Date: 4/07/2026 21:01:39
From: dv
ID: 2407609
Subject: religion thread

https://www.nbcnews.com/world/the-vatican/vatican-declares-society-st-pius-x-schism-excommunicates-bishops-inval-rcna352691

Vatican declares ultraconservative society in schism, excommunicates bishops and warns faithful
The Vatican’s doctrine office went beyond the minimal sanctions foreseen by the church’s canon law to respond to the consecrations of four new bishops at the society’s Econe, Switzerland, seminary.

The Vatican responded aggressively Thursday to a traditionalist society that consecrated bishops without the pope’s consent, declaring the Society of St. Pius X in schism, excommunicating its bishops and priests and warning its faithful they too face the harshest sanctions in the Catholic Church.

The Vatican’s doctrine office went above and beyond the minimum sanctions foreseen by the church’s canon law to respond to the consecrations Wednesday of four new bishops at the society’s Econe, Switzerland, seminary.

The society, known by its initialism SSPX, celebrates the ancient Latin Mass and opposes the modernizing reforms of the Catholic Church, which it considers to be rife with heresies and errors.

During a ritual-filled, five-hour Mass on Wednesday, attended by some 15,500 people and their children, the SSPX consecrated four new bishops in direct defiance of Pope Leo XIV, who had urged the SSPX to hold off for the sake of the church’s unity.

In a decree, the Vatican excommunicated the four new bishops and the two bishops who participated in the ceremony. It declared the consecrations a “schismatic act” and declared the society itself had created a schism, or intentional rupture with the Catholic Church.

The Vatican warned the faithful who go to the society’s Masses to stop, declaring “those who adhere formally” to the society are considered themselves schismatic and excommunicated. It declared SSPX priests to be schismatic, and therefore excommunicated, and invalidated the sacraments of confession and marriage that they administer.

The sanctions, especially those targeting the priests, the faithful and the sacraments they can receive, were particularly harsh and reversed concessions the Vatican had granted the SSPX in recent years as part of its outreach to bring the group back under Rome’s wing.

The harshness of the response suggested that after nearly five decades of trying to negotiate with the SSPX, the Holy See has had enough.

French Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre founded the SSPX in 1970 in opposition to the modernizing reforms of the Second Vatican Council. Among other things, the 1960s meetings known as Vatican II revolutionized the church’s relations with other Christians, Jews and people of other faiths and allowed Mass to be celebrated in the vernacular rather than Latin.

Lefebvre consecrated four bishops without papal consent in 1988. The Vatican promptly excommunicated Lefebvre and the four bishops and declared the consecrations a “schismatic act.”

Pope Benedict XVI in 2009 lifted the excommunications as part of his yearslong outreach to the group. But the SSPX today has no legal standing in the church and with Thursday’s decree is declared to be in schism.

The consecrations had posed a crisis for Leo because the American pope has stressed the need for church unity. He has reached out especially to the conservative and traditionalist wing of the church that was in many ways alienated during the Pope Francis pontificate.

—-

https://www.ft.com/content/6b6caf0c-4c17-4612-a8cc-67c376b4bd70?syn-25a6b1a6=1
Vatican schism puts Maga Catholics under pressure

Reply Quote

Date: 4/07/2026 21:14:38
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2407612
Subject: re: religion thread

damn imagine if some other country had legislated for ethnic unity

Reply Quote

Date: 4/07/2026 21:18:40
From: kii
ID: 2407614
Subject: re: religion thread

Oh noes! Not the religion thread!

Reply Quote

Date: 4/07/2026 22:00:12
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2407618
Subject: re: religion thread

dv said:


https://www.nbcnews.com/world/the-vatican/vatican-declares-society-st-pius-x-schism-excommunicates-bishops-inval-rcna352691

Vatican declares ultraconservative society in schism, excommunicates bishops and warns faithful
The Vatican’s doctrine office went beyond the minimal sanctions foreseen by the church’s canon law to respond to the consecrations of four new bishops at the society’s Econe, Switzerland, seminary.

The Vatican responded aggressively Thursday to a traditionalist society that consecrated bishops without the pope’s consent, declaring the Society of St. Pius X in schism, excommunicating its bishops and priests and warning its faithful they too face the harshest sanctions in the Catholic Church.

