Date: 27/10/2014 15:30:55
From: esselte
ID: 617015
Subject: Many Interacting Worlds Hypothesis

Abstract and Paper

Howard Wiseman (theoretical physicist at Griffith Uni in Brisbane) and co. have released a paper. From the abstract:

“We investigate whether quantum theory can be understood as the continuum limit of a mechanical theory, in which there is a huge, but finite, number of classical “worlds,” and quantum effects arise solely from a universal interaction between these worlds, without reference to any wave function. Here, a “world” means an entire universe with well-defined properties, determined by the classical configuration of its particles and fields. In our approach, each world evolves deterministically, probabilities arise due to ignorance as to which world a given observer occupies, and we argue that in the limit of infinitely many worlds the wave function can be recovered (as a secondary object) from the motion of these worlds. We introduce a simple model of such a “many interacting worlds” approach and show that it can reproduce some generic quantum phenomena—such as Ehrenfest’s theorem, wave packet spreading, barrier tunneling, and zero-point energy—as a direct consequence of mutual repulsion between worlds. Finally, we perform numerical simulations using our approach. We demonstrate, first, that it can be used to calculate quantum ground states, and second, that it is capable of reproducing, at least qualitatively, the double-slit interference phenomenon.”

Reply Quote

Date: 28/10/2014 07:21:28
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 617540
Subject: re: Many Interacting Worlds Hypothesis

The introduction to that paper is an interesting summary of the most popular interpretations of quantum mechanics.

The role of the wave function differs markedly in various
formulations of quantum mechanics. For example, in the
Copenhagen interpretation, it is a necessary tool for
calculating statistical correlations between a priori classical
preparation and registration devices; in the de Broglie–
Bohm (dBB) interpretation, it acts as a pilot wave that
guides the world’s classical configuration; in the manyworlds
(MW) interpretation, it describes an ever-branching
tree of noninteracting quasiclassical worlds; and in
spontaneous collapse models, its objective “collapse”
creates a single quasiclassical world.

In other formulations, the wave function does not even
play a primary role. For example, in Madelung’s quantum
hydrodynamics, Nelson’s stochastic dynamics, and
Hall and Reginatto’s exact uncertainty approach, the
fundamental equations of motion are formulated in terms of
a configuration probability density P and a momentum
potential S (or the gradient of the latter), with a purely
formal translation to a wave function description via
Ψ ≔ P1=2 exp½iS=ℏ. These approaches can describe the
evolution of any scalar wave function on configuration
space, which includes any fixed number of spinless
particles, plus bosonic fields. In this paper, we similarly
treat spinless and bosonic degrees of freedom.
More recently, it has been observed by Holland and
by Poirier and co-workers that the evolution of
such quantum systems can be formulated without reference
to even a momentum potential.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/10/2014 07:23:28
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 617542
Subject: re: Many Interacting Worlds Hypothesis

There is one thing in all this of which we may be certain:

There’s more to be revealed.

Reply Quote

Date: 28/10/2014 07:39:56
From: roughbarked
ID: 617549
Subject: re: Many Interacting Worlds Hypothesis

The Rev Dodgson said:


There is one thing in all this of which we may be certain:

There’s more to be revealed.

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 28/10/2014 08:27:59
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 617555
Subject: re: Many Interacting Worlds Hypothesis

roughbarked said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

There is one thing in all this of which we may be certain:

There’s more to be revealed.

:)

Recognise the source of the quote?

If you do, I’m sure you are the only one here who does :)

Reply Quote