Recent studies reveal or perhaps they don’t that nearly 100% of all discussions about Global Warming contain lots of graphs are incredibly boring as they rehash the same argument pro and con over and over again and eventually degenerate into personal insults with the most popular insults calling people dickheads of fucktards.

Cymek said:

Recent studies reveal or perhaps they don’t that nearly 100% of all discussions about Global Warming contain lots of graphs are incredibly boring as they rehash the same argument pro and con over and over again and eventually degenerate into personal insults with the most popular insults calling people dickheads of fucktards.

Wow! The title’s longer than the post. Is that a first for us?

whatever happened to playing the ball, not the man…

Tamb said:

Cymek said:

Recent studies reveal or perhaps they don’t that nearly 100% of all discussions about Global Warming contain lots of graphs are incredibly boring as they rehash the same argument pro and con over and over again and eventually degenerate into personal insults with the most popular insults calling people dickheads of fucktards.

Wow! The title’s longer than the post. Is that a first for us?

No it’s not and no it wouldn’t have been.

stumpy_seahorse said:

whatever happened to playing the ball, not the man…

Most of the participants don’t have balls.

So is this a global warming thread or not?

Tamb said:

stumpy_seahorse said:

whatever happened to playing the ball, not the man…

Most of the participants don’t have balls.

This …

both of the participants in the girlie slapping are acting like puerile grubs

Speedy said:

So is this a global warming thread or not?

Not.

Speedy said:

So is this a global warming thread or not?

No its meant to be humerous.
Any thread on global warming seem to be pointless, the two opposing parties will fight to the bitter end, never agree to disagree, post lots of taken out of context graphs and eventually insult each other.

Cymek said:

Speedy said:

So is this a global warming thread or not?

No its meant to be humerous.
Any thread on global warming seem to be pointless, the two opposing parties will fight to the bitter end, never agree to disagree, post lots of taken out of context graphs and eventually insult each other.

Yes, I got the humour.

Just wasn’t sure whether it qualified as another GF thread. It was missing the personal insults, is all :)

Shut up big nose

Dropbear said:

Shut up big nose

You need a comma in there, dickhead.

sibeen said:

Dropbear said:

Shut up big nose

You need a comma in there, dickhead.

sibeen said:

Dropbear said:

Shut up big nose

You need a comma in there, dickhead.

Idol of idiot-worshippers!

Meanwhile I sit here in the middle of a busfire. Pollution plus.

roughbarked said:

Meanwhile I sit here in the middle of a busfire. Pollution plus.

I reckon that would stink rb. Especially the tyres.

Are they burning off or is it a real bushfire?

Speedy said:

roughbarked said:

Meanwhile I sit here in the middle of a busfire. Pollution plus.

I reckon that would stink rb. Especially the tyres.

Are they burning off or is it a real bushfire?

I think it escaped a bit yeah.

roughbarked said:

Speedy said:

roughbarked said:

Meanwhile I sit here in the middle of a busfire. Pollution plus.

I reckon that would stink rb. Especially the tyres.

Are they burning off or is it a real bushfire?

I think it escaped a bit yeah.

They said the area was free of inversion layers when they were going to put the incinerator for PCB and Dioxins put here. I call BS on the inversion layers part. Lucky the wind blows too.

sibeen said:

Dropbear said:

Shut up big nose

You need a comma in there, dickhead.

You’re such a comma Nazi!

Witty Rejoinder said:

sibeen said:

Dropbear said:

Shut up big nose

You need a comma in there, dickhead.

You’re such a comma Nazi!

He wears two. One under each nostril.

Speedy said:

So is this a global warming thread or not?

I can find some global warming articles if you want

and LOL when the observer tunes to insults around his second post

I’ve done a great deal of research on this matter & have discovered that 97% of all climate alarmists are drug addicted alcoholics

and believe humankind is mostly responsible for their predicament.

The_observer said:

I’ve done a great deal of research on this matter & have discovered that 97% of all climate alarmists are drug addicted alcoholics

and believe humankind is mostly responsible for their predicament.

and you are just green with envy, one can tell.

roughbarked said:

The_observer said:

I’ve done a great deal of research on this matter & have discovered that 97% of all climate alarmists are drug addicted alcoholics

and believe humankind is mostly responsible for their predicament.

and you are just green with envy, one can tell.

‘GREEN”??????????

Lime, if you don’t mind.

The_observer said:

roughbarked said:

The_observer said:

I’ve done a great deal of research on this matter & have discovered that 97% of all climate alarmists are drug addicted alcoholics

and believe humankind is mostly responsible for their predicament.

and you are just green with envy, one can tell.

‘GREEN”??????????

Lime, if you don’t mind.

About time for you to do some research into limes then.

roughbarked said:

The_observer said:

roughbarked said:

and you are just green with envy, one can tell.

‘GREEN”??????????

Lime, if you don’t mind.

About time for you to do some research into limes then.

I’ve heard that there’s a great deal of worry in the orchid industry as it’s believed that, looking into the data,

limes are becoming more alkaline.

The_observer said:

roughbarked said:

The_observer said:

‘GREEN”??????????

Lime, if you don’t mind.

About time for you to do some research into limes then.

I’ve heard that there’s a great deal of worry in the orchid industry as it’s believed that, looking into the data,

limes are becoming more alkaline.

So what has this to do with orchids? Presumably you have references?

roughbarked said:

The_observer said:

roughbarked said:

About time for you to do some research into limes then.

I’ve heard that there’s a great deal of worry in the orchid industry as it’s believed that, looking into the data,

limes are becoming more alkaline.

