Date: 3/02/2014 12:56:44
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 481347
Subject: Federal Government move to delist part of Tasmania's World Heritage Area

Federal Government defends move to delist part of Tasmania’s World Heritage Area

Environment Minister Greg Hunt has defended the Federal Government’s push to delist a section of Tasmania’s World Heritage Area.

The Government has asked the World Heritage Committee to delist about 74,000 hectares of 170,000 which was added under Tasmania’s historic forest peace deal.

Mr Hunt says the area was added amidst “enormous local controversy” and was against the wishes of some in the community.

“What has been put to the committee for reconsideration is 117 degraded or logged areas so these were areas that many people feel should never have been added because they significantly detract from what is one of the great World Heritage Areas,” he said.

“I have been right over the maps, the photographs – these were old logging areas, 117 of them, that were added against the wishes of local community.”
Audio: Radio National’s Fran Kelly talks to Greg Hunt. (ABC News)

Under last year’s World Heritage boundary change, areas of the Southern Forests, the Styx and the Florentine were given protection.

But the Government has said areas of genuine high conservation value are not part of the delisting plan, including tall forests in the Great Western Tiers.

A prominent world heritage consultant is worried about the plan.

Peter Hitchcock was a key advisor on the original Tasmanian World Heritage nomination in 1989, and is questioning the claim that some of it is not worth protecting.

He has told Radio National that about 90 per cent of the land is outstanding eucalyptus forest that had never been logged.

“Some of it is some of the most outstanding forests in the country, if not in the planet,” Mr Hitchcock said.

“So the great majority of the area that is being proposed to be removed from the World Heritage Area is in fact unlogged forest, and much of it with important conservation values.”
Do you agree with the Government’s decision? Have your say.

Special timber workers support the delisting, but say the Government should have applied for more special timber areas to be removed.

George Harris from the Special Timbers Alliance says the industry has been severely disadvantaged since 170,000 hectares were placed under the highest level of protection.

“We have actually lost a lot of area in the extension that went through last year,” he said.

“They’ve actually taken most of our best stands of timber and we’re in a situation where you can’t harvest it where it doesn’t grow, we need to actually be able to access particular types of timber.”

Liberal candidate Guy Barnett says the public should support the de-listing move because the areas should never have been listed in the first place.

“The Greens have had so much influence over the Labor Governments both federally and at a state level, it’s time to say enough is enough,” he said.

The World Heritage Committee will announce its decision in June.

===
Tony Abbott Defending Big Business Interests

Leave Old growth Forests alone

What is it with the Abbott Government

First, the Murry River sell back, now this

whats next?

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2014 13:02:24
From: Tamb
ID: 481350
Subject: re: Federal Government move to delist part of Tasmania's World Heritage Area

>>What’s next?

Barrier Reef dredging spoil dumping.

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2014 13:05:28
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 481352
Subject: re: Federal Government move to delist part of Tasmania's World Heritage Area

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2014 13:08:33
From: Tamb
ID: 481354
Subject: re: Federal Government move to delist part of Tasmania's World Heritage Area

My son calls his property Girt.

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2014 13:11:13
From: roughbarked
ID: 481356
Subject: re: Federal Government move to delist part of Tasmania's World Heritage Area

<The Government="" has="" asked="" the="" World="" Heritage="" Committee="" to="" delist="" about="" 74,000="" hectares="" of="" 170,000="" which="" was="" added="" under="" Tasmania’s="" historic="" forest="" peace="" deal.<="" p="">

Mr Hunt says the area was added amidst “enormous local controversy” and was against the wishes of some in the community.>

some in the community..

methinks mandating goeth to far.

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2014 13:12:58
From: Tamb
ID: 481358
Subject: re: Federal Government move to delist part of Tasmania's World Heritage Area

roughbarked said:


<The Government="" has="" asked="" the="" World="" Heritage="" Committee="" to="" delist="" about="" 74,000="" hectares="" of="" 170,000="" which="" was="" added="" under="" Tasmania’s="" historic="" forest="" peace="" deal.<="" p="">

Mr Hunt says the area was added amidst “enormous local controversy” and was against the wishes of some in the community.>

some in the community..

methinks mandating goeth to far.

Isn’t democracy the will of the majority of the people not the wishes of the lunatic fringe?

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2014 13:16:01
From: roughbarked
ID: 481360
Subject: re: Federal Government move to delist part of Tasmania's World Heritage Area

Tamb said:


roughbarked said:

<The Government="" has="" asked="" the="" World="" Heritage="" Committee="" to="" delist="" about="" 74,000="" hectares="" of="" 170,000="" which="" was="" added="" under="" Tasmania’s="" historic="" forest="" peace="" deal.<="" p="">

Mr Hunt says the area was added amidst “enormous local controversy” and was against the wishes of some in the community.>

some in the community..

methinks mandating goeth to far.

Isn’t democracy the will of the majority of the people not the wishes of the lunatic fringe?

Repeat the words Greg Hunt rapidly until they self transform.

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2014 13:51:17
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 481367
Subject: re: Federal Government move to delist part of Tasmania's World Heritage Area

roughbarked said:

Repeat the words Greg Hunt rapidly until they self transform.

Doesn’t take long, does it?

