Date: 13/12/2013 13:00:00
From: Stealth
ID: 449206
Subject: WACA Test

Lets have a bat…

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 13:01:15
From: Arts
ID: 449208
Subject: re: WACA Test

numbat, wombat dingbat

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 13:04:05
From: Tamb
ID: 449210
Subject: re: WACA Test

Arts said:


numbat, wombat dingbat

Let’s hope it isn’t a microbat.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 13:06:16
From: Stealth
ID: 449212
Subject: re: WACA Test

Tamb said:


Arts said:

numbat, wombat dingbat

Let’s hope it isn’t a microbat.


Ali bat.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 13:08:51
From: Arts
ID: 449215
Subject: re: WACA Test

first bat aussie

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 13:11:20
From: Tamb
ID: 449216
Subject: re: WACA Test

Arts said:


first bat aussie

Couple of nice days in the Perth sun for the poms.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 13:25:04
From: party_pants
ID: 449226
Subject: re: WACA Test

what a noise :(

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 13:35:12
From: Stealth
ID: 449230
Subject: re: WACA Test

0/0 That was the closest the Poms were going to come to being in front, it is all downhill from here for them.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 13:36:23
From: podzol
ID: 449231
Subject: re: WACA Test

Perth forecast 38 degrees today. Blimey…

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 13:36:42
From: party_pants
ID: 449232
Subject: re: WACA Test

Stealth said:


0/0 That was the closest the Poms were going to come to being in front, it is all downhill from here for them.

I don’t like that sort of talk, it’s tempting fate.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 13:38:26
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 449233
Subject: re: WACA Test

I see Billy Bowden has been elevated back to the first grade of umpires, you can do that now with just handing over cash to the Indian Cricket Board that now run international cricket.

I mean Billy’s probably a nice chap but they dropped him because he was f’ing hopeless, a deaf cripple who is learning brail.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 13:40:01
From: morrie
ID: 449235
Subject: re: WACA Test

We need some scientifical tests re the effect of sun on Poms. Boris, I suggest that you go and stand in the sun for a couple of hours, then report back.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 13:42:15
From: Boris
ID: 449236
Subject: re: WACA Test

was the reason i gave up outdoor cricket. got to old and sensible to stand in the sun chasing a ball.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 13:42:57
From: Stealth
ID: 449237
Subject: re: WACA Test

Well, that is appalling play in a Test.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 13:47:54
From: wookiemeister
ID: 449240
Subject: re: WACA Test

Spider bat

Buy me a pony

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 13:52:02
From: party_pants
ID: 449242
Subject: re: WACA Test

wookiemeister said:

Buy me a pony

Sorry, your file is stamped “Not to be trusted with cute animals”

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 14:19:49
From: Dropbear
ID: 449254
Subject: re: WACA Test

Stealth said:


Lets have a bat…

not now, im working.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 14:25:12
From: Boris
ID: 449258
Subject: re: WACA Test

dear oh dear oh dear.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 14:37:51
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 449272
Subject: re: WACA Test

Interesting that both Clark and Cook are playing their 100th test.
From memory there have only been two Tests in which two or more players have appeared in their 100th Test: Michael Atherton and Alec Stewart for England against West Indies in 2000, and Jacques Kallis, Shaun Pollock and Stephen Fleming in the match between South Africa and New Zealand in 2006., I think that’s right, I’ll check to make sure later.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 14:39:12
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 449274
Subject: re: WACA Test

Peak Warming Man said:


Interesting that both Clark and Cook are playing their 100th test.
From memory there have only been two Tests in which two or more players have appeared in their 100th Test: Michael Atherton and Alec Stewart for England against West Indies in 2000, and Jacques Kallis, Shaun Pollock and Stephen Fleming in the match between South Africa and New Zealand in 2006., I think that’s right, I’ll check to make sure later.

You’ve got a mighty fine memory there, to be sure, PWM.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 14:39:41
From: Dropbear
ID: 449275
Subject: re: WACA Test

The Rev Dodgson said:


Peak Warming Man said:

Interesting that both Clark and Cook are playing their 100th test.
From memory there have only been two Tests in which two or more players have appeared in their 100th Test: Michael Atherton and Alec Stewart for England against West Indies in 2000, and Jacques Kallis, Shaun Pollock and Stephen Fleming in the match between South Africa and New Zealand in 2006., I think that’s right, I’ll check to make sure later.

You’ve got a mighty fine memory there, to be sure, PWM.

he’s an idiot savant…

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 15:23:20
From: party_pants
ID: 449334
Subject: re: WACA Test

D’oh!

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 15:23:21
From: sibeen
ID: 449335
Subject: re: WACA Test

Rushes in

Bloody meetings!

Anyway, a quick updat:

FUCK
FUCK

and just now:

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 15:24:11
From: Boris
ID: 449337
Subject: re: WACA Test

bloody hell, talk of the devil.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 15:24:39
From: roughbarked
ID: 449338
Subject: re: WACA Test

sibeen said:


Rushes in

Bloody meetings!

Anyway, a quick updat:

FUCK
FUCK

and just now:

FUCK

notes the effectiveness of the shortened phrase.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 15:24:44
From: Arts
ID: 449339
Subject: re: WACA Test

this commentary needs work

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 15:25:48
From: Boris
ID: 449340
Subject: re: WACA Test

clarke probably got some product in his eyes.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 15:26:29
From: Dropbear
ID: 449341
Subject: re: WACA Test

live scores jinxed it. they said we were on top.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 15:27:00
From: Dropbear
ID: 449342
Subject: re: WACA Test

Boris said:


clarke probably got some product in his eyes.

tears probably.. he thought about his feelings

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 15:28:39
From: Tamb
ID: 449344
Subject: re: WACA Test

Dropbear said:


live scores jinxed it. they said we were on top.

On top is just another way of being screwed.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 15:28:55
From: dv
ID: 449345
Subject: re: WACA Test

So product=semen?

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 15:31:09
From: Tamb
ID: 449348
Subject: re: WACA Test

dv said:


So product=semen?

No. That’s the reason camels are called ships of the desert.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 16:20:40
From: Michael V
ID: 449376
Subject: re: WACA Test

Six for Smith! (First runs.)

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 16:26:40
From: party_pants
ID: 449379
Subject: re: WACA Test

The sight-screen alarm is terribly annoying. I’m listening to it on the radio and they must have an effect mic right nearby.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 16:34:08
From: sibeen
ID: 449381
Subject: re: WACA Test

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 16:34:09
From: party_pants
ID: 449382
Subject: re: WACA Test

brown, round objects :(

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 16:37:41
From: Michael V
ID: 449383
Subject: re: WACA Test

Have they forgotten how to bat in the last few days?

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 16:38:53
From: party_pants
ID: 449386
Subject: re: WACA Test

Michael V said:


Have they forgotten how to bat in the last few days?

Yes.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 16:39:52
From: Dropbear
ID: 449388
Subject: re: WACA Test

Michael V said:


Have they forgotten how to bat in the last few days?

ashes already won, syndrome

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 16:47:22
From: Michael V
ID: 449393
Subject: re: WACA Test

Dropbear said:


Michael V said:

Have they forgotten how to bat in the last few days?

ashes already won, syndrome

I sincerely hope not. :(

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 16:53:14
From: sibeen
ID: 449403
Subject: re: WACA Test

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 16:53:23
From: party_pants
ID: 449404
Subject: re: WACA Test

Holy heck!

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 16:53:26
From: Michael V
ID: 449405
Subject: re: WACA Test

Stinky poos!

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 16:54:37
From: party_pants
ID: 449406
Subject: re: WACA Test

Terry Alderman on the radio is calling it dumb batting

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 16:57:02
From: ratty one
ID: 449408
Subject: re: WACA Test

sibeen said:


FUCK

He is passionate about his cricket.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 19:06:55
From: morrie
ID: 449455
Subject: re: WACA Test

I do hope that we are not in for a pratfall, eh Boris.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 19:27:10
From: dv
ID: 449462
Subject: re: WACA Test

Ah well should at least be a contest.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 19:31:55
From: Michael V
ID: 449465
Subject: re: WACA Test

Yeah, the top order didn’t do so well, did they.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 19:41:39
From: stumpy_seahorse
ID: 449467
Subject: re: WACA Test

Well…just paid the deposit on a house

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 19:47:58
From: sibeen
ID: 449470
Subject: re: WACA Test

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 19:48:35
From: Michael V
ID: 449471
Subject: re: WACA Test

Stinky poos…

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 19:51:19
From: party_pants
ID: 449474
Subject: re: WACA Test

Bummer, just got home and turned the TV on, first ball a wicket falls.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 19:52:12
From: Michael V
ID: 449475
Subject: re: WACA Test

Oh, so it was you who got Haddin out. Shame…

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 19:54:24
From: party_pants
ID: 449476
Subject: re: WACA Test

Michael V said:


Oh, so it was you who got Haddin out. Shame…

I think Haddin got Haddin out – like most of the Aussie batters today.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 19:55:23
From: Michael V
ID: 449477
Subject: re: WACA Test

No, no – you just had to turn the TV on, now didn’t you?

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 19:57:27
From: party_pants
ID: 449480
Subject: re: WACA Test

Michael V said:


No, no – you just had to turn the TV on, now didn’t you?

I’m sure it’s Stumpy’s house-buying activity that did it.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 19:58:16
From: stumpy_seahorse
ID: 449481
Subject: re: WACA Test

party_pants said:


Michael V said:

No, no – you just had to turn the TV on, now didn’t you?

I’m sure it’s Stumpy’s house-buying activity that did it.

that’s right… blame the cripple :P

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2013 19:58:58
From: Michael V
ID: 449482
Subject: re: WACA Test

stumpy_seahorse said:


party_pants said:

Michael V said:

No, no – you just had to turn the TV on, now didn’t you?

I’m sure it’s Stumpy’s house-buying activity that did it.

that’s right… blame the cripple :P

LOLOLOLOL!

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2013 23:42:50
From: sibeen
ID: 449492
Subject: re: WACA Test

Rushes in, I need to update you people.

FUCK
FUCK
FUCK
FUCK
FUCK
FUCK

Change of innings

FUCK OFF
FUCK OFF
FUCK OFF
FUCK OFF

Ok, you’re all now up to date.

