Date: 4/12/2012 13:43:21
From: poikilotherm
ID: 236428
Subject: HDL - probably not that useful

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1206797?query=featured_home

Drug raised HDL levels, didn’t alter outcomes (death) re heart attack/stroke

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2012 06:09:46
From: Rule 303
ID: 236707
Subject: re: HDL - probably not that useful

Another study?

I thought the last one covered this?

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2012 06:37:12
From: buffy
ID: 236708
Subject: re: HDL - probably not that useful

>>Another study?<<

You can never have enough papers published. It’s the currency. More papers = more prestige. Bugger the value.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2012 07:05:50
From: poikilotherm
ID: 236713
Subject: re: HDL - probably not that useful

buffy said:

>>Another study?<<

You can never have enough papers published. It’s the currency. More papers = more prestige. Bugger the value.

Publishing of negative results is the new black.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2012 07:20:57
From: Rule 303
ID: 236717
Subject: re: HDL - probably not that useful

buffy said:

You can never have enough papers published. It’s the currency. More papers = more prestige. Bugger the value.

It dilutes them to the point of worthlessness.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2012 07:49:26
From: Spider Lily
ID: 236718
Subject: re: HDL - probably not that useful

Good Morning Holidayers

25 .8 and 71% humidity, it managed to get down to 25 overnight. It is expected to reach 33 today which appears to be one of the cooler temps for our area.

For me, it’s hair day :D

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2012 07:50:43
From: Dropbear
ID: 236719
Subject: re: HDL - probably not that useful

HDL does not stand for Hair Day Lily

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2012 07:54:08
From: Rule 303
ID: 236720
Subject: re: HDL - probably not that useful

Dropbear said:

HDL does not stand for Hair Day Lily

Nope. Stands for ‘Harsh, Dropbear; Like.’

:-)

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2012 07:56:09
From: Spider Lily
ID: 236723
Subject: re: HDL - probably not that useful

Rule 303 said:


Dropbear said:
HDL does not stand for Hair Day Lily

Nope. Stands for ‘Harsh, Dropbear; Like.’

:-)

Ooops :p

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2012 08:00:30
From: Aquila
ID: 236727
Subject: re: HDL - probably not that useful

Spider Lily said:

For me, it’s hair day :D

Another $200 poorer!

That’s why I like being a bloke…$20 for a haircut…job done
My stylist is from the UK, I *think he might be gay…not 100% sure, but he gives good haircut and charges a bargain price.

-)
Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2012 08:07:08
From: Rule 303
ID: 236731
Subject: re: HDL - probably not that useful

Aquila said:

That’s why I like being a bloke…$20 for a haircut…job done

$20! Jeyzus…

I bought a good pair of clippers in the early 90s and haven’t paid for a haircut since.

;-)

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2012 08:11:36
From: kii
ID: 236733
Subject: re: HDL - probably not that useful

Husband’s haircut – about once a week at home with clippers.
Mine – every now and then at supermarket hairdresser, about $20 including a nice tip.

I trim my own fringe when it’s in my eyes.

(Aquila – why mention the hairdresser’s sexuality?)

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2012 08:12:12
From: kii
ID: 236734
Subject: re: HDL - probably not that useful

Damn it! Wrong thread :P

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2012 08:13:24
From: Aquila
ID: 236736
Subject: re: HDL - probably not that useful

Rule 303 said:


Aquila said:
That’s why I like being a bloke…$20 for a haircut…job done

$20! Jeyzus…

I bought a good pair of clippers in the early 90s and haven’t paid for a haircut since.

;-)

)
Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2012 09:18:32
From: morrie
ID: 236746
Subject: re: HDL - probably not that useful

Rule 303 said:


Aquila said:
That’s why I like being a bloke…$20 for a haircut…job done

$20! Jeyzus…

I bought a good pair of clippers in the early 90s and haven’t paid for a haircut since.

;-)


Hair, I remember that.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2012 14:23:11
From: poikilotherm
ID: 236819
Subject: re: HDL - probably not that useful

Rule 303 said:


buffy said:
You can never have enough papers published. It’s the currency. More papers = more prestige. Bugger the value.

It dilutes them to the point of worthlessness.

“Editors should seriously consider for publication any carefully done study of an important question, relevant to their readers, whether the results for the primary or any additional outcome are statistically significant. Failure to submit or publish findings because of lack of statistical significance is an important cause of publication bias.”

http://www.icmje.org/publishing_1negative.html

It really is the new black…

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2012 14:27:40
From: buffy
ID: 236820
Subject: re: HDL - probably not that useful

I think there might be a couple of words missing in the first sentence. It doesn’t quite make sense.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2012 14:33:13
From: poikilotherm
ID: 236823
Subject: re: HDL - probably not that useful

Editors should seriously consider for publication any carefully done study of an important question, relevant to their readers, whether the results for the primary outcome or any additional outcome are statistically significant.

Any better?

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2012 14:42:56
From: buffy
ID: 236827
Subject: re: HDL - probably not that useful

>>whether the results for the primary outcome or any additional outcome are statistically significant.<<

I think it needs an ‘or not’ on the end.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2012 14:57:40
From: Michael V
ID: 236841
Subject: re: HDL - probably not that useful

poikilotherm said:


Editors should seriously consider for publication any carefully done study of an important question, relevant to their readers, whether the results for the primary outcome or any additional outcome are statistically significant.

Any better?

.
“or not”?

Reply Quote