Date: 21/09/2014 15:47:45
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 597423
Subject: The Space Elevator again

More progress is being made on it, it’s getting closer. We could actually build one in the next decade or so if we wanted to.
It’ll be a cheap way to get into space and get hardware up & down from there as well.

Space elevator talk

Reply Quote

Date: 21/09/2014 16:15:31
From: wookiemeister
ID: 597446
Subject: re: The Space Elevator again

Huge balloons might be cheaper and doable for the moment

A space elevator would certainly be useful

How you’d guard against terrorist attack I don’t know, it would become a prime target for anyone wanting to make a “ statement”

Reply Quote

Date: 21/09/2014 16:17:09
From: Tamb
ID: 597450
Subject: re: The Space Elevator again

wookiemeister said:


Huge balloons might be cheaper and doable for the moment

A space elevator would certainly be useful

How you’d guard against terrorist attack I don’t know, it would become a prime target for anyone wanting to make a “ statement”


Build it so that if it fell its impact zone would be Mecca & Medina.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/09/2014 16:19:20
From: wookiemeister
ID: 597453
Subject: re: The Space Elevator again

Tamb said:


wookiemeister said:

Huge balloons might be cheaper and doable for the moment

A space elevator would certainly be useful

How you’d guard against terrorist attack I don’t know, it would become a prime target for anyone wanting to make a “ statement”


Build it so that if it fell its impact zone would be Mecca & Medina.


It could be anyone that’s the thing

In “ contact” it’s an extremist religious group – not Islamic

Reply Quote

Date: 21/09/2014 16:22:19
From: Tamb
ID: 597455
Subject: re: The Space Elevator again

wookiemeister said:


Tamb said:

wookiemeister said:

Huge balloons might be cheaper and doable for the moment

A space elevator would certainly be useful

How you’d guard against terrorist attack I don’t know, it would become a prime target for anyone wanting to make a “ statement”


Build it so that if it fell its impact zone would be Mecca & Medina.


It could be anyone that’s the thing

In “ contact” it’s an extremist religious group – not Islamic


They’re the only ones with the capability of knocking down something as big as that.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/09/2014 16:23:57
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 597456
Subject: re: The Space Elevator again

wookiemeister said:


Tamb said:

wookiemeister said:

Huge balloons might be cheaper and doable for the moment

A space elevator would certainly be useful

How you’d guard against terrorist attack I don’t know, it would become a prime target for anyone wanting to make a “ statement”


Build it so that if it fell its impact zone would be Mecca & Medina.


It could be anyone that’s the thing

In “ contact” it’s an extremist religious group – not Islamic

A ladder, a really long one, 360+km one, and then wave a flag when you get to the top

Reply Quote

Date: 21/09/2014 16:25:11
From: wookiemeister
ID: 597458
Subject: re: The Space Elevator again

Tamb said:


wookiemeister said:

Tamb said:

Build it so that if it fell its impact zone would be Mecca & Medina.


It could be anyone that’s the thing

In “ contact” it’s an extremist religious group – not Islamic


They’re the only ones with the capability of knocking down something as big as that.


If you had explosives in the lift it would sever the thing completely

Unless of course you built it so the blast would travel outwards not inwards

Reply Quote

Date: 21/09/2014 16:27:22
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 597460
Subject: re: The Space Elevator again

It’d be nice if we could talk about the science behind it and not about how to destroy it.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/09/2014 16:28:46
From: wookiemeister
ID: 597461
Subject: re: The Space Elevator again

Spiny Norman said:


It’d be nice if we could talk about the science behind it and not about how to destroy it.

Hee hee

Science versus human nature

Reply Quote

Date: 21/09/2014 16:30:25
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 597463
Subject: re: The Space Elevator again

Spiny Norman said:


It’d be nice if we could talk about the science behind it and not about how to destroy it.

yeah

Reply Quote

Date: 21/09/2014 16:32:12
From: wookiemeister
ID: 597464
Subject: re: The Space Elevator again

I think wind shear would destroy it

How do you install??

Lower a cable down?

The cable would have to be heat resistant , if you were in free fall around the earth the cable would have to resist being dragged through the atmosphere

Reply Quote

Date: 21/09/2014 16:32:29
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 597465
Subject: re: The Space Elevator again

CrazyNeutrino said:


Spiny Norman said:

It’d be nice if we could talk about the science behind it and not about how to destroy it.

yeah

Space Elevator to Mars

Reply Quote

Date: 21/09/2014 16:33:33
From: wookiemeister
ID: 597466
Subject: re: The Space Elevator again

Maybe you’d need a virtual elevator where there’s no physical cable if that makes sense

Reply Quote

Date: 21/09/2014 16:36:59
From: wookiemeister
ID: 597468
Subject: re: The Space Elevator again

Maybe you could beam power to an aircraft so it doesn’t have to carry much fuel

For the journey in the atmosphere electric motors turn fans ? No fuel required

The “ elevator “ is driven and uses the atmosphere to gain speed and height

Sure there would be drag losses but so what? Electrical power is limitless

Reply Quote

Date: 21/09/2014 16:45:27
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 597475
Subject: re: The Space Elevator again

wookiemeister said:


I think wind shear would destroy it

Not likely though it’d make it wobble around a bit for sure.

wookiemeister said:


How do you install??

As described in the video, from a geostationary orbit downwards.

wookiemeister said:


Lower a cable down?