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2013 23:44:10
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 449493
Subject: re: WACA Test

evening. except The Munter.

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2013 23:44:10
From: Skunkworks
ID: 449494
Subject: re: WACA Test

sibeen said:


Rushes in, I need to update you people.

FUCK
FUCK
FUCK
FUCK
FUCK
FUCK

Change of innings

FUCK OFF
FUCK OFF
FUCK OFF
FUCK OFF

Ok, you’re all now up to date.

For a second there I thought Kii was back.

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2013 23:47:16
From: Michael V
ID: 449498
Subject: re: WACA Test

sibeen said:


Rushes in, I need to update you people.

FUCK
FUCK
FUCK
FUCK
FUCK
FUCK

Change of innings

FUCK OFF
FUCK OFF
FUCK OFF
FUCK OFF

Ok, you’re all now up to date.

(phew)

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 13:28:59
From: Michael V
ID: 449850
Subject: re: WACA Test

They’re coming onto the ground.

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 13:34:44
From: Riff-in-Thyme
ID: 449851
Subject: re: WACA Test

Michael V said:


They’re coming onto the ground.

:)

I keep expecting to hear mic booth sound effects and clipped accents to accompany this commentary- taps pencil on desk*-“a short de-livery, played spendidly down to long pocket for 3 runs. The crowd is excited”-*makes crowd sound into empty tin cup

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 13:43:16
From: Michael V
ID: 449852
Subject: re: WACA Test

On ya bike, Bell!

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 14:01:32
From: Michael V
ID: 449856
Subject: re: WACA Test

Pavilion, Stokes!

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 14:19:56
From: Michael V
ID: 449859
Subject: re: WACA Test

Pavilion, Prior!

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 14:30:33
From: dv
ID: 449865
Subject: re: WACA Test

Michael V said:


They’re coming onto the ground.

:)

Like Onan

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 14:45:03
From: Michael V
ID: 449868
Subject: re: WACA Test

Away you go, Broad.

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 14:58:10
From: Michael V
ID: 449877
Subject: re: WACA Test

Onya bike, Bresnan!

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 15:00:23
From: dv
ID: 449879
Subject: re: WACA Test

Bresnan, too, hie thee hence, sirrah!

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 15:22:31
From: Michael V
ID: 449886
Subject: re: WACA Test

Broad out. All out for 251.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 16:02:09
From: Michael V
ID: 449908
Subject: re: WACA Test

Australian 2nd innings starts…

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 16:42:51
From: bob(from black rock)
ID: 449914
Subject: re: WACA Test

They are doing it again Mum, the batsman hits the ball up in the air, then all the fieldsmen yell out, “cat shit” but where is the defecateing cat?

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 19:30:58
From: Michael V
ID: 449973
Subject: re: WACA Test

Warner out for 112.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 19:33:28
From: party_pants
ID: 449975
Subject: re: WACA Test

Michael V said:


Warner out for 112.

Tired looking shot. Still a great innings though.

I’ve been outside for all of 10 minutes this afternoon, and it was bloody hot. To be out there for a few hours running about is a good effort.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 19:34:32
From: Divine Angel
ID: 449976
Subject: re: WACA Test

Do they still wear ice vests?

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 19:37:44
From: party_pants
ID: 449978
Subject: re: WACA Test

Divine Angel said:


Do they still wear ice vests?

I know not.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 20:09:17
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 450009
Subject: re: WACA Test

So what’s the score ATM?

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 20:10:20
From: Dropbear
ID: 450012
Subject: re: WACA Test

Witty Rejoinder said:


So what’s the score ATM?

2/196 lead by 330

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 20:26:17
From: dv
ID: 450036
Subject: re: WACA Test

This is not looking like much of a contest.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 20:28:37
From: Michael V
ID: 450039
Subject: re: WACA Test

No, not really. But it is looking stronger by the minute that we might regain The Ashes. This is a good thing.

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 20:30:10
From: Divine Angel
ID: 450040
Subject: re: WACA Test

Is it because they suck or the Aussies finally pulled their finger out?

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 20:31:00
From: dv
ID: 450041
Subject: re: WACA Test

It’s a Christmas miracle.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 20:32:32
From: Michael V
ID: 450046
Subject: re: WACA Test

Aussies are playing well. But, they now have Johnson bowling again. He’s been outstanding.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 20:34:14
From: party_pants
ID: 450050
Subject: re: WACA Test

Divine Angel said:


Is it because they suck or the Aussies finally pulled their finger out?

Mostly the latter I think. The Aussies have improved a bit. I no longer use the term Smith the Unworthy for example. I think Smith is now worthy. Ditto Johnson and Warner.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 20:35:48
From: Michael V
ID: 450052
Subject: re: WACA Test

M J Clarke out for 23…

Bowled.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 20:39:29
From: Michael V
ID: 450061
Subject: re: WACA Test

party_pants said:


Divine Angel said:

Is it because they suck or the Aussies finally pulled their finger out?

Mostly the latter I think. The Aussies have improved a bit. I no longer use the term Smith the Unworthy for example. I think Smith is now worthy. Ditto Johnson and Warner.

Smith’s 1st innings was great to watch. Great contribution – set Australia up, I reckon.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 20:40:29
From: party_pants
ID: 450062
Subject: re: WACA Test

Gees, Slats interviewing Warner. I wonder if Slats still has his pants on.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 20:42:32
From: Michael V
ID: 450065
Subject: re: WACA Test

Hahahaha!

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 20:42:58
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 450066
Subject: re: WACA Test

This is not ideal preparation for the upcoming three test series against the South Africa.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 20:57:19
From: sibeen
ID: 450080
Subject: re: WACA Test

Christ, Prior really is an idiot. How the hell did he convince anyone to review that.

In the Adelaide test I’m fairly sure I saw him appeal when he nicked one.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 20:59:47
From: party_pants
ID: 450083
Subject: re: WACA Test

sibeen said:


Christ, Prior really is an idiot. How the hell did he convince anyone to review that.

In the Adelaide test I’m fairly sure I saw him appeal when he nicked one.

Wicket-keepers should be excluded from the huddle when deciding to go the DRS or not.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 21:00:10
From: diddly-squat
ID: 450084
Subject: re: WACA Test

sibeen said:


Christ, Prior really is an idiot. How the hell did he convince anyone to review that.

In the Adelaide test I’m fairly sure I saw him appeal when he nicked one.

So seems tomorrow we take the Ashes back.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 21:01:45
From: diddly-squat
ID: 450086
Subject: re: WACA Test

party_pants said:


sibeen said:

Christ, Prior really is an idiot. How the hell did he convince anyone to review that.

In the Adelaide test I’m fairly sure I saw him appeal when he nicked one.

Wicket-keepers should be excluded from the huddle when deciding to go the DRS or not.

Except that last series Prior was instrumental in the review process…

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 21:02:01
From: party_pants
ID: 450087
Subject: re: WACA Test

diddly-squat said:


sibeen said:

Christ, Prior really is an idiot. How the hell did he convince anyone to review that.

In the Adelaide test I’m fairly sure I saw him appeal when he nicked one.

So seems tomorrow we take the Ashes back.

Possibly, maybe the next day. Bat on for a bit longer, make them sweat out in the sun. Get 500 in front and then declare. The longer we bat on the bigger those cracks get.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 21:03:55
From: diddly-squat
ID: 450088
Subject: re: WACA Test

party_pants said:


diddly-squat said:

sibeen said:

Christ, Prior really is an idiot. How the hell did he convince anyone to review that.

In the Adelaide test I’m fairly sure I saw him appeal when he nicked one.

So seems tomorrow we take the Ashes back.

Possibly, maybe the next day. Bat on for a bit longer, make them sweat out in the sun. Get 500 in front and then declare. The longer we bat on the bigger those cracks get.

Totally, bat till 30min before lunch and then let the trio back at em…

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 21:04:03
From: party_pants
ID: 450089
Subject: re: WACA Test

diddly-squat said:


party_pants said:

sibeen said:

Christ, Prior really is an idiot. How the hell did he convince anyone to review that.

In the Adelaide test I’m fairly sure I saw him appeal when he nicked one.

Wicket-keepers should be excluded from the huddle when deciding to go the DRS or not.

Except that last series Prior was instrumental in the review process…

Yeah, but it was too good to last, he has reverted to type :)

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 22:18:20
From: tauto
ID: 450145
Subject: re: WACA Test

What a sweet day for watching cricket.

The poms have held the Ashes for three series and all the pommy broadcasters that came here to report told us to expect more pain, some predicting a 5-0 whitewash. Well they were somewhat right. :))

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 22:25:10
From: tauto
ID: 450156
Subject: re: WACA Test

Captain Cook’s endeavour is sinking.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 22:27:22
From: Michael V
ID: 450157
Subject: re: WACA Test

tauto said:


Captain Cook’s endeavour is sinking.
:)

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 22:28:40
From: roughbarked
ID: 450158
Subject: re: WACA Test

tauto said:


Captain Cook’s endeavour is sinking.

Does rather look that way.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 22:35:39
From: wookiemeister
ID: 450165
Subject: re: WACA Test

tauto said:


What a sweet day for watching cricket.

The poms have held the Ashes for three series and all the pommy broadcasters that came here to report told us to expect more pain, some predicting a 5-0 whitewash. Well they were somewhat right. :))


the only thing that beat the English was the weather i fancy

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 22:38:20
From: tauto
ID: 450167
Subject: re: WACA Test

wookiemeister said:


tauto said:

What a sweet day for watching cricket.

The poms have held the Ashes for three series and all the pommy broadcasters that came here to report told us to expect more pain, some predicting a 5-0 whitewash. Well they were somewhat right. :))


the only thing that beat the English was the weather i fancy

—-

and the better bowling, batting, fielding, sledging…..to be fair

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 22:40:31
From: roughbarked
ID: 450170
Subject: re: WACA Test

wookiemeister said:


tauto said:

What a sweet day for watching cricket.

The poms have held the Ashes for three series and all the pommy broadcasters that came here to report told us to expect more pain, some predicting a 5-0 whitewash. Well they were somewhat right. :))


the only thing that beat the English was the weather i fancy

Don’t think the poms ever did remarkably well at the WACA.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 22:46:20
From: Rule 303
ID: 450174
Subject: re: WACA Test

tauto said:

and the better bowling, batting, fielding, sledging…..to be fair

To misuse a famous quote – There was two sides out there today, but only one of them was playing Cricket.

