Date: 18/11/2013 16:38:30
From: Riff-in-Thyme
ID: 432978
Subject: Single photon detected but not destroyed

Physicists have seen a single particle of light and then let it go on its way. The feat was possible thanks to a new technique that, for the first time, detects optical photons without destroying them. The technology could eventually offer perfect detection of photons, providing a boost to quantum communication and even biological imaging.

more

Reply Quote

Date: 18/11/2013 16:40:19
From: roughbarked
ID: 432980
Subject: re: Single photon detected but not destroyed

Riff-in-Thyme said:


Physicists have seen a single particle of light and then let it go on its way. The feat was possible thanks to a new technique that, for the first time, detects optical photons without destroying them. The technology could eventually offer perfect detection of photons, providing a boost to quantum communication and even biological imaging.

more

They did this every day, without instruments.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/11/2013 16:42:14
From: roughbarked
ID: 432981
Subject: re: Single photon detected but not destroyed

harking back to the canon pinon. The fact is remarkable that I haven’t had a comeback on it.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/11/2013 17:05:14
From: Riff-in-Thyme
ID: 432995
Subject: re: Single photon detected but not destroyed

has this done away with ‘can’t measure a particles velocity and position……’ yada..

Reply Quote

Date: 18/11/2013 17:06:22
From: roughbarked
ID: 432996
Subject: re: Single photon detected but not destroyed

Riff-in-Thyme said:


has this done away with ‘can’t measure a particles velocity and position……’ yada..

without instrumets, no.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/11/2013 17:06:53
From: roughbarked
ID: 432997
Subject: re: Single photon detected but not destroyed

roughbarked said:


Riff-in-Thyme said:

has this done away with ‘can’t measure a particles velocity and position……’ yada..

without instrumets, no.

instruments.

um who makes them?
Reply Quote

Date: 18/11/2013 17:10:22
From: Tamb
ID: 433000
Subject: re: Single photon detected but not destroyed

roughbarked said:


roughbarked said:

Riff-in-Thyme said:

has this done away with ‘can’t measure a particles velocity and position……’ yada..

without instrumets, no.

instruments.

um who makes them?

Madam Lash?

Reply Quote

Date: 18/11/2013 17:11:59
From: roughbarked
ID: 433001
Subject: re: Single photon detected but not destroyed

Tamb said:


roughbarked said:

roughbarked said:

without instrumets, no.

instruments.

um who makes them?

Madam Lash?

Mesdames needlepoint and backslash.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/11/2013 18:00:33
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 433022
Subject: re: Single photon detected but not destroyed

Riff-in-Thyme said:


has this done away with ‘can’t measure a particles velocity and position……’ yada..

No.

FWIW, the Heisenberg Uncertainty principle doesn’t stop you from measuring a particle’s position and momentum simultaneously, it merely limits the accuracy with which you can do so.

But this detector is only trying to count photons – it doesn’t try to measure the photon’s position and momentum to high precision, so HUP doesn’t really apply.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/11/2013 18:02:11
From: Riff-in-Thyme
ID: 433023
Subject: re: Single photon detected but not destroyed

PM 2Ring said:


Riff-in-Thyme said:

has this done away with ‘can’t measure a particles velocity and position……’ yada..

No.

FWIW, the Heisenberg Uncertainty principle doesn’t stop you from measuring a particle’s position and momentum simultaneously, it merely limits the accuracy with which you can do so.

But this detector is only trying to count photons – it doesn’t try to measure the photon’s position and momentum to high precision, so HUP doesn’t really apply.

sweet. I’m still relatively impressed.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/11/2013 18:07:40
From: PM 2Ring
ID: 433026
Subject: re: Single photon detected but not destroyed

(From the link)

“It’s a very cool experiment,” says Alan Migdall, who leads the quantum optics group at the National Institute of Standards and Technology in Gaithersburg, Md. But he warns that identifying photons without destroying them does not mean that the outgoing photon is the same as it was prior to detection. “You’ve pulled some information out of it, so you do wind up affecting it,” he says.

This detector works by getting the photons to interact with an atom in a superposition of states, which puts the photons into a superposition of states. So the photon ensemble is certainly affected. But at least the detected photons aren’t totally absorbed, like they are in a traditional detector.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/11/2013 18:14:59
From: Riff-in-Thyme
ID: 433028
Subject: re: Single photon detected but not destroyed

PM 2Ring said:


(From the link)
“It’s a very cool experiment,” says Alan Migdall, who leads the quantum optics group at the National Institute of Standards and Technology in Gaithersburg, Md. But he warns that identifying photons without destroying them does not mean that the outgoing photon is the same as it was prior to detection. “You’ve pulled some information out of it, so you do wind up affecting it,” he says.

This detector works by getting the photons to interact with an atom in a superposition of states, which puts the photons into a superposition of states. So the photon ensemble is certainly affected. But at least the detected photons aren’t totally absorbed, like they are in a traditional detector.

Being able to enforce and use superposition in a system seems to have more potential than just measuring photons….

Reply Quote