Date: 8/12/2014 14:42:53
From: diddly-squat
ID: 641722
Subject: 1st Test - Australia v India

Chris Rogers, David Warner, Shane Watson, Michael Clarke, Steven Smith, Mitchell Marsh, Brad Haddin, Mitchell Johnson, Ryan Harris, Peter Siddle

It should be an interesting summer, especially given the mix of success and failure the test team has had over the past 12 months, but no Dhoni is a good thing for Australia at least.

Reply Quote

Date: 8/12/2014 14:44:53
From: Tamb
ID: 641725
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

diddly-squat said:


Chris Rogers, David Warner, Shane Watson, Michael Clarke, Steven Smith, Mitchell Marsh, Brad Haddin, Mitchell Johnson, Ryan Harris, Peter Siddle

It should be an interesting summer, especially given the mix of success and failure the test team has had over the past 12 months, but no Dhoni is a good thing for Australia at least.


Will be no Clarke after about an hour.

Reply Quote

Date: 8/12/2014 14:46:14
From: Dropbear
ID: 641726
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Can’t believe they left Phil Hughes out ..

Reply Quote

Date: 8/12/2014 14:47:37
From: The_observer
ID: 641728
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Dropbear said:


Can’t believe they left Phil Hughes out ..

not surprising

going by the op we’ve only picked 10 players

Reply Quote

Date: 8/12/2014 14:51:10
From: diddly-squat
ID: 641730
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Dropbear said:


Can’t believe they left Phil Hughes out ..

can’t bat, can’t bowl

Reply Quote

Date: 8/12/2014 14:52:21
From: Dropbear
ID: 641731
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

63 not out in his last innings and still overlooked …

I blame boof

Reply Quote

Date: 8/12/2014 14:52:50
From: Tamb
ID: 641732
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

diddly-squat said:


Dropbear said:

Can’t believe they left Phil Hughes out ..

can’t bat, can’t bowl


Prolly doesn’t keep to well either.

Reply Quote

Date: 8/12/2014 14:53:50
From: Dropbear
ID: 641734
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Tamb said:

Prolly doesn’t keep to well either.

heh .. (so naughty)

Reply Quote

Date: 8/12/2014 14:53:52
From: Tamb
ID: 641735
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Tamb said:


diddly-squat said:

Dropbear said:

Can’t believe they left Phil Hughes out ..

can’t bat, can’t bowl


Prolly doesn’t keep to well either.


to = too

Reply Quote

Date: 8/12/2014 15:03:14
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 641740
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

They are probably saving him for the next ashes series.

Reply Quote

Date: 8/12/2014 15:04:06
From: Dropbear
ID: 641741
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Peak Warming Man said:


They are probably saving him for the next ashes series.

we’re all going straight to heck

Reply Quote

Date: 8/12/2014 15:06:17
From: Tamb
ID: 641745
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Dropbear said:


Peak Warming Man said:

They are probably saving him for the next ashes series.

we’re all going straight to heck


I wonder if that Israeli bloke will be umpiring?

Reply Quote

Date: 8/12/2014 15:14:52
From: rumpole
ID: 641754
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

No spinner on a track that’s usually suited to spinners.

I wonder if Lyon will play another test.

I’d like to see Boyce given a chance. Off spinners have had their day, the batsmen are too used to them.

Reply Quote

Date: 8/12/2014 15:49:01
From: jjjust moi
ID: 641781
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Lyon’s in, according to the list I saw anyway

Reply Quote

Date: 8/12/2014 15:51:58
From: party_pants
ID: 641783
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

jjjust moi said:


Lyon’s in, according to the list I saw anyway

As he should be.

Reply Quote

Date: 8/12/2014 15:53:33
From: Dropbear
ID: 641785
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

jjjust moi said:


Lyon’s in, according to the list I saw anyway

I think DA will be lyon in, soon.

Reply Quote

Date: 8/12/2014 16:00:06
From: party_pants
ID: 641787
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Dropbear said:


Can’t believe they left Phil Hughes out ..

They’ve officially named him as the 13th man. Which is probably about where he would have been anyway.

Reply Quote

Date: 8/12/2014 16:03:14
From: Dropbear
ID: 641789
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

party_pants said:


Dropbear said:

Can’t believe they left Phil Hughes out ..

They’ve officially named him as the 13th man. Which is probably about where he would have been anyway.

I see Shaun Marsh couldn’t even beat a dead guy to 13th man

Reply Quote

Date: 8/12/2014 16:06:50
From: party_pants
ID: 641792
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Dropbear said:


party_pants said:

Dropbear said:

Can’t believe they left Phil Hughes out ..

They’ve officially named him as the 13th man. Which is probably about where he would have been anyway.

I see Shaun Marsh couldn’t even beat a dead guy to 13th man

We’ve got the better Marsh brother in the team already.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 10:57:54
From: diddly-squat
ID: 642206
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Australia win the toss and decide to bat.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 10:59:11
From: jjjust moi
ID: 642207
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Where’s Sibeen, is he ready?

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 11:05:26
From: sibeen
ID: 642210
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

jjjust moi said:


Where’s Sibeen, is he ready?

Do re me fa so la ti do

Fuck

Fuck Off

Yep, all tuned up. I haven’t lost it.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 11:09:48
From: The_observer
ID: 642217
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Shot

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 11:13:32
From: The_observer
ID: 642221
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Warner’s on fire

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 11:20:09
From: sibeen
ID: 642222
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

It’s test cricket, but not as we know it.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 11:21:49
From: The_observer
ID: 642223
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Bouncer

is good

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 11:24:33
From: jjjust moi
ID: 642224
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

sibeen said:


It’s test cricket, but not as we know it.

Neither do the elephant jockeys.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 11:29:21
From: diddly-squat
ID: 642226
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

sibeen said:


It’s test cricket, but not as we know it.

If I were Kohli I would have made sure that the first ball was a shoulder high bouncer… Get right up under the chin… in stead they are bowling full…

what sort of tactics is that?

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 11:34:19
From: diddly-squat
ID: 642227
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Ishant Sharma brought on to try and stem the flow…

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 11:36:49
From: The_observer
ID: 642228
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Bowling full?

bowling shit!

