Date: 16/12/2013 22:20:52
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 451103
Subject: KCNA Random Insult Generator
I’d like random pictures as well
I’d like random pictures as well
Piss-poor, it hasn’t got the basics like, you fuckwit, dick head, cock sucker etc etc 2/10 must do better next term.
bob(from black rock) said:
Piss-poor, it hasn’t got the basics like, you fuckwit, dick head, cock sucker etc etc 2/10 must do better next term.
I think you want the bogan insult generator, yet to be made.
poikilotherm said:
bob(from black rock) said:
Piss-poor, it hasn’t got the basics like, you fuckwit, dick head, cock sucker etc etc 2/10 must do better next term.
I think you want the bogan insult generator, yet to be made.
Ta poik, do you know if I can get one for Christmas? could save my neuron a lot of work.
Never mind the bogan bit, what sort of insult generator is it that makes no reference to hamsters or elderberries?
aghh god, someone call me a c#nt.
transition said:
aghh god, someone call me a c#nt.
Why do you wish to be called a c#nt my good man?
The Rev Dodgson said:
transition said:
aghh god, someone call me a c#nt.
Why do you wish to be called a c#nt my good man?
He wishes to be called a c#nt because he’s worth 1/100 of a dollar.
seems to me that people here are really good at insults and a random generator for this is superfluous…
a random compliment generator, that’s something…
Arts said:
seems to me that people here are really good at insults and a random generator for this is superfluous…a random compliment generator, that’s something…
You’re welcome.
*
*if you haven’t anything nice to say, say nothing.
We need one of those mathematics people to explain why the generator does not produce random insults.
if you can’t be kind, be quiet
Arts said:
:)
if you can’t be kind, be quiet
do no ham.
JudgeMental said:
do no ham.
Because pigs are unclean?
JudgeMental said:
do no ham.:)
JudgeMental said:
do no ham.
that’s illegal…
hmmmmaybe not in Arizona
Arts said:
JudgeMental said:
do no ham.
that’s illegal…
hmmmmaybe not in Arizona
>Why do you wish to be called a c#nt my good man?
Hints of sadism, something I can work with :)
The meaning of N Korea’s strange jibes
South Korea has even begun to keep count.
A government official recently claimed that North Korea’s official state media has insulted the South Korean president more than 1,700 times this year alone.
That is an average of 10 insults a day.
He is variously called “a lackey”, “a stooge”, “a dictator” and the leader of “a gang of traitors”.
The official admitted that the jibes were sometimes “downright silly”.
But the language chosen by North Korea to attack its opponents can border on the terrifying.
Last year, for example, it threatened to reduce South Korea “to ashes” and, more recently, warned of a “fire shower” of nuclear retaliation.
So, just how much attention should we be paying to this kind of rhetoric?
more….
N. Korea’s news keeps tone at high pitch
In the world according to North Korea’s official news agency, the country is a paragon of peace, forced against its wishes to detonate a nuclear bomb last week to foil the sinister plots of U.S. “warmongers,” South Korean “lackeys” and Japanese “reactionaries.”
Should outsiders dare challenge North Korea’s “peerlessly brilliant commander” Kim Jong Il, they will be wiped out “with a barrage of fire” because the country “shows no mercy to peace wreckers and war provocateurs,” the agency says.
The propaganda spewed out by the Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) can make irresistible comic fodder: It has even inspired one website, NK News, to post a tongue-in-cheek “KCNA random insult generator” that tosses out phrases based on the agency’s florid prose, such as “You swollen-headed political dwarf!”
more….
CrazyNeutrino said:
The meaning of N Korea’s strange jibes
South Korea has even begun to keep count.
A government official recently claimed that North Korea’s official state media has insulted the South Korean president more than 1,700 times this year alone.
That is an average of 10 insults a day.
He is variously called “a lackey”, “a stooge”, “a dictator” and the leader of “a gang of traitors”.
The official admitted that the jibes were sometimes “downright silly”.
But the language chosen by North Korea to attack its opponents can border on the terrifying.
Last year, for example, it threatened to reduce South Korea “to ashes” and, more recently, warned of a “fire shower” of nuclear retaliation.
So, just how much attention should we be paying to this kind of rhetoric?
more….
Gonna be messy for NK. The son is attempting to consolidate power and offing a few, but if he goes silly, he will be seen as a threat by the generals and they will join against him and his loyal forces.
I reckon it will implode the middle of next year, the senior staff have now been put on notice and that gives them planning time. The confounding issue will be how completely the NK people have been indoctrinated, but U have faith there, that they know what a pariah they are in the world and what a nutjob their leadership is. They are powerless not ignorant.
Skunkworks said:
CrazyNeutrino said:The meaning of N Korea’s strange jibes
South Korea has even begun to keep count.
A government official recently claimed that North Korea’s official state media has insulted the South Korean president more than 1,700 times this year alone.
That is an average of 10 insults a day.
He is variously called “a lackey”, “a stooge”, “a dictator” and the leader of “a gang of traitors”.
The official admitted that the jibes were sometimes “downright silly”.
But the language chosen by North Korea to attack its opponents can border on the terrifying.
Last year, for example, it threatened to reduce South Korea “to ashes” and, more recently, warned of a “fire shower” of nuclear retaliation.
So, just how much attention should we be paying to this kind of rhetoric?
more….
