It’s so straight forward to resolve. But I expect a drone with a cheque will turn up before I finish work tomorrow and lay out clearly what I sketched out in the last thread summarily. Then I’d have to go see a lawyer provided I don’t get disappeared in between here and there.
The resolution of an electron/positron pairing in an exponential background establishes a light cones capacitance through the deviation from original trajectory required to annihilate.
The energy dispersal from the annihilation disperses as a proton/antiproton pairing which deviates to self annihilation establishing light cone maximum velocity/c.
Light cone has developed cascade depth.
Electron/positron cascade occurs within the established light cone. High heat annihilations within the initial period of this cascade extends the light cone until there is approximate space to allow a proton/antiproton cascade to find a path in the direction of light cone expansion. This establishes an infant EM opposition within the growing light cone.
Establishing opposition of dispersal within the light cone allows a depth of light cone expansion to be stabilised that allows a stable hydrogen cascade to proliferate at the centre of the light cones momentum. This establishes vacuum confinement.
A stable hydrogen cascade provides further depth to the growing light cone allowing a cascade of helium to develop with proximal velocity to the hydrogen cascade providing centre of momentum to the expansion of the light cone. Establishment of a helium cascade relative to the centre of momentum of the direction of travel of the expansion of the light cone establishes the vacuum coherence of the now definable universe light cone.
Postpocelipse said:
The resolution of an electron/positron pairing in an exponential background establishes a light cones capacitance through the deviation from original trajectory required to annihilate.The energy dispersal from the annihilation disperses as a proton/antiproton pairing which deviates to self annihilation establishing light cone maximum velocity/c.
Light cone has developed cascade depth.
Electron/positron cascade occurs within the established light cone. High heat annihilations within the initial period of this cascade extends the light cone until there is approximate space to allow a proton/antiproton cascade to find a path in the direction of light cone expansion. This establishes an infant EM opposition within the growing light cone.
Establishing opposition of dispersal within the light cone allows a depth of light cone expansion to be stabilised that allows a stable hydrogen cascade to proliferate at the centre of the light cones momentum. This establishes vacuum confinement.
A stable hydrogen cascade provides further depth to the growing light cone allowing a cascade of helium to develop with proximal velocity to the hydrogen cascade providing centre of momentum to the expansion of the light cone. Establishment of a helium cascade relative to the centre of momentum of the direction of travel of the expansion of the light cone establishes the vacuum coherence of the now definable universe light cone.
For momentum to remain centred a mirroing cascade must develop in a space that becomes distinguishable as space the light cone is entering, for entire vacuum integrity
Hypothesis: There has been a theory of gravity since the Manhattan Project which was probably considered proven with observations of DM/DE.
This wiki entry is like the code key to my confusion with how standard theory maths is put together and presented.
Were I inclined to spoil the puzzle of standard theory as presented I would provide a link between the section on sources of cosmic rays in this link to the wiki entries on DM/DE. I am trying to figure out if the cosmic ray origin theories presented are simply leaving out the theory that is provable and passing on the extent to which entry of these particles to observability has been measured but the information that is available on this one page relevant to what I have absorbed probably means the answer is not of consequence.
What I might leave here as a question of any relevance is whether or not a panoramic image similar to the microwave background image has been composed solely of primary cosmic rays? I think there would be a great deal of data in a comparison of the two.
I’m genuinely expecting this to have been accomplished already but withheld as classified material. If the planck epoch is accurately described this would provide mathematical illustration of a cosmic ray background image.
ok. after studying planck reference big bang timelines it turns out the annihilation reduction exercise I’ve had in my head represents 0-1 planck time which apparently has “no real coherent models.“http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/astro/planck.html#c5
Mathematically it defines the boundaries of the separation of the forces and describes the association of each with gravity. If you are interested Moll.