The Vatican’s doctrine office went above and beyond the minimum sanctions foreseen by the church’s canon law to respond to the consecrations Wednesday of four new bishops at the society’s Econe, Switzerland, seminary.

The society, known by its initialism SSPX, celebrates the ancient Latin Mass and opposes the modernizing reforms of the Catholic Church, which it considers to be rife with heresies and errors.

During a ritual-filled, five-hour Mass on Wednesday, attended by some 15,500 people and their children, the SSPX consecrated four new bishops in direct defiance of Pope Leo XIV, who had urged the SSPX to hold off for the sake of the church’s unity.

In a decree, the Vatican excommunicated the four new bishops and the two bishops who participated in the ceremony. It declared the consecrations a “schismatic act” and declared the society itself had created a schism, or intentional rupture with the Catholic Church.

The Vatican warned the faithful who go to the society’s Masses to stop, declaring “those who adhere formally” to the society are considered themselves schismatic and excommunicated. It declared SSPX priests to be schismatic, and therefore excommunicated, and invalidated the sacraments of confession and marriage that they administer.

The sanctions, especially those targeting the priests, the faithful and the sacraments they can receive, were particularly harsh and reversed concessions the Vatican had granted the SSPX in recent years as part of its outreach to bring the group back under Rome’s wing.

The harshness of the response suggested that after nearly five decades of trying to negotiate with the SSPX, the Holy See has had enough.

French Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre founded the SSPX in 1970 in opposition to the modernizing reforms of the Second Vatican Council. Among other things, the 1960s meetings known as Vatican II revolutionized the church’s relations with other Christians, Jews and people of other faiths and allowed Mass to be celebrated in the vernacular rather than Latin.

Lefebvre consecrated four bishops without papal consent in 1988. The Vatican promptly excommunicated Lefebvre and the four bishops and declared the consecrations a “schismatic act.”

Pope Benedict XVI in 2009 lifted the excommunications as part of his yearslong outreach to the group. But the SSPX today has no legal standing in the church and with Thursday’s decree is declared to be in schism.

The consecrations had posed a crisis for Leo because the American pope has stressed the need for church unity. He has reached out especially to the conservative and traditionalist wing of the church that was in many ways alienated during the Pope Francis pontificate.

—-

https://www.ft.com/content/6b6caf0c-4c17-4612-a8cc-67c376b4bd70?syn-25a6b1a6=1
Vatican schism puts Maga Catholics under pressure

Us and Them by Pink Floyd.

Reply Quote

Date: 4/07/2026 22:43:40
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2407627
Subject: re: religion thread

kii said:


Oh noes! Not the religion thread!

Nobody expects the religion thread.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 07:58:16
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2407675
Subject: re: religion thread

>Vatican declares ultraconservative society in schism, excommunicates bishops and warns faithful

Goodo. I like to see them fight, fight, fight!

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 09:58:48
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2407688
Subject: re: religion thread

Witty Rejoinder said:


kii said:

Oh noes! Not the religion thread!

Nobody expects the religion thread.

Well certainly I was a bit surprised that dv would start a religion thread.

but anyway …

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 10:02:58
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2407692
Subject: re: religion thread

The Rev Dodgson said:


Witty Rejoinder said:

kii said:

Oh noes! Not the religion thread!

Nobody expects the religion thread.

Well certainly I was a bit surprised that dv would start a religion thread.

but anyway …


Dv himself is one of only two known religious believers on this forum (dv – Protestant, PWM – Catholic) but we don’t hold it against them, normally.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 10:02:59
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2407693
Subject: re: religion thread

The Rev Dodgson said:


Witty Rejoinder said:

kii said:

Oh noes! Not the religion thread!

Nobody expects the religion thread.

Well certainly I was a bit surprised that dv would start a religion thread.

but anyway …


Dv himself is one of only two known religious believers on this forum (dv – Protestant, PWM – Catholic) but we don’t hold it against them, normally.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 10:07:36
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2407694
Subject: re: religion thread

Bubblecar said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

Witty Rejoinder said:

Nobody expects the religion thread.

