Date: 25/08/2015 18:12:01
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 766128
Subject: Reverse cycle air conditioners cheaper to run than gas heating.
Reverse cycle air conditioners cheaper to run than gas heating, report finds
Consumers can save money by making the switch from gas heating to using reverse cycle air conditioners, a Melbourne University study has found.
The report, Switching Off Gas: an Examination of Declining Gas Demand in Eastern Australia, by the university’s Melbourne Energy Institute found some Australian households falsely believe gas is cheapest option for heating.
more…
Date: 25/08/2015 18:12:34
From: dv
ID: 766129
Subject: re: Reverse cycle air conditioners cheaper to run than gas heating.
How does it compare to a jumper and HTFU?
Date: 25/08/2015 18:14:11
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 766131
Subject: re: Reverse cycle air conditioners cheaper to run than gas heating.
dv said:
How does it compare to a jumper and HTFU?
jumpers are cheaper, for sure
Date: 25/08/2015 18:17:27
From: Bubblecar
ID: 766133
Subject: re: Reverse cycle air conditioners cheaper to run than gas heating.
Going to get a considerably wider variety of fruit when I do my shopping later in the week. And NO ORANGES.
Date: 25/08/2015 18:18:29
From: AwesomeO
ID: 766135
Subject: re: Reverse cycle air conditioners cheaper to run than gas heating.
It doesn’t mention if it is town gas or bottled gas. As some one who will be very shortly replacing a heater it would be nice to see some easy comparisons.
I know last winter I got into the habit of putting on a oil heater overnight to keep the main area warm. That made the bill skyrocket. This year I just blast the room for 15 minutes on high of gas and instant warm up and much cheaper.
Date: 25/08/2015 18:18:38
From: Bubblecar
ID: 766136
Subject: re: Reverse cycle air conditioners cheaper to run than gas heating.