Date: 16/07/2015 19:36:55
From: Michael V
ID: 749174
Subject: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Pup’s won the toss and elected to bat.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/07/2015 19:39:34
From: roughbarked
ID: 749180
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Michael V said:


Pup’s won the toss and elected to bat.

It is his time to show all his collated experience.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/07/2015 20:43:15
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 749228
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Channel 9 has fucking Kings Cross ER on instead of the Ashes fro Lords for which they have sole rights to, idiots.
I’ll have no truck with them.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/07/2015 20:44:05
From: roughbarked
ID: 749231
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Peak Warming Man said:


Channel 9 has fucking Kings Cross ER on instead of the Ashes fro Lords for which they have sole rights to, idiots.
I’ll have no truck with them.

GEM.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/07/2015 20:45:14
From: party_pants
ID: 749233
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Peak Warming Man said:


Channel 9 has fucking Kings Cross ER on instead of the Ashes fro Lords for which they have sole rights to, idiots.
I’ll have no truck with them.

You’ll do as you’re fucking told.

Go to Dick Smith and get an antenna.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/07/2015 21:08:10
From: Michael V
ID: 749247
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Peak Warming Man said:


Channel 9 has fucking Kings Cross ER on instead of the Ashes fro Lords for which they have sole rights to, idiots.
I’ll have no truck with them.
Mrs V has just told me she’s watching the Ashes on free-to-air TV. She’s in Brisbane.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/07/2015 21:10:27
From: sibeen
ID: 749250
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 16/07/2015 21:13:28
From: Michael V
ID: 749259
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

sibeen said:


FUCK
Bloody

Reply Quote

Date: 16/07/2015 21:15:05
From: sibeen
ID: 749261
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Michael V said:


sibeen said:

FUCK
Bloody

Enough of your potty mouth, young man.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/07/2015 21:17:11
From: Michael V
ID: 749264
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

sibeen said:


Michael V said:

sibeen said:

FUCK
Bloody

Enough of your potty mouth, young man.

(Holds head low, in shame.)

Please don’t bring out the soap, Mr sibeen, Sir.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/07/2015 21:17:18
From: party_pants
ID: 749265
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

sibeen said:


Michael V said:

sibeen said:

FUCK
Bloody

Enough of your potty mouth, young man.

Now I panic every time I see you post in a cricket thread thinking it’s more bad news.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/07/2015 21:18:15
From: sibeen
ID: 749268
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

party_pants said:


sibeen said:

Michael V said:

Bloody

Enough of your potty mouth, young man.

Now I panic every time I see you post in a cricket thread thinking it’s more bad news.

Pavlovian reaction :)

Reply Quote

Date: 16/07/2015 21:18:59
From: Michael V
ID: 749269
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

party_pants said:


sibeen said:

Michael V said:

Bloody

Enough of your potty mouth, young man.

Now I panic every time I see you post in a cricket thread thinking it’s more bad news.

(chuckle)

Reply Quote

Date: 16/07/2015 21:48:38
From: Michael V
ID: 749289
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Aus: 1/100

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 16/07/2015 21:51:33
From: sibeen
ID: 749292
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Michael V said:


Aus: 1/100

:)

Yeah, and off 24 overs. Bloody pommy bastards are only going to bowl about 27 overs in the session, and that’s with Ali bowling 3.

Cheating bastards!

Reply Quote

Date: 16/07/2015 21:57:00
From: Michael V
ID: 749296
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

sibeen said:


Michael V said:

Aus: 1/100

:)

Yeah, and off 24 overs. Bloody pommy bastards are only going to bowl about 27 overs in the session, and that’s with Ali bowling 3.

Cheating bastards!

De we expect less from the poms?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/07/2015 22:06:54
From: Michael V
ID: 749300
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

LUNCH! Australia 1-104, Rogers 43*, Smith 16*

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 00:13:24
From: sibeen
ID: 749340
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

snigger

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 03:18:16
From: Ian
ID: 749344
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

>Cheating bastards!

Tried to replicate Cardiff pudin but forgot to win the toss. HA!

Stats stats stats falling everywhere..

It’s a funny old game.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 08:05:48
From: Michael V
ID: 749370
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

AUS 1/337 – Smith 129*, Rogers 158* at the end of the first day at Lord’s. Well done!

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 08:07:48
From: kii
ID: 749374
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Michael V said:


AUS 1/337 – Smith 129*, Rogers 158* at the end of the first day at Lord’s. Well done!

What does this mean? The English cabbie will start blabbing about the cricket when I see him tomorrow. He was ecstatic yesterday and rambled on about something.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 08:12:38
From: Michael V
ID: 749380
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

kii said:


Michael V said:

AUS 1/337 – Smith 129*, Rogers 158* at the end of the first day at Lord’s. Well done!

What does this mean? The English cabbie will start blabbing about the cricket when I see him tomorrow. He was ecstatic yesterday and rambled on about something.

It means Australia (especially Smith and Rogers) batted well on the first day at Lord’s. Australia have set a great score and only lost one wicket (Warner). It is the best second-wicket partnership by Australia at Lord’s ever, a record previously previously held by Bradman and someone else.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 08:15:12
From: kii
ID: 749383
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Michael V said:


kii said:

Michael V said:

AUS 1/337 – Smith 129*, Rogers 158* at the end of the first day at Lord’s. Well done!

What does this mean? The English cabbie will start blabbing about the cricket when I see him tomorrow. He was ecstatic yesterday and rambled on about something.

It means Australia (especially Smith and Rogers) batted well on the first day at Lord’s. Australia have set a great score and only lost one wicket (Warner). It is the best second-wicket partnership by Australia at Lord’s ever, a record previously previously held by Bradman and someone else.

Seriously, I am c’n‘p and printing that and when Gordon starts going on about the cricket I will whip it out of my pocket and recite it to him. That’ll teach him :P

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 08:18:50
From: kii
ID: 749386
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

I might ask for further updates on the cricket, MV. Then I can stun the cabbie with my new knowledge, until he asks questions.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 10:19:13
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 749429
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

>>What does this mean?

It means you cant tell people at the shop you’re Australian again.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 11:40:19
From: dv
ID: 749456
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

I admit this start looks promising but let us face it, there’s no hope without Watto.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 11:47:09
From: kii
ID: 749457
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

dv said:


I admit this start looks promising but let us face it, there’s no hope without Watto.

Ooo…another thing to say to Gordon The English Cabbie!

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 11:58:04
From: Ian
ID: 749458
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

dv said:


I admit this start looks promising but let us face it, there’s no hope without Watto

We boned Watto and look at how well we’re doing already.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 20:03:53
From: Michael V
ID: 749604
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Bell’s been dinged (or is that dung?), as is Rogers helmet and head, first ball.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 20:10:53
From: sibeen
ID: 749607
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Boycott is going on about it, but that pitch really is as dead as Judge Mental’s jokes.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 20:17:48
From: Michael V
ID: 749611
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Smith and Rogers have compiled Australia’s highest ever Test partnership at Lords. 263 and counting.

