Date: 16/03/2013 18:02:25
From: Michael V
ID: 281923
Subject: Testing thread

Thread for testing all your latest HTML and other stuff.

Test: Currenly in Brisbane, it is: 30.0° C, 54% RH

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 18:03:50
From: wookiemeister
ID: 281924
Subject: re: Testing thread

dancing elephant

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 18:04:24
From: wookiemeister
ID: 281925
Subject: re: Testing thread

wookiemeister said:


dancing elephant

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 18:08:20
From: Bubblecar
ID: 281930
Subject: re: Testing thread

Don’t know where those exs came from:

Bubblecar said:


<marquee behavior="slide" direction="left"></marquee>

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 18:11:24
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 281938
Subject: re: Testing thread

Protip: test your stuff with the Preview button before hitting Submit…

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 18:12:17
From: party_pants
ID: 281939
Subject: re: Testing thread

PM 2Ring said:


Protip: test your stuff with the Preview button before hitting Submit…

No. I refuse

:p

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 18:15:19
From: Michael V
ID: 281942
Subject: re: Testing thread

Anyway, I’ve gotten my degree symbol (°) worked out. Now to memorise it…

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 18:22:06
From: wookiemeister
ID: 281947
Subject: re: Testing thread

wookiemeister said:


Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 18:22:37
From: wookiemeister
ID: 281948
Subject: re: Testing thread

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 18:22:51
From: wookiemeister
ID: 281949
Subject: re: Testing thread

no doesn’t like that

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 18:23:32
From: wookiemeister
ID: 281950
Subject: re: Testing thread

wookiemeister said:


starwars

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 18:23:53
From: wookiemeister
ID: 281951
Subject: re: Testing thread

wookiemeister said:


wookiemeister said:

starwars

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 18:24:20
From: wookiemeister
ID: 281953
Subject: re: Testing thread

hmm made the box bigger

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 18:56:38
From: morrie
ID: 281979
Subject: re: Testing thread

PM 2Ring said:


Protip: test your stuff with the Preview button before hitting Submit…

Simple to do. It amazes me that people don’t use it.
shrug

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 18:59:36
From: roughbarked
ID: 281982
Subject: re: Testing thread

morrie said:


PM 2Ring said:

Protip: test your stuff with the Preview button before hitting Submit…

Simple to do. It amazes me that people don’t use it.
shrug

a lot of posts don’t warrant the effort.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 19:29:52
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 282002
Subject: re: Testing thread

test

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 19:34:09
From: Michael V
ID: 282005
Subject: re: Testing thread

cricket

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 19:34:35
From: kii
ID: 282006
Subject: re: Testing thread

Peak Warming Man said:


test

FAIL.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 19:37:17
From: Carmen_Sandiego
ID: 282011
Subject: re: Testing thread

Spiderlily framed some of Sarah’s Mum’s art for me for me birfdy.

Looks grouse.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 19:37:53
From: morrie
ID: 282013
Subject: re: Testing thread

roughbarked said:


morrie said:

PM 2Ring said:

Protip: test your stuff with the Preview button before hitting Submit…

Simple to do. It amazes me that people don’t use it.
shrug

a lot of posts don’t warrant the effort.


This is the Holiday Forum. We have standards around here. Long lists of them.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 19:42:47
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 282017
Subject: re: Testing thread

Carmen_Sandiego said:

Spiderlily framed some of Sarah’s Mum’s art for me for me birfdy.

Lovely. How large is the piece?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 19:48:06
From: Skeptic Pete
ID: 282020
Subject: re: Testing thread

This thread is very testing

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 19:49:38
From: Skeptic Pete
ID: 282021
Subject: re: Testing thread

morrie said:

This is the Holiday Forum. We have standards around here. Long lists of them.

We should send kii a copy.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 19:56:36
From: kii
ID: 282027
Subject: re: Testing thread

Skeptic Pete said:


morrie said:

This is the Holiday Forum. We have standards around here. Long lists of them.

We should send kii a copy.

:P At least I am not posting dancing elephants or photos of squishy dogs.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 20:20:25
From: poikilotherm
ID: 282042
Subject: re: Testing thread

Testing, Testing.Seems to be out of frame in previewthis is rather fun tehhtml :) Annoying for some though I suppose.

“Evolution is a fact, etc.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 20:51:33
From: poikilotherm
ID: 282068
Subject: re: Testing thread

50%

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 20:53:42
From: poikilotherm
ID: 282070
Subject: re: Testing thread

<html lang="zh">
汉字/漢字
</html>

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 20:56:54
From: poikilotherm
ID: 282072
Subject: re: Testing thread


Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 20:59:33
From: party_pants
ID: 282074
Subject: re: Testing thread

é

º

some random combinations of ALT and 4 numbers

+

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 21:32:34
From: morrie
ID: 282082
Subject: re: Testing thread

poikilotherm said:


<html lang="zh">
汉字/漢字
</html>

Googling that is a bit frightening.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 21:45:08
From: wookiemeister
ID: 282084
Subject: re: Testing thread

(°)

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 21:45:24
From: wookiemeister
ID: 282085
Subject: re: Testing thread

°

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 21:53:11
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 282088
Subject: re: Testing thread

wookiemeister said:


(°)

( . Y . )

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 22:21:38
From: wookiemeister
ID: 282094
Subject: re: Testing thread

®

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 22:22:02
From: wookiemeister
ID: 282096
Subject: re: Testing thread

&trade

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 22:22:27
From: wookiemeister
ID: 282097
Subject: re: Testing thread

©

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 22:22:51
From: wookiemeister
ID: 282098
Subject: re: Testing thread

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 22:23:40
From: wookiemeister
ID: 282099
Subject: re: Testing thread

wookiemeister™

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 22:25:46
From: wookiemeister
ID: 282101
Subject: re: Testing thread

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 22:30:00
From: wookiemeister
ID: 282102
Subject: re: Testing thread

2CO ⇋ CO2 + C

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 22:38:21
From: roughbarked
ID: 282105
Subject: re: Testing thread

poikilotherm said:


Testing, Testing.way out of whack, actuallythis is rather fun ~ no it is not tehhtml :) Annoying for some though I suppose. For some perhaps

“Evolution is a fact, etc.


Ya dig?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 22:41:46
From: furious
ID: 282106
Subject: re: Testing thread

The spirit of jazz…

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 22:42:42
From: roughbarked
ID: 282107
Subject: re: Testing thread

furious said:

  • Ya dig?

The spirit of jazz…

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 22:51:32
From: roughbarked
ID: 282110
Subject: re: Testing thread

wookiemeister said:


wookiemeister™

ha

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 22:53:15
From: roughbarked
ID: 282112
Subject: re: Testing thread

♫To The Teeth | Ani DiFranco | To The Teeth♪♩

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 23:01:31
From: party_pants
ID: 282113
Subject: re: Testing thread

roughbarked said:


♫To The Teeth | Ani DiFranco | To The Teeth♪♩

I like the musical note;
♫whistles innocently♫

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 23:04:03
From: roughbarked
ID: 282114
Subject: re: Testing thread

party_pants said:


roughbarked said:

♫To The Teeth | Ani DiFranco | To The Teeth♪♩

I like the musical note;
♫whistles innocently♫

♫through your teeth?♫ ;)

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 23:06:14
From: party_pants
ID: 282115
Subject: re: Testing thread

roughbarked said:


party_pants said:

roughbarked said:

♫To The Teeth | Ani DiFranco | To The Teeth♪♩

I like the musical note;
♫whistles innocently♫

♫through your teeth?♫ ;)

I might be able to use it (sparingly) in general chat. Given that the asterix are code to turn things into bold.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/03/2013 23:07:36
From: roughbarked
ID: 282116
Subject: re: Testing thread

party_pants said:


roughbarked said:

party_pants said:

I like the musical note;
♫whistles innocently♫

♫through your teeth?♫ ;)

I might be able to use it (sparingly) in general chat. Given that the asterix are code to turn things into bold.

