Date: 14/08/2013 23:51:32
From: Bubblecar
ID: 369143
Subject: Oopsadaisy, Upsalite!

Scientists accidentally make ‘impossible material’ Upsalite – the world’s most efficient water absorber

Human error solves problem of how to produce world’s most efficient water absorber more cheaply

It is so difficult to make that the researchers who first discovered it called it the “impossible material”.

Now a century later, a team of Swedish scientists have done the impossible by producing the substance known as Upsalite by accident – after leaving their equipment running over the weekend.

The breakthrough has far-reaching commercial applications, as Upsalite (named after the University of Uppsala, where the scientists are based) is the world’s most efficient water absorber, with potential to be used for the removal of moisture in drug creation and high-tech electronics to cleaning up huge oil spills.

A single gram of this elusive white, dry, powdered form of magnesium carbonate (MgCO3) has an extraordinarily-large surface area of 800 square meters thanks to numerous minuscule pores, each one a million times smaller than the width of a human hair.

“Upsalite absorbs more water and low relative humidities than the best materials presently available and can be regenerated with less energy consumption than is used in similar processes today,” said Maria Stromme, professor of nanotechnology at Uppsala University.

“This, together with other unique properties of the discovered impossible material, is expected to pave the way for new sustainable products in a number of industrial applications,” she said.

Other uses include ice hockey rinks, warehouses, the collection of toxic waste or chemical spills and odour control.

Full report: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/scientists-accidentally-make-impossible-material-upsalite—the-worlds-most-efficient-water-absorber-8760118.html

Reply Quote

Date: 14/08/2013 23:53:25
From: OCDC
ID: 369144
Subject: re: Oopsadaisy, Upsalite!

Better than a ShamWow™? Campbell Newman better update The Next Brisbane Flood Repair Kit.

Reply Quote

Date: 14/08/2013 23:54:42
From: dv
ID: 369145
Subject: re: Oopsadaisy, Upsalite!

So what’s the mass ratio?

Reply Quote

Date: 14/08/2013 23:58:50
From: diddly-squat
ID: 369148
Subject: re: Oopsadaisy, Upsalite!

dv said:


So what’s the mass ratio?

presumably it’s a measure of some kind

Reply Quote

Date: 14/08/2013 23:59:38
From: morrie
ID: 369149
Subject: re: Oopsadaisy, Upsalite!

>>each one a million times smaller than the width of a human hair.

Lets get it right. One microhair.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/08/2013 00:01:38
From: dv
ID: 369150
Subject: re: Oopsadaisy, Upsalite!

presumably it’s a measure of some kind

—-

:-)

Reply Quote

Date: 15/08/2013 00:01:52
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 369151
Subject: re: Oopsadaisy, Upsalite!

“The total area of the pore walls of one gram of material would cover 800 square meters (8611 sq ft) if you would ‘roll them out’”

Reply Quote

Date: 15/08/2013 00:02:18
From: morrie
ID: 369152
Subject: re: Oopsadaisy, Upsalite!

Similar surface area per gram to a low end activated carbon.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/08/2013 00:03:26
From: OCDC
ID: 369156
Subject: re: Oopsadaisy, Upsalite!

morrie said:


Similar surface area per gram to a low end activated carbon.

Which works by adsorption. Something else my moran colleagues didn’t know.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/08/2013 00:04:54
From: diddly-squat
ID: 369157
Subject: re: Oopsadaisy, Upsalite!

OCDC said:


morrie said:

Similar surface area per gram to a low end activated carbon.

Which works by adsorption. Something else my moran colleagues didn’t know.

probably didn’t even go to uni…

Reply Quote

Date: 15/08/2013 00:05:40
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 369160
Subject: re: Oopsadaisy, Upsalite!

CrazyNeutrino said:

The total area of the pore walls of one gram of material would cover 800 square meters

Yes, we read that, but we’d still like to know the water to Upsalite mass ratio.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/08/2013 00:06:13
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 369161
Subject: re: Oopsadaisy, Upsalite!

new material thought for more than 100 years to be impossible to make.

accidentally left the material in the reaction chamber over a weekend

ok

Reply Quote

Date: 15/08/2013 00:06:14
From: dv
ID: 369162
Subject: re: Oopsadaisy, Upsalite!

Something else my moran colleagues didn’t know.

—-

???

How did they think it fucking worked?

Reply Quote

Date: 15/08/2013 00:07:52
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 369164
Subject: re: Oopsadaisy, Upsalite!

OCDC said:


morrie said:

Similar surface area per gram to a low end activated carbon.

Which works by adsorption. Something else my moran colleagues didn’t know.

Do they know the difference between adsorption and absorption?

Reply Quote

Date: 15/08/2013 00:09:11
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 369167
Subject: re: Oopsadaisy, Upsalite!

Upsalite’s moisture absorption properties are striking. It was found to absorb 20 times more moisture than fumed silica, a material used for cat box fillers and as an anti-caking agent for moisture control during the transport of moisture sensitive goods. This means that you’d need 20 times less material to do the moisture control job.

Its unique pore structure also opens up new applications in drug delivery. The pores can host drugs that need protection from the environment before being delivered to the human body. It’s also useful in thermal insulation, drying residues from oil and gas industries, and as a dessicant for humidity control. Potential applications are still being discovered as the material undergoes development for industrial use.

http://www.gizmag.com/upsalite-impossible-material/28393/

Reply Quote

Date: 15/08/2013 00:09:12
From: OCDC
ID: 369168
Subject: re: Oopsadaisy, Upsalite!

dv said:

Something else my moran colleagues didn’t know.

—-

???

How did they think it fucking worked?


Absorption.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/08/2013 00:09:31
From: OCDC
ID: 369169
Subject: re: Oopsadaisy, Upsalite!

PM 2Ring said:


OCDC said:

morrie said:

Similar surface area per gram to a low end activated carbon.

Which works by adsorption. Something else my moran colleagues didn’t know.

Do they know the difference between adsorption and absorption?


They didn’t.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/08/2013 00:11:09
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 369172
Subject: re: Oopsadaisy, Upsalite!

Strømme confesses that they didn’t actually set out to create it. “We were really into making a porous calcium carbonate for drug delivery purposes and wanted to try to make a similarly porous magnesium carbonate since we knew that magnesium carbonate was non-toxic and already approved for drug delivery,” she tells us. “We tried to use the same process as with the calcium carbonate, totally unaware of the fact that researchers had tried to make disordered magnesium carbonates for many decades using this route without succeeding.”

http://www.gizmag.com/upsalite-impossible-material/28393/

Reply Quote

Date: 15/08/2013 00:15:43
From: morrie
ID: 369178
Subject: re: Oopsadaisy, Upsalite!

One of the issues with activated carbon is maintaining physical properties at high surface areas. Coconut shell does very well in this regard which is why it finds wide use in the gold industry. The applications for the Upsalite will depend on it’s physical properties. Crush strength mainly. Apart from it’s adsorption properties.

Reply Quote