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 11:42:29
From: The_observer
ID: 642231
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Ishant over the wicket

look out

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 11:43:48
From: sibeen
ID: 642232
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 11:44:16
From: The_observer
ID: 642233
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

The_observer said:


Ishant over the wicket

look out

Told ya

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 11:46:20
From: diddly-squat
ID: 642234
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

sibeen said:


FUCK

that’s OK… we have a great No.3 and No.4 – when have they ever failed us??

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 11:46:30
From: jjjust moi
ID: 642235
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

The_observer said:


The_observer said:

Ishant over the wicket

look out

Told ya


Wasn’t a good ball but, just a very poor choice of shot.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 11:51:58
From: Dropbear
ID: 642236
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

When is Hughes in?

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 11:55:00
From: stumpy_seahorse
ID: 642237
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Dropbear said:


When is Hughes in?

She’ll be in during the lunch break on thursday

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 11:55:02
From: The_observer
ID: 642238
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

jjjust moi said:


The_observer said:

The_observer said:

Ishant over the wicket

look out

Told ya


Wasn’t a good ball but, just a very poor choice of shot.

short of a length, moving across and away

good ball me thinks

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 11:55:52
From: dv
ID: 642239
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

He went in six days ago.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 11:57:39
From: jjjust moi
ID: 642240
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

The_observer said:


jjjust moi said:

The_observer said:

Told ya


Wasn’t a good ball but, just a very poor choice of shot.

short of a length, moving across and away

good ball me thinks


18” outside off, should have been left alone.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 12:00:25
From: The_observer
ID: 642242
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

jjjust moi said:


The_observer said:

jjjust moi said:

Wasn’t a good ball but, just a very poor choice of shot.

short of a length, moving across and away

good ball me thinks


18” outside off, should have been left alone.

Got sucked into it

what was it, 138k ?

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 12:11:09
From: The_observer
ID: 642252
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

KFC now has a pie

Mmmmmmm. chicken

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 12:11:49
From: diddly-squat
ID: 642253
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Dropbear said:


When is Hughes in?

is he even in state?

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 12:16:56
From: diddly-squat
ID: 642261
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Unless they can make some early inroads, it may well be a very long day in the field for India…

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 12:22:17
From: diddly-squat
ID: 642263
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Warner chalks up his half century

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 12:37:34
From: sibeen
ID: 642270
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 12:38:23
From: The_observer
ID: 642271
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

sibeen said:


FUCK

BUGGER, even

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 12:39:18
From: party_pants
ID: 642273
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

sibeen said:


FUCK

Meh, it’s only Watson.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 12:40:11
From: diddly-squat
ID: 642275
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

sibeen said:


FUCK

Don’t worry, we have a world class No.4 – when has he ever let us down?

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 12:41:21
From: diddly-squat
ID: 642277
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

comment on Cricinfo

“Fantastic to see Michael Clarke getting through the national anthem and coin toss this morning without re-injuring his hamstring.”

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 12:43:09
From: diddly-squat
ID: 642279
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

are we now happy that the Watson experiment is finally over??

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 13:06:25
From: Ian
ID: 642289
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Mmmm.. good stuff

Hope Warner keeps going and Clarkes leg dosnt fall off.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 14:18:20
From: diddly-squat
ID: 642313
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Clarke is putting a few away here….

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 14:32:39
From: Dropbear
ID: 642316
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

diddly-squat said:


Clarke is putting a few away here….

lunch beers?

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 14:35:14
From: diddly-squat
ID: 642317
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Dropbear said:


diddly-squat said:

Clarke is putting a few away here….

lunch beers?

what ever it is, it seems to be working

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 14:42:45
From: diddly-squat
ID: 642321
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

David Warner (lhb) 100 (106)

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 14:45:32
From: Dropbear
ID: 642323
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

I still think he’s a shit opener…. not a bad #4 or 5..

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 14:46:57
From: diddly-squat
ID: 642324
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Dropbear said:


I still think he’s a shit opener…. not a bad #4 or 5..

8/

He’s the best opener we have…

There is that Phil Hughes guy, what ever happened to him?

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 14:48:30
From: Dropbear
ID: 642325
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

diddly-squat said:


Dropbear said:

I still think he’s a shit opener…. not a bad #4 or 5..

8/

He’s the best opener we have…

There is that Phil Hughes guy, what ever happened to him?

He can’t defend his wicket and stay in for a long time … it’s death or glory ….

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 14:50:35
From: dv
ID: 642327
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

ExHughmed

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 14:51:15
From: diddly-squat
ID: 642328
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Dropbear said:


diddly-squat said:

Dropbear said:

I still think he’s a shit opener…. not a bad #4 or 5..

8/

He’s the best opener we have…

There is that Phil Hughes guy, what ever happened to him?

He can’t defend his wicket and stay in for a long time … it’s death or glory ….

sounds like Hughes loss

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 14:53:42
From: diddly-squat
ID: 642329
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

so have we all had our Phil of these tasteless puns yet?

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 14:56:18
From: poikilotherm
ID: 642330
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

diddly-squat said:

so have we all had our Phil of these tasteless puns yet?

Someone might bounce a few more in.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 14:57:09
From: Cymek
ID: 642331
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

diddly-squat said:

so have we all had our Phil of these tasteless puns yet?

Am I out of order to say he’s been buried and now it’s time for the public to drop the pretense about how upset they are he died especially those that never met him and just seem to be jumping on the mourning bandwagon.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 14:57:58
From: Tamb
ID: 642332
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

poikilotherm said:


diddly-squat said:

so have we all had our Phil of these tasteless puns yet?

Someone might bounce a few more in.


I wonder if this is neckrophilia,

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 15:02:36
From: furious
ID: 642334
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Hughes to say?

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 15:03:29
From: Dropbear
ID: 642335
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

diddly-squat said:

so have we all had our Phil of these tasteless puns yet?

I’m sure we’re yet to tap that rich vein

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 15:05:42
From: Cymek
ID: 642337
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Apparently his favourite animal celebrity was Bouncer from Neighbours

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 15:09:54
From: Tamb
ID: 642340
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Cymek said:


Apparently his favourite animal celebrity was Bouncer from Neighbours

I thought it would be a Kookaburra.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 15:10:27
From: Ian
ID: 642341
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

These two have given the Ozzies a hughe fillip.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 15:11:40
From: Tamb
ID: 642342
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Ian said:


These two have given the Ozzies a hughe fillip.

Oz 2/206 but Clarkie looks like he’s broken down.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 15:11:54
From: jjjust moi
ID: 642343
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Clarke fkd again!