;-)

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 22:48:28
From: roughbarked
ID: 450177
Subject: re: WACA Test

Rule 303 said:


tauto said:
and the better bowling, batting, fielding, sledging…..to be fair

To misuse a famous quote – There was two sides out there today, but only one of them was playing Cricket.

;-)

Hardly fair. The English were simply flogged by a better side than they had planned to meet.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 22:49:11
From: jjjust moi
ID: 450178
Subject: re: WACA Test

There was two sides out there today, but only one of them was playing Cricket succesfully.

fixed

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 22:51:00
From: roughbarked
ID: 450180
Subject: re: WACA Test

jjjust moi said:

There was two sides out there today, but only one of them was playing Cricket succesfully.

fixed

more sportingly put.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 22:52:17
From: tauto
ID: 450184
Subject: re: WACA Test

roughbarked said:


Rule 303 said:

tauto said:
and the better bowling, batting, fielding, sledging…..to be fair

To misuse a famous quote – There was two sides out there today, but only one of them was playing Cricket.

;-)

Hardly fair. The English were simply flogged by a better side than they had planned to meet.

—-
\

Pfft, all hail Boof!

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 22:53:48
From: Rule 303
ID: 450186
Subject: re: WACA Test

roughbarked said:

Hardly fair. The English were simply flogged by a better side than they had planned to meet.

They have looked awful for the whole series. Really shabby.

The idea that they had ‘planned to meet’ a lesser team is difficult to understand – Are you suggesting they could play better if they prepared for a better team? Seems like a difficult sort of argument to mount.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 22:54:50
From: roughbarked
ID: 450187
Subject: re: WACA Test

tauto said:


roughbarked said:

Rule 303 said:

To misuse a famous quote – There was two sides out there today, but only one of them was playing Cricket.

;-)

Hardly fair. The English were simply flogged by a better side than they had planned to meet.

—-
\

Pfft, all hail Boof!

fair comment

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 22:56:19
From: roughbarked
ID: 450188
Subject: re: WACA Test

Rule 303 said:


roughbarked said:
Hardly fair. The English were simply flogged by a better side than they had planned to meet.

They have looked awful for the whole series. Really shabby.

The idea that they had ‘planned to meet’ a lesser team is difficult to understand – Are you suggesting they could play better if they prepared for a better team? Seems like a difficult sort of argument to mount.

it is cricket. They flogged us last time and really hadn’t done their homework on where we are up to at this time. One could say their arrogance was what cost them.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 22:59:26
From: tauto
ID: 450189
Subject: re: WACA Test

Rule 303 said:


roughbarked said:
Hardly fair. The English were simply flogged by a better side than they had planned to meet.

They have looked awful for the whole series. Really shabby.

The idea that they had ‘planned to meet’ a lesser team is difficult to understand – Are you suggesting they could play better if they prepared for a better team? Seems like a difficult sort of argument to mount.

—-

Yes, we got rid of a foreign coach that sent MJ and DW away for not doing their homework.
Boof came in and sorted it out.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 23:05:20
From: roughbarked
ID: 450191
Subject: re: WACA Test

tauto said:


Rule 303 said:

roughbarked said:
Hardly fair. The English were simply flogged by a better side than they had planned to meet.

They have looked awful for the whole series. Really shabby.

The idea that they had ‘planned to meet’ a lesser team is difficult to understand – Are you suggesting they could play better if they prepared for a better team? Seems like a difficult sort of argument to mount.

—-

Yes, we got rid of a foreign coach that sent MJ and DW away for not doing their homework.
Boof came in and sorted it out.

Boof did return morale to the team and England underestimated their foe.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 23:14:06
From: roughbarked
ID: 450195
Subject: re: WACA Test

Rule 303 said:


Are you suggesting they could play better if they prepared for a better team? Seems like a difficult sort of argument to mount.

Yes. They as we do, have a range of players to select from. The problem was more that they didn’t try and change things about a bit. This could have made all the difference.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 23:52:07
From: tauto
ID: 450233
Subject: re: WACA Test

Tis so good to have the Pommies (you know who you are) eating a shit sandwich for breakfast. ;)

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 23:56:20
From: roughbarked
ID: 450236
Subject: re: WACA Test

Losing Trott couldn’t have helped England but at the same time, they could have left him at home and replaced him before they started out. His problems were documented.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 23:57:09
From: party_pants
ID: 450237
Subject: re: WACA Test

The BBC podcast was good tonight. Geoff Boycott was not a happy man.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/12/2013 23:59:05
From: roughbarked
ID: 450240
Subject: re: WACA Test

party_pants said:


The BBC podcast was good tonight. Geoff Boycott was not a happy man.

Well his lads underperformed. It would be easy to be upset about that.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 00:15:34
From: tauto
ID: 450248
Subject: re: WACA Test

I was going to say something

but it would be like a cat playing with a near dead mouse

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 00:22:35
From: roughbarked
ID: 450250
Subject: re: WACA Test

tauto said:


I was going to say something

but it would be like a cat playing with a near dead mouse

The odds may be stacked against it but this is still test cricket and there are still days to play.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 00:25:26
From: Stealth
ID: 450251
Subject: re: WACA Test

roughbarked said:


tauto said:

I was going to say something

but it would be like a cat playing with a near dead mouse

The odds may be stacked against it but this is still test cricket and there are still days to play.


I have tickets to go and watch the poms lose tomorrow, but the lurgi has got to me and I am not sure if I can handle sitting in the sun on a 39 degree day :(

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 00:27:46
From: party_pants
ID: 450254
Subject: re: WACA Test

Stealth said:


roughbarked said:

tauto said:

I was going to say something

but it would be like a cat playing with a near dead mouse

The odds may be stacked against it but this is still test cricket and there are still days to play.


I have tickets to go and watch the poms lose tomorrow, but the lurgi has got to me and I am not sure if I can handle sitting in the sun on a 39 degree day :(

I wouldn’t go in this heat, even if I had tickets and was feeling well.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 00:27:53
From: roughbarked
ID: 450255
Subject: re: WACA Test

Stealth said:


roughbarked said:

tauto said:

I was going to say something

but it would be like a cat playing with a near dead mouse

The odds may be stacked against it but this is still test cricket and there are still days to play.


I have tickets to go and watch the poms lose tomorrow, but the lurgi has got to me and I am not sure if I can handle sitting in the sun on a 39 degree day :(

:(

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 00:32:40
From: roughbarked
ID: 450257
Subject: re: WACA Test

party_pants said:


Stealth said:

roughbarked said:

The odds may be stacked against it but this is still test cricket and there are still days to play.


I have tickets to go and watch the poms lose tomorrow, but the lurgi has got to me and I am not sure if I can handle sitting in the sun on a 39 degree day :(

I wouldn’t go in this heat, even if I had tickets and was feeling well.

I am in the sun all day every day. Whatever the temperature.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 00:40:17
From: party_pants
ID: 450260
Subject: re: WACA Test

roughbarked said:


party_pants said:

Stealth said:

I have tickets to go and watch the poms lose tomorrow, but the lurgi has got to me and I am not sure if I can handle sitting in the sun on a 39 degree day :(

I wouldn’t go in this heat, even if I had tickets and was feeling well.

I am in the sun all day every day. Whatever the temperature.

Yeah, but I’m a whitey,

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 00:45:09
From: roughbarked
ID: 450261
Subject: re: WACA Test

party_pants said:


roughbarked said:

party_pants said:

I wouldn’t go in this heat, even if I had tickets and was feeling well.

I am in the sun all day every day. Whatever the temperature.

Yeah, but I’m a whitey,

I try not to show the sun much skin.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 00:47:06
From: Stealth
ID: 450262
Subject: re: WACA Test

roughbarked said:


party_pants said:

roughbarked said:

I am in the sun all day every day. Whatever the temperature.

Yeah, but I’m a whitey,

I try not to show the sun much skin.


I will probably pike, but I was going with two poms and the opportunity to personally rub their faces in defeat doesn’t come along often.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 00:49:13
From: roughbarked
ID: 450263
Subject: re: WACA Test

Stealth said:


roughbarked said:

party_pants said:

Yeah, but I’m a whitey,

I try not to show the sun much skin.


I will probably pike, but I was going with two poms and the opportunity to personally rub their faces in defeat doesn’t come along often.

Watermelon is good. the cold necktie is good. A good hat helps but grandstands tend to interrupt breezes.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 13:30:04
From: Michael V
ID: 450522
Subject: re: WACA Test

They are walking onto the WACA, now.

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 13:34:32
From: Michael V
ID: 450524
Subject: re: WACA Test

SIX!

14 in the first over (from Watson).

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 13:36:38
From: Dropbear
ID: 450526
Subject: re: WACA Test

they’d want to get the bastards in by lunch I reckon.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 13:37:47
From: party_pants
ID: 450527
Subject: re: WACA Test

Dropbear said:


they’d want to get the bastards in by lunch I reckon.

Nah, an hour before tea.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 13:38:27
From: diddly-squat
ID: 450530
Subject: re: WACA Test

Dropbear said:


they’d want to get the bastards in by lunch I reckon.

half hour before

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 13:40:32
From: Dropbear
ID: 450532
Subject: re: WACA Test

party_pants said:


Dropbear said:

they’d want to get the bastards in by lunch I reckon.

Nah, an hour before tea.

GTFOOH

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 13:43:37
From: diddly-squat
ID: 450534
Subject: re: WACA Test

anyone got a link for an online radio streaming site?

Grandstand has no online coverage
BBC5 is bound by rights subscription

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 13:44:26
From: Dropbear
ID: 450535
Subject: re: WACA Test

diddly-squat said:

anyone got a link for an online radio streaming site?

Grandstand has no online coverage
BBC5 is bound by rights subscription

good luck with that.. they’re flogging the online streaming rights this year

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 13:46:11
From: jjjust moi
ID: 450537
Subject: re: WACA Test

diddly-squat said:

anyone got a link for an online radio streaming site?

Grandstand has no online coverage
BBC5 is bound by rights subscription


Nein have been advertising streaming on cricket.com. But I suspect from the blurb that it’s pay as well.

