Date: 21/07/2015 16:09:01
From: Bubblecar
ID: 751216
Subject: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

An Australian scientist says he is “completely blown away” after being given the job of searching for alien life forms in a new $135 million push financed by Stephen Hawking and Russian billionaire Yuri Milner.

Australia will play a crucial role in the Breakthrough Listen project’s hunt for extraterrestrial life, with the Parkes Observatory in New South Wales signing a multi-million-dollar contract to scan radio waves for life in the cosmos.

The CSIRO has signed a deal for the Breakthrough Prize Foundation to use the Parkes telescope to look for intelligent life on the closest stars to Earth, beyond the Milky Way and into other galaxies.

It has been described as the “biggest scientific research” project looking for signs of intelligent life, and will cover 10 times as much of the sky than previous programs.

Professor Matthew Bailes from Melbourne’s Swinburne University was let in on the secret mission just a few days ago and he is still coming to terms with the announcement.

He will be the project’s lead investigator at the Parkes Telescope.

“I was completely blown away, in fact I have to still pinch myself that I’m not dreaming, it’s an amazing cash investment in the science we do, and it’s astounding really,” he said.

At the launch of the project in London, physicist Professor Hawking said it was time to find out if extraterrestrial life existed.

“We believe that life arose spontaneously on Earth, so in an infinite universe, there must be other occurrences of life,” he said.

“Somewhere in the cosmos, perhaps, intelligence may be watching these lights of ours, aware of what they mean.

Full report: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-07-21/australia-scientist-blown-away-over-role-in-alien-search/6635478

Reply Quote

Date: 21/07/2015 16:16:36
From: furious
ID: 751218
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

Why are they starting a whole new search? Wouldn’t it be better to join resources with those that are already searching?

Reply Quote

Date: 21/07/2015 16:22:13
From: Cymek
ID: 751219
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

furious said:


Why are they starting a whole new search? Wouldn’t it be better to join resources with those that are already searching?

Maybe they are getting access to the data of stars and areas already searched and disregard them or perhaps the telescope is an order of magnitude more sensitive so an entire new search will take place. I wonder if stars with known planets will be the first scanned.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/07/2015 16:53:06
From: Bubblecar
ID: 751231
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

furious said:


Why are they starting a whole new search? Wouldn’t it be better to join resources with those that are already searching?

It “will cover 10 times as much of the sky than previous programs” so presumably they don’t require the assistance of the other projects.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/07/2015 18:28:01
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 751259
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

That is great news, I’m blown away too.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/07/2015 19:19:18
From: Ian
ID: 751270
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

furious said:


Why are they starting a whole new search? Wouldn’t it be better to join resources with those that are already searching?

It’s a SETI reboot and upgrade. Lots more moola.

Why has Hawking changed his tune on keeping our heads down and staying schtum?

Reply Quote

Date: 21/07/2015 19:32:13
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 751279
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

Ian said:


furious said:

Why are they starting a whole new search? Wouldn’t it be better to join resources with those that are already searching?

It’s a SETI reboot and upgrade. Lots more moola.

Why has Hawking changed his tune on keeping our heads down and staying schtum?

He has been enlightened, hope its a new trend.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/07/2015 19:37:07
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 751287
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

Hawking said we have to find out, we have to know.
It’s on his bucket list I think.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/07/2015 20:28:48
From: wookiemeister
ID: 751303
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

it’s a waste of time listening for ET

first you have to hope that you can accidentally listen in on a conversation thousands of years ago – maybe

then you have to listen and cut out the noise

they are saying now that the noise drowns everything out so listening to the radio waves is a waste of time

the only thing they’ve ever found was “ WOW” and the canteens microwave

Reply Quote

Date: 21/07/2015 20:30:58
From: JudgeMental
ID: 751304
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

nah, all we are looking for is an anomalous signal. that isn’t natural.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/07/2015 20:32:55
From: wookiemeister
ID: 751306
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

JudgeMental said:


nah, all we are looking for is an anomalous signal. that isn’t natural.

good luck to that

the odds aren’t in your favour

Reply Quote

Date: 21/07/2015 22:14:32
From: Cymek
ID: 751378
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

The program will be 50 times more sensitive than previous searches, and cover 10 times more of the sky, experts said.

It will scan at least five times more of the radio spectrum, and 100 times faster, while in tandem undertake the deepest and broadest-ever search for optical laser transmission

Reply Quote

Date: 21/07/2015 22:20:56
From: esselte
ID: 751386
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

Ian said:


Why has Hawking changed his tune on keeping our heads down and staying schtum?