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 15:12:15
From: diddly-squat
ID: 642344
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Knock out innings from Warner here and even Clarke will soon pas 63 – I can feel the tingles down my spine.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 15:13:49
From: diddly-squat
ID: 642346
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

I don’t get it… cricket really isn’t that physical… how the fk does Clarke keep hurting himself..

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 15:14:40
From: jjjust moi
ID: 642347
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

diddly-squat said:


I don’t get it… cricket really isn’t that physical… how the fk does Clarke keep hurting himself..


He’s sooky.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 15:15:22
From: Tamb
ID: 642348
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

diddly-squat said:


I don’t get it… cricket really isn’t that physical… how the fk does Clarke keep hurting himself..


That was an Aunt Sally wasn’t it diddles?

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 15:15:50
From: diddly-squat
ID: 642349
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

FFS sake… don;t worry about can’t bat, can’t bowl… Clarke doesn’t even seem to be able to walk

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 15:26:34
From: Dropbear
ID: 642350
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

diddly-squat said:


I don’t get it… cricket really isn’t that physical… how the fk does Clarke keep hurting himself..

He’s got a weak heart-string.. it’s easilly pulled.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 15:31:43
From: stumpy_seahorse
ID: 642351
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

diddly-squat said:


I don’t get it… cricket really isn’t that physical… how the fk does Clarke keep hurting himself..

looks like he’s pulled an ovary again…

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 15:40:02
From: Dropbear
ID: 642355
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Clarkey has the record for most number of retired hurts in test cricket..

Atta boy.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 15:48:37
From: diddly-squat
ID: 642358
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Dropbear said:


diddly-squat said:

I don’t get it… cricket really isn’t that physical… how the fk does Clarke keep hurting himself..

He’s got a weak heart-string.. it’s easilly pulled.

obviously he need a little brother or something…

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 15:51:48
From: roughbarked
ID: 642360
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

diddly-squat said:


I don’t get it… cricket really isn’t that physical… how the fk does Clarke keep hurting himself..

Lack of fitness.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 15:52:07
From: Dropbear
ID: 642361
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

roughbarked said:


diddly-squat said:

I don’t get it… cricket really isn’t that physical… how the fk does Clarke keep hurting himself..

Lack of fitness.

Not at all.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 15:54:34
From: roughbarked
ID: 642364
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Dropbear said:


roughbarked said:

diddly-squat said:

I don’t get it… cricket really isn’t that physical… how the fk does Clarke keep hurting himself..

Lack of fitness.

Not at all.

no fitness? Sounds correct.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 15:55:03
From: diddly-squat
ID: 642365
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

roughbarked said:


diddly-squat said:

I don’t get it… cricket really isn’t that physical… how the fk does Clarke keep hurting himself..

Lack of fitness.

yeah no… I’d say Clarke is super-dooper fit. the term you are searching for is conditioning

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 15:59:15
From: roughbarked
ID: 642367
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

diddly-squat said:


roughbarked said:

diddly-squat said:

I don’t get it… cricket really isn’t that physical… how the fk does Clarke keep hurting himself..

Lack of fitness.

yeah no… I’d say Clarke is super-dooper fit. the term you are searching for is conditioning

mere words. The man is out of condition and therefore unfit.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 16:02:01
From: Dropbear
ID: 642369
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

his hamstring is fucked and he has not given it a proper chance to heal

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 16:03:45
From: roughbarked
ID: 642370
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Dropbear said:


his hamstring is fucked and he has not given it a proper chance to heal

Yes. This is true but it would mean letting someone else take his job. Who cares if he never walks again, he wants to keep the job.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 16:05:03
From: jjjust moi
ID: 642371
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Dropbear said:


his hamstring is fucked and he has not given it a proper chance to heal


Was a back spasm I thought.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 16:18:39
From: stumpy_seahorse
ID: 642379
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Is Shebs on a delayed telecast?

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 16:36:24
From: sibeen
ID: 642387
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

stumpy_seahorse said:


Is Shebs on a delayed telecast?

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 16:38:42
From: stumpy_seahorse
ID: 642388
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

sibeen said:


stumpy_seahorse said:

Is Shebs on a delayed telecast?

FUCK

you’re 19 deliveries behind…

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 16:48:46
From: sibeen
ID: 642391
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

stumpy_seahorse said:


sibeen said:

stumpy_seahorse said:

Is Shebs on a delayed telecast?

FUCK

you’re 19 deliveries behind…

Had to run a sprog to a music lesson.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 16:50:08
From: stumpy_seahorse
ID: 642392
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

sibeen said:


stumpy_seahorse said:

sibeen said:

FUCK

you’re 19 deliveries behind…

Had to run a sprog to a music lesson.

euphamism?

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 16:51:33
From: sibeen
ID: 642393
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

stumpy_seahorse said:


sibeen said:

stumpy_seahorse said:

you’re 19 deliveries behind…

Had to run a sprog to a music lesson.

euphamism?

No, guitar; she’s not as advanced as Bubblecar.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 16:53:26
From: Cymek
ID: 642394
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

sibeen said:


stumpy_seahorse said:

sibeen said:

Had to run a sprog to a music lesson.

euphamism?

No, guitar; she’s not as advanced as Bubblecar.

None of us are, he’s like a Homo Sapiens Superior

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 17:09:07
From: Cymek
ID: 642395
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Teenagers do dumb things but imagine the mess you’d have made of your life if you were these two girls

Austrian IS poster girls Samra Kesinovic, 17, and Sabina Selimovic, 15 reportedly admitted they had made a huge mistake joining the terror group.

The teens, were said to be fed up with the gruelling and barbaric lifestyle which comes with joining the IS territory.

The young friends believe their lives have been turned completely upside down after becoming accustomed to talking to whoever they wanted, saying whatever they pleased and wearing whatever clothes they liked.

They also didn’t like being controlled, according to media reports.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 17:24:25
From: diddly-squat
ID: 642405
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Dropbear said:


his hamstring is fucked and he has not given it a proper chance to heal

what is needs to do is pull a Warnie, get caught with drugs in his system, and have a 2 year lay off

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 18:19:03
From: sibeen
ID: 642440
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 18:20:03
From: sibeen
ID: 642441
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 9/12/2014 18:31:05
From: diddly-squat
ID: 642447
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

what a shitty end to such an otherwise good day

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 11:16:03
From: diddly-squat
ID: 642787
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Clarke is back out at the crease

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 12:00:57
From: diddly-squat
ID: 642857
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

the 400 clicks over with Smith 7 shy of his 100 and Clarke 8 runs behind him

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 12:09:03
From: diddly-squat
ID: 642874
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

and rain has halted play

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 14:05:17
From: diddly-squat
ID: 642992
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Smith (The Unworthy) gets his ton

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 14:06:31
From: Dropbear
ID: 642993
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Clark(e) is on 97 after finding his spine.