;)

Reply Quote

Date: 17/03/2013 01:32:43
From: Teleost
ID: 282183
Subject: re: Testing thread

Love Wookie’s dancing Elephants……

Or are they flames………………..

Reply Quote

Date: 17/03/2013 21:06:25
From: wookiemeister
ID: 282509
Subject: re: Testing thread


<script language="JavaScript">

</script>

Reply Quote

Date: 17/03/2013 21:09:46
From: poikilotherm
ID: 282510
Subject: re: Testing thread

wookiemeister said:



<script language="JavaScript">

</script>

Fail.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/03/2013 21:10:06
From: wookiemeister
ID: 282511
Subject: re: Testing thread

hence the testing thread

Reply Quote

Date: 17/03/2013 21:11:03
From: Boris
ID: 282512
Subject: re: Testing thread

bwhahahahahahahaha

Reply Quote

Date: 17/03/2013 21:13:46
From: wookiemeister
ID: 282513
Subject: re: Testing thread

<marquee behavior="slide" direction="left">OH BORIS, GUESS WHAT YOU DON“T LIKE?</marquee>

Reply Quote

Date: 17/03/2013 21:15:41
From: wookiemeister
ID: 282514
Subject: re: Testing thread
wookiemeister.
Reply Quote

Date: 17/03/2013 21:40:21
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 282516
Subject: re: Testing thread

Sorry, Wookie, standard script blocks don’t work here, you need to get a bit more creative…

Script blocks really should be in the head of the page, or the outer context of the body, but anything we submit here goes inside a div in the body, as you’ll see if you view the frame source when you do a preview.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/03/2013 21:53:44
From: Glance Fleeting
ID: 282517
Subject: re: Testing thread

<div><iframe src="http://tokyo3.org/forums/holiday/"></iframe> </div>

Reply Quote

Date: 17/03/2013 22:01:31
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 282519
Subject: re: Testing thread

<zimma> <frame> goes for leak</frame></zimmer>

Reply Quote

Date: 17/03/2013 22:10:06
From: roughbarked
ID: 282525
Subject: re: Testing thread

wookiemeister said:


<marquee behavior="slide" direction="right"> time to exit stage er right?</marquee>

Reply Quote

Date: 17/03/2013 22:33:14
From: wookiemeister
ID: 282536
Subject: re: Testing thread

PM 2Ring said:


Sorry, Wookie, standard script blocks don’t work here, you need to get a bit more creative…

Script blocks really should be in the head of the page, or the outer context of the body, but anything we submit here goes inside a div in the body, as you’ll see if you view the frame source when you do a preview.


yeah i’ve noticed that the command is inside the < > symbols

Reply Quote

Date: 17/03/2013 22:34:04
From: wookiemeister
ID: 282537
Subject: re: Testing thread

roughbarked said:


wookiemeister said:

<marquee behavior="slide" direction="right"> time to exit stage er right?</marquee>


i’m going to have to use marquee when boris gets a little too boisterous

Reply Quote

Date: 17/03/2013 22:40:13
From: Kingy
ID: 282538
Subject: re: Testing thread

A new message for the 9/11 tragics:

<marquee behavior="slide" direction="left"> <———Conspiracy sites that way</marquee>

Reply Quote

Date: 17/03/2013 22:42:32
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 282539
Subject: re: Testing thread

<marquee behavior="slide" direction="up"> Going down?</marquee>

Reply Quote

Date: 17/03/2013 22:43:28
From: Kingy
ID: 282541
Subject: re: Testing thread

<marquee behavior="slide" direction="down"> Ladies underwear</marquee>

Reply Quote

Date: 17/03/2013 22:46:42
From: wookiemeister
ID: 282542
Subject: re: Testing thread

it was the dancing elephants that really brought out the fury

Reply Quote

Date: 17/03/2013 22:49:35
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 282543
Subject: re: Testing thread

wookiemeister said:


it was the dancing elephants that really brought out the fury

Can never have too many dancing elephants; preferably pink.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/03/2013 22:50:08
From: wookiemeister
ID: 282544
Subject: re: Testing thread

whats the real limit for tricks here?

the marquee, click buttons etc seem to be the limit

the gif file seems to work

Reply Quote

Date: 17/03/2013 22:51:29
From: wookiemeister
ID: 282545
Subject: re: Testing thread

what we need is a thread explaining the background behind the tricks, how to load jpgs and gifs

Reply Quote

Date: 17/03/2013 22:52:48
From: wookiemeister
ID: 282546
Subject: re: Testing thread

By Time · By Topic ♦ New Topic · Home · Logout ♦ Chat · Goodnight * html tools*

Reply Quote

Date: 17/03/2013 22:52:55
From: roughbarked
ID: 282547
Subject: re: Testing thread

wookiemeister said:


what we need is a thread explaining the background behind the tricks, how to load jpgs and gifs

http://textile.thresholdstate.com/

Reply Quote

Date: 17/03/2013 22:53:16
From: party_pants
ID: 282548
Subject: re: Testing thread
A horse, A horse
my kingdom for a horse…
Reply Quote

Date: 17/03/2013 22:58:46
From: roughbarked
ID: 282550
Subject: re: Testing thread

party_pants said:


A horse, A horse
my kingdom for a horse…

Reply Quote

Date: 17/03/2013 23:15:40
From: AussieDJ
ID: 282561
Subject: re: Testing thread

roughbarked said:


wookiemeister said:

what we need is a thread explaining the background behind the tricks, how to load jpgs and gifs

http://textile.thresholdstate.com/


That link doesn’t open for me.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/03/2013 23:16:48
From: AussieDJ
ID: 282562
Subject: re: Testing thread

Kingy said:

<marquee behavior="slide" direction="down"> Ladies underwear</marquee>


LOL

Reply Quote

Date: 17/03/2013 23:20:21
From: roughbarked
ID: 282565
Subject: re: Testing thread

AussieDJ said:


roughbarked said:

wookiemeister said:

what we need is a thread explaining the background behind the tricks, how to load jpgs and gifs

http://textile.thresholdstate.com/


That link doesn’t open for me.


When you hit reply or quote buttons.. Have a look at the Textile and HTML mark-up quick reference. The link is clickable there. Under, For full syntax see:

Reply Quote

Date: 17/03/2013 23:39:00
From: Boris
ID: 282581
Subject: re: Testing thread

<marquee><blink>Test of Annoying Stuff</blink></marquee>

Reply Quote

Date: 17/03/2013 23:41:22
From: roughbarked
ID: 282583
Subject: re: Testing thread

Boris said:


<marquee><blink>—z—-i—-p.</blink></marquee>

Reply Quote

Date: 17/03/2013 23:42:49
From: Boris
ID: 282585
Subject: re: Testing thread

it probably wont flash for most people unfortunately.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/03/2013 23:43:17
From: party_pants
ID: 282586
Subject: re: Testing thread

Boris said:

Test of Annoying Stuff

ﺌ shakes fist at Boris ﺌ

Reply Quote

Date: 17/03/2013 23:54:51
From: morrie
ID: 282593
Subject: re: Testing thread

I had a quick look outside here just in case, but nothing. A friend said they saw the lights from Hopetoun once.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/03/2013 23:55:28
From: morrie
ID: 282594
Subject: re: Testing thread

Whoops

Reply Quote

Date: 18/03/2013 16:21:57
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 282712
Subject: re: Testing thread

I’m tipping India to win this test.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/03/2013 16:29:12
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 282713
Subject: re: Testing thread

Peak Warming Man said:


I’m tipping India to win this test.

Very droll PWM.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/03/2013 17:01:19
From: sibeen
ID: 282720
Subject: re: Testing thread

>I’m tipping India to win this test.

