toe in an orange-brick patterned suit. Blake “Brick Man” Marnell is famous for clambering on stage with Trump at rallies; the loud suit represents his support for building a wall along the US-Mexico border. When I ask him about the fractures afflicting the MAGA movement, he answers with a thoughtful gravitas that doesn’t quite match his attire. “Whenever you’re out of power, you’ve all got to band together to get back into power, then when you’re at the top, some squabbles come out,” the 61-year-old says. “These are not new discrepancies in thought, it’s just now we have the luxury to entertain them because we’re the party in power.”
Brick Man believes the so-called fractures are overstated. But he also touches on another important point: the MAGA movement has attracted a lot of attention-seekers looking to make hay out of its success and its power. “There are certainly differences of opinion, and certain people are trying to drive wedges in those opinions,” he says. “For the most part, the people doing that are not doing that for the good of the movement. They’re doing that for their own personal gain, and to elevate their own profile, and to profit off of being controversial.”
It’s a Friday, and back in Washington, the nation’s political class is focused on that evening’s deadline for the Department of Justice to release the so-called Epstein files – documents from its sex-trafficking investigation into now-dead financier Jeffrey Epstein. Despite saturation coverage in the media, it barely registers here at AmericaFest. When I meet 20-year-old Shelby Sylvester and her 52-year-old aunt Brandi Barton from the deep red state of Oklahoma, what they really want to talk about is petrol prices.
“Do you know how much gas is in Oklahoma?” says Barton. Sylvester finishes her aunt’s sentence: “$US1.95 right now. Do you know what it was about a month ago? Probably $US3.80, $US2.80.” In fact, the average price in Oklahoma has only come down about 40 cents a gallon over the past year – but it has fallen significantly from Biden-era highs.
Sylvester doesn’t like hearing people say that Trump hasn’t done anything to lower the cost of living. “Tell that to your gas prices … To me, it really just shows that he does care about the American people, and he’s going to make sure it gets done.”
The two of them would vote for Trump again in a heartbeat if they could. If not, Sylvester thinks J. D. Vance is the next best thing. “He knows how Trump runs,” she says. “He’ll have Trump in the back of his ear telling him what to do.”
It feels far too early to be thinking about the 2028 election. But Erika Kirk kicked off the conference by vowing to make Vance the next president. Steve Bannon, who spoke on Friday, insists Trump will torpedo the constitution and run again. But for most people here, Vance is the heir apparent, and minds are already turning to how he can win and what kind of president he might be.
Out on media row, Ben Shapiro is doing a live event for his own network. I’m standing beside the makeshift studio with a throng of supporters, many of whom are taking photos, or posing for selfies with Shapiro in the background. It’s clear that, for many people here, he’s an icon.
Shapiro says there is an ideological vacuum in the American conservative movement right now because its leader, Donald Trump, has no ideology. “That’s not who he is – he was always a pragmatist. And any attempt to abstract a Trumpism from Trump was always going to fail because Donald Trump is a set of really good impulses – but impulses. Nobody would call President Trump a philosopher.
“What that means is, in the absence of a cohesive vision, the Republican Party has fallen into a lot of different conversations about a lot of different issues, and all that stuff has been opened up, and all those conversations are going to have to take place in a pretty robust way.”
Shapiro’s problem with that style of leadership is that it allows the so-called frauds and grifters to creep in and dilute the movement: people who are not really conservative or who hijack conservatism for their own ends. “A movement without principle is not a movement at all,” he says. “It is an agglomeration of people who are following whoever happens to be the leader that day.”
Trump, Shapiro says, brought together a “disparate and weird” coalition of voters through the sheer force of his personality and charisma. He says it would be a “massive, massive mistake” for any politician – Vance included – to assume they will inherit the coalition of their predecessor.
“Hillary Clinton tried to do this with Barack Obama. ‘His coalition is my coalition, I don’t have to campaign in Wisconsin, all the people who voted for Barack Obama will vote for me.’ Obviously, that failed.
“J. D. Vance’s coalition is not going to be identical to Donald Trump’s. Donald Trump is a once-in-a-generation figure. If the vice-president believes that he is simply going to be able to walk into Donald Trump’s coalition … he’s missing that Trump is unique, and he’s also missing the nature of electoral politics.”
For Shapiro, Vance’s strengths are his intelligence, his abilities behind the podium and his penchant for debate. But his weaknesses are likely to be among black voters, Hispanics, Asians and perhaps even blue-collar workers – despite his well-publicised working-class roots. Trump, the purported billionaire, somehow built a rapport with that demographic despite his own privileges.
“What I’d love to see from the vice-president is: what are the contours of his leadership?” says Shapiro. “What does he want America to actually look like? What are the policies you want to pursue? And then you can define a coalition within those boundaries.”
Vance has that opportunity on the final day of the conference, a Sunday, when he delivers the closing address. After 72 hours of squabbling over the size of the MAGA tent and where to draw the line on bigotry, it is widely assumed the vice-president will weigh in – and he does so. But he does not condemn the antisemites or bigots. Vance argues the best way to honour Charlie Kirk’s legacy is to avoid doing something Kirk refused to do when he was alive. Therefore, he says, “I didn’t bring a list of conservatives to denounce or to de-platform.” He concludes by telling people not to be discouraged by the infighting. “Wouldn’t you rather lead a movement of free thinkers who sometimes disagree than a bunch of drones who take their orders from George Soros?”
In the most consequential moment of his presidency, Trump reveals his end game
The Vice President hopes to float above the fray, much like he did when Politico revealed how a dozen Young Republican leaders were exchanging deeply racist messages in a Telegram group chat. The texts ranged from professing love for Hitler to calling black people monkeys and n——rs. Vance said it was a case of “kids” doing stupid things, “especially young boys” – although most of the participants were reportedly aged 24 to 35.
Unlike some conservative events, AmericaFest is not a male-dominated environment: at the outset, Erika Kirk proudly announces 54 per cent of the 30,000 attendees are female. But a lot of time and energy is spent talking about young men: how they are suppressed and disenfranchised by the narrative of “toxic masculinity”, and what can be done to empower them in an era when they are supposedly disadvantaged.
At a bar on Friday night, I meet 30-year-old Jonny Toups from Little Rock, Arkansas, who is having drinks with male and female friends. He’s keen to chat about the consequences of “the demonisation of white males”, as he calls it. “You’re gonna get a generation of young white men who are not gonna care any more and say, ‘Well, you know what, sure I’m racist, we’re the better people,’ ” Toups tells me.
“That vein in the Republican Party or conservative movement right now is a reaction to all those years of, ‘You’re racist, you’re homophobic’ or whatever. I don’t think that’s the right reaction, so I like that Ben kind of called it out. But I also think it’s important to understand why people feel that way and meet them where they’re at, and say, ‘Hey, it’s not skin colour, it’s ideology’ … It doesn’t matter the colour of your skin or your orientation as long as America is your blood, you put God first, you put country first. That’s what we care about.”
https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/i-went-to-the-us-s-peak-maga-conference-to-gauge-the-state-of-movement-here-s-what-i-found-20260121-p5nvnm.html
Date: 7/03/2026 08:07:54
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2367142
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
“Steve Bannon, who spoke on Friday, insists Trump will torpedo the constitution and run again.”
He ain’t gonna live that long. Never mind that part though, the worrying part should be Trump’s clear and ongoing disrespect for the Constitution.
In any case, the event sounds like a Mecca for incels, racists, and general fuckwits. Hope the reporter washed himself thoroughly with Dettol afterwards.
Date: 7/03/2026 08:09:48
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2367143
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
“Steve Bannon, who spoke on Friday, insists Trump will torpedo the constitution and run again.”
He ain’t gonna live that long. Never mind that part though, the worrying part should be Trump’s clear and ongoing disrespect for the Constitution.
In any case, the event sounds like a Mecca for incels, racists, and general fuckwits. Hope the reporter washed himself thoroughly with Dettol afterwards.
I won’t have you refer to PWM that way!
Date: 7/03/2026 08:35:16
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2367148
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/mar/06/february-jobs-report
The US lost 92,000 jobs in February, a major slackening in the labor market that came just before Donald Trump threw the global economy into upheaval with his conflict in Iran.
The unemployment rate edged up to 4.4% in February. In comparison, the US added a revised 126,000 jobs in January, far surpassing expectations of 70,000 jobs but still less than January 2025. Economists predicted an increase of 60,000 jobs added in February and a steady unemployment rate of 4.3%.
is it winning
Date: 7/03/2026 08:40:08
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2367151
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
dv said:
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/mar/06/february-jobs-report
The US lost 92,000 jobs in February, a major slackening in the labor market that came just before Donald Trump threw the global economy into upheaval with his conflict in Iran.
The unemployment rate edged up to 4.4% in February. In comparison, the US added a revised 126,000 jobs in January, far surpassing expectations of 70,000 jobs but still less than January 2025. Economists predicted an increase of 60,000 jobs added in February and a steady unemployment rate of 4.3%.
is it winning
is it great again
or is it The Great Depression again
Date: 7/03/2026 08:41:24
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2367152
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Other 98%
The secretary of the Miami-Dade Republican Party ran a group chat where members fantasized about killing Black people, and he’s refusing to resign.
Abel Carvajal started a WhatsApp group last fall for conservative students at Florida International University. Within three weeks it was overflowing with the n-word, used over 400 times, alongside antisemitic slurs, misogyny, and open worship of Nazi ideology.
These aren’t anonymous trolls. The participants included Ian Valdes, president of FIU’s Turning Point USA chapter, and Dariel Gonzalez, a former recruitment chair for FIU’s College Republicans, the next generation of GOP leadership in one of America’s most important swing counties.
Gonzalez called his Black professors “the coloreds.” Valdes declared he’d never marry a Jewish person. He called for an immigration ban, then clarified what he meant: white people only.
One participant, William Bejerano, rattled off a grotesque list of ways to murder Black people, crucifixion, beheading, extermination. They renamed the chat after a mythical Nazi civilization they lovingly called “Nazi heaven.”
And here’s the kicker, Carvajal wasn’t just a passive bystander. He used racial slurs himself, deleted dozens of his own messages, and recruited members of this very chat to serve as committee members in the Miami-Dade GOP.
When a Black student was harassed out of the College Republicans, Carvajal mocked her departure with slurs.
This is the SECOND time FIU’s Turning Point chapter has been caught in a hate-filled group chat, the first was in 2018. Last year, Young Republican leaders across multiple states got busted in a nearly identical scandal.
JD Vance’s response? Don’t worry about it, just “kids telling edgy jokes.”
This is who they are. FIU says the chat is now part of a criminal investigation. The Miami-Dade GOP board has called for Carvajal’s removal. But Carvajal says he won’t step down because the worst messages “were not mine.”
They keep telling us who they are. Believe them.
Date: 7/03/2026 08:45:26
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2367154
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
The Other 98%
The secretary of the Miami-Dade Republican Party ran a group chat where members fantasized about killing Black people, and he’s refusing to resign.
Abel Carvajal started a WhatsApp group last fall for conservative students at Florida International University. Within three weeks it was overflowing with the n-word, used over 400 times, alongside antisemitic slurs, misogyny, and open worship of Nazi ideology.
These aren’t anonymous trolls. The participants included Ian Valdes, president of FIU’s Turning Point USA chapter, and Dariel Gonzalez, a former recruitment chair for FIU’s College Republicans, the next generation of GOP leadership in one of America’s most important swing counties.
Gonzalez called his Black professors “the coloreds.” Valdes declared he’d never marry a Jewish person. He called for an immigration ban, then clarified what he meant: white people only.
One participant, William Bejerano, rattled off a grotesque list of ways to murder Black people, crucifixion, beheading, extermination. They renamed the chat after a mythical Nazi civilization they lovingly called “Nazi heaven.”
And here’s the kicker, Carvajal wasn’t just a passive bystander. He used racial slurs himself, deleted dozens of his own messages, and recruited members of this very chat to serve as committee members in the Miami-Dade GOP.
When a Black student was harassed out of the College Republicans, Carvajal mocked her departure with slurs.
This is the SECOND time FIU’s Turning Point chapter has been caught in a hate-filled group chat, the first was in 2018. Last year, Young Republican leaders across multiple states got busted in a nearly identical scandal.
JD Vance’s response? Don’t worry about it, just “kids telling edgy jokes.”
This is who they are. FIU says the chat is now part of a criminal investigation. The Miami-Dade GOP board has called for Carvajal’s removal. But Carvajal says he won’t step down because the worst messages “were not mine.”
They keep telling us who they are. Believe them.
ah well who are we to judge really, Triumph des Willens was pretty edgy
Date: 7/03/2026 09:46:43
From: Michael V
ID: 2367158
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
The Other 98%
The secretary of the Miami-Dade Republican Party ran a group chat where members fantasized about killing Black people, and he’s refusing to resign.
Abel Carvajal started a WhatsApp group last fall for conservative students at Florida International University. Within three weeks it was overflowing with the n-word, used over 400 times, alongside antisemitic slurs, misogyny, and open worship of Nazi ideology.
These aren’t anonymous trolls. The participants included Ian Valdes, president of FIU’s Turning Point USA chapter, and Dariel Gonzalez, a former recruitment chair for FIU’s College Republicans, the next generation of GOP leadership in one of America’s most important swing counties.
Gonzalez called his Black professors “the coloreds.” Valdes declared he’d never marry a Jewish person. He called for an immigration ban, then clarified what he meant: white people only.
One participant, William Bejerano, rattled off a grotesque list of ways to murder Black people, crucifixion, beheading, extermination. They renamed the chat after a mythical Nazi civilization they lovingly called “Nazi heaven.”
And here’s the kicker, Carvajal wasn’t just a passive bystander. He used racial slurs himself, deleted dozens of his own messages, and recruited members of this very chat to serve as committee members in the Miami-Dade GOP.
When a Black student was harassed out of the College Republicans, Carvajal mocked her departure with slurs.
This is the SECOND time FIU’s Turning Point chapter has been caught in a hate-filled group chat, the first was in 2018. Last year, Young Republican leaders across multiple states got busted in a nearly identical scandal.
JD Vance’s response? Don’t worry about it, just “kids telling edgy jokes.”
This is who they are. FIU says the chat is now part of a criminal investigation. The Miami-Dade GOP board has called for Carvajal’s removal. But Carvajal says he won’t step down because the worst messages “were not mine.”
They keep telling us who they are. Believe them.
!!!
Date: 7/03/2026 09:51:47
From: roughbarked
ID: 2367161
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
JudgeMental said:
The Other 98%
The secretary of the Miami-Dade Republican Party ran a group chat where members fantasized about killing Black people, and he’s refusing to resign.
Abel Carvajal started a WhatsApp group last fall for conservative students at Florida International University. Within three weeks it was overflowing with the n-word, used over 400 times, alongside antisemitic slurs, misogyny, and open worship of Nazi ideology.
These aren’t anonymous trolls. The participants included Ian Valdes, president of FIU’s Turning Point USA chapter, and Dariel Gonzalez, a former recruitment chair for FIU’s College Republicans, the next generation of GOP leadership in one of America’s most important swing counties.
Gonzalez called his Black professors “the coloreds.” Valdes declared he’d never marry a Jewish person. He called for an immigration ban, then clarified what he meant: white people only.
One participant, William Bejerano, rattled off a grotesque list of ways to murder Black people, crucifixion, beheading, extermination. They renamed the chat after a mythical Nazi civilization they lovingly called “Nazi heaven.”
And here’s the kicker, Carvajal wasn’t just a passive bystander. He used racial slurs himself, deleted dozens of his own messages, and recruited members of this very chat to serve as committee members in the Miami-Dade GOP.
When a Black student was harassed out of the College Republicans, Carvajal mocked her departure with slurs.
This is the SECOND time FIU’s Turning Point chapter has been caught in a hate-filled group chat, the first was in 2018. Last year, Young Republican leaders across multiple states got busted in a nearly identical scandal.
JD Vance’s response? Don’t worry about it, just “kids telling edgy jokes.”
This is who they are. FIU says the chat is now part of a criminal investigation. The Miami-Dade GOP board has called for Carvajal’s removal. But Carvajal says he won’t step down because the worst messages “were not mine.”
They keep telling us who they are. Believe them.
!!!
“were not mine”…. He started the chat group. It wouldn’t be in existence without him.
Date: 7/03/2026 11:18:47
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2367178
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 7/03/2026 14:19:35
From: buffy
ID: 2367237
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Have we read this Carrick Ryan piece posted 20 hr ago? My sister has posted it on her FB. (I decided to put it in the politics rather than the war thread, but it could have been in either). The numbers are mind boggling.
>>The cost of war can be counted in many ways, but strangely for a nation obsessed with its eye watering debt crisis… very few people seem to be talking about the very literal monetary cost of Trump’s unauthorised venture in Iran.
We don’t know the exact details on the weaponry used so far, but Hegseth did announce that they had struck “…more than 1,000 targets in the first 24 hours.”
Analysts believe more than 200 Tomahawk cruise missiles have so far been fired at Iran. Each one costs around $1.5 million (all figures in USD). JASSM cruise missiles cost a similar amount, while cheaper options like the JDAM guided bomb can cost less than $100,000 each.
But the real expense comes from what Iran is throwing back at them.
U.S. officials say Iran had launched more than 500 ballistic missiles and around 2,000 drones by March 4. Each Patriot interceptor used to knock these out of the sky costs around $4 million each, while each THAAD interceptor costs around $12 million. To rub salt into the wounds, many of these interceptors are being used to take out Iranian drones that cost less than $20,000 to produce.
Satellite imagery analysis suggests Iranian strikes hit sites hosting U.S. AN/TPY-2 radars in Jordan and the UAE, though U.S. officials have not confirmed that the radars themselves were destroyed. Each radar costs roughly $500 million to $1 billion, depending on configuration and support infrastructure.
Meanwhile, three U.S. Air Force F-15E Strike Eagles were lost in an apparent friendly-fire incident over Kuwait. Each of these cost around $95 million.
We haven’t even begun to consider the costs of fuel, maintenance, logistics, and personnel deployment costs, nor the impact on the global economy.
The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) estimated the first four days of US attacks cost about $3.7 billion.
According to one Congressional official, the Pentagon circulated a preliminary estimate that the conflict could cost about $1 billion per day. This is presumably depending on everything going to plan, and in my view a substantial under estimation.
For context, the entire U.S. foreign aid budget is about $50 billion a year.
Whether or not you believe this war to be necessary, the financial cost is a human cost… and it’s worth counting.
Date: 7/03/2026 14:24:49
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2367240
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Have we read this Carrick Ryan piece posted 20 hr ago? My sister has posted it on her FB. (I decided to put it in the politics rather than the war thread, but it could have been in either). The numbers are mind boggling.
>>The cost of war can be counted in many ways, but strangely for a nation obsessed with its eye watering debt crisis… very few people seem to be talking about the very literal monetary cost of Trump’s unauthorised venture in Iran.
We don’t know the exact details on the weaponry used so far, but Hegseth did announce that they had struck “…more than 1,000 targets in the first 24 hours.”
Analysts believe more than 200 Tomahawk cruise missiles have so far been fired at Iran. Each one costs around $1.5 million (all figures in USD). JASSM cruise missiles cost a similar amount, while cheaper options like the JDAM guided bomb can cost less than $100,000 each.
But the real expense comes from what Iran is throwing back at them.
U.S. officials say Iran had launched more than 500 ballistic missiles and around 2,000 drones by March 4. Each Patriot interceptor used to knock these out of the sky costs around $4 million each, while each THAAD interceptor costs around $12 million. To rub salt into the wounds, many of these interceptors are being used to take out Iranian drones that cost less than $20,000 to produce.
Satellite imagery analysis suggests Iranian strikes hit sites hosting U.S. AN/TPY-2 radars in Jordan and the UAE, though U.S. officials have not confirmed that the radars themselves were destroyed. Each radar costs roughly $500 million to $1 billion, depending on configuration and support infrastructure.
Meanwhile, three U.S. Air Force F-15E Strike Eagles were lost in an apparent friendly-fire incident over Kuwait. Each of these cost around $95 million.
We haven’t even begun to consider the costs of fuel, maintenance, logistics, and personnel deployment costs, nor the impact on the global economy.
The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) estimated the first four days of US attacks cost about $3.7 billion.
According to one Congressional official, the Pentagon circulated a preliminary estimate that the conflict could cost about $1 billion per day. This is presumably depending on everything going to plan, and in my view a substantial under estimation.
For context, the entire U.S. foreign aid budget is about $50 billion a year.
Whether or not you believe this war to be necessary, the financial cost is a human cost… and it’s worth counting.
we thought iran ran out of missiles and drones, they’re hardly launching anything now
Date: 7/03/2026 14:53:43
From: kii
ID: 2367242
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Have we read this Carrick Ryan piece posted 20 hr ago?
Yes.
Date: 7/03/2026 15:13:16
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2367245
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Have we read this Carrick Ryan piece posted 20 hr ago?
I follow Carrick so I have read it. He writes some good stuff.
Date: 7/03/2026 15:14:47
From: roughbarked
ID: 2367246
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
buffy said:
Have we read this Carrick Ryan piece posted 20 hr ago?
I follow Carrick so I have read it. He writes some good stuff.
He gets posted here which is where I read him.
Date: 7/03/2026 15:15:04
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2367247
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
how is does the economy ¿ works

we don’t like it, someone please explain
Date: 7/03/2026 15:17:00
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2367248
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
JudgeMental said:
buffy said:
Have we read this Carrick Ryan piece posted 20 hr ago?
I follow Carrick so I have read it. He writes some good stuff.
He gets posted here which is where I read him.
I usually post his stuff. not always though.
Date: 7/03/2026 15:21:28
From: roughbarked
ID: 2367249
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
roughbarked said:
JudgeMental said:
I follow Carrick so I have read it. He writes some good stuff.
He gets posted here which is where I read him.
I usually post his stuff. not always though.
I’m happy to wait.
Date: 7/03/2026 15:21:49
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2367250
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
so the bottom line is that JudgeMental and roughbarked and kii and Witty Rejoinder and Bubblecar and buffy are all the same person, got it
Date: 7/03/2026 16:03:03
From: dv
ID: 2367262
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 7/03/2026 17:56:37
From: kii
ID: 2367306
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
JudgeMental said:
roughbarked said:
He gets posted here which is where I read him.
I usually post his stuff. not always though.
I’m happy to wait.
Oh, that is such a LOLOLOLOL 🙄
Date: 7/03/2026 18:16:24
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2367317
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
roughbarked said:
JudgeMental said:
I usually post his stuff. not always though.
I’m happy to wait.
Oh, that is such a LOLOLOLOL 🙄
LOLOLOL 🦨🦨
Date: 7/03/2026 18:33:29
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2367322
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
kii said:
roughbarked said:
I’m happy to wait.
Oh, that is such a LOLOLOLOL 🙄
LOLOLOL 🦨🦨
ahahahahahaha
Date: 8/03/2026 01:08:55
From: dv
ID: 2367406
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 8/03/2026 08:46:31
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2367436
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
A Mighty Girl
For three years, a bronze plaque honoring the police officers who defended the U.S. Capitol during the January 6th insurrection sat in a basement storage room — waiting for House Speaker Mike Johnson to do something his office called “not implementable”: hang it on a wall.
This morning, at 4 a.m., two workers finally did after 100 House Democrats forced the issue by mounting replicas outside their offices and turning Johnson’s obstruction into a public scandal. With no fanfare and no ceremony, the memorial plaque was finally bolted to a wall near the west front entrance — the same ground where nearly 140 officers were assaulted by violent rioters five years ago.
The plaque’s message is simple yet profound, a long overdue recognition of the officers’ courage and sacrifice: “On behalf of a grateful Congress, this plaque honors the extraordinary individuals who bravely protected and defended this symbol of democracy on Jan. 6, 2021. Their heroism will never be forgotten.”
Next to the plaque, workers affixed a QR code linking to a list of the officers who responded that day. The list runs 45 pages.
The memorial plaque’s creation was an official act of Congress, passed as part of the 2022 government funding bill and signed into law on March 15, 2022. It was due to be installed by March 2023. The Acting Architect of the Capitol had testified that the plaque was complete and ready. The installation never happened.
Rep. Joe Morelle of New York eventually hunted the plaque down last May — finding it shoved into a Capitol basement room alongside a mini-fridge, a scooter, and old lockers. It had been sitting there for two years, waiting for Johnson’s approval. When asked about the long delay, his office offered the vague excuse that hanging it is “not implementable.”
Johnson also failed to personally recognize the insurrection’s fifth anniversary last January or organize any bipartisan memorial for the House.
His actions were not surprising given that he was a central figure in efforts to overturn the 2020 election. Johnson organized an amicus brief signed by over 100 House Republicans supporting a lawsuit to throw out election results in four swing states. And on the night of January 6th itself — after the riot was quelled and the blood was mopped from the Capitol floors — he voted to object to certifying the electoral votes.
In response to Johnson’s defiance of the law in failing to install the memorial plaque, two officers who fought the mob that day — former Capitol Police Officer Harry Dunn and D.C. Metropolitan Police Officer Daniel Hodges — filed a lawsuit last summer. Their complaint was damning: “By refusing to follow the law and honor officers as it is required to do, Congress encourages this rewriting of history. It suggests that the officers are not worthy of being recognized, because Congress refuses to recognize them.” Trump’s Department of Justice had been seeking to have the officers’ case dismissed.
Disgusted by Johnson’s block on even a simple memorial plaque, Reps. Joe Morelle, Jamie Raskin (MD), and Jim McGovern (MA) circulated a letter in June to their colleagues announcing the replica effort. They did not mince words: “If you’re frustrated, like we are, with this embarrassing violation of law and spectacular disregard for the valor, honor and sacrifice of our police officers who responded on that day, please join us by displaying a poster replica of the plaque outside of your office.”
Over 100 House Democrats answered the call. The Capitol complex was soon awash with replicas of the memorial plaque, a testament to both the officers’ heroism and the Republican party’s shameful refusal to acknowledge it. As Rep. Morelle observed: “I guess that’s the irony — that it’s displayed far more because of reluctance to follow the law than it would have been had he just done the right thing.” Instead of one plaque, he wryly noted, they’ve “now got 100.”
Among the House members who displayed replicas honoring these courageous officers was Rep. Terri Sewell of Alabama, pictured here, who wrote: “Congress voted to honor the brave officers who defended our democracy on January 6th with a memorial plaque in the U.S. Capitol. Speaker Johnson is refusing to install it, so I’m hanging a replica outside my office. We won’t let their heroism be erased.”
In January, Senators Jeff Merkley (D-OR) and Thom Tillis (R-NC) — the latter having grown more critical of the administration since announcing he won’t seek re-election — passed a resolution by unanimous consent ordering the display of the plaque on the Senate side of the Capitol “until the plaque can be placed in its permanent location.” The 2022 law specifies the plaque should be installed on the west front of the Capitol, where some of the most violent fighting took place. The parliamentary move essentially dared any Republican to block it — and none did.
That it took three years and a parliamentary maneuver to honor these officers is a scandal in itself. The January 6th insurrection was one of the greatest acts of political violence in modern American history. The law enforcement officers on the front line — defending democracy and protecting members of Congress — paid the greatest cost.
Violent rioters assaulted 138 police officers that day. Fifteen were injured so severely they had to be hospitalized.
Officers suffered concussions, cracked ribs, and wounds from being beaten with pipes and crushed in doorways. Officer Brian Sicknick was assaulted by rioters, suffered two strokes, and died the following day. Four other officers later died by suicide.
And yet, as one of his first acts after being inaugurated on January 20, 2025, Donald Trump granted full pardons to all those convicted in the January 6th attack — over 1,500 rioters in total. That includes the 123 individuals charged with using a deadly or dangerous weapon or causing serious bodily injury to a police officer. It includes those convicted of seditious conspiracy, the gravest charge against the republic.
On the fifth anniversary of the attack, the White House launched an official propaganda website that not only rewrote the history of January 6th but directly blamed the Capitol Police for the violence — accusing officers of “deliberately escalating tensions” with “provocative tactics” that “turned a peaceful demonstration into chaos.” The site falsely asserted that “zero law enforcement officers lost their lives.” Former Speaker Nancy Pelosi called it what it was: “a manifesto of lies.”
So this is where we were: The officers who defended the Capitol couldn’t get a simple memorial plaque hung in their honor. The rioters who attacked them had received presidential pardons, public praise, and a revisionist history website. Johnson still hadn’t acted. Trump still called January 6th a “day of love.”
And then, at 4 a.m. this morning, two workers quietly bolted the plaque to the wall. The three-year saga to reach this point would be absurd if it weren’t so revealing. As Dunn, the former Capitol Police officer, reflected, “I never thought honoring police officers would be this controversial.”
For the vast majority of Americans, it never was. It was only controversial to those bent on rewriting the history of that shameful day — the ones who wanted these officers’ stories to gather dust in a basement storage room. Thanks to those who refused to be silenced, they failed. The plaque is now on the wall. The officers’ heroism will not be forgotten — no matter how hard some try to erase it.
Date: 8/03/2026 09:00:31
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2367439
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
yeah but how about going and honouring and pardoning those great American police Derek Chauvin, J. Alexander Kueng, Thomas Lane, Tou Thao and so forth who keep the streets safe, not just protect angry old white paedophiles in their world leading country running law making refuge
Date: 8/03/2026 11:17:14
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2367462
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 8/03/2026 12:06:32
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2367487
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 8/03/2026 17:52:21
From: dv
ID: 2367677
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I realise it is callous to be looking for silver linings but it would be great if this is what finally cleaves Trump from Putin.
Date: 8/03/2026 17:54:45
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2367680
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
I realise it is callous to be looking for silver linings but it would be great if this is what finally cleaves Trump from Putin.
He’ll do to Putin what he did to Elon, wipe him like a dirty arse.
Date: 8/03/2026 17:55:12
From: party_pants
ID: 2367681
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
I realise it is callous to be looking for silver linings but it would be great if this is what finally cleaves Trump from Putin.
You think there is much chance of that?
Trump seems to adore leaders like Putin and hates the democratically elected reasonable and sensible types.
Date: 8/03/2026 18:06:27
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2367684
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
I realise it is callous to be looking for silver linings but it would be great if this is what finally cleaves Trump from Putin.
It’d take more than this .
The Pee Tapes are real, and Vlad has them.
Date: 8/03/2026 18:17:16
From: kii
ID: 2367686
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
dv said:
I realise it is callous to be looking for silver linings but it would be great if this is what finally cleaves Trump from Putin.
It’d take more than this .
The Pee Tapes are real, and Vlad has them.
The Pee Tapes are not about urine. I have always said that there is video of Trump killing a girl. After reading some of the Epstein files I am sure of it.
Date: 8/03/2026 18:21:55
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2367688
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
captain_spalding said:
dv said:
I realise it is callous to be looking for silver linings but it would be great if this is what finally cleaves Trump from Putin.
It’d take more than this .
The Pee Tapes are real, and Vlad has them.
The Pee Tapes are not about urine. I have always said that there is video of Trump killing a girl. After reading some of the Epstein files I am sure of it.
yeah we read plausible but quite circumstantial suggestions that there were snuff films
Date: 8/03/2026 18:28:18
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2367691
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Fake news!
AI!
Photoshop!
Deepfake!
Date: 8/03/2026 18:33:53
From: roughbarked
ID: 2367696
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
kii said:
captain_spalding said:
It’d take more than this .
The Pee Tapes are real, and Vlad has them.
The Pee Tapes are not about urine. I have always said that there is video of Trump killing a girl. After reading some of the Epstein files I am sure of it.
yeah we read plausible but quite circumstantial suggestions that there were snuff films
Weren’t they all in it together? Who was good at organising Russian girls?
Date: 8/03/2026 18:35:15
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2367698
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
The Pee Tapes are not about urine. I have always said that there is video of Trump killing a girl. After reading some of the Epstein files I am sure of it.
From Trump’s (deranged) point of view, it really doesn’t really matter what’s on them.
It’s the fact that Putin has them, and if Putin makes them public, especially at this advanced stage, it verifies that Trump has been under Putin’s influence all this time, that he has, in effect, been a puppet of the Russians all along.
The longer that Trump is in office, the greater will be the perception of the betrayal that he’s committed. It just gets worse, and more risky for him.
Date: 8/03/2026 18:35:33
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2367699
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
kii said:
The Pee Tapes are not about urine. I have always said that there is video of Trump killing a girl. After reading some of the Epstein files I am sure of it.
yeah we read plausible but quite circumstantial suggestions that there were snuff films
Weren’t they all in it together? Who was good at organising Russian girls?
the FSB.
Date: 9/03/2026 09:42:37
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2367778
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
aha we(0,0,1) have discovered something
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-03-09/oil-markets-qatar-gulf-iran-religion-litics-straight-of-hormuz/106380388
What Americans are now learning is that although their constitution is secular, not religious like Iran’s, supposedly with “checks and balances”, it gives the president almost monarchical powers if he chooses to use them when there is also a supine Congress and Supreme Court.
took a while
Date: 9/03/2026 09:50:01
From: roughbarked
ID: 2367782
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
aha we(0,0,1) have discovered something
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-03-09/oil-markets-qatar-gulf-iran-religion-litics-straight-of-hormuz/106380388
What Americans are now learning is that although their constitution is secular, not religious like Iran’s, supposedly with “checks and balances”, it gives the president almost monarchical powers if he chooses to use them when there is also a supine Congress and Supreme Court.
took a while
“President Trump has been anointed by Jesus to light the signal fire in Iran to cause Armageddon and mark his return to Earth.”
Ack!
Date: 9/03/2026 09:57:49
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2367784
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
I realise it is callous to be looking for silver linings but it would be great if this is what finally cleaves Trump from Putin.
nah they can have a love in
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-03-09/middle-east-war-oil-crisis-could-help-russia/106417484

disclaimer we note the clipped axis
Date: 9/03/2026 13:27:27
From: Ian
ID: 2367867
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 9/03/2026 13:29:04
From: roughbarked
ID: 2367870
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Ian said:

He really shouldn’t hold up the mirror like that.
It doesn’t show his good side, if there is one at all.
Date: 9/03/2026 13:44:43
From: Arts
ID: 2367881
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Ian said:

He really shouldn’t hold up the mirror like that.
It doesn’t show his good side, if there is one at all.
Fake news, Thank you for your attention to this matter, DJT
Date: 9/03/2026 14:03:52
From: kii
ID: 2367884
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
LOLOLOLOL 😆
The plumber didn’t call Hegseth the Secretary of War!

Date: 9/03/2026 15:18:02
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2367918
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
U.S. was only country in a worldwide survey to say most fellow citizens are bad people
It’s not clear why so many Americans think their neighbors are immoral, but experts think political polarization has something to do with it.
Updated March 6, 2026
By Michelle Boorstein
From Indonesia to Nigeria to Greece, people around the world see some slice of their fellow citizens as immoral or unethical. But there is only one country where the majority of residents say their countrymen are “bad”: the United States.
A striking survey released Thursday finds that 53 percent of American adults describe the morality and ethics of their fellow citizens as “bad” (somewhat bad or very bad). In the 24 other countries polled by Pew Research Center, most people said other residents there are somewhat good or good.
At the opposite end of the spectrum is Canada, where Pew found that 92 percent of people say their fellow Canadians are good, while just 7 percent say they’re bad.
“Americans tend to think broadly that most other people are worse than they are,” said Scott Schieman, a University of Toronto sociologist who studies the social psychology of Americans and Canadians. Whether people are asked to assess how happy the public is about their jobs, or the cost of living, or the government, he said, there is a “negativity bias” in Canada, but “it’s no where near as sharp as in the U.S.”
Pew has never asked this specific question, so there is no data over time and there weren’t follow-up questions to reveal why Americans assessed other Americans so negatively and if this is new.
Ask The Post AI
Dive deeper
However, more than half of the countries surveyed showed a partisanship bias, meaning that people whose preferred political party is out of power “are particularly likely to view their fellow citizens as immoral,” the report found.
In the U.S., Pew found, 60 percent of Democrats and those who lean Democratic saw their fellow citizens as morally or ethically bad, while 46 percent of Republicans did.


Karen Swallow Prior, a Christian author who writes about morality and ethics, said today’s political leaders, along with algorithms and swarms of social media bots, fuel the idea that “bad” people are everywhere.
“Almost every moral issue has become politicized. We have two parties that cannot and will not work with one another and demonize one another, so it’s not surprising at all that our perception of one another’s goodness would be so low,” said Prior, whose most recent book is “You Have a Calling: Finding Your Vocation in the True, Good, and Beautiful.”
Though Pew hasn’t asked the question on ethics and morality before, Gallup has asked something similar. Since 2003, it has surveyed Americans on how they would rate the “overall state of moral values” in the country. Spoiler: not good. The number has been in negative territory the entire time, meaning many more said poor or only fair, compared with those saying good or excellent.
Bonhoeffer wrote in the 1930s that there were so many Christian groups in the U.S. that “they couldn’t ever agree that something was heretical,” she told The Washington Post. America, he thought, didn’t really have a shared creed. Instead, Barnett said, America is a political system in which religion and morality become used by political leaders, “which in turn can lead to great cynicism about … public morality and intense polarization.”
Schieman said he wonders whether the U.S.-Canada split stems from American politics. “The United States has so many internal contradictions right now, more than I’ve ever seen,” he said.
Canadians tend to blame people in power and elites, Schieman said. But “it’s not directed at other Canadians” the way Americans are assessing one another, he said.
A 2022 Pew poll showed a sharp rise among Americans in negative views about people from the other political party. Forty-seven percent of Republican Americans and 35 percent of Democrats in 2016 said people in the opposing party were “immoral.” That jumped to 72 percent of Republicans and 63 percent of Democrats in 2022.
There were also large jumps in Americans saying people from the opposing party are dishonest, close-minded and lazy.
“When you have a deep degree of political polarization as we have now,” Barnett said, “that erodes trust in lots of other ways. Especially right now where much of it is framed in terms of religious teaching. The framing of things as religious issues skews the perception.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2026/03/06/americans-immoral-unethical-survey/
Date: 9/03/2026 15:36:21
From: Cymek
ID: 2367922
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
U.S. was only country in a worldwide survey to say most fellow citizens are bad people
It’s not clear why so many Americans think their neighbors are immoral, but experts think political polarization has something to do with it.
Updated March 6, 2026
By Michelle Boorstein
From Indonesia to Nigeria to Greece, people around the world see some slice of their fellow citizens as immoral or unethical. But there is only one country where the majority of residents say their countrymen are “bad”: the United States.
A striking survey released Thursday finds that 53 percent of American adults describe the morality and ethics of their fellow citizens as “bad” (somewhat bad or very bad). In the 24 other countries polled by Pew Research Center, most people said other residents there are somewhat good or good.
At the opposite end of the spectrum is Canada, where Pew found that 92 percent of people say their fellow Canadians are good, while just 7 percent say they’re bad.
“Americans tend to think broadly that most other people are worse than they are,” said Scott Schieman, a University of Toronto sociologist who studies the social psychology of Americans and Canadians. Whether people are asked to assess how happy the public is about their jobs, or the cost of living, or the government, he said, there is a “negativity bias” in Canada, but “it’s no where near as sharp as in the U.S.”
Pew has never asked this specific question, so there is no data over time and there weren’t follow-up questions to reveal why Americans assessed other Americans so negatively and if this is new.
Ask The Post AI
Dive deeper
However, more than half of the countries surveyed showed a partisanship bias, meaning that people whose preferred political party is out of power “are particularly likely to view their fellow citizens as immoral,” the report found.
In the U.S., Pew found, 60 percent of Democrats and those who lean Democratic saw their fellow citizens as morally or ethically bad, while 46 percent of Republicans did.


Karen Swallow Prior, a Christian author who writes about morality and ethics, said today’s political leaders, along with algorithms and swarms of social media bots, fuel the idea that “bad” people are everywhere.
“Almost every moral issue has become politicized. We have two parties that cannot and will not work with one another and demonize one another, so it’s not surprising at all that our perception of one another’s goodness would be so low,” said Prior, whose most recent book is “You Have a Calling: Finding Your Vocation in the True, Good, and Beautiful.”
Though Pew hasn’t asked the question on ethics and morality before, Gallup has asked something similar. Since 2003, it has surveyed Americans on how they would rate the “overall state of moral values” in the country. Spoiler: not good. The number has been in negative territory the entire time, meaning many more said poor or only fair, compared with those saying good or excellent.
Bonhoeffer wrote in the 1930s that there were so many Christian groups in the U.S. that “they couldn’t ever agree that something was heretical,” she told The Washington Post. America, he thought, didn’t really have a shared creed. Instead, Barnett said, America is a political system in which religion and morality become used by political leaders, “which in turn can lead to great cynicism about … public morality and intense polarization.”
Schieman said he wonders whether the U.S.-Canada split stems from American politics. “The United States has so many internal contradictions right now, more than I’ve ever seen,” he said.
Canadians tend to blame people in power and elites, Schieman said. But “it’s not directed at other Canadians” the way Americans are assessing one another, he said.
A 2022 Pew poll showed a sharp rise among Americans in negative views about people from the other political party. Forty-seven percent of Republican Americans and 35 percent of Democrats in 2016 said people in the opposing party were “immoral.” That jumped to 72 percent of Republicans and 63 percent of Democrats in 2022.
There were also large jumps in Americans saying people from the opposing party are dishonest, close-minded and lazy.
“When you have a deep degree of political polarization as we have now,” Barnett said, “that erodes trust in lots of other ways. Especially right now where much of it is framed in terms of religious teaching. The framing of things as religious issues skews the perception.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2026/03/06/americans-immoral-unethical-survey/
Religion seems to be another area
Christians and extreme racist behaviour and comments all based on some idea of superiority
Date: 9/03/2026 15:40:37
From: Cymek
ID: 2367926
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
U.S. was only country in a worldwide survey to say most fellow citizens are bad people
It’s not clear why so many Americans think their neighbors are immoral, but experts think political polarization has something to do with it.
Updated March 6, 2026
By Michelle Boorstein
From Indonesia to Nigeria to Greece, people around the world see some slice of their fellow citizens as immoral or unethical. But there is only one country where the majority of residents say their countrymen are “bad”: the United States.
A striking survey released Thursday finds that 53 percent of American adults describe the morality and ethics of their fellow citizens as “bad” (somewhat bad or very bad). In the 24 other countries polled by Pew Research Center, most people said other residents there are somewhat good or good.
At the opposite end of the spectrum is Canada, where Pew found that 92 percent of people say their fellow Canadians are good, while just 7 percent say they’re bad.
“Americans tend to think broadly that most other people are worse than they are,” said Scott Schieman, a University of Toronto sociologist who studies the social psychology of Americans and Canadians. Whether people are asked to assess how happy the public is about their jobs, or the cost of living, or the government, he said, there is a “negativity bias” in Canada, but “it’s no where near as sharp as in the U.S.”
Pew has never asked this specific question, so there is no data over time and there weren’t follow-up questions to reveal why Americans assessed other Americans so negatively and if this is new.
Ask The Post AI
Dive deeper
However, more than half of the countries surveyed showed a partisanship bias, meaning that people whose preferred political party is out of power “are particularly likely to view their fellow citizens as immoral,” the report found.
In the U.S., Pew found, 60 percent of Democrats and those who lean Democratic saw their fellow citizens as morally or ethically bad, while 46 percent of Republicans did.


Karen Swallow Prior, a Christian author who writes about morality and ethics, said today’s political leaders, along with algorithms and swarms of social media bots, fuel the idea that “bad” people are everywhere.
“Almost every moral issue has become politicized. We have two parties that cannot and will not work with one another and demonize one another, so it’s not surprising at all that our perception of one another’s goodness would be so low,” said Prior, whose most recent book is “You Have a Calling: Finding Your Vocation in the True, Good, and Beautiful.”
Though Pew hasn’t asked the question on ethics and morality before, Gallup has asked something similar. Since 2003, it has surveyed Americans on how they would rate the “overall state of moral values” in the country. Spoiler: not good. The number has been in negative territory the entire time, meaning many more said poor or only fair, compared with those saying good or excellent.
Bonhoeffer wrote in the 1930s that there were so many Christian groups in the U.S. that “they couldn’t ever agree that something was heretical,” she told The Washington Post. America, he thought, didn’t really have a shared creed. Instead, Barnett said, America is a political system in which religion and morality become used by political leaders, “which in turn can lead to great cynicism about … public morality and intense polarization.”
Schieman said he wonders whether the U.S.-Canada split stems from American politics. “The United States has so many internal contradictions right now, more than I’ve ever seen,” he said.
Canadians tend to blame people in power and elites, Schieman said. But “it’s not directed at other Canadians” the way Americans are assessing one another, he said.
A 2022 Pew poll showed a sharp rise among Americans in negative views about people from the other political party. Forty-seven percent of Republican Americans and 35 percent of Democrats in 2016 said people in the opposing party were “immoral.” That jumped to 72 percent of Republicans and 63 percent of Democrats in 2022.
There were also large jumps in Americans saying people from the opposing party are dishonest, close-minded and lazy.
“When you have a deep degree of political polarization as we have now,” Barnett said, “that erodes trust in lots of other ways. Especially right now where much of it is framed in terms of religious teaching. The framing of things as religious issues skews the perception.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2026/03/06/americans-immoral-unethical-survey/
Religion seems to be another area
Christians and extreme racist behaviour and comments all based on some idea of superiority
Sorry it mention religion.
I noticed it with these fake AI videos of non white people misbehaving in public
Really nasty comments and the profiles are often Christian white people, pro Trump.
Date: 9/03/2026 15:44:45
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2367932
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
Cymek said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
U.S. was only country in a worldwide survey to say most fellow citizens are bad people
It’s not clear why so many Americans think their neighbors are immoral, but experts think political polarization has something to do with it.
Updated March 6, 2026
By Michelle Boorstein
From Indonesia to Nigeria to Greece, people around the world see some slice of their fellow citizens as immoral or unethical. But there is only one country where the majority of residents say their countrymen are “bad”: the United States.
A striking survey released Thursday finds that 53 percent of American adults describe the morality and ethics of their fellow citizens as “bad” (somewhat bad or very bad). In the 24 other countries polled by Pew Research Center, most people said other residents there are somewhat good or good.
At the opposite end of the spectrum is Canada, where Pew found that 92 percent of people say their fellow Canadians are good, while just 7 percent say they’re bad.
“Americans tend to think broadly that most other people are worse than they are,” said Scott Schieman, a University of Toronto sociologist who studies the social psychology of Americans and Canadians. Whether people are asked to assess how happy the public is about their jobs, or the cost of living, or the government, he said, there is a “negativity bias” in Canada, but “it’s no where near as sharp as in the U.S.”
Pew has never asked this specific question, so there is no data over time and there weren’t follow-up questions to reveal why Americans assessed other Americans so negatively and if this is new.
Ask The Post AI
Dive deeper
However, more than half of the countries surveyed showed a partisanship bias, meaning that people whose preferred political party is out of power “are particularly likely to view their fellow citizens as immoral,” the report found.
In the U.S., Pew found, 60 percent of Democrats and those who lean Democratic saw their fellow citizens as morally or ethically bad, while 46 percent of Republicans did.

Karen Swallow Prior, a Christian author who writes about morality and ethics, said today’s political leaders, along with algorithms and swarms of social media bots, fuel the idea that “bad” people are everywhere.
“Almost every moral issue has become politicized. We have two parties that cannot and will not work with one another and demonize one another, so it’s not surprising at all that our perception of one another’s goodness would be so low,” said Prior, whose most recent book is “You Have a Calling: Finding Your Vocation in the True, Good, and Beautiful.”
Though Pew hasn’t asked the question on ethics and morality before, Gallup has asked something similar. Since 2003, it has surveyed Americans on how they would rate the “overall state of moral values” in the country. Spoiler: not good. The number has been in negative territory the entire time, meaning many more said poor or only fair, compared with those saying good or excellent.
Bonhoeffer wrote in the 1930s that there were so many Christian groups in the U.S. that “they couldn’t ever agree that something was heretical,” she told The Washington Post. America, he thought, didn’t really have a shared creed. Instead, Barnett said, America is a political system in which religion and morality become used by political leaders, “which in turn can lead to great cynicism about … public morality and intense polarization.”
Schieman said he wonders whether the U.S.-Canada split stems from American politics. “The United States has so many internal contradictions right now, more than I’ve ever seen,” he said.
Canadians tend to blame people in power and elites, Schieman said. But “it’s not directed at other Canadians” the way Americans are assessing one another, he said.
A 2022 Pew poll showed a sharp rise among Americans in negative views about people from the other political party. Forty-seven percent of Republican Americans and 35 percent of Democrats in 2016 said people in the opposing party were “immoral.” That jumped to 72 percent of Republicans and 63 percent of Democrats in 2022.
There were also large jumps in Americans saying people from the opposing party are dishonest, close-minded and lazy.
“When you have a deep degree of political polarization as we have now,” Barnett said, “that erodes trust in lots of other ways. Especially right now where much of it is framed in terms of religious teaching. The framing of things as religious issues skews the perception.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2026/03/06/americans-immoral-unethical-survey/
Religion seems to be another area
Christians and extreme racist behaviour and comments all based on some idea of superiority
Sorry it mention religion.
I noticed it with these fake AI videos of non white people misbehaving in public
Really nasty comments and the profiles are often Christian white people, pro Trump.
tbh we thought they were just bots
Date: 9/03/2026 16:03:38
From: dv
ID: 2367943
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
U.S. was only country in a worldwide survey to say most fellow citizens are bad people
It’s not clear why so many Americans think their neighbors are immoral, but experts think political polarization has something to do with it.
Updated March 6, 2026
By Michelle Boorstein
From Indonesia to Nigeria to Greece, people around the world see some slice of their fellow citizens as immoral or unethical. But there is only one country where the majority of residents say their countrymen are “bad”: the United States.
A striking survey released Thursday finds that 53 percent of American adults describe the morality and ethics of their fellow citizens as “bad” (somewhat bad or very bad). In the 24 other countries polled by Pew Research Center, most people said other residents there are somewhat good or good.
At the opposite end of the spectrum is Canada, where Pew found that 92 percent of people say their fellow Canadians are good, while just 7 percent say they’re bad.
“Americans tend to think broadly that most other people are worse than they are,” said Scott Schieman, a University of Toronto sociologist who studies the social psychology of Americans and Canadians. Whether people are asked to assess how happy the public is about their jobs, or the cost of living, or the government, he said, there is a “negativity bias” in Canada, but “it’s no where near as sharp as in the U.S.”
Pew has never asked this specific question, so there is no data over time and there weren’t follow-up questions to reveal why Americans assessed other Americans so negatively and if this is new.
Ask The Post AI
Dive deeper
However, more than half of the countries surveyed showed a partisanship bias, meaning that people whose preferred political party is out of power “are particularly likely to view their fellow citizens as immoral,” the report found.
In the U.S., Pew found, 60 percent of Democrats and those who lean Democratic saw their fellow citizens as morally or ethically bad, while 46 percent of Republicans did.


Karen Swallow Prior, a Christian author who writes about morality and ethics, said today’s political leaders, along with algorithms and swarms of social media bots, fuel the idea that “bad” people are everywhere.
“Almost every moral issue has become politicized. We have two parties that cannot and will not work with one another and demonize one another, so it’s not surprising at all that our perception of one another’s goodness would be so low,” said Prior, whose most recent book is “You Have a Calling: Finding Your Vocation in the True, Good, and Beautiful.”
Though Pew hasn’t asked the question on ethics and morality before, Gallup has asked something similar. Since 2003, it has surveyed Americans on how they would rate the “overall state of moral values” in the country. Spoiler: not good. The number has been in negative territory the entire time, meaning many more said poor or only fair, compared with those saying good or excellent.
Bonhoeffer wrote in the 1930s that there were so many Christian groups in the U.S. that “they couldn’t ever agree that something was heretical,” she told The Washington Post. America, he thought, didn’t really have a shared creed. Instead, Barnett said, America is a political system in which religion and morality become used by political leaders, “which in turn can lead to great cynicism about … public morality and intense polarization.”
Schieman said he wonders whether the U.S.-Canada split stems from American politics. “The United States has so many internal contradictions right now, more than I’ve ever seen,” he said.
Canadians tend to blame people in power and elites, Schieman said. But “it’s not directed at other Canadians” the way Americans are assessing one another, he said.
A 2022 Pew poll showed a sharp rise among Americans in negative views about people from the other political party. Forty-seven percent of Republican Americans and 35 percent of Democrats in 2016 said people in the opposing party were “immoral.” That jumped to 72 percent of Republicans and 63 percent of Democrats in 2022.
There were also large jumps in Americans saying people from the opposing party are dishonest, close-minded and lazy.
“When you have a deep degree of political polarization as we have now,” Barnett said, “that erodes trust in lots of other ways. Especially right now where much of it is framed in terms of religious teaching. The framing of things as religious issues skews the perception.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2026/03/06/americans-immoral-unethical-survey/
Maybe they are right
Date: 9/03/2026 16:22:22
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2367952
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
no wonder it’s so difficult to find a good guy with a gun in these dark times
Date: 9/03/2026 17:28:13
From: Michael V
ID: 2368006
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
U.S. was only country in a worldwide survey to say most fellow citizens are bad people
It’s not clear why so many Americans think their neighbors are immoral, but experts think political polarization has something to do with it.
Updated March 6, 2026
By Michelle Boorstein
From Indonesia to Nigeria to Greece, people around the world see some slice of their fellow citizens as immoral or unethical. But there is only one country where the majority of residents say their countrymen are “bad”: the United States.
A striking survey released Thursday finds that 53 percent of American adults describe the morality and ethics of their fellow citizens as “bad” (somewhat bad or very bad). In the 24 other countries polled by Pew Research Center, most people said other residents there are somewhat good or good.
At the opposite end of the spectrum is Canada, where Pew found that 92 percent of people say their fellow Canadians are good, while just 7 percent say they’re bad.
“Americans tend to think broadly that most other people are worse than they are,” said Scott Schieman, a University of Toronto sociologist who studies the social psychology of Americans and Canadians. Whether people are asked to assess how happy the public is about their jobs, or the cost of living, or the government, he said, there is a “negativity bias” in Canada, but “it’s no where near as sharp as in the U.S.”
Pew has never asked this specific question, so there is no data over time and there weren’t follow-up questions to reveal why Americans assessed other Americans so negatively and if this is new.
Ask The Post AI
Dive deeper
However, more than half of the countries surveyed showed a partisanship bias, meaning that people whose preferred political party is out of power “are particularly likely to view their fellow citizens as immoral,” the report found.
In the U.S., Pew found, 60 percent of Democrats and those who lean Democratic saw their fellow citizens as morally or ethically bad, while 46 percent of Republicans did.


Karen Swallow Prior, a Christian author who writes about morality and ethics, said today’s political leaders, along with algorithms and swarms of social media bots, fuel the idea that “bad” people are everywhere.
“Almost every moral issue has become politicized. We have two parties that cannot and will not work with one another and demonize one another, so it’s not surprising at all that our perception of one another’s goodness would be so low,” said Prior, whose most recent book is “You Have a Calling: Finding Your Vocation in the True, Good, and Beautiful.”
Though Pew hasn’t asked the question on ethics and morality before, Gallup has asked something similar. Since 2003, it has surveyed Americans on how they would rate the “overall state of moral values” in the country. Spoiler: not good. The number has been in negative territory the entire time, meaning many more said poor or only fair, compared with those saying good or excellent.
Bonhoeffer wrote in the 1930s that there were so many Christian groups in the U.S. that “they couldn’t ever agree that something was heretical,” she told The Washington Post. America, he thought, didn’t really have a shared creed. Instead, Barnett said, America is a political system in which religion and morality become used by political leaders, “which in turn can lead to great cynicism about … public morality and intense polarization.”
Schieman said he wonders whether the U.S.-Canada split stems from American politics. “The United States has so many internal contradictions right now, more than I’ve ever seen,” he said.
Canadians tend to blame people in power and elites, Schieman said. But “it’s not directed at other Canadians” the way Americans are assessing one another, he said.
A 2022 Pew poll showed a sharp rise among Americans in negative views about people from the other political party. Forty-seven percent of Republican Americans and 35 percent of Democrats in 2016 said people in the opposing party were “immoral.” That jumped to 72 percent of Republicans and 63 percent of Democrats in 2022.
There were also large jumps in Americans saying people from the opposing party are dishonest, close-minded and lazy.
“When you have a deep degree of political polarization as we have now,” Barnett said, “that erodes trust in lots of other ways. Especially right now where much of it is framed in terms of religious teaching. The framing of things as religious issues skews the perception.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2026/03/06/americans-immoral-unethical-survey/
Huh!
I’m not convinced that their explanation is complete, but it certainly is overall an interesting observation, worthy of follow-up.
Date: 11/03/2026 01:12:31
From: dv
ID: 2368414
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 11/03/2026 01:21:02
From: kii
ID: 2368415
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Then there’s the comment made by Dear Leader about the dead soldiers walking around with no legs…
(I can’t even be bothered to find a link to it.)
(I’m going to go inject choccy into my brain.)
(New reaction “lolsob”.)
Date: 11/03/2026 01:22:44
From: party_pants
ID: 2368416
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

Fuck me. You must be fucking absolutely totally morally bankrupt if Tucker Carlson is lining up against you on being immoral.
Date: 11/03/2026 14:56:58
From: dv
ID: 2368548
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/mar/10/erika-kirk-board-us-air-force-academy
Sure, why not, nothing matters
Date: 11/03/2026 18:57:57
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2368639
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I’m sure I’ve missed this discussion but lemme just say, what?

Date: 11/03/2026 22:29:41
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2368704
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/mar/10/erika-kirk-board-us-air-force-academy
Sure, why not, nothing matters
I’m sure I’ve missed this discussion but lemme just say, what?

Is this the real life? Is this just fantasy?
Caught in a landslide, no escape from reality
Open your eyes, look up to the skies and see
It starts with one
One thing, I don’t know why
It doesn’t even matter how hard you try
Keep that in mind, I designed this rhyme to explain in due time
All I know time is a valuable thing
Watch it fly by as the pendulum swings
Watch it count down to the end of the day, the clock ticks life away
It’s so unreal, didn’t look out below
Watch the time go right out the window
Tryna hold on, d-didn’t even know
I wasted it all just to watch you go
I’m just a poor boy, I need no sympathy
Because I’m easy come, easy go
Little high, little low
Any way the wind blows doesn’t really matter to me, to me
I kept everything inside
And even though I tried, it all fell apart
What it meant to me will eventually be a memory of a time when
I tried so hard and got so farMama, just killed a man
Put a gun against his head, pulled my trigger, now he’s dead
Mama, life had just begun
But now I’ve gone and thrown it all away
Mama, ooh, didn’t mean to make you cry
If I’m not back again this time tomorrow
Carry on, carry on
Date: 11/03/2026 22:34:12
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2368706
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
alleged

Date: 11/03/2026 22:49:57
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2368709
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
alleged

alleged

to be fair there were times we weren’t so confident
Date: 12/03/2026 16:18:39
From: dv
ID: 2368898
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/18S13Zqcqw/
Doss.discourse on the troops
Date: 12/03/2026 18:07:12
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2368953
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 12/03/2026 18:18:05
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2368955
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
You’re Not Overreacting. This Is Actually Fascism.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDf25rNyT1A
Date: 13/03/2026 06:09:20
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2369066
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Iran strikes are Donald Trump’s ninth foreign military action in 14 months
Venezuela
Syria
Nigeria
Pacific and Caribbean boat strikes
Iran 2025
Somalia
Iraq
Yemen
Iran 2026
Date: 13/03/2026 12:02:19
From: dv
ID: 2369134
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/18GWM6Xegr/
Deposition of Nathan Cavanaugh, regarding how DOGE determined grants to be cancelled.
Date: 13/03/2026 12:07:47
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2369136
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/18GWM6Xegr/
Deposition of Nathan Cavanaugh, regarding how DOGE determined grants to be cancelled.
This is Nathan Cavanaugh, a DOGE staffer assigned to the General Services Administration who, alongside another DOGE member named Justin Fox, was tasked with identifying grants for review for termination at the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH). This six-part video deposition has been edited down for clarity and length and has been released by the American Historical Association, one of the of the associations alongside the Modern Language Association and the American Council of Learned Societies, filing a lawsuit over terminated grants for ”schools, libraries and community organizations.“
”The motion included discovery documents revealing that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) used a flawed ChatGPT process to identify “DEI programs” and inform decisions to terminate grants awarded by the NEH. The motion was filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York,“ their joint press release reads. ”In the motion, the plaintiffs present three claims: violations of the First Amendment; violations of the Equal Protection Clause; and violation of the separation of powers, as DOGE carried out the termination of the grants, not the NEH Chair, and without approval from Congress.“ See less
Date: 13/03/2026 14:03:55
From: kii
ID: 2369193
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
dv said:
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/18GWM6Xegr/
Deposition of Nathan Cavanaugh, regarding how DOGE determined grants to be cancelled.
This is Nathan Cavanaugh, a DOGE staffer assigned to the General Services Administration who, alongside another DOGE member named Justin Fox, was tasked with identifying grants for review for termination at the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH). This six-part video deposition has been edited down for clarity and length and has been released by the American Historical Association, one of the of the associations alongside the Modern Language Association and the American Council of Learned Societies, filing a lawsuit over terminated grants for ”schools, libraries and community organizations.“
”The motion included discovery documents revealing that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) used a flawed ChatGPT process to identify “DEI programs” and inform decisions to terminate grants awarded by the NEH. The motion was filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York,“ their joint press release reads. ”In the motion, the plaintiffs present three claims: violations of the First Amendment; violations of the Equal Protection Clause; and violation of the separation of powers, as DOGE carried out the termination of the grants, not the NEH Chair, and without approval from Congress.“ See less
I watched part of Justin Fox’s deposition concerning his understanding of “DEI”.
Holy fucksticks 🙄 what a load of avoidance!
Date: 13/03/2026 19:38:09
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2369370
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
well that’s something at least we guess

Date: 13/03/2026 19:47:28
From: Michael V
ID: 2369379
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
well that’s something at least we guess

What were they taxed before?
Date: 13/03/2026 19:51:31
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2369380
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
well that’s something at least we guess

What were they taxed before?
we’ve never paid tax there but apparently
The state of Washington has been one of nine states that do not levy a broad-based personal income tax, joining Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas and Wyoming. This notion has long been a magnet for individuals seeking to retain more of their earnings within the United States.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/nathangoldman/2026/03/11/washingtons-99-millionaire-tax-raises-fears-of-wealthy-exodus/
Date: 13/03/2026 20:04:05
From: Michael V
ID: 2369385
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
well that’s something at least we guess

What were they taxed before?
we’ve never paid tax there but apparently
The state of Washington has been one of nine states that do not levy a broad-based personal income tax, joining Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas and Wyoming. This notion has long been a magnet for individuals seeking to retain more of their earnings within the United States.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/nathangoldman/2026/03/11/washingtons-99-millionaire-tax-raises-fears-of-wealthy-exodus/
Gosh!
Date: 13/03/2026 20:04:43
From: roughbarked
ID: 2369386
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
What were they taxed before?
we’ve never paid tax there but apparently
The state of Washington has been one of nine states that do not levy a broad-based personal income tax, joining Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas and Wyoming. This notion has long been a magnet for individuals seeking to retain more of their earnings within the United States.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/nathangoldman/2026/03/11/washingtons-99-millionaire-tax-raises-fears-of-wealthy-exodus/
Gosh!
It isn’t fair.
Date: 13/03/2026 20:11:15
From: Michael V
ID: 2369388
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
What were they taxed before?
we’ve never paid tax there but apparently
The state of Washington has been one of nine states that do not levy a broad-based personal income tax, joining Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas and Wyoming. This notion has long been a magnet for individuals seeking to retain more of their earnings within the United States.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/nathangoldman/2026/03/11/washingtons-99-millionaire-tax-raises-fears-of-wealthy-exodus/
Gosh!
Looking at it more, I see that federal, state and local government can impose income taxes in the USA.
I worked with a US citizen who was a supervising geologist in Australia. Turns out he had to pay Australian income tax and US income tax on his salary. When he got his US tax bill, he pronounced the US as Farkin Godam Carmunists…
Date: 13/03/2026 20:42:32
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2369414
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
hey good news
“This technology disrupts humanities-trained—largely Democratic—voters, and makes their economic power less. And increases the economic power of vocationally trained, working-class, often male, working-class voters,” Karp said in a CNBC interview Thursday. “And so these disruptions are gonna disrupt every aspect of our society. And to make this work, we have to come to an agreement of what it is we’re going to do with the technology; how are we gonna explain to people who are likely gonna have less good, and less interesting jobs.”
https://newrepublic.com/post/207693/palantir-ceo-karp-disrupting-democratic-power
fknel
Date: 14/03/2026 11:55:22
From: dv
ID: 2369528
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-blames-recent-attacks-genetics-assailants-rcna263351
On about genetics again
Date: 14/03/2026 11:59:48
From: Michael V
ID: 2369530
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-blames-recent-attacks-genetics-assailants-rcna263351
On about genetics again
Spruiking nonsense to make racism seem scientific.
Date: 14/03/2026 12:06:26
From: kii
ID: 2369535
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 14/03/2026 12:07:58
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2369537
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
dv said:
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-blames-recent-attacks-genetics-assailants-rcna263351
On about genetics again
Spruiking nonsense to make racism seem scientific.
media still playing at the stage of “oh hey look at this curious outburst, poll of the day are there signs of fascism in the country, and now back to your regular programming” when they really needed to call it out 6 years ago and address the pachyderm in the confined building space
Date: 14/03/2026 12:10:15
From: dv
ID: 2369538
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
dv said:
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-blames-recent-attacks-genetics-assailants-rcna263351
On about genetics again
Spruiking nonsense to make racism seem scientific.
media still playing at the stage of “oh hey look at this curious outburst, poll of the day are there signs of fascism in the country, and now back to your regular programming” when they really needed to call it out 6 years ago and address the pachyderm in the confined building space
*11
Date: 14/03/2026 12:34:46
From: Michael V
ID: 2369545
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
dv said:
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-blames-recent-attacks-genetics-assailants-rcna263351
On about genetics again
Spruiking nonsense to make racism seem scientific.
media still playing at the stage of “oh hey look at this curious outburst, poll of the day are there signs of fascism in the country, and now back to your regular programming” when they really needed to call it out 6 years ago and address the pachyderm in the confined building space
The US has seriously entrenched racism. Many or perhaps even most government forms require you to state your race.
Date: 14/03/2026 21:29:51
From: dv
ID: 2369706
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
US officer having a ‘mild anxiety attack’ took ambulance meant for man shot by police
Dyshan Best later died after having to wait 10 extra minutes for next ambulance, according to Connecticut investigation
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/mar/12/us-officer-anxiety-attack-ambulance-police-shooting
Some of these deaths due to callous disregard seem worse than the ones due to malicious intent.
Date: 15/03/2026 08:27:44
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2369777
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
alleged but we don’t follow US gambling so we don’t have an interpretation for yous sorry

Date: 15/03/2026 12:15:21
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2369856
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
alleged but we don’t follow US gambling so we don’t have an interpretation for yous sorry

but what if they grab it by the purulence

Date: 15/03/2026 12:24:07
From: Michael V
ID: 2369860
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
SCIENCE said:
alleged but we don’t follow US gambling so we don’t have an interpretation for yous sorry

but what if they grab it by the purulence

Ha!
Date: 15/03/2026 12:50:12
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2369875
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
SCIENCE said:
alleged but we don’t follow US gambling so we don’t have an interpretation for yous sorry

but what if they grab it by the purulence

Ha!
guess it’s gone through some refinements over the hours


Date: 15/03/2026 14:33:29
From: dv
ID: 2369894
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.thelettersfromleo.com/p/pete-hegseths-pastor-wants-to-ban

Date: 15/03/2026 18:10:05
From: Bogsnorkler
ID: 2369988
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.indy100.com/politics/jd-vance-gas-prices-iran-biden
Link
However, speaking in Rocky Mount, North Carolina on Friday, the vice president argued: “All of this conversation happens where Joe Biden left us in a terrible situation, and the reason why gas prices are where they are today is because of Donald Trump’s work to get them lower, because the Biden administration, they were crazy high.
Date: 15/03/2026 18:47:18
From: Michael V
ID: 2370005
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Bogsnorkler said:
https://www.indy100.com/politics/jd-vance-gas-prices-iran-biden
Link
However, speaking in Rocky Mount, North Carolina on Friday, the vice president argued: “All of this conversation happens where Joe Biden left us in a terrible situation, and the reason why gas prices are where they are today is because of Donald Trump’s work to get them lower, because the Biden administration, they were crazy high.
WTAF???
Date: 15/03/2026 18:50:24
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2370006
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Bogsnorkler said:
https://www.indy100.com/politics/jd-vance-gas-prices-iran-biden
Link
However, speaking in Rocky Mount, North Carolina on Friday, the vice president argued: “All of this conversation happens where Joe Biden left us in a terrible situation, and the reason why gas prices are where they are today is because of Donald Trump’s work to get them lower, because the Biden administration, they were crazy high.
WTAF???
The price did get to extraordinary (for the US) heights of around $4 per (US) gallon during Biden’s term, but soon fell considerably.
If the current trend continues, that level will soon be exceeded.
Date: 16/03/2026 19:18:17
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2370437
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 16/03/2026 19:22:20
From: Michael V
ID: 2370438
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:

Ha!
:)
Date: 16/03/2026 20:45:13
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2370459
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

‘Titanic’ statue of Trump and Epstein on the Mall draws praise, scorn
The statue is the third satirical installation placed on the Mall by a mysterious group of artists that highlights the relationship between the two men.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2026/03/10/trump-epstein-statue-titanic-mall-washington/
Date: 16/03/2026 20:48:22
From: dv
ID: 2370460
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Turning Point CSA
Date: 16/03/2026 21:00:50
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2370463
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Turning Point CSA
I asked AI (Artificial Insemination) what CSA means
CSA most commonly refers to Community Supported Agriculture, a partnership where consumers subscribe to a local farm’s harvest. It can also mean Child Support Assessment (government payment calculation), Central Sleep Apnea (a breathing disorder), or Child Sexual Abuse.
Date: 17/03/2026 17:18:07
From: dv
ID: 2370697
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
U.S. Considers Withholding H.I.V. Aid Unless Zambia Expands Minerals Access
A draft State Department memo outlines ways the Trump administration may ratchet up pressure on the African country by ending health support “on a massive scale.”
—
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/16/health/zambia-hiv-aid-minerals-trump.html
Date: 17/03/2026 17:19:16
From: roughbarked
ID: 2370700
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
U.S. Considers Withholding H.I.V. Aid Unless Zambia Expands Minerals Access
A draft State Department memo outlines ways the Trump administration may ratchet up pressure on the African country by ending health support “on a massive scale.”
—
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/16/health/zambia-hiv-aid-minerals-trump.html
Is Blackmail the way to run a government?
Date: 17/03/2026 17:20:57
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2370703
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
U.S. Considers Withholding H.I.V. Aid Unless Zambia Expands Minerals Access
A draft State Department memo outlines ways the Trump administration may ratchet up pressure on the African country by ending health support “on a massive scale.”
—
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/16/health/zambia-hiv-aid-minerals-trump.html
He’s taking the humanitarian out of humanitarian aid.
Date: 17/03/2026 17:21:16
From: Cymek
ID: 2370704
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
U.S. Considers Withholding H.I.V. Aid Unless Zambia Expands Minerals Access
A draft State Department memo outlines ways the Trump administration may ratchet up pressure on the African country by ending health support “on a massive scale.”
—
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/16/health/zambia-hiv-aid-minerals-trump.html
HIV was probably a god send to some people as it originally wiped out what they consider undesirables
Date: 17/03/2026 17:21:59
From: dv
ID: 2370705
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
dv said:
U.S. Considers Withholding H.I.V. Aid Unless Zambia Expands Minerals Access
A draft State Department memo outlines ways the Trump administration may ratchet up pressure on the African country by ending health support “on a massive scale.”
—
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/16/health/zambia-hiv-aid-minerals-trump.html
Is Blackmail the way to run a government?
Historically it’s been quite popular but naked colonialism was been considered gauche for the last 70 years or so.
Date: 17/03/2026 17:31:14
From: Cymek
ID: 2370710
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
roughbarked said:
dv said:
U.S. Considers Withholding H.I.V. Aid Unless Zambia Expands Minerals Access
A draft State Department memo outlines ways the Trump administration may ratchet up pressure on the African country by ending health support “on a massive scale.”
—
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/16/health/zambia-hiv-aid-minerals-trump.html
Is Blackmail the way to run a government?
Historically it’s been quite popular but naked colonialism was been considered gauche for the last 70 years or so.
That’s pretty damn disgusting behaviour
Perhaps the USA can put them into some sort of extermination camps be honest about what they really want
Date: 17/03/2026 17:50:23
From: Michael V
ID: 2370723
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
U.S. Considers Withholding H.I.V. Aid Unless Zambia Expands Minerals Access
A draft State Department memo outlines ways the Trump administration may ratchet up pressure on the African country by ending health support “on a massive scale.”
—
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/16/health/zambia-hiv-aid-minerals-trump.html
What a tnuc!
Date: 17/03/2026 18:03:27
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2370731
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
dv said:
U.S. Considers Withholding H.I.V. Aid Unless Zambia Expands Minerals Access
A draft State Department memo outlines ways the Trump administration may ratchet up pressure on the African country by ending health support “on a massive scale.”
—
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/16/health/zambia-hiv-aid-minerals-trump.html
HIV was probably a god send to some people as it originally wiped out what they consider undesirables
we thought it was god’s punishment for homosexuality
Date: 17/03/2026 18:04:18
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2370732
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
dv said:
roughbarked said:
Is Blackmail the way to run a government?
Historically it’s been quite popular but naked colonialism was been considered gauche for the last 70 years or so.
That’s pretty damn disgusting behaviour
Perhaps the USA can put them into some sort of extermination camps be honest about what they really want
that said spreading infection instead of controlling it has become fashionable again over the past 6 years so shrug
Date: 17/03/2026 18:09:27
From: Cymek
ID: 2370736
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Cymek said:
dv said:
U.S. Considers Withholding H.I.V. Aid Unless Zambia Expands Minerals Access
A draft State Department memo outlines ways the Trump administration may ratchet up pressure on the African country by ending health support “on a massive scale.”
—
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/16/health/zambia-hiv-aid-minerals-trump.html
HIV was probably a god send to some people as it originally wiped out what they consider undesirables
we thought it was god’s punishment for homosexuality
People probably believe that
Date: 17/03/2026 18:10:20
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2370738
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
Cymek said:
HIV was probably a god send to some people as it originally wiped out what they consider undesirables
we thought it was god’s punishment for homosexuality
People probably believe that
What’s covid punishment for?
Date: 17/03/2026 18:15:21
From: Cymek
ID: 2370739
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
we thought it was god’s punishment for homosexuality
People probably believe that
What’s covid punishment for?
Human greed and destruction of the natural world ?
Date: 17/03/2026 18:39:26
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2370749
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
we thought it was god’s punishment for homosexuality
People probably believe that
What’s covid punishment for?
‘Reality’ TV shows.
Date: 17/03/2026 19:02:32
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2370754
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 17/03/2026 19:51:53
From: Michael V
ID: 2370782
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:

Nods.
Date: 17/03/2026 20:48:53
From: roughbarked
ID: 2370806
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:

He’s certainly no magician.
Date: 17/03/2026 20:56:28
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2370808
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Dunno if this has been posted.

