Date: 17/06/2015 18:59:45
From: bob(from black rock)
ID: 737981
Subject: Thugbe

What I find strange with Rugby,is why it is called football, it should be called run and throw the ball backwards ball. And the sight of adult men getting down on their hands and knees and sniffing each others arseholes is, well, very weird.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/06/2015 19:11:49
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 737987
Subject: re: Thugbe

bob(from black rock) said:


What I find strange with Rugby,is why it is called football, it should be called run and throw the ball backwards ball. And the sight of adult men getting down on their hands and knees and sniffing each others arseholes is, well, very weird.

Because if they called it “kick them in the balls” then the name wouldn’t be sufficiently subtle.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/06/2015 19:13:58
From: bob(from black rock)
ID: 737988
Subject: re: Thugbe

mollwollfumble said:


bob(from black rock) said:

What I find strange with Rugby,is why it is called football, it should be called run and throw the ball backwards ball. And the sight of adult men getting down on their hands and knees and sniffing each others arseholes is, well, very weird.

Because if they called it “kick them in the balls” then the name wouldn’t be sufficiently subtle.

Thanks molly, I hadn’t thought of that.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/06/2015 19:19:18
From: bob(from black rock)
ID: 737989
Subject: re: Thugbe

bob(from black rock) said:


mollwollfumble said:

bob(from black rock) said:

What I find strange with Rugby,is why it is called football, it should be called run and throw the ball backwards ball. And the sight of adult men getting down on their hands and knees and sniffing each others arseholes is, well, very weird.

Because if they called it “kick them in the balls” then the name wouldn’t be sufficiently subtle.

Thanks molly, I hadn’t thought of that.

Just one small point, there is nothing subtle about that Thugbe anyway.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/06/2015 19:21:54
From: pommiejohn
ID: 737993
Subject: re: Thugbe

bob(from black rock) said:


What I find strange with Rugby,is why it is called football, it should be called run and throw the ball backwards ball. And the sight of adult men getting down on their hands and knees and sniffing each others arseholes is, well, very weird.

Maybe because it started as football at Rugby school?

Reply Quote

Date: 17/06/2015 19:23:32
From: bob(from black rock)
ID: 737996
Subject: re: Thugbe

pommiejohn said:


bob(from black rock) said:

What I find strange with Rugby,is why it is called football, it should be called run and throw the ball backwards ball. And the sight of adult men getting down on their hands and knees and sniffing each others arseholes is, well, very weird.

Maybe because it started as football at Rugby school?

So they are all weird?

Reply Quote

Date: 17/06/2015 19:25:42
From: party_pants
ID: 737997
Subject: re: Thugbe

The general theory is that the word football arose because the game was played by people on foot, rather than on horseback.

The word football predates the codification of any form of the game by a long way, it has nothing to do with kicking the ball. Under the earliest rules of the Football Association in England for example, players were allowed to use their hands to catch the ball. The word football was already invented before they used it as part of their name.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/06/2015 19:47:40
From: bob(from black rock)
ID: 738009
Subject: re: Thugbe

pommiejohn said:


bob(from black rock) said:

What I find strange with Rugby,is why it is called football, it should be called run and throw the ball backwards ball. And the sight of adult men getting down on their hands and knees and sniffing each others arseholes is, well, very weird.

Maybe because it started as football at Rugby school?

But where does the “football” terminology come in? the basic activities is bum sniffing scrotal sack grabbing, grab the ball and run with it, not kick it, I think that wankball would be a more accutate title.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/06/2015 20:32:00
From: PermeateFree
ID: 738059
Subject: re: Thugbe

Not sure if the description of Rugby = Thugbe is correct. I played both rugby and cricket and was injured far more whilst playing cricket.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/06/2015 20:56:22
From: roughbarked
ID: 738071
Subject: re: Thugbe

PermeateFree said:


Not sure if the description of Rugby = Thugbe is correct. I played both rugby and cricket and was injured far more whilst playing cricket.

Thugby is about the people who play it. They stomp on your hands with their studded boots etc.

