Date: 31/10/2013 23:53:45
From: Riff-in-Thyme
ID: 423087
Subject: Life Imitating Art

Mean looking machine(not an office I’d want to work). Looks like this enterprise included a certain degree of stealth tech. Shatner will be shat!

Captain Kirk to command new Navy destroyer

The commander of the U.S. Navy’s sleek new guided-missile destroyer, which launched late last week in Maine, has a name to match its space-age look: Captain Kirk.

Captain James Kirk, the prospective commanding officer of USS Zumwalt, will lead the 610-foot vessel, the Navy’s largest destroyer and first of three new Zumwalt-class ships “designed for littoral operations and land attack,” the Navy said.

Kirk, a native of Bethesda, Md., was commissioned at the U.S. Naval Academy in 1990 and has served in a variety posts as a “surface warfare officer,” according to his online bio. “Ashore, Captain Kirk has served as Executive Assistant to the Navy’s Chief of Legislative Affairs and as an Action Officer on the Joint Staff.”

Reply Quote

Date: 31/10/2013 23:57:53
From: party_pants
ID: 423092
Subject: re: Life Imitating Art

Good on him, happy for him his career is progressing along. Getting command of a new first ship of a class must be a special honour. I’m sure he deserves it on merit and the name is merely a coincidence.

Reply Quote

Date: 31/10/2013 23:59:54
From: roughbarked
ID: 423096
Subject: re: Life Imitating Art

party_pants said:


Good on him, happy for him his career is progressing along. Getting command of a new first ship of a class must be a special honour. I’m sure he deserves it on merit and the name is merely a coincidence.

He’d have had to study the new systems to be shortlisted for the job.

Reply Quote

Date: 1/11/2013 00:01:13
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 423097
Subject: re: Life Imitating Art

Very strange looking ship.

Reply Quote

Date: 1/11/2013 00:03:20
From: roughbarked
ID: 423099
Subject: re: Life Imitating Art

Witty Rejoinder said:


Very strange looking ship.

Reminds me of a dart(paper plane). It would be interesting to learn about the weapons systems.

Reply Quote

Date: 1/11/2013 00:04:48
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 423101
Subject: re: Life Imitating Art

http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/dd21/

Reply Quote

Date: 1/11/2013 00:07:46
From: party_pants
ID: 423102
Subject: re: Life Imitating Art

Witty Rejoinder said:


Very strange looking ship.

Yeah, low radar profile and all that.

Reply Quote

Date: 1/11/2013 00:14:31
From: Riff-in-Thyme
ID: 423108
Subject: re: Life Imitating Art

would be interested to see how much these new boats are stabilized with all the weight over the keel the way it is. must be comfy

Reply Quote

Date: 1/11/2013 00:20:15
From: party_pants
ID: 423110
Subject: re: Life Imitating Art

they are actually rather large ships. As large as a WW2 era “pocket-battleship”. Longer and heavier than the preceding class of cruisers in the Ticonderoga class, yet still classified as a destroyer. 180m long and 14,800 tonnes displacement.

Reply Quote

Date: 1/11/2013 00:32:55
From: Riff-in-Thyme
ID: 423114
Subject: re: Life Imitating Art

party_pants said:


they are actually rather large ships. As large as a WW2 era “pocket-battleship”. Longer and heavier than the preceding class of cruisers in the Ticonderoga class, yet still classified as a destroyer. 180m long and 14,800 tonnes displacement.

Armory probably takes up a lot of room having to stow all those missiles instead of artillery rounds

Reply Quote

Date: 1/11/2013 00:36:41
From: party_pants
ID: 423115
Subject: re: Life Imitating Art

Riff-in-Thyme said:


party_pants said:

they are actually rather large ships. As large as a WW2 era “pocket-battleship”. Longer and heavier than the preceding class of cruisers in the Ticonderoga class, yet still classified as a destroyer. 180m long and 14,800 tonnes displacement.

Armory probably takes up a lot of room having to stow all those missiles instead of artillery rounds

Could be, but I don’t know enough about it.