Date: 18/03/2026 13:41:09
From: dv
ID: 2370994
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.stlpr.org/government-politics-issues/2026-03-10/missouri-lawmakers-pass-bill-removing-legal-barriers-for-pregnant-women-to-divorce
Missouri lawmakers pass bill removing legal barriers for pregnant women to divorce
Date: 18/03/2026 13:51:40
From: Michael V
ID: 2370995
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
https://www.stlpr.org/government-politics-issues/2026-03-10/missouri-lawmakers-pass-bill-removing-legal-barriers-for-pregnant-women-to-divorce
Missouri lawmakers pass bill removing legal barriers for pregnant women to divorce
I wonder when those legal barriers were placed. Seems kind of medieval.
Date: 18/03/2026 14:09:55
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2370996
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
dv said:
https://www.stlpr.org/government-politics-issues/2026-03-10/missouri-lawmakers-pass-bill-removing-legal-barriers-for-pregnant-women-to-divorce
Missouri lawmakers pass bill removing legal barriers for pregnant women to divorce
I wonder when those legal barriers were placed. Seems kind of medieval.
American lawmakers making changes that don’t seem medieval?
Something fishy there…
Date: 18/03/2026 15:52:33
From: dv
ID: 2371032
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Currently atop his truth social account.
He’s inscrutable.
Date: 18/03/2026 16:07:23
From: Michael V
ID: 2371040
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Currently atop his truth social account.
He’s inscrutable.
Now that one, I don’t understand.
Date: 19/03/2026 09:53:48
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2371230
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 20/03/2026 09:12:36
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2371540
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Did he just mention Pearl Harbour? Whilst sat next to the Japanese PM? Yes he did.
https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3mhgfj7joct2p
Date: 20/03/2026 09:21:34
From: Ian
ID: 2371542
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
Did he just mention Pearl Harbour? Whilst sat next to the Japanese PM? Yes he did.
https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3mhgfj7joct2p
Someone should blow him up!
Oh look…

;
Date: 20/03/2026 09:25:44
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2371543
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
oh are they on about the last so called world war now tell us about the Nanjing atrocity
Date: 20/03/2026 09:27:14
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2371545
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 20/03/2026 09:29:54
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2371547
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
Did he just mention Pearl Harbour? Whilst sat next to the Japanese PM? Yes he did.
https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3mhgfj7joct2p
Don’t mention Pearl Harbour.
I mentioned it once but I think I got away with it.
Date: 20/03/2026 13:11:16
From: dv
ID: 2371604
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
An amendment to the Military Selective Service Act to direct the Selective Service System (SSS) to try to register all potential draftees in the USA automatically has been included in the version of this year’s military authorization bill agreed to by a House-Senate conference committee and likely to be enacted into law within the next few weeks.
This doesn’t mean that a draft is being activated right away, or that any or all of those “automatically” registered will be sent induction orders — although preparing to do so is the sole purpose of registration with or by the SSS. This will, however, be the largest change in Selective Service law since 1980. More importantly, it will move the USA closer to activation of a draft, or at least to being able to claim to be ready to activate a draft “on demand” of Congress and the President, than at any time in the half century since draft registration was suspended and draft boards were deactivated in 1975.
——
Probably nothing to worry about, just dotting the tease and crossing the eyes.
Date: 20/03/2026 14:48:39
From: kii
ID: 2371652
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
From Alt National Park Service’s Facebook page…
This is amazing news! The people of Minneapolis and St. Paul are being recognized with one of the most prestigious civic honors in America. The JFK Library Foundation announced today that the people of the Twin Cities will receive a 2026 John F. Kennedy Profile in Courage Award for their resistance to a massive federal immigration enforcement operation.
Date: 20/03/2026 15:07:43
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2371656
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
nice save
An Ohio-based company that initially balked at granting a mom’s request to work from home during a high-risk pregnancy has been found liable for the newborn’s death and ordered on Wednesday to pay $22.5 million in damages. Chelsea Walsh, according to her lawsuit, made the work-from-home request with Total Quality Logistics on Feb. 15, 2021, four days after undergoing an operation on her cervix to prevent her from going into early labor. Instead, the lawsuit states, “TQL presented Walsh with an impossible choice — work at the office and put additional strain on her child, or take an unpaid leave of absence and lose the income and health insurance she needed.” Walsh returned to the office on Feb. 22, 2021. Walsh, according to her lawsuit, gave birth to a daughter she named Magnolia on the evening of Feb. 24, 2021, the same day her manager at TQL told her the company “had reconsidered its decision to deny her requested accommodation” and allowed her to go home and continue working. Walsh was between four and five months pregnant when she gave birth, the suit states.
Walsh was finally allowed to work from home after her husband, Joel Walsh, spoke about his wife’s plight with his company’s human resources manager, who is friends with a top executive at TQL, the suit states. That manager, who is not named in the lawsuit, notified the TQL executive about Walsh’s situation. “Thank you,” the TQL executive said, according to the lawsuit. “You just saved us a lawsuit.”
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/ohio-firm-must-pay-225-million-mom-whose-baby-died-was-denied-work-hom-rcna264321
Date: 20/03/2026 15:10:42
From: Michael V
ID: 2371657
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
From Alt National Park Service’s Facebook page…
This is amazing news! The people of Minneapolis and St. Paul are being recognized with one of the most prestigious civic honors in America. The JFK Library Foundation announced today that the people of the Twin Cities will receive a 2026 John F. Kennedy Profile in Courage Award for their resistance to a massive federal immigration enforcement operation.
Good.
Date: 20/03/2026 15:17:17
From: furious
ID: 2371658
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
kii said:
From Alt National Park Service’s Facebook page…
This is amazing news! The people of Minneapolis and St. Paul are being recognized with one of the most prestigious civic honors in America. The JFK Library Foundation announced today that the people of the Twin Cities will receive a 2026 John F. Kennedy Profile in Courage Award for their resistance to a massive federal immigration enforcement operation.
Good.
Yeah, but now Trump will suggest that he deserves one too…
Date: 20/03/2026 15:27:31
From: Michael V
ID: 2371665
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
furious said:
Michael V said:
kii said:
From Alt National Park Service’s Facebook page…
This is amazing news! The people of Minneapolis and St. Paul are being recognized with one of the most prestigious civic honors in America. The JFK Library Foundation announced today that the people of the Twin Cities will receive a 2026 John F. Kennedy Profile in Courage Award for their resistance to a massive federal immigration enforcement operation.
Good.
Yeah, but now Trump will suggest that he deserves one too…
It wouldn’t surprise me. Not one little bit.
Date: 20/03/2026 15:52:15
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2371674
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 20/03/2026 16:23:34
From: Neophyte
ID: 2371684
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
From Alt National Park Service’s Facebook page…
This is amazing news! The people of Minneapolis and St. Paul are being recognized with one of the most prestigious civic honors in America. The JFK Library Foundation announced today that the people of the Twin Cities will receive a 2026 John F. Kennedy Profile in Courage Award for their resistance to a massive federal immigration enforcement operation.
Surely the first course of action will be to rename it the DJT-JFK Library Foundation, and the 2026 Donald j Trump-John F Kennedy Profile In Courage…
Date: 20/03/2026 16:41:07
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2371688
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
At least they didn’t use the image of his fist pump after the alleged ear incident

Date: 20/03/2026 16:46:02
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2371689
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
At least they didn’t use the image of his fist pump after the alleged ear incident

It’s gross to ponder bc Trump’s… well, Trump, but if someone else had’ve been POTUS during this year, it’s reasonable to expect the President to be featured alongside Washington on a commemorative coin.
Date: 20/03/2026 16:46:02
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2371690
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
At least they didn’t use the image of his fist pump after the alleged ear incident

It’s gross to ponder bc Trump’s… well, Trump, but if someone else had’ve been POTUS during this year, it’s reasonable to expect the President to be featured alongside Washington on a commemorative coin.
Date: 20/03/2026 17:13:10
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2371692
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/indland/groenland/danmark-forberedte-sig-paa-muligt-angreb-fra-usa-floej-poser-med-blod-til-groenland-og-gjorde-klar
Da danske soldater over hals og hoved blev fløjet til Grønland i januar i år, medbragte de sprængstoffer, så de kunne ødelægge blandt andet landingsbanerne i Nuuk og Kangerlussuaq. Det skulle forhindre amerikanske militærfly i at landsætte soldater på øen, hvis præsident Donald Trump i yderste konsekvens valgte at ville tage Grønland med magt. Med i lasten var også blod fra danske blodbanker, så sårede kunne få behandling, hvis det var kommet til kamp.
Sensommeren og efteråret 2025 beskriver DR’s kilder som en periode, hvor Grønlands-krisen boblede på et lavere blus. Men kort inde i januar 2026 eskalerede situationen på en måde, der fik den danske regering til i al hast at fremskynde udsendelsen af soldaterne. Otte af DR’s kilder beskriver særligt én udløsende faktor: Morgenen den 3. januar 2026, hvor de vågnede til nyheden om, at USA havde angrebet Venezuela og fjernet landets præsident. Med kort aftræk blev først en forkommando med danske, franske, tyske, norske og svenske soldater fløjet til Nuuk og Kangerlussuaq. Umiddelbart efter fulgte en hovedstyrke med blandt andre soldater fra Dragonregimentet i Holstebro, elitesoldater fra Jægerkorpset og franske alpejægere, der er trænet til krig i kolde, bjergrige områder. Samtidig blev danske kampfly og et fransk flådefartøj sendt mod Nordatlanten.
Målet med at have soldater på landjorden i Grønland – med så mange forskellige flag på skuldrene som muligt – var ifølge seks af kilderne, at amerikanerne ville være tvunget til at foretage en større fjendtlig handling, hvis Donald Trump reelt ville indtage Grønland militært. Det skulle afskrække USA fra overhovedet at forsøge. – Vi har ikke stået i en sådan situation siden april 1940, siger en dansk forsvarskilde med henvisning til dagene op til besættelsen af Danmark under Anden Verdenskrig.
‘Det her er ikke slut’
Date: 20/03/2026 17:31:56
From: Michael V
ID: 2371701
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:

LOLOL
Date: 20/03/2026 17:58:26
From: Michael V
ID: 2371711
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/indland/groenland/danmark-forberedte-sig-paa-muligt-angreb-fra-usa-floej-poser-med-blod-til-groenland-og-gjorde-klar
Da danske soldater over hals og hoved blev fløjet til Grønland i januar i år, medbragte de sprængstoffer, så de kunne ødelægge blandt andet landingsbanerne i Nuuk og Kangerlussuaq. Det skulle forhindre amerikanske militærfly i at landsætte soldater på øen, hvis præsident Donald Trump i yderste konsekvens valgte at ville tage Grønland med magt. Med i lasten var også blod fra danske blodbanker, så sårede kunne få behandling, hvis det var kommet til kamp.
Sensommeren og efteråret 2025 beskriver DR’s kilder som en periode, hvor Grønlands-krisen boblede på et lavere blus. Men kort inde i januar 2026 eskalerede situationen på en måde, der fik den danske regering til i al hast at fremskynde udsendelsen af soldaterne. Otte af DR’s kilder beskriver særligt én udløsende faktor: Morgenen den 3. januar 2026, hvor de vågnede til nyheden om, at USA havde angrebet Venezuela og fjernet landets præsident. Med kort aftræk blev først en forkommando med danske, franske, tyske, norske og svenske soldater fløjet til Nuuk og Kangerlussuaq. Umiddelbart efter fulgte en hovedstyrke med blandt andre soldater fra Dragonregimentet i Holstebro, elitesoldater fra Jægerkorpset og franske alpejægere, der er trænet til krig i kolde, bjergrige områder. Samtidig blev danske kampfly og et fransk flådefartøj sendt mod Nordatlanten.
Målet med at have soldater på landjorden i Grønland – med så mange forskellige flag på skuldrene som muligt – var ifølge seks af kilderne, at amerikanerne ville være tvunget til at foretage en større fjendtlig handling, hvis Donald Trump reelt ville indtage Grønland militært. Det skulle afskrække USA fra overhovedet at forsøge. – Vi har ikke stået i en sådan situation siden april 1940, siger en dansk forsvarskilde med henvisning til dagene op til besættelsen af Danmark under Anden Verdenskrig.
‘Det her er ikke slut’
TC;DT;DR
Date: 20/03/2026 19:10:17
From: roughbarked
ID: 2371741
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/indland/groenland/danmark-forberedte-sig-paa-muligt-angreb-fra-usa-floej-poser-med-blod-til-groenland-og-gjorde-klar
Da danske soldater over hals og hoved blev fløjet til Grønland i januar i år, medbragte de sprængstoffer, så de kunne ødelægge blandt andet landingsbanerne i Nuuk og Kangerlussuaq. Det skulle forhindre amerikanske militærfly i at landsætte soldater på øen, hvis præsident Donald Trump i yderste konsekvens valgte at ville tage Grønland med magt. Med i lasten var også blod fra danske blodbanker, så sårede kunne få behandling, hvis det var kommet til kamp.
Sensommeren og efteråret 2025 beskriver DR’s kilder som en periode, hvor Grønlands-krisen boblede på et lavere blus. Men kort inde i januar 2026 eskalerede situationen på en måde, der fik den danske regering til i al hast at fremskynde udsendelsen af soldaterne. Otte af DR’s kilder beskriver særligt én udløsende faktor: Morgenen den 3. januar 2026, hvor de vågnede til nyheden om, at USA havde angrebet Venezuela og fjernet landets præsident. Med kort aftræk blev først en forkommando med danske, franske, tyske, norske og svenske soldater fløjet til Nuuk og Kangerlussuaq. Umiddelbart efter fulgte en hovedstyrke med blandt andre soldater fra Dragonregimentet i Holstebro, elitesoldater fra Jægerkorpset og franske alpejægere, der er trænet til krig i kolde, bjergrige områder. Samtidig blev danske kampfly og et fransk flådefartøj sendt mod Nordatlanten.
Målet med at have soldater på landjorden i Grønland – med så mange forskellige flag på skuldrene som muligt – var ifølge seks af kilderne, at amerikanerne ville være tvunget til at foretage en større fjendtlig handling, hvis Donald Trump reelt ville indtage Grønland militært. Det skulle afskrække USA fra overhovedet at forsøge. – Vi har ikke stået i en sådan situation siden april 1940, siger en dansk forsvarskilde med henvisning til dagene op til besættelsen af Danmark under Anden Verdenskrig.
‘Det her er ikke slut’
This is not over.
Date: 20/03/2026 23:04:55
From: Bogsnorkler
ID: 2371804
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Oregon’s Bay Area
Earlier this week, a UK reader asked whether King Charles should cancel any planned visit to the United States while Trump remains in office. The concern was straightforward: Trump would seize on the imagery and use it to inflate himself, turning constitutional ceremony into yet another tribute reel. I said I thought that concern was well-founded.
Trump does not experience pageantry as neutral statecraft; he experiences it as personal affirmation. And that reader’s question opens onto a larger issue. What we are now seeing in these bilateral meetings is not just old-fashioned vanity, but the beginnings of a more deliberate White House effort to convert foreign visits into branding material, with allied leaders recast as supporting players in the ongoing marketing campaign for Trump’s presidency.
The bilateral meeting with Japan made that painfully clear. What should have been a sober discussion of trade, regional security, China, and the spiraling consequences of Trump’s Iran fiasco quickly turned into another one-man festival of self-worship. Trump welcomed Japan’s prime minister with the usual syrupy praise, declaring that she had just won “a tremendous election in a record-setting fashion” and adding, “we have something in common,” because of course even a foreign leader’s electoral success had to be dragged back into the orbit of Trump’s own vanity. He then boasted about his endorsement and inflated her victory into “the biggest win in the history of Japan,” because naturally no foreign leader can simply succeed on her own without first passing through the cleansing car wash of Trump’s ego. From there the event dissolved into the now-familiar slurry of boasting, threats, and historical vulgarity.
Asked about Iran, Trump lurched into stock market brags, rambling that “the Dow just hit 50,000” and that everything was going great until he had to take what he repeatedly called his “little excursion.” He then bragged that the United States had “obliterated their Navy,” “obliterated their just about everything there is to obliterate,” and that Iran’s leaders kept being replaced and wiped out again. It was an Oval Office hostage situation in which Japan’s prime minister had to stand politely by while Trump narrated his own delusions of omnipotence.
Then came the Pearl Harbor line, which should have been disqualifying all by itself. When a Japanese reporter asked why U.S. allies had not been informed in advance about the attack on Iran, Trump responded by smirking, “Who knows better about surprise than Japan? … Why didn’t you tell me about Pearl Harbor?” There it was: the historical illiteracy, the cheap-jack cruelty, the schoolyard nastiness, all wrapped in the usual Trumpian belief that if he gets a reaction, he has scored a point. In one sentence he managed to trivialize one of the most consequential events in U.S.-Japan history, insult the country of the visiting prime minister, and remind the world that he treats diplomacy as an opportunity to say something outrageous and then bask in the attention.
What makes this more than mere vulgarity, though, is what happened afterward. The White House then released a glossy promotional video built from the visit, pairing carefully selected audio clips from the earlier meeting with soft-focus imagery of Trump and the prime minister strolling the colonnade, cherry blossoms blooming, and presidential portraits lining the wall. At one point, the prime minister appears to pause and gesture quizzically toward the absurd Biden autopen display Trump has installed there, as if even a visiting ally could not quite miss the fact that the White House has been redecorated as a shrine to Trump’s grievances. But the real tell was the soundtrack. The video lifts the prime minister’s line that “it is only you, Donald, who can achieve peace across the world” and lays it over those stately visuals like a benediction. In context, it was diplomatic flattery. Out of context, it becomes a cinematic endorsement. The rambling, the threats, the Pearl Harbor crack, the incoherence, all of that was cut away. What remained was a carefully polished myth: Trump the peacemaker, Trump the historic figure, Trump the man affirmed by allies and framed by presidential grandeur. Diplomacy was recut into a legitimacy commercial.
The same formula appears to have been used with Ireland. There too, the White House stitched together pleasant lines from the bilateral meeting and laid them over scenic shots of green fountains, Capitol vistas, the gold-plated Oval Office, the presidential portrait walk, and even a bizarre close-up of shamrock socks and Florsheim shoes, as though statecraft had been handed over to a lifestyle influencer with authoritarian sympathies. Taken together, these videos look less like innocent highlight reels than the early stages of a new White House branding effort, one that seems to have accelerated after Trump’s disastrous invasion of Iran and the international backlash that followed.
Having shredded his own credibility through recklessness and bombast, Trump now appears to be using foreign leaders, ceremonial settings, and the visual language of alliance to market himself back into respectability.
That is what makes the reader’s concern about King Charles so relevant. The danger is not only that Trump enjoys pomp. It is that he is now systematically repurposing it. Every bilateral meeting can be mined for clips, every visiting leader can be turned into a supporting character in a soft-focus presidential trailer, every act of courtesy can be edited into proof that serious people admire him, trust him, and still regard him as a legitimate figure on the world stage. In that sense, these visits are no longer just diplomatic necessities; they are raw material for Trump’s image-laundering operation. Foreign leaders who tell themselves they are merely showing respect for the office need to understand that, in Trump’s hands, they are extras in a legitimacy campaign designed to restore his stature after his own conduct has diminished it.
Date: 20/03/2026 23:14:37
From: Bogsnorkler
ID: 2371807
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Oregon’s Bay Area
Pete Hegseth stood at that podium and did something so morally rotten, so grotesque, that it deserves to be named plainly. He took the grief of military families, the imagery of flag-draped coffins, the unbearable finality of lives cut short, and he used it as a sales pitch for more war.
Instead of honoring the dead, he conscripted them. He wrapped himself in the language of sacrifice and duty and patriotism, but beneath all of it was the same old lie that has been used for generations to keep the body count rising: if we do not send more young men and women into the fire, then those who have already died will have died “for nothing.” It is one of the ugliest manipulations in American political life, and Hegseth delivered it with the smug certainty of a man who thinks rage and bloodlust are the same thing as strength.
Let’s be honest about what this is: a war of choice, built on dubious grounds and wrapped in the usual language of necessity so the people responsible never have to admit they chose it. They chose it. And now they want to use the dead to sanctify that choice, as if mourning itself can be turned into consent. Honoring lives lost in war does not require feeding more lives into the same machine. It does not require manufacturing more widows, more broken bodies, more folded flags, more mothers waking up every day with a hole blown through the center of their lives. It does not require another round of patriotic stagecraft from men in power who speak so easily of sacrifice because it is almost never their own.
What sickened me most was the way he tried to turn mourning into obligation. He thinks the tears of grieving families can be weaponized into a mandate and sorrow itself is now a blank check for escalation. As though the proper response to death is not grief, not truth, not restraint, not even the smallest shred of humility, but more death. More sons and daughters sent into the abyss so men like Hegseth can stand at podiums and pretend they are Churchill.
I know exactly what war sounds like when it reaches into a family’s home, and I have absolutely no patience left for these strutting frauds who talk about it like it is a morality play designed to flatter their courage.
While my Marine son was serving in Iraq, in Ramadi, I used to get Google alerts that would say something like, “Marines died today in Ramadi.” The moment I saw those words, my gut would twist so violently I would run to the bathroom and wretch into the toilet. Then came the frantic search for details. Who died? What rank? What company? What tiny scrap of information could tell me whether my son was still alive?
That is the reality they never speak about. That moment of panic, of physical terror. That desperate hunt for information because your child is in a war zone and somewhere, someone’s world has just ended.
Then relief would come. My son was still alive. But even that relief was poisoned, because it was immediately followed by the realization that some other mother was not so fortunate. Some other woman had just entered the darkest chamber of grief a human being can know. Some other family’s life had been split in two: before the knock at the door, and after.
That is what men like Hegseth erase. They erase the bathroom floor, the mothers, the sickening dread of every headline and every notification. They erase the guilt braided into relief, and try to erase the knowledge that every fresh speech about “resolve” is really a threat aimed at more families: get ready, because we are about to do this to you too.
So when I hear him stand there, draping himself in the dead while demanding more sacrifice, my reaction is not respect. It is shear contempt for the shamelessness of it. Contempt for the manipulation, for the way he tried to use the pain of families as cover for the continuation of a pointless war, for the obscene theatricality of a man speaking about “honor” while preparing more parents to live with dread and more mothers to live with devastation. I try hard not to resort to profanity, but fuck you Pete Hegseth, you vainglorious, oleaginous, war-drunk propagandist, and the horse you rode in on.
There is nothing noble or brave about turning the dead into propaganda. There is nothing patriotic about making grief do the work of persuasion. And there is certainly nothing honorable about implying that the only way to respect those already lost is to make sure more American families suffer exactly as they did.
The truth is that war does not stay on the battlefield. It lives in mothers’ bodies. It lives in every panicked breath, every half-second of dread when the phone rings, every frantic search for a name, every prayer uttered through nausea, every terrible moment of relief that means someone else’s child is dead. It lives in the homes of the people who wait and fear and grieve, while men at podiums congratulate themselves for their resolve.
Pete Hegseth does not get to define honor for me. If honoring the dead means anything at all, it means telling the truth about what war does, refusing to let grief be turned into ammunition, and looking at the machinery that keeps demanding more lives and saying, enough.
Every time these men say “finish this,” what mothers hear is something else entirely.
Date: 20/03/2026 23:16:11
From: kii
ID: 2371808
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Dang…I was just about to post the Oregon’s Bay Area post.
It’s a good one.
Date: 20/03/2026 23:16:56
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2371809
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Bogsnorkler said:
A
the usual Trumpian belief that if he gets a reaction, he has scored a point
B
What makes this more than mere vulgarity, though, is what happened afterward.
C
lifts the prime minister’s line that “it is only you, Donald, who can achieve peace across the world” and lays it over those stately visuals like a benediction. In context, it was diplomatic flattery
A
it’s a belief founded in truth
B
oh we thought they meant what happened afterward relative to the Pearl Harbor thing, well, didn’t the surprise attacker end up losing and copping 2 big ones to the groin
C
in context, it was sycophancy, and out of context, it is still sycophancy
Date: 20/03/2026 23:19:08
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2371810
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Bogsnorkler said:
if we do not send more young men and women into the fire, then those who have already died will have died “for nothing.” It is one of the ugliest manipulations
pretty sure that’s just the sunk battleship phallusy
Date: 21/03/2026 07:29:04
From: Bogsnorkler
ID: 2371834
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Oregon’s Bay Area is feeling discouraged.
Good morning! Yesterday I wrote about the way Trump has been co-opting state visits and appearances with foreign leaders into glossy little presidential promo reels, the kind of soft-focus pageantry meant to lazzle the eye just long enough to keep people from noticing the rot underneath. That instinct matters now, because there is something uncomfortably Epsteinian in the way Trump collects people in images. Not relationships, just images, trophy photos, proof of proximity. The point is not whether the encounter meant anything; the point is that it can be displayed later, recut into propaganda, and made to imply status, intimacy, or power. Epstein put the pictures on mantels. Trump folds them into White House promo videos. Same hunger, different set design.
The reason to bring this up is that the Epstein stink still hangs over all of this no matter how many flags they drape across the screen. Conjecture is not proof, and nobody should pretend otherwise, but the speculation keeps surfacing here and abroad for a reason: because this administration has the emotional texture of a regime that is always in need of a new spectacle, always hungry for a larger crisis to swallow the old one whole. When commentators mutter that this Middle East fiasco is functioning as a giant distraction from the Epstein files, they are not inventing that suspicion out of thin air. They are responding to a White House that has spent years substituting image management for truth, noise for accountability, and choreographed power for actual legitimacy.
Unfortunately for them, this war is not behaving like a clean distraction. It is a fiasco, a kakistrophe (please indulge me). Even as Trump insists the fight is “militarily won,” the Pentagon is sending thousands more Marines and sailors into the region aboard the USS Boxer group, on top of the tens of thousands of US troops already there. Israel is still striking Tehran. Iran is still hitting energy infrastructure and launching attacks on Gulf states. And the administration is floating ideas so reckless they sound like parody, including reported consideration of occupying or blockading Iran’s Kharg Island, the terminal that handles most of Iran’s oil exports, while Trump publicly berates NATO allies as “cowards” for refusing to join what he absurdly describes as a “simple military maneuver” in the Strait of Hormuz. If your war is supposedly under control, you do not need to beg allies to clean up the chokepoint you helped set on fire.
The human cost is already being laundered into propaganda. Pete Hegseth, who has spent this conflict sounding like a man auditioning for the role of war in a movie trailer, told reporters that grieving families of the six service members killed in last week’s tanker crash urged him to “finish” the job in Iran and “do not stop until the job is done.” But now one of those fathers, Charles Simmons, says he said no such thing. Instead, Simmons recalled telling Hegseth: “I understand there’s a lot of peril that goes into making decisions like this, and I just certainly hope the decisions being made are necessary.” Asked directly whether he had said anything about continuing the war, Simmons was unequivocal: “No, I didn’t say anything along those lines.” In other words, Hegseth appears to have taken private grief and converted it into a public sales pitch for more escalation. Ventriloquism with the dead.
While Washington tries to package all of this as resolve, the rest of the world is staring at the bill. France has explicitly rejected any “forceful opening” of Hormuz under current bombardment and instead called for “the immediate implementation of a moratorium on strikes targeting civilian infrastructure, especially energy and water facilities.”
Spain, meanwhile, is scrambling to cushion the blow at home: Pedro Sánchez has unveiled a €5bn relief package, saying the measures are meant to “ease the impact of energy price rises” as Europe absorbs the shock. Switzerland has halted new arms export licences to the United States, a pointed reminder that some countries want no deeper part in this disaster. And the International Energy Agency is warning that this may be “the greatest global energy security threat in history,” with Fatih Birol cautioning that it could take “six months” for some disrupted Gulf oil and gas flows to come back. This is what American “leadership” now looks like: allies scrambling to protect their own populations from the economic fallout of a war they did not want, do not trust, and increasingly want no part of.
Even the shipping picture alone is a catastrophe. Traffic through Hormuz has collapsed, insurers have backed away, and thousands of seafarers remain trapped in the Gulf as attacks, port refusals, and fear turn one of the world’s most vital trade arteries into a floating bottleneck. The International Maritime Organization is now discussing how to get ships and crews out of the area safely. And as Sal Mercagliano pointed out, this is “well beyond the energy crisis” people are fixated on. It is a crisis for the crews themselves. One mariner stuck aboard a ship in the Gulf told him that a nearby vessel had “call in desperately to port control, saying they’re officially out of water,” only to be denied entry. Sal warned that this is “turning into a disaster for the crews on the ships,” with people “overdue for our stores and fuel, water, and trying to ration ourselves.” That is what this administration’s blundering has produced: not just higher prices, but thousands of seafarers stranded in a war zone, running short on food, water, fuel, and options while Washington flails. And the White House response so far has been exactly the kind of improvisation Sal mocked, considering whether to unsanction Iranian oil already at sea and issuing a 60-day Jones Act waiver that looks less like strategy than, in his words, “throwing spaghetti at the wall here trying to figure out what to do.”
Because the farce must always have one more layer of insult, Trump is publicly scheduled to leave Washington later today for Palm Beach and remain at Mar-a-Lago through another taxpayer-funded golfing weekend. So there you have it: a widening regional war, a global energy shock, dead service members turned into messaging props, allied governments trying to contain the damage, and the president once again decamping to the resort. He treats the presidency like a stage set, war like a branding environment, and crisis like something to be managed through camera angles until it is time to board the plane for another taxpayer-funded weekend. The reels will be glossy, I am sure. The consequences already are not.
So that is where we are this Friday morning: a war sold as strength that looks more like improvisation, a White House still trying to bury reality under glossy presidential scenery, grieving families used as stage props, allies left to absorb the shock, and thousands of ordinary people, from sailors trapped in the Gulf to families staring at the price of fuel and food, paying for the vanity and recklessness of men who will never bear the real cost themselves.
Marz and I continue to hold all of you in our thoughts each night during our moonbeam vigils. Now, with the weather apparently behaving itself for once and one pair of very soft brown eyes giving me The Look, I am being informed that it is time for a romp. Stay safe, stay loud, and take good care of yourselves out there.
Date: 21/03/2026 07:40:22
From: Bogsnorkler
ID: 2371835
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Oregon’s Bay Area
Yesterday, Pete Hegseth stood before the American public and spoke of honoring the fallen as they returned home in coffins. He spoke about attending the Dignified Transfer Ceremony and about speaking to the families, and then he offered the country a version of grief that sounded less like mourning and more like a recruitment slogan. He said, “What I heard through tears, through hugs, through strength, and through unbreakable resolve, was the same from family after family. They said, ‘Finish this. Honor their sacrifice. Do not waver. Do not stop until the job is done.’ My response along with that of the president was simple. Of course we will finish this.”
I cannot say with certainty what every family said in that room, because I was not there to hear it for myself, but I can say now that at least one grieving father has publicly contradicted Hegseth’s version of events. Charles Simmons, whose son Tech. Sgt. Tyler H. Simmons was among the dead, said he did not tell Hegseth or Trump to keep fighting and did not say anything along those lines. That matters because it reveals exactly how this kind of war rhetoric works. Powerful men take the most private language of grief and try to convert it into public consent for more violence.
Whether those exact words were spoken by anyone else or not, what Hegseth offered at that podium was not reverence, honesty, or care. It was an old trick in a fresh suit, the dead held up as proof that more death is necessary, mourning repackaged as resolve, and shattered families made to stand in for a nation that never seems to run out of other people’s children to spend.
What I cannot bring myself to believe, not for a single second, is that in the first raw moments of loss, with hearts broken open and futures collapsed, family after family approached the Secretary of War to ask for more bombing, more escalation, and more blood. I do not believe that mothers looking at flag draped coffins were thinking about military momentum or national resolve. I do not believe that brothers and sisters were standing there in the wreckage of their lives hoping that what had just been done to them should now be done to someone else. Grief does not speak the language of empire that fluently unless someone has taught it to, shaped it, staged it, and handed it a script.
You can hear the strain of that script in the way he speaks, in the lowered eyes, in the deliberate certainty, in the effort to make brutality sound like duty and cruelty sound like courage. It is all presentation, all muscle flexing dressed up as moral clarity, all the familiar theater of a small man trying to make power look like principle. What he offers is not strength, because strength does not need to hide behind dead servicemembers in order to justify itself. What he offers is the oldest performance in American war making, which is the insistence that if we have already sacrificed so much, then we must sacrifice more, because to stop now would somehow dishonor what has already been lost.
I spent my childhood with my brother away fighting one of these wars, one of these lies about protection and duty and safety. My family was lucky enough that he came home, but even that sentence is more complicated than it appears, because he returned to us alive and still we lost him in ways that took years to name. The warm boy who once protected other children from bullies did not simply come back and resume his life where it had paused. He came home altered by horror, burdened by memory, carrying things that never should have been placed inside any young person and certainly not under the banner of patriotic service to a safer world.
That is what men like Hegseth never say when they talk about sacrifice. They never say that war does not end when a soldier boards a plane home. They do not say that war keeps living in the body long after the uniforms are folded away, that it settles into the nervous system, that it follows families into kitchens and holidays and ordinary afternoons, that it steals tenderness and sleep and ease, that it can leave a person standing in front of the people who love him most while still being unbearably far away. They speak as though war is an event, a mission, a task to complete, while families know it as an inheritance that can be handed down in silence, fear, and grief for years.
My brother walks through the world now with the conscience that war failed to beat out of him. He carries the picture of a young girl who suffered because of his actions, and instead of burying that pain beneath slogans or self congratulation, he allowed it to change him. He got an education so he could help others living with trauma like his own. He did not give up his conscience in order to survive what he had done and seen. He let that conscience become the thing that guided him afterward, and to me that is what honor actually looks like. Honor is not standing at a podium describing death and destruction from above like it is a show of force to be admired. Honor is not speaking with swagger about the machinery that tears children apart. Honor is not treating war as a stage on which to perform masculinity for the cameras. Honor is what remains when a person refuses to become numb, refuses to call cruelty victory, and refuses to let power erase the human cost of what was done in his name.
That is why one of the most chilling things Hegseth said in that briefing was, “We’re hunting and striking, death and destruction from above.” He offered the line with the confidence of someone who wants the public to feel awe instead of revulsion, and I felt the opposite. I felt the cold of hearing a man speak about massive violence with the polished assurance of someone who has convinced himself that distance makes it cleaner. He invoked his own experience in earlier wars and referred to Bush as a foolish politician, and while I do not disagree that there was foolishness there, what seems different now is not wisdom but a terrifying absence of restraint. At least earlier administrations understood they needed to pretend, however imperfectly, that the loss of civilian life mattered. What stands before us now is a version of war rhetoric so stripped of shame that it barely bothers to hide its contempt for the dead on the other end.
And it is not only the dead abroad who are being treated as expendable. Standing there beside him, Caine spoke with pride about how young these servicemembers are, and that pride turned my stomach because youth should call forth protection, not appetite. It should make us pause, not posture. The fact that they are young is not evidence of national greatness. It is evidence of how early this country learns to place its children on the altar and call the smoke patriotism.
I think about the mothers on every side of this violence, the mothers here who are handed folded flags and speeches about resolve, and the mothers there who gather what remains of their children after our officials have finished explaining why the blast radius was regrettable but necessary. I think about the obscene distance between the language of the briefing room and the reality of a mother trying to survive the unendurable fact that her child will never come home from school, never laugh from the next room, never leave a pair of shoes by the door again. Men like Pete Hegseth speak in abstractions because abstractions allow them to keep moving. Mothers live in particulars, and particulars are what make war impossible to sanitize.
This is why I cannot accept the theft of grief that happened in that briefing. The dead do not belong to the state once they are buried. Their families do not owe the government a continued supply of resolve. Their mothers do not owe men like Hegseth composure, endorsement, or silence. Their loss does not become military property simply because a politician or a television soldier decides to wrap himself in it.
I also cannot accept the lie that the only honorable path available to a servicemember is obedience. My brother’s life taught me otherwise. A true soldier is not one who abandons conscience in service of command, but one who keeps enough of it intact to recognize when something is wrong, when the mission is rotten, when the justification is hollow, when the order being carried out is less about defense than domination. We ask some of our youngest citizens to shoulder unbearable moral weight, and then we tell them that duty means silence, compliance, and endurance. It does not have to mean that. There remains, even in uniform, the possibility of refusal. There remains the possibility of saying no. There remains the possibility of recognizing that what is being demanded is not courage but surrender of the soul.
That possibility matters because it is one of the only things standing between a nation and total moral collapse. If soldiers are taught that honor means obeying every lie, then we have not built a military, we have built a machine. If, on the other hand, they understand that honor includes restraint, conscience, and the refusal to carry out what they know to be wrong, then perhaps there is still some human ground left beneath all this ash.
My family spent years in the aftermath of Iraq wrestling with trauma, broken hearts, fear, and the grief of losing someone who was still alive. We know what war does after the speech ends. We know what it costs after the headlines move on. We know that some of the most honorable people who serve are the ones who come back determined not to glorify what they survived, but to tell the truth about it, to help others carry what they can, and to resist becoming mouthpieces for the same machinery that harmed them.
So when Pete Hegseth stands before the country and asks us, explicitly or implicitly, to see more war as the proper tribute to the dead, I reject him. I reject the theft of mourning in service of power. I reject the use of young servicemembers as props in a fantasy of dominance. I reject the idea that devastated families are naturally asking for more devastation. Most of all, I reject the cruel and ancient lie that the only way to honor sacrifice is to multiply it.
Honor does not live in the briefing room. Honor lives in the mother who refuses to let her child be turned into a slogan. Honor lives in the soldier who keeps his conscience. Honor lives in the person who has seen what war does and still chooses not to worship it. And if there is any hope left for us, it will not come from men like Pete Hegseth promising to finish the job. It will come from the people, including soldiers themselves, who finally decide that this job should never have been theirs to finish in the first place.
In other words, Pete, I’m not falling for your bull shit, and I hope others will join me.
Written by Shanley Hurt
Date: 21/03/2026 09:23:32
From: roughbarked
ID: 2371845
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
What Trump doesn’t mention is that after the surprise attack on Pearl harbour Hapan lost the war. If he’s comparing it with Iran, he should be prepared for defeat.
Date: 21/03/2026 09:29:46
From: ms spock
ID: 2371848
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Bogsnorkler said:
Oregon’s Bay Area is feeling discouraged.
Good morning! Yesterday I wrote about the way Trump has been co-opting state visits and appearances with foreign leaders into glossy little presidential promo reels, the kind of soft-focus pageantry meant to lazzle the eye just long enough to keep people from noticing the rot underneath. That instinct matters now, because there is something uncomfortably Epsteinian in the way Trump collects people in images. Not relationships, just images, trophy photos, proof of proximity. The point is not whether the encounter meant anything; the point is that it can be displayed later, recut into propaganda, and made to imply status, intimacy, or power. Epstein put the pictures on mantels. Trump folds them into White House promo videos. Same hunger, different set design.
The reason to bring this up is that the Epstein stink still hangs over all of this no matter how many flags they drape across the screen. Conjecture is not proof, and nobody should pretend otherwise, but the speculation keeps surfacing here and abroad for a reason: because this administration has the emotional texture of a regime that is always in need of a new spectacle, always hungry for a larger crisis to swallow the old one whole. When commentators mutter that this Middle East fiasco is functioning as a giant distraction from the Epstein files, they are not inventing that suspicion out of thin air. They are responding to a White House that has spent years substituting image management for truth, noise for accountability, and choreographed power for actual legitimacy.
Unfortunately for them, this war is not behaving like a clean distraction. It is a fiasco, a kakistrophe (please indulge me). Even as Trump insists the fight is “militarily won,” the Pentagon is sending thousands more Marines and sailors into the region aboard the USS Boxer group, on top of the tens of thousands of US troops already there. Israel is still striking Tehran. Iran is still hitting energy infrastructure and launching attacks on Gulf states. And the administration is floating ideas so reckless they sound like parody, including reported consideration of occupying or blockading Iran’s Kharg Island, the terminal that handles most of Iran’s oil exports, while Trump publicly berates NATO allies as “cowards” for refusing to join what he absurdly describes as a “simple military maneuver” in the Strait of Hormuz. If your war is supposedly under control, you do not need to beg allies to clean up the chokepoint you helped set on fire.
The human cost is already being laundered into propaganda. Pete Hegseth, who has spent this conflict sounding like a man auditioning for the role of war in a movie trailer, told reporters that grieving families of the six service members killed in last week’s tanker crash urged him to “finish” the job in Iran and “do not stop until the job is done.” But now one of those fathers, Charles Simmons, says he said no such thing. Instead, Simmons recalled telling Hegseth: “I understand there’s a lot of peril that goes into making decisions like this, and I just certainly hope the decisions being made are necessary.” Asked directly whether he had said anything about continuing the war, Simmons was unequivocal: “No, I didn’t say anything along those lines.” In other words, Hegseth appears to have taken private grief and converted it into a public sales pitch for more escalation. Ventriloquism with the dead.
While Washington tries to package all of this as resolve, the rest of the world is staring at the bill. France has explicitly rejected any “forceful opening” of Hormuz under current bombardment and instead called for “the immediate implementation of a moratorium on strikes targeting civilian infrastructure, especially energy and water facilities.”
Spain, meanwhile, is scrambling to cushion the blow at home: Pedro Sánchez has unveiled a €5bn relief package, saying the measures are meant to “ease the impact of energy price rises” as Europe absorbs the shock. Switzerland has halted new arms export licences to the United States, a pointed reminder that some countries want no deeper part in this disaster. And the International Energy Agency is warning that this may be “the greatest global energy security threat in history,” with Fatih Birol cautioning that it could take “six months” for some disrupted Gulf oil and gas flows to come back. This is what American “leadership” now looks like: allies scrambling to protect their own populations from the economic fallout of a war they did not want, do not trust, and increasingly want no part of.
Even the shipping picture alone is a catastrophe. Traffic through Hormuz has collapsed, insurers have backed away, and thousands of seafarers remain trapped in the Gulf as attacks, port refusals, and fear turn one of the world’s most vital trade arteries into a floating bottleneck. The International Maritime Organization is now discussing how to get ships and crews out of the area safely. And as Sal Mercagliano pointed out, this is “well beyond the energy crisis” people are fixated on. It is a crisis for the crews themselves. One mariner stuck aboard a ship in the Gulf told him that a nearby vessel had “call in desperately to port control, saying they’re officially out of water,” only to be denied entry. Sal warned that this is “turning into a disaster for the crews on the ships,” with people “overdue for our stores and fuel, water, and trying to ration ourselves.” That is what this administration’s blundering has produced: not just higher prices, but thousands of seafarers stranded in a war zone, running short on food, water, fuel, and options while Washington flails. And the White House response so far has been exactly the kind of improvisation Sal mocked, considering whether to unsanction Iranian oil already at sea and issuing a 60-day Jones Act waiver that looks less like strategy than, in his words, “throwing spaghetti at the wall here trying to figure out what to do.”
Because the farce must always have one more layer of insult, Trump is publicly scheduled to leave Washington later today for Palm Beach and remain at Mar-a-Lago through another taxpayer-funded golfing weekend. So there you have it: a widening regional war, a global energy shock, dead service members turned into messaging props, allied governments trying to contain the damage, and the president once again decamping to the resort. He treats the presidency like a stage set, war like a branding environment, and crisis like something to be managed through camera angles until it is time to board the plane for another taxpayer-funded weekend. The reels will be glossy, I am sure. The consequences already are not.
So that is where we are this Friday morning: a war sold as strength that looks more like improvisation, a White House still trying to bury reality under glossy presidential scenery, grieving families used as stage props, allies left to absorb the shock, and thousands of ordinary people, from sailors trapped in the Gulf to families staring at the price of fuel and food, paying for the vanity and recklessness of men who will never bear the real cost themselves.
Marz and I continue to hold all of you in our thoughts each night during our moonbeam vigils. Now, with the weather apparently behaving itself for once and one pair of very soft brown eyes giving me The Look, I am being informed that it is time for a romp. Stay safe, stay loud, and take good care of yourselves out there.
Depressing but beautifully written.
“Ventriloquism with the dead”.
Date: 21/03/2026 09:45:04
From: ms spock
ID: 2371851
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Bogsnorkler said:
Oregon’s Bay Area
Yesterday, Pete Hegseth stood before the American public and spoke of honoring the fallen as they returned home in coffins. He spoke about attending the Dignified Transfer Ceremony and about speaking to the families, and then he offered the country a version of grief that sounded less like mourning and more like a recruitment slogan. He said, “What I heard through tears, through hugs, through strength, and through unbreakable resolve, was the same from family after family. They said, ‘Finish this. Honor their sacrifice. Do not waver. Do not stop until the job is done.’ My response along with that of the president was simple. Of course we will finish this.”
I cannot say with certainty what every family said in that room, because I was not there to hear it for myself, but I can say now that at least one grieving father has publicly contradicted Hegseth’s version of events. Charles Simmons, whose son Tech. Sgt. Tyler H. Simmons was among the dead, said he did not tell Hegseth or Trump to keep fighting and did not say anything along those lines. That matters because it reveals exactly how this kind of war rhetoric works. Powerful men take the most private language of grief and try to convert it into public consent for more violence.
Whether those exact words were spoken by anyone else or not, what Hegseth offered at that podium was not reverence, honesty, or care. It was an old trick in a fresh suit, the dead held up as proof that more death is necessary, mourning repackaged as resolve, and shattered families made to stand in for a nation that never seems to run out of other people’s children to spend.
What I cannot bring myself to believe, not for a single second, is that in the first raw moments of loss, with hearts broken open and futures collapsed, family after family approached the Secretary of War to ask for more bombing, more escalation, and more blood. I do not believe that mothers looking at flag draped coffins were thinking about military momentum or national resolve. I do not believe that brothers and sisters were standing there in the wreckage of their lives hoping that what had just been done to them should now be done to someone else. Grief does not speak the language of empire that fluently unless someone has taught it to, shaped it, staged it, and handed it a script.
You can hear the strain of that script in the way he speaks, in the lowered eyes, in the deliberate certainty, in the effort to make brutality sound like duty and cruelty sound like courage. It is all presentation, all muscle flexing dressed up as moral clarity, all the familiar theater of a small man trying to make power look like principle. What he offers is not strength, because strength does not need to hide behind dead servicemembers in order to justify itself. What he offers is the oldest performance in American war making, which is the insistence that if we have already sacrificed so much, then we must sacrifice more, because to stop now would somehow dishonor what has already been lost.
I spent my childhood with my brother away fighting one of these wars, one of these lies about protection and duty and safety. My family was lucky enough that he came home, but even that sentence is more complicated than it appears, because he returned to us alive and still we lost him in ways that took years to name. The warm boy who once protected other children from bullies did not simply come back and resume his life where it had paused. He came home altered by horror, burdened by memory, carrying things that never should have been placed inside any young person and certainly not under the banner of patriotic service to a safer world.
That is what men like Hegseth never say when they talk about sacrifice. They never say that war does not end when a soldier boards a plane home. They do not say that war keeps living in the body long after the uniforms are folded away, that it settles into the nervous system, that it follows families into kitchens and holidays and ordinary afternoons, that it steals tenderness and sleep and ease, that it can leave a person standing in front of the people who love him most while still being unbearably far away. They speak as though war is an event, a mission, a task to complete, while families know it as an inheritance that can be handed down in silence, fear, and grief for years.
My brother walks through the world now with the conscience that war failed to beat out of him. He carries the picture of a young girl who suffered because of his actions, and instead of burying that pain beneath slogans or self congratulation, he allowed it to change him. He got an education so he could help others living with trauma like his own. He did not give up his conscience in order to survive what he had done and seen. He let that conscience become the thing that guided him afterward, and to me that is what honor actually looks like. Honor is not standing at a podium describing death and destruction from above like it is a show of force to be admired. Honor is not speaking with swagger about the machinery that tears children apart. Honor is not treating war as a stage on which to perform masculinity for the cameras. Honor is what remains when a person refuses to become numb, refuses to call cruelty victory, and refuses to let power erase the human cost of what was done in his name.
That is why one of the most chilling things Hegseth said in that briefing was, “We’re hunting and striking, death and destruction from above.” He offered the line with the confidence of someone who wants the public to feel awe instead of revulsion, and I felt the opposite. I felt the cold of hearing a man speak about massive violence with the polished assurance of someone who has convinced himself that distance makes it cleaner. He invoked his own experience in earlier wars and referred to Bush as a foolish politician, and while I do not disagree that there was foolishness there, what seems different now is not wisdom but a terrifying absence of restraint. At least earlier administrations understood they needed to pretend, however imperfectly, that the loss of civilian life mattered. What stands before us now is a version of war rhetoric so stripped of shame that it barely bothers to hide its contempt for the dead on the other end.
And it is not only the dead abroad who are being treated as expendable. Standing there beside him, Caine spoke with pride about how young these servicemembers are, and that pride turned my stomach because youth should call forth protection, not appetite. It should make us pause, not posture. The fact that they are young is not evidence of national greatness. It is evidence of how early this country learns to place its children on the altar and call the smoke patriotism.
I think about the mothers on every side of this violence, the mothers here who are handed folded flags and speeches about resolve, and the mothers there who gather what remains of their children after our officials have finished explaining why the blast radius was regrettable but necessary. I think about the obscene distance between the language of the briefing room and the reality of a mother trying to survive the unendurable fact that her child will never come home from school, never laugh from the next room, never leave a pair of shoes by the door again. Men like Pete Hegseth speak in abstractions because abstractions allow them to keep moving. Mothers live in particulars, and particulars are what make war impossible to sanitize.
This is why I cannot accept the theft of grief that happened in that briefing. The dead do not belong to the state once they are buried. Their families do not owe the government a continued supply of resolve. Their mothers do not owe men like Hegseth composure, endorsement, or silence. Their loss does not become military property simply because a politician or a television soldier decides to wrap himself in it.
I also cannot accept the lie that the only honorable path available to a servicemember is obedience. My brother’s life taught me otherwise. A true soldier is not one who abandons conscience in service of command, but one who keeps enough of it intact to recognize when something is wrong, when the mission is rotten, when the justification is hollow, when the order being carried out is less about defense than domination. We ask some of our youngest citizens to shoulder unbearable moral weight, and then we tell them that duty means silence, compliance, and endurance. It does not have to mean that. There remains, even in uniform, the possibility of refusal. There remains the possibility of saying no. There remains the possibility of recognizing that what is being demanded is not courage but surrender of the soul.
That possibility matters because it is one of the only things standing between a nation and total moral collapse. If soldiers are taught that honor means obeying every lie, then we have not built a military, we have built a machine. If, on the other hand, they understand that honor includes restraint, conscience, and the refusal to carry out what they know to be wrong, then perhaps there is still some human ground left beneath all this ash.
My family spent years in the aftermath of Iraq wrestling with trauma, broken hearts, fear, and the grief of losing someone who was still alive. We know what war does after the speech ends. We know what it costs after the headlines move on. We know that some of the most honorable people who serve are the ones who come back determined not to glorify what they survived, but to tell the truth about it, to help others carry what they can, and to resist becoming mouthpieces for the same machinery that harmed them.
So when Pete Hegseth stands before the country and asks us, explicitly or implicitly, to see more war as the proper tribute to the dead, I reject him. I reject the theft of mourning in service of power. I reject the use of young servicemembers as props in a fantasy of dominance. I reject the idea that devastated families are naturally asking for more devastation. Most of all, I reject the cruel and ancient lie that the only way to honor sacrifice is to multiply it.
Honor does not live in the briefing room. Honor lives in the mother who refuses to let her child be turned into a slogan. Honor lives in the soldier who keeps his conscience. Honor lives in the person who has seen what war does and still chooses not to worship it. And if there is any hope left for us, it will not come from men like Pete Hegseth promising to finish the job. It will come from the people, including soldiers themselves, who finally decide that this job should never have been theirs to finish in the first place.
In other words, Pete, I’m not falling for your bull shit, and I hope others will join me.
Written by Shanley Hurt
Very moving writing.
They do not say that war keeps living in the body long after the uniforms are folded away, that it settles into the nervous system, that it follows families into kitchens and holidays and ordinary afternoons, that it steals tenderness and sleep and ease, that it can leave a person standing in front of the people who love him most while still being unbearably far away.
… and the mothers there who gather what remains of their children after our officials have finished explaining why the blast radius was regrettable but necessary.
My family spent years in the aftermath of Iraq wrestling with trauma, broken hearts, fear, and the grief of losing someone who was still alive.
Date: 21/03/2026 10:23:32
From: Michael V
ID: 2371878
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Bogsnorkler said:
Oregon’s Bay Area is feeling discouraged.
Good morning! Yesterday I wrote about the way Trump has been co-opting state visits and appearances with foreign leaders into glossy little presidential promo reels, the kind of soft-focus pageantry meant to lazzle the eye just long enough to keep people from noticing the rot underneath. That instinct matters now, because there is something uncomfortably Epsteinian in the way Trump collects people in images. Not relationships, just images, trophy photos, proof of proximity. The point is not whether the encounter meant anything; the point is that it can be displayed later, recut into propaganda, and made to imply status, intimacy, or power. Epstein put the pictures on mantels. Trump folds them into White House promo videos. Same hunger, different set design.
The reason to bring this up is that the Epstein stink still hangs over all of this no matter how many flags they drape across the screen. Conjecture is not proof, and nobody should pretend otherwise, but the speculation keeps surfacing here and abroad for a reason: because this administration has the emotional texture of a regime that is always in need of a new spectacle, always hungry for a larger crisis to swallow the old one whole. When commentators mutter that this Middle East fiasco is functioning as a giant distraction from the Epstein files, they are not inventing that suspicion out of thin air. They are responding to a White House that has spent years substituting image management for truth, noise for accountability, and choreographed power for actual legitimacy.
Unfortunately for them, this war is not behaving like a clean distraction. It is a fiasco, a kakistrophe (please indulge me). Even as Trump insists the fight is “militarily won,” the Pentagon is sending thousands more Marines and sailors into the region aboard the USS Boxer group, on top of the tens of thousands of US troops already there. Israel is still striking Tehran. Iran is still hitting energy infrastructure and launching attacks on Gulf states. And the administration is floating ideas so reckless they sound like parody, including reported consideration of occupying or blockading Iran’s Kharg Island, the terminal that handles most of Iran’s oil exports, while Trump publicly berates NATO allies as “cowards” for refusing to join what he absurdly describes as a “simple military maneuver” in the Strait of Hormuz. If your war is supposedly under control, you do not need to beg allies to clean up the chokepoint you helped set on fire.
The human cost is already being laundered into propaganda. Pete Hegseth, who has spent this conflict sounding like a man auditioning for the role of war in a movie trailer, told reporters that grieving families of the six service members killed in last week’s tanker crash urged him to “finish” the job in Iran and “do not stop until the job is done.” But now one of those fathers, Charles Simmons, says he said no such thing. Instead, Simmons recalled telling Hegseth: “I understand there’s a lot of peril that goes into making decisions like this, and I just certainly hope the decisions being made are necessary.” Asked directly whether he had said anything about continuing the war, Simmons was unequivocal: “No, I didn’t say anything along those lines.” In other words, Hegseth appears to have taken private grief and converted it into a public sales pitch for more escalation. Ventriloquism with the dead.
While Washington tries to package all of this as resolve, the rest of the world is staring at the bill. France has explicitly rejected any “forceful opening” of Hormuz under current bombardment and instead called for “the immediate implementation of a moratorium on strikes targeting civilian infrastructure, especially energy and water facilities.”
Spain, meanwhile, is scrambling to cushion the blow at home: Pedro Sánchez has unveiled a €5bn relief package, saying the measures are meant to “ease the impact of energy price rises” as Europe absorbs the shock. Switzerland has halted new arms export licences to the United States, a pointed reminder that some countries want no deeper part in this disaster. And the International Energy Agency is warning that this may be “the greatest global energy security threat in history,” with Fatih Birol cautioning that it could take “six months” for some disrupted Gulf oil and gas flows to come back. This is what American “leadership” now looks like: allies scrambling to protect their own populations from the economic fallout of a war they did not want, do not trust, and increasingly want no part of.
Even the shipping picture alone is a catastrophe. Traffic through Hormuz has collapsed, insurers have backed away, and thousands of seafarers remain trapped in the Gulf as attacks, port refusals, and fear turn one of the world’s most vital trade arteries into a floating bottleneck. The International Maritime Organization is now discussing how to get ships and crews out of the area safely. And as Sal Mercagliano pointed out, this is “well beyond the energy crisis” people are fixated on. It is a crisis for the crews themselves. One mariner stuck aboard a ship in the Gulf told him that a nearby vessel had “call in desperately to port control, saying they’re officially out of water,” only to be denied entry. Sal warned that this is “turning into a disaster for the crews on the ships,” with people “overdue for our stores and fuel, water, and trying to ration ourselves.” That is what this administration’s blundering has produced: not just higher prices, but thousands of seafarers stranded in a war zone, running short on food, water, fuel, and options while Washington flails. And the White House response so far has been exactly the kind of improvisation Sal mocked, considering whether to unsanction Iranian oil already at sea and issuing a 60-day Jones Act waiver that looks less like strategy than, in his words, “throwing spaghetti at the wall here trying to figure out what to do.”
Because the farce must always have one more layer of insult, Trump is publicly scheduled to leave Washington later today for Palm Beach and remain at Mar-a-Lago through another taxpayer-funded golfing weekend. So there you have it: a widening regional war, a global energy shock, dead service members turned into messaging props, allied governments trying to contain the damage, and the president once again decamping to the resort. He treats the presidency like a stage set, war like a branding environment, and crisis like something to be managed through camera angles until it is time to board the plane for another taxpayer-funded weekend. The reels will be glossy, I am sure. The consequences already are not.
So that is where we are this Friday morning: a war sold as strength that looks more like improvisation, a White House still trying to bury reality under glossy presidential scenery, grieving families used as stage props, allies left to absorb the shock, and thousands of ordinary people, from sailors trapped in the Gulf to families staring at the price of fuel and food, paying for the vanity and recklessness of men who will never bear the real cost themselves.
Marz and I continue to hold all of you in our thoughts each night during our moonbeam vigils. Now, with the weather apparently behaving itself for once and one pair of very soft brown eyes giving me The Look, I am being informed that it is time for a romp. Stay safe, stay loud, and take good care of yourselves out there.

Date: 21/03/2026 10:26:27
From: ms spock
ID: 2371882
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Bogsnorkler said:
Oregon’s Bay Area is feeling discouraged.
Good morning! Yesterday I wrote about the way Trump has been co-opting state visits and appearances with foreign leaders into glossy little presidential promo reels, the kind of soft-focus pageantry meant to lazzle the eye just long enough to keep people from noticing the rot underneath. That instinct matters now, because there is something uncomfortably Epsteinian in the way Trump collects people in images. Not relationships, just images, trophy photos, proof of proximity. The point is not whether the encounter meant anything; the point is that it can be displayed later, recut into propaganda, and made to imply status, intimacy, or power. Epstein put the pictures on mantels. Trump folds them into White House promo videos. Same hunger, different set design.
The reason to bring this up is that the Epstein stink still hangs over all of this no matter how many flags they drape across the screen. Conjecture is not proof, and nobody should pretend otherwise, but the speculation keeps surfacing here and abroad for a reason: because this administration has the emotional texture of a regime that is always in need of a new spectacle, always hungry for a larger crisis to swallow the old one whole. When commentators mutter that this Middle East fiasco is functioning as a giant distraction from the Epstein files, they are not inventing that suspicion out of thin air. They are responding to a White House that has spent years substituting image management for truth, noise for accountability, and choreographed power for actual legitimacy.
Unfortunately for them, this war is not behaving like a clean distraction. It is a fiasco, a kakistrophe (please indulge me). Even as Trump insists the fight is “militarily won,” the Pentagon is sending thousands more Marines and sailors into the region aboard the USS Boxer group, on top of the tens of thousands of US troops already there. Israel is still striking Tehran. Iran is still hitting energy infrastructure and launching attacks on Gulf states. And the administration is floating ideas so reckless they sound like parody, including reported consideration of occupying or blockading Iran’s Kharg Island, the terminal that handles most of Iran’s oil exports, while Trump publicly berates NATO allies as “cowards” for refusing to join what he absurdly describes as a “simple military maneuver” in the Strait of Hormuz. If your war is supposedly under control, you do not need to beg allies to clean up the chokepoint you helped set on fire.
The human cost is already being laundered into propaganda. Pete Hegseth, who has spent this conflict sounding like a man auditioning for the role of war in a movie trailer, told reporters that grieving families of the six service members killed in last week’s tanker crash urged him to “finish” the job in Iran and “do not stop until the job is done.” But now one of those fathers, Charles Simmons, says he said no such thing. Instead, Simmons recalled telling Hegseth: “I understand there’s a lot of peril that goes into making decisions like this, and I just certainly hope the decisions being made are necessary.” Asked directly whether he had said anything about continuing the war, Simmons was unequivocal: “No, I didn’t say anything along those lines.” In other words, Hegseth appears to have taken private grief and converted it into a public sales pitch for more escalation. Ventriloquism with the dead.
While Washington tries to package all of this as resolve, the rest of the world is staring at the bill. France has explicitly rejected any “forceful opening” of Hormuz under current bombardment and instead called for “the immediate implementation of a moratorium on strikes targeting civilian infrastructure, especially energy and water facilities.”
Spain, meanwhile, is scrambling to cushion the blow at home: Pedro Sánchez has unveiled a €5bn relief package, saying the measures are meant to “ease the impact of energy price rises” as Europe absorbs the shock. Switzerland has halted new arms export licences to the United States, a pointed reminder that some countries want no deeper part in this disaster. And the International Energy Agency is warning that this may be “the greatest global energy security threat in history,” with Fatih Birol cautioning that it could take “six months” for some disrupted Gulf oil and gas flows to come back. This is what American “leadership” now looks like: allies scrambling to protect their own populations from the economic fallout of a war they did not want, do not trust, and increasingly want no part of.
Even the shipping picture alone is a catastrophe. Traffic through Hormuz has collapsed, insurers have backed away, and thousands of seafarers remain trapped in the Gulf as attacks, port refusals, and fear turn one of the world’s most vital trade arteries into a floating bottleneck. The International Maritime Organization is now discussing how to get ships and crews out of the area safely. And as Sal Mercagliano pointed out, this is “well beyond the energy crisis” people are fixated on. It is a crisis for the crews themselves. One mariner stuck aboard a ship in the Gulf told him that a nearby vessel had “call in desperately to port control, saying they’re officially out of water,” only to be denied entry. Sal warned that this is “turning into a disaster for the crews on the ships,” with people “overdue for our stores and fuel, water, and trying to ration ourselves.” That is what this administration’s blundering has produced: not just higher prices, but thousands of seafarers stranded in a war zone, running short on food, water, fuel, and options while Washington flails. And the White House response so far has been exactly the kind of improvisation Sal mocked, considering whether to unsanction Iranian oil already at sea and issuing a 60-day Jones Act waiver that looks less like strategy than, in his words, “throwing spaghetti at the wall here trying to figure out what to do.”
Because the farce must always have one more layer of insult, Trump is publicly scheduled to leave Washington later today for Palm Beach and remain at Mar-a-Lago through another taxpayer-funded golfing weekend. So there you have it: a widening regional war, a global energy shock, dead service members turned into messaging props, allied governments trying to contain the damage, and the president once again decamping to the resort. He treats the presidency like a stage set, war like a branding environment, and crisis like something to be managed through camera angles until it is time to board the plane for another taxpayer-funded weekend. The reels will be glossy, I am sure. The consequences already are not.
So that is where we are this Friday morning: a war sold as strength that looks more like improvisation, a White House still trying to bury reality under glossy presidential scenery, grieving families used as stage props, allies left to absorb the shock, and thousands of ordinary people, from sailors trapped in the Gulf to families staring at the price of fuel and food, paying for the vanity and recklessness of men who will never bear the real cost themselves.
Marz and I continue to hold all of you in our thoughts each night during our moonbeam vigils. Now, with the weather apparently behaving itself for once and one pair of very soft brown eyes giving me The Look, I am being informed that it is time for a romp. Stay safe, stay loud, and take good care of yourselves out there.