(c-n-p from Auntie’s blog…)

I have no TV here sibeen, so I have to take your word for the pitch.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 20:19:15
From: sibeen
ID: 749616
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Michael V said:


Smith and Rogers have compiled Australia’s highest ever Test partnership at Lords. 263 and counting.

(c-n-p from Auntie’s blog…)

I have no TV here sibeen, so I have to take your word for the pitch.

Matting would provide more bounce and movement. It’s a deadun.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 20:19:58
From: dv
ID: 749619
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Bring back Watto.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 20:22:08
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 749625
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

sibeen said:


Michael V said:

Smith and Rogers have compiled Australia’s highest ever Test partnership at Lords. 263 and counting.

(c-n-p from Auntie’s blog…)

I have no TV here sibeen, so I have to take your word for the pitch.

Matting would provide more bounce and movement. It’s a deadun.

Pacifically prepared to deaden Australia’s pace attack.

Hahahahahah

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 20:23:37
From: Michael V
ID: 749629
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

dv said:


Bring back Watto.
No, just no .

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 20:26:09
From: sibeen
ID: 749635
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 20:28:51
From: Michael V
ID: 749636
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

sibeen said:


FUCK
Uh-oh.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 20:30:29
From: party_pants
ID: 749638
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Rogers to be dropped for the next test. Once again got a decent start but couldn’t go on and make 200.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 20:31:50
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 749640
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

party_pants said:


Rogers to be dropped for the next test. Once again got a decent start but couldn’t go on and make 200.

Replaced with Watto.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 20:32:28
From: dv
ID: 749642
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

party_pants said:


Rogers to be dropped for the next test. Once again got a decent start but couldn’t go on and make 200.

Watto would have made 300

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 20:32:32
From: party_pants
ID: 749643
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Peak Warming Man said:


party_pants said:

Rogers to be dropped for the next test. Once again got a decent start but couldn’t go on and make 200.

Replaced with Watto.

Bring Mark Taylor out of retirement.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 21:13:48
From: party_pants
ID: 749656
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

150 for Smith the Worthy.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 21:17:23
From: sibeen
ID: 749657
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 21:19:07
From: Michael V
ID: 749658
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

sibeen said:


FUCK
R79!

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 21:20:27
From: Michael V
ID: 749659
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

7. He needs to have a Watto done on him. Or perhaps he can hit himself over the head, like Haddin.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 21:21:37
From: sibeen
ID: 749660
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Michael V said:


sibeen said:

FUCK
R79!

Look…I’ve already had to tell you off about your language, must I now have to point out your inhospitable attitude.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 21:22:17
From: party_pants
ID: 749661
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Michael V said:


7. He needs to have a Watto done on him. Or perhaps he can hit himself over the head, like Haddin.

lame shot.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 21:24:16
From: Michael V
ID: 749664
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

sibeen said:


Michael V said:

sibeen said:

FUCK
R79!

Look…I’ve already had to tell you off about your language, must I now have to point out your inhospitable attitude.

Hold on to your horses there. I was taking your comment and directing the R79 to Pup.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 21:31:50
From: sibeen
ID: 749666
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Michael V said:


sibeen said:

Michael V said:

R79!

Look…I’ve already had to tell you off about your language, must I now have to point out your inhospitable attitude.

Hold on to your horses there. I was taking your comment and directing the R79 to Pup.

Thou need to be more specific in you wanton criticisms!

ie: R79, pup!, would give the casual follower of this site a greater insight into your thinking.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 21:32:30
From: sibeen
ID: 749667
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

snigger

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 21:35:34
From: Michael V
ID: 749668
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

sibeen said:


Michael V said:

sibeen said:

Look…I’ve already had to tell you off about your language, must I now have to point out your inhospitable attitude.

Hold on to your horses there. I was taking your comment and directing the R79 to Pup.

Thou need to be more specific in you wanton criticisms!

ie: R79, pup!, would give the casual follower of this site a greater insight into your thinking.

Well probably, I guess. I blame the passion of the moment.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 21:37:09
From: party_pants
ID: 749669
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Michael V said:

Well probably, I guess. I blame the passion of the moment.

It’s a funny old game sometimes.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 22:06:45
From: Michael V
ID: 749681
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

LUNCH

Australia 3-424, Smith 168*, Voges 24*
Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 22:08:25
From: kii
ID: 749682
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Michael V said:


LUNCH

Australia 3-424, Smith 168*, Voges 24*

Is this a good thing? I need info to respond to the cabbie ;)

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 22:12:55
From: party_pants
ID: 749684
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

kii said:


Michael V said:

LUNCH

Australia 3-424, Smith 168*, Voges 24*

Is this a good thing? I need info to respond to the cabbie ;)

Yes, A total of around 350-400 is considered good. Australia have gone past that and are up to 424 so far, with only 3 (out of a maximum of 10) batters out. So they are in a good position to press on and get over 500 or perhaps 600, which would be better than good.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 22:14:13
From: kii
ID: 749685
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

thanks…..*scribbles notes *

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 22:16:12
From: Michael V
ID: 749686
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

kii said:


Michael V said:

LUNCH

Australia 3-424, Smith 168*, Voges 24*

Is this a good thing? I need info to respond to the cabbie ;)

Yes. The score is good. The asterix means “not out”.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 22:20:44
From: kii
ID: 749690
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Michael V said:

Yes. The score is good. The asterix means “not out”.

Ah…..not out….I think I even know what that means :P

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 22:26:42
From: btm
ID: 749692
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

party_pants said:


kii said:

Is this a good thing? I need info to respond to the cabbie ;)

Yes, A total of around 350-400 is considered good. Australia have gone past that and are up to 424 so far, with only 3 (out of a maximum of 10) batters out. So they are in a good position to press on and get over 500 or perhaps 600, which would be better than good.

I don’t know much about cricket, but wouldn’t they be better off declaring sometime (relatively) soon so they win this game rather than draw it, as would happen if it continued past the 5 or whatever days they’ve got for it?

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 22:28:43
From: sibeen
ID: 749693
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

btm said:


party_pants said:

kii said:

Is this a good thing? I need info to respond to the cabbie ;)

Yes, A total of around 350-400 is considered good. Australia have gone past that and are up to 424 so far, with only 3 (out of a maximum of 10) batters out. So they are in a good position to press on and get over 500 or perhaps 600, which would be better than good.

I don’t know much about cricket, but wouldn’t they be better off declaring sometime (relatively) soon so they win this game rather than draw it, as would happen if it continued past the 5 or whatever days they’ve got for it?

