Date: 15/11/2013 11:56:01
From: Riff-in-Thyme
ID: 431204
Subject: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

Lockheed Martin developing successor to the SR-71 Blackbird

When the last SR-71 Blackbird was grounded in 1998 it was a double blow. Not only did aviation lose one of the most advanced aircraft ever built, but also one of the most beautiful. Lockheed Martin’s Skunk Works has now revealed that it is building a successor to the Blackbird: the SR-72. Using a new hypersonic engine design that combines turbines and ramjets, the company says that the unmanned SR-72 will be twice as fast as its predecessor with a cruising speed of Mach 6.

The SR-72 uses technology from the HTV-2 (Image: Lockheed Martin)

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2013 12:15:38
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 431207
Subject: re: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

Believe it when I see it roll out the door.
Clever toy otherwise though.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2013 12:19:15
From: Riff-in-Thyme
ID: 431208
Subject: re: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

Spiny Norman said:


Believe it when I see it roll out the door.
Clever toy otherwise though.

going on the pic, if it goes into operation, pics of it’s bow shock will be popular

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2013 12:22:43
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 431209
Subject: re: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

Riff-in-Thyme said:


Spiny Norman said:

Believe it when I see it roll out the door.
Clever toy otherwise though.

going on the pic, if it goes into operation, pics of it’s bow shock will be popular

Yeah no real point in trying to make it too stealthy, it’ll stand out on IR about 2,000 km away.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2013 12:23:27
From: Riff-in-Thyme
ID: 431210
Subject: re: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

Spiny Norman said:


Riff-in-Thyme said:

Spiny Norman said:

Believe it when I see it roll out the door.
Clever toy otherwise though.

going on the pic, if it goes into operation, pics of it’s bow shock will be popular

Yeah no real point in trying to make it too stealthy, it’ll stand out on IR about 2,000 km away.

I did get the picture it was all about response time

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2013 13:25:12
From: bob(from black rock)
ID: 431234
Subject: re: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

Has Kelly Johnsons finger prints all over it, wonder of he still alive?

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2013 15:00:05
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 431251
Subject: re: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

Has Kelly Johnsons finger prints all over it, wonder of he still alive?

he died back in 1990.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2013 15:04:43
From: Riff-in-Thyme
ID: 431253
Subject: re: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

ChrispenEvan said:


Has Kelly Johnsons finger prints all over it, wonder of he still alive?

he died back in 1990.

I can see him sneaking off the plot at night to tinker……

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2013 15:33:28
From: bob(from black rock)
ID: 431274
Subject: re: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

Riff-in-Thyme said:


ChrispenEvan said:

Has Kelly Johnsons finger prints all over it, wonder of he still alive?

he died back in 1990.

I can see him sneaking off the plot at night to tinker……

Sorry to hear he died, and yeah >>I can see him sneaking off the plot at night to tinker……

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2013 17:03:10
From: Tamb
ID: 431327
Subject: re: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

But not beautiful like the SR71.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2013 17:06:36
From: Riff-in-Thyme
ID: 431329
Subject: re: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

Tamb said:


But not beautiful like the SR71.

fluffy dice will help(when I’ve overriden the remote in one passing and installed me a seat in it, obviously)

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2013 10:57:50
From: bob(from black rock)
ID: 431745
Subject: re: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

Tamb said:


But not beautiful like the SR71.

Or the P38

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2013 11:22:47
From: Riff-in-Thyme
ID: 431751
Subject: re: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

bob(from black rock) said:


Tamb said:

But not beautiful like the SR71.

Or the P38

neither of those develop a pretty compression burn to their leading edge……..

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2013 11:24:44
From: Carmen_Sandiego
ID: 431752
Subject: re: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

Riff-in-Thyme said:

Not only did aviation lose one of the most advanced aircraft ever built, but also one of the most beautiful.

Like much military designed equipment, it has a type of beauty that results when utilitarian form meets extreme function but I could never call it “beautiful”.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2013 11:30:02
From: Riff-in-Thyme
ID: 431753
Subject: re: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

Carmen_Sandiego said:


Riff-in-Thyme said:

Not only did aviation lose one of the most advanced aircraft ever built, but also one of the most beautiful.

Like much military designed equipment, it has a type of beauty that results when utilitarian form meets extreme function but I could never call it “beautiful”.

It’s beauty was in it’s engineering and the nostalgia it now induces for those who followed it’s history

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2013 11:52:36
From: bob(from black rock)
ID: 431760
Subject: re: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

The F35 designed by Buddy Rich? was a great machine too, although not desined by Kelly Johnson, I think Buddy had a great mentor in Kelly.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2013 12:08:15
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 431765
Subject: re: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

bob(from black rock) said:


The F35 designed by Buddy Rich? was a great machine too, although not desined by Kelly Johnson, I think Buddy had a great mentor in Kelly.