Well certainly I was a bit surprised that dv would start a religion thread.

but anyway …


Dv himself is one of only two known religious believers on this forum (dv – Protestant, PWM – Catholic) but we don’t hold it against them, normally.

Good heavens!

I’m sure I must have known that once, but I had totally forgotten.

(assuming I’m not missing some irony here or something :))

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 10:09:08
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2407697
Subject: re: religion thread

The Rev Dodgson said:


Bubblecar said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

Well certainly I was a bit surprised that dv would start a religion thread.

but anyway …


Dv himself is one of only two known religious believers on this forum (dv – Protestant, PWM – Catholic) but we don’t hold it against them, normally.

Good heavens!

I’m sure I must have known that once, but I had totally forgotten.

(assuming I’m not missing some irony here or something :))

No, dv is a Christian. But not out to save our souls, thankfully.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 10:11:26
From: Michael V
ID: 2407698
Subject: re: religion thread

Bubblecar said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

Witty Rejoinder said:

Nobody expects the religion thread.

Well certainly I was a bit surprised that dv would start a religion thread.

but anyway …


Dv himself is one of only two known religious believers on this forum (dv – Protestant, PWM – Catholic) but we don’t hold it against them, normally.

First I’ve heard of this attribute of dv. I remain unconvinced.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 10:12:43
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2407700
Subject: re: religion thread

Bubblecar said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

Bubblecar said:

Dv himself is one of only two known religious believers on this forum (dv – Protestant, PWM – Catholic) but we don’t hold it against them, normally.

Good heavens!

I’m sure I must have known that once, but I had totally forgotten.

(assuming I’m not missing some irony here or something :))

No, dv is a Christian. But not out to save our souls, thankfully.

Dammit, I’ve already packed my trivia notebook.

(Am I going to hell for saying “dammit” in a religion thread?)

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 10:14:12
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2407701
Subject: re: religion thread

Michael V said:


Bubblecar said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

Well certainly I was a bit surprised that dv would start a religion thread.

but anyway …


Dv himself is one of only two known religious believers on this forum (dv – Protestant, PWM – Catholic) but we don’t hold it against them, normally.

First I’ve heard of this attribute of dv. I remain unconvinced.

He doesn’t make a fuss about it but did reveal frankly some years ago that he is a believing Christian.

He was happy to concede that rationally, the forum atheists have the advantage, but he remains a faith-based believer nonetheless.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 10:14:39
From: roughbarked
ID: 2407702
Subject: re: religion thread

Divine Angel said:


Bubblecar said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

Good heavens!

I’m sure I must have known that once, but I had totally forgotten.

(assuming I’m not missing some irony here or something :))

No, dv is a Christian. But not out to save our souls, thankfully.

Dammit, I’ve already packed my trivia notebook.

(Am I going to hell for saying “dammit” in a religion thread?)

BLASPHEMER!

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 10:17:38
From: roughbarked
ID: 2407703
Subject: re: religion thread

Bubblecar said:


Michael V said:

Bubblecar said:

Dv himself is one of only two known religious believers on this forum (dv – Protestant, PWM – Catholic) but we don’t hold it against them, normally.

First I’ve heard of this attribute of dv. I remain unconvinced.

He doesn’t make a fuss about it but did reveal frankly some years ago that he is a believing Christian.

He was happy to concede that rationally, the forum atheists have the advantage, but he remains a faith-based believer nonetheless.

Consider me now educated of this?

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 10:21:49
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2407706
Subject: re: religion thread

roughbarked said:


Bubblecar said:

Michael V said:

First I’ve heard of this attribute of dv. I remain unconvinced.

He doesn’t make a fuss about it but did reveal frankly some years ago that he is a believing Christian.

He was happy to concede that rationally, the forum atheists have the advantage, but he remains a faith-based believer nonetheless.

Consider me now educated of this?

I don’t know how so many posters missed all that :)

But I’m sure dv himself will be happy to confirm it.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 10:25:51
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2407708
Subject: re: religion thread

I’m not religious, I am a religious figure, being divine and all. Obviously.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 10:27:01
From: roughbarked
ID: 2407709
Subject: re: religion thread

Bubblecar said:


roughbarked said:

Bubblecar said:

He doesn’t make a fuss about it but did reveal frankly some years ago that he is a believing Christian.