I dont think he has. Hawking wants to know if life is out there, but he doesnt want to communicate with it or do anything to let it know we are here. He is a smart man.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/07/2015 22:24:05
From: AwesomeO
ID: 751388
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

esselte said:


Ian said:

Why has Hawking changed his tune on keeping our heads down and staying schtum?

I dont think he has. Hawking wants to know if life is out there, but he doesnt want to communicate with it or do anything to let it know we are here. He is a smart man.

He has sold out man. There was a program today which was basically science stories with him linking and introducing them. Whose bright idea was that I wonder? He was the most frigging annoying part of the program, a host who speaks in a slow robotic monotone. His were the worst bits.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/07/2015 22:26:08
From: party_pants
ID: 751390
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

AwesomeO said:


esselte said:

Ian said:

Why has Hawking changed his tune on keeping our heads down and staying schtum?

I dont think he has. Hawking wants to know if life is out there, but he doesnt want to communicate with it or do anything to let it know we are here. He is a smart man.

He has sold out man. There was a program today which was basically science stories with him linking and introducing them. Whose bright idea was that I wonder? He was the most frigging annoying part of the program, a host who speaks in a slow robotic monotone. His were the worst bits.

I know the show you mean but can’t recall the name. A bit like a modern day Beyond 2000.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/07/2015 22:28:00
From: AwesomeO
ID: 751392
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

party_pants said:


AwesomeO said:

esselte said:

I dont think he has. Hawking wants to know if life is out there, but he doesnt want to communicate with it or do anything to let it know we are here. He is a smart man.

He has sold out man. There was a program today which was basically science stories with him linking and introducing them. Whose bright idea was that I wonder? He was the most frigging annoying part of the program, a host who speaks in a slow robotic monotone. His were the worst bits.

I know the show you mean but can’t recall the name. A bit like a modern day Beyond 2000.

Stephen Hawkings Future Universe.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/07/2015 22:37:28
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 751397
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

AwesomeO said:


esselte said:

Ian said:

Why has Hawking changed his tune on keeping our heads down and staying schtum?

I dont think he has. Hawking wants to know if life is out there, but he doesnt want to communicate with it or do anything to let it know we are here. He is a smart man.

He has sold out man. There was a program today which was basically science stories with him linking and introducing them. Whose bright idea was that I wonder? He was the most frigging annoying part of the program, a host who speaks in a slow robotic monotone. His were the worst bits.

Its time his robot voice was upgraded to a normal sounding one.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/07/2015 22:39:42
From: AwesomeO
ID: 751398
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

CrazyNeutrino said:


AwesomeO said:

esselte said:

I dont think he has. Hawking wants to know if life is out there, but he doesnt want to communicate with it or do anything to let it know we are here. He is a smart man.

He has sold out man. There was a program today which was basically science stories with him linking and introducing them. Whose bright idea was that I wonder? He was the most frigging annoying part of the program, a host who speaks in a slow robotic monotone. His were the worst bits.

Its time his robot voice was upgraded to a normal sounding one.

He has been asked about that and he says he thinks of it as his voice and is happy with it. It is also in many ways his trademark. I accept that totally.

But it doesn’t make a good choice as a host.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/07/2015 22:39:54
From: party_pants
ID: 751399
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

AwesomeO said:


Stephen Hawkings Future Universe.

That’s the one.

They should have just got Amanda Keller out of retirement.

Reply Quote

Date: 21/07/2015 22:55:03
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 751412
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

AwesomeO said:


esselte said:

Ian said:

Why has Hawking changed his tune on keeping our heads down and staying schtum?

I dont think he has. Hawking wants to know if life is out there, but he doesnt want to communicate with it or do anything to let it know we are here. He is a smart man.

He has sold out man. There was a program today which was basically science stories with him linking and introducing them. Whose bright idea was that I wonder? He was the most frigging annoying part of the program, a host who speaks in a slow robotic monotone. His were the worst bits.

Hawking managed to get on Pink Floyd’s new album too

I would not listen to a whole doc with Steven’s robot voice, its about time he upgraded to be able to say things using multiple different voices.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/07/2015 04:54:52
From: Ian
ID: 751440
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

Part of the project is $1 million competition, called Breakthrough Message, to create messages that could be sent to aliens.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/07/2015 10:25:30
From: Cymek
ID: 751507
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

party_pants said:


AwesomeO said:

Stephen Hawkings Future Universe.

That’s the one.

They should have just got Amanda Keller out of retirement.

