Amongst todays’ thoughtful moments was some expansion on what the human cranium is for, starting with it being to stop shit falling out and bothering other people, and the problems with there being a mouth in the head of which the shit can fall out of the head and bother other people.
Another deep moment involved mechanisms to do with social levelling, what people might carry around in a head that do interesting work in the territory of deservedness/undeservedness, and things relating to taking liberties above ones station, or status.
Of this latter thing to do with mechanisms of social levelling (the parts in the head performing the magic, and that expressed operating in the social field involving others) it came to me that maybe narcissistic-tending creatures don’t get around to considering at what point roaming subterranean ideas-become-projections to do with others taking liberties appropriate to their station itself requires the application of the idea to the roaming thing concerned with others’ deservedness/undeservedness.
From this I considered what one might come up with if the media were profiled as an individual personality, to what extent the media is a projection of human consciousness and the ethical concerns of groups, the extent individuals may model themselves on media, the extent media is a feedback mechanism, and things relating to this.
The question I were trying to answer was of the mechanisms in minds (social instincts) that evolved hundreds of thousands of years ago and how adapted they are to the modern world, whether there are shortcomings about these mechanisms that maybe do not entirely serve humanity well. And particularly whether people in the media are captives of possible errors about these.
Do the media represent human consciousness? Does the media represent or is it in some way a model representative of a healthy human being?