In cricket if you get hurt, it is your fault.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/06/2015 21:03:56
From: PermeateFree
ID: 738076
Subject: re: Thugbe

roughbarked said:


PermeateFree said:

Not sure if the description of Rugby = Thugbe is correct. I played both rugby and cricket and was injured far more whilst playing cricket.

Thugby is about the people who play it. They stomp on your hands with their studded boots etc.

In cricket if you get hurt, it is your fault.

Must have been playing ruggers with some good chaps then.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/06/2015 22:00:56
From: party_pants
ID: 738094
Subject: re: Thugbe

I understand not the rules of this game sometimes…

Reply Quote

Date: 17/06/2015 22:03:31
From: stumpy_seahorse
ID: 738096
Subject: re: Thugbe

party_pants said:


I understand not the rules of this game sometimes…

the umpiring has been a bit strange tonight

Reply Quote

Date: 17/06/2015 22:21:43
From: roughbarked
ID: 738102
Subject: re: Thugbe

PermeateFree said:


roughbarked said:

PermeateFree said:

Not sure if the description of Rugby = Thugbe is correct. I played both rugby and cricket and was injured far more whilst playing cricket.

Thugby is about the people who play it. They stomp on your hands with their studded boots etc.

In cricket if you get hurt, it is your fault.

Must have been playing ruggers with some good chaps then.

Model citizens.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/06/2015 10:20:58
From: Cymek
ID: 738161
Subject: re: Thugbe

I thought it was called Thugbe because a number of professionals who play it are exactly that thugs and if not for playing football would probably be violent dickheads in jail

Reply Quote

Date: 18/06/2015 10:30:11
From: Arts
ID: 738164
Subject: re: Thugbe

there is so much wrong with this thread…

Reply Quote

Date: 18/06/2015 10:34:12
From: Cymek
ID: 738169
Subject: re: Thugbe

Arts said:


there is so much wrong with this thread…

It is a bit pointless but if you remember with mens sports especially football (in all its variations) the players got away with antisocial/criminal behaviour with the line “its boy being boys” its not accepted anywhere near as much today

Reply Quote

Date: 18/06/2015 10:37:01
From: Arts
ID: 738172
Subject: re: Thugbe

Cymek said:


Arts said:

there is so much wrong with this thread…

It is a bit pointless but if you remember with mens sports especially football (in all its variations) the players got away with antisocial/criminal behaviour with the line “its boy being boys” its not accepted anywhere near as much today

apparently you can screw who you like when you are a golfing legend, you can shout and make abusive comments on the tennis court, you can screw a whole corporation in cycling and you can be Ben Cousins…. oh we are back to football…

Reply Quote

Date: 18/06/2015 10:39:11
From: Cymek
ID: 738174
Subject: re: Thugbe

Arts said:


Cymek said:

Arts said:

there is so much wrong with this thread…

It is a bit pointless but if you remember with mens sports especially football (in all its variations) the players got away with antisocial/criminal behaviour with the line “its boy being boys” its not accepted anywhere near as much today

apparently you can screw who you like when you are a golfing legend, you can shout and make abusive comments on the tennis court, you can screw a whole corporation in cycling and you can be Ben Cousins…. oh we are back to football…

I don’t think the sport itself excuses the behaviour, the people you mention in the others sports are tools as well.
Ben Cousins did commit criminal acts as well though, I personally think he was the Eagles drug supplier and thats why the police were after him

Reply Quote

Date: 18/06/2015 10:45:56
From: roughbarked
ID: 738176
Subject: re: Thugbe

Arts said:


Cymek said:

Arts said:

there is so much wrong with this thread…

It is a bit pointless but if you remember with mens sports especially football (in all its variations) the players got away with antisocial/criminal behaviour with the line “its boy being boys” its not accepted anywhere near as much today

apparently you can screw who you like when you are a golfing legend, you can shout and make abusive comments on the tennis court, you can screw a whole corporation in cycling and you can be Ben Cousins…. oh we are back to football…

Now you tell me. Should have taken up sports.

Reply Quote