You are absolutely correct, btm; you don’t know much about cricket :)

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 22:32:42
From: party_pants
ID: 749694
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

btm said:


party_pants said:

kii said:

Is this a good thing? I need info to respond to the cabbie ;)

Yes, A total of around 350-400 is considered good. Australia have gone past that and are up to 424 so far, with only 3 (out of a maximum of 10) batters out. So they are in a good position to press on and get over 500 or perhaps 600, which would be better than good.

I don’t know much about cricket, but wouldn’t they be better off declaring sometime (relatively) soon so they win this game rather than draw it, as would happen if it continued past the 5 or whatever days they’ve got for it?

We’re at lunch on day 2. Depends on how fast they score, would most likely not bat all of day 2, declare with an hour or so left and send England in to face a stiff hour or so of fast bowling.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 22:49:19
From: sibeen
ID: 749701
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 22:57:19
From: Michael V
ID: 749702
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

sibeen said:


FUCK
Right. Now I get to hear about Marsh in a test, rather than watch. Bummer. I think he has potential. I guess we’ll see soon enough…

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:02:46
From: sibeen
ID: 749704
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:12:16
From: kii
ID: 749706
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

sibeen said:


FUCK

So…what does this mean ?

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:13:14
From: JudgeMental
ID: 749707
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

an aussie is out.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:15:26
From: kii
ID: 749708
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Which one ?

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:15:51
From: sibeen
ID: 749709
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

kii said:


sibeen said:

FUCK

So…what does this mean ?

When my commentary includes the word FUCK this means something really, really bad has happened to the Australian side.

The FUCK OFF means something really, really bad has happened to the other side.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:16:30
From: JudgeMental
ID: 749710
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

dunno. aren’t watching it. wont be watto though. whoever he/she/it is.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:17:22
From: bob(from black rock)
ID: 749711
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

kii said:


sibeen said:

FUCK

So…what does this mean ?

Ask your Mummy to explain “Fuck “ to you, there are birds and Bees and other critters involved, I never did understand this myself, although lizard stropping did seem to be vaguely connected.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:18:20
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 749712
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

kii said:


sibeen said:

FUCK

So…what does this mean ?

It means Sibeen had a strict childhood where he was not allowed to swear. He is making up for it now.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:21:31
From: Michael V
ID: 749713
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Marsh out, and this disappoints me. But still better than the Pup.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:23:46
From: bob(from black rock)
ID: 749715
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Michael V said:


Marsh out, and this disappoints me. But still better than the Pup.

Is “Pup” an acronym for “pull your pud”?

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:23:49
From: kii
ID: 749716
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

bob(from black rock) said:


kii said:

sibeen said:

FUCK

So…what does this mean ?

Ask your Mummy to explain “Fuck “ to you, there are birds and Bees and other critters involved, I never did understand this myself, although lizard stropping did seem to be vaguely connected.

My mother is dead .

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:25:36
From: dv
ID: 749717
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Useless Marsh, get Watson back.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:27:31
From: party_pants
ID: 749718
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

bob(from black rock) said:


Michael V said:

Marsh out, and this disappoints me. But still better than the Pup.

Is “Pup” an acronym for “pull your pud”?

No.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:29:31
From: bob(from black rock)
ID: 749719
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

kii said:


bob(from black rock) said:

kii said:

So…what does this mean ?

Ask your Mummy to explain “Fuck “ to you, there are birds and Bees and other critters involved, I never did understand this myself, although lizard stropping did seem to be vaguely connected.

My mother is dead .

So is mine.
Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:30:55
From: dv
ID: 749720
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

kii: FUCK means an Australian wicket. FUCK OFF means an English wicket.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:31:22
From: kii
ID: 749722
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

The teenage boy has arrived, time to leave.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:32:35
From: Bubblecar
ID: 749724
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

FUCK was originally an acronym meaning “Fucking Under Consent of the King”.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:34:22
From: Michael V
ID: 749726
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

bob(from black rock) said:


Michael V said:

Marsh out, and this disappoints me. But still better than the Pup.

Is “Pup” an acronym for “pull your pud”?

No. Michael Clarke’s nickname.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:34:45
From: dv
ID: 749727
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Bubblecar said:


FUCK was originally an acronym meaning “Fucking Under Consent of the King”.

ROFL

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:35:02
From: Michael V
ID: 749728
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

bob(from black rock) said:


kii said:

bob(from black rock) said:

Ask your Mummy to explain “Fuck “ to you, there are birds and Bees and other critters involved, I never did understand this myself, although lizard stropping did seem to be vaguely connected.

My mother is dead .

So is mine.
Mine’s not.
Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:36:28
From: Michael V
ID: 749730
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Bubblecar said:


FUCK was originally an acronym meaning “Fucking Under Consent of the King”.
Really? This surprises me. Do you have a legitimate reference?

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:36:41
From: party_pants
ID: 749731
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Bubblecar said:


FUCK was originally an acronym meaning “Fucking Under Consent of the King”.

I’d dispute that. It was the role of the church, not the king to interfere in people’s private lives. Besides which, the sheer administrative burden of reading and approving and policing all the requests would be impractical.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:37:05
From: JudgeMental
ID: 749732
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

a plague on your false etymology!

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:37:56
From: party_pants
ID: 749733
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

JudgeMental said:


a plague on your false etymology!

yeah – APOYFE to Bubblecar!

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:38:14
From: Michael V
ID: 749734
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

But the internally recursive joke was good, Mr Car.

:) :)

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:40:50
From: party_pants
ID: 749737
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Oh….

I demand a sarcasm font in this forum.

(Not my fault, I’ve been self-harming again under instructions of the doctor)

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:41:02
From: dv
ID: 749738
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Michael V said:


Bubblecar said:

FUCK was originally an acronym meaning “Fucking Under Consent of the King”.
Really? This surprises me. Do you have a legitimate reference?

He’s joking.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:43:09
From: Michael V
ID: 749741
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

dv said:


Michael V said:

Bubblecar said:

FUCK was originally an acronym meaning “Fucking Under Consent of the King”.
Really? This surprises me. Do you have a legitimate reference?

He’s joking.

I know; I was playing the straight man.

;)

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:47:29
From: dv
ID: 749744
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

party_pants said:


Oh….

I demand a sarcasm font in this forum.

(Not my fault, I’ve been self-harming again under instructions of the doctor)

Doctor: Uh hum. Mmm. I’m sorry, Mr. Marsh, but there appears to be permanent damage.

Randy: Oh boy, this is great! My week just keeps getting better.

Sharon: How do we fix this, doctor?

Doctor: You don’t. I’m sorry, there… just isn’t enough research in how sarcasm affects the brain.

Randy: So that’s it. I should just go home and forget about what this sport has done to me. Let thousands of people play sarcastaball and get hurt too!