OK, but one battle a war does not make. As long as we win the series, it will all be OK.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/03/2013 17:02:29
From: Boris
ID: 282721
Subject: re: Testing thread

how many years is this series over?

Reply Quote

Date: 18/03/2013 17:03:35
From: Michael V
ID: 282722
Subject: re: Testing thread

Phew

Look everyone!

sibeen is here to save us!

Claps hands

Reply Quote

Date: 18/03/2013 17:39:26
From: buffy
ID: 282730
Subject: re: Testing thread

>>Phew

Look everyone!

sibeen is here to save us!

Claps hands<<

Dunno about that. He didn’t keep the refugees out very effectively. Although oddly enough, not many have remained. I wonder what he did to them once they got here…..

Reply Quote

Date: 18/03/2013 17:40:32
From: Divine Angel
ID: 282731
Subject: re: Testing thread

They thought the holiday dungeon was just a cute name.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/03/2013 17:42:37
From: buffy
ID: 282733
Subject: re: Testing thread

>>They thought the holiday dungeon was just a cute name.<<

I see. But how did they find it? Did they ‘accidentally’ trip on the very small step?

(Mr buffy mixed with coppers in Melbourne in the 70’s…..)

Reply Quote

Date: 18/03/2013 17:43:24
From: buffy
ID: 282734
Subject: re: Testing thread

My last comment may not have been prudent. I even know which local police station had a notorious step to the cells.

I could, of course, be referencing the Discworld Watch.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/03/2013 17:53:49
From: sibeen
ID: 282741
Subject: re: Testing thread

Xavier Doherty strides to the crease. Ready, and prepared, to make a quick fire ton.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/03/2013 16:24:19
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 283153
Subject: re: Testing thread

Test

Canvas sketch pad


If you can read this, your browser does not support the HTML5 Canvas.

Click in the frame to activate it, then click to draw lines.

Press ‘c’ to clear, press the space key to lift the pen.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/03/2013 16:26:52
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 283154
Subject: re: Testing thread

>>Click in the frame to activate it,

There is no frame.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/03/2013 16:27:05
From: Divine Angel
ID: 283155
Subject: re: Testing thread

well, I’ve just found my entertainment for the rest of the afternoon! Thanks PM :)

Reply Quote

Date: 19/03/2013 16:32:30
From: Michael V
ID: 283156
Subject: re: Testing thread

Peak Warming Man said:


>>Click in the frame to activate it,

There is no frame.

.

I think that is the point, PWM. Our browsers don’t support whatever PM has set up.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/03/2013 16:33:10
From: Divine Angel
ID: 283157
Subject: re: Testing thread

Firefox does, and it’s fun.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/03/2013 16:38:30
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 283158
Subject: re: Testing thread

Divine Angel said:


well, I’ve just found my entertainment for the rest of the afternoon! Thanks PM :)

Glad you like it, DA.
Sorry that there’s no colour in this version. Getting it to draw in colour is easy, figuring out a simple way to let you select the colour is a bit harder… :)

Reply Quote

Date: 19/03/2013 16:38:55
From: poikilotherm
ID: 283159
Subject: re: Testing thread

You have to click, hold, then let go to draw a line in chrome.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/03/2013 16:39:55
From: Divine Angel
ID: 283160
Subject: re: Testing thread

Reply Quote

Date: 19/03/2013 16:42:28
From: poikilotherm
ID: 283161
Subject: re: Testing thread

poikilotherm said:


You have to click, hold, then let go to draw a line in chrome.

Ccratch that, if you read the instructions, everything works just fine in Chrome :P

Reply Quote

Date: 19/03/2013 17:08:30
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 283162
Subject: re: Testing thread

I should’ve mentioned that in Firefox (and probably some other browsers), if you right click in the canvas, a menu will pop up that gives you the option to view the image on a blank page.

When you’re viewing the image you can right click to get another menu that lets you save the image as a PNG, but the saved image may look a bit weird, since it’s on a transparent background. It’ll look OK in a simple image viewer, but in fancier programs (like Firefox) it will get displayed on a grey chequered background.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/03/2013 17:39:36
From: Skeptic Pete
ID: 283164
Subject: re: Testing thread

afternoon

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 07:48:43
From: AussieDJ
ID: 283892
Subject: re: Testing thread

roughbarked said:


AussieDJ said:

roughbarked said:

http://textile.thresholdstate.com/


That link doesn’t open for me.


When you hit reply or quote buttons.. Have a look at the Textile and HTML mark-up quick reference. The link is clickable there. Under, For full syntax see:


I can see the quick reference section, but the link after that section doesn’t work.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 08:00:13
From: Dropbear
ID: 283896
Subject: re: Testing thread


hmmm

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 21:54:07
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 284286
Subject: re: Testing thread

Test

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 21:55:47
From: Bubblecar
ID: 284287
Subject: re: Testing thread

That’s clever :)

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 21:56:52
From: sibeen
ID: 284288
Subject: re: Testing thread

Damm :)

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 21:58:36
From: party_pants
ID: 284289
Subject: re: Testing thread

what happened?

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 22:16:07
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 284295
Subject: re: Testing thread

The link at the end of this post contains a self-decompressing JavaScript program that runs an animation of bodies obeying Newtonian orbital dynamics. Each body is considered to have insignificant mass, and it only interacts with the Sun in the centre of the canvas, not with the other bodies.

The bodies all start at the same point, with the same speed, but heading in different directions. The bodies trace out elliptical orbits of various eccentricity but identical period, so they all meet up back at the starting point.

The periods are identical because they all start with the same total energy per unit mass. The potential energy of a body is inversely proportional to its distance from the Sun, and its kinetic energy is proportional to the square of its speed.

For best results, open the link in a new tab or window (this can often be done by clicking with the middle button). This script uses the new HTML5 Canvas element to do the rendering. It should work in most modern browsers; sorry, it won’t work in old versions of Internet Explorer.

Launch orbital dynamics demo

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 22:21:29
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 284296
Subject: re: Testing thread

Link no worky in Chrome.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 22:24:22
From: Bubblecar
ID: 284297
Subject: re: Testing thread

They all met up back at the starting point as soon as I clicked on it, so nothing actually happened.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 22:26:12
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 284298
Subject: re: Testing thread

Witty Rejoinder said:


Link no worky in Chrome.

Bugger. I only tested it in Firefox. Thanks for the info, Witty.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 22:27:56
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 284299
Subject: re: Testing thread

Bubblecar said:


They all met up back at the starting point as soon as I clicked on it, so nothing actually happened.

Have you got a new browser?

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 22:28:04
From: Boris
ID: 284300
Subject: re: Testing thread

worked well in opera.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 22:29:04
From: Bubblecar
ID: 284301
Subject: re: Testing thread

PM 2Ring said:


Bubblecar said:

They all met up back at the starting point as soon as I clicked on it, so nothing actually happened.

Have you got a new browser?

I’m still on IE8, so I wasn’t expecting fireworks :)

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 22:29:59
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 284302
Subject: re: Testing thread

Does this little sketch pad thingy I posted the other day work for you, Witty?

PM 2Ring said:


Test

Canvas sketch pad


If you can read this, your browser does not support the HTML5 Canvas.

Click in the frame to activate it, then click to draw lines.

Press ‘c’ to clear, press the space key to lift the pen.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 22:31:16
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 284303
Subject: re: Testing thread

Bubblecar said:


I’m still on IE8, so I wasn’t expecting fireworks :)

Ah, rightio. I’m amazed you saw anything, apart from the “Sorry, I can’t set up the canvases!” message…

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 22:31:26
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 284305
Subject: re: Testing thread

Boris said:


worked well in opera.

Excellent!

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 22:31:30
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 284306
Subject: re: Testing thread

PM 2Ring said:


Does this little sketch pad thingy I posted the other day work for you, Witty?