He was happy to concede that rationally, the forum atheists have the advantage, but he remains a faith-based believer nonetheless.

Consider me now educated of this?

I don’t know how so many posters missed all that :)

But I’m sure dv himself will be happy to confirm it.

I am not seeking out people’s spirituality/faith whatever. If they want me to know, they’ll tell me. It is their business, not mine.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 10:30:12
From: roughbarked
ID: 2407715
Subject: re: religion thread

Divine Angel said:


I’m not religious, I am a religious figure, being divine and all. Obviously.

We are all made in the image of God. ;)

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 10:40:16
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2407720
Subject: re: religion thread

I’m not religious, I am a religious figure, being divine and all. Obviously.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 10:52:42
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2407721
Subject: re: religion thread

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwtdhWltSIg

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 10:58:23
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2407725
Subject: re: religion thread

Witty Rejoinder said:


kii said:

Oh noes! Not the religion thread!

Nobody expects the religion thread.

Nobody expected so many schisms from one organisation.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 11:00:01
From: Michael V
ID: 2407729
Subject: re: religion thread

roughbarked said:


Divine Angel said:

I’m not religious, I am a religious figure, being divine and all. Obviously.

We are all made in the image of God. ;)

Gosh!

I suspect after being made in his image, that Dog hit me with the ugly stick.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 11:10:42
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2407732
Subject: re: religion thread

Tau.Neutrino said:


Witty Rejoinder said:

kii said:

Oh noes! Not the religion thread!

Nobody expects the religion thread.

Nobody expected so many schisms from one organisation.

How many schisms is the catholic church up to now?

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 11:10:58
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2407733
Subject: re: religion thread

I think Onty is Christian or at least he seems that way when he jokingly refers to going to Mass or teases the unbelievers. Or maybe it’s just his anti-psychotics.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 11:11:11
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2407734
Subject: re: religion thread

Divine Angel said:


I’m not religious, I am a religious figure, being divine and all. Obviously.

I have faith in the divinity of DA.

Not so sure about the axe-wielding bit though.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 11:13:02
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2407735
Subject: re: religion thread

The Rev Dodgson said:


Divine Angel said:

I’m not religious, I am a religious figure, being divine and all. Obviously.

I have faith in the divinity of DA.

Not so sure about the axe-wielding bit though.


Alter-ego

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 11:23:49
From: roughbarked
ID: 2407738
Subject: re: religion thread

Michael V said:


roughbarked said:

Divine Angel said:

I’m not religious, I am a religious figure, being divine and all. Obviously.

We are all made in the image of God. ;)

Gosh!

I suspect after being made in his image, that Dog hit me with the ugly stick.

It’s the beautiful on the inside thing.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 11:25:04
From: roughbarked
ID: 2407739
Subject: re: religion thread

Divine Angel said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

Divine Angel said:

I’m not religious, I am a religious figure, being divine and all. Obviously.

I have faith in the divinity of DA.

Not so sure about the axe-wielding bit though.


Alter-ego

Relifious deities do their smiting too.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 11:26:47
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2407740
Subject: re: religion thread

roughbarked said:


Divine Angel said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

I have faith in the divinity of DA.

Not so sure about the axe-wielding bit though.


Alter-ego

Relifious deities do their smiting too.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 12:02:53
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2407743
Subject: re: religion thread

Down through the centuries mankind has had the need to worship something, it gives meaning to their lives.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 12:13:20
From: Michael V
ID: 2407745
Subject: re: religion thread

JudgeMental said:


roughbarked said:

Divine Angel said:

Alter-ego

Relifious deities do their smiting too.


I’m smitten.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 12:49:01
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2407756
Subject: re: religion thread

anyway we suppose for us this is also the opium thread

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 12:57:58
From: dv
ID: 2407759
Subject: re: religion thread

I’m probably better characterised as an agnostic these days, but I remain very interested in Christianity.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 13:02:39
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2407760
Subject: re: religion thread

Religion’s given us beaut architecture and art and public holidays.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 13:03:23
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2407762
Subject: re: religion thread

dv said:


I’m probably better characterised as an agnostic these days, but I remain very interested in Christianity.