Doctor: Ohh, rreally? You, you think there’s a correlation between sarcasm and sarcastaball? Really? That’s fascinating. Please, go on.

Randy: No, sarcastaball has nothing to do with it. I just… I just really enjoy being sarcastic and so I must be finding an excuse.

Doctor: You know, I have a 50-year-old Alzheimer’s patient out in the waiting room who can’t even remember his family, but… let’s forget about him and focus on how sarcastaball might be damaging people’s brains.

Randy: My son is out there playing that game! It’s heartwarming to see you have such high regard for his safety!

Doctor: Okay, well I’ve got a better idea. Let’s get all the funding for cancer research and genetic diseases, let’s, let’s take all that money and make commercials that say “Hey America, sarcasm might not be such a great thing for your brain.”

Randy: Thank you, doctor. Thank you so much!

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:49:56
From: sibeen
ID: 749745
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Not a bad effort.

Smith … 203

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:50:13
From: party_pants
ID: 749746
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

200 up for Smith the Worthy.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:50:49
From: dv
ID: 749747
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Thar she blows.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:52:57
From: Michael V
ID: 749748
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

sibeen said:


Not a bad effort.

Smith … 203

:) :) :) :)

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:54:10
From: Michael V
ID: 749749
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

It’s strange how we put so much emphasis on 50, 100, 150, 200 etc…

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:55:30
From: dv
ID: 749750
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Michael V said:


It’s strange how we put so much emphasis on 50, 100, 150, 200 etc…

It should be on 64, 128, 256 …

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:59:14
From: Michael V
ID: 749751
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Or just random numbers.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/07/2015 23:59:35
From: Michael V
ID: 749752
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

That change for every test.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 00:01:38
From: party_pants
ID: 749753
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Should be 42 and 87

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 00:01:48
From: dv
ID: 749754
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55,89,144,233…

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 00:09:17
From: Michael V
ID: 749756
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

dv said:


1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55,89,144,233…
There’s a pattern there…

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 00:09:47
From: dv
ID: 749758
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Since we love stupid stats, this is the highest Australian score abroad since Tubby’s big thump in Pakistan 17 years ago.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 00:09:55
From: sibeen
ID: 749759
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 00:13:46
From: sibeen
ID: 749766
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Smith out for 215 :(

No doubt Watson will take his place next test.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 00:14:15
From: dv
ID: 749767
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Smith’s first innings scores since the start of the Aussie summer:

162*
133
192
117
25
199
33
215

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 00:14:41
From: party_pants
ID: 749769
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

sibeen said:


Smith out for 215 :(

No doubt Watson will take his place next test.

At least Watson won’t waste reviews when he’s given LBW.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 00:14:44
From: Michael V
ID: 749770
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

sibeen said:


Smith out for 215 :(

No doubt Watson will take his place next test.

Or the Pup’s place.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 00:15:20
From: Michael V
ID: 749771
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

dv said:


Smith’s first innings scores since the start of the Aussie summer:

162*
133
192
117
25
199
33
215

Plurry good effort.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 00:18:30
From: sibeen
ID: 749774
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 00:20:27
From: dv
ID: 749777
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Not a bad debut for Nev.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 00:26:11
From: party_pants
ID: 749779
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

How long till the Tea Break?

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 00:30:19
From: sibeen
ID: 749781
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

10 minutes

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 00:31:33
From: party_pants
ID: 749782
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

What do you reckon – declare at tea on about 550, or bat on another hour and aim for 600?

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 00:33:05
From: dv
ID: 749783
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

I would not be in any big hurry to declare. Make runs when the conditions are good.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 00:33:37
From: sibeen
ID: 749784
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

party_pants said:


What do you reckon – declare at tea on about 550, or bat on another hour and aim for 600?

The later.

600 is a fairly big emotional hurdle.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 00:39:08
From: party_pants
ID: 749785
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Sounds reasonable.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 00:40:23
From: sibeen
ID: 749786
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

TEA

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 00:48:24
From: tauto
ID: 749788
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

My guess is that this match will be a draw.

Home advantage is to prepare wickets to suit the home team. England is one up, so all they have to do is to draw the remaining tests to win series. So be prepared for lots of batting.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 00:52:08
From: party_pants
ID: 749789
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

tauto said:


My guess is that this match will be a draw.

Home advantage is to prepare wickets to suit the home team. England is one up, so all they have to do is to draw the remaining tests to win series. So be prepared for lots of batting.

Australia’s Second-Favourite Nathan to bowl us to victory on the last day.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 01:01:04
From: sibeen
ID: 749790
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

party_pants said:


tauto said:

My guess is that this match will be a draw.

Home advantage is to prepare wickets to suit the home team. England is one up, so all they have to do is to draw the remaining tests to win series. So be prepared for lots of batting.

Australia’s Second-Favourite Nathan to bowl us to victory on the last day.

OK, I’m lost. There’s another Nathan?

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 01:02:31
From: party_pants
ID: 749791
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

sibeen said:


party_pants said:

tauto said:

My guess is that this match will be a draw.

Home advantage is to prepare wickets to suit the home team. England is one up, so all they have to do is to draw the remaining tests to win series. So be prepared for lots of batting.

Australia’s Second-Favourite Nathan to bowl us to victory on the last day.

OK, I’m lost. There’s another Nathan?

Plays AFL footy for Fremantle.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 01:03:58
From: sibeen
ID: 749792
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

party_pants said:


sibeen said:

party_pants said:

Australia’s Second-Favourite Nathan to bowl us to victory on the last day.

OK, I’m lost. There’s another Nathan?

Plays AFL footy for Fremantle.

Never heard of him or them.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 01:06:06
From: party_pants
ID: 749793
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

sibeen said:


party_pants said:

sibeen said:

OK, I’m lost. There’s another Nathan?

Plays AFL footy for Fremantle.

Never heard of him or them.

Maybe tomorrow.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 01:06:51
From: party_pants
ID: 749794
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Johnno is out, and Pup has declared.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 01:15:19
From: sibeen
ID: 749796
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 03:39:38
From: Ian
ID: 749800
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

And that’s stumps..

Aus 8/788 dec .. Double ton to Smitty

Pommie bastards 4/30 at one point and playing like a whole team of Watto

…oh there’s a pidgeon over there and look, a plane coming into land….

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 08:30:13
From: roughbarked
ID: 749820
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

It was worth staying up most of the night for.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 09:50:53
From: party_pants
ID: 749825
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

roughbarked said:


It was worth staying up most of the night for.

I was watching in bed, I fell asleep just after the 4th English wicket fell. Looking up the score first thing this morning, I was congratulating myself for the excellent timing.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 09:53:20
From: roughbarked
ID: 749826
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

party_pants said:


roughbarked said:

It was worth staying up most of the night for.