I find it quite amusing she has parts in both Housos and Swift and Shift Couriers

Reply Quote

Date: 22/07/2015 11:13:43
From: wookiemeister
ID: 751543
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

Ian said:

Part of the project is $1 million competition, called Breakthrough Message, to create messages that could be sent to aliens.

maybe we could send them quotes from joe hockey

Reply Quote

Date: 22/07/2015 11:16:07
From: roughbarked
ID: 751545
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

wookiemeister said:


Ian said:
Part of the project is $1 million competition, called Breakthrough Message, to create messages that could be sent to aliens.

maybe we could send them quotes from joe hockey

If we did that, the aliens make a takeover bid for earth.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/07/2015 11:20:41
From: Cymek
ID: 751546
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

wookiemeister said:


Ian said:
Part of the project is $1 million competition, called Breakthrough Message, to create messages that could be sent to aliens.

maybe we could send them quotes from joe hockey

Scientists mostly seem to assume aliens with the ability to colonise space are benevolent as cooperation is needed to undertake such endeavours but one does wonder if they are aggressive as that’s whats needed (at least here on Earth) to become top of the food chain. If they are sufficiently advanced space travel could be as easy as we find air or sea travel and they could come to Earth to conquer us just for kicks.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/07/2015 11:23:37
From: roughbarked
ID: 751547
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

You know the old tale.. We know that there is intelligent life out there because they have never bothered to contact us.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/07/2015 11:25:38
From: Cymek
ID: 751548
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

roughbarked said:


You know the old tale.. We know that there is intelligent life out there because they have never bothered to contact us.

Yes I’d believe that as well, if aliens had been watching us they’d know our various governments would try to get exclusive contact to get access to technology to exploit everyone else.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/07/2015 16:19:29
From: Bubblecar
ID: 751671
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

esselte said:


I dont think he has. Hawking wants to know if life is out there, but he doesnt want to communicate with it or do anything to let it know we are here. He is a smart man.

The trouble is, these SETI projects rely on the assumption that there are aliens out there who do want to communicate with us and let us know they’re there. But why would they do that if they’re “smart”?

Reply Quote

Date: 22/07/2015 16:21:17
From: stumpy_seahorse
ID: 751673
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

Bubblecar said:


esselte said:

I dont think he has. Hawking wants to know if life is out there, but he doesnt want to communicate with it or do anything to let it know we are here. He is a smart man.

The trouble is, these SETI projects rely on the assumption that there are aliens out there who do want to communicate with us and let us know they’re there. But why would they do that if they’re “smart”?

I think the greatest proof that there is intelligent life out there is that it hasn’t tried to contact us…

Reply Quote

Date: 22/07/2015 16:21:44
From: furious
ID: 751674
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

There might be a time where a civilization thinks to itself “we better shut up, don’t want to attract unwanted attention” however, before that happens they have spent 50 years broadcasting Gilligan’s Island re-runs and these are the signals that you would look for…

Reply Quote

Date: 22/07/2015 16:24:23
From: Bubblecar
ID: 751676
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

furious said:

  • The trouble is, these SETI projects rely on the assumption that there are aliens out there who do want to communicate with us and let us know they’re there. But why would they do that if they’re “smart”?

There might be a time where a civilization thinks to itself “we better shut up, don’t want to attract unwanted attention” however, before that happens they have spent 50 years broadcasting Gilligan’s Island re-runs and these are the signals that you would look for…

My understanding was that terrestrial broadcasts are too weak to be detectable at astronomical distances.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/07/2015 16:25:40
From: Cymek
ID: 751677
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

Bubblecar said:


furious said:
  • The trouble is, these SETI projects rely on the assumption that there are aliens out there who do want to communicate with us and let us know they’re there. But why would they do that if they’re “smart”?

There might be a time where a civilization thinks to itself “we better shut up, don’t want to attract unwanted attention” however, before that happens they have spent 50 years broadcasting Gilligan’s Island re-runs and these are the signals that you would look for…

My understanding was that terrestrial broadcasts are too weak to be detectable at astronomical distances.

I thought that as well, aren’t we looking for deliberate directed signals

Reply Quote

Date: 22/07/2015 16:33:44
From: Bubblecar
ID: 751681
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

furious said:


Why are they starting a whole new search? Wouldn’t it be better to join resources with those that are already searching?

Seems they will be, to some extent. From Wikipedia:

Announced in July 2015, the project will use thousands of hours every year on two major radio telescopes, the Green Bank Observatory in West Virginia and the Parkes Observatory in Australia. Previously, only about 24 to 36 hours of telescope per year was used in the search for alien life. Furthermore, the Automated Planet Finder of Lick observatory will search for optical signals coming from laser transmissions. For processing of the massive data, the experience of SETI and SETI@home will be used. SETI founder Frank Drake is one of the project’s scientists.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/07/2015 21:51:51
From: esselte
ID: 751867
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

Bubblecar said:


The trouble is, these SETI projects rely on the assumption that there are aliens out there who do want to communicate with us and let us know they’re there. But why would they do that if they’re “smart”?