Great meme! +1
Date: 21/03/2026 10:28:39
From: Michael V
ID: 2371885
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
What Trump doesn’t mention is that after the surprise attack on Pearl harbour Hapan lost the war. If he’s comparing it with Iran, he should be prepared for defeat.
I think that the WWII Pearl Harbour attack is likely the only fact Dunny remembers about Japan.
Date: 21/03/2026 10:29:46
From: roughbarked
ID: 2371886
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
roughbarked said:
What Trump doesn’t mention is that after the surprise attack on Pearl harbour Hapan lost the war. If he’s comparing it with Iran, he should be prepared for defeat.
I think that the WWII Pearl Harbour attack is likely the only fact Dunny remembers about Japan.
He saw the movie.
Date: 21/03/2026 10:40:02
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2371887
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ms spock said:
Michael V said:
Bogsnorkler said:
Oregon’s Bay Area is feeling discouraged.
Good morning! Yesterday I wrote about the way Trump has been co-opting state visits and appearances with foreign leaders into glossy little presidential promo reels, the kind of soft-focus pageantry meant to lazzle the eye just long enough to keep people from noticing the rot underneath. That instinct matters now, because there is something uncomfortably Epsteinian in the way Trump collects people in images. Not relationships, just images, trophy photos, proof of proximity. The point is not whether the encounter meant anything; the point is that it can be displayed later, recut into propaganda, and made to imply status, intimacy, or power. Epstein put the pictures on mantels. Trump folds them into White House promo videos. Same hunger, different set design.
The reason to bring this up is that the Epstein stink still hangs over all of this no matter how many flags they drape across the screen. Conjecture is not proof, and nobody should pretend otherwise, but the speculation keeps surfacing here and abroad for a reason: because this administration has the emotional texture of a regime that is always in need of a new spectacle, always hungry for a larger crisis to swallow the old one whole. When commentators mutter that this Middle East fiasco is functioning as a giant distraction from the Epstein files, they are not inventing that suspicion out of thin air. They are responding to a White House that has spent years substituting image management for truth, noise for accountability, and choreographed power for actual legitimacy.
Unfortunately for them, this war is not behaving like a clean distraction. It is a fiasco, a kakistrophe (please indulge me). Even as Trump insists the fight is “militarily won,” the Pentagon is sending thousands more Marines and sailors into the region aboard the USS Boxer group, on top of the tens of thousands of US troops already there. Israel is still striking Tehran. Iran is still hitting energy infrastructure and launching attacks on Gulf states. And the administration is floating ideas so reckless they sound like parody, including reported consideration of occupying or blockading Iran’s Kharg Island, the terminal that handles most of Iran’s oil exports, while Trump publicly berates NATO allies as “cowards” for refusing to join what he absurdly describes as a “simple military maneuver” in the Strait of Hormuz. If your war is supposedly under control, you do not need to beg allies to clean up the chokepoint you helped set on fire.
The human cost is already being laundered into propaganda. Pete Hegseth, who has spent this conflict sounding like a man auditioning for the role of war in a movie trailer, told reporters that grieving families of the six service members killed in last week’s tanker crash urged him to “finish” the job in Iran and “do not stop until the job is done.” But now one of those fathers, Charles Simmons, says he said no such thing. Instead, Simmons recalled telling Hegseth: “I understand there’s a lot of peril that goes into making decisions like this, and I just certainly hope the decisions being made are necessary.” Asked directly whether he had said anything about continuing the war, Simmons was unequivocal: “No, I didn’t say anything along those lines.” In other words, Hegseth appears to have taken private grief and converted it into a public sales pitch for more escalation. Ventriloquism with the dead.
While Washington tries to package all of this as resolve, the rest of the world is staring at the bill. France has explicitly rejected any “forceful opening” of Hormuz under current bombardment and instead called for “the immediate implementation of a moratorium on strikes targeting civilian infrastructure, especially energy and water facilities.”
Spain, meanwhile, is scrambling to cushion the blow at home: Pedro Sánchez has unveiled a €5bn relief package, saying the measures are meant to “ease the impact of energy price rises” as Europe absorbs the shock. Switzerland has halted new arms export licences to the United States, a pointed reminder that some countries want no deeper part in this disaster. And the International Energy Agency is warning that this may be “the greatest global energy security threat in history,” with Fatih Birol cautioning that it could take “six months” for some disrupted Gulf oil and gas flows to come back. This is what American “leadership” now looks like: allies scrambling to protect their own populations from the economic fallout of a war they did not want, do not trust, and increasingly want no part of.
Even the shipping picture alone is a catastrophe. Traffic through Hormuz has collapsed, insurers have backed away, and thousands of seafarers remain trapped in the Gulf as attacks, port refusals, and fear turn one of the world’s most vital trade arteries into a floating bottleneck. The International Maritime Organization is now discussing how to get ships and crews out of the area safely. And as Sal Mercagliano pointed out, this is “well beyond the energy crisis” people are fixated on. It is a crisis for the crews themselves. One mariner stuck aboard a ship in the Gulf told him that a nearby vessel had “call in desperately to port control, saying they’re officially out of water,” only to be denied entry. Sal warned that this is “turning into a disaster for the crews on the ships,” with people “overdue for our stores and fuel, water, and trying to ration ourselves.” That is what this administration’s blundering has produced: not just higher prices, but thousands of seafarers stranded in a war zone, running short on food, water, fuel, and options while Washington flails. And the White House response so far has been exactly the kind of improvisation Sal mocked, considering whether to unsanction Iranian oil already at sea and issuing a 60-day Jones Act waiver that looks less like strategy than, in his words, “throwing spaghetti at the wall here trying to figure out what to do.”
Because the farce must always have one more layer of insult, Trump is publicly scheduled to leave Washington later today for Palm Beach and remain at Mar-a-Lago through another taxpayer-funded golfing weekend. So there you have it: a widening regional war, a global energy shock, dead service members turned into messaging props, allied governments trying to contain the damage, and the president once again decamping to the resort. He treats the presidency like a stage set, war like a branding environment, and crisis like something to be managed through camera angles until it is time to board the plane for another taxpayer-funded weekend. The reels will be glossy, I am sure. The consequences already are not.
So that is where we are this Friday morning: a war sold as strength that looks more like improvisation, a White House still trying to bury reality under glossy presidential scenery, grieving families used as stage props, allies left to absorb the shock, and thousands of ordinary people, from sailors trapped in the Gulf to families staring at the price of fuel and food, paying for the vanity and recklessness of men who will never bear the real cost themselves.
Marz and I continue to hold all of you in our thoughts each night during our moonbeam vigils. Now, with the weather apparently behaving itself for once and one pair of very soft brown eyes giving me The Look, I am being informed that it is time for a romp. Stay safe, stay loud, and take good care of yourselves out there.

Great meme! +1
alleged

Date: 21/03/2026 10:45:10
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2371892
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
roughbarked said:
What Trump doesn’t mention is that after the surprise attack on Pearl harbour Hapan lost the war. If he’s comparing it with Iran, he should be prepared for defeat.
I think that the WWII Pearl Harbour attack is likely the only fact Dunny remembers about Japan.
He saw the movie.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
Date: 21/03/2026 12:32:03
From: Bogsnorkler
ID: 2371941
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Oregon’s Bay Area is feeling better.
Good morning! Let’s begin with the claim that may finally have shoved even legacy media out of its usual polite trance. Earlier this week, Donald Trump announced that a former U.S. president privately told him he wished he had attacked Iran too. When asked which former president, Trump suddenly turned coy, saying he didn’t want to say.
Mysterious, solemn, very “the girlfriend goes to another school.” There was just one problem: representatives for all four living former presidents Clinton, Bush, Obama, and Biden, denied having any such conversation. Every last one of them. The effect was less dramatic revelation than universal reputational self-preservation: a bipartisan chorus of absolutely not, leave me out of whatever this is.
Once even the straight-faced press corps has to report, in serious institutional language, that the president appears to have invented a supportive conversation with an unnamed ex-president, the rest of the week starts to look different.
The illusion cracks and the ceremonial backdrop no longer reads as authority, but as set design. Suddenly you have to ask: is Trump communing with the dead, chatting with portraits on the wall, or just workshopping foreign policy with the drapes? If Clinton, Bush, Obama, and Biden have all effectively said, “Do not drag me into this mess,” then the mystery former president exists only in one of two places: Trump’s imagination or the afterlife. From there, the bilateral meetings, the luncheon speeches, the shamrock bowls, the flags, the solemn podiums, the gold curtains, the diplomatic rituals, all of it feels less like a functioning presidency and more like a presidential charade, a costume drama in which the props are still expensive but reality has quietly left the building.
And what a week to prove it. Trump spent much of St. Patrick’s week wrapped in the soft green optics of Irish diplomacy, which was already jarring enough because I am not sure I had ever seen him voluntarily wear green anything before. There he was, in a green tie, beside Taoiseach Micheál Martin, trying very hard to look like a normal statesman participating in a friendly annual ritual of Irish-American symbolism. For maybe twelve seconds it almost worked. Then Trump opened his mouth and the whole shamrock stage set was immediately flooded with the usual slurry of Iran boasting, NATO resentment, tariff muttering, Europe-bashing, and complaints that allies are not sufficiently grateful for his latest military “success.”
The ties said St. Patrick’s Day. The remarks said grievance convention in a body-snatcher suit. Trump kept circling back to the same emotional wound all day: everyone supposedly agreed with him, everyone supposedly thought “it was a very important thing to do,” everyone was apparently calling to congratulate him on the “great job” he did with Iran, and yet, in his telling, those same allies still “don’t want to help us,” which he described as “amazing” and “very unfair to the United States.” That was the real heartbeat of the performance. No diplomacy, just hurt feelings. The president of the United States spent an Ireland meeting sounding like a guy who threw himself a war and is now sulking because nobody volunteered to bring the folding chairs. He insisted “we don’t need any help actually,” then kept complaining that allies should have sent “a couple of mind sweepers” because “they should have been there.”
Strip away the green tie and the shamrock staging, and what remained was not a coherent foreign policy message but a very familiar Trump lament: I did something tremendous, everyone says it was tremendous, and now I am furious that other people are not proving their gratitude loudly enough.
Micheál Martin, meanwhile, performed the near-superhuman task of acting like the only adult in a room where the furniture had become sentient and resentful. Over and over, Martin tried to steer the conversation back toward peace, diplomacy, transatlantic cooperation, legal migration, economic ties, and reality itself. He pushed back gently but unmistakably on Trump’s caricatures of Europe. He talked about reconciliation, institutions, and de-escalation. Martin even managed, somehow, to correct Trump without turning the event into an international hostage situation. It was the diplomatic equivalent of trying to keep a shopping cart upright while a raccoon in a necktie keeps climbing out of it to shout about minesweepers.
The Friends of Ireland luncheon was no better. This should have been easy material even for Trump: heritage, friendship, shamrocks, Irish-American history, broad smiles, and maybe a few canned lines about how “the Irish did not come to America. They helped found America.” Instead, he turned the event into an open mic night at the grievance casino. He praised Mike Johnson as a man getting things done like “really nobody,” made those familiar creepy little detours into women’s appearance, “you’re not allowed to use the word beauty anymore,” he said, before doing exactly that anyway, marveled at his own political destiny, and reminded the room that he was not even “supposed to be president right now,” but here he is with the Olympics, the World Cup, and the 250th anniversary all under his watchful magnificence. Naturally, he plugged his golf property in Ireland while insisting, in the usual Trumpian way, that he has “nothing to do with it” even as he explained at length what a triumph it is. He bragged that “we hit 50,000 on the Dow” and “7,000 on the S&P,” then, because apparently no gathering is too ceremonial to escape him, lurched right back to Iran and to his grotesque little phrase for war: a “little excursion.” As he told it, the economy was soaring, everything was perfect, and he simply asked Susie Wiles, “Do you mind if I take a little excursion here?”, as though bombing a country were something between a side errand and a weekend golf detour. That phrase did all the work. In one breath he reduced war to a scheduling inconvenience, a brief interruption in his otherwise glittering success story, while the room sat there pretending this was a normal way for a president to describe military escalation.
Then came the Shamrock Bowl presentation, which should have been one of the simplest symbolic events on the calendar: a ceremonial gift, a few gracious words, a nod to shared history. Instead, Trump used it to say he should have been spending the day “with the Iranians,” boast that the U.S. was “knocking them for a loop,” hype a new White House ballroom, grumble about Ireland’s trade surplus, praise loyalists, brag about his health, and toss in more culture-war filler for good measure. It was less a diplomatic ceremony than a wandering monologue in search of a theme.
This is where the phantom-president story stops being just funny and starts becoming useful. Once even the press has to report that Trump appears to have invented a flattering conversation with an unnamed former president, the rest of the week snaps into focus. Every ceremonial appearance turns into a stage for his own mythmaking. For Trump, the presidency is not governance. It is atmosphere, an endless effort to use the room, the flags, the podium, and the ritual as proof that the fantasy in his head is real.
James O’Brien, to his credit, has been among the clearest voices on what all this actually feels like. His breakdown of Trump’s recent comments gets at the deeper point: this is not just routine lying. It is a sliding blend of derangement, fabrication, malice, and swagger, often compressed into the same sentence. You hear it when Trump confuses offices and titles while insulting Gavin Newsom. You hear it when he fantasizes aloud about “taking Cuba” as though sovereign nations are casino properties. You hear it when he sneers at Keir Starmer for consulting his team, because in Trump’s worldview, consultation itself is weakness. He cannot comprehend governance as a process. To him, power is a man barking until institutions stop objecting.
If you needed one more reminder that everyone around Trump is trapped in an ever-thickening fog of degradation, there was the Neil Dunn moment. During a public event, Mike Johnson was trying to praise Republican congressman Neil Dunn for continuing to show up to work despite serious health problems. Johnson called Dunn “a real champion and a patriot” and said that if other people had received the same diagnosis, “they would be apt to go home and retire.” Then Trump asked, “What was the diagnosis?” Johnson answered, “It was, I mean, I think it was a terminal diagnosis,” and that should have been the point where any normal person let the sentence die. Instead, Trump barreled right past the stop sign and added, “He would be dead by June.” Johnson then awkwardly tried to clean it up with, “Okay, that wasn’t public, but yeah,” and that was the moment you could hear the room groan.
That groan mattered. It was the sound of the mask slipping. For one split second, even the trained applauders and professional flatterers could not keep the revulsion from surfacing. They knew, instantly, that something private and awful had just been dragged into the room because Trump wanted one more grisly detail for the anecdote. That is what this presidency does. It drags everyone around it into a moral sinkhole where basic decency gets flattened by performance, and then expects them to smile through the stench.
Trump has spent the week performing presidential masculinity by free-associating through golf, war, and shamrocks, while Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi offered a very different kind of theater in a lengthy Al Jazeera interview: calm, steady, polished, and hard-edged. Speaking through a translator, Araghchi projected endurance above all else. He insisted the Islamic Republic is built on institutions rather than any one man, emphasized that assassinations and leadership losses would not collapse the system, and framed the war as an American-Israeli assault imposed on Iran rather than something Tehran widened on its own. It was a disciplined message aimed at several audiences at once: reassure the domestic audience that the regime is solid, warn regional neighbors that hosting U.S. forces comes with costs, and tell Washington that Iran will not be boxed into a narrow temporary pause dressed up as peace.
That interview mattered because of how controlled it sounded. Araghchi did not froth or rant, or sound cornered. He sounded like a man deliberately preserving ambiguity. On Hormuz, he hinted that Tehran may see the crisis not just as a military problem but as leverage to shape a future regional framework around passage through the waterway. On the nuclear issue, he maintained that Iran’s doctrine remains peaceful while leaving just enough shadow around the future of the regime’s religious prohibition to remind everyone that ambiguity itself is a tool. Think of it as a warning in a pressed suit.
The green ties, the shamrock bowls, the fake mystery ex-presidents, the wounded complaints about ungrateful allies, the smooth Iranian messaging, would already be enough for one morning. But because this administration cannot stop turning every scandal into a nested doll of corruption, there is also Pam Bondi, whose Epstein-files cleanup tour appears to have hit the point where even Congress is no longer willing to pretend the performance counts as transparency.
The House Oversight Committee has subpoenaed Bondi for a closed-door deposition on April 14, which is a problem for her because the whole routine works best on camera. Bondi thrives in the theatrical habitat of selective disclosure, sanctimonious scolding, and prop management. She likes burn-books, posture, and the general energy of a mean girl in legal drag. A closed-door deposition strips away the lighting, the rehearsed indignation, and the ability to wave around curated fragments while pretending they constitute openness. Under oath, without the usual production design, she may actually have to explain why the Justice Department’s idea of transparency keeps arriving with pages missing, names blacked out, and a suspicious odor of cleanup solution in the air.
Which brings us, finally, to the question of priorities. Because for all Trump’s giddy talk about “little excursions,” there is a material reality underneath this war fever, and it is obscene. The U.S. spent $11.3 billion in the first week alone of the Iran war. That is more than enough to fund the EPA for a year. More than enough for the CDC. More than enough for the National Cancer Institute. More than the annual federal research funding via the National Science Foundation. The numbers are not subtle. They are a slap in the face.
Budgets are values. They always have been, and this administration’s values are plain as day. There is always money for destruction, for spectacle, for war, for fossil-fuel fantasies, for culture-war theatrics, for gold drapery and ballroom dreams and military pageants and whatever fresh absurdity Trump decides will flatter him by sunset. But for clean air, cancer cures, scientific innovation, environmental safety, and public health? We are told to be realistic, tighten our belts, lower expectations, and maybe try not to get sick near the end of the fiscal year.
Meanwhile, in the real world, Marz once again submitted to the annual shamrock humiliation, despite his longstanding and deeply principled position that he is an Italian mastiff, not an Irish wolfhound. He expressed this objection not through protest, but through passive resistance, refusing to give us a single decent pose unless at least two people were involved and one of them was probably bribing him. So yes, the photo happened, but only after the usual negotiations.
And me, I am finally starting to feel a little more human again. Still not perfect, still not running at full speed, but better. Better is good. Better means I may manage to stay upright for most of the day, which lately feels less like a default setting and more like an achievement. We take the wins where we can.
Date: 21/03/2026 14:19:27
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2371977
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Soz if repost.
House Republicans on Wednesday introduced a bill that would require every pregnant person using abortion pills to use “catch kits” when ending their pregnancy.
The Clean Water For All Life Act, introduced by Rep. Mary Miller (R-Ill.), would make it illegal to flush abortion or miscarriage remains down a toilet “to protect both human dignity and America’s water systems,” according to a press release from Miller. The bill is the first of its kind to gain any national traction, though it’s unlikely to pass.
“The murder-for-profit abortion industry is not only ending innocent life, but is also polluting our water, endangering women and operating with virtually no accountability,” Miller said during a Wednesday press conference.
“The fact is, the abortion pill ingredients used to starve a pre-born child remain active and unfiltered in our water treatments,” she continued. “That means families across the nation may be unknowingly ingesting abortion-related chemicals in their drinking water, exposing them to potential health risks like infertility and cancer.”
The bill would also ban telehealth abortion care, or the ability to prescribe abortion pills via mail, and force women to use catch kits ― which stop any fetal remains from going down the toilet after ending a pregnancy ― and bring the medical waste to their physician. The penalties include a $50,000 fine and up to five years in prison.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/republicans-bill-stop-pollution-drinking-water-fetal-remains-abortion_n_69bc3b14e4b0bb6debb81953
Never mind preserving the dignity of the person ending their pregnancy, let’s preserve dignity for tissue. Keep the cancer-inducing abortion pills out of the water, keep the microplastics and chemo chemicals there though.
Date: 21/03/2026 14:53:19
From: kii
ID: 2372001
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I just found out that Chuck Norris was endorsed by Roy Moore. A sexual predator, a former chief justice of the Alabama supreme court who was removed from office twice for judicial misconduct.
I first noticed him for this incident – riding to the polls to vote. I don’t know much about horses but he seems to be too big for this horse.

Date: 21/03/2026 15:24:10
From: Michael V
ID: 2372013
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Soz if repost.
House Republicans on Wednesday introduced a bill that would require every pregnant person using abortion pills to use “catch kits” when ending their pregnancy.
The Clean Water For All Life Act, introduced by Rep. Mary Miller (R-Ill.), would make it illegal to flush abortion or miscarriage remains down a toilet “to protect both human dignity and America’s water systems,” according to a press release from Miller. The bill is the first of its kind to gain any national traction, though it’s unlikely to pass.
“The murder-for-profit abortion industry is not only ending innocent life, but is also polluting our water, endangering women and operating with virtually no accountability,” Miller said during a Wednesday press conference.
“The fact is, the abortion pill ingredients used to starve a pre-born child remain active and unfiltered in our water treatments,” she continued. “That means families across the nation may be unknowingly ingesting abortion-related chemicals in their drinking water, exposing them to potential health risks like infertility and cancer.”
The bill would also ban telehealth abortion care, or the ability to prescribe abortion pills via mail, and force women to use catch kits ― which stop any fetal remains from going down the toilet after ending a pregnancy ― and bring the medical waste to their physician. The penalties include a $50,000 fine and up to five years in prison.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/republicans-bill-stop-pollution-drinking-water-fetal-remains-abortion_n_69bc3b14e4b0bb6debb81953
Never mind preserving the dignity of the person ending their pregnancy, let’s preserve dignity for tissue. Keep the cancer-inducing abortion pills out of the water, keep the microplastics and chemo chemicals there though.
Fuckknuckles.
Date: 21/03/2026 16:35:01
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2372036
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
well, you’re wrong

face is a dirty ASIAN quality, only dirty ASIANS can be accused of trying to save face
Date: 21/03/2026 16:40:27
From: buffy
ID: 2372038
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Soz if repost.
House Republicans on Wednesday introduced a bill that would require every pregnant person using abortion pills to use “catch kits” when ending their pregnancy.
The Clean Water For All Life Act, introduced by Rep. Mary Miller (R-Ill.), would make it illegal to flush abortion or miscarriage remains down a toilet “to protect both human dignity and America’s water systems,” according to a press release from Miller. The bill is the first of its kind to gain any national traction, though it’s unlikely to pass.
“The murder-for-profit abortion industry is not only ending innocent life, but is also polluting our water, endangering women and operating with virtually no accountability,” Miller said during a Wednesday press conference.
“The fact is, the abortion pill ingredients used to starve a pre-born child remain active and unfiltered in our water treatments,” she continued. “That means families across the nation may be unknowingly ingesting abortion-related chemicals in their drinking water, exposing them to potential health risks like infertility and cancer.”
The bill would also ban telehealth abortion care, or the ability to prescribe abortion pills via mail, and force women to use catch kits ― which stop any fetal remains from going down the toilet after ending a pregnancy ― and bring the medical waste to their physician. The penalties include a $50,000 fine and up to five years in prison.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/republicans-bill-stop-pollution-drinking-water-fetal-remains-abortion_n_69bc3b14e4b0bb6debb81953
Never mind preserving the dignity of the person ending their pregnancy, let’s preserve dignity for tissue. Keep the cancer-inducing abortion pills out of the water, keep the microplastics and chemo chemicals there though.
I’m a bit tickled by the term “pre-born”. My spellchecker doesn’t like it.
Date: 21/03/2026 17:42:05
From: kii
ID: 2372060
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Divine Angel said:
Soz if repost.
House Republicans on Wednesday introduced a bill that would require every pregnant person using abortion pills to use “catch kits” when ending their pregnancy.
The Clean Water For All Life Act, introduced by Rep. Mary Miller (R-Ill.), would make it illegal to flush abortion or miscarriage remains down a toilet “to protect both human dignity and America’s water systems,” according to a press release from Miller. The bill is the first of its kind to gain any national traction, though it’s unlikely to pass.
“The murder-for-profit abortion industry is not only ending innocent life, but is also polluting our water, endangering women and operating with virtually no accountability,” Miller said during a Wednesday press conference.
“The fact is, the abortion pill ingredients used to starve a pre-born child remain active and unfiltered in our water treatments,” she continued. “That means families across the nation may be unknowingly ingesting abortion-related chemicals in their drinking water, exposing them to potential health risks like infertility and cancer.”
The bill would also ban telehealth abortion care, or the ability to prescribe abortion pills via mail, and force women to use catch kits ― which stop any fetal remains from going down the toilet after ending a pregnancy ― and bring the medical waste to their physician. The penalties include a $50,000 fine and up to five years in prison.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/republicans-bill-stop-pollution-drinking-water-fetal-remains-abortion_n_69bc3b14e4b0bb6debb81953
Never mind preserving the dignity of the person ending their pregnancy, let’s preserve dignity for tissue. Keep the cancer-inducing abortion pills out of the water, keep the microplastics and chemo chemicals there though.
I’m a bit tickled by the term “pre-born”. My spellchecker doesn’t like it.
I watched one woman describing the issue as “tiny babies in the water”.
Faaarken hell,
Date: 21/03/2026 17:54:41
From: buffy
ID: 2372066
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
buffy said:
Divine Angel said:
Soz if repost.
House Republicans on Wednesday introduced a bill that would require every pregnant person using abortion pills to use “catch kits” when ending their pregnancy.
The Clean Water For All Life Act, introduced by Rep. Mary Miller (R-Ill.), would make it illegal to flush abortion or miscarriage remains down a toilet “to protect both human dignity and America’s water systems,” according to a press release from Miller. The bill is the first of its kind to gain any national traction, though it’s unlikely to pass.
“The murder-for-profit abortion industry is not only ending innocent life, but is also polluting our water, endangering women and operating with virtually no accountability,” Miller said during a Wednesday press conference.
“The fact is, the abortion pill ingredients used to starve a pre-born child remain active and unfiltered in our water treatments,” she continued. “That means families across the nation may be unknowingly ingesting abortion-related chemicals in their drinking water, exposing them to potential health risks like infertility and cancer.”
The bill would also ban telehealth abortion care, or the ability to prescribe abortion pills via mail, and force women to use catch kits ― which stop any fetal remains from going down the toilet after ending a pregnancy ― and bring the medical waste to their physician. The penalties include a $50,000 fine and up to five years in prison.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/republicans-bill-stop-pollution-drinking-water-fetal-remains-abortion_n_69bc3b14e4b0bb6debb81953
Never mind preserving the dignity of the person ending their pregnancy, let’s preserve dignity for tissue. Keep the cancer-inducing abortion pills out of the water, keep the microplastics and chemo chemicals there though.
I’m a bit tickled by the term “pre-born”. My spellchecker doesn’t like it.
I watched one woman describing the issue as “tiny babies in the water”.
Faaarken hell,
Are we back in the days of the homunculus?!
Date: 22/03/2026 00:22:31
From: kii
ID: 2372207
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 22/03/2026 03:50:40
From: kii
ID: 2372210
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Yes, yes…we know he is a demented, malignant narcissist.
Seriously…wtf?

Date: 22/03/2026 04:55:08
From: kii
ID: 2372212
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 22/03/2026 04:59:54
From: dv
ID: 2372213
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Robert Mueller has died.
He had a good knock
Date: 22/03/2026 05:07:00
From: dv
ID: 2372214
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
kii said:
Robert Mueller has died.
He had a good knock

I’ve confirmed this is real.
Date: 22/03/2026 05:29:04
From: kii
ID: 2372215
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
dv said:
kii said:
Robert Mueller has died.
He had a good knock

I’ve confirmed this is real.
I checked before I posted, but couldn’t be bothered putting a link up.
Date: 22/03/2026 07:47:49
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2372227
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
dv said:
kii said:
Robert Mueller has died.
He had a good knock

I’ve confirmed this is real.
Yesterday I read an article in which Trump said he’s been told he could live til the age of 200. Since he says the exact opposite of truth, he probably got told he’s at death’s door. Or at least stumbling up the driveway.
Date: 22/03/2026 07:50:32
From: roughbarked
ID: 2372229
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
dv said:
He had a good knock

I’ve confirmed this is real.
Yesterday I read an article in which Trump said he’s been told he could live til the age of 200. Since he says the exact opposite of truth, he probably got told he’s at death’s door. Or at least stumbling up the driveway.
Hope he stubbs his toe.
Date: 22/03/2026 08:29:32
From: roughbarked
ID: 2372254
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 22/03/2026 08:32:22
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2372255
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:

Yet nothing will actually be done about it. Outrage and protests add fuel to the dumpster fire.
Date: 22/03/2026 08:54:05
From: roughbarked
ID: 2372256
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:

Yet nothing will actually be done about it. Outrage and protests add fuel to the dumpster fire.
Can the US grow out of this after Trump?
Date: 22/03/2026 09:05:06
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2372257
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:

Yet nothing will actually be done about it. Outrage and protests add fuel to the dumpster fire.
Can the US grow out of this after Trump?
A lot depends on who comes after Trump. Vance isn’t going to make things better.
Date: 22/03/2026 09:07:40
From: roughbarked
ID: 2372258
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
Yet nothing will actually be done about it. Outrage and protests add fuel to the dumpster fire.
Can the US grow out of this after Trump?
A lot depends on who comes after Trump. Vance isn’t going to make things better.
Before this, the republicans are going to have to reformat.
Date: 22/03/2026 09:19:52
From: Bogsnorkler
ID: 2372261
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Oregon’s Bay Area is feeling thoughtful.
Good morning! Welcome to another edition of the global economy getting strangled by one man’s ego while he insists everything is going beautifully, with Trump handling the world economy much as he handled his other failed ventures: bluffing through disaster, lying about the numbers, and expecting everyone else to absorb the losses. Donald Trump spent Friday doing what he does best: lurching between triumphalism, threats, gibberish, and contradiction while the real world continued to catch fire behind him. He floated the possibility of “winding down” the war with Iran even as the Pentagon moved additional Marines and warships toward the region, bringing the visible buildup to roughly 5,000 troops and sailors headed into the theater.
Because this administration is physically incapable of choosing one lie at a time, Trump also spent the day bragging that Iran had already been militarily crushed, rejecting calls for a ceasefire, and scolding NATO and U.S. allies for not rushing in to help clean up the mess. Asked about Pope Leo’s call for a ceasefire, Trump replied, “We can have dialogue, but I don’t want to do a ceasefire,” before adding, “You don’t do a ceasefire when you’re literally obliterating the other side.” In his en route gaggle, he declared that Iran’s navy, air force, radar, anti-aircraft systems, and leadership were basically gone, insisted the Strait of Hormuz was a “simple military maneuver,” and whined that Europe, Japan, Korea, China, and NATO lacked the “courage” to do more. He even mused about bases in Spain and Germany after Lindsey Graham suggested revisiting them. The official line now appears to be that the war is already won, might be winding down, requires more Marines, and is also somehow everyone else’s responsibility. So coherent. So very stable genius.
Reality, unfortunately, exists, and reality continues to be extremely rude. The Strait of Hormuz remains one of the most critical energy chokepoints on Earth, carrying roughly a fifth of global oil consumption and more than a quarter of seaborne oil trade. Trump can babble that “we don’t use it” all he wants, but globally priced oil does not care about his talking points. When Hormuz gets choked, Americans feel it at the pump, Europeans feel it in utilities, Asian importers feel it in industrial supply, and everybody gets a front-row seat to what happens when a narcissist decides to cosplay as Churchill with a lighter and a gas can.
That wider damage is no longer theoretical. Reuters reported within the last hour that Iraq has declared force majeure on all oil fields developed by foreign companies after the disruption of Hormuz largely halted the country’s crude exports. Iraq’s oil ministry ordered shutdowns at affected areas and acknowledged the resulting strain on a state budget that depends overwhelmingly on crude revenue. That is the moment this stops being just a market panic and starts becoming a genuine structural wound. Not satisfied with bankrupting his own businesses, he now aims to bankrupt the world.
The Financial Times editorial board put the point bluntly, warning that this war is “metastasising into a global economic calamity” and that “the worst-case scenarios for investors and policymakers are now coming into view.” Even if the bombs stopped tomorrow, the damage would not simply vanish. The scar is the lesson markets have now relearned: one of the world’s most important energy chokepoints can be weaponized again and again whenever reckless men decide history is a toy. Once shipping, investment, and insurers absorb that lesson, they do not just forget it because Trump posts something about victory on social media between rounds of golf.
If you needed a more tactile picture of that damage, shipping experts have been spelling it out in language even this White House might understand if it stopped screaming for fifteen seconds. Sal Mercogliano explained that military dominance and commercial safety are not the same thing. As he put it, “you don’t need a navy to exert an anti-ship campaign,” and that is exactly the problem: the U.S. can dominate the skies and still fail to make shipping feel safe.
Around 20,000 seafarers and roughly 3,200 vessels have been affected in the region, with ships stuck, ports refusing entry, supplies dwindling, and crews trapped in a floating humanitarian crisis while insurers and shipowners conclude that a one-percent chance of disaster is still far too high when the cargo is essentially a giant explosive cylinder of global necessity. Mercogliano’s formulation was devastatingly simple: “a military guy” hears a 99 percent success rate and calls it a slam dunk, but “a commercial shipping guy” hears there is a 1 percent chance “I’m not going to get through.” That is what happens when the circulatory system of world trade gets a clamp on its femoral artery.
Which makes what Treasury did next somehow even more absurd. In a move so breathtakingly contradictory it almost deserves applause for sheer farce, the Trump administration issued a short-term authorization allowing the sale of roughly 140 million barrels of Iranian oil already loaded onto tankers. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the idea was to relieve supply pressure and help cool the market. So yes, the same administration bombing Iran, boasting about obliterating Iran, and threatening further escalation is now partially unsanctioning Iranian oil because its own war is wrecking the global energy system. Nothing says total victory like quietly needing your enemy’s oil to stop your own war from detonating the world economy.
Europe, for its part, is increasingly sounding like the last adult at the table. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has condemned the conflict as an “illegal war,” warned that it could become “a serious crisis” depending on how it evolves, and stressed that “this is not our war.” He has now announced an emergency package of roughly €5 billion and 80 measures to shield Spanish households and businesses from the fallout. Spain’s message has been refreshingly clear: we do not support this war, and we are now spending public money to protect our people from a crisis Washington helped unleash. It is a remarkable contrast with Trump’s demand that allies show “courage” by volunteering to shoulder the costs of his own recklessness.
Even Saudi voices that loathe Iran are sounding more alarmed than enthusiastic. The emerging Gulf line is essentially this: Iran is dangerous, yes, but the United States “actually started this war,” and the region is now stuck trying to survive the blaze. Saudi-aligned commentary has emphasized that “the last thing we want actually is to enter this war” and that “we want a political solution by any way,” while also warning that Iran should not force Riyadh into the conflict because “Saudi Arabia should never be in war with Iran” and that if it is, the result would be “literally devastating for the Iranian regime.” In other words, nobody with skin in this game actually wants more of Trump’s war. They just want to deter being dragged deeper into it.
Since authoritarianism is never content to merely break foreign policy when it can also take a swing at the First Amendment for fun, there was at least one genuinely good legal development: a federal judge struck down key parts of the Pentagon’s restrictive press policy, finding that it violated the Constitution. Judge Paul Friedman rejected language that treated Pentagon access as a “privilege,” blasted the vague restrictions on “soliciting” information, and found the policy appeared designed to chill critical reporting and weed out disfavored journalists. The Pentagon does not get to dress viewpoint discrimination up in a national security costume while the country is stumbling through war.
That is excellent news, because a free press is not there to contort presidential gibberish into statesmanship or to help Pete Hegseth look less reckless on television. If Hegseth is worried about coming off badly in public, he may just have to try the unthinkable: clean up his own act instead of relying on “patriotic” press to polish the delivery. The job of journalism is not to flatter these people. It is to report what they are doing before they get more people killed.
Because this is still America in 2026 and the carnival always runs two rings at once, here is your well-deserved side dish of schadenfreude: A California jury found that Elon Musk defrauded Twitter investors during the 2022 buyout circus. The jurors concluded that his tweets claiming the deal was “temporarily on hold” over bot concerns were misleading, since he had already signed a binding agreement and waived due diligence. Those posts helped drive down Twitter’s stock price, costing investors money before the deal eventually closed at the original $44 billion price anyway.
The jury did not go so far as to say Musk pulled off a full fraudulent scheme, but they did find that he misled shareholders while trying to wriggle around the deal he had already agreed to. After years of acting like posting is a substitute for responsibility, Musk has now received the extremely funny news that tweets can, in fact, have consequences.
As the administration is doing its level best to dress aggression up as virtue, this next contrast belongs here too, exactly as written: An update to my earlier essay on Trump, Hegseth, and the sanctification of force: new reporting on Pope Leo XIV offers a striking counterpoint. While this administration continues to aestheticize violence and wrap militarism in the language of providence, civilization, and strength, Leo is warning that “war is back in vogue” and that the postwar taboo against imposing dominion through force is being deliberately eroded. That matters, especially in light of Hegseth’s efforts to fuse American military power with explicitly Christian rhetoric. Leo’s position makes clear that this administration’s worldview is not some broad expression of Christian teaching, but a far narrower and more dangerous blend of nationalism, militarism, and moral self-anointment. In plain terms: Trump admires the firepower, Hegseth blesses it, and Leo is warning the world not to confuse that with righteousness.
That same corruption of public morality is showing up at home in smaller but still telling ways. One of the more useful pieces circulating this morning notes how far our political culture has fallen in just a decade. Trump entered national politics railing against corruption, promising to “drain the swamp.” Now the presidency itself has become a licensing platform, a checkout page, a branded shopping channel with Bibles, watches, guitars, phones, and a thousand little disclaimers in fine print. The old scandal was that politicians privately profited from access. The new scandal is that they do it out loud, on camera, and dare you to call it scandalous while the checkout cart processes your order.
Astonishing how much damage one man has been able to wrought, though the tragedy is that he has never done it alone. He has had a party, a media ecosystem, a donor class, a court faction, and a cult of grievance helping him sand down each new atrocity until it feels like weather. But this morning’s story is what happens when the weather starts wrecking ports, budgets, alliances, markets, supply chains, and press freedom all at once. At a certain point even propaganda cannot hide the smell of smoke.
Marz and I slept in a little this morning after staying up late for a longer moonbeam vigil, sending love from Oregon’s South Coast.
Date: 22/03/2026 10:07:34
From: ms spock
ID: 2372278
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
Yet nothing will actually be done about it. Outrage and protests add fuel to the dumpster fire.
Can the US grow out of this after Trump?
A lot depends on who comes after Trump. Vance isn’t going to make things better.
If they end up with a Nazi in the White House, in 2028, it is not going to end well.
Date: 22/03/2026 10:17:12
From: Michael V
ID: 2372281
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ms spock said:
Bogsnorkler said:
Oregon’s Bay Area
Yesterday, Pete Hegseth stood before the American public and spoke of honoring the fallen as they returned home in coffins. He spoke about attending the Dignified Transfer Ceremony and about speaking to the families, and then he offered the country a version of grief that sounded less like mourning and more like a recruitment slogan. He said, “What I heard through tears, through hugs, through strength, and through unbreakable resolve, was the same from family after family. They said, ‘Finish this. Honor their sacrifice. Do not waver. Do not stop until the job is done.’ My response along with that of the president was simple. Of course we will finish this.”
I cannot say with certainty what every family said in that room, because I was not there to hear it for myself, but I can say now that at least one grieving father has publicly contradicted Hegseth’s version of events. Charles Simmons, whose son Tech. Sgt. Tyler H. Simmons was among the dead, said he did not tell Hegseth or Trump to keep fighting and did not say anything along those lines. That matters because it reveals exactly how this kind of war rhetoric works. Powerful men take the most private language of grief and try to convert it into public consent for more violence.
Whether those exact words were spoken by anyone else or not, what Hegseth offered at that podium was not reverence, honesty, or care. It was an old trick in a fresh suit, the dead held up as proof that more death is necessary, mourning repackaged as resolve, and shattered families made to stand in for a nation that never seems to run out of other people’s children to spend.
What I cannot bring myself to believe, not for a single second, is that in the first raw moments of loss, with hearts broken open and futures collapsed, family after family approached the Secretary of War to ask for more bombing, more escalation, and more blood. I do not believe that mothers looking at flag draped coffins were thinking about military momentum or national resolve. I do not believe that brothers and sisters were standing there in the wreckage of their lives hoping that what had just been done to them should now be done to someone else. Grief does not speak the language of empire that fluently unless someone has taught it to, shaped it, staged it, and handed it a script.
You can hear the strain of that script in the way he speaks, in the lowered eyes, in the deliberate certainty, in the effort to make brutality sound like duty and cruelty sound like courage. It is all presentation, all muscle flexing dressed up as moral clarity, all the familiar theater of a small man trying to make power look like principle. What he offers is not strength, because strength does not need to hide behind dead servicemembers in order to justify itself. What he offers is the oldest performance in American war making, which is the insistence that if we have already sacrificed so much, then we must sacrifice more, because to stop now would somehow dishonor what has already been lost.
I spent my childhood with my brother away fighting one of these wars, one of these lies about protection and duty and safety. My family was lucky enough that he came home, but even that sentence is more complicated than it appears, because he returned to us alive and still we lost him in ways that took years to name. The warm boy who once protected other children from bullies did not simply come back and resume his life where it had paused. He came home altered by horror, burdened by memory, carrying things that never should have been placed inside any young person and certainly not under the banner of patriotic service to a safer world.
That is what men like Hegseth never say when they talk about sacrifice. They never say that war does not end when a soldier boards a plane home. They do not say that war keeps living in the body long after the uniforms are folded away, that it settles into the nervous system, that it follows families into kitchens and holidays and ordinary afternoons, that it steals tenderness and sleep and ease, that it can leave a person standing in front of the people who love him most while still being unbearably far away. They speak as though war is an event, a mission, a task to complete, while families know it as an inheritance that can be handed down in silence, fear, and grief for years.
My brother walks through the world now with the conscience that war failed to beat out of him. He carries the picture of a young girl who suffered because of his actions, and instead of burying that pain beneath slogans or self congratulation, he allowed it to change him. He got an education so he could help others living with trauma like his own. He did not give up his conscience in order to survive what he had done and seen. He let that conscience become the thing that guided him afterward, and to me that is what honor actually looks like. Honor is not standing at a podium describing death and destruction from above like it is a show of force to be admired. Honor is not speaking with swagger about the machinery that tears children apart. Honor is not treating war as a stage on which to perform masculinity for the cameras. Honor is what remains when a person refuses to become numb, refuses to call cruelty victory, and refuses to let power erase the human cost of what was done in his name.
That is why one of the most chilling things Hegseth said in that briefing was, “We’re hunting and striking, death and destruction from above.” He offered the line with the confidence of someone who wants the public to feel awe instead of revulsion, and I felt the opposite. I felt the cold of hearing a man speak about massive violence with the polished assurance of someone who has convinced himself that distance makes it cleaner. He invoked his own experience in earlier wars and referred to Bush as a foolish politician, and while I do not disagree that there was foolishness there, what seems different now is not wisdom but a terrifying absence of restraint. At least earlier administrations understood they needed to pretend, however imperfectly, that the loss of civilian life mattered. What stands before us now is a version of war rhetoric so stripped of shame that it barely bothers to hide its contempt for the dead on the other end.
And it is not only the dead abroad who are being treated as expendable. Standing there beside him, Caine spoke with pride about how young these servicemembers are, and that pride turned my stomach because youth should call forth protection, not appetite. It should make us pause, not posture. The fact that they are young is not evidence of national greatness. It is evidence of how early this country learns to place its children on the altar and call the smoke patriotism.
I think about the mothers on every side of this violence, the mothers here who are handed folded flags and speeches about resolve, and the mothers there who gather what remains of their children after our officials have finished explaining why the blast radius was regrettable but necessary. I think about the obscene distance between the language of the briefing room and the reality of a mother trying to survive the unendurable fact that her child will never come home from school, never laugh from the next room, never leave a pair of shoes by the door again. Men like Pete Hegseth speak in abstractions because abstractions allow them to keep moving. Mothers live in particulars, and particulars are what make war impossible to sanitize.
This is why I cannot accept the theft of grief that happened in that briefing. The dead do not belong to the state once they are buried. Their families do not owe the government a continued supply of resolve. Their mothers do not owe men like Hegseth composure, endorsement, or silence. Their loss does not become military property simply because a politician or a television soldier decides to wrap himself in it.
I also cannot accept the lie that the only honorable path available to a servicemember is obedience. My brother’s life taught me otherwise. A true soldier is not one who abandons conscience in service of command, but one who keeps enough of it intact to recognize when something is wrong, when the mission is rotten, when the justification is hollow, when the order being carried out is less about defense than domination. We ask some of our youngest citizens to shoulder unbearable moral weight, and then we tell them that duty means silence, compliance, and endurance. It does not have to mean that. There remains, even in uniform, the possibility of refusal. There remains the possibility of saying no. There remains the possibility of recognizing that what is being demanded is not courage but surrender of the soul.
That possibility matters because it is one of the only things standing between a nation and total moral collapse. If soldiers are taught that honor means obeying every lie, then we have not built a military, we have built a machine. If, on the other hand, they understand that honor includes restraint, conscience, and the refusal to carry out what they know to be wrong, then perhaps there is still some human ground left beneath all this ash.
My family spent years in the aftermath of Iraq wrestling with trauma, broken hearts, fear, and the grief of losing someone who was still alive. We know what war does after the speech ends. We know what it costs after the headlines move on. We know that some of the most honorable people who serve are the ones who come back determined not to glorify what they survived, but to tell the truth about it, to help others carry what they can, and to resist becoming mouthpieces for the same machinery that harmed them.
So when Pete Hegseth stands before the country and asks us, explicitly or implicitly, to see more war as the proper tribute to the dead, I reject him. I reject the theft of mourning in service of power. I reject the use of young servicemembers as props in a fantasy of dominance. I reject the idea that devastated families are naturally asking for more devastation. Most of all, I reject the cruel and ancient lie that the only way to honor sacrifice is to multiply it.
Honor does not live in the briefing room. Honor lives in the mother who refuses to let her child be turned into a slogan. Honor lives in the soldier who keeps his conscience. Honor lives in the person who has seen what war does and still chooses not to worship it. And if there is any hope left for us, it will not come from men like Pete Hegseth promising to finish the job. It will come from the people, including soldiers themselves, who finally decide that this job should never have been theirs to finish in the first place.
In other words, Pete, I’m not falling for your bull shit, and I hope others will join me.
Written by Shanley Hurt
Very moving writing.
They do not say that war keeps living in the body long after the uniforms are folded away, that it settles into the nervous system, that it follows families into kitchens and holidays and ordinary afternoons, that it steals tenderness and sleep and ease, that it can leave a person standing in front of the people who love him most while still being unbearably far away.
… and the mothers there who gather what remains of their children after our officials have finished explaining why the blast radius was regrettable but necessary.
My family spent years in the aftermath of Iraq wrestling with trauma, broken hearts, fear, and the grief of losing someone who was still alive.
You should also consider the epigenetic changes that occur due to exposure to war. Adults pass those changes to their kids. Kids in war zones become adults and pass those changes to their kids. Even non-combatants one or more generations removed are strongly affected.
Date: 22/03/2026 10:30:17
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2372284
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
ms spock said:
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:

Yet nothing will actually be done about it. Outrage and protests add fuel to the dumpster fire.
Can the US grow out of this after Trump?
A lot depends on who comes after Trump. Vance isn’t going to make things better.
Before this, the republicans are going to have to reformat.
If they end up with a Nazi in the White House, in 2028, it is not going to end well.
yeah we were going to say, we can talk about USSAians doing nothing about it, but why didn’t anyone stop the last big round 90 years ago
Date: 22/03/2026 11:06:58
From: fsm
ID: 2372288
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 22/03/2026 11:10:34
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2372289
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Dear oh dear
Date: 22/03/2026 11:11:54
From: Bogsnorkler
ID: 2372290
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
fsm said:

https://fazzler.com/trump-suggests-truckers-switch-gasoline-fuel-costs/
Link
Date: 22/03/2026 11:15:22
From: buffy
ID: 2372291
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Bogsnorkler said:
fsm said:

https://fazzler.com/trump-suggests-truckers-switch-gasoline-fuel-costs/
Link
From that link:
>>Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt later described the remarks as reflecting the President’s “aspirational approach to conventional fuel frameworks.”<<
I’ll just let you think about what sort of mind can think up a sentence like that…
Date: 22/03/2026 11:18:57
From: Bogsnorkler
ID: 2372292
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Bogsnorkler said:
fsm said:

https://fazzler.com/trump-suggests-truckers-switch-gasoline-fuel-costs/
Link
From that link:
>>Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt later described the remarks as reflecting the President’s “aspirational approach to conventional fuel frameworks.”<<
I’ll just let you think about what sort of mind can think up a sentence like that…
Randall ‘fink’ Finkelstein, the author, is good at satire.
Date: 22/03/2026 11:28:11
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2372297
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Bogsnorkler said:
buffy said:
Bogsnorkler said:
https://fazzler.com/trump-suggests-truckers-switch-gasoline-fuel-costs/
Link
From that link:
>>Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt later described the remarks as reflecting the President’s “aspirational approach to conventional fuel frameworks.”<<
I’ll just let you think about what sort of mind can think up a sentence like that…
Randall ‘fink’ Finkelstein, the author, is good at satire.
There’s a lot of misinformation out there regarding Donald Trump, a lot of those with Trump derangement syndrome are just making things up and then posting them to the interweb.
What he really said is that truckers should switch to coal.
Date: 22/03/2026 11:41:15
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2372301
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Bogsnorkler said:
buffy said:
From that link:
>>Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt later described the remarks as reflecting the President’s “aspirational approach to conventional fuel frameworks.”<<
I’ll just let you think about what sort of mind can think up a sentence like that…
Randall ‘fink’ Finkelstein, the author, is good at satire.
There’s a lot of misinformation out there regarding Donald Trump, a lot of those with Trump derangement syndrome are just making things up and then posting them to the interweb.
What he really said is that truckers should switch to coal.
I was worried you might have lost your TDS for a minute there.
Date: 22/03/2026 11:46:10
From: transition
ID: 2372303
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Bogsnorkler said:
buffy said:
From that link:
>>Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt later described the remarks as reflecting the President’s “aspirational approach to conventional fuel frameworks.”<<
I’ll just let you think about what sort of mind can think up a sentence like that…
Randall ‘fink’ Finkelstein, the author, is good at satire.
There’s a lot of misinformation out there regarding Donald Trump, a lot of those with Trump derangement syndrome are just making things up and then posting them to the interweb.
What he really said is that truckers should switch to coal.
reading …..rolls eyes ignores energy density and much more
“aspirational approach to conventional fuel frameworks”, chuckle, that’s extraordinarily generous
Date: 22/03/2026 11:50:53
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2372305
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
love how ussaoles keep lapping this shit up still
Date: 22/03/2026 11:55:17
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2372306
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
And then we have class.

Date: 22/03/2026 11:56:58
From: roughbarked
ID: 2372308
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Dear oh dear
Hello Mr Trump. Don’t you know that you shouldn’t speak ill of the dead.
Date: 22/03/2026 11:58:15
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2372310
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Dear oh dear
Hello Mr Trump. Don’t you know that you shouldn’t speak ill of the dead.
Advice no one will take when he finally kicks the bucket.
Date: 22/03/2026 12:01:15
From: roughbarked
ID: 2372311
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Dear oh dear
Hello Mr Trump. Don’t you know that you shouldn’t speak ill of the dead.
Advice no one will take when he finally kicks the bucket.
He’s already dead to me.
Date: 22/03/2026 12:02:05
From: party_pants
ID: 2372312
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Dear oh dear
Hello Mr Trump. Don’t you know that you shouldn’t speak ill of the dead.
Advice no one will take when he finally kicks the bucket.
If it is someone you spoke ill of when s/he was alive, then that rule doesn’t really apply when they cark it.
I speak very ill of the orange Dunny Trumpet while he is alive.
Date: 22/03/2026 12:28:51
From: buffy
ID: 2372315
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
My Houston sister is rather against this war thing. Another post from her FaceBook.

Date: 22/03/2026 12:38:30
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2372316
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
My Houston sister is rather against this war thing. Another post from her FaceBook.

Is there anybody for this war thing?
Date: 22/03/2026 12:41:58
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2372317
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
buffy said:
My Houston sister is rather against this war thing. Another post from her FaceBook.

Is there anybody for this war thing?
When you are not very good at diplomacy, like saying you’re glad someone’s dead, war is all you’ve got.
Date: 22/03/2026 12:43:05
From: Michael V
ID: 2372318
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
fsm said:

Tnuc!
Date: 22/03/2026 12:43:26
From: Michael V
ID: 2372319
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Dear oh dear
Nasty Tnuc!
Date: 22/03/2026 12:43:41
From: party_pants
ID: 2372320
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
buffy said:
My Houston sister is rather against this war thing. Another post from her FaceBook.

Is there anybody for this war thing?
Yes. The Christian Nationalists and the Zionists.
Date: 22/03/2026 12:44:14
From: Michael V
ID: 2372321
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Bogsnorkler said:
fsm said:

https://fazzler.com/trump-suggests-truckers-switch-gasoline-fuel-costs/
Link
From that link:
>>Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt later described the remarks as reflecting the President’s “aspirational approach to conventional fuel frameworks.”<<
I’ll just let you think about what sort of mind can think up a sentence like that…
Distant water-filled trench!
Date: 22/03/2026 12:45:36
From: Michael V
ID: 2372323
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Bogsnorkler said:
buffy said:
From that link:
>>Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt later described the remarks as reflecting the President’s “aspirational approach to conventional fuel frameworks.”<<
I’ll just let you think about what sort of mind can think up a sentence like that…
Randall ‘fink’ Finkelstein, the author, is good at satire.
There’s a lot of misinformation out there regarding Donald Trump, a lot of those with Trump derangement syndrome are just making things up and then posting them to the interweb.
What he really said is that truckers should switch to coal.
Ha!
Date: 22/03/2026 12:51:29
From: buffy
ID: 2372325
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Bogsnorkler said:
Randall ‘fink’ Finkelstein, the author, is good at satire.
There’s a lot of misinformation out there regarding Donald Trump, a lot of those with Trump derangement syndrome are just making things up and then posting them to the interweb.
What he really said is that truckers should switch to coal.
Ha!
MV…it’s a satire site. But it’s a good satire site…
Date: 22/03/2026 12:52:19
From: party_pants
ID: 2372326
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
buffy said:
Bogsnorkler said:
https://fazzler.com/trump-suggests-truckers-switch-gasoline-fuel-costs/
Link
From that link:
>>Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt later described the remarks as reflecting the President’s “aspirational approach to conventional fuel frameworks.”<<
I’ll just let you think about what sort of mind can think up a sentence like that…
Distant water-filled trench!
I think I am suffering from Karoline Leavitt Derangement Syndrome. She really needs to be locked up and kept out of public speaking for the rest of her life. How can anyone so be so openly and obviously a complete liar like that for the sake of an decaying decrepit nasty senile old crook is beyond me. Only a person with lower moral standards than Trump could be such an enabler.
I really wish a cruel punishment upon her and the rest of the crew of enablers for the rest of their lives once the final siren sounds for Trump. I don’t know the names of any of the rest of them, only hers. So she gets the brunt of the hate.
Date: 22/03/2026 12:52:32
From: Michael V
ID: 2372327
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Michael V said:
Peak Warming Man said:
There’s a lot of misinformation out there regarding Donald Trump, a lot of those with Trump derangement syndrome are just making things up and then posting them to the interweb.
What he really said is that truckers should switch to coal.
Ha!
MV…it’s a satire site. But it’s a good satire site…
Oh. I got sucked in by what was posted.
Date: 22/03/2026 13:03:09
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2372330
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
funding for war starting to think he’s just misread a different word that sounds similar but has 5 letters
Date: 22/03/2026 13:10:44
From: Michael V
ID: 2372333
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
funding for war starting to think he’s just misread a different word that sounds similar but has 5 letters
???
Date: 22/03/2026 13:12:27
From: party_pants
ID: 2372334
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
funding for war starting to think he’s just misread a different word that sounds similar but has 5 letters
huh?
IDGI
Date: 22/03/2026 13:15:48
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2372336
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
sorry we were just making a tasteless allusion to the idea that the rapist in charge was demanding access to sex workers and in a failing comedy of errors he ended up with this
Date: 22/03/2026 13:32:38
From: fsm
ID: 2372340
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 22/03/2026 13:32:40
From: roughbarked
ID: 2372341
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:
Hello Mr Trump. Don’t you know that you shouldn’t speak ill of the dead.
Advice no one will take when he finally kicks the bucket.
If it is someone you spoke ill of when s/he was alive, then that rule doesn’t really apply when they cark it.
I speak very ill of the orange Dunny Trumpet while he is alive.
I’ve been known to do the same.
Date: 22/03/2026 13:33:24
From: roughbarked
ID: 2372342
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
buffy said:
My Houston sister is rather against this war thing. Another post from her FaceBook.

Is there anybody for this war thing?
Trump thinks it is in the bag.
Date: 22/03/2026 13:35:12
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2372343
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
fsm said:

It’s really astounding how stupid Trump is. He doesn’t understand hypocrisy in any way shape or form and just gets defensive when confronted with his behaviour. Journalists don’t even bother pointing it out any more.
Date: 22/03/2026 13:36:41
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2372345
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
buffy said:
My Houston sister is rather against this war thing. Another post from her FaceBook.

Is there anybody for this war thing?
Trump thinks it is in the bag.
Well now that the yanks are allowing Iranian oil to be sold in an effort to lower prices I imagine the Iranians feel that they’ve won.
Date: 22/03/2026 13:38:50
From: dv
ID: 2372346
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Never sure whether he has no situational awareness or really doesn’t think other people are human. James Comey handed him his first presidency. Robert Mueller kept him out of prison by calling for impeachment rather than criminal charges. He never indicates that his fortune has depended on other people’s mercy.
Date: 22/03/2026 13:49:56
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2372349
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Never sure whether he has no situational awareness or really doesn’t think other people are human. James Comey handed him his first presidency. Robert Mueller kept him out of prison by calling for impeachment rather than criminal charges. He never indicates that his fortune has depended on other people’s mercy.
survivor ships are never biased
Date: 22/03/2026 13:50:32
From: Michael V
ID: 2372350
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
fsm said:

Fair comment.
Date: 22/03/2026 13:52:25
From: Bogsnorkler
ID: 2372352
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 22/03/2026 13:53:29
From: Michael V
ID: 2372353
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
Is there anybody for this war thing?
Trump thinks it is in the bag.
Well now that the yanks are allowing Iranian oil to be sold in an effort to lower prices I imagine the Iranians feel that they’ve won.
It’s all part of the 4-D chess thing the MAGAts argue that Dunny is doing.
Date: 22/03/2026 13:54:55
From: dv
ID: 2372354
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
2012 – 2016 World leaders successfully negotiate deal with Iran to give up nuclear weapons program in exchange for sanctions alleviation.
2018 Trump shreds the deal so he can reimpose sanctions. Nuclear weapons program restarts.
2026 Trump replace senescent Supreme Leader with younger, more alert son, puts Iran in a position where they can choke the oil supply, removes oil sanctions, nuclear weapons program continues.
Date: 22/03/2026 13:57:19
From: kii
ID: 2372356
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
fsm said:

It’s really astounding how stupid Trump is. He doesn’t understand hypocrisy in any way shape or form and just gets defensive when confronted with his behaviour. Journalists don’t even bother pointing it out any more.
The stupid has always been there, so has the Malignant Narcissism. The dementia has been evident since at least 2016, according to a few experts (including his niece).
As the dementia progresses the other disorders are magnified.
Sometimes I think people avoid aggravating him because he does random shit when he’s pushed.
Date: 22/03/2026 14:09:51
From: roughbarked
ID: 2372363
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Bogsnorkler said:

Does she know how those minks died?
Date: 22/03/2026 14:13:02
From: kii
ID: 2372366
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Bogsnorkler said:

Does she know how those minks died?
Why don’t you ask her?
Date: 22/03/2026 14:14:48
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2372367
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Bogsnorkler said:

Does she know how those minks died?
https://georgiatoday.ge/trump-administration-delegation-visits-minsk/
Date: 22/03/2026 14:15:35
From: Kingy
ID: 2372368
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Bogsnorkler said:

Trumps parents

Date: 22/03/2026 14:20:49
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2372371
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
roughbarked said:
Bogsnorkler said:

Does she know how those minks died?
Why don’t you ask her?
what’s her number
Date: 22/03/2026 15:11:16
From: ms spock
ID: 2372382
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
ms spock said:
Bogsnorkler said:
Oregon’s Bay Area
Yesterday, Pete Hegseth stood before the American public and spoke of honoring the fallen as they returned home in coffins. He spoke about attending the Dignified Transfer Ceremony and about speaking to the families, and then he offered the country a version of grief that sounded less like mourning and more like a recruitment slogan. He said, “What I heard through tears, through hugs, through strength, and through unbreakable resolve, was the same from family after family. They said, ‘Finish this. Honor their sacrifice. Do not waver. Do not stop until the job is done.’ My response along with that of the president was simple. Of course we will finish this.”
I cannot say with certainty what every family said in that room, because I was not there to hear it for myself, but I can say now that at least one grieving father has publicly contradicted Hegseth’s version of events. Charles Simmons, whose son Tech. Sgt. Tyler H. Simmons was among the dead, said he did not tell Hegseth or Trump to keep fighting and did not say anything along those lines. That matters because it reveals exactly how this kind of war rhetoric works. Powerful men take the most private language of grief and try to convert it into public consent for more violence.
Whether those exact words were spoken by anyone else or not, what Hegseth offered at that podium was not reverence, honesty, or care. It was an old trick in a fresh suit, the dead held up as proof that more death is necessary, mourning repackaged as resolve, and shattered families made to stand in for a nation that never seems to run out of other people’s children to spend.
What I cannot bring myself to believe, not for a single second, is that in the first raw moments of loss, with hearts broken open and futures collapsed, family after family approached the Secretary of War to ask for more bombing, more escalation, and more blood. I do not believe that mothers looking at flag draped coffins were thinking about military momentum or national resolve. I do not believe that brothers and sisters were standing there in the wreckage of their lives hoping that what had just been done to them should now be done to someone else. Grief does not speak the language of empire that fluently unless someone has taught it to, shaped it, staged it, and handed it a script.
You can hear the strain of that script in the way he speaks, in the lowered eyes, in the deliberate certainty, in the effort to make brutality sound like duty and cruelty sound like courage. It is all presentation, all muscle flexing dressed up as moral clarity, all the familiar theater of a small man trying to make power look like principle. What he offers is not strength, because strength does not need to hide behind dead servicemembers in order to justify itself. What he offers is the oldest performance in American war making, which is the insistence that if we have already sacrificed so much, then we must sacrifice more, because to stop now would somehow dishonor what has already been lost.
I spent my childhood with my brother away fighting one of these wars, one of these lies about protection and duty and safety. My family was lucky enough that he came home, but even that sentence is more complicated than it appears, because he returned to us alive and still we lost him in ways that took years to name. The warm boy who once protected other children from bullies did not simply come back and resume his life where it had paused. He came home altered by horror, burdened by memory, carrying things that never should have been placed inside any young person and certainly not under the banner of patriotic service to a safer world.
That is what men like Hegseth never say when they talk about sacrifice. They never say that war does not end when a soldier boards a plane home. They do not say that war keeps living in the body long after the uniforms are folded away, that it settles into the nervous system, that it follows families into kitchens and holidays and ordinary afternoons, that it steals tenderness and sleep and ease, that it can leave a person standing in front of the people who love him most while still being unbearably far away. They speak as though war is an event, a mission, a task to complete, while families know it as an inheritance that can be handed down in silence, fear, and grief for years.
My brother walks through the world now with the conscience that war failed to beat out of him. He carries the picture of a young girl who suffered because of his actions, and instead of burying that pain beneath slogans or self congratulation, he allowed it to change him. He got an education so he could help others living with trauma like his own. He did not give up his conscience in order to survive what he had done and seen. He let that conscience become the thing that guided him afterward, and to me that is what honor actually looks like. Honor is not standing at a podium describing death and destruction from above like it is a show of force to be admired. Honor is not speaking with swagger about the machinery that tears children apart. Honor is not treating war as a stage on which to perform masculinity for the cameras. Honor is what remains when a person refuses to become numb, refuses to call cruelty victory, and refuses to let power erase the human cost of what was done in his name.
That is why one of the most chilling things Hegseth said in that briefing was, “We’re hunting and striking, death and destruction from above.” He offered the line with the confidence of someone who wants the public to feel awe instead of revulsion, and I felt the opposite. I felt the cold of hearing a man speak about massive violence with the polished assurance of someone who has convinced himself that distance makes it cleaner. He invoked his own experience in earlier wars and referred to Bush as a foolish politician, and while I do not disagree that there was foolishness there, what seems different now is not wisdom but a terrifying absence of restraint. At least earlier administrations understood they needed to pretend, however imperfectly, that the loss of civilian life mattered. What stands before us now is a version of war rhetoric so stripped of shame that it barely bothers to hide its contempt for the dead on the other end.
And it is not only the dead abroad who are being treated as expendable. Standing there beside him, Caine spoke with pride about how young these servicemembers are, and that pride turned my stomach because youth should call forth protection, not appetite. It should make us pause, not posture. The fact that they are young is not evidence of national greatness. It is evidence of how early this country learns to place its children on the altar and call the smoke patriotism.
I think about the mothers on every side of this violence, the mothers here who are handed folded flags and speeches about resolve, and the mothers there who gather what remains of their children after our officials have finished explaining why the blast radius was regrettable but necessary. I think about the obscene distance between the language of the briefing room and the reality of a mother trying to survive the unendurable fact that her child will never come home from school, never laugh from the next room, never leave a pair of shoes by the door again. Men like Pete Hegseth speak in abstractions because abstractions allow them to keep moving. Mothers live in particulars, and particulars are what make war impossible to sanitize.
This is why I cannot accept the theft of grief that happened in that briefing. The dead do not belong to the state once they are buried. Their families do not owe the government a continued supply of resolve. Their mothers do not owe men like Hegseth composure, endorsement, or silence. Their loss does not become military property simply because a politician or a television soldier decides to wrap himself in it.
I also cannot accept the lie that the only honorable path available to a servicemember is obedience. My brother’s life taught me otherwise. A true soldier is not one who abandons conscience in service of command, but one who keeps enough of it intact to recognize when something is wrong, when the mission is rotten, when the justification is hollow, when the order being carried out is less about defense than domination. We ask some of our youngest citizens to shoulder unbearable moral weight, and then we tell them that duty means silence, compliance, and endurance. It does not have to mean that. There remains, even in uniform, the possibility of refusal. There remains the possibility of saying no. There remains the possibility of recognizing that what is being demanded is not courage but surrender of the soul.
That possibility matters because it is one of the only things standing between a nation and total moral collapse. If soldiers are taught that honor means obeying every lie, then we have not built a military, we have built a machine. If, on the other hand, they understand that honor includes restraint, conscience, and the refusal to carry out what they know to be wrong, then perhaps there is still some human ground left beneath all this ash.
My family spent years in the aftermath of Iraq wrestling with trauma, broken hearts, fear, and the grief of losing someone who was still alive. We know what war does after the speech ends. We know what it costs after the headlines move on. We know that some of the most honorable people who serve are the ones who come back determined not to glorify what they survived, but to tell the truth about it, to help others carry what they can, and to resist becoming mouthpieces for the same machinery that harmed them.
So when Pete Hegseth stands before the country and asks us, explicitly or implicitly, to see more war as the proper tribute to the dead, I reject him. I reject the theft of mourning in service of power. I reject the use of young servicemembers as props in a fantasy of dominance. I reject the idea that devastated families are naturally asking for more devastation. Most of all, I reject the cruel and ancient lie that the only way to honor sacrifice is to multiply it.
Honor does not live in the briefing room. Honor lives in the mother who refuses to let her child be turned into a slogan. Honor lives in the soldier who keeps his conscience. Honor lives in the person who has seen what war does and still chooses not to worship it. And if there is any hope left for us, it will not come from men like Pete Hegseth promising to finish the job. It will come from the people, including soldiers themselves, who finally decide that this job should never have been theirs to finish in the first place.
In other words, Pete, I’m not falling for your bull shit, and I hope others will join me.
Written by Shanley Hurt
Very moving writing.
They do not say that war keeps living in the body long after the uniforms are folded away, that it settles into the nervous system, that it follows families into kitchens and holidays and ordinary afternoons, that it steals tenderness and sleep and ease, that it can leave a person standing in front of the people who love him most while still being unbearably far away.
… and the mothers there who gather what remains of their children after our officials have finished explaining why the blast radius was regrettable but necessary.
My family spent years in the aftermath of Iraq wrestling with trauma, broken hearts, fear, and the grief of losing someone who was still alive.
You should also consider the epigenetic changes that occur due to exposure to war. Adults pass those changes to their kids. Kids in war zones become adults and pass those changes to their kids. Even non-combatants one or more generations removed are strongly affected.
Absolutely! Epigenetics is where it is at.
Children of Holocaust survivors had shortened telomeres.
The Stolen Generations have many health issues and emotional burdens to carry from that trauma of being stolen and then the abuses they were subjected to.
Children of the Vietnam Vets “Children of the Mist” have many different impacts. I have weird ears, shaped abnormally, one sister is missing part of her hip, one lives on the edge of suicide, one has reduced intellectual abilities, one sister keeps getting tumours, breast cancer, every one of my siblings has both physical and mental impairments from the war in Vietnam, which won’t really end until we all die. And I haven’t met my nieces or nephews, but they all suffer severe and overwhelming anxiety.
The impacts on Palestinian children will be horrendous. The dehumanisation of Palestinians, Arabs and Muslims in Australia is having a huge impact on the elderly women, who no longer shop because of being harassed, shouted at and been assaulted. But also, as friend my age, doesn’t go out when a huge amount of Islamophobia is in the news because of the attacks. Her work lets her work from home.
Islamophobia has surged since the Bondi attack. Australia’s Muslim community should not have to endure this abuse
The Islamophobia Register Australia and Action Against Islamophobia have both recorded a spike in such incidents. The Islamophobia Register Australia, for example, has recorded a 740% increase in reports since the Bondi terror attack.
Islamophobia has surged since the Bondi attack. Australia’s Muslim community should not have to endure this abuse by Aftab Malik
Likewise for Holocaust survivors, Jews, and Zionists who oppose the genocide of the Zionist Supremacists. Families have been torn asunder because the genocide in Palestine.
The Jewish Council of Australia has been addressing these issues so well. Even after the Bondi attack they came out against the surging Islamophobia.
Jewish Council of Australia
Jews have a long history of resisting Zionists. Hannah Arendt, Albert Einstein and many others wrote an open letter to the New York Times in 1948 comparing the newly formed Israeli government to Nazism in detail. They said that the Israeli government was like Nazis in methods, structures, organisation and social appeal. Well worth a read.
Albert Einstein Letter to The New York Times. December 4, 1948 New Palestine Party.
Date: 22/03/2026 16:34:04
From: ms spock
ID: 2372423
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
ms spock said:
roughbarked said:
Before this, the republicans are going to have to reformat.
If they end up with a Nazi in the White House, in 2028, it is not going to end well.
yeah we were going to say, we can talk about USSAians doing nothing about it, but why didn’t anyone stop the last big round 90 years ago
Fair but terrifying point.
The Minnesotans are hiding folks right now. Many folks are leaving the US. But poor folks are stuck in a terrible situation.
Date: 22/03/2026 21:44:11
From: kii
ID: 2372506
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Zero fucks French style.
From I Fucking Love Australia
Date: 22/03/2026 23:56:11
From: AussieDJ
ID: 2372516
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Zero fucks French style.
From I Fucking Love Australia
This is a better link –
A Cinematic Masterpiece. Zero Fucks French Style
From – https://ifloz.substack.com/p/a-cinematic-masterpiece-zero-fucks
Date: 23/03/2026 00:03:35
From: kii
ID: 2372518
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Has the US blockade on Cuba been mentioned here? I’ve seen it mentioned a few times on social media.