I was watching in bed, I fell asleep just after the 4th English wicket fell. Looking up the score first thing this morning, I was congratulating myself for the excellent timing.

I did the same. Only I was on the couch. They were 4/40 odd when I slipped away.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 11:00:05
From: dv
ID: 749844
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Was 4 for about 40 when I nodded.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 20:15:50
From: Michael V
ID: 749993
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

They’ve started again and England has put on a few more runs..

Currently: ENG 4/98 – Cook 24, Stokes 48 (AUS 8/566d)

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 20:34:36
From: party_pants
ID: 749994
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Michael V said:


They’ve started again and England has put on a few more runs..

Currently: ENG 4/98 – Cook 24, Stokes 48 (AUS 8/566d)

Hoping for another clatter of wickets..

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 21:05:38
From: dv
ID: 749998
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

I guess this is heading to a draw, it’s a shame we don’t have someone like Watson to take the crucial wickets.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 21:18:50
From: party_pants
ID: 749999
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

dv said:


I guess this is heading to a draw, it’s a shame we don’t have someone like Watson to take the crucial wickets.

What’s Warnie doing these days?

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 21:24:48
From: Michael V
ID: 750002
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

party_pants said:


dv said:

I guess this is heading to a draw, it’s a shame we don’t have someone like Watson to take the crucial wickets.

What’s Warnie doing these days?

He’s been doing too much botox.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 21:27:21
From: party_pants
ID: 750003
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Michael V said:


party_pants said:

dv said:

I guess this is heading to a draw, it’s a shame we don’t have someone like Watson to take the crucial wickets.

What’s Warnie doing these days?

He’s been doing too much botox.

Is Botox banned for sportspeople?

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 21:45:20
From: sibeen
ID: 750007
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 21:45:26
From: Michael V
ID: 750008
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

party_pants said:


Michael V said:

party_pants said:

What’s Warnie doing these days?

He’s been doing too much botox.

Is Botox banned for sportspeople?

It’s not performance enhancing, so I doubt it.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 21:45:59
From: party_pants
ID: 750009
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Off ya go son.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 21:48:19
From: Michael V
ID: 750012
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Stokes, bowled March for 87. Good!

(That number…)

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 21:50:12
From: Michael V
ID: 750013
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

BOWLED HIM! STOKES IS CLEANED UP BY MARSH FOR 87! AUS 5/175”

Whoopsie on the ABC blog…

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 21:52:00
From: party_pants
ID: 750014
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Michael V said:


BOWLED HIM! STOKES IS CLEANED UP BY MARSH FOR 87! AUS 5/175”

Whoopsie on the ABC blog…

Big inside edge. But we’ll take it :)

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 21:56:10
From: Michael V
ID: 750017
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

party_pants said:


Michael V said:

BOWLED HIM! STOKES IS CLEANED UP BY MARSH FOR 87! AUS 5/175”

Whoopsie on the ABC blog…

Big inside edge. But we’ll take it :)

Of course we’ll take it. Rub it in even. No problems.

It was the score that was the Whoopsie. ……..>>…………“AUS 5/175”…………….

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 21:59:45
From: party_pants
ID: 750019
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

I didn’t even notice :)

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 22:04:29
From: kii
ID: 750023
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Thanks for the cricket notes. I saw the cabbie and pretended to have an understanding of recent cricket stuff. I sneakily showed his wife my notes and she cracked up :P he realized what was happening and laughed heartily. I gave him the notes and he gleefully read them, snorting over scores etc. Left them with him as a pressy

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 22:06:25
From: Michael V
ID: 750026
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

kii said:


Thanks for the cricket notes. I saw the cabbie and pretended to have an understanding of recent cricket stuff. I sneakily showed his wife my notes and she cracked up :P he realized what was happening and laughed heartily. I gave him the notes and he gleefully read them, snorting over scores etc. Left them with him as a pressy
:)

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 22:08:04
From: party_pants
ID: 750028
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

kii said:


Thanks for the cricket notes. I saw the cabbie and pretended to have an understanding of recent cricket stuff. I sneakily showed his wife my notes and she cracked up :P he realized what was happening and laughed heartily. I gave him the notes and he gleefully read them, snorting over scores etc. Left them with him as a pressy

Awesome. Happy to help.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 22:08:06
From: JudgeMental
ID: 750029
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

south african

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 22:15:41
From: kii
ID: 750035
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

party_pants said:

Awesome. Happy to help.

Thank you…I think he’ll live off that story for a while.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 22:49:58
From: Michael V
ID: 750054
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

“Ben Stokes was dismissed for 87. This is the 87th time a batsman got out for 87 Runs”

From Auntie’s blog.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 22:51:05
From: roughbarked
ID: 750055
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Michael V said:


“Ben Stokes was dismissed for 87. This is the 87th time a batsman got out for 87 Runs”

From Auntie’s blog.

Someone’s keeping stats but then it wouldn’t be cricket without them.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 22:52:21
From: sibeen
ID: 750057
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Michael V said:


“Ben Stokes was dismissed for 87. This is the 87th time a batsman got out for 87 Runs”

From Auntie’s blog.

I doubt that. I know I got out on 87 once*, and I bet the bastards didn’t count me.

*Aberfeldie Park under 14s, 1975.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 22:54:23
From: roughbarked
ID: 750058
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

sibeen said:


Michael V said:

“Ben Stokes was dismissed for 87. This is the 87th time a batsman got out for 87 Runs”

From Auntie’s blog.

I doubt that. I know I got out on 87 once*, and I bet the bastards didn’t count me.

*Aberfeldie Park under 14s, 1975.

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 22:55:36
From: sibeen
ID: 750060
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 22:56:53
From: sibeen
ID: 750061
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 22:58:28
From: Michael V
ID: 750062
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Jumped the gun there?

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 23:02:01
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 750064
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Opps.. Sibeen is so drunk he’s forgotten who he’s barracking for.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 23:02:58
From: roughbarked
ID: 750065
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Witty Rejoinder said:


Opps.. Sibeen is so drunk he’s forgotten who he’s barracking for.

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 18/07/2015 23:20:57
From: sibeen
ID: 750077
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 00:16:56
From: party_pants
ID: 750089
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Ah well, that was worth the review. Only a bee’s dick in it.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 00:18:08
From: sibeen
ID: 750090
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 00:19:59
From: party_pants
ID: 750091
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Oh how’d ya be. Out for 96!

Ah well. Well bowled Marsh

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 00:33:57
From: party_pants
ID: 750092
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

I’m abandoning. Can’t do it tonight.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 01:15:52
From: sibeen
ID: 750093
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 01:22:05
From: bob(from black rock)
ID: 750094
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

sibeen said:


FUCK OFF

Please be polite , it’s FUCK IN THE DIRECTION OF OFF!!!

