Date: 30/11/2014 07:40:43
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 636378
Subject: Space Rock Sheds Light on Mysterious Mineral on Earth

Space Rock Sheds Light on Mysterious Mineral on Earth

A rock from space is giving scientists the first glimpse of a mineral long thought to be the most abundant mineral on Earth, but which researchers lacked a natural sample of until now.

This discovery could shed light on the structure and dynamics of the inner Earth, as well as the early history of the solar system, according to the new paper.

more…

Reply Quote

Date: 30/11/2014 11:55:16
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 636437
Subject: re: Space Rock Sheds Light on Mysterious Mineral on Earth

CrazyNeutrino said:


A rock from space is giving scientists the first glimpse of a mineral long thought to be the most abundant mineral on Earth

Let me guess. Enstatite? There are enstatite meteorites, they’re far from being the most common but they’re also far from being the rarest. Enstatite is also found on the asteroid Vesta. As “the most abundant mineral on Earth”, the silicate perovskites, are reduced to lower pressure in the upper mantle they become enstatites with a “post-perovskite structure”.

Now to check CN’s link.


The mineral is a high-density version of magnesium iron silicate.

No, that’s different, slightly. Enstatite is a magnesium silicate on the end of the olivine series that grades from magnesium to iron.

The fact that scientists had not found any specimens of magnesium iron silicate perovskite in nature also meant it could not get an official mineral name from the International Mineralogical Association. This presented geologists with the odd situation of a nameless mineral being the most abundant one on Earth.

LOL. That’s absolutely true.

CN’s link leads to a brilliant little article, that is a “must read” for anyone interested, even a little, in geology. Expect to hear of “Bridgmanite” more often in future.

Reply Quote

Date: 1/12/2014 14:03:00
From: dv
ID: 637050
Subject: re: Space Rock Sheds Light on Mysterious Mineral on Earth

Good stuff though I would have preferred that they’d qualified their statements about the lower mantle: indicated that is just the result of modelling and that there is uncertainty associated with it.

Reply Quote