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 14:08:32
From: diddly-squat
ID: 642995
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

98… he’s really grown a back bone today…

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 14:12:11
From: diddly-squat
ID: 642999
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

and the again, the covers are out.

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 14:12:36
From: Dropbear
ID: 643000
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

it’s raining ..

lol

it never rains in adelaide in december .. WTF

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 14:13:28
From: jjjust moi
ID: 643001
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Going to be off for a few hours, looking at the radar:
http://www.bom.gov.au/products/IDR643.loop.shtml#skip

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 14:13:50
From: diddly-squat
ID: 643002
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Dropbear said:


it’s raining ..

lol

it never rains in adelaide in december .. WTF

this is what happens when you pretend to be the Brisbane test

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 14:14:42
From: jjjust moi
ID: 643003
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Dropbear said:


it’s raining ..

lol

it never rains in adelaide in december .. WTF


Never happened before ss moved that way, blame him then.

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 14:23:03
From: Dropbear
ID: 643006
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

diddly-squat said:


Dropbear said:

it’s raining ..

lol

it never rains in adelaide in december .. WTF

this is what happens when you pretend to be the Brisbane test

mind blown

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 16:06:54
From: diddly-squat
ID: 643079
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Clarke get’s his ton..

I wonder when the last time was that three Australian batsman scored 100s in the first innings of a test? Did it happen during the last Ashes series?

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 18:30:41
From: sibeen
ID: 643152
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

rushes in

FUCK

Sorry for the break in transmission. Had to drive SWMBO up to the pub.

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 18:32:11
From: Divine Angel
ID: 643153
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

sibeen said:

Had to drive SWMBO up to the pub.

Is she hoping to win big on the raffles?

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 18:33:39
From: sibeen
ID: 643154
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Divine Angel said:


sibeen said:
Had to drive SWMBO up to the pub.

Is she hoping to win big on the raffles?

I’d be stunned if she did, and then be asking pointed questions. The pub I dropped her off at doesn’t do raffles, pokies, TAB, or any of that other shit.

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 18:37:35
From: party_pants
ID: 643155
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

I missed it – did we declare or just go off for bad light?

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 18:37:39
From: Cymek
ID: 643156
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

I was hoping all this cricket nonsense would just go away, damn

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 18:38:12
From: sibeen
ID: 643157
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Bad light.

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 21:05:01
From: rumpole
ID: 643240
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

A million dollar lighting system and they still go off for bad light.

That sucks.

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 21:15:02
From: stumpy_seahorse
ID: 643244
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

rumpole said:


A million dollar lighting system and they still go off for bad light.

That sucks.

that’s the problem, the lighting system is too good…

(the umps call it when the artificial light outpowers the natural light

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 21:15:08
From: party_pants
ID: 643245
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

rumpole said:


A million dollar lighting system and they still go off for bad light.

That sucks.

Problem is with the $100 ball. Dark red is hard to see under lights. They still can make a more visible ball in white. yellow, orange or bright pink, that will last 80 overs without wearing away.

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 21:17:44
From: sibeen
ID: 643249
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

party_pants said:


rumpole said:

A million dollar lighting system and they still go off for bad light.

That sucks.

Problem is with the $100 ball. Dark red is hard to see under lights. They still can make a more visible ball in white. yellow, orange or bright pink, that will last 80 overs without wearing away.

Your cant could do with a can’t :)

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 21:18:09
From: party_pants
ID: 643250
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

party_pants said:


rumpole said:

A million dollar lighting system and they still go off for bad light.

That sucks.

Problem is with the $100 ball. Dark red is hard to see under lights. They still can’t make a more visible ball in white. yellow, orange or bright pink, that will last 80 overs without wearing away.

edit

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 21:19:03
From: party_pants
ID: 643252
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

sibeen said:


party_pants said:

rumpole said:

A million dollar lighting system and they still go off for bad light.

That sucks.

Problem is with the $100 ball. Dark red is hard to see under lights. They still can make a more visible ball in white. yellow, orange or bright pink, that will last 80 overs without wearing away.

Your cant could do with a can’t :)

I’m already on to it.

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 21:25:47
From: tauto
ID: 643257
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Was asked today how much difference the ball makes in a test match. I wasn’t sure but said in Oz we have Kookaburras and overseas they select their own.

How much difference can the brand of ball affect a test match?

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 21:27:54
From: sibeen
ID: 643260
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

tauto said:


Was asked today how much difference the ball makes in a test match. I wasn’t sure but said in Oz we have Kookaburras and overseas they select their own.

How much difference can the brand of ball affect a test match?

I thought it was basically the Kookaburra everywhere but England & Wales, where they use the Duke.

The Duke appears to swing more, but that may also be due to English conditions.

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 21:32:42
From: tauto
ID: 643265
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

sibeen said:


tauto said:

Was asked today how much difference the ball makes in a test match. I wasn’t sure but said in Oz we have Kookaburras and overseas they select their own.

How much difference can the brand of ball affect a test match?

I thought it was basically the Kookaburra everywhere but England & Wales, where they use the Duke.

The Duke appears to swing more, but that may also be due to English conditions.

Ta. So the Kookaburra is the standard ball in world cricket.

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 21:36:26
From: sibeen
ID: 643266
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

tauto said:


sibeen said:

tauto said:

Was asked today how much difference the ball makes in a test match. I wasn’t sure but said in Oz we have Kookaburras and overseas they select their own.

How much difference can the brand of ball affect a test match?

I thought it was basically the Kookaburra everywhere but England & Wales, where they use the Duke.

The Duke appears to swing more, but that may also be due to English conditions.

Ta. So the Kookaburra is the standard ball in world cricket.

I was close. According to wiki, which I’ve just checked, the West Indies also use the Duke and India uses something called the SG.

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 21:37:34
From: party_pants
ID: 643267
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

tauto said:


sibeen said:

tauto said:

Was asked today how much difference the ball makes in a test match. I wasn’t sure but said in Oz we have Kookaburras and overseas they select their own.