Exactly. There are three things we can assume about evolved extra-terrestrial technologically capable intelligences (cribbed from the novel The Killing Star by Charles R Pelligrino and George Zabrowski).

1. They will consider their survival more important than our survival. In a case of them or us, they will always chose themselves.
2. Wimps don’t become top dogs. Any technologically advanced species will be smart, aggressive and capable of ruthlessness.
3. They will assume that 1 and 2 are true of us.

Being smart enough to keep quiet and not advertise your presence is one possible solution to the Fermi Paradox.

If we did contact an alien species, and they had the capability to come and visit us here on Earth, they would also have the capability to sterilize the planet. In a risk/reward assessment, even if the chances that aliens would want to destroy us are very small the consequences of taking that risk are too great to be justifiable. If I offered you a million dollars, with the only condition being that there was a one in a hundred chance your accepting that money would annihilate humanity, would you take the money? What about if the odds were one in a thousand? One in a million? Remember, the downside is the complete destruction of humanity.

From the same novel mentioned above:

““Imagine yourself taking a stroll through Manhattan, somewhere north of 68th street, deep inside Central Park, late at night. It would be nice to meet someone friendly, but you know that the park is dangerous at night. That’s when the monsters come out. There’s always a strong undercurrent of drug dealings, muggings, and occasional homicides.

“It is not easy to distinguish the good guys from the bad guys. They dress alike, and the weapons are concealed. The only difference is intent, and you can’t read minds.

“Stay in the dark long enough and you may hear an occasional distance shriek or blunder across a body.

“How do you survive the night? The last thing you want to do is shout, “I’m here!” The next to last thing you want to do is reply to someone who shouts, “I’m a friend!”

“What you would like to do is find a policeman, or get out of the park. But you don’t want to make noise or move towards a light where you might be spotted, and it is difficult to find either a policeman or your way out without making yourself known. Your safest option is to hunker down and wait for daylight, then safely walk out.

“There are, of course, a few obvious differences between Central Park and the universe.

“There is no policeman.

“There is no way out.

“And the night never ends.”

Reply Quote

Date: 22/07/2015 21:55:07
From: JudgeMental
ID: 751871
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

on the other hand the message we get could take so long to reach us, even a couple of thousand light years, and the civilisation no longer exists. or they are so far away we will never meet.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/07/2015 10:41:09
From: Cymek
ID: 752571
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

It we did detect a signal and wanted to reply how could we ensure the aliens received our message, do we have the ability to build a machine capable of sending a directed signal to another planet/star. Also how accurate would our own detection methods be, could we narrow it down to a specific planet orbiting the star or just from the direction of the star itself, I suppose that would depend on the signal strength though.

http://www.news.com.au/technology/science/australian-scientist-professor-matthew-bailes-says-we-should-think-twice-before-responding-to-aliens/story-fnjwlcze-1227454503072

HE IS the Australian scientist who has been handed the task of finding signs of alien life on other planets.
However Professor Matthew Bailes warns if aliens contact us we should think twice before replying, saying any creature from outer space capable of sending out a signal would more than likely be more intelligent than us — and possibly dangerous.

The Swinburne University academic was this week told that he would be lead the Australian team as part of the world’s biggest search for extraterrestrial life.

The Breakthrough Prize Foundation project is being funded by Russian billionaire Yuri Milner and astrophysicist Stephen Hawking to the tune of $135 million and will involve some of the greatest minds devising a supercomputer capable of detecting signs of life in deep space.

Professor Bailes will lead a team of CSIRO researchers to build this supercomputer at the Parkes Observatory in central-western NSW.

And while the Aussie scientist was shocked by the scale of the project (he was only told about it a few days before the rest of the world), he is also looking forward to it.

But when he was asked what he would do if he actually found a signal sent by aliens, his response was not what you would expect.

“I think we should think very carefully before we reply to a signal received from outer space,” he told German press agency, dpa.

“The history of weak civilisations contacting more advanced civilisations is not a happy one.”

Yikes. I think the good professor is thinking of those aliens in Independence Day and not the ET kind.

“The difficulty is to know what sort of signal we are looking for,” he then went on to say to dpa. “There is no manual on how to find aliens. We’ll have to imagine the sort of transmissions an alien race might send, and a variety of strategies will have to be deployed ranging from looking for single bursts to signals that might be more encoded in other transmissions.