Date: 23/03/2026 00:06:13
From: kii
ID: 2372520
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
AussieDJ said:
kii said:
Zero fucks French style.
From I Fucking Love Australia
This is a better link –
A Cinematic Masterpiece. Zero Fucks French Style
From – https://ifloz.substack.com/p/a-cinematic-masterpiece-zero-fucks
Thanks, the other one seems to have gotten lost in the ethers.
Date: 23/03/2026 00:18:19
From: AussieDJ
ID: 2372521
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Has the US blockade on Cuba been mentioned here? I’ve seen it mentioned a few times on social media.
From – https://ifloz.substack.com/
CUBA JUST TOLD AMERICA TO SIT IN THE DARK AND I’VE NEVER LOVED ANYTHING MORE
Alright. Sit down. I need to tell you something that actually made me put my phone down and stare at the wall for a solid 30 seconds.

You know how Trump’s been blockading Cuba’s fuel supply since January, yeah? Ousted Maduro, cut off their Venezuelan oil, threatened anyone who trades with them. The whole island’s power grid collapsed this week. 11 million people. Total blackout. Hospitals dark. Kids sitting in houses they can’t cool eating food they can’t keep cold.
And Trump, this fucking guy, goes on camera and says he’ll have “the honour of taking Cuba.” Says “I think I can do anything I want with it.” Like it’s a penthouse with water views. Then says “they’re a very weakened nation now.”
Yeah mate. You weakened them. That’s like breaking someone’s legs then bragging about winning the race. Fucking sociopath behaviour.
But here’s where it gets so good I nearly cried into my beer.
The US Embassy in Havana. Right there on the island. Full of American diplomats living inside the consequences of their own government’s policy. Their generators are running out of diesel. Because no shit, they’re on a blockaded island.
So the embassy asks Cuba, very politely, if they can please import 2 containers of fuel. Just for them. Just so the Americans can keep their air con and their comms running while the country around them fucking melts.
And Cuba said no.
Not just no. The Cuban Foreign Ministry wrote back and called the request “shameless.” Said it was bold of America to demand access to a resource it is deliberately denying to the Cuban people.
Mate. That’s not diplomacy. That is a country with absolutely nothing left in the tank, literally nothing, looking the most powerful nation on earth dead in the eye and saying get fucked.
In formal diplomatic language. Which is somehow even more devastating. Imagine getting told to go fuck yourself in cursive.
And it gets better. The Spanish Embassy had spare diesel. Offered to share it with other European embassies running low. Cuba blocked that too. Because the rule is the rule. Nobody gets special treatment while 11 million Cubans are rationing candles. Not America. Not Spain. Nobody.
That’s not pettiness. That’s a country saying if our people sit in the dark, everyone sits in the dark.
So now the State Department is considering pulling staff out because they can’t keep the bloody generators going. They reckon they’ve got maybe a month of diesel left. And if they reduce embassy staff in Havana, Cuba gets to demand the same reduction at their embassy in Washington.
Let me just walk you through this one more time because it’s fucking magnificent.
You blockade an island’s fuel.
Your own embassy runs out of fuel because of your own blockade.
You ask the country you’re blockading to make an exception. For you.
They say absolutely not.
And now you might have to close your own embassy because of your own policy that you created on purpose.
This is like setting your neighbour’s house on fire then knocking on their door asking to borrow the garden hose because sparks blew back on your pergola. And the neighbour, standing in the ashes of what used to be their lounge room, just says no. And honestly? Fair enough.
Meanwhile humanitarian groups are flying in solar panels and medicine. The things a decent country would just provide to people it deliberately pushed into crisis. But America isn’t providing those things. America is the reason those things are needed.
Trump wanted Cuba on its knees. Instead Cuba looked him dead in the eye, told him to bring his own diesel, and went back to surviving the blockade with more dignity than America has shown in its entire fucking foreign policy playbook this year.
Sixty years of bullying. And they still won’t flinch.
Sit in the dark, Donald. Like everybody else.
~Gman
Date: 23/03/2026 00:22:13
From: kii
ID: 2372522
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Thanks. I knew I’d read about it somewhere. Too many distractions and too many rabbit holes. Now buffy has me watching The Danish Woman 😆 🤣
Date: 23/03/2026 00:50:12
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2372523
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Has the US blockade on Cuba been mentioned here? I’ve seen it mentioned a few times on social media.

Epstein Distraction (Southern)
Date: 23/03/2026 01:16:42
From: Kingy
ID: 2372524
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Someone just described Kash Patel as “Mortgage Eyes”
One fixed, one variable.

Date: 23/03/2026 01:39:51
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2372525
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Kingy said:
Someone just described Kash Patel as “Mortgage Eyes”
One fixed, one variable.

Most apt.
Date: 23/03/2026 05:56:47
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2372527
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Kingy said:
Someone just described Kash Patel as “Mortgage Eyes”
One fixed, one variable.

His brain revolves at neutron star speeds.
It should be possible to measure its density.
Work out how dense he is.
Date: 23/03/2026 08:12:42
From: Michael V
ID: 2372542
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
kii said:
Has the US blockade on Cuba been mentioned here? I’ve seen it mentioned a few times on social media.

Epstein Distraction (Southern)
Yeah, and maybe, just maybe, the Dunny has this feeling, this need, to add territory to the US, or make other nations submit to him, or something, as well.
Date: 23/03/2026 12:29:02
From: kii
ID: 2372603
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Apparently not satire…

Date: 23/03/2026 13:11:49
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2372611
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 23/03/2026 13:24:00
From: kii
ID: 2372614
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
kii said:
Apparently not satire…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mTLO2F_ERY
They are definitely woke as fuck.
(I love that ad, thanks for the reminder.)
Date: 23/03/2026 13:42:59
From: Cymek
ID: 2372617
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Apparently not satire…

It’s astonishing but not really how stupid people are.
Even if global warming was a complete lie plenty of others reasons exist for shifting away from fossil fuel.
Date: 23/03/2026 13:46:05
From: kii
ID: 2372618
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
kii said:
Apparently not satire…

It’s astonishing but not really how stupid people are.
Even if global warming was a complete lie plenty of others reasons exist for shifting away from fossil fuel.
I watched a few videos of this dumbfuck. He’s using key words and talking points from trump’s spiels.
Date: 23/03/2026 13:47:16
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2372620
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
kii said:
Apparently not satire…

It’s astonishing but not really how stupid people are.
Even if global warming was a complete lie plenty of others reasons exist for shifting away from fossil fuel.
“Democrats want good for everyone, Republicans think about themselves”
Surely the worldwide fuel situation is enough for people to wonder about a future without reliance on fossil fuels. But no, they gotta “own the libs” or something.
Date: 23/03/2026 13:52:55
From: Cymek
ID: 2372623
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Cymek said:
kii said:
Apparently not satire…

It’s astonishing but not really how stupid people are.
Even if global warming was a complete lie plenty of others reasons exist for shifting away from fossil fuel.
“Democrats want good for everyone, Republicans think about themselves”
Surely the worldwide fuel situation is enough for people to wonder about a future without reliance on fossil fuels. But no, they gotta “own the libs” or something.
You would think so wouldn’t you
What is someone decided to escalate it and target fuel sources worldwide
Date: 23/03/2026 14:15:24
From: roughbarked
ID: 2372627
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
Divine Angel said:
Cymek said:
It’s astonishing but not really how stupid people are.
Even if global warming was a complete lie plenty of others reasons exist for shifting away from fossil fuel.
“Democrats want good for everyone, Republicans think about themselves”
Surely the worldwide fuel situation is enough for people to wonder about a future without reliance on fossil fuels. But no, they gotta “own the libs” or something.
You would think so wouldn’t you
What is someone decided to escalate it and target fuel sources worldwide
You mean Trump?
Date: 23/03/2026 14:18:00
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2372629
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Cymek said:
kii said:
Apparently not satire…

It’s astonishing but not really how stupid people are.
Even if global warming was a complete lie plenty of others reasons exist for shifting away from fossil fuel.
I watched a few videos of this dumbfuck. He’s using key words and talking points from trump’s spiels.
can’t they just get ChatGPT to do that
Date: 23/03/2026 14:28:00
From: Cymek
ID: 2372632
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Cymek said:
Divine Angel said:
“Democrats want good for everyone, Republicans think about themselves”
Surely the worldwide fuel situation is enough for people to wonder about a future without reliance on fossil fuels. But no, they gotta “own the libs” or something.
You would think so wouldn’t you
What is someone decided to escalate it and target fuel sources worldwide
You mean Trump?
Him or anyone
Date: 23/03/2026 14:28:53
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2372634
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
roughbarked said:
Cymek said:
You would think so wouldn’t you
What is someone decided to escalate it and target fuel sources worldwide
You mean Trump?
Him or anyone
plenty of thorium to go around
Date: 23/03/2026 14:31:33
From: roughbarked
ID: 2372636
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
roughbarked said:
Cymek said:
You would think so wouldn’t you
What is someone decided to escalate it and target fuel sources worldwide
You mean Trump?
Him or anyone
Putin?
Date: 23/03/2026 16:34:08
From: roughbarked
ID: 2372668
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
roughbarked said:
Cymek said:
You would think so wouldn’t you
What is someone decided to escalate it and target fuel sources worldwide
You mean Trump?
Him or anyone

Date: 24/03/2026 04:30:00
From: Michael V
ID: 2372745
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Has the US blockade on Cuba been mentioned here? I’ve seen it mentioned a few times on social media.

I’d forgotten that that was going on. Awful. There is so much awful. It is distressing.
Date: 24/03/2026 05:44:15
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2372755
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
kii said:
Has the US blockade on Cuba been mentioned here? I’ve seen it mentioned a few times on social media.

I’d forgotten that that was going on. Awful. There is so much awful. It is distressing.
oh but they always tell us about big nasty countries bullying little islands off to their south east
Date: 24/03/2026 05:52:04
From: Michael V
ID: 2372757
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Michael V said:
kii said:
Has the US blockade on Cuba been mentioned here? I’ve seen it mentioned a few times on social media.

I’d forgotten that that was going on. Awful. There is so much awful. It is distressing.
oh but they always tell us about big nasty countries bullying little islands off to their south east
See? Another example of Awful. Too much Awful.
Date: 24/03/2026 11:05:48
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2372819
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 24/03/2026 11:08:25
From: dv
ID: 2372820
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Iran’s a terrible place, one of the worst in the world, and I’m loath to amplify the regime’s message … but this is objectively funny.
https://x.com/i/status/2036085188288000046
Reporter – What about the straits of Hormuz, who’s going to be in control…
Trump – That will be open very soon if this works.”
Reporter – How soon?
Trump – …
Reporter – And who’s in control of it? Will Iran still be able to control the flow of oil?
Trump – Be uh jointly controlled.
Reporter – By whom?
Trump – Maybe me. Maybe me. Me and the Ayatollah, whoever the Ayatollah is.
-
This was the response

Date: 24/03/2026 11:24:16
From: Cymek
ID: 2372829
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
It would be interesting to find out the truth about Middle Eastern nations coveting or not nuclear weapons.
Seem to be a lot of trouble for likely no return or complete annihilation.
I’d assume you would need a number and efficient ICBMS to avoid them being shot down.
They could be part of plan of just wanting to watch the world burn and start the apocalypse I suppose.
Date: 24/03/2026 11:57:12
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2372847
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
It would be interesting to find out the truth about Middle Eastern nations coveting or not nuclear weapons.
Seem to be a lot of trouble for likely no return or complete annihilation.
I’d assume you would need a number and efficient ICBMS to avoid them being shot down.
They could be part of plan of just wanting to watch the world burn and start the apocalypse I suppose.
Muhammad is not coming back. It’s the crazy US Christians who think an apocalypse is necessary for Christ’s return.
Date: 24/03/2026 12:04:59
From: Cymek
ID: 2372849
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Cymek said:
It would be interesting to find out the truth about Middle Eastern nations coveting or not nuclear weapons.
Seem to be a lot of trouble for likely no return or complete annihilation.
I’d assume you would need a number and efficient ICBMS to avoid them being shot down.
They could be part of plan of just wanting to watch the world burn and start the apocalypse I suppose.
Muhammad is not coming back. It’s the crazy US Christians who think an apocalypse is necessary for Christ’s return.
If he is real what a truly terrible way to return.
Destroy our beautiful planet and all the Christians don’t go to heaven because well they act terrible and disgrace humanity
Date: 24/03/2026 12:12:09
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2372853
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Don’t know who Trump is negotiating with since he’s killed all the Iranian leaders, maybe the equivalent of Baldrick.
Date: 24/03/2026 12:13:15
From: Bogsnorkler
ID: 2372854
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Don’t know who Trump is negotiating with since he’s killed all the Iranian leaders, maybe the equivalent of Baldrick.
sounds like a cunning plan to me.
Date: 24/03/2026 12:13:39
From: Michael V
ID: 2372855
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Don’t know who Trump is negotiating with since he’s killed all the Iranian leaders, maybe the equivalent of Baldrick.
At least Baldrick always has a cunning plan.
Date: 24/03/2026 12:14:10
From: Cymek
ID: 2372857
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Don’t know who Trump is negotiating with since he’s killed all the Iranian leaders, maybe the equivalent of Baldrick.
He has a cunning plan
Date: 24/03/2026 12:16:00
From: Bogsnorkler
ID: 2372859
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 24/03/2026 12:37:32
From: dv
ID: 2372867
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://youtu.be/6Q9BkdQSrOM?si=HLG12FqgpYRVYqh6
LegalEagles: The Banned DOGE tapes
—-
Somehow it’s dumber than I thought.
Date: 24/03/2026 12:38:07
From: dv
ID: 2372868
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Don’t know who Trump is negotiating with since he’s killed all the Iranian leaders, maybe the equivalent of Baldrick.
Lol
Date: 24/03/2026 12:54:49
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2372872
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Cymek said:
It would be interesting to find out the truth about Middle Eastern nations coveting or not nuclear weapons.
Seem to be a lot of trouble for likely no return or complete annihilation.
I’d assume you would need a number and efficient ICBMS to avoid them being shot down.
They could be part of plan of just wanting to watch the world burn and start the apocalypse I suppose.
Muhammad is not coming back. It’s the crazy US Christians who think an apocalypse is necessary for Christ’s return.
If he is real what a truly terrible way to return.
Destroy our beautiful planet and all the Christians don’t go to heaven because well they act terrible and disgrace humanity
you’re wrong, the right and good will elevate themselves to Mars in the heavens and the rest of the humans shall have hell on earth as they deserve
Date: 24/03/2026 14:53:51
From: Woodie
ID: 2372912
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
Don’t know who Trump is negotiating with since he’s killed all the Iranian leaders, maybe the equivalent of Baldrick.
You might be on to something there, Mr Man.
Ayatollah Mohammed al Baldrick.
I’ll check and see if he’s in the Iranian phone book.
Date: 24/03/2026 15:10:12
From: dv
ID: 2372921
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Treasury just declared the U.S. insolvent. The media missed it
The U.S. government is insolvent. That’s not hyperbole — it’s the conclusion drawn directly from the Treasury Department’s own consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 2025, released last week to near-total media silence.
https://fortune.com/2026/03/23/us-government-insolvent-fiscal-crisis-fix/
Date: 24/03/2026 15:12:39
From: kii
ID: 2372923
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
The Treasury just declared the U.S. insolvent. The media missed it
The U.S. government is insolvent. That’s not hyperbole — it’s the conclusion drawn directly from the Treasury Department’s own consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 2025, released last week to near-total media silence.
https://fortune.com/2026/03/23/us-government-insolvent-fiscal-crisis-fix/
Oh, fucksticks!
What will that mean for the US dollar?
Date: 24/03/2026 15:22:44
From: dv
ID: 2372928
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
dv said:
The Treasury just declared the U.S. insolvent. The media missed it
The U.S. government is insolvent. That’s not hyperbole — it’s the conclusion drawn directly from the Treasury Department’s own consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 2025, released last week to near-total media silence.
https://fortune.com/2026/03/23/us-government-insolvent-fiscal-crisis-fix/
Oh, fucksticks!
What will that mean for the US dollar?
They talk about taking over Greenland and Panama and Venezuela but honestly they should probably be thinking about selling their poorly performing states. Mississippi has to be worth something just for the barbecue.
Date: 24/03/2026 15:27:31
From: Cymek
ID: 2372930
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
kii said:
dv said:
The Treasury just declared the U.S. insolvent. The media missed it
The U.S. government is insolvent. That’s not hyperbole — it’s the conclusion drawn directly from the Treasury Department’s own consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 2025, released last week to near-total media silence.
https://fortune.com/2026/03/23/us-government-insolvent-fiscal-crisis-fix/
Oh, fucksticks!
What will that mean for the US dollar?
They talk about taking over Greenland and Panama and Venezuela but honestly they should probably be thinking about selling their poorly performing states. Mississippi has to be worth something just for the barbecue.
Could they wall of the Southern States and sell them to South America
Date: 24/03/2026 15:29:26
From: Bogsnorkler
ID: 2372932
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
dv said:
kii said:
Oh, fucksticks!
What will that mean for the US dollar?
They talk about taking over Greenland and Panama and Venezuela but honestly they should probably be thinking about selling their poorly performing states. Mississippi has to be worth something just for the barbecue.
Could they wall of the Southern States and sell them to South America
the mason dixon line wall?
Date: 24/03/2026 16:01:39
From: Michael V
ID: 2372971
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
The Treasury just declared the U.S. insolvent. The media missed it
The U.S. government is insolvent. That’s not hyperbole — it’s the conclusion drawn directly from the Treasury Department’s own consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 2025, released last week to near-total media silence.
https://fortune.com/2026/03/23/us-government-insolvent-fiscal-crisis-fix/

Date: 24/03/2026 16:06:05
From: Woodie
ID: 2372975
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 24/03/2026 16:06:40
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2372976
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
kii said:
dv said:
The Treasury just declared the U.S. insolvent. The media missed it
The U.S. government is insolvent. That’s not hyperbole — it’s the conclusion drawn directly from the Treasury Department’s own consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 2025, released last week to near-total media silence.
https://fortune.com/2026/03/23/us-government-insolvent-fiscal-crisis-fix/
Oh, fucksticks!
What will that mean for the US dollar?
They talk about taking over Greenland and Panama and Venezuela but honestly they should probably be thinking about selling their poorly performing states. Mississippi has to be worth something just for the barbecue.
In PPP terms the Mississippi median wage is higher than the UK’s.
Date: 24/03/2026 16:35:05
From: dv
ID: 2372982
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
dv said:
kii said:
Oh, fucksticks!
What will that mean for the US dollar?
They talk about taking over Greenland and Panama and Venezuela but honestly they should probably be thinking about selling their poorly performing states. Mississippi has to be worth something just for the barbecue.
In PPP terms the Mississippi median wage is higher than the UK’s.
There seems to be a real disconnect there, because we always see notes for jobs in the US paying lik $18 per hour for senior positions.
But moreover this seems to be straight untrue. When I last looked at this they were comparing household income with one person’s salary.
52,348.40
Median earnings in the UK are e £39,039 in 2025 ($52348 USD). Median earnings in the US last year were $51370. It’s not much less, but Mississippi is the poorest state in the union so we can expect median earnings to be much lower.
Date: 24/03/2026 16:50:03
From: Michael V
ID: 2372989
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
dv said:
They talk about taking over Greenland and Panama and Venezuela but honestly they should probably be thinking about selling their poorly performing states. Mississippi has to be worth something just for the barbecue.
In PPP terms the Mississippi median wage is higher than the UK’s.
There seems to be a real disconnect there, because we always see notes for jobs in the US paying lik $18 per hour for senior positions.
But moreover this seems to be straight untrue. When I last looked at this they were comparing household income with one person’s salary.
52,348.40
Median earnings in the UK are e £39,039 in 2025 ($52348 USD). Median earnings in the US last year were $51370. It’s not much less, but Mississippi is the poorest state in the union so we can expect median earnings to be much lower.
But if stuff is overall cheaper in Mississippi, then on PPP terms?
Date: 24/03/2026 17:02:27
From: dv
ID: 2372991
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
dv said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
In PPP terms the Mississippi median wage is higher than the UK’s.
There seems to be a real disconnect there, because we always see notes for jobs in the US paying lik $18 per hour for senior positions.
But moreover this seems to be straight untrue. When I last looked at this they were comparing household income with one person’s salary.
52,348.40
Median earnings in the UK are e £39,039 in 2025 ($52348 USD). Median earnings in the US last year were $51370. It’s not much less, but Mississippi is the poorest state in the union so we can expect median earnings to be much lower,
But if stuff is overall cheaper in Mississippi, then on PPP terms?
I don’t have the data specifically on Mississippi to hand … if anyone has it, please present it. But the US dollar is somewhat overvalued vs the GBP so when PPP is allowed for, it makes the US values lower. Going by the GDP estimates it appears the dollar is overvalued about 9% vs the pound, so that median US income can only buy about 10% less stuff than the median UK income.
We may reasonably assume that things are cheaper in Miss than US average, but whether that discount is more or less than the wages discount, IDK.
Date: 24/03/2026 17:20:39
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2372992
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
dv said:
They talk about taking over Greenland and Panama and Venezuela but honestly they should probably be thinking about selling their poorly performing states. Mississippi has to be worth something just for the barbecue.
In PPP terms the Mississippi median wage is higher than the UK’s.
There seems to be a real disconnect there, because we always see notes for jobs in the US paying lik $18 per hour for senior positions.
But moreover this seems to be straight untrue. When I last looked at this they were comparing household income with one person’s salary.
52,348.40
Median earnings in the UK are e £39,039 in 2025 ($52348 USD). Median earnings in the US last year were $51370. It’s not much less, but Mississippi is the poorest state in the union so we can expect median earnings to be much lower.
Are those numbers PPP?
Date: 24/03/2026 17:26:18
From: dv
ID: 2372993
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
dv said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
In PPP terms the Mississippi median wage is higher than the UK’s.
There seems to be a real disconnect there, because we always see notes for jobs in the US paying lik $18 per hour for senior positions.
But moreover this seems to be straight untrue. When I last looked at this they were comparing household income with one person’s salary.
52,348.40
Median earnings in the UK are e £39,039 in 2025 ($52348 USD). Median earnings in the US last year were $51370. It’s not much less, but Mississippi is the poorest state in the union so we can expect median earnings to be much lower.
Are those numbers PPP?
See subsequent comment on ppp. It’s worse for the US as PPP.
Date: 24/03/2026 17:51:37
From: Cymek
ID: 2372995
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
dv said:
There seems to be a real disconnect there, because we always see notes for jobs in the US paying lik $18 per hour for senior positions.
But moreover this seems to be straight untrue. When I last looked at this they were comparing household income with one person’s salary.
52,348.40
Median earnings in the UK are e £39,039 in 2025 ($52348 USD). Median earnings in the US last year were $51370. It’s not much less, but Mississippi is the poorest state in the union so we can expect median earnings to be much lower.
Are those numbers PPP?
See subsequent comment on ppp. It’s worse for the US as PPP.
I imagine value not included may also be working conditions, leave, etc
Date: 24/03/2026 17:55:15
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2372997
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
dv said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Are those numbers PPP?
See subsequent comment on ppp. It’s worse for the US as PPP.
I imagine value not included may also be working conditions, leave, etc
Yeah. Mississippi is definitely a shit hole. I presume those on minimum wage there work 2 jobs to get by with no entitlements like annual leave.
I will investigate when I have some free time later.
Date: 24/03/2026 23:22:30
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2373071
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Googling ‘us states by ppp median income’ yields the following site in 3rd place. It claims to be based on BEA (The U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis) and OECD statistics so unless the author is engaged in some elaborate con I think the concluding graph can be trusted.
Reddit · r/MURICA
150+ comments · 1 year ago
PPP Adjusted Median Disposable Income by State : r/MURICA
Searching the OECD and BEA websites is proving difficult so I can’t give the source of this graph. The comments on Reddit largely don’t question the graph’s accuracy but rather either emphasise structural differences given the European welfare state and universal healthcare except for one guy who doesn’t seem to understand how PPP is calculated. There are a lot of comments crying poor but I think we can disregard those..
Make off that what you will.
Date: 25/03/2026 11:35:02
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2373135
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Trump just voted by a method he calls ‘mail-in cheating’
The president’s decision to vote by mail comes as he pushes a sweeping bill to reform balloting nationwide, including restrictions on mail-in voting.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/03/23/trump-mail-in-voting-florida/
…
What a wacky guy…
Date: 25/03/2026 11:39:47
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2373136
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Trump just voted by a method he calls ‘mail-in cheating’
The president’s decision to vote by mail comes as he pushes a sweeping bill to reform balloting nationwide, including restrictions on mail-in voting.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/03/23/trump-mail-in-voting-florida/
…
What a wacky guy…
More like an oligarchs puppet pandering to their greed.
Date: 25/03/2026 11:43:45
From: buffy
ID: 2373137
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Trump just voted by a method he calls ‘mail-in cheating’
The president’s decision to vote by mail comes as he pushes a sweeping bill to reform balloting nationwide, including restrictions on mail-in voting.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/03/23/trump-mail-in-voting-florida/
…
What a wacky guy…
He may have needed help to use the machine or fill in the ballot papers. It would be embarrassing to have to ask for assistance from an electoral official at a polling booth. And he might have had to join a line, as all voters are equal…
Date: 25/03/2026 11:48:53
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2373139
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Trump just voted by a method he calls ‘mail-in cheating’
The president’s decision to vote by mail comes as he pushes a sweeping bill to reform balloting nationwide, including restrictions on mail-in voting.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/03/23/trump-mail-in-voting-florida/
…
What a wacky guy…
He may have needed help to use the machine or fill in the ballot papers. It would be embarrassing to have to ask for assistance from an electoral official at a polling booth. And he might have had to join a line, as all voters are equal…
You’re too kind…
Date: 25/03/2026 12:29:43
From: roughbarked
ID: 2373152
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Trump just voted by a method he calls ‘mail-in cheating’
The president’s decision to vote by mail comes as he pushes a sweeping bill to reform balloting nationwide, including restrictions on mail-in voting.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/03/23/trump-mail-in-voting-florida/
…
What a wacky guy…
He may have needed help to use the machine or fill in the ballot papers. It would be embarrassing to have to ask for assistance from an electoral official at a polling booth. And he might have had to join a line, as all voters are equal…
Not even tempted by the democracy sausage?
Date: 25/03/2026 12:47:49
From: diddly-squat
ID: 2373170
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
buffy said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Trump just voted by a method he calls ‘mail-in cheating’
The president’s decision to vote by mail comes as he pushes a sweeping bill to reform balloting nationwide, including restrictions on mail-in voting.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/03/23/trump-mail-in-voting-florida/
…
What a wacky guy…
He may have needed help to use the machine or fill in the ballot papers. It would be embarrassing to have to ask for assistance from an electoral official at a polling booth. And he might have had to join a line, as all voters are equal…
Not even tempted by the democracy sausage?
The Democratic candidate (Emily Gregory) has won the special election in Florida’s 87th (State) District – the district that contains Mar-a-Largo.
Overall, across all special elections held in 25/26 there has been a 12% swing to the Dems
Date: 25/03/2026 12:50:18
From: roughbarked
ID: 2373173
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
diddly-squat said:
roughbarked said:
buffy said:
He may have needed help to use the machine or fill in the ballot papers. It would be embarrassing to have to ask for assistance from an electoral official at a polling booth. And he might have had to join a line, as all voters are equal…
Not even tempted by the democracy sausage?
The Democratic candidate (Emily Gregory) has won the special election in Florida’s 87th (State) District – the district that contains Mar-a-Largo.
Overall, across all special elections held in 25/26 there has been a 12% swing to the Dems
Good.
Date: 25/03/2026 15:24:35
From: dv
ID: 2373238
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

DJT’s approval levels dip
Date: 25/03/2026 15:35:17
From: Cymek
ID: 2373239
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
DJT’s approval levels dip
I wonder how anyone could approve of him unless that are a racist, fascist or a generally nasty human being all who are simple minded.
Date: 25/03/2026 15:35:52
From: Michael V
ID: 2373240
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
DJT’s approval levels dip
Fuck Trump.
Date: 25/03/2026 15:54:50
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2373241
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
DJT’s approval levels dip

Date: 25/03/2026 19:24:19
From: dv
ID: 2373279
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 25/03/2026 19:25:55
From: Cymek
ID: 2373280
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

Perhaps the USA needs to copy the Russians and people who upset POTUS fall out windows.
Date: 25/03/2026 19:25:55
From: kii
ID: 2373281
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

🤣😂 lololol 😆 🤣 😂
Date: 25/03/2026 20:36:13
From: roughbarked
ID: 2373317
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
It was pleasing to read this. 
Date: 25/03/2026 20:41:56
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2373320
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
It was pleasing to read this. 
As long as they don’t exhaust their retaliatory rage before November.
Date: 25/03/2026 20:44:22
From: roughbarked
ID: 2373323
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
roughbarked said:
It was pleasing to read this. 
As long as they don’t exhaust their retaliatory rage before November.
The way he’s stoking the fires of their rage, there should be plenty rage by then.
Date: 25/03/2026 20:48:06
From: party_pants
ID: 2373328
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
roughbarked said:
It was pleasing to read this. 
As long as they don’t exhaust their retaliatory rage before November.
As long as the mid-terms actually happen in a proper and fair way. I’m starting to doubt they will proceed in a “normal” fashion without massive effort to disrupt them.
Date: 25/03/2026 20:50:39
From: roughbarked
ID: 2373331
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
captain_spalding said:
roughbarked said:
It was pleasing to read this. 
As long as they don’t exhaust their retaliatory rage before November.
As long as the mid-terms actually happen in a proper and fair way. I’m starting to doubt they will proceed in a “normal” fashion without massive effort to disrupt them.
Everything proper and fair is out the window while Trump is there.
Date: 25/03/2026 21:01:43
From: buffy
ID: 2373335
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
captain_spalding said:
roughbarked said:
It was pleasing to read this. 
As long as they don’t exhaust their retaliatory rage before November.
As long as the mid-terms actually happen in a proper and fair way. I’m starting to doubt they will proceed in a “normal” fashion without massive effort to disrupt them.
Can you mess with elections if you are at war?
Date: 25/03/2026 21:03:55
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2373336
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
party_pants said:
captain_spalding said:
As long as they don’t exhaust their retaliatory rage before November.
As long as the mid-terms actually happen in a proper and fair way. I’m starting to doubt they will proceed in a “normal” fashion without massive effort to disrupt them.
Can you mess with elections if you are at war?
Trump has broken so many ‘rules’, conventions, and even laws up to the present time that no-one expects him to abide by any constraints at all.
Date: 25/03/2026 21:04:08
From: roughbarked
ID: 2373337
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
party_pants said:
captain_spalding said:
As long as they don’t exhaust their retaliatory rage before November.
As long as the mid-terms actually happen in a proper and fair way. I’m starting to doubt they will proceed in a “normal” fashion without massive effort to disrupt them.
Can you mess with elections if you are at war?
That could prove problematic.
Date: 25/03/2026 21:11:55
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2373344
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 25/03/2026 21:13:16
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2373347
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
buffy said:
party_pants said:
As long as the mid-terms actually happen in a proper and fair way. I’m starting to doubt they will proceed in a “normal” fashion without massive effort to disrupt them.
Can you mess with elections if you are at war?
That could prove problematic.
U.S. elections cannot be suspended or delayed by the President during a war. The U.S. Constitution and federal law mandate the timing of elections. Even during the Civil War and both World Wars, elections continued. Only Congress has the power to change federal election dates.
No Presidential Authority: The President has no constitutional authority to suspend elections or alter federal election statutes.
Constitutional Mandate: The Constitution sets fixed terms for senators, representatives, and the president, requiring regular elections.
Historical Precedent: The United States has never postponed a presidential election in its history, even during major wars.
While some countries have legal frameworks for postponing elections during emergencies, the U.S. legal system provides no mechanism for the executive branch to unilaterally delay federal elections, even during wartime.
Date: 25/03/2026 21:14:12
From: roughbarked
ID: 2373348
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Anyway, what’s this shyte about someone giviing DJT a bg beautiful present worth a lot of a lot of money. He’s not going to tell us anything about it but it seems to be happy in his bank account.
Date: 25/03/2026 21:15:45
From: Michael V
ID: 2373350
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:

Ha!
Date: 25/03/2026 21:16:58
From: Michael V
ID: 2373351
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
roughbarked said:
buffy said:
Can you mess with elections if you are at war?
That could prove problematic.
U.S. elections cannot be suspended or delayed by the President during a war. The U.S. Constitution and federal law mandate the timing of elections. Even during the Civil War and both World Wars, elections continued. Only Congress has the power to change federal election dates.
No Presidential Authority: The President has no constitutional authority to suspend elections or alter federal election statutes.
Constitutional Mandate: The Constitution sets fixed terms for senators, representatives, and the president, requiring regular elections.
Historical Precedent: The United States has never postponed a presidential election in its history, even during major wars.
While some countries have legal frameworks for postponing elections during emergencies, the U.S. legal system provides no mechanism for the executive branch to unilaterally delay federal elections, even during wartime.
Good.
Date: 25/03/2026 21:17:01
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2373352
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
roughbarked said:
buffy said:
Can you mess with elections if you are at war?
That could prove problematic.
U.S. elections cannot be suspended or delayed by the President during a war. The U.S. Constitution and federal law mandate the timing of elections. Even during the Civil War and both World Wars, elections continued. Only Congress has the power to change federal election dates.
No Presidential Authority: The President has no constitutional authority to suspend elections or alter federal election statutes.
Constitutional Mandate: The Constitution sets fixed terms for senators, representatives, and the president, requiring regular elections.
Historical Precedent: The United States has never postponed a presidential election in its history, even during major wars.
While some countries have legal frameworks for postponing elections during emergencies, the U.S. legal system provides no mechanism for the executive branch to unilaterally delay federal elections, even during wartime.
Sif DJT gives a shit about the constitution. Look at all the other shit he’s done without congressional approval.
Date: 25/03/2026 21:18:20
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2373354
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Anyway, what’s this shyte about someone giviing DJT a bg beautiful present worth a lot of a lot of money. He’s not going to tell us anything about it but it seems to be happy in his bank account.
24ct gold toilet.
Date: 25/03/2026 21:21:04
From: party_pants
ID: 2373357
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
roughbarked said:
buffy said:
Can you mess with elections if you are at war?
That could prove problematic.
U.S. elections cannot be suspended or delayed by the President during a war. The U.S. Constitution and federal law mandate the timing of elections. Even during the Civil War and both World Wars, elections continued. Only Congress has the power to change federal election dates.
No Presidential Authority: The President has no constitutional authority to suspend elections or alter federal election statutes.
Constitutional Mandate: The Constitution sets fixed terms for senators, representatives, and the president, requiring regular elections.
Historical Precedent: The United States has never postponed a presidential election in its history, even during major wars.
While some countries have legal frameworks for postponing elections during emergencies, the U.S. legal system provides no mechanism for the executive branch to unilaterally delay federal elections, even during wartime.
There was talk of voter ID legislation using birth certificates as the required proof. Problem is that most women in the US opt to change their surname when they get married. Potentially meaning that millions of married women will miss out on getting vote.
Then there is deliberate underfunding and understaffing of polling booths in areas that don’t vote the way Trump likes.
Then there’s all the talk of banning postal voting.
All up, these things can be a significant impediment to free and fair voting without actually outright cancelling the election.
Date: 25/03/2026 22:02:00
From: KJW
ID: 2373371
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:

Heather Cox Richardson said:
Trump’s niece, psychologist Mary Trump, posted: “The Democrats just flipped a state house seat in the district where Donald committed voter fraud by casting his ballot illegally by mail.”
Date: 25/03/2026 22:21:14
From: diddly-squat
ID: 2373375
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
captain_spalding said:
roughbarked said:
That could prove problematic.
U.S. elections cannot be suspended or delayed by the President during a war. The U.S. Constitution and federal law mandate the timing of elections. Even during the Civil War and both World Wars, elections continued. Only Congress has the power to change federal election dates.
No Presidential Authority: The President has no constitutional authority to suspend elections or alter federal election statutes.
Constitutional Mandate: The Constitution sets fixed terms for senators, representatives, and the president, requiring regular elections.
Historical Precedent: The United States has never postponed a presidential election in its history, even during major wars.
While some countries have legal frameworks for postponing elections during emergencies, the U.S. legal system provides no mechanism for the executive branch to unilaterally delay federal elections, even during wartime.
Sif DJT gives a shit about the constitution. Look at all the other shit he’s done without congressional approval.
The thing is, in the US, elections (even federal elections) are run by the states, and there is no mechanism (outside of straight-up-and-down political influence) by which DJT can effect changes to state election laws. I think it’s likely the red states will try to disenfranchise voters (noting they have already done this to some extent by gerrymandering the fuck out of some house districts), but I do not think this impact will be significantly different to elections in 2024 or 2022 or 2020, etc…
What we do know is that historically, the party that has overperformed in the special elections leading up to the midterms has taken the House.
On aggregate, there has been a 12% swing to the Dems in the 2025 and 2026 special elections.
Finally, the POTUS has significant powers under the Constitution to do things without Congressional approval – this is nothing new and something that most Presidents do all the time.
Date: 25/03/2026 22:25:58
From: diddly-squat
ID: 2373376
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
captain_spalding said:
roughbarked said:
That could prove problematic.
U.S. elections cannot be suspended or delayed by the President during a war. The U.S. Constitution and federal law mandate the timing of elections. Even during the Civil War and both World Wars, elections continued. Only Congress has the power to change federal election dates.
No Presidential Authority: The President has no constitutional authority to suspend elections or alter federal election statutes.
Constitutional Mandate: The Constitution sets fixed terms for senators, representatives, and the president, requiring regular elections.
Historical Precedent: The United States has never postponed a presidential election in its history, even during major wars.
While some countries have legal frameworks for postponing elections during emergencies, the U.S. legal system provides no mechanism for the executive branch to unilaterally delay federal elections, even during wartime.
There was talk of voter ID legislation using birth certificates as the required proof. Problem is that most women in the US opt to change their surname when they get married. Potentially meaning that millions of married women will miss out on getting vote.
Then there is deliberate underfunding and understaffing of polling booths in areas that don’t vote the way Trump likes.
Then there’s all the talk of banning postal voting.
All up, these things can be a significant impediment to free and fair voting without actually outright cancelling the election.
The SAVE Act won’t pass – most GOP representatives are clued in enough to understand that imposing those sorts of impediments to voter registration will hurt them more than it will hurt the Dems. More than 50% of US citizens do not have a passport, and the proportion of people without passports is higher in rural and regional areas (ie, red states).
Date: 25/03/2026 22:33:30
From: Kingy
ID: 2373377
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
diddly-squat said:
Divine Angel said:
captain_spalding said:
U.S. elections cannot be suspended or delayed by the President during a war. The U.S. Constitution and federal law mandate the timing of elections. Even during the Civil War and both World Wars, elections continued. Only Congress has the power to change federal election dates.
No Presidential Authority: The President has no constitutional authority to suspend elections or alter federal election statutes.
Constitutional Mandate: The Constitution sets fixed terms for senators, representatives, and the president, requiring regular elections.
Historical Precedent: The United States has never postponed a presidential election in its history, even during major wars.
While some countries have legal frameworks for postponing elections during emergencies, the U.S. legal system provides no mechanism for the executive branch to unilaterally delay federal elections, even during wartime.
Sif DJT gives a shit about the constitution. Look at all the other shit he’s done without congressional approval.
The thing is, in the US, elections (even federal elections) are run by the states, and there is no mechanism (outside of straight-up-and-down political influence) by which DJT can effect changes to state election laws. I think it’s likely the red states will try to disenfranchise voters (noting they have already done this to some extent by gerrymandering the fuck out of some house districts), but I do not think this impact will be significantly different to elections in 2024 or 2022 or 2020, etc…
What we do know is that historically, the party that has overperformed in the special elections leading up to the midterms has taken the House.
On aggregate, there has been a 12% swing to the Dems in the 2025 and 2026 special elections.
Finally, the POTUS has significant powers under the Constitution to do things without Congressional approval – this is nothing new and something that most Presidents do all the time.
Can POTArse just declare an emergency based on the 1796 law that he just made up and have the elections cancelled because of the emergency that he just made up?
At what point does this criminal get actually arrested and charged?
Date: 25/03/2026 22:46:07
From: diddly-squat
ID: 2373378
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Kingy said:
Can POTArse just declare an emergency based on the 1796 law that he just made up and have the elections cancelled because of the emergency that he just made up?
nope
Date: 25/03/2026 22:55:30
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2373379
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
diddly-squat said:
Finally, the POTUS has significant powers under the Constitution to do things without Congressional approval – this is nothing new and something that most Presidents do all the time.
It’s rather odd that the Americans had a revolution to rid themselves of a king who they imagined wielded great power over them, only to replace that king with a president who has unilateral powers that English kings could only dream of.
Date: 25/03/2026 23:01:11
From: Kingy
ID: 2373380
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
diddly-squat said:
Kingy said:
Can POTArse just declare an emergency based on the 1796 law that he just made up and have the elections cancelled because of the emergency that he just made up?
nope
It appears that they only have about 6 months to work that out.
Hint: The ones with the most guns win.
Date: 25/03/2026 23:10:27
From: diddly-squat
ID: 2373381
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
diddly-squat said:
Finally, the POTUS has significant powers under the Constitution to do things without Congressional approval – this is nothing new and something that most Presidents do all the time.
It’s rather odd that the Americans had a revolution to rid themselves of a king who they imagined wielded great power over them, only to replace that king with a president who has unilateral powers that English kings could only dream of.
yeah.. but in fairness, the Founders did put provisions in the Constitution to deal with tyrannical Presidents.. shame they didn’t fully grasp the influence of political partisanship…
Date: 25/03/2026 23:13:21
From: party_pants
ID: 2373382
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
diddly-squat said:
captain_spalding said:
diddly-squat said:
Finally, the POTUS has significant powers under the Constitution to do things without Congressional approval – this is nothing new and something that most Presidents do all the time.
It’s rather odd that the Americans had a revolution to rid themselves of a king who they imagined wielded great power over them, only to replace that king with a president who has unilateral powers that English kings could only dream of.
yeah.. but in fairness, the Founders did put provisions in the Constitution to deal with tyrannical Presidents.. shame they didn’t fully grasp the influence of political partisanship…
It was a bold attempt.
Just based on the assumption that they would all be honest actors.
Date: 25/03/2026 23:17:03
From: Neophyte
ID: 2373383
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 25/03/2026 23:18:19
From: diddly-squat
ID: 2373384
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
diddly-squat said:
captain_spalding said:
It’s rather odd that the Americans had a revolution to rid themselves of a king who they imagined wielded great power over them, only to replace that king with a president who has unilateral powers that English kings could only dream of.
yeah.. but in fairness, the Founders did put provisions in the Constitution to deal with tyrannical Presidents.. shame they didn’t fully grasp the influence of political partisanship…
It was a bold attempt.
Just based on the assumption that they would all be honest actors.
They were so cute
Date: 26/03/2026 00:42:45
From: dv
ID: 2373387
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

One year ago
Date: 26/03/2026 02:13:58
From: dv
ID: 2373391
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 26/03/2026 05:50:12
From: roughbarked
ID: 2373393
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Kingy said:
diddly-squat said:
Divine Angel said:
Sif DJT gives a shit about the constitution. Look at all the other shit he’s done without congressional approval.
The thing is, in the US, elections (even federal elections) are run by the states, and there is no mechanism (outside of straight-up-and-down political influence) by which DJT can effect changes to state election laws. I think it’s likely the red states will try to disenfranchise voters (noting they have already done this to some extent by gerrymandering the fuck out of some house districts), but I do not think this impact will be significantly different to elections in 2024 or 2022 or 2020, etc…
What we do know is that historically, the party that has overperformed in the special elections leading up to the midterms has taken the House.
On aggregate, there has been a 12% swing to the Dems in the 2025 and 2026 special elections.
Finally, the POTUS has significant powers under the Constitution to do things without Congressional approval – this is nothing new and something that most Presidents do all the time.
Can POTArse just declare an emergency based on the 1796 law that he just made up and have the elections cancelled because of the emergency that he just made up?
At what point does this criminal get actually arrested and charged?
Probably only when the people rise up and demand it.
Date: 26/03/2026 05:52:50
From: roughbarked
ID: 2373394
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
diddly-squat said:
captain_spalding said:
It’s rather odd that the Americans had a revolution to rid themselves of a king who they imagined wielded great power over them, only to replace that king with a president who has unilateral powers that English kings could only dream of.
yeah.. but in fairness, the Founders did put provisions in the Constitution to deal with tyrannical Presidents.. shame they didn’t fully grasp the influence of political partisanship…
It was a bold attempt.
Just based on the assumption that they would all be honest actors.
Back then there were still more devious ways to learn yet.
Date: 26/03/2026 05:55:16
From: roughbarked
ID: 2373395
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
diddly-squat said:
party_pants said:
diddly-squat said:
yeah.. but in fairness, the Founders did put provisions in the Constitution to deal with tyrannical Presidents.. shame they didn’t fully grasp the influence of political partisanship…
It was a bold attempt.
Just based on the assumption that they would all be honest actors.
They were so cute
Thet were all the religious nutters that escaped British tyranny to the sunllit uplands.
Date: 26/03/2026 05:57:08
From: roughbarked
ID: 2373396
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

He’s such a clever chap.
Date: 26/03/2026 06:18:56
From: roughbarked
ID: 2373397
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
dv said:

He’s such a clever chap.
He clearly doesn’t follow the brain diet.
Date: 26/03/2026 06:31:58
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2373399
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
roughbarked said:
dv said:

He’s such a clever chap.
He clearly doesn’t follow the brain diet.
probably they did and ended up with vCJD or similar
Date: 26/03/2026 07:26:22
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2373411
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

Gee, I hope they don’t put that guy in some important, influential medical position.
Date: 26/03/2026 12:02:15
From: fsm
ID: 2373518
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 26/03/2026 13:08:20
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2373569
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.facebook.com/reel/918731937665315
Link
Mike Johnson: Tonight we have created a new award. We are going to do something we’ve never done before. We will honor him with a new award. He is the first ever recipient of the America first award. That is this beautiful golden statue here, appropriate for the golden era.
Date: 26/03/2026 13:09:39
From: buffy
ID: 2373570
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 26/03/2026 13:11:27
From: Cymek
ID: 2373571
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
https://www.facebook.com/reel/918731937665315
Link
Mike Johnson: Tonight we have created a new award. We are going to do something we’ve never done before. We will honor him with a new award. He is the first ever recipient of the America first award. That is this beautiful golden statue here, appropriate for the golden era.
One in a million chance doc
Date: 26/03/2026 13:14:10
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2373572
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
JudgeMental said:
https://www.facebook.com/reel/918731937665315
Link
Mike Johnson: Tonight we have created a new award. We are going to do something we’ve never done before. We will honor him with a new award. He is the first ever recipient of the America first award. That is this beautiful golden statue here, appropriate for the golden era.
One in a million chance doc
wait so the J stands for josephvissarionovichdzhugashvili we knew it
Date: 26/03/2026 13:15:35
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2373573
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
Cymek said:
JudgeMental said:
https://www.facebook.com/reel/918731937665315
Link
Mike Johnson: Tonight we have created a new award. We are going to do something we’ve never done before. We will honor him with a new award. He is the first ever recipient of the America first award. That is this beautiful golden statue here, appropriate for the golden era.
One in a million chance doc
wait so the J stands for josephvissarionovichdzhugashvili we knew it
no jeanious!
Date: 26/03/2026 13:18:50
From: roughbarked
ID: 2373574
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
https://www.facebook.com/reel/918731937665315
Link
Mike Johnson: Tonight we have created a new award. We are going to do something we’ve never done before. We will honor him with a new award. He is the first ever recipient of the America first award. That is this beautiful golden statue here, appropriate for the golden era.
aww.. fuck.
Date: 26/03/2026 13:20:11
From: roughbarked
ID: 2373575
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
SCIENCE said:
Cymek said:
One in a million chance doc
wait so the J stands for josephvissarionovichdzhugashvili we knew it
no jeanious!
LOve the word.
Date: 26/03/2026 13:22:18
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2373577
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
https://www.facebook.com/reel/918731937665315
Link
Mike Johnson: Tonight we have created a new award. We are going to do something we’ve never done before. We will honor him with a new award. He is the first ever recipient of the America first award. That is this beautiful golden statue here, appropriate for the golden era.
First, last, and only recipient. Once he’s out of the Presidency, it’s the Dustbin of History for that knick-knack.
Sigmund Freud would have had a great time picking apart Donny’s obsession with ‘gold’ stuff.
Date: 26/03/2026 13:24:27
From: Michael V
ID: 2373578
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
https://www.facebook.com/reel/918731937665315
Link
Mike Johnson: Tonight we have created a new award. We are going to do something we’ve never done before. We will honor him with a new award. He is the first ever recipient of the America first award. That is this beautiful golden statue here, appropriate for the golden era.
Fantastic.
Date: 26/03/2026 13:25:17
From: Michael V
ID: 2373579
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:

Nods.
Date: 26/03/2026 13:31:56
From: roughbarked
ID: 2373582
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
JudgeMental said:
https://www.facebook.com/reel/918731937665315
Link
Mike Johnson: Tonight we have created a new award. We are going to do something we’ve never done before. We will honor him with a new award. He is the first ever recipient of the America first award. That is this beautiful golden statue here, appropriate for the golden era.
First, last, and only recipient. Once he’s out of the Presidency, it’s the Dustbin of History for that knick-knack.
Sigmund Freud would have had a great time picking apart Donny’s obsession with ‘gold’ stuff.
Can imagine many conversations with Carl Jung about it.
Date: 26/03/2026 13:34:57
From: buffy
ID: 2373583
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

(I may have got distracted by a website…)
Date: 26/03/2026 13:36:11
From: Michael V
ID: 2373584
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
(I may have got distracted by a website…)
LOL
Date: 26/03/2026 13:42:29
From: buffy
ID: 2373586
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I definitely got distracted. I blame my sister. Her Facebook pointed me there.
So here is another one.

Date: 26/03/2026 14:13:28
From: buffy
ID: 2373591
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I’m still down that rabbit hole. I rather hope this one is true.

Date: 26/03/2026 14:14:22
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2373592
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The bit I wanted to share is at 3.23.
The other three interviewees in the clip are supportive of the war even if it means higher fuel costs.
https://youtu.be/VgRRlUNmrWQ?si=R-LK-BuxP7v3Y4oU
Date: 26/03/2026 14:42:44
From: dv
ID: 2373605
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Vexed by the Justice Department’s chaotic oversight of federal prosecutions in New Jersey, a judge on Monday threw a government attorney out of a hearing and ordered the three officials in charge of the state’s U.S. Attorney’s office to answer his questions under oath.
U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi lit into prosecutors after another judge ruled last week that the Trump administration’s decision to replace interim U.S. Attorney Alina Habba with a trio of officials was another violation of the Constitution’s Appointments Clause, which requires Senate confirmation.
The officials, Philip Lamparello, Jordan Fox and Ari Fontecchio, have remained in charge pending an appeal.
Quraishi quizzed Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel Rosenblum about his office’s current management structure and whether Habba, a Justice Department senior adviser, has any role in running the office, which she has denied.
When Rosenblum’s supervising attorney interjected, Quraishi accused him of trying to “blindside” the court and ordered him to leave or risk being removed by court security officers.
The judge vented his frustrations as he was preparing to sentence a man for possessing child sexual abuse material — a case that he said had been compromised by a “sloppy investigation” and the U.S. attorney’s office’s haste to reach a plea agreement. The sentencing was rescheduled.
“You have lost the confidence and the trust of this Court,” Quraishi told Rosenblum during a tense 22-minute hearing. “You have lost the confidence and the trust of the New Jersey legal community, and you are losing the trust and confidence of the public.”
https://whyy.org/articles/nj-us-attorney-district-judge-testimony/
Date: 26/03/2026 14:45:08
From: Cymek
ID: 2373607
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Vexed by the Justice Department’s chaotic oversight of federal prosecutions in New Jersey, a judge on Monday threw a government attorney out of a hearing and ordered the three officials in charge of the state’s U.S. Attorney’s office to answer his questions under oath.
U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi lit into prosecutors after another judge ruled last week that the Trump administration’s decision to replace interim U.S. Attorney Alina Habba with a trio of officials was another violation of the Constitution’s Appointments Clause, which requires Senate confirmation.
The officials, Philip Lamparello, Jordan Fox and Ari Fontecchio, have remained in charge pending an appeal.
Quraishi quizzed Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel Rosenblum about his office’s current management structure and whether Habba, a Justice Department senior adviser, has any role in running the office, which she has denied.
When Rosenblum’s supervising attorney interjected, Quraishi accused him of trying to “blindside” the court and ordered him to leave or risk being removed by court security officers.
The judge vented his frustrations as he was preparing to sentence a man for possessing child sexual abuse material — a case that he said had been compromised by a “sloppy investigation” and the U.S. attorney’s office’s haste to reach a plea agreement. The sentencing was rescheduled.
“You have lost the confidence and the trust of this Court,” Quraishi told Rosenblum during a tense 22-minute hearing. “You have lost the confidence and the trust of the New Jersey legal community, and you are losing the trust and confidence of the public.”
https://whyy.org/articles/nj-us-attorney-district-judge-testimony/
Should be no reason to rush court cases unless something untoward is going on.
Date: 26/03/2026 16:15:11
From: Michael V
ID: 2373659
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 27/03/2026 09:17:05
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2373846
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Occupy Democrats
BREAKING: Dementia Don goes on a completely incomprehensible rant about SHARPIES – yes, the pens– in the middle of his cabinet meeting while everyone else sits and listens uncomfortably!
The president has lost whatever little was left of his mind. During a cabinet meeting today, in the middle of war, with a gas price crisis, a TSA funding crisis, a housing crisis, and a healthcare crisis to deal with, the president began ranting and raving about…pens.
“See this pen right here? This pen is an interesting example. It’s the same thing.”
“So this pen is very inexpensive, but it writes well. I like it. But I can’t have the pen the way it was.”
“You know what it is. I don’t want to give too much publicity, but they do treat me well. Sharpie.”
“So I came here, they have thousand-dollar pens. And you know, you hand pens out, you’re signing and you hand them out, you’re handing them to all these people. Sometimes you have 30, 40 people.”
“And they were a thousand dollars a piece. Beautiful pen. Ballpoint. Thousand. It was gold, silver, gorgeous. But I’m handing out to kids that don’t even know what they are.”
“What is this, mommy? It’s kids. They’re getting a pen for a thousand dollars. They have no idea what it is.”
“And I feel guilty because I’m like, you know, I’m by nature. I don’t, you know, it’s the government. I love the government.”
“Like I love myself economically. I want to save money. So I’m saying this is crazy.”
“And it had another problem. They didn’t write well. So I take it out and I saw it and there’s no ink.”
“And I got all you people looking. And you say there must be something wrong with Trump. And there’s no ink in the pen, and it costs a thousand dollars.”
“This one I call the guy. I said, I’d like to use your pen, but I can’t have a great thing with a big S on it. Same Sharpie as I’m signing a trillion-dollar airplane contract to buy brand new fighter jets, brand new B2 bombers, of which we just ordered plenty.”
“I can’t do that with the press. Use your pen. But I like the pen the best, but I’ll sign it.”
“I could do like Biden did, you know, give it to somebody else to sign or an auto pen, or maybe sign it separately in another room. But I can’t use your pen. You said, well, I can make it nicer.
So what can you do? He said, I’ll paint it black. I said, that’s nice. And I can even paint the White House on it, sir, if you like, in gold, almost real gold, not bad.”
“And I can even do your signature, sir. And by the way, this was not staged. I just saw the pen sit there.”
“I thought that this is an example of how twenty five million dollars spent by me at the Federal Reserve Building would be a better job than four billion dollars that they’re spending. And you know, one of the things.”
What in the HELL is he talking about?
This is just complete and utter gibberish from the president of the United States, a man who is currently being presented with options for a military invasion of Iran.
He needs to be removed from office IMMEDIATELY, whether it’s impeachment, the 25th Amendment, institutionalization in an old folks home, WHATEVER.
He cannot be allowed to send our troops into harm’s way when he clearly is incapable of comprehending the reality around him.
Date: 27/03/2026 09:22:26
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2373847
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 27/03/2026 09:26:24
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2373848
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:

Don’t worry, Dominos will make him a supreme pizza.
Date: 27/03/2026 09:46:51
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2373853
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
Occupy Democrats
BREAKING: Dementia Don goes on a completely incomprehensible rant about SHARPIES – yes, the pens– in the middle of his cabinet meeting while everyone else sits and listens uncomfortably!
The president has lost whatever little was left of his mind. During a cabinet meeting today, in the middle of war, with a gas price crisis, a TSA funding crisis, a housing crisis, and a healthcare crisis to deal with, the president began ranting and raving about…pens.
“See this pen right here? This pen is an interesting example. It’s the same thing.”
“So this pen is very inexpensive, but it writes well. I like it. But I can’t have the pen the way it was.”
“You know what it is. I don’t want to give too much publicity, but they do treat me well. Sharpie.”
“So I came here, they have thousand-dollar pens. And you know, you hand pens out, you’re signing and you hand them out, you’re handing them to all these people. Sometimes you have 30, 40 people.”
“And they were a thousand dollars a piece. Beautiful pen. Ballpoint. Thousand. It was gold, silver, gorgeous. But I’m handing out to kids that don’t even know what they are.”
“What is this, mommy? It’s kids. They’re getting a pen for a thousand dollars. They have no idea what it is.”
“And I feel guilty because I’m like, you know, I’m by nature. I don’t, you know, it’s the government. I love the government.”
“Like I love myself economically. I want to save money. So I’m saying this is crazy.”
“And it had another problem. They didn’t write well. So I take it out and I saw it and there’s no ink.”
“And I got all you people looking. And you say there must be something wrong with Trump. And there’s no ink in the pen, and it costs a thousand dollars.”
“This one I call the guy. I said, I’d like to use your pen, but I can’t have a great thing with a big S on it. Same Sharpie as I’m signing a trillion-dollar airplane contract to buy brand new fighter jets, brand new B2 bombers, of which we just ordered plenty.”
“I can’t do that with the press. Use your pen. But I like the pen the best, but I’ll sign it.”
“I could do like Biden did, you know, give it to somebody else to sign or an auto pen, or maybe sign it separately in another room. But I can’t use your pen. You said, well, I can make it nicer.
So what can you do? He said, I’ll paint it black. I said, that’s nice. And I can even paint the White House on it, sir, if you like, in gold, almost real gold, not bad.”
“And I can even do your signature, sir. And by the way, this was not staged. I just saw the pen sit there.”
“I thought that this is an example of how twenty five million dollars spent by me at the Federal Reserve Building would be a better job than four billion dollars that they’re spending. And you know, one of the things.”
What in the HELL is he talking about?
This is just complete and utter gibberish from the president of the United States, a man who is currently being presented with options for a military invasion of Iran.
He needs to be removed from office IMMEDIATELY, whether it’s impeachment, the 25th Amendment, institutionalization in an old folks home, WHATEVER.
He cannot be allowed to send our troops into harm’s way when he clearly is incapable of comprehending the reality around him.
The Hand That Signed the Paper with the pen, the thousand-dollar pen is out of ink or out of oink as some would say but that’s another story and we’ll get back to that but I have to go because here comes me buss.
Date: 27/03/2026 09:52:27
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2373855
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
JudgeMental said:
He needs to be removed from office IMMEDIATELY, whether it’s impeachment, the 25th Amendment, institutionalization in an old folks home, WHATEVER.
He cannot be allowed to send our troops into harm’s way when he clearly is incapable of comprehending the reality around him.
The Hand That Signed the Paper with the pen, the thousand-dollar pen is out of ink or out of oink as some would say but that’s another story and we’ll get back to that but I have to go because here comes me buss.
“The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ,
Moves on: nor all thy Piety nor Wit
Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line,
Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it.”
the rubber yacht of hymie cohen
Date: 27/03/2026 09:54:44
From: roughbarked
ID: 2373856
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
Occupy Democrats
BREAKING: Dementia Don goes on a completely incomprehensible rant about SHARPIES – yes, the pens– in the middle of his cabinet meeting while everyone else sits and listens uncomfortably!
The president has lost whatever little was left of his mind. During a cabinet meeting today, in the middle of war, with a gas price crisis, a TSA funding crisis, a housing crisis, and a healthcare crisis to deal with, the president began ranting and raving about…pens.
“See this pen right here? This pen is an interesting example. It’s the same thing.”
“So this pen is very inexpensive, but it writes well. I like it. But I can’t have the pen the way it was.”
“You know what it is. I don’t want to give too much publicity, but they do treat me well. Sharpie.”
“So I came here, they have thousand-dollar pens. And you know, you hand pens out, you’re signing and you hand them out, you’re handing them to all these people. Sometimes you have 30, 40 people.”
“And they were a thousand dollars a piece. Beautiful pen. Ballpoint. Thousand. It was gold, silver, gorgeous. But I’m handing out to kids that don’t even know what they are.”
“What is this, mommy? It’s kids. They’re getting a pen for a thousand dollars. They have no idea what it is.”
“And I feel guilty because I’m like, you know, I’m by nature. I don’t, you know, it’s the government. I love the government.”
“Like I love myself economically. I want to save money. So I’m saying this is crazy.”
“And it had another problem. They didn’t write well. So I take it out and I saw it and there’s no ink.”
“And I got all you people looking. And you say there must be something wrong with Trump. And there’s no ink in the pen, and it costs a thousand dollars.”
“This one I call the guy. I said, I’d like to use your pen, but I can’t have a great thing with a big S on it. Same Sharpie as I’m signing a trillion-dollar airplane contract to buy brand new fighter jets, brand new B2 bombers, of which we just ordered plenty.”
“I can’t do that with the press. Use your pen. But I like the pen the best, but I’ll sign it.”
“I could do like Biden did, you know, give it to somebody else to sign or an auto pen, or maybe sign it separately in another room. But I can’t use your pen. You said, well, I can make it nicer.
So what can you do? He said, I’ll paint it black. I said, that’s nice. And I can even paint the White House on it, sir, if you like, in gold, almost real gold, not bad.”
“And I can even do your signature, sir. And by the way, this was not staged. I just saw the pen sit there.”
“I thought that this is an example of how twenty five million dollars spent by me at the Federal Reserve Building would be a better job than four billion dollars that they’re spending. And you know, one of the things.”
What in the HELL is he talking about?
This is just complete and utter gibberish from the president of the United States, a man who is currently being presented with options for a military invasion of Iran.
He needs to be removed from office IMMEDIATELY, whether it’s impeachment, the 25th Amendment, institutionalization in an old folks home, WHATEVER.
He cannot be allowed to send our troops into harm’s way when he clearly is incapable of comprehending the reality around him.
FFS, what is wrong with you people…? quote King Charles.
Date: 27/03/2026 09:56:39
From: roughbarked
ID: 2373857
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
JudgeMental said:
Occupy Democrats
BREAKING: Dementia Don goes on a completely incomprehensible rant about SHARPIES – yes, the pens– in the middle of his cabinet meeting while everyone else sits and listens uncomfortably!
The president has lost whatever little was left of his mind. During a cabinet meeting today, in the middle of war, with a gas price crisis, a TSA funding crisis, a housing crisis, and a healthcare crisis to deal with, the president began ranting and raving about…pens.
“See this pen right here? This pen is an interesting example. It’s the same thing.”
“So this pen is very inexpensive, but it writes well. I like it. But I can’t have the pen the way it was.”
“You know what it is. I don’t want to give too much publicity, but they do treat me well. Sharpie.”
“So I came here, they have thousand-dollar pens. And you know, you hand pens out, you’re signing and you hand them out, you’re handing them to all these people. Sometimes you have 30, 40 people.”
“And they were a thousand dollars a piece. Beautiful pen. Ballpoint. Thousand. It was gold, silver, gorgeous. But I’m handing out to kids that don’t even know what they are.”
“What is this, mommy? It’s kids. They’re getting a pen for a thousand dollars. They have no idea what it is.”
“And I feel guilty because I’m like, you know, I’m by nature. I don’t, you know, it’s the government. I love the government.”
“Like I love myself economically. I want to save money. So I’m saying this is crazy.”
“And it had another problem. They didn’t write well. So I take it out and I saw it and there’s no ink.”
“And I got all you people looking. And you say there must be something wrong with Trump. And there’s no ink in the pen, and it costs a thousand dollars.”
“This one I call the guy. I said, I’d like to use your pen, but I can’t have a great thing with a big S on it. Same Sharpie as I’m signing a trillion-dollar airplane contract to buy brand new fighter jets, brand new B2 bombers, of which we just ordered plenty.”
“I can’t do that with the press. Use your pen. But I like the pen the best, but I’ll sign it.”
“I could do like Biden did, you know, give it to somebody else to sign or an auto pen, or maybe sign it separately in another room. But I can’t use your pen. You said, well, I can make it nicer.
So what can you do? He said, I’ll paint it black. I said, that’s nice. And I can even paint the White House on it, sir, if you like, in gold, almost real gold, not bad.”
“And I can even do your signature, sir. And by the way, this was not staged. I just saw the pen sit there.”
“I thought that this is an example of how twenty five million dollars spent by me at the Federal Reserve Building would be a better job than four billion dollars that they’re spending. And you know, one of the things.”
What in the HELL is he talking about?
This is just complete and utter gibberish from the president of the United States, a man who is currently being presented with options for a military invasion of Iran.
He needs to be removed from office IMMEDIATELY, whether it’s impeachment, the 25th Amendment, institutionalization in an old folks home, WHATEVER.
He cannot be allowed to send our troops into harm’s way when he clearly is incapable of comprehending the reality around him.
The Hand That Signed the Paper with the pen, the thousand-dollar pen is out of ink or out of oink as some would say but that’s another story and we’ll get back to that but I have to go because here comes me buss.
Should I sing the fool on the hill or I am the walrus?
Date: 27/03/2026 10:03:10
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2373858
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
Peak Warming Man said:
JudgeMental said:
He needs to be removed from office IMMEDIATELY, whether it’s impeachment, the 25th Amendment, institutionalization in an old folks home, WHATEVER.
He cannot be allowed to send our troops into harm’s way when he clearly is incapable of comprehending the reality around him.
The Hand That Signed the Paper with the pen, the thousand-dollar pen is out of ink or out of oink as some would say but that’s another story and we’ll get back to that but I have to go because here comes me buss.
“The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ,
Moves on: nor all thy Piety nor Wit
Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line,
Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it.”
the rubber yacht of hymie cohen
And all those moments will be lost, like tears in the rain, over.
Date: 27/03/2026 10:11:04
From: roughbarked
ID: 2373860
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Peak Warming Man said:
JudgeMental said:
Peak Warming Man said:
The Hand That Signed the Paper with the pen, the thousand-dollar pen is out of ink or out of oink as some would say but that’s another story and we’ll get back to that but I have to go because here comes me buss.
“The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ,
Moves on: nor all thy Piety nor Wit
Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line,
Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it.”
the rubber yacht of hymie cohen
And all those moments will be lost, like tears in the rain, over.
I talk to the wind,
my words are all carried away.
I talk to the wind,
the wind does not hear,
the wind cannot hear.
Date: 27/03/2026 10:18:50
From: Tamb
ID: 2373861
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Peak Warming Man said:
JudgeMental said:
“The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ,
Moves on: nor all thy Piety nor Wit
Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line,
Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it.”
the rubber yacht of hymie cohen
And all those moments will be lost, like tears in the rain, over.
I talk to the wind,
my words are all carried away.
I talk to the wind,
the wind does not hear,
the wind cannot hear.
“I talk to the trees
That’s why they put me away”
is a quote from Eccles, played by Spike Milligan
Date: 27/03/2026 10:24:01
From: Michael V
ID: 2373863
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
Occupy Democrats
BREAKING: Dementia Don goes on a completely incomprehensible rant about SHARPIES – yes, the pens– in the middle of his cabinet meeting while everyone else sits and listens uncomfortably!
The president has lost whatever little was left of his mind. During a cabinet meeting today, in the middle of war, with a gas price crisis, a TSA funding crisis, a housing crisis, and a healthcare crisis to deal with, the president began ranting and raving about…pens.
“See this pen right here? This pen is an interesting example. It’s the same thing.”
“So this pen is very inexpensive, but it writes well. I like it. But I can’t have the pen the way it was.”
“You know what it is. I don’t want to give too much publicity, but they do treat me well. Sharpie.”
“So I came here, they have thousand-dollar pens. And you know, you hand pens out, you’re signing and you hand them out, you’re handing them to all these people. Sometimes you have 30, 40 people.”
“And they were a thousand dollars a piece. Beautiful pen. Ballpoint. Thousand. It was gold, silver, gorgeous. But I’m handing out to kids that don’t even know what they are.”
“What is this, mommy? It’s kids. They’re getting a pen for a thousand dollars. They have no idea what it is.”
“And I feel guilty because I’m like, you know, I’m by nature. I don’t, you know, it’s the government. I love the government.”
“Like I love myself economically. I want to save money. So I’m saying this is crazy.”
“And it had another problem. They didn’t write well. So I take it out and I saw it and there’s no ink.”
“And I got all you people looking. And you say there must be something wrong with Trump. And there’s no ink in the pen, and it costs a thousand dollars.”
“This one I call the guy. I said, I’d like to use your pen, but I can’t have a great thing with a big S on it. Same Sharpie as I’m signing a trillion-dollar airplane contract to buy brand new fighter jets, brand new B2 bombers, of which we just ordered plenty.”
“I can’t do that with the press. Use your pen. But I like the pen the best, but I’ll sign it.”
“I could do like Biden did, you know, give it to somebody else to sign or an auto pen, or maybe sign it separately in another room. But I can’t use your pen. You said, well, I can make it nicer.
So what can you do? He said, I’ll paint it black. I said, that’s nice. And I can even paint the White House on it, sir, if you like, in gold, almost real gold, not bad.”
“And I can even do your signature, sir. And by the way, this was not staged. I just saw the pen sit there.”
“I thought that this is an example of how twenty five million dollars spent by me at the Federal Reserve Building would be a better job than four billion dollars that they’re spending. And you know, one of the things.”
What in the HELL is he talking about?
This is just complete and utter gibberish from the president of the United States, a man who is currently being presented with options for a military invasion of Iran.
He needs to be removed from office IMMEDIATELY, whether it’s impeachment, the 25th Amendment, institutionalization in an old folks home, WHATEVER.
He cannot be allowed to send our troops into harm’s way when he clearly is incapable of comprehending the reality around him.
OK
Date: 27/03/2026 10:24:15
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2373864
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Trump’s Treasury Department is planning to add his signature to all denominations of the United States Dollar moving forward, which will mark the first time in history that the sitting president’s signature will appear on American currency, with Trump’s signature expected to replace that of the U.S. Treasurer, Brandon Beach, sitting alongside his Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s, several sources, including Beach himself, have confirmed to Vanity Fair.
MeidasTouch
Date: 27/03/2026 10:24:18
From: Michael V
ID: 2373865
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:

FMD
Date: 27/03/2026 10:24:32
From: Michael V
ID: 2373866
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
JudgeMental said:

Don’t worry, Dominos will make him a supreme pizza.
LOL
Date: 27/03/2026 10:31:59
From: Michael V
ID: 2373870
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
Trump’s Treasury Department is planning to add his signature to all denominations of the United States Dollar moving forward, which will mark the first time in history that the sitting president’s signature will appear on American currency, with Trump’s signature expected to replace that of the U.S. Treasurer, Brandon Beach, sitting alongside his Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s, several sources, including Beach himself, have confirmed to Vanity Fair.
MeidasTouch
Good. Makes him responsible for bankrupting the country.
Oh, right. No responsibility accepted.
Date: 27/03/2026 10:40:18
From: dv
ID: 2373875
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 27/03/2026 10:49:03
From: roughbarked
ID: 2373880
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Tamb said:
roughbarked said:
Peak Warming Man said:
And all those moments will be lost, like tears in the rain, over.
I talk to the wind,
my words are all carried away.
I talk to the wind,
the wind does not hear,
the wind cannot hear.
“I talk to the trees
That’s why they put me away”
is a quote from Eccles, played by Spike Milligan
:) Goood morning Tamb. :)
Date: 27/03/2026 10:50:38
From: roughbarked
ID: 2373882
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
Trump’s Treasury Department is planning to add his signature to all denominations of the United States Dollar moving forward, which will mark the first time in history that the sitting president’s signature will appear on American currency, with Trump’s signature expected to replace that of the U.S. Treasurer, Brandon Beach, sitting alongside his Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s, several sources, including Beach himself, have confirmed to Vanity Fair.
MeidasTouch
Apt.
How soon will he turn his daughter to gold?
Date: 27/03/2026 10:53:27
From: roughbarked
ID: 2373884
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
JudgeMental said:
Trump’s Treasury Department is planning to add his signature to all denominations of the United States Dollar moving forward, which will mark the first time in history that the sitting president’s signature will appear on American currency, with Trump’s signature expected to replace that of the U.S. Treasurer, Brandon Beach, sitting alongside his Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s, several sources, including Beach himself, have confirmed to Vanity Fair.
MeidasTouch
Good. Makes him responsible for bankrupting the country.
Oh, right. No responsibility accepted.
No. He still shits on the floor and expects someone else to clean up. Like any toddler that has escaped the so called ‘playpen’ jail.
Date: 27/03/2026 11:42:54
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2373914
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Occupy Democrats on fb: (I lack the cognitive bandwidth to fact check these claims)
Here’s all the INSANE things that Trump said at his cabinet meeting today:
On cognitive tests: “I aced it. I got them all right… President Obama, he wasn’t a smart man. I know all about him. He wasn’t a smart man. Highly overrated.”
On his post-presidency plans:
“After the presidency, I think I may go to Venezuela and run for president against Delcy. It’s an option!”
On the missile allegedly shot at the US base at Diego Garcia:
“They shot the now-famous Ireland —- the island that the UK was very afraid to give us.”
On his “big present” from Iran: “They said to show you the fact that we’re real and solid and we’re there, we’re gonna let you have eight boats of oil. Eight big boats of oil. I think they were Pakistani flagged.” (this 100% did not happen)
When Sec. Burgum told him about oil being brought to America:
“Forget that. When are they gonna do the statue of me?”
On energy prices:
“It’s not over, so maybe it’ll go up a little bit more. It’s all gonna come back down to where it was and probably lower. And my predictions have been right. Trump was right about everything. They have a new hat.”
On Iran:
“I’m the opposite of desperate. I don’t care. In fact, we have other targets we want to hit!”
On using a mail-in ballot: “I used a mail-in ballot. You know why? Because I’m President of the United States and because of the fact that I’m President of the United States, I did a mail-in ballot.”
On the National Guard in DC:
“I never wanna take out of D.C. I mean, maybe somebody later on will do it, but I never wanna…We see these beautiful, strong people, and they’re so nice. They help, they open the doors for people, they carry bags, they pick up paper on the ground.”
On the Strait of Hormuz: “The amazing thing is we don’t need the Hormuz Strait. We don’t need it. We don’t need it at all. We have so much oil. Our country is not affected by this.”
On pens: “See, this pen right here. This pen is an interesting example. It’s the same thing. So this pen is very inexpensive. But it writes well. I like it. But I can’t have the pen the way it was. You know what it is. I don’t want to give too much publicity but they do treat me well. Sharpie.”
25th. Amendment. NOW.
Date: 27/03/2026 11:51:04
From: Michael V
ID: 2373921
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Occupy Democrats on fb: (I lack the cognitive bandwidth to fact check these claims)
Here’s all the INSANE things that Trump said at his cabinet meeting today:
On cognitive tests: “I aced it. I got them all right… President Obama, he wasn’t a smart man. I know all about him. He wasn’t a smart man. Highly overrated.”
On his post-presidency plans:
“After the presidency, I think I may go to Venezuela and run for president against Delcy. It’s an option!”
On the missile allegedly shot at the US base at Diego Garcia:
“They shot the now-famous Ireland —- the island that the UK was very afraid to give us.”
On his “big present” from Iran: “They said to show you the fact that we’re real and solid and we’re there, we’re gonna let you have eight boats of oil. Eight big boats of oil. I think they were Pakistani flagged.” (this 100% did not happen)
When Sec. Burgum told him about oil being brought to America:
“Forget that. When are they gonna do the statue of me?”
On energy prices:
“It’s not over, so maybe it’ll go up a little bit more. It’s all gonna come back down to where it was and probably lower. And my predictions have been right. Trump was right about everything. They have a new hat.”
On Iran:
“I’m the opposite of desperate. I don’t care. In fact, we have other targets we want to hit!”
On using a mail-in ballot: “I used a mail-in ballot. You know why? Because I’m President of the United States and because of the fact that I’m President of the United States, I did a mail-in ballot.”
On the National Guard in DC:
“I never wanna take out of D.C. I mean, maybe somebody later on will do it, but I never wanna…We see these beautiful, strong people, and they’re so nice. They help, they open the doors for people, they carry bags, they pick up paper on the ground.”
On the Strait of Hormuz: “The amazing thing is we don’t need the Hormuz Strait. We don’t need it. We don’t need it at all. We have so much oil. Our country is not affected by this.”
On pens: “See, this pen right here. This pen is an interesting example. It’s the same thing. So this pen is very inexpensive. But it writes well. I like it. But I can’t have the pen the way it was. You know what it is. I don’t want to give too much publicity but they do treat me well. Sharpie.”
25th. Amendment. NOW.
Havoc. NOW.
Date: 27/03/2026 11:52:35
From: roughbarked
ID: 2373924
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:
Occupy Democrats on fb: (I lack the cognitive bandwidth to fact check these claims)
Here’s all the INSANE things that Trump said at his cabinet meeting today:
On cognitive tests: “I aced it. I got them all right… President Obama, he wasn’t a smart man. I know all about him. He wasn’t a smart man. Highly overrated.”
On his post-presidency plans:
“After the presidency, I think I may go to Venezuela and run for president against Delcy. It’s an option!”
On the missile allegedly shot at the US base at Diego Garcia:
“They shot the now-famous Ireland —- the island that the UK was very afraid to give us.”
On his “big present” from Iran: “They said to show you the fact that we’re real and solid and we’re there, we’re gonna let you have eight boats of oil. Eight big boats of oil. I think they were Pakistani flagged.” (this 100% did not happen)
When Sec. Burgum told him about oil being brought to America:
“Forget that. When are they gonna do the statue of me?”
On energy prices:
“It’s not over, so maybe it’ll go up a little bit more. It’s all gonna come back down to where it was and probably lower. And my predictions have been right. Trump was right about everything. They have a new hat.”
On Iran:
“I’m the opposite of desperate. I don’t care. In fact, we have other targets we want to hit!”
On using a mail-in ballot: “I used a mail-in ballot. You know why? Because I’m President of the United States and because of the fact that I’m President of the United States, I did a mail-in ballot.”
On the National Guard in DC:
“I never wanna take out of D.C. I mean, maybe somebody later on will do it, but I never wanna…We see these beautiful, strong people, and they’re so nice. They help, they open the doors for people, they carry bags, they pick up paper on the ground.”
On the Strait of Hormuz: “The amazing thing is we don’t need the Hormuz Strait. We don’t need it. We don’t need it at all. We have so much oil. Our country is not affected by this.”
On pens: “See, this pen right here. This pen is an interesting example. It’s the same thing. So this pen is very inexpensive. But it writes well. I like it. But I can’t have the pen the way it was. You know what it is. I don’t want to give too much publicity but they do treat me well. Sharpie.”
25th. Amendment. NOW.
Havoc. NOW.
Start installing solar and wind generation NOW.
Date: 27/03/2026 11:53:44
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2373926
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:
Occupy Democrats on fb: (I lack the cognitive bandwidth to fact check these claims)
Here’s all the INSANE things that Trump said at his cabinet meeting today:
On cognitive tests: “I aced it. I got them all right… President Obama, he wasn’t a smart man. I know all about him. He wasn’t a smart man. Highly overrated.”
On his post-presidency plans:
“After the presidency, I think I may go to Venezuela and run for president against Delcy. It’s an option!”
On the missile allegedly shot at the US base at Diego Garcia:
“They shot the now-famous Ireland —- the island that the UK was very afraid to give us.”
On his “big present” from Iran: “They said to show you the fact that we’re real and solid and we’re there, we’re gonna let you have eight boats of oil. Eight big boats of oil. I think they were Pakistani flagged.” (this 100% did not happen)
When Sec. Burgum told him about oil being brought to America:
“Forget that. When are they gonna do the statue of me?”
On energy prices:
“It’s not over, so maybe it’ll go up a little bit more. It’s all gonna come back down to where it was and probably lower. And my predictions have been right. Trump was right about everything. They have a new hat.”
On Iran:
“I’m the opposite of desperate. I don’t care. In fact, we have other targets we want to hit!”
On using a mail-in ballot: “I used a mail-in ballot. You know why? Because I’m President of the United States and because of the fact that I’m President of the United States, I did a mail-in ballot.”
On the National Guard in DC:
“I never wanna take out of D.C. I mean, maybe somebody later on will do it, but I never wanna…We see these beautiful, strong people, and they’re so nice. They help, they open the doors for people, they carry bags, they pick up paper on the ground.”
On the Strait of Hormuz: “The amazing thing is we don’t need the Hormuz Strait. We don’t need it. We don’t need it at all. We have so much oil. Our country is not affected by this.”
On pens: “See, this pen right here. This pen is an interesting example. It’s the same thing. So this pen is very inexpensive. But it writes well. I like it. But I can’t have the pen the way it was. You know what it is. I don’t want to give too much publicity but they do treat me well. Sharpie.”
25th. Amendment. NOW.
Havoc. NOW.
Start installing solar and wind generation NOW.
Can’t. Renewable energy is too woke. Own the Libs!
Date: 27/03/2026 11:56:40
From: roughbarked
ID: 2373928
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
Havoc. NOW.
Start installing solar and wind generation NOW.
Can’t. Renewable energy is too woke. Own the Libs!
! WTF is wrong with these people?
Date: 27/03/2026 12:06:16
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2373930
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:
Start installing solar and wind generation NOW.
Can’t. Renewable energy is too woke. Own the Libs!
! WTF is wrong with these people?
Indulge me a moment off-topic.
Saw this during the week

And thought about free will. Now the biblical God gave the gift of free will, but only if you made choices agreeable to the Lord’s will. Biblical God seems to have given up, left us to our own devices, and is playing us like The Sims.
In an episode of that new Todd Sampson vehicle on ABC, Why? he visits an alien-worshiping cult. Every week this cult prays to a box of crystals which act like a battery to carry the prayers to a council of aliens. Wonder how bad things have to get for these aliens to intervene.
Date: 27/03/2026 12:39:40
From: Michael V
ID: 2373939
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
Can’t. Renewable energy is too woke. Own the Libs!
! WTF is wrong with these people?
Indulge me a moment off-topic.
Saw this during the week

And thought about free will. Now the biblical God gave the gift of free will, but only if you made choices agreeable to the Lord’s will. Biblical God seems to have given up, left us to our own devices, and is playing us like The Sims.
In an episode of that new Todd Sampson vehicle on ABC, Why? he visits an alien-worshiping cult. Every week this cult prays to a box of crystals which act like a battery to carry the prayers to a council of aliens. Wonder how bad things have to get for these aliens to intervene.
I hope this gives you a laugh:
Heaven’s IT Guy – Tech Support for the Faithful (Short Sketch Comedy) – Free Will
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/uLjjYRE-zxY
Date: 27/03/2026 14:32:54
From: dv
ID: 2373977
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1DVQNDRfuo/
On Lutheran Pastors running for office
Date: 27/03/2026 14:50:11
From: kii
ID: 2373982
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 27/03/2026 14:57:52
From: Michael V
ID: 2373985
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:

Fair comment.
Date: 27/03/2026 15:49:51
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2373993
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
kii said:

Fair comment.
unfairderstatement
Date: 27/03/2026 16:00:33
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2373997
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Republican Party gave the first-ever “America First award” to President Donald Trump on March 25, an achievement that follows backlash from legislators over his receiving of these newly created honors.
The award was presented to Trump at the National Republican Congressional Committee annual fundraising dinner by House Speaker Mike Johnson, who said it was created with the president in mind.
“We’re going to do something we’ve never done before. We’re going to honor him with a new award that we’ll present annually from this point forward, but he is the suitable and fitting recipient of the first-ever America First award,” Johnson said. “We can think of no better title for what that is…that’s this beautiful golden statue here, appropriate for the new golden era in America.”
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2026/03/26/trump-given-america-first-award-republican-party/89330333007/
The award looks like the immunity idols on S50 of Survivor.
Date: 27/03/2026 16:02:58
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2373999
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
The Republican Party gave the first-ever “America First award” to President Donald Trump on March 25, an achievement that follows backlash from legislators over his receiving of these newly created honors.
The award was presented to Trump at the National Republican Congressional Committee annual fundraising dinner by House Speaker Mike Johnson, who said it was created with the president in mind.
“We’re going to do something we’ve never done before. We’re going to honor him with a new award that we’ll present annually from this point forward, but he is the suitable and fitting recipient of the first-ever America First award,” Johnson said. “We can think of no better title for what that is…that’s this beautiful golden statue here, appropriate for the new golden era in America.”
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2026/03/26/trump-given-america-first-award-republican-party/89330333007/
The award looks like the immunity idols on S50 of Survivor.
Best Fuhrer Award is a catchier title.
Date: 27/03/2026 20:36:47
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2374066
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
So old mate John Vance reckons they have to worry about ‘nuclear vests worn by terrorists’.
Far canal ….
https://x.com/realstewpeters/status/2037265947459727691
Date: 27/03/2026 22:55:52
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2374089
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
PWM will no doubt condemn these dirty anti-Semites:
…
Bigotry among young conservatives has Republicans on edge
Many Republicans dismiss such party members even as white supremacists like Nick Fuentes gain popularity, but there’s growing unease at their presence in the rank and file.
March 26, 2026 at 5:00 a.m.
By Hannah Knowles
PHOENIX — Twenty-three-year-old Alec Beaton has the résumé of a model GOP foot soldier. He’s a former precinct delegate and county Republican youth chair who ran a small Michigan field office for Donald Trump’s 2024 campaign.
He’s also a self-described Holocaust “revisionist” who views praise for Adolf Hitler as a way to “mess with people.”
“We don’t think Hitler is, like, the worst person ever,” Beaton explained as he roamed a national conference for young conservatives with his friends, joined at one point by an acquaintance on the event staff for the host group, Turning Point USA.
Many Republicans dismiss young people such as Beaton as fringe actors, unrepresentative of the GOP. But there’s a growing unease in the party at their presence among the rank and file. Leaks of offensive group chats and infighting over the bounds of acceptable political discourse are fanning anxiety in the party: Maybe the kids are not all right.
At a conference on antisemitism this month in Washington, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) warned that he has seen more prejudice against Jewish people “in the last 18 months on the right than at any point in my lifetime,” and that “it is gaining real purchase, especially with young people.”
The fight against antisemitism is winning with “folks in this room with some gray or salt-and-pepper in their hair,” Cruz said.
“But in the college classroom,” he added, “I’m a lot less certain.”
Concern has flared with one scandal after another. In one group chat, Young Republican leaders from several states used racial slurs, casually referenced Hitler and described rape as “epic.” In another meant for GOP students in Miami, participants called for grisly violence against Black people and discussed “Nazi heaven”; a leak prompted the resignation of a Turning Point chapter president who wrote, “I would def not marry a Jew.” At the University of Florida, a statewide conservative group just disbanded a College Republicans chapter after allegations that students gave a Nazi salute.
And online, Republicans have fretted about the rise of white-supremacist influencer Nick Fuentes, who courts disaffected young men and has summed up his views as, “Jews are running society, women need to shut the f—- up, Blacks need to be imprisoned for the most part, and we would live in paradise.” The College Republicans of America this month appointed a longtime fan of Fuentes as their political director.
Radicalization on the young right has set off a bitter debate in the GOP about how much Republicans should police their movement and how serious a threat its most extreme elements pose. Some dismiss Fuentes and like-minded commentators as online agitators with little real influence — infiltrators trying to hurt the Republican Party. Others are alarmed at the traction they have gotten and say the party needs to push them more forcefully out of the GOP tent.
Fuentes’s young fans, who call themselves “groypers,” didn’t seem like pariahs as they strolled around the Turning Point conference late last year. They said hi to friends they had met at other conservative meetups. They got compliments on their bright-blue hats that helped identify them as Fuentes followers. They crashed at an Airbnb hosting dozens of groypers — a cardboard cutout of Fuentes in the backyard, the words “Splash house” emblazoned on a wall.
The groypers were firmly in the minority: An official straw poll of attendees at the conference found that 87 percent of respondents viewed Israel as an ally, drawing a stark contrast with Fuentes, who rails against Israel.
But the tension over their rise was front-and-center, in the sniping between speakers and the questions coming from the audience.
“We influence the room,” bragged Beaton, a self-described groyper. “We have the power and influence to come in here, and they respect it.”
Hanging out at the Airbnb after midnight, Beaton and his friends buzzed about their brief turn on the main stage of the conference. One of the speakers, the conservative activist James O’Keefe, had recruited young volunteers to walk out with him in blond wigs, a stunt meant to evoke his undercover work secretly recording liberals and journalists.
“Half the people there were, like, us,” Beaton said, meaning groypers. He and his friends met O’Keefe, they said, and told him that Fuentes sent his regards.
O’Keefe did not respond to a request for comment through his media organization. Turning Point declined to comment.
Davis Ingle, a spokesman for the White House, said Trump “has zero tolerance for anti-Semitism” and accused Democrats in Congress of “being taken over by anti-Semitic and anti-American radicals.”
He pointed to Reps. Ilhan Omar (D-Minnesota) and Rashida Tlaib (D-Michigan), who have drawn rebukes from Republicans as well as some Democrats. The lawmakers’ offices did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Other people at the Turning Point conference were curious about Fuentes. Arnie Hernandez, a Republican from California in his early 30s, didn’t agree with everything he said but followed him on X, and liked that he called out “Israel’s influence on society.” He had met groypers at conservative events; they were friendly.
Hernandez got in line for a conference breakout session on mobilizing Catholic voters. The panelists included the activist Jack Posobiec, who would draw criticism that same weekend for posing with a podcaster who was wearing a hoodie bearing a “Let em cook” cartoon, widely viewed as a reference to the Holocaust and the burning of the bodies of Jewish people.
Eating popcorn as he waited, Hernandez considered Fuentes’s comments. What about the influencer’s declaration that Hitler was “cool”?
“People say … pirates are cool,” Hernandez said. “But at the same time, they’re like, you know, they were murderous savages. And the most interesting thing about villains — they have some sort of aura.”
The doors to the breakout session opened, and Hernandez took a seat not far from a young man in a blue groyper hat.
Republicans worry the online ecosystem that rewards people such as Fuentes is consequential, even if it often distorts reality.
“The migration of our politics online has created a perverse incentive structure,” said David Brog, founding president of the foundation behind the annual National Conservatism Conference. “If you voice anti-Israel and antisemitic views, you get an instant reward in the form of clicks, likes and follows. This fuels the fallacy that the activist base of the party shares these views.”
“So ambitious politicians and commentators trying to position themselves to lead ‘America First’ are misreading these digital leaves,” Brog said, “and coming to some deeply flawed conclusions.”
Few candidates have appealed more explicitly to Fuentes’s followers than James Fishback, a 31-year-old Republican making a long-shot bid for governor in Florida. Running a campaign designed, above all, to seize online attention, Fishback has declared the young men who follow Fuentes to be “incredibly informed” and “very patriotic.”
That attitude has set up an unusual test of the groyper movement’s clout.
On the one hand, Republicans say, Fishback’s campaign is evidence the groyper-curious message has limited appeal — that what gets clicks online does not necessarily translate to votes. He got 6 percent of the GOP primary vote in a recent poll, while the front-runner, Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Florida) — who has Trump’s endorsement — led handily with 31 percent.
But Fishback’s ability to draw an enthusiastic young crowd has left some Republicans unsettled. He’s been on the shows of influencers with sizable audiences — the former Fox host Tucker Carlson, the podcaster Patrick Bet-David.
He’s polling better than Florida’s Republican lieutenant governor (4 percent) and former statehouse speaker (1 percent) — all while lobbing racist taunts at his opponent Donalds, who is Black. He calls Donalds “By’rone” and says he wants to “turn Florida into a Section 8 ghetto,” a reference to low-income housing.
“At the beginning, the thing to do was ignore it — you don’t pay attention to every lunatic that runs,” said Gabriel Groisman, a Republican consultant in Florida. His calculus has changed.
“Everybody involved in Republican politics in Florida has an obligation to not just speak out against him,” Groisman said, “but also to draw clear lines … and say this is outside the bounds of what the party will even accept.”
The condemnations, so far, have been muted.
Donalds has largely attacked Fishback as a fake.
“You’re no racist,” he wrote in a retort to Fishback on X last month. “You’re no groyper. You’re no anti-semite. You’re what people hate about politics — performative slop.”
Fishback, meanwhile, is working to tap into “America First” anger over the United States’ entanglements abroad. This month he went to Washington to blast the war with Iran as a “disaster, full stop.”
He paused to survey his mostly male audience — about 30 young people assembled on the lawn of the U.S. Capitol.
“Total sausage fest, guys,” he said. People laughed.
In an interview, Fishback said he disagrees with some of Fuentes and his followers’ views, but meets them all the time at his events and thinks they’re a “fascinating pulse about what’s going on politically.”
“It’s wrong for any party, Republican or Democrat, to try to disavow people,” Fishback said.
Some Republicans are ramping up their efforts to do just that. The California Republican Party last month sent a memo to GOP leaders around the state warning that groypers were making their way into party positions and running for office, requiring a conscious effort to keep them out.
“A radical and divisive iteration of ‘America First’ ideology is growing within the ranks of the Right wing in American politics that is directly at odds with the core founding principles of the United States Constitution,” the memo read, adding later: “The effects of this movement on our conservative American youth cannot be ignored.”
John Park, the party vice chair, said he doesn’t want to overstate the problem. But “this is one of those situations where silence is consent,” he said.
Other Republicans have been less eager to gatekeep. Asked about Carlson’s decision to sit down with Fuentes last year, Trump demurred.
“I don’t know much about him,” Trump said of Fuentes, despite having dinner with him in 2022 in an incident that caused an uproar.
If Carlson wants to interview Fuentes, Trump said, “get the word out. Let him. People have to decide.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/03/26/gop-feuntes-trump-antisemitism-nationalism/
Date: 27/03/2026 23:29:18
From: kii
ID: 2374091
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Heather Delaney Reese
At 10:35 this morning, Donald J. Trump took a break from praising authoritarians on social media and sat down behind the long mahogany table inside the White House Cabinet Room for his first meeting with his full cabinet since his war with Iran began. In what was supposed to be a wartime briefing, Trump instead declared he might become president of a South American country and accidentally shared that he should probably have the 25th Amendment invoked on him. And that was just the beginning. What unfolded over the next 97 minutes was an alarming spiral of disinformation and recklessness.
As he sat there in his navy suit, crisp white shirt, and red tie that perfectly matched the red stripes in the multiple American flags placed behind him, he appeared surprisingly alert. Like he’d been practicing for the camera. He cracked jokes, clearly enjoying himself. If you couldn’t hear what he was saying, you’d think you were watching a man without a care in the world.
And as he gestured and grinned and interrupted and rambled, it’s easy to imagine that he feels like he’s back on The Apprentice. But instead of saying catchphrases for a camera, he’s holding the fate of millions in his hands. And he doesn’t seem to feel the weight of that at all.
And for their part, his cabinet played along. One by one, they took their turns participating in the theatrical production. Rubio called him the president who finally had the courage to act. Vance claimed Iran’s military is effectively destroyed. And then came Hegseth, the former Fox News host turned Defense Secretary, who used his time to attack the press. “Behind every headline you write, there’s a helicopter crew in the air,” he told the reporters in the room. “Behind every fake news story, there’s an F-35 pilot executing a dangerous mission.” He called Trump’s war “stuff for the history books” and “stuff for legacy.” Then he said the Department of “War” would “continue negotiating with bombs.” The rest of the cabinet nodded along. But none of that was true. The press he was attacking were doing their jobs, reporting the facts with compassion and respect for the men and women in uniform. It was Hegseth who was spinning reality into his preferred storyline to make an unjust and struggling war look justified and heroic.
And while Hegseth delivered that performance, the man sitting right next to him, the man who started this war, once again couldn’t keep his eyes open. Trump sat hunched forward in his chair, his head tilting, his eyes heavy and closed. The commander-in-chief of the United States military could not stay awake while his own Defense Secretary briefed him on the war he launched 27 days ago. That is how this administration is really being run. By a deteriorating president who sleeps through “life and death” meetings.
But when it was his turn to talk again, he snapped back. Not to discuss strategy or a number of important matters involving the country he was elected to lead. Instead, he wanted to talk about pens. To make his point, he pulled a Sharpie from his pocket, held it up for the cameras, and spent the next five minutes telling the story of how it got there. The Biden administration, he said, had left behind ballpoint pens that cost $1,000 each. Gold and silver. Beautiful, he said. But they didn’t write. “I take it out and I sign and there’s no ink and I got all you people looking and you’re saying there must be something wrong with Trump.” So he personally called the CEO of Sharpie. Negotiated the price down to $5. Asked them to paint it black so it wouldn’t look “too informal” when he was signing “a trillion dollar airplane contract to buy brand new fighter jets.” They added the White House logo in gold. “Almost real gold,” he said. Then they added his signature. His signature. On a pen. That is what the president is focused on these days.
And when the story was finally over, he held the pen out to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. “Could I give it to a man who’s done a great job at treasuring?” he said. The cabinet laughed. Because that’s what you do when the most powerful man in the room hands you a $5 pen, and expects you to act grateful for the “gift” and amazed by the story.
And then, moments later, he went on his next detour. ‘I’m the highest-polling person,’ he said. ‘In other words, after the presidency, I think I may go to Venezuela and run for president against Delcy. I may run against Delcy. It’s an option for me. It’s a wonderful option.’ The room laughed at the absurdity of it all, because they had been trained to always respond to his outbursts in this way. But it becomes more troublesome when you think about what he has just said. The President of the United States declared that running a foreign country he just invaded is ‘a wonderful option’ for his post-presidency. And as much as I’d love to say this was just a joke, with Trump, all of his so-called jokes must be taken seriously. Because this is not a man limited by rules or common sense. This is a man who responds with impulse.
Earlier in the same meeting, he had described the Venezuela arrangement as ‘sort of like a joint venture.’ He said, “we get a lot of it,” referring to their oil. He confirmed the U.S. took in 100 million barrels in the first two weeks. Rubio confirmed the money flows into a U.S. Treasury blocked account. Trump said the U.S. has ‘made a lot of money’ and that they’ve ‘paid for the cost of that military hit many, many times over.’ One of his cabinet members then told him the Venezuelan people were going to build a statue of him, comparing him to Simón Bolívar, the liberator of South America. Trump’s response? ‘That would be a great honor.’ And then, while that same cabinet member was still talking about oil production and American companies returning to Venezuela, Trump interrupted him to ask, ‘Forget that, when are they going to do the statue?’ Because all jokes aside, that is what Trump cares most about. Seeing his likeness plastered all over our country and the world, like most authoritarians do.
And then, in the moment that was the most concerning and possibly the most truthful thing Donald Trump has ever said, he admitted the reality of his presidency. A reporter asked about his plans for Iran. Trump said he couldn’t reveal them, and then, unprompted, offered this: “I can’t say what we’re going to do because if I did, I wouldn’t be sitting here for long. They probably, what is it called, the 25th Amendment.” He couldn’t remember what it was called. The 25th Amendment. The constitutional mechanism designed specifically to remove a president who is no longer fit to serve. And he had to search for it mid-sentence. Then he added, almost as an afterthought: “Which they didn’t do with Biden. Which is shocking.”
Nobody asked him about the 25th Amendment. No reporter brought it up. No cabinet member raised it. He volunteered it. He put it on the table himself, in front of the cameras and the world, and in doing so told the country two things at once: that somewhere in the back of his mind, he knows the 25th Amendment is a real possibility for him. And that even he knows it should be invoked based on his actions. That is who sat behind that mahogany table today. That is who is running this war.
And as if to prove the point he didn’t realize he was making, Trump spent the final stretch of the meeting on an unprompted defense of his own mind. No reporter asked about his cognitive health or even brought it up. The question that started it was about European deportation policy. But Trump’s mind took him somewhere else entirely. He went from European policy to attacking Democrats, to calling Kamala Harris and Biden “two sleepy people, two stupid people,” to mocking Gavin Newsom for having “a mental disability,” to him ironically declaring, “I don’t want a stupid person being president.” And that’s where his own brain betrayed him. Because from there, with no one pushing him, he drove himself straight into a defense of his own cognitive decline.
He told the room he’s “the only president that ever took a cognitive test.” That he took it three times. That he “aced it all three times.” That the questions start easy, but “by the time you get to the middle, it gets tougher,” and “by the time you get to the end, very few people can answer those questions.”
And that’s the part where he let the truth out. A cognitive screening test is not an IQ test. The questions don’t get “tough” for a healthy brain. They’re designed to detect impairment. If the middle of the test is where it starts getting hard, that’s not a sign of difficulty. That’s a sign of potential decline. These tests exist for one reason: as a screening tool designed to measure cognitive strengths and weaknesses. So when the president tells us it gets really hard in the middle, he’s telling us more than he thinks.
And then there are the questions no one in that room had the courage to ask. Why has he taken it three times? Most of us have never taken one. It’s not part of a routine physical. It’s ordered when there is a concern. Who ordered them? He said he took them “in front of numerous doctors that I have no idea who they are.” He doesn’t know who was evaluating him. And he said his own doctors warned him beforehand that “it’s Walter Reed, it’s essentially a public hospital, and if you do badly, it’s probably going to get out.” They warned him before the test. That’s not how you prep someone you’re confident about. That’s how you prep someone you’re worried about.
He ended by calling Obama “not a smart man” and saying Biden “wasn’t a smart man 30 years ago.” But the room wasn’t thinking about Obama or Biden. The room was watching a 79-year-old president, in the middle of a war, unable to stay awake during his own Defense Secretary’s briefing, defending his cognitive fitness to a roomful of people who hadn’t asked, and insisting he passed a test that most healthy adults would never need to take.
Every day brings more chaos and damage, but today it went beyond just what Trump said and into what he is doing. Because hours after that cabinet meeting ended, the Treasury Department made an announcement that shows how unrecognizable this country truly has become. Starting in June, Donald Trump’s signature will appear on all U.S. paper currency. The first $100 bills will roll off the press this summer with his name on them. He will be the first sitting president in American history to put his signature on our money. And to make room for it, they are removing the signature of the U.S. Treasurer, a position that has appeared on every single bill printed since 1861. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent released a statement that read like something out of a state propaganda handbook: “There is no more powerful way to recognize the historic achievements of our great country and President Donald J. Trump than U.S. dollar bills bearing his name.”
In that one sentence, the Trump regime made its intentions clear: Donald J. Trump and the United States of America are one and the same. ‘Our great country and President Donald J. Trump,’ side by side, as if there is no difference between the two. Because in his mind, there isn’t.
And this wasn’t even his first attempt at conquering all of the visual reminders of what this country really is and replacing them with his likeness. His first attempt was to put his face on a coin. He wanted a $1 coin with his portrait to go into circulation, and a 24-karat gold commemorative coin with his image hunched over a desk, fists clenched, to also be available. But federal law has prohibited living people from appearing on U.S. currency since 1866. The nonpartisan Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee, a body established by Congress specifically to review coin designs, refused to even look at it. The chair, Donald Scarinci’s words carry the weight of what Trump has been attempting: “Only those nations ruled by kings or dictators display the image of their sitting ruler on the coins of the realm.” He called the proposal “abhorrent to the Declaration of Independence.”
And here’s what makes this so much bigger than vanity. George Washington, the first president of the United States, the man who led the revolution, specifically refused to put his face on the country’s currency. He called it “monarchical.” The Mint Act of 1792, one of the earliest laws of this nation, stamped coins with an image of Liberty instead of Washington’s face. The founders did this on purpose. They had just fought a war to free themselves from a king. They were not going to put another one on their money. That principle held for years. Until Donald Trump became president.
And now, to celebrate the 250th anniversary of independence from that king, this president is stamping his name on every dollar bill in America. The irony is so heavy it’s painful. Because it will be just one more way to normalize his authoritarian tactics. It is just a signature, but it means so much more. And we know that because we’ve seen it before. Mussolini put himself on Italian coins. Saddam Hussein’s face was on every Iraqi dinar. Franco did it in Spain. Marcos in the Philippines. Assad put himself on the Syrian currency in 2017 while his country burned. Mao is on every bill in China. The pattern is consistent across a century of authoritarian regimes, and it never varies: when a leader puts himself on the money, he is not honoring the nation. He is claiming ownership of it.
And now connect it to everything we watched today. The pen with his signature on it. The statue he wants in Venezuela. The “joint venture” where he’s extracting oil from a country he just invaded. And then the things he’s already done; the Kennedy Center with his name added to the building. The triumphal arch he’s building. His name going on warships, on a drug discount website, on savings accounts for newborns. His face on a banner hanging down from the Department of Justice. And now he’s adding his name to our money.
And while he stamps his name on our currency, he’s simultaneously tearing apart every alliance that once made this country a force for stability in the world. Today, in that same cabinet meeting, he told our NATO allies to “remember my statements” and warned them to “never forget” that they didn’t help. He called the UK’s aircraft carriers “toys compared to what we have” and mocked their offer of support by saying, “We’ll send our aircraft carrier when the war is over. I said, ‘Oh, that’s wonderful, thank you very much. Don’t bother. We don’t need it.’” And then, most devastatingly, he said this about standing with our allies in the future: “We’re always going to be there. At least we were. I don’t know about anymore, to be honest with you.”
These were not random comments. This was the intentional destabilization of allied governments. He is weakening Europe because strong allies hold him accountable. He went after Venezuela first because Maduro was a dictator no one would defend. Then Iran, because the nuclear threat made it justifiable on the surface. He’s already said Cuba will “just fall.” He said “Operation Colombia sounds good to me.” He said “you have to do something with Mexico.” He hasn’t forgotten about Greenland or Canada. He’s just temporarily distracted by easier targets, racking up “wins”, building the precedent that America can take what it wants without consequence.
But here’s what he doesn’t understand, and what every authoritarian eventually learns the hard way. He can put his name on every bill in circulation, and we still get to decide where those bills go. Because I spent the better part of an afternoon doing something that has become a regular part of my life under this administration, making sure my money is going to people on the right side of history. That day’s search was for a new specialist doctor for preventative care. But now I don’t just read reviews and check credentials, I also scroll through their social media, looking for any sign of where they stand. I’m not expecting a public statement from every provider. I understand the cost of speaking out. I’ve felt it. The threats against myself and my family. The emails no parent should ever have to read. I know what it costs to use your voice right now, and I understand why some people don’t feel safe doing it.
But I also know what silence costs. And I wanted to find someone who understood that too. I found one. A doctor who had posted against ICE, who had made it clear they weren’t okay with what’s happening in this country. And today was my appointment. When I went in, I told them exactly why I chose them. It wasn’t just the amazing reviews. It was because they, too, were not okay with what is happening to our country. They said it was hard, that they too got pushback. But they own their own practice, they can’t be fired, and they felt it was important to speak out. I’m bringing my whole family to this doctor now. Because we have to support each other. We have to make sure our money goes to the people who are standing up when it would be easier to stay quiet.
There’s an old saying that if there’s a fascist at the table and ten people sitting with him, you’ve got eleven fascists. I’m not calling anyone a fascist for being afraid. But I am saying this isn’t business as usual. Nothing about this is usual. We are watching a regime take shape in real time, and every one of us is making a choice about where we stand, whether we realize it or not. I choose to reward the people who are brave enough to say something. And I’m asking us all to do the same in any way we can. I know it is hard to find a doctor these days, and this isn’t practical for everyone to do, but it doesn’t have to be all-or-nothing. Look for the opportunities you can easily align with others on the right side of history and start there.
We are not looking for perfection in our resistance efforts. We are looking at endurance. Because our push back is working. New polling from Reuters/Ipsos from March 24th now shows his approval has dropped to 36%, with 62% disapproving, a new second-term low.
And on Saturday, two days from now, this country is going to show him beyond the polls and in numbers never seen before just how unpopular he and his presidency really are. The third No Kings Day of Action is happening on March 28. Over 3,100 events are planned in all 50 states. The first No Kings protest in June 2025 drew nearly 5 million people. The second in October drew 7 million. Organizers are projecting 9 million for Saturday, hoping to make it one of the largest sustained nonviolent protest movements in American history. And as we get closer to the midterms, the resistance movement will just keep getting larger and louder. If we can keep the pressure building, we will be in a very different place next year. We will have a Congress that actually checks his power. And that is why I still have hope for America. And you should, too.
I’ll see you tomorrow,
Heather
Date: 28/03/2026 00:22:05
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2374103
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://newrepublic.com/article/208227/hegseth-dod-military-enlistment-discrimination
Link
DOD: We’ll Take Anyone for This War. Well, as Long as You’re Not …
Based on his new recruitment policies, Pete Hegseth cares more about winning culture wars than the real war he just helped start.
Date: 28/03/2026 08:26:23
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2374131
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Oregon’s Bay Area is feeling amused.
Kash Patel transformed into content may be the most revealing part of this whole mess. The breach itself is humiliating enough. Old emails, personal documents, a rum-bottle mirror selfie apparently waiting in the wings like a bonus feature on the Blu-ray edition of American Decline. The man entrusted with one of the most powerful law enforcement and counterintelligence agencies on earth, was reduced by an Iran-linked hack-and-leak operation into a propaganda object. A meme with a title. A cautionary tale with a government badge.
This is exactly the kind of thing Congress is supposed to think about before handing somebody the keys to the kingdom. In theory, that is what confirmation hearings are for. They are supposed to function as a national filter. They are supposed to ask whether the person about to be placed at the apex of federal law enforcement is disciplined, competent, serious, and resistant to compromise. They are supposed to identify vulnerabilities before hostile states do it for them in public. The whole point is to prevent the head of the FBI from one day becoming an international humiliation ritual with cigar photos.
Yet here we are. According to the reporting, the Iran-linked Handala operation claims to have hacked Patel’s personal email and published photographs and documents online, including a collection of images that do not exactly scream stern guardian of institutional stability. The dump reportedly included old correspondence and personal material rather than classified state secrets, which the FBI was quick to emphasize in the bureaucratic dialect of damage control.
Nothing to see here, citizen, beyond the small matter of America’s top federal investigator apparently getting digitally pantsed on the world stage.
This was about spectacle. It was about taking a senior American official and flattening him into a symbol of unseriousness, vanity, and vulnerability and sending a message that the people who strut around Washington wrapped in the language of strength and order are, in fact, fragile enough to be turned into theater.
Propaganda has changed with the times. Once upon a time you might expose a rival official as corrupt, compromised, or incompetent with grainy footage and whispered allegations. Now you just crack a personal account and let the man’s own aesthetic do the work for you. It is less “feared lawman of the republic” and more “regional steakhouse owner going through a divorce.” Because this is the internet age, humiliation is no longer a side effect of political warfare; it is the product.
Hostile governments and their proxies understand something Washington still pretends not to grasp: public ridicule is a weapon. Embarrassment erodes authority. Exposure creates doubt. A compromised image, even more than compromised data, can make institutions look hollow. You do not have to prove the FBI director sold state secrets to make the United States look foolish. You just have to make him look like a guy who should not have been trusted with the Wi-Fi password at a Holiday Inn business center.
This is even more absurd because it was avoidable. Congress was not blindsided by Patel’s existence. He did not emerge from the sea foam fully formed, clutching a federal badge and demanding a motorcade. He was nominated, scrutinized, debated, and confirmed. Senators had an obligation to evaluate not only his politics but his judgment, temperament, and capacity for stewardship. They were supposed to ask whether he understood the gravity of the office, whether he had the discipline required for it, whether he would protect the institution instead of performing himself through it.
Instead, the process devolved into partisan camp theater. One side treated him as a warrior-saint sent to cleanse the deep state. The other warned of politicization and abuse, but the broader mechanism failed in the way it so often fails now: not with a dramatic constitutional rupture, but with a shrug.
Patel’s defenders will say the real villain here is Iran-linked hacking, and of course it is. Foreign cyber operations aimed at embarrassing American officials are not funny in any grand strategic sense. They are hostile acts, and they should be treated as such. But the existence of malicious actors is not an excuse for installing people who seem custom-built to become their easiest targets. “Adversaries exist” is not a defense of negligence.
That is why this episode lands as more than gossip and more than schadenfreude. It is a tiny, perfect parable of institutional decay. The FBI director is not supposed to be a man who can be converted overnight into a visual aid for foreign propaganda. The confirmation process is not supposed to be a rubber stamp for whichever combative partisan has the right patrons and the right cable-news mystique. Public office is not supposed to be a costume party where swagger counts as readiness.
Now the empire’s decline arrives not only in court filings and inspector general reports, but in leaked selfies and mockery packets assembled by foreign hackers who understand American weakness at least as well as American voters do.
Patel was turned into a propaganda object. Humiliating for him, but more humiliating for the system that put him there.
Date: 28/03/2026 12:39:34
From: buffy
ID: 2374185
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Trump’s new tourism envoy once proposed banishing pigeons from Sydney streets
Some Australians are just completely cringe-worthy. He seems to have found his level.
Date: 28/03/2026 12:50:34
From: Michael V
ID: 2374187
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Trump’s new tourism envoy once proposed banishing pigeons from Sydney streets
Some Australians are just completely cringe-worthy. He seems to have found his level.
Sounds like Trump and Adams deserve each other.
One easy way to attract more tourists would be to stop government employees (and others) gratuitously shooting and killing people going about their business.
Date: 28/03/2026 13:42:22
From: kii
ID: 2374190
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
Trump’s new tourism envoy once proposed banishing pigeons from Sydney streets
Some Australians are just completely cringe-worthy. He seems to have found his level.
I remember him and his stupid ideas.
Especially the banning of Germaine Greer. At the time my younger sister was dealing with schizophrenia, and she was planning to travel to England to become her personal assistant.
The dog poop one was particularly funny for me. In 2001 I encountered tiny little homemade signs saying LNP DNA poked into piles of dog shit on various Katoomba streets. The signs were made from cardboard and toothpicks.
Also….thrust?
LOLOLOLOLOL….hiccup
Date: 28/03/2026 16:39:24
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2374229
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Trump: “Can I look at that tractor? I assume it’s a gift to me. Can you imagine if I accept that, what would they do? A Democrat is allowed to accept, we’re not allowed to accept.”
Tractors 🚫 planes ☑️
Date: 28/03/2026 17:03:47
From: Michael V
ID: 2374237
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Spiny Norman said:
So old mate John Vance reckons they have to worry about ‘nuclear vests worn by terrorists’.
Far canal ….
https://x.com/realstewpeters/status/2037265947459727691
Cheeses!
Date: 28/03/2026 17:06:11
From: party_pants
ID: 2374239
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Spiny Norman said:
So old mate John Vance reckons they have to worry about ‘nuclear vests worn by terrorists’.
Far canal ….
https://x.com/realstewpeters/status/2037265947459727691
Cheeses!
Remember when we all used to mock George Dubya for being a bit of a thicky? That man was a fucking genius compared to these clowns.
Date: 28/03/2026 17:27:21
From: roughbarked
ID: 2374248
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
Michael V said:
Spiny Norman said:
So old mate John Vance reckons they have to worry about ‘nuclear vests worn by terrorists’.
Far canal ….
https://x.com/realstewpeters/status/2037265947459727691
Cheeses!
Remember when we all used to mock George Dubya for being a bit of a thicky? That man was a fucking genius compared to these clowns.
apt description.
Date: 28/03/2026 17:42:47
From: Michael V
ID: 2374257
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
party_pants said:
Michael V said:
Spiny Norman said:
So old mate John Vance reckons they have to worry about ‘nuclear vests worn by terrorists’.
Far canal ….
https://x.com/realstewpeters/status/2037265947459727691
Cheeses!
Remember when we all used to mock George Dubya for being a bit of a thicky? That man was a fucking genius compared to these clowns.
Nods, but not reassuringly though.
Date: 28/03/2026 18:35:30
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2374284
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Trump: “Can I look at that tractor? I assume it’s a gift to me. Can you imagine if I accept that, what would they do? A Democrat is allowed to accept, we’re not allowed to accept.”
Tractors 🚫 planes ☑️
free pass for fascist liars these global rules based international laws and orders are great
Date: 28/03/2026 18:41:41
From: dv
ID: 2374289
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1


Democrats focusing on the big issues in American schools
Date: 28/03/2026 18:46:57
From: buffy
ID: 2374291
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

Democrats focusing on the big issues in American schools
I chatted with a twenty-something the other day who is presently doing nursing training. She told me she is looked on as oldfashioned because she writes out notes by hand. But she said that is how she learns. I reassured her that she is not alone, I also remember stuff better by writing it out, and often rewriting it a bit differently. I’d thought it might just be because I am old now and that is what I did at school/uni, but I’m not so sure. I’m a touch typist, so it’s sort of automatic when I type something up. Writing it out is much closer to my brain.
Date: 28/03/2026 19:00:51
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2374294
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
dv said:


Democrats focusing on the big issues in American schools
I chatted with a twenty-something the other day who is presently doing nursing training. She told me she is looked on as oldfashioned because she writes out notes by hand. But she said that is how she learns. I reassured her that she is not alone, I also remember stuff better by writing it out, and often rewriting it a bit differently. I’d thought it might just be because I am old now and that is what I did at school/uni, but I’m not so sure. I’m a touch typist, so it’s sort of automatic when I type something up. Writing it out is much closer to my brain.
we mean why not go the whole porcine and chisel the ideas into stone
anyway guess they aren’t pressing for their students to be “爱 capable / skilled” any time soon then
Date: 28/03/2026 19:01:48
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2374295
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
dv said:

Democrats focusing on the big issues in American schools
I chatted with a twenty-something the other day who is presently doing nursing training. She told me she is looked on as oldfashioned because she writes out notes by hand. But she said that is how she learns. I reassured her that she is not alone, I also remember stuff better by writing it out, and often rewriting it a bit differently. I’d thought it might just be because I am old now and that is what I did at school/uni, but I’m not so sure. I’m a touch typist, so it’s sort of automatic when I type something up. Writing it out is much closer to my brain.
Mrs S, also a former nursing sister, is a fabulous note-taker. I wish that i was as good at it as she is.
I’m not too bad . When i was with Qld Health, for a while i had to take notes of some big meetings and produce the minutes, and i was complimented more than once on the clarity and conciseness of those minutes.
In the 1960s, we were only allowed to use pencils up to 3rd grade. In 4th grade, we were introduced to cursive script, but we had to use nib pens (supplied by the school) and inkwells.
Being a left-handed person was disadvantageous, as you had to devise a way to avoid passing the side of your hand over the still-wet ink of what you’d just written.
This was rather difficult, and criticism of one’s penmanship was frequent.
After 4th grade, ball-point pens were permitted.
Later in life, i became interested in calligraphy, and devoted quite some time to it. I still have the pens, and might return to it, but the days when you could go into just about any newsagency ad buy a bottle of Quink (ink) at a reasonable price are long gone.
Date: 28/03/2026 19:12:20
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2374297
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
captain_spalding said:
buffy said:
dv said:


Democrats focusing on the big issues in American schools
I chatted with a twenty-something the other day who is presently doing nursing training. She told me she is looked on as oldfashioned because she writes out notes by hand. But she said that is how she learns. I reassured her that she is not alone, I also remember stuff better by writing it out, and often rewriting it a bit differently. I’d thought it might just be because I am old now and that is what I did at school/uni, but I’m not so sure. I’m a touch typist, so it’s sort of automatic when I type something up. Writing it out is much closer to my brain.
Mrs S, also a former nursing sister, is a fabulous note-taker. I wish that i was as good at it as she is.
I’m not too bad . When i was with Qld Health, for a while i had to take notes of some big meetings and produce the minutes, and i was complimented more than once on the clarity and conciseness of those minutes.
In the 1960s, we were only allowed to use pencils up to 3rd grade. In 4th grade, we were introduced to cursive script, but we had to use nib pens (supplied by the school) and inkwells.
Being a left-handed person was disadvantageous, as you had to devise a way to avoid passing the side of your hand over the still-wet ink of what you’d just written.
This was rather difficult, and criticism of one’s penmanship was frequent.
After 4th grade, ball-point pens were permitted.
Later in life, i became interested in calligraphy, and devoted quite some time to it. I still have the pens, and might return to it, but the days when you could go into just about any newsagency ad buy a bottle of Quink (ink) at a reasonable price are long gone.
pretty sure it’s like $12 or so at the blue signed office supplies shop, which is less than a full meal sandwich roll from the green and yellow signed fast food outlet
Date: 28/03/2026 19:26:19
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2374302
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
captain_spalding said:
buffy said:
I chatted with a twenty-something the other day who is presently doing nursing training. She told me she is looked on as oldfashioned because she writes out notes by hand. But she said that is how she learns. I reassured her that she is not alone, I also remember stuff better by writing it out, and often rewriting it a bit differently. I’d thought it might just be because I am old now and that is what I did at school/uni, but I’m not so sure. I’m a touch typist, so it’s sort of automatic when I type something up. Writing it out is much closer to my brain.
Mrs S, also a former nursing sister, is a fabulous note-taker. I wish that i was as good at it as she is.
I’m not too bad . When i was with Qld Health, for a while i had to take notes of some big meetings and produce the minutes, and i was complimented more than once on the clarity and conciseness of those minutes.
In the 1960s, we were only allowed to use pencils up to 3rd grade. In 4th grade, we were introduced to cursive script, but we had to use nib pens (supplied by the school) and inkwells.
Being a left-handed person was disadvantageous, as you had to devise a way to avoid passing the side of your hand over the still-wet ink of what you’d just written.
This was rather difficult, and criticism of one’s penmanship was frequent.
After 4th grade, ball-point pens were permitted.
Later in life, i became interested in calligraphy, and devoted quite some time to it. I still have the pens, and might return to it, but the days when you could go into just about any newsagency ad buy a bottle of Quink (ink) at a reasonable price are long gone.
pretty sure it’s like $12 or so at the blue signed office supplies shop, which is less than a full meal sandwich roll from the green and yellow signed fast food outlet
Yeah, i know that they’re supposed to stock it, and i have looked for it in the Toowoomba store on a few occasions when we’ve gone there for Mrs S’s art supplies and similar.
But, i can’t locate it , despite looking long, hard, and everywhere. The last time, i asked one of the staff where it might be, she didn’t know, asked a next-level person, but neither could recall having ever seen it.
Date: 28/03/2026 19:35:44
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2374312
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
dv said:

Democrats focusing on the big issues in American schools
I chatted with a twenty-something the other day who is presently doing nursing training. She told me she is looked on as oldfashioned because she writes out notes by hand. But she said that is how she learns. I reassured her that she is not alone, I also remember stuff better by writing it out, and often rewriting it a bit differently. I’d thought it might just be because I am old now and that is what I did at school/uni, but I’m not so sure. I’m a touch typist, so it’s sort of automatic when I type something up. Writing it out is much closer to my brain.
Last year i worked regularly with an autistic kid whose teacher asked me to help with his handwriting. He proceeded to tell me all the letters of the alphabet that were “wrong”. His letters looked perfect, but he wrote them in a different way than taught. Eventually I realised the teacher meant he needed to write them the “correct” way for when they learn cursive in higher grades.
Date: 29/03/2026 07:03:59
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2374384
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
buffy said:
dv said:


Democrats focusing on the big issues in American schools
I chatted with a twenty-something the other day who is presently doing nursing training. She told me she is looked on as oldfashioned because she writes out notes by hand. But she said that is how she learns. I reassured her that she is not alone, I also remember stuff better by writing it out, and often rewriting it a bit differently. I’d thought it might just be because I am old now and that is what I did at school/uni, but I’m not so sure. I’m a touch typist, so it’s sort of automatic when I type something up. Writing it out is much closer to my brain.
Last year i worked regularly with an autistic kid whose teacher asked me to help with his handwriting. He proceeded to tell me all the letters of the alphabet that were “wrong”. His letters looked perfect, but he wrote them in a different way than taught. Eventually I realised the teacher meant he needed to write them the “correct” way for when they learn cursive in higher grades.
teachers focusing on the big issues, nice
Date: 29/03/2026 09:29:48
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2374407
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Trump bragged about a Sharpie negotiation the company said never happened.
Yesterday: Trump spent five minutes in a Cabinet meeting bragging about negotiating $5 personalized Sharpies. Sharpie said the detailed conversation Trump related never happened.
The Sharpies: Trump’s personalized Sharpies reflect his aesthetic preferences, with the black markers saying “The White House” in gold lettering.
…
Historians will marvel at this time period for centuries to come.
Date: 29/03/2026 09:33:47
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2374409
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Trump bragged about a Sharpie negotiation the company said never happened.
Yesterday: Trump spent five minutes in a Cabinet meeting bragging about negotiating $5 personalized Sharpies. Sharpie said the detailed conversation Trump related never happened.
The Sharpies: Trump’s personalized Sharpies reflect his aesthetic preferences, with the black markers saying “The White House” in gold lettering.
…
Historians will marvel at this time period for centuries to come.
Sundowning in real time. Fascinating to watch.
Date: 29/03/2026 09:37:02
From: roughbarked
ID: 2374410
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Trump bragged about a Sharpie negotiation the company said never happened.
Yesterday: Trump spent five minutes in a Cabinet meeting bragging about negotiating $5 personalized Sharpies. Sharpie said the detailed conversation Trump related never happened.
The Sharpies: Trump’s personalized Sharpies reflect his aesthetic preferences, with the black markers saying “The White House” in gold lettering.
…
Historians will marvel at this time period for centuries to come.
They’ll be mortified that people actually elected this shitty dictator.
Date: 29/03/2026 09:45:15
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2374412
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Trump bragged about a Sharpie negotiation the company said never happened.
Yesterday: Trump spent five minutes in a Cabinet meeting bragging about negotiating $5 personalized Sharpies. Sharpie said the detailed conversation Trump related never happened.
The Sharpies: Trump’s personalized Sharpies reflect his aesthetic preferences, with the black markers saying “The White House” in gold lettering.
…
Historians will marvel at this time period for centuries to come.
They’ll be mortified that people actually elected this shitty dictator.
Yet we wonder how Hitler got elected. “Why didn’t Germans do something??” Well, now it’s your turn.
Date: 29/03/2026 09:45:38
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2374413
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Trump bragged about a Sharpie negotiation the company said never happened.
Yesterday: Trump spent five minutes in a Cabinet meeting bragging about negotiating $5 personalized Sharpies. Sharpie said the detailed conversation Trump related never happened.
The Sharpies: Trump’s personalized Sharpies reflect his aesthetic preferences, with the black markers saying “The White House” in gold lettering.
…
Historians will marvel at this time period for centuries to come.
Sundowning in real time. Fascinating to watch.
I’m unsure myself that he is becoming increasingly unhinged. He’s always been a moron and to me I just think he’s guzzled all his own Kool-Aid and legitimately thinks his meandering speaks to the base who are largely as stoopid as he is.
Date: 29/03/2026 09:57:14
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2374422
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Divine Angel said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Trump bragged about a Sharpie negotiation the company said never happened.
Yesterday: Trump spent five minutes in a Cabinet meeting bragging about negotiating $5 personalized Sharpies. Sharpie said the detailed conversation Trump related never happened.
The Sharpies: Trump’s personalized Sharpies reflect his aesthetic preferences, with the black markers saying “The White House” in gold lettering.
…
Historians will marvel at this time period for centuries to come.
Sundowning in real time. Fascinating to watch.
I’m unsure myself that he is becoming increasingly unhinged. He’s always been a moron and to me I just think he’s guzzled all his own Kool-Aid and legitimately thinks his meandering speaks to the base who are largely as stoopid as he is.
Anecdote alert!
When my step-grandmother had dementia, she’d come out with the most random things. The family would be talking about like current affairs, and Norma would suddenly start talking about overwatering pot plants. Then she’d walk past the couch she’d owned for twenty years and say, “I used to own a couch like that”. My younger cousins would laugh, but I was old enough to understand.
Date: 29/03/2026 09:58:42
From: roughbarked
ID: 2374423
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Trump bragged about a Sharpie negotiation the company said never happened.
Yesterday: Trump spent five minutes in a Cabinet meeting bragging about negotiating $5 personalized Sharpies. Sharpie said the detailed conversation Trump related never happened.
The Sharpies: Trump’s personalized Sharpies reflect his aesthetic preferences, with the black markers saying “The White House” in gold lettering.
…
Historians will marvel at this time period for centuries to come.
They’ll be mortified that people actually elected this shitty dictator.
Yet we wonder how Hitler got elected. “Why didn’t Germans do something??” Well, now it’s your turn.
Hitler started out doing good things for the economy and the people were sold on that.
Date: 29/03/2026 10:04:47
From: roughbarked
ID: 2374429
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Divine Angel said:
Sundowning in real time. Fascinating to watch.
I’m unsure myself that he is becoming increasingly unhinged. He’s always been a moron and to me I just think he’s guzzled all his own Kool-Aid and legitimately thinks his meandering speaks to the base who are largely as stoopid as he is.
Anecdote alert!
When my step-grandmother had dementia, she’d come out with the most random things. The family would be talking about like current affairs, and Norma would suddenly start talking about overwatering pot plants. Then she’d walk past the couch she’d owned for twenty years and say, “I used to own a couch like that”. My younger cousins would laugh, but I was old enough to understand.
I must always have had dementia then. Going by that description.
Date: 29/03/2026 13:10:49
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2374477
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:
They’ll be mortified that people actually elected this shitty dictator.
Yet we wonder how Hitler got elected. “Why didn’t Germans do something??” Well, now it’s your turn.
Hitler started out doing good things for the economy and the people were sold on that.
what could the Germans have done
Date: 29/03/2026 13:16:37
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2374481
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
Divine Angel said:
Yet we wonder how Hitler got elected. “Why didn’t Germans do something??” Well, now it’s your turn.
Hitler started out doing good things for the economy and the people were sold on that.
what could the Germans have done
Actually the German economy was on the verge of collapse on the eve of the war. Hitler’s plan was to rely on plundering the economies of the conquered nations.
Date: 29/03/2026 13:32:20
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2374487
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Bubblecar said:
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
Hitler started out doing good things for the economy and the people were sold on that.
what could the Germans have done
Actually the German economy was on the verge of collapse on the eve of the war. Hitler’s plan was to rely on plundering the economies of the conquered nations.
Ref?
Date: 29/03/2026 13:48:05
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2374493
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Bubblecar said:
SCIENCE said:
what could the Germans have done
Actually the German economy was on the verge of collapse on the eve of the war. Hitler’s plan was to rely on plundering the economies of the conquered nations.
Ref?
From Wiki:
Hitler called for Germany to have the world’s “first army” in terms of fighting power within the next four years and that “the extent of the military development of our resources cannot be too large, nor its pace too swift” and the role of the economy was simply to support “Germany’s self-assertion and the extension of her Lebensraum”.
Hitler went on to write that given the magnitude of the coming struggle that the concerns expressed by members of the “free market” faction like Schacht and Goerdeler that the current level of military spending was bankrupting Germany were irrelevant. Hitler wrote that: “However well balanced the general pattern of a nation’s life ought to be, there must at particular times be certain disturbances of the balance at the expense of other less vital tasks. If we do not succeed in bringing the German army as rapidly as possible to the rank of premier army in the world … then Germany will be lost!” and “The nation does not live for the economy, for economic leaders, or for economic or financial theories; on the contrary, it is finance and the economy, economic leaders and theories, which all owe unqualified service in this struggle for the self-assertion of our nation”.
Germany had already been rapidly rearming and militarizing before 1936. However, it was in his memorandum of 1936 that Hitler made it clear he expected war to be imminent. He argued that the German economy “must be fit for war within four years.”
Autarky was to be pursued more aggressively, and the German people would have to begin making sacrifices in their consumption habits in order to enable food supplies and raw materials to be diverted toward military uses. Despite Nazi propaganda frequently depicting German families as well-dressed and driving new Volkswagen cars, consumption stagnated in the pre-war economy, with few people being able to afford cars.
Speaking to a meeting of his main economic advisers in 1937, Hitler insisted that Germany’s population had grown to the point where the nation would soon become unable to feed itself, so war for the conquest of Lebensraum in Eastern Europe was necessary as soon as possible. Therefore, if the rearmament drive caused economic problems, the response would have to entail pushing even harder in order to be ready for war faster, rather than scaling back military spending.
Seeing that Hitler had taken this stance, Schacht resigned as Minister of Economics in November 1937, and the management of the economy effectively passed to Hermann Göring.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Nazi_Germany#Preparations_for_war
Date: 29/03/2026 13:56:06
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2374494
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Bubblecar said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Bubblecar said:
Actually the German economy was on the verge of collapse on the eve of the war. Hitler’s plan was to rely on plundering the economies of the conquered nations.
Ref?
From Wiki:
Hitler called for Germany to have the world’s “first army” in terms of fighting power within the next four years and that “the extent of the military development of our resources cannot be too large, nor its pace too swift” and the role of the economy was simply to support “Germany’s self-assertion and the extension of her Lebensraum”.
Hitler went on to write that given the magnitude of the coming struggle that the concerns expressed by members of the “free market” faction like Schacht and Goerdeler that the current level of military spending was bankrupting Germany were irrelevant. Hitler wrote that: “However well balanced the general pattern of a nation’s life ought to be, there must at particular times be certain disturbances of the balance at the expense of other less vital tasks. If we do not succeed in bringing the German army as rapidly as possible to the rank of premier army in the world … then Germany will be lost!” and “The nation does not live for the economy, for economic leaders, or for economic or financial theories; on the contrary, it is finance and the economy, economic leaders and theories, which all owe unqualified service in this struggle for the self-assertion of our nation”.
Germany had already been rapidly rearming and militarizing before 1936. However, it was in his memorandum of 1936 that Hitler made it clear he expected war to be imminent. He argued that the German economy “must be fit for war within four years.”
Autarky was to be pursued more aggressively, and the German people would have to begin making sacrifices in their consumption habits in order to enable food supplies and raw materials to be diverted toward military uses. Despite Nazi propaganda frequently depicting German families as well-dressed and driving new Volkswagen cars, consumption stagnated in the pre-war economy, with few people being able to afford cars.
Speaking to a meeting of his main economic advisers in 1937, Hitler insisted that Germany’s population had grown to the point where the nation would soon become unable to feed itself, so war for the conquest of Lebensraum in Eastern Europe was necessary as soon as possible. Therefore, if the rearmament drive caused economic problems, the response would have to entail pushing even harder in order to be ready for war faster, rather than scaling back military spending.
Seeing that Hitler had taken this stance, Schacht resigned as Minister of Economics in November 1937, and the management of the economy effectively passed to Hermann Göring.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Nazi_Germany#Preparations_for_war
aha so that’s why they’re bombing Iran first to make sure the USSA economy is about to collapse before they launch their blitzkrieg we knew it
Date: 29/03/2026 14:07:26
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2374497
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Bubblecar said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Bubblecar said:
Actually the German economy was on the verge of collapse on the eve of the war. Hitler’s plan was to rely on plundering the economies of the conquered nations.
Ref?
From Wiki:
Hitler called for Germany to have the world’s “first army” in terms of fighting power within the next four years and that “the extent of the military development of our resources cannot be too large, nor its pace too swift” and the role of the economy was simply to support “Germany’s self-assertion and the extension of her Lebensraum”.
Hitler went on to write that given the magnitude of the coming struggle that the concerns expressed by members of the “free market” faction like Schacht and Goerdeler that the current level of military spending was bankrupting Germany were irrelevant. Hitler wrote that: “However well balanced the general pattern of a nation’s life ought to be, there must at particular times be certain disturbances of the balance at the expense of other less vital tasks. If we do not succeed in bringing the German army as rapidly as possible to the rank of premier army in the world … then Germany will be lost!” and “The nation does not live for the economy, for economic leaders, or for economic or financial theories; on the contrary, it is finance and the economy, economic leaders and theories, which all owe unqualified service in this struggle for the self-assertion of our nation”.
Germany had already been rapidly rearming and militarizing before 1936. However, it was in his memorandum of 1936 that Hitler made it clear he expected war to be imminent. He argued that the German economy “must be fit for war within four years.”
Autarky was to be pursued more aggressively, and the German people would have to begin making sacrifices in their consumption habits in order to enable food supplies and raw materials to be diverted toward military uses. Despite Nazi propaganda frequently depicting German families as well-dressed and driving new Volkswagen cars, consumption stagnated in the pre-war economy, with few people being able to afford cars.
Speaking to a meeting of his main economic advisers in 1937, Hitler insisted that Germany’s population had grown to the point where the nation would soon become unable to feed itself, so war for the conquest of Lebensraum in Eastern Europe was necessary as soon as possible. Therefore, if the rearmament drive caused economic problems, the response would have to entail pushing even harder in order to be ready for war faster, rather than scaling back military spending.
Seeing that Hitler had taken this stance, Schacht resigned as Minister of Economics in November 1937, and the management of the economy effectively passed to Hermann Göring.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Nazi_Germany#Preparations_for_war
Thanks. I suppose my knowledge of this period is influenced by modern economic understanding that indebtedness is not entirely a bad thing if one has the ability to service it and moreover favourable terms of trade. Also invading other countries is not really a sensible means to expand the economy given the expense of armaments and the working population who must join the military with the only real benefit being the plundering of other countries gold reserves.
I do wonder if I have forgotten this but IIRC it wasn’t much discussed in ‘The Age of Extremes’ by Eric Hobsbawm, one of the better comprehensive histories of the period. Also the thirties were a fairly dreary time for all western economies so German economic privation was not necessary any worse than similar powers.
Date: 29/03/2026 14:30:48
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2374503
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Bubblecar said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Ref?
From Wiki:
Hitler called for Germany to have the world’s “first army” in terms of fighting power within the next four years and that “the extent of the military development of our resources cannot be too large, nor its pace too swift” and the role of the economy was simply to support “Germany’s self-assertion and the extension of her Lebensraum”.
Hitler went on to write that given the magnitude of the coming struggle that the concerns expressed by members of the “free market” faction like Schacht and Goerdeler that the current level of military spending was bankrupting Germany were irrelevant. Hitler wrote that: “However well balanced the general pattern of a nation’s life ought to be, there must at particular times be certain disturbances of the balance at the expense of other less vital tasks. If we do not succeed in bringing the German army as rapidly as possible to the rank of premier army in the world … then Germany will be lost!” and “The nation does not live for the economy, for economic leaders, or for economic or financial theories; on the contrary, it is finance and the economy, economic leaders and theories, which all owe unqualified service in this struggle for the self-assertion of our nation”.
Germany had already been rapidly rearming and militarizing before 1936. However, it was in his memorandum of 1936 that Hitler made it clear he expected war to be imminent. He argued that the German economy “must be fit for war within four years.”
Autarky was to be pursued more aggressively, and the German people would have to begin making sacrifices in their consumption habits in order to enable food supplies and raw materials to be diverted toward military uses. Despite Nazi propaganda frequently depicting German families as well-dressed and driving new Volkswagen cars, consumption stagnated in the pre-war economy, with few people being able to afford cars.
Speaking to a meeting of his main economic advisers in 1937, Hitler insisted that Germany’s population had grown to the point where the nation would soon become unable to feed itself, so war for the conquest of Lebensraum in Eastern Europe was necessary as soon as possible. Therefore, if the rearmament drive caused economic problems, the response would have to entail pushing even harder in order to be ready for war faster, rather than scaling back military spending.
Seeing that Hitler had taken this stance, Schacht resigned as Minister of Economics in November 1937, and the management of the economy effectively passed to Hermann Göring.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Nazi_Germany#Preparations_for_war
Thanks. I suppose my knowledge of this period is influenced by modern economic understanding that indebtedness is not entirely a bad thing if one has the ability to service it and moreover favourable terms of trade. Also invading other countries is not really a sensible means to expand the economy given the expense of armaments and the working population who must join the military with the only real benefit being the plundering of other countries gold reserves.
I do wonder if I have forgotten this but IIRC it wasn’t much discussed in ‘The Age of Extremes’ by Eric Hobsbawm, one of the better comprehensive histories of the period. Also the thirties were a fairly dreary time for all western economies so German economic privation was not necessary any worse than similar powers.
I have Hobsbawm’s Age of Extremes and although it’s good in parts, it’s a bit thrown together, with not a lot of detail for the WW2 period.
There are plenty of works analysing the decline of the German economy under the Nazis, as an inevitable consequence of Hitler’s drive for a war economy that would then be enriched by conquest. A strategy that failed largely due to Nazi Germany’s oppressive policies in many of the conquered territories effectively ruining those economies as well.
Date: 29/03/2026 14:37:14
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2374509
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Bubblecar said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Bubblecar said:
From Wiki:
Hitler called for Germany to have the world’s “first army” in terms of fighting power within the next four years and that “the extent of the military development of our resources cannot be too large, nor its pace too swift” and the role of the economy was simply to support “Germany’s self-assertion and the extension of her Lebensraum”.
Hitler went on to write that given the magnitude of the coming struggle that the concerns expressed by members of the “free market” faction like Schacht and Goerdeler that the current level of military spending was bankrupting Germany were irrelevant. Hitler wrote that: “However well balanced the general pattern of a nation’s life ought to be, there must at particular times be certain disturbances of the balance at the expense of other less vital tasks. If we do not succeed in bringing the German army as rapidly as possible to the rank of premier army in the world … then Germany will be lost!” and “The nation does not live for the economy, for economic leaders, or for economic or financial theories; on the contrary, it is finance and the economy, economic leaders and theories, which all owe unqualified service in this struggle for the self-assertion of our nation”.
Germany had already been rapidly rearming and militarizing before 1936. However, it was in his memorandum of 1936 that Hitler made it clear he expected war to be imminent. He argued that the German economy “must be fit for war within four years.”
Autarky was to be pursued more aggressively, and the German people would have to begin making sacrifices in their consumption habits in order to enable food supplies and raw materials to be diverted toward military uses. Despite Nazi propaganda frequently depicting German families as well-dressed and driving new Volkswagen cars, consumption stagnated in the pre-war economy, with few people being able to afford cars.
Speaking to a meeting of his main economic advisers in 1937, Hitler insisted that Germany’s population had grown to the point where the nation would soon become unable to feed itself, so war for the conquest of Lebensraum in Eastern Europe was necessary as soon as possible. Therefore, if the rearmament drive caused economic problems, the response would have to entail pushing even harder in order to be ready for war faster, rather than scaling back military spending.
Seeing that Hitler had taken this stance, Schacht resigned as Minister of Economics in November 1937, and the management of the economy effectively passed to Hermann Göring.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Nazi_Germany#Preparations_for_war
Thanks. I suppose my knowledge of this period is influenced by modern economic understanding that indebtedness is not entirely a bad thing if one has the ability to service it and moreover favourable terms of trade. Also invading other countries is not really a sensible means to expand the economy given the expense of armaments and the working population who must join the military with the only real benefit being the plundering of other countries gold reserves.
I do wonder if I have forgotten this but IIRC it wasn’t much discussed in ‘The Age of Extremes’ by Eric Hobsbawm, one of the better comprehensive histories of the period. Also the thirties were a fairly dreary time for all western economies so German economic privation was not necessary any worse than similar powers.
I have Hobsbawm’s Age of Extremes and although it’s good in parts, it’s a bit thrown together, with not a lot of detail for the WW2 period.
There are plenty of works analysing the decline of the German economy under the Nazis, as an inevitable consequence of Hitler’s drive for a war economy that would then be enriched by conquest. A strategy that failed largely due to Nazi Germany’s oppressive policies in many of the conquered territories effectively ruining those economies as well.
Ta. I might be experiencing a minor British Museum when my knowledge has proved wanting in a subject I thought I knew a lot about. Oh well…
Date: 29/03/2026 14:38:48
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2374510
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Bubblecar said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Thanks. I suppose my knowledge of this period is influenced by modern economic understanding that indebtedness is not entirely a bad thing if one has the ability to service it and moreover favourable terms of trade. Also invading other countries is not really a sensible means to expand the economy given the expense of armaments and the working population who must join the military with the only real benefit being the plundering of other countries gold reserves.
I do wonder if I have forgotten this but IIRC it wasn’t much discussed in ‘The Age of Extremes’ by Eric Hobsbawm, one of the better comprehensive histories of the period. Also the thirties were a fairly dreary time for all western economies so German economic privation was not necessary any worse than similar powers.
I have Hobsbawm’s Age of Extremes and although it’s good in parts, it’s a bit thrown together, with not a lot of detail for the WW2 period.
There are plenty of works analysing the decline of the German economy under the Nazis, as an inevitable consequence of Hitler’s drive for a war economy that would then be enriched by conquest. A strategy that failed largely due to Nazi Germany’s oppressive policies in many of the conquered territories effectively ruining those economies as well.
Ta. I might be experiencing a minor British Museum when my knowledge has proved wanting in a subject I thought I knew a lot about. Oh well…
British Museum moment
Date: 29/03/2026 14:40:34
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2374511
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
more free passage

in a sensible world, Australians would totally have faith in the fascist alliance remaining to lose

in a sensible world, USSA would totally have credibility remaining to lose
Date: 29/03/2026 22:30:14
From: kii
ID: 2374639
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
I Fucking Love Australia.
The standard that you walk past.
Date: 30/03/2026 07:27:27
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2374659
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Oregon’s Bay Area is feeling determined.
Good morning! If yesterday’s No Kings protests proved anything, it is that a whole lot of Americans have finally decided they are done pretending this is normal. Across more than 3,300 rallies in all 50 states, plus solidarity events abroad, millions of people turned out to protest Trump’s war in Iran, his immigration crackdown, his attacks on rights, and his general monarch-with-a-budget-deficit approach to governing. Organizers put turnout as high as eight million; news organizations have not independently confirmed that full number, but even cautious reporting agrees this was one of the largest coordinated protest days in recent U.S. history.
More than just the size, it was the breadth. This was not one issue, one constituency, one neat little box for cable anchors to mislabel and move on from. It was veterans, immigrants, retirees, queer folks, Native communities, parents of service members, scientists, teachers, and ordinary people who have had quite enough of being told that mass deportation, forever war, and creeping authoritarianism are just politics as usual. In city after city, people linked ICE cruelty, the Iran war, rising costs, attacks on voting rights, and the degradation of democratic norms as parts of the same ugly project.
The human details were on full display. In Austin, a 93-year-old Korean War veteran called Trump’s attack on Iran “a diversion” and warned that “that idiot is going to cause a lot of good military people to lose their lives.” A New York mother whose Marine son may be deployed said Trump is using troops “as pawns, just to flex.” In St. Paul, residents described months of federal immigration operations as “hell,” with one woman saying she still carries her passport whenever she leaves home.
Here in Coos Bay, the local MAGA contingent decided to cosplay as the Last Defenders of Freedom by arriving early to occupy the boardwalk with giant gas- and diesel-powered pickups, acres of flag fabric, and a lonely little soundtrack of Lee Greenwood and pro-Trump anthems. They came armed with the usual “Trump is my president” and Second Amendment swagger, only to be visibly outnumbered and diluted as the day wore on and the real message of the protest asserted itself: no ICE terror, no war, no more protecting predators, no more cruelty as public policy. Loud does not equal dominant, and big trucks do not equal majority. Sometimes it just means your insecurity has a tailpipe.
That broader protest energy may now be looking for a weekday form. Organizers are already pointing toward May Day Strong on May 1, which is not really a formal general strike in the classic labor sense, but very much wants to flirt with the idea. The coalition is explicitly calling for a national day of action under the banner “Workers Over Billionaires,” with some local efforts urging “No School. No Work. No Shopping.” That is not yet a full shutdown. But it is a meaningful next step if the resistance is trying to move from weekend catharsis toward weekday disruption and pressure on the machinery of business as usual.
On the international stage, the war rhetoric keeps getting uglier because, as always, Trump and his people are trying to govern by euphemism while the actual consequences keep piling up. Iran’s parliamentary speaker, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, marked thirty days of war by warning that Iranian forces are waiting for American troops on the ground “to set them on fire.” Regional diplomacy talks are underway in Islamabad, but the public evidence still points to a widening conflict, continued strikes on Tehran, threats around the Strait of Hormuz, and a U.S. administration that keeps talking about diplomacy with one side of its mouth while keeping military options tucked behind its back like a blackjack.
The latest Trump-language analysis gets this exactly right: the lies are not random, they are the operating system. Trump keeps insisting this is not a war, just an operation, a mission, a little excursion in imperial tourism. He claims Iran’s capabilities are completely obliterated, then immediately resurrects them as an urgent threat requiring more escalation. Victory is declared before reality has even bothered to show up. Politics run like a failing casino: loud, shiny, contradictory, and somehow always asking everyone else to cover the losses. The same public record that gave us more than 30,000 false or misleading claims in Trump’s first term now gives us war by euphemism and escalation by press release.
No superpower decline is complete without a propaganda sideshow, Iranian state-affiliated media have been circulating those bizarre but undeniably clever AI-generated LEGO-style videos mocking Trump. Reporting ties at least one of them to Tasnim, the IRGC-linked outlet, and the clips reportedly depict Trump and Netanyahu as sweating little plastic tyrants while Iran flexes its ability to choke Hormuz and hit the global economy right at the gas pump. It is juvenile, theatrical, and irritatingly effective, which also makes it a pretty fair mirror of the administration it is targeting. Tehran has figured out that if Trump insists on turning geopolitics into reality television, then maybe the best rebuttal is to turn him into a toy.
In our own Pentagon clown tent, Pete Hegseth has reportedly picked up a new nickname from current and former officials: “Dumb McNamara.” It is so viciously concise that you almost want to frame it. For younger readers, Robert McNamara was the defense secretary most closely associated with deepening U.S. involvement in Vietnam, a war that became a byword for strategic arrogance, official deception, and catastrophic human cost. He later became linked in the public mind to the Pentagon Papers era and to the kind of polished, overconfident war management that looked rational in the briefing room and disastrous in real life.
That is what makes the nickname sting. It is not just saying Hegseth is a hawk. It is saying even people inside the building seem to understand he is auditioning to become the face of a swaggering, badly sold war pushed by men too arrogant to imagine consequences. Trump himself publicly praised Hegseth this week as one of the first voices urging military action against Iran. If you were trying to invent a grim historical metaphor for where this administration is headed, you would struggle to improve on Dumb McNamara.
So that is the picture this morning. Trump wants a country that accepts mass fear at home, euphemized war abroad, and permanent unreality in the public square. Yesterday, millions of people answered back. Not with one slogan or one ideology or one perfectly focus-grouped message, but with a loud, messy, deeply human refusal to treat ICE raids as normal or to treat another Middle East war as a vanity project with someone else’s children. Refusal to treat a man who posts AI crown videos of himself as anything but what he is: a dangerous armed clown with access to the controls.
Trump does not take public defiance as a democratic correction; he takes it as a personal insult. The last time this movement rose up, he was already busy literally tearing down part of the White House to build himself a gilded monument, a fitting little metaphor for a presidency that answers dissent with destruction and calls it greatness. Yesterday was heartening, but it was also a reminder that every time the country says no, we have to brace for whatever fresh act of spite, escalation, or authoritarian theater he dreams up next.
Date: 30/03/2026 09:51:41
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2374684
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The unreligious religiosity of Christian identity politics
The new religious right is distinct from the one that was once led by evangelicals.
March 27, 2026
Opinion
Matthew Schmitz
James Fishback is a different kind of Republican candidate. At appearances across the state of Florida, where he is seeking the Republican nomination for governor, he fluently uses Gen Z slang and leans into a memeable form of religiosity. At a recent event, Fishback, a Catholic, stood before a cheering crowd of young men as he kissed an icon of Christ the Bridegroom. “I will never kiss the wall,” he said, referring to the Western Wall in Jerusalem, one of Judaism’s holiest sites. “But I will kiss our Lord and Savior.”
The conversations animating the Editorial Board, delivered to your inbox every Tuesday
It’s hard to imagine a member of the Moral Majority-era religious right doing the same thing. But Fishback distinguishes himself from conventional politicians by asserting his Christianity in baroque and confrontational terms. He does not just invoke Christian themes. He draws a line between Christians and non-Christians, as in his comment about the Western Wall.
Fishback’s religious rhetoric is part of an emerging form of Christian identity politics. Like a number of prominent influencers, he interlaces elaborate expressions of Christian piety with criticisms of Jewish supporters of Israel. Many of these influencers are “trad Caths,” Catholics drawn to the traditional Latin mass and alienated from the church hierarchy. They are creating a religious right distinct from the one that was once led by evangelicals.
Candace Owens, for example, attends the Latin mass and spins her anti-establishment and anti-Jewish fantasias while sitting in front of an ornate crucifix and a gothic reliquary containing a stone associated with the cult of St. Michael the Archangel. (She recently said that she has not yet been confirmed in the Catholic faith with which she publicly identifies.)
Megyn Kelly, another Catholic, has likewise grown more demonstrative in her piety as she has grown more critical of pro-Israel Jewish commentators such as Ben Shapiro and Mark Levin. In December, she announced to the world that she was about to pray the rosary “like virtually all Christians do.” (About half of Christians are non-Catholic.)
This political Cathsploitation has turned Fishback, a financier with a history of legal and money troubles, into a rising star of the online right. His opponent, Rep. Byron Donalds, is favored to win the August primary. But a February poll found Fishback drawing support from 32 percent of Republican voters age 18-34, compared with just 8 percent for Donalds. With millions of TikTok views and a young and enthusiastic following, Fishback is poised to thrive as an antiestablishment influencer.
Far from being a sign of resurgent faith, Christian identity politics is a symptom of religious decline. As one observer has noted, the fact that Americans are growing more secular and less religiously literate has made religion more salient as a marker of political difference, even as invocations of it become less informed.
This irony was already evident during Donald Trump’s first presidential campaign and term, in his unidiomatic citation of “Two Corinthians” (most Christians would say “Second Corinthians”) and his decision to hold up a Bible in response to public disorder in 2020. (When a reporter asked, “Is that your Bible?,” Trump memorably replied, “It’s a Bible.”)
But the new Christian identity politics differs from Trump’s fairly conventional civic religion. Fishback kisses an icon rather than lifting a Bible. He punctuates his remarks not by saying “God bless America” but by proclaiming “Christ is king.” Like Owens and Kelly, he seems to prefer distinctive and striking expressions of belief to the familiar and reassuring.
It isn’t a coincidence that all these figures have thrived on video-based platforms in the age of social media. Visual media incentivize more striking and extreme displays of religious identity. In the 1970s, the media theorist Marshall McLuhan remarked on how people had come to look down on religious figures who tried to blend in by wearing everyday clothing, “the plain-clothed priest or plain-clothed nun.” Instead, he said, young people wanted “massive costumes and vestments” — the kind of thing traditional Catholicism specializes in — because they prized the “far out” and “very unconventional.”
Something similar is true today. Holding up rosaries at rallies and kissing icons on the campaign trail is a form of religious expression optimized for a culture based on images rather than text. As Americans spend less time reading and feel less reverence for the written word, the Bible will lose ground to non-textual expressions of faith. This is partly a story of Catholic devotions replacing Protestant piety. But the new Christian identity politics also break with the understated style of older Catholic politicians like Jeb Bush. It has less to do with fine points of doctrine than with a general attraction to the outré.
Even the richest expressions of faith can be used as little more than badges of belonging. Wielding Christianity in this way is likely to unsettle non-Christians, but it will be no less distressing to many believers. Like taking the Lord’s name in vain, it is misuse of a holy thing. Viewed in this light, Fishback’s problem is not that he is too religious. It’s that he isn’t religious enough.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/03/27/megyn-kelly-candace-owens-religious-right-christianity/
Date: 30/03/2026 11:47:30
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2374714
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
A interesting follow-up to the discussion last week about US vs European median incomes:
…
A new way to measure poverty shows the US falling behind Europe
The time needed to get $1 in international dollars is 63 minutes in the US. This is about twice the average in Germany, France and the UK according to an Oxford University researcher. This suggests that average poverty is significantly higher in the US.
https://www.euronews.com/business/2026/03/29/a-new-way-to-measure-poverty-shows-the-us-falling-behind-europe
Date: 30/03/2026 11:59:11
From: Cymek
ID: 2374715
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
A interesting follow-up to the discussion last week about US vs European median incomes:
…
A new way to measure poverty shows the US falling behind Europe
The time needed to get $1 in international dollars is 63 minutes in the US. This is about twice the average in Germany, France and the UK according to an Oxford University researcher. This suggests that average poverty is significantly higher in the US.
https://www.euronews.com/business/2026/03/29/a-new-way-to-measure-poverty-shows-the-us-falling-behind-europe
Something I remember reading about empires in decline and poverty in its communities is the decay of infrastructure and repair times.
Seems a lot of infrastructure in the USA is in disrepair and not being fixed, priorities all wrong
Date: 30/03/2026 12:15:16
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2374719
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
A interesting follow-up to the discussion last week about US vs European median incomes:
…
A new way to measure poverty shows the US falling behind Europe
The time needed to get $1 in international dollars is 63 minutes in the US. This is about twice the average in Germany, France and the UK according to an Oxford University researcher. This suggests that average poverty is significantly higher in the US.
https://www.euronews.com/business/2026/03/29/a-new-way-to-measure-poverty-shows-the-us-falling-behind-europe
Something I remember reading about empires in decline and poverty in its communities is the decay of infrastructure and repair times.
Seems a lot of infrastructure in the USA is in disrepair and not being fixed, priorities all wrong
Infrastructure always gets old but public rejuvenation of existing, aging stuff is somewhat lacking in the US. But a shiny new subway in Shanghai is always going to look better than the 100 year old equivalent in New York or London.
Date: 30/03/2026 12:21:28
From: Cymek
ID: 2374721
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Cymek said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
A interesting follow-up to the discussion last week about US vs European median incomes:
…
A new way to measure poverty shows the US falling behind Europe
The time needed to get $1 in international dollars is 63 minutes in the US. This is about twice the average in Germany, France and the UK according to an Oxford University researcher. This suggests that average poverty is significantly higher in the US.
https://www.euronews.com/business/2026/03/29/a-new-way-to-measure-poverty-shows-the-us-falling-behind-europe
Something I remember reading about empires in decline and poverty in its communities is the decay of infrastructure and repair times.
Seems a lot of infrastructure in the USA is in disrepair and not being fixed, priorities all wrong
Infrastructure always gets old but public rejuvenation of existing, aging stuff is somewhat lacking in the US. But a shiny new subway in Shanghai is always going to look better than the 100 year old equivalent in New York or London.
That is true
The way the world is going isn’t really unexpected as history is full of empires long gone, they have finite lives.
Our technology and knowledge has advanced, but socially and emotionally maturing very little
Date: 30/03/2026 12:27:52
From: Michael V
ID: 2374723
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
A interesting follow-up to the discussion last week about US vs European median incomes:
…
A new way to measure poverty shows the US falling behind Europe
The time needed to get $1 in international dollars is 63 minutes in the US. This is about twice the average in Germany, France and the UK according to an Oxford University researcher. This suggests that average poverty is significantly higher in the US.
https://www.euronews.com/business/2026/03/29/a-new-way-to-measure-poverty-shows-the-us-falling-behind-europe
Something I remember reading about empires in decline and poverty in its communities is the decay of infrastructure and repair times.
Seems a lot of infrastructure in the USA is in disrepair and not being fixed, priorities all wrong
I wonder what we might learn if we studied it properly.
Date: 30/03/2026 12:29:58
From: roughbarked
ID: 2374725
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Cymek said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
A interesting follow-up to the discussion last week about US vs European median incomes:
…
A new way to measure poverty shows the US falling behind Europe
The time needed to get $1 in international dollars is 63 minutes in the US. This is about twice the average in Germany, France and the UK according to an Oxford University researcher. This suggests that average poverty is significantly higher in the US.
https://www.euronews.com/business/2026/03/29/a-new-way-to-measure-poverty-shows-the-us-falling-behind-europe
Something I remember reading about empires in decline and poverty in its communities is the decay of infrastructure and repair times.
Seems a lot of infrastructure in the USA is in disrepair and not being fixed, priorities all wrong
I wonder what we might learn if we studied it properly.
Not to unstall a fuckwit leafer at a time when you need a clever head?
Date: 30/03/2026 12:30:35
From: Cymek
ID: 2374726
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Cymek said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
A interesting follow-up to the discussion last week about US vs European median incomes:
…
A new way to measure poverty shows the US falling behind Europe
The time needed to get $1 in international dollars is 63 minutes in the US. This is about twice the average in Germany, France and the UK according to an Oxford University researcher. This suggests that average poverty is significantly higher in the US.
https://www.euronews.com/business/2026/03/29/a-new-way-to-measure-poverty-shows-the-us-falling-behind-europe
Something I remember reading about empires in decline and poverty in its communities is the decay of infrastructure and repair times.
Seems a lot of infrastructure in the USA is in disrepair and not being fixed, priorities all wrong
I wonder what we might learn if we studied it properly.
It would be interesting wouldn’t it
Could you prevent an empires decline or is human nature that is the main cause and its inevitable.
Plus is it worth it or stay small and look after yourself
Date: 30/03/2026 12:32:41
From: Cymek
ID: 2374727
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
Cymek said:
Something I remember reading about empires in decline and poverty in its communities is the decay of infrastructure and repair times.
Seems a lot of infrastructure in the USA is in disrepair and not being fixed, priorities all wrong
I wonder what we might learn if we studied it properly.
Not to unstall a fuckwit leafer at a time when you need a clever head?
That’s certainty required.
The MAGA part to me is the 1950’s to 1980’s USA that existed during the height of the Cold War.
Powerful but morally bankrupt and gone as others powers have stepped up since then.
Unless you want to nuke them back into the stone age what can you do
Date: 30/03/2026 12:41:59
From: roughbarked
ID: 2374728
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
I wonder what we might learn if we studied it properly.
Not to unstall a fuckwit leafer at a time when you need a clever head?
That’s certainty required.
The MAGA part to me is the 1950’s to 1980’s USA that existed during the height of the Cold War.
Powerful but morally bankrupt and gone as others powers have stepped up since then.
Unless you want to nuke them back into the stone age what can you do
Educate educate.
Educate eduare
Date: 30/03/2026 14:57:40
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2374774
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
alleged

speaking of becoming the enemies that you fight
Date: 30/03/2026 15:54:26
From: buffy
ID: 2374790
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 30/03/2026 16:06:56
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2374795
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 30/03/2026 16:09:56
From: furious
ID: 2374800
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
buffy said:
This is an odd story.
Trump says he has ‘no problem’ with Russian oil tanker bringing relief to Cuba despite blockade
what’s the ¿ précis
Trump says he has ‘no problem’ with Russian oil tanker bringing relief to Cuba despite blockade…
Date: 30/03/2026 16:14:31
From: Woodie
ID: 2374804
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
furious said:
SCIENCE said:
buffy said:
This is an odd story.
Trump says he has ‘no problem’ with Russian oil tanker bringing relief to Cuba despite blockade
what’s the ¿ précis
Trump says he has ‘no problem’ with Russian oil tanker bringing relief to Cuba despite blockade…
Dunny Can (Poo Tin) probably popped off a quick email asking for a small favour.
Date: 30/03/2026 16:29:09
From: dv
ID: 2374810
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 30/03/2026 16:34:48
From: buffy
ID: 2374812
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
buffy said:
This is an odd story.
Trump says he has ‘no problem’ with Russian oil tanker bringing relief to Cuba despite blockade
what’s the ¿ précis
He’s fine with a blockaded Russian ship delivering oil.
Date: 30/03/2026 16:35:29
From: Cymek
ID: 2374813
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
buffy said:
This is an odd story.
Trump says he has ‘no problem’ with Russian oil tanker bringing relief to Cuba despite blockade
Great Man of peace lifts sanctions on Cuba and Iran
Imagine if the whole world came together to impose sanctions on the USA
To prevent the rise of the Fourth Reich Fuehrer Trump, nothing personal
Date: 30/03/2026 17:25:15
From: Michael V
ID: 2374828
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Woodie said:
furious said:
SCIENCE said:
what’s the ¿ précis
Trump says he has ‘no problem’ with Russian oil tanker bringing relief to Cuba despite blockade…
Dunny Can (Poo Tin) probably popped off a quick email asking for a small favour.
Thunder Box likely TOLD Krasnov.
Date: 30/03/2026 17:26:06
From: roughbarked
ID: 2374829
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 31/03/2026 14:58:44
From: Michael V
ID: 2375063
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Heather Delaney Reese
At 10:35 this morning, Donald J. Trump took a break from praising authoritarians on social media and sat down behind the long mahogany table inside the White House Cabinet Room for his first meeting with his full cabinet since his war with Iran began. In what was supposed to be a wartime briefing, Trump instead declared he might become president of a South American country and accidentally shared that he should probably have the 25th Amendment invoked on him. And that was just the beginning. What unfolded over the next 97 minutes was an alarming spiral of disinformation and recklessness.
As he sat there in his navy suit, crisp white shirt, and red tie that perfectly matched the red stripes in the multiple American flags placed behind him, he appeared surprisingly alert. Like he’d been practicing for the camera. He cracked jokes, clearly enjoying himself. If you couldn’t hear what he was saying, you’d think you were watching a man without a care in the world.
And as he gestured and grinned and interrupted and rambled, it’s easy to imagine that he feels like he’s back on The Apprentice. But instead of saying catchphrases for a camera, he’s holding the fate of millions in his hands. And he doesn’t seem to feel the weight of that at all.
And for their part, his cabinet played along. One by one, they took their turns participating in the theatrical production. Rubio called him the president who finally had the courage to act. Vance claimed Iran’s military is effectively destroyed. And then came Hegseth, the former Fox News host turned Defense Secretary, who used his time to attack the press. “Behind every headline you write, there’s a helicopter crew in the air,” he told the reporters in the room. “Behind every fake news story, there’s an F-35 pilot executing a dangerous mission.” He called Trump’s war “stuff for the history books” and “stuff for legacy.” Then he said the Department of “War” would “continue negotiating with bombs.” The rest of the cabinet nodded along. But none of that was true. The press he was attacking were doing their jobs, reporting the facts with compassion and respect for the men and women in uniform. It was Hegseth who was spinning reality into his preferred storyline to make an unjust and struggling war look justified and heroic.
And while Hegseth delivered that performance, the man sitting right next to him, the man who started this war, once again couldn’t keep his eyes open. Trump sat hunched forward in his chair, his head tilting, his eyes heavy and closed. The commander-in-chief of the United States military could not stay awake while his own Defense Secretary briefed him on the war he launched 27 days ago. That is how this administration is really being run. By a deteriorating president who sleeps through “life and death” meetings.
But when it was his turn to talk again, he snapped back. Not to discuss strategy or a number of important matters involving the country he was elected to lead. Instead, he wanted to talk about pens. To make his point, he pulled a Sharpie from his pocket, held it up for the cameras, and spent the next five minutes telling the story of how it got there. The Biden administration, he said, had left behind ballpoint pens that cost $1,000 each. Gold and silver. Beautiful, he said. But they didn’t write. “I take it out and I sign and there’s no ink and I got all you people looking and you’re saying there must be something wrong with Trump.” So he personally called the CEO of Sharpie. Negotiated the price down to $5. Asked them to paint it black so it wouldn’t look “too informal” when he was signing “a trillion dollar airplane contract to buy brand new fighter jets.” They added the White House logo in gold. “Almost real gold,” he said. Then they added his signature. His signature. On a pen. That is what the president is focused on these days.
And when the story was finally over, he held the pen out to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. “Could I give it to a man who’s done a great job at treasuring?” he said. The cabinet laughed. Because that’s what you do when the most powerful man in the room hands you a $5 pen, and expects you to act grateful for the “gift” and amazed by the story.
And then, moments later, he went on his next detour. ‘I’m the highest-polling person,’ he said. ‘In other words, after the presidency, I think I may go to Venezuela and run for president against Delcy. I may run against Delcy. It’s an option for me. It’s a wonderful option.’ The room laughed at the absurdity of it all, because they had been trained to always respond to his outbursts in this way. But it becomes more troublesome when you think about what he has just said. The President of the United States declared that running a foreign country he just invaded is ‘a wonderful option’ for his post-presidency. And as much as I’d love to say this was just a joke, with Trump, all of his so-called jokes must be taken seriously. Because this is not a man limited by rules or common sense. This is a man who responds with impulse.
Earlier in the same meeting, he had described the Venezuela arrangement as ‘sort of like a joint venture.’ He said, “we get a lot of it,” referring to their oil. He confirmed the U.S. took in 100 million barrels in the first two weeks. Rubio confirmed the money flows into a U.S. Treasury blocked account. Trump said the U.S. has ‘made a lot of money’ and that they’ve ‘paid for the cost of that military hit many, many times over.’ One of his cabinet members then told him the Venezuelan people were going to build a statue of him, comparing him to Simón Bolívar, the liberator of South America. Trump’s response? ‘That would be a great honor.’ And then, while that same cabinet member was still talking about oil production and American companies returning to Venezuela, Trump interrupted him to ask, ‘Forget that, when are they going to do the statue?’ Because all jokes aside, that is what Trump cares most about. Seeing his likeness plastered all over our country and the world, like most authoritarians do.
And then, in the moment that was the most concerning and possibly the most truthful thing Donald Trump has ever said, he admitted the reality of his presidency. A reporter asked about his plans for Iran. Trump said he couldn’t reveal them, and then, unprompted, offered this: “I can’t say what we’re going to do because if I did, I wouldn’t be sitting here for long. They probably, what is it called, the 25th Amendment.” He couldn’t remember what it was called. The 25th Amendment. The constitutional mechanism designed specifically to remove a president who is no longer fit to serve. And he had to search for it mid-sentence. Then he added, almost as an afterthought: “Which they didn’t do with Biden. Which is shocking.”
Nobody asked him about the 25th Amendment. No reporter brought it up. No cabinet member raised it. He volunteered it. He put it on the table himself, in front of the cameras and the world, and in doing so told the country two things at once: that somewhere in the back of his mind, he knows the 25th Amendment is a real possibility for him. And that even he knows it should be invoked based on his actions. That is who sat behind that mahogany table today. That is who is running this war.
And as if to prove the point he didn’t realize he was making, Trump spent the final stretch of the meeting on an unprompted defense of his own mind. No reporter asked about his cognitive health or even brought it up. The question that started it was about European deportation policy. But Trump’s mind took him somewhere else entirely. He went from European policy to attacking Democrats, to calling Kamala Harris and Biden “two sleepy people, two stupid people,” to mocking Gavin Newsom for having “a mental disability,” to him ironically declaring, “I don’t want a stupid person being president.” And that’s where his own brain betrayed him. Because from there, with no one pushing him, he drove himself straight into a defense of his own cognitive decline.
He told the room he’s “the only president that ever took a cognitive test.” That he took it three times. That he “aced it all three times.” That the questions start easy, but “by the time you get to the middle, it gets tougher,” and “by the time you get to the end, very few people can answer those questions.”
And that’s the part where he let the truth out. A cognitive screening test is not an IQ test. The questions don’t get “tough” for a healthy brain. They’re designed to detect impairment. If the middle of the test is where it starts getting hard, that’s not a sign of difficulty. That’s a sign of potential decline. These tests exist for one reason: as a screening tool designed to measure cognitive strengths and weaknesses. So when the president tells us it gets really hard in the middle, he’s telling us more than he thinks.
And then there are the questions no one in that room had the courage to ask. Why has he taken it three times? Most of us have never taken one. It’s not part of a routine physical. It’s ordered when there is a concern. Who ordered them? He said he took them “in front of numerous doctors that I have no idea who they are.” He doesn’t know who was evaluating him. And he said his own doctors warned him beforehand that “it’s Walter Reed, it’s essentially a public hospital, and if you do badly, it’s probably going to get out.” They warned him before the test. That’s not how you prep someone you’re confident about. That’s how you prep someone you’re worried about.
He ended by calling Obama “not a smart man” and saying Biden “wasn’t a smart man 30 years ago.” But the room wasn’t thinking about Obama or Biden. The room was watching a 79-year-old president, in the middle of a war, unable to stay awake during his own Defense Secretary’s briefing, defending his cognitive fitness to a roomful of people who hadn’t asked, and insisting he passed a test that most healthy adults would never need to take.
Every day brings more chaos and damage, but today it went beyond just what Trump said and into what he is doing. Because hours after that cabinet meeting ended, the Treasury Department made an announcement that shows how unrecognizable this country truly has become. Starting in June, Donald Trump’s signature will appear on all U.S. paper currency. The first $100 bills will roll off the press this summer with his name on them. He will be the first sitting president in American history to put his signature on our money. And to make room for it, they are removing the signature of the U.S. Treasurer, a position that has appeared on every single bill printed since 1861. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent released a statement that read like something out of a state propaganda handbook: “There is no more powerful way to recognize the historic achievements of our great country and President Donald J. Trump than U.S. dollar bills bearing his name.”
In that one sentence, the Trump regime made its intentions clear: Donald J. Trump and the United States of America are one and the same. ‘Our great country and President Donald J. Trump,’ side by side, as if there is no difference between the two. Because in his mind, there isn’t.
And this wasn’t even his first attempt at conquering all of the visual reminders of what this country really is and replacing them with his likeness. His first attempt was to put his face on a coin. He wanted a $1 coin with his portrait to go into circulation, and a 24-karat gold commemorative coin with his image hunched over a desk, fists clenched, to also be available. But federal law has prohibited living people from appearing on U.S. currency since 1866. The nonpartisan Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee, a body established by Congress specifically to review coin designs, refused to even look at it. The chair, Donald Scarinci’s words carry the weight of what Trump has been attempting: “Only those nations ruled by kings or dictators display the image of their sitting ruler on the coins of the realm.” He called the proposal “abhorrent to the Declaration of Independence.”
And here’s what makes this so much bigger than vanity. George Washington, the first president of the United States, the man who led the revolution, specifically refused to put his face on the country’s currency. He called it “monarchical.” The Mint Act of 1792, one of the earliest laws of this nation, stamped coins with an image of Liberty instead of Washington’s face. The founders did this on purpose. They had just fought a war to free themselves from a king. They were not going to put another one on their money. That principle held for years. Until Donald Trump became president.
And now, to celebrate the 250th anniversary of independence from that king, this president is stamping his name on every dollar bill in America. The irony is so heavy it’s painful. Because it will be just one more way to normalize his authoritarian tactics. It is just a signature, but it means so much more. And we know that because we’ve seen it before. Mussolini put himself on Italian coins. Saddam Hussein’s face was on every Iraqi dinar. Franco did it in Spain. Marcos in the Philippines. Assad put himself on the Syrian currency in 2017 while his country burned. Mao is on every bill in China. The pattern is consistent across a century of authoritarian regimes, and it never varies: when a leader puts himself on the money, he is not honoring the nation. He is claiming ownership of it.
And now connect it to everything we watched today. The pen with his signature on it. The statue he wants in Venezuela. The “joint venture” where he’s extracting oil from a country he just invaded. And then the things he’s already done; the Kennedy Center with his name added to the building. The triumphal arch he’s building. His name going on warships, on a drug discount website, on savings accounts for newborns. His face on a banner hanging down from the Department of Justice. And now he’s adding his name to our money.
And while he stamps his name on our currency, he’s simultaneously tearing apart every alliance that once made this country a force for stability in the world. Today, in that same cabinet meeting, he told our NATO allies to “remember my statements” and warned them to “never forget” that they didn’t help. He called the UK’s aircraft carriers “toys compared to what we have” and mocked their offer of support by saying, “We’ll send our aircraft carrier when the war is over. I said, ‘Oh, that’s wonderful, thank you very much. Don’t bother. We don’t need it.’” And then, most devastatingly, he said this about standing with our allies in the future: “We’re always going to be there. At least we were. I don’t know about anymore, to be honest with you.”
These were not random comments. This was the intentional destabilization of allied governments. He is weakening Europe because strong allies hold him accountable. He went after Venezuela first because Maduro was a dictator no one would defend. Then Iran, because the nuclear threat made it justifiable on the surface. He’s already said Cuba will “just fall.” He said “Operation Colombia sounds good to me.” He said “you have to do something with Mexico.” He hasn’t forgotten about Greenland or Canada. He’s just temporarily distracted by easier targets, racking up “wins”, building the precedent that America can take what it wants without consequence.
But here’s what he doesn’t understand, and what every authoritarian eventually learns the hard way. He can put his name on every bill in circulation, and we still get to decide where those bills go. Because I spent the better part of an afternoon doing something that has become a regular part of my life under this administration, making sure my money is going to people on the right side of history. That day’s search was for a new specialist doctor for preventative care. But now I don’t just read reviews and check credentials, I also scroll through their social media, looking for any sign of where they stand. I’m not expecting a public statement from every provider. I understand the cost of speaking out. I’ve felt it. The threats against myself and my family. The emails no parent should ever have to read. I know what it costs to use your voice right now, and I understand why some people don’t feel safe doing it.
But I also know what silence costs. And I wanted to find someone who understood that too. I found one. A doctor who had posted against ICE, who had made it clear they weren’t okay with what’s happening in this country. And today was my appointment. When I went in, I told them exactly why I chose them. It wasn’t just the amazing reviews. It was because they, too, were not okay with what is happening to our country. They said it was hard, that they too got pushback. But they own their own practice, they can’t be fired, and they felt it was important to speak out. I’m bringing my whole family to this doctor now. Because we have to support each other. We have to make sure our money goes to the people who are standing up when it would be easier to stay quiet.
There’s an old saying that if there’s a fascist at the table and ten people sitting with him, you’ve got eleven fascists. I’m not calling anyone a fascist for being afraid. But I am saying this isn’t business as usual. Nothing about this is usual. We are watching a regime take shape in real time, and every one of us is making a choice about where we stand, whether we realize it or not. I choose to reward the people who are brave enough to say something. And I’m asking us all to do the same in any way we can. I know it is hard to find a doctor these days, and this isn’t practical for everyone to do, but it doesn’t have to be all-or-nothing. Look for the opportunities you can easily align with others on the right side of history and start there.
We are not looking for perfection in our resistance efforts. We are looking at endurance. Because our push back is working. New polling from Reuters/Ipsos from March 24th now shows his approval has dropped to 36%, with 62% disapproving, a new second-term low.
And on Saturday, two days from now, this country is going to show him beyond the polls and in numbers never seen before just how unpopular he and his presidency really are. The third No Kings Day of Action is happening on March 28. Over 3,100 events are planned in all 50 states. The first No Kings protest in June 2025 drew nearly 5 million people. The second in October drew 7 million. Organizers are projecting 9 million for Saturday, hoping to make it one of the largest sustained nonviolent protest movements in American history. And as we get closer to the midterms, the resistance movement will just keep getting larger and louder. If we can keep the pressure building, we will be in a very different place next year. We will have a Congress that actually checks his power. And that is why I still have hope for America. And you should, too.
I’ll see you tomorrow,
Heather
Thanks for posting. That was an interesting read.
Date: 31/03/2026 15:15:35
From: kii
ID: 2375079
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
kii said:
Heather Delaney Reese
At 10:35 this morning, Donald J. Trump took a break from praising authoritarians on social media and sat down behind the long mahogany table inside the White House Cabinet Room for his first meeting with his full cabinet since his war with Iran began. In what was supposed to be a wartime briefing, Trump instead declared he might become president of a South American country and accidentally shared that he should probably have the 25th Amendment invoked on him. And that was just the beginning. What unfolded over the next 97 minutes was an alarming spiral of disinformation and recklessness.
As he sat there in his navy suit, crisp white shirt, and red tie that perfectly matched the red stripes in the multiple American flags placed behind him, he appeared surprisingly alert. Like he’d been practicing for the camera. He cracked jokes, clearly enjoying himself. If you couldn’t hear what he was saying, you’d think you were watching a man without a care in the world.
And as he gestured and grinned and interrupted and rambled, it’s easy to imagine that he feels like he’s back on The Apprentice. But instead of saying catchphrases for a camera, he’s holding the fate of millions in his hands. And he doesn’t seem to feel the weight of that at all.
And for their part, his cabinet played along. One by one, they took their turns participating in the theatrical production. Rubio called him the president who finally had the courage to act. Vance claimed Iran’s military is effectively destroyed. And then came Hegseth, the former Fox News host turned Defense Secretary, who used his time to attack the press. “Behind every headline you write, there’s a helicopter crew in the air,” he told the reporters in the room. “Behind every fake news story, there’s an F-35 pilot executing a dangerous mission.” He called Trump’s war “stuff for the history books” and “stuff for legacy.” Then he said the Department of “War” would “continue negotiating with bombs.” The rest of the cabinet nodded along. But none of that was true. The press he was attacking were doing their jobs, reporting the facts with compassion and respect for the men and women in uniform. It was Hegseth who was spinning reality into his preferred storyline to make an unjust and struggling war look justified and heroic.
And while Hegseth delivered that performance, the man sitting right next to him, the man who started this war, once again couldn’t keep his eyes open. Trump sat hunched forward in his chair, his head tilting, his eyes heavy and closed. The commander-in-chief of the United States military could not stay awake while his own Defense Secretary briefed him on the war he launched 27 days ago. That is how this administration is really being run. By a deteriorating president who sleeps through “life and death” meetings.
But when it was his turn to talk again, he snapped back. Not to discuss strategy or a number of important matters involving the country he was elected to lead. Instead, he wanted to talk about pens. To make his point, he pulled a Sharpie from his pocket, held it up for the cameras, and spent the next five minutes telling the story of how it got there. The Biden administration, he said, had left behind ballpoint pens that cost $1,000 each. Gold and silver. Beautiful, he said. But they didn’t write. “I take it out and I sign and there’s no ink and I got all you people looking and you’re saying there must be something wrong with Trump.” So he personally called the CEO of Sharpie. Negotiated the price down to $5. Asked them to paint it black so it wouldn’t look “too informal” when he was signing “a trillion dollar airplane contract to buy brand new fighter jets.” They added the White House logo in gold. “Almost real gold,” he said. Then they added his signature. His signature. On a pen. That is what the president is focused on these days.
And when the story was finally over, he held the pen out to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. “Could I give it to a man who’s done a great job at treasuring?” he said. The cabinet laughed. Because that’s what you do when the most powerful man in the room hands you a $5 pen, and expects you to act grateful for the “gift” and amazed by the story.
And then, moments later, he went on his next detour. ‘I’m the highest-polling person,’ he said. ‘In other words, after the presidency, I think I may go to Venezuela and run for president against Delcy. I may run against Delcy. It’s an option for me. It’s a wonderful option.’ The room laughed at the absurdity of it all, because they had been trained to always respond to his outbursts in this way. But it becomes more troublesome when you think about what he has just said. The President of the United States declared that running a foreign country he just invaded is ‘a wonderful option’ for his post-presidency. And as much as I’d love to say this was just a joke, with Trump, all of his so-called jokes must be taken seriously. Because this is not a man limited by rules or common sense. This is a man who responds with impulse.
Earlier in the same meeting, he had described the Venezuela arrangement as ‘sort of like a joint venture.’ He said, “we get a lot of it,” referring to their oil. He confirmed the U.S. took in 100 million barrels in the first two weeks. Rubio confirmed the money flows into a U.S. Treasury blocked account. Trump said the U.S. has ‘made a lot of money’ and that they’ve ‘paid for the cost of that military hit many, many times over.’ One of his cabinet members then told him the Venezuelan people were going to build a statue of him, comparing him to Simón Bolívar, the liberator of South America. Trump’s response? ‘That would be a great honor.’ And then, while that same cabinet member was still talking about oil production and American companies returning to Venezuela, Trump interrupted him to ask, ‘Forget that, when are they going to do the statue?’ Because all jokes aside, that is what Trump cares most about. Seeing his likeness plastered all over our country and the world, like most authoritarians do.
And then, in the moment that was the most concerning and possibly the most truthful thing Donald Trump has ever said, he admitted the reality of his presidency. A reporter asked about his plans for Iran. Trump said he couldn’t reveal them, and then, unprompted, offered this: “I can’t say what we’re going to do because if I did, I wouldn’t be sitting here for long. They probably, what is it called, the 25th Amendment.” He couldn’t remember what it was called. The 25th Amendment. The constitutional mechanism designed specifically to remove a president who is no longer fit to serve. And he had to search for it mid-sentence. Then he added, almost as an afterthought: “Which they didn’t do with Biden. Which is shocking.”
Nobody asked him about the 25th Amendment. No reporter brought it up. No cabinet member raised it. He volunteered it. He put it on the table himself, in front of the cameras and the world, and in doing so told the country two things at once: that somewhere in the back of his mind, he knows the 25th Amendment is a real possibility for him. And that even he knows it should be invoked based on his actions. That is who sat behind that mahogany table today. That is who is running this war.
And as if to prove the point he didn’t realize he was making, Trump spent the final stretch of the meeting on an unprompted defense of his own mind. No reporter asked about his cognitive health or even brought it up. The question that started it was about European deportation policy. But Trump’s mind took him somewhere else entirely. He went from European policy to attacking Democrats, to calling Kamala Harris and Biden “two sleepy people, two stupid people,” to mocking Gavin Newsom for having “a mental disability,” to him ironically declaring, “I don’t want a stupid person being president.” And that’s where his own brain betrayed him. Because from there, with no one pushing him, he drove himself straight into a defense of his own cognitive decline.
He told the room he’s “the only president that ever took a cognitive test.” That he took it three times. That he “aced it all three times.” That the questions start easy, but “by the time you get to the middle, it gets tougher,” and “by the time you get to the end, very few people can answer those questions.”
And that’s the part where he let the truth out. A cognitive screening test is not an IQ test. The questions don’t get “tough” for a healthy brain. They’re designed to detect impairment. If the middle of the test is where it starts getting hard, that’s not a sign of difficulty. That’s a sign of potential decline. These tests exist for one reason: as a screening tool designed to measure cognitive strengths and weaknesses. So when the president tells us it gets really hard in the middle, he’s telling us more than he thinks.
And then there are the questions no one in that room had the courage to ask. Why has he taken it three times? Most of us have never taken one. It’s not part of a routine physical. It’s ordered when there is a concern. Who ordered them? He said he took them “in front of numerous doctors that I have no idea who they are.” He doesn’t know who was evaluating him. And he said his own doctors warned him beforehand that “it’s Walter Reed, it’s essentially a public hospital, and if you do badly, it’s probably going to get out.” They warned him before the test. That’s not how you prep someone you’re confident about. That’s how you prep someone you’re worried about.
He ended by calling Obama “not a smart man” and saying Biden “wasn’t a smart man 30 years ago.” But the room wasn’t thinking about Obama or Biden. The room was watching a 79-year-old president, in the middle of a war, unable to stay awake during his own Defense Secretary’s briefing, defending his cognitive fitness to a roomful of people who hadn’t asked, and insisting he passed a test that most healthy adults would never need to take.
Every day brings more chaos and damage, but today it went beyond just what Trump said and into what he is doing. Because hours after that cabinet meeting ended, the Treasury Department made an announcement that shows how unrecognizable this country truly has become. Starting in June, Donald Trump’s signature will appear on all U.S. paper currency. The first $100 bills will roll off the press this summer with his name on them. He will be the first sitting president in American history to put his signature on our money. And to make room for it, they are removing the signature of the U.S. Treasurer, a position that has appeared on every single bill printed since 1861. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent released a statement that read like something out of a state propaganda handbook: “There is no more powerful way to recognize the historic achievements of our great country and President Donald J. Trump than U.S. dollar bills bearing his name.”
In that one sentence, the Trump regime made its intentions clear: Donald J. Trump and the United States of America are one and the same. ‘Our great country and President Donald J. Trump,’ side by side, as if there is no difference between the two. Because in his mind, there isn’t.
And this wasn’t even his first attempt at conquering all of the visual reminders of what this country really is and replacing them with his likeness. His first attempt was to put his face on a coin. He wanted a $1 coin with his portrait to go into circulation, and a 24-karat gold commemorative coin with his image hunched over a desk, fists clenched, to also be available. But federal law has prohibited living people from appearing on U.S. currency since 1866. The nonpartisan Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee, a body established by Congress specifically to review coin designs, refused to even look at it. The chair, Donald Scarinci’s words carry the weight of what Trump has been attempting: “Only those nations ruled by kings or dictators display the image of their sitting ruler on the coins of the realm.” He called the proposal “abhorrent to the Declaration of Independence.”
And here’s what makes this so much bigger than vanity. George Washington, the first president of the United States, the man who led the revolution, specifically refused to put his face on the country’s currency. He called it “monarchical.” The Mint Act of 1792, one of the earliest laws of this nation, stamped coins with an image of Liberty instead of Washington’s face. The founders did this on purpose. They had just fought a war to free themselves from a king. They were not going to put another one on their money. That principle held for years. Until Donald Trump became president.
And now, to celebrate the 250th anniversary of independence from that king, this president is stamping his name on every dollar bill in America. The irony is so heavy it’s painful. Because it will be just one more way to normalize his authoritarian tactics. It is just a signature, but it means so much more. And we know that because we’ve seen it before. Mussolini put himself on Italian coins. Saddam Hussein’s face was on every Iraqi dinar. Franco did it in Spain. Marcos in the Philippines. Assad put himself on the Syrian currency in 2017 while his country burned. Mao is on every bill in China. The pattern is consistent across a century of authoritarian regimes, and it never varies: when a leader puts himself on the money, he is not honoring the nation. He is claiming ownership of it.
And now connect it to everything we watched today. The pen with his signature on it. The statue he wants in Venezuela. The “joint venture” where he’s extracting oil from a country he just invaded. And then the things he’s already done; the Kennedy Center with his name added to the building. The triumphal arch he’s building. His name going on warships, on a drug discount website, on savings accounts for newborns. His face on a banner hanging down from the Department of Justice. And now he’s adding his name to our money.
And while he stamps his name on our currency, he’s simultaneously tearing apart every alliance that once made this country a force for stability in the world. Today, in that same cabinet meeting, he told our NATO allies to “remember my statements” and warned them to “never forget” that they didn’t help. He called the UK’s aircraft carriers “toys compared to what we have” and mocked their offer of support by saying, “We’ll send our aircraft carrier when the war is over. I said, ‘Oh, that’s wonderful, thank you very much. Don’t bother. We don’t need it.’” And then, most devastatingly, he said this about standing with our allies in the future: “We’re always going to be there. At least we were. I don’t know about anymore, to be honest with you.”
These were not random comments. This was the intentional destabilization of allied governments. He is weakening Europe because strong allies hold him accountable. He went after Venezuela first because Maduro was a dictator no one would defend. Then Iran, because the nuclear threat made it justifiable on the surface. He’s already said Cuba will “just fall.” He said “Operation Colombia sounds good to me.” He said “you have to do something with Mexico.” He hasn’t forgotten about Greenland or Canada. He’s just temporarily distracted by easier targets, racking up “wins”, building the precedent that America can take what it wants without consequence.
But here’s what he doesn’t understand, and what every authoritarian eventually learns the hard way. He can put his name on every bill in circulation, and we still get to decide where those bills go. Because I spent the better part of an afternoon doing something that has become a regular part of my life under this administration, making sure my money is going to people on the right side of history. That day’s search was for a new specialist doctor for preventative care. But now I don’t just read reviews and check credentials, I also scroll through their social media, looking for any sign of where they stand. I’m not expecting a public statement from every provider. I understand the cost of speaking out. I’ve felt it. The threats against myself and my family. The emails no parent should ever have to read. I know what it costs to use your voice right now, and I understand why some people don’t feel safe doing it.
But I also know what silence costs. And I wanted to find someone who understood that too. I found one. A doctor who had posted against ICE, who had made it clear they weren’t okay with what’s happening in this country. And today was my appointment. When I went in, I told them exactly why I chose them. It wasn’t just the amazing reviews. It was because they, too, were not okay with what is happening to our country. They said it was hard, that they too got pushback. But they own their own practice, they can’t be fired, and they felt it was important to speak out. I’m bringing my whole family to this doctor now. Because we have to support each other. We have to make sure our money goes to the people who are standing up when it would be easier to stay quiet.
There’s an old saying that if there’s a fascist at the table and ten people sitting with him, you’ve got eleven fascists. I’m not calling anyone a fascist for being afraid. But I am saying this isn’t business as usual. Nothing about this is usual. We are watching a regime take shape in real time, and every one of us is making a choice about where we stand, whether we realize it or not. I choose to reward the people who are brave enough to say something. And I’m asking us all to do the same in any way we can. I know it is hard to find a doctor these days, and this isn’t practical for everyone to do, but it doesn’t have to be all-or-nothing. Look for the opportunities you can easily align with others on the right side of history and start there.
We are not looking for perfection in our resistance efforts. We are looking at endurance. Because our push back is working. New polling from Reuters/Ipsos from March 24th now shows his approval has dropped to 36%, with 62% disapproving, a new second-term low.
And on Saturday, two days from now, this country is going to show him beyond the polls and in numbers never seen before just how unpopular he and his presidency really are. The third No Kings Day of Action is happening on March 28. Over 3,100 events are planned in all 50 states. The first No Kings protest in June 2025 drew nearly 5 million people. The second in October drew 7 million. Organizers are projecting 9 million for Saturday, hoping to make it one of the largest sustained nonviolent protest movements in American history. And as we get closer to the midterms, the resistance movement will just keep getting larger and louder. If we can keep the pressure building, we will be in a very different place next year. We will have a Congress that actually checks his power. And that is why I still have hope for America. And you should, too.
I’ll see you tomorrow,
Heather
Thanks for posting. That was an interesting read.
It’s a Lovely Life by Heather Delaney Reese – Facebook etc
Heather also does videos. She’s also on Youtube, and has a Substack. Her website appears to be blocked here in Oz.
Date: 31/03/2026 15:24:36
From: Cymek
ID: 2375080
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Michael V said:
kii said:
Heather Delaney Reese
At 10:35 this morning, Donald J. Trump took a break from praising authoritarians on social media and sat down behind the long mahogany table inside the White House Cabinet Room for his first meeting with his full cabinet since his war with Iran began. In what was supposed to be a wartime briefing, Trump instead declared he might become president of a South American country and accidentally shared that he should probably have the 25th Amendment invoked on him. And that was just the beginning. What unfolded over the next 97 minutes was an alarming spiral of disinformation and recklessness.
As he sat there in his navy suit, crisp white shirt, and red tie that perfectly matched the red stripes in the multiple American flags placed behind him, he appeared surprisingly alert. Like he’d been practicing for the camera. He cracked jokes, clearly enjoying himself. If you couldn’t hear what he was saying, you’d think you were watching a man without a care in the world.
And as he gestured and grinned and interrupted and rambled, it’s easy to imagine that he feels like he’s back on The Apprentice. But instead of saying catchphrases for a camera, he’s holding the fate of millions in his hands. And he doesn’t seem to feel the weight of that at all.
And for their part, his cabinet played along. One by one, they took their turns participating in the theatrical production. Rubio called him the president who finally had the courage to act. Vance claimed Iran’s military is effectively destroyed. And then came Hegseth, the former Fox News host turned Defense Secretary, who used his time to attack the press. “Behind every headline you write, there’s a helicopter crew in the air,” he told the reporters in the room. “Behind every fake news story, there’s an F-35 pilot executing a dangerous mission.” He called Trump’s war “stuff for the history books” and “stuff for legacy.” Then he said the Department of “War” would “continue negotiating with bombs.” The rest of the cabinet nodded along. But none of that was true. The press he was attacking were doing their jobs, reporting the facts with compassion and respect for the men and women in uniform. It was Hegseth who was spinning reality into his preferred storyline to make an unjust and struggling war look justified and heroic.
And while Hegseth delivered that performance, the man sitting right next to him, the man who started this war, once again couldn’t keep his eyes open. Trump sat hunched forward in his chair, his head tilting, his eyes heavy and closed. The commander-in-chief of the United States military could not stay awake while his own Defense Secretary briefed him on the war he launched 27 days ago. That is how this administration is really being run. By a deteriorating president who sleeps through “life and death” meetings.
But when it was his turn to talk again, he snapped back. Not to discuss strategy or a number of important matters involving the country he was elected to lead. Instead, he wanted to talk about pens. To make his point, he pulled a Sharpie from his pocket, held it up for the cameras, and spent the next five minutes telling the story of how it got there. The Biden administration, he said, had left behind ballpoint pens that cost $1,000 each. Gold and silver. Beautiful, he said. But they didn’t write. “I take it out and I sign and there’s no ink and I got all you people looking and you’re saying there must be something wrong with Trump.” So he personally called the CEO of Sharpie. Negotiated the price down to $5. Asked them to paint it black so it wouldn’t look “too informal” when he was signing “a trillion dollar airplane contract to buy brand new fighter jets.” They added the White House logo in gold. “Almost real gold,” he said. Then they added his signature. His signature. On a pen. That is what the president is focused on these days.
And when the story was finally over, he held the pen out to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. “Could I give it to a man who’s done a great job at treasuring?” he said. The cabinet laughed. Because that’s what you do when the most powerful man in the room hands you a $5 pen, and expects you to act grateful for the “gift” and amazed by the story.
And then, moments later, he went on his next detour. ‘I’m the highest-polling person,’ he said. ‘In other words, after the presidency, I think I may go to Venezuela and run for president against Delcy. I may run against Delcy. It’s an option for me. It’s a wonderful option.’ The room laughed at the absurdity of it all, because they had been trained to always respond to his outbursts in this way. But it becomes more troublesome when you think about what he has just said. The President of the United States declared that running a foreign country he just invaded is ‘a wonderful option’ for his post-presidency. And as much as I’d love to say this was just a joke, with Trump, all of his so-called jokes must be taken seriously. Because this is not a man limited by rules or common sense. This is a man who responds with impulse.
Earlier in the same meeting, he had described the Venezuela arrangement as ‘sort of like a joint venture.’ He said, “we get a lot of it,” referring to their oil. He confirmed the U.S. took in 100 million barrels in the first two weeks. Rubio confirmed the money flows into a U.S. Treasury blocked account. Trump said the U.S. has ‘made a lot of money’ and that they’ve ‘paid for the cost of that military hit many, many times over.’ One of his cabinet members then told him the Venezuelan people were going to build a statue of him, comparing him to Simón Bolívar, the liberator of South America. Trump’s response? ‘That would be a great honor.’ And then, while that same cabinet member was still talking about oil production and American companies returning to Venezuela, Trump interrupted him to ask, ‘Forget that, when are they going to do the statue?’ Because all jokes aside, that is what Trump cares most about. Seeing his likeness plastered all over our country and the world, like most authoritarians do.
And then, in the moment that was the most concerning and possibly the most truthful thing Donald Trump has ever said, he admitted the reality of his presidency. A reporter asked about his plans for Iran. Trump said he couldn’t reveal them, and then, unprompted, offered this: “I can’t say what we’re going to do because if I did, I wouldn’t be sitting here for long. They probably, what is it called, the 25th Amendment.” He couldn’t remember what it was called. The 25th Amendment. The constitutional mechanism designed specifically to remove a president who is no longer fit to serve. And he had to search for it mid-sentence. Then he added, almost as an afterthought: “Which they didn’t do with Biden. Which is shocking.”
Nobody asked him about the 25th Amendment. No reporter brought it up. No cabinet member raised it. He volunteered it. He put it on the table himself, in front of the cameras and the world, and in doing so told the country two things at once: that somewhere in the back of his mind, he knows the 25th Amendment is a real possibility for him. And that even he knows it should be invoked based on his actions. That is who sat behind that mahogany table today. That is who is running this war.
And as if to prove the point he didn’t realize he was making, Trump spent the final stretch of the meeting on an unprompted defense of his own mind. No reporter asked about his cognitive health or even brought it up. The question that started it was about European deportation policy. But Trump’s mind took him somewhere else entirely. He went from European policy to attacking Democrats, to calling Kamala Harris and Biden “two sleepy people, two stupid people,” to mocking Gavin Newsom for having “a mental disability,” to him ironically declaring, “I don’t want a stupid person being president.” And that’s where his own brain betrayed him. Because from there, with no one pushing him, he drove himself straight into a defense of his own cognitive decline.
He told the room he’s “the only president that ever took a cognitive test.” That he took it three times. That he “aced it all three times.” That the questions start easy, but “by the time you get to the middle, it gets tougher,” and “by the time you get to the end, very few people can answer those questions.”
And that’s the part where he let the truth out. A cognitive screening test is not an IQ test. The questions don’t get “tough” for a healthy brain. They’re designed to detect impairment. If the middle of the test is where it starts getting hard, that’s not a sign of difficulty. That’s a sign of potential decline. These tests exist for one reason: as a screening tool designed to measure cognitive strengths and weaknesses. So when the president tells us it gets really hard in the middle, he’s telling us more than he thinks.
And then there are the questions no one in that room had the courage to ask. Why has he taken it three times? Most of us have never taken one. It’s not part of a routine physical. It’s ordered when there is a concern. Who ordered them? He said he took them “in front of numerous doctors that I have no idea who they are.” He doesn’t know who was evaluating him. And he said his own doctors warned him beforehand that “it’s Walter Reed, it’s essentially a public hospital, and if you do badly, it’s probably going to get out.” They warned him before the test. That’s not how you prep someone you’re confident about. That’s how you prep someone you’re worried about.
He ended by calling Obama “not a smart man” and saying Biden “wasn’t a smart man 30 years ago.” But the room wasn’t thinking about Obama or Biden. The room was watching a 79-year-old president, in the middle of a war, unable to stay awake during his own Defense Secretary’s briefing, defending his cognitive fitness to a roomful of people who hadn’t asked, and insisting he passed a test that most healthy adults would never need to take.
Every day brings more chaos and damage, but today it went beyond just what Trump said and into what he is doing. Because hours after that cabinet meeting ended, the Treasury Department made an announcement that shows how unrecognizable this country truly has become. Starting in June, Donald Trump’s signature will appear on all U.S. paper currency. The first $100 bills will roll off the press this summer with his name on them. He will be the first sitting president in American history to put his signature on our money. And to make room for it, they are removing the signature of the U.S. Treasurer, a position that has appeared on every single bill printed since 1861. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent released a statement that read like something out of a state propaganda handbook: “There is no more powerful way to recognize the historic achievements of our great country and President Donald J. Trump than U.S. dollar bills bearing his name.”
In that one sentence, the Trump regime made its intentions clear: Donald J. Trump and the United States of America are one and the same. ‘Our great country and President Donald J. Trump,’ side by side, as if there is no difference between the two. Because in his mind, there isn’t.
And this wasn’t even his first attempt at conquering all of the visual reminders of what this country really is and replacing them with his likeness. His first attempt was to put his face on a coin. He wanted a $1 coin with his portrait to go into circulation, and a 24-karat gold commemorative coin with his image hunched over a desk, fists clenched, to also be available. But federal law has prohibited living people from appearing on U.S. currency since 1866. The nonpartisan Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee, a body established by Congress specifically to review coin designs, refused to even look at it. The chair, Donald Scarinci’s words carry the weight of what Trump has been attempting: “Only those nations ruled by kings or dictators display the image of their sitting ruler on the coins of the realm.” He called the proposal “abhorrent to the Declaration of Independence.”
And here’s what makes this so much bigger than vanity. George Washington, the first president of the United States, the man who led the revolution, specifically refused to put his face on the country’s currency. He called it “monarchical.” The Mint Act of 1792, one of the earliest laws of this nation, stamped coins with an image of Liberty instead of Washington’s face. The founders did this on purpose. They had just fought a war to free themselves from a king. They were not going to put another one on their money. That principle held for years. Until Donald Trump became president.
And now, to celebrate the 250th anniversary of independence from that king, this president is stamping his name on every dollar bill in America. The irony is so heavy it’s painful. Because it will be just one more way to normalize his authoritarian tactics. It is just a signature, but it means so much more. And we know that because we’ve seen it before. Mussolini put himself on Italian coins. Saddam Hussein’s face was on every Iraqi dinar. Franco did it in Spain. Marcos in the Philippines. Assad put himself on the Syrian currency in 2017 while his country burned. Mao is on every bill in China. The pattern is consistent across a century of authoritarian regimes, and it never varies: when a leader puts himself on the money, he is not honoring the nation. He is claiming ownership of it.
And now connect it to everything we watched today. The pen with his signature on it. The statue he wants in Venezuela. The “joint venture” where he’s extracting oil from a country he just invaded. And then the things he’s already done; the Kennedy Center with his name added to the building. The triumphal arch he’s building. His name going on warships, on a drug discount website, on savings accounts for newborns. His face on a banner hanging down from the Department of Justice. And now he’s adding his name to our money.
And while he stamps his name on our currency, he’s simultaneously tearing apart every alliance that once made this country a force for stability in the world. Today, in that same cabinet meeting, he told our NATO allies to “remember my statements” and warned them to “never forget” that they didn’t help. He called the UK’s aircraft carriers “toys compared to what we have” and mocked their offer of support by saying, “We’ll send our aircraft carrier when the war is over. I said, ‘Oh, that’s wonderful, thank you very much. Don’t bother. We don’t need it.’” And then, most devastatingly, he said this about standing with our allies in the future: “We’re always going to be there. At least we were. I don’t know about anymore, to be honest with you.”
These were not random comments. This was the intentional destabilization of allied governments. He is weakening Europe because strong allies hold him accountable. He went after Venezuela first because Maduro was a dictator no one would defend. Then Iran, because the nuclear threat made it justifiable on the surface. He’s already said Cuba will “just fall.” He said “Operation Colombia sounds good to me.” He said “you have to do something with Mexico.” He hasn’t forgotten about Greenland or Canada. He’s just temporarily distracted by easier targets, racking up “wins”, building the precedent that America can take what it wants without consequence.
But here’s what he doesn’t understand, and what every authoritarian eventually learns the hard way. He can put his name on every bill in circulation, and we still get to decide where those bills go. Because I spent the better part of an afternoon doing something that has become a regular part of my life under this administration, making sure my money is going to people on the right side of history. That day’s search was for a new specialist doctor for preventative care. But now I don’t just read reviews and check credentials, I also scroll through their social media, looking for any sign of where they stand. I’m not expecting a public statement from every provider. I understand the cost of speaking out. I’ve felt it. The threats against myself and my family. The emails no parent should ever have to read. I know what it costs to use your voice right now, and I understand why some people don’t feel safe doing it.
But I also know what silence costs. And I wanted to find someone who understood that too. I found one. A doctor who had posted against ICE, who had made it clear they weren’t okay with what’s happening in this country. And today was my appointment. When I went in, I told them exactly why I chose them. It wasn’t just the amazing reviews. It was because they, too, were not okay with what is happening to our country. They said it was hard, that they too got pushback. But they own their own practice, they can’t be fired, and they felt it was important to speak out. I’m bringing my whole family to this doctor now. Because we have to support each other. We have to make sure our money goes to the people who are standing up when it would be easier to stay quiet.
There’s an old saying that if there’s a fascist at the table and ten people sitting with him, you’ve got eleven fascists. I’m not calling anyone a fascist for being afraid. But I am saying this isn’t business as usual. Nothing about this is usual. We are watching a regime take shape in real time, and every one of us is making a choice about where we stand, whether we realize it or not. I choose to reward the people who are brave enough to say something. And I’m asking us all to do the same in any way we can. I know it is hard to find a doctor these days, and this isn’t practical for everyone to do, but it doesn’t have to be all-or-nothing. Look for the opportunities you can easily align with others on the right side of history and start there.
We are not looking for perfection in our resistance efforts. We are looking at endurance. Because our push back is working. New polling from Reuters/Ipsos from March 24th now shows his approval has dropped to 36%, with 62% disapproving, a new second-term low.
And on Saturday, two days from now, this country is going to show him beyond the polls and in numbers never seen before just how unpopular he and his presidency really are. The third No Kings Day of Action is happening on March 28. Over 3,100 events are planned in all 50 states. The first No Kings protest in June 2025 drew nearly 5 million people. The second in October drew 7 million. Organizers are projecting 9 million for Saturday, hoping to make it one of the largest sustained nonviolent protest movements in American history. And as we get closer to the midterms, the resistance movement will just keep getting larger and louder. If we can keep the pressure building, we will be in a very different place next year. We will have a Congress that actually checks his power. And that is why I still have hope for America. And you should, too.
I’ll see you tomorrow,
Heather
Thanks for posting. That was an interesting read.
It’s a Lovely Life by Heather Delaney Reese – Facebook etc
Heather also does videos. She’s also on Youtube, and has a Substack. Her website appears to be blocked here in Oz.
To think this old fool could have the ability to start a nuclear war for shits and giggles
Date: 31/03/2026 15:29:17
From: furious
ID: 2375081
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
- To think this old fool could have the ability to start a nuclear war for shits and giggles
Dear Iran, you want some nukes? Well, we’re sending some now and they will be there shortly. I hope you enjoy the show. Thank for your attention to this matter…
Date: 31/03/2026 15:31:34
From: roughbarked
ID: 2375082
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
furious said:
- To think this old fool could have the ability to start a nuclear war for shits and giggles
Dear Iran, you want some nukes? Well, we’re sending some now and they will be there shortly. I hope you enjoy the show. Thank for your attention to this matter…
The ultimate fireworks display.
Date: 31/03/2026 15:53:19
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2375083
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
furious said:
- To think this old fool could have the ability to start a nuclear war for shits and giggles
Dear Iran, you want some nukes? Well, we’re sending some now and they will be there shortly. I hope you enjoy the show. Thank for your attention to this matter…
The ultimate fireworks display.
wait until someone realises that the purported theocratic terrorists aren’t the theocratic terrorists at all, and instead it’s the other guys who are the theocratic terrorists for whom every accusation is a confession and darvoed everyone into believing the wrong fellas were theocratic terrorists after all
Date: 31/03/2026 16:21:42
From: Cymek
ID: 2375090
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
furious said:
- To think this old fool could have the ability to start a nuclear war for shits and giggles
Dear Iran, you want some nukes? Well, we’re sending some now and they will be there shortly. I hope you enjoy the show. Thank for your attention to this matter…
The ultimate fireworks display.
wait until someone realises that the purported theocratic terrorists aren’t the theocratic terrorists at all, and instead it’s the other guys who are the theocratic terrorists for whom every accusation is a confession and darvoed everyone into believing the wrong fellas were theocratic terrorists after all
Iran aren’t decent as a government by any moral measurement.
The thing is though the two main nations fighting them are morally bankrupt as well
Everything Iran is doing to its own people the USA have also done in the past (perhaps in smaller numbers) and also killed numerous people in proxy wars around the globe.
We are all human and until we have some sort of worldwide cooperation, sharing of resources, etc, nothing is going to change for the better.
Especially now where you wonder if the MAD doctrine is reconsidered as someone thinks they can sneak nukes past defences
Date: 31/03/2026 16:59:41
From: Michael V
ID: 2375109
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Michael V said:
kii said:
Heather Delaney Reese
….snip…
I’ll see you tomorrow,
Heather
Thanks for posting. That was an interesting read.
It’s a Lovely Life by Heather Delaney Reese – Facebook etc
Heather also does videos. She’s also on Youtube, and has a Substack. Her website appears to be blocked here in Oz.
OK. I wonder why it’s blocked.
Date: 31/03/2026 21:44:28
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2375177
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
“A woman in Muskegon Heights, Michigan has gone viral after she managed to wiggle her way out of a police cruiser window while fully handcuffed and took off running down the street.”
https://x.com/Mollyploofkins/status/2038707997296263601
Well played, Miss. I was quite concerned that she’d land on her head but with some impressive flexibility & agility she landed on her feet.
Date: 31/03/2026 21:49:46
From: kii
ID: 2375179
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 31/03/2026 22:01:26
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2375181
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Marco Rubio on Iran.
Lolololol 😆 🤣 😂 😹
thanks
Australia gets roughly 90% of its liquid fuel from imports. We have 30-something days of reserves, stored partly in the United States because Angus Taylor thought that was a brilliant idea.
how is this piece of shit not recognised as a foreign agent we mean what the fuck
Date: 31/03/2026 22:04:56
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2375183
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
kii said:
Marco Rubio on Iran.
Lolololol 😆 🤣 😂 😹
thanks
Australia gets roughly 90% of its liquid fuel from imports. We have 30-something days of reserves, stored partly in the United States because Angus Taylor thought that was a brilliant idea.
how is this piece of shit not recognised as a foreign agent we mean what the fuck
also
And now the bill is due, and Rubio is trying to split it at a table full of people who remember exactly how they were treated. Good luck with that, Marco. Well done punching yourself in the head while kicking yourself in the babymakers you epic level grand Jedi master moron. ~Gman
pretty sure when the alternative is COMMUNISM and THEOCRACY and FOREIGNERS and ACCOUNTABILITY then all of a sudden those “people who remember” will conveniently forget again and roll over and join the fray on the side of the righteous and divide the spoils and have a good life
Date: 31/03/2026 22:24:31
From: Michael V
ID: 2375186
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Marco Rubio on Iran.
Lolololol 😆 🤣 😂 😹
:)
Date: 1/04/2026 07:48:33
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2375234
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Plans for gaudy Trump presidential library in Miami spark ridicule
Video posted on social media depicts a rendering of the proposed 50-storey gargantuan structure decked in gold
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/mar/31/trump-presidential-library-plans-miami-ridicule
Date: 1/04/2026 07:52:04
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2375236
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Plans for gaudy Trump presidential library in Miami spark ridicule
Video posted on social media depicts a rendering of the proposed 50-storey gargantuan structure decked in gold
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/mar/31/trump-presidential-library-plans-miami-ridicule
Sif he’s ever read anything in his life. Put anything in an executive order folder and he’ll sign it.
Date: 1/04/2026 07:52:04
From: roughbarked
ID: 2375237
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Plans for gaudy Trump presidential library in Miami spark ridicule
Video posted on social media depicts a rendering of the proposed 50-storey gargantuan structure decked in gold
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/mar/31/trump-presidential-library-plans-miami-ridicule
Does he not realise that other dictators have had all their gaudy statues smashed when overthrown?
His name removed from places where he put it.
Date: 1/04/2026 07:52:58
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2375239
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Plans for gaudy Trump presidential library in Miami spark ridicule
Video posted on social media depicts a rendering of the proposed 50-storey gargantuan structure decked in gold
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/mar/31/trump-presidential-library-plans-miami-ridicule
Does he not realise that other dictators have had all their gaudy statues smashed when overthrown?
His name removed from places where he put it.
Toppling of Saddam Hussein’s statue was glorious, wasn’t it?
Date: 1/04/2026 07:53:25
From: roughbarked
ID: 2375240
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
roughbarked said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Plans for gaudy Trump presidential library in Miami spark ridicule
Video posted on social media depicts a rendering of the proposed 50-storey gargantuan structure decked in gold
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/mar/31/trump-presidential-library-plans-miami-ridicule
Does he not realise that other dictators have had all their gaudy statues smashed when overthrown?
His name removed from places where he put it.
Toppling of Saddam Hussein’s statue was glorious, wasn’t it?
Yup.
Date: 1/04/2026 07:57:41
From: roughbarked
ID: 2375241
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
:)
Date: 1/04/2026 07:59:57
From: roughbarked
ID: 2375242
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