Gonna be messy for NK. The son is attempting to consolidate power and offing a few, but if he goes silly, he will be seen as a threat by the generals and they will join against him and his loyal forces.
I reckon it will implode the middle of next year, the senior staff have now been put on notice and that gives them planning time. The confounding issue will be how completely the NK people have been indoctrinated, but U have faith there, that they know what a pariah they are in the world and what a nutjob their leadership is. They are powerless not ignorant.
But they are not informed. They have no information to make decisions with other than what dear leader gives them. Hence they are actually unintentionally ignorant.
A well placed cruise missile would possibly do more good than harm.
>The son is attempting to consolidate power and offing a few, but if he goes silly, he will be seen as a threat by the generals and they will join against him and his loyal forces.
That would depend on how free they are to organise. Regimes of this kind are usually infested with state security personnel and informants at every level.
Kingy said:
But they are not informed. They have no information to make decisions with other than what dear leader gives them. Hence they are actually unintentionally ignorant.A well placed cruise missile would possibly do more good than harm.
meh Jews in the Warsaw ghetto in the 1940s knew what was happening in the world, the border is porus in areas, radios can be modified. They know what is going on. This will lead to a deeper debate about knowledge, perception and information and I get all that. Not saying they are all switched on, nor that all are brainwashed. Just I reckon they know as a nation they are a pariah and it is hurting them individually. They just need to look at the bright lights of S Korea.
Bubblecar said:
>The son is attempting to consolidate power and offing a few, but if he goes silly, he will be seen as a threat by the generals and they will join against him and his loyal forces.That would depend on how free they are to organise. Regimes of this kind are usually infested with state security personnel and informants at every level.
I agree but at some point they figure, this guy is a bit paranoid and offing everyone, to retain my priveledges I am better off supporting my fellow officers who, on a balance of probabilities, wont kill me.
>I agree but at some point they figure, this guy is a bit paranoid and offing everyone, to retain my priveledges I am better off supporting my fellow officers who, on a balance of probabilities, wont kill me.
There are plenty of examples of dictators of that kind who nonetheless make it extremely difficult for the military to challenge them. Look at Hitler, Stalin, Saddam etc. The very fear they instil in the top ranks makes obedience more likely than rebellion, and the more paranoid and unpredictable their behaviour, the more frightening they seem and the harder it is for opponents to find space to organise.
Bubblecar said:
>I agree but at some point they figure, this guy is a bit paranoid and offing everyone, to retain my priveledges I am better off supporting my fellow officers who, on a balance of probabilities, wont kill me.There are plenty of examples of dictators of that kind who nonetheless make it extremely difficult for the military to challenge them. Look at Hitler, Stalin, Saddam etc. The very fear they instil in the top ranks makes obedience more likely than rebellion, and the more paranoid and unpredictable their behaviour, the more frightening they seem and the harder it is for opponents to find space to organise.
Yeah, that as well. It is a hard thing to predict cos it swings on two personalities. A leader appointed by his father who has not done the consensus building and is offing of rivals and the unknown General who will organise a resistance.
I predict an implosion. To my mind high level executions speak of power struggles and that wont be good for a young idiot. I suspect he will be out manoeuvred, he is probably a bobber and not had enough time to gather mature backers and his ratpack are clueless.
Time for bed I feel. With clear breathing have a lot more stamina and energy.
>There are plenty of examples of dictators of that kind who nonetheless make it extremely difficult for the military to challenge them. Look at Hitler, Stalin, Saddam etc. The very fear they instil in the top ranks makes obedience more likely than rebellion, and the more paranoid and unpredictable their behaviour, the more frightening they seem and the harder it is for opponents to find space to organise”
And when does a reaction to them become like them, more of the same encouraging more of the same, operating at a ‘higher level’, and are the likes of Snowden part of something (power levellers are not always adversaries) .
You mention Adolf etc, but I ask what part does the belief, not properly considered perhaps, in ‘organization’ being a ‘social construction’ – perhaps political construction venturing social construction (force of ideology) – what part does this play in the ‘organization’.
Once the ‘organic space’, or the ‘operating space’ for individuals to emerge that then has culture an expression of the individuals (a plurality) gives way to the force of the social construction, ideology rules, add some fear so the fearful take it (find their) home in the daddy ‘ideology’ (some world of appealing ideas) – like a parent of a child (overbearing perhaps) – anyway ‘the home’ becomes the homeostasis provided by the group and the shared ideas and views converged. To make this work language must also be considered a large determinant of reality, more so than it is (or ought be perhaps).
Basically the nonsense goes nowhere without first believing (use of fear inclusive)disproportionately that culture and language determine reality.
In the free countries, where democracy is worth anything, the slow grind of progress, negotiating the plurality of interests, these are part of minimalist government – the minimalist ideological imposition.
The view of what provides the larger social organism are substantially different to the authoritarian way. The larger social organization does not shape the individual (so much), rather the many individuals give rise to something that can be variously seen to be something larger but it is not a forced view, not a single or singular-tending view, not an imposed view.
Hence the importance of avoiding (caution framing it) an ideolgical view of the ideologically governed.
Mostly all that is needed for most individuals is provided internally (homeostasis, mechanisms such), and anytime loons try to force the mediating mechanisms internal external the field of social constructions are ventured. In free countries there are ethics to limit the power of groups (and other individuals) over individuals.