Date: 19/05/2014 23:24:54
From: transition
ID: 533397
Subject: there's cheer in there, and a care as well.

>Anti-death penalty activists

Q – the state has a monopoly on violence (some have used this to define ‘the state’), violence against self intentionally causing death is know as suicide, the history of that being an offence seems self explanatory in the term ‘commit suicide’ (though haven’t looked to check, the ‘commit’ part generally annoys me when people add that), anyway the Q is of the situation in which the state is to exercise its monopoly on violence and terminate a life, should this right be softened for those that are to be executed and them be allowed to kill themselves if they so wish.

What would be the outcome of allowing someone sentenced to death the right or choice to terminate their own life?

Reply Quote

Date: 20/05/2014 09:23:41
From: AussieDJ
ID: 533519
Subject: re: there's cheer in there, and a care as well.

transition said:


What would be the outcome of allowing someone sentenced to death the right or choice to terminate their own life?

What would happen if the condemned person elected to die of old age?

Reply Quote

Date: 20/05/2014 14:54:19
From: bob(from black rock)
ID: 533602
Subject: re: there's cheer in there, and a care as well.

AussieDJ said:


transition said:

What would be the outcome of allowing someone sentenced to death the right or choice to terminate their own life?

What would happen if the condemned person elected to die of old age?

Nah can’t do that, it’s called “voluntary euthanasia” and that is illegal!

Reply Quote