Who’d pay to hear those fukwits?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 13:46:46
From: diddly-squat
ID: 450538
Subject: re: WACA Test

Dropbear said:


diddly-squat said:

anyone got a link for an online radio streaming site?

Grandstand has no online coverage
BBC5 is bound by rights subscription

good luck with that.. they’re flogging the online streaming rights this year

I know… was just wondering if anyone had an pirate-esque links

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 13:48:27
From: Dropbear
ID: 450539
Subject: re: WACA Test

I believe Michael V was streaming live on the Holiday forum earlier, but he passed out as soon as Watson hit a six and was never heard from again..

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 13:49:23
From: party_pants
ID: 450540
Subject: re: WACA Test

diddly-squat said:

anyone got a link for an online radio streaming site?

Grandstand has no online coverage
BBC5 is bound by rights subscription

Cricket Australia webiste. You can access both.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 13:52:37
From: diddly-squat
ID: 450542
Subject: re: WACA Test

party_pants said:


diddly-squat said:

anyone got a link for an online radio streaming site?

Grandstand has no online coverage
BBC5 is bound by rights subscription

Cricket Australia webiste. You can access both.

thanks

http://www.cricket.com.au/live/audio-stream

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 13:52:49
From: Dropbear
ID: 450543
Subject: re: WACA Test

party_pants said:


diddly-squat said:

anyone got a link for an online radio streaming site?

Grandstand has no online coverage
BBC5 is bound by rights subscription

Cricket Australia webiste. You can access both.

you need to pay from the cricket Australia site

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 13:53:26
From: Michael V
ID: 450544
Subject: re: WACA Test

Dropbear said:


I believe Michael V was streaming live on the Holiday forum earlier, but he passed out as soon as Watson hit a six and was never heard from again..

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 13:53:57
From: Michael V
ID: 450545
Subject: re: WACA Test

SIX!

Watson again.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 13:54:07
From: Dropbear
ID: 450546
Subject: re: WACA Test

it cuts out in 10-20 seconds

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 13:54:57
From: Michael V
ID: 450547
Subject: re: WACA Test

And Again!

Watto playing T20?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 13:55:26
From: diddly-squat
ID: 450548
Subject: re: WACA Test

Dropbear said:


it cuts out in 10-20 seconds

not here

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 13:55:40
From: Michael V
ID: 450549
Subject: re: WACA Test

Michael V said:


SIX!

Watson again.

And again!

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 13:56:01
From: diddly-squat
ID: 450550
Subject: re: WACA Test

Watson hits 3 sixes in a row

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 13:56:17
From: Dropbear
ID: 450551
Subject: re: WACA Test

diddly-squat said:


Dropbear said:

it cuts out in 10-20 seconds

not here

does here.. weird.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 13:56:57
From: diddly-squat
ID: 450552
Subject: re: WACA Test

22 off the last Swan over

Broad doesn’t have a fractured foot 8(

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 13:57:19
From: diddly-squat
ID: 450553
Subject: re: WACA Test

Dropbear said:


diddly-squat said:

Dropbear said:

it cuts out in 10-20 seconds

not here

does here.. weird.

The Grandstand player?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 13:57:46
From: Dropbear
ID: 450554
Subject: re: WACA Test

that and the beeb player, yes

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 14:05:43
From: Michael V
ID: 450555
Subject: re: WACA Test

Smith Out.

:(

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 14:06:10
From: Dropbear
ID: 450556
Subject: re: WACA Test

fnerk!

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 14:08:33
From: Dropbear
ID: 450557
Subject: re: WACA Test

ah well they’ve obviously been instructed to throw the bat! they’re there for a good time, not a long time.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 14:09:44
From: Michael V
ID: 450558
Subject: re: WACA Test

Dropbear said:


ah well they’ve obviously been instructed to throw the bat! they’re there for a good time, not a long time.

Sure seems like it.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 14:20:39
From: Dropbear
ID: 450559
Subject: re: WACA Test

It won’t suit Bailey any if he has been told to throw the bat.. he above all needs a decent score this innings…

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 14:21:21
From: Michael V
ID: 450560
Subject: re: WACA Test

What a six…

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 14:23:24
From: Michael V
ID: 450561
Subject: re: WACA Test

Watto gets The TON!

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 14:23:52
From: Dropbear
ID: 450562
Subject: re: WACA Test

5 wides? lol what happened?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 14:27:01
From: Michael V
ID: 450564
Subject: re: WACA Test

Watto dropped – then run out on 102.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 14:27:25
From: Michael V
ID: 450565
Subject: re: WACA Test

Sorry – 103.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 14:27:27
From: diddly-squat
ID: 450566
Subject: re: WACA Test

lol… Watson dropped and then run out because he walked

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 14:41:10
From: Dropbear
ID: 450567
Subject: re: WACA Test

diddly-squat said:

lol… Watson dropped and then run out because he walked

shakes head

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 14:41:42
From: Michael V
ID: 450568
Subject: re: WACA Test

Haddin – out for 5.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 14:43:08
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 450569
Subject: re: WACA Test

Michael V said:


Watto dropped – then run out on 102.

It’s like a carnival.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 14:43:42
From: Stealth
ID: 450571
Subject: re: WACA Test

Haddin must have been feeling sorry for the Poms, gave them catching practice until they got it right.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 14:49:09
From: Dropbear
ID: 450573
Subject: re: WACA Test

Bailey is going for a quick-fire 300 before lunch

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 14:50:20
From: diddly-squat
ID: 450574
Subject: re: WACA Test

Bailey – 4 sixes and 2 fours 28 from the over…

Australia declare with a lead of 503

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 14:51:59
From: Michael V
ID: 450576
Subject: re: WACA Test

How was that last over!

Brilliant!

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 14:52:40
From: Stealth
ID: 450577
Subject: re: WACA Test

diddly-squat said:

Bailey – 4 sixes and 2 fours 28 from the over…

Australia declare with a lead of 503


That would be 32. Change a six to a hard run two.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 14:54:59
From: Dropbear
ID: 450581
Subject: re: WACA Test

28 from the over.. cric info says that has equaled a record?

Amidst all the mania that was going on in the last few overs, I have forgotten the fact that Bailey has just equalled the record for the most runs scored in an over – which stands at 28 set by Brian Charles Lara against Robbie Peterson. Apologies for missing out on that, but there were lots of things happening and I couldn’t seem to remember that. Anway with that done, let’s take a look at what England have in front of them

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 14:56:13
From: diddly-squat
ID: 450582
Subject: re: WACA Test

Stealth said:


diddly-squat said:

Bailey – 4 sixes and 2 fours 28 from the over…

Australia declare with a lead of 503


That would be 32. Change a six to a hard run two.

sorry 3 sixes and 2 fours and a 2

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 14:57:25
From: Dropbear
ID: 450583
Subject: re: WACA Test

86.6 J Anderson to Bailey, SIX, and with that six, Australia have declared. Clarke has seen enough and in his own inimitable style, whistles and calls the batsmen in. The last six was a monster hit as well, pitched up on the stumps, Bailey just drilled that flat and hard over long-on, it goes a long way and falls on the white cloth. As soon as Bailey smashed that six, Clarke called them in – 28 off that Anderson over too
86.5 J Anderson to Bailey, SIX, that is a mishit folks! A mishit and it has crossed the ropes at long-off, the fielder thought he had a chance, but the ball kept sailing over his head
86.4 J Anderson to Bailey, FOUR, now Bailey is getting into the act, swung away across the line and beats deep backward square leg, the man just had a few paces to move to his left, but couldn’t get there
86.3 J Anderson to Bailey, 2 runs, flicked away to backward square leg, just a couple of runs this time
86.2 J Anderson to Bailey, SIX, Boink! Bailey has nailed that. Absolutely nailed it. Half volley on the stumps, Bailey clears his left-leg slightly and lofts hard and straight down the ground, Clarke and Co. like it, they love it in fact. That was a 105 metre hit. Bounces off the concrete
86.1 J Anderson to Bailey, FOUR, the width was there and the bounce too to play that kind of a stroke – short and bouncing outside off, Bailey just upper-dabs it well over Cook’s head at slip, races away to the third man fence

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 14:58:26
From: jjjust moi
ID: 450584
Subject: re: WACA Test

Dropbear said:


28 from the over.. cric info says that has equaled a record?

Amidst all the mania that was going on in the last few overs, I have forgotten the fact that Bailey has just equalled the record for the most runs scored in an over – which stands at 28 set by Brian Charles Lara against Robbie Peterson. Apologies for missing out on that, but there were lots of things happening and I couldn’t seem to remember that. Anway with that done, let’s take a look at what England have in front of them


I thought 36 by Sobers was the record for a six ball over?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 14:59:05
From: Dropbear
ID: 450585
Subject: re: WACA Test

jjjust moi said:


Dropbear said:

28 from the over.. cric info says that has equaled a record?

Amidst all the mania that was going on in the last few overs, I have forgotten the fact that Bailey has just equalled the record for the most runs scored in an over – which stands at 28 set by Brian Charles Lara against Robbie Peterson. Apologies for missing out on that, but there were lots of things happening and I couldn’t seem to remember that. Anway with that done, let’s take a look at what England have in front of them


I thought 36 by Sobers was the record for a six ball over?

thats 1st class matches, not test

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 15:00:14
From: Michael V
ID: 450587
Subject: re: WACA Test

First Ball WickeT!

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 15:00:55
From: jjjust moi
ID: 450589
Subject: re: WACA Test

Dropbear said:


jjjust moi said:

Dropbear said:

28 from the over.. cric info says that has equaled a record?

Amidst all the mania that was going on in the last few overs, I have forgotten the fact that Bailey has just equalled the record for the most runs scored in an over – which stands at 28 set by Brian Charles Lara against Robbie Peterson. Apologies for missing out on that, but there were lots of things happening and I couldn’t seem to remember that. Anway with that done, let’s take a look at what England have in front of them


I thought 36 by Sobers was the record for a six ball over?

thats 1st class matches, not test


Does it matter? They seem to want a record for anything nowdays…………..I blame Packer.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 15:00:56
From: diddly-squat
ID: 450590
Subject: re: WACA Test

harris takes a wicket off the first ball

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 15:01:07
From: Michael V
ID: 450591
Subject: re: WACA Test

Cook – a golden duck.

Well done Harris!