Yep that worked.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 22:35:02
From: Bubblecar
ID: 284307
Subject: re: Testing thread

PM 2Ring said:


Bubblecar said:

I’m still on IE8, so I wasn’t expecting fireworks :)

Ah, rightio. I’m amazed you saw anything, apart from the “Sorry, I can’t set up the canvases!” message…

I didn’t actually see anything :)

Nothing happens when I click the link.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 22:38:31
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 284309
Subject: re: Testing thread

Witty Rejoinder said:


PM 2Ring said:

Does this little sketch pad thingy I posted the other day work for you, Witty?

Yep that worked.

Ok. In that case, I suspect that the problem may be related to my decompression routine. So I guess I’ll be testing alternate schemes to get fancy Javascript here over the next few days. :)

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 22:41:18
From: roughbarked
ID: 284313
Subject: re: Testing thread

Bubblecar said:


PM 2Ring said:

Bubblecar said:

They all met up back at the starting point as soon as I clicked on it, so nothing actually happened.

Have you got a new browser?

I’m still on IE8, so I wasn’t expecting fireworks :)

just about nothing much works on this computer but I’m not buying new one until it breaks.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 22:42:58
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 284315
Subject: re: Testing thread

How about this one, Mr Car?

hello

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 22:46:35
From: Bubblecar
ID: 284321
Subject: re: Testing thread

PM 2Ring said:


How about this one, Mr Car?

roger wilco

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 22:47:27
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 284322
Subject: re: Testing thread

roughbarked said:


just about nothing much works on this computer but I’m not buying new one until it breaks.

I thought you used a Mac, Roughie. My program should work on your machine… unless, of course, you have disabled JavaScript…

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 22:47:42
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 284323
Subject: re: Testing thread

Bubblecar said:


PM 2Ring said:

How about this one, Mr Car?

roger wilco

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 22:48:02
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 284324
Subject: re: Testing thread

Oops! :)

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 22:51:29
From: wookiemeister
ID: 284326
Subject: re: Testing thread

Bubblecar said:


PM 2Ring said:

How about this one, Mr Car?

<marquee behavior="slide" direction="left">roger wilco</marquee>

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 22:52:25
From: wookiemeister
ID: 284327
Subject: re: Testing thread

wookiemeister said:


Bubblecar said:

PM 2Ring said:

How about this one, Mr Car?

<marquee behavior="slide" direction="left">roger wilco</marquee>


looks as if you can nest commands within commands

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 22:53:01
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 284329
Subject: re: Testing thread

Latest Flickr capybara images

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 22:54:46
From: roughbarked
ID: 284333
Subject: re: Testing thread

PM 2Ring said:


roughbarked said:

just about nothing much works on this computer but I’m not buying new one until it breaks.

I thought you used a Mac, Roughie. My program should work on your machine… unless, of course, you have disabled JavaScript…

Javascript isn’t disabled.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 22:56:50
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 284336
Subject: re: Testing thread

wookiemeister said:

<marquee behavior="slide" direction="left">
<a href=javascript:alert('works')>roger wilco</a></marquee>

looks as if you can nest commands within commands


Sort of. The marquee is just a container, a lot like a div, except with the automatic movement stuff added.

But PLEASE stop doing that marquee stuff, OK?

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 23:00:22
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 284341
Subject: re: Testing thread

roughbarked said:


Javascript isn’t disabled.

Hmm. What browser are you using? Both Firefox & Safari have supported Canvas for quite a while, so I guess the problem is my decompression code might be using something that’s specific to Firefox & friends (although Boris said it worked OK in Opera).

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 23:02:02
From: roughbarked
ID: 284343
Subject: re: Testing thread

PM 2Ring said:


roughbarked said:

Javascript isn’t disabled.

Hmm. What browser are you using? Both Firefox & Safari have supported Canvas for quite a while, so I guess the problem is my decompression code might be using something that’s specific to Firefox & friends (although Boris said it worked OK in Opera).

I’m using Safari.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 23:14:26
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 284352
Subject: re: Testing thread

Try this one, Witty & Roughie.

orbits

BTW, did the capybara one do anything for those not using Firefox?

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 23:18:27
From: wookiemeister
ID: 284355
Subject: re: Testing thread

PM 2Ring said:


wookiemeister said:

<marquee behavior="slide" direction="left">
<a href=javascript:alert('works')>roger wilco</a></marquee>

looks as if you can nest commands within commands


Sort of. The marquee is just a container, a lot like a div, except with the automatic movement stuff added.

But PLEASE stop doing that marquee stuff, OK?


ok two things

1 this is a testing thread – the space has been dedicated so as not to disrupt the other part of the forum, which is fair enough. as this is a testing thread what i was doign is seeing exactly what would happen if i used one command with another – this is a testing thread

2 i rarely use marquee anymore but reserve the right to use it as i see fit in other parts of the forum

its nothing personal i’m just pointing out it is reasonable to use marquee in a testing thread along with dancing elephanats

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 23:19:09
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 284357
Subject: re: Testing thread

PM 2Ring said:


Try this one, Witty & Roughie.

The orbit simulator comes up but doesn’t seem to want to work.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 23:22:24
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 284362
Subject: re: Testing thread

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 23:24:09
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 284366
Subject: re: Testing thread

!http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y237/impatient2477/Smilies/elefant.gif!!http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y237/impatient2477/Smilies/elefant.gif!!http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y237/impatient2477/Smilies/elefant.gif!!http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y237/impatient2477/Smilies/elefant.gif!!http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y237/impatient2477/Smilies/elefant.gif!

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 23:28:29
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 284370
Subject: re: Testing thread

Witty Rejoinder said:


The orbit simulator comes up but doesn’t seem to want to work.

Oh well, at least that’s a start.

Thanks again for the feedback.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 23:35:17
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 284374
Subject: re: Testing thread


wookiemeister said:

PM 2Ring said:

wookiemeister said:

<marquee behavior="slide" direction="left">
<a href=javascript:alert('works')>roger wilco</a></marquee>

looks as if you can nest commands within commands


Sort of. The marquee is just a container, a lot like a div, except with the automatic movement stuff added.

But PLEASE stop doing that marquee stuff, OK?


ok two things

1 this is a testing thread – the space has been dedicated so as not to disrupt the other part of the forum, which is fair enough. as this is a testing thread what i was doign is seeing exactly what would happen if i used one command with another – this is a testing thread

2 i rarely use marquee anymore but reserve the right to use it as i see fit in other parts of the forum

its nothing personal i’m just pointing out it is reasonable to use marquee in a testing thread along with dancing elephanats


Yeah, ok. I just hope that you rarely see fit to use marquee in this or any other part of the forum. :)

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 23:38:35
From: wookiemeister
ID: 284377
Subject: re: Testing thread

PM 2Ring said:



wookiemeister said:

PM 2Ring said:

Sort of. The marquee is just a container, a lot like a div, except with the automatic movement stuff added.

But PLEASE stop doing that marquee stuff, OK?


ok two things

1 this is a testing thread – the space has been dedicated so as not to disrupt the other part of the forum, which is fair enough. as this is a testing thread what i was doign is seeing exactly what would happen if i used one command with another – this is a testing thread

2 i rarely use marquee anymore but reserve the right to use it as i see fit in other parts of the forum

its nothing personal i’m just pointing out it is reasonable to use marquee in a testing thread along with dancing elephanats


Yeah, ok. I just hope that you rarely see fit to use marquee in this or any other part of the forum. :)


its a testing thread

you’re not reasoning well tonight

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 23:39:28
From: wookiemeister
ID: 284378
Subject: re: Testing thread


i think i like this colour though

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 23:40:21
From: roughbarked
ID: 284379
Subject: re: Testing thread

PM 2Ring said:


Try this one, Witty & Roughie.

orbits

BTW, did the capybara one do anything for those not using Firefox?