Ben Rich. He died long before the F-35 was ever put to paper, he was heavily involved in the F-117 though.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2013 12:13:59
From: bob(from black rock)
ID: 431768
Subject: re: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

Spiny Norman said:


bob(from black rock) said:

The F35 designed by Buddy Rich? was a great machine too, although not desined by Kelly Johnson, I think Buddy had a great mentor in Kelly.

Ben Rich. He died long before the F-35 was ever put to paper, he was heavily involved in the F-117 though.

Then who designed the F35? (sorry about my 73 year old brain) and yeah it was the F-117, and what did the F-35 look like?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2013 12:23:03
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 431770
Subject: re: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

bob(from black rock) said:


Spiny Norman said:

bob(from black rock) said:

The F35 designed by Buddy Rich? was a great machine too, although not desined by Kelly Johnson, I think Buddy had a great mentor in Kelly.

Ben Rich. He died long before the F-35 was ever put to paper, he was heavily involved in the F-117 though.

Then who designed the F35? (sorry about my 73 year old brain) and yeah it was the F-117, and what did the F-35 look like?

I don’t know who headed the F-35 team sorry but it looks like this –

The F-117 looks like this –

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2013 12:28:58
From: Tamb
ID: 431771
Subject: re: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

How do I put an image in here please?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2013 12:32:18
From: Carmen_Sandiego
ID: 431772
Subject: re: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

Tamb said:


How do I put an image in here please?

!http://www.address.com/image.jpg!
Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2013 12:33:09
From: Riff-in-Thyme
ID: 431773
Subject: re: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

Tamb said:


How do I put an image in here please?

copy the image url and paste it in between two apostrophes, without spacing

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2013 12:36:29
From: Tamb
ID: 431775
Subject: re: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

‘C:\Users\Sandy\Desktop’

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2013 12:38:49
From: Carmen_Sandiego
ID: 431777
Subject: re: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

Tamb said:


‘C:\Users\Sandy\Desktop’

Nah, needs to be on the internet, not your local poota.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2013 12:39:36
From: Tamb
ID: 431778
Subject: re: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2013 12:41:39
From: Tamb
ID: 431780
Subject: re: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

Carmen_Sandiego said:


Tamb said:

‘C:\Users\Sandy\Desktop’

Nah, needs to be on the internet, not your local poota.

Yes. I thought I’d cut & pasted the url but still had an old one in the cliupboard. Not accustomed to this borrowed lappy.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2013 12:42:38
From: Tamb
ID: 431782
Subject: re: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

Tamb said:



Yay! It worked.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2013 12:44:51
From: Carmen_Sandiego
ID: 431786
Subject: re: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

Tamb said:


Tamb said:


Yay! It worked.

Google says it is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blohm_&_Voss_BV_141

Weirdest plane I’ve seen. What is it with Germans and their ridiculously bizarre war equipment?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2013 12:45:48
From: Riff-in-Thyme
ID: 431788
Subject: re: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

Tamb said:


Tamb said:


Yay! It worked.

Is that a jet/rocket on the starboard wing?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2013 12:46:23
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 431789
Subject: re: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

Tamb said:



Shopped.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2013 12:47:03
From: Riff-in-Thyme
ID: 431791
Subject: re: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

Carmen_Sandiego said:


Tamb said:

Tamb said:


Yay! It worked.

Google says it is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blohm_&_Voss_BV_141

Weirdest plane I’ve seen. What is it with Germans and their ridiculously bizarre war equipment?

I see. Observer platform. No wonder it didn’t go into service

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2013 12:48:05
From: Tamb
ID: 431793
Subject: re: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

The idea was that it could stand continuously on a wingtip & pull very high G turns.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2013 12:48:46
From: Tamb
ID: 431796
Subject: re: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

Riff-in-Thyme said:


Tamb said:

Tamb said:


Yay! It worked.

Is that a jet/rocket on the starboard wing?

No it’s the cockpit.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2013 12:50:42
From: Riff-in-Thyme
ID: 431799
Subject: re: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

Tamb said:


Riff-in-Thyme said:

Tamb said:

Yay! It worked.

Is that a jet/rocket on the starboard wing?

No it’s the cockpit.

had to get a side view from the wiki page for a better look. wonder how good a snap you’d get in a high G turn?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2013 12:59:58
From: Bubblecar
ID: 431807
Subject: re: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

>What is it with Germans and their ridiculously bizarre war equipment?

A futile attempt to balance their hopeless (& self-inflicted) attrition rate with cheap but “cunningly clever” devices.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/11/2013 13:07:53
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 431814
Subject: re: SR-72... Mmmmmmmmm...........

BV 141

Other BV Planes

Reply Quote