How much difference can the brand of ball affect a test match?

I thought it was basically the Kookaburra everywhere but England & Wales, where they use the Duke.

The Duke appears to swing more, but that may also be due to English conditions.

Ta. So the Kookaburra is the standard ball in world cricket.

England & West Indies use Duke brand, Inida uses some other local brand. Apart from that everyone else uses Kookaburra for test matches. For ODIs and T20s everyone uses white Kookaburras.

Not sure why the Duke balls swing more than the Kookaburras. But this seems to be the accepted wisdom that they do.

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 21:40:16
From: sibeen
ID: 643268
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Wiki also tells me that there is a British Standard – BS 5993 specifically for cricket balls.

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 21:42:08
From: stumpy_seahorse
ID: 643269
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

They also mentioned today that test match balls are not available to buy, they are all hand-made only to be used in test matches

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 21:44:30
From: tauto
ID: 643270
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

stumpy_seahorse said:


They also mentioned today that test match balls are not available to buy, they are all hand-made only to be used in test matches

Ta.

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 21:44:41
From: party_pants
ID: 643271
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

stumpy_seahorse said:


They also mentioned today that test match balls are not available to buy, they are all hand-made only to be used in test matches

I wonder what they cost. The best ones you can buy (for club cricket) are about $80-100 each.

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 21:47:15
From: tauto
ID: 643272
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

party_pants said:


stumpy_seahorse said:

They also mentioned today that test match balls are not available to buy, they are all hand-made only to be used in test matches

I wonder what they cost. The best ones you can buy (for club cricket) are about $80-100 each.

—-

What are you buying for the extra money?

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 21:50:21
From: stumpy_seahorse
ID: 643273
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

party_pants said:


stumpy_seahorse said:

They also mentioned today that test match balls are not available to buy, they are all hand-made only to be used in test matches

I wonder what they cost. The best ones you can buy (for club cricket) are about $80-100 each.

no idea..
I do know that Afl grade goal posts wholesale for around $13K /set (2x goal, 2x behind posts)

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 21:53:14
From: jjjust moi
ID: 643274
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

I love the specsavers volleyball ad, very good.

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 21:53:20
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 643275
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

better leather for scuff resistance. better size control, better weight control. more accurate hand stitching. though i would think that they just go through the production items and pick the best ones out.

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 21:53:41
From: party_pants
ID: 643276
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

tauto said:


party_pants said:

stumpy_seahorse said:

They also mentioned today that test match balls are not available to buy, they are all hand-made only to be used in test matches

I wonder what they cost. The best ones you can buy (for club cricket) are about $80-100 each.

—-

What are you buying for the extra money?

Don’t know, never played with a test standard cricket ball, or even touched one. Presumably they are better stitched, more symmetrical and have a better finish than the machine-made ones.

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 21:54:57
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 643277
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

jjjust moi said:


I love the specsavers volleyball ad, very good.

Bouncy bouncy?

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 21:57:34
From: tauto
ID: 643278
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

ChrispenEvan said:


better leather for scuff resistance. better size control, better weight control. more accurate hand stitching. though i would think that they just go through the production items and pick the best ones out.

—-

Ta, Zardoz :)

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 21:58:45
From: rumpole
ID: 643279
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

party_pants said:


party_pants said:

rumpole said:

A million dollar lighting system and they still go off for bad light.

That sucks.

Problem is with the $100 ball. Dark red is hard to see under lights. They still can’t make a more visible ball in white. yellow, orange or bright pink, that will last 80 overs without wearing away.

edit

I guess that’s because the cover is made of leather and painted on the outside.

You would need to make the cover of some artificial compound that’s the same colour all the way through. Don’t know if the traditionalists are ready for that yet.

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 22:00:39
From: party_pants
ID: 643280
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

rumpole said:


party_pants said:

party_pants said:

Problem is with the $100 ball. Dark red is hard to see under lights. They still can’t make a more visible ball in white. yellow, orange or bright pink, that will last 80 overs without wearing away.

edit

I guess that’s because the cover is made of leather and painted on the outside.

You would need to make the cover of some artificial compound that’s the same colour all the way through. Don’t know if the traditionalists are ready for that yet.

Either that or you’d need to dye the leather all the way through. But that might change the properties of the leather.

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 22:00:40
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 643281
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

making it out of artificial material would be hard as you still need it to wear. that is part of the game, wearing balls.

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 22:01:28
From: jjjust moi
ID: 643282
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Witty Rejoinder said:


jjjust moi said:

I love the specsavers volleyball ad, very good.

Bouncy bouncy?


Guy bats a seagull for a winner & then does a victory dance.

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 22:01:34
From: sibeen
ID: 643283
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

rumpole said:


party_pants said:

party_pants said:

Problem is with the $100 ball. Dark red is hard to see under lights. They still can’t make a more visible ball in white. yellow, orange or bright pink, that will last 80 overs without wearing away.

edit

I guess that’s because the cover is made of leather and painted on the outside.

You would need to make the cover of some artificial compound that’s the same colour all the way through. Don’t know if the traditionalists are ready for that yet.

I’m still getting used to the front foot no ball rule, and the six ball over; so don’t you start.

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 22:04:39
From: rumpole
ID: 643284
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

sibeen said:


rumpole said:

party_pants said:

edit

I guess that’s because the cover is made of leather and painted on the outside.

You would need to make the cover of some artificial compound that’s the same colour all the way through. Don’t know if the traditionalists are ready for that yet.

I’m still getting used to the front foot no ball rule, and the six ball over; so don’t you start.

I’m a spikey green glove man myself. The sausages they wear on their fingers these days are for wimps.

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 22:08:39
From: jjjust moi
ID: 643285
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

rumpole said:


sibeen said:

rumpole said:

I guess that’s because the cover is made of leather and painted on the outside.

You would need to make the cover of some artificial compound that’s the same colour all the way through. Don’t know if the traditionalists are ready for that yet.

I’m still getting used to the front foot no ball rule, and the six ball over; so don’t you start.

I’m a spikey green glove man myself. The sausages they wear on their fingers these days are for wimps.


GLOVES, let me tell you in my day……………………..

Reply Quote

Date: 10/12/2014 23:16:15
From: roughbarked
ID: 643308
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

jjjust moi said:


rumpole said:

sibeen said:

I’m still getting used to the front foot no ball rule, and the six ball over; so don’t you start.