I should have mentioned that you may have changed since then.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 13:24:06
From: Ian
ID: 2407766
Subject: re: religion thread

God on the water.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 13:32:23
From: JudgeMental
ID: 2407767
Subject: re: religion thread

DV is a nice guy, regardless.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 13:34:54
From: Bubblecar
ID: 2407768
Subject: re: religion thread

JudgeMental said:


DV is a nice guy, regardless.

+1

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 13:38:40
From: furious
ID: 2407769
Subject: re: religion thread

Bubblecar said:


JudgeMental said:

DV is a nice guy, regardless.

+1

Well, DV’s just this guy, you know?

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 13:53:27
From: party_pants
ID: 2407770
Subject: re: religion thread

I am very definitely an atheist. But I am very interested in critical scholarship about the Bible, about when and where it was most likely written. When you can fit it into a historical context it begins to make sense why it was written. Much of it was written during or shortly after the Babylonian exile. Lots of it is myth. I think the first historical characters mentioned are David and Saul. Everything before that is myth.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 14:20:07
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2407771
Subject: re: religion thread

party_pants said:


I am very definitely an atheist. But I am very interested in critical scholarship about the Bible, about when and where it was most likely written. When you can fit it into a historical context it begins to make sense why it was written. Much of it was written during or shortly after the Babylonian exile. Lots of it is myth. I think the first historical characters mentioned are David and Saul. Everything before that is myth.

I like the bits that got left out. Gnostic Gospels. Book of Mary Magdalene. Gospel of Jesus’ infancy.

There’s an old cathedral in Brisbane which I visited with Mr Mutant very early in our relationship. A very old Bible stands at the front of the cathedral. I flipped through but the one thing I remember was that there was a dragon in with Daniel, not a lion. If I’d been taught about dragons as a child, I may have stuck with religion.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 14:22:05
From: Divine Angel
ID: 2407772
Subject: re: religion thread

Seems I’ve misremembered:

AI Overview You are referring to the apocryphal story of Bel and the Dragon (found in Daniel Chapter 14), not the classic “Daniel in the Lions’ Den”. In this Babylonian tale, the king worships a massive dragon (or serpent) and challenges Daniel to prove it isn’t a god.Daniel slays the dragon without a sword or club:
The Trap: Daniel bakes a concoction of pitch (tar), fat, and hair.
The Feeding: He forms this mixture into cakes and feeds them to the dragon.
The Defeat: The ingredients cause the dragon’s stomach to burst open.Because of this, an angry crowd forces the king to throw Daniel into the lions’ den, where he is miraculously protected

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 14:44:07
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2407779
Subject: re: religion thread

we know that any deity that any person believes exists, does indeed exist

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 16:03:03
From: kii
ID: 2407810
Subject: re: religion thread

How many lives has religion destroyed?
All of it can fuck off.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 16:03:35
From: roughbarked
ID: 2407811
Subject: re: religion thread

party_pants said:


I am very definitely an atheist. But I am very interested in critical scholarship about the Bible, about when and where it was most likely written. When you can fit it into a historical context it begins to make sense why it was written. Much of it was written during or shortly after the Babylonian exile. Lots of it is myth. I think the first historical characters mentioned are David and Saul. Everything before that is myth.

Professor Francesca Stavrakopoulou

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 16:43:43
From: ms spock
ID: 2407832
Subject: re: religion thread

Divine Angel said:


I’m not religious, I am a religious figure, being divine and all. Obviously.

You are a deity we can live without. 🖖🏽😁🖖🏽

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 17:20:02
From: ms spock
ID: 2407845
Subject: re: religion thread

ms spock said:


Divine Angel said:

I’m not religious, I am a religious figure, being divine and all. Obviously.

You are a deity we can live without. 🖖🏽😁🖖🏽

Correction
You are a deity we cannot live without. 🖖🏽😁🖖🏽

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 17:23:23
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2407846
Subject: re: religion thread

kii said:

How many lives has religion destroyed?
All of it can fuck off.

yeah but just think of how many souls it has saved

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 17:50:37
From: kii
ID: 2407857
Subject: re: religion thread

ms spock said:


ms spock said:

Divine Angel said:

I’m not religious, I am a religious figure, being divine and all. Obviously.