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 01:23:47
From: sibeen
ID: 750095
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 01:26:20
From: dv
ID: 750096
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

My lord, your cup of fuck offs runneth over.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 01:35:45
From: sibeen
ID: 750099
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

dv said:


My lord, your cup of fuck offs runneth over.

There has been 10 so far this innings. One was a trigger reaction which I quickly recanted with a quick FUCK. So there have been in fact nine,

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 01:36:02
From: sibeen
ID: 750100
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 01:36:20
From: sibeen
ID: 750101
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

That’s ten.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 01:36:41
From: roughbarked
ID: 750102
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

dv said:


My lord, your cup of fuck offs runneth over.

Well, That’s it. The Aussies will be back out to bat.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 01:37:23
From: dv
ID: 750103
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Silicon been, would you enforce the follow on?

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 01:38:43
From: sibeen
ID: 750106
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

dv said:


Silicon been, would you enforce the follow on?

Since that test in India there’s not an Australian captain who’s even thought about it.

I agree.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 01:41:47
From: dv
ID: 750108
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Caught by SHAUN Marsh

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 01:43:34
From: Ian
ID: 750109
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

They all FUCKED OFF for 312.
A lead of 254.
We’re going to have to go hard and then hope the pommie rain FUCKS OFF.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 01:57:44
From: sibeen
ID: 750116
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

SNIGGER

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 02:04:14
From: btm
ID: 750118
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Why would you not enforce the follow-on, sibeen? I’d have thought it would be good (psychologically) for the team doing the enforcing, and could mean the difference between a win and a draw.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 02:10:43
From: sibeen
ID: 750120
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

btm said:


Why would you not enforce the follow-on, sibeen? I’d have thought it would be good (psychologically) for the team doing the enforcing, and could mean the difference between a win and a draw.

2001, Aus vs Ind.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 02:13:03
From: roughbarked
ID: 750123
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Why would anyone want to keep bowling again?

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 02:43:01
From: dv
ID: 750139
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

At present we can expect to lose 60 overs to rain so there might be 135 overs to come.

A case could be made for batting the shit out of it and then gwtting maybe 5 overs against England at the end of today but by the way the Australians are batting, that is not Pup’s plan.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 02:59:54
From: roughbarked
ID: 750142
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

dv said:


At present we can expect to lose 60 overs to rain so there might be 135 overs to come.

A case could be made for batting the shit out of it and then gwtting maybe 5 overs against England at the end of today but by the way the Australians are batting, that is not Pup’s plan.

Think pup wants to rub it into the pommies at Lords.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 03:31:07
From: Ian
ID: 750143
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

0/108.. 360 ahead

STUMPS

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 03:37:12
From: Ian
ID: 750144
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

At present we can expect to lose 60 overs to rain so there might be 135 overs to come

——-

Reckon we’d be looking at a draw then.

You’d have to foolish or Watto to try and predict London showers though.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 14:32:28
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 750203
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

They had Alan Lamb on Willow Talk this morning, funny as.
Those days are gone now, you have to be a puritan to get selected these days.
Tucked into bed early with a glass of milk.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 17:08:04
From: Michael V
ID: 750233
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Interesting commentary:

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-07-19/ashes-myth-busting-no-follow-on-does-not-mean-defensive/6631964

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 19:48:59
From: Michael V
ID: 750352
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Bump.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 19:53:00
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 750354
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Last night channel 9 did the right thing, they put the cricket on the station that everyone can access.
Everybody from the lowest car salesman to the wealthy weather girls, right across this vast snow covered land.
But do the right thing twice in a row was outside their reach.
Tonight they have give their No. 1 priority to the frigging Voice or some such and banished The Ashes Test to Go.

thumb thumb

Q R S

thumb thumb

T, TA, TB TC

thumb thumb

TU, TURNB

thumb thumb

Here it is, Turnbull M

Operator………….put me through to this number…………………………………

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 19:56:44
From: AwesomeO
ID: 750356
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Try Gem.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 19:59:18
From: Michael V
ID: 750357
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Everybody from the lowest car salesman to the wealthy weather girls, right across this vast snow covered land.
—-
But not me. No TV.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 20:01:27
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 750359
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

I could handle that, sitting in the mild sun drinking a pint of ale without a worry in the world.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 20:02:51
From: Michael V
ID: 750360
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

I reckon I could too.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 20:03:09
From: dv
ID: 750361
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Weather cleared up after all, but still a lead of 420 should be heaps.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 20:04:11
From: dv
ID: 750362
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Peak Warming Man said:


Last night channel 9 did the right thing, they put the cricket on the station that everyone can access.
Everybody from the lowest car salesman to the wealthy weather girls, right across this vast snow covered land.
But do the right thing twice in a row was outside their reach.
Tonight they have give their No. 1 priority to the frigging Voice or some such and banished The Ashes Test to Go.

thumb thumb

Q R S

thumb thumb

T, TA, TB TC

thumb thumb

TU, TURNB

thumb thumb

Here it is, Turnbull M

Operator………….put me through to this number…………………………………

“Can’t you just stream it?”

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 20:16:35
From: Michael V
ID: 750365
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Rogers retired hurt. (Where are you sibeen?)

What happened to Rogers?

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 20:30:01
From: party_pants
ID: 750373
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Michael V said:


Rogers retired hurt. (Where are you sibeen?)

What happened to Rogers?

Don’t know for sure. Seemed to be having a dizzy spell. Walked over to Warner at the end of the over, said a couple of words and then sat down. Warner immediately turned to the dressing room and waved for the doctor with both arms.

He did get hit on the head yesterday, and also a month or so ago in the West Indies and missed both tests there.

Hope he is okay.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 20:32:51
From: Michael V
ID: 750376
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

I hope so too.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 20:36:09
From: sibeen
ID: 750381
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Michael V said:


Rogers retired hurt. (Where are you sibeen?)

What happened to Rogers?

I don’t do half fucks.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 20:49:31
From: sibeen
ID: 750392
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 21:19:43
From: sibeen
ID: 750422
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 21:25:21
From: Arts
ID: 750424
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

what happened to him??

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 21:28:18
From: JudgeMental
ID: 750425
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

watto nobbled him most likely.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 21:38:55
From: sibeen
ID: 750433
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

OK, there’s conservative and then there’s conservative. I think we’re overdoing it.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 21:39:07
From: Arts
ID: 750434
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

OVER 48 AUSTRALIA 2-239 & 8-566 (ENGLAND 312)
A fine cut from Marsh brings up the only boundary of the latest Root over, which contained its usual selection of easy picking singles for both batsmen. Can we just hit a couple to the stands and call them off already?

ha!

