Date: 18/07/2013 13:46:05
From: wookiemeister
ID: 350585
Subject: Missile strike theory in US plane crash

http://www.aljazeera.com/video/americas/2013/07/201371718461064379.html

New film suggests midair explosion of Flight 800 off Long Island in 1996 happened after jet was hit by projectile.

A new film about the TWA Flight 800 crash 17 years ago claims a missile was fired at the aircraft.

Several experts and investigators say the US government’s aviation agency and the FBI tampered with evidence.

But the National Transportation Safety Board maintains it will only re-open the case if there is compelling new evidence.

Al Jazeera’s Cath Turner reports from Fire Island, New York

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2013 13:50:10
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 350586
Subject: re: Missile strike theory in US plane crash

This is one of the very few woo woo stories that has some legs.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2013 13:50:49
From: wookiemeister
ID: 350588
Subject: re: Missile strike theory in US plane crash

Peak Warming Man said:


This is one of the very few woo woo stories that has some legs.

says woo?

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2013 13:55:22
From: wookiemeister
ID: 350589
Subject: re: Missile strike theory in US plane crash

wookiemeister said:


Peak Warming Man said:

This is one of the very few woo woo stories that has some legs.

says woo?


and no

it wasn’t an air asiana flight

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2013 14:05:57
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 350591
Subject: re: Missile strike theory in US plane crash

Peak Warming Man said:


This is one of the very few woo woo stories that has some legs.

No it’s not.
747 went bang because of badly maintained wiring, it’s not much more complex than that.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2013 14:10:30
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 350593
Subject: re: Missile strike theory in US plane crash

The best maintained wiring does not survive a missile strike, so at the end of the day it didn’t matter how well the wiring was maintained.
Plus you are in the pocket of Big Plane.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2013 14:12:52
From: Divine Angel
ID: 350594
Subject: re: Missile strike theory in US plane crash

It was probably destroyed to hide evidence of CHEMTRAIL equipment onboard.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2013 14:18:28
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 350602
Subject: re: Missile strike theory in US plane crash

Peak Warming Man said:


The best maintained wiring does not survive a missile strike, so at the end of the day it didn’t matter how well the wiring was maintained.
Plus you are in the pocket of Big Plane.

The problem is that the wreckage doesn’t support the theory of a missile strike. The explosion came from inside, not outside.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2013 14:19:17
From: wookiemeister
ID: 350604
Subject: re: Missile strike theory in US plane crash

Spiny Norman said:


Peak Warming Man said:

The best maintained wiring does not survive a missile strike, so at the end of the day it didn’t matter how well the wiring was maintained.
Plus you are in the pocket of Big Plane.

The problem is that the wreckage doesn’t support the theory of a missile strike. The explosion came from inside, not outside.


watch the trailer on the link I provided

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2013 14:28:43
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 350611
Subject: re: Missile strike theory in US plane crash

wookiemeister said:


Spiny Norman said:

Peak Warming Man said:

The best maintained wiring does not survive a missile strike, so at the end of the day it didn’t matter how well the wiring was maintained.
Plus you are in the pocket of Big Plane.

The problem is that the wreckage doesn’t support the theory of a missile strike. The explosion came from inside, not outside.


watch the trailer on the link I provided

Meh, still no proof.
Nobody in the woo-woo conspiracy world has managed to answer two important questions -
- Why shoot down a US airliner? What’s the reason?
- Where did the missile come from? There’s none missing, all accounted for.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2013 16:15:44
From: neomyrtus_
ID: 350653
Subject: re: Missile strike theory in US plane crash

All of you MOsSad supporters are denying Teh Wookster, so you must all be Jewish agents. He has provided Teh TRuTH and yet you’re just splitting hares with factual stuff.

BTW: there is a differences between ‘Hypothesis’ and ‘Theory’, and then there is ‘Speculation” and ‘Woo’.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2013 17:25:01
From: Skeptic Pete
ID: 350677
Subject: re: Missile strike theory in US plane crash

Peak Warming Man said:

Plus you are in the pocket of Big Plane.

LOL

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2013 18:00:20
From: wookiemeister
ID: 350733
Subject: re: Missile strike theory in US plane crash

neomyrtus_ said:


All of you MOsSad supporters are denying Teh Wookster, so you must all be Jewish agents. He has provided Teh TRuTH and yet you’re just splitting hares with factual stuff.

BTW: there is a differences between ‘Hypothesis’ and ‘Theory’, and then there is ‘Speculation” and ‘Woo’.


sorry neo we are discussing food here atm, we don’t have time for your conspiracy theories

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2013 20:50:20
From: Stealth
ID: 350857
Subject: re: Missile strike theory in US plane crash

The problem is that the wreckage doesn’t support the theory of a missile strike. The explosion came from inside, not outside.
———————-
Well I guess a missile can penetrate the fuselage and then explode from the inside outwards. And finding evidence of a small penetration into the fuselage in an explode plane would be hard.

But I am not trying to show support for the woo…

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2013 20:55:08
From: wookiemeister
ID: 350859
Subject: re: Missile strike theory in US plane crash

Dambusters squadron to fly the RAF’s new £100million Joint Strike Fighter

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2367708/Legendary-Dambusters-squadron-fly-RAFs-new-100million-Joint-Strike-Fighter.html#ixzz2ZORpihmo
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

looks as if the cost of the JSF in Australian dollars just went up from the 130 million bucks they were forecasting in feb this year
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-02-18/pentagons-doubts-on-joint-strike-fighter/4524962

Reply Quote