Date: 29/05/2014 05:27:30
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 538797
Subject: Screw Type Wind Turbine

Screwy-looking wind turbine makes little noise and a big claim

Although it’s getting increasingly common to see solar panels on the roofs of homes, household wind turbines are still a fairly rare sight. If Rotterdam-based tech firm The Archimedes has its way, however, that will soon change. Today the company officially introduced its Liam F1 Urban Wind Turbine, which is said to have an energy yield that is “80 percent of the maximum that is theoretically feasible.” That’s quite the assertion, given that most conventional wind turbines average around 25 to 50 percent.

So it creates a mini tornado within its design?

Reply Quote

Date: 29/05/2014 06:28:03
From: Carmen_Sandiego
ID: 538804
Subject: re: Screw Type Wind Turbine

CrazyNeutrino said:


Screwy-looking wind turbine makes little noise and a big claim

Although it’s getting increasingly common to see solar panels on the roofs of homes, household wind turbines are still a fairly rare sight. If Rotterdam-based tech firm The Archimedes has its way, however, that will soon change. Today the company officially introduced its Liam F1 Urban Wind Turbine, which is said to have an energy yield that is “80 percent of the maximum that is theoretically feasible.” That’s quite the assertion, given that most conventional wind turbines average around 25 to 50 percent.

So it creates a mini tornado within its design?

The writer of that article is an idiot. (FTR, it is no more efficient than any other modern wind turbine)

Having said that, I can see a few practical advantages to the design,along with some potential disadvantages.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/05/2014 09:03:49
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 538834
Subject: re: Screw Type Wind Turbine

“Additionally, the design is claimed to keep it always pointing into the wind for maximum yield.”

Now why didn’t those conventional wind turbine designers think of that?

Reply Quote

Date: 29/05/2014 09:16:48
From: The_observer
ID: 538839
Subject: re: Screw Type Wind Turbine

>> “That’s quite the assertion, given that most conventional wind turbines average around 25 to 50 percent.” <<

Pigs Arse

Reply Quote

Date: 29/05/2014 09:23:07
From: The_observer
ID: 538841
Subject: re: Screw Type Wind Turbine

Going by the figures, I’d need about 5 of those turbines ON MY ROOF to cover my average daily kw usage.

I wonder how much one CO$T$

Reply Quote

Date: 29/05/2014 12:16:13
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 538906
Subject: re: Screw Type Wind Turbine

The_observer said:


Going by the figures, I’d need about 5 of those turbines ON MY ROOF to cover my average daily kw usage. I wonder how much one CO$T$

I know someone who used to work for a firm manufacturing rooftop wind turbines. He now works in designing pumps for use in extreme environments for the mining industry. Cost per unit power for rooftop wind turbines was a problem, performance increases greatly as diameter increases which is why you see big ones rather than small ones.

You can buy small wind turbines from Jaycar.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/05/2014 12:21:13
From: dv
ID: 538910
Subject: re: Screw Type Wind Turbine

I think Hockey is interested in Screw Wind Turbines, I believe he uttered those words.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/05/2014 12:22:26
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 538914
Subject: re: Screw Type Wind Turbine

dv said:


I think Hockey is interested in Screw Wind Turbines, I believe he uttered those words.

He knows a lot about science

Reply Quote

Date: 29/05/2014 12:24:21
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 538918
Subject: re: Screw Type Wind Turbine

mollwollfumble said:


The_observer said:

Going by the figures, I’d need about 5 of those turbines ON MY ROOF to cover my average daily kw usage. I wonder how much one CO$T$

I know someone who used to work for a firm manufacturing rooftop wind turbines. He now works in designing pumps for use in extreme environments for the mining industry. Cost per unit power for rooftop wind turbines was a problem, performance increases greatly as diameter increases which is why you see big ones rather than small ones.

Also location-wise, domestic roof tops are even more hopeless for wind than they are for solar.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/05/2014 12:33:59
From: MartinB
ID: 538929
Subject: re: Screw Type Wind Turbine

which is said to have an energy yield that is “80 percent of the maximum that is theoretically feasible.” That’s quite the assertion, given that most conventional wind turbines average around 25 to 50 percent.

I suspect there’s apples and oranges here and that the 80% is 80% of the Betz limit while the 25 – 50% is of the total energy content.

As I understand, and if correct I’m sure many others here do too, the main design issue of urban wind turbines is for them to be able to start and stop quickly to be able to get useful energy from gustier, more unpredictable wind conditions compared to the large-scale turbines that have sugnificant ramp-up times, but can take advantage of the stronger, steadier winds where they are located.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/05/2014 13:19:05
From: dv
ID: 538956
Subject: re: Screw Type Wind Turbine

Those percentages are basically meaningless as an aid to comparison.

The single most important statistic is $ per mean watt.

Reply Quote