Date: 23/09/2015 12:13:46
From: Postpocelipse
ID: 779407
Subject: New Contract

How much sense does it make, now that Turn’N‘Pull has pulled such a neat swifty on old unccy Gollum, to petition our new PM to order Clive Campbell to spend the money he suggested spending on a replica Titanic instead on commissioning an aircraft carrier size ship to pick up and process refugees in international waters?

It could be his first official order as Australia’s first “Supreme-Brane-Interpreter” for the new retro-public.

The ship would have to be named “The Midwife”.

That would be golf clap………..

Reply Quote

Date: 23/09/2015 12:16:10
From: Postpocelipse
ID: 779408
Subject: re: New Contract

That would be ‘a’ golf clap………..

Reply Quote

Date: 23/09/2015 12:28:47
From: wookiemeister
ID: 779410
Subject: re: New Contract

wouldn’t it be easier to tell people to turn up at the airport instead?

if people knew they just had to turn up at any airport in the world and claim unconditional asylum just think how easier that would be

Australia has the space and the money to take say 20 million people quite quickly

if we raised the GST to 15 percent we could easily pay for taking in the worlds refugees – all of the worlds refugees

I think its a great idea that people take in asylum seekers so , we’ll make it compulsory , all of the asylum seekers will live in everyones houses – even Malcolm’s nice house.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/09/2015 12:31:13
From: wookiemeister
ID: 779411
Subject: re: New Contract

places like centennial park in Sydney could be built over for refugee housing, big towering apartments casting a shadow on the rich people in the area

why should they throw the asylum seekers into shit places out west when they could easily house them in the eastern suburbs where its nice?

Reply Quote

Date: 24/09/2015 14:08:55
From: Postpocelipse
ID: 779817
Subject: re: New Contract

Q: With ongoing wars, do we prevent the collateral and peripheral drama or simply go on absorbing it, draining resources and re-instilling confusion and animosities?

Reply Quote

Date: 24/09/2015 14:08:56
From: Postpocelipse
ID: 779818
Subject: re: New Contract

Q: With ongoing wars, do we prevent the collateral and peripheral drama or simply go on absorbing it, draining resources and re-instilling confusion and animosities?

Reply Quote

Date: 24/09/2015 14:17:51
From: wookiemeister
ID: 779819
Subject: re: New Contract

Postpocelipse said:


Q: With ongoing wars, do we prevent the collateral and peripheral drama or simply go on absorbing it, draining resources and re-instilling confusion and animosities?

you don’t allow wars to be ongoing
fall like a hammer and conduct decisive battles or airstrikes

Reply Quote

Date: 24/09/2015 14:19:39
From: wookiemeister
ID: 779820
Subject: re: New Contract

the Syrian conflict is getting messy because they are trying to take every hill

cut the logistics to raqqa, stop the logistics to ISIS via turkey and ISIS collapses in two weeks, money will be of no use to you if you can’t move oil or people across the border

ISIS topples

Reply Quote