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 15:02:03
From: diddly-squat
ID: 450593
Subject: re: WACA Test

all out before lunch?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 15:02:32
From: Stealth
ID: 450594
Subject: re: WACA Test

Dropbear said:


jjjust moi said:

Dropbear said:

28 from the over.. cric info says that has equaled a record?

Amidst all the mania that was going on in the last few overs, I have forgotten the fact that Bailey has just equalled the record for the most runs scored in an over – which stands at 28 set by Brian Charles Lara against Robbie Peterson. Apologies for missing out on that, but there were lots of things happening and I couldn’t seem to remember that. Anway with that done, let’s take a look at what England have in front of them


I thought 36 by Sobers was the record for a six ball over?

thats 1st class matches, not test


When they mention a record, it has cavities. Tp th point of highest runs on an over in an ashes test, at the Waco by the 6th wicket partnership……

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 15:03:54
From: Dropbear
ID: 450595
Subject: re: WACA Test

unbelievable.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 15:04:01
From: Stealth
ID: 450597
Subject: re: WACA Test

Stealth said:


Dropbear said:

jjjust moi said:

I thought 36 by Sobers was the record for a six ball over?

thats 1st class matches, not test


When they mention a record, it has cavities. Tp th point of highest runs on an over in an ashes test, at the Waco by the 6th wicket partnership……

Stupid iPad…

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 15:04:08
From: diddly-squat
ID: 450598
Subject: re: WACA Test

Dropbear said:


unbelievable.

where’s dv??

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 15:05:27
From: Michael V
ID: 450599
Subject: re: WACA Test

Heh!

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 15:05:42
From: Dropbear
ID: 450600
Subject: re: WACA Test

diddly-squat said:


Dropbear said:

unbelievable.

where’s dv??

Where’s PJ? the fker has gone all quiet :)

(lol)

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 15:06:39
From: diddly-squat
ID: 450602
Subject: re: WACA Test

Dropbear said:


diddly-squat said:

Dropbear said:

unbelievable.

where’s dv??

Where’s PJ? the fker has gone all quiet :)

(lol)

and Dr Strangepork

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 15:07:56
From: diddly-squat
ID: 450603
Subject: re: WACA Test

referral to come

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 15:18:27
From: Dropbear
ID: 450621
Subject: re: WACA Test

twice today there has been 5 wides.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 15:19:15
From: Divine Angel
ID: 450624
Subject: re: WACA Test

Dropbear said:


twice today there has been 5 wides.

It prevents camel toe *boom tish *

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 15:48:19
From: party_pants
ID: 450667
Subject: re: WACA Test

Seems like in between all the “fun” I’m having at work today I have missed one of the most amazing sessions of cricket…

sigh

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 15:49:31
From: diddly-squat
ID: 450669
Subject: re: WACA Test

party_pants said:


Seems like in between all the “fun” I’m having at work today I have missed one of the most amazing sessions of cricket…

sigh

totes amazeballs

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 15:50:08
From: roughbarked
ID: 450672
Subject: re: WACA Test

party_pants said:


Seems like in between all the “fun” I’m having at work today I have missed one of the most amazing sessions of cricket…

sigh

I was out in the hot sun working but as soon as the cricket started, I turned the radio on and cranked the volume.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 15:50:10
From: Stealth
ID: 450673
Subject: re: WACA Test

party_pants said:


Seems like in between all the “fun” I’m having at work today I have missed one of the most amazing sessions of cricket…

sigh


Yep, and I am watching it on the couch rather than lapping up the at,ops here at the WACA :(

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 15:50:36
From: roughbarked
ID: 450675
Subject: re: WACA Test

diddly-squat said:


party_pants said:

Seems like in between all the “fun” I’m having at work today I have missed one of the most amazing sessions of cricket…

sigh

totes amazeballs

records falling right left and centre.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 15:50:48
From: Michael V
ID: 450676
Subject: re: WACA Test

party_pants said:


Seems like in between all the “fun” I’m having at work today I have missed one of the most amazing sessions of cricket…

sigh

Bugger.

:(

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 16:02:11
From: sibeen
ID: 450706
Subject: re: WACA Test

A hammering. A battering. A shellacking. A pummelling. A dismantling. A dismembering. A destruction. A thrashing. A drubbing. A trouncing. A rout. An annihilation.

That’s how the last session was just described in The Guardian

How the hell did I let myself get talked into having a 5 hour meeting that started at 10.

I am an idiot!

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 16:04:15
From: Dropbear
ID: 450709
Subject: re: WACA Test

That was one of the best sessions of cricket I’ve never seen.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 16:04:16
From: Divine Angel
ID: 450710
Subject: re: WACA Test

You couldn’t find invisible earbuds connected to a small radio?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 16:04:35
From: JudgeMental
ID: 450711
Subject: re: WACA Test

I am an idiot!

step 1. tick.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 16:05:21
From: Dropbear
ID: 450716
Subject: re: WACA Test

Divine Angel said:


You couldn’t find invisible earbuds connected to a small radio?

outrageous fake french accent: listen very carefully, i shall say this only once

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 16:06:11
From: Michael V
ID: 450719
Subject: re: WACA Test

sibeen said:


A hammering. A battering. A shellacking. A pummelling. A dismantling. A dismembering. A destruction. A thrashing. A drubbing. A trouncing. A rout. An annihilation.

That’s how the last session was just described in The Guardian

How the hell did I let myself get talked into having a 5 hour meeting that started at 10.

I am an idiot!

Hah!

:)

I have gout. That’s short for “get out of everything”. So I got to watch it.

;)

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 16:06:52
From: roughbarked
ID: 450720
Subject: re: WACA Test

Dropbear said:


That was one of the best sessions of cricket I’ve never seen.

Without any doubt. I only heard it on the radio and I had lots of giggles about how England couldn’t win a trick and the Aussies were walking on their grave.

ie: Bresnan caught one of those sixes and fell over the rope.
Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 16:07:57
From: sibeen
ID: 450722
Subject: re: WACA Test

Divine Angel said:


You couldn’t find invisible earbuds connected to a small radio?

Lets just say that I was ‘working feverishly’ on my iPud during most of the meeting since about 1:30. God knows how the guardian ashes website ended up on the screen.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 16:11:01
From: Dropbear
ID: 450723
Subject: re: WACA Test

sibeen said:


Divine Angel said:

You couldn’t find invisible earbuds connected to a small radio?

Lets just say that I was ‘working feverishly’ on my iPud during most of the meeting since about 1:30. God knows how the guardian ashes website ended up on the screen.

Angry Birds.. (nods sagely)

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 16:34:17
From: Michael V
ID: 450766
Subject: re: WACA Test

TV commentators said Broad has a fracture.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 16:35:35
From: roughbarked
ID: 450768
Subject: re: WACA Test

Michael V said:


TV commentators said Broad has a fracture.

It was only to be expected. The foot is very flexible but being hit with a hammer at 150 klicks wasn’t in the design plan.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 16:37:41
From: party_pants
ID: 450773
Subject: re: WACA Test

Anyway, time to go out into the warehouse and do some work. It’s bloody hot out there but at least I have a radio.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 16:52:22
From: diddly-squat
ID: 450788
Subject: re: WACA Test

Michael V said:


TV commentators said Broad has a fracture.

the guys on the radio said it wasn’t… this was earlier this morning though.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 16:53:54
From: roughbarked
ID: 450792
Subject: re: WACA Test

diddly-squat said:


Michael V said:

TV commentators said Broad has a fracture.

the guys on the radio said it wasn’t… this was earlier this morning though.

ever noticed how many news sources are later with the news than others? Often times later than other reports the same news sources released.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 16:55:29
From: diddly-squat
ID: 450794
Subject: re: WACA Test

sibeen said:


A hammering. A battering. A shellacking. A pummelling. A dismantling. A dismembering. A destruction. A thrashing. A drubbing. A trouncing. A rout. An annihilation.

That’s how the last session was just described in The Guardian

How the hell did I let myself get talked into having a 5 hour meeting that started at 10.

I am an idiot!

just move straight to stage 5 (acceptance)

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 16:55:35
From: Michael V
ID: 450795
Subject: re: WACA Test

diddly-squat said:


Michael V said:

TV commentators said Broad has a fracture.

the guys on the radio said it wasn’t… this was earlier this morning though.

(scratches head)

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 16:56:39
From: Divine Angel
ID: 450797
Subject: re: WACA Test

diddly-squat said:


Michael V said:

TV commentators said Broad has a fracture.

the guys on the radio said it wasn’t… this was earlier this morning though.

Photo here

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 17:03:23
From: diddly-squat
ID: 450811
Subject: re: WACA Test

Cadbury OUT!!! that was sweet

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 17:04:09
From: Stealth
ID: 450813
Subject: re: WACA Test

diddly-squat said:

Cadbury OUT!!! that was sweet


Even if no one knows how he got out, it is out.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 17:06:10
From: diddly-squat
ID: 450819
Subject: re: WACA Test

so Watson has pulled it out of the fire again…

with a quick fire ton and a couple of wickets it would seem he’s cemented his place for another three of four years…

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 17:06:14
From: Michael V
ID: 450820
Subject: re: WACA Test

diddly-squat said:

Cadbury OUT!!! that was sweet

Heh!

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 17:07:29
From: Stealth
ID: 450822
Subject: re: WACA Test

diddly-squat said:

so Watson has pulled it out of the fire again…

with a quick fire ton and a couple of wickets it would seem he’s cemented his place for another three of four years…


Enough that he doesn’t have to do his homework anymore?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 17:08:46
From: Tamb
ID: 450828
Subject: re: WACA Test

diddly-squat said:

Cadbury OUT!!! that was sweet

No comments about dark chocolate please :)

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 17:09:08
From: diddly-squat
ID: 450831
Subject: re: WACA Test

Stealth said:


diddly-squat said:

so Watson has pulled it out of the fire again…

with a quick fire ton and a couple of wickets it would seem he’s cemented his place for another three of four years…


Enough that he doesn’t have to do his homework anymore?

Boof don’t do homework

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 17:49:58
From: sibeen
ID: 450903
Subject: re: WACA Test

You, yes you, laddie.

FUCK OFF!

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 18:03:08
From: bob(from black rock)
ID: 450904
Subject: re: WACA Test

sibeen said:


You, yes you, laddie.