More than just annoying that Trump is using this war to manipulate markets to enrich himself.
Date: 1/04/2026 08:04:09
From: roughbarked
ID: 2375244
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Pete Hegseth said the next few days would be “decisive” and that “if Iran is wise, they would cut a deal” to end the war.
Cut a deal?
Iran currently hold the upper hand from where I can see it.
Date: 1/04/2026 08:16:17
From: Michael V
ID: 2375245
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Divine Angel said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Plans for gaudy Trump presidential library in Miami spark ridicule
Video posted on social media depicts a rendering of the proposed 50-storey gargantuan structure decked in gold
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/mar/31/trump-presidential-library-plans-miami-ridicule
Sif he’s ever read anything in his life. Put anything in an executive order folder and he’ll sign it.
You’re talking about the goose who destroyed NASA’s libraries.
Date: 1/04/2026 08:28:14
From: roughbarked
ID: 2375246
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Divine Angel said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Plans for gaudy Trump presidential library in Miami spark ridicule
Video posted on social media depicts a rendering of the proposed 50-storey gargantuan structure decked in gold
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/mar/31/trump-presidential-library-plans-miami-ridicule
Sif he’s ever read anything in his life. Put anything in an executive order folder and he’ll sign it.
You’re talking about the goose who destroyed NASA’s libraries.
I believe the average goose is likely more intelligent.
Date: 1/04/2026 09:36:07
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2375256
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
oh fuck it must be the first day of the first month of Greg’s calendar
US President Donald Trump has told America’s allies the “US won’t be there to help you anymore” as he again criticised European nations for their refusal to provide more military support for the Iran war.
the fascist is telling the truth
fuck
Date: 1/04/2026 09:38:50
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2375257
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
oh fuck it must be the first day of the fourth month of Greg’s calendar
US President Donald Trump has told America’s allies the “US won’t be there to help you anymore” as he again criticised European nations for their refusal to provide more military support for the Iran war.
the fascist is telling the truth
fuck autocorrect
Date: 1/04/2026 09:49:49
From: Michael V
ID: 2375259
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
oh fuck it must be the first day of the first month of Greg’s calendar
US President Donald Trump has told America’s allies the “US won’t be there to help you anymore” as he again criticised European nations for their refusal to provide more military support for the Iran war.
the fascist is telling the truth
fuck
KKK says “You’re fired!”
Date: 1/04/2026 10:05:06
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2375266
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
https://archive.is/20260330110633/https://newrepublic.com/article/208322/pete-hegseth-religion-war-iran-sadism-rage#selection-945.0-1381.98
Link
When Pete Hegseth talks to God, he asks the Almighty to help him kill people—as violently and ruthlessly as possible.
In a potential violation of the separation of church and state, Hegseth has ordered monthly prayer meetings at the Pentagon, and in his first such gathering since launching the war against Iran, the defense secretary pleaded for divine assistance in mowing down the Iranian foe.
“Let every round find its mark against the enemies of righteousness and our nation,” Hegseth intoned to a military audience, reciting a prayer previously given by a military chaplain before the Venezuela raid and applying it to American troops in Iran.
“Give them wisdom in every decision,” Hegseth continued, “endurance for the trial ahead, unbreakable unity, and overwhelming violence of action against those who deserve no mercy.”
Hegseth’s prayer service attracted only scattered media attention. But it helps explain the real impetus behind a development that deserves far more notice: The appointed leader of the world’s most powerful military regularly speaks about his capacity to rain terror and death on the enemy with an undisguised relish that should unsettle us all.
By now it’s become unmistakable that Hegseth’s tenure has been marked by open and unrestrained sadism and bloodlust. He enthuses about raining “death and destruction from the sky all day long” and about “punching” the enemy “while they’re down.” He speaks of liberating the military from “stupid” rules of engagement. He delights in unleashing its “maximum lethality.” He rhapsodizes about killing “without hesitation”—with no moral qualms whatsoever.
This talk has already stirred deep concern among lawmakers. “The U.S. military needs to be better than other militaries,” Senator Mark Kelly, a retired Navy pilot, told me, adding that we should conduct ourselves as “merciful people” who “respect life” and “respect the rule of law.”
Yet Hegseth’s prayer also displays something else: With fresh clarity, it exposes how the roots of his bloodthirstiness lie in his particular brand of right-wing Christianity.
Hegseth appears to be a devotee of Christian Reconstructionism, a theology preached by influential far-right pastor Douglas Wilson that aims to reshape all earthly endeavors around the dictums of what his disciples claim is God’s law. As scholar-of-religion Julie Ingersoll explains on Sarah Posner’s podcast, Wilson believes that “all authority belongs to God,” rendering the state’s authority wholly subordinate to a “higher category of Biblical law.” A Pentagon spokesman has confirmed that Hegseth recently met with Wilson and is his “admirer.”
What does this say about Hegseth’s conduct in the Iran war? A lot, it turns out.
During his prayer extolling “overwhelming violence,” Hegseth expanded on this by reading from Scripture. “I pursued my enemies and overtook them,” Hegseth preached, quoting King David recounting his wars against Israel’s ancient foes and likening them to the Iranian enemy. “Those who hated me I destroyed. They cried to the Lord, but He did not answer them.”
“Snap the rod of the oppressor,” Hegseth continued in his appeal to God. “Break the teeth of the ungodly” so that “wicked souls” are “delivered to the eternal damnation prepared for them.”
Hegseth directed this prayer toward “our men and women in harm’s way right now”—meaning in Iran. As Rev. Brian Kaylor, who closely track’s Hegseth’s services, told me, Hegseth’s verses are “kind of a Mad Libs mashup of Biblical violence.”
What should we make of this? The relationship between organized religion and the military has long been complex and contested. The armed forces have chaplains. But their role is pluralist, affording members of diverse faiths a place to seek guidance. Yet speaking from the government-owned Pentagon, Hegseth has urged prayer “in the name of Jesus Christ”—his Christian God.
Official religious appeals, it should also be noted, have long been commonplace within the armed forces. Military chaplains have often prayed publicly before missions. Presidents have at times claimed divine blessing for conflicts or pronounced the enemy godless. It’s of course understandable that troops facing danger would pray for deliverance.
But Hegseth is doing something different. It’s unusual for a defense secretary to directly appeal to God—his God exclusively—to assist in maximal killing, says Ronit Stahl, a historian of the military chaplaincy. What’s notable is Hegseth’s suggestion that God actively approves of as much killing as possible, and his enlistment of God in making it “overwhelming”—supremely violent and brutal.
“Rarely has an American military leader justified killing by declaring that God has sanctioned violence as an ultimate, higher good,” Stahl told me. “It’s highly unusual for high-ranking officers or civilian military leaders to relish killing and violence in God’s name as a religious duty.”
Hegseth has open contempt for limits on what our military can inflict on foes. He has called for “no quarter” and “no mercy for our enemies.” That means killing enemies who have surrendered—a war crime. His executions of suspected Caribbean drug-runners violate international law—and possibly U.S. law and American military codes as well.
But grasping the roots of this in his particular far-right Christianity makes all this bloodlust more intelligible—and much worse. If Hegseth truly believes his war on Iran is unfolding in accordance with his conception of Biblical law—the highest authority of all—then that explains why he treats all those niggling secular constraints as unbinding on him.
Maximum violence and killing of the enemy—who cry out to God, but unlike Hegseth, don’t get an answer back from Him—are affirmatively good.
“It’s not the way somebody who claims to be a person of God—a religious person—should think,” Senator Kelly, who has flown many combat missions himself, told me. War, he added, “is a morally and ethically complicated thing for any person. Any serious warfighter struggles with it.” If we don’t wrestle with this, Kelly said, we’ll “start to lose ourselves.”
The ugliness here runs deeper still. Like other MAGA figures, Hegseth sees himself as a warrior saving “Western civilization” from ruinous barbarism, which includes battling against everything from the Iranian regime to mass migrations. Hegseth’s bicep tattoo extols the Crusaders, which he sees as his inspiration: God apparently wants Hegseth, their spiritual descendant, to kill Western civilization’s enemies as violently as possible.
But Western civilization has also bequeathed to us another legacy worth invoking here: The just war tradition, which is grounded in conceptions of our common humanity. That’s the idea that our adversaries are human beings in spite of their “enemy” status, which places limits on what we can do to them in war. It was given early formulation by Cicero and elaborated on by European philosophers like Hugo Grotius and Immanuel Kant.
Political theorist Matt McManus notes another irony here: Christian thinkers like Augustine also helped formulate a theory of forbearance in war premised on Christian principles that appears anathema to Hegseth. As McManus told me, this theory requires the waging of war “for the right reasons and in a non-brutal way.”
Obviously we’ve failed miserably at times to honor those ideals. But that should lead us to try harder to meet them, not to decide they’re worthless or unattainable. Hegseth imagines himself heroically defending “the West” while discarding its noble contributions to that just-war tradition.
These ideals generally include prohibitions on needless wars; on excessive cruelty; and on unnecessarily wanton and unrestrained killing, especially of civilians and combatants who surrender, among other things. Hegseth has violated all of them: The rationale for his war is based on lies. He casts his maximally brutal killing as an inherent good. His war has killed nearly 1,500 civilians, including many children. He lionizes the killing of enemies who surrender.
But Hegseth answers to a higher authority. Utterly incapable of genuine humility, Hegseth knows with unshakable certainty that those simply cannot be transgressions. No: They’re all in God’s plan.
Greg Sargent
Greg Sargent is a staff writer at The New Republic and the host of the podcast The Daily Blast. A seasoned political commentator with over two decades of experience, he was a prominent columnist and blogger at The Washington Post from 2010 to 2023 and has worked at Talking Points Memo, New York magazine, and the New York Observer. Greg is also the author of the critically acclaimed book An Uncivil War: Taking Back Our Democracy in an Age of Disinformation and Thunderdome Politics.
Date: 1/04/2026 10:21:37
From: Michael V
ID: 2375268
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
https://archive.is/20260330110633/https://newrepublic.com/article/208322/pete-hegseth-religion-war-iran-sadism-rage#selection-945.0-1381.98
Link
When Pete Hegseth talks to God, he asks the Almighty to help him kill people—as violently and ruthlessly as possible.
In a potential violation of the separation of church and state, Hegseth has ordered monthly prayer meetings at the Pentagon, and in his first such gathering since launching the war against Iran, the defense secretary pleaded for divine assistance in mowing down the Iranian foe.
“Let every round find its mark against the enemies of righteousness and our nation,” Hegseth intoned to a military audience, reciting a prayer previously given by a military chaplain before the Venezuela raid and applying it to American troops in Iran.
“Give them wisdom in every decision,” Hegseth continued, “endurance for the trial ahead, unbreakable unity, and overwhelming violence of action against those who deserve no mercy.”
Hegseth’s prayer service attracted only scattered media attention. But it helps explain the real impetus behind a development that deserves far more notice: The appointed leader of the world’s most powerful military regularly speaks about his capacity to rain terror and death on the enemy with an undisguised relish that should unsettle us all.
By now it’s become unmistakable that Hegseth’s tenure has been marked by open and unrestrained sadism and bloodlust. He enthuses about raining “death and destruction from the sky all day long” and about “punching” the enemy “while they’re down.” He speaks of liberating the military from “stupid” rules of engagement. He delights in unleashing its “maximum lethality.” He rhapsodizes about killing “without hesitation”—with no moral qualms whatsoever.
This talk has already stirred deep concern among lawmakers. “The U.S. military needs to be better than other militaries,” Senator Mark Kelly, a retired Navy pilot, told me, adding that we should conduct ourselves as “merciful people” who “respect life” and “respect the rule of law.”
Yet Hegseth’s prayer also displays something else: With fresh clarity, it exposes how the roots of his bloodthirstiness lie in his particular brand of right-wing Christianity.
Hegseth appears to be a devotee of Christian Reconstructionism, a theology preached by influential far-right pastor Douglas Wilson that aims to reshape all earthly endeavors around the dictums of what his disciples claim is God’s law. As scholar-of-religion Julie Ingersoll explains on Sarah Posner’s podcast, Wilson believes that “all authority belongs to God,” rendering the state’s authority wholly subordinate to a “higher category of Biblical law.” A Pentagon spokesman has confirmed that Hegseth recently met with Wilson and is his “admirer.”
What does this say about Hegseth’s conduct in the Iran war? A lot, it turns out.
During his prayer extolling “overwhelming violence,” Hegseth expanded on this by reading from Scripture. “I pursued my enemies and overtook them,” Hegseth preached, quoting King David recounting his wars against Israel’s ancient foes and likening them to the Iranian enemy. “Those who hated me I destroyed. They cried to the Lord, but He did not answer them.”
“Snap the rod of the oppressor,” Hegseth continued in his appeal to God. “Break the teeth of the ungodly” so that “wicked souls” are “delivered to the eternal damnation prepared for them.”
Hegseth directed this prayer toward “our men and women in harm’s way right now”—meaning in Iran. As Rev. Brian Kaylor, who closely track’s Hegseth’s services, told me, Hegseth’s verses are “kind of a Mad Libs mashup of Biblical violence.”
What should we make of this? The relationship between organized religion and the military has long been complex and contested. The armed forces have chaplains. But their role is pluralist, affording members of diverse faiths a place to seek guidance. Yet speaking from the government-owned Pentagon, Hegseth has urged prayer “in the name of Jesus Christ”—his Christian God.
Official religious appeals, it should also be noted, have long been commonplace within the armed forces. Military chaplains have often prayed publicly before missions. Presidents have at times claimed divine blessing for conflicts or pronounced the enemy godless. It’s of course understandable that troops facing danger would pray for deliverance.
But Hegseth is doing something different. It’s unusual for a defense secretary to directly appeal to God—his God exclusively—to assist in maximal killing, says Ronit Stahl, a historian of the military chaplaincy. What’s notable is Hegseth’s suggestion that God actively approves of as much killing as possible, and his enlistment of God in making it “overwhelming”—supremely violent and brutal.
“Rarely has an American military leader justified killing by declaring that God has sanctioned violence as an ultimate, higher good,” Stahl told me. “It’s highly unusual for high-ranking officers or civilian military leaders to relish killing and violence in God’s name as a religious duty.”
Hegseth has open contempt for limits on what our military can inflict on foes. He has called for “no quarter” and “no mercy for our enemies.” That means killing enemies who have surrendered—a war crime. His executions of suspected Caribbean drug-runners violate international law—and possibly U.S. law and American military codes as well.
But grasping the roots of this in his particular far-right Christianity makes all this bloodlust more intelligible—and much worse. If Hegseth truly believes his war on Iran is unfolding in accordance with his conception of Biblical law—the highest authority of all—then that explains why he treats all those niggling secular constraints as unbinding on him.
Maximum violence and killing of the enemy—who cry out to God, but unlike Hegseth, don’t get an answer back from Him—are affirmatively good.
“It’s not the way somebody who claims to be a person of God—a religious person—should think,” Senator Kelly, who has flown many combat missions himself, told me. War, he added, “is a morally and ethically complicated thing for any person. Any serious warfighter struggles with it.” If we don’t wrestle with this, Kelly said, we’ll “start to lose ourselves.”
The ugliness here runs deeper still. Like other MAGA figures, Hegseth sees himself as a warrior saving “Western civilization” from ruinous barbarism, which includes battling against everything from the Iranian regime to mass migrations. Hegseth’s bicep tattoo extols the Crusaders, which he sees as his inspiration: God apparently wants Hegseth, their spiritual descendant, to kill Western civilization’s enemies as violently as possible.
But Western civilization has also bequeathed to us another legacy worth invoking here: The just war tradition, which is grounded in conceptions of our common humanity. That’s the idea that our adversaries are human beings in spite of their “enemy” status, which places limits on what we can do to them in war. It was given early formulation by Cicero and elaborated on by European philosophers like Hugo Grotius and Immanuel Kant.
Political theorist Matt McManus notes another irony here: Christian thinkers like Augustine also helped formulate a theory of forbearance in war premised on Christian principles that appears anathema to Hegseth. As McManus told me, this theory requires the waging of war “for the right reasons and in a non-brutal way.”
Obviously we’ve failed miserably at times to honor those ideals. But that should lead us to try harder to meet them, not to decide they’re worthless or unattainable. Hegseth imagines himself heroically defending “the West” while discarding its noble contributions to that just-war tradition.
These ideals generally include prohibitions on needless wars; on excessive cruelty; and on unnecessarily wanton and unrestrained killing, especially of civilians and combatants who surrender, among other things. Hegseth has violated all of them: The rationale for his war is based on lies. He casts his maximally brutal killing as an inherent good. His war has killed nearly 1,500 civilians, including many children. He lionizes the killing of enemies who surrender.
But Hegseth answers to a higher authority. Utterly incapable of genuine humility, Hegseth knows with unshakable certainty that those simply cannot be transgressions. No: They’re all in God’s plan.
Greg Sargent
Greg Sargent is a staff writer at The New Republic and the host of the podcast The Daily Blast. A seasoned political commentator with over two decades of experience, he was a prominent columnist and blogger at The Washington Post from 2010 to 2023 and has worked at Talking Points Memo, New York magazine, and the New York Observer. Greg is also the author of the critically acclaimed book An Uncivil War: Taking Back Our Democracy in an Age of Disinformation and Thunderdome Politics.
Hegseth said at the start of this stupid war that “President Trump has been anointed by Jesus to light the signal fire in Iran to cause Armageddon and mark his return to Earth.”
With that dreadful, dreadful belief, he’s unlikely to stop – because he doesn’t care how may people are killed. In the end, he knows that God will sort it out and the good people will go to heaven.
His faith is all-knowing and unchangeable.
Date: 1/04/2026 10:31:00
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2375272
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
JudgeMental said:
https://archive.is/20260330110633/https://newrepublic.com/article/208322/pete-hegseth-religion-war-iran-sadism-rage#selection-945.0-1381.98
Link
When Pete Hegseth talks to God, he asks the Almighty to help him kill people—as violently and ruthlessly as possible.
In a potential violation of the separation of church and state, Hegseth has ordered monthly prayer meetings at the Pentagon, and in his first such gathering since launching the war against Iran, the defense secretary pleaded for divine assistance in mowing down the Iranian foe.
“Let every round find its mark against the enemies of righteousness and our nation,” Hegseth intoned to a military audience, reciting a prayer previously given by a military chaplain before the Venezuela raid and applying it to American troops in Iran.
“Give them wisdom in every decision,” Hegseth continued, “endurance for the trial ahead, unbreakable unity, and overwhelming violence of action against those who deserve no mercy.”
Hegseth’s prayer service attracted only scattered media attention. But it helps explain the real impetus behind a development that deserves far more notice: The appointed leader of the world’s most powerful military regularly speaks about his capacity to rain terror and death on the enemy with an undisguised relish that should unsettle us all.
By now it’s become unmistakable that Hegseth’s tenure has been marked by open and unrestrained sadism and bloodlust. He enthuses about raining “death and destruction from the sky all day long” and about “punching” the enemy “while they’re down.” He speaks of liberating the military from “stupid” rules of engagement. He delights in unleashing its “maximum lethality.” He rhapsodizes about killing “without hesitation”—with no moral qualms whatsoever.
This talk has already stirred deep concern among lawmakers. “The U.S. military needs to be better than other militaries,” Senator Mark Kelly, a retired Navy pilot, told me, adding that we should conduct ourselves as “merciful people” who “respect life” and “respect the rule of law.”
Yet Hegseth’s prayer also displays something else: With fresh clarity, it exposes how the roots of his bloodthirstiness lie in his particular brand of right-wing Christianity.
Hegseth appears to be a devotee of Christian Reconstructionism, a theology preached by influential far-right pastor Douglas Wilson that aims to reshape all earthly endeavors around the dictums of what his disciples claim is God’s law. As scholar-of-religion Julie Ingersoll explains on Sarah Posner’s podcast, Wilson believes that “all authority belongs to God,” rendering the state’s authority wholly subordinate to a “higher category of Biblical law.” A Pentagon spokesman has confirmed that Hegseth recently met with Wilson and is his “admirer.”
What does this say about Hegseth’s conduct in the Iran war? A lot, it turns out.
During his prayer extolling “overwhelming violence,” Hegseth expanded on this by reading from Scripture. “I pursued my enemies and overtook them,” Hegseth preached, quoting King David recounting his wars against Israel’s ancient foes and likening them to the Iranian enemy. “Those who hated me I destroyed. They cried to the Lord, but He did not answer them.”
“Snap the rod of the oppressor,” Hegseth continued in his appeal to God. “Break the teeth of the ungodly” so that “wicked souls” are “delivered to the eternal damnation prepared for them.”
Hegseth directed this prayer toward “our men and women in harm’s way right now”—meaning in Iran. As Rev. Brian Kaylor, who closely track’s Hegseth’s services, told me, Hegseth’s verses are “kind of a Mad Libs mashup of Biblical violence.”
What should we make of this? The relationship between organized religion and the military has long been complex and contested. The armed forces have chaplains. But their role is pluralist, affording members of diverse faiths a place to seek guidance. Yet speaking from the government-owned Pentagon, Hegseth has urged prayer “in the name of Jesus Christ”—his Christian God.
Official religious appeals, it should also be noted, have long been commonplace within the armed forces. Military chaplains have often prayed publicly before missions. Presidents have at times claimed divine blessing for conflicts or pronounced the enemy godless. It’s of course understandable that troops facing danger would pray for deliverance.
But Hegseth is doing something different. It’s unusual for a defense secretary to directly appeal to God—his God exclusively—to assist in maximal killing, says Ronit Stahl, a historian of the military chaplaincy. What’s notable is Hegseth’s suggestion that God actively approves of as much killing as possible, and his enlistment of God in making it “overwhelming”—supremely violent and brutal.
“Rarely has an American military leader justified killing by declaring that God has sanctioned violence as an ultimate, higher good,” Stahl told me. “It’s highly unusual for high-ranking officers or civilian military leaders to relish killing and violence in God’s name as a religious duty.”
Hegseth has open contempt for limits on what our military can inflict on foes. He has called for “no quarter” and “no mercy for our enemies.” That means killing enemies who have surrendered—a war crime. His executions of suspected Caribbean drug-runners violate international law—and possibly U.S. law and American military codes as well.
But grasping the roots of this in his particular far-right Christianity makes all this bloodlust more intelligible—and much worse. If Hegseth truly believes his war on Iran is unfolding in accordance with his conception of Biblical law—the highest authority of all—then that explains why he treats all those niggling secular constraints as unbinding on him.
Maximum violence and killing of the enemy—who cry out to God, but unlike Hegseth, don’t get an answer back from Him—are affirmatively good.
“It’s not the way somebody who claims to be a person of God—a religious person—should think,” Senator Kelly, who has flown many combat missions himself, told me. War, he added, “is a morally and ethically complicated thing for any person. Any serious warfighter struggles with it.” If we don’t wrestle with this, Kelly said, we’ll “start to lose ourselves.”
The ugliness here runs deeper still. Like other MAGA figures, Hegseth sees himself as a warrior saving “Western civilization” from ruinous barbarism, which includes battling against everything from the Iranian regime to mass migrations. Hegseth’s bicep tattoo extols the Crusaders, which he sees as his inspiration: God apparently wants Hegseth, their spiritual descendant, to kill Western civilization’s enemies as violently as possible.
But Western civilization has also bequeathed to us another legacy worth invoking here: The just war tradition, which is grounded in conceptions of our common humanity. That’s the idea that our adversaries are human beings in spite of their “enemy” status, which places limits on what we can do to them in war. It was given early formulation by Cicero and elaborated on by European philosophers like Hugo Grotius and Immanuel Kant.
Political theorist Matt McManus notes another irony here: Christian thinkers like Augustine also helped formulate a theory of forbearance in war premised on Christian principles that appears anathema to Hegseth. As McManus told me, this theory requires the waging of war “for the right reasons and in a non-brutal way.”
Obviously we’ve failed miserably at times to honor those ideals. But that should lead us to try harder to meet them, not to decide they’re worthless or unattainable. Hegseth imagines himself heroically defending “the West” while discarding its noble contributions to that just-war tradition.
These ideals generally include prohibitions on needless wars; on excessive cruelty; and on unnecessarily wanton and unrestrained killing, especially of civilians and combatants who surrender, among other things. Hegseth has violated all of them: The rationale for his war is based on lies. He casts his maximally brutal killing as an inherent good. His war has killed nearly 1,500 civilians, including many children. He lionizes the killing of enemies who surrender.
But Hegseth answers to a higher authority. Utterly incapable of genuine humility, Hegseth knows with unshakable certainty that those simply cannot be transgressions. No: They’re all in God’s plan.
Greg Sargent
Greg Sargent is a staff writer at The New Republic and the host of the podcast The Daily Blast. A seasoned political commentator with over two decades of experience, he was a prominent columnist and blogger at The Washington Post from 2010 to 2023 and has worked at Talking Points Memo, New York magazine, and the New York Observer. Greg is also the author of the critically acclaimed book An Uncivil War: Taking Back Our Democracy in an Age of Disinformation and Thunderdome Politics.
Hegseth said at the start of this stupid war that “President Trump has been anointed by Jesus to light the signal fire in Iran to cause Armageddon and mark his return to Earth.”
With that dreadful, dreadful belief, he’s unlikely to stop – because he doesn’t care how may people are killed. In the end, he knows that God will sort it out and the good people will go to heaven.
His faith is all-knowing and unchangeable.
damn we remember when suicide bombers were terrorists and shunned by all civilised peoples
Date: 1/04/2026 10:36:25
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2375275
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
JudgeMental said:
https://archive.is/20260330110633/https://newrepublic.com/article/208322/pete-hegseth-religion-war-iran-sadism-rage#selection-945.0-1381.98
Link
When Pete Hegseth talks to God, he asks the Almighty to help him kill people—as violently and ruthlessly as possible.
In a potential violation of the separation of church and state, Hegseth has ordered monthly prayer meetings at the Pentagon, and in his first such gathering since launching the war against Iran, the defense secretary pleaded for divine assistance in mowing down the Iranian foe.
“Let every round find its mark against the enemies of righteousness and our nation,” Hegseth intoned to a military audience, reciting a prayer previously given by a military chaplain before the Venezuela raid and applying it to American troops in Iran.
“Give them wisdom in every decision,” Hegseth continued, “endurance for the trial ahead, unbreakable unity, and overwhelming violence of action against those who deserve no mercy.”
Hegseth’s prayer service attracted only scattered media attention. But it helps explain the real impetus behind a development that deserves far more notice: The appointed leader of the world’s most powerful military regularly speaks about his capacity to rain terror and death on the enemy with an undisguised relish that should unsettle us all.
By now it’s become unmistakable that Hegseth’s tenure has been marked by open and unrestrained sadism and bloodlust. He enthuses about raining “death and destruction from the sky all day long” and about “punching” the enemy “while they’re down.” He speaks of liberating the military from “stupid” rules of engagement. He delights in unleashing its “maximum lethality.” He rhapsodizes about killing “without hesitation”—with no moral qualms whatsoever.
This talk has already stirred deep concern among lawmakers. “The U.S. military needs to be better than other militaries,” Senator Mark Kelly, a retired Navy pilot, told me, adding that we should conduct ourselves as “merciful people” who “respect life” and “respect the rule of law.”
Yet Hegseth’s prayer also displays something else: With fresh clarity, it exposes how the roots of his bloodthirstiness lie in his particular brand of right-wing Christianity.
Hegseth appears to be a devotee of Christian Reconstructionism, a theology preached by influential far-right pastor Douglas Wilson that aims to reshape all earthly endeavors around the dictums of what his disciples claim is God’s law. As scholar-of-religion Julie Ingersoll explains on Sarah Posner’s podcast, Wilson believes that “all authority belongs to God,” rendering the state’s authority wholly subordinate to a “higher category of Biblical law.” A Pentagon spokesman has confirmed that Hegseth recently met with Wilson and is his “admirer.”
What does this say about Hegseth’s conduct in the Iran war? A lot, it turns out.
During his prayer extolling “overwhelming violence,” Hegseth expanded on this by reading from Scripture. “I pursued my enemies and overtook them,” Hegseth preached, quoting King David recounting his wars against Israel’s ancient foes and likening them to the Iranian enemy. “Those who hated me I destroyed. They cried to the Lord, but He did not answer them.”
“Snap the rod of the oppressor,” Hegseth continued in his appeal to God. “Break the teeth of the ungodly” so that “wicked souls” are “delivered to the eternal damnation prepared for them.”
Hegseth directed this prayer toward “our men and women in harm’s way right now”—meaning in Iran. As Rev. Brian Kaylor, who closely track’s Hegseth’s services, told me, Hegseth’s verses are “kind of a Mad Libs mashup of Biblical violence.”
What should we make of this? The relationship between organized religion and the military has long been complex and contested. The armed forces have chaplains. But their role is pluralist, affording members of diverse faiths a place to seek guidance. Yet speaking from the government-owned Pentagon, Hegseth has urged prayer “in the name of Jesus Christ”—his Christian God.
Official religious appeals, it should also be noted, have long been commonplace within the armed forces. Military chaplains have often prayed publicly before missions. Presidents have at times claimed divine blessing for conflicts or pronounced the enemy godless. It’s of course understandable that troops facing danger would pray for deliverance.
But Hegseth is doing something different. It’s unusual for a defense secretary to directly appeal to God—his God exclusively—to assist in maximal killing, says Ronit Stahl, a historian of the military chaplaincy. What’s notable is Hegseth’s suggestion that God actively approves of as much killing as possible, and his enlistment of God in making it “overwhelming”—supremely violent and brutal.
“Rarely has an American military leader justified killing by declaring that God has sanctioned violence as an ultimate, higher good,” Stahl told me. “It’s highly unusual for high-ranking officers or civilian military leaders to relish killing and violence in God’s name as a religious duty.”
Hegseth has open contempt for limits on what our military can inflict on foes. He has called for “no quarter” and “no mercy for our enemies.” That means killing enemies who have surrendered—a war crime. His executions of suspected Caribbean drug-runners violate international law—and possibly U.S. law and American military codes as well.
But grasping the roots of this in his particular far-right Christianity makes all this bloodlust more intelligible—and much worse. If Hegseth truly believes his war on Iran is unfolding in accordance with his conception of Biblical law—the highest authority of all—then that explains why he treats all those niggling secular constraints as unbinding on him.
Maximum violence and killing of the enemy—who cry out to God, but unlike Hegseth, don’t get an answer back from Him—are affirmatively good.
“It’s not the way somebody who claims to be a person of God—a religious person—should think,” Senator Kelly, who has flown many combat missions himself, told me. War, he added, “is a morally and ethically complicated thing for any person. Any serious warfighter struggles with it.” If we don’t wrestle with this, Kelly said, we’ll “start to lose ourselves.”
The ugliness here runs deeper still. Like other MAGA figures, Hegseth sees himself as a warrior saving “Western civilization” from ruinous barbarism, which includes battling against everything from the Iranian regime to mass migrations. Hegseth’s bicep tattoo extols the Crusaders, which he sees as his inspiration: God apparently wants Hegseth, their spiritual descendant, to kill Western civilization’s enemies as violently as possible.
But Western civilization has also bequeathed to us another legacy worth invoking here: The just war tradition, which is grounded in conceptions of our common humanity. That’s the idea that our adversaries are human beings in spite of their “enemy” status, which places limits on what we can do to them in war. It was given early formulation by Cicero and elaborated on by European philosophers like Hugo Grotius and Immanuel Kant.
Political theorist Matt McManus notes another irony here: Christian thinkers like Augustine also helped formulate a theory of forbearance in war premised on Christian principles that appears anathema to Hegseth. As McManus told me, this theory requires the waging of war “for the right reasons and in a non-brutal way.”
Obviously we’ve failed miserably at times to honor those ideals. But that should lead us to try harder to meet them, not to decide they’re worthless or unattainable. Hegseth imagines himself heroically defending “the West” while discarding its noble contributions to that just-war tradition.
These ideals generally include prohibitions on needless wars; on excessive cruelty; and on unnecessarily wanton and unrestrained killing, especially of civilians and combatants who surrender, among other things. Hegseth has violated all of them: The rationale for his war is based on lies. He casts his maximally brutal killing as an inherent good. His war has killed nearly 1,500 civilians, including many children. He lionizes the killing of enemies who surrender.
But Hegseth answers to a higher authority. Utterly incapable of genuine humility, Hegseth knows with unshakable certainty that those simply cannot be transgressions. No: They’re all in God’s plan.
Greg Sargent
Greg Sargent is a staff writer at The New Republic and the host of the podcast The Daily Blast. A seasoned political commentator with over two decades of experience, he was a prominent columnist and blogger at The Washington Post from 2010 to 2023 and has worked at Talking Points Memo, New York magazine, and the New York Observer. Greg is also the author of the critically acclaimed book An Uncivil War: Taking Back Our Democracy in an Age of Disinformation and Thunderdome Politics.
Hegseth said at the start of this stupid war that “President Trump has been anointed by Jesus to light the signal fire in Iran to cause Armageddon and mark his return to Earth.”
With that dreadful, dreadful belief, he’s unlikely to stop – because he doesn’t care how may people are killed. In the end, he knows that God will sort it out and the good people will go to heaven.
His faith is all-knowing and unchangeable.
I take back what I said about Hanson’s popularity being horrifying.
This stuff is truly horrifying.
Date: 1/04/2026 10:41:39
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2375277
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
Michael V said:
JudgeMental said:
https://archive.is/20260330110633/https://newrepublic.com/article/208322/pete-hegseth-religion-war-iran-sadism-rage#selection-945.0-1381.98
Link
When Pete Hegseth talks to God, he asks the Almighty to help him kill people—as violently and ruthlessly as possible.
In a potential violation of the separation of church and state, Hegseth has ordered monthly prayer meetings at the Pentagon, and in his first such gathering since launching the war against Iran, the defense secretary pleaded for divine assistance in mowing down the Iranian foe.
“Let every round find its mark against the enemies of righteousness and our nation,” Hegseth intoned to a military audience, reciting a prayer previously given by a military chaplain before the Venezuela raid and applying it to American troops in Iran.
“Give them wisdom in every decision,” Hegseth continued, “endurance for the trial ahead, unbreakable unity, and overwhelming violence of action against those who deserve no mercy.”
Hegseth’s prayer service attracted only scattered media attention. But it helps explain the real impetus behind a development that deserves far more notice: The appointed leader of the world’s most powerful military regularly speaks about his capacity to rain terror and death on the enemy with an undisguised relish that should unsettle us all.
By now it’s become unmistakable that Hegseth’s tenure has been marked by open and unrestrained sadism and bloodlust. He enthuses about raining “death and destruction from the sky all day long” and about “punching” the enemy “while they’re down.” He speaks of liberating the military from “stupid” rules of engagement. He delights in unleashing its “maximum lethality.” He rhapsodizes about killing “without hesitation”—with no moral qualms whatsoever.
This talk has already stirred deep concern among lawmakers. “The U.S. military needs to be better than other militaries,” Senator Mark Kelly, a retired Navy pilot, told me, adding that we should conduct ourselves as “merciful people” who “respect life” and “respect the rule of law.”
Yet Hegseth’s prayer also displays something else: With fresh clarity, it exposes how the roots of his bloodthirstiness lie in his particular brand of right-wing Christianity.
Hegseth appears to be a devotee of Christian Reconstructionism, a theology preached by influential far-right pastor Douglas Wilson that aims to reshape all earthly endeavors around the dictums of what his disciples claim is God’s law. As scholar-of-religion Julie Ingersoll explains on Sarah Posner’s podcast, Wilson believes that “all authority belongs to God,” rendering the state’s authority wholly subordinate to a “higher category of Biblical law.” A Pentagon spokesman has confirmed that Hegseth recently met with Wilson and is his “admirer.”
What does this say about Hegseth’s conduct in the Iran war? A lot, it turns out.
During his prayer extolling “overwhelming violence,” Hegseth expanded on this by reading from Scripture. “I pursued my enemies and overtook them,” Hegseth preached, quoting King David recounting his wars against Israel’s ancient foes and likening them to the Iranian enemy. “Those who hated me I destroyed. They cried to the Lord, but He did not answer them.”
“Snap the rod of the oppressor,” Hegseth continued in his appeal to God. “Break the teeth of the ungodly” so that “wicked souls” are “delivered to the eternal damnation prepared for them.”
Hegseth directed this prayer toward “our men and women in harm’s way right now”—meaning in Iran. As Rev. Brian Kaylor, who closely track’s Hegseth’s services, told me, Hegseth’s verses are “kind of a Mad Libs mashup of Biblical violence.”
What should we make of this? The relationship between organized religion and the military has long been complex and contested. The armed forces have chaplains. But their role is pluralist, affording members of diverse faiths a place to seek guidance. Yet speaking from the government-owned Pentagon, Hegseth has urged prayer “in the name of Jesus Christ”—his Christian God.
Official religious appeals, it should also be noted, have long been commonplace within the armed forces. Military chaplains have often prayed publicly before missions. Presidents have at times claimed divine blessing for conflicts or pronounced the enemy godless. It’s of course understandable that troops facing danger would pray for deliverance.
But Hegseth is doing something different. It’s unusual for a defense secretary to directly appeal to God—his God exclusively—to assist in maximal killing, says Ronit Stahl, a historian of the military chaplaincy. What’s notable is Hegseth’s suggestion that God actively approves of as much killing as possible, and his enlistment of God in making it “overwhelming”—supremely violent and brutal.
“Rarely has an American military leader justified killing by declaring that God has sanctioned violence as an ultimate, higher good,” Stahl told me. “It’s highly unusual for high-ranking officers or civilian military leaders to relish killing and violence in God’s name as a religious duty.”
Hegseth has open contempt for limits on what our military can inflict on foes. He has called for “no quarter” and “no mercy for our enemies.” That means killing enemies who have surrendered—a war crime. His executions of suspected Caribbean drug-runners violate international law—and possibly U.S. law and American military codes as well.
But grasping the roots of this in his particular far-right Christianity makes all this bloodlust more intelligible—and much worse. If Hegseth truly believes his war on Iran is unfolding in accordance with his conception of Biblical law—the highest authority of all—then that explains why he treats all those niggling secular constraints as unbinding on him.
Maximum violence and killing of the enemy—who cry out to God, but unlike Hegseth, don’t get an answer back from Him—are affirmatively good.
“It’s not the way somebody who claims to be a person of God—a religious person—should think,” Senator Kelly, who has flown many combat missions himself, told me. War, he added, “is a morally and ethically complicated thing for any person. Any serious warfighter struggles with it.” If we don’t wrestle with this, Kelly said, we’ll “start to lose ourselves.”
The ugliness here runs deeper still. Like other MAGA figures, Hegseth sees himself as a warrior saving “Western civilization” from ruinous barbarism, which includes battling against everything from the Iranian regime to mass migrations. Hegseth’s bicep tattoo extols the Crusaders, which he sees as his inspiration: God apparently wants Hegseth, their spiritual descendant, to kill Western civilization’s enemies as violently as possible.
But Western civilization has also bequeathed to us another legacy worth invoking here: The just war tradition, which is grounded in conceptions of our common humanity. That’s the idea that our adversaries are human beings in spite of their “enemy” status, which places limits on what we can do to them in war. It was given early formulation by Cicero and elaborated on by European philosophers like Hugo Grotius and Immanuel Kant.
Political theorist Matt McManus notes another irony here: Christian thinkers like Augustine also helped formulate a theory of forbearance in war premised on Christian principles that appears anathema to Hegseth. As McManus told me, this theory requires the waging of war “for the right reasons and in a non-brutal way.”
Obviously we’ve failed miserably at times to honor those ideals. But that should lead us to try harder to meet them, not to decide they’re worthless or unattainable. Hegseth imagines himself heroically defending “the West” while discarding its noble contributions to that just-war tradition.
These ideals generally include prohibitions on needless wars; on excessive cruelty; and on unnecessarily wanton and unrestrained killing, especially of civilians and combatants who surrender, among other things. Hegseth has violated all of them: The rationale for his war is based on lies. He casts his maximally brutal killing as an inherent good. His war has killed nearly 1,500 civilians, including many children. He lionizes the killing of enemies who surrender.
But Hegseth answers to a higher authority. Utterly incapable of genuine humility, Hegseth knows with unshakable certainty that those simply cannot be transgressions. No: They’re all in God’s plan.
Greg Sargent
Greg Sargent is a staff writer at The New Republic and the host of the podcast The Daily Blast. A seasoned political commentator with over two decades of experience, he was a prominent columnist and blogger at The Washington Post from 2010 to 2023 and has worked at Talking Points Memo, New York magazine, and the New York Observer. Greg is also the author of the critically acclaimed book An Uncivil War: Taking Back Our Democracy in an Age of Disinformation and Thunderdome Politics.
Hegseth said at the start of this stupid war that “President Trump has been anointed by Jesus to light the signal fire in Iran to cause Armageddon and mark his return to Earth.”
With that dreadful, dreadful belief, he’s unlikely to stop – because he doesn’t care how may people are killed. In the end, he knows that God will sort it out and the good people will go to heaven.
His faith is all-knowing and unchangeable.
I take back what I said about Hanson’s popularity being horrifying.
This stuff is truly horrifying.
don’t worry orange australia could never lead to orange ussamerica
Date: 1/04/2026 10:45:48
From: buffy
ID: 2375278
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
Michael V said:
JudgeMental said:
https://archive.is/20260330110633/https://newrepublic.com/article/208322/pete-hegseth-religion-war-iran-sadism-rage#selection-945.0-1381.98
Link
When Pete Hegseth talks to God, he asks the Almighty to help him kill people—as violently and ruthlessly as possible.
In a potential violation of the separation of church and state, Hegseth has ordered monthly prayer meetings at the Pentagon, and in his first such gathering since launching the war against Iran, the defense secretary pleaded for divine assistance in mowing down the Iranian foe.
“Let every round find its mark against the enemies of righteousness and our nation,” Hegseth intoned to a military audience, reciting a prayer previously given by a military chaplain before the Venezuela raid and applying it to American troops in Iran.
“Give them wisdom in every decision,” Hegseth continued, “endurance for the trial ahead, unbreakable unity, and overwhelming violence of action against those who deserve no mercy.”
Hegseth’s prayer service attracted only scattered media attention. But it helps explain the real impetus behind a development that deserves far more notice: The appointed leader of the world’s most powerful military regularly speaks about his capacity to rain terror and death on the enemy with an undisguised relish that should unsettle us all.
By now it’s become unmistakable that Hegseth’s tenure has been marked by open and unrestrained sadism and bloodlust. He enthuses about raining “death and destruction from the sky all day long” and about “punching” the enemy “while they’re down.” He speaks of liberating the military from “stupid” rules of engagement. He delights in unleashing its “maximum lethality.” He rhapsodizes about killing “without hesitation”—with no moral qualms whatsoever.
This talk has already stirred deep concern among lawmakers. “The U.S. military needs to be better than other militaries,” Senator Mark Kelly, a retired Navy pilot, told me, adding that we should conduct ourselves as “merciful people” who “respect life” and “respect the rule of law.”
Yet Hegseth’s prayer also displays something else: With fresh clarity, it exposes how the roots of his bloodthirstiness lie in his particular brand of right-wing Christianity.
Hegseth appears to be a devotee of Christian Reconstructionism, a theology preached by influential far-right pastor Douglas Wilson that aims to reshape all earthly endeavors around the dictums of what his disciples claim is God’s law. As scholar-of-religion Julie Ingersoll explains on Sarah Posner’s podcast, Wilson believes that “all authority belongs to God,” rendering the state’s authority wholly subordinate to a “higher category of Biblical law.” A Pentagon spokesman has confirmed that Hegseth recently met with Wilson and is his “admirer.”
What does this say about Hegseth’s conduct in the Iran war? A lot, it turns out.
During his prayer extolling “overwhelming violence,” Hegseth expanded on this by reading from Scripture. “I pursued my enemies and overtook them,” Hegseth preached, quoting King David recounting his wars against Israel’s ancient foes and likening them to the Iranian enemy. “Those who hated me I destroyed. They cried to the Lord, but He did not answer them.”
“Snap the rod of the oppressor,” Hegseth continued in his appeal to God. “Break the teeth of the ungodly” so that “wicked souls” are “delivered to the eternal damnation prepared for them.”
Hegseth directed this prayer toward “our men and women in harm’s way right now”—meaning in Iran. As Rev. Brian Kaylor, who closely track’s Hegseth’s services, told me, Hegseth’s verses are “kind of a Mad Libs mashup of Biblical violence.”
What should we make of this? The relationship between organized religion and the military has long been complex and contested. The armed forces have chaplains. But their role is pluralist, affording members of diverse faiths a place to seek guidance. Yet speaking from the government-owned Pentagon, Hegseth has urged prayer “in the name of Jesus Christ”—his Christian God.
Official religious appeals, it should also be noted, have long been commonplace within the armed forces. Military chaplains have often prayed publicly before missions. Presidents have at times claimed divine blessing for conflicts or pronounced the enemy godless. It’s of course understandable that troops facing danger would pray for deliverance.
But Hegseth is doing something different. It’s unusual for a defense secretary to directly appeal to God—his God exclusively—to assist in maximal killing, says Ronit Stahl, a historian of the military chaplaincy. What’s notable is Hegseth’s suggestion that God actively approves of as much killing as possible, and his enlistment of God in making it “overwhelming”—supremely violent and brutal.
“Rarely has an American military leader justified killing by declaring that God has sanctioned violence as an ultimate, higher good,” Stahl told me. “It’s highly unusual for high-ranking officers or civilian military leaders to relish killing and violence in God’s name as a religious duty.”
Hegseth has open contempt for limits on what our military can inflict on foes. He has called for “no quarter” and “no mercy for our enemies.” That means killing enemies who have surrendered—a war crime. His executions of suspected Caribbean drug-runners violate international law—and possibly U.S. law and American military codes as well.
But grasping the roots of this in his particular far-right Christianity makes all this bloodlust more intelligible—and much worse. If Hegseth truly believes his war on Iran is unfolding in accordance with his conception of Biblical law—the highest authority of all—then that explains why he treats all those niggling secular constraints as unbinding on him.
Maximum violence and killing of the enemy—who cry out to God, but unlike Hegseth, don’t get an answer back from Him—are affirmatively good.
“It’s not the way somebody who claims to be a person of God—a religious person—should think,” Senator Kelly, who has flown many combat missions himself, told me. War, he added, “is a morally and ethically complicated thing for any person. Any serious warfighter struggles with it.” If we don’t wrestle with this, Kelly said, we’ll “start to lose ourselves.”
The ugliness here runs deeper still. Like other MAGA figures, Hegseth sees himself as a warrior saving “Western civilization” from ruinous barbarism, which includes battling against everything from the Iranian regime to mass migrations. Hegseth’s bicep tattoo extols the Crusaders, which he sees as his inspiration: God apparently wants Hegseth, their spiritual descendant, to kill Western civilization’s enemies as violently as possible.
But Western civilization has also bequeathed to us another legacy worth invoking here: The just war tradition, which is grounded in conceptions of our common humanity. That’s the idea that our adversaries are human beings in spite of their “enemy” status, which places limits on what we can do to them in war. It was given early formulation by Cicero and elaborated on by European philosophers like Hugo Grotius and Immanuel Kant.
Political theorist Matt McManus notes another irony here: Christian thinkers like Augustine also helped formulate a theory of forbearance in war premised on Christian principles that appears anathema to Hegseth. As McManus told me, this theory requires the waging of war “for the right reasons and in a non-brutal way.”
Obviously we’ve failed miserably at times to honor those ideals. But that should lead us to try harder to meet them, not to decide they’re worthless or unattainable. Hegseth imagines himself heroically defending “the West” while discarding its noble contributions to that just-war tradition.
These ideals generally include prohibitions on needless wars; on excessive cruelty; and on unnecessarily wanton and unrestrained killing, especially of civilians and combatants who surrender, among other things. Hegseth has violated all of them: The rationale for his war is based on lies. He casts his maximally brutal killing as an inherent good. His war has killed nearly 1,500 civilians, including many children. He lionizes the killing of enemies who surrender.
But Hegseth answers to a higher authority. Utterly incapable of genuine humility, Hegseth knows with unshakable certainty that those simply cannot be transgressions. No: They’re all in God’s plan.
Greg Sargent
Greg Sargent is a staff writer at The New Republic and the host of the podcast The Daily Blast. A seasoned political commentator with over two decades of experience, he was a prominent columnist and blogger at The Washington Post from 2010 to 2023 and has worked at Talking Points Memo, New York magazine, and the New York Observer. Greg is also the author of the critically acclaimed book An Uncivil War: Taking Back Our Democracy in an Age of Disinformation and Thunderdome Politics.
Hegseth said at the start of this stupid war that “President Trump has been anointed by Jesus to light the signal fire in Iran to cause Armageddon and mark his return to Earth.”
With that dreadful, dreadful belief, he’s unlikely to stop – because he doesn’t care how may people are killed. In the end, he knows that God will sort it out and the good people will go to heaven.
His faith is all-knowing and unchangeable.
I take back what I said about Hanson’s popularity being horrifying.
This stuff is truly horrifying.
It’s very Old Testament. And the whole setup is rather fading Roman Empire. Playing golf while Rome burns?
Date: 1/04/2026 10:59:50
From: Michael V
ID: 2375280
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
buffy said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Michael V said:
Hegseth said at the start of this stupid war that “President Trump has been anointed by Jesus to light the signal fire in Iran to cause Armageddon and mark his return to Earth.”
With that dreadful, dreadful belief, he’s unlikely to stop – because he doesn’t care how may people are killed. In the end, he knows that God will sort it out and the good people will go to heaven.
His faith is all-knowing and unchangeable.
I take back what I said about Hanson’s popularity being horrifying.
This stuff is truly horrifying.
It’s very Old Testament. And the whole setup is rather fading Roman Empire. Playing golf while Rome burns?
Nods.
Date: 1/04/2026 11:00:32
From: Michael V
ID: 2375281
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Michael V said:
Hegseth said at the start of this stupid war that “President Trump has been anointed by Jesus to light the signal fire in Iran to cause Armageddon and mark his return to Earth.”
With that dreadful, dreadful belief, he’s unlikely to stop – because he doesn’t care how may people are killed. In the end, he knows that God will sort it out and the good people will go to heaven.
His faith is all-knowing and unchangeable.
I take back what I said about Hanson’s popularity being horrifying.
This stuff is truly horrifying.
don’t worry orange australia could never lead to orange ussamerica
Phew.
Date: 1/04/2026 11:08:15
From: Cymek
ID: 2375282
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
buffy said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
I take back what I said about Hanson’s popularity being horrifying.
This stuff is truly horrifying.
It’s very Old Testament. And the whole setup is rather fading Roman Empire. Playing golf while Rome burns?
Nods.
To be crude the USA has always gotten a hardon, killing Muslims combined with Christian righteousness in starting wars.
Date: 1/04/2026 11:15:15
From: dv
ID: 2375283
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1

