Date: 23/04/2013 23:04:24
From: dv
ID: 300197
Subject: Mars 3 possibly found

http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2013-04/17/soviet-mars-3-lander-found

Amateur Russian astronomers may well have found the final resting place of the Mars 3 lander, the first probe to successfully achieve a soft landing on Mars on 2 December 1971.

On 10 March, the HiRISE camera took those further pictures, to try and get a good look at what the group had found in colour, and with better angles of illumination. The candidate features match the sizes and shapes of the Mars 3 objects very closely. The parachute candidate is roughly seven metres wide compared to its fully stretched size of 11 metres, for example, and the petal-shaped lander’s 1.5m size is close to the roughly 1.8m petal-shaped lander candidate. There’s even evidence of surface damage from the 4.5m chain that connected the lander to the retrorocket, and which could have dragged across the ground during landing.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/04/2013 23:07:49
From: 19 shillings
ID: 300198
Subject: re: Mars 3 possibly found

Sounds like fishing for Mars One…

Reply Quote

Date: 23/04/2013 23:10:27
From: Bubblecar
ID: 300199
Subject: re: Mars 3 possibly found

Interesting. Archaeological studies of the Space Age, conducted from space.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/04/2013 07:01:06
From: Dropbear
ID: 300243
Subject: re: Mars 3 possibly found

ack…ack ack

Reply Quote

Date: 24/04/2013 09:04:10
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 300274
Subject: re: Mars 3 possibly found

So what does this mean, going forward.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/04/2013 09:24:00
From: dv
ID: 300279
Subject: re: Mars 3 possibly found

ACK?

Reply Quote

Date: 24/04/2013 18:48:05
From: Mr Ironic
ID: 300522
Subject: re: Mars 3 possibly found

ACK?
————

I think that is the result of smoking to many ciggies the night before.

Definatly a case where 3 hacks are better than one…

Reply Quote

Date: 25/04/2013 01:25:36
From: diddly-squat
ID: 300783
Subject: re: Mars 3 possibly found

dv said:


ACK?

Would have though you’d get that one…

Reply Quote