I have been after a set of sums for a while and have had a difficult time getting help with the challenge. The equations I am seeking are the torque are the torque covariant and the torque co-efficient between the expansion of space and terminal velocity.
It is my working that the covariant here is E = mc^2 and the co-efficient is c = i by E(when -1 = m)
Is there another result?
Riff-in-Thyme said:
I have been after a set of sums for a while and have had a difficult time getting help with the challenge. The equations I am seeking are the torque ‘co-efficient’ are the torque covariant and the torque co-efficient between the expansion of space and terminal velocity.It is my working that the covariant here is E = mc^2 and the co-efficient is c = i by E(when -1 = m)
Is there another result?
fixed
Riff-in-Thyme said:
Riff-in-Thyme said:
I have been after a set of sums for a while and have had a difficult time getting help with the challenge. The equations I am seeking are the torque co-efficient are the torque covariant between the expansion of space and terminal velocity.It is my working that the covariant here is E = mc^2 and the co-efficient is c = i by E(when -1 = m)
Is there another result?
aargh!!!
bloody half arsed editor!
Riff-in-Thyme said:
Riff-in-Thyme said:
Riff-in-Thyme said:
I have been after a set of sums for a while and have had a difficult time getting help with the challenge. The equations I am seeking are the torque co-efficient andthe torque covariant between the expansion of space and terminal velocity.It is my working that the covariant here is E = mc^2 and the co-efficient is c = i by E(when -1 = m)
Is there another result?
(messy, messy, messy,messy, runs around with arms flailing above head)
Why do you keep starting new threads on the same topic?
although it is not the deciding check I put against my working, the greater part of my believing I have that the right way round is that I have the impression the co-variant should have the ^2 in it and the co-efficient should have the ^2\ in it. Further clarification would be appreciated.
Witty Rejoinder said:
Why do you keep starting new threads on the same topic?
clean working
Witty Rejoinder said:
Why do you keep starting new threads on the same topic?
That is where I am up to with the question. If people don’t want to discuss my pet interest with me then there will be no further post but the questions I supply. I don’t give the slightest shit if a single one of you resents my curiosities…….
Witty Rejoinder said:
Why do you keep starting new threads on the same topic?
clean working. people put a lot of crap on my threads. clean working!
so can anyone stop providing there own curiosity regarding my personal particulars to the topic I post and address the questions I ask. There has been only one on this one.
“Consider the engineering challenge of maintaining perfect sphericity of torque upon the contraction or expansion of a perfectly spherical mass. What is the compressional torque value and what is the expansional torque value?”
Two equations I have been seeking for a substantial time are the torque covariant and the torque co-efficient between terminal velocity and the rate of expansion of space. The equations I have are E = mc^2 and c = i/E(when -1 = m).
I understand how I have arrived at these figures, but am only ‘certain’ I have them the right way about to a vague feeling that the variant should contain the square and the efficient the root.
I am now re-analysing my procedure to identify alternate formulations. I have provided the included thought experiment as reference for how I arrived at the equations here. If anyone would be interested in solving this equation it would be a boon to refer to anothers alternate thinking.
(contributions considerable as phD submission by the Deportment of Universal Degrees)
I would make the clear distinction here that both gravitation and spatial expansion are polaric expressions of terminal velocity, with c being the mediary expression.
Witty Rejoinder said:
Why do you keep starting new threads on the same topic?
And replying to your own posts?
The “look at me” “look at me” syndrome.
gaghalfrunt said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Why do you keep starting new threads on the same topic?
And replying to your own posts?
The “look at me” “look at me” syndrome.
no. I am keeping track of my thoughts while providing them for critical scrutiny. any other assumptions you would like cleared up?
gaghalfrunt said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Why do you keep starting new threads on the same topic?
And replying to your own posts?
The “look at me” “look at me” syndrome.
I can only say that chiming in where your repugnant assumptions weren’t invited displays your own sentiment perfectly
Gag Halfrunt is Zaphod Beeblebrox’s personal brain care specialist. He also consults for such beings as ProstetnicVogon Jeltz.
As a psychiatrist, Halfrunt realised that should the Ultimate Question to Life, the Universe, and Everything ever be found, the psychiatric profession would lose the business of many bewildered and highly profitable clientele. Therefore, it was Halfrunt that ordered and paid the Vogons to demolish the Earth (under the premise of building a hyperspace bypass). Following that, he had Jeltz hunt down the Heart of Gold and attempt to destroy it. Believing that Arthur Dent and Trillian (the last two members of Earth’s original programming) were killed, he returned to his profitable business.
While the crew of the Heart of Gold survived that attack, Halfrunt’s order eventually led to the destruction of Earth anyway, due to the Vogon’s paranioa with finishing the job, the Earth was finally destroyed, under the watchful eye of the Vogons by the Grebulons.
http://hitchhikers.wikia.com/wiki/Gag_Halfrunt
Riff-in-Thyme said:
gaghalfrunt said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Why do you keep starting new threads on the same topic?
And replying to your own posts?
The “look at me” “look at me” syndrome.
I can only say that chiming in where your repugnant assumptions weren’t invited displays your own sentiment perfectly
Yeah , what you said.
gaghalfrunt said:
Riff-in-Thyme said:
gaghalfrunt said:And replying to your own posts?
The “look at me” “look at me” syndrome.
I can only say that chiming in where your repugnant assumptions weren’t invited displays your own sentiment perfectly
Yeah , what you said.
Yup ok. Sounds like “waah waah wah wah”
child
hello riff. How’s your guitar going, I think you have one and play?
Riff-in-Thyme said:
gaghalfrunt said:
Riff-in-Thyme said:I can only say that chiming in where your repugnant assumptions weren’t invited displays your own sentiment perfectly
Yeah , what you said.
This is cool. Loving a sensible conversation
Yup ok. Sounds like “waah waah wah wah”
child
transition said:
hello riff. How’s your guitar going, I think you have one and play?
yeah she’s sweet. this week I haven’t had much chance to pick it up..
gaghalfrunt said:
Riff-in-Thyme said:
gaghalfrunt said:Yeah , what you said.
This is cool. Loving a sensible conversation
Yup ok. Sounds like “waah waah wah wah”
child
lol got me :P
>yeah she’s sweet. this week I haven’t had much chance to pick it up..
What’s your most liked style of guitar music. What does it for you.