Yep.

wookiemeister said:


The cable would have to be heat resistant , if you were in free fall around the earth the cable would have to resist being dragged through the atmosphere

It moves with the Earth so there’s no movement relative to it, the cable only has to contend with regular wind forces. A bit of rain & hail every now and then as well though it’ll be close to the equator so it’s not likely to get hailed upon.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/09/2014 16:51:21
From: Arts
ID: 597477
Subject: re: The Space Elevator again

the only problem I can foresee is if someone gets in at the ground floor and pushes all the buttons…

Reply Quote

Date: 21/09/2014 16:57:27
From: wookiemeister
ID: 597482
Subject: re: The Space Elevator again

Spiny Norman said:


wookiemeister said:

I think wind shear would destroy it

Not likely though it’d make it wobble around a bit for sure.

wookiemeister said:


How do you install??

As described in the video, from a geostationary orbit downwards.

wookiemeister said:


Lower a cable down?

Yep.

wookiemeister said:


The cable would have to be heat resistant , if you were in free fall around the earth the cable would have to resist being dragged through the atmosphere

It moves with the Earth so there’s no movement relative to it, the cable only has to contend with regular wind forces. A bit of rain & hail every now and then as well though it’ll be close to the equator so it’s not likely to get hailed upon.


hmmm i thought that too but i think friction could be a real problem

the relative speed of the wind, atmosphere might be ok in one direction but what if the wind, atmosphere is travelling at another angle other than in a straight line around the earth?

I’m seriously doubtful it could work

Reply Quote

Date: 21/09/2014 17:03:10
From: wookiemeister
ID: 597488
Subject: re: The Space Elevator again

i like my beamed energy elevator

you have a steerable microwave dish

the transport sits initially at some point ahead of it

maybe the electricity flashes a tank of water into steam and superheated steam comes pouring out the back

most of the crafts orbital energy is gained whilst being some reasonable distance form the dish?

the water whilst still being in the atmosphere isn’t lost to space

i suppose you could have an electric motor version? but most of the forward motion would have to be achieved whilst it could capture air and accelerate it , then you’d have problems with shockwaves in the air intake

Reply Quote

Date: 21/09/2014 17:06:12
From: JudgeMental
ID: 597491
Subject: re: The Space Elevator again

maybe the electricity flashes a tank of water into steam and superheated steam comes pouring out the back

why not just have a LOX hydrogen rocket?

Reply Quote

Date: 21/09/2014 17:09:22
From: wookiemeister
ID: 597494
Subject: re: The Space Elevator again

JudgeMental said:


maybe the electricity flashes a tank of water into steam and superheated steam comes pouring out the back

why not just have a LOX hydrogen rocket?


because LOX and liquid hydrogen require industrial plants to make

water is available cheaply

then you have issues with mixing the LOX and LH

using an electric element to superheat water could be easier

Reply Quote

Date: 21/09/2014 20:05:48
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 597662
Subject: re: The Space Elevator again

Japanese company wants to build one.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/09/2014 16:20:49
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 598084
Subject: re: The Space Elevator again

The yellow peril are on to it.

“Once the realm of science fiction, a Japanese company has announced they will have a space elevator up and running by the year 2050.

If successful it would revolutionise space travel and potentially transform the global economy.

The Japanese construction giant Obayashi says they will build a space elevator that will reach 96,000 kilometres into space.

Robotic cars powered by magnetic linear motors will carry people and cargo to a newly-built space station, at a fraction of the cost of rockets. It will take seven days to get there.

The company said the fantasy can now become a reality because of the development of carbon nanotechnology.”

Reply Quote

Date: 22/09/2014 16:21:57
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 598085
Subject: re: The Space Elevator again

As is Captain Yesterday.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/09/2014 16:28:33
From: Cymek
ID: 598089
Subject: re: The Space Elevator again

Peak Warming Man said:


The yellow peril are on to it.

“Once the realm of science fiction, a Japanese company has announced they will have a space elevator up and running by the year 2050.

If successful it would revolutionise space travel and potentially transform the global economy.

The Japanese construction giant Obayashi says they will build a space elevator that will reach 96,000 kilometres into space.

Robotic cars powered by magnetic linear motors will carry people and cargo to a newly-built space station, at a fraction of the cost of rockets. It will take seven days to get there.

The company said the fantasy can now become a reality because of the development of carbon nanotechnology.”

Being Japanese and how they run their massive military and civilian projects in anime they will have an angry teenage girl in charge.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/09/2014 01:53:19
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 598334
Subject: re: The Space Elevator again

I did once calculate the difference in weight between a space elevator and a space tower. In a space tower an object in simply lifter to the top. A space tower could be made remarkably light (10 to 100 times the weight of a space elevator) but fabrication techniques required extremely thing braced walls to avoid buckling. The overall cross section ended up resembling the Eiffel tower, but the individual struts were multiwall carbon fibre nanotubes.

IMHO, a necessary pre-requisite for a space elevator is a device for growing long carbon nanotubes. Just last year, the length of carbon nanotubes reached 0.55 metres. Link here. That’s long enough to knit with. The earlier 1-2 cm long ones were not long enough to knit with, and tube-tube bonding is notoriously weak without chemical alteration that in turn weakens the nanotubes.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/09/2014 02:30:38
From: Wocky
ID: 598336
Subject: re: The Space Elevator again

A question I’ve never seen addressed about the space elevator idea is that of Coriolis forces. A 1kg mass raised from the surface of the earth to 1000km (Obayashi say they want to elevate things 96000km) would experience a lateral force of about 73N over the duration of the trip (unless my BOTE calculations are wrong, but it looks about right.; whatever mass is sent up needs to gain about 73 m.s-1.) How do they compensate for that?

Also, someone earlier said that the cable would be lowered from a geostationary satellite. How? If the satellite is in stable geostationary orbit, it’s in a weightless environment, so anything it extrudes remains in orbit with it.

Reply Quote