Date: 1/11/2014 22:01:48
From: Kingy
ID: 620474
Subject: New chemical childrens names
A learned colleague of mine has asked for childrens names made up of only the abbreviations of the chemicals in the periodic table. This has been fun so far.
ClArK
ArSe
TiMoThY
KrAP
Please add your own suggestions.
Date: 1/11/2014 22:10:46
From: pommiejohn
ID: 620481
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
Date: 1/11/2014 22:20:59
From: Kingy
ID: 620487
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
Date: 1/11/2014 22:21:44
From: Dropbear
ID: 620488
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
Date: 1/11/2014 22:22:34
From: furious
ID: 620489
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
Date: 1/11/2014 22:22:42
From: Dropbear
ID: 620490
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
Date: 1/11/2014 22:23:08
From: AwesomeO
ID: 620491
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
Kingy said:
KNaCKErS
Geeze that’s a memory, the name for everyone, “hey you, knackers, get over here”.
Date: 1/11/2014 22:23:57
From: furious
ID: 620492
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
Date: 1/11/2014 22:24:30
From: Dropbear
ID: 620493
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
Date: 1/11/2014 22:28:02
From: furious
ID: 620494
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
Date: 1/11/2014 22:28:39
From: Dropbear
ID: 620496
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
Date: 1/11/2014 22:29:41
From: furious
ID: 620497
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
Date: 1/11/2014 22:37:15
From: Dropbear
ID: 620498
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
Date: 1/11/2014 22:40:33
From: sibeen
ID: 620499
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
Hmm, “J” and “Q” are the only letters that are not represented in an elements name.
Bloody unconscionable.
Date: 1/11/2014 22:42:53
From: Kingy
ID: 620500
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
Date: 1/11/2014 22:43:44
From: furious
ID: 620502
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
- Hmm, “J” and “Q” are the only letters that are not represented in an elements name.
Next time they make a short lived exotic element try should use Jq or Qj to name it…
Date: 1/11/2014 22:51:13
From: Kingy
ID: 620503
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
Date: 1/11/2014 22:53:58
From: Kingy
ID: 620504
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
Date: 1/11/2014 22:56:44
From: Kingy
ID: 620506
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
Date: 1/11/2014 22:56:47
From: furious
ID: 620507
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
BUCK … Or change the B for an F…
Date: 1/11/2014 23:01:26
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 620508
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
You mean like RaBiEs? But that’s not a very good children’s name.
BaRb
CoDy
OsCAr
IrIS
WAlLi
VAl
FRaN
MoUSe
RaFe
BLaIr
Probably dozens more.
Date: 1/11/2014 23:03:14
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 620509
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
Kingy said:
PoRnSTaAr
Damnit, I spotted PoRn but couldn’t think how to finish it.
Date: 1/11/2014 23:04:43
From: furious
ID: 620510
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
- Damnit, I spotted PoRn but couldn’t think how to finish it.
WHoRe
Date: 1/11/2014 23:07:03
From: Kingy
ID: 620513
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
Date: 1/11/2014 23:10:11
From: furious
ID: 620514
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
Date: 1/11/2014 23:24:22
From: Kingy
ID: 620517
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
Date: 1/11/2014 23:31:13
From: Carmen_Sandiego
ID: 620526
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
Date: 1/11/2014 23:33:54
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 620531
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
> Probably dozens more.
BaBY, plural BaBiEs
Date: 1/11/2014 23:34:39
From: roughbarked
ID: 620532
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
mollwollfumble said:
> Probably dozens more.
BaBY, plural BaBiEs
RaBiEs
Date: 1/11/2014 23:43:06
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 620535
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
BrOsNaN and MoORe and CoNNErY all played BONd
Date: 1/11/2014 23:48:16
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 620537
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
What about a full name, like
LaNCe BOYLe
Date: 1/11/2014 23:50:38
From: furious
ID: 620539
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
Date: 1/11/2014 23:51:28
From: Michael V
ID: 620540
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
Date: 1/11/2014 23:52:25
From: Michael V
ID: 620541
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
Date: 2/11/2014 00:10:15
From: furious
ID: 620546
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
Date: 2/11/2014 00:11:36
From: furious
ID: 620547
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
PUNKY BReWSTa…
Took me ten minutes to write that on the stupid hand held device and it was still effing wrong…
Date: 2/11/2014 00:38:55
From: roughbarked
ID: 620548
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
furious said:
PUNKY BReWSTa…
Took me ten minutes to write that on the stupid hand held device and it was still effing wrong…
You don’t want hear what I’ve been telling this pice of android shyte then.
Date: 2/11/2014 00:41:45
From: furious
ID: 620549
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
- You don’t want hear what I’ve been telling this pice of android shyte then.
Thought you were an apple fan boi…
Date: 2/11/2014 00:46:34
From: roughbarked
ID: 620550
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
furiousiu don’t want hear what I’ve been telling this pice of android shyte then.
Thought you were an apple fan boi…
[/quote said:
Not a fanboi simply of stupid android see how it fucks evyting by chucking the cursor to silly places and ruiningmy typing.
I doubt that an iPhone would make me feel any different than simply, poorer.
Date: 2/11/2014 08:11:43
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 620591
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
CoNaN
CoRbY
HaNa
LuCaS
DyLaN
LiAm
FeLiX
GaVIn
BrYCe
GaGe
NaTe
Date: 2/11/2014 15:00:01
From: OCDC
ID: 620821
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
Some dumb bunny forgot to mention that they must be consecutive elements, which rules out my ArSeClOWN.
Date: 2/11/2014 15:05:51
From: roughbarked
ID: 620823
Subject: re: New chemical childrens names
OCDC said:
Some dumb bunny forgot to mention that they must be consecutive elements, which rules out my ArSeClOWN.
Thank goodness someone else brought this up.