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 21:39:27
From: tauto
ID: 750435
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

sibeen said:


FUCK

—-

Smith out for 58
That brings his average down, from his last 16 innings.
Probably down from 121 to 117.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 21:40:12
From: sibeen
ID: 750437
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Oh, THANK FUCK

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 21:41:41
From: sibeen
ID: 750438
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

tauto said:


sibeen said:

FUCK

—-

Smith out for 58
That brings his average down, from his last 16 innings.
Probably down from 121 to 117.

Rogers has a better average for this test :)

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 21:42:10
From: dv
ID: 750441
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Did we do the “embarrassment of Mitches” joke?

And the “Mitch better have my bunny” joke?

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 21:44:42
From: Michael V
ID: 750445
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

And I didn’t get either of them.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 21:44:49
From: sibeen
ID: 750446
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Some innings break amusement:

There was a story about a letter which concerned Geoff Boycott.

It was sent during a test match at Lord’s and addressed to “The Greatest Batsman in the UK, C/O Lord’s”.

It was given to him in the dressing room. He triumphantly opened it to read:

“Dear Mr Boycott, if you are reading this then the postman thinks more of you than I do.”

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 21:50:19
From: Michael V
ID: 750449
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

sibeen said:


Some innings break amusement:

There was a story about a letter which concerned Geoff Boycott.

It was sent during a test match at Lord’s and addressed to “The Greatest Batsman in the UK, C/O Lord’s”.

It was given to him in the dressing room. He triumphantly opened it to read:

“Dear Mr Boycott, if you are reading this then the postman thinks more of you than I do.”

snortle

LOL

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 21:51:02
From: Arts
ID: 750450
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

twitter is alive

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 21:52:39
From: dv
ID: 750451
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Michael V said:


And I didn’t get either of them.

Well you see, there are three players called Mitch in the Australian side. There is a common expression “embarrassment of riches”, and a simple rhyming replacement results in “embarrassment of Mitches”.

“Mitch better have my bunny” is a spoonerism for “Bitch better have my money”, which is a popular Rihanna song but was a common enough phrase even before that.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 21:53:24
From: dv
ID: 750452
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Arts said:


twitter is alive

Why would there be a joke about Smith? He’s the new bradman.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 21:53:25
From: party_pants
ID: 750453
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Arts said:


http://images.scribblelive.com/2015/7/19/d9951848-61b5-4f15-a616-6993ca200d2b_800.jpg

twitter is alive

There were some nasty souls around here 3 or 4 years ago calling him Smith the Unworthy. Well, hasn’t he proved them wrong.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 21:55:47
From: dv
ID: 750454
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Lilith avoids the pair

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 21:56:15
From: Michael V
ID: 750455
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Thanks, dv.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 21:57:14
From: dv
ID: 750457
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Actually the clip for the Rihanna song is a bit too violent for my tastes.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 22:01:49
From: party_pants
ID: 750461
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Excellent session for Australia.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 22:02:30
From: Michael V
ID: 750463
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

party_pants said:


Arts said:

http://images.scribblelive.com/2015/7/19/d9951848-61b5-4f15-a616-6993ca200d2b_800.jpg

twitter is alive

There were some nasty souls around here 3 or 4 years ago calling him Smith the Unworthy. Well, hasn’t he proved them wrong.

Hasn’t he indeed. Cast the doubters to the lions!

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 22:03:31
From: tauto
ID: 750466
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

party_pants said:


Arts said:

http://images.scribblelive.com/2015/7/19/d9951848-61b5-4f15-a616-6993ca200d2b_800.jpg

twitter is alive

There were some nasty souls around here 3 or 4 years ago calling him Smith the Unworthy. Well, hasn’t he proved them wrong.

——

Yes, you will probably go the Bishop and say it was an error of judgement.

I have never seen a batsman improve so quickly at the top level. Thankfully we can rule out drugs.
Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 22:04:39
From: party_pants
ID: 750469
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

tauto said:


party_pants said:

Arts said:

http://images.scribblelive.com/2015/7/19/d9951848-61b5-4f15-a616-6993ca200d2b_800.jpg

twitter is alive

There were some nasty souls around here 3 or 4 years ago calling him Smith the Unworthy. Well, hasn’t he proved them wrong.

——

Yes, you will probably go the Bishop and say it was an error of judgement.

I have never seen a batsman improve so quickly at the top level. Thankfully we can rule out drugs.

Once he gave up trying to be an all-rounder.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 22:39:30
From: Michael V
ID: 750495
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-07-19/rogers-retires-hurt-after-dizzy-spell/6632200

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 22:47:06
From: sibeen
ID: 750498
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 22:51:10
From: Michael V
ID: 750502
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Nine to go…

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 23:07:20
From: sibeen
ID: 750508
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 23:08:56
From: Ian
ID: 750509
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

sibeen said:


FUCK OFF

Oh yeah.
Chew down.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 23:45:49
From: sibeen
ID: 750524
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 23:47:10
From: party_pants
ID: 750526
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Mitch Marsh again. Got to say his bowling has been handy.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 23:48:35
From: Michael V
ID: 750528
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

party_pants said:


Mitch Marsh again. Got to say his bowling has been handy.
I reckon!

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 23:48:45
From: sibeen
ID: 750529
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

party_pants said:


Mitch Marsh again. Got to say his bowling has been handy.

I prefer Watto.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 23:49:13
From: bob(from black rock)
ID: 750530
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

sibeen said:


FUCK OFF

Please calmn it down try “phuck it off”

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 23:50:24
From: Michael V
ID: 750532
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

sibeen said:


party_pants said:

Mitch Marsh again. Got to say his bowling has been handy.

I prefer Watto.

He’s done absolutely nothing in this game.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 23:51:45
From: party_pants
ID: 750533
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Michael V said:


sibeen said:

party_pants said:

Mitch Marsh again. Got to say his bowling has been handy.

I prefer Watto.

He’s done absolutely nothing in this game.

Lol – very true :)

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 23:54:46
From: sibeen
ID: 750536
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

3 wickets down:

c. Nevill b. Mitch
c. Nevill b. Mitch
c. Nevill b. Mitch

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 23:54:51
From: Bubblecar
ID: 750537
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

bob(from black rock) said:


sibeen said:

FUCK OFF

Please calmn it down try “phuck it off”

He could try:

THANKS FOR PLAYING TODAY, YOU DID A FINE JOB! BUT I’M SORRY, YOU’RE NOW OUT

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 23:58:50
From: dv
ID: 750539
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Or POLITE APPLAUSE EVEN THOUGH THE BATSMAN UNDERPERFORMED AFTER ALL ANYONE CAN HAVE A BAD DAY WE ARE ALL COUSINS IF YOU GO BACK FAR ENOUGH.

Seems as though Nevill the Concrete has had a satisfactory debut.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 23:59:08
From: party_pants
ID: 750540
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

A Mitch carrying the drinks is safe, but that’s not what Mitches are built for.

