Date: 9/09/2013 01:30:11
From: dv
ID: 389975
Subject: Warren truss

The Warren truss was patented in 1848 by its designers James Warren and Willoughby Theobald Monzani, and consists of longitudinal members joined only by angled cross-members, forming alternately inverted equilateral triangle-shaped spaces along its length, ensuring that no individual strut, beam, or tie is subject to bending or torsional straining forces, but only to tension or compression. Loads on the diagonals alternate between compression and tension (approaching the center), with no vertical elements, while elements near the center must support both tension and compression in response to live loads. This configuration combines strength with economy of materials and can therefore be relatively light. The girders being of equal length, it is ideal for use in prefabricated modular bridges. It is an improvement over the Neville truss which uses a spacing configuration of isosceles triangles.

Warren truss construction has also been used in airframe construction for aircraft since the 1920s, mostly for smaller aircraft fuselages, using chrome molybdenum alloy steel tubing, with popular aircraft such as the Piper J-3 Cub. One of the earliest uses for the Warren truss design in aircraft design was for the interplane wing strut layout, as seen in a nose-on view, on the Italian World War I Ansaldo SVA series of fast reconnaissance biplanes, which were among the fastest aircraft of the First World War era. Warren truss construction is still used today for some homebuilt aircraft fuselage designs, that essentially use the same 1920s-era design philosophies in the 21st century.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_truss#Warren_truss

Reply Quote

Date: 9/09/2013 01:42:30
From: morrie
ID: 389976
Subject: re: Warren truss

>> combines strength with economy

Well there you go.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/09/2013 01:43:58
From: roughbarked
ID: 389977
Subject: re: Warren truss

morrie said:


>> combines strength with economy

Well there you go.

Hopefully it still flies or we are gonna crash and burn.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/09/2013 02:05:26
From: kii
ID: 389981
Subject: re: Warren truss

This just needs to go here:

Reply Quote

Date: 9/09/2013 02:07:48
From: kii
ID: 389982
Subject: re: Warren truss

Oooops :)

Reply Quote

Date: 9/09/2013 02:12:12
From: morrie
ID: 389983
Subject: re: Warren truss

Looks like a hernia truss.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/09/2013 02:14:13
From: kii
ID: 389985
Subject: re: Warren truss

morrie said:


Looks like a hernia truss.

With added “snack sack”.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/09/2013 02:18:37
From: morrie
ID: 389987
Subject: re: Warren truss

More cross members than the ALP in a bun fight.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/09/2013 08:07:17
From: Rule 303
ID: 390030
Subject: re: Warren truss

I had no idea there were so many types of truss.

What is it that attracts you to the Warren Truss in particular, Daz?

Reply Quote

Date: 9/09/2013 08:40:02
From: kii
ID: 390040
Subject: re: Warren truss

Rule 303 said:


I had no idea there were so many types of truss.

What is it that attracts you to the Warren Truss in particular, Daz?

The politician?

Reply Quote

Date: 9/09/2013 08:46:47
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 390049
Subject: re: Warren truss

Similar structures are also used in a lot of spaceframe racing cars.

The steel tubes are nickel-bronzed together in that one.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/09/2013 09:01:46
From: Rule 303
ID: 390069
Subject: re: Warren truss

Spiny Norman said:

Similar structures are also used in a lot of spaceframe racing cars.

Yep. Lots of truss elements in monocoque vehicles. So much so that I often find myself superimposing a truss bridge over a passenger vehicle to create a lasting mental image in road crash rescue training.

Seems to make a difference where the metal hits the road, too. It’s been years since I’ve seen a car fall in half because someone cut a chord in rescue.

:-)

Reply Quote

Date: 9/09/2013 14:59:49
From: stan101
ID: 390298
Subject: re: Warren truss

Rule 303 said:


I had no idea there were so many types of truss.


Plenty of truss variations and many cheaper in design than the warren. You have the fink, the how’s, the fan, the reverse fink, the queen and the Rennie to name a few. All have pros and con’s depending on the governing loads.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/09/2013 15:02:01
From: stan101
ID: 390301
Subject: re: Warren truss

stan101 said:


Rule 303 said:

I had no idea there were so many types of truss.

the how’s

Make that howe

Reply Quote

Date: 9/09/2013 15:02:04
From: Skunkworks
ID: 390302
Subject: re: Warren truss

stan101 said:


Rule 303 said:

I had no idea there were so many types of truss.


Plenty of truss variations and many cheaper in design than the warren. You have the fink, the how’s, the fan, the reverse fink, the queen and the Rennie to name a few. All have pros and con’s depending on the governing loads.

THE KING IS A FINK!

Reply Quote

Date: 9/09/2013 23:13:47
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 390589
Subject: re: Warren truss

stan101 said:


Rule 303 said:

I had no idea there were so many types of truss.

Plenty of truss variations and many cheaper in design than the warren. You have the fink, the how’s, the fan, the reverse fink, the queen and the Rennie to name a few. All have pros and con’s depending on the governing loads.

Not many truss types are widely used in civil engineering. The Warren truss, Pratt truss, Brown truss (NOT all diagonals in tension) and K-truss are the ones I’m most familiar with. The K truss is not illustrated on that linked page, diagonals are connected to the centres of the verticals to stop the buckling of the verticals under compression. The shape of the K truss is like a series of Ks, ie. KKKKKKKK plus top and bottom chords.

Reply Quote