Now that’s a couple of puppies she won’t shoot
Date: 1/04/2026 11:19:57
From: Cymek
ID: 2375284
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Now that’s a couple of puppies she won’t shoot
No trampolining for him
Date: 1/04/2026 11:21:51
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2375285
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Now that’s a couple of puppies she won’t shoot
It must be true because it’s written in the Daily Mail.
Date: 1/04/2026 11:43:20
From: Michael V
ID: 2375287
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
Now that’s a couple of puppies she won’t shoot
It must be true because it’s written in the Daily Mail.
I’ll say.
Date: 1/04/2026 12:41:04
From: roughbarked
ID: 2375308
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
oh fuck it must be the first day of the first month of Greg’s calendar
US President Donald Trump has told America’s allies the “US won’t be there to help you anymore” as he again criticised European nations for their refusal to provide more military support for the Iran war.
the fascist is telling the truth
fuck
The European nations weren’t invited until the illegal takeover bid failed and then they were abused for not being NATO when NATO was exactly what they were being.
Date: 1/04/2026 12:46:11
From: Cymek
ID: 2375310
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
SCIENCE said:
oh fuck it must be the first day of the first month of Greg’s calendar
US President Donald Trump has told America’s allies the “US won’t be there to help you anymore” as he again criticised European nations for their refusal to provide more military support for the Iran war.
the fascist is telling the truth
fuck
The European nations weren’t invited until the illegal takeover bid failed and then they were abused for not being NATO when NATO was exactly what they were being.
How would he react if USA allies told him to fuck off and remove all troops from bases on their territory
Date: 1/04/2026 12:47:32
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2375311
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
SCIENCE said:
SCIENCE said:
oh fuck it must be the first day of the fourth month of Greg’s calendar
US President Donald Trump has told America’s allies the “US won’t be there to help you anymore” as he again criticised European nations for their refusal to provide more military support for the Iran war.
the fascist is telling the truth
fuck autocorrect
KKK says “You’re fired!”
The European nations weren’t invited until the illegal takeover bid failed and then they were abused for not being NATO when NATO was exactly what they were being.
sorry we meant the undimmed bit, as in the ussa hasn’t been there to help anyone any more since like 60 years ago
Date: 1/04/2026 12:49:10
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2375312
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
roughbarked said:
The European nations weren’t invited until the illegal takeover bid failed and then they were abused for not being NATO when NATO was exactly what they were being.
How would he react if USA allies told him to fuck off and remove all troops from bases on their territory
he’d probably thank his rectal polyps that nobody is talking about the paedo files any more
Date: 1/04/2026 13:01:58
From: roughbarked
ID: 2375316
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
The Rev Dodgson said:
Michael V said:
JudgeMental said:
https://archive.is/20260330110633/https://newrepublic.com/article/208322/pete-hegseth-religion-war-iran-sadism-rage#selection-945.0-1381.98
Link
When Pete Hegseth talks to God, he asks the Almighty to help him kill people—as violently and ruthlessly as possible.
In a potential violation of the separation of church and state, Hegseth has ordered monthly prayer meetings at the Pentagon, and in his first such gathering since launching the war against Iran, the defense secretary pleaded for divine assistance in mowing down the Iranian foe.
“Let every round find its mark against the enemies of righteousness and our nation,” Hegseth intoned to a military audience, reciting a prayer previously given by a military chaplain before the Venezuela raid and applying it to American troops in Iran.
“Give them wisdom in every decision,” Hegseth continued, “endurance for the trial ahead, unbreakable unity, and overwhelming violence of action against those who deserve no mercy.”
Hegseth’s prayer service attracted only scattered media attention. But it helps explain the real impetus behind a development that deserves far more notice: The appointed leader of the world’s most powerful military regularly speaks about his capacity to rain terror and death on the enemy with an undisguised relish that should unsettle us all.
By now it’s become unmistakable that Hegseth’s tenure has been marked by open and unrestrained sadism and bloodlust. He enthuses about raining “death and destruction from the sky all day long” and about “punching” the enemy “while they’re down.” He speaks of liberating the military from “stupid” rules of engagement. He delights in unleashing its “maximum lethality.” He rhapsodizes about killing “without hesitation”—with no moral qualms whatsoever.
This talk has already stirred deep concern among lawmakers. “The U.S. military needs to be better than other militaries,” Senator Mark Kelly, a retired Navy pilot, told me, adding that we should conduct ourselves as “merciful people” who “respect life” and “respect the rule of law.”
Yet Hegseth’s prayer also displays something else: With fresh clarity, it exposes how the roots of his bloodthirstiness lie in his particular brand of right-wing Christianity.
Hegseth appears to be a devotee of Christian Reconstructionism, a theology preached by influential far-right pastor Douglas Wilson that aims to reshape all earthly endeavors around the dictums of what his disciples claim is God’s law. As scholar-of-religion Julie Ingersoll explains on Sarah Posner’s podcast, Wilson believes that “all authority belongs to God,” rendering the state’s authority wholly subordinate to a “higher category of Biblical law.” A Pentagon spokesman has confirmed that Hegseth recently met with Wilson and is his “admirer.”
What does this say about Hegseth’s conduct in the Iran war? A lot, it turns out.
During his prayer extolling “overwhelming violence,” Hegseth expanded on this by reading from Scripture. “I pursued my enemies and overtook them,” Hegseth preached, quoting King David recounting his wars against Israel’s ancient foes and likening them to the Iranian enemy. “Those who hated me I destroyed. They cried to the Lord, but He did not answer them.”
“Snap the rod of the oppressor,” Hegseth continued in his appeal to God. “Break the teeth of the ungodly” so that “wicked souls” are “delivered to the eternal damnation prepared for them.”
Hegseth directed this prayer toward “our men and women in harm’s way right now”—meaning in Iran. As Rev. Brian Kaylor, who closely track’s Hegseth’s services, told me, Hegseth’s verses are “kind of a Mad Libs mashup of Biblical violence.”
What should we make of this? The relationship between organized religion and the military has long been complex and contested. The armed forces have chaplains. But their role is pluralist, affording members of diverse faiths a place to seek guidance. Yet speaking from the government-owned Pentagon, Hegseth has urged prayer “in the name of Jesus Christ”—his Christian God.
Official religious appeals, it should also be noted, have long been commonplace within the armed forces. Military chaplains have often prayed publicly before missions. Presidents have at times claimed divine blessing for conflicts or pronounced the enemy godless. It’s of course understandable that troops facing danger would pray for deliverance.
But Hegseth is doing something different. It’s unusual for a defense secretary to directly appeal to God—his God exclusively—to assist in maximal killing, says Ronit Stahl, a historian of the military chaplaincy. What’s notable is Hegseth’s suggestion that God actively approves of as much killing as possible, and his enlistment of God in making it “overwhelming”—supremely violent and brutal.
“Rarely has an American military leader justified killing by declaring that God has sanctioned violence as an ultimate, higher good,” Stahl told me. “It’s highly unusual for high-ranking officers or civilian military leaders to relish killing and violence in God’s name as a religious duty.”
Hegseth has open contempt for limits on what our military can inflict on foes. He has called for “no quarter” and “no mercy for our enemies.” That means killing enemies who have surrendered—a war crime. His executions of suspected Caribbean drug-runners violate international law—and possibly U.S. law and American military codes as well.
But grasping the roots of this in his particular far-right Christianity makes all this bloodlust more intelligible—and much worse. If Hegseth truly believes his war on Iran is unfolding in accordance with his conception of Biblical law—the highest authority of all—then that explains why he treats all those niggling secular constraints as unbinding on him.
Maximum violence and killing of the enemy—who cry out to God, but unlike Hegseth, don’t get an answer back from Him—are affirmatively good.
“It’s not the way somebody who claims to be a person of God—a religious person—should think,” Senator Kelly, who has flown many combat missions himself, told me. War, he added, “is a morally and ethically complicated thing for any person. Any serious warfighter struggles with it.” If we don’t wrestle with this, Kelly said, we’ll “start to lose ourselves.”
The ugliness here runs deeper still. Like other MAGA figures, Hegseth sees himself as a warrior saving “Western civilization” from ruinous barbarism, which includes battling against everything from the Iranian regime to mass migrations. Hegseth’s bicep tattoo extols the Crusaders, which he sees as his inspiration: God apparently wants Hegseth, their spiritual descendant, to kill Western civilization’s enemies as violently as possible.
But Western civilization has also bequeathed to us another legacy worth invoking here: The just war tradition, which is grounded in conceptions of our common humanity. That’s the idea that our adversaries are human beings in spite of their “enemy” status, which places limits on what we can do to them in war. It was given early formulation by Cicero and elaborated on by European philosophers like Hugo Grotius and Immanuel Kant.
Political theorist Matt McManus notes another irony here: Christian thinkers like Augustine also helped formulate a theory of forbearance in war premised on Christian principles that appears anathema to Hegseth. As McManus told me, this theory requires the waging of war “for the right reasons and in a non-brutal way.”
Obviously we’ve failed miserably at times to honor those ideals. But that should lead us to try harder to meet them, not to decide they’re worthless or unattainable. Hegseth imagines himself heroically defending “the West” while discarding its noble contributions to that just-war tradition.
These ideals generally include prohibitions on needless wars; on excessive cruelty; and on unnecessarily wanton and unrestrained killing, especially of civilians and combatants who surrender, among other things. Hegseth has violated all of them: The rationale for his war is based on lies. He casts his maximally brutal killing as an inherent good. His war has killed nearly 1,500 civilians, including many children. He lionizes the killing of enemies who surrender.
But Hegseth answers to a higher authority. Utterly incapable of genuine humility, Hegseth knows with unshakable certainty that those simply cannot be transgressions. No: They’re all in God’s plan.
Greg Sargent
Greg Sargent is a staff writer at The New Republic and the host of the podcast The Daily Blast. A seasoned political commentator with over two decades of experience, he was a prominent columnist and blogger at The Washington Post from 2010 to 2023 and has worked at Talking Points Memo, New York magazine, and the New York Observer. Greg is also the author of the critically acclaimed book An Uncivil War: Taking Back Our Democracy in an Age of Disinformation and Thunderdome Politics.
Hegseth said at the start of this stupid war that “President Trump has been anointed by Jesus to light the signal fire in Iran to cause Armageddon and mark his return to Earth.”
With that dreadful, dreadful belief, he’s unlikely to stop – because he doesn’t care how may people are killed. In the end, he knows that God will sort it out and the good people will go to heaven.
His faith is all-knowing and unchangeable.
I take back what I said about Hanson’s popularity being horrifying.
This stuff is truly horrifying.
Hanson is just a fish and chips lady with delusions of nationhood.
Hegseth on the other hand is the grim reaper himself.
Date: 1/04/2026 13:04:40
From: roughbarked
ID: 2375318
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
dv said:
Now that’s a couple of puppies she won’t shoot
No trampolining for him
His nipples are awry.
Date: 1/04/2026 13:06:35
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2375321
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
Michael V said:
buffy said:
It’s very Old Testament. And the whole setup is rather fading Roman Empire. Playing golf while Rome burns?
Nods.
To be crude the USA has always gotten a hardon, killing Muslims combined with Christian righteousness in starting wars.
Not really true. The US is allied with most gulf Muslim nations in this fight. Apparently MBS was one of the main instigators.
Date: 1/04/2026 13:10:23
From: roughbarked
ID: 2375323
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
KKK says “You’re fired!”
The European nations weren’t invited until the illegal takeover bid failed and then they were abused for not being NATO when NATO was exactly what they were being.
sorry we meant the undimmed bit, as in the ussa hasn’t been there to help anyone any more since like 60 years ago
and even then they had to be forced into it and making a lot of money out of selling armanents as well..
Date: 1/04/2026 13:11:55
From: Cymek
ID: 2375324
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Michael V said:
Hegseth said at the start of this stupid war that “President Trump has been anointed by Jesus to light the signal fire in Iran to cause Armageddon and mark his return to Earth.”
With that dreadful, dreadful belief, he’s unlikely to stop – because he doesn’t care how may people are killed. In the end, he knows that God will sort it out and the good people will go to heaven.
His faith is all-knowing and unchangeable.
I take back what I said about Hanson’s popularity being horrifying.
This stuff is truly horrifying.
Hanson is just a fish and chips lady with delusions of nationhood.
Hegseth on the other hand is the grim reaper himself.
I doubt it but should death from wars in all its gruesomeness be shown to the public.
We get a sanitised version but the reality would be enough to traumatise people, perhaps we need it.
Date: 1/04/2026 13:14:18
From: roughbarked
ID: 2375325
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
roughbarked said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
I take back what I said about Hanson’s popularity being horrifying.
This stuff is truly horrifying.
Hanson is just a fish and chips lady with delusions of nationhood.
Hegseth on the other hand is the grim reaper himself.
I doubt it but should death from wars in all its gruesomeness be shown to the public.
We get a sanitised version but the reality would be enough to traumatise people, perhaps we need it.
I thought I saw enough of that in the Vietnam senseless conflict. Then we had spectacular explosions of boatloads of people in the Falklamds fiasco. and so on and on.
Date: 1/04/2026 13:51:50
From: dv
ID: 2375333
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 1/04/2026 14:03:20
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2375334
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:


because they always apply the rules to themselves
Date: 1/04/2026 14:13:03
From: Cymek
ID: 2375336
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
dv said:


because they always apply the rules to themselves
Its was like how evangelistic preachers were often involved in sexual trysts with porn stars
Date: 1/04/2026 14:17:04
From: roughbarked
ID: 2375337
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:


The man should be countiing his blessings instead.
Date: 1/04/2026 14:18:43
From: roughbarked
ID: 2375339
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
SCIENCE said:
dv said:


because they always apply the rules to themselves
Its was like how evangelistic preachers were often involved in sexual trysts with porn stars
Of course they sprinkle them with holy water first.
Date: 1/04/2026 15:53:34
From: Michael V
ID: 2375352
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:


Perfidious.
Date: 1/04/2026 16:08:03
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2375365
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
alleged

Date: 1/04/2026 16:10:06
From: Cymek
ID: 2375369
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
SCIENCE said:
alleged

Plastic surgery does look plastic and you do wonder if the owner has a skewed view of it
Date: 1/04/2026 16:13:40
From: dv
ID: 2375374
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Date: 1/04/2026 16:15:20
From: roughbarked
ID: 2375377
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:

Is that a hospital bed he’s in?
Date: 2/04/2026 09:07:16
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2375578
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Oregon’s Bay Area is feeling determined.
Good morning! April Fool’s Day arrived with Donald Trump doing what he does best: hovering around institutions he wants to dominate. He is set to attend Supreme Court arguments in the birthright citizenship case, because it is no longer enough for this administration to assault the Constitution from the executive branch; now it must also loom menacingly over the judiciary while the justices consider whether the 14th Amendment still means what it has meant for generations. The case itself is no small procedural scuffle. It goes straight to Trump’s executive order aimed at ending automatic citizenship for children born in the United States to undocumented immigrants and some temporary visitors, which means the Court is being asked, in essence, whether one man’s anti-immigrant obsessions can override a constitutional guarantee written in the aftermath of slavery and Dred Scott.
Really, unless Trump planned to stroll up to counsel table and deliver the oral argument himself, his presence serves no legal purpose at all. It reads instead as one more act of presidential intimidation theater, the political equivalent of a mob boss turning up in the back row to remind everyone whose interests are on the line. No sitting president attends Supreme Court arguments because presidents are not supposed to loom over the judiciary like they are checking on renovations at one of their casinos. Trump has never understood the difference between democratic institutions and buildings he would like to slap his name on.
Abroad, the administration’s Iran debacle was acquiring the full hallucinatory texture of a world that now arrives pre-satirized. Markets were rallying on hopes the conflict might soon wind down even as the bombs kept falling, tankers were being hit, Tehran was under fire again, and Trump was off insulting NATO allies as though the central problem in the Middle East were insufficient European gratitude for his chaos. The Financial Times live coverage had the usual fever-dream quality of war reporting, financial reporting, and Trump coverage all crammed into the same bloodstream: investors cheering on whispers of de-escalation while the region remained on fire and global shipping still hung in the balance.
The New York Times made the deeper problem impossible to miss. Trump is now openly saying the United States will be out of Iran within two or three weeks, with the White House promising an evening address so he can no doubt stand before the cameras and attempt to sell strategic confusion as statesmanship. But the reporting shows an administration that looks like it is frantically workshopping a surrender speech with extra explosions. Rubio has apparently been sketching a narrower list of war aims that would allow Trump to declare success and crawl toward the exit, while Trump himself continues blurting out larger fantasies about regime change, total victory, and other strongman bedtime stories.
That gap between rhetoric and reality is where the rot really shows. Trump keeps claiming he has neutralized Iran’s nuclear threat, but the reporting says there is no evidence the stockpile of near-bomb-grade uranium has actually been removed or destroyed. The administration appears to be doing what it always does when reality intrudes: quietly shrinking the definition of winning until it is small enough to fit inside the available lie. The original case for war was the nuclear threat. Now that the nuclear material apparently remains, aides are redefining success downward so Trump can strut away from the wreckage in one of those grotesque made-for-TV exits he mistakes for history.
This is beginning to look exactly like what it is: a shameful retreat spray-painted gold and sold as victory. Just a disorderly climb-down wrapped in patriotic stage lighting. Trump appears desperate to claim he has already won, while the facts on the ground suggest a region still destabilized, core objectives unmet, and allies left to deal with the fallout. The old con remains intact: create a disaster, fail to achieve the original goal, then announce success while backing away from the smoking crater.
And what makes it worse is that this crisis did not spring from nowhere. One of the more useful pieces circulating today argued bluntly that the real beginning of this war was not the latest bombing campaign, but Trump’s decision to tear up Obama’s Iran deal in 2018. That agreement, whatever its imperfections, imposed real constraints, real inspections, and real limits on Iran’s program. Trump trashed it because Barack Obama’s name was on it, promised a bigger and better replacement because of course he did, delivered absolutely nothing, and now appears eager to retreat from a conflict made more likely by his own vanity and sabotage. That is the deeper scandal is not that he is just fleeing a war, but trying to flee the consequences of his own earlier wrecking spree while still demanding applause on the way out.
In Europe, the message is being received with all the enthusiasm of dinner guests watching the host set the curtains on fire and then hand them the extinguisher. Britain is now reportedly hosting talks among 35 countries on how to reopen the Strait of Hormuz after Trump signaled the United States may simply leave the war without securing the waterway. Imagine setting the neighborhood ablaze, insulting the fire department, and then announcing that everyone else should probably go get their own hoses. That is roughly where American leadership now stands. It is not the posture of an empire at the height of its competence. It is the posture of an arsonist informing the block association that he will not be staying for cleanup.
Back home, the corruption machine kept humming in its usual key of grotesque absurdity. The Justice Department is reportedly struggling to figure out how to respond to Trump’s lawsuit demanding at least $10 billion from the IRS, an agency he oversees, over the leak of his tax returns to The New York Times in 2020. Trump argues the agency failed to stop former contractor Charles Littlejohn from disclosing the records, even though Littlejohn has already been prosecuted and imprisoned for the leak, and even though the disclosure itself plainly did not destroy Trump politically, since he went on to win the presidency anyway. The result is an exquisite ethical spectacle: the federal government must now decide how to defend itself against the man who runs it. Officials are reportedly debating delay tactics, conflict workarounds, and outside counsel possibilities, and may ultimately have to consult Trump himself on how the government should respond to Trump’s own suit. You would reject this plotline as too on-the-nose if it appeared in a mediocre streaming drama about democratic collapse. Yet here we are, watching the state get bent once again into a personal indemnity machine for one man’s grievances, appetites, and revenge fantasies.
There was also a small but satisfying hiccup in Trump’s ongoing attempt to redecorate the republic in his own image: a judge ordered work stopped on the $400 million White House ballroom he wants to build where the East Wing used to be. It turns out you cannot just tear chunks off a national landmark, funnel in money from loyalists and corporations, and call it statesmanship. Sometimes even authoritarian kitsch still has to clear permitting.
Taken together, these stories reveal something important about this moment. Trump is not strong in the way authoritarians like to project strength. He is loud, vindictive, theatrical, and still terrifyingly dangerous, yes. But strong? This is a presidency straining to maintain the image of domination even as the underlying machinery groans, sputters, and contradicts itself. Anyone who has to hover over Supreme Court arguments to project strength is not secure.
Neither is a president who keeps shrinking his war aims so he can back away without saying he is backing away. And a regime whose own Justice Department cannot answer its leader’s personal shakedown without twisting itself into constitutional knots is plainly not at ease. These are the symptoms of a system under strain.
Moments of strain are when pro-democracy movements either find their courage or waste their opening. As activists, we should be honest about what this moment offers. Trump looks weak because he is weak, though not harmless. He looks cornered because he has created too many crises to manage cleanly. The temptation, naturally, is to answer that weakness with sheer energy: more marches, more outrage, more glorious talk of general strikes, more cathartic public fury. All of that has its place. But pressure without demands creates noise. Pressure with demands creates leverage.
That has been the missing piece in far too much of the conversation. What, exactly, do we want in return? What are the terms under which democratic resistance knows it is succeeding? If the answer is only “not this,” the opposition will always be reactive, forever chasing the latest outrage while power adapts. If, however, the answer becomes concrete and expansive at the same time, then resistance starts to look less like permanent defense and more like democratic construction.
The idea of a new Bill of Rights matters so much right now. This administration has shown us, in painful detail, where our old guarantees were too weak, too narrow, too conditional, or too easily ignored. It has exposed how fragile due process can become when cruelty is policy, how quickly equal protection can be narrowed by ideology, how vulnerable voting rights remain, how brittle truth itself becomes when propaganda captures institutions, and how utterly unserious our governing system still is about protecting the living world on which every other freedom depends. We should not be fighting merely to tape the old order back together and pray the leaks slow down. We have to build something stronger than what failed.
The answer to authoritarianism cannot simply be nostalgia for the old rules, because the old rules were already failing too many people and too much of the living world. A real democratic resistance should be bold enough to imagine a new Bill of Rights, one born from everything this administration has revealed about cruelty, impunity, ecological destruction, and institutional weakness, and one expansive enough to protect both human freedom and the rights of nature to exist, thrive, and naturally evolve. That would give the resistance a destination worthy of the danger of this moment. Not just endless triage, or just “please stop.” A clear destination.
That, ultimately, is how to take advantage of Trump at his weakest. Not by merely mocking him, though heaven knows he makes it easy. Not by staging resistance as a form of national group therapy. But by identifying peaceful tools that create pressure and tying them to clear democratic goals that the public can understand, measure, and rally around. Protest. Boycott. Strike where possible. Refuse normalization. Force defections. Demand accountability. Build institutions that can outlast the man. Name the concessions. Name the reforms. Name the future. In earlier posts, I’ve offered a draft framework for a new Bill of Rights as one possible starting place for that conversation, a way to think seriously about what must be protected, reaffirmed, and newly recognized if democracy is to survive this era. That framework is in the archives, and if it would help move this discussion forward, I’m happy to repost it simply as a conversation starter.
This is the part the authoritarians never fully understand: weakness at the top only matters if there is something organized below it, something morally serious enough and politically clear enough to exploit the opening. Trump is giving the country an extraordinary education in corruption, cruelty, and collapse. The question now is whether the resistance will settle for outrage, or whether it will seize this moment to articulate what democracy must become after him. Carpe momentum. Not someday, not after one more scandal, not after one more election cycle, not after permission arrives from the people who helped create this mess. Now. While the cracks are visible. While the performance of strength is faltering. While people can still be persuaded that a different future must be built. That is our real work now.
Date: 2/04/2026 11:38:31
From: dv
ID: 2375693
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
“Mr President, no one has paid the price, like you have paid the price. You were betrayed and arrested and falsely accused. It’s a familiar pattern that our Lord and Savior showed us…God is with you and God is using you to defeat evil.”
https://www.threads.com/@bulwarkonline/post/DWm3jqEDKFJ
White House spiritual advisor Paula White’s address at the White House Easter lunch
“On Palm Sunday, Jesus entered Jerusalem as crowds welcomed him with praise honoring him as king. They call me king now. Can you believe it?”
Date: 2/04/2026 11:40:30
From: Michael V
ID: 2375694
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
“Mr President, no one has paid the price, like you have paid the price. You were betrayed and arrested and falsely accused. It’s a familiar pattern that our Lord and Savior showed us…God is with you and God is using you to defeat evil.”
https://www.threads.com/@bulwarkonline/post/DWm3jqEDKFJ
White House spiritual advisor Paula White’s address at the White House Easter lunch
“On Palm Sunday, Jesus entered Jerusalem as crowds welcomed him with praise honoring him as king. They call me king now. Can you believe it?”
FMD!
Date: 2/04/2026 11:44:31
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 2375696
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
“Mr President, no one has paid the price, like you have paid the price. You were betrayed and arrested and falsely accused. It’s a familiar pattern that our Lord and Savior showed us…God is with you and God is using you to defeat evil.”
https://www.threads.com/@bulwarkonline/post/DWm3jqEDKFJ
White House spiritual advisor Paula White’s address at the White House Easter lunch
“On Palm Sunday, Jesus entered Jerusalem as crowds welcomed him with praise honoring him as king. They call me king now. Can you believe it?”
Far canal. :(
Date: 2/04/2026 11:44:43
From: Cymek
ID: 2375697
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
dv said:
“Mr President, no one has paid the price, like you have paid the price. You were betrayed and arrested and falsely accused. It’s a familiar pattern that our Lord and Savior showed us…God is with you and God is using you to defeat evil.”
https://www.threads.com/@bulwarkonline/post/DWm3jqEDKFJ
White House spiritual advisor Paula White’s address at the White House Easter lunch
“On Palm Sunday, Jesus entered Jerusalem as crowds welcomed him with praise honoring him as king. They call me king now. Can you believe it?”
FMD!
Yeah, wow
Can justify anything if you believe that
Date: 2/04/2026 11:45:25
From: roughbarked
ID: 2375698
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
“Mr President, no one has paid the price, like you have paid the price. You were betrayed and arrested and falsely accused. It’s a familiar pattern that our Lord and Savior showed us…God is with you and God is using you to defeat evil.”
https://www.threads.com/@bulwarkonline/post/DWm3jqEDKFJ
White House spiritual advisor Paula White’s address at the White House Easter lunch
“On Palm Sunday, Jesus entered Jerusalem as crowds welcomed him with praise honoring him as king. They call me king now. Can you believe it?”
FFS!
Date: 2/04/2026 11:46:13
From: roughbarked
ID: 2375699
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
Michael V said:
dv said:
“Mr President, no one has paid the price, like you have paid the price. You were betrayed and arrested and falsely accused. It’s a familiar pattern that our Lord and Savior showed us…God is with you and God is using you to defeat evil.”
https://www.threads.com/@bulwarkonline/post/DWm3jqEDKFJ
White House spiritual advisor Paula White’s address at the White House Easter lunch
“On Palm Sunday, Jesus entered Jerusalem as crowds welcomed him with praise honoring him as king. They call me king now. Can you believe it?”
FMD!
Yeah, wow
Can justify anything if you believe that
In just 15 minutes the King will announce the fate of the world.
Date: 2/04/2026 11:47:01
From: roughbarked
ID: 2375700
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Cymek said:
Michael V said:
FMD!
Yeah, wow
Can justify anything if you believe that
In just 15 minutes the King will announce the fate of the world.
11:46:13
From: roughbarked oops it was 12 minutes.
Date: 2/04/2026 11:47:45
From: roughbarked
ID: 2375701
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
roughbarked said:
Cymek said:
Yeah, wow
Can justify anything if you believe that
In just 15 minutes the King will announce the fate of the world.
11:46:13
From: roughbarked oops it was 12 minutes.
or is now.
Date: 2/04/2026 11:50:37
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2375704
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Wait a sec… Jesus was executed? Can we look forward to Trump being crucified both figuratively and literally?
Date: 2/04/2026 11:53:31
From: roughbarked
ID: 2375706
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Wait a sec… Jesus was executed? Can we look forward to Trump being crucified both figuratively and literally?
If God has his/her way, then surely this must come to pass?
Date: 2/04/2026 11:55:12
From: roughbarked
ID: 2375707
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Wait a sec… Jesus was executed? Can we look forward to Trump being crucified both figuratively and literally?
If God has his/her way, then surely this must come to pass?
Hopefully sometime between Friday and Saturday?
Date: 2/04/2026 12:00:15
From: roughbarked
ID: 2375713
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
roughbarked said:
roughbarked said:
In just 15 minutes the King will announce the fate of the world.
11:46:13
From: roughbarked oops it was 12 minutes.
or is now.
Trump starts talking: very soon.
Date: 2/04/2026 12:01:32
From: dv
ID: 2375715
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
dv said:
“Mr President, no one has paid the price, like you have paid the price. You were betrayed and arrested and falsely accused. It’s a familiar pattern that our Lord and Savior showed us…God is with you and God is using you to defeat evil.”
https://www.threads.com/@bulwarkonline/post/DWm3jqEDKFJ
White House spiritual advisor Paula White’s address at the White House Easter lunch
“On Palm Sunday, Jesus entered Jerusalem as crowds welcomed him with praise honoring him as king. They call me king now. Can you believe it?”
FMD!
Welcome back, Rasputin!
Date: 2/04/2026 12:10:30
From: roughbarked
ID: 2375718
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Michael V said:
dv said:
“Mr President, no one has paid the price, like you have paid the price. You were betrayed and arrested and falsely accused. It’s a familiar pattern that our Lord and Savior showed us…God is with you and God is using you to defeat evil.”
https://www.threads.com/@bulwarkonline/post/DWm3jqEDKFJ
White House spiritual advisor Paula White’s address at the White House Easter lunch
“On Palm Sunday, Jesus entered Jerusalem as crowds welcomed him with praise honoring him as king. They call me king now. Can you believe it?”
FMD!
Welcome back, Rasputin!
I’m already sick of hearing about how great our new King is. No actual facts about the end of this non war he’s having. Like Putin he has called it an operation.
Bring on the crucifixion.
Date: 2/04/2026 12:18:13
From: Michael V
ID: 2375722
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Witty Rejoinder said:
Wait a sec… Jesus was executed? Can we look forward to Trump being crucified both figuratively and literally?
I like your thinking!
:)
Date: 2/04/2026 12:18:44
From: roughbarked
ID: 2375723
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
dv said:
Michael V said:
FMD!
Welcome back, Rasputin!
I’m already sick of hearing about how great our new King is. No actual facts about the end of this non war he’s having. Like Putin he has called it an operation.
Bring on the crucifixion.
Even in the background this monologue of self gratification for achievements never achieved, is making me turn it off and go listen to the birds.
Date: 2/04/2026 12:19:34
From: roughbarked
ID: 2375725
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Wait a sec… Jesus was executed? Can we look forward to Trump being crucified both figuratively and literally?
I like your thinking!
:)
Let us pray.
Date: 2/04/2026 12:20:10
From: Michael V
ID: 2375726
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Michael V said:
dv said:
“Mr President, no one has paid the price, like you have paid the price. You were betrayed and arrested and falsely accused. It’s a familiar pattern that our Lord and Savior showed us…God is with you and God is using you to defeat evil.”
https://www.threads.com/@bulwarkonline/post/DWm3jqEDKFJ
White House spiritual advisor Paula White’s address at the White House Easter lunch
“On Palm Sunday, Jesus entered Jerusalem as crowds welcomed him with praise honoring him as king. They call me king now. Can you believe it?”
FMD!
Welcome back, Rasputin!
Snigger.
Date: 2/04/2026 12:21:14
From: roughbarked
ID: 2375727
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
May God hang his head in shame.
Date: 2/04/2026 13:28:37
From: dv
ID: 2375738
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
I’m already sick of hearing about how great our new King is.
Everyone: Our king…
Shrignold: His name is Malcolm.
Everyone: Our king…
Furry Boy: He is the king of love.
Everyone: Our king…
Unicorn: We must feed him.
Everyone: Our king…
Rabbit Boy: We must feed him gravel.
Everyone: Our king…
Shrignold: Or he becomes angry.
Everyone: Our king…
Malcolm: Feed me gravel!
Date: 2/04/2026 15:57:41
From: Ian
ID: 2375814
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Oil prices rise after Donald Trump addresses Americans about progress of Iran war
Oil prices surged almost immediately after Donald Trump’s address on the Iran war. His 20 minute speech did little to soothe market worries over the closure of the strait of Hormuz, with the US president calling on other nations to help reopen it.
Brent jumped more than 4% to $105.55, while West Texas Intermediate climbed 3% to hit $103.16. Both had been falling before Trump started his speech.
Garud
Date: 2/04/2026 16:00:56
From: Michael V
ID: 2375818
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
JudgeMental said:
Oregon’s Bay Area is feeling determined.
……………………………………..
Thanks for posting.
Date: 2/04/2026 16:36:36
From: dv
ID: 2375835
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Kind of weird day in court.
DJT showed up in the audience, maybe thinking it would influence matters, but the SCJs are just basically repeating, “why are you presenting what is obviously not a valid legal argument?”
Which is a fair question, and again I wonder what they think their future is. They debase and humiliate themselves for the boss, make themselves look incompetent.
Date: 2/04/2026 17:44:31
From: dv
ID: 2375856
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
“Iran’s strategy was so obvious. They wanted to produce as many missiles as possible, and they did with the longest range possible, and they had some weapons that nobody believed they had. We just learned that out. We took them out, we took them all out so that no one would really dare stop them.”
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2026/04/02/donald-trump-iran-war-speech-full-transcript/89430245007/
One thing about him is that he has just so many kinds of stupidity that one ends up overwhelmed.
I mean you are wincing at “we just learned that out”, before considering that it is unlikely that the world’s biggest intelligence apparatus didn’t have a pretty good idea of what weapons Iran had.
Then he finishes up with “we took them all out so that no one would really dare stop them”. What the hell does that mean?
Date: 2/04/2026 17:52:02
From: Cymek
ID: 2375859
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
“Iran’s strategy was so obvious. They wanted to produce as many missiles as possible, and they did with the longest range possible, and they had some weapons that nobody believed they had. We just learned that out. We took them out, we took them all out so that no one would really dare stop them.”
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2026/04/02/donald-trump-iran-war-speech-full-transcript/89430245007/
One thing about him is that he has just so many kinds of stupidity that one ends up overwhelmed.
I mean you are wincing at “we just learned that out”, before considering that it is unlikely that the world’s biggest intelligence apparatus didn’t have a pretty good idea of what weapons Iran had.
Then he finishes up with “we took them all out so that no one would really dare stop them”. What the hell does that mean?
Would you not apply worst case scenario if you are uncertain, perhaps not nuclear warheads or ICBMS but certainly missiles with many 1000’s of km ability.
Date: 2/04/2026 17:53:14
From: roughbarked
ID: 2375860
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
“Iran’s strategy was so obvious. They wanted to produce as many missiles as possible, and they did with the longest range possible, and they had some weapons that nobody believed they had. We just learned that out. We took them out, we took them all out so that no one would really dare stop them.”
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2026/04/02/donald-trump-iran-war-speech-full-transcript/89430245007/
One thing about him is that he has just so many kinds of stupidity that one ends up overwhelmed.
I mean you are wincing at “we just learned that out”, before considering that it is unlikely that the world’s biggest intelligence apparatus didn’t have a pretty good idea of what weapons Iran had.
Then he finishes up with “we took them all out so that no one would really dare stop them”. What the hell does that mean?
gibberish.
Date: 2/04/2026 17:56:14
From: Michael V
ID: 2375861
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
“Iran’s strategy was so obvious. They wanted to produce as many missiles as possible, and they did with the longest range possible, and they had some weapons that nobody believed they had. We just learned that out. We took them out, we took them all out so that no one would really dare stop them.”
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2026/04/02/donald-trump-iran-war-speech-full-transcript/89430245007/
One thing about him is that he has just so many kinds of stupidity that one ends up overwhelmed.
I mean you are wincing at “we just learned that out”, before considering that it is unlikely that the world’s biggest intelligence apparatus didn’t have a pretty good idea of what weapons Iran had.
Then he finishes up with “we took them all out so that no one would really dare stop them”. What the hell does that mean?
I don’t know. I guess it is just another example of Trump’s pathological lying.
Date: 2/04/2026 17:58:22
From: roughbarked
ID: 2375862
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Michael V said:
dv said:
“Iran’s strategy was so obvious. They wanted to produce as many missiles as possible, and they did with the longest range possible, and they had some weapons that nobody believed they had. We just learned that out. We took them out, we took them all out so that no one would really dare stop them.”
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2026/04/02/donald-trump-iran-war-speech-full-transcript/89430245007/
One thing about him is that he has just so many kinds of stupidity that one ends up overwhelmed.
I mean you are wincing at “we just learned that out”, before considering that it is unlikely that the world’s biggest intelligence apparatus didn’t have a pretty good idea of what weapons Iran had.
Then he finishes up with “we took them all out so that no one would really dare stop them”. What the hell does that mean?
I don’t know. I guess it is just another example of Trump’s pathological lying.
Part of what he does is trigger rises and falls in the markets which I’m sure he does well out of.
Date: 2/04/2026 17:58:30
From: Cymek
ID: 2375863
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
dv said:
“Iran’s strategy was so obvious. They wanted to produce as many missiles as possible, and they did with the longest range possible, and they had some weapons that nobody believed they had. We just learned that out. We took them out, we took them all out so that no one would really dare stop them.”
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2026/04/02/donald-trump-iran-war-speech-full-transcript/89430245007/
One thing about him is that he has just so many kinds of stupidity that one ends up overwhelmed.
I mean you are wincing at “we just learned that out”, before considering that it is unlikely that the world’s biggest intelligence apparatus didn’t have a pretty good idea of what weapons Iran had.
Then he finishes up with “we took them all out so that no one would really dare stop them”. What the hell does that mean?
gibberish.
All you need to be is produce missiles that fly regardless of how they perform or look.
If you can produce a 100 for the cost of one interceptor you are doing your job
If you also have 1000’s of people building them and your enemy is still relying on producing them as business as usual you fall behind.
Date: 2/04/2026 18:00:00
From: Cymek
ID: 2375864
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
dv said:
“Iran’s strategy was so obvious. They wanted to produce as many missiles as possible, and they did with the longest range possible, and they had some weapons that nobody believed they had. We just learned that out. We took them out, we took them all out so that no one would really dare stop them.”
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2026/04/02/donald-trump-iran-war-speech-full-transcript/89430245007/
One thing about him is that he has just so many kinds of stupidity that one ends up overwhelmed.
I mean you are wincing at “we just learned that out”, before considering that it is unlikely that the world’s biggest intelligence apparatus didn’t have a pretty good idea of what weapons Iran had.
Then he finishes up with “we took them all out so that no one would really dare stop them”. What the hell does that mean?
I don’t know. I guess it is just another example of Trump’s pathological lying.
Part of what he does is trigger rises and falls in the markets which I’m sure he does well out of.
All of this for the whims of the rich.
Imagine we destroy human civilisation for the beast that is the stock market
We deserve extinction for being so stupid
Date: 2/04/2026 18:00:38
From: roughbarked
ID: 2375865
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
roughbarked said:
dv said:
“Iran’s strategy was so obvious. They wanted to produce as many missiles as possible, and they did with the longest range possible, and they had some weapons that nobody believed they had. We just learned that out. We took them out, we took them all out so that no one would really dare stop them.”
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2026/04/02/donald-trump-iran-war-speech-full-transcript/89430245007/
One thing about him is that he has just so many kinds of stupidity that one ends up overwhelmed.
I mean you are wincing at “we just learned that out”, before considering that it is unlikely that the world’s biggest intelligence apparatus didn’t have a pretty good idea of what weapons Iran had.
Then he finishes up with “we took them all out so that no one would really dare stop them”. What the hell does that mean?
gibberish.
All you need to be is produce missiles that fly regardless of how they perform or look.
If you can produce a 100 for the cost of one interceptor you are doing your job
If you also have 1000’s of people building them and your enemy is still relying on producing them as business as usual you fall behind.
Anything to force the enemy to expend billions on patriot missiles to counter cheaper missiles and drones.
Date: 2/04/2026 18:01:33
From: roughbarked
ID: 2375866
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
I don’t know. I guess it is just another example of Trump’s pathological lying.
Part of what he does is trigger rises and falls in the markets which I’m sure he does well out of.
All of this for the whims of the rich.
Imagine we destroy human civilisation for the beast that is the stock market
We deserve extinction for being so stupid
It isn’t my stupid. That’s my only defence.
Date: 2/04/2026 18:08:49
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2375869
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
dv said:
“Iran’s strategy was so obvious. They wanted to produce as many missiles as possible, and they did with the longest range possible, and they had some weapons that nobody believed they had. We just learned that out. We took them out, we took them all out so that no one would really dare stop them.”
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2026/04/02/donald-trump-iran-war-speech-full-transcript/89430245007/
One thing about him is that he has just so many kinds of stupidity that one ends up overwhelmed.
I mean you are wincing at “we just learned that out”, before considering that it is unlikely that the world’s biggest intelligence apparatus didn’t have a pretty good idea of what weapons Iran had.
Then he finishes up with “we took them all out so that no one would really dare stop them”. What the hell does that mean?
gibberish.
and the audience lap it all up regardless
Date: 2/04/2026 18:08:54
From: Cymek
ID: 2375870
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
roughbarked said:
Cymek said:
roughbarked said:
Part of what he does is trigger rises and falls in the markets which I’m sure he does well out of.
All of this for the whims of the rich.
Imagine we destroy human civilisation for the beast that is the stock market
We deserve extinction for being so stupid
It isn’t my stupid. That’s my only defence.
True.
It makes you wonder the point of existence
The Earth certainty doesn’t need us, intelligence is likely an evolutionary dead end and mistake
Date: 2/04/2026 18:10:52
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2375873
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Cymek said:
roughbarked said:
Michael V said:
I don’t know. I guess it is just another example of Trump’s pathological lying.
Part of what he does is trigger rises and falls in the markets which I’m sure he does well out of.
All of this for the whims of the rich.
Imagine we destroy human civilisation for the beast that is the stock market
We deserve extinction for being so stupid

Date: 2/04/2026 18:23:37
From: kii
ID: 2375878
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Heather Delaney Reese
“Shortly after 1 pm this afternoon, Donald J. Trump walked into the East Room to join faith leaders for an Easter lunch celebration. He appeared energized, talkative, and completely unrestrained. As he made his way to the podium, his makeup sitting unevenly across his face, a harsh line of orange against pale skin along his collar, he paused on the stage, soaking in the applause and encouraging the crowd to keep cheering. Once at the mic, he launched into nearly 45 minutes of rambling, self-focused commentary that had very little to do with Easter and everything to do with himself. He drifted between attacks on judges, racist rhetoric about immigrants, and bizarre tangents about seizing foreign oil and mocking allied world leaders, all while religious leaders stood beside him and said nothing.
But most telling about the whole event was what happened after. Because shortly after the luncheon had ended, the White House made a move not often seen. They deleted the video recording of his entire speech. And we have to imagine that they did this because what he said was such a disaster that even they knew it would be a struggle to contain it. How do you explain the president saying, “When somebody’s nice to me, I love that person. Even if they’re bad people, I couldn’t care less. I’ll fight to the end for them.” And how do you make sure that the United States is safe from both domestic and foreign adversaries when the president says you can be “bad” as long as you are nice to him? Where does that leave us as a country?
When taken in context to everything else he said today, to a room full of pastors, reverends, and bishops, during Holy Week, it just keeps looking worse. He did full impressions of Allied world leaders turning him down when he asked for help in the Strait of Hormuz. He mocked British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, telling the room the UK has “two old broken down aircraft carriers.” He mocked French President Macron, calling him “France Macaron,” joking that Macron’s wife treats him “extremely badly,” and referencing “the right to the jaw.” These are the leaders of nations whose soldiers fought and died alongside ours in Afghanistan after September 11th. These are the countries that invoked NATO’s mutual defense clause for the first and only time in history, not for themselves, but for us. And this is how he talks about them at an Easter prayer lunch. Because they weren’t nice to him. Because they didn’t join his unjust and dangerous war.
And while he was mocking the allies who wouldn’t help him, he told the room exactly why the fight is really happening. “We could just take their oil,” he said, talking about Iran. “I’d prefer just to take the oil.” The Associated Press flagged it as the lead story of the day. The President of the United States, surrounded by men and women of the cloth, openly admitted he wants to seize another sovereign nation’s natural resources. He said the only reason he wouldn’t is that Americans don’t have “the patience.” Not that it’s wrong or that it violates international law, but that it would take too long.
Then he moved to Venezuela, bragging that the invasion was won “in 45 minutes” and comparing it to “a fighter getting knocked out in the first three seconds.” He told the room the United States now controls “59% of the oil in the world.” He described the arrangement as “like a joint venture.” This is what the wars are for. This is what the alliances are being reshaped around. Oil and obedience for a power-hungry monster.
And then, still in that same room, still surrounded by religious leaders, he turned to the subject of Somali immigrants in Minnesota. He called Somali people “low IQ.” He said Somalia is “the worst country anywhere in the world” where “they just shoot each other all day long.” He claimed they have “94% unemployment” and “stole $19 billion.” He said they come to this country with no money and immediately go out and buy Mercedes-Benzes. He called Congresswoman Ilhan Omar “a stone-cold crook” and repeated the long-debunked claim that she married her brother. This is how the President spoke during an Easter celebration.
And while he was dehumanizing immigrants and confessing to imperial ambitions, he made clear exactly how little he thinks of his fellow Americans. He told his budget director not to send any federal money for daycares because he is spending all his time fighting wars he created. “The United States can’t take care of daycare,” he said. “We’re a big country. We have 50 states. We have all these other people. We’re fighting wars. We can’t take care of daycare.” Then he went further, calling daycare, Medicaid, and Medicare “all these little things” and “all these little scams.” He said the federal government has one job: “military protection.” States should raise their own taxes to pay for the rest.
Daycare is not “a little scam”. Daycare is how families are able to work, build stability, improve their economic futures, and the futures of their communities. Daycares are some of the first places children receive education. They are often the first time a child learns structure, socialization, and routine outside of the home. Subsidizing daycare is not a handout. It is an investment in the children who will inherit whatever is left of this country when he’s done with it.
And Medicare is not a government gift. Medicare is something that Americans pay into for their entire working lives. It comes out of every paycheck. People sacrifice from their earnings for decades with the understanding that when they reach retirement, that safety net will be there. They already paid for it. They already funded it. It is their money. And Medicaid is not something people receive on a whim. You have to qualify. It exists for the most vulnerable among us, and he called that a scam, too.
A large portion of his own supporters are Medicare recipients, people who are in their retirement years, who showed up for him, voted for him, and believed him when he said he would protect them. And this is how he talks about them when he thinks he’s among friends. Like they’re a burden. Like the programs they depend on to survive are a line item to be cut, so he can keep fighting wars and building ballrooms.
He used the occasion to attack the judiciary, too. He called the judge who blocked his ballroom “not good people.” He said Democratic judges would rule against you “even if the person admits they’re guilty.” He called Republican judges “stupid people” for wanting to show independence from him. Hours earlier, he had become the first sitting president in American history to attend Supreme Court oral arguments, sitting with his arms crossed, staring at the justices hearing his attempt to end birthright citizenship. He was not there in support of anything; he was there to intimidate. Thankfully, much like most of his presidency, that didn’t seem to work either. Both liberal and conservative justices were deeply skeptical. Justice Barrett questioned whether his legal theory would even apply to the freed slaves the Fourteenth Amendment was written for. Justice Gorsuch tore apart the administration’s central argument. He showed up to flex, and the court didn’t flinch.
Then came the moment that, in any functioning democracy, would have ended a political career. While reading the biblical passage about Jesus entering Jerusalem, he stopped mid-sentence and said, “They call me king now. Do you believe it? No king. I’m such a king. I can’t get a ballroom approved.” He compared himself to a king while telling the story of Christ’s sacrifice. At an Easter celebration. In the White House.
And throughout it all, his right hand was covered in a visible square of beige foundation, poorly blended, clearly covering bruising that had been visible for weeks. His left hand was also noticeably paler. When reporters asked, the White House responded with a canned statement calling him “the sharpest, most accessible president.” Another typical response from this administration.
But what may be the most disturbing part of the entire event was not anything Trump said. It was the silence of every faith leader in that room. Not one of them stopped him. Not one pushed back, not even during the racist rant or during the King comparison. Instead, they laid hands on him and prayed. Pastor Paula White told him, “No one has paid the price like you have paid the price.” She compared his suffering to the death and resurrection of Jesus. Franklin Graham compared him to the biblical Esther, chosen by God to save the Jewish people. Another pastor thanked God for “causing him to turn his head” when the bullet came in Butler, Pennsylvania. These are not true spiritual leaders. These are enablers offering divine cover to a morally corrupt man during the week Christians honor the one who washed the feet of strangers and died for the sins of others.
And then, at the end of it all, someone asked what his primetime address to the nation would be about later that night. The President of the United States said, “Basically, I’m going to tell everybody how great I am. What a great job I’ve done. What a phenomenal job.” And that is exactly what he did.
Less than 24 hours earlier, the White House had announced that the president would deliver a primetime address to the nation. From the moment the announcement dropped, the country was on edge. Was he ending the war? Was he pulling us out of NATO? Was he announcing a ground invasion? For an entire day, the weight of not knowing sat on all of us. That is what he does. He holds the country and the world hostage with the anxiety of what comes next, forces everyone to stop and wait, and feeds on the attention.
And the man who walked into the Cross Hall of the White House at 9 PM looked nothing like the man who had walked into the Easter lunch just hours earlier. His head was down. His steps were heavy and slow. His eyes were sunken, and the color was drained from his face. He was breathing so hard I thought there was a chance he might have some sort of medical emergency right at the podium. This was not a president preparing to lead. This was a man barely holding himself upright.
For nearly 19 minutes, he read from the teleprompter, struggling with it the entire time. He said “epic theory” before correcting himself to “epic fury.” He said “batter field” instead of “battlefield.” He had trouble pronouncing numerous words and at times appeared to repeat, almost verbatim, his own Truth Social posts from earlier in the week as though he were reading them for the first time. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer asked if there has “ever been a more rambling, disjointed, and pathetic presidential war speech,” and called Trump “completely unfit to be Commander-in-Chief.” Senator Chris Coons wrote simply, “No clear plan. Rambling, unmoored, unserious.” Representative Jason Crow said, “No American is going to bed tonight with a more clear picture of what the endgame is.” Raw Story reported that political analysts and observers were “left puzzled and confused by the address.” Ian Bremmer of Eurasia Group called Trump’s Iran statements and policies “completely incoherent.” And even his own advisers admitted to Axios that they don’t know what he intends to do next, with one senior adviser saying, “Nobody knows in the end what he’s really thinking.”
It was babbling. It was disconnected. And it was completely unbecoming of the President of the United States of America. He told us there was no inflation, which is not true. He claimed every fallen soldier’s family told him, “Please, sir, finish the job,” language borrowed almost word for word from Pete Hegseth, and we already know that at least one Gold Star father has publicly disputed that account. He thanked our “allies” Qatar, the UAE, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Bahrain, countries whose leaders fund his family’s business interests, while never once naming the actual allies who have stood beside us through decades of mutual defense. He bragged about military victories as if he personally flew the missions. And he threatened to send Iran “back to the stone ages.”
But one line summed up the entire address: “Never in the history of warfare has an enemy suffered such clear and devastating large-scale losses in a matter of weeks. Our enemies are losing, and America, as it has been for five years under my presidency, is winning, and now winning bigger than ever before.”
He said five years. Because in his mind, all five of those years are one continuous reign. The Biden presidency doesn’t exist in his reality. The election he lost doesn’t count. But even more embarrassingly, he is trying to rewrite history and the reality we are living in right now. The economy is crashing. Fuel prices are surging. Everywhere you turn, people are talking about the economy and are gravely concerned. He held the country in suspense for an entire day just so he could say out loud how great he is.
And while the country was processing what it had just watched, the rest of the world was already responding. Because what Trump did today wasn’t just embarrassing for the United States. It was destabilizing for the planet.
Earlier in the day, he told Reuters he is “absolutely” considering pulling the United States out of NATO. He called the alliance “a paper tiger.” He said he was “never swayed by NATO.” And he said Putin already knows it, as though validating the assessment of a dictator who invaded a sovereign nation is something an American president should be doing or even thinking. He told the British newspaper The Telegraph that a withdrawal is “beyond reconsideration.” When asked if he would do it, he said, “Wouldn’t you do that if you were me?”
And to answer his question, no. No, we wouldn’t. Because NATO is the reason our children and grandchildren have not had to fight World War III. NATO was formed in 1949, in the ruins of a war that killed more than 70 million people. It was built on a single, radical idea: that an attack on one member is an attack on all. That idea has held for 77 years. It was invoked for the first and only time after September 11th, 2001, when our allies came to our defense. Not the other way around. They came for us. Soldiers from the United Kingdom, Canada, France, Germany, Denmark, and dozens of other nations deployed to Afghanistan, fought alongside Americans, and many of them never came home. To call that a “one-way street,” as Trump did today, is an insult to the dead and one of the most despicable things he has ever said.
And the man who is one of his biggest enablers, Marco Rubio, is the same man who, as a senator, co-sponsored the 2023 law that requires two-thirds of the Senate or an act of Congress to approve any withdrawal from NATO. He wrote the law to prevent exactly what Trump is now threatening to do. And now, as Secretary of State, Rubio is saying NATO’s “value” needs to be “reexamined” because allies refused to join Trump’s unjust and illegal Iran war. The man who built the guardrail is now helping tear it down. That is the corruption of this system in a single person.
And what Trump doesn’t understand, or doesn’t care about, is that NATO is not just a military arrangement. It is the architecture that prevents great power wars. It is the reason Europe has seen relative peace for nearly eight decades. It is the reason Russia has not moved on a NATO member. It is the structure that allowed the United States to project stability without having to wage wars. When you weaken NATO, you don’t make America stronger. You make America isolated and weak. You invite the very conflicts NATO was built to prevent. And you tell every adversary on the planet that the United States can no longer be relied upon.
Authoritarian leaders always weaken alliances before they consolidate power. They isolate their country, remove external checks, and surround themselves only with leaders who mirror their methods. Hitler pulled Germany out of the League of Nations in 1933, two years before he began his military buildup. Putin has spent decades trying to fracture NATO from the outside. Because without NATO, Putin’s Ukraine invasion spreads to neighboring countries.
And the consequences of Trump’s complete disregard for how any of this works are already here. Today, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese delivered a rare national address to his country about the fuel crisis created by this war, the first such address since the pandemic. Albanese warned of “tough months ahead,” admitted that “no government can promise to eliminate the pressure this war is causing,” and urged citizens not to panic-buy fuel, asking them to take public transport so that farmers, miners, and tradespeople could keep working. Two Australian states announced temporary free public transit to ease the pressure. The same day, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer also addressed his nation, calling NATO “the single most effective military alliance the world has ever seen” and making clear the UK would not be dragged into Trump’s war. Two allied nations, on opposite sides of the world, both felt the need to address their people on the same day because of the chaos one American president has created. That is the isolation Trump is building. Not just from our enemies, but from the countries that have stood with us for generations.
And I want to say something to our international readers, because I know you’re watching. I know it looks like we’re not doing anything, or at least not enough. I know it feels like the American people are sitting by while our government dismantles the global order. And I understand why it looks that way. But please know that tens of millions see what is happening, and we are fighting back. What you’re seeing is not apathy. It is the helplessness of living inside a system that is being bent beyond recognition by people who do not represent the majority of us. We are not doing nothing. But we are not doing enough. And I think most of us know that. I personally believe we should all be in the streets. I think about that every day. And I think the day is coming when we will be. But until then, we use every tool we have. And the most powerful one we have right now is the truth.
A CNN poll released today confirmed what so many of us are already feeling. Trump’s approval on the economy has hit a career low of 31%. Two-thirds of Americans say his policies have worsened economic conditions. His approval on inflation dropped from 44% a year ago to 27%. Seven in ten say he doesn’t have a clear plan for gas prices. And the cracks inside his own base are widening. Among Republicans, strong approval dropped from 52% in January to 43%. Among Republicans under 45, his economic approval is down 23 points since the start of the year. One Republican respondent wrote, “Prices! Everything is so expensive. Between gas and grocery prices, we are poor.”
Those numbers are not just data. They are a map. They show us exactly where the path forward is. Because the people who are going to decide the midterms are not the die-hards who will never leave him. They are the people who voted for him in 2024 and are now watching their grocery bills climb and their gas tanks empty. They are the people who are against what’s happening but stayed home because they didn’t think their vote mattered. They are the ones who need to hear from us. Not from a headline, but from someone they trust. From a neighbor. A coworker. A friend. From posts like this one, shared at the right moment, reaching the right person.
Our goal is to take both chambers of Congress in November. The House and the Senate. Both are possible. Neither is guaranteed. If we fall short in one, we keep fighting. But both are within reach if we do our part. If we keep people informed, and if we keep showing them what is happening and reminding them that we do not have to live like this. That there is a clear path out of this darkness. That the numbers are already moving in our direction, and all we need is to reach the people who care but haven’t yet realized how much their voice matters. We know what we have to do, and I know we can do it. That is why I still have hope for America. And you should, too.
I’ll see you tomorrow,
Heather”
Date: 2/04/2026 18:54:09
From: Michael V
ID: 2375888
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
kii said:
Heather Delaney Reese
“Shortly after 1 pm this afternoon, Donald J. Trump walked into the East Room to join faith leaders for an Easter lunch celebration. He appeared energized, talkative, and completely unrestrained. As he made his way to the podium, his makeup sitting unevenly across his face, a harsh line of orange against pale skin along his collar, he paused on the stage, soaking in the applause and encouraging the crowd to keep cheering. Once at the mic, he launched into nearly 45 minutes of rambling, self-focused commentary that had very little to do with Easter and everything to do with himself. He drifted between attacks on judges, racist rhetoric about immigrants, and bizarre tangents about seizing foreign oil and mocking allied world leaders, all while religious leaders stood beside him and said nothing.
But most telling about the whole event was what happened after. Because shortly after the luncheon had ended, the White House made a move not often seen. They deleted the video recording of his entire speech. And we have to imagine that they did this because what he said was such a disaster that even they knew it would be a struggle to contain it. How do you explain the president saying, “When somebody’s nice to me, I love that person. Even if they’re bad people, I couldn’t care less. I’ll fight to the end for them.” And how do you make sure that the United States is safe from both domestic and foreign adversaries when the president says you can be “bad” as long as you are nice to him? Where does that leave us as a country?
When taken in context to everything else he said today, to a room full of pastors, reverends, and bishops, during Holy Week, it just keeps looking worse. He did full impressions of Allied world leaders turning him down when he asked for help in the Strait of Hormuz. He mocked British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, telling the room the UK has “two old broken down aircraft carriers.” He mocked French President Macron, calling him “France Macaron,” joking that Macron’s wife treats him “extremely badly,” and referencing “the right to the jaw.” These are the leaders of nations whose soldiers fought and died alongside ours in Afghanistan after September 11th. These are the countries that invoked NATO’s mutual defense clause for the first and only time in history, not for themselves, but for us. And this is how he talks about them at an Easter prayer lunch. Because they weren’t nice to him. Because they didn’t join his unjust and dangerous war.
And while he was mocking the allies who wouldn’t help him, he told the room exactly why the fight is really happening. “We could just take their oil,” he said, talking about Iran. “I’d prefer just to take the oil.” The Associated Press flagged it as the lead story of the day. The President of the United States, surrounded by men and women of the cloth, openly admitted he wants to seize another sovereign nation’s natural resources. He said the only reason he wouldn’t is that Americans don’t have “the patience.” Not that it’s wrong or that it violates international law, but that it would take too long.
Then he moved to Venezuela, bragging that the invasion was won “in 45 minutes” and comparing it to “a fighter getting knocked out in the first three seconds.” He told the room the United States now controls “59% of the oil in the world.” He described the arrangement as “like a joint venture.” This is what the wars are for. This is what the alliances are being reshaped around. Oil and obedience for a power-hungry monster.
And then, still in that same room, still surrounded by religious leaders, he turned to the subject of Somali immigrants in Minnesota. He called Somali people “low IQ.” He said Somalia is “the worst country anywhere in the world” where “they just shoot each other all day long.” He claimed they have “94% unemployment” and “stole $19 billion.” He said they come to this country with no money and immediately go out and buy Mercedes-Benzes. He called Congresswoman Ilhan Omar “a stone-cold crook” and repeated the long-debunked claim that she married her brother. This is how the President spoke during an Easter celebration.
And while he was dehumanizing immigrants and confessing to imperial ambitions, he made clear exactly how little he thinks of his fellow Americans. He told his budget director not to send any federal money for daycares because he is spending all his time fighting wars he created. “The United States can’t take care of daycare,” he said. “We’re a big country. We have 50 states. We have all these other people. We’re fighting wars. We can’t take care of daycare.” Then he went further, calling daycare, Medicaid, and Medicare “all these little things” and “all these little scams.” He said the federal government has one job: “military protection.” States should raise their own taxes to pay for the rest.
Daycare is not “a little scam”. Daycare is how families are able to work, build stability, improve their economic futures, and the futures of their communities. Daycares are some of the first places children receive education. They are often the first time a child learns structure, socialization, and routine outside of the home. Subsidizing daycare is not a handout. It is an investment in the children who will inherit whatever is left of this country when he’s done with it.
And Medicare is not a government gift. Medicare is something that Americans pay into for their entire working lives. It comes out of every paycheck. People sacrifice from their earnings for decades with the understanding that when they reach retirement, that safety net will be there. They already paid for it. They already funded it. It is their money. And Medicaid is not something people receive on a whim. You have to qualify. It exists for the most vulnerable among us, and he called that a scam, too.
A large portion of his own supporters are Medicare recipients, people who are in their retirement years, who showed up for him, voted for him, and believed him when he said he would protect them. And this is how he talks about them when he thinks he’s among friends. Like they’re a burden. Like the programs they depend on to survive are a line item to be cut, so he can keep fighting wars and building ballrooms.
He used the occasion to attack the judiciary, too. He called the judge who blocked his ballroom “not good people.” He said Democratic judges would rule against you “even if the person admits they’re guilty.” He called Republican judges “stupid people” for wanting to show independence from him. Hours earlier, he had become the first sitting president in American history to attend Supreme Court oral arguments, sitting with his arms crossed, staring at the justices hearing his attempt to end birthright citizenship. He was not there in support of anything; he was there to intimidate. Thankfully, much like most of his presidency, that didn’t seem to work either. Both liberal and conservative justices were deeply skeptical. Justice Barrett questioned whether his legal theory would even apply to the freed slaves the Fourteenth Amendment was written for. Justice Gorsuch tore apart the administration’s central argument. He showed up to flex, and the court didn’t flinch.
Then came the moment that, in any functioning democracy, would have ended a political career. While reading the biblical passage about Jesus entering Jerusalem, he stopped mid-sentence and said, “They call me king now. Do you believe it? No king. I’m such a king. I can’t get a ballroom approved.” He compared himself to a king while telling the story of Christ’s sacrifice. At an Easter celebration. In the White House.
And throughout it all, his right hand was covered in a visible square of beige foundation, poorly blended, clearly covering bruising that had been visible for weeks. His left hand was also noticeably paler. When reporters asked, the White House responded with a canned statement calling him “the sharpest, most accessible president.” Another typical response from this administration.
But what may be the most disturbing part of the entire event was not anything Trump said. It was the silence of every faith leader in that room. Not one of them stopped him. Not one pushed back, not even during the racist rant or during the King comparison. Instead, they laid hands on him and prayed. Pastor Paula White told him, “No one has paid the price like you have paid the price.” She compared his suffering to the death and resurrection of Jesus. Franklin Graham compared him to the biblical Esther, chosen by God to save the Jewish people. Another pastor thanked God for “causing him to turn his head” when the bullet came in Butler, Pennsylvania. These are not true spiritual leaders. These are enablers offering divine cover to a morally corrupt man during the week Christians honor the one who washed the feet of strangers and died for the sins of others.
And then, at the end of it all, someone asked what his primetime address to the nation would be about later that night. The President of the United States said, “Basically, I’m going to tell everybody how great I am. What a great job I’ve done. What a phenomenal job.” And that is exactly what he did.
Less than 24 hours earlier, the White House had announced that the president would deliver a primetime address to the nation. From the moment the announcement dropped, the country was on edge. Was he ending the war? Was he pulling us out of NATO? Was he announcing a ground invasion? For an entire day, the weight of not knowing sat on all of us. That is what he does. He holds the country and the world hostage with the anxiety of what comes next, forces everyone to stop and wait, and feeds on the attention.
And the man who walked into the Cross Hall of the White House at 9 PM looked nothing like the man who had walked into the Easter lunch just hours earlier. His head was down. His steps were heavy and slow. His eyes were sunken, and the color was drained from his face. He was breathing so hard I thought there was a chance he might have some sort of medical emergency right at the podium. This was not a president preparing to lead. This was a man barely holding himself upright.
For nearly 19 minutes, he read from the teleprompter, struggling with it the entire time. He said “epic theory” before correcting himself to “epic fury.” He said “batter field” instead of “battlefield.” He had trouble pronouncing numerous words and at times appeared to repeat, almost verbatim, his own Truth Social posts from earlier in the week as though he were reading them for the first time. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer asked if there has “ever been a more rambling, disjointed, and pathetic presidential war speech,” and called Trump “completely unfit to be Commander-in-Chief.” Senator Chris Coons wrote simply, “No clear plan. Rambling, unmoored, unserious.” Representative Jason Crow said, “No American is going to bed tonight with a more clear picture of what the endgame is.” Raw Story reported that political analysts and observers were “left puzzled and confused by the address.” Ian Bremmer of Eurasia Group called Trump’s Iran statements and policies “completely incoherent.” And even his own advisers admitted to Axios that they don’t know what he intends to do next, with one senior adviser saying, “Nobody knows in the end what he’s really thinking.”
It was babbling. It was disconnected. And it was completely unbecoming of the President of the United States of America. He told us there was no inflation, which is not true. He claimed every fallen soldier’s family told him, “Please, sir, finish the job,” language borrowed almost word for word from Pete Hegseth, and we already know that at least one Gold Star father has publicly disputed that account. He thanked our “allies” Qatar, the UAE, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Bahrain, countries whose leaders fund his family’s business interests, while never once naming the actual allies who have stood beside us through decades of mutual defense. He bragged about military victories as if he personally flew the missions. And he threatened to send Iran “back to the stone ages.”
But one line summed up the entire address: “Never in the history of warfare has an enemy suffered such clear and devastating large-scale losses in a matter of weeks. Our enemies are losing, and America, as it has been for five years under my presidency, is winning, and now winning bigger than ever before.”
He said five years. Because in his mind, all five of those years are one continuous reign. The Biden presidency doesn’t exist in his reality. The election he lost doesn’t count. But even more embarrassingly, he is trying to rewrite history and the reality we are living in right now. The economy is crashing. Fuel prices are surging. Everywhere you turn, people are talking about the economy and are gravely concerned. He held the country in suspense for an entire day just so he could say out loud how great he is.
And while the country was processing what it had just watched, the rest of the world was already responding. Because what Trump did today wasn’t just embarrassing for the United States. It was destabilizing for the planet.
Earlier in the day, he told Reuters he is “absolutely” considering pulling the United States out of NATO. He called the alliance “a paper tiger.” He said he was “never swayed by NATO.” And he said Putin already knows it, as though validating the assessment of a dictator who invaded a sovereign nation is something an American president should be doing or even thinking. He told the British newspaper The Telegraph that a withdrawal is “beyond reconsideration.” When asked if he would do it, he said, “Wouldn’t you do that if you were me?”
And to answer his question, no. No, we wouldn’t. Because NATO is the reason our children and grandchildren have not had to fight World War III. NATO was formed in 1949, in the ruins of a war that killed more than 70 million people. It was built on a single, radical idea: that an attack on one member is an attack on all. That idea has held for 77 years. It was invoked for the first and only time after September 11th, 2001, when our allies came to our defense. Not the other way around. They came for us. Soldiers from the United Kingdom, Canada, France, Germany, Denmark, and dozens of other nations deployed to Afghanistan, fought alongside Americans, and many of them never came home. To call that a “one-way street,” as Trump did today, is an insult to the dead and one of the most despicable things he has ever said.
And the man who is one of his biggest enablers, Marco Rubio, is the same man who, as a senator, co-sponsored the 2023 law that requires two-thirds of the Senate or an act of Congress to approve any withdrawal from NATO. He wrote the law to prevent exactly what Trump is now threatening to do. And now, as Secretary of State, Rubio is saying NATO’s “value” needs to be “reexamined” because allies refused to join Trump’s unjust and illegal Iran war. The man who built the guardrail is now helping tear it down. That is the corruption of this system in a single person.
And what Trump doesn’t understand, or doesn’t care about, is that NATO is not just a military arrangement. It is the architecture that prevents great power wars. It is the reason Europe has seen relative peace for nearly eight decades. It is the reason Russia has not moved on a NATO member. It is the structure that allowed the United States to project stability without having to wage wars. When you weaken NATO, you don’t make America stronger. You make America isolated and weak. You invite the very conflicts NATO was built to prevent. And you tell every adversary on the planet that the United States can no longer be relied upon.
Authoritarian leaders always weaken alliances before they consolidate power. They isolate their country, remove external checks, and surround themselves only with leaders who mirror their methods. Hitler pulled Germany out of the League of Nations in 1933, two years before he began his military buildup. Putin has spent decades trying to fracture NATO from the outside. Because without NATO, Putin’s Ukraine invasion spreads to neighboring countries.
And the consequences of Trump’s complete disregard for how any of this works are already here. Today, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese delivered a rare national address to his country about the fuel crisis created by this war, the first such address since the pandemic. Albanese warned of “tough months ahead,” admitted that “no government can promise to eliminate the pressure this war is causing,” and urged citizens not to panic-buy fuel, asking them to take public transport so that farmers, miners, and tradespeople could keep working. Two Australian states announced temporary free public transit to ease the pressure. The same day, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer also addressed his nation, calling NATO “the single most effective military alliance the world has ever seen” and making clear the UK would not be dragged into Trump’s war. Two allied nations, on opposite sides of the world, both felt the need to address their people on the same day because of the chaos one American president has created. That is the isolation Trump is building. Not just from our enemies, but from the countries that have stood with us for generations.
And I want to say something to our international readers, because I know you’re watching. I know it looks like we’re not doing anything, or at least not enough. I know it feels like the American people are sitting by while our government dismantles the global order. And I understand why it looks that way. But please know that tens of millions see what is happening, and we are fighting back. What you’re seeing is not apathy. It is the helplessness of living inside a system that is being bent beyond recognition by people who do not represent the majority of us. We are not doing nothing. But we are not doing enough. And I think most of us know that. I personally believe we should all be in the streets. I think about that every day. And I think the day is coming when we will be. But until then, we use every tool we have. And the most powerful one we have right now is the truth.
A CNN poll released today confirmed what so many of us are already feeling. Trump’s approval on the economy has hit a career low of 31%. Two-thirds of Americans say his policies have worsened economic conditions. His approval on inflation dropped from 44% a year ago to 27%. Seven in ten say he doesn’t have a clear plan for gas prices. And the cracks inside his own base are widening. Among Republicans, strong approval dropped from 52% in January to 43%. Among Republicans under 45, his economic approval is down 23 points since the start of the year. One Republican respondent wrote, “Prices! Everything is so expensive. Between gas and grocery prices, we are poor.”
Those numbers are not just data. They are a map. They show us exactly where the path forward is. Because the people who are going to decide the midterms are not the die-hards who will never leave him. They are the people who voted for him in 2024 and are now watching their grocery bills climb and their gas tanks empty. They are the people who are against what’s happening but stayed home because they didn’t think their vote mattered. They are the ones who need to hear from us. Not from a headline, but from someone they trust. From a neighbor. A coworker. A friend. From posts like this one, shared at the right moment, reaching the right person.
Our goal is to take both chambers of Congress in November. The House and the Senate. Both are possible. Neither is guaranteed. If we fall short in one, we keep fighting. But both are within reach if we do our part. If we keep people informed, and if we keep showing them what is happening and reminding them that we do not have to live like this. That there is a clear path out of this darkness. That the numbers are already moving in our direction, and all we need is to reach the people who care but haven’t yet realized how much their voice matters. We know what we have to do, and I know we can do it. That is why I still have hope for America. And you should, too.
I’ll see you tomorrow,
Heather”
Ta.
Epstein files? What Epstein files?
Date: 2/04/2026 19:59:53
From: dv
ID: 2375905
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
Looked up the Wikipedia article on White House Spiritual Advisor Paula White, only to find her full name is.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paula_White-Cain
I mean the jokes just make themselves. Do we go with the bloke who killed Abel? Do we say it explains why she’s blind to Trump’s sins? Our cups runneth over.
Date: 2/04/2026 21:01:38
From: Michael V
ID: 2375921
Subject: re: US Politics 2026 #1
dv said:
Looked up the Wikipedia article on White House Spiritual Advisor Paula White, only to find her full name is.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paula_White-Cain
I mean the jokes just make themselves. Do we go with the bloke who killed Abel? Do we say it explains why she’s blind to Trump’s sins? Our cups runneth over.
Yeah.