I’m a spikey green glove man myself. The sausages they wear on their fingers these days are for wimps.


GLOVES, let me tell you in my day……………………..

We never wore any, yeah I know the story.

Reply Quote

Date: 11/12/2014 10:37:30
From: diddly-squat
ID: 643486
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

diddly-squat said:


Chris Rogers, David Warner, Shane Watson, Michael Clarke, Steven Smith, Mitchell Marsh, Brad Haddin, Mitchell Johnson, Ryan Harris, Peter Siddle

It should be an interesting summer, especially given the mix of success and failure the test team has had over the past 12 months, but no Dhoni is a good thing for Australia at least.

interesting tactics from Clarke… I wonder why he didn’t declare last night and have a few overs at the Indian’s late in the day…

I guess it might be a bit steamy in Adelaide this morning, I wonder if the quicks will get the new ball to move around much?

Reply Quote

Date: 11/12/2014 10:40:39
From: Divine Angel
ID: 643492
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

diddly-squat said:

I guess it might be a bit steamy in Adelaide this morning, I wonder if the quicks will get the new ball to move around much?

something I learned yesterday is that tennis balls at Wimbledon are kept at 20C. Are cricket balls kept at a certain temperature before use in a test?

Reply Quote

Date: 11/12/2014 10:42:12
From: roughbarked
ID: 643493
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Divine Angel said:


diddly-squat said:

I guess it might be a bit steamy in Adelaide this morning, I wonder if the quicks will get the new ball to move around much?

something I learned yesterday is that tennis balls at Wimbledon are kept at 20C. Are cricket balls kept at a certain temperature before use in a test?


No.

Reply Quote

Date: 11/12/2014 10:42:12
From: diddly-squat
ID: 643494
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Divine Angel said:


diddly-squat said:

I guess it might be a bit steamy in Adelaide this morning, I wonder if the quicks will get the new ball to move around much?

something I learned yesterday is that tennis balls at Wimbledon are kept at 20C. Are cricket balls kept at a certain temperature before use in a test?

not that I’m aware of

Reply Quote

Date: 11/12/2014 10:43:08
From: jjjust moi
ID: 643498
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Clarke didn’t declare because the umps would have stopped play with the quicks on. As they did when India was going to put them back on.

Reply Quote

Date: 11/12/2014 10:43:51
From: party_pants
ID: 643499
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Divine Angel said:

Are cricket balls kept at a certain temperature before use in a test?

Yes, room temperature.

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 11/12/2014 11:09:03
From: diddly-squat
ID: 643519
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 11/12/2014 12:54:52
From: stumpy_seahorse
ID: 643658
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Is Sibeen MIA?

starts pacing

Reply Quote

Date: 11/12/2014 12:55:36
From: Dropbear
ID: 643659
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Allow me

GOTTIM

Reply Quote

Date: 11/12/2014 13:08:55
From: stumpy_seahorse
ID: 643672
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Lunch at Adelaide oval and Hughes takes to the crease… :D

Reply Quote

Date: 11/12/2014 14:55:33
From: sibeen
ID: 643698
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 11/12/2014 14:55:36
From: stumpy_seahorse
ID: 643699
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

taps foot impatiently…

Reply Quote

Date: 11/12/2014 14:56:19
From: stumpy_seahorse
ID: 643700
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

sibeen said:


FUCK OFF

SIBEEN!!!

you’re alive.

stops pacing…

Reply Quote

Date: 11/12/2014 15:24:06
From: Dropbear
ID: 643704
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

must be playing on a runway…
720 runs for 10 wickets.

Reply Quote

Date: 11/12/2014 15:26:39
From: party_pants
ID: 643705
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Dropbear said:


must be playing on a runway…
720 runs for 10 wickets.

a drop-in runway

Reply Quote

Date: 11/12/2014 16:56:58
From: sibeen
ID: 643753
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 11/12/2014 17:02:16
From: party_pants
ID: 643756
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

stands outside office door and raises finger

Reply Quote

Date: 11/12/2014 17:02:43
From: roughbarked
ID: 643757
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

party_pants said:


stands outside office door and raises finger

did you fart?

Reply Quote

Date: 11/12/2014 17:05:07
From: party_pants
ID: 643758
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

roughbarked said:


party_pants said:

stands outside office door and raises finger

did you fart?

My colleague is out in the yard driving the forklift around. It’s my signal that a wicket has fallen.

Reply Quote

Date: 11/12/2014 18:20:49
From: sibeen
ID: 643809
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 11/12/2014 19:42:08
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 643839
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

They might get one or two more tests out of Clarke and then put him down.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/12/2014 01:04:45
From: party_pants
ID: 644042
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

till tomorrow then.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/12/2014 11:19:12
From: diddly-squat
ID: 644164
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 12/12/2014 11:33:18
From: diddly-squat
ID: 644174
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 12/12/2014 11:52:56
From: Rule 303
ID: 644195
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Lyon goes to five-for. He’d be happy with that.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/12/2014 11:54:51
From: diddly-squat
ID: 644197
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Rule 303 said:


Lyon goes to five-for. He’d be happy with that.

two in an over…

he’s bowled very well…

Reply Quote

Date: 12/12/2014 11:55:35
From: Dropbear
ID: 644199
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Rule 303 said:


Lyon goes to five-for. He’d be happy with that.

Indians can’t play spin.. Who knew?

Reply Quote

Date: 12/12/2014 11:57:35
From: Rule 303
ID: 644201
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Dropbear said:


Rule 303 said:

Lyon goes to five-for. He’d be happy with that.

Indians can’t play spin.. Who knew?

I reckon they would be regretting not having DRS by now.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/12/2014 11:58:00
From: diddly-squat
ID: 644202
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Dropbear said:


Rule 303 said:

Lyon goes to five-for. He’d be happy with that.

Indians can’t play spin.. Who knew?

add in the bounce and it’s another world to them

Reply Quote

Date: 12/12/2014 12:03:36
From: Michael V
ID: 644211
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Sibeen?