(not mine, someone just posted it elsewhere)

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 23:59:35
From: Arts
ID: 750542
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

I never thought I’d say this but – I agree with Shebs

Reply Quote

Date: 19/07/2015 23:59:55
From: Michael V
ID: 750543
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

sibeen said:


3 wickets down:

c. Nevill b. Mitch
c. Nevill b. Mitch
c. Nevill b. Mitch

New boys making a show of it.

Good on-em!

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 00:27:30
From: sibeen
ID: 750554
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 00:31:24
From: Michael V
ID: 750555
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

That’s Bell done. 4/48.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 00:31:33
From: bob(from black rock)
ID: 750556
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

sibeen said:


FUCK OFF

Do you mean, “fuck in the direction of off?

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 00:33:31
From: sibeen
ID: 750557
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 00:35:30
From: Michael V
ID: 750558
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

That’ll be Stokes out for a duck. Onya Johnson. They’re 5/52.

Good stuff! :) :)

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 00:36:39
From: Ian
ID: 750559
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Esibeen said:


FUCK OFF

That’s Michelle for not much and everyone’s stoked :)

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 00:38:29
From: Michael V
ID: 750560
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Clean-em up guys!

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 00:41:12
From: sibeen
ID: 750562
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Andy Zaltman on twitter:

A boy was expelled from my school for being run out like that.

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 00:42:37
From: Michael V
ID: 750563
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

sibeen said:


Andy Zaltman on twitter:

A boy was expelled from my school for being run out like that.

:)

Hahahaha!

I read he didn’t ground his bat. Bloody!

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 00:45:53
From: sibeen
ID: 750564
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Michael V said:


sibeen said:

Andy Zaltman on twitter:

A boy was expelled from my school for being run out like that.

:)

Hahahaha!

I read he didn’t ground his bat. Bloody!

He was half way over the crease. Just had both feet and his bat in the air when the ball hit. it really was a ridiculous piece of cricket.

I agree with Zaltman; christ, my under 12 couch would have beaten me senseless with a a stump for that.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 00:48:49
From: sibeen
ID: 750565
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

sibeen said:


Michael V said:

sibeen said:

Andy Zaltman on twitter:

A boy was expelled from my school for being run out like that.

:)

Hahahaha!

I read he didn’t ground his bat. Bloody!

He was half way over the crease. Just had both feet and his bat in the air when the ball hit. it really was a ridiculous piece of cricket.

I agree with Zaltman; christ, my under 12 couch would have beaten me senseless with a a stump for that.

Err, coach, not couch.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 00:48:50
From: Michael V
ID: 750566
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

I wish I had a TV here…

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 00:50:42
From: Michael V
ID: 750567
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

sibeen said:


sibeen said:

Michael V said:

Hahahaha!

I read he didn’t ground his bat. Bloody!

He was half way over the crease. Just had both feet and his bat in the air when the ball hit. it really was a ridiculous piece of cricket.

I agree with Zaltman; christ, my under 12 couch would have beaten me senseless with a a stump for that.

Err, coach, not couch.

Freudian!

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 00:52:15
From: sibeen
ID: 750568
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Michael V said:


sibeen said:

sibeen said:

He was half way over the crease. Just had both feet and his bat in the air when the ball hit. it really was a ridiculous piece of cricket.

I agree with Zaltman; christ, my under 12 couch would have beaten me senseless with a a stump for that.

Err, coach, not couch.

Freudian!

No, at 12 I was beating off on the couch :)

OK, way too much :)

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 00:54:49
From: Michael V
ID: 750569
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Yes. Waves red card.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 01:02:55
From: Michael V
ID: 750570
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

6 for.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 01:05:32
From: Michael V
ID: 750571
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Sibeen?

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 01:06:00
From: sibeen
ID: 750572
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

FUCK OFF

&

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 01:06:55
From: Michael V
ID: 750573
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

phew

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 01:07:11
From: sibeen
ID: 750574
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Michael V said:


Sibeen?

Had switched over to see the end of the tour, two bloody minutes I was away.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 01:07:47
From: Michael V
ID: 750575
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

7/64

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 01:07:54
From: Ian
ID: 750576
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

The wheels have fallen off.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 01:10:21
From: Michael V
ID: 750577
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

After the annoyance Ali has caused, it’s fitting he gets a duck.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 01:20:47
From: Michael V
ID: 750578
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

“That was quite a profitable over in the end for England.”

ENG 7/82- Root 11, Broad 11 – Chasing 509 to win”

——————————————————-

OK……… right……..

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 01:27:49
From: sibeen
ID: 750579
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 01:29:56
From: Michael V
ID: 750580
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Eight fa!

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 01:31:07
From: sibeen
ID: 750581
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

FUCK OFF

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 01:34:10
From: Michael V
ID: 750582
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Nine-fah!

snigger

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 01:35:19
From: Ian
ID: 750583
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Michael V said:


Nine-fah!

snigger

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 01:35:19
From: Ian
ID: 750584
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Michael V said:


Nine-fah!

snigger

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 01:41:27
From: Ian
ID: 750585
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

ALL FUCK OFF

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 01:42:06
From: sibeen
ID: 750586
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

FUCK OFF

37 overs….you weak pricks!

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 01:44:19
From: Michael V
ID: 750587
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

:) :) :)

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 01:46:28
From: Michael V
ID: 750588
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

AUSTRALIA WINS BY 405 RUNS AT LORDS!

Well done!

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 01:47:08
From: Ian
ID: 750589
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

That was an entertaining evening.

You’ll have to get yourself a teev Michael.

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 01:49:13
From: Michael V
ID: 750590
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Ian said:


That was an entertaining evening.

You’ll have to get yourself a teev Michael.

:)

Yes. Dunno what we’d do with an extra TV in the long run, but yes, I need one…

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 01:51:46
From: dv
ID: 750591
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

So …

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 09:57:04
From: JudgeMental
ID: 750617
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

good to see england has got over that anomaly of a win.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 10:00:00
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 750620
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

JudgeMental said:


good to see england has got over that anomaly of a win.

Yeah, they had us all worried for a bit there.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 10:03:20
From: roughbarked
ID: 750622
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Peak Warming Man said:


JudgeMental said:

good to see england has got over that anomaly of a win.

Yeah, they had us all worried for a bit there.

Can they regroup for test #3?

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 10:04:49
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 750623
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Actor, writer and presenter Stephen Fry: “The worst thing about England’s batting today is that it allows teachery people to use words like “disgrace” and “shameful”.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 18:20:55
From: dv
ID: 750868
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

Be nice to have a close match

Reply Quote

Date: 20/07/2015 18:23:37
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 750871
Subject: re: Ashes - 2nd Test.

I’m warming the tele up right now.
rubs hands

Reply Quote