It was always a no brainer that it was he rebels, not the Syrian government, that used gas in the CW attack last August (if gas was used and the whole thing wasn’t a staged farce).

Only the rebels could have gained from the attack by evoking an attack from the West, who were, as usual, chomping at the bit for war and regime change.

Now a MIT report has concluded the rockets used could only have come from rebel held areas due to their limited range of 2km.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/mit-study-of-ghouta-chemical-attack-challenges-us-intelligence/5365110

Where’s the outrage now? Or the blanket media coverage? Instead the West still supports the Islamist rebels against the secular Dr Assad.

https://s3.amazonaws.com/s3.documentcloud.org/documents/1006045/possible-implications-of-bad-intelligence.pdf

Appears to be the original sourece.

Bugger me. I’m not stating that the document is a fake…I just don’t know; but looking at the first page, who the fuck capitalises like that?

the gas attack happened when the UN team to investigate this kind of thing was a few kilometres away – chance? unlikely

why would the Syrian gov launch a gas attack when the UN was in town and could investigate immediately

its unlikely that the Syrian gov launched the attack

in the meantime we are giving men and arms to al qaeda after fighting them for ten years or more

enjoy the war – its going to be a long one

http://web.mit.edu/sts/Analysis%20of%20the%20UN%20Report%20on%20Syria%20CW.pdf

this is what you get when you search the MIT website. the diagrams look similar.

Don’t you mean pretending to fight al Qaeda for ten years or more wookiemeister?

The West never fought Al Qaeda, they created that organisation to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan, Al Qaeda has always been a proxy army for Western intelligence agencies to be use for destabilisation in places like Bosnia, Libya, and now Syria.

The war on terror is a hoax.

All attacks on the West are false flag operations, it is fact that the twin towers and WTC 7 were demolished via controlled demolition.

Anywho said:

…it is fact that the twin towers and WTC 7 were demolished via controlled demolition.

Hahahhahahahahahahah!

Such a jolly joker.

Anywho said:

Don’t you mean pretending to fight al Qaeda for ten years or more wookiemeister?

The West never fought Al Qaeda, they created that organisation to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan, Al Qaeda has always been a proxy army for Western intelligence agencies to be use for destabilisation in places like Bosnia, Libya, and now Syria.

The war on terror is a hoax.

All attacks on the West are false flag operations, it is fact that the twin towers and WTC 7 were demolished via controlled demolition.

I vaguely recall a few posts on this subject/s before, can’t quite recall when though.

That’s all very well, but what do I want for dinner tonight?

Bubblecar said:

That’s all very well, but what do I want for dinner tonight?

Sorry that was for chat but somebody hijacked it.

The war on terror is a hoax.

===

I suspect so

we are now climbing into bed with terrorists we have been fighting so they can take down another middle eastern country – unleashing more problems – problems that we might not be able to control or know where the end takes us.

stop sending money and all “aid” its making things worse.