That was kewl. Capybara didn’t work for me.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 23:41:57
From: wookiemeister
ID: 284380
Subject: re: Testing thread

i think it was “boris” who started masturbating over the marquee thing anyway and complaining about me using it

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 23:49:38
From: roughbarked
ID: 284384
Subject: re: Testing thread

wookiemeister said:



i think i like this colour though

quickly turns off page styles.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 23:55:29
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 284389
Subject: re: Testing thread

I guess I ought to put this here for those viewing the full thread…

Reply Quote

Date: 21/03/2013 23:58:58
From: wookiemeister
ID: 284390
Subject: re: Testing thread

PM 2Ring said:


I guess I ought to put this here for those viewing the full thread…


thats an interesting command line

i wonder?……..

one for later i think

Reply Quote

Date: 22/03/2013 00:04:00
From: wookiemeister
ID: 284391
Subject: re: Testing thread

it doesn’t work if you “view” the thread

the orange comes up again if you scroll up after clicking on the button

Reply Quote

Date: 22/03/2013 00:04:59
From: wookiemeister
ID: 284392
Subject: re: Testing thread

i think this thread is becoming somewhat of a sourcerer’s apprentice situation

Reply Quote

Date: 22/03/2013 00:14:25
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 284397
Subject: re: Testing thread

wookiemeister said:


it doesn’t work if you “view” the thread

the orange comes up again if you scroll up after clicking on the button

Yes, the red background gets reactivated if your mouse passes over that post. I could possibly do something about that, but I’m loathe to, since I’d have to use extreme techniques that I’d rather not reveal, techniques that could be used to modify the appearance of other people’s posts…

Reply Quote

Date: 22/03/2013 00:19:41
From: wookiemeister
ID: 284398
Subject: re: Testing thread

PM 2Ring said:


wookiemeister said:

it doesn’t work if you “view” the thread

the orange comes up again if you scroll up after clicking on the button

Yes, the red background gets reactivated if your mouse passes over that post. I could possibly do something about that, but I’m loathe to, since I’d have to use extreme techniques that I’d rather not reveal, techniques that could be used to modify the appearance of other people’s posts…


you can tell me

Reply Quote

Date: 22/03/2013 00:20:34
From: Kingy
ID: 284399
Subject: re: Testing thread

>>since I’d have to use extreme techniques that I’d rather not reveal, techniques that could be used to modify the appearance of other people’s posts…<<

Techniques that would reveal PM 2Rings alter ego as the BATMAN!

Reply Quote

Date: 22/03/2013 00:25:14
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 284402
Subject: re: Testing thread

wookiemeister said:


PM 2Ring said:
since I’d have to use extreme techniques that I’d rather not reveal, techniques that could be used to modify the appearance of other people’s posts…


you can tell me

Yeah, right.

These extreme techniques wouldn’t actually modify posts, just their appearance, and since they only take effect in View Full Thread mode, they wouldn’t really be much of a threat. But still…

Reply Quote

Date: 22/03/2013 00:45:44
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 284406
Subject: re: Testing thread
this post can be modified…
Reply Quote

Date: 22/03/2013 00:46:02
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 284407
Subject: re: Testing thread



Reply Quote

Date: 22/03/2013 01:00:02
From: Michael V
ID: 284409
Subject: re: Testing thread

PM 2Ring said:




.

Nope,does nothing my end. (XP, IE 7).

Reply Quote

Date: 22/03/2013 01:06:44
From: Wocky
ID: 284410
Subject: re: Testing thread

Michael V said:

Nope,does nothing my end. (XP, IE 7).

Does it work if you’ve got the whole thread (“view whole thread”) in view, Mr V?

Reply Quote

Date: 22/03/2013 01:07:32
From: Michael V
ID: 284411
Subject: re: Testing thread

Haven’t tried. Will do.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/03/2013 01:08:57
From: Michael V
ID: 284412
Subject: re: Testing thread

Nope. But the thread has a weird font.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/03/2013 15:51:25
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 284637
Subject: re: Testing thread

Michael V said:


But the thread has a weird font.

It does. I wonder if a close font tag will fix it?

Reply Quote

Date: 22/03/2013 15:52:20
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 284638
Subject: re: Testing thread

Oh well, it was worth a try. :)

Reply Quote

Date: 22/03/2013 15:54:19
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 284639
Subject: re: Testing thread

Reply Quote

Date: 22/03/2013 16:40:59
From: wookiemeister
ID: 284654
Subject: re: Testing thread
this wookie post can be modified..????.
Reply Quote

Date: 22/03/2013 16:41:32
From: wookiemeister
ID: 284655
Subject: re: Testing thread

Reply Quote

Date: 22/03/2013 16:43:40
From: wookiemeister
ID: 284657
Subject: re: Testing thread

i’m not really sure what i’ve really just done there

Reply Quote

Date: 22/03/2013 16:43:45
From: wookiemeister
ID: 284658
Subject: re: Testing thread

i’m not really sure what i’ve really just done there

Reply Quote

Date: 22/03/2013 16:51:30
From: wookiemeister
ID: 284664
Subject: re: Testing thread

sideways V div id=zzz>this post can be modified…

the id is setting up zzz to be recognised by another command i guess? the br is particular to the command by ending it with br??

sidewaysV input type=“button” value=“Append the current time to the previous post” onclick=“document.getElementById(‘zzz’).innerHTML+= new Date().toUTCString() + ‘\x3cbr\x3e’”>

so i see a command that makes the button and the information on it

then i see a command finding zzz

what is the innerHTML command doing? putting a date and time on the post zzz??

Reply Quote

Date: 22/03/2013 17:52:15
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 284751
Subject: re: Testing thread

This is a multicoloured text generator.

It colourises all text inside the div, (hopefully) dealing correctly with

embedded tags
:)
You can control the frequency of the colour cycling by changing the value of the f parameter at the start of the script: it’s currently set to 2, so the colours go around the hue cycle twice.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/03/2013 17:55:54
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 284757
Subject: re: Testing thread

Oops. The instructions for changing the frequency in the previous post were written for an earlier version which didn’t work properly on the forum. Sorry. To change the frequency, change the number ‘2’ near the start of the code which is sandwiched between %3D and %2C

PM 2Ring said:


eval(unescape(‘var%20f%3D2%2C

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 15:51:21
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 285239
Subject: re: Testing thread


This post contains a slab of text that colour-cycles at a rapid rate. At slow speeds, small amounts of colour cycling can be a pleasant effect, but in large doses at high speeds it can be annoying, if not downright nauseating. :)

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci tation ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in hendrerit in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum dolore eu feugiat nulla facilisis at vero eros et accumsan et iusto odio dignissim qui blandit praesent luptatum zzril delenit augue duis dolore te feugait nulla facilisi. Nam liber tempor cum soluta nobis eleifend option congue nihil imperdiet doming id quod mazim placerat facer possim assum. Typi non habent claritatem insitam; est usus legentis in iis qui facit eorum claritatem. Investigationes demonstraverunt lectores legere me lius quod ii legunt saepius. Claritas est etiam processus dynamicus, qui sequitur mutationem consuetudium lectorum. Mirum est notare quam littera gothica, quam nunc putamus parum claram, anteposuerit litterarum formas humanitatis per seacula quarta decima et quinta decima. Eodem modo typi, qui nunc nobis videntur parum clari, fiant sollemnes in futurum.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 15:53:49
From: wookiemeister
ID: 285240
Subject: re: Testing thread

PM 2Ring said:



This post contains a slab of text that colour-cycles at a rapid rate. At slow speeds, small amounts of colour cycling can be a pleasant effect, but in large doses at high speeds it can be annoying, if not downright nauseating. :)

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci tation ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in hendrerit in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum dolore eu feugiat nulla facilisis at vero eros et accumsan et iusto odio dignissim qui blandit praesent luptatum zzril delenit augue duis dolore te feugait nulla facilisi. Nam liber tempor cum soluta nobis eleifend option congue nihil imperdiet doming id quod mazim placerat facer possim assum. Typi non habent claritatem insitam; est usus legentis in iis qui facit eorum claritatem. Investigationes demonstraverunt lectores legere me lius quod ii legunt saepius. Claritas est etiam processus dynamicus, qui sequitur mutationem consuetudium lectorum. Mirum est notare quam littera gothica, quam nunc putamus parum claram, anteposuerit litterarum formas humanitatis per seacula quarta decima et quinta decima. Eodem modo typi, qui nunc nobis videntur parum clari, fiant sollemnes in futurum.


not for me

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 15:54:39
From: Michael V
ID: 285241
Subject: re: Testing thread

Lucky for me you used the colour white.