FUCK OFF!

Do you mean, FUCK (in the direction) of OFF?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 18:53:23
From: Michael V
ID: 450942
Subject: re: WACA Test

Pietersen – to the pavilion…

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 19:34:38
From: Dropbear
ID: 450966
Subject: re: WACA Test

Pomms are making this look easy

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2013 20:30:43
From: party_pants
ID: 450995
Subject: re: WACA Test

Hmmmn – could have sworn that missed the bat looking at the replay.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 00:53:50
From: diddly-squat
ID: 451215
Subject: re: WACA Test

Some great reading here

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/cricket/international/theashes/10170731/Ashes-third-Test-live.html

The Cook/Clarke stat near the top is awesome…

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 13:41:22
From: Michael V
ID: 451451
Subject: re: WACA Test

BLIMP

They’ve started.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 13:50:12
From: Dropbear
ID: 451452
Subject: re: WACA Test

I wonder how long this will drag on for … would be pretty special (in a bad way) if the poms can extract a draw from this…

Will certainly dent our confidence, given that Johnson has not been ‘unaplayable’ this test at all – on perhaps the most pace friendly wicket going around in world cricket today.

over to you Richie.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 14:06:59
From: Dropbear
ID: 451464
Subject: re: WACA Test

The WACA Ground may never again host a Test match, with Cricket Australia and the International Cricket Council united in their belief the venue no longer meets international standards.

The blow the venue received in September – it was excluded from next summer’s four-match series against India – is set to be compounded by warnings from administrators that Tests, and possibly limited-over matches, could be shifted interstate out of exasperation at the Western Australian Cricket Association’s long-stalled attempts to fund a major redevelopment of the ground.

Despite Channel Nine’s enthusiasm for Test matches in Perth, due to the favourable timeslot for eastern states viewers, and the wish of Indian authorities for a Test in Perth, CA left it off the list of hosts, primarily due to its poor facilities.

CA, which is led by former WACA vice-president Wally Edwards, justified its decision on the basis the WACA Ground had the smallest capacity of venues in contention to host matches and it was in need of “significant improvements”.
Advertisement

CA and the ICC, in Perth for the third Test, are poised to deliver an adverse review of the venue. It is believed their chief concerns relate to spectator comfort and safety, such as the often cramped walkways and the necessity for fans to queue for taps and toilets in sweltering temperatures.

The $500 million plan that had been in train for almost seven years was officially shelved late on Monday by the WACA.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricket/waca-may-never-host-a-test-match-again-20131217-2zho9.html#ixzz2nhK79c00

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 14:12:21
From: Michael V
ID: 451479
Subject: re: WACA Test

Dropbear said:


The WACA Ground may never again host a Test match, with Cricket Australia and the International Cricket Council united in their belief the venue no longer meets international standards.

The blow the venue received in September – it was excluded from next summer’s four-match series against India – is set to be compounded by warnings from administrators that Tests, and possibly limited-over matches, could be shifted interstate out of exasperation at the Western Australian Cricket Association’s long-stalled attempts to fund a major redevelopment of the ground.

Despite Channel Nine’s enthusiasm for Test matches in Perth, due to the favourable timeslot for eastern states viewers, and the wish of Indian authorities for a Test in Perth, CA left it off the list of hosts, primarily due to its poor facilities.

CA, which is led by former WACA vice-president Wally Edwards, justified its decision on the basis the WACA Ground had the smallest capacity of venues in contention to host matches and it was in need of “significant improvements”.
Advertisement

CA and the ICC, in Perth for the third Test, are poised to deliver an adverse review of the venue. It is believed their chief concerns relate to spectator comfort and safety, such as the often cramped walkways and the necessity for fans to queue for taps and toilets in sweltering temperatures.

The $500 million plan that had been in train for almost seven years was officially shelved late on Monday by the WACA.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricket/waca-may-never-host-a-test-match-again-20131217-2zho9.html#ixzz2nhK79c00

Huh!

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 14:13:28
From: party_pants
ID: 451482
Subject: re: WACA Test

Dropbear said:


The WACA Ground may never again host a Test match, with Cricket Australia and the International Cricket Council united in their belief the venue no longer meets international standards.

The blow the venue received in September – it was excluded from next summer’s four-match series against India – is set to be compounded by warnings from administrators that Tests, and possibly limited-over matches, could be shifted interstate out of exasperation at the Western Australian Cricket Association’s long-stalled attempts to fund a major redevelopment of the ground.

Despite Channel Nine’s enthusiasm for Test matches in Perth, due to the favourable timeslot for eastern states viewers, and the wish of Indian authorities for a Test in Perth, CA left it off the list of hosts, primarily due to its poor facilities.

CA, which is led by former WACA vice-president Wally Edwards, justified its decision on the basis the WACA Ground had the smallest capacity of venues in contention to host matches and it was in need of “significant improvements”.
Advertisement

CA and the ICC, in Perth for the third Test, are poised to deliver an adverse review of the venue. It is believed their chief concerns relate to spectator comfort and safety, such as the often cramped walkways and the necessity for fans to queue for taps and toilets in sweltering temperatures.

The $500 million plan that had been in train for almost seven years was officially shelved late on Monday by the WACA.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricket/waca-may-never-host-a-test-match-again-20131217-2zho9.html#ixzz2nhK79c00

They will pay the price for their lack of vision…

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 14:15:29
From: furious
ID: 451488
Subject: re: WACA Test

Kind of stupid spending all that money on a cricket ground and then someone else building a bigger stadium down the road…

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 14:15:31
From: Dropbear
ID: 451489
Subject: re: WACA Test

Take a look at the Adelaide Oval.. redeveloped up the yang, but it still retains a feel of the old ..

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 14:16:53
From: furious
ID: 451492
Subject: re: WACA Test

And if you build it, they will come… haven’t the two big football teams taken up residence there also?

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 14:20:08
From: Dropbear
ID: 451497
Subject: re: WACA Test

furious said:

  • Take a look at the Adelaide Oval.. redeveloped up the yang, but it still retains a feel of the old ..

And if you build it, they will come… haven’t the two big football teams taken up residence there also?

Yep.. The best move they have made in decades…

The main sporting stadium within 10 minutes walk of the central train station

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 14:21:17
From: diddly-squat
ID: 451498
Subject: re: WACA Test

Dropbear said:


furious said:
  • Take a look at the Adelaide Oval.. redeveloped up the yang, but it still retains a feel of the old ..

And if you build it, they will come… haven’t the two big football teams taken up residence there also?

Yep.. The best move they have made in decades…

The main sporting stadium within 10 minutes walk of the central train station

in fairness, everything is 10 min walk from the central train station in Adelaide

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 14:21:57
From: party_pants
ID: 451499
Subject: re: WACA Test

furious said:

  • They will pay the price for their lack of vision…

Kind of stupid spending all that money on a cricket ground and then someone else building a bigger stadium down the road…

Pre-GFC it looked like a monster plan, which should have begun construction in 2011 in time for today’s test match. Now it’s all gone to pot.

They need two grounds, one smallish ground of about 5,000 seats for domestic cricket, one large stadium for tests, ODIs and domestic T20. The WACA ground itself was always going to be somewhere in the middle, too small for the big matches and too big for the Sheffield Shield stuff. They need to sell off the WACA and spend the money building a new base over the river somewhere within the new stadium precinct.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 14:25:48
From: Dropbear
ID: 451501
Subject: re: WACA Test

diddly-squat said:


Dropbear said:

furious said:
  • Take a look at the Adelaide Oval.. redeveloped up the yang, but it still retains a feel of the old ..

And if you build it, they will come… haven’t the two big football teams taken up residence there also?

Yep.. The best move they have made in decades…

The main sporting stadium within 10 minutes walk of the central train station

in fairness, everything is 10 min walk from the central train station in Adelaide

AAMI Stadium wasn’t.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 14:32:02
From: jjjust moi
ID: 451508
Subject: re: WACA Test

Dropbear said:


furious said:
  • Take a look at the Adelaide Oval.. redeveloped up the yang, but it still retains a feel of the old ..

And if you build it, they will come… haven’t the two big football teams taken up residence there also?

Yep.. The best move they have made in decades…

The main sporting stadium within 10 minutes walk of the central train station


You would have to be a bloody fast walker.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 14:33:53
From: dv
ID: 451510
Subject: re: WACA Test

If Prior sets in and there is some support from Bresnan and maybe Broad, this could turn into a match

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 14:35:04
From: Dropbear
ID: 451512
Subject: re: WACA Test

jjjust moi said:


Dropbear said:

furious said:
  • Take a look at the Adelaide Oval.. redeveloped up the yang, but it still retains a feel of the old ..

And if you build it, they will come… haven’t the two big football teams taken up residence there also?

Yep.. The best move they have made in decades…

The main sporting stadium within 10 minutes walk of the central train station


You would have to be a bloody fast walker.

From Adelaide Station to the Oval? Across the footbridge??

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 14:35:52
From: Dropbear
ID: 451513
Subject: re: WACA Test

Yeh the way this is going, this will be the last test match we win this year.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 14:38:02
From: jjjust moi
ID: 451516
Subject: re: WACA Test

Dropbear said:


jjjust moi said:

Dropbear said:

Yep.. The best move they have made in decades…

The main sporting stadium within 10 minutes walk of the central train station


You would have to be a bloody fast walker.

From Adelaide Station to the Oval? Across the footbridge??


Thought the new Perth stadium was being refered to.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 14:50:38
From: sibeen
ID: 451533
Subject: re: WACA Test

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 14:50:39
From: party_pants
ID: 451534
Subject: re: WACA Test

Gottim!

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 14:51:15
From: diddly-squat
ID: 451536
Subject: re: WACA Test

get out, piss off, you’re out!!!

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 15:03:00
From: Michael V
ID: 451554
Subject: re: WACA Test

Goodonya Stokes!

First Pommie TON!

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 15:14:08
From: Michael V
ID: 451567
Subject: re: WACA Test

SIX: Stokes.

Well done!

