Date: 15/02/2015 12:25:12
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 677454
Subject: Fighter Jets to Launch Satellites
Here’s a Better Use for Fighter Jets: Launching Satellites
For decades, the human race has been deploying satellites into orbit. And in all that time, the method has remained the same – a satellite is placed aboard a booster rocket which is then launched from a limited number of fixed ground facilities with limited slots available. This process not only requires a month or more of preparation, it requires years of planning and costs upwards of millions of dollars.
more…
Date: 15/02/2015 12:34:44
From: Tamb
ID: 677460
Subject: re: Fighter Jets to Launch Satellites
CrazyNeutrino said:
Here’s a Better Use for Fighter Jets: Launching Satellites
For decades, the human race has been deploying satellites into orbit. And in all that time, the method has remained the same – a satellite is placed aboard a booster rocket which is then launched from a limited number of fixed ground facilities with limited slots available. This process not only requires a month or more of preparation, it requires years of planning and costs upwards of millions of dollars.
more…
Seems like an ideal application for the Lockheed SR71 Blackhawk.
Date: 15/02/2015 12:41:53
From: Boris
ID: 677465
Subject: re: Fighter Jets to Launch Satellites
blackbird.
M21
“d21 Drone“http://www.sr-71.org/blackbird/d-21.php
Date: 15/02/2015 12:43:50
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 677468
Subject: re: Fighter Jets to Launch Satellites
Tamb said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
Here’s a Better Use for Fighter Jets: Launching Satellites
For decades, the human race has been deploying satellites into orbit. And in all that time, the method has remained the same – a satellite is placed aboard a booster rocket which is then launched from a limited number of fixed ground facilities with limited slots available. This process not only requires a month or more of preparation, it requires years of planning and costs upwards of millions of dollars.
more…
Seems like an ideal application for the Lockheed SR71 Blackhawk.
Maybe an updated replacement is in the works?
Could they use SR71s aren’t they in retirement?
Date: 15/02/2015 12:45:27
From: Boris
ID: 677471
Subject: re: Fighter Jets to Launch Satellites
none are operational. the U-2 is still used by NASA i believe. but they are easier to maintain.
Date: 15/02/2015 12:46:01
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 677472
Subject: re: Fighter Jets to Launch Satellites
Tthey will probably use drones to do it
Date: 15/02/2015 12:46:05
From: Tamb
ID: 677473
Subject: re: Fighter Jets to Launch Satellites
CrazyNeutrino said:
Tamb said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
Here’s a Better Use for Fighter Jets: Launching Satellites
For decades, the human race has been deploying satellites into orbit. And in all that time, the method has remained the same – a satellite is placed aboard a booster rocket which is then launched from a limited number of fixed ground facilities with limited slots available. This process not only requires a month or more of preparation, it requires years of planning and costs upwards of millions of dollars.
more…
Seems like an ideal application for the Lockheed SR71 Blackhawk.
Maybe an updated replacement is in the works?
Could they use SR71s aren’t they in retirement?
The Chinook was in retirement as was the Missouri but when need arose.
Date: 15/02/2015 12:47:22
From: Tamb
ID: 677476
Subject: re: Fighter Jets to Launch Satellites
Boris said:
none are operational. the U-2 is still used by NASA i believe. but they are easier to maintain.
That’s a better idea Boris.
Date: 15/02/2015 12:49:35
From: Boris
ID: 677479
Subject: re: Fighter Jets to Launch Satellites
Date: 15/02/2015 13:01:40
From: Postpocelipse
ID: 677487
Subject: re: Fighter Jets to Launch Satellites
Date: 15/02/2015 13:29:16
From: captain_spalding
ID: 677517
Subject: re: Fighter Jets to Launch Satellites
I don’t think you could use the U-2/TR-1.
I think that this satellite launching thing stems from the Anti-SATellite (ASAT) programme of the late ’80s and the ’90s.
I think it was Boeing that came up with an air-launched ASAT missile that depended on an F-15 making a zoom climb to a high altitude, and releasing the missile in a ‘ballistic toss’ from where it could carry itself to low-Earth orbit.
Ain’t no way you’re doing a zoom climb or a ballistic toss with a U-2/TR-1.
Date: 15/02/2015 13:31:24
From: Boris
ID: 677523
Subject: re: Fighter Jets to Launch Satellites
ni the U-2 is too lightweight. i just put that in to show as far as that era spy planes this was the only one still in service.
