Date: 27/04/2015 15:10:50
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 714301
Subject: Rarely Observed 'Quadruple' Rainbow Isn't What it Seems

Rarely Observed ‘Quadruple’ Rainbow Isn’t What it Seems

The photo of the “quadruple rainbow” that’s taking the Internet by storm doesn’t actually show a quadruple rainbow. The phenomenon is technically two double rainbows.

more…

Reply Quote
Date: 27/04/2015 15:14:12
From: dv
ID: 714302
Subject: re: Rarely Observed 'Quadruple' Rainbow Isn't What it Seems

Still amazeballs

Reply Quote
Date: 27/04/2015 16:01:18
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 714321
Subject: re: Rarely Observed 'Quadruple' Rainbow Isn't What it Seems

CrazyNeutrino said:


Rarely Observed ‘Quadruple’ Rainbow Isn’t What it Seems

The photo of the “quadruple rainbow” that’s taking the Internet by storm doesn’t actually show a quadruple rainbow. The phenomenon is technically two double rainbows.

more…

As pop-sci over-simplifications go, referring to a twin double rainbow as a quadruple rainbow doesn’t seem too bad.

Reply Quote
Date: 27/04/2015 16:04:10
From: bob(from black rock)
ID: 714324
Subject: re: Rarely Observed 'Quadruple' Rainbow Isn't What it Seems

The Rev Dodgson said:


CrazyNeutrino said:

Rarely Observed ‘Quadruple’ Rainbow Isn’t What it Seems

The photo of the “quadruple rainbow” that’s taking the Internet by storm doesn’t actually show a quadruple rainbow. The phenomenon is technically two double rainbows.

more…

As pop-sci over-simplifications go, referring to a twin double rainbow as a quadruple rainbow doesn’t seem too bad.

Or a quadruple single rainbow?

Reply Quote