Reply Quote

Date: 12/12/2014 12:17:43
From: diddly-squat
ID: 644226
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

so I say drop Watson and put Cowan at 3

Reply Quote

Date: 12/12/2014 13:09:12
From: roughbarked
ID: 644246
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

diddly-squat said:

so I say drop Watson and put Cowan at 3

It is a fair call.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/12/2014 13:48:53
From: party_pants
ID: 644304
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

fizzing pisspots.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/12/2014 13:49:31
From: Dropbear
ID: 644305
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Fudge

Reply Quote

Date: 12/12/2014 13:51:12
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 644307
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

I’d be dropping Rogers and moving Watson into the opening spot.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/12/2014 13:52:04
From: party_pants
ID: 644308
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Peak Warming Man said:


I’d be dropping Rogers and moving Watson into the opening spot.

Yeah, but you’re a dickhead.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/12/2014 14:01:59
From: diddly-squat
ID: 644311
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Peak Warming Man said:


I’d be dropping Rogers and moving Watson into the opening spot.

does your newsletter have many subscribers?

Reply Quote

Date: 12/12/2014 14:49:25
From: Dropbear
ID: 644339
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

I’ll say it again. warner is a shit opener.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/12/2014 14:55:46
From: diddly-squat
ID: 644348
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Dropbear said:


I’ll say it again. warner is a shit opener.

may well be 100 reasons to back that up today…

Reply Quote

Date: 12/12/2014 15:05:42
From: roughbarked
ID: 644363
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

diddly-squat said:


Peak Warming Man said:

I’d be dropping Rogers and moving Watson into the opening spot.

does your newsletter have many subscribers?

Very few on the books.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/12/2014 15:24:53
From: Michael V
ID: 644379
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

diddly-squat said:


Dropbear said:

I’ll say it again. warner is a shit opener.

may well be 100 reasons to back that up today…

Well, 66 anyway.

LOL!

No ball!

Reply Quote

Date: 12/12/2014 15:28:19
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 644384
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Michael V said:


diddly-squat said:

Dropbear said:

I’ll say it again. warner is a shit opener.

may well be 100 reasons to back that up today…

Well, 66 anyway.

LOL!

No ball!

I’ve never really understood the saying ‘Luck’s a Fortune’ but I think it applies in this case.
But I wont use it because I think it’s a stupid saying and I’ll have no truck with it.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/12/2014 15:48:26
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 644402
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Australia needs to cut loose after tea, sacrifice wickets if need be.
Even so I doubt they will have enough runs to declare before stumps, depends how much faith Clark has in Lyon to clean up on a fifth day wicket.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/12/2014 16:09:09
From: Michael V
ID: 644415
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Peak Warming Man said:


Australia needs to cut loose after tea, sacrifice wickets if need be.
Even so I doubt they will have enough runs to declare before stumps, depends how much faith Clark has in Lyon to clean up on a fifth day wicket.
Watson, 33. Is that evidence?

Reply Quote

Date: 12/12/2014 17:27:07
From: party_pants
ID: 644499
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

polite applause

Reply Quote

Date: 12/12/2014 17:27:19
From: sibeen
ID: 644500
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

I’d definitely drop him. What a crap opener.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/12/2014 17:37:20
From: party_pants
ID: 644509
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

what’s going on?

I’ve got the sound down.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/12/2014 17:38:25
From: sibeen
ID: 644510
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Bit of argy bargy.

Not much in it.

Reply Quote

Date: 12/12/2014 17:44:19
From: Divine Angel
ID: 644512
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 12:03:04
From: sibeen
ID: 644993
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 14:20:51
From: party_pants
ID: 645039
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Michael Clarke seems to have hurt hisself again.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 14:21:41
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 645042
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

party_pants said:


Michael Clarke seems to have hurt hisself again.

I think the best thing for everyone is for them to just have him put down.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 14:29:36
From: jjjust moi
ID: 645070
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

I suspect that’s the last time we will see Cap’n Hammy on the park.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 15:51:07
From: party_pants
ID: 645144
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Can’t see us getting 8 wickets in the last session. So the draw looks on.

I might have to wonder off and do something useful instead.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 15:55:37
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 645145
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

party_pants said:


Can’t see us getting 8 wickets in the last session. So the draw looks on.

I might have to wonder off and do something useful instead.

Sibeen must be drunk under his work desk.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 15:57:23
From: party_pants
ID: 645146
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Witty Rejoinder said:


party_pants said:

Can’t see us getting 8 wickets in the last session. So the draw looks on.

I might have to wonder off and do something useful instead.

Sibeen must be drunk under his work desk.

Nobody has got out for the last 3 hours or more. there’s been nothing for him to call either way.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 16:05:45
From: Dropbear
ID: 645148
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Fucking plum

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 16:32:13
From: party_pants
ID: 645150
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

both batsmen on 99*

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 16:32:23
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 645151
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Two batsmen on 99, don’t see that often.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 16:35:19
From: Brooke
ID: 645152
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Hope they both get out on 99

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 16:35:38
From: party_pants
ID: 645153
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Peak Warming Man said:


Two batsmen on 99, don’t see that often.

can’t remember the last time

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 16:37:15
From: Dropbear
ID: 645155
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Gottim fuck off you’re out

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 16:37:27
From: party_pants
ID: 645156
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

oh no – out for 99

feel sorry for the lad.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 16:37:51
From: Brooke
ID: 645157
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Brooke said:


Hope they both get out on 99

I’ll take one…

Lyon deserves it

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 16:40:18
From: Dropbear
ID: 645159
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Hi Brooke and welcome to the forum

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 16:40:21
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 645160
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Hadden is a very ordinary keeper.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 16:41:52
From: party_pants
ID: 645162
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

hmmmn

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 16:42:12
From: sibeen
ID: 645163
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

FUCK OFF

&

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 16:42:33
From: Dropbear
ID: 645164
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Gottim fuck off

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 16:42:46
From: Brooke
ID: 645165
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Dropbear said:


Hi Brooke and welcome to the forum

I should come here more often… Two wickets in quick succession

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 16:43:57
From: Dropbear
ID: 645166
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Brooke said:


Dropbear said:

Hi Brooke and welcome to the forum

I should come here more often… Two wickets in quick succession

Not when we’re batting

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 16:44:42
From: ratty one
ID: 645167
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

sibeen said:


FUCK OFF

&

FUCK OFF

Sibeen is watching the cricket again evidently

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 16:45:56
From: Brooke
ID: 645168
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Heh… India might want to rethink their stance on the DRS

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 16:47:44
From: party_pants
ID: 645172
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Brooke said:


Heh… India might want to rethink their stance on the DRS

Vijay would’ve been out on 25 if that was the case. As it stands he got 99, but wasted an entire session for Australia.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 16:50:43
From: Dropbear
ID: 645178
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

I think Warnie wants to rip the top off of something

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 16:51:14
From: Brooke
ID: 645180
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

party_pants said:


Brooke said:

Heh… India might want to rethink their stance on the DRS

Vijay would’ve been out on 25 if that was the case. As it stands he got 99, but wasted an entire session for Australia.