Date: 15/02/2015 13:35:07
From: captain_spalding
ID: 677530
Subject: re: Fighter Jets to Launch Satellites
Boris said:
ni the U-2 is too lightweight. i just put that in to show as far as that era spy planes this was the only one still in service.
What about RC-135s?
When they show up in your neighbourhood, you know the Americans are definitrly interested.
Date: 15/02/2015 13:37:51
From: Boris
ID: 677533
Subject: re: Fighter Jets to Launch Satellites
RC-135, well i was more commenting on overflying aircraft at very high altitude. i mean we could talk wild weasels and all.
:-)
Date: 15/02/2015 13:39:06
From: roughbarked
ID: 677535
Subject: re: Fighter Jets to Launch Satellites
Boris said:
RC-135, well i was more commenting on overflying aircraft at very high altitude. i mean we could talk wild weasels and all.
:-)
Wasn’t aware that wild weasels had wings.
Date: 15/02/2015 13:40:31
From: captain_spalding
ID: 677537
Subject: re: Fighter Jets to Launch Satellites
roughbarked said:
Wasn’t aware that wild weasels had wings.
And, they can launch missiles.
Date: 15/02/2015 13:41:58
From: roughbarked
ID: 677539
Subject: re: Fighter Jets to Launch Satellites
captain_spalding said:
roughbarked said:
Wasn’t aware that wild weasels had wings.
And, they can launch missiles.
off to google.
Date: 15/02/2015 13:43:04
From: Boris
ID: 677541
Subject: re: Fighter Jets to Launch Satellites
though the WW weren’t strictly recon they were used in conjunction with the sr-71. they would send one in so that the enemy would fire up their air defence radar which the sr-71 would then record.
Date: 15/02/2015 13:43:49
From: roughbarked
ID: 677542
Subject: re: Fighter Jets to Launch Satellites
roughbarked said:
captain_spalding said:
roughbarked said:
Wasn’t aware that wild weasels had wings.
And, they can launch missiles.
off to google.
problem solved: Wild Weasel is a code name given by the United States Armed Forces, specifically the US Air Force.
Date: 15/02/2015 21:13:09
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 677788
Subject: re: Fighter Jets to Launch Satellites
Since we’re talking about launching satellites, I put the following graph together earlier today. It’s a plot of all rockets that can launch satellites smaller than 1 tonne into LEO (including one each from Israel, North Korea, Brazil and India). Almost all of them are 3-stage or 4-stage. The smallest is a Japanese rocket 16.5 metres long and 0.74 metres in diameter. That’s possible for a fighter jet – sort of. All other satellite-launching rockets have a diameter exceeding 1 metre.
As for speed, to get a satellite up requires a Delta V of at least 9.3 km/s (on the equator in the direction of Earth’s rotation). The fastest fighter jet is capable of very close to 1 km/s. So it’s clear that almost all of the speed has to come from the rocket.
I’m working together with another forum member on getting into space for less than the FUEL cost of a fighter jet.

Date: 15/02/2015 21:16:41
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 677790
Subject: re: Fighter Jets to Launch Satellites
mollwollfumble said:
The fastest fighter jet is capable of very close to 1 km/s.
Actually about half that, and that’s with the airframe ‘clean’ i.e. with nothing stored externally.
The SR-71 could do mach 3 or about 1 km per second, but no fighter can go that fast.
Date: 15/02/2015 21:17:54
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 677791
Subject: re: Fighter Jets to Launch Satellites
Date: 15/02/2015 21:32:26
From: Boris
ID: 677797
Subject: re: Fighter Jets to Launch Satellites
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikoyan-Gurevich_MiG-25
2,981.5 km/h over a 500 km closed circuit on 5 October 1967. no payload.
Date: 16/02/2015 18:02:11
From: Obviousman
ID: 678100
Subject: re: Fighter Jets to Launch Satellites
The Wild Weasel programme (motto: YGBSM*) was more for hitting ground-based radars, not shooting satellites into space. They would ‘troll’ in order to get the SAM radars to activate then another aircraft (or themselves) would shoot a missile to destroy the radar (typically a HARM, Homing Anti-Radiation Missile).
The SR-71 never launched the D-21; it was launched by a modified version of the A-12 (which itself is a cousin of the SR-71, thus the confusion). They did a few launches but the crews hated it; one aircraft even collided with it’s D-21 after launch and the programme was cancelled for the A-12 (it continued with the B-52, though).
YGBSM = You gotta be shitting me!