Reply Quote

Date: 1/11/2013 00:41:57
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 423116
Subject: re: Life Imitating Art

DDG1000 weaponry

DDG 1000 will have a sensor and weapons suite optimised for littoral warfare and for network-centric warfare. Northrop Grumman has put forward a solution based on a peripheral vertical launch system (PVLS).

The solution consists of 20 four-cell PVLS situated round the perimeter of the deck, rather than the usual centrally located VLS. This would reduce the ship’s vulnerability to a single hit.

The advanced vertical launch system (AVLS) that forms the basis of the PVLS is being developed by BAE Systems Land and Armaments and Raytheon and has been designated the mk57 VLS.

Missile systems under consideration include tactical tomahawk (intended to succeed Tomahawk TLAM), standard missile SM-3 and the evolved Sea Sparrow missile (ESSM) for air defence.

BAE Systems Land and Armaments has been awarded the contract to develop the EDM for the ship’s advanced gun system (AGS), building on development work carried out for DD-21.

It will be equipped with a fully automated weapon handling and storage system and a family of advanced munitions and propelling charges, including the GPS-guided long-range land attack projectile (LRLAP). Up to 900 rounds of LRAP ammunition will be carried.

Lockheed Martin has been awarded the contract for the LRAP EDM.

The family of munitions is expected to include land attack and ballistic projectiles. Technologies derived from the US Navy’s extended-range guided munition (ERGM), the US Army 155mm XM-982 projectiles and the DTRA 5in projectile are being studied for incorporation into the projectile suite.

BAE Systems Land and Armaments is developing advanced gun barrel technologies for the new AGS, with improvements to barrel life, overall system performance and life-cycle costs.

The ship’s close-in gun system (CIGS) will be the BAE Systems Land and Armaments 57mm mk110 naval gun. The gun has a firing rate of 220 rounds a minute and range of 14km (nine miles). Raytheon IDS is supplying the ship’s electro-optical / infrared suite which has five Lockheed Martin sensors and will provide 360° surveillance and gun fire control.

Reply Quote

Date: 1/11/2013 00:44:51
From: roughbarked
ID: 423117
Subject: re: Life Imitating Art

party_pants said:


Riff-in-Thyme said:

party_pants said:

they are actually rather large ships. As large as a WW2 era “pocket-battleship”. Longer and heavier than the preceding class of cruisers in the Ticonderoga class, yet still classified as a destroyer. 180m long and 14,800 tonnes displacement.

Armory probably takes up a lot of room having to stow all those missiles instead of artillery rounds

Could be, but I don’t know enough about it.

For a start it carries three extra aircraft.

Reply Quote

Date: 1/11/2013 00:46:25
From: party_pants
ID: 423118
Subject: re: Life Imitating Art

ChrispenEvan said:


DDG1000 weaponry

DDG 1000 will have a sensor and weapons suite optimised for littoral warfare

Littoral meaning close to shore.

Reply Quote

Date: 1/11/2013 01:01:30
From: Riff-in-Thyme
ID: 423120
Subject: re: Life Imitating Art

could you imagine a battle between vehicles of this standard? Not a strike on some city but two separate relatively equipped fleets set on sorting the other out. Spectactasticles!!!

Reply Quote

Date: 1/11/2013 01:18:30
From: Stealth
ID: 423124
Subject: re: Life Imitating Art

It looks like they launch it and it rolled turtle…

Reply Quote

Date: 1/11/2013 01:21:03
From: party_pants
ID: 423125
Subject: re: Life Imitating Art

Stealth said:


It looks like they launch it and it rolled turtle…

I’m sure they’ve tank tested a few models by now.

Reply Quote

Date: 1/11/2013 01:26:21
From: Stealth
ID: 423127
Subject: re: Life Imitating Art

party_pants said:


Stealth said:

It looks like they launch it and it rolled turtle…

I’m sure they’ve tank tested a few models by now.


Being a littoral ship I guess you have to expect a few tanks to take shots at it…

Reply Quote

Date: 1/11/2013 11:53:19
From: Anywho
ID: 423202
Subject: re: Life Imitating Art

Considering how many lives get destroyed by the US lust for war, perhaps the title should be “death imitating art”?

Reply Quote