Thanks. :)

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 15:54:40
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 285242
Subject: re: Testing thread

Here’s a variation on the text colouriser I posted yesterday.

This is a multicoloured text generator.

It colourises all text inside the div, (hopefully) skipping over

embedded tags
:)
You can control the rate that the colours go around the hue cycle by changing the value of the second parameter to the colourise() function, it’s currently set to 2, so the colours go around the hue cycle twice.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 15:54:58
From: Divine Angel
ID: 285243
Subject: re: Testing thread

Me neither.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 15:56:58
From: Geoff D
ID: 285244
Subject: re: Testing thread

Divine Angel said:


Me neither.

Did you mouseover? Works for me

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 15:57:42
From: Divine Angel
ID: 285245
Subject: re: Testing thread

That could be the problem, I don’t have a mouse.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 15:58:46
From: morrie
ID: 285246
Subject: re: Testing thread

Divine Angel said:


Me neither.

+1

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 15:58:55
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 285247
Subject: re: Testing thread

wookiemeister said:

not for me

Hmm. That’s odd. The colour cycling doesn’t use anything too fancy.
But you do have to move your mouse on top of the text for the cycling to kick in. And it should stop when you move the mouse away from the text block.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 15:59:19
From: Divine Angel
ID: 285248
Subject: re: Testing thread

OK, it works when I stick my finger on it.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 15:59:22
From: jjjust moi
ID: 285249
Subject: re: Testing thread

PM 2Ring said:



This post contains a slab of text that colour-cycles at a rapid rate. At slow speeds, small amounts of colour cycling can be a pleasant effect, but in large doses at high speeds it can be annoying, if not downright nauseating. :)

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci tation ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in hendrerit in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum dolore eu feugiat nulla facilisis at vero eros et accumsan et iusto odio dignissim qui blandit praesent luptatum zzril delenit augue duis dolore te feugait nulla facilisi. Nam liber tempor cum soluta nobis eleifend option congue nihil imperdiet doming id quod mazim placerat facer possim assum. Typi non habent claritatem insitam; est usus legentis in iis qui facit eorum claritatem. Investigationes demonstraverunt lectores legere me lius quod ii legunt saepius. Claritas est etiam processus dynamicus, qui sequitur mutationem consuetudium lectorum. Mirum est notare quam littera gothica, quam nunc putamus parum claram, anteposuerit litterarum formas humanitatis per seacula quarta decima et quinta decima. Eodem modo typi, qui nunc nobis videntur parum clari, fiant sollemnes in futurum.


Is that from Adobe?

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 16:01:12
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 285251
Subject: re: Testing thread

Divine Angel said:


That could be the problem, I don’t have a mouse.

Ah. That would definitely create a problem. :)
I assume you’re using some form of touch screen?
I’ll do a version that uses a mouse click to activate it: that ought to work on a touch screen… I think.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 16:02:26
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 285252
Subject: re: Testing thread

Divine Angel said:


That could be the problem, I don’t have a mouse.

I always pictured you on a good old-fashioned desktop at work; mouse and all.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 16:03:03
From: Divine Angel
ID: 285253
Subject: re: Testing thread

Oui, touchscreen.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 16:04:33
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 285255
Subject: re: Testing thread

jjjust moi said:



Is that from Adobe?

The JavaScript is from me. The fake Latin is from http://www.loremipsum.net/
It’s an old typographer’s convention to use fake Latin when testing layouts, the idea being that you just want to look at the visual effect of the page & you don’t want to get distracted by reading the contents.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorem_ipsum

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 16:05:18
From: wookiemeister
ID: 285256
Subject: re: Testing thread

my computer is a punch card and magnetic drum hybrid with half of the brain consisting of valves and the other half with new fangled “transistors”. there is no screen as such , new images are simply printed out on my dot matrix

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 16:06:14
From: morrie
ID: 285257
Subject: re: Testing thread

It doesn’t work for me, mouse or no mouse, PM.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 16:06:41
From: Divine Angel
ID: 285258
Subject: re: Testing thread

Witty Rejoinder said:


Divine Angel said:

That could be the problem, I don’t have a mouse.

I always pictured you on a good old-fashioned desktop at work; mouse and all.

Nowt of the sort. We have a touchscreen with a CPU in the back, which doesn’t hold a lot so open more than 3 programmes and the Low Memory popup becomes a real PITA. We normally have a mouse, but one girl here keeps dropping it and it broke. Plus we ran out of USB ports to plug new ones into… so we just use the screen. Annoying when you want to right click though…

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 16:08:27
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 285259
Subject: re: Testing thread

Divine Angel said:


OK, it works when I stick my finger on it.

In that case, I won’t bother with doing the alternate version. :)

Did the post with the colorised text work? It should start something like this:

This is a multicoloured text generator.

It colourises all text inside the div, (hopefully) skipping over

embedded tags
:)

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 16:09:01
From: Divine Angel
ID: 285260
Subject: re: Testing thread

Yes, I saw the multicoloured text.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 16:10:10
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 285261
Subject: re: Testing thread

Back shortly.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 16:16:44
From: morrie
ID: 285265
Subject: re: Testing thread

Divine Angel said:


Yes, I saw the multicoloured text.

Praise the Lord!

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 16:20:31
From: jjjust moi
ID: 285268
Subject: re: Testing thread

PM 2Ring said:


jjjust moi said:


Is that from Adobe?

The JavaScript is from me. The fake Latin is from http://www.loremipsum.net/
It’s an old typographer’s convention to use fake Latin when testing layouts, the idea being that you just want to look at the visual effect of the page & you don’t want to get distracted by reading the contents.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorem_ipsum

Ah, that explains why I’ve seen that on Pagemaker somewhere, thanks PM.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 16:21:17
From: morrie
ID: 285269
Subject: re: Testing thread

PM 2Ring said:


Back shortly.

(gone to get some more ink cartridges)

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 16:35:55
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 285272
Subject: re: Testing thread

jjjust moi said:


PM 2Ring said:

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorem_ipsum

Ah, that explains why I’ve seen that on Pagemaker somewhere, thanks PM.

No worries. FWIW, I first encountered “Lorem ipsum” in an old Letraset catalogue, back in the early 1980s.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 16:39:06
From: Boris
ID: 285273
Subject: re: Testing thread

letraset, gawd haven’t seen that for a while or mecanorma, which was better IMO.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 16:46:24
From: Geoff D
ID: 285275
Subject: re: Testing thread

Boris said:


letraset, gawd haven’t seen that for a while or mecanorma, which was better IMO.

I praise Dog for the day when programs like Fontasy set me free from the clutches of the dreaded Letraset. The joke going around where I was in the late ’80s was “How do you burn out an Epson LX 80? Give an Indonesian public servant a copy of (insert name of currently popular DOS graphics program).”

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 16:46:56
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 285276
Subject: re: Testing thread

Boris said:


letraset, gawd haven’t seen that for a while or mecanorma, which was better IMO.