Now 113…

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 15:33:20
From: diddly-squat
ID: 451591
Subject: re: WACA Test

the poms could do this…

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 15:35:32
From: pommiejohn
ID: 451594
Subject: re: WACA Test

diddly-squat said:

the poms could do this…

I wanted to say that, but I’m scared I’ll jinx it :)

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 15:37:00
From: Dropbear
ID: 451595
Subject: re: WACA Test

diddly-squat said:

the poms could do this…

Still a long way to go

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 16:21:08
From: party_pants
ID: 451637
Subject: re: WACA Test

Well played Mr Stokes, but that’s enough for now… off you go.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 16:23:50
From: Obviousman
ID: 451638
Subject: re: WACA Test

He’s made a name for himself in this Test.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 16:26:02
From: Michael V
ID: 451640
Subject: re: WACA Test

Yes.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 16:29:23
From: Obviousman
ID: 451641
Subject: re: WACA Test

They have made a great comeback, all credit to them, but I can’t see them making 160 runs with the tail enders.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 16:29:54
From: Michael V
ID: 451642
Subject: re: WACA Test

Swann gone…

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 16:30:06
From: Obviousman
ID: 451643
Subject: re: WACA Test

Like I said…..

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 16:36:21
From: Michael V
ID: 451646
Subject: re: WACA Test

Bresnan – on ya bike…

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 16:36:37
From: Obviousman
ID: 451647
Subject: re: WACA Test

And then there was one…

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 16:37:11
From: Dropbear
ID: 451648
Subject: re: WACA Test

had to come back to say “YAY!”..

was looking worrisome for a while there

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 16:43:58
From: Dropbear
ID: 451652
Subject: re: WACA Test

English resistance was only really two batsmen.. not good enough

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 16:45:35
From: Michael V
ID: 451654
Subject: re: WACA Test

DONE

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 16:45:55
From: Michael V
ID: 451655
Subject: re: WACA Test

THE ASHES ARE OURS!

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 16:46:20
From: sibeen
ID: 451656
Subject: re: WACA Test

FUUUUUUCK OFFFFFFFFFFFF!

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 16:46:46
From: party_pants
ID: 451657
Subject: re: WACA Test

Bew Yutey !!!

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 16:46:54
From: Divine Angel
ID: 451658
Subject: re: WACA Test

Michael V said:


THE ASHES ARE OURS!

Just don’t suck them up in the vacuum cleaner.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 16:47:10
From: Obviousman
ID: 451659
Subject: re: WACA Test

Has anyone ever been boned by a low flying camera?

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 16:48:34
From: Dropbear
ID: 451660
Subject: re: WACA Test

sibeen said:


FUUUUUUCK OFFFFFFFFFFFF!

quite

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 16:49:19
From: JudgeMental
ID: 451661
Subject: re: WACA Test

there you go. that’s as good as it’ll get. a picture.

;-)

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 16:52:40
From: JudgeMental
ID: 451662
Subject: re: WACA Test

hey, i was only joking!

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 16:54:07
From: pommiejohn
ID: 451663
Subject: re: WACA Test

Bugger!

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 16:56:39
From: party_pants
ID: 451664
Subject: re: WACA Test

I seem to have a salty discharge in my eye..

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 16:58:26
From: JudgeMental
ID: 451665
Subject: re: WACA Test

I seem to have a salty discharge in my eye..

dear oh dear oh dear.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 17:01:48
From: Arts
ID: 451668
Subject: re: WACA Test

oh hooray

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 17:07:48
From: Michael V
ID: 451673
Subject: re: WACA Test

party_pants said:


I seem to have a salty discharge in my eye..
Heh! :)

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 17:12:18
From: Michael V
ID: 451678
Subject: re: WACA Test

WELL DONE AUSTRALIA.

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 17:21:25
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 451685
Subject: re: WACA Test

Michael V said:


WELL DONE AUSTRALIA.

:)

+1

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 17:26:51
From: Ian
ID: 451691
Subject: re: WACA Test

party_pants said:


I seem to have a salty discharge in my eye..

Cum on Ozzie!

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 17:41:07
From: Stealth
ID: 451704
Subject: re: WACA Test

I have just texted a lot of my Pommie mates something along the lines of

“Oh Yeah, we won, we won we won the Ashes, we won, we won we won the Ashes, we won, we won we won the Ashes, we won, we won we won the Ashes,we won, we won we won the Ashes, we won, we won we won the Ashes, we won, we won we won the Ashes, we won, we won we won the Ashes, we won, we won we won the Ashes, we won, we won we won the Ashes, we won, we won we won the Ashes, we won, we won we won the Ashes, we won, we won we won the Ashes, we won, we won we won the Ashes.

Aussie, Aussie, Aussie, Oi, Oi, Oi”

and I seem to be getting quite a negative vibe in response… can’t figure that one out…

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 17:47:27
From: Michael V
ID: 451712
Subject: re: WACA Test

Yair, goodonyer.

;)

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 17:51:33
From: Stealth
ID: 451719
Subject: re: WACA Test

Obviousman said:


Has anyone ever been boned by a low flying camera?

Not sure, but there was an incident involving a segway mounted camera (and cameraman) coming to grief on the field.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:20:32
From: tauto
ID: 451917
Subject: re: WACA Test

What a sweet, sweet victory after three thrashings from the poms.

Special mention to the comeback kids.
Brad Haddin: 36yo, Brilliant keeping and batting. Best form of his career.
Mitchell Johnson, 32yo, dropped early this year for homework issues, now probably the best fast bowler in the world.
Ryan Harris 34yo, Amazing consistency at the highest level. Would have got more wickets if he didn’t bowl so well.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:23:27
From: Dropbear
ID: 451918
Subject: re: WACA Test

Johnson wasn’t the deciding factor in this test at all.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:25:52
From: tauto
ID: 451919
Subject: re: WACA Test

Dropbear said:


Johnson wasn’t the deciding factor in this test at all.

What was?

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:25:53
From: roughbarked
ID: 451920
Subject: re: WACA Test

Dropbear said:


Johnson wasn’t the deciding factor in this test at all.

True.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:26:37
From: roughbarked
ID: 451921
Subject: re: WACA Test

tauto said:


Dropbear said:

Johnson wasn’t the deciding factor in this test at all.

What was?

A number of factors. Johnson was one of them.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:28:29
From: party_pants
ID: 451922
Subject: re: WACA Test

tauto said:


What a sweet, sweet victory after three thrashings from the poms.

Special mention to the comeback kids.
Brad Haddin: 36yo, Brilliant keeping and batting. Best form of his career.
Mitchell Johnson, 32yo, dropped early this year for homework issues, now probably the best fast bowler in the world.
Ryan Harris 34yo, Amazing consistency at the highest level. Would have got more wickets if he didn’t bowl so well.

David Warner – once he stops punching people at nightclubs and concentrates in his batting he is ok.
Steve Smith – or Smith the Worthy as I now call him.
Nathan Lyon – he isn’t a weapon likme Warne, but he’s a far better bowler than people give him credit for. Please can we stop dumping him from the side at the drop of a hat whenever there is some 19-year old spinner that bowls one great ball to take a wicket.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:29:14
From: tauto
ID: 451923
Subject: re: WACA Test

roughbarked said:


tauto said:

Dropbear said:

Johnson wasn’t the deciding factor in this test at all.

What was?

A number of factors. Johnson was one of them.

—-

That is not a punchline……

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:30:57
From: Dropbear
ID: 451924
Subject: re: WACA Test

tauto said:


Dropbear said:

Johnson wasn’t the deciding factor in this test at all.

What was?

Shit batting and bowing vs a good team effort of batting / bowling.. Wasn’t a one man factor like say Brisbane

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:31:00
From: roughbarked
ID: 451925
Subject: re: WACA Test

tauto said:


roughbarked said:

tauto said:

What was?

A number of factors. Johnson was one of them.

—-

That is not a punchline……

Oh, OK..

Smithy was.
Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:31:50
From: Dropbear
ID: 451926
Subject: re: WACA Test

Lyon isn’t really a fearsome bowler.. IMO

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:32:03
From: party_pants
ID: 451927
Subject: re: WACA Test

tauto said:


Dropbear said:

Johnson wasn’t the deciding factor in this test at all.

What was?

Lack of application and patience from the England top order. Every time they looked like getting a big partnership going the Aussie bowlers managed to tighten things up, and one of them played a careless attacking shot and got out.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:32:58
From: roughbarked
ID: 451928
Subject: re: WACA Test

Dropbear said:


tauto said:

Dropbear said:

Johnson wasn’t the deciding factor in this test at all.

What was?

Shit batting and bowing vs a good team effort of batting / bowling.. Wasn’t a one man factor like say Brisbane

Good fielding.

How many 5 byes did Mitchell generate?

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:33:13
From: tauto
ID: 451929
Subject: re: WACA Test

Nathan Lyon – he isn’t a weapon likme Warne, but he’s a far better bowler than people give him credit for. Please can we stop dumping him from the side at the drop of a hat whenever there is some 19-year old spinner that bowls one great ball to take a wicket

——

Check Lyons bowling figures this series against Swann (song).

Lyon would be in the thirties while I think Swann is up in the nineties.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:33:40
From: roughbarked
ID: 451931
Subject: re: WACA Test

party_pants said:


tauto said:

Dropbear said:

Johnson wasn’t the deciding factor in this test at all.

What was?

Lack of application and patience from the England top order. Every time they looked like getting a big partnership going the Aussie bowlers managed to tighten things up, and one of them played a careless attacking shot and got out.

ie: shit batting. Apart from Stokes that is.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:33:46
From: Dropbear
ID: 451932
Subject: re: WACA Test

Plus really shit discipline and fielding from the poms

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:34:15
From: party_pants
ID: 451933
Subject: re: WACA Test

Dropbear said:


Lyon isn’t really a fearsome bowler.. IMO

No. But he can dry up the runs from one end and let the quicks go at them from the other. Or if the quicks have them tied down at the other end he can get wickets when batsmen target him.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:34:17
From: roughbarked
ID: 451934
Subject: re: WACA Test

tauto said:


Nathan Lyon – he isn’t a weapon likme Warne, but he’s a far better bowler than people give him credit for. Please can we stop dumping him from the side at the drop of a hat whenever there is some 19-year old spinner that bowls one great ball to take a wicket

——

Check Lyons bowling figures this series against Swann (song).

Lyon would be in the thirties while I think Swann is up in the nineties.