They also wouldn’t have lost the other two wickets so who knows what would have happened

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 17:13:58
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 645190
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

India should win this, they need 100 off 120+ balls min.
If Kholi stays there they will.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 17:16:36
From: Brooke
ID: 645191
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Which idiot thought that having Brayshaw in the commentary team was a good idea?!

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 17:19:13
From: jjjust moi
ID: 645192
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

You can say the same for a few of them, I’m on radio.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 17:19:18
From: sibeen
ID: 645193
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 17:31:24
From: sibeen
ID: 645195
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 17:31:35
From: Dropbear
ID: 645196
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Brooke said:


Which idiot thought that having Brayshaw in the commentary team was a good idea?!

Brayshaw

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 17:40:08
From: sibeen
ID: 645200
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 17:45:15
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 645202
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

How shall we FUCK OFF oh Master?

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 17:46:02
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 645203
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

OOPS

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 17:46:49
From: Boris
ID: 645204
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

getting excited sibeen?

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 17:53:57
From: sibeen
ID: 645208
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 17:54:49
From: Dropbear
ID: 645210
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Two more Fuck Offs to go

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 18:00:18
From: dv
ID: 645213
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

All four results still on the table

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 18:03:16
From: sibeen
ID: 645215
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 18:03:35
From: Dropbear
ID: 645216
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

That swung a shit load

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 18:04:19
From: Dropbear
ID: 645217
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Beautiful delivery

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 18:04:57
From: Dropbear
ID: 645219
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Instant is gunna get you

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 18:08:58
From: Dropbear
ID: 645220
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

GOTTIM

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 18:09:01
From: sibeen
ID: 645221
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 18:10:19
From: Dropbear
ID: 645223
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Nicely done by India too. Very classy

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 18:11:10
From: sibeen
ID: 645224
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

A great Test match.

Kudos to India.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 18:12:18
From: Dropbear
ID: 645225
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

sibeen said:


A great Test match.

Kudos to India.

Yep they showed real class

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 18:14:28
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 645226
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

sibeen said:


Kudos to India.

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 18:18:36
From: Dropbear
ID: 645227
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Lol

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 18:20:50
From: Dropbear
ID: 645229
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Indian captain shows a bit more class than Lyon in the interview

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 18:43:16
From: Brooke
ID: 645239
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Now can we all stop crying about Phil Hughes…

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 18:44:32
From: Dropbear
ID: 645242
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Brooke said:


Now can we all stop crying about Phil Hughes…

I’m sure he will come up in the Ashses

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 18:45:18
From: Brooke
ID: 645243
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Dropbear said:


Brooke said:

Now can we all stop crying about Phil Hughes…

I’m sure he will come up in the Ashses

ISWYDT

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 18:48:26
From: Dropbear
ID: 645245
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

I’ll have that spare S back, too

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 20:23:21
From: party_pants
ID: 645290
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

party_pants said:


Can’t see us getting 8 wickets in the last session. So the draw looks on.

I might have to wonder off and do something useful instead.

So, that worked out well.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 22:28:04
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 645357
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

http://www.theage.com.au/sport/cricket/michael-clarkes-career-in-doubt-after-latest-hamstring-injury-20141213-126j6a.html

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 22:30:25
From: party_pants
ID: 645359
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Witty Rejoinder said:


http://www.theage.com.au/sport/cricket/michael-clarkes-career-in-doubt-after-latest-hamstring-injury-20141213-126j6a.html

Would be sad to see any Australian captain end his career that way. But shit happens.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 22:34:05
From: jjjust moi
ID: 645360
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

party_pants said:


Witty Rejoinder said:

http://www.theage.com.au/sport/cricket/michael-clarkes-career-in-doubt-after-latest-hamstring-injury-20141213-126j6a.html

Would be sad to see any Australian captain end his career that way. But shit happens.


If he doesn’t pull the pin, he’ll be pushed.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 22:39:06
From: furious
ID: 645361
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

I’ve never batted for hours in a test but the injuries that he gets seem extreme for a cricketer. Football players get battered and bashed, tearing tendons everywhere and dislocating joints but the most they miss is twelve months. Why can’t he just take some time to get it right and come back through the shield like everyone else?

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 22:39:22
From: party_pants
ID: 645362
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

jjjust moi said:


party_pants said:

Witty Rejoinder said:

http://www.theage.com.au/sport/cricket/michael-clarkes-career-in-doubt-after-latest-hamstring-injury-20141213-126j6a.html

Would be sad to see any Australian captain end his career that way. But shit happens.


If he doesn’t pull the pin, he’ll be pushed.

I don’t think so. He had a poor series against Pakistan in the Gulf States, but he is still scoring hundreds. He scored hundreds against Sarth Africa in March/April, he scored a hundred yesterday. Can’t see why he would be dropped.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 22:42:07
From: party_pants
ID: 645363
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

… if he was fit, of course

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 22:46:26
From: sibeen
ID: 645364
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Take a year off, come back. Shit, the god of cricket, WARNIE, did it.

His time off may have been enforced :)

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2014 22:54:35
From: jjjust moi
ID: 645366
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

party_pants said:


jjjust moi said:

party_pants said:

Would be sad to see any Australian captain end his career that way. But shit happens.


If he doesn’t pull the pin, he’ll be pushed.

I don’t think so. He had a poor series against Pakistan in the Gulf States, but he is still scoring hundreds. He scored hundreds against Sarth Africa in March/April, he scored a hundred yesterday. Can’t see why he would be dropped.


How can the selectors gamble on ANYONE who may breakdown minutes into a 5 day test. It won’t happen.

He’s played his last game for Oz, unfortunately.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/12/2014 22:30:26
From: party_pants
ID: 647436
Subject: re: 1st Test - Australia v India

Brothers Mitchell and Shaun Marsh are set to play together in the second test tomorrow. Will be only the 7th pair of brothers to play in the same match for Australia.

I would have thought in the hundred plus years of Australia playing test cricket the number of brothers would have been greater.

Reply Quote