You are a deity we can live without. 🖖🏽😁🖖🏽

Correction
You are a deity we cannot live without. 🖖🏽😁🖖🏽

I don’t need or want any dieties.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 17:56:53
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2407859
Subject: re: religion thread

kii said:

ms spock said:

ms spock said:

You are a deity we can live without. 🖖🏽😁🖖🏽

Correction
You are a deity we cannot live without. 🖖🏽😁🖖🏽

I don’t need or want any dieties.

what about high protein high energy ones

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 18:18:59
From: party_pants
ID: 2407863
Subject: re: religion thread

roughbarked said:


party_pants said:

I am very definitely an atheist. But I am very interested in critical scholarship about the Bible, about when and where it was most likely written. When you can fit it into a historical context it begins to make sense why it was written. Much of it was written during or shortly after the Babylonian exile. Lots of it is myth. I think the first historical characters mentioned are David and Saul. Everything before that is myth.

Professor Francesca Stavrakopoulou

She is just one scholar in this area worth listening to or reading. There are plenty of others too.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 18:28:31
From: kii
ID: 2407865
Subject: re: religion thread

SCIENCE said:

kii said:

ms spock said:

Correction
You are a deity we cannot live without. 🖖🏽😁🖖🏽

I don’t need or want any dieties.

what about high protein high energy ones

Yeah, that too.
Brain farts as i multitask between 2 screens.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 18:32:42
From: dv
ID: 2407869
Subject: re: religion thread

what about high protein high energy ones

Edamamdalf!

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 18:37:24
From: kii
ID: 2407871
Subject: re: religion thread

dv said:


what about high protein high energy ones

Edamamdalf!

Edamame Cling Clang…

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 18:43:07
From: dv
ID: 2407873
Subject: re: religion thread

kii said:


dv said:

what about high protein high energy ones

Edamamdalf!

Edamame Cling Clang…

Yea

Reply Quote

Date: 5/07/2026 20:19:27
From: ms spock
ID: 2407892
Subject: re: religion thread

kii said:


ms spock said:

ms spock said:

You are a deity we can live without. 🖖🏽😁🖖🏽

Correction
You are a deity we cannot live without. 🖖🏽😁🖖🏽

I don’t need or want any dieties.

Fairy nuf.

Twas a joke.

Reply Quote

Date: 1/08/2026 10:41:18
From: dv
ID: 2416143
Subject: re: religion thread

Hot takes

Reply Quote

Date: 4/08/2026 13:21:41
From: kii
ID: 2416888
Subject: re: religion thread

Lucas Bean on religion:

Why Religion Makes You Dumber
Dogma is Dangerous.
I am not against your religion. I am against dogma and blind faith to believe in something without facts or repeatable ways to test those things.
If you believe, and it helps you in life, I am all for it.
If you use religion as a framework on how to live your life without hurting people in any way because of that religion. I am all for it.
This video is for you to question blindly believing in things rather than using religion to copout of critical thinking or even to use it as an excuse TO NOT THINK at all.
Religion is dangerous because it gives you permission to copout in life instead of thinking because thinking is hard. Black and White answers are comfortable but almost always wrong.
Keep abstract thinking, don’t let DOGMA give you an excuse to stop thinking.”

Link

Reply Quote

Date: 4/08/2026 14:32:09
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 2416899
Subject: re: religion thread

kii said:


Lucas Bean on religion:

Why Religion Makes You Dumber
Dogma is Dangerous.
I am not against your religion. I am against dogma and blind faith to believe in something without facts or repeatable ways to test those things.
If you believe, and it helps you in life, I am all for it.
If you use religion as a framework on how to live your life without hurting people in any way because of that religion. I am all for it.
This video is for you to question blindly believing in things rather than using religion to copout of critical thinking or even to use it as an excuse TO NOT THINK at all.
Religion is dangerous because it gives you permission to copout in life instead of thinking because thinking is hard. Black and White answers are comfortable but almost always wrong.
Keep abstract thinking, don’t let DOGMA give you an excuse to stop thinking.”

Link

As the great Trevor said I think therefore I am.

Reply Quote