So what has this to do with orchids? Presumably you have references?

I meant orchard, & I’m sure I can pull up a graph or two with a peer reviewed paper or seven

You speak an infinite deal of nothing…

The_observer said:

roughbarked said:

The_observer said:

I’ve heard that there’s a great deal of worry in the orchid industry as it’s believed that, looking into the data,

limes are becoming more alkaline.

So what has this to do with orchids? Presumably you have references?

I meant orchard, & I’m sure I can pull up a graph or two with a peer reviewed paper or seven

OK, so you mean that orchards are becoming more alkaline? What’s it got to do with limes?

roughbarked said:

The_observer said:

roughbarked said:

So what has this to do with orchids? Presumably you have references?

I meant orchard, & I’m sure I can pull up a graph or two with a peer reviewed paper or seven

OK, so you mean that orchards are becoming more alkaline? What’s it got to do with limes?

Limes becoming more alkaline is an indication that anchovy catch numbers are persisting which is an indication that up welling of the coast or Peru is strong, which is an indication that the price of textiles in China is peaking proving that there’s too many rabbits in Blackbutt reserve.

It all very simple.

•in China is peaking

surely you mean Beiging?

roughbarked said:

•in China is peaking

surely you mean Beiging?

No, I mean China

roughbarked said:

The_observer said:

I’ve done a great deal of research on this matter & have discovered that 97% of all climate alarmists are drug addicted alcoholics

and believe humankind is mostly responsible for their predicament.

and you are just green with envy, one can tell.

lol

Cymek said:

Recent studies reveal or perhaps they don’t that nearly 100% of all discussions about Global Warming contain lots of graphs are incredibly boring as they rehash the same argument pro and con over and over again and eventually degenerate into personal insults with the most popular insults calling people dickheads of fucktards.

> contain lots of graphs and are incredibly boring.
The following graph is from “Google Trends” showing that “Global Warming” is so 2007.

mollwollfumble said:

Cymek said:

Recent studies reveal or perhaps they don’t that nearly 100% of all discussions about Global Warming contain lots of graphs are incredibly boring as they rehash the same argument pro and con over and over again and eventually degenerate into personal insults with the most popular insults calling people dickheads of fucktards.

> contain lots of graphs and are incredibly boring.
The following graph is from “Google Trends” showing that “Global Warming” is so 2007.

Does that mean our attention span is not much better than most other animals?

PermeateFree said:

mollwollfumble said:

Cymek said:

Recent studies reveal or perhaps they don’t that nearly 100% of all discussions about Global Warming contain lots of graphs are incredibly boring as they rehash the same argument pro and con over and over again and eventually degenerate into personal insults with the most popular insults calling people dickheads of fucktards.

> contain lots of graphs and are incredibly boring.
The following graph is from “Google Trends” showing that “Global Warming” is so 2007.

Does that mean our attention span is not much better than most other animals?

No, it just means that most people realise that its just a non issue trumped up by demented environmentalists, scientists & renewable energy zealots looking for handouts

The_observer said:

PermeateFree said:

mollwollfumble said:

> contain lots of graphs and are incredibly boring.
The following graph is from “Google Trends” showing that “Global Warming” is so 2007.

Does that mean our attention span is not much better than most other animals?

No, it just means that most people realise that its just a non issue trumped up by demented environmentalists, scientists & renewable energy zealots looking for handouts

I think it is more like a quiet acceptance of Global Warming and that the influence of vested interests is no longer of concern.

The_observer said:

PermeateFree said:

mollwollfumble said:

> contain lots of graphs and are incredibly boring.
The following graph is from “Google Trends” showing that “Global Warming” is so 2007.

Does that mean our attention span is not much better than most other animals?

No, it just means that most people realise that its just a non issue trumped up by demented environmentalists, scientists & renewable energy zealots looking for handouts

Climate skeptics and Bjørn Lomborg are looking for handouts

Most people are realizing they are a non issue

CrazyNeutrino said:

The_observer said:

PermeateFree said:

Does that mean our attention span is not much better than most other animals?

No, it just means that most people realise that its just a non issue trumped up by demented environmentalists, scientists & renewable energy zealots looking for handouts

Climate skeptics and Bjørn Lomborg are looking for handouts

Most people are realizing they are a non issue

Just for you Crazy

The Daily Climate reports that global warming is set to make Californian marijuana a lot stronger – if we let it happen.

According to the Daily Climate;

Global warming may give a minor twist to that classic hippie bumper sticker that quips “Acid rain: Too bad it’s not as much fun as it sounds.” Turns out a warming climate could boost the medicinal and psychoactive properties of plants including cannabis.

But that’s not all: Climate change will also open up higher elevations to growing weed clandestinely on public lands, a practice that’s putting increased strain on fragile ecosystems. Some say relaxed marijuana laws exacerbate the problem by bringing in more growers; others argue increased regulation and oversight will eventually lead to more responsible growing practices.

One prominent researcher who specializes in weed migration patterns in the face of climate change said marijuana grown outdoors will likely become stronger and require less water to thrive.

“If you go back to the times plants evolved on land, the average CO2 (carbon dioxide) levels were 1,000 parts per million; today it’s about 400,” said Lewis Ziska, a plant physiologist with the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Agricultural Research Service.

Read more: http://www.dailyclimate.org/tdc-newsroom/2015/05/climate-change-marijuana-pot-global-warming-potent

marijuana grown outdoors will likely become stronger and require less water to thrive.

thats good