He’s a hard working bowler.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:35:17
From: roughbarked
ID: 451935
Subject: re: WACA Test

Dropbear said:


Plus really shit discipline and fielding from the poms

Yes. it was a test that the poms lost. The couldn’t capitalise on Stokes work.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:38:08
From: roughbarked
ID: 451936
Subject: re: WACA Test

I haven’t checked the scorecard to see how many byes or wides were in the sum of the England total but I recall they were 3 for 22 or something and only 13 were off the bat.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:39:02
From: tauto
ID: 451937
Subject: re: WACA Test

It’s not fair we speak like this without a pomm around to taunt.

I

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:39:18
From: Dropbear
ID: 451938
Subject: re: WACA Test

tauto said:


It’s not fair we speak like this without a pomm around to taunt.

I

Trollololol… Indeed

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:41:33
From: jjjust moi
ID: 451939
Subject: re: WACA Test

Dropbear said:


tauto said:

It’s not fair we speak like this without a pomm around to taunt.

I

Trollololol… Indeed


car is probably lurking

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:41:53
From: tauto
ID: 451940
Subject: re: WACA Test

Dropbear said:


tauto said:

It’s not fair we speak like this without a pomm around to taunt.

I

Trollololol… Indeed

—-

Like their bowlers, they have gone into their shell…

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:43:45
From: tauto
ID: 451941
Subject: re: WACA Test

jjjust moi said:


Dropbear said:

tauto said:

It’s not fair we speak like this without a pomm around to taunt.

I

Trollololol… Indeed


car is probably lurking

—-

car is not a pom

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:44:01
From: party_pants
ID: 451942
Subject: re: WACA Test

I just really wish we could move the cricket to the new stadium when it is built. it’s only over the river and maybe 800m along – so it should get the same breeze and the same climate to produce a similar pitch. Be so nice if ordinary patrons could get a seat in the shade.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:45:29
From: roughbarked
ID: 451943
Subject: re: WACA Test

party_pants said:


I just really wish we could move the cricket to the new stadium when it is built. it’s only over the river and maybe 800m along – so it should get the same breeze and the same climate to produce a similar pitch. Be so nice if ordinary patrons could get a seat in the shade.

It is what is under the pitch that makes the big difference.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:46:12
From: party_pants
ID: 451944
Subject: re: WACA Test

the other great factor – the Kookaburra ball doesn’t swing much – which negates the strength of the English attach. The pitches so far haven’t spun much, which takes much away from Swann’s strengths.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:47:03
From: tauto
ID: 451945
Subject: re: WACA Test

party_pants said:


I just really wish we could move the cricket to the new stadium when it is built. it’s only over the river and maybe 800m along – so it should get the same breeze and the same climate to produce a similar pitch. Be so nice if ordinary patrons could get a seat in the shade.

——

Lamentations ——> English Ash bash…..

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:50:17
From: party_pants
ID: 451946
Subject: re: WACA Test

roughbarked said:


party_pants said:

I just really wish we could move the cricket to the new stadium when it is built. it’s only over the river and maybe 800m along – so it should get the same breeze and the same climate to produce a similar pitch. Be so nice if ordinary patrons could get a seat in the shade.

It is what is under the pitch that makes the big difference.

Yes, but they could source the clay from the same place as they do now. It comes from a place about 200 km south of Perth.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:51:16
From: roughbarked
ID: 451947
Subject: re: WACA Test

party_pants said:


the other great factor – the Kookaburra ball doesn’t swing much – which negates the strength of the English attach. The pitches so far haven’t spun much, which takes much away from Swann’s strengths.

Not really an excuse. England has played with the kookaburra rock on Australian pitches enough times to know what they are doing. No. The problem is more complacency. They thought they were the favourites to win and couldn’t deal with the grief.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:51:20
From: jjjust moi
ID: 451948
Subject: re: WACA Test

tauto said:


jjjust moi said:

Dropbear said:

Trollololol… Indeed


car is probably lurking


you certain about that? regardless of his name.

—-

car is not a pom

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:51:55
From: jjjust moi
ID: 451949
Subject: re: WACA Test

party_pants said:


roughbarked said:

party_pants said:

I just really wish we could move the cricket to the new stadium when it is built. it’s only over the river and maybe 800m along – so it should get the same breeze and the same climate to produce a similar pitch. Be so nice if ordinary patrons could get a seat in the shade.

It is what is under the pitch that makes the big difference.

Yes, but they could source the clay from the same place as they do now. It comes from a place about 200 km south of Perth.


Harvey.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:53:29
From: tauto
ID: 451950
Subject: re: WACA Test

party_pants said:


the other great factor – the Kookaburra ball doesn’t swing much – which negates the strength of the English attach. The pitches so far haven’t spun much, which takes much away from Swann’s strengths.

—-

Wrong. It the same pitch Lyon bowls on as Swann.

As for the Duke/ Kookaburra swing thing, in Oz the wicket gets hotter and negates the swing. It will swing early when cooler and if it is cloudy, once it gets hot there is too much turbulent air coming off the pitch for swing to work..

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:53:48
From: party_pants
ID: 451951
Subject: re: WACA Test

jjjust moi said:


party_pants said:

roughbarked said:

It is what is under the pitch that makes the big difference.

Yes, but they could source the clay from the same place as they do now. It comes from a place about 200 km south of Perth.


Harvey.

Yeah. The property used to be owned by the family of the head curator of the 1960s or 710s, but eventually it was sold. In the late 1990s or early 2000s they went back there and asked the new owner for a deal on sourcing clay. He was only too happy to oblige. I understand some club cricket grounds also source their clay from there.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:54:34
From: roughbarked
ID: 451952
Subject: re: WACA Test

tauto said:


party_pants said:

the other great factor – the Kookaburra ball doesn’t swing much – which negates the strength of the English attach. The pitches so far haven’t spun much, which takes much away from Swann’s strengths.

—-

Wrong. It the same pitch Lyon bowls on as Swann.

As for the Duke/ Kookaburra swing thing, in Oz the wicket gets hotter and negates the swing. It will swing early when cooler and if it is cloudy, once it gets hot there is too much turbulent air coming off the pitch for swing to work..

Yair.. Swing bowlers pray for clouds

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:55:05
From: party_pants
ID: 451953
Subject: re: WACA Test

tauto said:


Wrong. It the same pitch Lyon bowls on as Swann.

As for the Duke/ Kookaburra swing thing, in Oz the wicket gets hotter and negates the swing. It will swing early when cooler and if it is cloudy, once it gets hot there is too much turbulent air coming off the pitch for swing to work..

Lyon doesn’t spin it any more than Swann, but he has better flight, and his captain sets better field placings.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 22:59:04
From: jjjust moi
ID: 451954
Subject: re: WACA Test

The nein idiots were talking about an abandoned match in the W.I., because of the state of the pitch.

They must have forgotten the one in Perth that was abandoned for the same reason. 80s I think.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 23:00:37
From: tauto
ID: 451955
Subject: re: WACA Test

party_pants said:


tauto said:

Wrong. It the same pitch Lyon bowls on as Swann.

As for the Duke/ Kookaburra swing thing, in Oz the wicket gets hotter and negates the swing. It will swing early when cooler and if it is cloudy, once it gets hot there is too much turbulent air coming off the pitch for swing to work..

Lyon doesn’t spin it any more than Swann, but he has better flight, and his captain sets better field placings.

—-

Nah, Lyon has improved heaps with his accuracy while Swann is fading into song…

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 23:02:18
From: party_pants
ID: 451956
Subject: re: WACA Test

jjjust moi said:


The nein idiots were talking about an abandoned match in the W.I., because of the state of the pitch.

They must have forgotten the one in Perth that was abandoned for the same reason. 80s I think.

Yeah, state game. I think it was WA v QLD. There was a great big crack right down the middle of the pitch. So wide that Geoff Marsh famously stuck his bat inside the crack and stood it upright. There were plenty of photos of it at the time.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 23:02:59
From: JudgeMental
ID: 451957
Subject: re: WACA Test

here have a nice pic of it.

bwhahahahahahaha.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 23:05:27
From: tauto
ID: 451958
Subject: re: WACA Test

JudgeMental said:


here have a nice pic of it.

bwhahahahahahaha.

—-

Oi, where is the merry christmas

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 23:06:03
From: jjjust moi
ID: 451959
Subject: re: WACA Test

party_pants said:


jjjust moi said:

The nein idiots were talking about an abandoned match in the W.I., because of the state of the pitch.

They must have forgotten the one in Perth that was abandoned for the same reason. 80s I think.

Yeah, state game. I think it was WA v QLD. There was a great big crack right down the middle of the pitch. So wide that Geoff Marsh famously stuck his bat inside the crack and stood it upright. There were plenty of photos of it at the time.


Our greenkeeper at the golf club was a fanboi of the curator at the time.

Telling us how he monitored the drainage runoff, weighed the clippings yada yada yada.

I think he got sacked the week of that debacle.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 23:08:26
From: JudgeMental
ID: 451960
Subject: re: WACA Test

the actual turf for the wicket was grown in east perth. can’t remember the street name. end of wellington where all the new stuff is. was a roped off area….4 star pickets with a bit of rope strung between them. macey street.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/12/2013 23:09:54
From: party_pants
ID: 451961
Subject: re: WACA Test

jjjust moi said:


party_pants said:

jjjust moi said:

The nein idiots were talking about an abandoned match in the W.I., because of the state of the pitch.

They must have forgotten the one in Perth that was abandoned for the same reason. 80s I think.

Yeah, state game. I think it was WA v QLD. There was a great big crack right down the middle of the pitch. So wide that Geoff Marsh famously stuck his bat inside the crack and stood it upright. There were plenty of photos of it at the time.


Our greenkeeper at the golf club was a fanboi of the curator at the time.

Telling us how he monitored the drainage runoff, weighed the clippings yada yada yada.

I think he got sacked the week of that debacle.

I remember watching the game on TV – back in the day when we used to get the afternoon session of Sheffield Sheild games on TV.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/12/2013 07:44:28
From: roughbarked
ID: 452020
Subject: re: WACA Test

On ya, Boof.

“I can’t remember such a shift in power between two teams in such a short space of time,” Gilchrist said.

“Obviously Mitchell Johnson has been of vital importance but I continue to go back to Darren Lehmann and the seeds that he would have planted as soon as he assumed that role.

“His fingerprints are all over the atmosphere around that team.”

Reply Quote