I thought that might bring back a few old memories for you, Boris. :)

Letraset did release some software & digital fonts, and made the Pantone colour system available in a digital form, but unfortunately they weren’t able to maintain their success in the digital age. I suspect that their pricing policy was largely to blame…

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 16:55:10
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 285278
Subject: re: Testing thread

The frame below contains a counter, which should advance by 1 approximately every second when you hold the mouse pointer over it.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 16:56:47
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 285280
Subject: re: Testing thread

PM 2Ring said:


The frame below contains a counter, which should advance by 1 approximately every second when you hold the mouse pointer over it.

That works, can it go to infinity?

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 16:59:53
From: Boris
ID: 285283
Subject: re: Testing thread

can it go to infinity?

experiment PWM, experiment.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 17:03:29
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 285288
Subject: re: Testing thread

The frame below contains a clock which runs when you hold the mouse pointer over it.


Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 17:03:56
From: jjjust moi
ID: 285289
Subject: re: Testing thread

PM 2Ring said:


Boris said:

letraset, gawd haven’t seen that for a while or mecanorma, which was better IMO.

I thought that might bring back a few old memories for you, Boris. :)

Letraset did release some software & digital fonts, and made the Pantone colour system available in a digital form, but unfortunately they weren’t able to maintain their success in the digital age. I suspect that their pricing policy was largely to blame…


The gold lettering for honour boards is badly missed.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 17:04:57
From: Divine Angel
ID: 285290
Subject: re: Testing thread

How does the clock know your timezone?

Can’t be from the IP, mine would say Sydney.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 17:13:14
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 285294
Subject: re: Testing thread

Peak Warming Man said:


That works, can it go to infinity?

Sorry, no. But it should go up to 9007199254740992. That works out to over 285 million years, which ought to be adequate for this forum. :)

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 17:15:44
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 285295
Subject: re: Testing thread

PM 2Ring said:


Sorry, no. But it should go up to 9007199254740992.

Why such an obscure number?

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 17:19:06
From: wookiemeister
ID: 285296
Subject: re: Testing thread

PM 2Ring said:


Peak Warming Man said:

That works, can it go to infinity?

Sorry, no. But it should go up to 9007199254740992. That works out to over 285 million years, which ought to be adequate for this forum. :)


and then start all over again?

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 17:19:55
From: Divine Angel
ID: 285297
Subject: re: Testing thread

wookiemeister said:


PM 2Ring said:

Peak Warming Man said:

That works, can it go to infinity?

Sorry, no. But it should go up to 9007199254740992. That works out to over 285 million years, which ought to be adequate for this forum. :)


and then start all over again?


One way to find out…

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 17:21:23
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 285299
Subject: re: Testing thread

Divine Angel said:


How does the clock know your timezone?

Can’t be from the IP, mine would say Sydney.


The script gets the time info from your browser, which in turn gets it from your OS.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 17:22:22
From: Divine Angel
ID: 285300
Subject: re: Testing thread

Ooh, clever.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 17:29:58
From: Wocky
ID: 285304
Subject: re: Testing thread

PM 2Ring said:


Peak Warming Man said:

That works, can it go to infinity?

Sorry, no. But it should go up to 9007199254740992. That works out to over 285 million years, which ought to be adequate for this forum. :)

Why 53? I would have thought 63 for a signed 64-bit int.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 17:30:26
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 285305
Subject: re: Testing thread

Witty Rejoinder said:


PM 2Ring said:

Sorry, no. But it should go up to 9007199254740992.

Why such an obscure number?

It only looks obscure in decimal. 9007199254740992 is 2^ 53. JavaScript can handle much larger numbers, up to around 10^308, IIRC. But 2^ 53 is the largest integer it can represent exactly. You can subtract 1 from it and get the proper answer, but if you try to add 1 to it, it doesn’t change.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 17:32:30
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 285306
Subject: re: Testing thread

Wocky said:


Why 53? I would have thought 63 for a signed 64-bit int.

Yeah, but it’s not using ints, it’s using floats, and pretending that they’re ints when appropriate.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 17:32:31
From: buffy
ID: 285307
Subject: re: Testing thread

>>The gold lettering for honour boards is badly missed.<<

In the Real Olden Days, that was real gold leaf.

(My paternal grandfather was a real signwriter with a company called Buckles in Melbourne.)

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 17:36:28
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 285308
Subject: re: Testing thread

Divine Angel said:


Ooh, clever.

Web browsers are pretty amazing things. People don’t generally realize the power hiding in their humble browser. A lot of the fancy stuff you see on Web sites is actually being done client-side, i.e., your browser is doing the computations, rather than being done server-side.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 17:38:01
From: wookiemeister
ID: 285309
Subject: re: Testing thread

just a question

within programming i guess you’d use the ability to use much bigger numbers if you were trying to get ultra accurate results

using longer numbers slows the programme slightly?

will definitely use more memory to perform the same calculations?

when they went to the moon i guess the longer the number used the better?

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 18:05:35
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 285313
Subject: re: Testing thread

PM 2Ring said:

It only looks obscure in decimal. 9007199254740992 is 2^ 53.

I thought it would be something like that.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 18:06:07
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 285314
Subject: re: Testing thread

wookiemeister said:


just a question

within programming i guess you’d use the ability to use much bigger numbers if you were trying to get ultra accurate results


Yes.

> using longer numbers slows the programme slightly?

Generally, it slows the program a lot, and requires major re-writing of the code. The CPU chip has the built-in ability to perform arithmetic on objects that fit into a machine word (or two), so such operations are very fast & simple to program. So a 32 bit machine can easily do arithmetic on numbers that fit in 32 bits, and it’s no big deal for it to do 64 bit arithmetic, but arithmetic on larger objects is a bit trickier.

Such objects need to be broken up and processed chunk by chunk. For medium sized numbers, the techniques used are essentially the same as those used when doing arithmetic on big numbers by hand, but for really large numbers advanced techniques are necessary.

> will definitely use more memory to perform the same calculations?

Sure. For moderately-sized numbers the additional memory requirement isn’t of much concern, but the extra processing time can be.

>when they went to the moon i guess the longer the number used the better?

Perhaps. But computers were a lot more primitive back then, and RAM was very expensive.

FWIW, virtually all Linux systems have an arbitrary-precision arithmetic program called bc, which is essentially a programable calculator that can be programmed using a C-like language. bc does basic arithmetic and some standad mathematical functions. It’s precision is only limited by your machine’s memory… and your patience.

And Python has a lovely arbitrary-precision arithmetic library called mpmath which comes with all sorts of fancy functions. mpmath isn’t part of the standard Python installation, but it’s free, and quite easy to install, and comes with excellent documentation.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 18:29:32
From: sibeen
ID: 285318
Subject: re: Testing thread

>>when they went to the moon i guess the longer the number used the better?

The distance to the moon is about 4 × 108 metres. The width of an atom is about 1 × 10-10 metres. Really large numbers aren’t all that nessesary to get reasonable accuracy.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 18:31:55
From: Divine Angel
ID: 285319
Subject: re: Testing thread

Or, they never went to the moon

*runs away *

Reply Quote

Date: 23/03/2013 18:44:35
From: Wocky
ID: 285326
Subject: re: Testing thread

Divine Angel said:


Or, they never went to the moon

*runs away *

It’s true, they never did go. I used to work with a bloke who knew a bloke whose cousin has seen a documentary about it called Capricorn One that proved that it was all done in a Hollywood studio.

Reply Quote

Date: 25/03/2013 00:10:42
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 286169
Subject: re: Testing thread

Inline SVG data test

Reply Quote

Date: 25/03/2013 00:12:26
From: Kingy
ID: 286170
Subject: re: Testing thread

PM 2Ring said:


Inline SVG data test


3 out of 5 stars.

Margaret?

Reply Quote

Date: 25/03/2013 00:13:21
From: dv
ID: 286171
Subject: re: Testing thread

Was it meant to look like the leftmost two thirds of a star?