“The signal is likely to be quite feeble after coming vast distances. We’ll need to be looking for advanced civilisations that have significantly more transmission grunt than we are capable of on Earth.

“Hopefully they send a transmission pattern we can recognise such as prime numbers, or a mathematical construct at a frequency that might have some significance to us.”

In order to do this Professor Bailes and his team will have to devise a very sophisticated computer with a new signal processor that is capable of filtering through one quadrillion floating point operations per second, or a petaflop, Fairfax media reported.

“It will be the equivalent of tuning into 400 HDTV channels at once,” Professor Bailes told Fairfax. “We’ll look for signals of signs of life within those channels.”

The professor also said the process for looking for these signs of life would not be like the movies where a scientist kept an ear out for a signal.

He explained it would be all up to the supercomputer.

“These computers will have to sort through a billion samples a second trying to find a pattern or what could be a signal,” he told dpa.

And if the supercomputer does detect something, it will be double-checked by many scientists before they release the news to the world.

“There is a protocol for what we do if we confirm we have found a signal, but I don’t know what it is. I have a year before we start so there is time,” he said.

“I suspect some people would go around with placards saying the world was about to end.

“We could be really lucky and find something coming from tens of light years away, but it is far more likely to come from thousands of light years away.

“Even if we discovered one tomorrow we’d all be long dead and buried before we could reply and the aliens would get an answer.”

It is estimated that it will take between five to ten years to build the supercomputer.

So we have a little time yet before we can phone ET

Reply Quote

Date: 24/07/2015 11:24:29
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 752583
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

If as I suspect that we are alone and when our brief tenure is destroyed with the sun the universe will continue it’s spiral, on and on, billion year after billion year unwitnessed in it’s pointless endeavour so much so as to be non existent.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/07/2015 11:34:14
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 752586
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

Peak Warming Man said:


If as I suspect that we are alone and when our brief tenure is destroyed with the sun the universe will continue it’s spiral, on and on, billion year after billion year unwitnessed in it’s pointless endeavour so much so as to be non existent.

Wouldn’t it be a bit sad if just a million years after our star goes giant red, an alien signal passes by.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/07/2015 11:39:39
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 752588
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

CrazyNeutrino said:


Peak Warming Man said:

If as I suspect that we are alone and when our brief tenure is destroyed with the sun the universe will continue it’s spiral, on and on, billion year after billion year unwitnessed in it’s pointless endeavour so much so as to be non existent.

Wouldn’t it be a bit sad if just a million years after our star goes giant red, an alien signal passes by.

Or maybe an alien signal paased by in 300BC

Reply Quote

Date: 24/07/2015 11:47:10
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 752589
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

CrazyNeutrino said:


CrazyNeutrino said:

Peak Warming Man said:

If as I suspect that we are alone and when our brief tenure is destroyed with the sun the universe will continue it’s spiral, on and on, billion year after billion year unwitnessed in it’s pointless endeavour so much so as to be non existent.

Wouldn’t it be a bit sad if just a million years after our star goes giant red, an alien signal passes by.

Or maybe an alien signal paased by in 300BC

Reply Quote

Date: 24/07/2015 12:03:42
From: JudgeMental
ID: 752592
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search
Reply Quote

Date: 24/07/2015 12:47:49
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 752607
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

If the alien signal arrives after our star girs red giant

We could send a spacecraft out of our solar system to listen and record an alien signal

But then what?

Hope someone finds it

Maybe someone does find it

And they read the message

Hello, is it me, your looking for……?

Reply Quote

Date: 24/07/2015 12:55:47
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 752608
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=n6DyGZFG6lE

Reply Quote

Date: 24/07/2015 21:09:08
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 752844
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

If an alien signal was found in your lifetime, would it change anything?

Reply Quote

Date: 24/07/2015 21:11:52
From: Michael V
ID: 752845
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

were

Reply Quote

Date: 24/07/2015 21:14:06
From: Michael V
ID: 752847
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

CrazyNeutrino said:


If an alien signal was found in your lifetime, would it change anything?
Not for me particularly.

But I have heard it argued that that’d be the time when the entire human race would unite and stop killing each other, to attend to the perceived potential external threat.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/07/2015 21:16:15
From: sibeen
ID: 752850
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

Michael V said:

But I have heard it argued that that’d be the time when the entire human race would unite and stop killing each other, to attend to the perceived potential external threat.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Reply Quote

Date: 24/07/2015 21:18:41
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 752852
Subject: re: Parkes Telescope in New ET Search

sibeen said:


Michael V said:

But I have heard it argued that that’d be the time when the entire human race would unite and stop killing each other, to attend to the perceived potential external threat.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Them’s fighting words!

Reply Quote