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2014 19:55:56
From: Divine Angel
ID: 481532
Subject: re: Federal Government move to delist part of Tasmania's World Heritage Area

I spose SP is off watching MKR #twinning

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2014 22:59:52
From: dv
ID: 481683
Subject: re: Federal Government move to delist part of Tasmania's World Heritage Area

Early days, but I am starting to think this isn’t the best govt in Australia’s history after all!

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2014 23:00:49
From: roughbarked
ID: 481684
Subject: re: Federal Government move to delist part of Tasmania's World Heritage Area

dv said:


Early days, but I am starting to think this isn’t the best govt in Australia’s history after all!

Never had any delusions myself.

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2014 23:02:10
From: morrie
ID: 481685
Subject: re: Federal Government move to delist part of Tasmania's World Heritage Area

roughbarked said:


dv said:

Early days, but I am starting to think this isn’t the best govt in Australia’s history after all!

Never had any delusions myself.


You know dv. Tony’s biggest fan.

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2014 23:03:17
From: roughbarked
ID: 481687
Subject: re: Federal Government move to delist part of Tasmania's World Heritage Area

morrie said:


roughbarked said:

dv said:

Early days, but I am starting to think this isn’t the best govt in Australia’s history after all!

Never had any delusions myself.


You know dv. Tony’s biggest fan.

So his daughters are faking it?

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2014 23:04:53
From: tauto
ID: 481688
Subject: re: Federal Government move to delist part of Tasmania's World Heritage Area

dv said:


Early days, but I am starting to think this isn’t the best govt in Australia’s history after all!

—-

I am still having trouble explaining to my son that yes, he is our leader.

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2014 23:04:54
From: Michael V
ID: 481689
Subject: re: Federal Government move to delist part of Tasmania's World Heritage Area

dv said:


Early days, but I am starting to think this isn’t the best govt in Australia’s history after all!
Just starting?

Looks like there is a campaign of payback to the ABC on the way. “Don’t do what we want? Take this funding reduction!”

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2014 23:06:38
From: roughbarked
ID: 481690
Subject: re: Federal Government move to delist part of Tasmania's World Heritage Area

Michael V said:


dv said:

Early days, but I am starting to think this isn’t the best govt in Australia’s history after all!
Just starting?

Looks like there is a campaign of payback to the ABC on the way. “Don’t do what we want? Take this funding reduction!”

Actually, He should be aware that the ABC charter prohibits them from doing what any dictator wants.

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2014 23:08:02
From: roughbarked
ID: 481692
Subject: re: Federal Government move to delist part of Tasmania's World Heritage Area

I’m reasonably sure that JWH would have controlled the ABC but for this.

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2014 23:09:13
From: morrie
ID: 481694
Subject: re: Federal Government move to delist part of Tasmania's World Heritage Area

roughbarked said:


Michael V said:

dv said:

Early days, but I am starting to think this isn’t the best govt in Australia’s history after all!
Just starting?

Looks like there is a campaign of payback to the ABC on the way. “Don’t do what we want? Take this funding reduction!”

Actually, He should be aware that the ABC charter prohibits them from doing what any dictator wants.


Hitler!

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2014 23:10:15
From: roughbarked
ID: 481695
Subject: re: Federal Government move to delist part of Tasmania's World Heritage Area

morrie said:


roughbarked said:

Michael V said:

Just starting?

Looks like there is a campaign of payback to the ABC on the way. “Don’t do what we want? Take this funding reduction!”

Actually, He should be aware that the ABC charter prohibits them from doing what any dictator wants.


Hitler!

The ABC can actually get away with godwinning your evening.

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2014 23:11:08
From: Michael V
ID: 481697
Subject: re: Federal Government move to delist part of Tasmania's World Heritage Area

roughbarked said:


Michael V said:

dv said:

Early days, but I am starting to think this isn’t the best govt in Australia’s history after all!
Just starting?

Looks like there is a campaign of payback to the ABC on the way. “Don’t do what we want? Take this funding reduction!”

Actually, He should be aware that the ABC charter prohibits them from doing what any dictator wants.

Hence the “back door” method.

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2014 23:13:00
From: roughbarked
ID: 481700
Subject: re: Federal Government move to delist part of Tasmania's World Heritage Area

Michael V said:


Hence the “back door” method.

Well that has always been Tony’s forté

Reply Quote

Date: 3/02/2014 23:16:56
From: roughbarked
ID: 481702
Subject: re: Federal Government move to delist part of Tasmania's World Heritage Area

roughbarked said:


Michael V said:

Hence the “back door” method.

Well that has always been Tony’s forté

One could be led to believe that he’s had too much contact with priests.

Reply Quote

Date: 4/02/2014 13:55:01
From: The_observer
ID: 481848
Subject: re: Federal Government move to delist part of Tasmania's World Heritage Area

>>>>The Government has asked the World Heritage Committee to delist about 74,000 hectares<<<

The Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area covers over 1.4 million hectares.

.
.

wow; that only leaves over 1.33 million hectares.

the outrage

the bastards

Reply Quote

Date: 4/02/2014 14:03:22
From: roughbarked
ID: 481851
Subject: re: Federal Government move to delist part of Tasmania's World Heritage Area

The_observer said:

>>>>The Government has asked the World Heritage Committee to delist about 74,000 hectares<<<

The Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area covers over 1.4 million hectares.

.
.

wow; that only leaves over 1.33 million hectares.

the outrage

the bastards

If you look at the big picture, there is very little Australian world Heritage area worth recognising as such left. Any loss is great.

Reply Quote