Reply Quote

Date: 25/03/2013 00:14:28
From: Kingy
ID: 286172
Subject: re: Testing thread

dv said:


Was it meant to look like the leftmost two thirds of a star?

No, that was the directors cut.

Reply Quote

Date: 25/03/2013 00:16:33
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 286173
Subject: re: Testing thread

src=>

Reply Quote

Date: 25/03/2013 00:17:10
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 286174
Subject: re: Testing thread

dv said:


Was it meant to look like the leftmost two thirds of a star?

No, it was meant to look like a whole star. If you tell your browser to “View image” it should show you the whole thing.

Reply Quote

Date: 25/03/2013 00:21:31
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 286176
Subject: re: Testing thread

Here’s an alternative version, this time without base64 encoding.

Reply Quote

Date: 25/03/2013 00:28:55
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 286178
Subject: re: Testing thread

A JPEG of a small raytraced shell, encoded as a data: URI

Reply Quote

Date: 26/03/2013 18:30:19
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 286977
Subject: re: Testing thread

Bounce test.

Move your mouse pointer over the frame to run the animation.

Bouncing
Reply Quote

Date: 26/03/2013 18:36:23
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 286981
Subject: re: Testing thread

Nested bouncing.

Bouncing
Reply Quote

Date: 26/03/2013 18:48:02
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 286986
Subject: re: Testing thread

Not even a dead cat bounce here PM

Reply Quote

Date: 26/03/2013 18:48:35
From: roughbarked
ID: 286988
Subject: re: Testing thread

Peak Warming Man said:


Not even a dead cat bounce here PM

It bounced for me.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/03/2013 18:49:37
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 286989
Subject: re: Testing thread

But I don’t think I’ve got Java on this machine.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/03/2013 18:49:47
From: Divine Angel
ID: 286991
Subject: re: Testing thread

Bounced here. The nesting one is cool.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/03/2013 18:54:07
From: Dropbear
ID: 286994
Subject: re: Testing thread

no bouncing here.. feck off with your false majickery

Reply Quote

Date: 26/03/2013 18:58:10
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 286997
Subject: re: Testing thread

Dropbear said:


no bouncing here.. feck off with your false majickery

Give it a few minutes. That’s what i have to do whenever I use IE.

:-P

Reply Quote

Date: 26/03/2013 19:00:06
From: Dropbear
ID: 286999
Subject: re: Testing thread

Witty Rejoinder said:


Dropbear said:

no bouncing here.. feck off with your false majickery

Give it a few minutes. That’s what i have to do whenever I use IE.

:-P

im chroming at the moment.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/03/2013 19:00:56
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 287000
Subject: re: Testing thread

Dropbear said:

im chroming at the moment.

That’s weird. It worked for me in Chrome.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/03/2013 19:06:42
From: Spider Lily
ID: 287003
Subject: re: Testing thread

Evening one and all

Nothing abnormal happened today.

I went to work, I ate, I came home and I’m about to eat again :)

Reply Quote

Date: 26/03/2013 19:07:34
From: pommiejohn
ID: 287004
Subject: re: Testing thread

Dropbear said:

Not much else to do in Brissie

Reply Quote

Date: 26/03/2013 19:08:40
From: pommiejohn
ID: 287007
Subject: re: Testing thread

Dropbear said:

im chroming at the moment.

Not much else to do in Brisbane.

Take 2

Reply Quote

Date: 26/03/2013 19:09:29
From: Dropbear
ID: 287008
Subject: re: Testing thread

pommiejohn said:


Dropbear said:

im chroming at the moment.

Not much else to do in Brisbane.

Take 2

hands the bag over

Reply Quote

Date: 26/03/2013 19:10:04
From: pommiejohn
ID: 287009
Subject: re: Testing thread

Dropbear said:

hands the bag over

Deep inhalation Mmm

Reply Quote

Date: 26/03/2013 19:10:37
From: pommiejohn
ID: 287010
Subject: re: Testing thread

How much longer are you here for?

Reply Quote

Date: 26/03/2013 19:12:13
From: Dropbear
ID: 287012
Subject: re: Testing thread

pommiejohn said:


How much longer are you here for?

until they bury me, by the looks of it …

i start permanent on tuesday.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/03/2013 19:12:37
From: Dropbear
ID: 287013
Subject: re: Testing thread

Im going to be the boss of the guy who interviewed me .. (well, one of them anyway)

Reply Quote

Date: 26/03/2013 19:13:15
From: pommiejohn
ID: 287014
Subject: re: Testing thread

Dropbear said:


pommiejohn said:

How much longer are you here for?

until they bury me, by the looks of it …

i start permanent on tuesday.

Does that mean you get lunch breaks for beer drinking?

Reply Quote

Date: 26/03/2013 19:13:59
From: Dropbear
ID: 287015
Subject: re: Testing thread

pommiejohn said:


Dropbear said:

pommiejohn said:

How much longer are you here for?

until they bury me, by the looks of it …

i start permanent on tuesday.

Does that mean you get lunch breaks for beer drinking?

i hope so.. ;)..

had an extended one last friday, so getting some practice in.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/03/2013 19:14:26
From: pommiejohn
ID: 287016
Subject: re: Testing thread

Dropbear said:


Im going to be the boss of the guy who interviewed me .. (well, one of them anyway)

That the Govt service for you. So the guy who interviewed you is now upset and resigns and the departmental costs go down.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/03/2013 19:15:10
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 287017
Subject: re: Testing thread

>>i start permanent on tuesday.

Tempory Protection Visa come through then.
You’ll get your Tic Gate pass stamped with a pineapple and everything now.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/03/2013 19:15:16
From: Dropbear
ID: 287018
Subject: re: Testing thread

pommiejohn said:


Dropbear said:

Im going to be the boss of the guy who interviewed me .. (well, one of them anyway)

That the Govt service for you. So the guy who interviewed you is now upset and resigns and the departmental costs go down.

works for me ;)

no-one is indispensable… (except me)

Reply Quote

Date: 26/03/2013 19:15:26
From: pommiejohn
ID: 287019
Subject: re: Testing thread

Dropbear said:


pommiejohn said:

Dropbear said:

until they bury me, by the looks of it …

i start permanent on tuesday.

Does that mean you get lunch breaks for beer drinking?

i hope so.. ;)..

had an extended one last friday, so getting some practice in.

Its just that ( when I’m quiet) lunchtimes are easier to organise that evenings

Reply Quote

Date: 26/03/2013 19:15:53
From: Dropbear
ID: 287020
Subject: re: Testing thread

Peak Warming Man said:


>>i start permanent on tuesday.

Tempory Protection Visa come through then.
You’ll get your Tic Gate pass stamped with a pineapple and everything now.

457 visa.. in before Red Leader clamps down ;)

Reply Quote

Date: 26/03/2013 19:16:16
From: Dropbear
ID: 287021
Subject: re: Testing thread

pommiejohn said:


Dropbear said:

pommiejohn said:

Does that mean you get lunch breaks for beer drinking?

i hope so.. ;)..

had an extended one last friday, so getting some practice in.

Its just that ( when I’m quiet) lunchtimes are easier to organise that evenings

ok but you pay for the hotel room.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/03/2013 19:18:55
From: pommiejohn
ID: 287023
Subject: re: Testing thread

Dropbear said:


pommiejohn said:

Dropbear said:

i hope so.. ;)..

had an extended one last friday, so getting some practice in.

Its just that ( when I’m quiet) lunchtimes are easier to organise that evenings

ok but you pay for the hotel room.

I knew it would degenerate, just not that quickly.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/03/2013 19:19:30
From: Dropbear
ID: 287024
Subject: re: Testing thread

four months away from home and anything is looking pretty

Reply Quote

Date: 28/03/2013 12:19:59
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 287668
Subject: re: Testing thread

For those who’d like a good introduction to the gentle art of HTML and CSS coding, take a look at the tutorials on HTML Dog

Reply Quote